<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tzoran</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tzoran"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Tzoran"/>
	<updated>2026-11-09T04:24:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856232</id>
		<title>Full Text of the Confederate States Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856232"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:05:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Preamble== &lt;br /&gt;
We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Confederate States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 1. - The Legislative Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - The Legislature===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. All legislative powers herein delegated shall be vested in a Congress of the Confederate States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - The House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several States; and the electors in each State shall be citizens of the Confederate States, and have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State Legislature; but no person of foreign birth, not a citizen of the Confederate States, shall be allowed to vote for any officer, civil or political, State or Federal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained the age of twenty-five years, and be a citizen of the Confederate States, and who shall not when elected, be an inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States, which may be included within this Confederacy, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all slaves. The actual enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the Confederate States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every fifty thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of South Carolina shall be entitled to choose six; the State of Georgia ten; the State of Alabama nine; the State of Florida two; the State of Mississippi seven; the State of Louisiana six; and the State of Texas six.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. When vacancies happen in the representation from any State the executive authority thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment; except that any judicial or other Federal officer, resident and acting solely within the limits of any State, may be impeached by a vote of two-thirds of both branches of the Legislature thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - The Senate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Senate of the Confederate States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen for six years by the Legislature thereof, at the regular session next immediately preceding the commencement of the term of service; and each Senator shall have one vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Immediately after they shall be assembled, in consequence of the first election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three classes. The seats of the Senators of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the second year; of the second class at the expiration of the fourth year; and of the third class at the expiration of the sixth year; so that one-third may be chosen every second year; and if vacancies happen by resignation, or other wise, during the recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary appointments until the next meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such vacancies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained the age of thirty years, and be a citizen of the Confederate States; and who shall not, then elected, be an inhabitant of the State for which he shall be chosen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Vice President of the Confederate States shall be president of the Senate, but shall have no vote unless they be equally divided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The Senate shall choose their other officers; and also a president pro tempore in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of President of the Confederate states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the Confederate States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside; and no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust, or profit under the Confederate States; but the party convicted shall, nevertheless, be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment according to law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Elections, Meetings===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof, subject to the provisions of this Constitution; but the Congress may, at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as to the times and places of choosing Senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year; and such meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall, by law, appoint a different day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 5 - Membership, Rules, Journals, Adjournment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner and under such penalties as each House may provide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of the whole number, expel a member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Each House shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may in their judgment require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the members of either House, on any question, shall, at the desire of one-fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 6 - Compensation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the Treasury of the Confederate States. They shall, in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place. No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the Confederate States, which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no person holding any office under the Confederate States shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office. But Congress may, by law, grant to the principal officer in each of the Executive Departments a seat upon the floor of either House, with the privilege of discussing any measures appertaining to his department.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments, as on other bills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Every bill which shall have passed both Houses, shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the President of the Confederate States; if he approve, he shall sign it; but if not, he shall return it, with his objections, to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If, after such reconsideration, two-thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that House, it shall become a law. But in all such cases, the votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress, by their adjournment, prevent its return; in which case it shall not be a law. The President may approve any appropriation and disapprove any other appropriation in the same bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate the appropriations disapproved; and shall return a copy of such appropriations, with his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had as in case of other bills disapproved by the President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Every order, resolution, or vote, to which the concurrence of both Houses may be necessary (except on a question of adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the Confederate States; and before the same shall take effect, shall be approved by him; or, being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two-thirds of both Houses, according to the rules and limitations prescribed in case of a bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 8 - Powers of Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress shall have power -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises for revenue, necessary to pay the debts, provide for the common defense, and carry on the Government of the Confederate States; but no bounties shall be granted from the Treasury; nor shall any duties or taxes on importations from foreign nations be laid to promote or foster any branch of industry; and all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. To borrow money on the credit of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes; but neither this, nor any other clause contained in the Constitution, shall ever be construed to delegate the power to Congress to appropriate money for any internal improvement intended to facilitate commerce; except for the purpose of furnishing lights, beacons, and buoys, and other aids to navigation upon the coasts, and the improvement of harbors and the removing of obstructions in river navigation; in all which cases such duties shall be laid on the navigation facilitated thereby as may be necessary to pay the costs and expenses thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. To establish uniform laws of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the Confederate States; but no law of Congress shall discharge any debt contracted before the passage of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. To establish post offices and post routes; but the expenses of the Post Office Department, after the 1st day of March in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and sixty-three, shall be paid out of its own revenues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. To raise and support armies; but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. To provide and maintain a navy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Confederate States, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the Confederate States; reserving to the States, respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. To exercise exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of one or more States and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the Confederate States; and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the Confederate States, or in any department or officer thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 9 - Limits on Congress, Bill of Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Congress shall also have power to prohibit the introduction of slaves from any State not a member of, or Territory not belonging to, this Confederacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. No capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any State, except by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Congress shall appropriate no money from the Treasury except by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses, taken by yeas and nays, unless it be asked and estimated for by some one of the heads of departments and submitted to Congress by the President; or for the purpose of paying its own expenses and contingencies; or for the payment of claims against the Confederate States, the justice of which shall have been judicially declared by a tribunal for the investigation of claims against the Government, which it is hereby made the duty of Congress to establish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. All bills appropriating money shall specify in Federal currency the exact amount of each appropriation and the purposes for which it is made; and Congress shall grant no extra compensation to any public contractor, officer, agent, or servant, after such contract shall have been made or such service rendered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. No title of nobility shall be granted by the Confederate States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact so tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the Confederacy, than according to the rules of common law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Every law, or resolution having the force of law, shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. No State shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, or ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts; or grant any title of nobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. No State shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any State on imports, or exports, shall be for the use of the Treasury of the Confederate States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No State shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty on tonnage, except on seagoing vessels, for the improvement of its rivers and harbors navigated by the said vessels; but such duties shall not conflict with any treaties of the Confederate States with foreign nations; and any surplus revenue thus derived shall, after making such improvement, be paid into the common treasury. Nor shall any State keep troops or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another State, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. But when any river divides or flows through two or more States they may enter into compacts with each other to improve the navigation thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 2. - The Executive Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - The President===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the Confederate States of America. He and the Vice President shall hold their offices for the term of six years; but the President shall not be reeligible. The President and Vice President shall be elected as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Each State shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative or person holding an office of trust or profit under the Confederate States shall be appointed an elector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The electors shall meet in their respective States and vote by ballot for President and Vice President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same State with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit, sealed, to the seat of the Government of. the Confederate States, directed to the President of the Senate; the President of the Senate shall,in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers, not exceeding three, on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President the votes shall be taken by States ~ the representation from each State having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the States, and a majority of all the States shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President, whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the 4th day of March next following, then the Vice President shall act as President, as in case of the death, or other constitutional disability of the President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice President shall be the Vice President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have a majority, then, from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. No person except a natural-born citizen of the Confederate; States, or a citizen thereof at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, or a citizen thereof born in the United States prior to the 20th of December, 1860, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the limits of the Confederate States, as they may exist at the time of his election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President; and the Congress may, by law, provide for the case of removal, death, resignation, or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President; and such officer shall act accordingly until the disability be removed or a President shall be elected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected; and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the Confederate States, or any of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Before he enters on the execution of his office he shall take the following oath or affirmation: &amp;quot;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the Confederate States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution thereof.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President shall be Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the Confederate States, and of the militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the Confederate States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the Executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices; and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the Confederate States, except in cases of impeachment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties; provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the Confederate States whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law; but the Congress may, by law, vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The principal officer in each of the Executive Departments, and all persons connected with the diplomatic service, may be removed from office at the pleasure of the President. All other civil officers of the Executive Departments may be removed at any time by the President, or other appointing power, when their services are unnecessary, or for dishonesty, incapacity. inefficiency, misconduct, or neglect of duty; and when so removed, the removal shall be reported to the Senate, together with the reasons therefor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The President shall have power to fill all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session; but no person rejected by the Senate shall be reappointed to the same office during their ensuing recess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - State of the Union, Convening Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President shall, from time to time, give to the Congress information of the state of the Confederacy, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them; and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Disqualification===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the Confederate States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 3. - The Judicial Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Judicial powers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The judicial power of the Confederate States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish. The judges, both of the Supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The judicial power shall extend to all cases arising under this Constitution, the laws of the Confederate States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; to controversies to which the Confederate States shall be a party; to controversies between two or more States; between a State and citizens of another State, where the State is plaintiff; between citizens claiming lands under grants of different States; and between a State or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects; but no State shall be sued by a citizen or subject of any foreign state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction both as to law and fact, with such exceptions and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury, and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - Treason===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Treason against the Confederate States shall consist only in levying war against.them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason; but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture, except during the life of the person attainted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 4. - The States==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Each State to Honor all others===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State; and the Congress may, by general laws, prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - State citizens, Extradition===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A person charged in any State with treason, felony, or other crime against the laws of such State, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another State, shall, on demand of the executive authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having jurisdiction of the crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No slave or other person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the Confederate States, under the laws thereof, escaping or lawfully carried into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor; but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such slave belongs; or to whom such service or labor may be due.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - New States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Other States may be admitted into this Confederacy by a vote of two- thirds of the whole House of Representatives and two-thirds of the Senate, the Senate voting by States; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor any State be formed by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned, as well as of the Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations concerning the property of the Confederate States, including the lands thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several Sates; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form States to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory the institution of negro slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress and by the Territorial government; and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories shall have the right to take to such Territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the States or Territories of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Confederate States shall guarantee to every State that now is, or hereafter may become, a member of this Confederacy, a republican form of government; and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the Legislature or of the Executive when the Legislature is not in session) against domestic violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 5. - Amendment== &lt;br /&gt;
1. Upon the demand of any three States, legally assembled in their several conventions, the Congress shall summon a convention of all the States, to take into consideration such amendments to the Constitution as the said States shall concur in suggesting at the time when the said demand is made; and should any of the proposed amendments to the Constitution be agreed on by the said convention ~ voting by States ~ and the same be ratified by the Legislatures of two-thirds of the several States, or by conventions in two-thirds thereof ~ as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the general convention ~ they shall thenceforward form a part of this Constitution. But no State shall, without its consent, be deprived of its equal representation in the Senate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 6. - The Confederacy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Transition from the Provisional Government===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Government established by this Constitution is the successor of the Provisional Government of the Confederate States of America, and all the laws passed by the latter shall continue in force until the same shall be repealed or modified; and all the officers appointed by the same shall remain in office until their successors are appointed and qualified, or the offices abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Debts of the Provisional Government===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. All debts contracted and engagements entered into before the adoption of this Constitution shall be as valid against the Confederate States under this Constitution, as under the Provisional Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - Supremacy of the Constitution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. This Constitution, and the laws of the Confederate States made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the Confederate States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Oaths of Office===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the Confederate States and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 5 - Reservation of unenumerated rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The enumeration, in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people of the several States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 6 - State powers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The powers not delegated to the Confederate States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 7. - Ratification==&lt;br /&gt;
1. The ratification of the conventions of five States shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. When five States shall have ratified this Constitution, in the manner before specified, the Congress under the Provisional Constitution shall prescribe the time for holding the election of President and Vice President; and for the meeting of the Electoral College; and for counting the votes, and inaugurating the President. They shall, also, prescribe the time for holding the first election of members of Congress under this Constitution, and the time for assembling the same. Until the assembling of such Congress, the Congress under the Provisional Constitution shall continue to exercise the legislative powers granted them; not extending beyond the time limited by the Constitution of the Provisional Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adopted unanimously by the Congress of the Confederate States of South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, sitting in Convention at the capitol, in the city of Montgomery, Alabama, on the Eleventh day of March, in the year Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HOWELL COBB,&lt;br /&gt;
President of the Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. South Carolina: R. Barnwell Rhett, C. G. Memminger, Wm. Porcher Miles, James Chesnut, Jr., R. W. Barnwell, William W. Boyce, Lawrence M. Keitt, T. J. Withers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Georgia: Francis S. Bartow, Martin J. Crawford, Benjamin H. Hill, Thos. R. R. Cobb.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Florida: Jackson Morton, J. Patton Anderson, Jas. B. Owens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Alabama: Richard W. Walker, Robt. H. Smith, Colin J. McRae, William P. Chilton, Stephen F. Hale, David P. Lewis, Tho. Fearn, Jno. Gill Shorter, J. L. M. Curry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Mississippi: Alex. M. Clayton, James T. Harrison, William S. Barry, W. S. Wilson, Walker Brooke, W. P. Harris, J. A. P. Campbell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Louisiana: Alex. de Clouet, C. M. Conrad, Duncan F. Kenner, Henry Marshall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Texas: John Hemphill, Thomas N. Waul, John H. Reagan, Williamson S. Oldham, Louis T. Wigfall, John Gregg, William Beck Ochiltree.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856230</id>
		<title>Full Text of the Confederate States Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856230"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:05:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Preamble== &lt;br /&gt;
We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character, in order to form a permanent federal government, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity — invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God — do ordain and establish this Constitution for the Confederate States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 1. - The Legislative Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - The Legislature===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. All legislative powers herein delegated shall be vested in a Congress of the Confederate States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - The House===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several States; and the electors in each State shall be citizens of the Confederate States, and have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State Legislature; but no person of foreign birth, not a citizen of the Confederate States, shall be allowed to vote for any officer, civil or political, State or Federal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained the age of twenty-five years, and be a citizen of the Confederate States, and who shall not when elected, be an inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States, which may be included within this Confederacy, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all slaves. The actual enumeration shall be made within three years after the first meeting of the Congress of the Confederate States, and within every subsequent term of ten years, in such manner as they shall by law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every fifty thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of South Carolina shall be entitled to choose six; the State of Georgia ten; the State of Alabama nine; the State of Florida two; the State of Mississippi seven; the State of Louisiana six; and the State of Texas six.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. When vacancies happen in the representation from any State the executive authority thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment; except that any judicial or other Federal officer, resident and acting solely within the limits of any State, may be impeached by a vote of two-thirds of both branches of the Legislature thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - The Senate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Senate of the Confederate States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen for six years by the Legislature thereof, at the regular session next immediately preceding the commencement of the term of service; and each Senator shall have one vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Immediately after they shall be assembled, in consequence of the first election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three classes. The seats of the Senators of the first class shall be vacated at the expiration of the second year; of the second class at the expiration of the fourth year; and of the third class at the expiration of the sixth year; so that one-third may be chosen every second year; and if vacancies happen by resignation, or other wise, during the recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive thereof may make temporary appointments until the next meeting of the Legislature, which shall then fill such vacancies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained the age of thirty years, and be a citizen of the Confederate States; and who shall not, then elected, be an inhabitant of the State for which he shall be chosen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Vice President of the Confederate States shall be president of the Senate, but shall have no vote unless they be equally divided.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The Senate shall choose their other officers; and also a president pro tempore in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the office of President of the Confederate states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the Confederate States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside; and no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two-thirds of the members present. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust, or profit under the Confederate States; but the party convicted shall, nevertheless, be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment according to law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Elections, Meetings===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof, subject to the provisions of this Constitution; but the Congress may, at any time, by law, make or alter such regulations, except as to the times and places of choosing Senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall assemble at least once in every year; and such meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall, by law, appoint a different day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 5 - Membership, Rules, Journals, Adjournment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns, and qualifications of its own members, and a majority of each shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the attendance of absent members, in such manner and under such penalties as each House may provide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of the whole number, expel a member.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Each House shall keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as may in their judgment require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of the members of either House, on any question, shall, at the desire of one-fifth of those present, be entered on the journal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Neither House, during the session of Congress, shall, without the consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other place than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 6 - Compensation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the Treasury of the Confederate States. They shall, in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place. No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the Confederate States, which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no person holding any office under the Confederate States shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office. But Congress may, by law, grant to the principal officer in each of the Executive Departments a seat upon the floor of either House, with the privilege of discussing any measures appertaining to his department.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments, as on other bills.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Every bill which shall have passed both Houses, shall, before it becomes a law, be presented to the President of the Confederate States; if he approve, he shall sign it; but if not, he shall return it, with his objections, to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the objections at large on their journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If, after such reconsideration, two-thirds of that House shall agree to pass the bill, it shall be sent, together with the objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two-thirds of that House, it shall become a law. But in all such cases, the votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and nays, and the names of the persons voting for and against the bill shall be entered on the journal of each House respectively. If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress, by their adjournment, prevent its return; in which case it shall not be a law. The President may approve any appropriation and disapprove any other appropriation in the same bill. In such case he shall, in signing the bill, designate the appropriations disapproved; and shall return a copy of such appropriations, with his objections, to the House in which the bill shall have originated; and the same proceedings shall then be had as in case of other bills disapproved by the President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Every order, resolution, or vote, to which the concurrence of both Houses may be necessary (except on a question of adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the Confederate States; and before the same shall take effect, shall be approved by him; or, being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two-thirds of both Houses, according to the rules and limitations prescribed in case of a bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 8 - Powers of Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Congress shall have power -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises for revenue, necessary to pay the debts, provide for the common defense, and carry on the Government of the Confederate States; but no bounties shall be granted from the Treasury; nor shall any duties or taxes on importations from foreign nations be laid to promote or foster any branch of industry; and all duties, imposts, and excises shall be uniform throughout the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. To borrow money on the credit of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian tribes; but neither this, nor any other clause contained in the Constitution, shall ever be construed to delegate the power to Congress to appropriate money for any internal improvement intended to facilitate commerce; except for the purpose of furnishing lights, beacons, and buoys, and other aids to navigation upon the coasts, and the improvement of harbors and the removing of obstructions in river navigation; in all which cases such duties shall be laid on the navigation facilitated thereby as may be necessary to pay the costs and expenses thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. To establish uniform laws of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the Confederate States; but no law of Congress shall discharge any debt contracted before the passage of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. To provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. To establish post offices and post routes; but the expenses of the Post Office Department, after the 1st day of March in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and sixty-three, shall be paid out of its own revenues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. To constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. To declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal, and make rules concerning captures on land and water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. To raise and support armies; but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. To provide and maintain a navy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Confederate States, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the Confederate States; reserving to the States, respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. To exercise exclusive legislation, in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of one or more States and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the Confederate States; and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the Legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the Confederate States, or in any department or officer thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 9 - Limits on Congress, Bill of Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Congress shall also have power to prohibit the introduction of slaves from any State not a member of, or Territory not belonging to, this Confederacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. No capitation or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any State, except by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one State over those of another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of the receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. Congress shall appropriate no money from the Treasury except by a vote of two-thirds of both Houses, taken by yeas and nays, unless it be asked and estimated for by some one of the heads of departments and submitted to Congress by the President; or for the purpose of paying its own expenses and contingencies; or for the payment of claims against the Confederate States, the justice of which shall have been judicially declared by a tribunal for the investigation of claims against the Government, which it is hereby made the duty of Congress to establish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. All bills appropriating money shall specify in Federal currency the exact amount of each appropriation and the purposes for which it is made; and Congress shall grant no extra compensation to any public contractor, officer, agent, or servant, after such contract shall have been made or such service rendered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. No title of nobility shall be granted by the Confederate States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. No soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16. No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17. In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact so tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the Confederacy, than according to the rules of common law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20. Every law, or resolution having the force of law, shall relate to but one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. No State shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, or ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts; or grant any title of nobility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. No State shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any State on imports, or exports, shall be for the use of the Treasury of the Confederate States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No State shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty on tonnage, except on seagoing vessels, for the improvement of its rivers and harbors navigated by the said vessels; but such duties shall not conflict with any treaties of the Confederate States with foreign nations; and any surplus revenue thus derived shall, after making such improvement, be paid into the common treasury. Nor shall any State keep troops or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another State, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay. But when any river divides or flows through two or more States they may enter into compacts with each other to improve the navigation thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 2. - The Executive Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - The President===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the Confederate States of America. He and the Vice President shall hold their offices for the term of six years; but the President shall not be reeligible. The President and Vice President shall be elected as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Each State shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress; but no Senator or Representative or person holding an office of trust or profit under the Confederate States shall be appointed an elector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The electors shall meet in their respective States and vote by ballot for President and Vice President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same State with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit, sealed, to the seat of the Government of. the Confederate States, directed to the President of the Senate; the President of the Senate shall,in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers, not exceeding three, on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President the votes shall be taken by States ~ the representation from each State having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the States, and a majority of all the States shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President, whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the 4th day of March next following, then the Vice President shall act as President, as in case of the death, or other constitutional disability of the President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice President shall be the Vice President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if no person have a majority, then, from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. No person except a natural-born citizen of the Confederate; States, or a citizen thereof at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, or a citizen thereof born in the United States prior to the 20th of December, 1860, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the limits of the Confederate States, as they may exist at the time of his election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President; and the Congress may, by law, provide for the case of removal, death, resignation, or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President; and such officer shall act accordingly until the disability be removed or a President shall be elected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected; and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the Confederate States, or any of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. Before he enters on the execution of his office he shall take the following oath or affirmation: &amp;quot;I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the Confederate States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution thereof.