<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vader1941</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Vader1941"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Vader1941"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T20:26:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=771186</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=771186"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T20:22:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest [[religion]], having 2.2 billion followers. It is a [[monotheistic]] religion that professes belief in [[Jesus]] as the Son of [[God]].  Christianity takes its name from [[Jesus Christ]] meaning &amp;quot;Jesus the Savior&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Jesus the Anointed One&amp;quot;.  Followers of Jesus are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Today, Christianity is widespread and is practiced on all continents. It is most prevalent in Latin America, with a following of over four hundred million. Over 90% of the population of countries like Mexico, Brazil, and the Democratic Republic of Congo practice Christianity. Other significant regions include North America and Eurasia, where over 70% of the population is Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believed established the Church and the succession of the [[Pope]]s as the spiritual authority over the Christian body of believers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) also trace their roots back to the beginnings of Christianity, but do not believe in the Primacy of the Pope.  Differing theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]]; the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 77 million baptized members) and the Lutheran World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It first broke away from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of [[faith]] and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]] as well as other practices that Luther saw in the Catholic Church at that time that he did not agree with could not be adequately reconciled with Papal prescriptions. Other preachers and movements then followed Luther's example and also left the Catholic fold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed]] below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I believe in one God, [[God the Father|the Father Almighty]], Maker of [[heaven]] and [[earth]], and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Virgin Mary]], and became man. And He was crucified for us under [[Pontius Pilate]], and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the [[Bible|Scriptures]]; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. In one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the [[Resurrection]] of the dead, and the life of the world to come.  Amen.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine and disagree on others. According to an online Harris poll from 2003  99% of all American Christians believe in [[God]], 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in [[Heaven]], 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in [[Hell]], 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious tenents of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See also: the [[Apostle's Creed]], [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. While God is tripartite, this does not imply that Christians are polytheists--the oneness of the divine nature (or essence) is what matters.  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to most (but not all) Christian theology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is [[love]].  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The God of the Christians is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, and all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left|]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Augustus Caesar|Caesar Augustus]] the Son (e.g. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnate as a man.  He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At the age of thirty he was baptized by his cousin, the [[John the Baptist|Prophet John]], and began to preach in the area [[Palestine]].  About three years after his baptism, he raised his friend [[Lazarus]] from the dead, prompting the Jewish power establishment to plot Jesus' death.  Jesus was [[crucified]].  He came back from the dead and was seen by over 500 people.  He ascended to Heaven.  The four [[Gospels]] contain the records of some of what Jesus did and said, but he did much more than those four books relate, as the Apostle John said in his Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is love and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. Jesus summarized his teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constant debate has resulted as to how a person should express love for God in their moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that  the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is most likely due to the constant mention of hospitality and generosity to one's &amp;quot;neighbors&amp;quot; in the Bible.  Jesus was especially passionate about caring for people in need:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus said to him, &amp;quot;If you want to be perfect, go and sell what you own and give the money to the destitute, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come back and follow me.&amp;quot; (Matthew 19:21)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while  advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escape slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 500 A.D., most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Atonement of Jesus on the Cross===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
All Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, along with His resurrection, is an indispensable proclamation of a crucial event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to understanding His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. Though there is ample recognition in the New Testament that others desired Him to die, and that the circumstances in which His path took him would bring Him to His end on earth, the mover of all these things was Himself and the will of the Father. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect that way. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben),  or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). And so, &amp;quot;The Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# It was the belief in Scripture, that in His death a way back to God was made possible for those that were near to God&amp;amp;mdash;the Jews. And a way back to God for those that were far away&amp;amp;mdash;the Gentiles. That is why the New Testament saw in the requirements of God for Israel a fulfillment in Jesus the Messiah. He was the perfect Israel, taken out of Egypt, to redeem Israel. And that is why the New Testament saw in Jesus, a  deepness to the incarnation of the Son of God, deeper than just a Jew of His time of a certain tribe. He was the &amp;quot;Second Adam&amp;quot; to redeem the sons of Adam. This encompassing perspective had further implications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself - How can I make reconciliation with my enemies, with even the members of my own family, of race with race and  people with people?; Does His death for the sins of the world include those who only partially understand, for the baby aborted, the feeble minded, and severely retarded?; For those who have never heard of Jesus, never been &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot;, distant and remote in place and time?;  Does His death for the sins of the world  also include a remedy for the ills that have come as a result of those sins&amp;amp;mdash;certain sicknesses, ills of the mind, body and the soul? Do they &amp;quot;hold&amp;quot; for today?; Does His death make good, turn to the better, show the way, effect the way, of the illnesses that have befallen the world, not only by sin, but simply by the circumstances of life, of degeneration, of compounded dysfunction? How does the fruit of His death bring in somehow the Kingdom &amp;quot;among us&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of the Son of God on the cross has provided the solution for sin, and it still holds its sway over the imagination and aspirations for the people of our generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17, and &amp;quot;Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men&amp;quot; (Mark 2:28)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often use the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; interchangeably.  Other Christians, notably the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]].  &amp;quot;Jesus answered, Amen, amen, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.&amp;quot; (John 3:5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to stay saved. However, this is a common misconception of the text. It is rather referring to proving that one is a child of God by their &amp;quot;fruit&amp;quot; (things that they do and how they behave). Christians in the Reformed tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer [[John Calvin]], as well as the faith outlined in the Belgic and Heidleberg Confessions) say that salvation is irrevocable and that it cannot be lost, if it were genuinely part of one's life to begin with.  Reformed Christians (often called [[Calvinists]]) often point to Romans 8:38-39 as validation of their belief: &amp;quot;For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord&amp;quot; (Romans 8:38-39; [[NASB]]). According to Calvinists, the reason it cannot be lost by natural things is because salvation was obtained through a supernatural being, namely Jesus Christ. This does not negate Jesus' human side, only that he was both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man, according to the [[Council of Chalcedon]] (A. D. 451). The Bible also makes it clear that mankind cannot earn their salvation, and that it is a free gift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history Gary Habermas is considered the foremost [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fact of the Resurrection of Christ is a key element of the preaching of the message about Jesus and an essential of Christian belief. But there are also certain effects that this belief has on the lives of believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead, that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The  New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion. He was &amp;quot;declared to be the Son of God&amp;quot;  by His resurrection. This brings believers in Him to a strong confidence in the determined power of God to both vindicate in their own lives and to bring His reign upon earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, their sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. His resurrection, carries with it our knowledge that our sin with its attendant death has been totally and finally paid for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life - as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life, and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully under the Spirit's control, guidance, and empowerment. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolations, and consider that even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him, a restoration, and that tears, even now, are wiped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History of the name &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22) and the church its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'', (Acts 24:5) evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived. Probably close to A.D 50 the [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16, and likely is referred to in James 2:7, &amp;quot;Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that at least initially, the church was a single organic community, in which &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles&amp;quot; due to determined persecution, which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other evidence indicates believers had their own houses and goods. (Acts 10:6; 16:14,15,40; 21:8; 1Cor. 11:22; 1Tim. 6:17; Philemon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), Early ecclesiatical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community  (197 A.D.): ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111-113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orthodox Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Church of England]] or ''Anglican Church''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Episcopal Church in the United States of America]] (or ''Episcopal Church'' or ''Episcopalians'') (Non-UK branch of the Anglican Church)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967-1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), ), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [http://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [http://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [http://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al, eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958-19820; 2565 pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=771185</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=771185"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T20:22:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest [[religion]], having 2.2 billion followers. It is a [[monotheistic]] religion that professes belief in [[Jesus]] as the Son of [[God]].  Christianity takes its name from [[Jesus Christ]] meaning &amp;quot;Jesus the Savior&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Jesus the Anointed One&amp;quot;.  Followers of Jesus are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Today, Christianity is widespread, and practiced on all continents. It is most prevalent in Latin America, with a following of over four hundred million. Over 90% of the population of countries like Mexico, Brazil, and the Democratic Republic of Congo practice Christianity. Other significant regions include North America and Eurasia, where over 70% of the population is Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believed established the Church and the succession of the [[Pope]]s as the spiritual authority over the Christian body of believers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) also trace their roots back to the beginnings of Christianity, but do not believe in the Primacy of the Pope.  Differing theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]]; the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 77 million baptized members) and the Lutheran World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It first broke away from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of [[faith]] and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]] as well as other practices that Luther saw in the Catholic Church at that time that he did not agree with could not be adequately reconciled with Papal prescriptions. Other preachers and movements then followed Luther's example and also left the Catholic fold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed]] below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I believe in one God, [[God the Father|the Father Almighty]], Maker of [[heaven]] and [[earth]], and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Virgin Mary]], and became man. And He was crucified for us under [[Pontius Pilate]], and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the [[Bible|Scriptures]]; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. In one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the [[Resurrection]] of the dead, and the life of the world to come.  Amen.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine and disagree on others. According to an online Harris poll from 2003  99% of all American Christians believe in [[God]], 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in [[Heaven]], 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in [[Hell]], 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious tenents of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See also: the [[Apostle's Creed]], [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. While God is tripartite, this does not imply that Christians are polytheists--the oneness of the divine nature (or essence) is what matters.  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to most (but not all) Christian theology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is [[love]].  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The God of the Christians is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, and all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left|]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Augustus Caesar|Caesar Augustus]] the Son (e.g. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnate as a man.  He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At the age of thirty he was baptized by his cousin, the [[John the Baptist|Prophet John]], and began to preach in the area [[Palestine]].  About three years after his baptism, he raised his friend [[Lazarus]] from the dead, prompting the Jewish power establishment to plot Jesus' death.  Jesus was [[crucified]].  He came back from the dead and was seen by over 500 people.  He ascended to Heaven.  The four [[Gospels]] contain the records of some of what Jesus did and said, but he did much more than those four books relate, as the Apostle John said in his Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is love and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. Jesus summarized his teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constant debate has resulted as to how a person should express love for God in their moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that  the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is most likely due to the constant mention of hospitality and generosity to one's &amp;quot;neighbors&amp;quot; in the Bible.  Jesus was especially passionate about caring for people in need:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus said to him, &amp;quot;If you want to be perfect, go and sell what you own and give the money to the destitute, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come back and follow me.&amp;quot; (Matthew 19:21)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while  advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escape slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 500 A.D., most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Atonement of Jesus on the Cross===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
All Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, along with His resurrection, is an indispensable proclamation of a crucial event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to understanding His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. Though there is ample recognition in the New Testament that others desired Him to die, and that the circumstances in which His path took him would bring Him to His end on earth, the mover of all these things was Himself and the will of the Father. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect that way. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben),  or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). And so, &amp;quot;The Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# It was the belief in Scripture, that in His death a way back to God was made possible for those that were near to God&amp;amp;mdash;the Jews. And a way back to God for those that were far away&amp;amp;mdash;the Gentiles. That is why the New Testament saw in the requirements of God for Israel a fulfillment in Jesus the Messiah. He was the perfect Israel, taken out of Egypt, to redeem Israel. And that is why the New Testament saw in Jesus, a  deepness to the incarnation of the Son of God, deeper than just a Jew of His time of a certain tribe. He was the &amp;quot;Second Adam&amp;quot; to redeem the sons of Adam. This encompassing perspective had further implications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself - How can I make reconciliation with my enemies, with even the members of my own family, of race with race and  people with people?; Does His death for the sins of the world include those who only partially understand, for the baby aborted, the feeble minded, and severely retarded?; For those who have never heard of Jesus, never been &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot;, distant and remote in place and time?;  Does His death for the sins of the world  also include a remedy for the ills that have come as a result of those sins&amp;amp;mdash;certain sicknesses, ills of the mind, body and the soul? Do they &amp;quot;hold&amp;quot; for today?; Does His death make good, turn to the better, show the way, effect the way, of the illnesses that have befallen the world, not only by sin, but simply by the circumstances of life, of degeneration, of compounded dysfunction? How does the fruit of His death bring in somehow the Kingdom &amp;quot;among us&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of the Son of God on the cross has provided the solution for sin, and it still holds its sway over the imagination and aspirations for the people of our generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17, and &amp;quot;Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men&amp;quot; (Mark 2:28)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often use the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; interchangeably.  Other Christians, notably the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]].  &amp;quot;Jesus answered, Amen, amen, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.&amp;quot; (John 3:5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to stay saved. However, this is a common misconception of the text. It is rather referring to proving that one is a child of God by their &amp;quot;fruit&amp;quot; (things that they do and how they behave). Christians in the Reformed tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer [[John Calvin]], as well as the faith outlined in the Belgic and Heidleberg Confessions) say that salvation is irrevocable and that it cannot be lost, if it were genuinely part of one's life to begin with.  Reformed Christians (often called [[Calvinists]]) often point to Romans 8:38-39 as validation of their belief: &amp;quot;For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord&amp;quot; (Romans 8:38-39; [[NASB]]). According to Calvinists, the reason it cannot be lost by natural things is because salvation was obtained through a supernatural being, namely Jesus Christ. This does not negate Jesus' human side, only that he was both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man, according to the [[Council of Chalcedon]] (A. D. 451). The Bible also makes it clear that mankind cannot earn their salvation, and that it is a free gift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history Gary Habermas is considered the foremost [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fact of the Resurrection of Christ is a key element of the preaching of the message about Jesus and an essential of Christian belief. But there are also certain effects that this belief has on the lives of believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead, that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The  New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion. He was &amp;quot;declared to be the Son of God&amp;quot;  by His resurrection. This brings believers in Him to a strong confidence in the determined power of God to both vindicate in their own lives and to bring His reign upon earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, their sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. His resurrection, carries with it our knowledge that our sin with its attendant death has been totally and finally paid for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life - as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life, and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully under the Spirit's control, guidance, and empowerment. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolations, and consider that even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him, a restoration, and that tears, even now, are wiped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History of the name &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22) and the church its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'', (Acts 24:5) evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived. Probably close to A.D 50 the [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16, and likely is referred to in James 2:7, &amp;quot;Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that at least initially, the church was a single organic community, in which &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles&amp;quot; due to determined persecution, which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other evidence indicates believers had their own houses and goods. (Acts 10:6; 16:14,15,40; 21:8; 1Cor. 11:22; 1Tim. 6:17; Philemon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), Early ecclesiatical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community  (197 A.D.): ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111-113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orthodox Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Church of England]] or ''Anglican Church''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Episcopal Church in the United States of America]] (or ''Episcopal Church'' or ''Episcopalians'') (Non-UK branch of the Anglican Church)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967-1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), ), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [http://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [http://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [http://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al, eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958-19820; 2565 pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=771182</id>
		<title>Human reproduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=771182"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T19:53:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: /* Biological aspects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sperm-egg.jpg|thumbnail|Sperm cell hitting an egg cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Human reproduction''' is the process by which children are conceived and born. In order for human reproduction to occur under normal circumstances, male and female must engage in [[sexual intercourse]]. Exceptionally, reproduction may take place without intercourse via procedures such as [[in vitro fertilization]].  &lt;br /&gt;
