<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Twitcher</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Twitcher"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Twitcher"/>
	<updated>2026-10-26T03:36:52Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752701</id>
		<title>Talk:Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752701"/>
		<updated>2010-02-08T14:09:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Auto-icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I fail to see how my statement that Bentham's body is in a box at UCL is 'unsourced', so I've put it back in. If I must wander down there myself between lectures and take a picture to prove it, then so be it.[[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 07:58, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That would be good. Or provide a quotation from a published author with a link (or at least a book title and page number). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:11, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bentham's preserved body is on public display at University College London (UCL), topped by a wax head [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/Faqs/auto_icon.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quotation I read, said &amp;quot;[[skeleton]]&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;[[body]]&amp;quot;. And why is it relevant, anyway? We're not a newspaper struggling for circulation; we don't need fascinating tidbits to hold our readers' attention. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:15, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since when are we banned from putting things of interest into articles? If anything it shows his drastic dissent with common Christian practice; he preferred to have a true monument to his death rather than pious burial. How exactly, by the way, is UCL's own page on Jeremy Bentham's Auto-Icon, given that the Auto-Icon is in the UCL cloisters, unreliable? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 09:07, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:As for 'published author with a link':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a795037377&amp;amp;db=all&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would that suffice? It also relates to the tenets of utilitarianism and his take on it. Since it is Bentham's article, it relates to Bentham, it relates to his views, and specifically his take on utilitarianism. I fail to see how it is not of note.[[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 09:09, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752700</id>
		<title>Talk:Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752700"/>
		<updated>2010-02-08T14:07:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Auto-icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I fail to see how my statement that Bentham's body is in a box at UCL is 'unsourced', so I've put it back in. If I must wander down there myself between lectures and take a picture to prove it, then so be it.[[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 07:58, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That would be good. Or provide a quotation from a published author with a link (or at least a book title and page number). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:11, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bentham's preserved body is on public display at University College London (UCL), topped by a wax head [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/Faqs/auto_icon.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quotation I read, said &amp;quot;[[skeleton]]&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;[[body]]&amp;quot;. And why is it relevant, anyway? We're not a newspaper struggling for circulation; we don't need fascinating tidbits to hold our readers' attention. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:15, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since when are we banned from putting things of interest into articles? If anything it shows his drastic dissent with common Christian practice; he preferred to have a true monument to his death rather than pious burial. How exactly, by the way, is UCL's own page on Jeremy Bentham's Auto-Icon, given that the Auto-Icon is in the UCL cloisters, unreliable? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 09:07, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752672</id>
		<title>Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752672"/>
		<updated>2010-02-08T13:01:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Jeremy Bentham''' (1748-1832) was an English [[philosopher]] who popularized the concept of [[utilitarianism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/info/jb.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy which states that individual actors (or indeed government) should do whatever maximizes overall &amp;quot;utility&amp;quot; (pleasure minus pain).&amp;lt;ref name=appraisal&amp;gt;Bentham started from the following premise: &amp;quot;Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.&amp;quot;  [http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/Euth/Euth06-04.htm Appraisal of Traditional Theories of Ethics from the Viewpoint of the Unification Theory of Ethics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If killing one innocent man saves ten other lives, then utilitarianism would favor it.  Under utilitarianism there is no Christian morality, and it is replaced by comparing benefits versus costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bentham influenced socialist reformer [[Robert Owen]], who agreed with Bentham's idea of &amp;quot;the greatest happiness of the greatest number.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=appraisal /&amp;gt;  He was also a major influence on the [[liberal]] philosopher and [[atheist]] [[John Stuart Mill]], and a friend of his father, [[James Mill]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bentham's preserved body is on public display at University College London (UCL), topped by a wax head&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/Faqs/auto_icon.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bentham, Jeremy}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752671</id>
		<title>Talk:Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752671"/>
		<updated>2010-02-08T12:58:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Created page with '== Auto-icon ==   I fail to see how my statement that Bentham's body is in a box at UCL is 'unsourced', so I've put it back in. If I must wander down there myself between lecture...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Auto-icon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I fail to see how my statement that Bentham's body is in a box at UCL is 'unsourced', so I've put it back in. If I must wander down there myself between lectures and take a picture to prove it, then so be it.[[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 07:58, 8 February 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752670</id>
		<title>Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752670"/>
		<updated>2010-02-08T12:58:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Jeremy Bentham''' (1748-1832) was an English [[philosopher]] who popularized the concept of [[utilitarianism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/info/jb.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy which states that individual actors (or indeed government) should do whatever maximizes overall &amp;quot;utility&amp;quot; (pleasure minus pain).&amp;lt;ref name=appraisal&amp;gt;Bentham started from the following premise: &amp;quot;Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do.&amp;quot;  [http://www.tparents.org/Library/Unification/Books/Euth/Euth06-04.htm Appraisal of Traditional Theories of Ethics from the Viewpoint of the Unification Theory of Ethics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If killing one innocent man saves ten other lives, then utilitarianism would favor it.  Under utilitarianism there is no Christian morality, and it is replaced by comparing benefits versus costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bentham influenced socialist reformer [[Robert Owen]], who agreed with Bentham's idea of &amp;quot;the greatest happiness of the greatest number.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=appraisal /&amp;gt;  He was also a major influence on the [[liberal]] philosopher and [[atheist]] [[John Stuart Mill]], and a friend of his father, [[James Mill]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bentham's preserved body is on public display at University College London (UCL), topped by a wax head&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/site_images/auto_il.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bentham, Jeremy}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ian_McKellen&amp;diff=752496</id>
		<title>Ian McKellen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ian_McKellen&amp;diff=752496"/>
		<updated>2010-02-07T15:17:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sir Ian McKellen''' (born 1939) is a [[British]] actor&lt;br /&gt;
who was knighted in 1991 for outstanding contributions to theater.&lt;br /&gt;
He has gained international recognition for playing [[Gandalf]] in [[The Lord of the Rings film trilogy|''The Lord of the Rings'' series of films]]. He is currently playing in a production of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot in London's West End. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKellen publically came out as a homosexual at the relatively late age of 49. He has been irrationally critical of so-called homophobic legislation in the UK, which stopped homosexuality from being preached in [[public schools]] (later disgracefully repealed). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Extreme opinions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKellen is an [[atheist]] and opposes [[capital punishment]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McKellen, Ian}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752331</id>
		<title>Jeremy Bentham</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jeremy_Bentham&amp;diff=752331"/>
		<updated>2010-02-06T18:22:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Jeremy Bentham''' (1748-1832) was an English [[philosopher]] who popularized the concept of [[utilitarianism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/info/jb.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy which states that individual actors (or indeed government) should do whatever maximizes overall &amp;quot;utility&amp;quot; (pleasure minus pain).  If killing one innocent man saves ten other lives, then utilitarianism would favor it.  Under utilitarianism there is no Christian morality, and it is replaced by comparing benefits versus costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His [[Panopticon]] design influenced the design of prisons around the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bentham's preserved body is on public display at University College London (UCL), topped by a wax head&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Bentham-Project/site_images/auto_il.gif&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bentham, Jeremy}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&amp;diff=751250</id>
		<title>Talk:George W. Bush</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&amp;diff=751250"/>
		<updated>2010-02-02T00:06:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Protected|TK}}&lt;br /&gt;
==War in Afghanistan==&lt;br /&gt;
Could footnotes be added to support the section on the War on Afghanistan?  None are available in the entire section, which breaks Conservapedia Commandment 2: &amp;quot;Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::thanks for the heads-up. I added the notes and updated the section.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 00:36, 11 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Media? == &lt;br /&gt;
um, isn't that an opinion phrase? I don't really think there's a scientific basis for such a remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Didn't you hear? This is conservapedia, a place where ignorance coalesces into a gungy goo of people who think their opinions are always right. Anyone who doesn't agree with them is a goshdang Communist! Liberal Media, haha, oh boy that's a larf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Everyone thinks their opinions are right.  That's why they're their opinions.  But you are right, the phrase &amp;quot;liberal media&amp;quot; has become an oft-lampooned indication of conservative paranoia.  The use of it will only serve to make this article sound Stephen Colbert-ish.  Not only do I think the phrase should be deleted; I think it should become the policy of conservapedia to strive to avoid it in the future.  --[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The [[Liberal-Biased Media]] is the GOP's equivalent of Hillary Clinton's [[Vast Right-wing Conspiracy]], as well as being an all-purpose scapegoat from when the facts turn out to have an anti-Bush agenda.  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 21:49, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Considering this page has been locked, I'd greatly appreciate it if an administrator would remove this clearly biased phrase.--[[User:Ge Ming|Ge Ming]] 15:38, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There IS no Liberal Media! [[User:MrDubya|MrDubya]] 01:27, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don't you mean &amp;quot;there is no cabal!&amp;quot; ?  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:39, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is well known that the media is overwelmingaly liberal.  This is based on facts.  --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Based on facts that come from the liberal media itself! Mindblowing, isn't it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Removed the line about Bush executing Saddam. Saddam was executed by the Iraqis under Iraqi law.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Removed the un-encyclopediac comment about John Kerry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why's this page locked?  It's not going to get any better if you don't let people add to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SysOp locked it b/c of rampant vandalism. It's an obivous target for such action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be unlocked.  All of Bush's good (and bad) deeds will not be known to the world until this page is unlocked.  The point of our site here is to inform the people, and without people interacting and adding information, Conservapedia will die out.  People will go elsewhere to a more democratic environment, and that is not good for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's just fine.  The Liberals can go to Communistpedia, and the people who want a more REPUBLICAN Wiki can come here!  --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:03, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The liberals would probably  be far more intelligent than the people that frequent this site and go to wikipedia [[User:You're wrong|You&amp;amp;#39;re wrong]] 15:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::communists can go to http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 15:21, 4 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
    :I'd rather Communism if Fascism were the other choice. If you really need to think you're always right to sleep at night, then be my guest my lil' Yank friend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the first sentence read Name, birth date, political party, etc. and then say only President of the United States?  After all, it's not like there is a Democratic President. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:48, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they didn't know bush was republican we don't want them on the site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think by &amp;quot;democratic,&amp;quot; the above poster (who failed to sign his/her comment) was referring to the political idea of democracy rather than the American political party, [[User:Ballon|Ballon]].  And let's try not to deride each other with pejoratives like &amp;quot;commie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;fascist.&amp;quot;  Anyway, I agree that this page needs to be watched closely.  It is an obvious location for vandalism.  However, very sensible changes (exempli gratia: moving references of George Bush's religious values to a section other than &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot;) have been suggested on this page, and they seem to have been largely ignored.  This article is not passable in its current state.  The sysops must either unlock the page or at the very least make changes that we agree upon on this talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Photo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somebody deleted the body of this page and substituted a photo-- can anybody verify that this photo actually is President Bush?  (Could we maybe print the photo as a thumbnail, and link to the large photo?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the photo is one of Prince Harry, who has recently taken up active duty in Iraq for the UK, in compliance with the American notion that leaders such as George Washington and the sons of prominent and wealthy people should be involved in and at risk from armed conflict for their country in equal measure to the legions of the poor they send to do their work for them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lacking Substance==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia will go absolutely nowhere if its alternative viewpoints from wikipedia consist purerly in pejorative adjectives and vague speculative references.  Disprove alternative opinions with facts, not derogatory adjectives and slanted phrases.  I would provide examples, but they are more than clear and numerous.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is useless. It is a stub, which is fine, except that this is GWB, not some arcane entry.  This is made more eggregious since this page has undergone many edits, and nobody has decided to actually make it a full article, just back and forth fluff.  I admit that I don't particularly want to put the work in, because I don't care about this entry, I just think that conservapedia needs a credible entry for GWB to be taken seriously.  Compare with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush Wikipedia's entry].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a starting point, how about information that would be useful, that you don't hear about in the liberal media;  Major (and minor) legislative pushes, both successful and not.  Who were his good conservative judicial appointments?  --[[User:Whatter|Whatter]] 01:51, 24 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nation building ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's interesting that Bush's stated opposition to nation building isn't modified to show that he has been involved in exactly that in both Afghanistan &amp;amp; Iraq for over half his time in office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd argue he hasn't done much nation-building in either of those places.  :(&lt;br /&gt;
It is weird, though--having a site for Conservative politics and having such dinky articles about President Bush and Iraq is like having a wiki about oceanography and not mentioning water. --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 14:38, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am concerned that the entry reads as if it were written by a gushing fan instead of one who spent significant time researching the President. If the point of conservapedia is to become a credible resource intellectually honest about its bias, we must demand these entries be written at the highest standard possible. This is gossipy drivel; the libs are bound to cackle over it. }-(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since when is Exxon Mobile the bellwether of the US economy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it bother the reader that while citing Exxon Mobile profits being at record highs, gas prices also are at record highs? This may not be a very good supporting argument as it raises suspicion that our current American way of life is at risk due to the high costs of fuel, which is hurting real estate as more and more people re-urbanize living closer to their workplaces in the city as well as the overall economy as people go out less because they want to conserve fuel. {{unsigned|Tchen}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Does it bother the reader that [[China]] has one fifth of the planets population and only 1% drive cars?  Does it bother the reader that China's economy is growing at 17%?  Does it bother the reader that when 2% of China's population own cars, gas will go from $3 to $6 per gallon?  Does it bother the reader that US politicians in Washington DC can nothing about this?  Does it bother readers that implied solution here is to exterminate the Chinese?  Yes, it does bother this reader.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:28, 24 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whoever wrote that is probably a Liberal grousing about the fact that Bush has made his corporate benefactors a great deal richer by strip-mining the American economy. --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 18:25, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul O'Niell (the man who rescued Alcoa) tried to talk economic sense to Bush. Good advice fell on deaf ears. Then Cheney arranged his dismissal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just visited the Yahoo! article linked to by reference 7, and it says nothing about unemployment being at an all-time low in March, 2007. In fact, the article's assessment of the economy is quite bleak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding “the Clinton years which lead to the lowest point of the stock market in January 2000 AD since the great depression of 1929 AD” it should be noted that the source that is cited states the opposite.    The stock market hit it’s highest in January 2000, before GWB took office.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per the article quoted:  “Oct. 9, 2002, the Dow Jones industrial average, battered by the worst stock market meltdown since the 1929 crash, hit bottom. It closed 4,437 points below its January 2000 all-time high”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major blow to the stock market took place in 2002, about 20 months after Bush took office.   It should be noted that this took place exactly one week after Congress authorized Bush to invade Iraq.  Investors claimed this as a reason for the drop in the stock market.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such frequently found mistakes underlines why Conservapedia is more propaganda than an online encyclopedia and should never be used as a source of information.  The information is at best one sided, and more frequently, blantently false.   The truth does not have a conservative or liberal slant.  There seems to be a trend, however, in the last 12 or so years of American political media to baselessly proclaim an extream slant in media.  Just because the reader does not like the truth does not mean that the carrier is slanted.   &lt;br /&gt;
Artical&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;As we all know, the facts have an anti-Bush agenda.&amp;quot; -- Steven Colbert. (Or, to be more accurate, it looks like Bush has an anti-facts agenda. :( --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:32, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Skull and Bones Club ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MountainDew, why did you take that part out?  It's a matter of public record (and any number of jokes) that Bush and Kerry are in the same club.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guy who put that in there was a known vandal, so I was just reversing all his edits at once. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locked Page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we really lock a page with so many typos? [[User:Czolgolz|Miguel_Cervantes]] 09:13, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can understand why the page is locked, obviously people will target Bush, but the page needs LOTS of improvement, not just typos, but the Economy section is laughable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Indeed. No mention of the 8 trillion (is it 9 now) debt? [[User:GofG | GofG]] [[Special:Contributions/GofG|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] [[User talk:GofG | Talk]] 20:07, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Debt only matters if you ever intend to pay it off.  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:29, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::not true, it also matters if you want to get lent more money, and it is also a matter of principal-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:38, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Though the liberal media continues to disparage Bush's handling of the economy, they often neglect to report the many aspects of the economy that Bush has improved. For example, during his term Exxon Mobile has posted the largest profit of any company in a signle year, and executive salaries have greatly increased as well [5]. This is due to changes in the stock market that lead to a record high in 2006, recovering from the Clinton years which lead to the lowest point of the stock market in January 2000 AD since the great depression of 1929 AD, and &amp;quot;Companies are churning out double-digit profit growth&amp;quot; currently.[6] Even the working class is benefiting from the Bush economy, as unemployment hits an all time low in March 2007.[7] Bush worked with Democrats to raise the minimum wage to a more livable level.[8]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The information in this section appears to have either been written by a liberal who was interested in subtly undermining the informative authority of this particular entry (and possibly Conservapedia in general), or by someone who is perhaps good-intentioned but very badly informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, using Exxon-Mobil and executive salary increases as an indication of how much Bush has done for the economy is actually quite bad press for him.  The majority of Americans are not voting to line the pockets of the people at the very top.  They prefer to have their own pockets lined, even if it is just in small ways, like in tax cuts for the middle class.  Suggesting that Bush has done good for our economy as evidenced by the economic boon of the elite would seem to give credit to Bush's detractors who have accused him of being concerned only with his &amp;quot;oil buddies&amp;quot; and largest contributors.  Let's not add more wood to that fire, please.  That's how we lost the mid-terms - shooting ourselves in the foot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second point, please, whoever has write permissions, clean up the spelling errors at the very least (Exxon-Mobile, signle - in this section)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third, someone else cited the error in referencing January 2000 as the lowest point of the stock market.  In addition to their points (including the quote from the article that was supposedly used as reference for that inaccurate &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;), I think it's important to clarify that while the market has never dropped as low as it did following the crash of 1929, the *percentage* drop could again be as great as it was in 1929.  In 1929 the percentage drop was 23%.  In 1987, the crash of October caused a dip of 22.7%.  The actual numbers of 1929 were in the 200-400 range, whereas the Dow Jones is over 12,000 right now.  If, in the modern era, the DJIA ever dropped as low as it did in 1929, i.e., down ot the 200-400 range, then we may as well prepare for Armageddon, because the state of the world would probably be *that* bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fourth, is it necessary to place A.D. after every year, even when it is obvious that the referenced year is In the Year of Our Lord (i.e. Anno Domini)?  It seems unnecessary, and certainly cumbersome to have A.D. following years that are obviously referring to U.S. political events.  Our conservative audience is not so dumb as to be confused about whether the Clinton administration of the year 2000 is in reference to 2000 years before or 2000 years after the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Mostly I agree that we should not be concerned about the stereotypes our liberal brothers and sisters have placed upon us, but when possible for us to avoid looking stupid and playing into the stereotypes the liberals have assigned to us, I think we ought do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fifth, the unemployment rate is dropping for March 2007, and this is wonderful and it speaks well of Bush's handling of the economy.  It is not the lowest rate of all time, however.  I don't feel compelled to provide sources here, because this information is readily available in under 2 minutes of searching for &amp;quot;U.S.&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unemployment rate&amp;quot; on any search engine of your choosing.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics, for example, can tell you that the lowest unemployment rate of the last 60 years was in 1953 at just under 3%.  It's an easy fact to check, and a ridiculous error to lock into an entry about our President.  There are true pieces of information about President Bush that make him worthy of admiration.  There is no need to attempt to bolster his image with false information.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally, let's please be honest about the minimum wage situation.  The decision to raise the minimum wage is controversial among conservatives, and I am  having difficulty finding a reliable source that suggests Bush supports, in isolation, the idea of raising the minimum wage (i.e. without tax-cuts for small-businesses also tacked on as a proviso).  In terms of economic growth, raising the minimum wage may not be helpful, and everything I have read about President Bush seems to indicate that he knows that.  So any suggestion that his personal opinion is that the minimum wage should be raised is questionable.  Aside from his personal opinion, in his professional capacity, he most certainly hasn't been placed in a position of &amp;quot;working with the Democrats to raise the minimum wage to a livable level.&amp;quot;  The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 has passed in both the House and the Senate, but it has not yet been presented to our President to be signed into law, because it is pending committee review.  Additionally, crediting Bush with &amp;quot;working with Democrats&amp;quot; on this is erroneous.  Bush has reached across partisan lines on many occasions, but this particular bill was brought on entirely by Democratic feather-ruffling during their &amp;quot;First 100-Hours&amp;quot; campaign.  It was an attempt by the Dems to make a garish display of their new &amp;quot;authority,&amp;quot; having gained the majority in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For starters, what powers do the executive branch have over economics? --[[User:JamesLipton|JamesLipton]] 22:29, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal political philosophies aside, I completely agree that Exxon-Mobile is probably the worst company that could have been chosen to show support for Bush's economic policies. This is an encyclopedia for conservatives, but if it's going to stand up to the criticisms of the liberal community and not be a major source of embarrassment for conservatives as a whole, it must hold itself to a higher level of political awareness. Whether one believes Exxon-Mobile's booming business is proof the economy is in great shape or not, the majority of those who read this (including conservatives) will fall out of their chairs when they read that. I guarantee you, liberal citizens all across America will copy and paste the paragraph into their blogs for their readers to laugh at.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is probably the most important article on conservapedia.  It HAS to be beyond reproof. --[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: When is this going to be fixed? The &amp;quot;lowest unemployment rate in history&amp;quot; is not true, it was far lower in the 60s, and lower during the later years of the Clinton administrator. The claim isn't even supported by the reference, which claims &amp;quot;the lowest in five years&amp;quot;, which I suppose is true enough. Concise and fact based indeed. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 16:02, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ridiculous claim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He is now working tirelessly to end the Iraqi insurgency and stabilize the region.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eh, ok? Source? A silly attempt to try to create some kind of sympathy for the man. It's like saying &amp;quot;Jesus was very kind.&amp;quot; in his entry. It has got nothing to do with facts and people should be given facts on this site and then determine for themselves if Jesus was kind and if GWB is working tirelessly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  Authors establish bias effectively by utilizing fact selectivity and through awareness of the perspective from which those facts are related.  Ineffective authors establish bias by simply writing their opinions.  An openly biased article is not the same thing as an opinion column.  An encyclopedia does not need to allow itself to be tainted with opinions in order to be biased.  This is supported by conservapedia itself in its article &amp;quot;Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.&amp;quot;  (Wikipedia, however biased it may or may not be, never allows anything close to the candid opinions of its editors to pollute articles.)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:29, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Hard Work&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George W Bush has never done a day's hard work in his lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh wait, he was having trouble reading his children's book when he heard about 9/11. Dang, forgot about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sarcasm and exaggeration are the didactic devices of idiots.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:31, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: and just insulting people to disprove their point is also idiotic. and sarcasm isn't idiotic at all its actually quite clever-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:41, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ridicolous Article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This whole article is a joke, right?  How can you put this out as fact when it has been debunked so many times?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Better Picture==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Busio.jpeg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, that is a much better picture.  It's the same one used on wikipedia, but it's public domain.  I'd use it, but get a higher resolution copy of the image at http://www.defenselink.mil/DODCMSShare/NewsPhoto/2003-02/030114-O-0000D-001.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:49, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
This article does not just neglect important information, but also gives incorrect facts. Al Gore won the popular vote in the 200 election. Also, this I laugh out loud that people are actually believing this conservopedia crap.&lt;br /&gt;
:writing unsigned comments is quite annoying, although i agree about the conservapedia point (tip there was no 200 election in america)-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:42, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requested edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The article needs to have &amp;lt;tt style=&amp;quot;background-color:#bfb&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{DEFAULTSORT:Bush, George W.}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; added just above the categories at the bottom, so its category sortkey is set properly.  Thanks.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 17:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please add &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Military Commanders]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:He is after all our [[Commander in Chief]] leading the hugely successful war against [[terrorism]] in [[Iraq]] and elswhere.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.&amp;quot; (Isaiah 55:4)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:JC|JC]] 10:26, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Hugely successful?&amp;quot;  I missed the announcement that they'd caught Osama Bin Laden. --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Poor addition to a poor article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You neglected to mention that Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 by a half-million votes. Your refusal to address it is just plain sad. Jesus hates liars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The line, &amp;quot;Many people feel that George W. Bush's faith is sincere and profound. The Faith of George W. Bush, a non-political book by author Stephen Strang, made the New York Times best-sellers list&amp;quot; should be quickly deleted from this article.  I know wikipedia doesn't allow such B.S. qualifiers as &amp;quot;many people feel,&amp;quot; and neither should conservapedia if it's going to be taken seriously.  Just state that he's a Christian.  How profound his Christian-ness is is both irrelevant and unquantifiable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least move it out of the &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot; section of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't agree with the first paragraph by Mechrobioticon, but I do agree with the second paragraph. I think that faith statement should be moved from the &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot; section to a new &amp;quot;Faith&amp;quot; section. There is tons of material from the book ''God and George W. Bush''. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:30, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OK, maybe requesting that the reference be completely omitted is a little harsh to ask of a conservative encyclopedia, but I still stand by my statement that it needs to be drastically reworded.  &amp;quot;Many people feel&amp;quot; is simply a phrase that should never be used in scholarly writing.  It's an obvious euphemism for &amp;quot;I feel,&amp;quot; and a bad attempt to cover up personal bias.  It makes the article appear very amateurish and will become a point of ridicule for knowledgeable readers.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:28, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Who cares how 'sincere' he is? [[Marshall Applewhite]] was 'sincere', but that didn't stop him from being lethally deluded. Or are we hoping the [[Great Pumpkin]] will visit Bush this Halloween? --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:51, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree that how &amp;quot;profound&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sincere&amp;quot; one's faith in something is is a poor indicator of one's character (not to mention highly arbitrary and impossible to confirm), but this isn't my encyclopedia.  It's conservapedia.  The ideas of the secular humanist must yield to the consensus of the conservative majority.  I think that even bearing this fact, however, that there is a good case to be made for the removal of the sentences in question on the basis that they are, in fact, an opinion that can't be indisputably confirmed.  But again, that's not my place to decide, and if the conservative editors and sysops of conservapedia say &amp;quot;it stays,&amp;quot; then it stays.  Secularists should always remember that we are here to advise and help, not to ridicule and lampoon.&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 16:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm][http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No Information==&lt;br /&gt;