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President shall be Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of the Confederate States, and of the militia of the several States, when called into the actual service of the Confederate States; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the Executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices; and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the Confederate States, except in cases of impeachment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties; provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint, ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the Confederate States whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law; but the Congress may, by law, vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The principal officer in each of the Executive Departments, and all persons connected with the diplomatic service, may be removed from office at the pleasure of the President. All other civil officers of the Executive Departments may be removed at any time by the President, or other appointing power, when their services are unnecessary, or for dishonesty, incapacity. inefficiency, misconduct, or neglect of duty; and when so removed, the removal shall be reported to the Senate, together with the reasons therefor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The President shall have power to fill all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session; but no person rejected by the Senate shall be reappointed to the same office during their ensuing recess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - State of the Union, Convening Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President shall, from time to time, give to the Congress information of the state of the Confederacy, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them; and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Disqualification===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the Confederate States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 3. - The Judicial Branch==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Judicial powers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The judicial power of the Confederate States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may, from time to time, ordain and establish. The judges, both of the Supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The judicial power shall extend to all cases arising under this Constitution, the laws of the Confederate States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls; to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction; to controversies to which the Confederate States shall be a party; to controversies between two or more States; between a State and citizens of another State, where the State is plaintiff; between citizens claiming lands under grants of different States; and between a State or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens, or subjects; but no State shall be sued by a citizen or subject of any foreign state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction both as to law and fact, with such exceptions and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury, and such trial shall be held in the State where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - Treason===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Treason against the Confederate States shall consist only in levying war against.them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason; but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture, except during the life of the person attainted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 4. - The States==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Each State to Honor all others===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Full faith and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State; and the Congress may, by general laws, prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - State citizens, Extradition===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A person charged in any State with treason, felony, or other crime against the laws of such State, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another State, shall, on demand of the executive authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having jurisdiction of the crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. No slave or other person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the Confederate States, under the laws thereof, escaping or lawfully carried into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor; but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such slave belongs; or to whom such service or labor may be due.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - New States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Other States may be admitted into this Confederacy by a vote of two- thirds of the whole House of Representatives and two-thirds of the Senate, the Senate voting by States; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor any State be formed by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned, as well as of the Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations concerning the property of the Confederate States, including the lands thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several Sates; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form States to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory the institution of negro slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress and by the Territorial government; and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories shall have the right to take to such Territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the States or Territories of the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Confederate States shall guarantee to every State that now is, or hereafter may become, a member of this Confederacy, a republican form of government; and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the Legislature or of the Executive when the Legislature is not in session) against domestic violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 5. - Amendment== &lt;br /&gt;
1. Upon the demand of any three States, legally assembled in their several conventions, the Congress shall summon a convention of all the States, to take into consideration such amendments to the Constitution as the said States shall concur in suggesting at the time when the said demand is made; and should any of the proposed amendments to the Constitution be agreed on by the said convention ~ voting by States ~ and the same be ratified by the Legislatures of two-thirds of the several States, or by conventions in two-thirds thereof ~ as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the general convention ~ they shall thenceforward form a part of this Constitution. But no State shall, without its consent, be deprived of its equal representation in the Senate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 6. - The Confederacy==&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 1 - Transition from the Provisional Government===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Government established by this Constitution is the successor of the Provisional Government of the Confederate States of America, and all the laws passed by the latter shall continue in force until the same shall be repealed or modified; and all the officers appointed by the same shall remain in office until their successors are appointed and qualified, or the offices abolished.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 2 - Debts of the Provisional Government===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. All debts contracted and engagements entered into before the adoption of this Constitution shall be as valid against the Confederate States under this Constitution, as under the Provisional Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 3 - Supremacy of the Constitution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. This Constitution, and the laws of the Confederate States made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the Confederate States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 4 - Oaths of Office===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the Confederate States and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the Confederate States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 5 - Reservation of unenumerated rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The enumeration, in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people of the several States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Section 6 - State powers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The powers not delegated to the Confederate States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people thereof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Article 7. - Ratification==&lt;br /&gt;
1. The ratification of the conventions of five States shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. When five States shall have ratified this Constitution, in the manner before specified, the Congress under the Provisional Constitution shall prescribe the time for holding the election of President and Vice President; and for the meeting of the Electoral College; and for counting the votes, and inaugurating the President. They shall, also, prescribe the time for holding the first election of members of Congress under this Constitution, and the time for assembling the same. Until the assembling of such Congress, the Congress under the Provisional Constitution shall continue to exercise the legislative powers granted them; not extending beyond the time limited by the Constitution of the Provisional Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adopted unanimously by the Congress of the Confederate States of South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, sitting in Convention at the capitol, in the city of Montgomery, Alabama, on the Eleventh day of March, in the year Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-One.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HOWELL COBB,&lt;br /&gt;
President of5. Mississippi: Alex. M. Clayton, James T. Harrison, William S. Barry, W. S. Wilson, Walker Brooke, W. P. Harris, J. A. P. Campbell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Louisiana: Alex. de Clouet, C. M. Conrad, Duncan F. Kenner, Henry Marshall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Texas: John Hemphill, Thomas N. Waul, John H. Reagan, Williamson S. Oldham, Louis T. Wigfall, John Gregg, William Beck Ochiltree.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856229</id>
		<title>Full Text of the Confederate States Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856229"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:04:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=856228</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=856228"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:04:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Please stop. */ removed vandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=856224</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=856224"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:01:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Please stop. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please stop. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're not being very helpful or productive. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 15:59, 11 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
just trying to help with all the vandalism since my account got messed up.  thanks for the help. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:01, 11 March 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=856222</id>
		<title>User talk:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=856222"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T21:00:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Nice */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:52, 5 November 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== -elect category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is lots of work....but remember it needs to be emptied shortly after the first of the year when they no longer will be ____elect! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, 7 November 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== conflict over [[Obama]] article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Marty, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I temporarily blocked you just as a notice to resolve the conflict you seem to be having with another user over the [[Obama]] article. How about we settle the issue about the authorization of oil drilling on the [[Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama|talk page]] instead of constantly reverting each other's edits? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt;I'm not interested in edit-warring either--I'll allow the more senior admins to rule on the issue. Cheers! [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 20:08, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be appropriate. Just be sure to raise your concerns on one of their talk pages or the talk page for the article to make sure that everyone remembers. Thanks! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:06, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Hernan Lara Zavala]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 13:31, 30 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...for undoing the troll. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:26, 3 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem. Would be easier without going through the captcha each time. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 18:28, 3 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Good stuff ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My job is more of a speaking position than a writing position, I appreciate your help on the [[Sarah Palin]] article. --[[User:AlaskanEconomy|AlaskanEconomy]] 21:30, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A pleasure. I live to edit. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 22:03, 8 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will you be celebrating Fidel's 100th birthday in 2026? --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:45, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course not. He's dead. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 17:27, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandalism==&lt;br /&gt;
thanks for helping me deal with all that vandalism, it looks like someone got into my account and strated messing it all up. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:00, 11 March 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856217</id>
		<title>Copyright law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856217"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:57:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 856215 by Martyp (talk) removed vandalism by user:tzoran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Ten&amp;diff=856214</id>
		<title>Homework Five Answers - Student Ten</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Ten&amp;diff=856214"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:55:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: removed vandalism by user:tzoran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)&amp;diff=856207</id>
		<title>Talk:John 1-7 (Translated)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)&amp;diff=856207"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856206</id>
		<title>Copyright law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856206"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cholera&amp;diff=856205</id>
		<title>Cholera</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cholera&amp;diff=856205"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856204</id>
		<title>Full Text of the Confederate States Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856204"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_global_warming_man-made_or_Heaven-sent%3F&amp;diff=856203</id>
		<title>Debate:Is global warming man-made or Heaven-sent?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_global_warming_man-made_or_Heaven-sent%3F&amp;diff=856203"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_25&amp;diff=856202</id>
		<title>Homework Five Answers - Student 25</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_25&amp;diff=856202"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diacritical_mark&amp;diff=856199</id>
		<title>Diacritical mark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diacritical_mark&amp;diff=856199"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Martyp&amp;diff=856198</id>
		<title>User:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Martyp&amp;diff=856198"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:49:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;MORE PAGES REMOVED!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)&amp;diff=856197</id>
		<title>Talk:John 1-7 (Translated)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)&amp;diff=856197"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856196</id>
		<title>Full Text of the Confederate States Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Full_Text_of_the_Confederate_States_Constitution&amp;diff=856196"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cholera&amp;diff=856195</id>
		<title>Cholera</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cholera&amp;diff=856195"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856194</id>
		<title>Copyright law</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Copyright_law&amp;diff=856194"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_global_warming_man-made_or_Heaven-sent%3F&amp;diff=856193</id>
		<title>Debate:Is global warming man-made or Heaven-sent?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_global_warming_man-made_or_Heaven-sent%3F&amp;diff=856193"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_25&amp;diff=856192</id>
		<title>Homework Five Answers - Student 25</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_25&amp;diff=856192"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Ten&amp;diff=856189</id>
		<title>Homework Five Answers - Student Ten</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Ten&amp;diff=856189"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diacritical_mark&amp;diff=856188</id>
		<title>Diacritical mark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Diacritical_mark&amp;diff=856188"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:48:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Replaced content with &amp;quot;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Martyp&amp;diff=856187</id>
		<title>User:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Martyp&amp;diff=856187"/>
		<updated>2011-03-11T20:47:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;PAGE REMOVED BY ANON&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838420</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838420"/>
		<updated>2011-01-07T04:32:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: per email&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Retired}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Tzoran&amp;diff=838419</id>
		<title>User:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Tzoran&amp;diff=838419"/>
		<updated>2011-01-07T04:32:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: per email&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Retired}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran/Archive2&amp;diff=838412</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran/Archive2</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran/Archive2&amp;diff=838412"/>
		<updated>2011-01-07T04:25:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
 Thanks, but I have some experience from editing wikipedia &amp;amp; other sites. Godspeed, Aaron&lt;br /&gt;
== Cheers! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job dealing with the vandals and general riffraff. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 16:24, 10 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you (for your help especially)! There's certainly been enough of it today... Ay. But! I'm doing my best. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:26, 10 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reverting a block==&lt;br /&gt;
Had to revert your block on user Kupochama, as he did not engage in hostility.  If he's got honorable intentions, we'll let him contribute.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:38, 11 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry about that, Karajou; I saw his edit comment and decided based on that. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 11 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Email==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I meant to let you know that I'd sent you an email, but days have a funny way of running away with free time.  No rush on checking it, of course, but I just wanted to let you know. [[User:JaneX|JaneX]] 13:51, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for letting me know, Jane. I just saw your email, but I'll apologize right now for the several days it will take me to reply. Unfortunately I'm quite busy at the moment (see my user page, I describe my current work/school schedule). Any day that currency markets are open and trading is a busy one for me, and if you're unaware, currency markets are open for trading ''every'' day. I'll do my best to respond to you this weekend, make no mistake. Thank you! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:27, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Take your time reading it and responding, it's not going anywhere.  I hope you get a moment of relaxation, not to respond to the email, but for yourself! [[User:JaneX|JaneX]] 14:40, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Username==&lt;br /&gt;
Very well, you previously blocked me for having a username which did not consist of my first initial and last name. I was not aware of such a policy but I offer my apologies nonetheless. In any case, I have now followed your advice and recreated my account with the username you advised me to take, namely my first initial and last time. I hope that this will suffice. Happy new year. --[[User:Tbarter|Tbarter]] 21:56, 30 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you very much! It's a simple rule to follow so we try to make sure everyone sticks to it. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, 30 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could You take a look ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen Ben P's comments on [[Talk:Evil]]? ''&amp;quot;...conservatives are awful, evil people!''&amp;quot; You helped before, perhaps a block is needed?--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 22:50, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:See my response on your talk page and the [[Talk:Evil]] page. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:04, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::sorry for the confusion.--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 19:03, 5 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Don't worry about it; just read more carefully next time and you'll be all right. Thanks! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:04, 5 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Clean up==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=cur this]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:39, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem! At least blanking the page is nice and simple to undo (but nevertheless annoying!) [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838410</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838410"/>
		<updated>2011-01-07T04:19:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran/Archives&amp;diff=838408</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran/Archives</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran/Archives&amp;diff=838408"/>
		<updated>2011-01-07T04:17:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk Page]] Archives==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
'''Archive'''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
'''Start Date'''&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
'''End Date'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archive1|Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
December 18, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
August 3, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
[[User talk:Tzoran/Archive2|Archive 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
August 4, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
January 6, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838109</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=838109"/>
		<updated>2011-01-06T01:04:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Could You take a look */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could You take a look ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen Ben P's comments on [[Talk:Evil]]? ''&amp;quot;...conservatives are awful, evil people!''&amp;quot; You helped before, perhaps a block is needed?--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 22:50, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:See my response on your talk page and the [[Talk:Evil]] page. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:04, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::sorry for the confusion.--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 19:03, 5 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Don't worry about it; just read more carefully next time and you'll be all right. Thanks! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:04, 5 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Clean up==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=cur this]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:39, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem! At least blanking the page is nice and simple to undo (but nevertheless annoying!) [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Architecture&amp;diff=837972</id>
		<title>Architecture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Architecture&amp;diff=837972"/>
		<updated>2011-01-05T19:27:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 837971 by Bzordy (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Bellas_Artes.jpg|thumb|250px|The Fine Arts Palace, [[Mexico]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Architecture''' (from Latin ''architura'', and that from Greek αρχιτεκτονική, architektoniki) is the art and science of constructing the built environment. The discipline that deals with the design, construction and ornamentation of fine buildings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Architecture and eloquence are mixed arts whose end is sometimes beauty and sometimes use.&amp;quot;'' [[Ralph Waldo Emerson]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ralph Waldo Emerson: [http://www.vcu.edu/engweb/transcendentalism/authors/emerson/essays/art.html Thought on Art]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Architectural types and styles classify architecture in terms of form, techniques, materials, time periods, contexts, region, climates, etc. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://types.greatbuildings.com/ A Menu of  Architectural Types]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Oxford English Dictionary defines architectural style as, &amp;quot;A definite type of architecture distinguished by special characteristics of structure and ornament&amp;quot;... ''The language of ornament employed throughout a building frequently identifies the architecture of a particular period.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wbdg.org/resources/style.php Style] by Phoebe Crisman, Assistant Professor,&lt;br /&gt;
University of Virginia, School of Architecture.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Terms like Balustrade, Column, [[Cupola]], Entablature, Façade, Gothic arch, Jamb, [[Masonry]], Portico, Volute, or Wattle, are typical of this architectural profession. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:The High Museum of Art in Atlanta.jpg|thumb|The High [[Museum]] of Art in [[Atlanta]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Basilica of the annunciation.jpg|thumb|240px|Basilica of the Annunciation, [[Nazareth]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Architects are those who engages in the profession of architecture. Many of them along history have achieved notable success leaving outstanding works. Using the technology available and suitable materials like [[wood]], stone or [[marble]], glass, [[cement]], [[steel]], or pre-stressed concrete, architects have enhanced our environment. In the following periods some of this works or cultural symbols will be presented.     &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Architecture is the will of an epoch translated into space&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Greek architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Parthenon.jpg|thumb|The Parthenon.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sup.jpg|left|The Supreme Court.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Greek architecture]] arose on the shores of the [[Aegean Sea]] and flourished in the ancient world. The most important works of Greek architecture were produced between 700 BC and 146 BC. Architects Callicrates, Mnesicles, and Ictinus flourished, and the [[Parthenon]] (Its most famous monument) and other great works were produced. The Parthenon was built using the golden proportion (0.618 : 1) by Ictinus, Callicrates and Phidias, ca. 440 BC.; there is a replica of it at Nashville, [[Tennessee]]. Another piece of Greek architecture was the magnificent Temple of [[Artemis]] at Ephesus, one of the [[Seven Wonders of the Ancient World]]; Paeonius and Demetrios were the architects of this temple in ca. 250 BC. The Temple of [[Nike]] by Callicrates, ca. 420 BC., was the earliest Ionic building on the [[Acropolis]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greek architecture has a strong influence on [[Greek influence on Western Culture|Western Culture]] even today.&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roman architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Colloseum.gif|right|100px|Colloseum, Rome.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Pantheon views.gif|200px|left|Pantheon, Rome.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Art in Roman Architecture appears in such varied purposes. ''The Romans were the first people to treat architecture as a minister to the numberless needs of a great nation. Before them, except in the Greek theatres, it had served the gods, the royal families, and the dead, alone.'' [http://www.2020site.org/rome/] Some examples of Roman Architecture are: [[Pantheon, Rome| The Pantheon]] (the best-preserved building in [[Rome]]), [[Colosseum|The Colosseum]], the aqueducts like The Aqua Appia, [[Hadrian's Wall| The Hadrian's Wall]], [[Antonine Wall|The Antonine Wall]], and The Library of Celsus designed by the Roman architect Vitruoya in the Roman city of Ephesus. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
By the middle of the fifteenth century, scholars in the curia--like the brilliant architect [[Leon Battista Alberti]] and the erudite scholar Flavio Biondo -- knew the ancient city (of Rome) better than anyone had for a thousand years. Artists recorded the ruins that survived, broken and ivy-covered, and reconstructed the original palaces and temples in all their crisp-edged glory. Architects tried to grasp the rules and methods of the Roman builders. When ancient works of art, like the Laocoon, came to light they immediately became famous and influential, finding prominent places in the sculpture collections that adorned the Capitoline hill, the Belvedere court of the Vatican, and many private houses. Drawn and printed images of them circulated throughout Europe and scholars and artists made pilgrimages to Rome to see them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&amp;amp;sdn=ancienthistory&amp;amp;zu=http%3A%2F%2Fmetalab.unc.edu%2Fexpo%2Fvatican.exhibit%2Fexhibit%2Fb-archeology%2FArchaeology.html Learning to Read Rome's Ruins]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gerasa Triumphal Arch of Hadrian.jpg|thumb|Triumphal Arch of Hadrian, Gerasa, [[Jordan]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of the featured element of the Roman architecture was the &amp;quot;[[arch]] semicircular&amp;quot;. Roman arcades were made with pilasters attached to piers carrying an entablature, or in some cases the arcs are resting directly upon their capitals. The Colosseum and the aqueducts are examples of this technique. Romans also introduced the triumphal arch to celebrate military victories. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The [[Pantheon, Rome|Pantheon]] and the ruined Temple of Peace were the two Roman edifices which indicated the progress of the Romans towards the invention of an architecture distinctively their own. '' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.2020site.org/rome/romanarch.html Roman Arch and Columns] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Architect Vitruvius wrote the earliest work on the subject of architecture &amp;quot;De architectura&amp;quot;, known today as ''The Ten Books on Architecture''.  Vitruvius' fundamental principles of architecture were ''firmitas, utilitas, venustas'' (firmness, commodity and delight).&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Middle Ages architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Architecture in the [[Middle Ages]] or [[Medieval architecture]] can be seen in the majestic [[Church|churches]] built during that era. There were two main styles: '''Romanesque''' and '''Gothic'''.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
===Romanesque Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Basilica.jpg|thumb|140px|Basilica, Paray-le-Monial, [[France]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Romanesque architecture was a continuation of the Roman tradition of building. This architecture is characterized by thick walls, rounded arches and small windows. Some examples of this period are: ''San Miniato al Monte'', [[Florence|Firenze]], [[Italy]], 1018-1062, ''Notre Dame le Grande'', Poitiers, [[France]], early 12th century, ''The Basilica'', Paray-le-Monial, France, 1090-1110, and ''Ste. Marie, Souillac'', France. c. 1130. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Souillac.jpg|thumb|left|220px|Ste. Marie, Souillac, France.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[Image:The katholikon of Great Lavra Monastery.jpg|210px|The katholikon of Great Lavra Monastery (963 AD.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great Lavra Monastery, Byzantine age, [[Macedonia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gothic Architecture===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Burgos Cathedral.JPG|thumb|180px|[[Burgos Cathedral]], [[Spain]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Gothic architecture]], consisted of taller, perpendicular structures with long windows, pointed arches and &amp;quot;flying buttresses&amp;quot; (stone supports on the outer walls of churches); the pointed spires of this style is said to reflect the desire of people of the Middle Ages to grow closer to [[God]], reaching towards [[heaven]] and away from the earth. Spires were a source of pride for churches, and stressing the limits of architecture resulted in frequent collapses of church buildings - much like miniature [[Tower of Babel|Towers of Babel]].  Tall windows allowed sunlight to illuminate the interior, unlike Romanesque architecture, in which windows were small and interiors were dim.  A particularly stunning example of Gothic architecture is the [[Notre Dame de Paris|Notre Dame]] in [[Paris]], on which construction began in 1163 during the reign of Louis VII, and was completed about 200 years later in about 1345.  The Notre Dame features a beautiful stained-glass &amp;quot;rose window,&amp;quot; which is another distinguishing characteristic of Gothic churches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman arch was followed by the pointed Gothic arch or ogive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Every one who has a heart, however ignorant of architecture he may be, feels the transcendent beauty and poetry of the mediaeval churches&amp;quot;.'' [[Goldwin Smith]]. &amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renaissance Architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dome of S. Maria del Fiore in Florence.jpg|thumb|Dome of S. Maria del Fiore in [[Florence]] by Filippo Brunelleschi]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Renaissance]] period goes from 1400 to 1620 AD. This architecture was inspired by artists' works of classical Greece and Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
Some famous architects were [[Filippo Brunelleschi]], [[Michelangelo|Michelangelo Buonarroti]], [[Andrea Palladio]], Michelozzo Michelozzi, [[Leon Battista Alberti]], Baldassare Peruzzi and Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola. [[Juan de Herrera]] (1530 - 1597) and Juan Bautista de Toledo in [[Spain]] worked in ''The Escorial'', the colossal monastery of Philip II. ''[[St. Peter's Basilica|The Basilica of St. Peter]]'' in Vatican City by Donato Bramante, Michelangelo and Carlo Maderno, is a masterpiece of this period. Works of Alberti included ''The Palazzo Rucellai'' and  the decoration of the façade at ''Santa Maria Novella'', in Florence. Vignola and his pupil Giacomo della Porta, were involved in the construction of ''Il Gesu'', Motherchurch of the [[Society of Jesus]], at Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Il Gesu.jpg|thumb|140px|Il Gesu, Rome.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Louvre by night.jpg|thumb|370px|left|''Le Louvre'' by night.]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''The [[Louvre]]'', by Pierre Lescot (1515 - 1578), at [[Paris]], is a good example of this style.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Baroque Architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Havana Cathedral.jpg|thumb|Havana Cathedral, [[Cuba]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
This period goes from 1650 to 1750 AD. The roots of [[Baroque]] architecture were in Italy, and from there it spread to France, England, Spain and America. The ornament elements of this period are presented in more complex ways and imagery. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Church St. Borromeo.jpg|thumb|205px|Church of St. Charles Borromeo at Antwerp, [[Belgium]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of this period are: ''[[:Image:Bernini Piazza and Colonnade.jpg|Piazza of St. Peter's]]'', by [[Gianlorenzo Bernini]], at [[Vatican City]]; ''[[Palace of Versailles|The Palace of Versailles]]'', by Andre Le Notre, Louis Le Vau, Jules Hardouin-Mansart, Charles Le Brun, Robert de Cotte, and Ange-Janques Bagriel, at [[Versailles]], France; ''The Christ Church'', by Nicholas Hawksmoor, at Spitalfields, [[London]], [[England]]; ''The Opera'', by Charles Garnier, at [[Paris]]; ''Church of St. Charles Borromeo'', by Pieter Huyssens, S.J., at Antwerp''; Sant'Andrea al Quirinale'', by Bernini, at Rome, Italy; ''Laurentian Library'', by [[Michelangelo]], at [[Florence]], Italy, and ''Galleria Vittorio Emanuele'', by Giuseppe Mengoni, at [[Milan]], Italy.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palace of Versailles.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Palace of Versailles, [[France]], both Baroque and Rococo.]] &lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rococo, Neoclassical and Federal style ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:56eugyjnm.jpg|thumb|180px|The White House by James Hoban]]&lt;br /&gt;
Baroque led to the exuberant Rococo style. Rococo began in the eighteenth century at [[Versailles]] like an art of exquisite refinement, graceful and linearity. Architects like Robert de Cotte, Gilles Marie Oppenord, and Jacques Ange Gabriel were representative of this style. Later, in the mid-18th century, Neoclassical architecture  began as a reaction against the Rococo ornament. It was inspired in the architecture of Classical Greece. In [[United States of America|America]], Neoclassical architecture conducted to Federal style. ''[[Thomas Jefferson]], Benjamin Latrobe, and others derived their building style more directly from [[Andrea Palladio|Palladio]].'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://uk.encarta.msn.com/text_761578082__1/Architecture.html Architecture] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Jefferson was among the many people who submitted a plan for the [[White House]]. His design, however, was not chosen. Instead, James Hoban, an [[Irish]] immigrant architect living in [[Charleston]], [[South Carolina]], won the competition and a $500 prize, with a design modeled after Leister House in [[Dublin]], [[Ireland]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/jb/nation/whitehse_2 The White House.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Architecture has recorded the great ideas of the human race. Not only every religious symbol, but every human thought has its page in that vast book. '' [[Victor Hugo]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modern Architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CCTV building en Beijing.jpg|thumb|left|CCTV building, [[Beijing]], [[China]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this period several styles have appeared, like: Deconstructivism, Formalism, Modernism, Expressionism,  Neo-expressionism, Structuralism, Postmodernism, [[Functionalism (architecture)|Functionalism]], International Style, [[Brutalism]] and The [[Bauhaus school]]. (Bauhaus is a term coined by [[Architect]] [[Walter Gropius]] and means ''house for building''). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Villa Tugendhat Van der Rohe.jpg|thumb|220px|Villa Tugendhat, a [[World Heritage Site]], by Ludwig Van der Rohe, [[Czech Republic]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The value of design lies in the ability of a space, a building, or a functional object to have an effect on people - to shape behavior, to inspire, to challenge, to inform, to comfort, to engage, and to stimulate. [[Jonathan Barnes]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some works of outstanding architects''':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery perrow=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Tour - Eiffel.jpg|[[Gustave Eiffel]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Sagrada Familia.jpg|[[Antonio Gaudi]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Seagram Building.jpg|[[Mies van der Rohe|Ludwig Mies van der Rohe]] - [[Philip Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Le Corbusier church.jpg|[[Le Corbusier]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Wright Dream House.jpg|[[Frank Lloyd Wright]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Lovell House.jpg|Richard Neutra&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Luis Barragan - Pool.jpg|Luis Barragan&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Bank of America Victor Gruen.jpg|[[Victor Gruen]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Sidney opera house.jpg|[[Jörn Utzon]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Centro de Convenciones de Coatzacoalcos Zabludovsky.JPG|Abraham Zabludovsky&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Petronas.jpg|Cesar Pelli&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Foster Queen Elizabeth II great court B.M. London.jpg|[[Norman Foster]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Centre Pompidou.jpg|[[Richard Rogers]], Renzo Piano, and Gianfranco Franchini&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Hemisferic Santiago Calatrava.jpg|Santiago Calatrava and Felix Candela&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Bigelow Chapel Hammel Green Abrahamson.jpg|Joan M. Soranno and John Cook&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lewis Glucksman Gallery.jpg|thumb|140px|Cork Gallery by Sheila O'Donnell and John Tuomey Architects, Dublin, [[Ireland]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palacio de los Deportes Felix Candela.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Felix Candela]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Architecture is an art when one consciously or unconsciously creates aesthetic emotion in the atmosphere and when this environment produces well being.&amp;quot;'' Luis Barragan.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Oriental Architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
