Bayeux Tapestry - Revision history

HistoryNerd: External links to Bayeux Museum, Bibioteca Ausgustana and High Speed History

2021-06-28T06:51:42Z

External links to Bayeux Museum, Bibioteca Ausgustana and High Speed History

DavidB4-bot: /* top */clean up & uniformity

2016-07-12T00:13:49Z

top: clean up & uniformity

AlanE: Cat change

2009-01-04T19:05:29Z

Cat change

CPalmer: subcat

2009-01-04T17:18:02Z

subcat

AlanE: Removed unnecessary link

2008-11-11T21:14:20Z

Removed unnecessary link

AlanE at 21:08, November 11, 2008

2008-11-11T21:08:13Z

AlanE at 21:07, November 11, 2008

2008-11-11T21:07:25Z

DParker: New page: The '''Bayeux Tapestry''' refers to a monumental woven tapestry creation, typically attributed to the wife of William the Conqueror, which depicts the events leading up to and surround...

2008-04-01T04:05:15Z

New page: The '''Bayeux Tapestry''' refers to a monumental woven tapestry creation, typically attributed to the wife of William the Conqueror, which depicts the events leading up to and surround...

New page

The '''Bayeux Tapestry''' refers to a monumental woven tapestry creation, typically attributed to the wife of [[William the Conqueror]], which depicts the events leading up to and surrounding the conquest of [[England]] by the [[Norman|Normans]], from the heirs of the [[Anglo-Saxon]] king [[Edward the Confessor]].

Created within a half-century of the [[Battle of Hastings]] (1066), which clinched this victory, the tapestry survived in the [[France|French]] city of [[Bayeux]] for some time before becoming, alternately, a [[propaganda]] piece for French [[Consul|First Consul]] [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] (who claimed to be heir to the Norman legacy, and hoped to conquer England himself), and an object of interest to [[Nazi]] [[war criminal]] and paranormal enthusiast [[Heinrich Himmler]]. Through the wars, the tapestry survived and remains in exhibition in Bayeux, in its own museum.

Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]]. This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself. The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favor. This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.

[[category:History]]
[[category:Art]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Created within a half-century of the [[Battle of Hastings]] (1066), which clinched this victory, the tapestry survived in the [[France|French]] city of Bayeux in northern [[Normandy]] for some time before becoming, alternately, a [[propaganda]] piece for French [[Consul|First Consul]] [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] (who claimed to be heir to the Norman legacy, and hoped to conquer England himself), and an object of interest to [[Nazi]] [[war criminal]] and paranormal enthusiast [[Heinrich Himmler]].  Through the wars, the tapestry survived and remains in exhibition in Bayeux, in its own museum.
-Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.
+Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the English Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.
 [[Category:English History]]
 [[Category:Art]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''Bayeux Tapestry''' refers to a monumental woven tapestry creation, typically attributed to Matilda of Flanders, the wife of [[William the Conqueror]], which depicts the events leading up to and surrounding the conquest of [[England]] by the [[Norman|Normans]], from the heirs of the [[Anglo-Saxon]] king [[Edward the Confessor]]. It was made for Odo bishop of Bayeux, a town in northern [[Normandy]], William’s half-brother to hang in Bayeux [[cathedral]].
+The '''Bayeux Tapestry''' refers to a monumental woven tapestry creation, typically attributed to Matilda of Flanders, the wife of [[William the Conqueror]], which depicts the events leading up to and surrounding the conquest of [[England]] by the [[Norman]]s, from the heirs of the [[Anglo-Saxon]] king [[Edward the Confessor]]. It was made for Odo bishop of Bayeux, a town in northern [[Normandy]], William’s half-brother to hang in Bayeux [[cathedral]].
-The tapestry is an enormous work. It is in one single narrative pattern, (though made in six panels before joining) using eight coloured wools on a linen background; 70 metres (231 feet) long by  49.5 cm (19.5 in) wide and portrays over 1500 figures (people, horses, dogs and other animals), 37 fortresses, 41 boats and ships, and many weapons and other implements. The top and bottom borders are foliage. It gives far more information than any written source on things from William's battle tactics, ship construction, armour and weapons, to even contemporary fashions and furniture and fittings.
+The tapestry is an enormous work. It is in one single narrative pattern, (though made in six panels before joining) using eight coloured wools on a linen background; 70 metres (231 feet) long by  49.5&nbsp;cm (19.5&nbsp;in) wide and portrays over 1500 figures (people, horses, dogs and other animals), 37 fortresses, 41 boats and ships, and many weapons and other implements. The top and bottom borders are foliage. It gives far more information than any written source on things from William's battle tactics, ship construction, armour and weapons, to even contemporary fashions and furniture and fittings.
 Created within a half-century of the [[Battle of Hastings]] (1066), which clinched this victory, the tapestry survived in the [[France|French]] city of Bayeux in northern [[Normandy]] for some time before becoming, alternately, a [[propaganda]] piece for French [[Consul|First Consul]] [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] (who claimed to be heir to the Norman legacy, and hoped to conquer England himself), and an object of interest to [[Nazi]] [[war criminal]] and paranormal enthusiast [[Heinrich Himmler]].  Through the wars, the tapestry survived and remains in exhibition in Bayeux, in its own museum.
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.
-[[category:English History]]
+[[Category:English History]]
-[[category:Art]]
+[[Category:Art]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.
-[[category:British History]]
+[[category:English History]]
 [[category:Art]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.
-[[category:History]]
+[[category:British History]]
 [[category:Art]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 The tapestry is an enormous work. It is in one single narrative pattern, (though made in six panels before joining) using eight coloured wools on a linen background; 70 metres (231 feet) long by  49.5 cm (19.5 in) wide and portrays over 1500 figures (people, horses, dogs and other animals), 37 fortresses, 41 boats and ships, and many weapons and other implements. The top and bottom borders are foliage. It gives far more information than any written source on things from William's battle tactics, ship construction, armour and weapons, to even contemporary fashions and furniture and fittings.
-Created within a half-century of the [[Battle of Hastings]] (1066), which clinched this victory, the tapestry survived in the [[France|French]] city of [[Bayeux]] for some time before becoming, alternately, a [[propaganda]] piece for French [[Consul|First Consul]] [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] (who claimed to be heir to the Norman legacy, and hoped to conquer England himself), and an object of interest to [[Nazi]] [[war criminal]] and paranormal enthusiast [[Heinrich Himmler]].  Through the wars, the tapestry survived and remains in exhibition in Bayeux, in its own museum.
+Created within a half-century of the [[Battle of Hastings]] (1066), which clinched this victory, the tapestry survived in the [[France|French]] city of Bayeux in northern [[Normandy]] for some time before becoming, alternately, a [[propaganda]] piece for French [[Consul|First Consul]] [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] (who claimed to be heir to the Norman legacy, and hoped to conquer England himself), and an object of interest to [[Nazi]] [[war criminal]] and paranormal enthusiast [[Heinrich Himmler]].  Through the wars, the tapestry survived and remains in exhibition in Bayeux, in its own museum.
 Traditionally, the story told by the tapestry is that [[Harold Godwinson]], wealthy [[patrician]], was commanded near the end of Edward the Confessor's life to convey title to the successorship of the British Crown to William (not yet "The Conqueror"), then in [[Normandy]].  This he did, but upon Edward's death, Harold allegedly betrayed William and claimed the Crown himself.  The monumental Battle of Hastings, however, resolved the dispute in William's favour.  This tale of betrayal obviously buttresses Norman claims to legitimacy, but modern historians have questioned whether the tapestry actually recites the orthodox version of events, or contains hints of dissent and notes of Anglo-Saxon support.