Appropriations Clause - Revision history

Aschlafly: /* CFPB v. CFSA */

2023-03-10T01:48:19Z

CFPB v. CFSA

Aschlafly: /* CFPB v. CFSA */

2023-03-10T01:47:34Z

CFPB v. CFSA

Aschlafly: /* CFPB v. CFSA */

2023-03-10T01:47:11Z

CFPB v. CFSA

Aschlafly: /* CFPB v. CFSA */

2023-03-10T01:30:44Z

CFPB v. CFSA

Aschlafly at 01:30, March 10, 2023

2023-03-10T01:30:11Z

DrSandstone: Undo revision 403237 by Special:Contributions/JosephCanyon (User talk:JosephCanyon)

2008-03-11T21:03:55Z

Undo revision 403237 by Special:Contributions/JosephCanyon (User talk:JosephCanyon)

JosephCanyon: Replacing page with '404- Page not found'

2008-03-11T20:59:56Z

Replacing page with '404- Page not found'

Aschlafly: New page: The '''Appropriations Clause''' authorizes Congress to spend money and requires that it keep a record of the expenditures. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states: {{cquot...

2007-11-11T14:38:36Z

New page: The '''Appropriations Clause''' authorizes Congress to spend money and requires that it keep a record of the expenditures. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states: {{cquot...

New page

The '''Appropriations Clause''' authorizes [[Congress]] to spend money and requires that it keep a record of the expenditures. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states:
{{cquote|No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.}}

[[Category:United States Constitution]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == CFPB v. CFSA ==
-On a petition granted by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in the case of ''[[CFPB v. CFSA]]'', No. 22-448 (CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LIMITED), appealing 51 F.4th 616 (all [[Trump]]-appointed panel of the [[Fifth Circuit]], Case No. 21-50826).
+On a petition granted by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in the case of ''[[CFPB v. CFSA]]'', No. 22-448 (CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LIMITED), appealing ''[[CFSA v. CFPB]]'', 51 F.4th 616 (all [[Trump]]-appointed panel of the [[Fifth Circuit]], Case No. 21-50826).
 QUESTION PRESENTED:

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == CFPB v. CFSA ==
-On a petition granted by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in the case of ''CFPB v. CFSA'', No. 22-448 (CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LIMITED), appealing 51 F.4th 616 (all [[Trump]]-appointed panel of the [[Fifth Circuit]], Case No. 21-50826).
+On a petition granted by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in the case of ''[[CFPB v. CFSA]]'', No. 22-448 (CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LIMITED), appealing 51 F.4th 616 (all [[Trump]]-appointed panel of the [[Fifth Circuit]], Case No. 21-50826).
 QUESTION PRESENTED:

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United States, 301 U.S. 308 (1937)
 *Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998)
-*Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021)
+*Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021) (severability required when a provision is unconstitutional)
 *Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477 (2010)
 *Harrington v. Bush, 553 F.2d 190 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 *Reeside v. Walker, 52 U.S. (11 How.) 272 (1851)
 *Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981)
-*Seila Law LLC v. CFPB,  140 S. Ct. 2183 (2020)
+*Seila Law LLC v. CFPB,  140 S. Ct. 2183 (2020) (severability required when a provision is unconstitutional)
 *United Biscuit Co. of Am. v. Wirtz, 359 F.2d 206 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert denied,  384 U.S. 971 (1966)
-*United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021)
+*United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021) (severability required when a provision is unconstitutional)
 *United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (2020)
 *United States v. Vaello Madero, 142 S. Ct. 1539 (2022)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, March 10, 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:

	QUESTION PRESENTED:		QUESTION PRESENTED:
−
	{{cquote\|Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.}}		{{cquote\|Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, March 10, 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{cquote\|No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.}}		{{cquote\|No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.}}

		+	== CFPB v. CFSA ==
		+	On a petition granted by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in the case of ''CFPB v. CFSA'', No. 22-448 (CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU V. COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, LIMITED), appealing 51 F.4th 616 (all [[Trump]]-appointed panel of the [[Fifth Circuit]], Case No. 21-50826).
		+
		+	QUESTION PRESENTED:
		+
		+	{{cquote\|Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that the statute providing funding to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), 12 U.S.C. 5497, violates the Appropriations Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I,§ 9, Cl. 7, and in vacating a regulation promulgated at a time when the CFPB was receiving such funding.}}
		+
		+	CERT. GRANTED 2/27/2023
		+
		+	The [[U.S.]] cited the following decisions to overturn a [[Fifth Circuit]] decision narrowing the scope of the Appropriations Clause:
		+
		+	*Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 575 U.S. 320 (2015)
		+	*Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)
		+	*Chiafalo v. Washington, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (2020)
		+	*Cincinnati Soap Co. v. United States, 301 U.S. 308 (1937)
		+	*Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998)
		+	*Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761 (2021)
		+	*Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477 (2010)
		+	*Harrington v. Bush, 553 F.2d 190 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
		+	*Iancu v. Brunetti, 139 S. Ct. 2294 (2019)
		+	*Lebron v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374 (1995)
		+	*Lincoln v. Vigil, 508 U.S. 182 (1993)
		+	*Maricopa County v. Lopez-Valenzuela, 574 U.S. 1006 (2014)
		+	*OPM v. Richmond, 496 U.S. 414 (1990)
		+	*PHH Corp. v. CFPB, 881 F.3d 75 (D.C. Cir. 2018), abrogated on other grounds by Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (2020)
		+	*Reeside v. Walker, 52 U.S. (11 How.) 272 (1851)
		+	*Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981)
		+	*Seila Law LLC v. CFPB, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (2020)
		+	*United Biscuit Co. of Am. v. Wirtz, 359 F.2d 206 (D.C. Cir. 1965), cert denied, 384 U.S. 971 (1966)
		+	*United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021)
		+	*United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (2020)
		+	*United States v. Vaello Madero, 142 S. Ct. 1539 (2022)
		+	*United States Dep’t of the Navy v. Federal Labor Relations Auth., 665 F.3d 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2012)
		+	*Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008)
	[[Category:United States Constitution]]		[[Category:United States Constitution]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, March 11, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~404- Page not found~~	+	The '''Appropriations Clause''' authorizes [[Congress]] to spend money and requires that it keep a record of the expenditures. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states:
		+	{{cquote\|No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.}}
		+
		+	[[Category:United States Constitution]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, March 11, 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~The '''Appropriations Clause''' authorizes [[Congress]] to spend money and requires that it keep a record of the expenditures. Specifically, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 states:~~	+	404- Page not found
−	{{cquote\|No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.}}
−
−	~~[[Category:United States Constitution]]~~