The styles of Oriental architecture have their own characteristics but the interrelation with  Western-style architecture has been important. Countries like [[China]], [[Japan]], and [[India]] present wonderful examples of this [[art]], so rich in symbolism. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery perrow=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Taj Mahal...jpg|Taj Mahal [[India]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:The Shahjahani Mosque in Thatta.jpg|The Shahjahani Mosque in Thatta, [[Pakistan]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:China Wall.jpg|Great Wall [[China]]&lt;br /&gt;
File:National Stadium, Beijing.jpg|National Stadium, Beijing [[China]]&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Saint Sophia Turkey.jpg|Saint Sophia [[Turkey]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Image:Japan Miyajima s.jpg|The gate of [[Itsukushima Shrine]] [[Japan]]&lt;br /&gt;
File:Cherry Blossom Japan.jpg|Japanese architecture [[Japan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;When you look at [[Japanese]] traditional architecture, you have to look at Japanese culture and its relationship with nature. You can actually live in a harmonious, close contact with nature - this very unique to Japan&amp;quot;.'' Tadao Ando.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Kiosko morisco de la Santa María la Ribera.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moorish Kiosk of Santa María la Ribera, [[Mexico City]], 1910.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cordova - Cattedrale Moschea.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cathedral - Mosque, Cordova, [[Spain]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Architecture in Spain is an exotic mix of early Moorish influences, European trends, and surreal modernism.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://architecture.about.com/od/countriescultures/p/spain.htm Architecture in Spain.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|310px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Architectural Sculpture Gallery]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous Architects]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pantheon, Paris]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obelisk]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Washington Monument]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Empire State Building]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Golden Gate Bridge]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Architect of the Capitol]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oriental art]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[World treasures]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chapitel.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Benares.jpg|thumb|180px|Benares' temple in [[India]], considered one of the Shakti Peethas (places of strength- worship).]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://architecture.about.com/od/periodsstyles/Periods_and_Styles.htm Periods and Styles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://types.greatbuildings.com/ A Menu of  Architectural Types]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lib.virginia.edu/artsandmedia/dic/colls/arh102/index.html Renaissance and Baroque Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-7907984.html GREEK REVIVAL DOMINATED AMERICAN ARCHITECTURE FROM 1818 TO 1850]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.loggia.com/designarts/architecture/styles/american/american.html American Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://architecture.about.com/cs/historicperiods/a/timeline.htm Architecture Timeline]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.kyoto-inet.or.jp/org/orion/eng/hst/hist.html HISTORY OF WESTERN ARCHITECTURE]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~helphand/homepage.html History of Landscape Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.greatbuildings.com/gbc.html Great Buildings Collection]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.oldandsold.com/articles10/famous-buildings-52.shtml Oriental Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www1.chinaculture.org/library/library_culture_architecture.html Chinese Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.orientalarchitecture.com/faqindex.htm Asian Historical Architecture] 19 Asian countries included.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.buddhanet.net/gallery.htm Buddhist Art and Architecture]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/archweb_frames.html Architecture Links on the World Wide Web]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chi-athenaeum.org/award2000.htm AMERICAN ARCHITECTURE AWARDS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chi-athenaeum.org/about.htm Museum of Architecture and Design] THE CHICAGO ATHENAEUM.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:The bell tower Korea.JPG|thumb|left|280px|The bell tower, Gyeongsang, [[Korea]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Silver Pagoda Cambodia.jpg|thumb|right|Silver Pagoda, Phnom Penh, [[Cambodia]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Htilominlo Temple, Myanmar.jpg|thumb|left|Htilominlo Temple, [[Myanmar]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Villa Adriana.jpg|thumb|center|Villa Adriana, Tívoli, [[Italy]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Wherever man exists, he finds the need to redesign, to recreate the world. A more beautiful world, purer, sweeter smelling and more colorful. A garden is probably the spot where the hopes for civilization are best captured.'' [http://www.bergerfoundation.ch/Jardin/index_english.html THE ENCHANTED GARDENS OF THE RENAISSANCE.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Schonbrun and gardens.jpg|440px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schönbrun Palace and gardens, [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Art]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Architecture]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ancient World Wonders]][[Category:Tourist Attractions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Housing]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=837621</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=837621"/>
		<updated>2011-01-04T04:15:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Clean up */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could You take a look ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen Ben P's comments on [[Talk:Evil]]? ''&amp;quot;...conservatives are awful, evil people!''&amp;quot; You helped before, perhaps a block is needed?--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 22:50, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:See my response on your talk page and the [[Talk:Evil]] page. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:04, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Clean up==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=cur this]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:39, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not a problem! At least blanking the page is nice and simple to undo (but nevertheless annoying!) [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, 3 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=837268</id>
		<title>User talk:Tzoran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Tzoran&amp;diff=837268"/>
		<updated>2011-01-03T04:04:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Could You take a look */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:absolute; z-index:100; right:10px; top:10px;&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;metadata&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox plainlinks&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;width: 100px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;padding-top: 2px; text-align: center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{archivelink2|[[User talk:Tzoran/Archives|'''Archives''']]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!---- {{clear}} --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could You take a look ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you seen Ben P's comments on [[Talk:Evil]]? ''&amp;quot;...conservatives are awful, evil people!''&amp;quot; You helped before, perhaps a block is needed?--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 22:50, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:See my response on your talk page and the [[Talk:Evil]] page. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:04, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Evil&amp;diff=837267</id>
		<title>Talk:Evil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Evil&amp;diff=837267"/>
		<updated>2011-01-03T04:03:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Is evil inherently liberal? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Blasphemy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this really belong here? Murder and rape are univerally recognized by civilized societies as evil. Blasphemy is not.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:11, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Those who speak blasphemy &amp;quot;shall surely be put to death&amp;quot;. (Leviticus 24:16) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin.&amp;quot; (Mark 3:29 ) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks pretty evil to me. Anyone who can't recognize that ain't part of a civilized society.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:JC|JC]] 12:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, anyone who does not recognize that is someone who is not part of a Judeo-Christian society.  There is civilization outside of the Judeo-Christian world; examples include India, China, and Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we give full credit to Christianity and America.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:JC|JC]] 12:18, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Blasphemy is dependent on a) if you follow the religion in question and b) then hold an antithetical view to that religion. It's not a universal evil; in fact, by its very definition it can only be considered evil by a subset of society unless you're talking about a theocracy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps a fair solution would be to give blasphemy a separate header and talk about how it can be considered evil. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:18, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's the kind of [[liberal]] bias we are trying to avoid.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:JC|JC]] 12:20, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::JC, no it isn't. The bias you are trying to avoid is not mentioning blasphemy at all. Giving it a separate header avoids that problem. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:23, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
America is not a Christian nation.  It is a secular nation with a (nominal, at least) Christian majority.  There is a major difference between the two.  Blasphemy is not considered a crime anywhere in the US.  Religion is not mandatory in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Its not about what [[America]] is or ain't but what [[Main Page|Conservapedia]] is.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:JC|JC]] 12:31, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::JC, by insisting blasphemy be considered by all to be evil, all you are doing is substituting your bias for another. Giving it a separate section and discussing it there would be a fair solution. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 12:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So killing babies ain't evil? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evil&amp;amp;diff=41355&amp;amp;oldid=41241] Ain't that kinda [[Liberal]]?&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:BillyBoy|BillyBoy]] 08:05, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Psalms 137:9, 2 Kings 15:16, Numbers 31:17.... God's never objected to killing babies, as long as they're EVIL babies. --[[User:BobD|BobD]] 02:17, 16 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== goodness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
repointing the link for 'goodness' to 'good', since &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;#REDIRECT&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; doesn't seem to be working for me. [[User:Ilikepie|Ilikepie]] 16:49, 28 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Isaiah 45:7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hebrew word that is translated &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; can have different meanings, as is common in Hebrew.  If you note the full verse, it's a foil.  It compares light and dark -- opposites.  It then compares peace/prosperity and ???  Calamity or hardship would be more likely. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:48, 30 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I'm a little concerned... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to me that we could take a more definitive stance on evil here.  The article seems to be aiming for a neutral presentation, but in places it comes across as suggesting that &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; is relative and depends on opinion...which seems contrary to Conservapedia's clearly-articulated affirmation of Biblical principles and Christian values.  Should this article take a stronger stance in presenting the reality that evil exists, that it is objective, and that it consists of opposition to God's Will?  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:08, 15 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, it should.  Give it a try. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:27, 15 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Will do, but it may be a few days before I can get to it--Christmas is almost upon us!  Merry Christmas to all, if I don't get the chance to say it nearer to the actual day.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:02, 16 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is evil inherently liberal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A belated merry Christmas to all, and now it's time to get back to work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I considered how to tackle this article, I realized that one of the issues that needed to be examined is this: is evil inherently liberal?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I realize that the question will provoke howls of outrage and protest from some; that is inevitable.  Such people will likely read no further ''than'' the title. However, the question is a serious one.  Philosophers have sought to know the nature of goodness and evil for thousands of years.  As such, I think that it's valid to ask whether evil holds certain inherent characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To begin, let's clarify what I mean by the question, &amp;quot;Is evil inherently liberal?&amp;quot;  I am defining &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; here, not in terms of a specific political party at a specific time period, but in its broadest and most general sense: rejection of tradition and a desire to change the status quo.  Specific policies generally considered liberal are an outgrowth of this desire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Viewed in this fashion, I believe it is possible to make a strong case that evil is inherently liberal, given certain axiomatic assumptions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we accept that the universe is created by God, and that God is entirely good and just, then it follows that the order of the universe at the time of Creation would ALSO be entirely good.  Thus, any rebellion against this order would ''not'' be good and just.  Conversely, any elements in the universe which are not good and just must perforce represent a rebellion against God's intended order. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words: evil is inherently a rebellion against the status quo of God's Creation.  Consequently, evil is inherently liberal.  Indeed, one could consider Genesis to be the tale of the birth of liberalism, from Adam and Eve's rebellion against the one and only restriction placed upon them by God to the ultimate tale of Big Government overreach, the Tower of Babel.  The history related by the Bible is one in which humans rebel against the traditions and laws set down by God, and suffer as a result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, let's fend off the most predictable protests:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1. Most liberals are good people!'''  Saying &amp;quot;Evil is inherently liberal&amp;quot; is not the same as saying &amp;quot;Liberalism is inherently evil.&amp;quot;  Nor is it the same as saying &amp;quot;Liberals are inherently evil.&amp;quot;  The world today is considerably altered from God's ideal order.  There are many cases where the present status quo is unjust, or where wicked traditions exist.  When liberals oppose such traditions, that is certainly a good thing.  However, I would argue that even at their best, liberals are well-intentioned but misguided, seeking to throw the baby out with the bathwater.  If the unjust status quo is that a company is cutting corners and creating unsafe working conditions for its employees, liberals may well oppose that, which is certainly not evil.  However, they are likely to oppose it by creating a slew of far-reaching (and expensive) new regulations that punish the innocent and the malefactor alike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2'''. Lots of conservatives are awful, evil people!'''  Setting aside for the moment the fact that liberals tend to be quick to describe anyone more conservative than, say, Karl Marx as &amp;quot;evil,&amp;quot; there is a valid point here.  Being conservative doesn't inherently make someone a good person.  One can believe in small government, fiscal responsibility, and upholding tradition and still be a rotten person.  However, again, we have to ask ''which'' traditions such a person is committed to upholding.  If those traditions represent a deviation from God's intended order--and they would have to, in the case of a truly evil &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;--then what is actually being defended is a product of earlier liberal rebellion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions?  Thoughts?  Is this beyond the scope of the article?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 15:25, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, it's not beyond the scope of the article.  It corresponds with Romans 3, in which Paul states in no uncertain terms that mankind is inherently evil; this includes both liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, men and women, black and white, old and young; '''absolutely no one has an excuse.'''  There's just one remedy, and it is also clearly-stated in Romans, as well as the rest of the New Testament: '''turn away from the sins and ask Jesus Christ to be your savior.'''  Just being good isn't going to work.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 20:17, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I certainly concur, which is why I suggested a rewrite on the article in the first place; right now, I'm just trying to sort out how ambitious that rewrite should be.  (Incidentally, was any conclusion ever reached on merging this with Good and Evil?)  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 20:21, 29 December 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Lots of conservatives are awful, evil people!&amp;quot;?????? So 60% of everyday Americans are awful and evil? '''I challenge you to prove that ridiculous claim''', Ben P.--[[User:AnthonyDW|AnthonyDW]] 22:44, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Anthony, I responded on to your concerns on your talk page. Please read ''all'' of what someone has to say, not merely the sections in bold, before jumping to conclusions. Ben has raised several very interesting points here, and I think it's a good discussion to have. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:03, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836977</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpope1487</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836977"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T19:48:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Tzoran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; '''is''' my last name. It derives itself from the same Latin root as the title &amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; does. If you have a problem with my username, please post something here BEFORE banning me, again.&lt;br /&gt;
:Your chosen user name is fine, then, but why couldn't you have started out using that user name? Had you done so, I wouldn't have asked you to recreate your account as I did before. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:31, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I did start off with an appropriate name, and was told to change it, as it was too similar to that of another Conservapedia Administrator. I did so, and that name was taken. I tried again, and it said that I had to use only &amp;quot;Alphanumeric&amp;quot; characters, despite the fact that that is what I was using. I got frustrated and simply made the username &amp;quot;Alphanumeric&amp;quot; so that I could finally get down to editing. Jpop1487 was a typo. [[User:Jpope1487|Jpope1487]] 14:37, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Always be sure to correct typos in an online form before you submit it. That will prevent such errors in the future. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:48, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836967</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpope1487</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836967"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T19:31:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Tzoran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; '''is''' my last name. It derives itself from the same Latin root as the title &amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; does. If you have a problem with my username, please post something here BEFORE banning me, again.&lt;br /&gt;
:Your chosen user name is fine, then, but why couldn't you have started out using that user name? Had you done so, I wouldn't have asked you to recreate your account as I did before. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:31, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836966</id>
		<title>User:Jpope1487</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836966"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T19:30:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Blanked the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836965</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpope1487</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpope1487&amp;diff=836965"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T19:30:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: moved from your user page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Dear Tzoran,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; '''is''' my last name. It derives itself from the same Latin root as the title &amp;quot;Pope&amp;quot; does. If you have a problem with my username, please post something here BEFORE banning me, again.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=836960</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=836960"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:35:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Fact vs Opinion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{articletalkheader|prefix=archive}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rense==&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Rense may not be a such a good source.  The Anti-Defamation League accuses him of promoting anti-Semitic views and 9/11 Conspiracy theories.  OTOH, what is wrong with a Pravda article written in the post Soviet-censorship era when democratic Russia hungars to exercise a free press, open discussion and discernment of facts?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:39, 23 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my talk page, Rob.  I never noticed who added the Pravda cite, so if you say so, it is of course fine with me, and please add it back if you haven't already! I now suspect it was yet another vandal site troll stirring the pot, so feel free to deal with him as well. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, 24 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terror Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have an issue with a claim made in the second paragraph.  ''Since abandoning the &amp;quot;War on Terror&amp;quot; in Obama's first year, the United States has suffered more terrorist attacks with deadly intent on American soil than in the previous eight years combined.''   Since Obama replaced the 'Global War on Terror' with 'Overseas Contingency Operation', there have been only four domestic terrorist attacks, a far cry from the 19 that took place under Bush's tenure.  This sentence should be reworded or removed in its entirety; it only makes the article look embarrassing.  --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 15:46, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More [[liberal]] poppycock, Michael?  Even the New York Times counts more, excluding 9/11, under Obama. Perhaps you should consider sources other than the Kos?  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:29, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A short time ago you gave me grief for making assumptions, yet here you are doing the same.  I didn't get any information from Kos, it all came from legitimate news sources.  Do you really believe that more terror attacks occurred on US soil from March 2009 to January 2010 than in the eight years of the Bush administration?  I would really like to see all your references for making such a bold claim.  And why would you want to exclude the WTC/Pentagon attacks?&lt;br /&gt;
::Some people have been making some really stupid claims lately about domestic terror.  Dana Perino and Rudy Guiliani both claimed there was not a terror attack on the US when Bush was in office.  The fact that these people could make such stupidly partisan claims is incredible. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kpfhGxJbLc] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tYoMoJHNDs] The claim made in this article reeks of the same idiocy of Perino and Guiliani, why not delete the sentence or at least make it factual?  --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 20:23, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The facts are undeniable that America was totally unprepared to protect itself from terrorist homeland attacks as Bush entered office, due to the total lack of focus of the Clinton Administration and Congress on the issue.  Bush can in no way be blamed for the 9/11 attacks with any real credibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I have stated many times before, as Mr. Schlafly has stated many times before, as several other Admins have as well,  coming here to argue-without-end against our conservative point of view in all articles you come across, is silly. If you and others cannot bring yourselves to accept alternative points of view, so be it. If you want a place to argue against conservatism in general, make your own site or try the Kos or HuffPo; but CP isn't a debate forum, it is a conservative encyclopedia ''project''. Article talk pages are for suggesting ways to improve articles from a conservative point of view, not a liberal one. Is that a clear enough statement?  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:29, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::TK: The change you made is completely unacceptable from a moral and ethical standpoint because instead of correcting an error, you are now highlighting a lie.  Three terror attacks occurred during Pres. Bush's last year in office.  I sent you links to all three events but you are willing to over look such trivial matters as the truth.  It's funny that a liberal who has been blocked twice for pointing out errors and outright falsehoods is vilified as a trouble-maker while the conservatives that knowingly mislead and lie are in charge of an alleged 'trustworthy encyclopedia'.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm trying to make these changes because I don't want Americans to look stupid, even the conservative ones.  It's an uphill battle. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::Gunman killed two people in a church.  [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-07-29-church-shooting_N.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
::::Suicide bomber attacked a Georgia law firm. [http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ga_law_firm_explodes_causing_multiple_injuries/]&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two police officers were killed by a bomb placed in a bank.  [http://www.odmp.org/officer/19697-captain-thomas-paul-tennant]&lt;br /&gt;
::::--[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 01:25, 29 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MichaelJB you cannot tell the difference between Muslim terrorists and someone with an ax to grind? Godspeed! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:36, 29 January 2010 (EST)v&lt;br /&gt;
:So Michael's point is that progressive liberal leftwing commie socialist (or whatever the flavor of the week) Prof. [[Amy  Bishop]] conducted a domestic overseas contingency operation attack. It's beginning to make sense. How would we classify the guy who crashed the plane into the IRS building in Houston, a tax protester who railed against corporations. Dang, this is a tuff one.... [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 08:13, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Middle name in article title? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It strikes to me odd that the title of the article is Barach Hussein Obama. While there is nothing wrong with that by itself, looking at the [[President_of_the_United_States_of_America#Presidents_list|list of all the U.S. presidents]], it seems that all the other presidents' articles are titled either without their middle name, or just a middle initial. Wouldn't it make sense to rename the article to either Barack Obama or Barack H. Obama to follow suit? [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:19, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a big difference between Walker or Jefferson and Hussein.  My two cents. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 18:22, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [[Ronald Wilson Reagan]]? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 18:26, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::This topic had been discussed before. He decided to be inaugurated with his middle name after not using it during the campaign. He is not ashamed of it and we are not ashamed to include it.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:29, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see. Looking at some lists though ([http://www.ipl.org/div/potus/] and [http://www.apples4theteacher.com/holidays/presidents-day/past-presidents-of-usa.html]), it seems that many presidents were also inaugurated in a similar fashion. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:33, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think that, as all encyclopedias and scholarly works try to do, we should try to decide on a particular set of rules and always follow it. In this case, these are the options:&lt;br /&gt;
:::1) Always cite the full name in the title, so &amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George Herbert Walker Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald Wilson Reagan&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2) Always use initials for middle names, so &amp;quot;Barack H. Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald W. Reagan&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3) Use the names in the way they most commonly used, using middle name initials only where they are necessary to distinguish one particular individual from another, therefore &amp;quot;Barack Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: We are talking about titles of articles; the full name should always be cited in the body of the article. Personally, I would vote for solution n.3. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:34, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I like the idea. Either 2 or 3 seem best in my opinion; full names seem a bit to long for article titles. The name that the president was inaugurated with isn't bad either, but it would seem less formal, as some have middle names and others don't. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:38, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I thought about that solution, but then I thought that we should better set very general rules; by this I mean that we should decide how to title page names referring to INDIVIDUALS, not to US PRESIDENTS. Deciding that &amp;quot;the name that the president was inaugurated with&amp;quot; is a rule that, naturally, can only be applied to presidents. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:41, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Another good rule would be to use the name that is mostly used to refer to that individual; this has the disadvantage of not being objective, but it is also the most effective. So &amp;quot;Barack Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; (to distinguish him from his son), &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Eminem&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Marshall Mathers&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;O.J. Simpson&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Orenthal J. Simpson&amp;quot;...  --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:56, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isn't any vote here, nor was one asked for.  Since Obama tries to soft-pedal his Muslim roots and associations, our editorial policy is to call attention to that ''fact''.  In addition you should note the [[Ronald Wilson Reagan|Reagan]] article, where well before anyone had an inkling Obama would run for President, Conservapedia used his full name, ''Ronald Wilson Reagan'' which Reagan himself preferred  for formal use. So I submit President Obama isn't being singled out, contrary to the insistence of silly-minded liberals. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:06, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But why call attention to that ''fact'' in the title of the article? The ''fact'' is never going to be denied. The introduction sentence would still say &amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama&amp;quot;. Italicize his middle name in the introduction or change the font color to bring out the ''fact'' if you wish. What I am trying to point at is, why should his middle name be used in the article title? Reagan may have preferred it for formal use, but does Mr. Obama say that same? He is commonly known as Barack Obama; I haven't seen it used in any other way (except Obama, of course). If he is commonly known as that, it would make sense to title the article like that, as should every article on people. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 21:05, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Richard Milhous Nixon was commonly refered to as [[Milhous]] by his detracters.  Indeed, googling milhouse brings up hundreds of thousands of hits on Nixon that dwarf most all other uses of the name.  Now, googling [[Hussein]] presents a host of other problems.   The [[Heshamite Dynasty]] of [[Hussein bin Ali]] had been the Islamic Keeper of the Holy places for 700 years until Western British Imperialist interests unseated them and installed the Saudi ruling clan thier place (visualize Islamists dethroning the Pope and installing thier own choice as successor).  How does it look when Hussein bin Ali's namesake bows to tne Saudi puppet? Why not focus on how Obama ''is'' bringing real change to the whole planet, rather than argue about how things have traditionally been done?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Drop it.  Further discussion is last-wordism. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:14, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On the question of &amp;quot;''all the other presidents' articles are titled either without their middle name, or just a middle initial. Wouldn't it make sense ...to follow suit? ''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:You will recall Barack Hussein Obama is the transformational president of change.  Wouldn't it make sense to begin change right here, with his name? (assuming that is his name).  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:54, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:58, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty slick conservative trap there TK. despite the fact that you neglected to answer some massive holes in the arguments above, you declare the debate &amp;quot;ended&amp;quot; (even though its not) then decry anything else as last wordism to stifle any further debate. well done--[[User:DerikJ|DerikJ]] 11:58, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What holes? We're implementing change. Let's find common ground and compromise. We've done just that.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:35, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I like your comment on change, Rob, it made me laugh :) Anyway, I don't see how an argument that Obama's slogan being &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; is any reason to title his article to what he is less commonly known as/less traditional. It's pushing it, in a sense. Besides, being a conservative, I would think that you wouldn't want to follow Obama's way of thinking ;) [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 13:40, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Conservatives are for change, both economic and social.  They want to change tax law and abortion rulings, for example.  Above all, change public education.  Being anti-change is just a vulgar stereotype held by closeminded and intolerant people.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:09, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can agree with that. But ''why'' &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; how Obama's article is titled when others are titled either without their middle name or with their middle name if they are commonly known and identified by the name, in some cases. Simply changing something doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, there has to be reason, and the reason has to be, well, reasonable. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 14:44, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Call it the price of progress.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:17, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::In that case, would changing the titles of all the other peoples' articles to include their middle names sound all right to you? It would be progress, after all. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 17:29, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I have always wondered why the Obamabots get so upset with the name Obama's parents chose.  Pretty silly. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:40, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I actually like the name, it has a nice ring to it. It's more of just keeping a solid style of titling pages, a format if you want to call it that. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 17:29, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Which brings us to the question of Barry Soetero.  If Obama went by this name, then he may have lied to the Illinois Supreme Court when asked to provide former names, according to this Attorney’s Registration Record. [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2061988/posts]  I'm not the sure what the resolution of this issue ever was, and we don't have a word about it in this article.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:49, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am new here but there really needs to be a consensus amongst all Presidential and Vice President articles, actually this should probably extend to all US politicians. I know there is a specified conservative bias, however the lack organization and consensus has nothing to do with liberal or conservative bias, it has to do with disorganization and lazyiness by the admins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to leave the middle, that is fine, however, there would need to be a quick modification of all or the majority of the US Politian article so as not to look so disorganized.[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:01, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You hit the nail on the head.  You are new here.  Don't come in criticizing and such off the bat. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 01:12, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My criticization is to help the article(s) to be better as a whole. None of the above discussion explains the reasoning for leaving it as is. Just people saying he used it in his inauguration so we use it here, however, almost every pres does this so why not have it that way for everyone????[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:15, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not really discussion just more of a question. I just recently found this site and was looking through the religious articles and for the most part they seemed pretty good. However, when I come to the political articles, some of them seem a little crazy. I know it is to call more attention to the things that are being overlooked by the media. But I have ask about the middle name thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read all of the information above and I still am not sure why it was decided to leave it as is.  Can someone clarify this? &lt;br /&gt;
