Bart Stupak - Revision history

Alex Kosh: /* References */

2025-01-06T07:13:40Z

References

Alex Kosh: /* References */

2022-08-14T15:59:06Z

References

Alex Kosh: /* References */

2022-08-14T15:54:26Z

References

Mr. Nationalist at 03:16, April 18, 2022

2022-04-18T03:16:37Z

DavidB4-bot: /* ObamaCare */HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com, http://www.weeklystandard.com → https://www.weeklystandard.com

2019-04-09T05:30:12Z

ObamaCare: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com, http://www.weeklystandard.com → https://www.weeklystandard.com

DavidB4-bot: /* ObamaCare */HTTPS/HTTP

2018-09-09T22:25:48Z

ObamaCare: HTTPS/HTTP

DavidB4-bot: /* ObamaCare */HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com

2018-09-09T04:54:59Z

ObamaCare: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com

DavidB4-bot: /* ObamaCare */Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: prolife → pro-life

2016-06-28T04:30:05Z

ObamaCare: Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: prolife → pro-life

DavidB4-bot: clean up & uniformity

2016-06-28T00:12:37Z

clean up & uniformity

Markman at 19:37, February 28, 2013

2013-02-28T19:37:14Z

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 {{DEFAULTSORT:Stupak, Bart}}
 [[Category:111th United States Congress]]
-[[Category:United States Representatives]]
+[[Category:Former United States Representatives]]
-[[Category:Democratic Party]]
+[[Category:Democrats]]
 [[Category:Michigan]]
 [[Category:Moderate Democrats]]
 [[Category:Pro Second Amendment Democrats]]
 [[Category:DINOs]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, August 14, 2022
Line 53:		Line 53:
	[[Category:Michigan]]		[[Category:Michigan]]
	[[Category:Moderate Democrats]]		[[Category:Moderate Democrats]]
		+	[[Category:Pro Second Amendment Democrats]]
		+	[[Category:DINOs]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, August 14, 2022
Line 52:		Line 52:
	[[Category:Democratic Party]]		[[Category:Democratic Party]]
	[[Category:Michigan]]		[[Category:Michigan]]
		+	[[Category:Moderate Democrats]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 	|state=Michigan
 	|district=1st
-	|terms=January 3, 1993 – Present
+	|terms=January 3, 1993 – January 3, 2011
 	|preceded=[[John Conyers]]
-	|former=
+	|former=y
-	|succeeded=
+	|succeeded=[[Dan Benishek]]
 	}}
 }}

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 or physical illness." <ref>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2009_record&page=H12921&position=all</ref> He led a small group of twelve pro-life representatives in the House to thwart legislation unless abortion was removed. It was removed, the group voted for reform and the bill was sent to the Senate.
-The Senate would strip the bill of abortion limitations while claiming abortion funding was not included. The bill must again be approved by the House for the changes made by the Senate. Stupak is sticking to his original request for no abortion funding. Obama and the [[Senate]] want Stupak to sign off on the bill through [[reconciliation]] whereby they vote for the legislation and then go back and make changes, such as abortion terms. Since the administration will stop at nothing to pass their bill, it is expected that Stupak will be the deal-clincher or deal-breaker yet again. He stated, "I'm more optimistic than I was a week ago" that abortion will be removed form healthcare reform legislation. Stupak would reiterate, "Everyone’s going around saying there’s a compromise—there’s no such thing." He will not agree to a promise to fix the bill in the future. Stupak emphasized, "My numbers remain firm at 12. These are 12 who voted for it [in November] who will not vote for it unless we resolve this issue."  <ref>[http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/stupak Stupak: There's No Deal, And I Won't Agree to a Promise to Fix the Bill in the Future, Weekly Standard, March 9, 2010]</ref>
+The Senate would strip the bill of abortion limitations while claiming abortion funding was not included. The bill must again be approved by the House for the changes made by the Senate. Stupak is sticking to his original request for no abortion funding. Obama and the [[Senate]] want Stupak to sign off on the bill through [[reconciliation]] whereby they vote for the legislation and then go back and make changes, such as abortion terms. Since the administration will stop at nothing to pass their bill, it is expected that Stupak will be the deal-clincher or deal-breaker yet again. He stated, "I'm more optimistic than I was a week ago" that abortion will be removed form healthcare reform legislation. Stupak would reiterate, "Everyone’s going around saying there’s a compromise—there’s no such thing." He will not agree to a promise to fix the bill in the future. Stupak emphasized, "My numbers remain firm at 12. These are 12 who voted for it [in November] who will not vote for it unless we resolve this issue."  <ref>[https://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/stupak Stupak: There's No Deal, And I Won't Agree to a Promise to Fix the Bill in the Future, Weekly Standard, March 9, 2010]</ref>
-Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
+Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis.<ref>[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
 An arrogant Stupak holds a press conference after the successful vote for universal healthcare in which he shames [[Republican]]s and touts pro-life Democrats. "Republicans don't want to cover 32 million uninsured," “The Executive Order will have the full force of law.” Which is in fact a bold face lie. It was such a bad deal that the Susan B. Anthony List rescinded its' “Defender of Life” award to Stupak.<ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/22/stupaks-deal-enforceable-or-empty/ Stupak’s Deal: Enforceable or Empty?, Fox news, March 22, 2010]</ref>