Period. This isn't an encyclopedia entry, this is more like the bio somebody writes for the program to their high school musical. Could it be more bland? Ish. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:02, 24 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing about his childhood, his college, or his time as Texas governor.  And there never will be.  Conservapedia doesn't trust their editors to write about this icon.  (They might mention, for instance, his drunk driving arrest or allegations of cocaine use). [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Someone tell me when this article is fixed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that this article is hopeless.  It's not my opinion that George W. Bush's &amp;quot;sincere and profound faith in God&amp;quot; doesn't belong in the foreign policy section of this article.  It's a demonstrable fact.  Someone tell me what qualifies his religion as a formal written policy by which America's interactions with other countries are deliberated, and I will shut up.  The addition is also poorly written, vague, unscholarly, conjectural, impossible to confirm, and dripping with bias and ethnocentrism, but I'll ignore that.  Just move it.  Please just move it.  If this ever happens, please email me at happyhealey@gmail.com, and will resume contributing to Conservapedia.  It's ludicrous for a wiki project to be unable to correct its own typographical errors. It's been a month.  A whole month.  If this were Wikipedia it would have been corrected in less than five minutes.  This is, without exaggeration, pitiful.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 23:24, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, at least you changed the picture.  Good to know the article isn't completely stagnant.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 23:32, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How can I edit this article? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some spelling mistakes (Exxon Mobil not Exxon Mobile) and grammar that need correcting but I can't get on to fix it. [[User:Erasmus|Erasmus]] 11:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone add &amp;quot;Category:Christian warriors&amp;quot; which I created specifically for Dubya?[[User:Muschifresser|Muschifresser]] 08:23, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Protected articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protected articles infringe on the right to free speech. I am greatly opposed to this policy. Bush happens to be one of my favorite people and you are depriving the fact that I can't contribute to this article is appalling. I know you are worried about vandals, but you are just punishing the innocent. The world is being deprived of my great knowledge, these are sad times.--[[User:BushRules12|BushRules12]] 23:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Eavesdropping program ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it becomes possible to edit this article again, something should be added about the NSA eavesdropping program.  As today's New York Times indicates, this program is extremely controversial even among conservatives and almost led to the resignations of Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI Director Mueller.--[[User:Amyz]] 10:04, May 16, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is one sad page... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
....And since it's locked, only the syspos (who have enough to do as it is) can DO anything with it.  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 02:37, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I quite agree, Gulik3.  Me, for instance, I have been reading your many posts, all seeming to be unhappy ones.  I hope you will straighten us out with good, solid examples of article production so that we may learn from you!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 05:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's be a good trick on my part, seeing how everything worth editing is locked. --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 23:53, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There actually is a real simple way around that: try, for the first time in known history, to actually write an article according to WP's NPOV.  It would actually work here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:15, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Wikipedia's''' NPOV?  The onbe that's &amp;quot;Six times more Liberal than America&amp;quot;?  That NPOV?  I can try... --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 00:29, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yep. Since WP does not enforce its only policies, perhaps we can have the first ever NPOV article written here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:42, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wait, wait. So Wikipedia has &amp;quot;a horrible anti-liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Anti American&amp;quot; bias, and you follow its rules on NPOV? [[User:NaglfarorGleipnir|NaglfarorGleipnir]] 18:58, 28 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== template ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this article should use a template similar to the others in Presidents of the United States category.. see [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] for example.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 13:03, 24 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Criticisms? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't Bush's page have a public criticisms page as suggested in the manual of style? It is an issue significant to his presidency. And what about his handling of 9-11? And why does the economic section sound sarcastic with respect tp executive salaries. This article needs a lot of help. [[User:Pokowpane|Pokowpane]] 18:00, 31 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What? You think you can do it?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:28, 31 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should have a criticism title like those for other President's. I don't think it has much credibility unless it does. [[User:Priestspez|Priestspez]] 10:24, 18 June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely. Unless it's Conservapedia policy not to report on criticism of presidents. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush had an alcohol problem until 1986, as he has openly admitted in the past. The severity of this problem remains open to doubt. Comment by User: Darkmind1970  (08:23, 4 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Threats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can't have a threats section. Otherwise, every liberal/communist would be on it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic Policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To write that Bush worked with the Democrats to raise the minimum wage is a little disingenuous.  The minimum wage increase was a platform of the 2006 Democrats.  While Bush didn't specifically issue a veto threat, as per the article referenced, the White House wanted tax breaks for small businesses to offset the cost to those businesses.  I think the current revision is a better recount of the minimum wage increase.  It credits both Democrats, as it was their issue, as well as Bush, who signed the provision after he got what he wanted in the bill.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not trying to vandalize, merely provide more context to the actions.--[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 12:22, 17 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, &amp;quot;worked with&amp;quot; is the operative phrase. In general, Republicans oppose increases in the [[minimum wage]], on the grounds that it hurts [[inner city]] youth - making it harder for them to get [[entry-level]] jobs. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, 17 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Poll #'s Are Wrong ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His most recent poll rating, according to ARG on 2/20/08, is 19%! http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
user:armstongandmiller says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i heard that his approval rating dropped below that of broccoli&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most people feel his faith is sincere and profound&amp;quot;.  Evidence please?  Polls showing this to be true?  This is clearly the writer's personal belief and not an encyclopedic fact.  Please remove this sentence. {{unsigned|StephenS}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely. Without saying who it is that feels this, and quoting some reference to back it up, this is just puffery. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cats==&lt;br /&gt;
Please add this article to [[:Category:Texas]] and [[:Category:United States Governors]] --&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;margin-top: -3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(contributions)&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] [[User_talk:Deborah|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;darkslategray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(talk)&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:25, 5 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==biased reports==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;mostly due to biased media reports&amp;quot;. This statement about the President's popularity clearly reflects the writer's opinion. Do we have a reference to back it up? If not, why is it here? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 13:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Click the wikilink on the word &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot; in the section.  Also check out [[media bias]].  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Read those. Nothing there indicates that Bush's falling polls are the fault of liberal media. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Daphnea has a point, I think the American populace is more upset that gas prices are skyrocketing while we have two oilmen in the Whitehouse and Americans are dying overseas for oil. I don't see a media bias in this, or if there is, how this bias isn't reflective of reality (I mean, 4.34?! a gallon)--[[User:MarkS|MarkS]] 16:32, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2000 election controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is there no mention at all of the 2000 Florida vote controversy? Surely we can't ignore what happened there? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 13:30, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is an article on the [[United_States_presidential_election%2C_2000|2000 election]] where such material would be more appropriate. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:57, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Perhaps a link to that in the first paragraph where the 2000 election is mentioned would be helpful for readers. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:03, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 18:46, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
No mention of anything before governorship? No mention of National Guard? What exactly are we allowed to write in this article? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:49, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Write up what you would like added and post it here. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:19, 24 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Legacy?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of Bush's economic legacy is no longer valid, and leaves out any mention of the record deficits run up during his administration.  I'm willing to put together an objective, properly referenced record of the positive and negative impact this administration has had on the US economy, if someone will pledge to unlock and post it so it's not a wast of time. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 11:13, 28 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like this would be a good time to revise the &amp;quot;Economic Legacy&amp;quot; section.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:38, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:This page needs to be unlocked so this section can be edited - it's so out of date it hurts the usefulness of this site for students looking to use it as a reference. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:20, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I want to remind you not to use word hyperbole to make an unwarranted point.  As a percent of GDP, the deficits aren't even close to being &amp;quot;records&amp;quot;.  I hope that any alterations you make will accurately reflect this and treat it in a balanced way. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:33, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks, and I'll be careful to be fair.  My intention is to divide the Bush economic legacy into three phases - one for his first administration, one for the first half of his second administration (2005-06), and the third covering 2007-08.  This way he can be acknowledged for areas where progress was both made and lost.  I'll also cite statistics from the government instead of the media for objectivity.  If the page gets hit by vandalism and needs to be locked, I'll post my suggested edits here and you can apply them. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:58, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikilinks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone add wikilinks to &amp;quot;Laura Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;United Methodist&amp;quot; in the infobox please? Thank you. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, 28 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Plg6067's edit ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must say that I found his edit very good: up to the point, concise, and... right. Does anyone have any proof on the contrary? --[[User:LadaNiva|LadaNiva]] 16:18, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Try making some serious edits. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:23, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unscourced==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Liberals have accused him of having a barbaric foreign policy, but actually Bill Clinton invaded more countries than Pres. Bush.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a good and valid point, but it needs references. Please cite a scource for both things. It'd be nice if you could get some quotes from more prominent liberals.--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 15:36, 11 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Still President?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Still President?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page still reads as though he is the current president. E.g. it says &amp;quot;Serving as president since 2001&amp;quot; and also lines like &amp;quot;when he leaves office&amp;quot;. Just a thought. [[User:JohnKite|JohnKite]] 11:19, 28 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Zogby poll referenced should have link changed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link to the document on the poll should be changed to be a link to the poll itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.zogby.com/search/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1588&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As the President's job approval ratings hit a new record low, job performance ratings for Congress have again fallen to their previous record-low of 9% it slipped to in August. The Democratically-controlled Congress earns positive ratings from 13% of Democrats, a drop from 18% who said the same in September. Republican approval has also fallen to 6% from 10% who said the same last month, while Congressional job approval ratings from political independents held steady at 10%.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faith and the use of &amp;quot;Immoral&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of the phrase &amp;quot;immoral embryonic stem cell research.&amp;quot; is quite clearly opinion and since there is no source for the the whole line, it should be deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vice President link ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The redirect [[Vice President]] was recently deleted. I fixed all the other links in actual articles, but can't get this one.  Can an admin change it to [[Vice President of the United States of America|Vice President]]?  {{unsigned|MarkGall}} -- 11:14, 7 July 2009 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Mark, I have. Sorry for this obvious oversight I missed!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:24, 7 July 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Easy Re-election ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering what constituted &amp;quot;easy&amp;quot; in terms of election results.  I think, one, easy is a subjective and qualitative term.  Also, I believe that the closeness of the election would lend the term &amp;quot;narrow.&amp;quot;  I feel that this would even be a better, albeit more honest, descriptor in light of the fact that the liberals tried so hard to suppress a re-election.  --[[User:BLJones|BLJones]] 22:44, 18 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Albeit&amp;quot;?  I assume you mean &amp;quot;and even&amp;quot;, unless you're suggesting the article is ''intentionally'' misleading? [[User:FREConservative|FREConservative]] 19:07, 19 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spelling mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Early Life -- First line  &amp;quot;were he attended Yale&amp;quot;  I believe it should be WHERE not WERE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Good catch.  Got it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:51, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Awkward sentence structure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He reformed K12 education with a major new program &amp;quot;No Child Left Behind,&amp;quot; and '''forced through Congress''' a series of major tax cuts.&amp;quot; Could someone fix this? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 19:07, 31 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. Done. --&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:57, 31 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Surely &amp;quot;...forced a series of major tax cuts through Congress?&amp;quot; [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 19:06, 1 February 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&amp;diff=751011</id>
		<title>Talk:George W. Bush</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&amp;diff=751011"/>
		<updated>2010-02-01T00:07:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Protected|TK}}&lt;br /&gt;
==War in Afghanistan==&lt;br /&gt;
Could footnotes be added to support the section on the War on Afghanistan?  None are available in the entire section, which breaks Conservapedia Commandment 2: &amp;quot;Always cite and give credit to your sources, even if in the public domain.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::thanks for the heads-up. I added the notes and updated the section.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 00:36, 11 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Media? == &lt;br /&gt;
um, isn't that an opinion phrase? I don't really think there's a scientific basis for such a remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Didn't you hear? This is conservapedia, a place where ignorance coalesces into a gungy goo of people who think their opinions are always right. Anyone who doesn't agree with them is a goshdang Communist! Liberal Media, haha, oh boy that's a larf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Everyone thinks their opinions are right.  That's why they're their opinions.  But you are right, the phrase &amp;quot;liberal media&amp;quot; has become an oft-lampooned indication of conservative paranoia.  The use of it will only serve to make this article sound Stephen Colbert-ish.  Not only do I think the phrase should be deleted; I think it should become the policy of conservapedia to strive to avoid it in the future.  --[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:42, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The [[Liberal-Biased Media]] is the GOP's equivalent of Hillary Clinton's [[Vast Right-wing Conspiracy]], as well as being an all-purpose scapegoat from when the facts turn out to have an anti-Bush agenda.  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 21:49, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Considering this page has been locked, I'd greatly appreciate it if an administrator would remove this clearly biased phrase.--[[User:Ge Ming|Ge Ming]] 15:38, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There IS no Liberal Media! [[User:MrDubya|MrDubya]] 01:27, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Don't you mean &amp;quot;there is no cabal!&amp;quot; ?  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:39, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is well known that the media is overwelmingaly liberal.  This is based on facts.  --[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Based on facts that come from the liberal media itself! Mindblowing, isn't it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Removed the line about Bush executing Saddam. Saddam was executed by the Iraqis under Iraqi law.&lt;br /&gt;
2) Removed the un-encyclopediac comment about John Kerry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why's this page locked?  It's not going to get any better if you don't let people add to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SysOp locked it b/c of rampant vandalism. It's an obivous target for such action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should be unlocked.  All of Bush's good (and bad) deeds will not be known to the world until this page is unlocked.  The point of our site here is to inform the people, and without people interacting and adding information, Conservapedia will die out.  People will go elsewhere to a more democratic environment, and that is not good for this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's just fine.  The Liberals can go to Communistpedia, and the people who want a more REPUBLICAN Wiki can come here!  --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:03, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The liberals would probably  be far more intelligent than the people that frequent this site and go to wikipedia [[User:You're wrong|You&amp;amp;#39;re wrong]] 15:17, 4 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::communists can go to http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page [[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 15:21, 4 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
    :I'd rather Communism if Fascism were the other choice. If you really need to think you're always right to sleep at night, then be my guest my lil' Yank friend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't the first sentence read Name, birth date, political party, etc. and then say only President of the United States?  After all, it's not like there is a Democratic President. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 16:48, 12 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they didn't know bush was republican we don't want them on the site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think by &amp;quot;democratic,&amp;quot; the above poster (who failed to sign his/her comment) was referring to the political idea of democracy rather than the American political party, [[User:Ballon|Ballon]].  And let's try not to deride each other with pejoratives like &amp;quot;commie&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;fascist.&amp;quot;  Anyway, I agree that this page needs to be watched closely.  It is an obvious location for vandalism.  However, very sensible changes (exempli gratia: moving references of George Bush's religious values to a section other than &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot;) have been suggested on this page, and they seem to have been largely ignored.  This article is not passable in its current state.  The sysops must either unlock the page or at the very least make changes that we agree upon on this talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Photo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somebody deleted the body of this page and substituted a photo-- can anybody verify that this photo actually is President Bush?  (Could we maybe print the photo as a thumbnail, and link to the large photo?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe the photo is one of Prince Harry, who has recently taken up active duty in Iraq for the UK, in compliance with the American notion that leaders such as George Washington and the sons of prominent and wealthy people should be involved in and at risk from armed conflict for their country in equal measure to the legions of the poor they send to do their work for them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lacking Substance==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia will go absolutely nowhere if its alternative viewpoints from wikipedia consist purerly in pejorative adjectives and vague speculative references.  Disprove alternative opinions with facts, not derogatory adjectives and slanted phrases.  I would provide examples, but they are more than clear and numerous.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is useless. It is a stub, which is fine, except that this is GWB, not some arcane entry.  This is made more eggregious since this page has undergone many edits, and nobody has decided to actually make it a full article, just back and forth fluff.  I admit that I don't particularly want to put the work in, because I don't care about this entry, I just think that conservapedia needs a credible entry for GWB to be taken seriously.  Compare with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush Wikipedia's entry].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a starting point, how about information that would be useful, that you don't hear about in the liberal media;  Major (and minor) legislative pushes, both successful and not.  Who were his good conservative judicial appointments?  --[[User:Whatter|Whatter]] 01:51, 24 February 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nation building ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's interesting that Bush's stated opposition to nation building isn't modified to show that he has been involved in exactly that in both Afghanistan &amp;amp; Iraq for over half his time in office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd argue he hasn't done much nation-building in either of those places.  :(&lt;br /&gt;
It is weird, though--having a site for Conservative politics and having such dinky articles about President Bush and Iraq is like having a wiki about oceanography and not mentioning water. --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 14:38, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am concerned that the entry reads as if it were written by a gushing fan instead of one who spent significant time researching the President. If the point of conservapedia is to become a credible resource intellectually honest about its bias, we must demand these entries be written at the highest standard possible. This is gossipy drivel; the libs are bound to cackle over it. }-(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since when is Exxon Mobile the bellwether of the US economy?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it bother the reader that while citing Exxon Mobile profits being at record highs, gas prices also are at record highs? This may not be a very good supporting argument as it raises suspicion that our current American way of life is at risk due to the high costs of fuel, which is hurting real estate as more and more people re-urbanize living closer to their workplaces in the city as well as the overall economy as people go out less because they want to conserve fuel. {{unsigned|Tchen}}&lt;br /&gt;
::Does it bother the reader that [[China]] has one fifth of the planets population and only 1% drive cars?  Does it bother the reader that China's economy is growing at 17%?  Does it bother the reader that when 2% of China's population own cars, gas will go from $3 to $6 per gallon?  Does it bother the reader that US politicians in Washington DC can nothing about this?  Does it bother readers that implied solution here is to exterminate the Chinese?  Yes, it does bother this reader.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:28, 24 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Whoever wrote that is probably a Liberal grousing about the fact that Bush has made his corporate benefactors a great deal richer by strip-mining the American economy. --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 18:25, 11 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paul O'Niell (the man who rescued Alcoa) tried to talk economic sense to Bush. Good advice fell on deaf ears. Then Cheney arranged his dismissal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've just visited the Yahoo! article linked to by reference 7, and it says nothing about unemployment being at an all-time low in March, 2007. In fact, the article's assessment of the economy is quite bleak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding “the Clinton years which lead to the lowest point of the stock market in January 2000 AD since the great depression of 1929 AD” it should be noted that the source that is cited states the opposite.    The stock market hit it’s highest in January 2000, before GWB took office.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per the article quoted:  “Oct. 9, 2002, the Dow Jones industrial average, battered by the worst stock market meltdown since the 1929 crash, hit bottom. It closed 4,437 points below its January 2000 all-time high”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major blow to the stock market took place in 2002, about 20 months after Bush took office.   It should be noted that this took place exactly one week after Congress authorized Bush to invade Iraq.  Investors claimed this as a reason for the drop in the stock market.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such frequently found mistakes underlines why Conservapedia is more propaganda than an online encyclopedia and should never be used as a source of information.  The information is at best one sided, and more frequently, blantently false.   The truth does not have a conservative or liberal slant.  There seems to be a trend, however, in the last 12 or so years of American political media to baselessly proclaim an extream slant in media.  Just because the reader does not like the truth does not mean that the carrier is slanted.   &lt;br /&gt;
Artical&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;As we all know, the facts have an anti-Bush agenda.&amp;quot; -- Steven Colbert. (Or, to be more accurate, it looks like Bush has an anti-facts agenda. :( --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:32, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Skull and Bones Club ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MountainDew, why did you take that part out?  It's a matter of public record (and any number of jokes) that Bush and Kerry are in the same club.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The guy who put that in there was a known vandal, so I was just reversing all his edits at once. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locked Page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should we really lock a page with so many typos? [[User:Czolgolz|Miguel_Cervantes]] 09:13, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can understand why the page is locked, obviously people will target Bush, but the page needs LOTS of improvement, not just typos, but the Economy section is laughable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Indeed. No mention of the 8 trillion (is it 9 now) debt? [[User:GofG | GofG]] [[Special:Contributions/GofG|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;|&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] [[User talk:GofG | Talk]] 20:07, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Debt only matters if you ever intend to pay it off.  --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:29, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::not true, it also matters if you want to get lent more money, and it is also a matter of principal-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:38, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Though the liberal media continues to disparage Bush's handling of the economy, they often neglect to report the many aspects of the economy that Bush has improved. For example, during his term Exxon Mobile has posted the largest profit of any company in a signle year, and executive salaries have greatly increased as well [5]. This is due to changes in the stock market that lead to a record high in 2006, recovering from the Clinton years which lead to the lowest point of the stock market in January 2000 AD since the great depression of 1929 AD, and &amp;quot;Companies are churning out double-digit profit growth&amp;quot; currently.[6] Even the working class is benefiting from the Bush economy, as unemployment hits an all time low in March 2007.[7] Bush worked with Democrats to raise the minimum wage to a more livable level.[8]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The information in this section appears to have either been written by a liberal who was interested in subtly undermining the informative authority of this particular entry (and possibly Conservapedia in general), or by someone who is perhaps good-intentioned but very badly informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, using Exxon-Mobil and executive salary increases as an indication of how much Bush has done for the economy is actually quite bad press for him.  The majority of Americans are not voting to line the pockets of the people at the very top.  They prefer to have their own pockets lined, even if it is just in small ways, like in tax cuts for the middle class.  Suggesting that Bush has done good for our economy as evidenced by the economic boon of the elite would seem to give credit to Bush's detractors who have accused him of being concerned only with his &amp;quot;oil buddies&amp;quot; and largest contributors.  Let's not add more wood to that fire, please.  That's how we lost the mid-terms - shooting ourselves in the foot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second point, please, whoever has write permissions, clean up the spelling errors at the very least (Exxon-Mobile, signle - in this section)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third, someone else cited the error in referencing January 2000 as the lowest point of the stock market.  In addition to their points (including the quote from the article that was supposedly used as reference for that inaccurate &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;), I think it's important to clarify that while the market has never dropped as low as it did following the crash of 1929, the *percentage* drop could again be as great as it was in 1929.  In 1929 the percentage drop was 23%.  In 1987, the crash of October caused a dip of 22.7%.  The actual numbers of 1929 were in the 200-400 range, whereas the Dow Jones is over 12,000 right now.  If, in the modern era, the DJIA ever dropped as low as it did in 1929, i.e., down ot the 200-400 range, then we may as well prepare for Armageddon, because the state of the world would probably be *that* bad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fourth, is it necessary to place A.D. after every year, even when it is obvious that the referenced year is In the Year of Our Lord (i.e. Anno Domini)?  It seems unnecessary, and certainly cumbersome to have A.D. following years that are obviously referring to U.S. political events.  Our conservative audience is not so dumb as to be confused about whether the Clinton administration of the year 2000 is in reference to 2000 years before or 2000 years after the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ.  Mostly I agree that we should not be concerned about the stereotypes our liberal brothers and sisters have placed upon us, but when possible for us to avoid looking stupid and playing into the stereotypes the liberals have assigned to us, I think we ought do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fifth, the unemployment rate is dropping for March 2007, and this is wonderful and it speaks well of Bush's handling of the economy.  It is not the lowest rate of all time, however.  I don't feel compelled to provide sources here, because this information is readily available in under 2 minutes of searching for &amp;quot;U.S.&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unemployment rate&amp;quot; on any search engine of your choosing.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics, for example, can tell you that the lowest unemployment rate of the last 60 years was in 1953 at just under 3%.  It's an easy fact to check, and a ridiculous error to lock into an entry about our President.  There are true pieces of information about President Bush that make him worthy of admiration.  There is no need to attempt to bolster his image with false information.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And finally, let's please be honest about the minimum wage situation.  The decision to raise the minimum wage is controversial among conservatives, and I am  having difficulty finding a reliable source that suggests Bush supports, in isolation, the idea of raising the minimum wage (i.e. without tax-cuts for small-businesses also tacked on as a proviso).  In terms of economic growth, raising the minimum wage may not be helpful, and everything I have read about President Bush seems to indicate that he knows that.  So any suggestion that his personal opinion is that the minimum wage should be raised is questionable.  Aside from his personal opinion, in his professional capacity, he most certainly hasn't been placed in a position of &amp;quot;working with the Democrats to raise the minimum wage to a livable level.&amp;quot;  The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 has passed in both the House and the Senate, but it has not yet been presented to our President to be signed into law, because it is pending committee review.  Additionally, crediting Bush with &amp;quot;working with Democrats&amp;quot; on this is erroneous.  Bush has reached across partisan lines on many occasions, but this particular bill was brought on entirely by Democratic feather-ruffling during their &amp;quot;First 100-Hours&amp;quot; campaign.  It was an attempt by the Dems to make a garish display of their new &amp;quot;authority,&amp;quot; having gained the majority in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For starters, what powers do the executive branch have over economics? --[[User:JamesLipton|JamesLipton]] 22:29, 19 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My personal political philosophies aside, I completely agree that Exxon-Mobile is probably the worst company that could have been chosen to show support for Bush's economic policies. This is an encyclopedia for conservatives, but if it's going to stand up to the criticisms of the liberal community and not be a major source of embarrassment for conservatives as a whole, it must hold itself to a higher level of political awareness. Whether one believes Exxon-Mobile's booming business is proof the economy is in great shape or not, the majority of those who read this (including conservatives) will fall out of their chairs when they read that. I guarantee you, liberal citizens all across America will copy and paste the paragraph into their blogs for their readers to laugh at.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This is probably the most important article on conservapedia.  It HAS to be beyond reproof. --[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:42, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: When is this going to be fixed? The &amp;quot;lowest unemployment rate in history&amp;quot; is not true, it was far lower in the 60s, and lower during the later years of the Clinton administrator. The claim isn't even supported by the reference, which claims &amp;quot;the lowest in five years&amp;quot;, which I suppose is true enough. Concise and fact based indeed. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 16:02, 6 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ridiculous claim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He is now working tirelessly to end the Iraqi insurgency and stabilize the region.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eh, ok? Source? A silly attempt to try to create some kind of sympathy for the man. It's like saying &amp;quot;Jesus was very kind.&amp;quot; in his entry. It has got nothing to do with facts and people should be given facts on this site and then determine for themselves if Jesus was kind and if GWB is working tirelessly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed.  Authors establish bias effectively by utilizing fact selectivity and through awareness of the perspective from which those facts are related.  Ineffective authors establish bias by simply writing their opinions.  An openly biased article is not the same thing as an opinion column.  An encyclopedia does not need to allow itself to be tainted with opinions in order to be biased.  This is supported by conservapedia itself in its article &amp;quot;Examples of Bias in Wikipedia.&amp;quot;  (Wikipedia, however biased it may or may not be, never allows anything close to the candid opinions of its editors to pollute articles.)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:29, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Hard Work&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George W Bush has never done a day's hard work in his lifetime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh wait, he was having trouble reading his children's book when he heard about 9/11. Dang, forgot about that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sarcasm and exaggeration are the didactic devices of idiots.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 17:31, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: and just insulting people to disprove their point is also idiotic. and sarcasm isn't idiotic at all its actually quite clever-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:41, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ridicolous Article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This whole article is a joke, right?  How can you put this out as fact when it has been debunked so many times?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Better Picture==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Busio.jpeg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree, that is a much better picture.  It's the same one used on wikipedia, but it's public domain.  I'd use it, but get a higher resolution copy of the image at http://www.defenselink.mil/DODCMSShare/NewsPhoto/2003-02/030114-O-0000D-001.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:49, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