Please don't ban me, I noticed that basically everyone with discussion in this thread that isn't an admin now has banned accounts. I personally don't care, I am just confused. [[User:StevenS|StevenS]] 01:12, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: As it says up at the top of this section, &amp;quot;Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;quot;  If you do have one, let's have it.  But it sure seems like everyone who signs up to this site and immediately starts complaining has nothing new to say at all.  Why don't you spend some time reading here with an open mind first, and complain later?  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 01:20, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, why would a single individual come here under several different user names all in an effort to get the word &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; removed from the title of this article?  It makes no sense at all unless that individual has a personal agenda to perform.  The article title stays as it is.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:42, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My only concern is that the title seems to exist in its current state for no purpose other than to further a bias.  The arguments that &amp;quot;well he asked for it&amp;quot; seem to suggest that accuracy and fairness are non-valuable in this wiki.  I sincerely hope this is not the case and that I may not be banned and able to start a fun future in helping this wiki grow in the impressive way it has so far. [[User:Vidihawk|Vidihawk]] 07:47, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''&amp;quot;Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you missed the bold title at the top of this section?  Also, see [[Ronald Wilson Reagan]] to see how silly your argument is. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:16, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess it wasn't as bright an idea as I had hoped.  Heh... It still comes off as somewhat purposeful, though.  Okie, I'll back away! - [[User:Vidihawk|Vidihawk]] 08:24, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Purposeful, as in done with the same horribly malevolent intent as ''my'' adding Reagan's middle name several years ago?  You are giving away your intent in advance, good sir, by refusing to admit your already formed assumptions about us are wrong.  I hope you prove me wrong, and turn out to be that rare U.K. denizen that turns out to be open-minded and as fair to us as you wish us to be to you. There have been precious few. And please do check out our editors guide and all of that. We differ quite a bit from Wikipedia. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think we should keep the current title of the article.  Furthermore, I think we should replace the top picture, which is currently a picture of Obama,  with a picture of an oil drenched pelican (and a new caption) as a tribute to Obama's indifference, sloth and incompetence.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:36, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I moved the material dealing with the present to the top  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I moved the material dealing with the present to the top as I thought readers would be more interested in how Obama is screwing up the present.  For example, I think Americans right now are very concerned about how Obama is screwing up the economy. Of course, he is also doing a poor job in other areas presently as well such as holding terrorists court cases in civilian courts, etc. etc. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 04:30, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That makes sense to me. I do appreciate letting me try the other timeline structure. However, I didn't really take into consideration the fact that because he is a high profile individual it may benefit readers to see more recent info before his earlier biography facts. At least while he's fulfilling his one failed term as president, your structure makes sense to me. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 12:42, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As the ==Maoism== section is being being built, we may eventually be able to free up space from the sections on the Ayers/Dohrn relationship by moving some of that material to Ayers own page, and/or creating a new separate page documenting Obama's rise with communist and terrorist assistance.  An acceptable title for that page would be needed.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:23, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any orders he gives to the American military are subject to being refused. Orders that Obama gives to America’s Joint Chiefs of Staff of the military can be refused.&amp;quot; --http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/19-01-2009/106972-Barry_Soetoro-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we really want to cite an article that makes this claim? Do any of us really support this opinion, or if we do, do we support the use of opinion articles as sources in addition to factual ones? --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 08:42, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is the opinion piece backed by valid and factual citations from the United States Code, Ben, as opposed to a unsupported rant? --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== pronunciation of &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is really considered evidence of anything? I've heard [[Mark Levin]] use the Spanish-inflected pronunciation of Sonia Sotomayor's name (''so tow my OR'' rather than ''so tow MY er''), but nobody would claim that proves he's Catholic or Hispanic. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 23:55, 9 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pronunciation shows an enormous amount about someone's views and history.  Obama doesn't use the American pronunciation, and this is telling, since ''no one else in the public sphere'' pronounces it in the muslim way ''but'' Obama. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 00:15, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[David Petraeus]] does [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtCLp7siY7I]. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 00:50, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
And [http://www.forvo.com/word/pakistan/ numerous other languages] use a pronunciation closer to the native form. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 00:57, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Golgaronok&amp;quot; (if that is your name), your quibbles with the entry have already been argued ad nauseum, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama/archive4#.22Pokiston.22.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F here], for instance.  If you've only come to argue on talk pages, you're wasting your own time.  Try making substantive contributions to the project; excessive talk is disfavored here.  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 01:04, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any responses to the points I raised. But it's y'all's funeral. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 01:13, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Kind of interesting that Davis Petraeus was mentioned here.  When that general was ordered to command US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, the liberal elites decided that his name should be pronounced &amp;quot;BETRAY US&amp;quot;.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:29, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barry Soetoro = birth name?==&lt;br /&gt;
This may have already been discussed, so forgive me if this has been settled.  I noticed that the article says ''&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (birth name Barry Soetoro...&amp;quot;'', however the articles cited do not support the idea that &amp;quot;Barry Soetoro&amp;quot; is Obama's birth name, in fact quite the opposite.  My understanding, from reading the Newsweek article, is that &amp;quot;Barack&amp;quot; is his birth name, although he went by &amp;quot;Barry&amp;quot; when he was younger.  His father's name, as I understand it, is Barack Hussein Obama, and he was named after his father.  &amp;quot;Seotoro&amp;quot;, if I remember right, was his stepfather's last name, so it is unlikely that it would have been part of Obama's birth name.  To be clear, I do realize that he spent his younger years being known as &amp;quot;Barry Soetoro&amp;quot;, and I think that should be included in the article, I just don't think it was actually his birth name.  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Please understand that I am not as knowledgeable in this kind of thing as many other contributors here, so I may have gotten it all wrong - that's why I didn't attempt to edit the article.  Please correct me if I have gotten it wrong - I won't be offended and I am curious as to the truth of the matter.  [[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:11, 1 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the citation that shows the birth certificate, the birth name is, in fact, Barack Hussein Obama II, NOT Barry Soetoro.  Also, because there is an actual document, i.e. physical, demonstrable proof, the word &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; should be removed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remove name repetition? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would anyone mind if I removed some of the repetition of Obama's name in certain portions of the article? For example, in this paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|Barack Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving]] and [[Barack Obama and liberal elitism|Barack Obama's liberal elitism]] is consistent with Obama being a [[Narcissism|narcissist]] which is a charge that has often been made against Barack Obama.  However, it is also true that Barack Obama is an [[evolution|evolutionist]].  Barack Obama told the ''York Daily Record'' that &amp;quot;I believe in [[evolution]]...&amp;quot;.  Barack Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving and liberal elitism is also in accordance with someone who has a certain degree of [[Social Darwinism|social darwinistic]] thinking.  In addition to [[Liberals and uncharitableness|American liberals giving less to charity]], it is also true that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|American liberals are also more likely to believe in evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I could alter it to make it more readable with &amp;quot;Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving and liberal elitism is consistent with that of a narcissist, a charge that has often been made against him.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so forth. In my linguistics class, we talked about semantic satiation, and I believe that paragraphs like these, along with the fact that it never seems to use pronouns, somewhat diminish the readability of the article. If I were to make this change, I would preserve every wikilink, reference, etc, but I believe it would become more readable. In Christ, [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:09, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insults? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the entire beginning of the article have to be so laden with insults? Couldnt it simply say what the article will be about, and THEN express views? As it is it appears very unprofessional. 19:11, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:We believe in the truth here, and the fact that [[liberals]] like yourself feign offense at the display of it speaks volumes about you. If you insist on closing your mind, at least take ownership of your [[deceit]]!  Sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; ~~~~ &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; next time. Godspeed! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:58, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;The first president who is biracial&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been other presidents of more than one race. Bush Jr. is has some German and English ancestry. [[User:NP|NP]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:George W is German and English, is that two races according to our census? I think the readers will understand what biracial refers to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::English and German are '''''not''''' races, and neither is Hispanic. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 17 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reorganizing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad to see the edit feature is enabled here once more.  I think this page needs a revamp to structure information better.  I've reorganized everything into a better structure, let me know what you think.  I am trying to put a summary of the presidency at the top, information about his life/career next, and then a political summary.  This should really improve the page's appearance, as it appears too disorganized right now.  --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 15:56, 20 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What you're doing is burying important information so fewer users will find it.  That's unacceptable. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 15:57, 20 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is a Muslim theory and the alleged claim of Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is what the American Thinker reported: &amp;quot;The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim.&amp;quot; That was the claim of Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, as reported in the May 2010 issue of Israel Today. According to journalist Avi Lipkin, Gheit appeared on Nile TV's &amp;quot;Round Table Show&amp;quot; in January, on which he said that &amp;quot;he had had a one-on-one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/report_obama_said_i_am_a_musli.html]  Here is what Hot Air says: http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/06/14/obama-is-a-muslim-take-two/  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally,  I am beginning to think Obama is: not a Muslim, not a Christian, and not an atheist.  I think Obama is a narcissist who worships himself.  I can also see him telling one person he is a Christian and then later telling someone else he is a Muslim.  There are many examples of Obama being insincere such as all the substantive healthcare  discussions were going to be on C-Span, etc. etc. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 15:53, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2009 Nobel Peace Prize ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find it strange that there is not a single mention of the president being awarded the Nobel peace prize in this article. Considering that other prominent award winners have it at least mentioned in their respective articles. The [[Mother Teresa]] article, for instance, prominently states her award in the introduction to the article, and even political figures like [[Al Gore]] and [[Henry Kissinger]] (both of whom won the peace prize) have their award at least mentioned in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DenisTR|DenisTR]] 16:04, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with you, Denis.  It was there, once-upon-a-time, but apparently it was removed in the constant editing turmoil. CP does mention this in the [[Nobel Prize]] article. I will add it here, as it should be. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:24, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faulty Logic==&lt;br /&gt;
I have a suspicion that Andy Schlafly is secretly a Muslim. Will you deny that, Andy? If you do deny it, then I accuse you of being a Muslim under the concept of Taqiyya.&lt;br /&gt;
It's like a terrible flow chart that always ends with &amp;quot;You're a Muslim.&amp;quot; I realize that you're kind of scraping the barrel with this whole &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; thing, but c'mon. [[User:Pete5383|Paul]] 18:57, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Paul, you seem to think all claims or facts are relative.  They aren't.  Truth is supported by logic and evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:00, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: President Obama clearly has an Islamic background. As an adult, he joined a church and says he's a Christian. I'd say he's as much Muslim as I am Jewish; by Jewish law, my having a Jewish mother makes me Jewish by birth, but I became a Christian by choice as a teenager. Go figure. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:04, 3 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether President Obama is Muslim or not is one question; however it is undeniable Obama misspoke or was deceptive while ramping up his ambitions back in 2005 when he told the ''Chicago Sun-Times'', &amp;quot;I am rooted in the Christian tradition.&amp;quot; Nowhere on his maternal side, grandma, gramps, or his natural father, or his stepfather, can any Christian rooting be found.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:37, 4 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Days in office==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] was inaugurated {{days since|2009|1|20}} days ago  and will finish his term in {{#expr: -{{days since|2013|1|20}} }} days. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 3 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apparent sourcing errors==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While looking over this article, I noticed a number of problems - mostly unsourced claims or claims for which the source is no longer available. Since my suggestions will almost certainly be controversial, I will not actually make any further changes to this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The quote &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship&amp;quot; under the heading &amp;quot;Presidency&amp;quot; is unattributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Obama represented ACORN in ''Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank'' is unsupported. While court documents do list Obama among the Plaintiff's Attorneys, they do not reference ACORN in any way. [http://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=10112] This claim seems to have been added by bloggers after the fact. Similarly, the cited reference contains no source for the claim that Obama had anything to do with the CRA, only a completely unsourced allegation that was reprinted almost verbatim here. As far as I can tell, Obama represented ACORN exactly once, on a case involving motor voter laws. [http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/oct/17/john-mccain/he-represented-them-in-one-case-/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The statement &amp;quot;Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982&amp;quot; under the subheading &amp;quot;Birth Certificate Controversy&amp;quot; is unsourced and ambiguous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Much of the content under the subheading &amp;quot;Engineers defeat of Centrist Democrats&amp;quot; is dubious. Two of the cites [http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-18/news/mn-3844_1_gus-savage][http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Carol_Moseley_Braun#Political_career] are about Carol Moseley Braun and don't mention Obama at all. There is no indication in any of the sources that Obama was connected to the Braun campaign, so these cites are meaningless. Additionally, the section attributes an anti-Dixon intent to Obama (referring to Obama as &amp;quot;subverting&amp;quot; Dixon's reelection, defined by Conservapedia's own article as &amp;quot;lending of aid, comfort, and moral support to individuals, groups, or organizations that advocate the overthrow of incumbent governments by force and violence&amp;quot;). What he did was increase voter turnout among the black community, a far cry from what the text implies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;The statement &amp;quot;President Obama falsely claimed that the senior citizen group AARP endorsed his administration's health care plan when they never made such an endorsement&amp;quot; under the subheading &amp;quot;Obama Administration Health Care Plan and Its Advocacy Methods&amp;quot; is sourced to a YouTube video that no longer exists. Additionally, it appears that AARP has been supporting health care reform since at least August 2009. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/17/eveningnews/main5247916.shtml][http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/19/aarp-ama-announce-support_n_506060.html]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Similarly, several cites link to YouTube videos that have been removed. Multiple cites under the subheading &amp;quot;Obama Administration Health Care Plan and Liberal Elitism&amp;quot; link to deleted videos, as does the cite for the statement &amp;quot;Barack Obama's &amp;quot;Disinformation Czar&amp;quot; (whose supposed job was to correct disinformation that others are spreading about the Obama administration's health care plan) was caught spreading misleading information.&amp;quot; The cite for the statement &amp;quot;Senior citizens are key Democratic party constituents that could kill Obama's socialistic health care plan&amp;quot; links to a private video.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DrewJ|DrewJ]] 15:50, 29 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Drew, but one glaring misrepresentation really sticks out, and explains why liberals are often accused of playing fast and loose with the truth:  While AARP has long advocated health care reform, it specifically repudiated Obama's distortion of the truth, saying they were not endorsing any specific plan, at that time.  See how easy it is to distort fact, by omission, and make obviously good-intentioned souls like you doubt the real truth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are obviously an editor here, and I would urge you, before making posts such as this one, to try and find substitute sources that back up what is in the story. At the very least, as is the case with the AARP, at least check the facts before stating something is incorrect. It was a very big story at the time, Obama's misstatement, and not at all hard to find....so easy and well-known in fact that some people might be tempted to accuse you of inserting a deliberate [[Red Herring]]. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:29, 29 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Typo ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first sentence here has a typo: it presumably is meant to read &amp;quot;...said to have '''been''' born in...&amp;quot; I'd fix it myself, but the page is so informative (and therefore long) that my poor old computer can't load it to edit.  --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 21:49, 11 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, JPatt got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:29, 11 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bryan Fischer: Obama wants to give America back to the Indians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [http://www.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147501360 this site] some kind of liberal parody? Otherwise, this is so serious that is should be included. American Family Association would seem to me as a pretty trustworthy organization, and this Bryan Fischer is writing for them. Any thoughts? &amp;amp;ndash; [[User:Dstone|dstone]] 16:42, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fact vs Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
Okay...I thought maybe this article would be a good place to start.  I was introduced to Conservapedia recently, and have been waffling about joining and bcoming an editor, but can no longer refrain.  So, I'm extraordinarily new...and I fully expect the welcoming and flame-free arms of this community, as I support the overall efforts of what Conservapedia is trying to accomplish.  The road to becoming a &amp;quot;Trustworthy Encyclopedia&amp;quot; is long, and this site is just starting to make baby steps in that direction.  That being said, I will try to keep this short.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FACT:  Opinions are not fact.  Even expert opinions are not fact.  They're just plain old opinions.  Despite being in the Commandments, and otherwise stated over and over again, folks seem to have trouble making this distinction.&lt;br /&gt;
OPINION: If you are unable to make cited references, or present the conservative viewpoint in a reasoned and intelligent manner, I would heavily suggest that you leave the site to those who can.  Your &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; is often unhelpful.  Especially in an article as...contentious...as this - and I imagine many others, I'll be looking shortly - the talk page is the place to present your opinions.  If you cannot site material, find sources that intelligently argue your viewpoint, or just want a second or third pair of eyes and ears, it would be addressed here.  Also, if haven't actually read the article that you are citing...do that first, before posting anything at all...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several on this page, the most innocuous of which:  President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico[28].  The moratorium lapsed in 2008.  It says it right in the article, paragraph 4.  This statement is spruious and vague and will be reworded to say something like: Then-Senator Obama voted to re-authorize oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.  This is just a small and harmless example, but, either research the issue before posting, or don't post.  If you wish to engage in historical revisionism, or just bottom-barrel opinion mongering, please roll on over to Wikipedia, and leave us be.  [[User:RyanDav|RyanDav]] 2 January 2011&lt;br /&gt;
:I moved this from the top of the page to its current location, to maintain threading. [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:35, 2 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=836959</id>
		<title>Conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=836959"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:34:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 836952 by MatthewL (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservatives| Previous Breaking News:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
A '''conservative''' adheres to principles of personal [[responsibility]], moral values, and limited government, agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that &amp;quot;religion and morality are indispensable supports&amp;quot; to political prosperity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: &amp;quot;tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL&amp;quot;[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former President [[Ronald Reagan]] said, &amp;quot;The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aaag.jpg|thumb|Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, is the epitome of American conservatism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''sine qua non'' of a conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all.  Alternatively, a conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of economics and the morality of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of all, recognizing that the Bible is the most logical book ever written.  Specifically, conservatives seek or support:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Limited government]] and balanced budgets&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]] and [[free market|free markets]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classroom prayer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Abstinence]] education&lt;br /&gt;
* Traditional marriage, not [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for [[differences between men and women]], boys and girls&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws against [[pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[death penalty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental control of education&lt;br /&gt;
* Private medical care and [[retirement plan]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Canceling failed social support programs&lt;br /&gt;
* No [[world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforcement of current laws regarding [[immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for our military ... past and present&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Low taxes, especially for families&lt;br /&gt;
* Confederationism (less power for the federal government and more for local and state governments)&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong [[national defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Hall of Fame==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rossiter, &amp;quot;The Giants of American Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the &amp;quot;Conservative's Hall of Fame,&amp;quot;'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Presidents===&lt;br /&gt;
Periodically a conservative has been elected president of the United States.  The most prominent conservative presidents include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]] (1789-1797)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Monroe]] (1817-1825)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889, 1893-1897) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009) (with respect to taxes, Supreme Court nominations, and national security)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)&lt;br /&gt;
*The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Movement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite liberal ridicule.  Movement conservative activists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]], opposed [[ERA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Buchanan]], TV commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jerry Falwell]], religion&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michele Bachmann]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ann Coulter]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rush Limbaugh]], radio&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Malkin]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Beck]], TV commentator&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Key leaders===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]] - 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russell Kirk]] - Theorist &amp;amp; intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irving Kristol|Irving]] and [[William Kristol]] - Notable [[neoconservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Thatcher]] - British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held similar views as Reagan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Milton Friedman]] - Chicago-school [[libertarian]] economist, influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==US Voters==&lt;br /&gt;
In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for McCain and 20% for Obama, with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative-republican-brain.jpg|thumb|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===&lt;br /&gt;
The Barna poll conducted in November  2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others --50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some findings: &lt;br /&gt;
Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that Satan is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Note: &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in this survey are based on politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives); &lt;br /&gt;
*a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%); &lt;br /&gt;
*the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%); &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:&lt;br /&gt;
*read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively) &lt;br /&gt;
*attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%) &lt;br /&gt;
*pray to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%) &lt;br /&gt;
*share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment) &lt;br /&gt;
*have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were atheist or agnostic &lt;br /&gt;
*15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were Christian evangelicals &lt;br /&gt;
*conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as born again, based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%) &lt;br /&gt;
*21% of conservatives were associated with the Catholic church, compared to 30% among the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama and American Conservatism Backlash ==&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''The Daily Telegraph'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative news organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]].  [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than [[conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative magazines and blogs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= &amp;quot;What Is a 'Conservative'?&amp;quot;], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of limited government.&lt;br /&gt;
# A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.&lt;br /&gt;
# Patriotism, nationalism, and support of a strong defense.&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of the institution of marriage. &lt;br /&gt;
# Emphasis on social values, like prayer and pro-life principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, neoconservatives generally support bigger government and globalism, and tend to downplay the significance of social values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paleoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty, and are suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean against foreign interventionalism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of &amp;quot;isolationism,&amp;quot; as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
==History of American conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
===Textbook problems===&lt;br /&gt;
College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a &amp;quot;liberal state paradigm&amp;quot;--that is, textbooks usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism--especially the New Deal, the welfare state, labor unions, and Civil Rights for blacks and equality for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a free market reply to the growth of big government; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality.  Where the violent Wobblies (IWW) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing Communist subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Leonard Moore, &amp;quot;Approaching Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Loyalists===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the Episcopal religion, a stronghold of conservative social values.  While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Founding Fathers===&lt;br /&gt;
The Founding Fathers created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from.  Two parties were named &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot;-- the one founded in 1794 by Jefferson and Madison (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[First Party System]] (1790s-1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting monarchy and aristocracy, they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On many issues American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his &amp;quot;Old Republicans&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Quids.&amp;quot;  They idealized the yeoman farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to corruption, that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called &amp;quot;judicial activism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Jeffersonians stressed small government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Second Party System]] (1830-54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The word was originally used in the French Revolution. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot; in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. Richard Hofstadter (1948) called him &amp;quot;The Marx of the Master Class.&amp;quot;  Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a &amp;quot;majority dictatorship&amp;quot; because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with Civil Rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus William J. Bennett (2006)  a prominent conservative leader, warns  conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century isolationists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lincoln to Cleveland===&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1865 the [[History of the United States Republican Party|Republican party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the Whigs and of both Jefferson and Hamilton. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's Declaration. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the Civil War reflected a reactionary opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective tariffs), and imperialism, and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the Democratic Party permanently to the left.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan &amp;quot;[[sound money]] and protection,&amp;quot; while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Graham Sumner]], Yale professor (1872-1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected evolution in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Curtis, Bruce. &amp;quot;William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'&amp;quot; Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early 20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of Rhode Island were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough regulatory approach toward businesses and trusts, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the German attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921-30, the only former president ever to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and H.L. Mencken's magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924-33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Great Depression, U.S.|Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in Chicago which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Depression brought liberals to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democratic party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only Maine and Vermont. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of Ohio, and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of Georgia.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were isolationists in 1939-41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the Korean War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Later 20th century: Goldwater, Buckley, the Dixiecrats===&lt;br /&gt;
By 1950, American liberalism was so dominant intellectually that liberal critic  [[Lionel Trilling]] could dismiss contemporary conservatism as &amp;quot;irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lapham 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like Russell Kirk's ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''National Review'', founded by [[William F. Buckley Jr.]] in 1955.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been isolationist the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose communism. It looked to the Founding Fathers for historical inspiration as opposed to Calhoun and the antebellum South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the Civil Rights movement came in the Civil Rights Act of 1864 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Most conservatives supported both, but [[Barry Goldwater]] opposed them.  Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democratic party. That lock was now broken and southern conservatives started voting for Republican candidates for president in 1964-68, and by the 1990s they were also voting for GOP candidates for state and local office. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and they became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democratic party.  The region favored the GOP heavily in presidential elections, but split in state contests.  In 2008, however, the Obama campaign broke into the solid Republican South, carrying Florida, Virginia and North Carolina. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all New Deal programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in California, and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the Northeast who supported many New Deal programs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and economic policies such as wage and price controls, than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and conservative principles dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to Soviet Communism.  Reagan promised to cut welfare spending but failed to do so.  He did cut taxes, but raised military spending and created large federal deficits of the sort conservatives had complained about for decades.  They stopped complaining, as the deficit issue switched to favor the Democrats (who did balance the budget in the late 1990s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply side economic policies, known as &amp;quot;[[Reaganomics]],&amp;quot; foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Australia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade.  In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Britain==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United Kingdom the present parliamentary opposition party since 1997 is the [[Conservative Party]]. Its current leader is [[David Cameron]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for abortion on demand and gay civil partnership and the Kyoto Treaty and to oppose capital punishment (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in England and Wales than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse.  However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively liberal in tone. The print media is different with pro-Conservative newspapers like the ''Daily Mail'' , ''Daily Express''  and ''Daily Telegraph'' selling more copies than their rivals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservatism and the French Revolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatism in France and the continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benefits of Conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy.  Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement.  Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement--and thus, weakens society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes individual responsibility.  In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion.  Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of morality, duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Also See ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685789&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Frohnen, Bruce et al eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference&lt;br /&gt;
* Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207759425&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages &lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205919226&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241925238&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [http://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193684721&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241924189&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003) &lt;br /&gt;