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ==ObamaCare==
 In 2009, Stupak co-wrote the Stupak–Pitts Amendment, which prohibits funds from being "used to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion, except in the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury,
-or physical illness." <ref>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2009_record&page=H12921&position=all</ref> He led a small group of twelve prolife representatives in the House to thwart legislation unless abortion was removed. It was removed, the group voted for reform and the bill was sent to the Senate.
+or physical illness." <ref>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2009_record&page=H12921&position=all</ref> He led a small group of twelve pro-life representatives in the House to thwart legislation unless abortion was removed. It was removed, the group voted for reform and the bill was sent to the Senate.
 The Senate would strip the bill of abortion limitations while claiming abortion funding was not included. The bill must again be approved by the House for the changes made by the Senate. Stupak is sticking to his original request for no abortion funding. Obama and the [[Senate]] want Stupak to sign off on the bill through [[reconciliation]] whereby they vote for the legislation and then go back and make changes, such as abortion terms. Since the administration will stop at nothing to pass their bill, it is expected that Stupak will be the deal-clincher or deal-breaker yet again. He stated, "I'm more optimistic than I was a week ago" that abortion will be removed form healthcare reform legislation. Stupak would reiterate, "Everyone’s going around saying there’s a compromise—there’s no such thing." He will not agree to a promise to fix the bill in the future. Stupak emphasized, "My numbers remain firm at 12. These are 12 who voted for it [in November] who will not vote for it unless we resolve this issue."  <ref>[http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/stupak Stupak: There's No Deal, And I Won't Agree to a Promise to Fix the Bill in the Future, Weekly Standard, March 9, 2010]</ref>