==Spiritual aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Soul_Conception.jpg|thumbnail|Artist's conception of soul joining the fertilized egg at conception.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human reproduction serves to create new human beings and with each of these new human beings comes a [[soul]]. The soul appears with the person at the moment of [[conception]], making him a complete human being from this moment.  This is why [[abortion]] is [[murder]]: the abortionist has rent the soul from a living human body, the soul being the source of a full life for human beings. If hypothetically there were no soul present in the human at the time of conception and it entered the body at some later stage, then until that moment the [[fetus]] would be nothing more than an animated body, similar to how animals and plants are alive but without souls. Thus, if this were the case, abortion would not be murder, but rather a termination of a non-human entity, at least until the soul finally joined the body. However, there has never been any evidence presented that the soul can enter the body at any time later than conception. Since the soul is intrinsic to human beings, it absolutely must be present at conception and therefore abortion is murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many religious beliefs, even within [[Christianity]], on the origin of the soul that accompanies a new human being. Some believe portions of the souls of the parents combine to form the new soul. Some believe a free-floating soul becomes trapped within the body. Some believe a soul is created with the fusion of the gametes, in a meta-chemical process. Believers in [[reincarnation]] say that the soul of a previously deceased person or animal (in this religion non-human animals are believed to have souls as well) enters the new body, so that there is a spiritual [[memory]] of the previous life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate act of intimacy serves to unite the male and female [[gamete]]s, the [[sperm]] and [[egg]], respectively. The male introduces sperm into the female using an organ called the 'penis'. The sperm is received within the female 'vagina', and travels up the cervix into the uterus. These gametes carry just one half of the [[gene]]tic material, or haploid ([[chromosome]]s) from each parent, and when they combine the new [[embryo]] contains a full set of chromosomes. The process of the gametes combining is called [[fertilization]], and takes place inside the woman's body, in the [[Fallopian tubes]] or [[uterus]]. The embryo then attaches itself to the uterine lining, and is nourished by the placenta (which in turn receives its nourishment from the mother's body) while it develops. This development takes roughly nine months (see [[Naegele's Rule]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of this process of protected development, what was once an embryo is now born as a new baby. Human babies are relatively helpless, and depend on the care and love of both parents in order to survive to maturity themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humans are not able to reproduce alone by [[budding]], [[parthenogenesis]], or [[self-cloning]] as some species are capable of. In addition, human [[gender]] is fixed at conception, unlike some species'; females are not able to become male or vice versa to deal with homogeneous populations of one gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/sex/ What Liberals Say - Category: Sex], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=771181</id>
		<title>Human reproduction</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_reproduction&amp;diff=771181"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T19:53:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: /* Biological aspects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sperm-egg.jpg|thumbnail|Sperm cell hitting an egg cell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Human reproduction''' is the process by which children are conceived and born. In order for human reproduction to occur under normal circumstances, male and female must engage in [[sexual intercourse]]. Exceptionally, reproduction may take place without intercourse via procedures such as [[in vitro fertilization]].  &lt;br /&gt;
==Spiritual aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Soul_Conception.jpg|thumbnail|Artist's conception of soul joining the fertilized egg at conception.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human reproduction serves to create new human beings and with each of these new human beings comes a [[soul]]. The soul appears with the person at the moment of [[conception]], making him a complete human being from this moment.  This is why [[abortion]] is [[murder]]: the abortionist has rent the soul from a living human body, the soul being the source of a full life for human beings. If hypothetically there were no soul present in the human at the time of conception and it entered the body at some later stage, then until that moment the [[fetus]] would be nothing more than an animated body, similar to how animals and plants are alive but without souls. Thus, if this were the case, abortion would not be murder, but rather a termination of a non-human entity, at least until the soul finally joined the body. However, there has never been any evidence presented that the soul can enter the body at any time later than conception. Since the soul is intrinsic to human beings, it absolutely must be present at conception and therefore abortion is murder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many religious beliefs, even within [[Christianity]], on the origin of the soul that accompanies a new human being. Some believe portions of the souls of the parents combine to form the new soul. Some believe a free-floating soul becomes trapped within the body. Some believe a soul is created with the fusion of the gametes, in a meta-chemical process. Believers in [[reincarnation]] say that the soul of a previously deceased person or animal (in this religion non-human animals are believed to have souls as well) enters the new body, so that there is a spiritual [[memory]] of the previous life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate act of intimacy serves to unite the male and female [[gamete]]s, the [[sperm]] and [[egg]], respectively. The male introduces sperm into the female using an organ called the 'penis'. The sperm is received within the female 'vagina', and travells up the cervix into the uteris. These gametes carry just one half of the [[gene]]tic material, or haploid ([[chromosome]]s) from each parent, and when they combine the new [[embryo]] contains a full set of chromosomes. The process of the gametes combining is called [[fertilization]], and takes place inside the woman's body, in the [[Fallopian tubes]] or [[uterus]]. The embryo then attaches itself to the uterine lining, and is nourished by the placenta (which in turn receives its nourishment from the mother's body) while it develops. This development takes roughly nine months (see [[Naegele's Rule]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of this process of protected development, what was once an embryo is now born as a new baby. Human babies are relatively helpless, and depend on the care and love of both parents in order to survive to maturity themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humans are not able to reproduce alone by [[budding]], [[parthenogenesis]], or [[self-cloning]] as some species are capable of. In addition, human [[gender]] is fixed at conception, unlike some species'; females are not able to become male or vice versa to deal with homogeneous populations of one gender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/sex/ What Liberals Say - Category: Sex], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=World_History_Lecture_Fourteen&amp;diff=771180</id>
		<title>World History Lecture Fourteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=World_History_Lecture_Fourteen&amp;diff=771180"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T19:46:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: /* Technology */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[World History Lecture One|1]]-[[World History Lecture Two|2]]-[[World History Lecture Three|3]]-[[World History Lecture Four|4]]-[[World History Lecture Five|5]]-[[World History Lecture Six|6]]-[[World History Lecture Seven|7]]-[[World History Lecture Eight|8]]-[[World History Lecture Nine|9]]-[[World History Lecture Ten|10]]-[[World History Lecture Eleven|11]]-[[World History Lecture Twelve|12]]-[[World History Lecture Thirteen|13]]-[[World History Lecture Fourteen|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our journey through world history reaches the present in this final lecture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian population has steady increased from 0% in 6 B.C. to 33% today.  Although Christians have always been a minority in the world, this minority has led the world in accomplishments and achievements.  Ask yourself as you complete this course:  What is the future for Christianity?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==World Trade==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One word sums up most historians’ view of the world today:  “globalism”.  That was not even a word 20 years ago.  “Globalism” means treating the world as one political unit, as one massive village.  Distances appear to be shortening between people, cultures and nations.  Travel is more affordable for more people.  Mobility is greater.  Trade among nations is larger.  Television and the internet link the world’s population of six or so billion people like never before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One [[invention]] in late 1947 made most of this possible.  Three scientists invented the [[transistor]] at Bell Labs in Murray Hill, New Jersey (exit 44 on I-78, near Berkeley Heights).  This tiny invention brought about a massive revolution in [[computer]]s and communications.  With improvements, the transistor permitted microelectronic control and amplification of signals.  This greatly advanced communication, as in radio, television, telephone and later the internet.  This also permitted the storage of massive amounts of information, as in computers.  Bell Labs, then part of AT&amp;amp;T, made this invention available to the entire world.  Soon transistors replaced vacuum tubes in radios and televisions, enabling them to work better.  The Japanese flooded the market with improved products.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Apple Computer]] sold a personal computer for home use in the late 1970s and, in 1981, [[IBM]] introduced its own personal computer.  Time magazine declared the personal (or home) computer to be “Man of the Year” for 1982.  Fifteen years later the internet became popular for connecting computers.  In 2000, presidential candidate Al Gore attempted to take credit for helping create the internet, and the world ridiculed him.  No politician, and certainly not Al Gore, can take credit for all this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other inventions also helped improve the world.  The invention of plastics enabled the mass production of inexpensive goods, everything from drinking cups to watches to car and airplane furnishings.  Robotics lowered the cost of manufacturing for everything.  In the [[United States of America|United States]] unions resisted some of these changes.  The Japanese companies, benefiting from cheaper labor and lack of unions, surpassed American companies in many industries.  Economic problems later caught up with [[Japan]] in the early 1990s, but even today its car industry (especially Toyota) does better than Detroit car manufacturers.  Voluntary import quotas have kept Japanese car imports lower than they would be without any trade barriers, and the Japanese began expensive selling luxury cars (such as the Lexus) as a way of making more money with fewer products.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to Japan, other [[Asia]]n nations also thrived after World War II.  The “Four Tigers” are the prosperous Pacific Rim nations of [[South Korea]], [[Taiwan]], [[Singapore]] and [[Hong Kong]].  (Hong Kong is now part of communist China but is allowed to remain free until at least the middle of the 21st century.)  Even communist China has grown stronger economically by trading with the United States.  Malaysia and other Asian nations have prospered too.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world today has numerous “multinational” companies having offices in many different countries.  Many American companies now have offices or factories even in communist China now.  These multinational companies are attracted by the low wages and inexpensive raw materials, and by the opportunity to sell their products there.  Increased regulation and taxes in America also encourage companies to transfer to their jobs to foreign countries, where there is less regulation and fewer lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning soon after the end of World War II, the western nations discussed agreements to reduce tariffs for trade among themselves.  In 1947, they entered into the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in order to decrease tariffs that interfered with trade.  This marked a significant change from how nations had used tariffs in the past to protect their domestic industries and raise revenue.  Under GATT, western countries first froze the tariffs (preventing them from increasing) and later began reducing the tariffs.  In 1995, this approach was taken one step further with the World Trade Organization (WTO), which included non-western countries and also established international courts for deciding trade disputes among nations.  There are 150 members of the WTO today, and Vietnam (which the communists won by war in the 1970s) joined the WTO in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:European Union.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Western European nations also joined the European Common Market after World War II, and then in 1958 joined the European Economic Community (EEC) to reduce tariffs among themselves.  The EEC later became the European Union (EU), which includes all Western European countries except Switzerland, which has never joined anything and fiercely defends its independence, Iceland, and Norway.  In 2002, all of EU began using a common currency known as the “euro”, except for Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, which still use their own currencies.  In 2004, many Eastern European nations also joined the EU.  A map of the EU is to the right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The large Muslim nation of Turkey has requested to join the EU.  One opponent is the new Pope Benedict XVI of the Catholic Church, who succeeded Pope John Paul II in 2005 upon his death.  Pope Benedict has emphasized the need to keep Europe Christian, and he sparked Muslim riots in late 2006 when he repeated a provocative quote about Islam.  One of President Barack Obama’s most significant statements after his election was to call for the inclusion of Turkey in the EU.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North America has also created a free trade zone (free from tariffs) with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was never ratified by the Senate as a treaty but which Congress passed into law anyway.  NAFTA establishes international courts that have already been used to force the United States to open its borders to Mexican trucks, which are less safe than American ones.  The importation of drugs into the United States from Mexico has increased since NAFTA went into effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are other free trade zones.  LAFTA is the Latin American Free Trade Agreement passed in 1961, and replaced in 1981 by the Latin American Integration Association (ALADI).  ALADI has not been very successful and therefore several Latin American countries decided to form new free trade zones.  The most successful free trade zone in Latin America is the South American Common Market (Mercosur) which has Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Venezuela as members.  Other trade zones in the Americas include the Andean Community, the Central American Common Market (CACM) and the Caribbean Common Market (Caricom). Supporters of these agreements assert that they help Latin American countries develop economic independence from foreign powers.  There is CAFTA, a recently enacted Central American Free Trade Agreement that the United States joined.  There is ASEAN, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, founded in 1967 by Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines to combat communism.  ASEAN signed trade agreements with Japan (1977) and the European Community (1980).   All these agreements and associations seek to reduce tariffs between member states and promote so-called “free trade.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The promotion of “free trade” has many opponents.  Conservatives object to sending money to foreign countries and the resultant loss of American manufacturing jobs to near-slave labor in foreign countries.  A consequence of “free trade” is an increase in illegal drugs from foreign countries into the United States, often hidden within other goods.  Foreign countries, particularly China, have been putting cheaper but dangerous substitutes into goods that result in injuring Americans, including children and pets, who end up using them.  Unions object to their loss of jobs that result from “free trade,” as it is cheaper to have goods manufactured outside of all the expensive regulations and lawsuits that occur in the United States.  Many inside and outside the United States also object to a culture of “consumerism”, such that people are encouraged to buy more than what is healthy or necessary.  Brand names like McDonalds, Coca-Cola and Nike dominate television and the culture of teenagers.  “McDonaldization” is when American advertising (as in the case of McDonalds) has an influence on the world culture, causing distant children (like Chinese) to repeat a McDonald’s slogan they heard on television.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Americans discovered crude oil (petroleum) near Titusville, Pennsylvania, and drilled their first oil there in 1859.  It began yielding 25 barrels a day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;By the end of 1859 the flow of oil from this first well had slowed from 25 to 15 barrels a day.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The world would never be the same again.  By 1906, American oil production had reached 126 million barrels a year.  Today petroleum constitutes 40% of Americans’ overall energy consumption in the United States, with coal being the other big source of energy.  Most of the cheap, readily accessible oil in the world is under the control of Muslims in the Middle East.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To keep the price of oil higher than it would be in a free market, Middle Eastern countries formed OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) in 1960.  The original members were Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Iraq and also the Latin American country of Venezuela.  African and Asian countries later joined OPEC too.  Angered by American support of Israel during the Arab-Israeli war of 1973, OPEC placed an embargo on the shipment of oil to the United States.  Prices jumped by a multiple of four in two years, and there were many long lines and shortages at American gas stations.  The worldwide economy was hurt by this shock in energy prices, aggravating a problem with inflation and unemployment late in the 1970s.  Japan, which relies heavily on oil imports, was hit hard.  But OPEC’s influence has steadily declined due to increased competition by other countries.  Mexico and Russia have become large oil-producing nations, and they have not joined OPEC.  In 2007, the net revenues from oil to OPEC nations will be about $500 billion, while the non-OPEC nations will have net oil revenues of about $225 billion.  The United States imports about $170 billion-worth more of oil than it exports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many claim that the involvement of the United States in the Middle East is to protect the cheap oil there.  In late 1990, Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded and conquered Kuwait, a large oil producer.  In January and February 1991, the United States (with the support of the United Nations) responded with Operation Desert Storm, and liberated Kuwait in this Gulf War.  Saddam Hussein, in retreat, lit fires on the Kuwaiti oil wells and dumped two million gallons of oil into the Persian Gulf.  This seemed to anger environmentalists more than the loss of life!  The environmentalists called this action by Saddam Hussein “environmental terrorism.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1990s, politicians and some scientists began to cite a warming trend in the earth’s weather as evidence of a “global warming” caused by the burning of oil and the release of chlorofluorocarbons, a chemical.  They blamed factory smokestacks and automobiles, and especially refrigerators and air conditioners.  The loss of trees in rain forests was also supposedly a cause of global warming.  Regulators began banning the use of certain chemicals in hairspray, and the Kyoto (Japan) Treaty was proposed to limit the pollution each country could generate each year.  Political opposition in America prevented the United States from ratifying the Kyoto Treaty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first decade of 21st century, worldwide temperatures have not increased, and in the past few years the average world temperature has actually been decreasing at a rapid rate.  Proponents of “global warming” (including Al Gore) refuse to debate this, however, and insist that the science is settled in favor of their theory, and that more governmental controls of energy are needed.  This is a familiar pattern by some:  they always seek theories and ways to increase governmental control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Barack Obama has called on Congress to pass a law by the end of May 2009 to place limits on energy production, particularly the production of coal, supposedly to help reduce “global warming.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technology===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advances in communication technology, such as the internet and cell phones, have created a worldwide culture that increasingly prefers English over local languages.  English is easier to type into a computer than Asian languages, for example.  At the same time, the cultural varieties of distant places such as India and Southeast Asia can be appreciated more in the Western world.  Restaurants featuring foreign food are prevalent across the United States now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Improvements in jet propulsion and rocketry made travel faster and easier than ever before. Such advances were spurred on by the World Wars. The urgent need for pressurized stratospheric bombers like the B-29 and advanced ballistics like the V2 missile advanced human knowledge by several decades. By 1956, airliners replaced ocean-liners as the primary means of trans-Atlantic travel. Remnants of Nazi Germany's scientific community fueled both American and Soviet space programs, ultimately culminating in the first manned spaceflight, by Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin in 1961.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technology has brought some medical advances, most notably in the expanded use of antibiotics after World War II.  Physicians say that most of medicine today was discovered in the past 70 years.  The modern inventions of the MRI and CAT scan have improved the ability to view the human body, and treat illness.  Other modern developments, such as widespread vaccination and insecticides, are more controversial.  Preventive vaccination is credited with eliminating the terrible diseases of polio and smallpox, but other, newer vaccines are opposed by many parents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proposals to spend taxpayer money on embryonic stem cell research are controversial and open to much criticism.  In Germany, where the people experienced the horrors of the medical experiments connected with the Holocaust, the people are strongly against embryonic stem cell research.  Private investors show little interest in spending their own money on this even in the United States.  But a political movement linked to the [[abortion]] industry demands that taxpayer money be spent on this research, without any evidence that any good will ever come of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Nations promotes abortion worldwide through its U.N. Fund for Population Activities.  Even though the world population will peak and begin to decline in the 21st century, the promoters of abortion continue to demand more and more killing of unborn children.  This is promoted using taxpayer money.  The United Nations also pushes its pro-abortion agenda through the World Health Organization (WHO).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agriculture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The “green revolution” was a worldwide effort to increase the food supply through better farming, particularly in undernourished regions like India and South America.  By increasing the amount of farmland and obtaining better [[crop yield]] from existing farms, the food supply increased such that India began producing more food than it could even consume, and exported its surplus.  Worldwide, the crops of rice, wheat and maize (corn) all increased.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Popular and easy to grow in the Asian climate, rice was historically the world's most popular crop.  But maize (corn), wheat and sugar cane have surpassed rice in popularity.  Here is the list of the most popular crops in the world today:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# sugar cane			&lt;br /&gt;