*Schoenwald; Jonathan . ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685365&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's &amp;quot;Crossfire&amp;quot; interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=France&amp;diff=836958</id>
		<title>France</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=France&amp;diff=836958"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:34:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 836953 by MatthewL (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =France rel94.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''République Française''&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =France location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of France.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Armoirie France.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Paris&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=French&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Nicolas Sarkozy&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =François Fillon&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =260,558 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =64,102,140 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$1.871 trillion (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$30,100 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency       =euro&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''France''' (Official title: ''République Française'', the ''French Republic'') is a major country in Western [[Europe]].  One of the oldest countries in Europe, France has played a significant role in world events since the era of King [[Louis XIV]] in the early 18th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Total area: 674,843 sq. km. (260,558 sq. mi.); largest Western European country, about the size of [[Texas]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital (and largest city)--[[Paris]]. Major cities--[[Marseille]], [[Lyon]], [[Toulouse]], [[Strasbourg]], [[Nice]], [[Rennes]], [[Lille]], [[Bordeaux]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Varied.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Temperate.&lt;br /&gt;
*Population : 62,150,775 (July 2008 INSEE est.) excluding overseas territories.&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
See [[History of France]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
Since prehistoric times, France has been a crossroads of trade, travel, and migration. Three basic European ethnic stocks--Celtic, Latin, and Teutonic (Frankish)--have blended over the centuries to make up its present population. France's birth rate was among the highest in Europe from 1945 until the late 1960s. Since then, its birth rate has fallen but remains higher than that of most other west European countries. Traditionally, France has had a high level of [[immigration]]. More than 1 million [[Muslims]] immigrated in the 1960s and early 1970s from [[North Africa]], especially [[Algeria]]; their numbers are now above 5 million (2004 figure). &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:French people.jpg|left|125px|thumb|Young Sarkozy supporters, the right-wing President]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Education is free, beginning at age 3 (sometimes 2), and mandatory between ages 6 and 16. The [[public education]] system is highly centralized. Private education is primarily Roman Catholic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolution is taught exclusively in state schools and almost exclusively in private schools. Creationism is almost never heard of and is an extremely minority view even among Roman Catholics. Likewise Intelligent Design and anything else that contradicts the atheistic religion of evolution. Teachers can be fired for mentioning alternative origins theories even scientific one like Intelligent Design.&lt;br /&gt;
====Higher education====&lt;br /&gt;
Higher education in France began with the founding of the [[University of Paris]] in 1150. It now consists of 91 public universities and 175 professional schools, including the post-graduate Grandes Ecoles. Private, college-level institutions focusing on business and management with curricula structured on the American system of credits and semesters have been growing in recent years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France has an elaborately stratified system of higher education; nearly all schools are controlled and funded by the government. There are few private foundations or endowments, but some research money comes from American foundations.  Most scholars and scientists at all levels are civil servants with lifetime tenure. Rigid hierarchies ensure that young researchers pay their dues before moving up the ladder to supervisory roles. Paris decides what areas of research are high priorities, which laboratories will be “centers of excellence,” and how many people will be hired in what fields. It also classifies France’s top educational and research institutions as grands organismes, grands établissements, and grandes écoles, with bureaucratic strictures ensuring that there will be little contact between the different groups.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Fred Schwarz, &amp;quot;The Uncertainty Principle: America dominates science with a classic American formula: freedom,&amp;quot;  ''National Review'',  Dec. 21, 2009 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
The French language derives from the vernacular Latin spoken by the Romans in [[Gaul]], although it includes some Celtic and Germanic words. Historically, French has been used as the international language of diplomacy and commerce. Today it remains one of six official languages at the [[United Nations]] and has been a unifying factor in Africa, Asia, the Pacific, and the Caribbean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The French language is controlled by the French Academy (''L'Académie française''). AsMembers of the Academy are appointed for life and this results in a very conservative approach to the changing demands on the language even going as far as banning words with an English origin. The French people (and other French speakers) often ignore the &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; French and adopt modern English words. This can cause an even wider gap opening up between the cultural elite, who prefer to follow the official French even if it is many years and even decades out of date, and ordinary French speakers who prefer to have a more useful language. There have even been arguments between the government and the Academy over the introduction of &amp;quot;foreign&amp;quot; French words from countries like Belgium and Canada which the government is keen to use. Some even say that this painfully slow and traditional organization is strangling the French language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
The French state is non-religious - it has no sanctioned religion and is forbidden to do so by law, commonly referred to as ''laicité''. Since the beginning of the 20th century, state banning of religion in education and other state-funded activities created a large proportion of people who are atheists. It was common for teachers to preach atheism at schools and classroom prayer was forbidden. That has changed somewhat in recent decades with a large number of state-funded quasi-private religious schools, mostly Catholic.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Notre-dame.jpg|thumb|left|125px|Notre Dame.]][[File:La Mosquée de Paris.jpg|thumb|left|125px|La Mosquée de Paris.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a January 2007 poll, 51% percent of respondents indicated they were Roman Catholic, including those who never attend religious services. Of Catholics, only 10% went to church regularly--mainly to Sunday mass or christenings. There are an estimated 5 million to 6 million Muslims (8 to 10% of the population), although estimates of how many of these are practicing vary widely. According to a January 17, 2008 survey in the Catholic daily ''La Croix,'' 39% of Muslims surveyed said they observed Islam's five prayers daily, an increase from 31% in 1994. Mosque attendance for Friday prayers rose to 23%, up from 16 percent in 1994, while Ramadan observance reached 70% compared to 60% in 1994. Drinking alcohol, which Islam forbids, also declined to 34% from 39% in 1994.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Data reported by [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108446.htm U.S. State Department, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Protestants make up 3% of the population, Jewish and Buddhist religious groups 1% each, and Sikhs less than 1 percent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008 a practicing Buddhist claimed the current estimate of 600,000 Buddhists strongly under represents the actual number of adherents; however, he acknowledged the difficulty in distinguishing between practicing Buddhists and the much larger number of persons who characterize themselves as sympathetic to certain Buddhist principles. Scholars distinguish between &amp;quot;sympathizers&amp;quot; (approximately 5 million), &amp;quot;associates&amp;quot; (defined as having a certain degree of proximity to Buddhism and estimated to number between 100,000 and 150,000), and &amp;quot;practitioners&amp;quot; (approximately 12,000). The biggest Buddhist meditation center in the West is in the region of Touraine, and two Tibetan monasteries in the Auvergne region have trained the largest number of Buddhist monks outside Asia, according to 2002 statistical data. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish community numbers approximately 600,000. According to press reports, at least 60% of Jews are not highly observant, celebrating at most only the High Holy Days. The large majority of observant Jews are Orthodox. There are small Conservative and Reform congregations as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jehovah's Witnesses reported that 250,000 persons attend their services either regularly or periodically. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Orthodox Christians number between 80,000 and 100,000; the vast majority are associated with the Greek or Russian Orthodox Churches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other religious groups include Evangelicals, Christian Scientists, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons). Membership in evangelical churches is growing (with as many as 400,000 adherents, according to February 2007 press reports), including African-style &amp;quot;prosperity&amp;quot; churches, especially in the suburbs of Paris, in large part because of increased participation by African and Antillean immigrants. According to the press, there are approximately 31,000 Mormons. The Church of Scientology has an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution of the Fifth Republic was approved by public referendum on September 28, 1958. It greatly strengthened the powers of the president in relation to those of Parliament. Under this constitution, presidents have been elected directly for a 7-year term since 1958. Beginning in 2002, the presidential term of office was reduced to 5 years. The president names the prime minister, presides over the cabinet, commands the armed forces, and concludes treaties. Traditionally, presidents under the Fifth Republic have tended to leave day-to-day policy-making to the Prime Minister and government; the five-year term of office is expected to make presidents more accountable for the results of domestic policies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The president can submit questions to a national referendum and can dissolve the National Assembly. In certain emergency situations, with the approval of parliament, the president may assume [[dictator]]ial powers and rule by decree. The main components of France's executive branch are the president, the prime minister and government, and the permanent bureaucracies of the many ministries. Led by a prime minister, who is the head of government, the cabinet is composed of a varying number of ministers, ministers-delegate, and secretaries of state. Parliament meets for one 9-[[month]] session each year. Under special circumstances the president can call an additional session. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Constitution, the legislative branch has few checks on executive power; nevertheless, the National Assembly can still cause a government to fall if an absolute majority of the total Assembly membership votes to censure. The Parliament is [[bicameral]] with a National Assembly and a Senate. The National Assembly is the principal legislative body. Its deputies are directly elected to 5-year terms, and all seats are voted on in each election. Senators are chosen by an electoral college and, under new rules passed in 2003 to shorten the term, serve for six years, with one-half of the Senate being renewed every three years. (As a transitional measure in 2004, 62 Senators were elected to 9-year terms, while 61 were elected to 6-year terms; subsequently, all terms will be six years.) The Senate's legislative powers are limited; the National Assembly has the last word in the event of a disagreement between the two houses. The government has a strong influence in shaping the agenda of Parliament. The government also can declare a bill to be a question of confidence, thereby linking its continued existence to the passage of the legislative text; unless a motion of censure is introduced and voted, the text is considered adopted without a vote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A distinctive feature of the French judicial system is that the Constitutional Council protects basic rights when they might be potentially violated by new laws and the Council of State protects basic rights when they might be violated by actions of the state. The Constitutional Council examines legislation and decides whether it conforms to the constitution. Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, it considers only legislation that is referred to it by Parliament, the prime minister, or the president. Moreover, it considers legislation before it is promulgated. The Council of State has a separate function from the Constitutional Council and provides recourse to individual citizens who have claims against the administration. The Ordinary Courts--including specialized bodies such as the police court, the criminal court, the correctional tribunal, the commercial court, and the industrial court--settle disputes that arise between citizens, as well as disputes that arise between citizens and corporations. The Court of Appeals reviews cases judged by the Ordinary Courts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally, decision-making in France has been highly centralized, with each of France's departments headed by a prefect appointed by the central government. In 1982, the national government passed legislation to decentralize authority by giving a wide range of administrative and fiscal powers to local elected officials. In March 1986, regional councils were directly elected for the first time, and the process of [[decentralization]] continues, albeit at a slow pace. &lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*President--Nicolas Sarkozy&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister--François Fillon&lt;br /&gt;
*Foreign Minister--Bernard Kouchner&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United States--Pierre Vimont (pending accreditation)&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United Nations--Jean-Marc Rochereau de la Sablière &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Conditions===&lt;br /&gt;
Since his inauguration in May 2007 as France's sixth president under the Fifth Republic, Nicolas Sarkozy focused his first months in office on improving the performance of France's economy through liberalization of labor markets, higher education and taxes. In the April 22, 2007 first round of presidential elections, Sarkozy, the leader of the center-right, union for a popular Movement (UMP) party, placed first; Socialist candidate Ségolène Royal placed second; centrist François Bayrou placed third; and extremist Jean-Marie Le Pen placed fourth out of a field of 12 candidates. Sarkozy prevailed in the May 6, 2007 second round, defeating Royal by a 53.06% to 46.94% margin. Royal's loss marked the third straight defeat for the Socialist candidate in presidential elections. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Sarkozy assumed office on May 16, 2007, the last day of Jacques Chirac's official term. Sarkozy named François Fillon Prime Minister. Jean-Louis Borloo, the second highest ranking figure in the government, presides over an expanded Ministry of Environment.. Legislative elections held on June 10 and 17, 2007 gave the UMP a large parliamentary majority. Current key ministers include: Jean-Louis Borloo, Ecology and Sustainable Planning; Michèle Alliot-Marie, Interior; Bernard Kouchner, Foreign Affairs; Christine Lagarde, Economy; Brice Hortefeux, Immigration; Rachida Dati, Justice; and Hervé Morin, Defense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electing Nicolas Sarkozy, French voters endorsed the wide-ranging program of reforms--including market-oriented social and economic reforms--that were the focal point of Sarkozy's campaign, implicitly giving him the green light to try and implement these reforms quickly, and allowing a way forward for overcoming France's 2005 rejection of the EU constitutional treaty. By embracing a figure long tagged as &amp;quot;pro-American,&amp;quot; French voters also expressed their desire to renew trust in the U.S.-France relationship. During the campaign Sarkozy often ended his stump speeches--evoking Martin Luther King--by calling for a &amp;quot;French dream&amp;quot; of social equality, social mobility, and equal opportunity; and his first speech as President-elect assured his &amp;quot;American friends&amp;quot; that they could rely on France's friendship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after taking office, President Sarkozy went to work on a series of reforms to address mounting pressure for short- and long-term restructuring, including reduced government spending, flexibility in the implementation of the 35-hour work week, more labor-market flexibility, less taxation, and further privatization and liberalization of the business sector. French and EU analysts stress that longer-term measures must focus on reducing the future burden of ballooning public pension and health care budgets, as well as reducing labor-related taxes. Government action to initiate such reforms may have contributed to the center-right's poor showing in 2004 regional and European Parliamentary elections, and continues to spark periodic strikes and work stoppages throughout France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that France is, in many ways, much more left-wing and socialist than the U.S.A. Even with what the French would call a right-wing president, there are differences fundamental between the right-wing in France and America. France has a very large state and employs a near majority of the workforce directly and indirectly (like state-owned private companies). France also has a very strong welfare state and comprehensive cover for health, unemployment, pensions, etc. This is expensive and so taxes are relatively high. So while President Chirac and his successor President Sarkozy are right-wing, they are not looking to dismantle these policies even if the latter wants to make them more efficient. Compared to America, Sarkozy would be roughly equivalent to a Democrat. The Socialist Party, the opposition political party at the moment, is very strong. There is no comparison to a main American political party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
A charter member of the United Nations, France holds one of the permanent seats in the Security Council and is a member of most of its specialized and related agencies. France is also America's oldest ally; French military intervention was instrumental in helping Britain's American colonies establish independence. Because many battles in which the United States was involved during World War I and World War II took place in France, more American soldiers have been killed on French soil than on that of any other foreign country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France is a leader in Western Europe because of its size, location, and large economy, membership in European organizations, strong military posture, and energetic diplomacy. France generally has worked to strengthen the global economic and political influence of the EU and its role in common European defense. It views Franco-German cooperation and the development of a European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) with other EU members, as the foundation of efforts to enhance European security. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France supports Quartet (U.S.-EU-Russia-UN) efforts to implement the Middle East roadmap, which envisions establishment of a Palestinian state, living side-by-side in peace and security with Israel. Recognizing the need for a comprehensive peace agreement, France supports the involvement of all Arab parties and Israel in a multilateral peace process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 2003, France has supported four UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions on Iraq, including UNSCR 1546, which laid out a timetable for Iraq's political transition and reaffirmed UNSC authorization for a Multinational Force in Iraq, at the invitation of the Iraqi government, to stabilize the country. France contributed to the 230 million euro EU contribution to Iraq reconstruction in 2003. After the Iraqi Interim Government took power, France agreed to substantial debt relief and offered police training to Iraqi security forces. In 2006, France and the U.S. collaborated closely to create a consensus in the UN to adopt UNSCR 1696 demanding action from Iran to end its enrichment-related and preprocessing activities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France continues to play an important role in Africa, especially in its former colonies, through aid programs, commercial activities, military agreements, and cultural impact. In those former colonies where the French presence remains important, France has supported political, military, and social stability. France maintains permanent military bases in Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Gabon, and Senegal, and has maintained a long-term military presence in Chad. An attack on French forces in Côte d'Ivoire in 2004 led to the departure of thousands of French nationals from that country. France responded to the crisis in Côte d'Ivoire by dispatching Operation Unicorn, which has worked with UN forces to help stabilize Côte d'Ivoire. France has also deployed forces to Togo (in support of Operation Unicorn in Côte d'Ivoire) and to the Central African Republic, where French forces have assisted government forces in deterring rebel elements. France with EU partners, participated in an international military operation (EUFOR) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2006, which played an important presence during in elections that year in the D.R.C. France was instrumental in organizing the June 2007 ministerial conference on Darfur and has shown leadership in increasing international interest and involvement in Chad and the Central African Republic, both of which are affected by the crisis in Darfur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France has extensive political and commercial relations with Asian countries, including China, Japan, and Southeast Asia as well as an increasing presence in regional fora. France is seeking to broaden its commercial presence in China and will pose a competitive challenge to U.S. business, particularly in aerospace, high-tech, and luxury markets. In Southeast Asia, France was an architect of the 1991 Paris Accords, which ended the conflict in Cambodia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sacre Coeur.jpg|right|Le Sacre Coeur]]&lt;br /&gt;
Relations between the United States and France are active and cordial. Mutual visits by high-level officials are conducted frequently. Bilateral contact at the cabinet level has traditionally been active. France and the United States share common values and have parallel policies on most political, economic, and security issues. Differences are discussed frankly and have not generally been allowed to impair the pattern of close cooperation that characterizes relations between the two countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France is one of NATO's top three troop contributors. The French support NATO modernization efforts and are leading contributors to the NATO Response Force (NRF). France is keen to build European defense capabilities, including through the development of EU battle-group sized force packages and joint European military production initiatives. Defense Minister Morin supports development of a European defense that must complement, not compete with, NATO, which remains at the core of transatlantic security. French resistance, however, to efforts to reinforce NATO's reach beyond the North Atlantic region remain a source of contention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France is a close partner with the U.S. in the war on terror. It cooperates with the U.S. to monitor and disrupt terrorist groups and has processed numerous U.S. requests for information under the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty. French security and intelligence services have rounded up hundreds of extremists in the past year. The French judiciary has upheld the pre-trial detainment of the four French former Guantanamo detainees. France is a strong partner in multiple non-proliferation fora and is a key participant in the Proliferation Security Initiative. Through the &amp;quot;EU3&amp;quot; (France, the U.K., and Germany), France is working to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France opposed the use of force in Iraq in March 2003 and did not join the U.S.-led coalition that liberated the country from the dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein with whom they, like other countries had close economic ties, especially in the supply of nuclear technology.Donald Rumsfeld famously quipped that &amp;quot;going to war without the French is like going on a duck hunt without an accordion&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Americans generally took France's refusal to join in the war very badly. Many politicians, especially Republicans, were incensed and even started campaigns to ridicule France and its military. There was even a campaign to change the name of French fries to Freedom fries. Since no weapons of mass destruction were found after the Iraq war, some have speculated that France was right all along. But many Americans still take a very negative view of the French generally and old stereotypes of rude, unwashed, horse-eating and cowardly French remain a popular vision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite differences over Iraq, the U.S. and France continue to cooperate closely on many issues, most notably the global war on terrorism, efforts to stem the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and on regional problems, including in Africa, Lebanon, and Kosovo. On Iraq, the French agreed to generous debt relief for Iraq in Paris Club negotiations and have accepted the establishment of a NATO training mission there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, France seeks robust U.S. engagement in the peace process. France is working to contain the Hamas-led challenge to the Palestinian Authority. President Sarkozy, like his predecessor, President Chirac, is committed to keeping France in supportive relations with Israel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. and France have worked closely to support a sovereign and independent Lebanon, free of Syrian domination, having fought with uncharacteristic tenacity to keep the British out in World War II, but without success.&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. and France co-sponsored in September 2004 UNSCR 1559, which called for full withdrawal of Syrian forces, a free and fair electoral process, and disbanding and disarmament of all Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias. In the wake of the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri in February 2005, the U.S. and France reiterated calls for a full, immediate withdrawal of all Syrian troops and security services from Lebanon. France also co-sponsored UNSCR 1701 and was one of the leading countries in Europe working to end hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah in 2006 by committing 2,000 troops to UNIFIL-plus. Strong French backing led to adoption of UNSCR 1757 establishing a Special Tribunal for Lebanon to prosecute the perpetrators of the Hariri assassination and other killings of critics of Syria's interference in Lebanon. Foreign Minister Kouchner is working hard to help competing Lebanese political factions agree to a framework for governing the country in accordance with the country's constitution and free from external interference. France also participates in the U.S. Broader Middle East and North Africa initiative. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade and investment between the U.S. and France are strong. On average over $1 billion in commercial transactions take place between France the U.S. every day. In 2006 U.S. exports to France totaled over 24.2 billion euros and U.S. imports from France were valued at 37.1 billion euros. France is the eighth partner for total trade of goods (imports plus exports) and the tenth-ranked supplier worldwide to the U.S. and its 10th largest customer. The U.S. is France's third-ranked supplier and its fifth largest customer. There are approximately 2,300 French subsidiaries in the U.S., providing more than 481,100 jobs and generating an estimated $178 billion turnover. U.S. companies in France employ about 603,400 French citizens. The U.S. is the top destination for French investments worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Relations at a cultural and popular level are complex. While many Americans see the French as too quick surrender in the face of military conflict, many French people view suspiciously America's willingness to go to war. There are suspicions that America will only fight to secure wealth primarily oil or its ideology of the US version of liberty with disregard for other nation's views. Americans often view French culture as being very elitist and overly reliant on the high arts while some French take exception to American &amp;quot;cultural imperialism&amp;quot; even though the French are keen consumers of American-style fast food, cinema and modern music. The French are generally proud of the donation of the Statue of Liberty but can sometimes appear ungrateful for the help America and other Allies gave in World War 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Security Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
French military doctrine is based on the concepts of national independence, nuclear deterrence, and military sufficiency. France is a founding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and has worked actively with Allies to adapt NATO, internally and externally, to the post-Cold War environment. However, in 1966, the French withdrew from NATO's military bodies while remaining full participants in the alliance's political councils. In December 1995, France announced that it would increase its participation in NATO's military wing, including the Military Committee. France remains a firm supporter of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and other efforts at cooperation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outside of NATO, France has actively and heavily participated in a variety of peacekeeping/coalition efforts in Africa, the Middle East, and the Balkans, often taking the lead in these operations. France has undertaken a major restructuring to develop a professional military that will be smaller, more rapidly deployable and better tailored for operations outside of mainland France. Key elements of the restructuring include reducing personnel, bases, and headquarters and rationalizing equipment and the armament industry. French active-duty military in June 2007 numbered about 350,000 (including Gendarmes), of which nearly 34,000 were deployed outside of French territory. France completed the move to all-professional armed forces when conscription ended on December 31, 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France places a high priority on arms control&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/11/10/151219.shtml French Arms Sales to China]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and non-proliferation. After conducting a final series of six nuclear tests, the French signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996. France has implemented a moratorium on the production, export, and use of anti-personnel landmines and supports negotiations leading toward a universal ban. France is an active participant in the major supplier regimes designed to restrict transfer of technologies that could lead to proliferation of weapons of mass destruction: the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Australia Group (for chemical and biological weapons), the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the Missile Technology Control Regime. France participates actively in the Proliferation Security Initiative, and is engaged with the U.S., both bilaterally and at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), to curb nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) proliferation from the D.P.R.K., Iran, Libya, and elsewhere. France has joined with the U.S., Germany, and the other three permanent members of the UN Security Council to offer a package of incentives and disincentives to Iran to halt its uranium enrichment activities. France has also signed and ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention. France maintains a color-coded security system, similar to that of the U.S., consisting of yellow, orange, red and scarlet threat levels. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least 12 French soldiers have been killed in [[Afghanistan]] during [[Operation Enduring Freedom]] since its inception in 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anon., [http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10651794&amp;amp;CFID=10819516&amp;amp;CFTOKEN=58cc719e037c97de-2515EEEE-B27C-BB00-012942FB89A6CFE4 Where the sniping has to stop] ''The Economist'', 7th February, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Unrest in France by Moslem immigrants has resulted in destruction of property.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/printer_friendly.cgi?article=333 Ann Coulter, October 7, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
With a GDP of approximately $2 trillion, France is the sixth-largest economy. It has substantial agricultural resources, a large industrial base, and a highly skilled work force. A dynamic services sector accounts for an increasingly large share of economic activity and is responsible for nearly all job creation in recent years. GDP growth was 1.1% in 2003, after two years of steady decline from 3.9% in 2000. GDP growth was 1.7% in 2005, down from 2.5% in 2004 (2000 price basis). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government economic policy aims to promote investment and domestic growth in a stable fiscal and monetary environment. Creating jobs and reducing the high unemployment rate through recovery-supportive policy has been a top priority. French unemployment dropped from a high of 12% to 8.7% in the late 1990s, and after hovering around 10% during the 2000s, unemployment slipped once again to 8.0% in July 2007. France joined 10 other European Union countries in adopting the euro as its currency in January 1999. Since then, monetary policy has been set by the European Central Bank in Frankfurt. On January 1, 2002, France, along with the other countries of the euro zone, dropped its national currency in favor of euro bills and coins. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite significant reform and privatization over the past 15 years, the government continues to control a large share of economic activity: Government spending, at 53.5% of GDP in 2006, is among the highest in the G-7. Regulation of labor and product markets is pervasive. The government continues to own shares in corporations in a range of sectors, including banking, energy production and distribution, automobiles, transportation, and telecommunications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legislation passed in 1998 shortened the legal work week from 39 to 35 hours for most employees effective January 1, 2000. Recent assessments of the impact of work week reduction on growth and jobs have generally concluded that the goal of job creation was not met. The former administration introduced increasing flexibility into the law, returning the country to a de facto (if not de jure) 39-hour work week in the private sector. Under President Nicolas Sarkozy's impetus, overtime work will be exempt from income taxes on October 1, 2007, a move to encourage work and to increase work duration. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Membership in France's labor unions accounts for approximately 5% of the private sector work force and is concentrated in the manufacturing, transportation, and heavy industry sectors. Most unions are affiliated with one of the competing national federations, the largest and most powerful of which are the communist-dominated General Labor Confederation (CGT), the Workers' Force (FO), and the French Democratic Confederation of Labor (CFDT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France has been very successful in developing dynamic telecommunications, aerospace, and weapons sectors. With virtually no domestic oil production, France has relied heavily on the development of nuclear power, which now accounts for about 80% of the country's electricity production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trade===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:French-Perfume.jpg|right|280px]]&lt;br /&gt;
France is the second-largest trading nation in Western Europe (after Germany). France ran a $33.7 billion deficit in 2006. Total trade for 2006 amounted to $1,013.5 billion, over 45% of GDP 75.0% of which was with EU-24 countries. In 2003, U.S.-France trade in goods and services totaled $80.3 billion. U.S. industrial chemicals, aircraft and engines, electronic components, telecommunications, computer software, computers and peripherals, analytical and scientific instrumentation, medical instruments and supplies, broadcasting equipment, and programming and franchising are particularly attractive to French importers. Total French trade of goods and services was $1,001 billion in 2006. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Principal French exports to the United States are [[aircraft]] and [[engine]]s, beverages, electrical equipment, chemicals, cosmetics, and luxury products. France is the ninth-largest trading partner of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agriculture===&lt;br /&gt;
France is the world's second-largest agricultural producer, after the United States. However, the destination of 70% of its exports is other EU member states. Wheat, beef, pork, poultry, and dairy products are the principal exports. The United States, although the second-largest exporter to France, faces stiff competition from domestic production, other EU member states, and third countries. U.S. agricultural exports to France, totaling $464 million in 2003, consist primarily of soybeans and products, feeds and fodders, seafood, and consumer oriented products, especially snack foods and nuts. French agricultural exports to the United States are mainly cheese, processed products, and wine. They amount to about $3.327 billion (2006) annually.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France accounts for about one-third of all agricultural land within the EU. Northern France is characterized by large wheat farms. Dairy products, pork, poultry, and apple production are concentrated in the western region. Beef production is located in central France, while the production of fruits, vegetables, and wine ranges from central to southern France. France is a large producer of many agricultural products and is expanding its forestry and fishery industries. The implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the Uruguay Round of the GATT Agreement resulted in reforms in the agricultural sector of the economy. Continued revision of the CAP and reforms agreed under the Doha round of World Trade Organization (WTO) will further change French agriculture. France remains Europe's strongest opponent of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and often assumes an agricultural position at the EU Council to promote this policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of French Masterpieces]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous French paintings]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Copyright Details (US Government)|http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3842.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:EU Members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:France| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=836957</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=836957"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:34:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 836955 by MatthewL (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest [[religion]], having 2.2 billion followers. It is a [[monotheistic]] religion that professes belief in [[Jesus]] as the Son of [[God]].  Christianity takes its name from [[Jesus Christ]] meaning &amp;quot;Jesus the Anointed One&amp;quot; or, in the Hebrew original, &amp;quot;Yeshua HaMashiach&amp;quot;.  Followers of Jesus are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, Christianity is widespread and is practiced on all continents. It is most prevalent in Latin America, with a following of over four hundred million. Over 90% of the population of countries like Mexico, Brazil, and the Democratic Republic of Congo practice Christianity. Other significant regions include North America and Oceania, where over 70% of the population is Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believe established their church and the succession of [[Pope]]s as the spiritual leaders of Christendom. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) also trace their roots back to the Apostles, but do not believe in the Primacy of the Pope. Differing theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]]; the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 115 million baptized members) and the Lutheran World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It first broke away from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of [[faith]] and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]] as well as other practices of the Catholic Church that Luther saw as unBiblical. Other preachers and theologians, such as [[Ulrich Zwingli]] and [[John Calvin]] followed Luther in rejecting key Catholic teachings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Christian beliefs [[Christian apologetics|are well supported via a large body of compelling evidence]].  Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed]] below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I believe in one God, [[God the Father|the Father Almighty]], Maker of [[heaven]] and [[earth]], and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Virgin Mary]], and became man. And He was crucified for us under [[Pontius Pilate]], and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the [[Bible|Scriptures]]; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. In one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the [[Resurrection]] of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine while disagreeing on others. According to an online Harris poll from 2003, 99% of all American Christians believe in [[God]], 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in [[Heaven]], 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in [[Hell]], 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious tenents of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See also: the [[Apostle's Creed]], [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. While God is tripartite, this does not imply that Christians are polytheists--the oneness of the divine nature (or essence) is what matters.  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to most (but not all) Christian theology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is [[love]].  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The God of the Christians is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, and all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left|]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Augustus Caesar|Caesar Augustus]] the Son (e.g. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnate as a man. He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At the age of thirty he was baptized by his cousin, the [[John the Baptist|Prophet John]], and began to preach in the area [[Palestine]]. About three years after his baptism, he raised his friend [[Lazarus]] from the dead, prompting the Jewish power establishment to plot Jesus' death. Jesus was [[crucified]]. He came back from the dead and was seen by over 500 people. He ascended to Heaven. The four [[Gospels]] contain the records of some of what Jesus did and said, but he did much more than those four books relate, as the Apostle John said in his Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is love and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. Jesus summarized his teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been endless debate over how a person should express love for God in his or her moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is most likely due to the constant mention of hospitality and generosity to one's &amp;quot;neighbors&amp;quot; in the Bible.  Jesus was especially passionate about caring for people in need:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus said to him, &amp;quot;If you want to be perfect, go and sell what you own and give the money to the destitute, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come back and follow me.&amp;quot; (Matthew 19:21)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escape slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 500 A.D., most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Atonement of Jesus on the Cross===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
All Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, along with His resurrection, is an indispensable proclamation of a crucial event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to understanding His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. Though there is ample recognition in the New Testament that others desired Him to die, and that the circumstances in which His path took him would bring Him to His end on earth, the mover of all these things was Himself and the will of the Father. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect that way. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben), or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). And so, &amp;quot;The Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# It was the belief, recorded in Scripture, that in His death a way back to God was made possible for those that were near to God&amp;amp;mdash;the Jews. And a way back to God for those that were far away&amp;amp;mdash;the Gentiles. That is why the New Testament saw in the requirements of God for Israel a fulfillment in Jesus the Messiah. He was the perfect Israel, taken out of Egypt, to redeem Israel. And that is why the New Testament saw in Jesus, a  deepness to the incarnation of the Son of God, deeper than just a Jew of His time of a certain tribe. He was the &amp;quot;Second Adam&amp;quot; to redeem the sons of Adam. This encompassing perspective had further implications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself - How can I make reconciliation with my enemies, with even the members of my own family, of race with race and  people with people?; Does His death for the sins of the world include those who only partially understand, for the baby aborted, the feeble minded, and severely retarded?; For those who have never heard of Jesus, never been &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot;, distant and remote in place and time?;  Does His death for the sins of the world  also include a remedy for the ills that have come as a result of those sins&amp;amp;mdash;certain sicknesses, ills of the mind, body and the soul? Do they &amp;quot;hold&amp;quot; for today?; Does His death make good, turn to the better, show the way, effect the way, of the illnesses that have befallen the world, not only by sin, but simply by the circumstances of life, of degeneration, of compounded dysfunction? How does the fruit of His death bring in somehow the Kingdom &amp;quot;among us&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of the Son of God on the cross has provided the solution for sin, and it still holds its sway over the imagination and aspirations for the people of our generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17, and &amp;quot;Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men&amp;quot; (Mark 2:28)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often use the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; interchangeably. Other Christians, notably the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]].  &amp;quot;Jesus answered, Amen, amen, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God&amp;quot; (John 3:5). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to stay saved. However, this is a common misconception of the text. It is rather referring to proving that one is a child of God by their &amp;quot;fruit&amp;quot; (things that they do and how they behave). Christians in the Reformed tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer and theologian [[John Calvin]], as well as the faith outlined in the Belgic and Heidleberg Confessions) say that salvation is irrevocable and that it cannot be lost, if it were genuinely part of one's life to begin with. Reformed Christians (often called [[Calvinists]]) point to many verses of Scripture in support of this belief. One such verse is Romans 8:38-39: &amp;quot;For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord&amp;quot; (Romans 8:38-39; [[NASB]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Calvinists, one reason salvation cannot be lost by natural things is because salvation was obtained through a supernatural being, namely Jesus Christ. This does not negate Jesus' human side, only that he was both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man, as asserted by the [[Council of Chalcedon]] (A. D. 451). Another is because Jesus said of his own Apostles that they could not be snatched from his hand (John 10:28-29). The Bible also makes clear that mankind cannot earn salvation, and that it is a free gift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history Gary Habermas is considered a leading [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fact of the Resurrection of Christ is a key element of the preaching of the message about Jesus and an essential of Christian belief. But there are also certain effects that this belief has on the lives of believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead, that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion. He was &amp;quot;declared to be the Son of God&amp;quot;  by His resurrection. This brings believers in Him to a strong confidence in the determined power of God to both vindicate in their own lives and to bring His reign upon earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, their sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. His resurrection, carries with it our knowledge that our sin with its attendant death has been totally and finally paid for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life - as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life, and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully under the Spirit's control, guidance, and empowerment. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolations, and consider that even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him, a restoration, and that tears, even now, are wiped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian evangelism and Christian internet evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Since its inception Christianity has seen a consistent and [http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/BChristianIncrease12.htm dramatic increase in its number of adherents].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/BChristianIncrease12.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pewforum.org/Christian/Faith-and-Conflict-The-Global-Rise-of-Christianity.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the 1940's, the [[Lausanne Movement]] was started in order to help Christendom evangelize globally with greater effectiveness and thousands of Christian leaders from around the globe meet regularly to increase the effectiveness of [[Christian evangelism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lausanne.org/about.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Internet evangelism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
see also: [[Internet evangelism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Campus Crusade for Christ International (CCCI) is one of the world's largest evangelism organizations within Christendom and has over 25,000 full time missionaries. In 2006, Alan Beeber of CCCI predicted that internet evangelism will result in more conversion that all other forms of evangelism for CCCI combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/pdf/issues/LWP0206.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At [[YouTube]], Christians and Christian creationists have faced problems with [[atheist bullying|atheist cyberbullies]], but they [[Essay: Sharing your Christian/creationist videos on the internet|have developed methods to overcome this problem]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History of the name &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22) and the church its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'', (Acts 24:5) evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived. Probably close to A.D 50 the [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16, and likely is referred to in James 2:7, &amp;quot;Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that, at least initially, the church saw itself as united. In the community:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles,&amp;quot; due to determined persecution which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) Although the scattered Christian communities could soon be found throughout the then known world, they were primarily to be found in two separate cultural and liguistic entities and then kingdoms--the Greek and Latin speaking empires of Europe and the mid-east, and the Aramaic speaking sphere of the Parthian empire of the mid and far-east. This latter sphere encompassed not only the eastern portions of Syria, Arabian peninsula and Persia, but also extended to portions of southern India and even China. To this day there are many [[Aramaic Church]] members in the Kerala province of south India.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other evidence indicates believers had their own houses and goods. (Acts 10:6; 16:14,15,40; 21:8; 1Cor. 11:22; 1Tim. 6:17; Philemon)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), Early ecclesiatical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community  (197 A.D.): ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111-113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:...in the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed, stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished. There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food--but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources on becoming a Christian ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoffman Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane.jpg|thumbnail|170px|[[Jesus Christ|Christ]] in the Garden of Gethsemane by Heinrich Hofmann.]]&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Below are some resources on becoming a [[Christian]]:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jesusfilm.org/film-and-media/watch-the-film  Jesus film - free access] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.thewordfortoday.org/?page=C2000 Free audio Bible and Bible audio streaming]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutgod.com/ AllAboutGod.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Video testimonies of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gotquestions.org/repentance.html Repentance]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tips on choosing a Christian church:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutreligion.org/choosing-a-christian-church-faq.htm Choosing a Christian Church]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Spiritual growth as a Christian:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9781576839324/The-Pursuit-of-Holiness-Jerry-Bridges The Pursuit of Holiness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9780891099413/The-Practice-of-Godliness-Jerry-Bridges The Practice of Godliness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/529785.The_Complete_Book_of_Discipleship The Complete Book of Discipleship: On Being and Making Followers of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Also See==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orthodox Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Church of England]] or ''Anglican Church''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Episcopal Church in the United States of America]] (or ''Episcopal Church'' or ''Episcopalians'') (Non-UK branch of the Anglican Church)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Internet evangelism:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Sharing your Christian and creationist videos on YouTube and the internet]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967-1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), ), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [http://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [http://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [http://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [http://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al, eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958-19820; 2565 pages&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.christian.com Christian] Social Network&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Germany&amp;diff=836956</id>
		<title>Germany</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Germany&amp;diff=836956"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:34:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: Undo revision 836954 by MatthewL (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Bundesrepublik Deutschland''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Germany rel 94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of Germany.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Germany.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Germany.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Berlin&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Federal Republic (Parliamentary)&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=German&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Christian Wulff&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=Angela Merkel&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =137,858 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =82,310,000 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$3.045 trillion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$36,975 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Euro (formerly the Deutsche Mark)&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Germ-vote-2009.jpg|200px|thumb|Exit polls from Sept. 2009 election won by the conservative coalition CDU and FDP]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Germany''' (official name: '''Federal Republic of Germany''') is a federally organized [[Democracy]] in Western [[Europe]] with a population of about 82.2 million. The capital city and seat of government is [[Berlin]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major ethnic groups are German 94%, Polish 1%, Yugoslavs 1% and others 4%. 34% of the population are Protestants, 34% are Roman Catholics and 4% are Muslim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Europe's largest economy and the most populous nation wholly within Europe, Germany is a key member of the continent's economic, political, and defense organizations.  The central German bank, the [[Bundesbank]], has historically been the most influential force within the financial markets of the European Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The September 2009 elections were a major win for the conservative forces led by Chancellor [[Angela Merkel]], breaking a stalemate and opening the way for more conservative economic policies.  Previously since an indecisive election in 2005 the Christian Democrats (CDU) (on the center-right) formed a &amp;quot;grand coalition&amp;quot; with the Social Democrats (SPD) (on the center-left).  Now Merkel and her CDU will form a coalition with the libertarian, pro-business Free Democrats (FDP). Left in the cold will be the SPD, the Greens, and the ex-Communists who remain strong in the former East Germany under the name &amp;quot;Left party&amp;quot;. Merkel is now expected to move forward on tax cuts, reform of the tax code, reduction of bureaucracy and a possible extension of the time that nuclear power plants can continue to operate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig Whitlock, &amp;quot;Germany's Merkel Reelected Easily, Will Form New Coalition,&amp;quot; [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092700631.html?nav=emailpage ''Washington Post'' Sept. 28, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merkel's program announced as she took office Oct. 28 includes $36 billion in income tax cuts, lower business taxes, and higher family benefits. The budget will be in deficit for the next four years, as the government believes the economy is too fragile for spending cuts  and that more stimulus is needed to end the recession.  By law the budget must be balanced by the year 2016. Nuclear power plants will be given an extension, and Merkel wants to move more of the welfare costs from corporations to households.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
===Demography===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 there were 388,451 marriages and 201,693 divorces. There were 685,795 births and 830,227 deaths. The number of births has dropped from 767,000 in 2000, while the deaths have risen from 179,600. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average age at marrying (for the first time) for men was 32 and for women 29. Abortions are officially illegal, according to a 1995 law. However, prosecutions are not brought if they are performed in the first three months of pregnancy after consultation with a doctor. The annual abortion rate, at under ten per 1,000 women aged 15–44, is among the lowest in the world &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 10.2% of all children lived in poverty (in households with income below 50% of the national median). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germany had a Net Reproduction Rate (NRR) of 0.66 in 1999. A rate of NRR=1.0 equals a constant population. Therefore, in terms of births and deaths (and not counting immigration) the population is shrinking by 34% between generations.[3] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life expectancy of females at birth in West Germany rose from 71 years in 1954 to 80 years in 2000; the expectancy for boys rose from 66 to 75. Expectancy in the eastern zone was about three years less. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Projected population in 2050 is 76 million, down from the present 82 million. There will be more deaths than births, and that is largely offset by a net inflow of immigrants from 2000 to 2050, predicted to be about 240,000 per year.&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most inhabitants of Germany are ethnic German. There are, however, more than 7 million foreign residents, many of whom are the families and descendants of so-called &amp;quot;guest workers&amp;quot; (foreign workers, mostly from Turkey, invited to Germany in the 1950s and 1960s to fill labor shortages) who remained in Germany. Germany has a sizable ethnic Turkish population. Germany is also a prime destination for political and economic refugees from many developing countries. An ethnic Danish minority lives in the north, and a small Slavic minority known as the Sorbs lives in eastern Germany. Due to restrictive German citizenship laws, most &amp;quot;foreigners&amp;quot; do not hold German citizenship even when born and raised in Germany. However, since the German government undertook citizenship and immigration law reforms in 2002, more foreign residents have had the ability to naturalize. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has one of the world's highest average levels of education, technological development, and economic productivity. Since the end of World War II, the number of youths entering universities has more than tripled, and the trade and technical schools of the Federal Republic of Germany (F.R.G.) are reasonable good.  German 15-year olds score about average in comparison with similar countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the university level, however, there has been a dramatic decline in quality from the days before Hitler, when German universities were the best in the world. Since the student revolts of 1968, conditions at the once-famous universities have deteriorated badly. A strong egalitarianism prevents the re-emergence of world class faculties and no German university ranks among the top 40 in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gebhard Schweigler, &amp;quot;Heidelberg is Not Harvard …and Germany is embarrassed.&amp;quot; [http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=83 ''The Atlantic Times'' Dec. 2004]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservative government has tried to reverse the decline by offering €1.9 billion (about $2.7 billion) in excellence grants to numerous schools spread over a period of five years--far less money than Harvard spends in one year. Little improvement has been reported from this small investment.  The leading schools are Freiburg, Heidelberg and Konstanz (all in the southern state of Baden-Württemberg), Aachen, Göttingen, the Free University of Berlin, two schools in Munich and Karlsruhe’s Technical University.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Lutz Lichtenberger, &amp;quot;Selective Upgrades The government’s 'Excellence Initiative' grants German universities small packs of ivy seeds,&amp;quot; [http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=1080 ''The Atlantic Times'' Nov. 2007]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meanwhile top German scientists and engineers migrate to the United States, where their talents are appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Standard of Living===&lt;br /&gt;
With a per capita income level of more than $28,700, Germany is a broadly middle class society. A generous social welfare system provides for universal medical care, unemployment compensation, and other social needs. Millions of Germans travel abroad each year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With unification on October 3, 1990, Germany began the major task of bringing the standard of living of Germans in the former German Democratic Republic (G.D.R.) up to that of western Germany. This has been a lengthy and difficult process due to the relative inefficiency of industrial enterprises in the former G.D.R., difficulties in resolving property ownership in eastern Germany, and the inadequate infrastructure and environmental damage that resulted from years of mismanagement under communist rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Extremism===&lt;br /&gt;
Economic malaise in eastern Germany is one factor contributing to extremist violence, primarily from the political right. Confusion about the causes of the current hardships and a need to place blame has found expression in harassment and violence by some Germans directed toward foreigners, particularly non-Europeans. The vast majority of Germans condemn such violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wolfgang Schaube, the Interior minister 2005-9, was shot by a deranged man in 1990 and is confined to a wheel chair. He calls on Germans to feel more patriotic, and for immigrants to assimilate faster.  He has adopted tough policies on policing and anti-terrorism, such as giving the military authority to shoot down hijacked planes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:St Stephens Cathedral interior.jpg|thumb|left|300px|St. Stephens Cathedral (''Stephansdom'') in Passau, Bavaria. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 the Roman Catholic Church reported a membership of 25.7 million. The Evangelical Church, a confederation of the Lutheran, Uniate, and Reformed Protestant Churches, has 25.3 million members. Together, these two churches account for nearly two-thirds of the population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108448.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protestant Christian denominations include: New Apostolic Church, 371,305; Ethnic German Baptists from the former Soviet Union (FSU), 85,000; and Baptist, 75,000. Muslims number 3.5 million, including Sunnis, 2.5 million; Alevis, 410,000; and Shi'a, 225,000. Until 2004 the annual number of conversions to Islam was 300, largely Christian women native citizens marrying Muslim men; however, since 2004 the annual numbers of conversions have jumped into the thousands. There are approximately 2,600 Islamic places of worship, including an estimated 150 traditional architecture mosques, with 100 more mosques being planned. One million Muslims are citizens. Orthodox Christians number 1.4 million, including Greek Orthodox/Constantinople Patriarchate, 450,000; Serbian Orthodox, 250,000; Romanian Orthodox, 300,000; and Russian Orthodox/Moscow Patriarchate, 150,000. Buddhists number 245,000, Jehovah's Witnesses 165,000, and Hindus 97,500. The Church of Scientology operates 18 churches and missions, and according to press reports, it has 30,000 members. However, according to the Offices for the Protection of the Constitution (OPC) in Brandenburg and Hamburg, the Church of Scientology has 5,000-6,000 members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to estimates, Jews number more than 200,000, of which 107,330 are registered members of the Jewish community. Of these registered community members, 100,967 are immigrants and 6,363 are originally from the country. From 1990 to 2006, approximately 202,000 Jews and non-Jewish dependents from the countries of the FSU arrived, joining 25,000 to 30,000 Jews already in the country. As a result of a more restrictive immigration policy regarding Jews from the FSU, the number of Jewish immigrants decreased to 1,296 in 2007 from 1,971 in 2006 and 3,124 in 2005. The new policy was designed in cooperation with Jewish organizations in order to better manage the integration of individuals into the Jewish community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An estimated 21 million persons (one-quarter of the population) either have no religious affiliation or belong to unrecorded religious organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 18, 2007, the Bertelsmann Foundation published a survey on religious convictions and practice in the country, which failed to confirm the commonly held belief that the country was becoming more secular. Fully 70% of adult respondents said they were religious, and of those, 18% said they were &amp;quot;deeply religious&amp;quot; and regularly attend worship services, up from 15% in earlier studies. In the 18-29 age group, 41% expressed a belief in eternal life and a divine being, more than in any other age bracket. Roman Catholics report that 15% of nominal Catholics regularly attend Sunday Mass. Seventeen years after reunification, the country's eastern part remains far more secular than the west. The Bertelsmann Foundation found former easterners self-identified as 36% religious and 8% deeply religious, in contrast with 78% and 21%, respectively, for those from the west. Only 5 to 10% of eastern citizens belong to a religious organization, but numbers are increasing among non-Lutheran Protestants in the east. &lt;br /&gt;
====Discrimination====&lt;br /&gt;
There have been recent reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, and practice. Right-wing extremists committed politically motivated crimes against minorities including religious groups, as well as anti-Semitic and anti-Islamic acts. Cemeteries were desecrated, and Muslim communities sometimes suffered societal discrimination when building new mosques and finding allotments of land for cemeteries; however, many members of Government and civil society initiated discussions about Muslim integration and expressed their commitment to addressing the issue. The Roman Catholic and Evangelical churches continued to use &amp;quot;sect commissioners&amp;quot; to warn the public of dangers from some minority religious groups such as the Unification Church, Scientologists, Universal Life (Universelles Leben), and Transcendental Meditation practitioners. Scientologists continue to find &amp;quot;sect filters&amp;quot; used against them in employment as well as discrimination in political party membership.&lt;br /&gt;
====Religion in schools====&lt;br /&gt;
Most public schools offer Protestant and Catholic religious instruction in cooperation with those churches, as well as instruction in Judaism if enough students express interest. The number of Islamic religion classes in public schools continued to grow. In principle, participants of the federal government-sponsored Islam Conference agreed that Islamic education should be made widely available. Education is a state responsibility and, in part because no nationally recognized Islamic organization exists that could assist in developing a curriculum or providing services, the form and content of Islamic instruction vary from state to state. Organizations providing Islamic instruction do not have public law corporation status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the state, a nonreligious ethics course or study hall may be available for students not wishing to participate in religious instruction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamic classes in public schools continued to be a controversial topic but were increasingly common throughout the country, except in areas where the Muslim population was too small to support them. Although no Muslim group had &amp;quot;public law corporation&amp;quot; status that would entitle them to offer Islamic courses, state governments recognized the need and demand and worked with local Muslim organizations to establish such courses. On March 13, 2008, the Interior Minister was quoted in the press indicating that the Federal Government and Muslim community leaders had reached an agreement in principle that schools should offer classes in Islam taught in German alongside the other religions, but he noted that it would take time to implement the agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are an estimated 900,000 Muslim students in the public school system; Islamic education in schools is offered in some states. At the start of the 2006‑07 school year, authorities in Baden‑Wuerttemberg established a two‑course system: one for Sunni and Shi'a students and another for Alevis. State officials and Muslim groups in Baden‑Wuerttemberg agreed upon the system and the initial reactions were positive. Some states offered similar programs while others were working with Muslim leaders to establish a uniform curriculum. Later in the year, universities in Frankfurt, Ludwigsburg, Karlsruhe, and Weingarten began offering training courses in the teaching of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The legal obligation that children attend school, confirmed by the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice in 2006, continued to be a problem for some home-schooling advocates, such as Baptists from the FSU in Eastern Westphalia, due to concerns about sex education and the teaching of evolution. On August 2, 2007, the Stuttgart Administrative Court dismissed the case brought by several Russian‑German immigrant families belonging to the Baptist group Gemeinde Gottes who had petitioned in 2004 to send their children to a private religious school run by members of their community. The court ruled that the teaching staff was insufficiently qualified. Other home-schooling cases remain in the court system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Data===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 82 million.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Primarily German; Danish minority in the north, Sorbian (Slavic) minority in the east; 7.3 million foreign residents.&lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Protestants (26 million); Roman Catholics (26 million); approximately 3.2 million Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
*Language: German. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--9-13 (depending on the Land); attendance--100%; literacy--99%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate (2006 est.)--4.12/1,000; life expectancy (2006 est.)--women 81.96 years, men 77.81 years.&lt;br /&gt;
*Persons employed (2006 avg.): 39.08 million; unemployed (2006 avg.): 9.8% of labor force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
===Executive Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a President as [[Head of State]], with little power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The actual political power and head of government is the Chancellor (&amp;quot;Bundeskanzler&amp;quot;), who is elected by federal parliament (&amp;quot;Bundestag&amp;quot;). The Chancellor is typically elected in the first session of a newly elected Bundestag for the entire legislative period of four years. The parliament can only force the Chancellor to resign in a ''constructive motion of no-confidence'', if it elects at the same time a new Chancellor.  The current Chancellor is [[Angela Merkel|Dr. Angela Merkel]]. The current government is a center-right coalition between the Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and the Free Democrats (FDP).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569386,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a bicameral system with a federal parliament (&amp;quot;Bundestag&amp;quot;) and a representation of the states (&amp;quot;Bundesrat&amp;quot;). The members of Bundestag in elected every four years, using a personalized proportional system. The members of the Bundesrat are representatives of the state governments, and the delegations of each state are required to vote as a bloc on behalf of their governments. Each delegation has between 3 and 6 members, depending on the size of the represented state. The position of president of the Bundesrat rotates on an annual basis between the prime ministers of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
The German constitution provides for an independent jurisdiction. The highest appeals court in Germany is the Federal Court of Justice (&amp;quot;Bundesgerichtshof&amp;quot;), which is seated in the Southwestern city of [[Karlsruhe]]. Members of the Federal court are elected by a committee, with 16 delegates from the states, one from each state, appointed by the state governments, and 16 delegates appointed by the federal parliament. The Federal Constitutional Court (&amp;quot;Bundesverfassungsgericht&amp;quot;) is the highest court to review decisions and acts by the executive and legislative branches of government. It can be called to determine whether public acts are unconstitutional and can render them ineffective if they are not. This court is also seated in city of Karlsruhe, and it members are elected by the Bundesrat and Bundestag, and need a 2/3 majority in each.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Parties===&lt;br /&gt;
====Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU)====&lt;br /&gt;
An important aspect of postwar German politics was the emergence of a moderate, ecumenical Christian party--the Christian Democratic Union (CDU)--operating in alliance with a related Bavarian party, the Christian Social Union (CSU). Although each party maintains its own structure, the two form a common caucus in the Bundestag and do not run opposing campaigns. The CDU/CSU has adherents among Catholics, Protestants, rural interests, and members of all economic classes. It is generally conservative on economic and social policy and more identified with the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Social Democratic Party (SPD)====&lt;br /&gt;
The SPD is one of the oldest organized political parties in the world. It originally advocated Marxist principles, but in the 1959 Godesberg Program abandoned the concept of a &amp;quot;class party&amp;quot; while continuing to stress social welfare programs. Under the leadership of Gerhard Schroeder, the SPD-Greens government implemented in 2003 the centrist Agenda 2010 reforms, designed to modernize the country's social system and labor market. The SPD has a powerful base in the bigger cities and industrialized states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Free Democratic Party (FDP)====&lt;br /&gt;
The FDP has traditionally been composed mainly of middle and upper class Protestants who consider themselves heirs to the European liberal tradition. It supports free trade and reducing the role of the state in economic policy. It is libertarian on social issues. The party has participated in all but three postwar federal governments but has not been in federal government since 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Communist Left====&lt;br /&gt;
The PDS (for 'Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus'; &amp;quot;Party of Democratic Socialism&amp;quot;, the renamed communist party of the former East Germany, and follow-up of the [[SED]]) and the WASG (for 'Wahlalternative Arbeit und Soziale Gerechtigkeit'; &amp;quot;Voting alternative work and social justice&amp;quot;) composed of west-German leftists) merged in June 2007 to form a party simply known as &amp;quot;The Left.&amp;quot; The party's foreign policy is largely shaped by its rigid opposition to foreign military deployments, for example in [[Afghanistan]], and insists on an immediate pull-out. On domestic policy, the party opposes economic and social reforms, such as Hartz IV, which aim to increase free markets and reduce unemployment benefits. The Left proposes to weaken the free market system with a new orientation to democratic socialist principles. The Left also experienced a lot of criticism due to its communist wing, the 'communist platform' which makes up 4.4% of the national vote, an insufficient total to clear the 5 percent hurdle.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.germanculture.com.ua/library/facts/bl_electoral_system.htm German Culture.com; Electoral System of Germany (next to last paragraph]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Alliance 90/Greens====&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1970s, environmentalists organized politically as the Greens. Opposition to nuclear power, military power, and certain aspects of highly industrialized society were principal campaign issues. In the December 1990 all-German elections, the Greens merged with the Eastern German Alliance 90, a loose grouping of civil rights activists with diverse political views. The Greens joined a federal government for the first time in 1998, forming a coalition with the SPD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other parties====&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the instability caused by the need for multi-party coalitions in the Weimar Republic, Germany's Basic Law today requires parties reach 5% of the vote to win seats in the Bundestag. In addition to those parties that won representation in the Bundestag in 2005, a variety of minor parties won a cumulative 2.7% of the vote, down from 3.0% in 2002. Several other parties were on the ballot in one or more states but did not qualify for representation in the federal Bundestag. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*President--Christian Wulff (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*President of the Bundestag--Norbert Lammert (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Chancellor--Angela Merkel (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs--Guido Westerwelle (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Defense--Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Finance--Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Interior--Thomas de Maizière (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Labor and Social Affairs--Franz Josef Jung (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Justice--Sabine Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Economics and Technology--Rainer Brüderle (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection--Ilse Aigner (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth--Ursula von der Leyen (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Health--Philipp Rösler (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs--Peter Ramsauer (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety--Norbert Röttgen (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Education and Research--Annette Schavan (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development--Dirk Niebel (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of the Federal Chancellery and Minister for Special Tasks--Ronald Pofalla (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany continues to emphasize close ties with the United States, membership in NATO, and the &amp;quot;deepening&amp;quot; of integration among current members of the EU. The Federal Republic of Germany took part in all of the joint postwar efforts aimed at closer political, economic, and defense cooperation among the countries of western Europe. Germany has been a large net contributor to the EU budget. Germany also is a strong supporter of the United Nations and of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the postwar era, the Federal Republic of Germany also sought to improve its relationship with the countries of eastern Europe, first establishing trade agreements and, subsequently, diplomatic relations. With unification, German relations with the new democracies in central and eastern Europe intensified. On November 14, 1990, Germany and Poland signed a treaty confirming the Oder-Neisse border. They also concluded a cooperation treaty on June 17, 1991. Germany concluded four treaties with the Soviet Union covering the overall bilateral relationship, economic relations, the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the former G.D.R., and German support for those troops. Russia accepted obligations under these treaties as successor to the Soviet Union. Germany continues to be active economically in the states of central and eastern Europe and to actively support the development of democratic institutions, bilaterally and through the EU. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Relations with the United States==== &lt;br /&gt;
