<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tyrone</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Tyrone"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Tyrone"/>
	<updated>2026-11-09T06:03:59Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=745794</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=745794"/>
		<updated>2010-01-17T21:34:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tyrone: /* Pillow Talk? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies/archive1|Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clean-up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is in need of major clean-up.  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 13:06, 19 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please proceed as you suggest.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:29, 19 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. I'll get to it when I have time after this weekend. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 11:00, 20 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Here's an interesting article by Roger Ebert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone agree with his choices?  I don't want to add any unless people agree with them. [[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060105/EDITOR/60106001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting article,  The choices seem to be by someone else (Feder?), but the list is interesting.  Feel free to add those that you think merit it.  It's seems like a legitimate list, though I saw only one of the films mentioned.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:59, 5 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right, my mistake, it was Don Feder who originally wrote the list.  Coach Carter is the only one I've seen, and I definitely agree that it has a conservative message.  I'll add it, and if anyone has any qualms please feel free to change it.  Since I haven't seen the others, I'll let someone with more knowledge of the films determine if they qualify to be on this list. [[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Oh, I see, that's '''Don Feder'''.  We previously recognized him with an honorable mention in [[Essay:Conservatives of the Decade]].  All his choices are likely good.  I can confirm that Feder is right about &amp;quot;Batman Begins,&amp;quot; and I doubt Feder mishits on any of his choices.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:18, 5 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fargo ==&lt;br /&gt;
The directors are liberal (Cohen brothers), much sensationalized bloodshed and terror- some of the reasons I didn't know if this was fit for &amp;quot;Greatest&amp;quot;. What say you?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:53, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I disliked the movie intensely --it portrays our rural part of the world in very negative terms--and did not see much conservative about it. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:04, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Fargo is one of my favorite movies, I wouldn't say for a second that it's conservative.  At the same time, I wouldn't argue that it's liberal.  I don't see much of a political agenda in the film.[[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's toss it then.  Whoever recommended it can't even spell &amp;quot;pious&amp;quot;.  (Don't take that personally if the poster is legitimate!).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:51, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pillow Talk? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How does a leading man slapping a leading lady square up any way with conservative values and [[chivalry]]? [[User:Tyrone|Tyrone]] 16:08, 17 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A movie free of feminist thought-policing is on the list because ... conservatives do not support the feminist distortions.  Understand it now?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:29, 17 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::No.  On the chivalry page, you wrote that chivalry includes &amp;quot;men opening doors for women&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;protection of the weaker elements of society.&amp;quot; [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chivalry&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=502110]  How does feminism have anything to do with the perceived conservative action of physically assaulting a woman? [[User:Tyrone|Tyrone]] 16:34, 17 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tyrone</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=745787</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Movies&amp;diff=745787"/>
		<updated>2010-01-17T21:08:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tyrone: /* Pillow Talk? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies/archive1|Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clean-up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This list is in need of major clean-up.  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 13:06, 19 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please proceed as you suggest.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:29, 19 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay. I'll get to it when I have time after this weekend. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinx McHue]] 11:00, 20 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Here's an interesting article by Roger Ebert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone agree with his choices?  I don't want to add any unless people agree with them. [[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060105/EDITOR/60106001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting article,  The choices seem to be by someone else (Feder?), but the list is interesting.  Feel free to add those that you think merit it.  It's seems like a legitimate list, though I saw only one of the films mentioned.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:59, 5 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're right, my mistake, it was Don Feder who originally wrote the list.  Coach Carter is the only one I've seen, and I definitely agree that it has a conservative message.  I'll add it, and if anyone has any qualms please feel free to change it.  Since I haven't seen the others, I'll let someone with more knowledge of the films determine if they qualify to be on this list. [[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Oh, I see, that's '''Don Feder'''.  We previously recognized him with an honorable mention in [[Essay:Conservatives of the Decade]].  All his choices are likely good.  I can confirm that Feder is right about &amp;quot;Batman Begins,&amp;quot; and I doubt Feder mishits on any of his choices.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:18, 5 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fargo ==&lt;br /&gt;
The directors are liberal (Cohen brothers), much sensationalized bloodshed and terror- some of the reasons I didn't know if this was fit for &amp;quot;Greatest&amp;quot;. What say you?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:53, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I disliked the movie intensely --it portrays our rural part of the world in very negative terms--and did not see much conservative about it. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 02:04, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Fargo is one of my favorite movies, I wouldn't say for a second that it's conservative.  At the same time, I wouldn't argue that it's liberal.  I don't see much of a political agenda in the film.[[User:JRobbe|JRobbe]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's toss it then.  Whoever recommended it can't even spell &amp;quot;pious&amp;quot;.  (Don't take that personally if the poster is legitimate!).--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:51, 7 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pillow Talk? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How does a leading man slapping a leading lady square up any way with conservative values and [[chivalry]]? [[User:Tyrone|Tyrone]] 16:08, 17 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tyrone</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Jackson&amp;diff=679286</id>
		<title>Talk:Michael Jackson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Jackson&amp;diff=679286"/>
		<updated>2009-06-28T19:56:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tyrone: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== No Fan, but... ==&lt;br /&gt;
No fan of his, but i should have prayed more for his soul.  Some more info. Sad Picture of Michael Jackson Emerges as Shock of His Death Fades [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529265,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
]&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia saw a flurry of activity, with close to 500 edits made to Jackson's entry in less than 24 hours. CNET reported that by 3:15 p.m. PT, Wikipedia seemed to be &amp;quot;temporarily overloaded.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Today was a seminal moment in Internet history. We've never seen anything like it in terms of scope or depth.&amp;quot; [http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/06/26/michael.jackson.internet/index.html][[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 11:08, 28 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Candle In The Wind&amp;quot; comes to my mind when events such as this happen...too bad he couldn't call upon/did not find, the strength and sustaining words of Jesus Christ in his time of need. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:13, 28 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
There are &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; tags used in the article, but no section set up to display them.  Can one of the admin fix this problems?  I would do it, but the page is locked (for good reason I see) [[User:Tyrone|Tyrone]] 15:56, 28 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tyrone</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Tyrone&amp;diff=676075</id>
		<title>User:Tyrone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Tyrone&amp;diff=676075"/>
		<updated>2009-06-18T16:11:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Tyrone: Created page with 'Yo.'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Yo.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Tyrone</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>