This article does not just neglect important information, but also gives incorrect facts. Al Gore won the popular vote in the 200 election. Also, this I laugh out loud that people are actually believing this conservopedia crap.&lt;br /&gt;
:writing unsigned comments is quite annoying, although i agree about the conservapedia point (tip there was no 200 election in america)-[[User:Greenmeanie|Greenmeanie]] 22:42, 21 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requested edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The article needs to have &amp;lt;tt style=&amp;quot;background-color:#bfb&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{DEFAULTSORT:Bush, George W.}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tt&amp;gt; added just above the categories at the bottom, so its category sortkey is set properly.  Thanks.  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 17:02, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please add &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Category:Military Commanders]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:He is after all our [[Commander in Chief]] leading the hugely successful war against [[terrorism]] in [[Iraq]] and elswhere.&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.&amp;quot; (Isaiah 55:4)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:JC|JC]] 10:26, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Hugely successful?&amp;quot;  I missed the announcement that they'd caught Osama Bin Laden. --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:56, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Poor addition to a poor article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You neglected to mention that Bush lost the popular vote in 2000 by a half-million votes. Your refusal to address it is just plain sad. Jesus hates liars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The line, &amp;quot;Many people feel that George W. Bush's faith is sincere and profound. The Faith of George W. Bush, a non-political book by author Stephen Strang, made the New York Times best-sellers list&amp;quot; should be quickly deleted from this article.  I know wikipedia doesn't allow such B.S. qualifiers as &amp;quot;many people feel,&amp;quot; and neither should conservapedia if it's going to be taken seriously.  Just state that he's a Christian.  How profound his Christian-ness is is both irrelevant and unquantifiable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least move it out of the &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot; section of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't agree with the first paragraph by Mechrobioticon, but I do agree with the second paragraph. I think that faith statement should be moved from the &amp;quot;Foreign Policy&amp;quot; section to a new &amp;quot;Faith&amp;quot; section. There is tons of material from the book ''God and George W. Bush''. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:30, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OK, maybe requesting that the reference be completely omitted is a little harsh to ask of a conservative encyclopedia, but I still stand by my statement that it needs to be drastically reworded.  &amp;quot;Many people feel&amp;quot; is simply a phrase that should never be used in scholarly writing.  It's an obvious euphemism for &amp;quot;I feel,&amp;quot; and a bad attempt to cover up personal bias.  It makes the article appear very amateurish and will become a point of ridicule for knowledgeable readers.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 14:28, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Who cares how 'sincere' he is? [[Marshall Applewhite]] was 'sincere', but that didn't stop him from being lethally deluded. Or are we hoping the [[Great Pumpkin]] will visit Bush this Halloween? --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 15:51, 1 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree that how &amp;quot;profound&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;sincere&amp;quot; one's faith in something is is a poor indicator of one's character (not to mention highly arbitrary and impossible to confirm), but this isn't my encyclopedia.  It's conservapedia.  The ideas of the secular humanist must yield to the consensus of the conservative majority.  I think that even bearing this fact, however, that there is a good case to be made for the removal of the sentences in question on the basis that they are, in fact, an opinion that can't be indisputably confirmed.  But again, that's not my place to decide, and if the conservative editors and sysops of conservapedia say &amp;quot;it stays,&amp;quot; then it stays.  Secularists should always remember that we are here to advise and help, not to ridicule and lampoon.&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 16:54, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm][http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No Information==&lt;br /&gt;
Period. This isn't an encyclopedia entry, this is more like the bio somebody writes for the program to their high school musical. Could it be more bland? Ish. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 16:02, 24 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nothing about his childhood, his college, or his time as Texas governor.  And there never will be.  Conservapedia doesn't trust their editors to write about this icon.  (They might mention, for instance, his drunk driving arrest or allegations of cocaine use). [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Someone tell me when this article is fixed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that this article is hopeless.  It's not my opinion that George W. Bush's &amp;quot;sincere and profound faith in God&amp;quot; doesn't belong in the foreign policy section of this article.  It's a demonstrable fact.  Someone tell me what qualifies his religion as a formal written policy by which America's interactions with other countries are deliberated, and I will shut up.  The addition is also poorly written, vague, unscholarly, conjectural, impossible to confirm, and dripping with bias and ethnocentrism, but I'll ignore that.  Just move it.  Please just move it.  If this ever happens, please email me at happyhealey@gmail.com, and will resume contributing to Conservapedia.  It's ludicrous for a wiki project to be unable to correct its own typographical errors. It's been a month.  A whole month.  If this were Wikipedia it would have been corrected in less than five minutes.  This is, without exaggeration, pitiful.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 23:24, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, at least you changed the picture.  Good to know the article isn't completely stagnant.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Mechrobioticon|Mechrobioticon]] 23:32, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How can I edit this article? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some spelling mistakes (Exxon Mobil not Exxon Mobile) and grammar that need correcting but I can't get on to fix it. [[User:Erasmus|Erasmus]] 11:19, 1 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone add &amp;quot;Category:Christian warriors&amp;quot; which I created specifically for Dubya?[[User:Muschifresser|Muschifresser]] 08:23, 3 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Protected articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protected articles infringe on the right to free speech. I am greatly opposed to this policy. Bush happens to be one of my favorite people and you are depriving the fact that I can't contribute to this article is appalling. I know you are worried about vandals, but you are just punishing the innocent. The world is being deprived of my great knowledge, these are sad times.--[[User:BushRules12|BushRules12]] 23:22, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Eavesdropping program ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it becomes possible to edit this article again, something should be added about the NSA eavesdropping program.  As today's New York Times indicates, this program is extremely controversial even among conservatives and almost led to the resignations of Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI Director Mueller.--[[User:Amyz]] 10:04, May 16, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is one sad page... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
....And since it's locked, only the syspos (who have enough to do as it is) can DO anything with it.  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 02:37, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I quite agree, Gulik3.  Me, for instance, I have been reading your many posts, all seeming to be unhappy ones.  I hope you will straighten us out with good, solid examples of article production so that we may learn from you!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 05:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That's be a good trick on my part, seeing how everything worth editing is locked. --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 23:53, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There actually is a real simple way around that: try, for the first time in known history, to actually write an article according to WP's NPOV.  It would actually work here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:15, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Wikipedia's''' NPOV?  The onbe that's &amp;quot;Six times more Liberal than America&amp;quot;?  That NPOV?  I can try... --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 00:29, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yep. Since WP does not enforce its only policies, perhaps we can have the first ever NPOV article written here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:42, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wait, wait. So Wikipedia has &amp;quot;a horrible anti-liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Anti American&amp;quot; bias, and you follow its rules on NPOV? [[User:NaglfarorGleipnir|NaglfarorGleipnir]] 18:58, 28 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== template ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this article should use a template similar to the others in Presidents of the United States category.. see [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] for example.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 13:03, 24 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public Criticisms? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't Bush's page have a public criticisms page as suggested in the manual of style? It is an issue significant to his presidency. And what about his handling of 9-11? And why does the economic section sound sarcastic with respect tp executive salaries. This article needs a lot of help. [[User:Pokowpane|Pokowpane]] 18:00, 31 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What? You think you can do it?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:28, 31 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page should have a criticism title like those for other President's. I don't think it has much credibility unless it does. [[User:Priestspez|Priestspez]] 10:24, 18 June 2007&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely. Unless it's Conservapedia policy not to report on criticism of presidents. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Comment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush had an alcohol problem until 1986, as he has openly admitted in the past. The severity of this problem remains open to doubt. Comment by User: Darkmind1970  (08:23, 4 January 2008)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Threats ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can't have a threats section. Otherwise, every liberal/communist would be on it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic Policy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To write that Bush worked with the Democrats to raise the minimum wage is a little disingenuous.  The minimum wage increase was a platform of the 2006 Democrats.  While Bush didn't specifically issue a veto threat, as per the article referenced, the White House wanted tax breaks for small businesses to offset the cost to those businesses.  I think the current revision is a better recount of the minimum wage increase.  It credits both Democrats, as it was their issue, as well as Bush, who signed the provision after he got what he wanted in the bill.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not trying to vandalize, merely provide more context to the actions.--[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 12:22, 17 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, &amp;quot;worked with&amp;quot; is the operative phrase. In general, Republicans oppose increases in the [[minimum wage]], on the grounds that it hurts [[inner city]] youth - making it harder for them to get [[entry-level]] jobs. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, 17 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Poll #'s Are Wrong ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His most recent poll rating, according to ARG on 2/20/08, is 19%! http://americanresearchgroup.com/economy/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
user:armstongandmiller says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i heard that his approval rating dropped below that of broccoli&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Faith==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most people feel his faith is sincere and profound&amp;quot;.  Evidence please?  Polls showing this to be true?  This is clearly the writer's personal belief and not an encyclopedic fact.  Please remove this sentence. {{unsigned|StephenS}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Absolutely. Without saying who it is that feels this, and quoting some reference to back it up, this is just puffery. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:33, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cats==&lt;br /&gt;
Please add this article to [[:Category:Texas]] and [[:Category:United States Governors]] --&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;margin-top: -3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; [[User:Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;gray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(contributions)&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] [[User_talk:Deborah|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;darkslategray&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(talk)&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; 16:25, 5 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==biased reports==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;mostly due to biased media reports&amp;quot;. This statement about the President's popularity clearly reflects the writer's opinion. Do we have a reference to back it up? If not, why is it here? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 13:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Click the wikilink on the word &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot; in the section.  Also check out [[media bias]].  [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:54, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Read those. Nothing there indicates that Bush's falling polls are the fault of liberal media. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:29, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Daphnea has a point, I think the American populace is more upset that gas prices are skyrocketing while we have two oilmen in the Whitehouse and Americans are dying overseas for oil. I don't see a media bias in this, or if there is, how this bias isn't reflective of reality (I mean, 4.34?! a gallon)--[[User:MarkS|MarkS]] 16:32, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2000 election controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why is there no mention at all of the 2000 Florida vote controversy? Surely we can't ignore what happened there? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 13:30, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is an article on the [[United_States_presidential_election%2C_2000|2000 election]] where such material would be more appropriate. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:57, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Perhaps a link to that in the first paragraph where the 2000 election is mentioned would be helpful for readers. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:03, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 18:46, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
No mention of anything before governorship? No mention of National Guard? What exactly are we allowed to write in this article? [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 16:49, 23 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Write up what you would like added and post it here. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:19, 24 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Legacy?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of Bush's economic legacy is no longer valid, and leaves out any mention of the record deficits run up during his administration.  I'm willing to put together an objective, properly referenced record of the positive and negative impact this administration has had on the US economy, if someone will pledge to unlock and post it so it's not a wast of time. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 11:13, 28 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems like this would be a good time to revise the &amp;quot;Economic Legacy&amp;quot; section.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 12:38, 9 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:This page needs to be unlocked so this section can be edited - it's so out of date it hurts the usefulness of this site for students looking to use it as a reference. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:20, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I want to remind you not to use word hyperbole to make an unwarranted point.  As a percent of GDP, the deficits aren't even close to being &amp;quot;records&amp;quot;.  I hope that any alterations you make will accurately reflect this and treat it in a balanced way. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:33, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks, and I'll be careful to be fair.  My intention is to divide the Bush economic legacy into three phases - one for his first administration, one for the first half of his second administration (2005-06), and the third covering 2007-08.  This way he can be acknowledged for areas where progress was both made and lost.  I'll also cite statistics from the government instead of the media for objectivity.  If the page gets hit by vandalism and needs to be locked, I'll post my suggested edits here and you can apply them. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:58, 23 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikilinks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone add wikilinks to &amp;quot;Laura Bush&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;United Methodist&amp;quot; in the infobox please? Thank you. '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, 28 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Plg6067's edit ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must say that I found his edit very good: up to the point, concise, and... right. Does anyone have any proof on the contrary? --[[User:LadaNiva|LadaNiva]] 16:18, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Try making some serious edits. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:23, 13 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unscourced==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Liberals have accused him of having a barbaric foreign policy, but actually Bill Clinton invaded more countries than Pres. Bush.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a good and valid point, but it needs references. Please cite a scource for both things. It'd be nice if you could get some quotes from more prominent liberals.--[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 15:36, 11 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Still President?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Still President?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page still reads as though he is the current president. E.g. it says &amp;quot;Serving as president since 2001&amp;quot; and also lines like &amp;quot;when he leaves office&amp;quot;. Just a thought. [[User:JohnKite|JohnKite]] 11:19, 28 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Zogby poll referenced should have link changed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link to the document on the poll should be changed to be a link to the poll itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.zogby.com/search/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1588&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As the President's job approval ratings hit a new record low, job performance ratings for Congress have again fallen to their previous record-low of 9% it slipped to in August. The Democratically-controlled Congress earns positive ratings from 13% of Democrats, a drop from 18% who said the same in September. Republican approval has also fallen to 6% from 10% who said the same last month, while Congressional job approval ratings from political independents held steady at 10%.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Faith and the use of &amp;quot;Immoral&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of the phrase &amp;quot;immoral embryonic stem cell research.&amp;quot; is quite clearly opinion and since there is no source for the the whole line, it should be deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vice President link ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The redirect [[Vice President]] was recently deleted. I fixed all the other links in actual articles, but can't get this one.  Can an admin change it to [[Vice President of the United States of America|Vice President]]?  {{unsigned|MarkGall}} -- 11:14, 7 July 2009 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Mark, I have. Sorry for this obvious oversight I missed!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:24, 7 July 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Easy Re-election ==&lt;br /&gt;
I was wondering what constituted &amp;quot;easy&amp;quot; in terms of election results.  I think, one, easy is a subjective and qualitative term.  Also, I believe that the closeness of the election would lend the term &amp;quot;narrow.&amp;quot;  I feel that this would even be a better, albeit more honest, descriptor in light of the fact that the liberals tried so hard to suppress a re-election.  --[[User:BLJones|BLJones]] 22:44, 18 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Albeit&amp;quot;?  I assume you mean &amp;quot;and even&amp;quot;, unless you're suggesting the article is ''intentionally'' misleading? [[User:FREConservative|FREConservative]] 19:07, 19 September 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spelling mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
Early Life -- First line  &amp;quot;were he attended Yale&amp;quot;  I believe it should be WHERE not WERE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Good catch.  Got it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:51, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Awkward sentence structure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He reformed K12 education with a major new program &amp;quot;No Child Left Behind,&amp;quot; and '''forced through Congress''' a series of major tax cuts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could someone fix this? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 19:07, 31 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Zinn&amp;diff=749925</id>
		<title>Howard Zinn</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Zinn&amp;diff=749925"/>
		<updated>2010-01-28T01:57:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Howard Zinn]] (August 24, 1922 – January 27, 2010) was an [[American]] historian, most famous for his book, ''[[A People's History of the United States]]''.  The book has sold over a million copies and gives a far-left interpretation of political history. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It does not incorporate the newer theories of history, but provides an energetic heavy-handed attack on conservatives, business, and white men.  His book is stuck in 1950, methodologically, and does not appreciate the scholarship of the last 4 decades in the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; intellectual, political, economic, diplomatic, military, cultural or social history. His &amp;quot;newest&amp;quot; ideas are that the white male &amp;quot;working class&amp;quot; -- as well as blacks, Indians, and women -- are victims of capitalism, a stock notion of 1930s [[Socialism|socialist]] philosophy regarding workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael Kazin, Professor in the Department of History at Georgetown University states that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;A People's History is bad history, albeit gilded with virtuous intentions. Zinn reduces the past to a Manichean fable&amp;quot;, whose failure to adequately explain why most Americans accepted the legitimacy of the capitalist republic &amp;quot;is grounded in a premise better suited to a conspiracy-monger's Web site than to a work of scholarship.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hnn.us/articles/4370.html Michael Kazin, &amp;quot;Howard Zinn's Disappointing History of the United States&amp;quot;,] History News Network, 3-30-04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historian and author John Fea of Messiah College states that,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Zinn writes well and is quite inspiring, but his book is bad history. In fact, I would not even call it history. A People's History of the United States is a political tract that uses the past to promote a presentist agenda...Zinn's book violates virtually every rule of good historical thinking.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.philipvickersfithian.com/search/label/Howard%20Zinn Howard Zinn vs. David Barton]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Historians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Zinn, Howard}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Private_Eye&amp;diff=749632</id>
		<title>Private Eye</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Private_Eye&amp;diff=749632"/>
		<updated>2010-01-27T15:49:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Private Eye''''' is a [[British]] satirical fortnightly magazine, founded in 1961 and currently edited by Ian Hislop. Its contents are a mixture of spoof news items, straight reporting and investigative journalism, cartoons, and an esoteric range of classified advertisements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.private-eye.co.uk/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It has a particular penchant for gossip about media and political figures. It has no overt political line, being to content to mock all British political parties for careerism and hypocrisy. The comedian Peter Cook was involved in the creation and running of Private Eye until his death, regularly contributing to columns and helping fund the large overheads which the publication and regular legal activity surrounding it incurred. The magazine uses a number of running gags; one of the most frequently employed, where the writers of an item run out of steam, is to break off by directing readers to a non-existent page, and this has the (contd. p94)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Magazines]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Guy&amp;diff=746933</id>
		<title>Family Guy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Family_Guy&amp;diff=746933"/>
		<updated>2010-01-21T16:57:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Editor obviously failed to realise that that was the joke. Putting it in the article is pointless, particularly when there are things like the program's criticism of Christianity to talk about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Family Guy''''' is an animated television program created by [[Seth MacFarlane]] and shown on the Fox television network.  It documents the life of &amp;quot;the Griffins,&amp;quot; a fictional family who live in Quahog, [[Rhode Island]]. The show, like ''[[The Simpsons]]'' and other cartoon shows on television, explores&amp;amp;mdash;from an extremely [[liberal]] angle&amp;amp;mdash;cultural and political themes that are important in the world today, as well as taking humorous approaches to past and present television shows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/main.asp Parents' Television Council]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It takes an unfavorable view of creationists, focusing instead on the theory of evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/us/newsletters/0107lead.asp Answers in Genesis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Family Guy'' is known for its constant use of rude and profane speech, violent and crude humor, and [[liberal deceit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One episode of ''Family Guy'' makes a crude attempt to connect the McCain-Palin ticket to Nazis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIWTB8POnkg ''Family Guy'' on YouTube]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Television Shows]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=744797</id>
		<title>Talk:Donoghue v. Stevenson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=744797"/>
		<updated>2010-01-14T18:29:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Title change suggestion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if this is the wrong place to talk about it, I'm quite new here. In English legal tradition, cases are names (x) v (y), and not (x) v. (y); the current title is the most appropriate name for the case. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 14:13, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, I see; what about the capitalization of &amp;quot;stevenson?&amp;quot; [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 14:16, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh yeah, sorry, that should be capitalised. My bad. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 13:29, 14 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744612</id>
		<title>Talk:Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744612"/>
		<updated>2010-01-14T01:58:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: /* Just right */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Christianity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I find the statement on Christianity to be rather inaccurate. While I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, that is no excuse for fallacies. Many metalheads and musicians are openly Christian, such as Dave Mustaine and Dave Ellefson of Megadeth, Jack Owen, and Tom Araya of Slayer. I believe a more accurate statement would be that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent in extreme metal music. There is also a strong Christian Metal Subgenre, see bands such as As I Lay Dying, Believer, and Stryper.  I shall change the statements to be more accurate and less condemning. [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 16:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't even say that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent at all.  I listen to metal music, and sure some of it is about death and killing and things like that, but I wouldn't say it's Anti-Christian.  Some metal music includes themes that are similar to many popular songs of other genres, just in a different form. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 16:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's primarily what I hoped to get across, I suppose the term &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; is more accurate. I consider the music to show, when it discusses Satan, a Christian perception of the being. What I meant to say was that the only genre, to my knowledge, that contains overtly anti-Christian themes would be death metal or black metal, and even there it is somewhat rare. I think many mainstream Christians misconstrue the disrespect for organized religion (i.e, a church, pastors, or priests.) for being Anti-Christian. They are not one in the same, as to not believe in church is not the same as not believing in god. I'll change it to be more accurate.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a metal fan (who's wearing a Dream Theater shirt right now), I think that the Satan reference was ridiculous. I took it right out. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:08, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed, i thought of it as inappropriate as well, but since it referenced it as the opinions of conservatives, I left it. Dream Theater! Another openly Christian metal band (though not in the Christian metal genre). I have a few more changes to make on the article, you left a slight typo! I forgive you! [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:13, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, creating this article in the way I did was almost a joke; this is indeed a conservative encyclopedia -- so I used those particular statements to be, in a way, on the extreme of what some people might think. Don't take it the wrong way.  Plus, the username I chose might have tipped people off: I really don't know much in the way of creating encyclopedia articles, so I left things vague and unopinionated (my opinions, anyway).  I am actually a metal fan who laughed at the article, not believing in what I was typing.  Then again, some of the more extreme Black metal bands do reference Satan in non-metaphorical terms.  But most of those bands are without actual substance and therefore suck. [[User:N00b|N00b]] 09:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, and I know only two people that worship the devil, as a god, in metal music of any form: Glen Benton, and Oystein Aarseth (Aka Euronymous), both extremists not to be considered the standard of a heavy-metaller.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 17:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to prove that anyone is actually &amp;quot;worshiping Satan&amp;quot;. Let's not fall into that trap. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Link==&lt;br /&gt;