# maize (corn)		        &lt;br /&gt;
# wheat			&lt;br /&gt;
# rice				&lt;br /&gt;
# potatoes			&lt;br /&gt;
# sugar beets&lt;br /&gt;
# soybeans&lt;br /&gt;
# oil palm fruit&lt;br /&gt;
# barley&lt;br /&gt;
# tomatoes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pesticides and fertilizers were used to increase production during the green revolution, and many wonder if they are harmful to our diet.  A massive market has developed in “organic” goods grown without the use of pesticides.  Today, there is also controversial use of genetic engineering of crops to increase crop yield (the amount of food produced per a given area).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Environmentalists complained that increased irrigation for crops has depleted ground water and an increase in the salinity of the soil.  Many ground wells in the United States may be polluted from hazardous waste (such as dumped oil), or possibly from fertilizers or pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outer Space===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1950s and 1960s, the United States and Soviet Union engaged in a “Space Race” to see who could explore and perhaps claim outer space first.  In 1957, the Soviet Union shocked Americans by being the first to launch spacecraft (“Sputnik”) into orbit.  The first astronaut was a dog named Laika, which sadly did not return alive.  The name “Sputnik” inspired the name chosen by a hippie-like leader of a new counterculture movement in San Francisco:  “beatnik”.  The beatniks in the late 1950s laid the foundation for the hippies in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sputnik, which was hyped in the media, alarmed some Americans, and politicians vowed not to remain in second place in this Space Race.  America launched a project in the 1960s to land a man on the Moon, and used a series of spacecraft named “Apollo”.  In 1969, with the immortal words “one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind,” Astronaut Neil Armstrong became the first human to walk on the Moon.  Some conservatives felt that the Soviets never intended to go to the Moon themselves, but wanted Americans to waste money on the project.  It’s unclear what good came of the lunar project.  Some schoolbooks and promoters of the space program teach that the space program led to the invention of Teflon, now widely used in cooking, but that claim is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' [http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ahrpa/opa/kids/calendar/kidfeb.htm Patent site]; [http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2007/mar/05/business/chi-0703050135mar05 Chicago Tribune article]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Soviet Union continued a more limited space program, and in the 1970s the two superpowers began to collaborate on docketing their spacecraft together in orbit, creating space shuttles, and even building space stations.  In 1975, the Apollo spacecraft and the Soviet Soyuz successfully docked together in space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Americans continued to explore planets with the Hubble Telescope (to explore distant space in 1990) and the Pathfinder space probe (landing on Mars in 1997).  For most of the 20th century scientists (and popular movies) claimed that life must exist in outer space.  Claims of life existing in outer space may have anti-Christian motivations and effects, as they tend to contradict the Christian view of the creation of life and the redemption by Jesus Christ.  No extraterrestrial life has ever been found, despite all the exploration costing billions of dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Security and Terrorism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As communications and travel make the world seem like a smaller place, security issues become more important.  America can no longer rely on the vast distance of the oceans to protect herself from her enemies.  A terrorist is only a few hours away by plane, or by car in crossing a border.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terrorism is the main threat.  It has existed long before the 20th century.  The Crusades were a reaction to medieval terrorism in Jerusalem.  The anarchist movement that began in the late 1800s, and which claimed President William McKinley as a victim (to assassination) in 1901, used terrorism.  In 1920, a bomb exploded in a crowd in the Wall Street district of Manhattan, killing 40 and injuring 400.  A warning note read, “Remember we will not tolerate any longer. Free the political prisoners or it will be sure death for all of you. American Anarchists Fighters.”  The criminals were never caught.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Both terrorism and violent anarchism seek to disrupt and defeat authority.  In 1995, a Japanese cult released poisonous nerve gas in a Tokyo subway, killing 12 and injuring thousands.  In late 1996, Marxist terrorists captured and held hostages at the Japanese embassy in Lima, Peru.  The oldest active terrorist group in the world is the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which has attacked and bombed Britain in an attempt to force it to relinquish control of Northern Ireland.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No sane person wants a terrorist to obtain a nuclear bomb.  Most developed countries signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 as a way of keeping nuclear arms out of the hands of terrorists and rogue nations.  India and Pakistan never signed this treaty, and in 1998 both successfully detonated nuclear explosions in tests, proving that they have atomic bombs.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Northern Ireland===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ireland is an island slightly northwest of England.  “Northern Ireland” is in the northeastern one-sixth of the island of Ireland.  Northern Ireland has about a million people, with slightly more Protestants than Catholics.  It is part of the United Kingdom rather than the country of Ireland.  Its Northern Ireland Assembly has 108 elected officials, of whom 59 are “Unionists” (who support remaining in the United Kingdom) and 42 are “Nationalist” (who seek joining the independent Irish Republic).  The other seven do not specify their allegiance.  The largest Christian denominations are Catholic,  the Presbyterian Church in Ireland, the Anglican Church of Ireland, and the Methodist Church, with the total number of Protestant members outnumbering the Catholics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Irish rebellions against British control date back to rebellions in 1798 and 1803, and several secret Irish societies (such as the Defenders and Ribbonmen) played roles in those uprisings.  There was an Irish Republican Army that fought the British at the Battle of Ridgeway.  There was the Easter Rising from April 24 to 30, 1916, during which Irish rebels capture key locations in Dublin and proclaimed an Irish Republic.  The British suppressed this and executed its leaders.  But on 1919, the Irish Republic was declared through the efforts of its leader, Michael Collins (1890-1922).  Unfortunately, Michael Collins was killed just three years later during an Irish civil war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Northern Ireland remains in control of the British, despite the objections of the growing Catholic minority.  On “Bloody Sunday” (1972), the Irish held a peaceful march for freedom in Derry, Northern Ireland.  The British soldiers responded by shooting thirteen unarmed protesters dead, including six minors, and another died from the wounds a few months later.  Five had been shot in the back.  Army vehicles ran over two protesters.  The British never punished those responsible and several songs (one by John Lennon, and other by U2) commemorate the tragedy.  There is a Christian rock group that dedicates its name to the event, calling themselves “Bloody Sunday.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This event made many Irish feel that complete independence is the only solution, and that armed revolt is the only way to achieve independence.  Membership in the IRA then soared.  At one point they launched missiles from a van, directed at the headquarters of the British prime minister, in the hopes of killing John Major.  He escaped injury.  More recently, violence in Northern Ireland has subsided, but there is no end to the controversy over whether the Protestants or Catholics should rule that northeastern corner of Ireland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===9/11===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamic terrorism has long plagued the Middle East.  Palestinian terrorists grabbed and murdered eleven Israeli athletes at the Olympic Games in Munich in 1972, shocking the world.  A suicide bomber drove a truck of explosives up to a barracks of American Marines in Beirut, Lebanon, and detonated an explosion that destroyed their building, killing 241 of them in 1983.  Within a year President Reagan pulled American troops out of Beirut.  In March 1998, terrorists bombed American embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.  Most suspected Osama Bin Laden as the mastermind behind these attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it was not until September 11, 2001 (9-11) that Islamic terrorism hit American soil.  A group of 19 Muslims, most from Saudi Arabia, hijacked American airlines and flew one into each tower of the World Trade Center, a third into the Pentagon (probably after the pilot had trouble locating the White House from the air), and a fourth crashed in Pennsylvania as the passengers attempted to retake control of the plane from the terrorists.  Nearly 3,000 people died when the World Trade Center collapsed from the resulting fire, as millions watched it live on television.  An outpouring of support for American followed, with only Saddam Hussein of Iraq refusing to fly his flag at half-mast at the United Nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by America, a number of nations (mostly NATO members) responded by attacking Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, after the Taliban in charge of that nation refused to hand him over.  Bin Laden is the leader of the terrorist organization called al Qaeda (spellings vary in translating that name from Arabic).  Bin Laden fled, but al Qaeda was broken up in Afghanistan, the Taliban was overthrown, and many of Bin Laden’s top aides were killed by the end of 2001.  Although a democratic provisional government has replaced the Taliban there, the persecution of Christians continues.  In 2006, one Christian was targeted for execution by the Afghanistan country merely for converting from Islam, and the United States did not intervene.  International pressure causes a suspension in the punishment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, a coalition (made up mostly of American and British soldiers, with support from various other nations) invaded Iraq after Saddam Hussein refused to cooperate with inspectors of his nuclear facility and Americans feared that he had weapons of mass destruction (WMD).  The Iraq War was initially very successful for the coalition, as Baghdad was captured quicker than expected.  The use of new body armor by American soldiers saved many lives that would have been lost at an earlier time.  At the end of 2006 Saddam Hussein himself, after being captured by an American soldier and tried by the Iraqis, was hanged for his crimes.  But in early 2007, three years after President Bush had announced victory in the war, he asked the American people to send 20,000 more troops to Iraq to try to finish the job.  Terrorists there have caused a continuing stream of violence and killings for over three years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Migration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the second half of the 20th century, people increasingly migrated to the United States and Europe.  In the United States, the immigrants were welcomed with jobs.  In Europe, the immigrants were first welcomed with jobs and became “guest workers,” but when the jobs became scarce the governments would welcome the immigrants with welfare.  Some migrated to Muslim countries in the Middle East to work on oil wells.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Push-pull factors” caused the massive migration.  The “pull factors” are those described above:  better jobs and welfare.  The “push factors” are poverty, violence, or religious persecution in a homeland.  Hindus fled Muslim Pakistan, Afghans fled the Taliban and Cubans fled Castro.  Sometimes refugee camps were necessary to take care of all the migrating people, as done in the Middle East for Palestinians and in Albania during the Kosovo crisis.  Congo also established refugee camps for those fleeing from the ethnic cleansing of the tribal wars in Rwanda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When immigrants failed to learn and speak the local language, tensions arose.  By the end of the 20th century, there was growing opposition in both the United States and Europe to the large amounts of immigration.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The EU removed most internal border patrols, so people now flow freely from one country into the next, such as from Austria into Germany.  The Muslim influx has been particularly high.  In past centuries, churches would play a central role in integrating the immigrants into the local activities and culture.  But churches, which have become largely empty in Europe anyway, cannot integrate the Muslim immigrants.  In France, a politician Jean-Marie Le Pen demanded tougher controls against immigration.  But the media then labeled him as a racist and he was badly defeated in the election for president in 2002.  But meanwhile Islam is overtaking the Christian French culture, as the mosques are more vibrant than the churches in France now.  In 2004, France desperately banned the wearing of the Muslim hijab (headscarf) girls in state schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many European nations now face the controversy of whether to allow women to wear the Muslim coverings.  In late 2006, the Dutch government announced its plan to ban Muslim head coverings in all public places.  In Germany, many teachers are forbidden from wearing the hijab.  A Belgian town banned the burqa (full-body covering) and niqab (a veil that covers only the face) entirely from its streets.  In Britain, schools were allowed fire teachers for wearing face-coverings. Even in the Muslim country of Turkey, its military rulers have banned any wearing of the Muslim veil in public buildings since the 1920s, when Mustafa Kemal Atatürk established the modern Republic of Turkey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are alarmed by this Muslim clothing because they frustrate the liberal desire to create a secular, atheistic society.  It becomes difficult to complain about a cross somewhere when women are wearing burqas in glaring display of their faith.  Also, some feminists object to the burqa as discriminatory towards women, subjugating them to an inferior position in society.  Only in the sanctuary of the home do Muslim women remove their coverings.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the largest group of immigrants is from Mexico, and they are pouring into Catholic churches.  For example, Catholics comprise less than 10% of Utah’s population, which is predominantly Mormon, but an influx of immigrants from Mexico is boosting church attendance there.  But much of this immigration is illegal, and has created a subculture of 12 million people – close to 5% of the American population – that is not even supposed to be here.  Illegal immigrants are winning robotics science competitions and garnering top prizes at universities.  Many become self-employed due to the laws making it a crime for companies to hire them as employees.  Congress proposed creating a “guest worker” policy that would allow the illegal immigrants to stay.  President Bush said he would build a fence to stem the tide of illegal immigration, yet much of the promised fence was never built.  Those caught for illegal immigration are typically returned to Mexico, only to return again illegally to the United States.  Some have gone back and forth over a dozen times.  Public schools welcome illegal immigrants, and some come here to obtain free benefits like schooling and medical care.  Some heinous crimes and also fatal car accidents, perhaps due to a lack of an ability to read English signs or understand traffic patterns, have been caused by illegal immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has also been much migration within a same country.  In developing countries, migration from rural areas to big cities caused huge increases in city population, and tons of pollution.  Mexico City has become one of the most populated cities in the world from this type of migration.  In developed countries like the United States, there is substantial migration in the opposite direction, from the city to the countryside, where it is easier to raise a family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Africa, ethnic cleansing plagued the nations of Rwanda (where the Tutsi minority was slaughtered by the Hutu majority) and in the Middle East, where the nomadic Kurds have been persecuted by Turks, Iranians and, most recently, Iraqis.  The former Yugoslavia has also been accused of ethnic cleansing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
International, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) formed in the 1960s to combat human rights abuses.  The most prominent is Amnesty International, which has sought release of political prisoners and also opposed use of the death penalty.  Sometimes these groups can obtain publicity and world pressure more effectively than governments can.  But these groups are often biased in what they complain about, and rarely publicize human rights abuses by communist or Islamic governments.  The persecution of Christians is unlikely to generate any outrage by NGOs or the press, unless (as in Afghanistan) the persecution is an embarrassment to Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Nations issued a Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.  It included in basic human rights “life, liberty, and security of person.”  In the United States, Rev. Martin Luther King led a movement in the 1950s and 1960s to establish civil rights for African Americans.  There were many protests and arrests, and Rev. King himself spent time in jail at one point.  But he and his supporters overcame the opposition and established equal rights regardless of race.  Ever since, virtually every other movement has attempted to claim authority based on this major civil rights movement.  Yet some movements today that claim to be civil rights movements actually conflict with Rev. King’s own Christian goals.  For example, Rev. King spoke out against the black Muslim movement, but he is almost never quoted for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public praise of Christian human rights workers is also rare.  An exception was in 1979, when the Nobel Prize committee broke from its own tradition and gave an award to an outwardly religious woman, Mother Teresa of Calcutta, India.  She was recognized for her work on behalf of the sick and poor of India.  When the government of India announced its intention to tax her award, thereby preventing her from contributing it to her work, an international outcry caused the Indian government to allow her to receive her award tax-free.  When Mother Teresa died in 1997, Indians gave her a funeral with full military honors!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the present day, genocide against native Africans in the Darfur region is one of the greatest human rights violations in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ramadan&amp;diff=771179</id>
		<title>Ramadan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ramadan&amp;diff=771179"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T19:32:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tilestar.gif|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ramadan''' (Arabic: رمضان, Ramaḍān) Ramadan is an [[Islamic]] religious observance that takes place during the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, when the [[Qur'an]] was revealed. It is considered the most venerated and blessed month of the [[Islam]]ic year. Lasting for the entire month, Muslims [[fast]] and abstain from [[sex]]ual relations during the daylight hours and in the evening eat small meals and visit with friends and family.&lt;br /&gt;
In some sects, drinking water is allowed during the day. It is a time of introspection, contemplation, worship, and a time to strengthen ties, both of the family and community. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://holidays.net/ramadan/ Ramadan on the Net]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During Ramadan, it is common for Muslims to go to the Masjid ([[mosque]]) and spend several hours praying and studying the Qur'an, in quiet contemplation or synchronous chanting.&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of Ramadan, 'Bakri Eid' is celebrated. Celebrations centre around the sacrifice of goats, that are then consumed during the celebrations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[World History Lecture Five]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Muhammad]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arab American]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://holidays.net/ramadan/story.htm The Fast of Ramadan]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://ramadan.com.au/2007/ Ramadan Awareness Campaign 2007 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;diff=771178</id>
		<title>Islam</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;diff=771178"/>
		<updated>2010-04-21T19:28:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Islam''' is a [[monotheism|monotheistic]] [[Abrahamic religion]] based on the teachings of [[Muhammad]], a seventh century [[Arab]] merchant, prophet and the founder of the religion.  The word &amp;quot;Islam&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;submission&amp;quot; (to Allah) in [[Arabic language|Arabic]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A follower of Islam is called a &amp;quot;[[Muslim]]&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Moslem&amp;quot;, a term which means &amp;quot;one who submits (to God)&amp;quot;. The older terms &amp;quot;Mohammedan&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Muhammedan&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;follower of Muhammad&amp;quot;), is offensive and has fallen out of use.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Additional archaic terms for Muslims include &amp;quot;Hagarene&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Saracen&amp;quot;. Saracen as a term for muslims was limited to the crusade era, although it makes frequent re-appearances in pre-modern polemics. Hagarene was a more common term in pre-modern works, as it denotes the biblical connection of Hagar the mother of Ishmael who is reported as the patriarch of Islam. Additional names for Muslims in pre-modern and Medieval works are generally derived from misspellings.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theology==&lt;br /&gt;
There are no clergy, but there are religious teachers, or Imams, who have their followings.  All Muslims follow the teachings of Muhammad, whom they believe to be [[God]]'s (&amp;quot;Allah&amp;quot;, '''الله''' in [[Arabic]]) last and greatest [[prophet]]. The teachings of Muhammad are transmitted through the [[Qur'an]], the Hadith, and the Sunnah. The Sunnah is a general term for &amp;quot;the life and doings of the Prophet&amp;quot;, which all Muslims are called on to replicate. The faith teaches that the Archangel [[Gabriel]] appeared to Muhammad in a cave reciting verbatim a revelation from Allah. The first word that Gabriel says to Muhammad is &amp;quot;Iqra&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Recite/Poclaim&amp;quot;,which is found in the 96th Sura of the Qur'an.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslims believe that God revealed the Qur'an (or Koran) to Muhammad. The key miracle of Islam comes from the historical condition of the illiterate and uneducated Muhammad, as the Qur'an is composed in an erudite and complex form of Arabic prose and poetry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created- Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood: Proclaim! And thy Lord is Most Bountiful,- He Who taught (the use of) the pen,- Taught man that which he knew not.(Surah 96:1-5)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Qur'an was not written down in a systemised fashion until a decade after Muhammad died, preferable transmission being through oral recenscion.The Qur'an is considered to be the pure and holy word of God, uncreated and eternal. In Islamic theology the term uncreated is very important, as it implies that there is no author for the Qur'an, only the delivering ot the word to Muhammad who delivered it to the Sahab and the Salaf (The Companions and the Pure), who delivered it to the scribe delegated to record it in the reign of the Caliph Uthman bin Affan. &lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
Like [[Christianity]] and [[Judaism]], Islam originated in the [[Middle East]].  Islam traces its roots back to [[Abraham]]. Like Christianity and Judaism, Islam originated in the Middle East. Islam claims to trace its roots back to Abraham through his son Ishmael. Muslims do not believe that Muhammad was the founder of Islam, rather that he restored the original faith of Abraham and the prophets that followed as recorded in the lost books of the Tawrat and Injil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based upon this belief, the Bible, Old and New Testament, is believed to have become corrupted through the translations and misinterpretations accumulated over several millenia. The criticism of the Torah centers around the reconstruction of the existing Biblical text required after the &amp;quot;Babylonian captivity&amp;quot;. The criticism of the New Testament centers in the many disputed gnostic texts which contradict the orthodox biblical canon. Interestingly, Islamic jurisprudence accepts that the Injil was complete and whole up until the revelation of Muhammad. Therefore there is some inconsistency in the claims made against the New Testament. For more information, see [[The Bible versus the Qur'an]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mecca.jpg|thumb|right|300px|[[Mecca]], one of the holy cities of Islam.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Today==&lt;br /&gt;
Islam is the worlds second largest religion, with over 1.6 billion followers, the number of Muslims is rapidly growing, mainly due to conversions, highbirth rates, and redefinitions of the term 'Muslim'. Conversions to Christianity (from ''any'' faith or lack thereof) outnumber those to Islam, but cannot keep up with the birthrate discrepancy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bible.ca/global-religion-statistics-world-christian-encyclopedia.htm World Christian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles6/AlJazeerahAfrica.php Translation of AL-Jazeerah interview between Maher Abdallah and Shiekh Ahmed Katani]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only a small extremist sect of Muslims participate in this activity, using the concept of &amp;quot;[[Jihad]]&amp;quot; (Holy War), to justify their actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Background==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[History of the Muslim World]] or [[History of Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Islamic belief, in approximately 610 A.D., [[Muhammad]], a 40-year-old merchant of the Quraysh tribe in [[Mecca]], located in the Hijaz (now eastern [[Saudi Arabia]]), was commanded by the angel [[Gabriel]] (or Jibreel) to &amp;quot;recite&amp;quot; the message of [[Allah]] (Arabic for God). Gabriel said mankind had lost sight of Allah's previous messages to earlier prophets, [[Adam]], [[Noah]], [[Abraham]], [[Moses]], [[Solomon]], and [[Jesus]], among others, and that Muhammad was to spread Allah's message to all people so that mankind would know how to live, how to show respect for Allah, and how to prepare for the judgment day. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The message to Muhammad was to be God's last and fullest revelation, a direct copy of the Umm Al Khitab, the mother of all books located in heaven next to God; Muhammad was the &amp;quot;seal of the prophets.&amp;quot; Muhammad won some converts to Islam in his local area, but his [[monotheist]] preaching threatened to undermine the profitable [[polytheist]] pilgrim traffic supporting many Meccan merchants. In 622 A.D., the merchants drove Muhammad and his followers out of Mecca to the city of Yathrib (later renamed [[Medina]], or the city - as in the city of the prophet). This flight (hijra) from Mecca to Medina marks the beginning of the Muslim lunar calendar, and is celebrated each year in the Hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muhammad's forces, composed of the sahaba (companions) from Mecca ,and the Ansar (allied tribes from Yathrib) started attacking the trade caravans going in and out of Mecca, cutting off its economic lifeline.  After a series of battles between the Meccans and Muhammad's forces, Mecca finally accepted Muhammad's ultimatum to succumb and convert to Islam.  The city welcomed the prophet back in 630. Muhammad died in 632.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Islam750.jpg|thumb|590px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tribal elders in a traditional council called the &amp;quot;Shura&amp;quot; elected [[Abu Bakr]] to be Muhammad's successor, or [[Caliph]] (Khalifa). Abu Bakr united the tribes of the Arabian peninsula during his two years as head of the new faith. Upon his death, the elders elected [[Umar ibn al-Khattab]] the next Caliph. During Umar's ten year reign, Islam invaded and spread through conquest and negotiation into [[Egypt]], [[Syria]], [[Palestine]], [[Iraq]], and parts of [[Iran]]. Umar was assassinated by a Persian (modern day Iran) in 644, and was succeeded by [[Uthman ibn Affan]], who continued the invasions to spread Islam into [[North Africa]], [[Cyprus]], the rest of Iran, [[Afghanistan]], and parts of [[India]] and [[Pakistan]]. Over the next two centuries, Islamic armies continued to expanded Islam's empire into sub-Saharan Africa, [[Spain]], South-east and Central Asia, and [[Turkey]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Muslim armies conquered and superseded the ancient Sassanid and Byzantine empires which had ruled before. Within a generation of Muhammad's death Muslim armies occupied an empire stretching from the Nile river to the far off Iranian province of khorasan. Reasons for the rapid conquest are varied and obscure. The Arab armies were more akin to tribal war bands raiding and settling where and when they could. The Byzantine and Sassanid empires had been at war for centuries. The constant simmering conflict between Constantinople and Persia reached a climax in the early 7th century. The Sassanids conquered briefly Egypt and the Levant threatening the central Byzantine heartland of Anatolia. Under the military reforms of the emperor Heraclius, the Byzantine army consolidated and counter attacked, recapturing all that they had lost and capturing the Sassanian capital of Ctesiphon in 628. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This brief end of the Roman-Persian wars disrupted the frontier areas which had predicated their economies on raiding and mercenary activities. Two major areas in Arabia were directly affected. The Lackmid tribe and the Gassanid tribe both acted as mercenaries for the Persians and Romans. The official religion of both tribes analogically mirrored that of their overseers. Monophysite Christianity was common, particularly of the Jacobite sect. The death of Muhammad and the subsequent Ridda wars occupied these warrior tribes until the reign of Caliph Umar. Additionally, there was great religious unrest in the levant and Egypt. These areas resented the ruinous taxes and the harsh orthodoxy imposed by the emperor in Constantinople. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The same climate was present in the Sassanid realm with the rise of the dualism of the Manicheans. Under the Caliph Umar ,the Arab tribes which had concluded the infighting following the death of Muhammad were allowed to raid into the Byzantine and Sassanid fronteirs. The weakened state of both regimes from both military and economic exhaustion and religious unrest made them fertile picking grounds for the tribal warbands. The Arabs were chiefly successful in holding these areas in that they upheld a lightweight regime of low taxes based in the Islamic laws and distant government. Rather than employing an army of bureaucrats and nobility, the early Arab empire was more favorable towards maintaining the existing government structures under the leadership of Arab tribes. In this atmosphere it is hardly surprising to note the reports from both Muslim and Christian sources of peaceful capitulation and invitation of the invading forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divisions Within Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