U.S.-German relations have been a focal point of American involvement in Europe since the end of World War II. Germany stands at the center of European affairs and is a key partner in U.S. relations with Europeans in NATO and the European Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German-American ties extend back to the colonial era. More than 7 million Germans have immigrated over the last three centuries, and today nearly a quarter of U.S. citizens claim German ancestry. In recognition of this heritage and the importance of modern-day U.S.-German ties, the U.S. President annually has proclaimed October 6, the date the first German immigrants arrived in 1623, to be &amp;quot;German-American Day.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. policy toward Germany remains the preservation and consolidation of a close and vital relationship with Germany, not only as friends and trading partners, but also as allies sharing common institutions. During the 45 years in which Germany was divided, the U.S. role in Berlin and the large American military presence in West Germany served as symbols of the U.S. commitment to preserving peace and security in Europe. Since German unification, the U.S. commitment to these goals has not changed. The U.S. made significant reductions in its troop levels in Germany after the Cold War ended, and, on July 12, 1994, President Clinton &amp;quot;cased the colors&amp;quot; at the Berlin Brigade's deactivation ceremony. The U.S., however, continues to recognize that the security and prosperity of the United States and Germany significantly depend on each other. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As allies in NATO, the United States and Germany work side by side to maintain peace and freedom. This unity and resolve made possible the successful conclusion of the 1987 U.S.-U.S.S.R. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), the Two-plus-Four process--which led to the Final Settlement Treaty--and the November 1990 Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, the two allies have cooperated closely in peacekeeping efforts in the Balkans and have worked together to encourage the evolution of open and democratic states throughout central and eastern Europe. Germany is also a strong contributor to our common effort to secure peace and stability in Afghanistan, contributing almost 3,000 troops to the NATO ISAF mission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, DC, Germany has been a reliable U.S. ally in the campaign against terrorism. As two of the world's leading trading nations, the United States and Germany share a common, deep-seated commitment to an open and expanding world economy. Personal ties between the United States and Germany extend beyond immigration to include intensive foreign exchange programs, booming tourism in both directions, and the presence in Germany of large numbers of American military personnel and their dependents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Germany have built a solid foundation of bilateral cooperation in a relationship that has changed significantly over nearly six decades. The historic unification of Germany and the role the United States played in that process have served to strengthen ties between the two countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German-American political, economic, and security relationships continue to be based on close consultation and coordination at the most senior levels. High-level visits take place frequently, and the United States and Germany cooperate actively in international forums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War on Terror===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led ISAF operation in [[Afghanistan]], but did not support the invasion of [[Iraq]]. German military participates in NATO Force Protection Program, protecting US military bases located in Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:The_castle3.jpg|right|thumb|Neuschwanstein Castle, a popular tourist destination.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Germany is the world's third-largest economy and the largest in Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
From the 1948 currency reform until the early 1970s, West Germany experienced almost continuous economic expansion. Real gross domestic product (GDP) growth slowed down, and even declined, from the mid-1970s through the recession of the early 1980s. The economy then experienced 8 consecutive years of growth that ended with a downturn beginning in late 1992. Since unification, Germany has seen annual average real growth of only about 1.5% and stubbornly high unemployment. In 2006, Germany had its best year since 2000 with 2.7% growth; for 2007, growth was at 2.5% despite a 3 percentage point VAT hike at the beginning of the year. The government forecasts 1.7% growth in GDP for 2008. Unemployment in 2007 dropped to an annualized average of 9.0% nationwide, but it is still significantly higher--15.1%--in the German states that make up the former East Germany. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germans often describe their economic system as a &amp;quot;social market economy.&amp;quot; The German Government provides an extensive array of social services. The state intervenes in the economy by providing subsidies to selected sectors and by owning some segments of the economy, while promoting competition and free enterprise. The government has restructured the railroad system on a corporate basis, privatized the national airline, and is privatizing telecommunications and postal services. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The German economy is heavily export-oriented, with exports accounting for more than one-third of national output. As a result, exports traditionally have been a key element in German macroeconomic expansion, accounting for over half of the economic growth in recent years. Germany is a strong advocate of closer European economic integration, and its economic and commercial policies are increasingly determined within the European Union (EU). Germany uses the common European currency, the euro, and the European Central Bank sets monetary policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early-mid 2000s, Germany adopted a complex set of labor/social welfare reforms to overcome structural weaknesses of the German welfare state and to create policies more conductive to employment. Defying a skeptical German public, the coalition government of Chancellor Angela Merkel initiated additional reform measures, such as the gradual increase in the mandatory retirement age from 65 to 67--a move that would add 2.5 million to the workforce by 2030. Subsequently, however, there has been active political debate and some rollback of these labor reforms; most notably the government decided to extend the payment period of unemployment benefits to older workers in early 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fifteen years after reunification (October 3, 1990), Germany had made great progress in raising the standard of living in eastern Germany, introducing a market economy and improving its infrastructure. At the same time, the process of convergence between east and west is taking longer than originally expected and, on some measures, has stagnated since the mid-1990s. Eastern economic growth rates have been lower than in the west in recent years, unemployment is twice as high, prompting many skilled easterners to seek work in the west, and productivity continues to lag. Eastern consumption levels are dependent on public net financial transfers from west to east totaling about $13 billion per year. In addition to social assistance payments, the government will extend funds to promote eastern economic development through 2019. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States is Germany's second-largest trading partner, and U.S.-German trade has continued to grow strongly. Two-way trade in goods totaled $184 billion in 2007. U.S. exports to Germany were $ 71 billion while U.S. imports from Germany were more than $113 billion. At nearly $45 billion, the U.S.'s fifth-largest trade deficit is with Germany. Major U.S. export categories include aircraft, electrical equipment, telecommunications equipment, data processing equipment, and motor vehicles and parts. German export sales are concentrated in metalworks, motor vehicles, machinery, chemicals and heavy electrical equipment. Much bilateral trade is intra-industry or intra-firm. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a liberal foreign investment policy. For 2005, the most recent year for which statistics are available, German investment in the U.S. amounted to 233 billion euros (29 % of all German foreign direct investment, or FDI; the U.S. is the number-one destination for German FDI), while U.S. investment in Germany was 45 billion euros (11.5 % of all FDI invested in Germany; U.S. is third-largest source of FDI in Germany). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. firms employ about 510,000 people in Germany; German firms likewise employ about 746,000 people in the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite persistence of some structural rigidities in the labor market and extensive government regulation, the economy remains strong and internationally competitive. Although production costs are very high, Germany is still an export powerhouse, and unit labor costs have decreased in the last 10 years. Additionally, Germany is strategically placed to take advantage of the rapidly growing central European countries. The current government has addressed some of the country's structural problems, with important tax, social security, and financial sector reforms. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2007 est.): $3.1 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate: (2006) 2.7%; (2007) 2.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita income (PPP, 2006): $31,900.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inflation rate (consumer prices, 2007): 2.2%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Iron, hard coal, lignite, potash, natural gas.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture (0.9% of GDP): Products--corn, wheat, potatoes, sugar, beets, barley, hops, viticulture, forestry, fisheries.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry (29.1% of GDP): Types--car-making; mechanical, electrical, and precision engineering; chemicals; environmental technology; optics; medical technology; biotech and genetic engineering; nanotechnology; aerospace; logistics.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$1.03 trillion: chemicals, motor vehicles, iron and steel products, manufactured goods, electrical products. Major markets--France, U.S., and U.K. Imports--$844 billion: food, petroleum products, manufactured goods, electrical products, motor vehicles, apparel. Major suppliers--France, Netherlands, U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The German economy showed substantial improvement in 2007 at 2.5% growth due to the effect of recent economic reforms and strong global economic growth. The export-led recovery is now filtering through to the domestic economy where private consumption has long been at a low level. &lt;br /&gt;
===Crisis of 2008===&lt;br /&gt;
The worldwide [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] hit Germany in the summer, revealing high risk policies pursued by numerous large banks looking for high rates of return outside Germany. In September the government unveiled a $635-billion bailout package for its floundering banks. Economic growth for 2009 is forecast to be an anemic 0.2%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Automobile manufacturing is a major sector, but the financial crisis caused credit to be harder to obtain; many families postponed purchases. Auto exports fell 10% in October 2008 from October 2007; domestic sales dropped 8%.  In contrast 2007 was a record year with production of 12.1 million vehicles and employment of  756,000 workers; an eighth of those jobs were created in the last five years alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The states (Bundesländer) and their capitals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(In alphabetical order)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Baden-Wuerttemberg]]:  [[Stuttgart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bavaria]] (''Bayern''):  [[München]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Berlin]]:  [[Berlin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brandenburg]]:  [[Potsdam]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bremen]]:  [[Bremen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hamburg]]:  [[Hamburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hesse]] (''Hessen''):  [[Wiesbaden]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mecklenburg-Vorpommern]]:  [[Schwerin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lower Saxony]] (''Niedersachsen''):  [[Hannover]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[North Rhine-Westphalia]] (''Nordrhein-Westfalen''):  [[Düsseldorf]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rhineland-Palatinate]] (''Rheinland-Pfalz''):  [[Mainz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saarland]]:  [[Saarbrücken]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saxony]] (''Sachsen''):  [[Dresden]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saxony-Anhalt]] (''Sachsen-Anhalt''):  [[Magdeburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sleswick-Holsatia]] (''Schleswig-Holstein''):  [[Kiel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Thuringia]] (''Thüringen''):  [[Erfurt]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Germans==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Konrad Adenauer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hannah Arendt]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johann Sebastian Bach]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franz Beckenbauer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Boris Becker]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pope Benedict XVI]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ludwig van Beethoven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto von Bismarck]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Böll]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Willy Brandt]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wernher von Braun]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bertolt Brecht]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dietrich Buxtehude]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marlene Dietrich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albrecht Dürer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albert Einstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roland Emmerich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Daniel Fahrenheit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainer Werner Fassbinder]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Goebbels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hermann Göring]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Günter Grass]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hans Jakob Christoffel von Grimmelshausen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johannes Gutenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Georg Friedrich Händel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Hahn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Händel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ernst August von Hannover]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl August von Hardenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Hegel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Werner Heisenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Hesse]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Himmler]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver Kahn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Helmut Kohl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Käthe Kollwitz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Kretschmer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Loriot]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Luther]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rosa Luxemburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Angela Merkel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lise Meitner]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anne-Sophie Mutter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dirk Nowitzki]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Nietzsche]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erwin Rommel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Schiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerhard Schröder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Schliemann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Schumacher]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karlheinz Stockhausen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Wagner]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wim Wenders]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Schafers, Bernha, ''The State of Germany Atlas'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/State-Germany-Atlas-Bernha-Schafers/dp/0415188261/ref=sr_1_27?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-27 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Schulte-Peevers, Andrea, et al. ''Lonely Planet Germany'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Lonely-Planet-Germany-Andrea-Schulte-Peevers/dp/1740599888/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324694&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Since 1990===&lt;br /&gt;
* Alba, Richard. Peter Schmidt, and Martina Wasmer. ''Germans or Foreigners?: Attitudes Toward Ethnic Minorities in Post-Reunification Germany'' (2004)  [http://www.amazon.com/Germans-Foreigners-Minorities-Post-Reunification-Transition/dp/1403963789/ref=sr_1_22?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324886&amp;amp;sr=1-22 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Berghahn, Volker Rolf. ''Modern Germany: society, economy, and politics in the twentieth century'' (1987) [http://hdl.handle.net.proxy.cc.uic.edu/2027/heb.01673 ACLS E-book] &lt;br /&gt;
* Buse, Dieter K. ed. ''Modern Germany: An Encyclopedia of History, People, and Culture 1871-1990'' (2 vol 1998) &lt;br /&gt;
* Kahn, Charlotte. ''Ten Years of German Unification: One State, Two Peoples'' (2000) [http://www.questia.com/read/23486249 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Larres, Klaus. ''Germany Since Unification: The Development of the Berlin Republic'' (2nd ed. 2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Germany-Since-Unification-Second-Development/dp/0333919998/ref=sr_1_28?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-28 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economics and society===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Siebert, Horst. ''The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/German-Economy-Beyond-Social-Market/dp/0691096643/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201328508&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Zimmermann, Klaus F. et al. ''Immigration Policy and the Labor Market: The German Experience and Lessons for Europe'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Immigration-Policy-Labor-Market-Experience/dp/354068381X/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201328716&amp;amp;sr=8-9 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
====Politics====&lt;br /&gt;
* Green, Simon, and William E. Paterson. ''Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Governance-Contemporary-Germany-Semisovereign-Revisited/dp/0521848814/ref=sr_1_25?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-25 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Hancock, M. Donald, ''Politics in Europe: An Introduction to the Politics of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Politics-Europe-Introduction-Kingdom-Germany/dp/1933116455/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324694&amp;amp;sr=1-11 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schmidt, Manfred G. ''Political Institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany''  (2003)  ISBN 0198782594&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centroeu.com/uboote/fotos.html U-Boote Photos] S. Mata (In Spanish)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prussia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bavaria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[German Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of German Masterpieces]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* source: [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3997.htm US State Department Country Study] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:EU Members]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=836947</id>
		<title>Talk:Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=836947"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T18:17:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: moving most recent post to the bottom of the page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{articletalkheader|prefix=archive}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rense==&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff Rense may not be a such a good source.  The Anti-Defamation League accuses him of promoting anti-Semitic views and 9/11 Conspiracy theories.  OTOH, what is wrong with a Pravda article written in the post Soviet-censorship era when democratic Russia hungars to exercise a free press, open discussion and discernment of facts?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 22:39, 23 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See my talk page, Rob.  I never noticed who added the Pravda cite, so if you say so, it is of course fine with me, and please add it back if you haven't already! I now suspect it was yet another vandal site troll stirring the pot, so feel free to deal with him as well. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, 24 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terror Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
I have an issue with a claim made in the second paragraph.  ''Since abandoning the &amp;quot;War on Terror&amp;quot; in Obama's first year, the United States has suffered more terrorist attacks with deadly intent on American soil than in the previous eight years combined.''   Since Obama replaced the 'Global War on Terror' with 'Overseas Contingency Operation', there have been only four domestic terrorist attacks, a far cry from the 19 that took place under Bush's tenure.  This sentence should be reworded or removed in its entirety; it only makes the article look embarrassing.  --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 15:46, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More [[liberal]] poppycock, Michael?  Even the New York Times counts more, excluding 9/11, under Obama. Perhaps you should consider sources other than the Kos?  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:29, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A short time ago you gave me grief for making assumptions, yet here you are doing the same.  I didn't get any information from Kos, it all came from legitimate news sources.  Do you really believe that more terror attacks occurred on US soil from March 2009 to January 2010 than in the eight years of the Bush administration?  I would really like to see all your references for making such a bold claim.  And why would you want to exclude the WTC/Pentagon attacks?&lt;br /&gt;
::Some people have been making some really stupid claims lately about domestic terror.  Dana Perino and Rudy Guiliani both claimed there was not a terror attack on the US when Bush was in office.  The fact that these people could make such stupidly partisan claims is incredible. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kpfhGxJbLc] [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tYoMoJHNDs] The claim made in this article reeks of the same idiocy of Perino and Guiliani, why not delete the sentence or at least make it factual?  --[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 20:23, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The facts are undeniable that America was totally unprepared to protect itself from terrorist homeland attacks as Bush entered office, due to the total lack of focus of the Clinton Administration and Congress on the issue.  Bush can in no way be blamed for the 9/11 attacks with any real credibility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I have stated many times before, as Mr. Schlafly has stated many times before, as several other Admins have as well,  coming here to argue-without-end against our conservative point of view in all articles you come across, is silly. If you and others cannot bring yourselves to accept alternative points of view, so be it. If you want a place to argue against conservatism in general, make your own site or try the Kos or HuffPo; but CP isn't a debate forum, it is a conservative encyclopedia ''project''. Article talk pages are for suggesting ways to improve articles from a conservative point of view, not a liberal one. Is that a clear enough statement?  --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:29, 25 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::TK: The change you made is completely unacceptable from a moral and ethical standpoint because instead of correcting an error, you are now highlighting a lie.  Three terror attacks occurred during Pres. Bush's last year in office.  I sent you links to all three events but you are willing to over look such trivial matters as the truth.  It's funny that a liberal who has been blocked twice for pointing out errors and outright falsehoods is vilified as a trouble-maker while the conservatives that knowingly mislead and lie are in charge of an alleged 'trustworthy encyclopedia'.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm trying to make these changes because I don't want Americans to look stupid, even the conservative ones.  It's an uphill battle. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::Gunman killed two people in a church.  [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-07-29-church-shooting_N.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
::::Suicide bomber attacked a Georgia law firm. [http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ga_law_firm_explodes_causing_multiple_injuries/]&lt;br /&gt;
::::Two police officers were killed by a bomb placed in a bank.  [http://www.odmp.org/officer/19697-captain-thomas-paul-tennant]&lt;br /&gt;
::::--[[User:MichaelJB|MichaelJB]] 01:25, 29 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MichaelJB you cannot tell the difference between Muslim terrorists and someone with an ax to grind? Godspeed! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:36, 29 January 2010 (EST)v&lt;br /&gt;
:So Michael's point is that progressive liberal leftwing commie socialist (or whatever the flavor of the week) Prof. [[Amy  Bishop]] conducted a domestic overseas contingency operation attack. It's beginning to make sense. How would we classify the guy who crashed the plane into the IRS building in Houston, a tax protester who railed against corporations. Dang, this is a tuff one.... [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 08:13, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Middle name in article title? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It strikes to me odd that the title of the article is Barach Hussein Obama. While there is nothing wrong with that by itself, looking at the [[President_of_the_United_States_of_America#Presidents_list|list of all the U.S. presidents]], it seems that all the other presidents' articles are titled either without their middle name, or just a middle initial. Wouldn't it make sense to rename the article to either Barack Obama or Barack H. Obama to follow suit? [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:19, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a big difference between Walker or Jefferson and Hussein.  My two cents. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 18:22, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [[Ronald Wilson Reagan]]? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 18:26, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::This topic had been discussed before. He decided to be inaugurated with his middle name after not using it during the campaign. He is not ashamed of it and we are not ashamed to include it.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:29, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ah, I see. Looking at some lists though ([http://www.ipl.org/div/potus/] and [http://www.apples4theteacher.com/holidays/presidents-day/past-presidents-of-usa.html]), it seems that many presidents were also inaugurated in a similar fashion. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:33, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think that, as all encyclopedias and scholarly works try to do, we should try to decide on a particular set of rules and always follow it. In this case, these are the options:&lt;br /&gt;
:::1) Always cite the full name in the title, so &amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George Herbert Walker Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald Wilson Reagan&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
:::2) Always use initials for middle names, so &amp;quot;Barack H. Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald W. Reagan&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
:::3) Use the names in the way they most commonly used, using middle name initials only where they are necessary to distinguish one particular individual from another, therefore &amp;quot;Barack Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: We are talking about titles of articles; the full name should always be cited in the body of the article. Personally, I would vote for solution n.3. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:34, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I like the idea. Either 2 or 3 seem best in my opinion; full names seem a bit to long for article titles. The name that the president was inaugurated with isn't bad either, but it would seem less formal, as some have middle names and others don't. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 18:38, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I thought about that solution, but then I thought that we should better set very general rules; by this I mean that we should decide how to title page names referring to INDIVIDUALS, not to US PRESIDENTS. Deciding that &amp;quot;the name that the president was inaugurated with&amp;quot; is a rule that, naturally, can only be applied to presidents. --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:41, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Another good rule would be to use the name that is mostly used to refer to that individual; this has the disadvantage of not being objective, but it is also the most effective. So &amp;quot;Barack Obama&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;George H.W. Bush&amp;quot; (to distinguish him from his son), &amp;quot;Ronald Reagan&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Eminem&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Marshall Mathers&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;O.J. Simpson&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Orenthal J. Simpson&amp;quot;...  --[[User:Maquissar|Maquissar]] 18:56, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There isn't any vote here, nor was one asked for.  Since Obama tries to soft-pedal his Muslim roots and associations, our editorial policy is to call attention to that ''fact''.  In addition you should note the [[Ronald Wilson Reagan|Reagan]] article, where well before anyone had an inkling Obama would run for President, Conservapedia used his full name, ''Ronald Wilson Reagan'' which Reagan himself preferred  for formal use. So I submit President Obama isn't being singled out, contrary to the insistence of silly-minded liberals. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:06, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But why call attention to that ''fact'' in the title of the article? The ''fact'' is never going to be denied. The introduction sentence would still say &amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama&amp;quot;. Italicize his middle name in the introduction or change the font color to bring out the ''fact'' if you wish. What I am trying to point at is, why should his middle name be used in the article title? Reagan may have preferred it for formal use, but does Mr. Obama say that same? He is commonly known as Barack Obama; I haven't seen it used in any other way (except Obama, of course). If he is commonly known as that, it would make sense to title the article like that, as should every article on people. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 21:05, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Richard Milhous Nixon was commonly refered to as [[Milhous]] by his detracters.  Indeed, googling milhouse brings up hundreds of thousands of hits on Nixon that dwarf most all other uses of the name.  Now, googling [[Hussein]] presents a host of other problems.   The [[Heshamite Dynasty]] of [[Hussein bin Ali]] had been the Islamic Keeper of the Holy places for 700 years until Western British Imperialist interests unseated them and installed the Saudi ruling clan thier place (visualize Islamists dethroning the Pope and installing thier own choice as successor).  How does it look when Hussein bin Ali's namesake bows to tne Saudi puppet? Why not focus on how Obama ''is'' bringing real change to the whole planet, rather than argue about how things have traditionally been done?  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:14, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Drop it.  Further discussion is last-wordism. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 21:14, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On the question of &amp;quot;''all the other presidents' articles are titled either without their middle name, or just a middle initial. Wouldn't it make sense ...to follow suit? ''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:You will recall Barack Hussein Obama is the transformational president of change.  Wouldn't it make sense to begin change right here, with his name? (assuming that is his name).  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 23:54, 26 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:58, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty slick conservative trap there TK. despite the fact that you neglected to answer some massive holes in the arguments above, you declare the debate &amp;quot;ended&amp;quot; (even though its not) then decry anything else as last wordism to stifle any further debate. well done--[[User:DerikJ|DerikJ]] 11:58, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What holes? We're implementing change. Let's find common ground and compromise. We've done just that.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:35, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I like your comment on change, Rob, it made me laugh :) Anyway, I don't see how an argument that Obama's slogan being &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; is any reason to title his article to what he is less commonly known as/less traditional. It's pushing it, in a sense. Besides, being a conservative, I would think that you wouldn't want to follow Obama's way of thinking ;) [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 13:40, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Conservatives are for change, both economic and social.  They want to change tax law and abortion rulings, for example.  Above all, change public education.  Being anti-change is just a vulgar stereotype held by closeminded and intolerant people.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:09, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I can agree with that. But ''why'' &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; how Obama's article is titled when others are titled either without their middle name or with their middle name if they are commonly known and identified by the name, in some cases. Simply changing something doesn't necessarily mean it's a good thing, there has to be reason, and the reason has to be, well, reasonable. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 14:44, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Call it the price of progress.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:17, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::In that case, would changing the titles of all the other peoples' articles to include their middle names sound all right to you? It would be progress, after all. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 17:29, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I have always wondered why the Obamabots get so upset with the name Obama's parents chose.  Pretty silly. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:40, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I actually like the name, it has a nice ring to it. It's more of just keeping a solid style of titling pages, a format if you want to call it that. [[User:Kayvan|Kayvan]] 17:29, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Which brings us to the question of Barry Soetero.  If Obama went by this name, then he may have lied to the Illinois Supreme Court when asked to provide former names, according to this Attorney’s Registration Record. [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2061988/posts]  I'm not the sure what the resolution of this issue ever was, and we don't have a word about it in this article.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:49, 27 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am new here but there really needs to be a consensus amongst all Presidential and Vice President articles, actually this should probably extend to all US politicians. I know there is a specified conservative bias, however the lack organization and consensus has nothing to do with liberal or conservative bias, it has to do with disorganization and lazyiness by the admins.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to leave the middle, that is fine, however, there would need to be a quick modification of all or the majority of the US Politian article so as not to look so disorganized.[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:01, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You hit the nail on the head.  You are new here.  Don't come in criticizing and such off the bat. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 01:12, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My criticization is to help the article(s) to be better as a whole. None of the above discussion explains the reasoning for leaving it as is. Just people saying he used it in his inauguration so we use it here, however, almost every pres does this so why not have it that way for everyone????[[User:Solarguy17|Solarguy17]] 01:15, 10 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not really discussion just more of a question. I just recently found this site and was looking through the religious articles and for the most part they seemed pretty good. However, when I come to the political articles, some of them seem a little crazy. I know it is to call more attention to the things that are being overlooked by the media. But I have ask about the middle name thing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read all of the information above and I still am not sure why it was decided to leave it as is.  Can someone clarify this? &lt;br /&gt;
Please don't ban me, I noticed that basically everyone with discussion in this thread that isn't an admin now has banned accounts. I personally don't care, I am just confused. [[User:StevenS|StevenS]] 01:12, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: As it says up at the top of this section, &amp;quot;Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;quot;  If you do have one, let's have it.  But it sure seems like everyone who signs up to this site and immediately starts complaining has nothing new to say at all.  Why don't you spend some time reading here with an open mind first, and complain later?  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 01:20, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, why would a single individual come here under several different user names all in an effort to get the word &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; removed from the title of this article?  It makes no sense at all unless that individual has a personal agenda to perform.  The article title stays as it is.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:42, 12 March 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My only concern is that the title seems to exist in its current state for no purpose other than to further a bias.  The arguments that &amp;quot;well he asked for it&amp;quot; seem to suggest that accuracy and fairness are non-valuable in this wiki.  I sincerely hope this is not the case and that I may not be banned and able to start a fun future in helping this wiki grow in the impressive way it has so far. [[User:Vidihawk|Vidihawk]] 07:47, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::'''&amp;quot;Unless you have some brilliant new argument to add to this section, further discussion is unneeded.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you missed the bold title at the top of this section?  Also, see [[Ronald Wilson Reagan]] to see how silly your argument is. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:16, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess it wasn't as bright an idea as I had hoped.  Heh... It still comes off as somewhat purposeful, though.  Okie, I'll back away! - [[User:Vidihawk|Vidihawk]] 08:24, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Purposeful, as in done with the same horribly malevolent intent as ''my'' adding Reagan's middle name several years ago?  You are giving away your intent in advance, good sir, by refusing to admit your already formed assumptions about us are wrong.  I hope you prove me wrong, and turn out to be that rare U.K. denizen that turns out to be open-minded and as fair to us as you wish us to be to you. There have been precious few. And please do check out our editors guide and all of that. We differ quite a bit from Wikipedia. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think we should keep the current title of the article.  Furthermore, I think we should replace the top picture, which is currently a picture of Obama,  with a picture of an oil drenched pelican (and a new caption) as a tribute to Obama's indifference, sloth and incompetence.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 20:36, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I moved the material dealing with the present to the top  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I moved the material dealing with the present to the top as I thought readers would be more interested in how Obama is screwing up the present.  For example, I think Americans right now are very concerned about how Obama is screwing up the economy. Of course, he is also doing a poor job in other areas presently as well such as holding terrorists court cases in civilian courts, etc. etc. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 04:30, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That makes sense to me. I do appreciate letting me try the other timeline structure. However, I didn't really take into consideration the fact that because he is a high profile individual it may benefit readers to see more recent info before his earlier biography facts. At least while he's fulfilling his one failed term as president, your structure makes sense to me. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 12:42, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As the ==Maoism== section is being being built, we may eventually be able to free up space from the sections on the Ayers/Dohrn relationship by moving some of that material to Ayers own page, and/or creating a new separate page documenting Obama's rise with communist and terrorist assistance.  An acceptable title for that page would be needed.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:23, 15 March 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Any orders he gives to the American military are subject to being refused. Orders that Obama gives to America’s Joint Chiefs of Staff of the military can be refused.&amp;quot; --http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/19-01-2009/106972-Barry_Soetoro-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we really want to cite an article that makes this claim? Do any of us really support this opinion, or if we do, do we support the use of opinion articles as sources in addition to factual ones? --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 08:42, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Is the opinion piece backed by valid and factual citations from the United States Code, Ben, as opposed to a unsupported rant? --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 6 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== pronunciation of &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is really considered evidence of anything? I've heard [[Mark Levin]] use the Spanish-inflected pronunciation of Sonia Sotomayor's name (''so tow my OR'' rather than ''so tow MY er''), but nobody would claim that proves he's Catholic or Hispanic. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 23:55, 9 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Pronunciation shows an enormous amount about someone's views and history.  Obama doesn't use the American pronunciation, and this is telling, since ''no one else in the public sphere'' pronounces it in the muslim way ''but'' Obama. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 00:15, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[David Petraeus]] does [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtCLp7siY7I]. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 00:50, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