Is that parody..? Linking to a cliched, comedic-parody of a heavy metal band in order to illustrate the article? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just about to say the same thing. Spinal tap was a fictionalized parody of a metal band. (And a darn good band, if I do say so myself, and I do). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The movie [[Spinal Tap]] was a comedy; I'd like to write about its director, who made a few similar movies like [[A Mighty Wind]] (satirizing folk music performers). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob Reiner directed &amp;quot;This Is Spinal Tap&amp;quot;,  but it was Christopher Guest who directed &amp;quot;A Mighty Wind&amp;quot;. Guest wrote/co-wrote both of them though. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are devilishly clever, my friend! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Guest is quite an interesting subject for a bio, even without touching on his works - Jewish American British nobleman... Quite a mix. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spirituality and etiquette==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's tread carefully while describing the delicate issue of [[spirituality]] of metal bands. Some have exploited satanic imagery, to be sure, but their proportion might be less than 99%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass reverts aren't good form. Just change one section at a time, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As someone who is fairly knowledgable about heavy metal, I actually agree with Walker in that I've never heard the term Satan's Fire Metal. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:27, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State of the Article==&lt;br /&gt;
In it's current condition this article is a joke to anyone who knows anything about metal. 99.9 percent of bands that have pyrotechnics are not trying to recreate hell. Also &amp;quot;the horns&amp;quot; are more often just a sign for metal and unity amongst metalheads and are not done to look like satan or praise satan. It isn't even limited to metal you will see it at even country and boy band shows or how about a Texas Longhorns football game? The song meanings are ridiculous, Go To Hell is about someone that is damned to hell, it is not promoting satanism. It was written for the Bill and Teds Bogus Journey movie where the charecters go to hell. Take no prisioners is about military warfare. The song references Normandy and Panzers so it was probably inspired by D-Day, it is not promoting violence anymore than Saving Private Ryan. Suicide Sollution is about how abusing drugs and alcohol to solve your problems is a &amp;quot;suicide&amp;quot; sollution. Fade to Black is about losing the will to carry on, and was inspired by the bands equipment being stolen, it can be interpreted as a suicide song but even then how is it glamorized? Also why was the referenced content about Christians in non Christian bands removed? All the unreferenced stuff on this page should be removed before that was.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 13:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal strikes me as utterly proposterous. Just like the idea of African Klu Klux Klan members or Jewish Nazis is utterly proposterous. Quit trying to make Heavy Metal music into something that it is not. You've made various attempts to censor the material here or downplay Metal's dangerous nature, but it's not going to work. Maybe you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. Your attempts to disassociate Metal with Satanism are pathetic. That's like saying you're a Ku Klux Klan member but you're not into the whole discrimination thing.. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jose calm down. Metal is a style of music, not a way of thinking. There is absolutely no contridiction with someone using a certain style of music to promote ''any'' message -- good ''or'' bad. You should check out some Christian metal. A youth Christian musical concert (Ichthus) often features metal bands -- one of their tents is dedicated entirely towards &amp;quot;heavier&amp;quot; music. I also personally know the manager of a Christian metal band. He is old friends with my youth pastor at church and I've done some work with him. He is an intense Christian and his music is... well, rather intense. So please take a chill pill and open your mind to other possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
::Think about it this way: even if metal ''were'' &amp;quot;satanist--dominated&amp;quot; (which I don't think it is), wouldn't that therefore be the best place for a Christian band? Jesus hanged out with prostitutes and beggars, remember. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's even Christian rap, which uses the rapid-fire half-spoken style of [[hip hop]] to convey the pro-woman, anti-violence message of Jesus and salvation. My favorite &amp;quot;heavenly metal&amp;quot; group is [[The Ancestors]]. And there's always [[Stryper]] (&amp;quot;by his stripes we were healed&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I do not agree with what any of you have posted. However, perhaps I shall listen to some of this &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal and &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; rap. There might be a small chance that I am wrong. I was wrong about Spinal tap. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This music.. [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huod7HJe4BM]] It's disgusting. I'm going to have to disagree with all those who support &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal. This just doesn't sound very Christian to me.. First of all, it's too loud and violent sounding and the screaming sounds very demonic. Even if there are pro-Christian lyrics in the songs it's impossible to tell because the screaming is incomprehensible. The choice of intervals strikes me as interesting.. Very evil sounding. Please listen and tell me what you think.. I really don't get it. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It obviously wasn't designed with you in mind. I don't hear anything &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;, except that you automatically associate the genre with evil, which is a circular argument. I don't hear any &amp;quot;evil-sounding intervals&amp;quot; either. Try looking up some lyrics before you base Christianity on how a group decides to play the guitar. Here's one called [http://lyrics.christiansunite.com/lyrics_1134_7.shtml If I Die] by Stryper. (&amp;quot;Living was hard /And loneliness easily justified / Oh, then I found You / Ooh, I suddenly knew / What I wanted to do was to make You satisfied / And not to die for selfish pleasure / But to live with You by my side&amp;quot;). It's not as heavy musically (here's a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFOsQd34qE Youtube vid] -- ignore the visuals though), but still considered &amp;quot;metal&amp;quot; I would think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I did some searching, and here's the lyrics from one of the songs in the video you found [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734]. Check out the description at the bottom: &amp;quot;True hope should only be placed in Christ, and no man. Christ will never fail you...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This isn't your mom's Christian music! But that doesn't make it wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would this qualify as metal? I could actually see myself listening to something like this. It's melodic, and the singing is clean and clear. Thanks.. This is inspiring. But I don't think it's heavy metal. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's why I found the other lyrics for you. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734 These] are lyrics from that Youtube video you disagreed with. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Jose all of what you are saying is your own personal opinion. How is it to loud? Any music can be to loud, if that is a problem turn the volume down. Different people have different tastes, just because you don't like a style of music doesn't make it &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;. Besides the bible instructs us to &amp;quot;Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully with a loud noise&amp;quot; (Psalm 33:3). God is infinitely bigger than your music tastes. Also many styles of metal have very easily comprehensable lyrics and so what if they aren't comprehensible? Does that make it wrong? If you don't like it thats fine, but it doesn't give you the right to try and demonize something just because it doesn't appeal to your personal tastes.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:14, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt Jesus would have &amp;quot;rocked out&amp;quot; to this garbage. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I think if you feel that the music is &amp;quot;garbage&amp;quot; then we should find someone with a more neutral attitude to edit it, no? I'm not saying you shouldn't edit, but I would think hard about if you are the appropriate one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you know God's musical tastes?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::God is absolutely Holy, therefore he wouldn't indulge in music with satanic connotation. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could you be a little more specific as to what you mean by &amp;quot;satanic connotation&amp;quot;.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:39, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A lot of heavy metal is inspired by Satan and the occult. This definitely would not cater to God's taste. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jesus hanged (hung? I never get that right) out with sinners, beggars and prostitutes. If this music really is as evil as you say, shouldn't Christians get in there to converted these supposed evildoers? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many books are inspired by Satan and the occult, does that mean all books are against God?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:49, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus would have discouraged the prostitutes from whoring themselves and they would have discouraged these bands from playing the music they are playing. He wouldn't encourage more Christians to become prostitutes or play heavy metal. A certain category of books are inspired by satan and the occult and all within that category are against god, just like how heavy metal is a certain genre of music which is against god. Not all music is against god. True heavy metal is. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I guess we know that these artists aren't Jesus himself then. It doesn't mean they aren't Christian, however. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jesus hung out with drunks and whores, I guess, him being so tolerant and all. But he also is famous for telling the adulterous woman to &amp;quot;go and sin no more&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My impression of metal is that it invokes a lot of nasty symbols: devils, long tongues, gloomy or morbid lyrics, etc. Within the genre I'm sure there are a handful of Christian groups like [[Stryper]] (which I wrote, hint hint!) who I suppose decided to &amp;quot;move into the neighborhood&amp;quot; and seek converts among metalheads. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
How does linking to lyrics prove the song is &amp;quot;promoting&amp;quot; satanism.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Funny the Fade to Black reference actually say the opposite of what is stated in the article.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly you and ''Jose'' disagree on many aspects of this genre of music. I suggest you '''add''' everything you want, while letting him do the same. I'll check back from time to time and see if I can integrate your work and his. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stop==&lt;br /&gt;
The article has seen plenty of edits going on, with no real improvement to its state. I can see both sides of the argument, but unless Walker and Jose83 can start to learn to work together, then we're just going to end up with a bigger pile of cowcake than when we started. The article is dire right now, and frankly the best thing is for you two to step away from it for a day and work out what you want to say in it, get together your references, then we'll take it from there. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:40, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was following Ed Poor's instruction from above. I wasn't changing his edits.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:41, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not apportioning any kind of blame. And Ed's advice is good, excepting for the fact that the article is now a scab to both of you and you can't resist picking it. Leave it until tomorrow, it will be unlocked in about 12 hours, and we can try to put together a '''coherent''' article presenting the facts as we know them, instead of a point/counterpoint list of grievances. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::==Dial-the-Truth-Ministries==&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Dial-the-Truth-Ministry is a controversial religious group that is part of King James Only Movement. One of the main goals of the group is to denounce the evil that they believe Christian metal or rock music is. The group believes that any form of music with a beat is evil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.av1611.org/ Dial-the-Truth-Ministries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ted Kirkpatrick, the drummer for the Christian metal band Tourniquet stated the following about the groups website, ''&amp;quot;This site is so full of inaccuracies, so devoid of sound Biblical principles, and uses such twisted logic, that some have emailed us asking if it was done as a joke.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tourniquet.net/faq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added the above here since the article is locked so I can move it to the article when it is unlocked.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:47, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... this article needs to be a collaboration, not a rant, from both sides. Content: I'm working on adding some history and the &amp;quot;technicalities&amp;quot; of what HM is (&amp;quot;neutral to the facts&amp;quot;), and then the more controversial aspects can be worked in by you guys. As I said it would be, it's unprotected, but that doesn't mean you should just come along and edit in tiny soundbites. Try to edit cohesively, so that the article doesn't just resemble the transcript of two guys shouting each other down :) [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 08:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needs to be SOME mention of Satanism in the article. Neglecting to do so is just plain irresponsible. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Try concentrating on an explanation of why some people believe there are Satanic elements in heavy metal. What satanic themes do they find in it? Imagery, lyrics? Be specific and provide references. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your work is being reverted, then create a user subpage like [[User:Jose83/metal]]. No one is allowed to edit there but you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagery of certain metal bands definitely attempt to make Satan appear &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.teens411.com/newspics/mudvayne.jpg Mudvayne picture]] The guy actually looks like the Devil!&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://static.metal-archives.com/images/3/9/4/394.jpg Countless]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Iron_Maiden-Dance_of_Death.jpg Iron Maiden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.mystrands.com/photos/1/4/5/normal/14556.jpg Covers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.av1611.org/rock.html]] And lyrics of many metal songs clearly convey an Anti-Christian/Satanic message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to give an honest depiction of what this music is instead of trying to make it out to be wholesome Christian music like Walker is trying to do. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're preaching to the choir. Those are good links. Now do some writing. Don't worry about reverts; Fox and I can resurrect anything that gets killed. (Oops, am I getting arrogant?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Instances of individual Satanic metal bands should only be used to argue against those bands being good, not just the whole genre. Should we argue that all movies of a certain genre are bad just because a few are rated R and point out instances of nudity and profanity in those movies? It's a logical fallacy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:00, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suicide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:suicide is the only way out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Ozzy quoting what the lad says to rebut it? Or is he promoting [[suicide]]? Perhaps it is this kind of ambiguity that makes parents and educators worry that metal is bad for kids. It's a far cry from, &amp;quot;Come and play / everything's A-OK&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I love you / You love me&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is the Scripture that follows promoting suicide? &amp;quot;Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him.&amp;quot; (1 Samuel 31:4-5) &amp;quot;But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.&amp;quot; (1 Kings 19:4 ) You have to put that line back into the context of the song, which is quite plainly about alcohol abuse, about how it is nothing glamorous, just a slow suicide for the alcoholic. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:25, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jolly good. So let's point out that '''not all''' references to suicide in heavy metal music are intended to glorify it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fact is you probaably can't find one example of a band '''glorifying''' suicide. Why would any band glorify suicide? If they are in the buisness of selling albums and filling the seats at concerts why would they want their fans to kill themselves? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 15:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The closest I can come to a band ''glorifying'' suicide would be ''Don't Fear the Reaper'' by Blue Oyster Cult. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 15:52, 28 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/standard/main.htm - rock music&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/satanic_quotes.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/nature.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian metal is not evil ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is preposterous to say that all Christian metal is evil. Every claim is based upon specific instances of evil in secular metal, and thus not a valid comparison. This site defends Christian metal against every argument that groups like Dial-the-Truth can come up with: http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/craindex.htm [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:59, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes this is quite obvious and wow that site is wonderful. This site here http://www.metalforjesus.org/friorfoe.html is also pretty good although it doesn't contain nearly as much information. I'd also like to point out that although there are secular acts that promote immorality and blaspheme and stuff like that, many of them do not. First of all just because a song is about something does not mean a band is advocating or promoting it. Oftentimes they are just telling a story for entertainment value and they often use satire. There are many different styles of metal and many of them have totally different common lyrical themes. These links Jose is posting are laughable. I'd also like to know how Jose knows what Satan physically looks like. According to one of the links, apparently when Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden told Hit Parader magazine that, &amp;quot;We can play with conviction every night, because we totally believe in the music we're performing.&amp;quot; That means that he is a satanist. Also what does posting links of album covers prove. If you want to find viable criticisms of heavy metal that aren't going to make this article into one of the jokes of conservapedia you might want to stay away from using Terry Watkins as a source.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 22:25, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you admit there are many Metal bands to promote immorality and blasphemy.. We have progress! If an Artist makes a song about &amp;quot;Killing 'em all&amp;quot; they don't need to openly promote it as a band to promote it because the song is already out there and young impressionable children are already being brainwashed and programmed. And you can also play dumb and and pretend that the guy from Mudvayne isn't trying to look like Satan but he looks exactly how popular culture has made him out to look like. Iron Maiden heavily relies on demonic images to sell-out concerts and sell albums. This is especially prevelant on their album covers where the marketing of a demon-like mascot is irrefutable. Do you listen to these bands, Walker? -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iron Maiden isn't a good influence. They had a song called &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot;. Nobody's saying that Iron Maiden is a good band. The issue here is Christian metal bands, who tend not to have songs like that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry another point I am trying to make is that much of secular metal does not stand as a polar opposite to Christian metal as well--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:13, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll concede that Christian Heavy Metal may not be ''evil'', but I think their Artists have selected the wrong medium in which to praise Jesus. I have not made any claims of Christian Metal being evil in the revised article. However, I will not write anything positive about it either. I shall leave that to you, Fox, or Walker. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never denied that there weren't bands who did, you made the claim that either most or all bands do, which simply is not true. Also a question, if something is a medium that means it is neither right or wrong, so why is it wrong?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:15, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A medium is not inherently neutral. All heavy metal is aggressive and violent so it incites aggressive, violent behavior in the listener. My former friend was in a car wreck because the music he was listening to {System of a Down} caused him to drive irresponsibly. Also, just read the news. Riots at heavy metal concerts are the norm. There is no denying that Rock music in general evokes aggressive feelings in the listener. I just don't believe that these feelings should be evoked while praising Jesus. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making generalizations.  [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your friend was in a car wreck because he's a reckless driver. - [[User:JasonAQuest|JasonAQuest]] 23:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I admited there are some bands that blaspheme and promote immorality, you can find people that do that in pretty much every area of life so what is your point? That doesn't mean all of it is like that. There is no song called Killing Em All that I know of. I don't like Mudvayne but suppoesadly they are trying to look like aliens from a fictional story that they created and base there albums on. Well if you examine the lyrics of the song &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot; which actually opens with a reading from the bible. The song is just a story about a guy who is trying to get away from a satanic cult and ultimately is unable to escape them. Apparently it was based on a nightmare Steve Harris had after seeing one of The Omen movies. Eddie is just a cartoon masscot and he is something different on pretty much every album cover. I've always thought of him as some sort of B horror movie type of zombie rather than a demon and by the logic you present I suppose the New Jersey Devils are also relying on satanism to promote their hockey team and Hot Tamales candies and other various hot sauce companies are doing the same? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:12, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article poses as unbiased. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would never expect a true conservative website to be so pro-heavy metal but here we are. The criticism section is laughable because it contains no real criticism at all whatsoever. I took the time to examine previous versions of the article and noticed that there were indeed previous examples of valid criticism, but they were removed by user [[User:Walker|Walker]]. I also noticed that a vast majority of his contributions involve removing criticism from articles of his Heavy Metal heroes. I believe this article should be revamped with some input from people who are willing to voice valid criticisms of the genre.  - [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please look at the reason for removing the criticism section before blindly adding it back in yourself (along with removing someone else's unrelated work). Most, if not all, of the references are junk; one actually leads you to a site where you can buy a &amp;quot;research paper&amp;quot; about heavy metal music. Plagiarism sites are not valid citations. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]], if there are any real valid criticisms out there then find them and add them to the article since you find it to be lacking.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 16:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps this site should be renamed Liberalpedia. Too deny that Heavy Metal is influenced by Satanists and Athiests is just downright looney. I cannot believe that blatantly un-christian music can be portrayed positively on a Conservative website. I readded the previous criticism section because it's the true conservative christian thing to do.  -- [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a conservative ''encyclopedia''. Did you even look at anything Walker or I have said? Better yet, have you looked at the portion you keep adding? Please tell me how [http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/64763.html this] is a reliable source. If heavy metal music is so unilaterally evil, surely you can find some better sources than that. Nobody is saying you can't have a critisism, but it has to follow our rules. If you readd the section again without better sources you will be blocked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:33, 11 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dang! Since when is a particular type of music evil. It's the people behind the music and what they are promoting that can be evil...... not the music itself. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 21:54, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We need more ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty of web resources we can use, and books too, I have a few of them and plan to add the citations (I know not how to do that yet, however I realize it must be simple.) Right now the article seems to lack much historical description for the genre save what I just added, as well as a description of the music itself aside from commonly held conceptions about what heavy metal is. Certainly we can do better. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Something else to consider: the criticism is not really... criticism, at all. In fact I'm trying to figure out if we need a criticism section at all if what is currently there is the only thing anyone can find. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 16:25, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definite need of a revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
This looks like the kind of article [[Wikipedia]] would have for Heavy Metal. In order to clean this article up, we should start by redoing the criticism section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jose83/Heavy_Metal_music &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I plan on using the above link as a rough guideline for how the article should look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Having substantive content, as per wikipedia, is not necessarily a bad thing.  By all means add info you feel would be censored by wikipedia - but to censor material which has been added without justifiable reasons (such as when material is unable to be backed up by citations) is against Conservapedia's commandments --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 10:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. The recent additions, while not broadly incorrect or out of place, reek of bias and ignorance. Not to play the authority card, but why not let people who /know/ something about heavy metal edit the article instead? I swear facts actually do help articles. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:15, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I figured that there was a difference between this article and Jose's talk page at first glance, but really it's just the same unsourced material from her talk page shoe-horned into this page without any sources whatsoever that actually back up her assertions. Indeed, as a long time Pantera and Megadeth fan, I can say your interpretations of their song lyrics or literal to the point of deception. If Phil and Owns thought suicide was so spectacular in the vein /you/ seem to believe then they would have sliced their own wrists by now. But obviously that is not the case. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I refuse to tolerate your ignorant behavior. If &amp;quot;liberal denial&amp;quot; is the best you can come up with then kindly stop editing this page and let us who know a thing or two about this subject handle it. It's quite obvious that you cannot. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:07, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your deception is weak, Jirby. It's obvious to me that you are attempting to hide the harmful effects of Heavy Metal music because you are in denial of them, being a devout follower of the genre. We don't believe in censorship here at Conservapedia and if you want to exhibit more [[Liberal denial]] in the form of Rule #60, maybe you will feel more at home here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music]]. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: AAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! I love it. If I argue then I'm in denial. If I don't argue, this article is allowed to exist in it's current deceitful form. Alright now seriously. Either source (which you can't) your assertions or don't expect them to remain in the article for more than five minutes before someone who knows better (me and the other actual CONTRIBUTORS to the article) remove them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, whilst I don't oft go into the personal details of my life, yes I love heavy metal. Big deal. You hate it. Big deal. If you can come up with a sourced, logical position, then I don't care what your personal tastes are, however, right now you're simply directing all of your hate onto a MORALLY NEUTRAL abstraction. As I said. I won't tolerate it. Now source, or delete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ball is in your court. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:16, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources will be posted within minutes -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:25, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... GnR are not considered heavy metal, first and foremost. Even if they were, riots are not EXPECTED to occur at heavy metal shows any more than with other shows of other musical genres. Also, Heavy Metal is /considered/ anti-christian by some, HENCE THE CRITICISM SECTION. Simply calling it anti-christian because you /perceive/ it to be anti-christian is not encyclopedic.[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:40, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns N Roses are Heavy Metal and your claim that a riot is as likely to occur at any concert of any musical genre is ridiculous. I've never heard of a full-scale riot breaking out at an Elton John concert. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incorrect. GnR is hardrock, you can't argue this/ If you think GnR is typical metal then you're hopelessly ignorant of what most metal sounds like. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request intervention ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose is beginning to annoy me, and I refuse to participate in an edit war with someone who obviously has such a strong anti-metal bent that the article is virtually untouchable by anyone with any sense. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And now she is beginning to vandalize the talk page. See talk page edit history. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Quit it with the childish name calling. You have been refering to me as a female when I am actual a male in order to annoy me. Stop now. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Jose is usually a girl's name. My bad. You can take yourself off the cross now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:58, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have yet to meet a single women in my life that went by &amp;quot;Jose&amp;quot;. Jose is typically a man's name, especially with Latinos. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose83 is a parodist. Check his block log. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, wasn't this solved, like, months ago? The description of &amp;quot;anti-Christian&amp;quot; does not belong in the first sentence of the article; it is not a fact, will never be a fact, and your website reference has no authority. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit Warring over amount of Info ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Too little?===&lt;br /&gt;
This article fails even to mention doom metal, death metal, melodic death metal, or any modern trends in metal, despite having sections devoted to the 1980s and 1990s, decades notable for far more musical innovation than just groove or black metal. I've stuck some bands in as examples and edit in some more in due course - as it stands I've missed out a lot of stuff. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added the basis of some more extensive descriptions. I've filled in a couple, and will do more, but I am no expert on glam, thrash, stoner, speed and new wave of british heavy metal. Any help would be welcomed. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Too much?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should not strive to be a compendium of pop-culture cruft. This article is already spinning out of control with its detailed description of marginally talented musical figures, and &amp;quot;Twitcher's&amp;quot; latest round of fanboy edits are hardly in the spirit of serious scholarship. The article should, in a brief and concise way, describe the genre and discuss some of the controversies attached to it from a Christian/conservative POV. No need for a detailed analysis of obscure bands. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 08:54, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So where's the consistency in naming a few sub-genres and pretending the others don't exist? That doesn't exactly strike me as particularly scholarly. As for 'marginally talented musical figures', please don't be so puerile. Your subjective views on the genre are utterly irrelevant. I think great swathes of what I've tried to document are fairly terrible, but you know what, since this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, the least that can be done is offer some examples of bands that characterise the particular sounds. I'm not sure where the 'fanboy' ad hominem is coming from either - am I a fanboy because I actually know something about the subject? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 09:37, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Just right===&lt;br /&gt;
Alright guys, here's what we're going to do.  We value conciseness here, so my feeling is that AlexWD should have free reign to remove whatever content he feels is excessive.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We also value information, so Twitcher, feel free to create an article on &amp;quot;Heavy metal genres&amp;quot; or something like that, and link to it from this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this appease everybody? [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 14:23, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol! Not particularly, as it'll end up getting deleted for being too in-depth, I imagine. If I'm going to spend time and effort on this (and considering how broad metal is, it will take me hours at a time), I don't want it summarily reverted because of someone wandering in and being inexperienced. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 20:58, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=744514</id>
		<title>Talk:Donoghue v. Stevenson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=744514"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T19:13:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Created page with '== Title change suggestion ==   Sorry if this is the wrong place to talk about it, I'm quite new here. In English legal tradition, cases are names (x) v (y), and not (x) v. (y); ...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Title change suggestion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if this is the wrong place to talk about it, I'm quite new here. In English legal tradition, cases are names (x) v (y), and not (x) v. (y); the current title is the most appropriate name for the case. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 14:13, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744396</id>