Uthman was assassinated in 656 A.D. by soldiers who then installed Ali ibn Abu Talib, Muhammad's son-in-law, as [[Caliph]]. Ali's followers believed Muhammad had chosen Ali to be Muhammad's heir, and had disagreed with the selections of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman as Caliphs. Ali's claim to the position was challenged by Muawiyah, a kinsman of the murdered Uthman. Five years later, Ali was assassinated by Kharjites, religious dissidents who broke away from the main body of Muslims because they rejected Ali's accepting arbitration to resolve his leadership dispute with Muawiyah. Ali's supporters, or the Shiah al-Ali (or Shiat Ali, partisans of Ali) believed that Ali was the true Caliph and was, in part, divinely inspired. Ali's sons, Hassan and Husayn followed as [[Shia]] Caliphs, Hassan dying in 669 or 670 A.D., possibly by poisoning, and Husayn slain by soldiers of his rival, the [[Sunni]] Caliph Yazid, in 680 A.D. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Shia Muslim community has divided further as followers coalesced around several of Ali's descendants or successors, called [[Imam]]s. The &amp;quot;twelvers,&amp;quot; predominant in Iran, believe the twelfth Imam is in hiding and will reveal himself just before judgement day. Ismailis rejected the seventh Imam and practice a spirituality that seeks hidden meaning in scripture. Ismailis ruled much of [[North Africa]] as the [[Fatimid Dynasty]] of [[Egypt]] in the tenth through the twelfth centuries, and today are found primarily in [[Pakistan]], [[Afghanistan]], and [[India]]. The Sunni majority reject the premise that men can be divine, including Muhammad, Ali, or Jesus, and did not accept any of the Imams who followed Ali. Sunnis remain more committed to traditions and less inclined to accept Shia mysticism. Today, about 15% of the world's Muslims are Shia and 85% are orthodox Sunni. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are other factions within Islam. Sufis, a name possibly derived from the wool garments they wear, developed around mystical practices and trance-induced revelations. Sufis are found today in [[Turkey]], [[Syria]], and parts of [[Africa]]. Other movements have taken reform tracks, such as the Unitarians of [[Saudi Arabia]], also called [[Wahhabi]]s after their 18th century reformist founder Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab. The conservative Wahhabis are found today in Saudi Arabia and [[Qatar]]. Today the Wahhabi line has a tendency to produce extremists, such as [[Osama Bin Laden]]. Some critics would argue that the [[Taliban]] of Afghanistan took conservative reform to an extreme. Other sects or break-away groups include, among others, the Alawis found in Syria and Turkey, the [[Druze]] in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Israel, the Ibadhis (Kharjites) in Oman and Africa, the Ahmadiya of Pakistan, and the Zaydis of Yemen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Guidance==&lt;br /&gt;
During his lifetime, Muhammad's companions learned and later transcribed the verses (surrahs) of the Qur'an as Muhammad spoke them. In Islam, the teachings of Mohammed were believed to be direct divine revelation from God. Some utterances that Mohammed was unsure about, dubbed the Satanic verses, would later be incorporated in a novel in modern times by [[Salman Rushdie]] who would then be subject to a death degree from the leader of Iran for his writing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third Caliph, Uthman, collected and codified the various versions of the surrahs into one written Qur'an that became the standard Arabic text used by the world's Muslims today.  The Qur'an is longer than the Bible and written in general order of longest chapters to shortest rather than in any order of when they were spoken, sometimes making the work appear to be confusing. In all there are 114 chapters. Most of the later recorded sayings of Mohammed, which were also more warlike, actually appear earlier in the text.  Present-day Muslims look first to the Qur'an as a guide to life, then to the [[Sunnah]], or the way of the Prophet (his life as an example for others) as recorded by his early companions, and then to the [[Hadith]], a collection of the Prophet's sayings, comments, advice, and descriptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequently, Muslims disagreed over how to interpret certain passages in the Qur'an, the Sunnah, or the Hadith in their search for the ideal life and perfect path to heaven. From these interpretations Sunni Muslims developed four schools of law, or interpretations of law, named after their founders or early leaders: the Hanbali, considered the most strict school and predominant today in Saudi Arabia; Shafi, the school of widest acceptance, found in Egypt, parts of Palestine-Syria, south Arabia, and the Far East; Maliki, prevalent in North Africa, Sudan, and Nigeria; and Hanafi, considered the most moderate school, predominant in Ottoman Turkey and today found primarily on the Levant and Indian subcontinent. Frequently, Muslim countries have two separate legal systems, one for civil, criminal, or commercial law, and a second, and separate, system for religious law. Religious courts and their judges (qadis) might handle issues dealing with marriage, divorce, child custody, inheritance, religious education, charitable or religious property (Waqf), or family matters. Among Middle Eastern countries, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen have Shariah courts serving alongside their secular courts or have adopted [[Sharia]]h (Islamic law) as the basis of their legal systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Clergy====&lt;br /&gt;
Sunni Islam does not have a priesthood or clerical hierarchy to conduct religious services or interpret scripture, but it does have prayer leaders, called Imams, and religious scholars, called Ulama, who often are educated men familiar with the Qur'an and able to offer commentaries on Qur'anic verses. Sunni Muslims also respect the teachings and interpretations of scholars, judges, and academics who may interpret laws, write treatises on Sharia (religious law) or Hadith, and issue Fatwas, religious declarations intended to enlighten or guide Muslims. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shia Islam has a hierarchy that resembles a priesthood. Mullahs are prayer leaders, but usually do not interpret religious law. Mujtahids are religious scholars who may interpret law or passages from the Qur'an or Hadith. The lower order of Mujtahids are called Hojjatolislam. Ayat Allah (literally sign of God, also Ayatollah) is a higher order of Mujtahid who may issue Fatwas, or religious edicts, in addition to leading Islamic schools, interpreting religious law and the Qur'an, and offering sermons or discourses on proper Islamic behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Five Pillars of Islam===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Shahadah (Profession of Faith)''' -The Shahadah is the Muslim profession of faith. 'ašhadu 'al-lā ilāha illā-llāhu wa 'ašhadu 'anna muħammadan rasūlu-llāh, a loose English translation reads &amp;quot;''There is none worthy of worship except God, and [[Muhammad]] is the messenger of God''&amp;quot; This testament can be seen as the foundation of all of the other tenets of Islam.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[Salat]] (Ritual Prayer)''' -All Muslims are required to Pray to God five times each day while facing [[Mecca]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Zakat (Charity)'''  Able Muslims must donate to the poor based on the wealth one has accumulated. In current usage it is interpreted as 2.5% of the value of most valuables and savings held for a full [[lunar year]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sawm (Fasting)''' All able-bodied Muslims (children, the elderly, and the ill are exempt) must fast during daylight hours during the daylight hours of the entire month of [[Ramadan]]. According to Muslims, this purifies the body and soul. Some Muslim sects allow military, police and emergency services personnel to receive an exemption from fasting from an imam, on the grounds that their work supports the community or national good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Hajj (Pilgrimage)''' All able-bodied Muslims must make a pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in their lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Aspects of Islam==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Quran.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Pages from the Qur'an, the holy book of the Islamic religion.]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Jihad====&lt;br /&gt;
Jihad is the &amp;quot;effort&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;struggle&amp;quot; each Muslim faces in the everyday trials of life, such as the effort to get better grades in school, or the striving to achieve better results from a job, or the struggle to avoid sinful temptations. Jihad also can be applied to warfare; participating in jihad in Allah's cause was the third most important good deed listed in the Hadith, after prayer and honoring one's parents. Jihad often was a rallying cry for the military spread of Islam in the seventh through tenth centuries against non-Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Osama bin Laden and Fundamentalists====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Osama bin Laden]], a follower of a particular brand of Islam popular in Saudi Arabia, has stated that Islam is at war with the United States and its allies. Some observers maintain that the number of Muslims who believe as bin Laden does is growing, and others go further to suggest that all &amp;quot;fundamentalist&amp;quot; Muslims are enemies of the West. But other observers differentiate between conservative &amp;quot;fundamentalists&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;extremists&amp;quot; who follow bin Laden or other terrorists. These observers suggest that the fundamentalists disagree with bin Laden as much as do Westerners.  It is hard to know the truth.  Many westerners are still haunted by the images of cheering crowds dancing in the streets when the 9/11 attacks were announced and were disappointed at the lack of prominent condemnation of the attack from Islamic circles worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====People of the Book====&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Jews are called &amp;quot;people of the Book&amp;quot; in the Qur'an and are considered earlier forerunners to Islam and viewed as brothers as long as they pay an extra tax when under Islamic rule.  Islam, tracing its roots back to Abraham through his son Ishmael instead of Isaac as the Jews did, believes that they are the descendants of God's promise.  Islam believes that both the Old and New Testament were corrupted and corrected by the Qur'an, but there is still an earlier link between the three religions.  The view of Jews and Christians varied within different parts of the Qur'an and Islamic history.  Much of current Islamic culture, even in places that were once very tolerant such as Egypt, has seen an upsurge in persecution and violence against Christians and Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Women in Islam====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In pre-Islamic times women's rights were defined by tribal laws which differed amongst the tribes. Some women had absolute equity and the ability to hold power, some women were treated worse than chattel, bride prices, unlimited polygamy, and female infanticide were a common theme. Islamic law gave women rights they had never had in the ancient world; namely, inheritance, ownership, legal standing (however dminished it is in Sharia law), education rights, and the ability to divorce.   That was over a thousand years ago and there has been little progress since.  The reality of traditional Sharia law as applied in the modern era has shocked the modern conscience. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Linda Rae Bennett, ''Women, Islam and Modernity'' (2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women are treated as inferiors to men. For example, women are required to &amp;quot;... draw their outer garments around them ... that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not annoyed (by men).&amp;quot; (Qur'an 33:59) Covering the head and body in public (hijab) is imposed as a protection of female status.  Hijab is applied in different ways: a small scarf around the head and western street clothes may be acceptable in Cairo or Damascus but a full length opaque [[Burqa]] was enforced in Taliban Afghanistan. The treatment of women may depend upon rural or urban settings, educational level, society norms, tradition, or other factors. As of 2008, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are the only two Middle Eastern countries where the government requires women to wear some form of restrictive garb.  [[Honor killing]] is winked at.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamic dress is a regular grounds for conflict in multicultural education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Treatment of women varies widely by country. In the Islamic state of Saudi Arabia women are forbidden from driving a car, traveling in public without their husband or a male family member as an escort, leaving their home without wearing Islamic dress, working or voting. Though not formally forbidden from owning property, they have no way of obtaining this as work is forbidden and only males are permitted to inherit - should a man die, his brothers, sons and father will all inherit before his wife. These restrictions are part of the criminal law of the country, and enforced by the police and a special Islamic office. Pakistan has similar restrictions, but to a lesser extent. In contrast, Turkey has a majority Muslim population yet still grants women rights near-equal to those of men including property ownership, employment, and education to university level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslim apologists suggest the extremely repressive policies of countries such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are cultural rather than religious, though these are the countries were traditional Islam is strongest. They point to the more moderate Islam practiced in Turkey as a demonstration that Islam and womens' rights are compatible, ignoring the efforts of traditionalists in Turkey  to end the freedoms women enjoy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Muslim women's status is controversial. Some critics claim that Muslim men control and oppress Muslim women by compelling them to remain hidden behind the veil, sequestered in the home, and ignorant of the world by denying them access to education and worldly opportunities. Defenders of some practices suggest that many of them, such as the veil, are cultural traditions that pre-date Islam and are intended to protect women from predatory men. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem====&lt;br /&gt;
Muhammad's home city of Mecca was the site of his earliest preaching and conversions, and is the location of the Kaaba, traditionally held to be the foundation stone of the first mosque built by Adam and later restored by Abraham, and now the focus of the annual pilgrimage (hajj). Some historians suggest that the Kaaba, a black stone probably meteoric in origin, was venerated by pre-Islamic polytheistic religions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first, Jerusalem was Islam's holy city and the focus of prayers, but Mecca became the center of Islam after Muhammad's return in 630. Medina, because of its early association with Muhammad and as the site of Muhammad's tomb, is second in importance to Mecca. Jerusalem is revered by Muslims as the site of Solomon's temple, Abraham's near sacrifice of his son Ishmael, and the scene of Muhammad's miraculous midnight journey, the latter two now enshrined in the [[Dome of the Rock]] mosque. According to the Qur'an (Surrah 17:1, Isra) and Hadith, Muhammad and Gabriel were taken on winged mules from Mecca to Jerusalem, where they ascended through the seven heavens to the presence of Allah. During the visit, Muhammad learned, among other points, that Muslims were to pray five times each day and to honor Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the other prophets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Restrictions====&lt;br /&gt;
Observant Muslims are not supposed to eat pork and in general do not have dogs as pets; both swine and canines are considered unclean. Muslims are proscribed from drinking alcoholic beverages. Observant Muslims do not collect interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Non-Muslim Practices====&lt;br /&gt;
Some practices have been associated with Islam because they occur in Islamic countries, but actually are not a part of Islam. For example, female circumcision is not mentioned in the Qur'an, but is mentioned in Hadith as an &amp;quot;honorable&amp;quot; but not obligatory condition. It is a pre-Islamic tradition in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab world, notably in Eritrea, Yemen, and Egypt. Another example of a practice that has been associated incorrectly with Islam is [[honor killing]], in which a brother, father, or uncle &amp;quot;restores&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;defends&amp;quot; a family's honor by killing the sister, daughter, or niece that dishonored the family through unmarried pregnancy or promiscuous behavior. The &amp;quot;honor killing&amp;quot; is more ancient and possibly tribalistic pagan in origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Islam and Christianity==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Dhimma]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Muslims do not believe Jesus to be the Son of God or in the resurrection, they consider him and his mother to be of God's most important prophets (Marian and Isa) otherwise known as Mary and Jesus. However, the Qur'an warns against worshipping Jesus, Muhammad, and other humans for fear of [[idolatry]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ccg.org/_domain/ccg.org/Islam/Islam.htm Christian Churches of God Articles on Islam], March 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Qur'an states that non-believers will be punished, though the nature of the punishment is not specified (same as similar statements in the Bible and the Torah):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Surely, disbelievers are those who said: &lt;br /&gt;
'Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).' But there is no god but One, Allah. &lt;br /&gt;
And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will they not repent to Allah and ask His Forgiveness? For Allah is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Messiah , son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a Siddiqah (i.e. she believed in the words of God and His Books ). &lt;br /&gt;
They both used to eat food (as any other human eat). &lt;br /&gt;
Look how We make the signs clear to them, yet look how they are deluded away (from the truth).&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
::(Qur'an 5:73-75)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Islam does recognize Christians and Jews as &amp;quot;people of the book&amp;quot; since both refer to one God only, and recognize Abraham (Ibrahim in Arabic) as a founding prophet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Islam and Paganism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Muslims profess belief in a single [[God]], some believe Islam has its roots in an earlier polytheistic system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By this thinking God is linked to an earlier moon deity, although it should be brought up that there is no mention of this in the Qur'an, where Allah is cited as the God of [[Abraham]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Qur'an, Sura 37 [http://www.amazon.com/Holy-Quran-Allamah-Nooruddin/dp/0963206702]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abramahov, &amp;quot;Islamic Theology&amp;quot;. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, 1988. [http://www.amazon.com/Islamic-Theology-Binyamin-Abrahamov/dp/0748611029/sr=8-4/qid=1172042917/ref=pd_bbs_sr_4/105-1837174-2630046?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sharia==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:StarCresent.png|thumb|right|220px|The Star and Crescent is a symbol of Islam. It is featured in the national flag of [[Algeria]], [[Azerbaijan]], [[Malaysia]], [[Tunisia]], [[Mauritania]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Turkey]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Sharia]] is the body of Islamic law. The term means &amp;quot;way&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;path&amp;quot;; it is the legal framework within which public and some private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Muslim principles of jurisprudence. It is not actually part of the canonical Qur'an; that is to say, it is not believed to be the direct word of God by Muslims, but rather the interpretation of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sharia deals with many aspects of day-to-day life, including politics, economics, banking, business law, contract law, sexuality, marriage, divorce, and social issues. Some Islamic scholars accept Sharia as the body of precedent and legal theory established before the 19th century, while other scholars view Sharia as a changing body, and include Islamic legal theory from the contemporary period.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sharia law is used in many modern Islamic theocracies and prescribes very harsh treatments for acts, that, in the western world, are relatively minor. For example, under sharia law, converting from Islam is punishable by death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ntpi.org/html/whyoppose.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Terminology==&lt;br /&gt;
Additional archaic terms for Muslims include , but are not limited to, &amp;quot;Hagarene&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Saracen&amp;quot;. The term Hagarene was more common in post-crusade Europe as it made specific reference to the biblical mother of Ishmael. Ishmael in the Muslim faith plays an analogous theological role to Isaac.{{citation needed}} Muslims do not use it today to avoid confusing worship of [[Muhammad]] with worship of [[Allah]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schimmel, (1992)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ex-Muslims==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michelle Malkin]] highlights a group of Ex-Muslims hoping to change the terms of debate about Islam in Europe. Maryam Namazie, the head of the British group said &amp;quot;Too many things in the media and government policies have been geared to pandering to the political Islamic movements and Islamic organizations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://michellemalkin.com/2007/06/20/ex-muslims-stand-up-in-britain/ Ex-Muslims stand up in Britain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Some of the text for this article was taken from &amp;quot;Islam: A Primer&amp;quot;, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (2003), a work in the public domain''  [http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/islam.htm#back] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Africa islam 87.jpg|thumb|Islam in Africa]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arab American]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Islamic republic]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Qur'an]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ramadan]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Armour, Rollin. ''Islam, Christianity, and the West: A Troubled History'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Islam-Christianity-West-Troubled-History/dp/1570754071/ref=sr_1_32?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342713&amp;amp;sr=1-32 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Armstrong, Karen.  ''Islam: A Short History''  (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Islam-History-Modern-Library-Chronicles/dp/081296618X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342302&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Berkey, Jonathan P. ''The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600-1800'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Formation-Islam-Religion-Society-600-1800/dp/0521588138/ref=sr_1_27?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342713&amp;amp;sr=1-27 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Campo, Juan Eduardo.  ''Encyclopedia of Islam'' (2009), basic introduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Esposito, John J. ''The Oxford History of Islam'' (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-History-Islam-John-Esposito/dp/0195107993/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342302&amp;amp;sr=1-6 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Glasse, Cyril. ''The New Encyclopedia of Islam'' ( 2nd ed. 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lewis, Bernard. ''Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East'' (2001), by leading conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Islam-History-People-Events-Middle/dp/0812695186/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342525&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Martin, Richard C. et al. ''Encyclopedia of Islam &amp;amp; the Muslim World'' (2003), more advanced&lt;br /&gt;
* Newby, Gordon. ''A Concise Encyclopedia of Islam'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Concise-Encyclopedia-Islam-Gordon-Newby/dp/1851682953/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342942&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Robinson, Chase F. ed. ''The New Cambridge History of Islam'' (Volume 1) (2009), summarizes advanced scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
* Ruthven, Malise, and Azim Nanji. ''Historical Atlas of Islam'' (2004) &lt;br /&gt;
* Schimmel, Annemarie. ''Islam: An Introduction''. (1992)&lt;br /&gt;
* Sonn, Tamara and Mary Williamsburg. ''A Brief History of Islam'' (2004) [http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-Blackwell-Histories-Religion/dp/1405109009/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342302&amp;amp;sr=1-12 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wheatcroft, Andrew. ''Infidels: A History of the Conflict Between Christendom and Islam'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Infidels-History-Conflict-Between-Christendom/dp/0812972392/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1259342525&amp;amp;sr=1-13 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://muslim-canada.org/islam_christianity.html Islam and Christianity] - excellent article comparing and contrasting the two.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/ Qur'an online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/ Sahih Bukhari (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muslim/ Sahih Muslim (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/abudawud/ Sunan Abu-Dawud (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/muwatta/ Malik's Muwatta  (Hadith collection) online in English]&lt;br /&gt;