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 '''Bartholomew Thomas "Bart" Stupak''' (born February 29, 1952) was a [[Democrat]]ic U.S. Representative from [[Michigan]]'s 1st congressional district from 1993 to 2011.
-Stupak claimed to be [[pro-life]] regarding [[abortion]], but then caved in to [[liberal pressure]] by the [[pro-aborts]] and agreed to vote yes on the health care bill. In 2006, he received a 100% rating from the [[National Right to Life Committee]], but another time voted against defunding [[Planned Parenthood]]. <ref>http://www.ontheissues.org/MI/Bart_Stupak.htm</ref> He voted for banning [[partial-birth abortion]]s and supported [[President George W. Bush]]'s veto of embryonic-stem-cell-research.
+Stupak claimed to be [[pro-life]] regarding [[abortion]], but then caved in to [[liberal pressure]] by the [[pro-aborts]] and agreed to vote yes on the health care bill. In 2006, he received a 100% rating from the [[National Right to Life Committee]], but another time voted against defunding [[Planned Parenthood]].<ref>http://www.ontheissues.org/MI/Bart_Stupak.htm</ref> He voted for banning [[partial-birth abortion]]s and supported [[President George W. Bush]]'s veto of embryonic-stem-cell-research.
 Stupak was a member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation. His high-profile [[Abortion betrayal|betrayal]] of the [[pro-lifer]]s resulted in the creation of a new word:  "Stupaked".
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 He is a graduate from Northwestern Michigan College, Saginaw Valley State University, and earned a [[Juris Doctor]] from Thomas Cooley Law School. Stupak served as a Michigan State Trooper from 1973 to 1984. After being injured in the line of duty he retired, and was elected to the Michigan House in 1988. In 1990 he lost a race for the State Senate. He was elected to the [[House of Representatives]] in 1992 and has been easily reelected ever since.
-Stupak endorsed [[John Edwards]] in the 2008 Democratic primaries. <ref>http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Bart_Stupak</ref>
+Stupak endorsed [[John Edwards]] in the 2008 Democratic primaries.<ref>http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Bart_Stupak</ref>
 ==ObamaCare==
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 The Senate would strip the bill of abortion limitations while claiming abortion funding was not included. The bill must again be approved by the House for the changes made by the Senate. Stupak is sticking to his original request for no abortion funding. Obama and the [[Senate]] want Stupak to sign off on the bill through [[reconciliation]] whereby they vote for the legislation and then go back and make changes, such as abortion terms. Since the administration will stop at nothing to pass their bill, it is expected that Stupak will be the deal-clincher or deal-breaker yet again. He stated, "I'm more optimistic than I was a week ago" that abortion will be removed form healthcare reform legislation. Stupak would reiterate, "Everyone’s going around saying there’s a compromise—there’s no such thing." He will not agree to a promise to fix the bill in the future. Stupak emphasized, "My numbers remain firm at 12. These are 12 who voted for it [in November] who will not vote for it unless we resolve this issue."  <ref>[http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/stupak Stupak: There's No Deal, And I Won't Agree to a Promise to Fix the Bill in the Future, Weekly Standard, March 9, 2010]</ref>
-Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis. <ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
+Bart caves in to Obama and [[Pelosi]], strikes a deal with an after the vote executive order. Stupak is mistaken that an executive order will suffice, it does not have the force of law that legislation would provide. "One man can sign an executive order and one man can repeal that again, the president of the United States," said Rep. [[Paul Ryan]], R-Wis.<ref>[http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/21/stupak-says-health-care-deal-looming-abortion-funding/ Stupak Announces Deal With White House on Abortion Funding Ban, FOX News, March 21, 2010]</ref>
-An arrogant Stupak holds a press conference after the successful vote for universal healthcare in which he shames [[Republican]]s and touts pro-life Democrats. "Republicans don't want to cover 32 million uninsured," “The Executive Order will have the full force of law.” Which is in fact a bold face lie. It was such a bad deal that the Susan B. Anthony List rescinded its' “Defender of Life” award to Stupak. <ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/22/stupaks-deal-enforceable-or-empty/ Stupak’s Deal: Enforceable or Empty?, Fox news, March 22, 2010]</ref>
+An arrogant Stupak holds a press conference after the successful vote for universal healthcare in which he shames [[Republican]]s and touts pro-life Democrats. "Republicans don't want to cover 32 million uninsured," “The Executive Order will have the full force of law.” Which is in fact a bold face lie. It was such a bad deal that the Susan B. Anthony List rescinded its' “Defender of Life” award to Stupak.<ref>[http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/22/stupaks-deal-enforceable-or-empty/ Stupak’s Deal: Enforceable or Empty?, Fox news, March 22, 2010]</ref>
-==See Also==
+==See also==
 *[[Abortion Betrayals]]
 *[[Stupak Amendment]]
-==External Links==
+==External links==
 *[http://www.house.gov/stupak/ Official Website]
 *[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=s001045 Biography at the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |party=[[Democrat]]
 |spouse=Laurie Ann Stupak
-|religion=Roman Catholic
+|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]
 |offices=
 	{{Officeholder/representative