		<title>Talk:Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744396"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T14:37:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: /* Too much information. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Christianity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I find the statement on Christianity to be rather inaccurate. While I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, that is no excuse for fallacies. Many metalheads and musicians are openly Christian, such as Dave Mustaine and Dave Ellefson of Megadeth, Jack Owen, and Tom Araya of Slayer. I believe a more accurate statement would be that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent in extreme metal music. There is also a strong Christian Metal Subgenre, see bands such as As I Lay Dying, Believer, and Stryper.  I shall change the statements to be more accurate and less condemning. [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 16:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't even say that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent at all.  I listen to metal music, and sure some of it is about death and killing and things like that, but I wouldn't say it's Anti-Christian.  Some metal music includes themes that are similar to many popular songs of other genres, just in a different form. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 16:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's primarily what I hoped to get across, I suppose the term &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; is more accurate. I consider the music to show, when it discusses Satan, a Christian perception of the being. What I meant to say was that the only genre, to my knowledge, that contains overtly anti-Christian themes would be death metal or black metal, and even there it is somewhat rare. I think many mainstream Christians misconstrue the disrespect for organized religion (i.e, a church, pastors, or priests.) for being Anti-Christian. They are not one in the same, as to not believe in church is not the same as not believing in god. I'll change it to be more accurate.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a metal fan (who's wearing a Dream Theater shirt right now), I think that the Satan reference was ridiculous. I took it right out. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:08, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed, i thought of it as inappropriate as well, but since it referenced it as the opinions of conservatives, I left it. Dream Theater! Another openly Christian metal band (though not in the Christian metal genre). I have a few more changes to make on the article, you left a slight typo! I forgive you! [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:13, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, creating this article in the way I did was almost a joke; this is indeed a conservative encyclopedia -- so I used those particular statements to be, in a way, on the extreme of what some people might think. Don't take it the wrong way.  Plus, the username I chose might have tipped people off: I really don't know much in the way of creating encyclopedia articles, so I left things vague and unopinionated (my opinions, anyway).  I am actually a metal fan who laughed at the article, not believing in what I was typing.  Then again, some of the more extreme Black metal bands do reference Satan in non-metaphorical terms.  But most of those bands are without actual substance and therefore suck. [[User:N00b|N00b]] 09:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, and I know only two people that worship the devil, as a god, in metal music of any form: Glen Benton, and Oystein Aarseth (Aka Euronymous), both extremists not to be considered the standard of a heavy-metaller.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 17:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to prove that anyone is actually &amp;quot;worshiping Satan&amp;quot;. Let's not fall into that trap. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Link==&lt;br /&gt;
Is that parody..? Linking to a cliched, comedic-parody of a heavy metal band in order to illustrate the article? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just about to say the same thing. Spinal tap was a fictionalized parody of a metal band. (And a darn good band, if I do say so myself, and I do). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The movie [[Spinal Tap]] was a comedy; I'd like to write about its director, who made a few similar movies like [[A Mighty Wind]] (satirizing folk music performers). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob Reiner directed &amp;quot;This Is Spinal Tap&amp;quot;,  but it was Christopher Guest who directed &amp;quot;A Mighty Wind&amp;quot;. Guest wrote/co-wrote both of them though. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are devilishly clever, my friend! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Guest is quite an interesting subject for a bio, even without touching on his works - Jewish American British nobleman... Quite a mix. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spirituality and etiquette==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's tread carefully while describing the delicate issue of [[spirituality]] of metal bands. Some have exploited satanic imagery, to be sure, but their proportion might be less than 99%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass reverts aren't good form. Just change one section at a time, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As someone who is fairly knowledgable about heavy metal, I actually agree with Walker in that I've never heard the term Satan's Fire Metal. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:27, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State of the Article==&lt;br /&gt;
In it's current condition this article is a joke to anyone who knows anything about metal. 99.9 percent of bands that have pyrotechnics are not trying to recreate hell. Also &amp;quot;the horns&amp;quot; are more often just a sign for metal and unity amongst metalheads and are not done to look like satan or praise satan. It isn't even limited to metal you will see it at even country and boy band shows or how about a Texas Longhorns football game? The song meanings are ridiculous, Go To Hell is about someone that is damned to hell, it is not promoting satanism. It was written for the Bill and Teds Bogus Journey movie where the charecters go to hell. Take no prisioners is about military warfare. The song references Normandy and Panzers so it was probably inspired by D-Day, it is not promoting violence anymore than Saving Private Ryan. Suicide Sollution is about how abusing drugs and alcohol to solve your problems is a &amp;quot;suicide&amp;quot; sollution. Fade to Black is about losing the will to carry on, and was inspired by the bands equipment being stolen, it can be interpreted as a suicide song but even then how is it glamorized? Also why was the referenced content about Christians in non Christian bands removed? All the unreferenced stuff on this page should be removed before that was.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 13:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal strikes me as utterly proposterous. Just like the idea of African Klu Klux Klan members or Jewish Nazis is utterly proposterous. Quit trying to make Heavy Metal music into something that it is not. You've made various attempts to censor the material here or downplay Metal's dangerous nature, but it's not going to work. Maybe you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. Your attempts to disassociate Metal with Satanism are pathetic. That's like saying you're a Ku Klux Klan member but you're not into the whole discrimination thing.. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jose calm down. Metal is a style of music, not a way of thinking. There is absolutely no contridiction with someone using a certain style of music to promote ''any'' message -- good ''or'' bad. You should check out some Christian metal. A youth Christian musical concert (Ichthus) often features metal bands -- one of their tents is dedicated entirely towards &amp;quot;heavier&amp;quot; music. I also personally know the manager of a Christian metal band. He is old friends with my youth pastor at church and I've done some work with him. He is an intense Christian and his music is... well, rather intense. So please take a chill pill and open your mind to other possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
::Think about it this way: even if metal ''were'' &amp;quot;satanist--dominated&amp;quot; (which I don't think it is), wouldn't that therefore be the best place for a Christian band? Jesus hanged out with prostitutes and beggars, remember. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's even Christian rap, which uses the rapid-fire half-spoken style of [[hip hop]] to convey the pro-woman, anti-violence message of Jesus and salvation. My favorite &amp;quot;heavenly metal&amp;quot; group is [[The Ancestors]]. And there's always [[Stryper]] (&amp;quot;by his stripes we were healed&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I do not agree with what any of you have posted. However, perhaps I shall listen to some of this &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal and &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; rap. There might be a small chance that I am wrong. I was wrong about Spinal tap. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This music.. [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huod7HJe4BM]] It's disgusting. I'm going to have to disagree with all those who support &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal. This just doesn't sound very Christian to me.. First of all, it's too loud and violent sounding and the screaming sounds very demonic. Even if there are pro-Christian lyrics in the songs it's impossible to tell because the screaming is incomprehensible. The choice of intervals strikes me as interesting.. Very evil sounding. Please listen and tell me what you think.. I really don't get it. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It obviously wasn't designed with you in mind. I don't hear anything &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;, except that you automatically associate the genre with evil, which is a circular argument. I don't hear any &amp;quot;evil-sounding intervals&amp;quot; either. Try looking up some lyrics before you base Christianity on how a group decides to play the guitar. Here's one called [http://lyrics.christiansunite.com/lyrics_1134_7.shtml If I Die] by Stryper. (&amp;quot;Living was hard /And loneliness easily justified / Oh, then I found You / Ooh, I suddenly knew / What I wanted to do was to make You satisfied / And not to die for selfish pleasure / But to live with You by my side&amp;quot;). It's not as heavy musically (here's a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFOsQd34qE Youtube vid] -- ignore the visuals though), but still considered &amp;quot;metal&amp;quot; I would think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I did some searching, and here's the lyrics from one of the songs in the video you found [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734]. Check out the description at the bottom: &amp;quot;True hope should only be placed in Christ, and no man. Christ will never fail you...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This isn't your mom's Christian music! But that doesn't make it wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would this qualify as metal? I could actually see myself listening to something like this. It's melodic, and the singing is clean and clear. Thanks.. This is inspiring. But I don't think it's heavy metal. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's why I found the other lyrics for you. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734 These] are lyrics from that Youtube video you disagreed with. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Jose all of what you are saying is your own personal opinion. How is it to loud? Any music can be to loud, if that is a problem turn the volume down. Different people have different tastes, just because you don't like a style of music doesn't make it &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;. Besides the bible instructs us to &amp;quot;Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully with a loud noise&amp;quot; (Psalm 33:3). God is infinitely bigger than your music tastes. Also many styles of metal have very easily comprehensable lyrics and so what if they aren't comprehensible? Does that make it wrong? If you don't like it thats fine, but it doesn't give you the right to try and demonize something just because it doesn't appeal to your personal tastes.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:14, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt Jesus would have &amp;quot;rocked out&amp;quot; to this garbage. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I think if you feel that the music is &amp;quot;garbage&amp;quot; then we should find someone with a more neutral attitude to edit it, no? I'm not saying you shouldn't edit, but I would think hard about if you are the appropriate one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you know God's musical tastes?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::God is absolutely Holy, therefore he wouldn't indulge in music with satanic connotation. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could you be a little more specific as to what you mean by &amp;quot;satanic connotation&amp;quot;.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:39, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A lot of heavy metal is inspired by Satan and the occult. This definitely would not cater to God's taste. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jesus hanged (hung? I never get that right) out with sinners, beggars and prostitutes. If this music really is as evil as you say, shouldn't Christians get in there to converted these supposed evildoers? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many books are inspired by Satan and the occult, does that mean all books are against God?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:49, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus would have discouraged the prostitutes from whoring themselves and they would have discouraged these bands from playing the music they are playing. He wouldn't encourage more Christians to become prostitutes or play heavy metal. A certain category of books are inspired by satan and the occult and all within that category are against god, just like how heavy metal is a certain genre of music which is against god. Not all music is against god. True heavy metal is. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I guess we know that these artists aren't Jesus himself then. It doesn't mean they aren't Christian, however. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jesus hung out with drunks and whores, I guess, him being so tolerant and all. But he also is famous for telling the adulterous woman to &amp;quot;go and sin no more&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My impression of metal is that it invokes a lot of nasty symbols: devils, long tongues, gloomy or morbid lyrics, etc. Within the genre I'm sure there are a handful of Christian groups like [[Stryper]] (which I wrote, hint hint!) who I suppose decided to &amp;quot;move into the neighborhood&amp;quot; and seek converts among metalheads. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
How does linking to lyrics prove the song is &amp;quot;promoting&amp;quot; satanism.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Funny the Fade to Black reference actually say the opposite of what is stated in the article.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly you and ''Jose'' disagree on many aspects of this genre of music. I suggest you '''add''' everything you want, while letting him do the same. I'll check back from time to time and see if I can integrate your work and his. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stop==&lt;br /&gt;
The article has seen plenty of edits going on, with no real improvement to its state. I can see both sides of the argument, but unless Walker and Jose83 can start to learn to work together, then we're just going to end up with a bigger pile of cowcake than when we started. The article is dire right now, and frankly the best thing is for you two to step away from it for a day and work out what you want to say in it, get together your references, then we'll take it from there. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:40, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was following Ed Poor's instruction from above. I wasn't changing his edits.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:41, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not apportioning any kind of blame. And Ed's advice is good, excepting for the fact that the article is now a scab to both of you and you can't resist picking it. Leave it until tomorrow, it will be unlocked in about 12 hours, and we can try to put together a '''coherent''' article presenting the facts as we know them, instead of a point/counterpoint list of grievances. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::==Dial-the-Truth-Ministries==&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Dial-the-Truth-Ministry is a controversial religious group that is part of King James Only Movement. One of the main goals of the group is to denounce the evil that they believe Christian metal or rock music is. The group believes that any form of music with a beat is evil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.av1611.org/ Dial-the-Truth-Ministries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ted Kirkpatrick, the drummer for the Christian metal band Tourniquet stated the following about the groups website, ''&amp;quot;This site is so full of inaccuracies, so devoid of sound Biblical principles, and uses such twisted logic, that some have emailed us asking if it was done as a joke.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tourniquet.net/faq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added the above here since the article is locked so I can move it to the article when it is unlocked.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:47, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... this article needs to be a collaboration, not a rant, from both sides. Content: I'm working on adding some history and the &amp;quot;technicalities&amp;quot; of what HM is (&amp;quot;neutral to the facts&amp;quot;), and then the more controversial aspects can be worked in by you guys. As I said it would be, it's unprotected, but that doesn't mean you should just come along and edit in tiny soundbites. Try to edit cohesively, so that the article doesn't just resemble the transcript of two guys shouting each other down :) [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 08:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needs to be SOME mention of Satanism in the article. Neglecting to do so is just plain irresponsible. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Try concentrating on an explanation of why some people believe there are Satanic elements in heavy metal. What satanic themes do they find in it? Imagery, lyrics? Be specific and provide references. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your work is being reverted, then create a user subpage like [[User:Jose83/metal]]. No one is allowed to edit there but you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagery of certain metal bands definitely attempt to make Satan appear &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.teens411.com/newspics/mudvayne.jpg Mudvayne picture]] The guy actually looks like the Devil!&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://static.metal-archives.com/images/3/9/4/394.jpg Countless]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Iron_Maiden-Dance_of_Death.jpg Iron Maiden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.mystrands.com/photos/1/4/5/normal/14556.jpg Covers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.av1611.org/rock.html]] And lyrics of many metal songs clearly convey an Anti-Christian/Satanic message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to give an honest depiction of what this music is instead of trying to make it out to be wholesome Christian music like Walker is trying to do. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're preaching to the choir. Those are good links. Now do some writing. Don't worry about reverts; Fox and I can resurrect anything that gets killed. (Oops, am I getting arrogant?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Instances of individual Satanic metal bands should only be used to argue against those bands being good, not just the whole genre. Should we argue that all movies of a certain genre are bad just because a few are rated R and point out instances of nudity and profanity in those movies? It's a logical fallacy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:00, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suicide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:suicide is the only way out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Ozzy quoting what the lad says to rebut it? Or is he promoting [[suicide]]? Perhaps it is this kind of ambiguity that makes parents and educators worry that metal is bad for kids. It's a far cry from, &amp;quot;Come and play / everything's A-OK&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I love you / You love me&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is the Scripture that follows promoting suicide? &amp;quot;Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him.&amp;quot; (1 Samuel 31:4-5) &amp;quot;But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.&amp;quot; (1 Kings 19:4 ) You have to put that line back into the context of the song, which is quite plainly about alcohol abuse, about how it is nothing glamorous, just a slow suicide for the alcoholic. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:25, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jolly good. So let's point out that '''not all''' references to suicide in heavy metal music are intended to glorify it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fact is you probaably can't find one example of a band '''glorifying''' suicide. Why would any band glorify suicide? If they are in the buisness of selling albums and filling the seats at concerts why would they want their fans to kill themselves? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 15:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The closest I can come to a band ''glorifying'' suicide would be ''Don't Fear the Reaper'' by Blue Oyster Cult. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 15:52, 28 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/standard/main.htm - rock music&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/satanic_quotes.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/nature.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian metal is not evil ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is preposterous to say that all Christian metal is evil. Every claim is based upon specific instances of evil in secular metal, and thus not a valid comparison. This site defends Christian metal against every argument that groups like Dial-the-Truth can come up with: http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/craindex.htm [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:59, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes this is quite obvious and wow that site is wonderful. This site here http://www.metalforjesus.org/friorfoe.html is also pretty good although it doesn't contain nearly as much information. I'd also like to point out that although there are secular acts that promote immorality and blaspheme and stuff like that, many of them do not. First of all just because a song is about something does not mean a band is advocating or promoting it. Oftentimes they are just telling a story for entertainment value and they often use satire. There are many different styles of metal and many of them have totally different common lyrical themes. These links Jose is posting are laughable. I'd also like to know how Jose knows what Satan physically looks like. According to one of the links, apparently when Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden told Hit Parader magazine that, &amp;quot;We can play with conviction every night, because we totally believe in the music we're performing.&amp;quot; That means that he is a satanist. Also what does posting links of album covers prove. If you want to find viable criticisms of heavy metal that aren't going to make this article into one of the jokes of conservapedia you might want to stay away from using Terry Watkins as a source.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 22:25, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you admit there are many Metal bands to promote immorality and blasphemy.. We have progress! If an Artist makes a song about &amp;quot;Killing 'em all&amp;quot; they don't need to openly promote it as a band to promote it because the song is already out there and young impressionable children are already being brainwashed and programmed. And you can also play dumb and and pretend that the guy from Mudvayne isn't trying to look like Satan but he looks exactly how popular culture has made him out to look like. Iron Maiden heavily relies on demonic images to sell-out concerts and sell albums. This is especially prevelant on their album covers where the marketing of a demon-like mascot is irrefutable. Do you listen to these bands, Walker? -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iron Maiden isn't a good influence. They had a song called &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot;. Nobody's saying that Iron Maiden is a good band. The issue here is Christian metal bands, who tend not to have songs like that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry another point I am trying to make is that much of secular metal does not stand as a polar opposite to Christian metal as well--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:13, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll concede that Christian Heavy Metal may not be ''evil'', but I think their Artists have selected the wrong medium in which to praise Jesus. I have not made any claims of Christian Metal being evil in the revised article. However, I will not write anything positive about it either. I shall leave that to you, Fox, or Walker. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never denied that there weren't bands who did, you made the claim that either most or all bands do, which simply is not true. Also a question, if something is a medium that means it is neither right or wrong, so why is it wrong?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:15, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A medium is not inherently neutral. All heavy metal is aggressive and violent so it incites aggressive, violent behavior in the listener. My former friend was in a car wreck because the music he was listening to {System of a Down} caused him to drive irresponsibly. Also, just read the news. Riots at heavy metal concerts are the norm. There is no denying that Rock music in general evokes aggressive feelings in the listener. I just don't believe that these feelings should be evoked while praising Jesus. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making generalizations.  [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your friend was in a car wreck because he's a reckless driver. - [[User:JasonAQuest|JasonAQuest]] 23:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I admited there are some bands that blaspheme and promote immorality, you can find people that do that in pretty much every area of life so what is your point? That doesn't mean all of it is like that. There is no song called Killing Em All that I know of. I don't like Mudvayne but suppoesadly they are trying to look like aliens from a fictional story that they created and base there albums on. Well if you examine the lyrics of the song &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot; which actually opens with a reading from the bible. The song is just a story about a guy who is trying to get away from a satanic cult and ultimately is unable to escape them. Apparently it was based on a nightmare Steve Harris had after seeing one of The Omen movies. Eddie is just a cartoon masscot and he is something different on pretty much every album cover. I've always thought of him as some sort of B horror movie type of zombie rather than a demon and by the logic you present I suppose the New Jersey Devils are also relying on satanism to promote their hockey team and Hot Tamales candies and other various hot sauce companies are doing the same? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:12, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article poses as unbiased. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would never expect a true conservative website to be so pro-heavy metal but here we are. The criticism section is laughable because it contains no real criticism at all whatsoever. I took the time to examine previous versions of the article and noticed that there were indeed previous examples of valid criticism, but they were removed by user [[User:Walker|Walker]]. I also noticed that a vast majority of his contributions involve removing criticism from articles of his Heavy Metal heroes. I believe this article should be revamped with some input from people who are willing to voice valid criticisms of the genre.  - [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please look at the reason for removing the criticism section before blindly adding it back in yourself (along with removing someone else's unrelated work). Most, if not all, of the references are junk; one actually leads you to a site where you can buy a &amp;quot;research paper&amp;quot; about heavy metal music. Plagiarism sites are not valid citations. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]], if there are any real valid criticisms out there then find them and add them to the article since you find it to be lacking.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 16:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps this site should be renamed Liberalpedia. Too deny that Heavy Metal is influenced by Satanists and Athiests is just downright looney. I cannot believe that blatantly un-christian music can be portrayed positively on a Conservative website. I readded the previous criticism section because it's the true conservative christian thing to do.  -- [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a conservative ''encyclopedia''. Did you even look at anything Walker or I have said? Better yet, have you looked at the portion you keep adding? Please tell me how [http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/64763.html this] is a reliable source. If heavy metal music is so unilaterally evil, surely you can find some better sources than that. Nobody is saying you can't have a critisism, but it has to follow our rules. If you readd the section again without better sources you will be blocked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:33, 11 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dang! Since when is a particular type of music evil. It's the people behind the music and what they are promoting that can be evil...... not the music itself. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 21:54, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We need more ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty of web resources we can use, and books too, I have a few of them and plan to add the citations (I know not how to do that yet, however I realize it must be simple.) Right now the article seems to lack much historical description for the genre save what I just added, as well as a description of the music itself aside from commonly held conceptions about what heavy metal is. Certainly we can do better. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Something else to consider: the criticism is not really... criticism, at all. In fact I'm trying to figure out if we need a criticism section at all if what is currently there is the only thing anyone can find. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 16:25, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definite need of a revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
This looks like the kind of article [[Wikipedia]] would have for Heavy Metal. In order to clean this article up, we should start by redoing the criticism section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jose83/Heavy_Metal_music &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I plan on using the above link as a rough guideline for how the article should look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Having substantive content, as per wikipedia, is not necessarily a bad thing.  By all means add info you feel would be censored by wikipedia - but to censor material which has been added without justifiable reasons (such as when material is unable to be backed up by citations) is against Conservapedia's commandments --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 10:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. The recent additions, while not broadly incorrect or out of place, reek of bias and ignorance. Not to play the authority card, but why not let people who /know/ something about heavy metal edit the article instead? I swear facts actually do help articles. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:15, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I figured that there was a difference between this article and Jose's talk page at first glance, but really it's just the same unsourced material from her talk page shoe-horned into this page without any sources whatsoever that actually back up her assertions. Indeed, as a long time Pantera and Megadeth fan, I can say your interpretations of their song lyrics or literal to the point of deception. If Phil and Owns thought suicide was so spectacular in the vein /you/ seem to believe then they would have sliced their own wrists by now. But obviously that is not the case. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I refuse to tolerate your ignorant behavior. If &amp;quot;liberal denial&amp;quot; is the best you can come up with then kindly stop editing this page and let us who know a thing or two about this subject handle it. It's quite obvious that you cannot. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:07, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your deception is weak, Jirby. It's obvious to me that you are attempting to hide the harmful effects of Heavy Metal music because you are in denial of them, being a devout follower of the genre. We don't believe in censorship here at Conservapedia and if you want to exhibit more [[Liberal denial]] in the form of Rule #60, maybe you will feel more at home here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music]]. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: AAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! I love it. If I argue then I'm in denial. If I don't argue, this article is allowed to exist in it's current deceitful form. Alright now seriously. Either source (which you can't) your assertions or don't expect them to remain in the article for more than five minutes before someone who knows better (me and the other actual CONTRIBUTORS to the article) remove them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, whilst I don't oft go into the personal details of my life, yes I love heavy metal. Big deal. You hate it. Big deal. If you can come up with a sourced, logical position, then I don't care what your personal tastes are, however, right now you're simply directing all of your hate onto a MORALLY NEUTRAL abstraction. As I said. I won't tolerate it. Now source, or delete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ball is in your court. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:16, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources will be posted within minutes -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:25, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... GnR are not considered heavy metal, first and foremost. Even if they were, riots are not EXPECTED to occur at heavy metal shows any more than with other shows of other musical genres. Also, Heavy Metal is /considered/ anti-christian by some, HENCE THE CRITICISM SECTION. Simply calling it anti-christian because you /perceive/ it to be anti-christian is not encyclopedic.[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:40, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns N Roses are Heavy Metal and your claim that a riot is as likely to occur at any concert of any musical genre is ridiculous. I've never heard of a full-scale riot breaking out at an Elton John concert. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incorrect. GnR is hardrock, you can't argue this/ If you think GnR is typical metal then you're hopelessly ignorant of what most metal sounds like. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request intervention ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose is beginning to annoy me, and I refuse to participate in an edit war with someone who obviously has such a strong anti-metal bent that the article is virtually untouchable by anyone with any sense. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And now she is beginning to vandalize the talk page. See talk page edit history. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Quit it with the childish name calling. You have been refering to me as a female when I am actual a male in order to annoy me. Stop now. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Jose is usually a girl's name. My bad. You can take yourself off the cross now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:58, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have yet to meet a single women in my life that went by &amp;quot;Jose&amp;quot;. Jose is typically a man's name, especially with Latinos. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose83 is a parodist. Check his block log. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, wasn't this solved, like, months ago? The description of &amp;quot;anti-Christian&amp;quot; does not belong in the first sentence of the article; it is not a fact, will never be a fact, and your website reference has no authority. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not enough information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article fails even to mention doom metal, death metal, melodic death metal, or any modern trends in metal, despite having sections devoted to the 1980s and 1990s, decades notable for far more musical innovation than just groove or black metal. I've stuck some bands in as examples and edit in some more in due course - as it stands I've missed out a lot of stuff. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added the basis of some more extensive descriptions. I've filled in a couple, and will do more, but I am no expert on glam, thrash, stoner, speed and new wave of british heavy metal. Any help would be welcomed. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Too much information. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should not strive to be a compendium of pop-culture cruft. This article is already spinning out of control with its detailed description of marginally talented musical figures, and &amp;quot;Twitcher's&amp;quot; latest round of fanboy edits are hardly in the spirit of serious scholarship. The article should, in a brief and concise way, describe the genre and discuss some of the controversies attached to it from a Christian/conservative POV. No need for a detailed analysis of obscure bands. [[User:AlexWD|AlexWD]] 08:54, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So where's the consistency in naming a few sub-genres and pretending the others don't exist? That doesn't exactly strike me as particularly scholarly. As for 'marginally talented musical figures', please don't be so puerile. Your subjective views on the genre are utterly irrelevant. I think great swathes of what I've tried to document are fairly terrible, but you know what, since this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, the least that can be done is offer some examples of bands that characterise the particular sounds. I'm not sure where the 'fanboy' ad hominem is coming from either - am I a fanboy because I actually know something about the subject? [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 09:37, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doctor_Who&amp;diff=744388</id>