* Congressional Research Service,  &amp;quot;Islam: A Primer&amp;quot;, Report for Congress (2003), a work in the public domain and the source of part of this article [http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/islam.htm#back]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oscar_Wilde&amp;diff=685325</id>
		<title>Oscar Wilde</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Oscar_Wilde&amp;diff=685325"/>
		<updated>2009-07-21T16:47:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Ngcfht.jpg|right|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Oscar Wilde''' (1854 – 1900) was an [[Ireland|Irish]] poet, novelist, and writer of plays and short stories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His father was a surgeon and founder of a hospital in Dublin, and his mother was a writer who was active in the early movement for women's rights. Wilde studied at Trinity College, Dublin, and Magdalen College, Oxford, receiving his BA in 1878.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilde married Constance Lloyd in 1884, and they had two sons, but the relationship ended in 1893. Wilde then had a romantic relationship with Lord Alfred Douglas, which eventually led to a conviction for &amp;quot;gross indecency&amp;quot; in 1895 for which he was sentenced to two years hard labor. He later wrote ''The Ballad of [[Reading]] Gaol'' and ''De Profundis'' about his experiences in prison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilde died in 1900, three years after his release from prison. In the past he was thought to have died of syphilis, but more recent studies by Dr Ashley Robins of the University of Cape Town in South Africa report that he died of meningoencephalitis, following a serious ear infection. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://classiclit.about.com/cs/profileswriters/p/aa_oscarwilde.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wilde's Sexuality==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilde's sexual orientation has been debated over the years and some considered him as either [[bisexual]], [[homosexual]], and even pederastic. Wilde himself believed that he belonged to a culture of male love inspired by the Greek pederastic tradition, through his association with the Uranians. This tradition believed that it was an adult male's duty to bring boys into manhood via sexuality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In describing his own sexual identity, Wilde used the term Socratic. He may have had significant sexual relationships with Frank Miles, Constance Lloyd (Wilde's wife), Robert Baldwin Ross, and Lord Alfred Douglas. Wilde also had numerous sexual encounters with working-class male youths, who were often called rent boys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilde was a well-known playwright and celebrity, and is still renowned for his wit today. Some of his lines, such as the following from ''The Picture of Dorian Gray'', are still often quoted: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written or badly written.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other memorable lines, from &amp;quot;The Critic as Artist&amp;quot;, include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The public is wonderfully tolerant. It forgives everything except genius.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;A little sincerity is a dangerous thing, and a great deal of it is absolutely fatal.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;There is no sin except stupidity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...nothing worth knowing can be taught.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilde's most frequently produced play is the high comedy ''The Importance of Being Earnest''. It includes such gems as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;London society is full of women of the very highest birth who have, of their own free choice, remained thirty-five for years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Modern life would be very tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete impossibility!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Works of Oscar Wilde==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plays===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lady Windermere's Fan (1892) &lt;br /&gt;
* Salomé (French version) (1893, first performed in Paris 1896) &lt;br /&gt;
* A Woman of No Importance (1893) &lt;br /&gt;
* An Ideal Husband (1895)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Importance of Being Earnest (1895)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vera; or, The Nihilists (1880)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Duchess of Padua (1883) &lt;br /&gt;
* Salomé: A Tragedy in One Act: Translated from the French of Oscar Wilde by Lord Alfred Douglas with Illustrations by Aubrey Beardsley (1894) &lt;br /&gt;
* La Sainte Courtisane and A Florentine Tragedy Fragmentary. First published 1908 in Methuen's Collected Works &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Dates are dates of first performance, which approximate better with the probable date of composition than dates of publication)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Poetry===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Ravenna (1878) &lt;br /&gt;
* Poems (1881) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Sphinx (1894) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prose===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Canterville Ghost (1887) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Happy Prince and Other Stories (1888, fairy tales) &lt;br /&gt;
* Lord Arthur Savile's Crime and Other Stories (1891) &lt;br /&gt;
* Intentions (1891, critical dialogues and essays) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891, Wilde's only novel) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Soul of Man under Socialism (First published in the Pall Mall Gazette, 1891, first book publication 1904) &lt;br /&gt;
* De Profundis (1905) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Rise of Historical Criticism (published in incomplete form 1905 and completed form in 1908) &lt;br /&gt;
* The Letters of Oscar Wilde (1960) This was rereleased in 2000, with letters uncovered since 1960, and new, detailed, footnotes by Merlin Holland. &lt;br /&gt;
* Teleny or The Reverse of the Medal (Paris, 1893) has been attributed to Wilde, but was more likely a combined effort by a several of Wilde's friends, which he may have edited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In Popular Culture==&lt;br /&gt;
The content-free encyclopedia, [[Uncyclopedia]] worships Wilde as ''His Majestic and All-Holy Wildeliness, The Right Honourable &amp;amp; Very Reverend Doctor, Imperial Dark Lord of the Sith, the Hero of Time.....and &amp;quot;Macho Commando&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Humanistic aestheticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors|Wilde, Oscar]] [[Category: Homosexuals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=431675</id>
		<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=431675"/>
		<updated>2008-04-15T20:32:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler7.JPG|right|300px|thumb|Adolf Hitler, giving a hint as to the violence to come.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Adolf Hitler''' was the Austrian-born Chancellor and President of [[Germany]] from January 30, 1933 until his death on April 30, 1945.  He was also the leader (German: ''Der Führer'') of the National Socialist German Workers Party (''National-sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'', or Nazi Party) which gained political power through threat, intimidation, and outright violence throughout Germany in the aftermath of the First World War. Hitler’s extreme [[right wing]] beliefs resulted in the mass extermination of the [[Jews]], Gypsies, [[homosexual]]s, [[communist]]s and [[leftist]]s, and other “inferior” peoples throughout central and eastern [[Europe]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler was born on April 20, 1889, in Braunau am Inn, [[Austria]].  Hitler's father, Alois (born 1837), was a customs official who was himself born illegitimate, carrying for a time his mother's name, Schicklgruber. By 1876 he had his baptismal entry corrected in his church records, establishing his father as Johan Heidler, which was altered slightly to Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When his father retired the family moved to Linz, Austria, where it remained a favorite for young Adolf for the rest of his life, and where he gave his wish to be buried.  When Alois died in 1903 he left enough of a pension to support his wife and children; Adolf would take his and live off of it in Vienna after leaving school, dreaming of becoming an artist.  Although somewhat competent as a painter of landscapes and architecture, his renderings of humans were considered “lifeless” and “crude” by the standards of the Academy of Fine Arts, and his application was rejected twice.  Remaining in [[Vienna]], he moved from one cheap flop house to another, painting postcards and advertisements to earn a meager living after his allowance had dried up.  By then he had developed traits which characterized his life as a whole: secretiveness, loneliness, a Spartan mode of everyday life, and a hatred of the cosmopolitan, multinational character that was the makeup of Vienna. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Who And What He Was==&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote famously, and most eloquently about Hitler in 1998:'''  &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At the same time that he terrorized his adversaries, he knew how to please, impress and charm the very interlocutors from whom he wanted support. Diplomats and journalists insist as much on his charm as they do on his temper tantrums. The savior admired by his own as he dragged them into his madness, the Satan and exterminating angel feared and hated by all others, Hitler led his people to a shameful defeat without precedent. That his political and strategic ambitions have created a dividing line in the history of this turbulent and tormented century is undeniable: there is a before and an after. By the breadth of his crimes, which have attained a quasi-ontological dimension, he surpasses all his predecessors: as a result of Hitler, man is defined by what makes him inhuman. With Hitler at the head of a gigantic laboratory, life itself seems to have changed. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
How did this Austrian without title or position manage to get himself elected head of a German nation renowned for its civilizing mission? How to explain the success of his cheap demagogy in the heart of a people so proud of having inherited the genius of a Wolfgang von Goethe and an Immanuel Kant? &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Was there no resistance to his disastrous projects? There was. But it was too feeble, too weak and too late to succeed. German society had rallied behind him: the judicial, the educational, the industrial and the economic establishments gave him their support. Few politicians of this century have aroused, in their lifetime, such love and so much hate; few have inspired so much historical and psychological research after their death. Even today, works on his enigmatic personality and his cursed career are best sellers everywhere. Some are good, others are less good, but all seem to respond to an authentic curiosity on the part of a public haunted by memory and the desire to understand.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
We think we know everything about the nefarious forces that shaped his destiny: his unhappy childhood, his frustrated adolescence; his artistic disappointments; his wound received on the front during World War I; his taste for spectacle, his constant disdain for social and military aristocracies; his relationship with [[Eva Braun]], who adored him; the cult of the very death he feared; his lack of scruples with regard to his former comrades of the SA, whom he had assassinated in 1934; his endless hatred of [[Jews]], whose survival enraged him — each and every phase of his official and private life has found its chroniclers, its biographers. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And yet. There are, in all these givens, elements that escape us. How did this unstable paranoid find it within himself to impose gigantic hope as an immutable ideal that motivated his nation almost until the end? Would he have come to power if Germany were not going through endless economic crises, or if the winners in 1918 had not imposed on it conditions that represented a national humiliation against which the German patriotic fiber could only revolt? ''We would be wrong to forget: Hitler came to power in January 1933 by the most legitimate means. His Nationalist Socialist Party won a majority in the parliamentary elections.'' The aging [[Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg]] had no choice but to allow him, at age 43, to form the new government, marking the end of the Weimar Republic. And the beginning of the Third Reich, which, according to Hitler, would last 1,000 years. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From that moment on, events cascaded. The burning of the [[Reichstag]] came only a little before the openings of the first concentration camps, established for members of the opposition. Fear descended on the country and squeezed it in a vise. Great writers, musicians and painters went into exile to France and the U.S. Jews with foresight emigrated toward Palestine. The air of Hitler's Germany was becoming more and more suffocating. Those who preferred to wait, thinking that the Nazi regime would not last, could not last, would regret it later, when it was too late. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is that Hitler was beloved by his people — not the military, at least not in the beginning, but by the average Germans who pledged to him an affection, a tenderness and a fidelity that bordered on the irrational. It was idolatry on a national scale. One had to see the crowds who acclaimed him. And the women who were attracted to him. And the young who in his presence went into ecstasy. Did they not see the hateful mask that covered his face? Did they not divine the catastrophe he bore within himself?&amp;quot;[http://www.time.com/time/time100/leaders/profile/hitler.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler munich1914.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler in the crowd in Munich, 1914, reacting to the news of Germany's entry in the First World War.]]&lt;br /&gt;
By 1913 Hitler was in Munich, Germany, with war clouds on the horizon.  Classified as unfit for service in the Austrian army (possibly by faking, as he did not like the thought of serving Austria) in 1914, he volunteered for the German army, joining the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment, greeting the war with enthusiasm, and finding the military discipline and comradeship satisfying.  He served during the entire First World War as a messenger carrying dispatches between units, and often at the front lines under fire; he was wounded in 1916, and gassed in 1918.  His bravery during this time earned him the Iron Cross, 2nd Class, in December, 1914, and in August 1918 he was awarded the Iron Cross, 1st Class – a rare decoration for a corporal.  But the gassing would take him out of the war and into a hospital, where he would be told the heart-wrenching news of Germany’s defeat the following November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Path to power==&lt;br /&gt;
After the war ended, Hitler's future seemed uncertain. There was much discontent among demobilized veterans because of the lack of employment. The German military had felt it had not been defeated; indeed, the German Army stood on foreign soil when the Armistice was signed November 11, 1918 and not a square inch of German soil had been occupied. This was despite the fact that the German Army's strongest position, the Hindenburg line, had been broken by the Allies, and the German Army itself was in full retreat. However, the Army felt they had done their job, and the nation had been &amp;quot;stabbed in the back&amp;quot; by a gang of traitors who sought to lay hands on the Fatherland.  The &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; that Germany had been defeated was the &amp;quot;big lie&amp;quot; Hitler spoke of, as if repeating it often enough would cause people to believe it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After his discharge from the hospital, Hitler acted as an army political agent, assigned in Munich to gather information on the various political parties which had spring up amid the social chaos following Germany’s defeat.  In September, 1919, he was given orders to investigate the relatively-minor German Workers’ Party (''Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''); intrigued by the party’s apparatus and its racial, pan-German nationalism, he joined, becoming its 55th member; he left the army soon after and devoted himself to improving the party’s propaganda, as well as his own position within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions in Germany fostered the development of the party.  Economic woes brought widespread discontent, added to the furor surrounding the loss of the war and the harsh terms heaped upon Germany by the Allied Powers in the Versailles Peace Treaty.  Bavaria’s traditional separatism from the central government in Berlin made current conditions especially sharp, and Hitler was savvy enough to take full advantage of them.  When he joined, he found the party ineffective in leadership and uncertain as to its aims; he accepted the party program, but regarded it as a means to an end.  He caused friction with other members of the party, and their attempts to control him caused a threat of resignation; realizing that the future of the party now depended on Hitler, who clearly had a talent of organization, fund collecting, and above all, speaking, they declined to accept it; from July, 1921 Hitler was regarded as the party leader with nearly unlimited power.  From his party newspaper, ''Völkischer Beobachter'' (“Popular Observer”), he spewed out endless propaganda.  His meetings where he spoke grew from handfuls to hundreds, and then on to thousands.  A man of charismatic personality, he quickly attracted a circle of loyal and devoted followers: Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Hermann Göring, and Rudolf Hess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Munich was also a gathering place for former servicemen dissatisfied with conditions in the country; members of the Freikorps, which had been organized after the war from army units that refused to return to civilian life; and those civilians who plotted against the republic. Many of these men joined the Nazi Party. Among them was a staff member of the district command who had joined the German Workers’ Party before Hitler, Ernst Röhm, a pudgy man with a scared face who saw his own ambition in helping further Hitler’s rise within the party.  Röhm recruited what came to be known as the “Brown Shirts”, the violent squads used to attack socialists and communists, and to protect party meetings whenever Hitler was speaking. By 1921 they were organized into a private army called the ''Sturmabteilung'', abbreviated to S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Beer Hall Putsch==&lt;br /&gt;
Germany in 1923 was marked by social and political unrest caused by hyperinflation. In this time Hitler was able convince [[Erich Ludendorff]], an accomplished  general and leader of the German forces in the first World War, to join him in a coup d'etat (''Putsch'' in German). When Hitler learned that the nationalist prime minister of Bavaria was giving a speech to 3000 officials in one of Munich's biggest beer halls (the Haufbrau Haus), he ordered his paramilitaries to surround the building. Hitler went inside and took the prime minister hostage, announced a revolution, and attempted to convince him to join the coup against Berlin and become member in his new administration. The Bavarian prime minister agreed under pressure, but informed the nation via radio later that night that he did not support Hitler. The prime minister also informed the federal government in Berlin; the putsch had begun to fail.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next morning, 9 November 1923, Hitler and Ludendorff were marching with approximately 2000 partly armed supporters through Munich in a show of strength to regain the momentum. In the ensuing fight between Hitler's marchers and a cordon of police and army units at least 14 Nazi supporters and three policemen were killed and hundreds wounded. Ludendorff handed himself over to the authorities, while Hitler fled soon after the fighting began. Hitler was arrested a few days later at a friend's house, were had been in hiding since the failed coup. Ludendorff was acquitted of all charges, while Hitler was sentenced to 5 years in prison (he would do eight months). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://history1900s.about.com/cs/thirdreich/a/beerhallputsch_2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/putsch2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Bavarian prime minister, who foiled the plan, was killed in 1934 in the &amp;quot;Night of the Long Knives&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''Mein Kampf''===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler had his inner circle as frequent visitors in his prison cell, which was made more comfortable due to his celebrity.  While there, he dictated to Rudolf Hess the first volume of ''Mein Kampf'' (“My Struggle”), his political autobiography and a compendium of his many ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler believed in the inequality of the races, nations, and individuals as part of the natural order of mankind, and chief among them was the exalted “Aryan race”, and the greatest of the Aryans were the Germans.   It was the German, according to Hitler, that gave the world civilization and the arts; to safeguard the German people as a race (the “Volk”), they would need to be united under a single leader (the Führer), where they would be protected from their three principle enemies: Marxism, which included social democracy as well as communism; democracy and its mob-rule, as shown by the failings of the Weimar Republic; and above all what Hitler called the poisoners of humanity, the Jews.  “Rational anti-Semitism must lead to systematic legal opposition,” he wrote in 1919. “Its final objective must be the removal of the Jews altogether.” In Mein Kampf, he told the world that the Jew was the “destroyer of culture,” “a parasite within the nation,” and “a menace.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rebuilding the Nazi Party==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler_speech.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Hitler speaking; he would often employ physical gesturing to emphasize a point.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler-3.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in car, saluting passing S.A. at one of many parades.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Internal dissention within the party caused it to languish while Hitler was in prison.  When he was released he saw difficulties in the country that had not existed before the Putsch, namely currency reform that brought economic stability, and the scaling back of the war reparations as a result of the Dawes Plan.  Hitler was also forbidden to speak in public, which remained in force until 1928; however, he wasn’t about to stop his rebuilding of the party nor of his re-establishing his own position within it as leader, despite Gregor Strasser’s opposition in northern Germany.  By 1927 the number of Nazis was in the hundreds of thousands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new period of political and economic instability with the onset of the Great Depression which threw millions out of work in Europe and North America.  To campaign against the [[Young Plan]] (a second renegotiation of war reparations payments) Hitler made an alliance with one of Germany’s leading nationalists, Alfred Hugenberg, whose newspapers enabled Hitler to reach a national audience for the first time. The alliance also had another advantage: it enabled him to seek support from many in business and industry who controlled funds going into politics, and who themselves were desirous of seeing Germany under the control of a strong anti-Soviet and Communist subversion regime.  The subsidies Hitler received placed the Nazy Party on a strong financial footing, enabling him to make his emotional appeal to the lower middle class and the unemployed in his faith that Germany would recover from its suffering and be a great nation once more. The alliance with the industrialists also demonstrated another aspect of Hitler, a skill of effectively using those that would use him, which many would discover when it was too late.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electoral strength of the Nazis grew during the Depression, as unceasing propaganda accused the government of failing to improve conditions for the working man.  By the fall of 1930 the Nazis captured more than 18 percent of the vote, compared to just 2.6 percent in 1928.  Hitler captured 36.8 percent of the vote when he opposed Paul von Hindenburg in the 1932 presidential election; his mass following put him in such a strong position that he entered a series of closed-door intrigues with Franz von Papen, Oskar Hindenburg, and Otto Meissner, all sharing a fear and loathing of a communist government.  Despite the party losing votes in the November, 1932 election, Hitler insisted on nothing less than the office of chancellor for himself.  For him, it was all or nothing.  Hindenburg offered it to him on January 30, 1933.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In power==&lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately, Hitler established himself as dictator.  Less than a month after taking office, on February 27 the Reichstag building was set on fire under mysterious circumstances (but officially blamed on a feeble-minded Dutch communist, Marinus van der Lubbe); Hitler soon after succeeded in getting several decrees passed removing much of the guarantees of freedom in the name of state security, and which also allowed an intensified campaign of violence against dissidents.  Incredibly, in a special election set in those conditions on March 5, the Nazis pulled 43.9 percent of the vote.  On March 21, the new Reichstag assembled at the Potsdam Church, as much a show of unity between the old guard under Hindenburg and the Nazis as it was a show of peace.  Two days later the Enabling Act was passed, giving Hitler full powers; with the exception of the Nazis, all other political parties, including those which had helped pass the Enabling Act, ceased to exist within three months.  Many of their leaders were tossed in concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Night of the Long Knives===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HitlerRohm1933.JPG|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with Ernst Röhm in 1933]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, however, did not wish to start an immediate revolution.  He still needed the support of the one agency he needed to implement his ideas: the army.  But he did have one growing problem that was a thorn in the army’s side, the million-plus men of the S.A. and their leader, Ernst Röhm, who wanted nothing less than the merger of the S.A. into the army, with himself in overall command.  At first, Hitler tried getting Röhm’s support by persuasion, but Hitler’s inner circle was for removing him by any means possible.  On June 29, 1934, Hitler ordered a purge, flew towards a resort near Munich where a number of S.A. leaders were vacationing, and had them all arrested; many would be shot without trial.  Refusing to shoot himself when offered, Röhm was killed in his cell at Dachau, his last words, ironically, “Mein Führer, mein Führer!” [http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/roehm.htm][http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/nsdap/Rohm.html] [http://www.dhm.de/lemo/html/nazi/innenpolitik/roehm/index.html] &lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, Hitler gave speech in the Reichstag, announcing that some seventy-four individuals had been shot for threatening the stability of the Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to the regular courts of justice, then all I can say is this: In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people…It was no secret that this time the revolution would have to be bloody; when we spoke of it we called it 'The Night of the Long Knives.' Everyone must know for all future time that if he raises his hand to strike the State, then certain death is his lot.&amp;quot; ''&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also used this event to settle his account with other opponents, such as Georg Strasser, who stood for a more socialist and less racist national socialism, and the former Bavarian prime minister who foiled the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. Satisfied that the S.A. leadership was thoroughly broken up (thousands of S.A. members were either arrested or killed that night), the army approved of Hitler’s actions.  Hindenburg died a few days later on August 2, and Hitler merged the office of president with the chancellorship, and with it the supreme command of the German armed forces.  During this time the world was slowly recovering economically from the Depression, but it quickened in Germany, coincidently with Hitler’s rise to power.  Taking credit for the recovery made him very popular, bringing him a 90 percent approval rating in a voter  plebiscite that year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beginnings of expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