And [http://www.forvo.com/word/pakistan/ numerous other languages] use a pronunciation closer to the native form. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 00:57, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Golgaronok&amp;quot; (if that is your name), your quibbles with the entry have already been argued ad nauseum, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama/archive4#.22Pokiston.22.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F here], for instance.  If you've only come to argue on talk pages, you're wasting your own time.  Try making substantive contributions to the project; excessive talk is disfavored here.  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 01:04, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any responses to the points I raised. But it's y'all's funeral. [[User:Golgaronok|Golgaronok]] 01:13, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Kind of interesting that Davis Petraeus was mentioned here.  When that general was ordered to command US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, the liberal elites decided that his name should be pronounced &amp;quot;BETRAY US&amp;quot;.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 01:29, 10 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barry Soetoro = birth name?==&lt;br /&gt;
This may have already been discussed, so forgive me if this has been settled.  I noticed that the article says ''&amp;quot;Barack Hussein Obama II (birth name Barry Soetoro...&amp;quot;'', however the articles cited do not support the idea that &amp;quot;Barry Soetoro&amp;quot; is Obama's birth name, in fact quite the opposite.  My understanding, from reading the Newsweek article, is that &amp;quot;Barack&amp;quot; is his birth name, although he went by &amp;quot;Barry&amp;quot; when he was younger.  His father's name, as I understand it, is Barack Hussein Obama, and he was named after his father.  &amp;quot;Seotoro&amp;quot;, if I remember right, was his stepfather's last name, so it is unlikely that it would have been part of Obama's birth name.  To be clear, I do realize that he spent his younger years being known as &amp;quot;Barry Soetoro&amp;quot;, and I think that should be included in the article, I just don't think it was actually his birth name.  &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Please understand that I am not as knowledgeable in this kind of thing as many other contributors here, so I may have gotten it all wrong - that's why I didn't attempt to edit the article.  Please correct me if I have gotten it wrong - I won't be offended and I am curious as to the truth of the matter.  [[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 18:11, 1 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the citation that shows the birth certificate, the birth name is, in fact, Barack Hussein Obama II, NOT Barry Soetoro.  Also, because there is an actual document, i.e. physical, demonstrable proof, the word &amp;quot;allegedly&amp;quot; should be removed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Remove name repetition? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would anyone mind if I removed some of the repetition of Obama's name in certain portions of the article? For example, in this paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|Barack Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving]] and [[Barack Obama and liberal elitism|Barack Obama's liberal elitism]] is consistent with Obama being a [[Narcissism|narcissist]] which is a charge that has often been made against Barack Obama.  However, it is also true that Barack Obama is an [[evolution|evolutionist]].  Barack Obama told the ''York Daily Record'' that &amp;quot;I believe in [[evolution]]...&amp;quot;.  Barack Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving and liberal elitism is also in accordance with someone who has a certain degree of [[Social Darwinism|social darwinistic]] thinking.  In addition to [[Liberals and uncharitableness|American liberals giving less to charity]], it is also true that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|American liberals are also more likely to believe in evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I could alter it to make it more readable with &amp;quot;Obama's recent pattern of charitable giving and liberal elitism is consistent with that of a narcissist, a charge that has often been made against him.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so forth. In my linguistics class, we talked about semantic satiation, and I believe that paragraphs like these, along with the fact that it never seems to use pronouns, somewhat diminish the readability of the article. If I were to make this change, I would preserve every wikilink, reference, etc, but I believe it would become more readable. In Christ, [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:09, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Insults? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the entire beginning of the article have to be so laden with insults? Couldnt it simply say what the article will be about, and THEN express views? As it is it appears very unprofessional. 19:11, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:We believe in the truth here, and the fact that [[liberals]] like yourself feign offense at the display of it speaks volumes about you. If you insist on closing your mind, at least take ownership of your [[deceit]]!  Sign your comments with &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt; ~~~~ &amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; next time. Godspeed! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:58, 6 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;The first president who is biracial&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been other presidents of more than one race. Bush Jr. is has some German and English ancestry. [[User:NP|NP]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:George W is German and English, is that two races according to our census? I think the readers will understand what biracial refers to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::English and German are '''''not''''' races, and neither is Hispanic. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 17 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reorganizing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad to see the edit feature is enabled here once more.  I think this page needs a revamp to structure information better.  I've reorganized everything into a better structure, let me know what you think.  I am trying to put a summary of the presidency at the top, information about his life/career next, and then a political summary.  This should really improve the page's appearance, as it appears too disorganized right now.  --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 15:56, 20 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What you're doing is burying important information so fewer users will find it.  That's unacceptable. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 15:57, 20 May 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama is a Muslim theory and the alleged claim of Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is what the American Thinker reported: &amp;quot;The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim.&amp;quot; That was the claim of Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit, as reported in the May 2010 issue of Israel Today. According to journalist Avi Lipkin, Gheit appeared on Nile TV's &amp;quot;Round Table Show&amp;quot; in January, on which he said that &amp;quot;he had had a one-on-one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/06/report_obama_said_i_am_a_musli.html]  Here is what Hot Air says: http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/06/14/obama-is-a-muslim-take-two/  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally,  I am beginning to think Obama is: not a Muslim, not a Christian, and not an atheist.  I think Obama is a narcissist who worships himself.  I can also see him telling one person he is a Christian and then later telling someone else he is a Muslim.  There are many examples of Obama being insincere such as all the substantive healthcare  discussions were going to be on C-Span, etc. etc. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 15:53, 16 June 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2009 Nobel Peace Prize ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find it strange that there is not a single mention of the president being awarded the Nobel peace prize in this article. Considering that other prominent award winners have it at least mentioned in their respective articles. The [[Mother Teresa]] article, for instance, prominently states her award in the introduction to the article, and even political figures like [[Al Gore]] and [[Henry Kissinger]] (both of whom won the peace prize) have their award at least mentioned in the article.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DenisTR|DenisTR]] 16:04, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree with you, Denis.  It was there, once-upon-a-time, but apparently it was removed in the constant editing turmoil. CP does mention this in the [[Nobel Prize]] article. I will add it here, as it should be. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:24, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faulty Logic==&lt;br /&gt;
I have a suspicion that Andy Schlafly is secretly a Muslim. Will you deny that, Andy? If you do deny it, then I accuse you of being a Muslim under the concept of Taqiyya.&lt;br /&gt;
It's like a terrible flow chart that always ends with &amp;quot;You're a Muslim.&amp;quot; I realize that you're kind of scraping the barrel with this whole &amp;quot;Obama is a Muslim&amp;quot; thing, but c'mon. [[User:Pete5383|Paul]] 18:57, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Paul, you seem to think all claims or facts are relative.  They aren't.  Truth is supported by logic and evidence.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:00, 19 August 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: President Obama clearly has an Islamic background. As an adult, he joined a church and says he's a Christian. I'd say he's as much Muslim as I am Jewish; by Jewish law, my having a Jewish mother makes me Jewish by birth, but I became a Christian by choice as a teenager. Go figure. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:04, 3 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether President Obama is Muslim or not is one question; however it is undeniable Obama misspoke or was deceptive while ramping up his ambitions back in 2005 when he told the ''Chicago Sun-Times'', &amp;quot;I am rooted in the Christian tradition.&amp;quot; Nowhere on his maternal side, grandma, gramps, or his natural father, or his stepfather, can any Christian rooting be found.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:37, 4 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Days in office==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] was inaugurated {{days since|2009|1|20}} days ago  and will finish his term in {{#expr: -{{days since|2013|1|20}} }} days. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 3 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apparent sourcing errors==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While looking over this article, I noticed a number of problems - mostly unsourced claims or claims for which the source is no longer available. Since my suggestions will almost certainly be controversial, I will not actually make any further changes to this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The quote &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship&amp;quot; under the heading &amp;quot;Presidency&amp;quot; is unattributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Obama represented ACORN in ''Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Fed. Sav. Bank'' is unsupported. While court documents do list Obama among the Plaintiff's Attorneys, they do not reference ACORN in any way. [http://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=10112] This claim seems to have been added by bloggers after the fact. Similarly, the cited reference contains no source for the claim that Obama had anything to do with the CRA, only a completely unsourced allegation that was reprinted almost verbatim here. As far as I can tell, Obama represented ACORN exactly once, on a case involving motor voter laws. [http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/oct/17/john-mccain/he-represented-them-in-one-case-/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The statement &amp;quot;Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982&amp;quot; under the subheading &amp;quot;Birth Certificate Controversy&amp;quot; is unsourced and ambiguous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Much of the content under the subheading &amp;quot;Engineers defeat of Centrist Democrats&amp;quot; is dubious. Two of the cites [http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-18/news/mn-3844_1_gus-savage][http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Carol_Moseley_Braun#Political_career] are about Carol Moseley Braun and don't mention Obama at all. There is no indication in any of the sources that Obama was connected to the Braun campaign, so these cites are meaningless. Additionally, the section attributes an anti-Dixon intent to Obama (referring to Obama as &amp;quot;subverting&amp;quot; Dixon's reelection, defined by Conservapedia's own article as &amp;quot;lending of aid, comfort, and moral support to individuals, groups, or organizations that advocate the overthrow of incumbent governments by force and violence&amp;quot;). What he did was increase voter turnout among the black community, a far cry from what the text implies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;The statement &amp;quot;President Obama falsely claimed that the senior citizen group AARP endorsed his administration's health care plan when they never made such an endorsement&amp;quot; under the subheading &amp;quot;Obama Administration Health Care Plan and Its Advocacy Methods&amp;quot; is sourced to a YouTube video that no longer exists. Additionally, it appears that AARP has been supporting health care reform since at least August 2009. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/17/eveningnews/main5247916.shtml][http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/19/aarp-ama-announce-support_n_506060.html]&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Similarly, several cites link to YouTube videos that have been removed. Multiple cites under the subheading &amp;quot;Obama Administration Health Care Plan and Liberal Elitism&amp;quot; link to deleted videos, as does the cite for the statement &amp;quot;Barack Obama's &amp;quot;Disinformation Czar&amp;quot; (whose supposed job was to correct disinformation that others are spreading about the Obama administration's health care plan) was caught spreading misleading information.&amp;quot; The cite for the statement &amp;quot;Senior citizens are key Democratic party constituents that could kill Obama's socialistic health care plan&amp;quot; links to a private video.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DrewJ|DrewJ]] 15:50, 29 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Drew, but one glaring misrepresentation really sticks out, and explains why liberals are often accused of playing fast and loose with the truth:  While AARP has long advocated health care reform, it specifically repudiated Obama's distortion of the truth, saying they were not endorsing any specific plan, at that time.  See how easy it is to distort fact, by omission, and make obviously good-intentioned souls like you doubt the real truth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are obviously an editor here, and I would urge you, before making posts such as this one, to try and find substitute sources that back up what is in the story. At the very least, as is the case with the AARP, at least check the facts before stating something is incorrect. It was a very big story at the time, Obama's misstatement, and not at all hard to find....so easy and well-known in fact that some people might be tempted to accuse you of inserting a deliberate [[Red Herring]]. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:29, 29 September 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Typo ==&lt;br /&gt;
The first sentence here has a typo: it presumably is meant to read &amp;quot;...said to have '''been''' born in...&amp;quot; I'd fix it myself, but the page is so informative (and therefore long) that my poor old computer can't load it to edit.  --[[User:LanceS|LanceS]] 21:49, 11 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, JPatt got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:29, 11 November 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bryan Fischer: Obama wants to give America back to the Indians ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [http://www.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147501360 this site] some kind of liberal parody? Otherwise, this is so serious that is should be included. American Family Association would seem to me as a pretty trustworthy organization, and this Bryan Fischer is writing for them. Any thoughts? &amp;amp;ndash; [[User:Dstone|dstone]] 16:42, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fact vs Opinion==&lt;br /&gt;
Okay...I thought maybe this article would be a good place to start.  I was introduced to Conservapedia recently, and have been waffling about joining and bcoming an editor, but can no longer refrain.  So, I'm extraordinarily new...and I fully expect the welcoming and flame-free arms of this community, as I support the overall efforts of what Conservapedia is trying to accomplish.  The road to becoming a &amp;quot;Trustworthy Encyclopedia&amp;quot; is long, and this site is just starting to make baby steps in that direction.  That being said, I will try to keep this short.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FACT:  Opinions are not fact.  Even expert opinions are not fact.  They're just plain old opinions.  Despite being in the Commandments, and otherwise stated over and over again, folks seem to have trouble making this distinction.&lt;br /&gt;
OPINION: If you are unable to make cited references, or present the conservative viewpoint in a reasoned and intelligent manner, I would heavily suggest that you leave the site to those who can.  Your &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; is often unhelpful.  Especially in an article as...contentious...as this - and I imagine many others, I'll be looking shortly - the talk page is the place to present your opinions.  If you cannot site material, find sources that intelligently argue your viewpoint, or just want a second or third pair of eyes and ears, it would be addressed here.  Also, if haven't actually read the article that you are citing...do that first, before posting anything at all...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several on this page, the most innocuous of which:  President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico[28].  The moratorium lapsed in 2008.  It says it right in the article, paragraph 4.  This statement is spruious and vague and will be reworded to say something like: Then-Senator Obama voted to re-authorize oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.  This is just a small and harmless example, but, either research the issue before posting, or don't post.  If you wish to engage in historical revisionism, or just bottom-barrel opinion mongering, please roll on over to Wikipedia, and leave us be.  [[User:RyanDav|RyanDav]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:AlejandroH&amp;diff=836768</id>
		<title>User talk:AlejandroH</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:AlejandroH&amp;diff=836768"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T03:17:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: welcome user&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=[[User:Tzoran|'''Tyler Zoran''']]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:04, 29 June 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=836758</id>
		<title>User talk:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=836758"/>
		<updated>2011-01-02T02:06:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* conflict over Obama article */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:52, 5 November 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== -elect category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is lots of work....but remember it needs to be emptied shortly after the first of the year when they no longer will be ____elect! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, 7 November 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== conflict over [[Obama]] article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Marty, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I temporarily blocked you just as a notice to resolve the conflict you seem to be having with another user over the [[Obama]] article. How about we settle the issue about the authorization of oil drilling on the [[Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama|talk page]] instead of constantly reverting each other's edits? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;gt;I'm not interested in edit-warring either--I'll allow the more senior admins to rule on the issue. Cheers! [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 20:08, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::That would be appropriate. Just be sure to raise your concerns on one of their talk pages or the talk page for the article to make sure that everyone remembers. Thanks! [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:06, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Illegal_immigration&amp;diff=836707</id>
		<title>Illegal immigration</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Illegal_immigration&amp;diff=836707"/>
		<updated>2011-01-01T23:17:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: fix typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Coleman - Arellano.jpg|thumb|The Rev. [[Oscar Carrasco]] and [[Elvira Arellano]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Illegal immigration''' is when people without legal permission from a country cross the border and proceed to dwell there. Therefore, illegal immigration is the act of immigrating to a country without having the right to do so.  A person who migrates without the legal right to do so is known as an [[illegal alien]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S.==&lt;br /&gt;
Illegal immigration has become a major issue in the [[United States]] in the 1980s, and continues to be a highly visible issue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic aspects===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Illegal immigrants pay sales taxes and gasoline taxes; most are too poor to pay income taxes. Many use fake Social Security numbers and pay Social Security taxes but are not eligible for any benefits. Many use tax-payer funded services such as health care and schools. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Numbers of people===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pew estimates about 12 million illegal immigrants lived in the U.S. in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Higher estimates run to 20 million; [http://immigrationcounters.com/ see high estimate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, many are afraid to use available services, such as domestic violence shelters, out of fear of deportation. Many illegals cannot speak English. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arguments favoring it===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====No one else wants those jobs anyway====&lt;br /&gt;
Illegal immigration is defended, saying that [[immigrants]] are simply coming to take [[unskilled job]]s that better educated Americans avoid, such as picking fruit and lettuce, making hotel beds and working in [[slaughterhouse]]s. One could just as easily argue, however, that these jobs in part only seem unappealing to many Americans because of their association with illegal immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====They need political asylum====&lt;br /&gt;
A small percentage come illegally to escape political oppression, as legal channels are not open to them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.immigration-usa.com/george_weissinger.html immigration Usa&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.uscis.gov Immigration and Naturalization Services&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.dhs.gov Department of Homeland Security&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Marriage to a U.S. citizen does not automatically gain one citizenship.  When Army Spc. Alex Jimenez was captured by terrorists in [[Iraq]], his wife was almost deported by the government.  Strong public opinion allowed her to stay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/20/national/main2956093.shtml Missing Soldier's Wife Faces Deportation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Where they come from===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mexico]] is the source of the about half of the recent illegal immigrants to the United States. Most arrive legally and over-stay their visas. Others cross the border mostly through the desert southwest or less often by swimming across the [[Rio Grande]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dispute with Mexico====&lt;br /&gt;
The United States receives constant criticism from the Mexican government for its efforts to curb illegal immigration. And United States officials criticize Mexican officials for passing out handbooks on how to cross the border, saying Mexico is trying to avoid political and governmental reforms at home by encouraging its citizens to leave. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legal aspects===&lt;br /&gt;
Illegal entry is a [[misdemeanor]] in U.S. law, at the level of [[speeding]]. Those who are caught are promptly expelled from the country without penalty. However, multiple illegal entries can lead to [[felony]] convictions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Legislative leaders in at least half a dozen American states say they will propose bills similar to a controversial law to fight illegal immigration that was adopted by [[Arizona]] last spring, even though a federal court has suspended central provisions of that statute. [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/01/us/01immig.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mexico and Mexicans====&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, one of Mexico's harshest criticisms was a plan by the United States to make illegal immigration a felony offense, which would impose harsher penalties on illegal Mexican immigrants. Mexico's own laws make illegal immigration a felony offense in that country.[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1602610/posts][http://www.vdare.com/awall/060518_memo.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Mexicans have to come to the United States to work because for many years the Mexican government was [[socialist]], being under the control of the [[Institutional Revolutionary Party]], which limited [[economic opportunity]] and [[economic growth|growth]].  Before 2001 there was frequent movement across the border.  It was common to work in summer jobs in the U.S. and spend the winter in Mexico. Border security since then has become much stricter, and it is far more difficult to cross repeatedly.  Therefore the tendency was to remain in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An unintended consequence of the tighter [[border security]] is that millions stayed in the U.S. and did not return. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Mexicans who come are religious and culturally conservative. They communities do not encourage [[homosexuality]], [[abortion]] or [[teenage promiscuity]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like other immigrant groups, many illegals send money to their families remaining in the old country.  In Mexico this funding is the second largest source of [[foreign income]], after [[crude oil]] sales.  It represents as much as 2.5 percent of the nation's Gross Domestic Product &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:20724214~pagePK:64257043~piPK:437376~theSitePK:4607,00.html] World Bank Report on Migration and Welfare&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Amnesty==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ronald Reagan|Reagan Administration]] gave amnesty to all the illegals present in the country in 1986. The &amp;quot;Illigration Control and Reform Act&amp;quot; of 1986 legalized the status of about 3 million immigrants. Other laws legalized the status of immigrants from Cuba and Haiti.  In 2006 President [[George W. Bush]] and Senator [[John McCain]] proposed legislation to legalize the status of most of the illegals. The business and religious communities supported the idea, but grass roots opposition blocked passage in Congress and denounced the notion of &amp;quot;amnesty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Moral issues==&lt;br /&gt;
As the [[Bible]] exhorts people to be compassionate towards illegal immigrants (Exodus 23:9 and Leviticus 19:34), and as more Americans are [[Christian]] than any other religion, many Americans feel compelled by their religion to show compassion and caring for illegal immigrants, many of whom are trying to escape tyranny or poverty in their homelands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some conservatives oppose illegal immigration because it allows for immigrants to fall between the cracks of society thus making them more likely to commit crime or experience poverty.  Other conservatives view illegal immigration as an exercise in a basic [[individualism|individual]] [[human rights|human right]] to pursue happiness.  Illegal immigration is also economically damaging to countries because illegal immigrants will often work illegally for below minimum wage, resulting in job loss for legal citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants in the U.S.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among many others:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2002 - Ingmar Guandique, a Salvadoran in the United States, is currently serving a ten year prison term for assaulting two joggers in Washington D.C. is now suspected of killing [[Chandra Levy]]. The Levy case is famous because during the initial investigation her relationship with California congressman [[Gary Condit]] was revealed, ending his career. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/23/return-of-the-chandra-levy-case-and-illegal-alien-sex-offender-ingmar-guandique/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2005 - Raul Garcia-Gomez, shot two Denver police officers in the back, killing one. He fled to Mexico and was captured. However, the Mexcian government sheltered Gomez until the American prosecutor agreed to not seek the death penalty against him. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337719,00.html Illegal Immigrant Worker Sentenced in Slaying of Actress Adrienne Shelly], ''[[Associated Press]]'', March 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2008 - Diego Pillco, a 20-year-old from Ecuador, pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter of actress Adrienne Shelly. Pillco was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Pillco admitted strangling Shelly and then hanging her body to make it look like a suicide. The judge said Pillco would be subject to immediate deportation upon release from prison. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,337719,00.html Illegal Immigrant Worker Sentenced in Slaying of Actress Adrienne Shelly], ''[[Associated Press]]'', March 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2008 - Edwin Ramos, killed three people on their way home from a family picnic. Ramos had been arrested multiple times before the killings (once for mugging a pregnant woman), but the city of San Francisco shielded him from deportation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/20/MNK011MAFR.DTL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of people immigrating to the United States illegally has declined since 2001.  People who formerly moved back and forth across the border (working the agricultural fields in the US in the summer and wintering in a village in the winter) has declined, and instead they tremain in the U.S. The estimated number of illegal immigrants in the United States in 2005 was about 12 million. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0603/charts.immigration/frameset.exclude.html?eref=yahoo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.house.gov/mccaul/pdf/Investigaions-Border-Report.pdf A Line In The Sand] House Committee on Homeland Security&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$397 billion dollars have been paid to families containing illegal immigrants through social services since 1996.  Most of the money goes to schooling for U.S. citizens and for children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecentersf134&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of illegal aliens who are in prison is over 300,000, about 3% of the total.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The number of convicted criminal aliens in federal prison at the end of 2003 was 46,063; in state prisons and local jails here were 262,105.[http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05646r.html online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sex offenders comprised 2% of illegals who have been arrested. Nearly one million sex crimes were committed by illegal immigrants in the United States, in the seven years 1999-2006. Each sex offender averaged 4 victims. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.drdsk.com/articles.html#Illegals The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration] Violent Crimes Institute, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Households headed by illegal aliens imposed more than $26.3 billion in costs on the federal government in 2002 and paid only $16 billion in taxes, creating a net fiscal deficit of almost $10.4 billion, or $2,700 per illegal household. Most of the costs were incurred by U.S. citizens, however, not by the illegals. On average, the costs that illegal households impose are less than half that of other households.  In terms of welfare use, receipt of cash assistance programs by illegals tends to be very low, while Medicaid use, though significant, is still less than for other households. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html The High Cost of Cheap Labor] Center For Immigration Studies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
California spent more than 11 billion dollars per year on illegal immigrants. California is seeking the federal government to bail them out of their financial deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'' There are some 7 million illegal immigrants in this country who lack health insurance, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.'' [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090912/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_overhaul]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2010 Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
Data compilled from [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] and [[Department of Homeland Security]] reports indicate: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 83% of warrants for murder in Phoenix are for illegal aliens.&lt;br /&gt;
* 86% of warrants for murder in Albuquerque are for illegal aliens.&lt;br /&gt;
* 75% of those on the most wanted list in Los Angeles , Phoenix and Albuquerque are illegal aliens. &lt;br /&gt;
* 24.9% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals&lt;br /&gt;
* 40.1% of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are Mexican nationals&lt;br /&gt;
* 48.2% of all inmates in New Mexico detention centers are Mexican nationals&lt;br /&gt;
* 29% (630,000) convicted illegal alien felons fill our state and Federal prisons at a cost of $1.6 billion annually&lt;br /&gt;
* 53% plus of all investigated burglaries reported in [[California]], [[New Mexico]], Nevada, Arizona and [[Texas]] are perpetrated by illegal aliens.&lt;br /&gt;
* 50% plus of all gang members in Los Angeles are illegal aliens &lt;br /&gt;
* 71% plus of all apprehended cars stolen in 2005 in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada and California were stolen by Illegal aliens or &amp;quot;[[transport coyotes]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* 47% of cited/stopped drivers in California have no license, no insurance and no registration for the vehicle. Of that 47%, 92% are illegal aliens. &lt;br /&gt;
* 63% of cited/stopped drivers in Arizona have no license, no insurance and no registration for&lt;br /&gt;
the vehicle. Of that 63%, 97% are illegal aliens&lt;br /&gt;
* 66% of cited/stopped drivers in New Mexico have no license, no insurance and no registration for&lt;br /&gt;
the vehicle. Of that 66% 98% are illegal aliens.&lt;br /&gt;
* 380,000 plus &amp;quot;anchor babies&amp;quot; were born in the US to illegal alien parents in just one year, making 380,000 babies automatically US citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
* 97.2% of all costs incurred from those illegal births were paid by the American taxpayers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Latino]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Xenophobia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lozano v. Hazleton]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elvira Arellano]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reno v. Flores]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* David W. Haines, Karen E. Rosenblum. ''Illegal Immigration in America: A Reference Handbook'' (Greenwood Press, 1999) [http://www.questia.com/read/111894645?title=Illegal%20Immigration%20in%20America%3a%20%20A%20Reference%20Handbook online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Pierre Hauser, ''Illegal Aliens'' (1990)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jeffrey S. Passel, &amp;quot;Unauthorized Migrants: Numbers and Characteristics,&amp;quot; Pew Hispanic Center Reports and fact Sheets. (June 14, 2005), [http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=46 online] &lt;br /&gt;
* Claudia Sadowski-Smith. &amp;quot;Unskilled Labor Migration and the Illegality Spiral: Chinese, European, and Mexican Indocumentados in the United States, 1882–2007,&amp;quot; ''American Quarterly,'' Volume 60, Number 3, September 2008, pp. 779-804 [http://muse.uq.edu.au/login?uri=/journals/american_quarterly/v060/60.3.sadowski-smith.html in Project Muse]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aristide R. Zolberg, ''A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/11/reasons_to_vote_for_mccain_rea.php About Illegal Immigration], [[Right Wing News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Social Problems]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RyanDav&amp;diff=836704</id>
		<title>User talk:RyanDav</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RyanDav&amp;diff=836704"/>
		<updated>2011-01-01T22:56:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* Conflict over Obama article */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=[[User:Tzoran|'''Tyler Zoran''']]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:04, 29 June 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conflict over [[Obama]] article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ryan, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I said to the other user as well, I temporarily blocked you just as a notice to resolve the conflict you seem to be having over the Obama article. Let's try to settle the issue about the authorization of oil drilling on the [[Talk:Barack Hussein Obama|talk page]] instead of reverting the edits back and forth repeatedly? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=836703</id>
		<title>User talk:Martyp</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Martyp&amp;diff=836703"/>
		<updated>2011-01-01T22:55:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tzoran: /* conflict over Obama article */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 18:52, 5 November 2010 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== -elect category ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is lots of work....but remember it needs to be emptied shortly after the first of the year when they no longer will be ____elect! --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, 7 November 2010 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== conflict over [[Obama]] article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Marty, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I temporarily blocked you just as a notice to resolve the conflict you seem to be having with another user over the [[Obama]] article. How about we settle the issue about the authorization of oil drilling on the [[Talk:Barack_Hussein_Obama|talk page]] instead of constantly reverting each other's edits? [[User:Tzoran|Tyler Zoran]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Tzoran|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, 1 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tzoran</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>