		<title>Doctor Who</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doctor_Who&amp;diff=744388"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T13:46:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Lack of reference - explanation on talk page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Doctor Who''''' is a [[British Broadcasting Corporation|BBC]] science fiction television programme originally created in 1963. It centres around a character named The Doctor, who travels around the universe in a [[time machine]] called the TARDIS (&amp;quot;Time and Relative Dimensions in Space&amp;quot;), which resembles a 1950s British Police phone box, but is considerably larger on the inside than it is on the outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme ran for twenty-six seasons between 1963 and 1989, at which point it was canceled indefinitely. Various forms of the series continued after the cancellation, with popular series of novels published by Target and then BBC Books, along with audio serials and re-releases of past episodes on VHS and DVD. Since 2005, a &amp;quot;new series&amp;quot; has been produced by BBC Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Doctor has the ability to regenerate his body when mortally weakened, a useful plot device that has allowed the role to be played on TV by ten different actors so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Doctors==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[William Hartnell]] (1963-66)===&lt;br /&gt;
The first actor to play the Doctor portrayed him as a cantankerous old man. Initially a somewhat dark character, he became more grandfatherly in later episodes. Hartnell's era introduced the most well-known of the Doctor's foes, the [[Dalek]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Patrick Troughton]] (1966-1969)===&lt;br /&gt;
Troughton's Doctor was an impish figure, whose gimmicks included playing the recorder. In this period, much of which is lost, the program felt the influence of [[Star Trek]] somewhat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Jon Pertwee]] (1970-1974)===&lt;br /&gt;
The third Doctor was Earth-bound for much of his tenure, a move that was partly motivated by budgeting constraints in production. In the stories themselves, this was explained by the Doctor's race - the Time Lords - imposing an exile upon him due to alleged crimes prosecuted in ''The War Games''. During this time, the United Nations Intelligence Taskforce (&amp;quot;UNIT&amp;quot;) was a key element of plots - the Doctor was officially UNIT's scientific advisor, but he frequently attempts to break free of the Time Lords' imposition of exile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Tom Baker]] (1974-1981)===&lt;br /&gt;
Arguably the most well-known Doctor, Baker, with his seven-foot long scarf and fondness for jelly babies played the role for longer than any other actor. Considered to be an &amp;quot;eccentric&amp;quot; character, he was capable both of representing human attributes and being aloof and of being detached from others around him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Peter Davison]] (1981-1984)===&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth Doctor became something of a vulnerable character, which was a conscious decision by the production team (led by John Nathan-Turner) to remove the aura of invincibility that they had felt was becoming part of the Doctor's characterisation with Tom Baker. Shown to be a keen cricket fan, the Doctor was arguably more human than any of his predecessors and often relied more on his companions to assist throughout his missions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Colin Baker]] (1984-1986)===&lt;br /&gt;
The sixth Doctor was premised around being the antithesis of his predecessor, with his garish and colour-mismatched costume reflecting the vast contrast with the mild-mannered fifth Doctor. In terms of characterisation, the Doctor became something of an unstable character, often violently responding to people and events around him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Sylvester McCoy]] (1987-1989)===&lt;br /&gt;
After the departure of Colin Baker, McCoy's depiction of the Doctor saw the series shift mood considerably. Early stories within the era depicted a somewhat comic and light-hearted Doctor, but over time the Doctor's character became steadily darker - a development that has been commonly described as making the Doctor a manipulating, scheming character who influenced events like a chess game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Paul McGann]] (1996)===&lt;br /&gt;
McGann played the role for a television movie, with the creation of a new series by US producers dependent on the success of the movie. This was never made. The Doctor himself was perhaps more human than any other, with the revelation that he was &amp;quot;half-human&amp;quot; on his mother's side and displaying far greater emotional response than in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Christopher Eccleston]] (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
The first Doctor in the &amp;quot;new series&amp;quot; created by [[Russell T. Davies]], Eccleston's portrayal saw much of the eccentricity of the past integrated into the ninth regeneration of the Doctor. An indefinite amount of time has elapsed since he was last seen on television screens, and it is clear that the events of the Time War have scarred him: he is the last of the Time Lord race. His character reflected a manic unpredictability that saw him capable of both compassion and apathy while maintaining a love-hate relationship with humans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[David Tennant]] (2006-2010)===&lt;br /&gt;
The current actor playing the Doctor was also well-known beforehand ([[Casanova]], [[Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]]). His portrayal is more humorous and vivacious than Eccleston's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Matt Smith]] (2010-)===&lt;br /&gt;
Matt Smith has been confirmed to take Tennants place in series 5 of Doctor Who. He is the youngest actor to play the role and is expected to bring radical changes with him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political and Social Themes==&lt;br /&gt;
Several stories in the series have been subtly or overtly political in their themes. For instance, ''The Green Death'' (1973) emphasized the dangers of [[pollution]] and big business; while the following year's ''Invasion of the Dinosaurs'' featured a contrasting menace -- pro-environment extremists. Other stories have taken their themes from current news stories of the time, such as the [[United Kingdom]]'s entry into the [[European Union|Common Market]]. Many of these pro-liberal stories came during the period where the show was produced by Barry Letts, whose heavily liberal and [[environmentalist]] views shaped a lot of stories in the early 1970s. Apart from this period, the original series generally did not have a particularly heavily political leaning (perhaps reflecting the less liberal culture in the BBC in those times), and in fact ''The Sun Makers'' (1977) was a pro-Conservative story that told of the dangers of heavy [[taxation|taxes]] and overly complex governments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent episode, the Daleks - Doctor Who's most dangerous enemy, a race of creatures who are physically shriveled and weak but contained within an armored tank-like body - take over Manhattan. They ruthlessly exploit workers engaged in construction and repair on the Empire State Building. This was reported in the British newspaper [[The Independent]] as a metaphor for the rampant abuse of capitalism. The lead writer of Dr. Who, [[Russell T Davies]] is known for aggressively promoting the [[gay agenda]] in his prior show [[Queer as Folk]] and continuing to promote it in Doctor Who (despite the fact that the show is supposed to be geared towards a young audience), with many openly gay or bisexual (or as the show jokes &amp;quot;Omnisexual&amp;quot; due to relations with aliens) characters, including the lead of the spin-off [[Torchwood]], [[Captain Jack Harkness]]. Davies' attitude has been contrasted with that of [[John Nathan-Turner]], the final producer of the original series who, while being publicly known as a homosexual, never allowed this to overtly influence the stories written while he produced the show.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Around the world, Doctor Who can be seen on:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[BBC]] One or BBC Three in the UK&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation|CBC Television]] in Canada&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SciFi Channel]] in the US, or via Netflix&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation|ABC]] in Australia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other countries to receive Doctor Who include the Netherlands, France, Denmark and Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Television Shows]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Doctor_Who&amp;diff=744387</id>
		<title>Talk:Doctor Who</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Doctor_Who&amp;diff=744387"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T13:45:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Summaries of the Doctors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The summaries of each Doctor are opinionated and do not have any basis on which to support the claims, even if in practical terms they may be true. I'm editing them. [[User:Karalius Nyder|Karalius Nyder]] 02:34, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Guardian claim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative writers in The Guardian have used this as supposed evidence of the BBC pumping out &amp;quot;relentless socialist propaganda&amp;quot;, although others argue that this assumes an inherently Marxist perspective.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find this a bit hard to believe - the Guardian is very much left-leaning magazine, and I think that if they'd accuse the Beeb of promoting a socialist agenda, it's unlikely they'd portray this as a bad thing (in their view, anyway). Additionally, this claim is unreferenced, and after half an hour of searching I can see no mention of this anywhere. I'm removing this sentence because I'm not entirely sure that what it claims is true. Of course, if the article can be found, I have no objection to this being reverted. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 08:45, 13 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744369</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744369"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T09:37:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Undo revision 744242 by AlexWD (Talk) (Ditto.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]]. The mid to late 1980s also saw the creation and evolution of death metal, spearheaded by early bands such as [[Death]] (their early demos, when they were known as [[Mantas]], were highly influential), [[Possessed]], [[Morbid Angel]] and many others. Many early death metal bands credited [[Slayer]] as an influence, citing the relentless riffs, speed and dark lyrics which made them so popular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. Death metal rapidly evolved and diversified into many different sub-genres: [[Suffocation]] are often credited with the more mid-tempo sub-genre of brutal death, while pioneers [[Atheist]] and [[Cynic]] brought strong jazz, jazz fusion and progressive elements to the genre. The Swedish death metal scene, which was originally known for a distinctive 'buzzsaw' guitar sound and strong hardcore punk influences, soon took the genre in a different direction. In particular, the Gothenburg scene produced extemely popular melodic death metal bands such as [[At the Gates]], [[In Flames]] and [[Dark Tranquillity]]. Other sub-genres of death metal include technical death metal ([[Necrophagist]], [[Origin]]), blackened death metal ([[Akercocke]]), death-doom metal (which was pioneered in the early 1990s by acts such as [[Autopsy]]), and deathcore, which mixes elements of metalcore into death metal (early [[Job for a Cowboy]], [[Whitechapel]], [[Despised Icon]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sub-genres ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metal has diversified enormously since the early days of Black Sabbath. Sub-genres include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Doom metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by [[Black Sabbath]], the genre's main characteristic is that of almost exclusive use of low tempos in order to create a crushing and dark atmosphere. Arguably, Black Sabbath's song Black Sabbath was the first song of this genre, with extensive use of a tritone in its main riff, and dark, slow progression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New wave of British heavy metal (NWOBHM)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Glam metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Speed metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Thrash metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Power metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Death metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the aggression and speed of thrash, death metal is incredibly diverse. The music will typically use many chromatic riffs, naturally distorted vocals (known as death growls, but high shrieking and clean singing are not unknown), extensive double bass drumming and blast beats, and extremely high tempos. However, mid and low tempos are also very prevalent, with bands such as [[Suffocation]] and [[Cryptopsy]] using this extensively as a tool to contrast the high tempos which make up much of their songs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Black metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Stoner metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metalcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deathcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deathcore takes death metal, often with elements such as pedal riffs taken from melodic death, and adds to them the hardcore vocals and one-note, palm-muted breakdowns of metalcore. Deathcore has known a period of high popularity, but is often rejected from many underground circles for using elements of metalcore, which is perceived as being less extreme and more commercial than most metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Djent '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A relatively recent term for bands making heavy use of low tunings (usually played on 7 or 8 stringed guitars) with extensive use of polymetrics. [[Meshuggah]] were the first band to make use of these musical devices extensively; in the last two years, bands such as [[TesseracT]], [[Bulb]], [[Periphery]] and [[Animals as Leaders]] taken Meshuggah's template and expanded on it; one common Djent trait is to make extensive use of atmospheric keyboards, something Meshuggah has never done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744367</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744367"/>
		<updated>2010-01-13T09:36:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Undo revision 744243 by AlexWD (Talk) (illogical revert on the basis that AlexWD had never heard of these rather central bands.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sub-genres ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metal has diversified enormously since the early days of Black Sabbath. Sub-genres include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Doom metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by [[Black Sabbath]], the genre's main characteristic is that of almost exclusive use of low tempos in order to create a crushing and dark atmosphere. Arguably, Black Sabbath's song Black Sabbath was the first song of this genre, with extensive use of a tritone in its main riff, and dark, slow progression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New wave of British heavy metal (NWOBHM)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Glam metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Speed metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Thrash metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Power metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Death metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the aggression and speed of thrash, death metal is incredibly diverse. The music will typically use many chromatic riffs, naturally distorted vocals (known as death growls, but high shrieking and clean singing are not unknown), extensive double bass drumming and blast beats, and extremely high tempos. However, mid and low tempos are also very prevalent, with bands such as [[Suffocation]] and [[Cryptopsy]] using this extensively as a tool to contrast the high tempos which make up much of their songs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Black metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Stoner metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metalcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deathcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deathcore takes death metal, often with elements such as pedal riffs taken from melodic death, and adds to them the hardcore vocals and one-note, palm-muted breakdowns of metalcore. Deathcore has known a period of high popularity, but is often rejected from many underground circles for using elements of metalcore, which is perceived as being less extreme and more commercial than most metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Djent '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A relatively recent term for bands making heavy use of low tunings (usually played on 7 or 8 stringed guitars) with extensive use of polymetrics. [[Meshuggah]] were the first band to make use of these musical devices extensively; in the last two years, bands such as [[TesseracT]], [[Bulb]], [[Periphery]] and [[Animals as Leaders]] taken Meshuggah's template and expanded on it; one common Djent trait is to make extensive use of atmospheric keyboards, something Meshuggah has never done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744236</id>
		<title>Talk:Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744236"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:57:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Christianity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I find the statement on Christianity to be rather inaccurate. While I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, that is no excuse for fallacies. Many metalheads and musicians are openly Christian, such as Dave Mustaine and Dave Ellefson of Megadeth, Jack Owen, and Tom Araya of Slayer. I believe a more accurate statement would be that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent in extreme metal music. There is also a strong Christian Metal Subgenre, see bands such as As I Lay Dying, Believer, and Stryper.  I shall change the statements to be more accurate and less condemning. [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 16:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't even say that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent at all.  I listen to metal music, and sure some of it is about death and killing and things like that, but I wouldn't say it's Anti-Christian.  Some metal music includes themes that are similar to many popular songs of other genres, just in a different form. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 16:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's primarily what I hoped to get across, I suppose the term &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; is more accurate. I consider the music to show, when it discusses Satan, a Christian perception of the being. What I meant to say was that the only genre, to my knowledge, that contains overtly anti-Christian themes would be death metal or black metal, and even there it is somewhat rare. I think many mainstream Christians misconstrue the disrespect for organized religion (i.e, a church, pastors, or priests.) for being Anti-Christian. They are not one in the same, as to not believe in church is not the same as not believing in god. I'll change it to be more accurate.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a metal fan (who's wearing a Dream Theater shirt right now), I think that the Satan reference was ridiculous. I took it right out. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:08, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed, i thought of it as inappropriate as well, but since it referenced it as the opinions of conservatives, I left it. Dream Theater! Another openly Christian metal band (though not in the Christian metal genre). I have a few more changes to make on the article, you left a slight typo! I forgive you! [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:13, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, creating this article in the way I did was almost a joke; this is indeed a conservative encyclopedia -- so I used those particular statements to be, in a way, on the extreme of what some people might think. Don't take it the wrong way.  Plus, the username I chose might have tipped people off: I really don't know much in the way of creating encyclopedia articles, so I left things vague and unopinionated (my opinions, anyway).  I am actually a metal fan who laughed at the article, not believing in what I was typing.  Then again, some of the more extreme Black metal bands do reference Satan in non-metaphorical terms.  But most of those bands are without actual substance and therefore suck. [[User:N00b|N00b]] 09:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, and I know only two people that worship the devil, as a god, in metal music of any form: Glen Benton, and Oystein Aarseth (Aka Euronymous), both extremists not to be considered the standard of a heavy-metaller.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 17:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to prove that anyone is actually &amp;quot;worshiping Satan&amp;quot;. Let's not fall into that trap. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Link==&lt;br /&gt;
Is that parody..? Linking to a cliched, comedic-parody of a heavy metal band in order to illustrate the article? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just about to say the same thing. Spinal tap was a fictionalized parody of a metal band. (And a darn good band, if I do say so myself, and I do). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The movie [[Spinal Tap]] was a comedy; I'd like to write about its director, who made a few similar movies like [[A Mighty Wind]] (satirizing folk music performers). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob Reiner directed &amp;quot;This Is Spinal Tap&amp;quot;,  but it was Christopher Guest who directed &amp;quot;A Mighty Wind&amp;quot;. Guest wrote/co-wrote both of them though. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are devilishly clever, my friend! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Guest is quite an interesting subject for a bio, even without touching on his works - Jewish American British nobleman... Quite a mix. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spirituality and etiquette==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's tread carefully while describing the delicate issue of [[spirituality]] of metal bands. Some have exploited satanic imagery, to be sure, but their proportion might be less than 99%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass reverts aren't good form. Just change one section at a time, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As someone who is fairly knowledgable about heavy metal, I actually agree with Walker in that I've never heard the term Satan's Fire Metal. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:27, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State of the Article==&lt;br /&gt;
In it's current condition this article is a joke to anyone who knows anything about metal. 99.9 percent of bands that have pyrotechnics are not trying to recreate hell. Also &amp;quot;the horns&amp;quot; are more often just a sign for metal and unity amongst metalheads and are not done to look like satan or praise satan. It isn't even limited to metal you will see it at even country and boy band shows or how about a Texas Longhorns football game? The song meanings are ridiculous, Go To Hell is about someone that is damned to hell, it is not promoting satanism. It was written for the Bill and Teds Bogus Journey movie where the charecters go to hell. Take no prisioners is about military warfare. The song references Normandy and Panzers so it was probably inspired by D-Day, it is not promoting violence anymore than Saving Private Ryan. Suicide Sollution is about how abusing drugs and alcohol to solve your problems is a &amp;quot;suicide&amp;quot; sollution. Fade to Black is about losing the will to carry on, and was inspired by the bands equipment being stolen, it can be interpreted as a suicide song but even then how is it glamorized? Also why was the referenced content about Christians in non Christian bands removed? All the unreferenced stuff on this page should be removed before that was.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 13:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal strikes me as utterly proposterous. Just like the idea of African Klu Klux Klan members or Jewish Nazis is utterly proposterous. Quit trying to make Heavy Metal music into something that it is not. You've made various attempts to censor the material here or downplay Metal's dangerous nature, but it's not going to work. Maybe you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. Your attempts to disassociate Metal with Satanism are pathetic. That's like saying you're a Ku Klux Klan member but you're not into the whole discrimination thing.. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jose calm down. Metal is a style of music, not a way of thinking. There is absolutely no contridiction with someone using a certain style of music to promote ''any'' message -- good ''or'' bad. You should check out some Christian metal. A youth Christian musical concert (Ichthus) often features metal bands -- one of their tents is dedicated entirely towards &amp;quot;heavier&amp;quot; music. I also personally know the manager of a Christian metal band. He is old friends with my youth pastor at church and I've done some work with him. He is an intense Christian and his music is... well, rather intense. So please take a chill pill and open your mind to other possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
::Think about it this way: even if metal ''were'' &amp;quot;satanist--dominated&amp;quot; (which I don't think it is), wouldn't that therefore be the best place for a Christian band? Jesus hanged out with prostitutes and beggars, remember. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's even Christian rap, which uses the rapid-fire half-spoken style of [[hip hop]] to convey the pro-woman, anti-violence message of Jesus and salvation. My favorite &amp;quot;heavenly metal&amp;quot; group is [[The Ancestors]]. And there's always [[Stryper]] (&amp;quot;by his stripes we were healed&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I do not agree with what any of you have posted. However, perhaps I shall listen to some of this &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal and &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; rap. There might be a small chance that I am wrong. I was wrong about Spinal tap. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This music.. [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huod7HJe4BM]] It's disgusting. I'm going to have to disagree with all those who support &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal. This just doesn't sound very Christian to me.. First of all, it's too loud and violent sounding and the screaming sounds very demonic. Even if there are pro-Christian lyrics in the songs it's impossible to tell because the screaming is incomprehensible. The choice of intervals strikes me as interesting.. Very evil sounding. Please listen and tell me what you think.. I really don't get it. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It obviously wasn't designed with you in mind. I don't hear anything &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;, except that you automatically associate the genre with evil, which is a circular argument. I don't hear any &amp;quot;evil-sounding intervals&amp;quot; either. Try looking up some lyrics before you base Christianity on how a group decides to play the guitar. Here's one called [http://lyrics.christiansunite.com/lyrics_1134_7.shtml If I Die] by Stryper. (&amp;quot;Living was hard /And loneliness easily justified / Oh, then I found You / Ooh, I suddenly knew / What I wanted to do was to make You satisfied / And not to die for selfish pleasure / But to live with You by my side&amp;quot;). It's not as heavy musically (here's a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFOsQd34qE Youtube vid] -- ignore the visuals though), but still considered &amp;quot;metal&amp;quot; I would think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I did some searching, and here's the lyrics from one of the songs in the video you found [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734]. Check out the description at the bottom: &amp;quot;True hope should only be placed in Christ, and no man. Christ will never fail you...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This isn't your mom's Christian music! But that doesn't make it wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would this qualify as metal? I could actually see myself listening to something like this. It's melodic, and the singing is clean and clear. Thanks.. This is inspiring. But I don't think it's heavy metal. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's why I found the other lyrics for you. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734 These] are lyrics from that Youtube video you disagreed with. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Jose all of what you are saying is your own personal opinion. How is it to loud? Any music can be to loud, if that is a problem turn the volume down. Different people have different tastes, just because you don't like a style of music doesn't make it &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;. Besides the bible instructs us to &amp;quot;Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully with a loud noise&amp;quot; (Psalm 33:3). God is infinitely bigger than your music tastes. Also many styles of metal have very easily comprehensable lyrics and so what if they aren't comprehensible? Does that make it wrong? If you don't like it thats fine, but it doesn't give you the right to try and demonize something just because it doesn't appeal to your personal tastes.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:14, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt Jesus would have &amp;quot;rocked out&amp;quot; to this garbage. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I think if you feel that the music is &amp;quot;garbage&amp;quot; then we should find someone with a more neutral attitude to edit it, no? I'm not saying you shouldn't edit, but I would think hard about if you are the appropriate one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you know God's musical tastes?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::God is absolutely Holy, therefore he wouldn't indulge in music with satanic connotation. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could you be a little more specific as to what you mean by &amp;quot;satanic connotation&amp;quot;.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:39, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A lot of heavy metal is inspired by Satan and the occult. This definitely would not cater to God's taste. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jesus hanged (hung? I never get that right) out with sinners, beggars and prostitutes. If this music really is as evil as you say, shouldn't Christians get in there to converted these supposed evildoers? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many books are inspired by Satan and the occult, does that mean all books are against God?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:49, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus would have discouraged the prostitutes from whoring themselves and they would have discouraged these bands from playing the music they are playing. He wouldn't encourage more Christians to become prostitutes or play heavy metal. A certain category of books are inspired by satan and the occult and all within that category are against god, just like how heavy metal is a certain genre of music which is against god. Not all music is against god. True heavy metal is. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I guess we know that these artists aren't Jesus himself then. It doesn't mean they aren't Christian, however. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jesus hung out with drunks and whores, I guess, him being so tolerant and all. But he also is famous for telling the adulterous woman to &amp;quot;go and sin no more&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My impression of metal is that it invokes a lot of nasty symbols: devils, long tongues, gloomy or morbid lyrics, etc. Within the genre I'm sure there are a handful of Christian groups like [[Stryper]] (which I wrote, hint hint!) who I suppose decided to &amp;quot;move into the neighborhood&amp;quot; and seek converts among metalheads. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
How does linking to lyrics prove the song is &amp;quot;promoting&amp;quot; satanism.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Funny the Fade to Black reference actually say the opposite of what is stated in the article.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly you and ''Jose'' disagree on many aspects of this genre of music. I suggest you '''add''' everything you want, while letting him do the same. I'll check back from time to time and see if I can integrate your work and his. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stop==&lt;br /&gt;