In matters of state, the running of domestic affairs was left to subordinates, which was something Hitler had little attention for. Foreign policy always peaked his interest, in so much as to the advantages of a “Greater Germany”, which was his chief ambition.  The first part of realizing this, according to ''Mein Kampf'', was to be a reunion of the German peoples within Europe; the second would be an expansion of Germany to the east (lebensraum).  Expanding would mean a renewed conflict with the Slavic peoples, whom Hitler intended to serve as slaves to the “New German Order.”  To follow through on his ambitions, he would have to remove Poland and the Soviet Union as countries; France also would have to be stabilized in the west, as she was Germany’s enemy for more than a century.  He counted as possible allies Italy, with its fascist government under [[Benito Mussolini]], and Britain, whom he regarded as having a similar, Teutonic heritage.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler6-thumb.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Hitler with his dog, Blondie. He regarded dogs as better than people.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Before any of his ambitions could take place, there was one thing he detested which needed immediate removal: the restrictions placed upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I.  Posing as a man of peace to allay suspicions, he insisted that he was a champion of Europe wishing only for the removal of the inequalities leveled by the treaty, and  posturing as a shield against Bolshevism.  In October, 1933, he had Germany withdraw from the [[League of Nations]].  The following January he signed a non-aggression treaty with Poland.  His individual repudiations of parts of the treaty were followed by offers of negotiations for new agreements, while maintaining Germany’s limited ambitious nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this was going on, Germany was steadily building up the armed forces.  Rigorous training using wooden guns and trucks marked as “tanks” got needed battlefield training for officers.  Potential fighter pilots began their training in gliders at public demonstrations – Germany, under terms of the treaty, was not allowed an air force – and later they would fly in new civilian stunt planes and transports, which on the drawing board were designed to be rapidly turned into fighters and bombers.  Conscription was introduced in January, 1935, and in June of that year Hitler successfully signed a naval treaty with Britain, giving him rights to a respectable navy; but even while the ink was drying, Germany was secretly building a large U-boat fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matter of reuniting the German peoples came into being in July, 1934, and here Hitler overreached.  German organizations were covertly aiding Austrian Nazis in the overthrow of their government, culminating in an attempted revolt as well as murdering Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss.  When the attempt clearly failed, Hitler denied involvement.  In January, 1935, a plebecite was introduced in the Saarland; more than 90 percent voted to return the territory to Germany.  Then in March, 1936, came his greatest slap to the Versailles Treaty: against the advice of his generals, and in open defiance of France and Britain, he ordered troops into the demilitarized Rhineland.  Germany was once again becoming the leading power in continental Europe.  By October, 1936, Germany had signed an alliance with Italy, proclaiming a “Rome-Berlin axis,” followed by the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan.  All three countries would sign a single, mutual alliance pact, the following year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anschluss==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed from their offices in January 1938 were Hjalmar Schacht (economic ministry); Werner von Fritsch (soldiers’ representative); and Konstantin von Neurath (foreign office); the reason being was they were not fully accepting of Nazism.  Beginning his plans of German conquest, he started with Austria.  Kurt von Schuschnigg, the Austrian chancellor, was invited to Berchtesgaden in February, where he was browbeaten and forced to sign an agreement placing Austrian Nazis in the government.   When Schuschnigg resisted and announced a plebiscite for Austrian voters concerning independence, Hitler ordered German troops into Austria, completely taking over the country within days.  His return to Vienna was in triumph; enthusiastic crowds greeted him by the tens of thousands, in sharp contrast to the scenes of privation he had gone through there in his youth.  Austria was annexed (Anschluss) to the Reich a short time later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Anschluss was going on, Hitler was speaking in friendly terms with Czechoslovakia; nearly as soon as Austria ceased to exist, Hitler proceeded with his plans against the Czechs.  The northwestern region of Czechoslovakia was the Sudetenland, inhabited by a German minority, and the leader of them, Konrad Henlein, was instructed to make impossible demands for those Germans on the Czech government.  In the interest of preventing a general war (which Hitler wanted), Mussolini and British prime minister Neville Chamberlain concluded a peaceful agreement in Munich on September 30, giving Hitler the Sudetenland without firing a shot.  Chamberlain would return to Britain, waving the agreement signed between himself and Hitler, declaring it to be “peace for our time”, but his act of appeasement would ensure the peace would last only a few more months.  Despite assurances that the Sudetenland was his last territorial demands, “Czechia”, as the remainder of Czechoslovakia was called, became a German protectorate on March 15, 1939, when Hitler ordered it occupied.  Just over a week later, Lithuania was forced to cede to Germany the territory of Memel (Klaipeda), on the border of East Prussia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Poland==&lt;br /&gt;
Poland’s turn was next, and listening to the rumblings was France and Britain, which signed guarantees of mutual assistance to the Polish nation should it be attacked by Germany.  Hitler also signed pacts: a “Pact of Steel” with Italy, strengthening the alliance between Rome and Berlin, and then a treaty that caught many off-guard: a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union on August 23.  A secret clause in the pact allowed for the simultaneous invasion of Poland, and the division of the country in the center from north to south.  Poland was invaded on September 1; two days later, Britain and France declared war on Germany.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler assumed his own war strategy.  Poland was conquered within weeks, and when a desired peace accord with Britain failed to materialize, he ordered the army to prepare for a western offensive.  Norway was invaded and occupied, forestalling a British move on that country; Denmark was occupied by April, 1940.  Hitler than adopted General Erich von Manstien’s plan for an offensive against France itself, which would move through neutral Belgium’s Ardenne Forest on May 10, taking that country as a matter of convenience, as well as avoiding the static fortifications of France’s Maginot Line.  The German forces, extremely successful in their operations, reached the coastal ports on the English Channel in 10 days; Holland and Belgium both surrendered within days.  But south of Dunkirk was where the army was ordered to halt.  Hitler had hoped even at this stage in the battle that Britain would commit to peace; instead, the halting of the German army allowed the British to remove 170,000 fighting men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 10, Italy entered the war as German tanks were sweeping across northern France.  Hitler signed an armistice with France on June 22, the signing taking place in the same rail car at the same site where the Germans surrendered in 1918.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having failed in getting the British to sign an armistice, Hitler prepared his forces for “Operation Sea Lion,” the invasion of Britain. However, the Luftwaffe was defeated in its attempt to gain air superiority over British airspace, also known as the Battle Of Britain, which forced the permanent postponement of Sealion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Facing the failure of the British to give in, Hitler started to prepare to double-cross his erstwhile partner in the Poland conquest, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union.  Then Mussolini invaded Greece, got bogged down in the Balkans, and the threat loomed that he would lose his whole army there.  Hitler found it necessary to come to his aid, while at the same time taking direct control of Yugoslavia in the wake of the overthrow of the pro-Nazi government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbarossa==&lt;br /&gt;
The attack on Soviet Russia began June 22, 1941.  Rapid in its advancement, the German army captured a large swath of territory between the Baltic and Black seas, and captured close to 3,000,000 prisoners.  But Hitler, already micro-managing military operations, became overbearing to his generals; he preferred to go after many targets, while his generals argued for a single objective.  A few miles in front of Moscow, the German army was halted by a Russian offensive in December, as well as something he had absolutely no control over: the severe Russian winter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the lands already occupied by German forces, S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler was preparing the ground for Hitler’s new German order.  Expelling the Jews from Germany was the first step, and this was carried out by laws and decrees beginning in 1933; the Germans would switch to outright force in 1939, as Jews were first deported en-masse to Poland, then walled into ghettos after the occupation began.  By 1941, a policy crafted under S.S. general Reinhard Heydrich had changed expulsion for extermination in what was called &amp;quot;a final solution to the Jewish question&amp;quot; (''die Endlösung der Judenfrage'').  The system of concentration camps was supplemented by the creation of specialized killing centers in the occupied countries, especially in Poland, where camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzac “processed” thousands of victims daily.  Some six million Jews died during what was called the [[Holocaust]], as well as an additional five million Slavs, Gypsies, the handicapped, the aged, and many others that the Nazis considered “subhuman” in accordance with German racial policies. [http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beginning of the end==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Adolf_hitler6.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in 1944, by now looking like a tired, strained man.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler grew increasingly strained by the end of 1942, depending on large amounts of drugs supplied by his physician, Theodor Morell, as a result of the twin defeats of El Alamein (which he lost the bulk of his Afrika corps to British general Montgomery), and Stalingrad (where he lost an entire army of 250,000 men to the Russians).  He spent more time in his headquarters in East Prussia, and his time in the public eye ceased to exist.  He refused to visit bombed German cities, and, as with Stalingrad, refused to allow German armies to withdraw from the battlefield when the situation was lost.  Still, he could make stunning, decisive decisions when called for, such as the commando raid that resulted in the rescue of Benito Mussolini from Italian partisans in July, 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the defeat of Germany in the war was looming closer.  Hitler’s relations with his leading commanders grew strained, the more so as he allowed units of the S.S. to take positions traditionally held by the army.  The line at the eastern front was slowly being pushed back by the Soviets, while in the Atlantic his U-boats campaign had faltered.  German cities were constantly being bombed, and a successful invasion on the Normandy coast of France in June, 1944 marked the beginning of the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Assassination attempt===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:NWT Hitler dead.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Hitler's death as covered by the ''New York Times'', May 2, 1945.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Seeing Germany’s chances of surviving the war were desperate, a group of officers plotted to assassinate Hitler, planning several attempts in 1943-44, but nearly successful on July 20, 1944, when a bomb hidden in a briefcase by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg went off under a table that Hitler and others were leaning over; four were killed outright, several suffered injuries, but Hitler escaped relatively unharmed (the bomb itself was set down away from Hitler behind a solid oak table leg, saving him).  The conspirators were quickly rounded up; Stauffenberg was shot.  The remainder were put on show trials and condemned to hang on meat hooks with piano wire.  It was said that Hitler enjoyed watching film of their executions.  As a result of the bomb, Nazi members were employed at key positions within the army, removing any trace of the army’s independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within months nearly all of the territory occupied by Germany was now in Allied hands.  A last offensive in December, 1944 to take the port of Antwerp, Belgium, failed.  Hitler had by them grown ill; his hopes for a German victory bordered on the fantastical and the imagination.  By January, 1945 he had moved into his command bunker in Berlin, where he gave orders deploying fictional divisions to counter the ever-closer Soviets.  When all seemed lost, he gave out his final orders: first, appointing Admiral Karl Dönitz as head of the state and his successor, and Josef Goebbels as chancellor; and second, dictating his last political will which was an attempt to justify his life’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 29, he committed the one truly-chivalrous act of his life: he married Eva Braun, his long-time mistress.  After retiring to his room in the bunker the next day, Eva took poison, and Hitler put a bullet in his head.  In accordance with his wishes, both bodies were burned.  His Third Reich would outlive him for another week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote the following in [[Time Magazine]] regarding Hitler: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Adolf Hitler or the incarnation of absolute evil; this is how future generations will remember the all-powerful Fuehrer of the criminal Third Reich. Compared with him, his peers [[Mussolini]] and [[Franco]] were novices. Under his hypnotic gaze, humanity crossed a threshold from which one could see the abyss. &amp;quot;Before Hitler, we thought we had sounded the depths of human nature,&amp;quot; argues Ron Rosenbaum, author of &amp;quot;Explaining Hitler.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;He showed how much lower we could go, and that's what was so horrifying. It gets us wondering not just at the depths he showed us but whether there is worse to come. The power of Hitler was to confound the modernist notion that judgments about good and [[evil]] were little more than matters of taste, reflections of social class and power and status. Although some modern scholars drive past the notion of evil and instead explain Hitler's conduct as a reflection of his childhood and self-esteem issues, for most survivors of the 20th century he is confirmation of our instinctive sense that evil does exist. It moves among us; it leads us astray and deploys powerful, subtle weapons against even the sturdiest souls.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/time100/leaders/profile/hitler.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hitler and the Theory of Evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerrisetopower.jpg|right|225px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
The staunch evolutionist Stephen Gould admitted the following: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Haeckel|Haeckel]] was the chief apostle of evolution in [[Germany]].... His evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others; the irrational mysticism that had always stood in strange communion with his brave words about objective science - all contributed to the rise of Nazism. -  Stephen J. Gould, &amp;quot;Ontogeny and Phylogeny,&amp;quot; Belknap Press: Cambridge MA, 1977, pp.77-78). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/social.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to evolutionary racism, Hitler wrote the following in his work [[Mein Kampf]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Germans were the higher race, destined for a glorious evolutionary future. For this reason it was essential that the [[Jew]]s should be segregated, otherwise mixed marriages would take place. Were this to happen, all nature’s efforts “to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being may thus be rendered futile.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1675&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also wrote in Mein Kampf:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he, after all, is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development (Hoherentwicklung) of organic living beings would be unthinkable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Robert E.D. Clark wrote in his work ''Darwin, Before and After'' the following regarding Hitler and the theory of evolution: “Adolf Hitler’s mind was captivated by evolutionary teaching — probably since the time he was a boy. Evolutionary ideas — quite undisguised — lie at the basis of all that is worst in Mein Kampf — and in his public speeches”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_holocaust_why_did_it_happen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Hickman in his work ''Biocreation'' concurs and wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It is perhaps no coincidence that Adolf Hitler was a firm believer in and preacher of evolutionism. Whatever the deeper, profound, complexities of his [[psychosis]], it is certain that [the concept of struggle was important for]. . . his book, Mein Kampf clearly set forth a number of evolutionary ideas, particularly those emphasizing struggle, survival of the fittest and extermination of the weak to produce a better society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationism.org/csshs/v08n3p24.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Noted evolutionary [[anthropology|anthropologists]] Sir [[Arthur Keith]] conceded the following in regards to Hitler: “The German Fuhrer, as I have consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought to make the practices of Germany conform to the theory of evolution”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_holocaust_why_did_it_happen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pulitzer Prize]] winning author [[Marilynne Robinson]] wrote the following regarding Hitler's racism in the November 2006 issue of [[Harper’s Magazine]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|While it is true that persecution of the Jews has a very long history in [[Europe]], it is also true that science in the twentieth century revived and absolutized persecution by giving it a fresh rationale — Jewishness was not religious or cultural, but genetic. Therefore no appeal could be made against the brute fact of a Jewish grandparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Dawkins|Dawkins]] deals with all this in one sentence. Hitler did his evil &amp;quot;in the name of. . . an insane and unscientific [[eugenics]] theory.&amp;quot; But eugenics is science as surely as totemism is religion. That either is in error is beside the point. Science quite appropriately acknowledges that error should be assumed, and at best it proceeds by a continuous process of criticism meant to isolate and identify error. So bad science is still science in more or less the same sense that bad religion is still religion. That both of them can do damage on a huge scale is clear. The prestige of both is a great part of the problem, and in the modern period the credibility of anything called science is enormous. As the history of eugenics proves, science at the highest levels is no reliable corrective to the influence of cultural prejudice but is in fact profoundly vulnerable to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is indeed historical precedent in the [[Spanish Inquisition]] for the notion of hereditary Judaism. But the fact that the worst religious thought of the sixteenth century can be likened to the worst scientific thought of the twentieth century hardly redounds to the credit of science.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://solutions.synearth.net/2006/10/20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/someone-finally-said-it-dawkinss-hysterical-scientism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/profile-index.htmlA Psychological Analysis of Adolf Hitler, His Life and Legend], Walter C. Langer, Office of Strategic Services, Washington, D.C.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Hitler, Adolf}} &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dictators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fascists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conspiracy theorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mass murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nazis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Propaganda&amp;diff=427409</id>
		<title>Talk:Propaganda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Propaganda&amp;diff=427409"/>
		<updated>2008-04-09T19:49:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: Weasel Words&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Wow, a stolen page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost all of this page is cut/pasted from creationpedia. really &amp;quot;creative&amp;quot; [[User:Menkatron|Menkatron]] 16:40, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For your information, I wrote that submission myself--in both places.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 00:01, 16 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Weasel Words==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In one famous example, a television broadcast network circulated for weeks certain memoranda, the contents of which were damaging to the incumbent President of the United States (George W. Bush), though those who obtained those memoranda knew, or ought to have known, that they were forgeries.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The above lines cite no sources.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Which 'television broadcast network' is this?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Elaborate on the 'contents', what were they?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Who are 'those who obtained those memoranda'?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Pornography&amp;diff=398023</id>
		<title>Talk:Pornography</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Pornography&amp;diff=398023"/>
		<updated>2008-03-03T21:25:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: /* Differene Experiences */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;* There is a draft of a proposed new version [[/draft|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Should there be an article on pornography==&lt;br /&gt;
It would, I’ve no doubt, take a lot of patrolling to keep this article site appropriate – it may be a real target for vandalism—but that being said, pornography and how it should be dealt with is one of the major political issues of our times (less now than 20 years ago, admittedly) and if we are going to provide an alternative to Wikipedia this is a very important place to do so (especially as Wikipedia’s page on this subject prominently features an image that is clearly not appropriate for children.).  I’d like to see this page unblocked so we can take a stab a writing a good article for it—I’d take a stab at one (I know enough about anti-pornography feminism to start and could look into 1st amendment law) if the sysops think that it is worth trying to write an article appropriate to Conservipedia on this subject.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 14:23, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Drop me a note at my talk page when you're ready to post your first draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:40, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Will do! --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:40, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First Draft==&lt;br /&gt;
I never say your note, so I just went ahead and wrote my own diatribe. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:28, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the fact is that in the history of erotic literature it is virtually impossible to find any depiction of normal marital relations.&amp;quot; That's just a flat out lie and misrepresentation.  You seem to be forgetting books like the Kama Sutra, Joy of Sex and videos that are created for couples to use.  And the 2nd paragraph is a POV. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:24, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not much about marriage in either one - the assumption is that you can go ahead and snuggle whenever and with whomever. I read Alex Comfort's book, a pernicious piece of polymorphous perversion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let's look at Reginod's draft: [[/draft]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:36, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I like Reginod's draft save one bit. I think the intro should read &amp;quot;what is widely regarded as an intimate act&amp;quot; and not just &amp;quot;an intimate act.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;FFD700&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:44, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jrssr5--you forgot the Book of Solomon.  And seeing how he had 50 wives, one assumed he knew a bit about marriage. --[[User:PassingThru|PassingThru]] 14:51, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think there is a &amp;quot;Book of Solomon&amp;quot;, and the Bible tells us he had seven hundred wives.  Perhaps there is something faulty in your research methodology you should examine before making such obviously flawed assertions.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:12, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Might that comment be intended to refer to the Song of Solomon? - [[User:Suricou|Suricou]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that I am back, I would like to implement the draft I proposed along with the changes that Ed Poor has made (thanks for those, by the way).  &lt;br /&gt;
The only objection I’ve seen to the draft is that we don’t need an article on pornography at all on this site.  I’ve explained above that pornography and how society ought to treat it is one of the more contentious social issues we face today (and it gets tangled up with a number of other ones).  I’m open to hearing other concerns before I implement it, but I’m not going to wait to terribly long as anything that needs changing can be fixed once it is in the article as easily as it can be fixed in the draft.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 21:23, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add something about the word derivation, like: '''Pornography,''' from the Greek ''porne'' meaning &amp;quot;prostitute,'' ... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:32, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had no idea.  Thank you for making that addition.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 21:41, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reginod - you're welcome to use any of the following that's of any use to you. Shouldn’t an article on pornography at least have its definition correct?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;pornography&amp;quot; is about two hundred years old. It originated after the discovery of erotic drawings and sculptures uncovered in the archaeological excavation of the ruins of Pompeii. They included a sculpture of the god Pan having sex with a goat, and drawings of p.enises that were found painted on the walls of houses. The Victorians collected everything they found offensive and put it in a museum in Naples, which was called The Secret Museum. Only men were allowed in, and they were not allowed to laugh or make jokes. From 1849 to 1860 the Secret Museum was bricked up altogether.[http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-07-38.html] Even today you need a permit and a guide to see the collection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word pornography derives from the Greek word ''porn'', meaning prostitution, and ''graphier'', meaning to write, and so it means to write of prostitution. The word was at first used to refer specifically to the Secret Museum, but began to take on a more general meaning by the middle of the 19th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Drawings and writings that were erotic were commonplace in earlier times, although they were not called pornography. In Samuel Pepys’ diary he writes about buying a French book called ''Escholle de Filles''. The book is a conversation between Francine and Susanne about sex, the older one telling the younger one all about it. Pepys saw the book in a shop, thought it was lewd and disgusting and did not buy it. However, he went back three weeks later and bought &amp;quot;the idle roguish book, L'escholle de filles; which I have bought in plain binding… because I resolve, as soon as I have read it, to burn it.&amp;quot;  He drank lots of wine, locked himself away, read it then burnt it. He said it was an idle and lewd book but it a good read for a sober man such as himself to read so as to learn about the villainy of the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Bibles and pornography were the two items most likely to be confiscated by the Soviet Customs on entering the USSR. The common question from border guards/customs officers was always: &amp;quot;Are you carrying Bibles or pornography?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women respond to pornography in a way that is more similar to the way men respond than was previously thought. Erotic imagery elicits a faster and stronger electrical response in a woman’s brain than any other kind of image, recent research reported in the journal ''Brain Research'' reveals. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199474,00.html] The researchers expected lower levels of response, since previous research had indicated men that are more aroused by erotic images than women, but found that women’s responses were as strong.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 21:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I’m not sure where exactly in the draft you want to place all that information, but go ahead and add it on in.  (I’ve added a few more sections to help place the information—I’d put the Museum part in the Modern History section, and the female response information in the effects on individuals section)  think the draft is (at the moment) in good enough shape to replace the current article, and since the article is (I just noticed) locked (and for good reason I’ve no doubt) I encourage you to just add to the draft, just like it was a real article, until a sysop can be found to implement it.  But, as I’ve said, it is a rough draft—I wouldn’t turn it in to a professor in the state it is currently in, but the wiki process is a collaborative one so I’m more than willing to put my work out there as a base for others to build on.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 22:10, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would gladly do that, but I don't know where the draft is!--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 22:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Try here [[Talk:Pornography/draft]]  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 08:37, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pornography and erotica==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, Reginod &amp;amp; Britinme. Good draft, coming along nicely. I'll just make one quibble:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Erotica uses sexually charged imagery for artistic purposes,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't actually true. Not unless you think that &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; is entirely separate from politics, etc. Or unless you're trying to say that [[art]] is a category of [[free speech]], which gets into the &amp;quot;P*** Christ&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;D*** Mary&amp;quot; controversies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In everyday use, [[erotica]] is [[pornography]]. If I'm wrong, please correct me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:08, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pornography is something that has degradation as its intent; it does not necessarily even have to contain sexual content. Erotica is material connected with love rather than sex, (though the love depicted is often of a sexual nature). So that although there is a large overlap between erotica and pronography, something can be one and not the other. For example the biblical book [[Song of Solomon]] might be readily categorised as erotica on the basis of its content, but few would call it pornography. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 11:16, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As a literary genre, pornography is writing that has sexual arousal as its primary objective. Erotica is such material with artistic pretensions. Thus, the descriptive term pornography implies a statement about intentionality and instrumentality without reference to merit, whereas the term erotica is evaluative and laudatory. In Flesh and the Word, John Preston more baldly says, &amp;quot;The only difference is that erotica is the stuff bought by rich people.&amp;quot; [http://www.glbtq.com/literature/erotica_pornography.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Certainly some pornography with artistic pretensions ''calls itself'' erotica, often to avoid legal prohibitions on the distribution of obscene material, for example. But this is in no way the same thing as ''being'' erotica. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That's a rather dodgy source you're using there, btw.)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 11:34, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I’m inclined to agree with you that erotica is pornography.  I’d say that it makes up a subset of pornography – I’d be hard pressed to find a clear distinction.  I think, in common usage, erotica=socially acceptable pornography, and pornography=socially unacceptable pornography.  &lt;br /&gt;
:Both erotica and pornography are intended to arouse sexual interest.  Erotica, perhaps, more subtly than other pornography, but in the end it is about eros – love mingled with sexual desire.  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:09, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Erotica is pornography for those who have some inteligence. It requires a high level of literacy, and artistic appreciation. It takes skill to make, while plain pornography needs nothing more than a camera. But underneath, it is still pornography. It strives to be respectable, and to some extent suceeeds. But porn is porn, and thats all it will ever be. Just because its a well-written story, or a painting that takes incredible skill to paint, does not turn it magically acceptable. Erotica is a subset of porn, not something completly different. - BornAgainBrit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm not convinced by this. I wonder if we can make the distinction that pornography is solely concerned with sexual arousal and gratification through the graphic depiction of sexual acts, and that works of literary and artistic merit can contain passages of explicit sexuality that function as an integral part of the total work but are not intended purely for purposes of sexual gratification. The famous example of this in English law was, of course, the 1963 trial involving Penguin books and the [[D.H.Lawrence]] novel ''Lady Chatterley's Lover''. I have read that, and it's true to say that the passages objected to in 1963 are fairly graphic (though perhaps less so by today's standards). However, they are not the central point of the book, and their purpose is not arousal but a deepening of understanding of the themes of the nove. IMHO they add a great deal to the overall merit of the work. Personally, I found a book like ''American Psycho'' a great deal more distressing in that it explicitly ties sexuality to graphic violence. It seems invidious to me to single out the depiction of erotica as pornography while ignoring the graphic depictions of violence that seem to pass unnoticed. --[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 14:18, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Needed fixes==&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article is locked can someone make the following changes, marked in '''bold'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Due to a series of liberal decisions beginning with the Warren Court, pornography is aggressive'''ly''' sold and distributed in the United States without meaningful law enforcement'''{{fact}}'''. It is a $12 billion industry that affects and harms 40 million Americans'''(POV)'''. Pornography destroys relationships and exploits young people.[2]'''maybe include the article that claims this POV'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there really such a large public concern about an alledged connection between pornography and porn? Check the link I provided in the debate about this subject for some statistics on the percentage of people who've ever seen porn or watch it on a regular basis, it might shock you to find that that multi-billion dollar industry only survives because it has many millions of consumers, not just the random perv, but lawyers, doctors, fathers and husbands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would also like to see a paragraph about erotica in ancient Rome, Greece, India, Egypt and the stone age, how it's related to human nature and that it does in some cases provide an outlet for potential rapists.&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make the article more balanced (and more serious).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1343839.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=913013&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]] I think if you look at [[Talk:Pornography/draft]] you’ll find a draft of an article that addresses some (but not all) of your concerns.  Please add any relevant information to the draft.  We are trying to get it into good enough shape that it can replace the current article.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:35, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It still lacks a paragraph about the psychology/sociology behind pornography, but, it's definitely a lot better than the current version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have no idea where to start on that paragraph as it stands the draft is touching the far edges of what I feel comfortable writing on (any more and I worry a bad source could steer me wrong).  But if you point me to a good source I’ll work on it, or you could add it yourself – feel free to treat the draft like the article, improve it as you can.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:41, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Needs Citations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to be in line with commandment 5. This page states much opinion and needs to be fixed by one of the people with the power to do it. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:27, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Needs deletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: terrible. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A draft (which I think is much better) is being worked on. See somewhere above for a link to said draft. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;FFD700&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:11, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I came to this page to try to add a UK context but see that it uneditable.  This is the sort of thing I was going to add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the UK pornography continues to be used by the mass circulation tabloids to bolster sales.  Since the 1970's the UK 'red-top' tabloids, in particular the News International Corp owned 'Sun' and the 'Daily Star' have used images of naked or semi-naked women to attract a readership of B2,C,D males.  They then fill other pages in the paper with biased articles pushing their political viewpoint in an attempt to control clearly influencible minds. The Sun in particular influenced the result of the 1992 General election with their pornography-ridden viewpoint that they claimed to have won the election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other tabloids such as the 'Daily Sport' and the 'Daily Express' are owned by David Sullivan and Richard Desmond, both of whom made their fortunes in pornography before moving into newspapers.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can this be added please. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 17:47, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please add it to the draft at  [[Talk:Pornography/draft]] .   The draft is editable and the better it is the more likely we are to get it to replace the current article.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 17:51, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the advice.  I've done that now.  --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 18:10, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: What does &amp;quot;B2,C,D&amp;quot; mean? --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:25, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It a form a categorization of people by social position and available income. A's are higher earner or those with wealth, B's not quite so much, B2,C &amp;amp; D are the classifications for either unskilled manual labour, the unemployed or the underclass. In the US this equates to blue collar etc. These were the groups considered most easily influenced by pornography and propaganda. Without their media-led political bias in the 1980's the political landscape of Britain would have been very different. That's why I added my bit in the Social Effects of Pornography  section in the new draft. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 18:41, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Addiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornography can be addictive, according to some source, especially ones involving violence. This fact should be added onto the article. [[User:Wooyi|Wooyi]] 22:32, 29 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal wants to help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I am liberal. I admit it. I accept that conservatives and/or Christians do not like pornography, etc. and I respect your decisions. My ex-boyfriend is a Christian and didn't view porn and was waiting until marriage, etc. so I understand how people like you guys think (we're still friends). As much as I'd love to edit articles like this one, the abortion one, and the cannabis one for content, I understand that this is a conservative website and I would gladly respect that and maintain your right-winged perspectives. I am mainly on this site because I want to broaden my horizons and see what the other side of the arguments are. I'm curious about the right-winged perspective, and even though I don't agree, I respect it and want to understand it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, here's my problem with conservapedia. It's not that this is conservative. You guys have every right to post this conservatively biased stuff because you're up front about it and say you're conservative and don't try to hide it. You display it proudly. More power to you. My problem is that a lot of these entries use vague words like &amp;quot;very bad&amp;quot; or, in the case of this porn article, you say that porn &amp;quot;has an effect.&amp;quot; That is quite vague. How is it bad? What are the effects? What is &amp;quot;very&amp;quot; bad? Furthermore, many sentences in this site are just poorly written, grammatically speaking, and it is difficult to read. If you want respect from the liberal world, at least take the time to sound intelligent, back up everything with lots and lots of sources, use good grammar and strong vocabulary. &amp;quot;Very bad&amp;quot; is not a strong choice of words. &amp;quot;Harmful&amp;quot; might be. Then again, once you say &amp;quot;harmful,&amp;quot; you'll have to say WHY it's harmful. In the sentence &amp;quot;everything is a perversion of one sort of another&amp;quot; ... well, &amp;quot;of&amp;quot; should be &amp;quot;or.&amp;quot; I recognize this is a common typo, but I would love to edit it and make this site better! There's hundreds of entries where it is just poorly written and I'd love to edit it JUST FOR FLUIDITY. In other words, so it's more readable, free from typos and other errors, etc. Also, there are some things which are obviously biased, but I don't think has anything to do with being conservative or liberal, such as the use of &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; in this article. Anyone, male or female, can be desensitized to sex via porn, and as a female who happens to enjoy porn, I think that this article should recognize that people of both genders view porn, and that sex is not as stereotypically male as many people would like you to believe. After all, it takes two...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've worked with a number of newspapers and I study linguistics. I've won numerous awards for my writing and read countless books on how to persuade people with words and make the most use out of every word. I regularly edit my peer's essays and I do not change their opinions, but make their opinions come across as stronger through a better method of writing. I would love to do this for this website, but unfortunately I am blocked from editing most articles because they are controversial and have been locked. I could probably find other examples of unclear sentences, but I can't remember which articles I have looked at.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep up your beliefs. It takes all kinds to make up this world, and we need both conservative and liberal viewpoints. I'd love to help you guys, but you consistently block me. Oh well. Your loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Neko1337&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the number of locked articles are as bad as you seem to think.  Surely there are ''some'' that you'd be interested in editing that are not locked.  And once the administrators see that you are doing a good job, they might even be willing to unlock articles for you to tidy up.&lt;br /&gt;
:I suspect that the original author(s) use male pronouns in a generic way, not specifically indicating males.&lt;br /&gt;
:I improved the article a little bit in line with your comments (but I agree it could do with more).&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:54, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Pornography consumers are overwhelmingly male (by a nearly 3:1 margin), so the only substantive point made by &amp;quot;Neko&amp;quot; above is not persuasive.[http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html]--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:15, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I didn't know the actual figures, but yes, I had meant to mention something along those lines also.  Nevertheless, I gather (it's just an impression) that pornography use by females is on the increase.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:26, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read somewhere (I actually think it was a claim by Pat Robertson, so take it with a grain of salt) that women tend more to read erotic literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any event, I think it's very interesting to present this from both a Christian and an Islamic perspective, as Ed has done here. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 11:58, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why porn is actually bad ==&lt;br /&gt;
Should we sight more sources for why pornography is bad...maybe we should offer counterpoints to why pornography is bad, then shown arguements against those to make our case stronger. {{unsigned|Kaji132007}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Him Vs Her and Person==&lt;br /&gt;
Why are all the references to males? &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Porn says that happiness is found by having the same experience over and over again with lots of different '''women'''''(my girl isn't interested in women)''; true eros says that happiness is found by having different experiences over and over again with the same person&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Viewing or reading pornography day in and day out has an effect. It desensitizes a person, makes '''him''' more withdrawn, and makes '''him''' view '''others''' ''(and other males?)'' like objects rather than the people they are.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted my girlfriend to look at this page because she does use porn quite regularly much to my disappointment. Its something we are trying to deal with and work through, but the inherit bias toward males in the article has turned her attention to topics of feminism and such and the original point of asking her to read this as been lost on her. --[[User:DjWizard|DjWizard]] 20:51, 5 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't get your point - or if I do, I disagree with it. We assume a porn user is a man, the same way we assume a nurse is a woman. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:02, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::And both assumptions would be invalid some of the time.  My general answer is that &amp;quot;male&amp;quot; terms are actually generic terms (as &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; is a reference to a member of &amp;quot;mankind&amp;quot;), although some specific instances might bear being reworded.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:42, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see oyur problem with you Girlfriend looking at porn, I mean, is it causing any actual relationship problems?  {{unsigned|Kaji132007}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't see a problem with portraying someone in a degrading manner?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:42, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious perspectives==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's time to re-visit this issue. Much as it is a touchy subject, it does need to be addressed. A well-balanced and scholarly article would explain why it's bad, and not (as &amp;quot;Neko&amp;quot; suggested) merely make general assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pornography actually lowers rape rate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was looking at statistics for rape rate in Japan, and It would seem that pornography and rape are inversely related. As porn sales go up, rape rates go down. Should we include this in the article?  {{unsigned|Bias}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;It would seem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;mdash;seems rather uncertain to me.  Is the source on-line?  If so, post it here (on this talk page) and we can look into it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, sorry, it's not online. If you would like, look in to it. [[User:Bias|Bias]] 22:19, 31 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do remember seeing an article that pointed out that pornography has become much more widely available in recent years, because of the Internet, and in that same time, the rate for rapes in the U.S. has gone down, although the article pointed out that law enforcement procedures had improved over that time too.  Unfortunately, I don't remember the name of the article or where I saw it, but it's an aspect of the issue that's worth investigating.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 15:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differene Experiences==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;having different experiences over and over again with the same person&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:How can I do that if the Bible/God only approves 'missionary', &amp;amp; does'nt approve 'devices'?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Pornography&amp;diff=398022</id>
		<title>Talk:Pornography</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Pornography&amp;diff=398022"/>
		<updated>2008-03-03T21:23:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Vader1941: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;* There is a draft of a proposed new version [[/draft|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Should there be an article on pornography==&lt;br /&gt;
It would, I’ve no doubt, take a lot of patrolling to keep this article site appropriate – it may be a real target for vandalism—but that being said, pornography and how it should be dealt with is one of the major political issues of our times (less now than 20 years ago, admittedly) and if we are going to provide an alternative to Wikipedia this is a very important place to do so (especially as Wikipedia’s page on this subject prominently features an image that is clearly not appropriate for children.).  I’d like to see this page unblocked so we can take a stab a writing a good article for it—I’d take a stab at one (I know enough about anti-pornography feminism to start and could look into 1st amendment law) if the sysops think that it is worth trying to write an article appropriate to Conservipedia on this subject.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 14:23, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Drop me a note at my talk page when you're ready to post your first draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:40, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Will do! --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:40, 25 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First Draft==&lt;br /&gt;
I never say your note, so I just went ahead and wrote my own diatribe. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:28, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the fact is that in the history of erotic literature it is virtually impossible to find any depiction of normal marital relations.&amp;quot; That's just a flat out lie and misrepresentation.  You seem to be forgetting books like the Kama Sutra, Joy of Sex and videos that are created for couples to use.  And the 2nd paragraph is a POV. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:24, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not much about marriage in either one - the assumption is that you can go ahead and snuggle whenever and with whomever. I read Alex Comfort's book, a pernicious piece of polymorphous perversion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Let's look at Reginod's draft: [[/draft]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:36, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I like Reginod's draft save one bit. I think the intro should read &amp;quot;what is widely regarded as an intimate act&amp;quot; and not just &amp;quot;an intimate act.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;FFD700&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:44, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jrssr5--you forgot the Book of Solomon.  And seeing how he had 50 wives, one assumed he knew a bit about marriage. --[[User:PassingThru|PassingThru]] 14:51, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think there is a &amp;quot;Book of Solomon&amp;quot;, and the Bible tells us he had seven hundred wives.  Perhaps there is something faulty in your research methodology you should examine before making such obviously flawed assertions.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:12, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Might that comment be intended to refer to the Song of Solomon? - [[User:Suricou|Suricou]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now that I am back, I would like to implement the draft I proposed along with the changes that Ed Poor has made (thanks for those, by the way).  &lt;br /&gt;
The only objection I’ve seen to the draft is that we don’t need an article on pornography at all on this site.  I’ve explained above that pornography and how society ought to treat it is one of the more contentious social issues we face today (and it gets tangled up with a number of other ones).  I’m open to hearing other concerns before I implement it, but I’m not going to wait to terribly long as anything that needs changing can be fixed once it is in the article as easily as it can be fixed in the draft.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 21:23, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add something about the word derivation, like: '''Pornography,''' from the Greek ''porne'' meaning &amp;quot;prostitute,'' ... [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:32, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had no idea.  Thank you for making that addition.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 21:41, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reginod - you're welcome to use any of the following that's of any use to you. Shouldn’t an article on pornography at least have its definition correct?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;pornography&amp;quot; is about two hundred years old. It originated after the discovery of erotic drawings and sculptures uncovered in the archaeological excavation of the ruins of Pompeii. They included a sculpture of the god Pan having sex with a goat, and drawings of p.enises that were found painted on the walls of houses. The Victorians collected everything they found offensive and put it in a museum in Naples, which was called The Secret Museum. Only men were allowed in, and they were not allowed to laugh or make jokes. From 1849 to 1860 the Secret Museum was bricked up altogether.[http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2003/2003-07-38.html] Even today you need a permit and a guide to see the collection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word pornography derives from the Greek word ''porn'', meaning prostitution, and ''graphier'', meaning to write, and so it means to write of prostitution. The word was at first used to refer specifically to the Secret Museum, but began to take on a more general meaning by the middle of the 19th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Drawings and writings that were erotic were commonplace in earlier times, although they were not called pornography. In Samuel Pepys’ diary he writes about buying a French book called ''Escholle de Filles''. The book is a conversation between Francine and Susanne about sex, the older one telling the younger one all about it. Pepys saw the book in a shop, thought it was lewd and disgusting and did not buy it. However, he went back three weeks later and bought &amp;quot;the idle roguish book, L'escholle de filles; which I have bought in plain binding… because I resolve, as soon as I have read it, to burn it.&amp;quot;  He drank lots of wine, locked himself away, read it then burnt it. He said it was an idle and lewd book but it a good read for a sober man such as himself to read so as to learn about the villainy of the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Bibles and pornography were the two items most likely to be confiscated by the Soviet Customs on entering the USSR. The common question from border guards/customs officers was always: &amp;quot;Are you carrying Bibles or pornography?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women respond to pornography in a way that is more similar to the way men respond than was previously thought. Erotic imagery elicits a faster and stronger electrical response in a woman’s brain than any other kind of image, recent research reported in the journal ''Brain Research'' reveals. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,199474,00.html] The researchers expected lower levels of response, since previous research had indicated men that are more aroused by erotic images than women, but found that women’s responses were as strong.--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 21:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I’m not sure where exactly in the draft you want to place all that information, but go ahead and add it on in.  (I’ve added a few more sections to help place the information—I’d put the Museum part in the Modern History section, and the female response information in the effects on individuals section)  think the draft is (at the moment) in good enough shape to replace the current article, and since the article is (I just noticed) locked (and for good reason I’ve no doubt) I encourage you to just add to the draft, just like it was a real article, until a sysop can be found to implement it.  But, as I’ve said, it is a rough draft—I wouldn’t turn it in to a professor in the state it is currently in, but the wiki process is a collaborative one so I’m more than willing to put my work out there as a base for others to build on.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 22:10, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would gladly do that, but I don't know where the draft is!--[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 22:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Try here [[Talk:Pornography/draft]]  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 08:37, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pornography and erotica==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks, Reginod &amp;amp; Britinme. Good draft, coming along nicely. I'll just make one quibble:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Erotica uses sexually charged imagery for artistic purposes,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This isn't actually true. Not unless you think that &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; is entirely separate from politics, etc. Or unless you're trying to say that [[art]] is a category of [[free speech]], which gets into the &amp;quot;P*** Christ&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;D*** Mary&amp;quot; controversies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In everyday use, [[erotica]] is [[pornography]]. If I'm wrong, please correct me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:08, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pornography is something that has degradation as its intent; it does not necessarily even have to contain sexual content. Erotica is material connected with love rather than sex, (though the love depicted is often of a sexual nature). So that although there is a large overlap between erotica and pronography, something can be one and not the other. For example the biblical book [[Song of Solomon]] might be readily categorised as erotica on the basis of its content, but few would call it pornography. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 11:16, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As a literary genre, pornography is writing that has sexual arousal as its primary objective. Erotica is such material with artistic pretensions. Thus, the descriptive term pornography implies a statement about intentionality and instrumentality without reference to merit, whereas the term erotica is evaluative and laudatory. In Flesh and the Word, John Preston more baldly says, &amp;quot;The only difference is that erotica is the stuff bought by rich people.&amp;quot; [http://www.glbtq.com/literature/erotica_pornography.html ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Certainly some pornography with artistic pretensions ''calls itself'' erotica, often to avoid legal prohibitions on the distribution of obscene material, for example. But this is in no way the same thing as ''being'' erotica. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That's a rather dodgy source you're using there, btw.)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 11:34, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I’m inclined to agree with you that erotica is pornography.  I’d say that it makes up a subset of pornography – I’d be hard pressed to find a clear distinction.  I think, in common usage, erotica=socially acceptable pornography, and pornography=socially unacceptable pornography.  &lt;br /&gt;
:Both erotica and pornography are intended to arouse sexual interest.  Erotica, perhaps, more subtly than other pornography, but in the end it is about eros – love mingled with sexual desire.  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:09, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Erotica is pornography for those who have some inteligence. It requires a high level of literacy, and artistic appreciation. It takes skill to make, while plain pornography needs nothing more than a camera. But underneath, it is still pornography. It strives to be respectable, and to some extent suceeeds. But porn is porn, and thats all it will ever be. Just because its a well-written story, or a painting that takes incredible skill to paint, does not turn it magically acceptable. Erotica is a subset of porn, not something completly different. - BornAgainBrit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I'm not convinced by this. I wonder if we can make the distinction that pornography is solely concerned with sexual arousal and gratification through the graphic depiction of sexual acts, and that works of literary and artistic merit can contain passages of explicit sexuality that function as an integral part of the total work but are not intended purely for purposes of sexual gratification. The famous example of this in English law was, of course, the 1963 trial involving Penguin books and the [[D.H.Lawrence]] novel ''Lady Chatterley's Lover''. I have read that, and it's true to say that the passages objected to in 1963 are fairly graphic (though perhaps less so by today's standards). However, they are not the central point of the book, and their purpose is not arousal but a deepening of understanding of the themes of the nove. IMHO they add a great deal to the overall merit of the work. Personally, I found a book like ''American Psycho'' a great deal more distressing in that it explicitly ties sexuality to graphic violence. It seems invidious to me to single out the depiction of erotica as pornography while ignoring the graphic depictions of violence that seem to pass unnoticed. --[[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 14:18, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Needed fixes==&lt;br /&gt;
Since the article is locked can someone make the following changes, marked in '''bold'''?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Due to a series of liberal decisions beginning with the Warren Court, pornography is aggressive'''ly''' sold and distributed in the United States without meaningful law enforcement'''{{fact}}'''. It is a $12 billion industry that affects and harms 40 million Americans'''(POV)'''. Pornography destroys relationships and exploits young people.[2]'''maybe include the article that claims this POV'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there really such a large public concern about an alledged connection between pornography and porn? Check the link I provided in the debate about this subject for some statistics on the percentage of people who've ever seen porn or watch it on a regular basis, it might shock you to find that that multi-billion dollar industry only survives because it has many millions of consumers, not just the random perv, but lawyers, doctors, fathers and husbands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would also like to see a paragraph about erotica in ancient Rome, Greece, India, Egypt and the stone age, how it's related to human nature and that it does in some cases provide an outlet for potential rapists.&lt;br /&gt;
Just to make the article more balanced (and more serious).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1343839.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=913013&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]] I think if you look at [[Talk:Pornography/draft]] you’ll find a draft of an article that addresses some (but not all) of your concerns.  Please add any relevant information to the draft.  We are trying to get it into good enough shape that it can replace the current article.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 13:35, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It still lacks a paragraph about the psychology/sociology behind pornography, but, it's definitely a lot better than the current version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have no idea where to start on that paragraph as it stands the draft is touching the far edges of what I feel comfortable writing on (any more and I worry a bad source could steer me wrong).  But if you point me to a good source I’ll work on it, or you could add it yourself – feel free to treat the draft like the article, improve it as you can.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 18:41, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Needs Citations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to be in line with commandment 5. This page states much opinion and needs to be fixed by one of the people with the power to do it. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:27, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Needs deletion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: terrible. --[[User:Hacker|Hacker]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;([[User talk:Hacker|Write some code]] • [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]])&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A draft (which I think is much better) is being worked on. See somewhere above for a link to said draft. &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;FFD700&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;000000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:11, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I came to this page to try to add a UK context but see that it uneditable.  This is the sort of thing I was going to add.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the UK pornography continues to be used by the mass circulation tabloids to bolster sales.  Since the 1970's the UK 'red-top' tabloids, in particular the News International Corp owned 'Sun' and the 'Daily Star' have used images of naked or semi-naked women to attract a readership of B2,C,D males.  They then fill other pages in the paper with biased articles pushing their political viewpoint in an attempt to control clearly influencible minds. The Sun in particular influenced the result of the 1992 General election with their pornography-ridden viewpoint that they claimed to have won the election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other tabloids such as the 'Daily Sport' and the 'Daily Express' are owned by David Sullivan and Richard Desmond, both of whom made their fortunes in pornography before moving into newspapers.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can this be added please. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 17:47, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please add it to the draft at  [[Talk:Pornography/draft]] .   The draft is editable and the better it is the more likely we are to get it to replace the current article.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 17:51, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the advice.  I've done that now.  --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 18:10, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: What does &amp;quot;B2,C,D&amp;quot; mean? --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 18:25, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It a form a categorization of people by social position and available income. A's are higher earner or those with wealth, B's not quite so much, B2,C &amp;amp; D are the classifications for either unskilled manual labour, the unemployed or the underclass. In the US this equates to blue collar etc. These were the groups considered most easily influenced by pornography and propaganda. Without their media-led political bias in the 1980's the political landscape of Britain would have been very different. That's why I added my bit in the Social Effects of Pornography  section in the new draft. --[[User:Commandment9|Commandment9]] 18:41, 11 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Addiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pornography can be addictive, according to some source, especially ones involving violence. This fact should be added onto the article. [[User:Wooyi|Wooyi]] 22:32, 29 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal wants to help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I am liberal. I admit it. I accept that conservatives and/or Christians do not like pornography, etc. and I respect your decisions. My ex-boyfriend is a Christian and didn't view porn and was waiting until marriage, etc. so I understand how people like you guys think (we're still friends). As much as I'd love to edit articles like this one, the abortion one, and the cannabis one for content, I understand that this is a conservative website and I would gladly respect that and maintain your right-winged perspectives. I am mainly on this site because I want to broaden my horizons and see what the other side of the arguments are. I'm curious about the right-winged perspective, and even though I don't agree, I respect it and want to understand it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, here's my problem with conservapedia. It's not that this is conservative. You guys have every right to post this conservatively biased stuff because you're up front about it and say you're conservative and don't try to hide it. You display it proudly. More power to you. My problem is that a lot of these entries use vague words like &amp;quot;very bad&amp;quot; or, in the case of this porn article, you say that porn &amp;quot;has an effect.&amp;quot; That is quite vague. How is it bad? What are the effects? What is &amp;quot;very&amp;quot; bad? Furthermore, many sentences in this site are just poorly written, grammatically speaking, and it is difficult to read. If you want respect from the liberal world, at least take the time to sound intelligent, back up everything with lots and lots of sources, use good grammar and strong vocabulary. &amp;quot;Very bad&amp;quot; is not a strong choice of words. &amp;quot;Harmful&amp;quot; might be. Then again, once you say &amp;quot;harmful,&amp;quot; you'll have to say WHY it's harmful. In the sentence &amp;quot;everything is a perversion of one sort of another&amp;quot; ... well, &amp;quot;of&amp;quot; should be &amp;quot;or.&amp;quot; I recognize this is a common typo, but I would love to edit it and make this site better! There's hundreds of entries where it is just poorly written and I'd love to edit it JUST FOR FLUIDITY. In other words, so it's more readable, free from typos and other errors, etc. Also, there are some things which are obviously biased, but I don't think has anything to do with being conservative or liberal, such as the use of &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; in this article. Anyone, male or female, can be desensitized to sex via porn, and as a female who happens to enjoy porn, I think that this article should recognize that people of both genders view porn, and that sex is not as stereotypically male as many people would like you to believe. After all, it takes two...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've worked with a number of newspapers and I study linguistics. I've won numerous awards for my writing and read countless books on how to persuade people with words and make the most use out of every word. I regularly edit my peer's essays and I do not change their opinions, but make their opinions come across as stronger through a better method of writing. I would love to do this for this website, but unfortunately I am blocked from editing most articles because they are controversial and have been locked. I could probably find other examples of unclear sentences, but I can't remember which articles I have looked at.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep up your beliefs. It takes all kinds to make up this world, and we need both conservative and liberal viewpoints. I'd love to help you guys, but you consistently block me. Oh well. Your loss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Neko1337&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the number of locked articles are as bad as you seem to think.  Surely there are ''some'' that you'd be interested in editing that are not locked.  And once the administrators see that you are doing a good job, they might even be willing to unlock articles for you to tidy up.&lt;br /&gt;
:I suspect that the original author(s) use male pronouns in a generic way, not specifically indicating males.&lt;br /&gt;
:I improved the article a little bit in line with your comments (but I agree it could do with more).&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:54, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Pornography consumers are overwhelmingly male (by a nearly 3:1 margin), so the only substantive point made by &amp;quot;Neko&amp;quot; above is not persuasive.[http://internet-filter-review.toptenreviews.com/internet-pornography-statistics.html]--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:15, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I didn't know the actual figures, but yes, I had meant to mention something along those lines also.  Nevertheless, I gather (it's just an impression) that pornography use by females is on the increase.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:26, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read somewhere (I actually think it was a claim by Pat Robertson, so take it with a grain of salt) that women tend more to read erotic literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any event, I think it's very interesting to present this from both a Christian and an Islamic perspective, as Ed has done here. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 11:58, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why porn is actually bad ==&lt;br /&gt;
Should we sight more sources for why pornography is bad...maybe we should offer counterpoints to why pornography is bad, then shown arguements against those to make our case stronger. {{unsigned|Kaji132007}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Him Vs Her and Person==&lt;br /&gt;
Why are all the references to males? &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Porn says that happiness is found by having the same experience over and over again with lots of different '''women'''''(my girl isn't interested in women)''; true eros says that happiness is found by having different experiences over and over again with the same person&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Viewing or reading pornography day in and day out has an effect. It desensitizes a person, makes '''him''' more withdrawn, and makes '''him''' view '''others''' ''(and other males?)'' like objects rather than the people they are.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted my girlfriend to look at this page because she does use porn quite regularly much to my disappointment. Its something we are trying to deal with and work through, but the inherit bias toward males in the article has turned her attention to topics of feminism and such and the original point of asking her to read this as been lost on her. --[[User:DjWizard|DjWizard]] 20:51, 5 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't get your point - or if I do, I disagree with it. We assume a porn user is a man, the same way we assume a nurse is a woman. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:02, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::And both assumptions would be invalid some of the time.  My general answer is that &amp;quot;male&amp;quot; terms are actually generic terms (as &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; is a reference to a member of &amp;quot;mankind&amp;quot;), although some specific instances might bear being reworded.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:42, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see oyur problem with you Girlfriend looking at porn, I mean, is it causing any actual relationship problems?  {{unsigned|Kaji132007}}&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't see a problem with portraying someone in a degrading manner?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:42, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious perspectives==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps it's time to re-visit this issue. Much as it is a touchy subject, it does need to be addressed. A well-balanced and scholarly article would explain why it's bad, and not (as &amp;quot;Neko&amp;quot; suggested) merely make general assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 7 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pornography actually lowers rape rate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was looking at statistics for rape rate in Japan, and It would seem that pornography and rape are inversely related. As porn sales go up, rape rates go down. Should we include this in the article?  {{unsigned|Bias}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;It would seem&amp;quot;&amp;amp;mdash;seems rather uncertain to me.  Is the source on-line?  If so, post it here (on this talk page) and we can look into it further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, sorry, it's not online. If you would like, look in to it. [[User:Bias|Bias]] 22:19, 31 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do remember seeing an article that pointed out that pornography has become much more widely available in recent years, because of the Internet, and in that same time, the rate for rapes in the U.S. has gone down, although the article pointed out that law enforcement procedures had improved over that time too.  Unfortunately, I don't remember the name of the article or where I saw it, but it's an aspect of the issue that's worth investigating.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 15:50, 3 March 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differene Experiences==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;having different experiences over and over again with the same person&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
How can I do that if the Bible/God only approves 'missionary', &amp;amp; does'nt approve 'devices'?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vader1941</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>