The article has seen plenty of edits going on, with no real improvement to its state. I can see both sides of the argument, but unless Walker and Jose83 can start to learn to work together, then we're just going to end up with a bigger pile of cowcake than when we started. The article is dire right now, and frankly the best thing is for you two to step away from it for a day and work out what you want to say in it, get together your references, then we'll take it from there. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:40, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was following Ed Poor's instruction from above. I wasn't changing his edits.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:41, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not apportioning any kind of blame. And Ed's advice is good, excepting for the fact that the article is now a scab to both of you and you can't resist picking it. Leave it until tomorrow, it will be unlocked in about 12 hours, and we can try to put together a '''coherent''' article presenting the facts as we know them, instead of a point/counterpoint list of grievances. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::==Dial-the-Truth-Ministries==&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Dial-the-Truth-Ministry is a controversial religious group that is part of King James Only Movement. One of the main goals of the group is to denounce the evil that they believe Christian metal or rock music is. The group believes that any form of music with a beat is evil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.av1611.org/ Dial-the-Truth-Ministries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ted Kirkpatrick, the drummer for the Christian metal band Tourniquet stated the following about the groups website, ''&amp;quot;This site is so full of inaccuracies, so devoid of sound Biblical principles, and uses such twisted logic, that some have emailed us asking if it was done as a joke.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tourniquet.net/faq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added the above here since the article is locked so I can move it to the article when it is unlocked.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:47, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... this article needs to be a collaboration, not a rant, from both sides. Content: I'm working on adding some history and the &amp;quot;technicalities&amp;quot; of what HM is (&amp;quot;neutral to the facts&amp;quot;), and then the more controversial aspects can be worked in by you guys. As I said it would be, it's unprotected, but that doesn't mean you should just come along and edit in tiny soundbites. Try to edit cohesively, so that the article doesn't just resemble the transcript of two guys shouting each other down :) [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 08:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needs to be SOME mention of Satanism in the article. Neglecting to do so is just plain irresponsible. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Try concentrating on an explanation of why some people believe there are Satanic elements in heavy metal. What satanic themes do they find in it? Imagery, lyrics? Be specific and provide references. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your work is being reverted, then create a user subpage like [[User:Jose83/metal]]. No one is allowed to edit there but you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagery of certain metal bands definitely attempt to make Satan appear &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.teens411.com/newspics/mudvayne.jpg Mudvayne picture]] The guy actually looks like the Devil!&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://static.metal-archives.com/images/3/9/4/394.jpg Countless]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Iron_Maiden-Dance_of_Death.jpg Iron Maiden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.mystrands.com/photos/1/4/5/normal/14556.jpg Covers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.av1611.org/rock.html]] And lyrics of many metal songs clearly convey an Anti-Christian/Satanic message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to give an honest depiction of what this music is instead of trying to make it out to be wholesome Christian music like Walker is trying to do. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're preaching to the choir. Those are good links. Now do some writing. Don't worry about reverts; Fox and I can resurrect anything that gets killed. (Oops, am I getting arrogant?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Instances of individual Satanic metal bands should only be used to argue against those bands being good, not just the whole genre. Should we argue that all movies of a certain genre are bad just because a few are rated R and point out instances of nudity and profanity in those movies? It's a logical fallacy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:00, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suicide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:suicide is the only way out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Ozzy quoting what the lad says to rebut it? Or is he promoting [[suicide]]? Perhaps it is this kind of ambiguity that makes parents and educators worry that metal is bad for kids. It's a far cry from, &amp;quot;Come and play / everything's A-OK&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I love you / You love me&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is the Scripture that follows promoting suicide? &amp;quot;Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him.&amp;quot; (1 Samuel 31:4-5) &amp;quot;But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.&amp;quot; (1 Kings 19:4 ) You have to put that line back into the context of the song, which is quite plainly about alcohol abuse, about how it is nothing glamorous, just a slow suicide for the alcoholic. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:25, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jolly good. So let's point out that '''not all''' references to suicide in heavy metal music are intended to glorify it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fact is you probaably can't find one example of a band '''glorifying''' suicide. Why would any band glorify suicide? If they are in the buisness of selling albums and filling the seats at concerts why would they want their fans to kill themselves? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 15:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The closest I can come to a band ''glorifying'' suicide would be ''Don't Fear the Reaper'' by Blue Oyster Cult. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 15:52, 28 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/standard/main.htm - rock music&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/satanic_quotes.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/nature.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian metal is not evil ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is preposterous to say that all Christian metal is evil. Every claim is based upon specific instances of evil in secular metal, and thus not a valid comparison. This site defends Christian metal against every argument that groups like Dial-the-Truth can come up with: http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/craindex.htm [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:59, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes this is quite obvious and wow that site is wonderful. This site here http://www.metalforjesus.org/friorfoe.html is also pretty good although it doesn't contain nearly as much information. I'd also like to point out that although there are secular acts that promote immorality and blaspheme and stuff like that, many of them do not. First of all just because a song is about something does not mean a band is advocating or promoting it. Oftentimes they are just telling a story for entertainment value and they often use satire. There are many different styles of metal and many of them have totally different common lyrical themes. These links Jose is posting are laughable. I'd also like to know how Jose knows what Satan physically looks like. According to one of the links, apparently when Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden told Hit Parader magazine that, &amp;quot;We can play with conviction every night, because we totally believe in the music we're performing.&amp;quot; That means that he is a satanist. Also what does posting links of album covers prove. If you want to find viable criticisms of heavy metal that aren't going to make this article into one of the jokes of conservapedia you might want to stay away from using Terry Watkins as a source.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 22:25, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you admit there are many Metal bands to promote immorality and blasphemy.. We have progress! If an Artist makes a song about &amp;quot;Killing 'em all&amp;quot; they don't need to openly promote it as a band to promote it because the song is already out there and young impressionable children are already being brainwashed and programmed. And you can also play dumb and and pretend that the guy from Mudvayne isn't trying to look like Satan but he looks exactly how popular culture has made him out to look like. Iron Maiden heavily relies on demonic images to sell-out concerts and sell albums. This is especially prevelant on their album covers where the marketing of a demon-like mascot is irrefutable. Do you listen to these bands, Walker? -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iron Maiden isn't a good influence. They had a song called &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot;. Nobody's saying that Iron Maiden is a good band. The issue here is Christian metal bands, who tend not to have songs like that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry another point I am trying to make is that much of secular metal does not stand as a polar opposite to Christian metal as well--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:13, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll concede that Christian Heavy Metal may not be ''evil'', but I think their Artists have selected the wrong medium in which to praise Jesus. I have not made any claims of Christian Metal being evil in the revised article. However, I will not write anything positive about it either. I shall leave that to you, Fox, or Walker. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never denied that there weren't bands who did, you made the claim that either most or all bands do, which simply is not true. Also a question, if something is a medium that means it is neither right or wrong, so why is it wrong?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:15, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A medium is not inherently neutral. All heavy metal is aggressive and violent so it incites aggressive, violent behavior in the listener. My former friend was in a car wreck because the music he was listening to {System of a Down} caused him to drive irresponsibly. Also, just read the news. Riots at heavy metal concerts are the norm. There is no denying that Rock music in general evokes aggressive feelings in the listener. I just don't believe that these feelings should be evoked while praising Jesus. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making generalizations.  [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your friend was in a car wreck because he's a reckless driver. - [[User:JasonAQuest|JasonAQuest]] 23:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I admited there are some bands that blaspheme and promote immorality, you can find people that do that in pretty much every area of life so what is your point? That doesn't mean all of it is like that. There is no song called Killing Em All that I know of. I don't like Mudvayne but suppoesadly they are trying to look like aliens from a fictional story that they created and base there albums on. Well if you examine the lyrics of the song &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot; which actually opens with a reading from the bible. The song is just a story about a guy who is trying to get away from a satanic cult and ultimately is unable to escape them. Apparently it was based on a nightmare Steve Harris had after seeing one of The Omen movies. Eddie is just a cartoon masscot and he is something different on pretty much every album cover. I've always thought of him as some sort of B horror movie type of zombie rather than a demon and by the logic you present I suppose the New Jersey Devils are also relying on satanism to promote their hockey team and Hot Tamales candies and other various hot sauce companies are doing the same? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:12, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article poses as unbiased. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would never expect a true conservative website to be so pro-heavy metal but here we are. The criticism section is laughable because it contains no real criticism at all whatsoever. I took the time to examine previous versions of the article and noticed that there were indeed previous examples of valid criticism, but they were removed by user [[User:Walker|Walker]]. I also noticed that a vast majority of his contributions involve removing criticism from articles of his Heavy Metal heroes. I believe this article should be revamped with some input from people who are willing to voice valid criticisms of the genre.  - [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please look at the reason for removing the criticism section before blindly adding it back in yourself (along with removing someone else's unrelated work). Most, if not all, of the references are junk; one actually leads you to a site where you can buy a &amp;quot;research paper&amp;quot; about heavy metal music. Plagiarism sites are not valid citations. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]], if there are any real valid criticisms out there then find them and add them to the article since you find it to be lacking.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 16:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps this site should be renamed Liberalpedia. Too deny that Heavy Metal is influenced by Satanists and Athiests is just downright looney. I cannot believe that blatantly un-christian music can be portrayed positively on a Conservative website. I readded the previous criticism section because it's the true conservative christian thing to do.  -- [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a conservative ''encyclopedia''. Did you even look at anything Walker or I have said? Better yet, have you looked at the portion you keep adding? Please tell me how [http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/64763.html this] is a reliable source. If heavy metal music is so unilaterally evil, surely you can find some better sources than that. Nobody is saying you can't have a critisism, but it has to follow our rules. If you readd the section again without better sources you will be blocked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:33, 11 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dang! Since when is a particular type of music evil. It's the people behind the music and what they are promoting that can be evil...... not the music itself. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 21:54, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We need more ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty of web resources we can use, and books too, I have a few of them and plan to add the citations (I know not how to do that yet, however I realize it must be simple.) Right now the article seems to lack much historical description for the genre save what I just added, as well as a description of the music itself aside from commonly held conceptions about what heavy metal is. Certainly we can do better. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Something else to consider: the criticism is not really... criticism, at all. In fact I'm trying to figure out if we need a criticism section at all if what is currently there is the only thing anyone can find. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 16:25, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definite need of a revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
This looks like the kind of article [[Wikipedia]] would have for Heavy Metal. In order to clean this article up, we should start by redoing the criticism section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jose83/Heavy_Metal_music &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I plan on using the above link as a rough guideline for how the article should look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Having substantive content, as per wikipedia, is not necessarily a bad thing.  By all means add info you feel would be censored by wikipedia - but to censor material which has been added without justifiable reasons (such as when material is unable to be backed up by citations) is against Conservapedia's commandments --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 10:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. The recent additions, while not broadly incorrect or out of place, reek of bias and ignorance. Not to play the authority card, but why not let people who /know/ something about heavy metal edit the article instead? I swear facts actually do help articles. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:15, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I figured that there was a difference between this article and Jose's talk page at first glance, but really it's just the same unsourced material from her talk page shoe-horned into this page without any sources whatsoever that actually back up her assertions. Indeed, as a long time Pantera and Megadeth fan, I can say your interpretations of their song lyrics or literal to the point of deception. If Phil and Owns thought suicide was so spectacular in the vein /you/ seem to believe then they would have sliced their own wrists by now. But obviously that is not the case. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I refuse to tolerate your ignorant behavior. If &amp;quot;liberal denial&amp;quot; is the best you can come up with then kindly stop editing this page and let us who know a thing or two about this subject handle it. It's quite obvious that you cannot. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:07, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your deception is weak, Jirby. It's obvious to me that you are attempting to hide the harmful effects of Heavy Metal music because you are in denial of them, being a devout follower of the genre. We don't believe in censorship here at Conservapedia and if you want to exhibit more [[Liberal denial]] in the form of Rule #60, maybe you will feel more at home here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music]]. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: AAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! I love it. If I argue then I'm in denial. If I don't argue, this article is allowed to exist in it's current deceitful form. Alright now seriously. Either source (which you can't) your assertions or don't expect them to remain in the article for more than five minutes before someone who knows better (me and the other actual CONTRIBUTORS to the article) remove them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, whilst I don't oft go into the personal details of my life, yes I love heavy metal. Big deal. You hate it. Big deal. If you can come up with a sourced, logical position, then I don't care what your personal tastes are, however, right now you're simply directing all of your hate onto a MORALLY NEUTRAL abstraction. As I said. I won't tolerate it. Now source, or delete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ball is in your court. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:16, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources will be posted within minutes -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:25, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... GnR are not considered heavy metal, first and foremost. Even if they were, riots are not EXPECTED to occur at heavy metal shows any more than with other shows of other musical genres. Also, Heavy Metal is /considered/ anti-christian by some, HENCE THE CRITICISM SECTION. Simply calling it anti-christian because you /perceive/ it to be anti-christian is not encyclopedic.[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:40, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns N Roses are Heavy Metal and your claim that a riot is as likely to occur at any concert of any musical genre is ridiculous. I've never heard of a full-scale riot breaking out at an Elton John concert. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incorrect. GnR is hardrock, you can't argue this/ If you think GnR is typical metal then you're hopelessly ignorant of what most metal sounds like. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request intervention ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose is beginning to annoy me, and I refuse to participate in an edit war with someone who obviously has such a strong anti-metal bent that the article is virtually untouchable by anyone with any sense. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And now she is beginning to vandalize the talk page. See talk page edit history. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Quit it with the childish name calling. You have been refering to me as a female when I am actual a male in order to annoy me. Stop now. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Jose is usually a girl's name. My bad. You can take yourself off the cross now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:58, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have yet to meet a single women in my life that went by &amp;quot;Jose&amp;quot;. Jose is typically a man's name, especially with Latinos. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose83 is a parodist. Check his block log. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, wasn't this solved, like, months ago? The description of &amp;quot;anti-Christian&amp;quot; does not belong in the first sentence of the article; it is not a fact, will never be a fact, and your website reference has no authority. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not enough information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article fails even to mention doom metal, death metal, melodic death metal, or any modern trends in metal, despite having sections devoted to the 1980s and 1990s, decades notable for far more musical innovation than just groove or black metal. I've stuck some bands in as examples and edit in some more in due course - as it stands I've missed out a lot of stuff. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added the basis of some more extensive descriptions. I've filled in a couple, and will do more, but I am no expert on glam, thrash, stoner, speed and new wave of british heavy metal. Any help would be welcomed. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744235</id>
		<title>Talk:Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744235"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:56:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Christianity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I find the statement on Christianity to be rather inaccurate. While I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, that is no excuse for fallacies. Many metalheads and musicians are openly Christian, such as Dave Mustaine and Dave Ellefson of Megadeth, Jack Owen, and Tom Araya of Slayer. I believe a more accurate statement would be that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent in extreme metal music. There is also a strong Christian Metal Subgenre, see bands such as As I Lay Dying, Believer, and Stryper.  I shall change the statements to be more accurate and less condemning. [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 16:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't even say that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent at all.  I listen to metal music, and sure some of it is about death and killing and things like that, but I wouldn't say it's Anti-Christian.  Some metal music includes themes that are similar to many popular songs of other genres, just in a different form. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 16:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's primarily what I hoped to get across, I suppose the term &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; is more accurate. I consider the music to show, when it discusses Satan, a Christian perception of the being. What I meant to say was that the only genre, to my knowledge, that contains overtly anti-Christian themes would be death metal or black metal, and even there it is somewhat rare. I think many mainstream Christians misconstrue the disrespect for organized religion (i.e, a church, pastors, or priests.) for being Anti-Christian. They are not one in the same, as to not believe in church is not the same as not believing in god. I'll change it to be more accurate.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a metal fan (who's wearing a Dream Theater shirt right now), I think that the Satan reference was ridiculous. I took it right out. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:08, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed, i thought of it as inappropriate as well, but since it referenced it as the opinions of conservatives, I left it. Dream Theater! Another openly Christian metal band (though not in the Christian metal genre). I have a few more changes to make on the article, you left a slight typo! I forgive you! [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:13, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, creating this article in the way I did was almost a joke; this is indeed a conservative encyclopedia -- so I used those particular statements to be, in a way, on the extreme of what some people might think. Don't take it the wrong way.  Plus, the username I chose might have tipped people off: I really don't know much in the way of creating encyclopedia articles, so I left things vague and unopinionated (my opinions, anyway).  I am actually a metal fan who laughed at the article, not believing in what I was typing.  Then again, some of the more extreme Black metal bands do reference Satan in non-metaphorical terms.  But most of those bands are without actual substance and therefore suck. [[User:N00b|N00b]] 09:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, and I know only two people that worship the devil, as a god, in metal music of any form: Glen Benton, and Oystein Aarseth (Aka Euronymous), both extremists not to be considered the standard of a heavy-metaller.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 17:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to prove that anyone is actually &amp;quot;worshiping Satan&amp;quot;. Let's not fall into that trap. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Link==&lt;br /&gt;
Is that parody..? Linking to a cliched, comedic-parody of a heavy metal band in order to illustrate the article? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just about to say the same thing. Spinal tap was a fictionalized parody of a metal band. (And a darn good band, if I do say so myself, and I do). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The movie [[Spinal Tap]] was a comedy; I'd like to write about its director, who made a few similar movies like [[A Mighty Wind]] (satirizing folk music performers). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob Reiner directed &amp;quot;This Is Spinal Tap&amp;quot;,  but it was Christopher Guest who directed &amp;quot;A Mighty Wind&amp;quot;. Guest wrote/co-wrote both of them though. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are devilishly clever, my friend! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Guest is quite an interesting subject for a bio, even without touching on his works - Jewish American British nobleman... Quite a mix. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spirituality and etiquette==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's tread carefully while describing the delicate issue of [[spirituality]] of metal bands. Some have exploited satanic imagery, to be sure, but their proportion might be less than 99%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass reverts aren't good form. Just change one section at a time, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As someone who is fairly knowledgable about heavy metal, I actually agree with Walker in that I've never heard the term Satan's Fire Metal. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:27, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State of the Article==&lt;br /&gt;
In it's current condition this article is a joke to anyone who knows anything about metal. 99.9 percent of bands that have pyrotechnics are not trying to recreate hell. Also &amp;quot;the horns&amp;quot; are more often just a sign for metal and unity amongst metalheads and are not done to look like satan or praise satan. It isn't even limited to metal you will see it at even country and boy band shows or how about a Texas Longhorns football game? The song meanings are ridiculous, Go To Hell is about someone that is damned to hell, it is not promoting satanism. It was written for the Bill and Teds Bogus Journey movie where the charecters go to hell. Take no prisioners is about military warfare. The song references Normandy and Panzers so it was probably inspired by D-Day, it is not promoting violence anymore than Saving Private Ryan. Suicide Sollution is about how abusing drugs and alcohol to solve your problems is a &amp;quot;suicide&amp;quot; sollution. Fade to Black is about losing the will to carry on, and was inspired by the bands equipment being stolen, it can be interpreted as a suicide song but even then how is it glamorized? Also why was the referenced content about Christians in non Christian bands removed? All the unreferenced stuff on this page should be removed before that was.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 13:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal strikes me as utterly proposterous. Just like the idea of African Klu Klux Klan members or Jewish Nazis is utterly proposterous. Quit trying to make Heavy Metal music into something that it is not. You've made various attempts to censor the material here or downplay Metal's dangerous nature, but it's not going to work. Maybe you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. Your attempts to disassociate Metal with Satanism are pathetic. That's like saying you're a Ku Klux Klan member but you're not into the whole discrimination thing.. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jose calm down. Metal is a style of music, not a way of thinking. There is absolutely no contridiction with someone using a certain style of music to promote ''any'' message -- good ''or'' bad. You should check out some Christian metal. A youth Christian musical concert (Ichthus) often features metal bands -- one of their tents is dedicated entirely towards &amp;quot;heavier&amp;quot; music. I also personally know the manager of a Christian metal band. He is old friends with my youth pastor at church and I've done some work with him. He is an intense Christian and his music is... well, rather intense. So please take a chill pill and open your mind to other possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
::Think about it this way: even if metal ''were'' &amp;quot;satanist--dominated&amp;quot; (which I don't think it is), wouldn't that therefore be the best place for a Christian band? Jesus hanged out with prostitutes and beggars, remember. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's even Christian rap, which uses the rapid-fire half-spoken style of [[hip hop]] to convey the pro-woman, anti-violence message of Jesus and salvation. My favorite &amp;quot;heavenly metal&amp;quot; group is [[The Ancestors]]. And there's always [[Stryper]] (&amp;quot;by his stripes we were healed&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I do not agree with what any of you have posted. However, perhaps I shall listen to some of this &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal and &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; rap. There might be a small chance that I am wrong. I was wrong about Spinal tap. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This music.. [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huod7HJe4BM]] It's disgusting. I'm going to have to disagree with all those who support &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal. This just doesn't sound very Christian to me.. First of all, it's too loud and violent sounding and the screaming sounds very demonic. Even if there are pro-Christian lyrics in the songs it's impossible to tell because the screaming is incomprehensible. The choice of intervals strikes me as interesting.. Very evil sounding. Please listen and tell me what you think.. I really don't get it. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It obviously wasn't designed with you in mind. I don't hear anything &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;, except that you automatically associate the genre with evil, which is a circular argument. I don't hear any &amp;quot;evil-sounding intervals&amp;quot; either. Try looking up some lyrics before you base Christianity on how a group decides to play the guitar. Here's one called [http://lyrics.christiansunite.com/lyrics_1134_7.shtml If I Die] by Stryper. (&amp;quot;Living was hard /And loneliness easily justified / Oh, then I found You / Ooh, I suddenly knew / What I wanted to do was to make You satisfied / And not to die for selfish pleasure / But to live with You by my side&amp;quot;). It's not as heavy musically (here's a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFOsQd34qE Youtube vid] -- ignore the visuals though), but still considered &amp;quot;metal&amp;quot; I would think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I did some searching, and here's the lyrics from one of the songs in the video you found [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734]. Check out the description at the bottom: &amp;quot;True hope should only be placed in Christ, and no man. Christ will never fail you...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This isn't your mom's Christian music! But that doesn't make it wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would this qualify as metal? I could actually see myself listening to something like this. It's melodic, and the singing is clean and clear. Thanks.. This is inspiring. But I don't think it's heavy metal. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's why I found the other lyrics for you. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734 These] are lyrics from that Youtube video you disagreed with. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Jose all of what you are saying is your own personal opinion. How is it to loud? Any music can be to loud, if that is a problem turn the volume down. Different people have different tastes, just because you don't like a style of music doesn't make it &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;. Besides the bible instructs us to &amp;quot;Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully with a loud noise&amp;quot; (Psalm 33:3). God is infinitely bigger than your music tastes. Also many styles of metal have very easily comprehensable lyrics and so what if they aren't comprehensible? Does that make it wrong? If you don't like it thats fine, but it doesn't give you the right to try and demonize something just because it doesn't appeal to your personal tastes.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:14, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt Jesus would have &amp;quot;rocked out&amp;quot; to this garbage. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I think if you feel that the music is &amp;quot;garbage&amp;quot; then we should find someone with a more neutral attitude to edit it, no? I'm not saying you shouldn't edit, but I would think hard about if you are the appropriate one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you know God's musical tastes?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::God is absolutely Holy, therefore he wouldn't indulge in music with satanic connotation. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could you be a little more specific as to what you mean by &amp;quot;satanic connotation&amp;quot;.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:39, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A lot of heavy metal is inspired by Satan and the occult. This definitely would not cater to God's taste. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jesus hanged (hung? I never get that right) out with sinners, beggars and prostitutes. If this music really is as evil as you say, shouldn't Christians get in there to converted these supposed evildoers? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many books are inspired by Satan and the occult, does that mean all books are against God?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:49, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus would have discouraged the prostitutes from whoring themselves and they would have discouraged these bands from playing the music they are playing. He wouldn't encourage more Christians to become prostitutes or play heavy metal. A certain category of books are inspired by satan and the occult and all within that category are against god, just like how heavy metal is a certain genre of music which is against god. Not all music is against god. True heavy metal is. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I guess we know that these artists aren't Jesus himself then. It doesn't mean they aren't Christian, however. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jesus hung out with drunks and whores, I guess, him being so tolerant and all. But he also is famous for telling the adulterous woman to &amp;quot;go and sin no more&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My impression of metal is that it invokes a lot of nasty symbols: devils, long tongues, gloomy or morbid lyrics, etc. Within the genre I'm sure there are a handful of Christian groups like [[Stryper]] (which I wrote, hint hint!) who I suppose decided to &amp;quot;move into the neighborhood&amp;quot; and seek converts among metalheads. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
How does linking to lyrics prove the song is &amp;quot;promoting&amp;quot; satanism.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Funny the Fade to Black reference actually say the opposite of what is stated in the article.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly you and ''Jose'' disagree on many aspects of this genre of music. I suggest you '''add''' everything you want, while letting him do the same. I'll check back from time to time and see if I can integrate your work and his. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stop==&lt;br /&gt;
The article has seen plenty of edits going on, with no real improvement to its state. I can see both sides of the argument, but unless Walker and Jose83 can start to learn to work together, then we're just going to end up with a bigger pile of cowcake than when we started. The article is dire right now, and frankly the best thing is for you two to step away from it for a day and work out what you want to say in it, get together your references, then we'll take it from there. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:40, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was following Ed Poor's instruction from above. I wasn't changing his edits.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:41, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not apportioning any kind of blame. And Ed's advice is good, excepting for the fact that the article is now a scab to both of you and you can't resist picking it. Leave it until tomorrow, it will be unlocked in about 12 hours, and we can try to put together a '''coherent''' article presenting the facts as we know them, instead of a point/counterpoint list of grievances. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::==Dial-the-Truth-Ministries==&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Dial-the-Truth-Ministry is a controversial religious group that is part of King James Only Movement. One of the main goals of the group is to denounce the evil that they believe Christian metal or rock music is. The group believes that any form of music with a beat is evil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.av1611.org/ Dial-the-Truth-Ministries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ted Kirkpatrick, the drummer for the Christian metal band Tourniquet stated the following about the groups website, ''&amp;quot;This site is so full of inaccuracies, so devoid of sound Biblical principles, and uses such twisted logic, that some have emailed us asking if it was done as a joke.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tourniquet.net/faq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added the above here since the article is locked so I can move it to the article when it is unlocked.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:47, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... this article needs to be a collaboration, not a rant, from both sides. Content: I'm working on adding some history and the &amp;quot;technicalities&amp;quot; of what HM is (&amp;quot;neutral to the facts&amp;quot;), and then the more controversial aspects can be worked in by you guys. As I said it would be, it's unprotected, but that doesn't mean you should just come along and edit in tiny soundbites. Try to edit cohesively, so that the article doesn't just resemble the transcript of two guys shouting each other down :) [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 08:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needs to be SOME mention of Satanism in the article. Neglecting to do so is just plain irresponsible. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Try concentrating on an explanation of why some people believe there are Satanic elements in heavy metal. What satanic themes do they find in it? Imagery, lyrics? Be specific and provide references. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your work is being reverted, then create a user subpage like [[User:Jose83/metal]]. No one is allowed to edit there but you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagery of certain metal bands definitely attempt to make Satan appear &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.teens411.com/newspics/mudvayne.jpg Mudvayne picture]] The guy actually looks like the Devil!&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://static.metal-archives.com/images/3/9/4/394.jpg Countless]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Iron_Maiden-Dance_of_Death.jpg Iron Maiden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.mystrands.com/photos/1/4/5/normal/14556.jpg Covers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.av1611.org/rock.html]] And lyrics of many metal songs clearly convey an Anti-Christian/Satanic message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to give an honest depiction of what this music is instead of trying to make it out to be wholesome Christian music like Walker is trying to do. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're preaching to the choir. Those are good links. Now do some writing. Don't worry about reverts; Fox and I can resurrect anything that gets killed. (Oops, am I getting arrogant?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Instances of individual Satanic metal bands should only be used to argue against those bands being good, not just the whole genre. Should we argue that all movies of a certain genre are bad just because a few are rated R and point out instances of nudity and profanity in those movies? It's a logical fallacy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:00, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suicide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:suicide is the only way out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Ozzy quoting what the lad says to rebut it? Or is he promoting [[suicide]]? Perhaps it is this kind of ambiguity that makes parents and educators worry that metal is bad for kids. It's a far cry from, &amp;quot;Come and play / everything's A-OK&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I love you / You love me&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is the Scripture that follows promoting suicide? &amp;quot;Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him.&amp;quot; (1 Samuel 31:4-5) &amp;quot;But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.&amp;quot; (1 Kings 19:4 ) You have to put that line back into the context of the song, which is quite plainly about alcohol abuse, about how it is nothing glamorous, just a slow suicide for the alcoholic. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:25, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jolly good. So let's point out that '''not all''' references to suicide in heavy metal music are intended to glorify it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fact is you probaably can't find one example of a band '''glorifying''' suicide. Why would any band glorify suicide? If they are in the buisness of selling albums and filling the seats at concerts why would they want their fans to kill themselves? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 15:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The closest I can come to a band ''glorifying'' suicide would be ''Don't Fear the Reaper'' by Blue Oyster Cult. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 15:52, 28 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/standard/main.htm - rock music&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/satanic_quotes.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/nature.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian metal is not evil ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is preposterous to say that all Christian metal is evil. Every claim is based upon specific instances of evil in secular metal, and thus not a valid comparison. This site defends Christian metal against every argument that groups like Dial-the-Truth can come up with: http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/craindex.htm [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:59, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes this is quite obvious and wow that site is wonderful. This site here http://www.metalforjesus.org/friorfoe.html is also pretty good although it doesn't contain nearly as much information. I'd also like to point out that although there are secular acts that promote immorality and blaspheme and stuff like that, many of them do not. First of all just because a song is about something does not mean a band is advocating or promoting it. Oftentimes they are just telling a story for entertainment value and they often use satire. There are many different styles of metal and many of them have totally different common lyrical themes. These links Jose is posting are laughable. I'd also like to know how Jose knows what Satan physically looks like. According to one of the links, apparently when Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden told Hit Parader magazine that, &amp;quot;We can play with conviction every night, because we totally believe in the music we're performing.&amp;quot; That means that he is a satanist. Also what does posting links of album covers prove. If you want to find viable criticisms of heavy metal that aren't going to make this article into one of the jokes of conservapedia you might want to stay away from using Terry Watkins as a source.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 22:25, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you admit there are many Metal bands to promote immorality and blasphemy.. We have progress! If an Artist makes a song about &amp;quot;Killing 'em all&amp;quot; they don't need to openly promote it as a band to promote it because the song is already out there and young impressionable children are already being brainwashed and programmed. And you can also play dumb and and pretend that the guy from Mudvayne isn't trying to look like Satan but he looks exactly how popular culture has made him out to look like. Iron Maiden heavily relies on demonic images to sell-out concerts and sell albums. This is especially prevelant on their album covers where the marketing of a demon-like mascot is irrefutable. Do you listen to these bands, Walker? -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iron Maiden isn't a good influence. They had a song called &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot;. Nobody's saying that Iron Maiden is a good band. The issue here is Christian metal bands, who tend not to have songs like that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry another point I am trying to make is that much of secular metal does not stand as a polar opposite to Christian metal as well--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:13, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll concede that Christian Heavy Metal may not be ''evil'', but I think their Artists have selected the wrong medium in which to praise Jesus. I have not made any claims of Christian Metal being evil in the revised article. However, I will not write anything positive about it either. I shall leave that to you, Fox, or Walker. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never denied that there weren't bands who did, you made the claim that either most or all bands do, which simply is not true. Also a question, if something is a medium that means it is neither right or wrong, so why is it wrong?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:15, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A medium is not inherently neutral. All heavy metal is aggressive and violent so it incites aggressive, violent behavior in the listener. My former friend was in a car wreck because the music he was listening to {System of a Down} caused him to drive irresponsibly. Also, just read the news. Riots at heavy metal concerts are the norm. There is no denying that Rock music in general evokes aggressive feelings in the listener. I just don't believe that these feelings should be evoked while praising Jesus. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making generalizations.  [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your friend was in a car wreck because he's a reckless driver. - [[User:JasonAQuest|JasonAQuest]] 23:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I admited there are some bands that blaspheme and promote immorality, you can find people that do that in pretty much every area of life so what is your point? That doesn't mean all of it is like that. There is no song called Killing Em All that I know of. I don't like Mudvayne but suppoesadly they are trying to look like aliens from a fictional story that they created and base there albums on. Well if you examine the lyrics of the song &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot; which actually opens with a reading from the bible. The song is just a story about a guy who is trying to get away from a satanic cult and ultimately is unable to escape them. Apparently it was based on a nightmare Steve Harris had after seeing one of The Omen movies. Eddie is just a cartoon masscot and he is something different on pretty much every album cover. I've always thought of him as some sort of B horror movie type of zombie rather than a demon and by the logic you present I suppose the New Jersey Devils are also relying on satanism to promote their hockey team and Hot Tamales candies and other various hot sauce companies are doing the same? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:12, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article poses as unbiased. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would never expect a true conservative website to be so pro-heavy metal but here we are. The criticism section is laughable because it contains no real criticism at all whatsoever. I took the time to examine previous versions of the article and noticed that there were indeed previous examples of valid criticism, but they were removed by user [[User:Walker|Walker]]. I also noticed that a vast majority of his contributions involve removing criticism from articles of his Heavy Metal heroes. I believe this article should be revamped with some input from people who are willing to voice valid criticisms of the genre.  - [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please look at the reason for removing the criticism section before blindly adding it back in yourself (along with removing someone else's unrelated work). Most, if not all, of the references are junk; one actually leads you to a site where you can buy a &amp;quot;research paper&amp;quot; about heavy metal music. Plagiarism sites are not valid citations. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]], if there are any real valid criticisms out there then find them and add them to the article since you find it to be lacking.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 16:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps this site should be renamed Liberalpedia. Too deny that Heavy Metal is influenced by Satanists and Athiests is just downright looney. I cannot believe that blatantly un-christian music can be portrayed positively on a Conservative website. I readded the previous criticism section because it's the true conservative christian thing to do.  -- [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a conservative ''encyclopedia''. Did you even look at anything Walker or I have said? Better yet, have you looked at the portion you keep adding? Please tell me how [http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/64763.html this] is a reliable source. If heavy metal music is so unilaterally evil, surely you can find some better sources than that. Nobody is saying you can't have a critisism, but it has to follow our rules. If you readd the section again without better sources you will be blocked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:33, 11 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dang! Since when is a particular type of music evil. It's the people behind the music and what they are promoting that can be evil...... not the music itself. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 21:54, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We need more ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty of web resources we can use, and books too, I have a few of them and plan to add the citations (I know not how to do that yet, however I realize it must be simple.) Right now the article seems to lack much historical description for the genre save what I just added, as well as a description of the music itself aside from commonly held conceptions about what heavy metal is. Certainly we can do better. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Something else to consider: the criticism is not really... criticism, at all. In fact I'm trying to figure out if we need a criticism section at all if what is currently there is the only thing anyone can find. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 16:25, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definite need of a revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
This looks like the kind of article [[Wikipedia]] would have for Heavy Metal. In order to clean this article up, we should start by redoing the criticism section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jose83/Heavy_Metal_music &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I plan on using the above link as a rough guideline for how the article should look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Having substantive content, as per wikipedia, is not necessarily a bad thing.  By all means add info you feel would be censored by wikipedia - but to censor material which has been added without justifiable reasons (such as when material is unable to be backed up by citations) is against Conservapedia's commandments --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 10:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. The recent additions, while not broadly incorrect or out of place, reek of bias and ignorance. Not to play the authority card, but why not let people who /know/ something about heavy metal edit the article instead? I swear facts actually do help articles. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:15, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I figured that there was a difference between this article and Jose's talk page at first glance, but really it's just the same unsourced material from her talk page shoe-horned into this page without any sources whatsoever that actually back up her assertions. Indeed, as a long time Pantera and Megadeth fan, I can say your interpretations of their song lyrics or literal to the point of deception. If Phil and Owns thought suicide was so spectacular in the vein /you/ seem to believe then they would have sliced their own wrists by now. But obviously that is not the case. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I refuse to tolerate your ignorant behavior. If &amp;quot;liberal denial&amp;quot; is the best you can come up with then kindly stop editing this page and let us who know a thing or two about this subject handle it. It's quite obvious that you cannot. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:07, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your deception is weak, Jirby. It's obvious to me that you are attempting to hide the harmful effects of Heavy Metal music because you are in denial of them, being a devout follower of the genre. We don't believe in censorship here at Conservapedia and if you want to exhibit more [[Liberal denial]] in the form of Rule #60, maybe you will feel more at home here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music]]. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: AAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! I love it. If I argue then I'm in denial. If I don't argue, this article is allowed to exist in it's current deceitful form. Alright now seriously. Either source (which you can't) your assertions or don't expect them to remain in the article for more than five minutes before someone who knows better (me and the other actual CONTRIBUTORS to the article) remove them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, whilst I don't oft go into the personal details of my life, yes I love heavy metal. Big deal. You hate it. Big deal. If you can come up with a sourced, logical position, then I don't care what your personal tastes are, however, right now you're simply directing all of your hate onto a MORALLY NEUTRAL abstraction. As I said. I won't tolerate it. Now source, or delete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ball is in your court. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:16, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources will be posted within minutes -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:25, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... GnR are not considered heavy metal, first and foremost. Even if they were, riots are not EXPECTED to occur at heavy metal shows any more than with other shows of other musical genres. Also, Heavy Metal is /considered/ anti-christian by some, HENCE THE CRITICISM SECTION. Simply calling it anti-christian because you /perceive/ it to be anti-christian is not encyclopedic.[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:40, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns N Roses are Heavy Metal and your claim that a riot is as likely to occur at any concert of any musical genre is ridiculous. I've never heard of a full-scale riot breaking out at an Elton John concert. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incorrect. GnR is hardrock, you can't argue this/ If you think GnR is typical metal then you're hopelessly ignorant of what most metal sounds like. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request intervention ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose is beginning to annoy me, and I refuse to participate in an edit war with someone who obviously has such a strong anti-metal bent that the article is virtually untouchable by anyone with any sense. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And now she is beginning to vandalize the talk page. See talk page edit history. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Quit it with the childish name calling. You have been refering to me as a female when I am actual a male in order to annoy me. Stop now. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Jose is usually a girl's name. My bad. You can take yourself off the cross now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:58, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have yet to meet a single women in my life that went by &amp;quot;Jose&amp;quot;. Jose is typically a man's name, especially with Latinos. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose83 is a parodist. Check his block log. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, wasn't this solved, like, months ago? The description of &amp;quot;anti-Christian&amp;quot; does not belong in the first sentence of the article; it is not a fact, will never be a fact, and your website reference has no authority. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not enough information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article fails even to mention doom metal, death metal, melodic death metal, or any modern trends in metal, despite having sections devoted to the 1980s and 1990s, decades notable for far more musical innovation than just groove or black metal. I've stuck some bands in as examples and edit in some more in due course - as it stands I've missed out a lot of stuff. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
     I've added the basis of some more extensive descriptions. I've filled in a couple, and will do more, but I am no expert on glam, thrash, stoner, speed and new wave of british heavy metal. Any help would be welcomed. [[User:Twitcher|Twitcher]] 15:56, 12 January 2010 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744234</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744234"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:54:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Descriptions going in one or two at a time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]]. The mid to late 1980s also saw the creation and evolution of death metal, spearheaded by early bands such as [[Death]] (their early demos, when they were known as [[Mantas]], were highly influential), [[Possessed]], [[Morbid Angel]] and many others. Many early death metal bands credited [[Slayer]] as an influence, citing the relentless riffs, speed and dark lyrics which made them so popular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. Death metal rapidly evolved and diversified into many different sub-genres: [[Suffocation]] are often credited with the more mid-tempo sub-genre of brutal death, while pioneers [[Atheist]] and [[Cynic]] brought strong jazz, jazz fusion and progressive elements to the genre. The Swedish death metal scene, which was originally known for a distinctive 'buzzsaw' guitar sound and strong hardcore punk influences, soon took the genre in a different direction. In particular, the Gothenburg scene produced extemely popular melodic death metal bands such as [[At the Gates]], [[In Flames]] and [[Dark Tranquillity]]. Other sub-genres of death metal include technical death metal ([[Necrophagist]], [[Origin]]), blackened death metal ([[Akercocke]]), death-doom metal (which was pioneered in the early 1990s by acts such as [[Autopsy]]), and deathcore, which mixes elements of metalcore into death metal (early [[Job for a Cowboy]], [[Whitechapel]], [[Despised Icon]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sub-genres ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metal has diversified enormously since the early days of Black Sabbath. Sub-genres include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Doom metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Inspired by [[Black Sabbath]], the genre's main characteristic is that of almost exclusive use of low tempos in order to create a crushing and dark atmosphere. Arguably, Black Sabbath's song Black Sabbath was the first song of this genre, with extensive use of a tritone in its main riff, and dark, slow progression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New wave of British heavy metal (NWOBHM)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Glam metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Speed metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Thrash metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Power metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Death metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the aggression and speed of thrash, death metal is incredibly diverse. The music will typically use many chromatic riffs, naturally distorted vocals (known as death growls, but high shrieking and clean singing are not unknown), extensive double bass drumming and blast beats, and extremely high tempos. However, mid and low tempos are also very prevalent, with bands such as [[Suffocation]] and [[Cryptopsy]] using this extensively as a tool to contrast the high tempos which make up much of their songs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Black metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Stoner metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metalcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deathcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deathcore takes death metal, often with elements such as pedal riffs taken from melodic death, and adds to them the hardcore vocals and one-note, palm-muted breakdowns of metalcore. Deathcore has known a period of high popularity, but is often rejected from many underground circles for using elements of metalcore, which is perceived as being less extreme and more commercial than most metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Djent '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A relatively recent term for bands making heavy use of low tunings (usually played on 7 or 8 stringed guitars) with extensive use of polymetrics. [[Meshuggah]] were the first band to make use of these musical devices extensively; in the last two years, bands such as [[TesseracT]], [[Bulb]], [[Periphery]] and [[Animals as Leaders]] taken Meshuggah's template and expanded on it; one common Djent trait is to make extensive use of atmospheric keyboards, something Meshuggah has never done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744232</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744232"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:45:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Whoops, I formatted this badly! Fixing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]]. The mid to late 1980s also saw the creation and evolution of death metal, spearheaded by early bands such as [[Death]] (their early demos, when they were known as [[Mantas]], were highly influential), [[Possessed]], [[Morbid Angel]] and many others. Many early death metal bands credited [[Slayer]] as an influence, citing the relentless riffs, speed and dark lyrics which made them so popular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. Death metal rapidly evolved and diversified into many different sub-genres: [[Suffocation]] are often credited with the more mid-tempo sub-genre of brutal death, while pioneers [[Atheist]] and [[Cynic]] brought strong jazz, jazz fusion and progressive elements to the genre. The Swedish death metal scene, which was originally known for a distinctive 'buzzsaw' guitar sound and strong hardcore punk influences, soon took the genre in a different direction. In particular, the Gothenburg scene produced extemely popular melodic death metal bands such as [[At the Gates]], [[In Flames]] and [[Dark Tranquillity]]. Other sub-genres of death metal include technical death metal ([[Necrophagist]], [[Origin]]), blackened death metal ([[Akercocke]]), death-doom metal (which was pioneered in the early 1990s by acts such as [[Autopsy]]), and deathcore, which mixes elements of metalcore into death metal (early [[Job for a Cowboy]], [[Whitechapel]], [[Despised Icon]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sub-genres ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metal has diversified enormously since the early days of Black Sabbath. Sub-genres include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Doom metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''New wave of British heavy metal (NWOBHM)'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Glam metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Speed metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Thrash metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Power metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Death metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Black metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Stoner metal'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Metalcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deathcore'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Djent ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744231</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744231"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:43:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: More edits to make the article describe some more sub-genres. I will edit in some descriptions soon, in the meantime I'll at least name them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]]. The mid to late 1980s also saw the creation and evolution of death metal, spearheaded by early bands such as [[Death]] (their early demos, when they were known as [[Mantas]], were highly influential), [[Possessed]], [[Morbid Angel]] and many others. Many early death metal bands credited [[Slayer]] as an influence, citing the relentless riffs, speed and dark lyrics which made them so popular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. Death metal rapidly evolved and diversified into many different sub-genres: [[Suffocation]] are often credited with the more mid-tempo sub-genre of brutal death, while pioneers [[Atheist]] and [[Cynic]] brought strong jazz, jazz fusion and progressive elements to the genre. The Swedish death metal scene, which was originally known for a distinctive 'buzzsaw' guitar sound and strong hardcore punk influences, soon took the genre in a different direction. In particular, the Gothenburg scene produced extemely popular melodic death metal bands such as [[At the Gates]], [[In Flames]] and [[Dark Tranquillity]]. Other sub-genres of death metal include technical death metal ([[Necrophagist]], [[Origin]]), blackened death metal ([[Akercocke]]), death-doom metal (which was pioneered in the early 1990s by acts such as [[Autopsy]]), and deathcore, which mixes elements of metalcore into death metal (early [[Job for a Cowboy]], [[Whitechapel]], [[Despised Icon]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sub-genres ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metal has diversified enormously since the early days of Black Sabbath. Sub-genres include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Doom metal&lt;br /&gt;
New wave of British heavy metal (NWOBHM)&lt;br /&gt;
Glam metal&lt;br /&gt;
Speed metal&lt;br /&gt;
Thrash metal&lt;br /&gt;
Power metal&lt;br /&gt;
Death metal&lt;br /&gt;
Black metal&lt;br /&gt;
Stoner metal&lt;br /&gt;
Metalcore&lt;br /&gt;
Deathcore&lt;br /&gt;
Djent''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744228</id>
		<title>Talk:Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744228"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:38:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Christianity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I find the statement on Christianity to be rather inaccurate. While I understand this is a conservative encyclopedia, that is no excuse for fallacies. Many metalheads and musicians are openly Christian, such as Dave Mustaine and Dave Ellefson of Megadeth, Jack Owen, and Tom Araya of Slayer. I believe a more accurate statement would be that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent in extreme metal music. There is also a strong Christian Metal Subgenre, see bands such as As I Lay Dying, Believer, and Stryper.  I shall change the statements to be more accurate and less condemning. [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 16:25, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn't even say that Anti-Christian sentiments are quite prevalent at all.  I listen to metal music, and sure some of it is about death and killing and things like that, but I wouldn't say it's Anti-Christian.  Some metal music includes themes that are similar to many popular songs of other genres, just in a different form. --[[User:ALFa|ALFa]] 16:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's primarily what I hoped to get across, I suppose the term &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; is more accurate. I consider the music to show, when it discusses Satan, a Christian perception of the being. What I meant to say was that the only genre, to my knowledge, that contains overtly anti-Christian themes would be death metal or black metal, and even there it is somewhat rare. I think many mainstream Christians misconstrue the disrespect for organized religion (i.e, a church, pastors, or priests.) for being Anti-Christian. They are not one in the same, as to not believe in church is not the same as not believing in god. I'll change it to be more accurate.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:07, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a metal fan (who's wearing a Dream Theater shirt right now), I think that the Satan reference was ridiculous. I took it right out. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:08, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed, i thought of it as inappropriate as well, but since it referenced it as the opinions of conservatives, I left it. Dream Theater! Another openly Christian metal band (though not in the Christian metal genre). I have a few more changes to make on the article, you left a slight typo! I forgive you! [[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 18:13, 20 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, creating this article in the way I did was almost a joke; this is indeed a conservative encyclopedia -- so I used those particular statements to be, in a way, on the extreme of what some people might think. Don't take it the wrong way.  Plus, the username I chose might have tipped people off: I really don't know much in the way of creating encyclopedia articles, so I left things vague and unopinionated (my opinions, anyway).  I am actually a metal fan who laughed at the article, not believing in what I was typing.  Then again, some of the more extreme Black metal bands do reference Satan in non-metaphorical terms.  But most of those bands are without actual substance and therefore suck. [[User:N00b|N00b]] 09:01, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, and I know only two people that worship the devil, as a god, in metal music of any form: Glen Benton, and Oystein Aarseth (Aka Euronymous), both extremists not to be considered the standard of a heavy-metaller.[[User:Mustaine12390|Mustaine12390]] 17:39, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's hard to prove that anyone is actually &amp;quot;worshiping Satan&amp;quot;. Let's not fall into that trap. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Link==&lt;br /&gt;
Is that parody..? Linking to a cliched, comedic-parody of a heavy metal band in order to illustrate the article? [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 19:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just about to say the same thing. Spinal tap was a fictionalized parody of a metal band. (And a darn good band, if I do say so myself, and I do). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:37, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The movie [[Spinal Tap]] was a comedy; I'd like to write about its director, who made a few similar movies like [[A Mighty Wind]] (satirizing folk music performers). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob Reiner directed &amp;quot;This Is Spinal Tap&amp;quot;,  but it was Christopher Guest who directed &amp;quot;A Mighty Wind&amp;quot;. Guest wrote/co-wrote both of them though. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:34, 29 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You are devilishly clever, my friend! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Guest is quite an interesting subject for a bio, even without touching on his works - Jewish American British nobleman... Quite a mix. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:50, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spirituality and etiquette==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's tread carefully while describing the delicate issue of [[spirituality]] of metal bands. Some have exploited satanic imagery, to be sure, but their proportion might be less than 99%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass reverts aren't good form. Just change one section at a time, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As someone who is fairly knowledgable about heavy metal, I actually agree with Walker in that I've never heard the term Satan's Fire Metal. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:27, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==State of the Article==&lt;br /&gt;
In it's current condition this article is a joke to anyone who knows anything about metal. 99.9 percent of bands that have pyrotechnics are not trying to recreate hell. Also &amp;quot;the horns&amp;quot; are more often just a sign for metal and unity amongst metalheads and are not done to look like satan or praise satan. It isn't even limited to metal you will see it at even country and boy band shows or how about a Texas Longhorns football game? The song meanings are ridiculous, Go To Hell is about someone that is damned to hell, it is not promoting satanism. It was written for the Bill and Teds Bogus Journey movie where the charecters go to hell. Take no prisioners is about military warfare. The song references Normandy and Panzers so it was probably inspired by D-Day, it is not promoting violence anymore than Saving Private Ryan. Suicide Sollution is about how abusing drugs and alcohol to solve your problems is a &amp;quot;suicide&amp;quot; sollution. Fade to Black is about losing the will to carry on, and was inspired by the bands equipment being stolen, it can be interpreted as a suicide song but even then how is it glamorized? Also why was the referenced content about Christians in non Christian bands removed? All the unreferenced stuff on this page should be removed before that was.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 13:51, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The idea of &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal strikes me as utterly proposterous. Just like the idea of African Klu Klux Klan members or Jewish Nazis is utterly proposterous. Quit trying to make Heavy Metal music into something that it is not. You've made various attempts to censor the material here or downplay Metal's dangerous nature, but it's not going to work. Maybe you'd feel more at home at Wikipedia. Your attempts to disassociate Metal with Satanism are pathetic. That's like saying you're a Ku Klux Klan member but you're not into the whole discrimination thing.. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jose calm down. Metal is a style of music, not a way of thinking. There is absolutely no contridiction with someone using a certain style of music to promote ''any'' message -- good ''or'' bad. You should check out some Christian metal. A youth Christian musical concert (Ichthus) often features metal bands -- one of their tents is dedicated entirely towards &amp;quot;heavier&amp;quot; music. I also personally know the manager of a Christian metal band. He is old friends with my youth pastor at church and I've done some work with him. He is an intense Christian and his music is... well, rather intense. So please take a chill pill and open your mind to other possibilities.&lt;br /&gt;
::Think about it this way: even if metal ''were'' &amp;quot;satanist--dominated&amp;quot; (which I don't think it is), wouldn't that therefore be the best place for a Christian band? Jesus hanged out with prostitutes and beggars, remember. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's even Christian rap, which uses the rapid-fire half-spoken style of [[hip hop]] to convey the pro-woman, anti-violence message of Jesus and salvation. My favorite &amp;quot;heavenly metal&amp;quot; group is [[The Ancestors]]. And there's always [[Stryper]] (&amp;quot;by his stripes we were healed&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I do not agree with what any of you have posted. However, perhaps I shall listen to some of this &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal and &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; rap. There might be a small chance that I am wrong. I was wrong about Spinal tap. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This music.. [[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huod7HJe4BM]] It's disgusting. I'm going to have to disagree with all those who support &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; metal. This just doesn't sound very Christian to me.. First of all, it's too loud and violent sounding and the screaming sounds very demonic. Even if there are pro-Christian lyrics in the songs it's impossible to tell because the screaming is incomprehensible. The choice of intervals strikes me as interesting.. Very evil sounding. Please listen and tell me what you think.. I really don't get it. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It obviously wasn't designed with you in mind. I don't hear anything &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;, except that you automatically associate the genre with evil, which is a circular argument. I don't hear any &amp;quot;evil-sounding intervals&amp;quot; either. Try looking up some lyrics before you base Christianity on how a group decides to play the guitar. Here's one called [http://lyrics.christiansunite.com/lyrics_1134_7.shtml If I Die] by Stryper. (&amp;quot;Living was hard /And loneliness easily justified / Oh, then I found You / Ooh, I suddenly knew / What I wanted to do was to make You satisfied / And not to die for selfish pleasure / But to live with You by my side&amp;quot;). It's not as heavy musically (here's a [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFOsQd34qE Youtube vid] -- ignore the visuals though), but still considered &amp;quot;metal&amp;quot; I would think.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I did some searching, and here's the lyrics from one of the songs in the video you found [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734]. Check out the description at the bottom: &amp;quot;True hope should only be placed in Christ, and no man. Christ will never fail you...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This isn't your mom's Christian music! But that doesn't make it wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:00, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Would this qualify as metal? I could actually see myself listening to something like this. It's melodic, and the singing is clean and clear. Thanks.. This is inspiring. But I don't think it's heavy metal. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's why I found the other lyrics for you. [http://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/lyrics/new/track.asp?track_id=8734 These] are lyrics from that Youtube video you disagreed with. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well Jose all of what you are saying is your own personal opinion. How is it to loud? Any music can be to loud, if that is a problem turn the volume down. Different people have different tastes, just because you don't like a style of music doesn't make it &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot;. Besides the bible instructs us to &amp;quot;Sing unto Him a new song; play skilfully with a loud noise&amp;quot; (Psalm 33:3). God is infinitely bigger than your music tastes. Also many styles of metal have very easily comprehensable lyrics and so what if they aren't comprehensible? Does that make it wrong? If you don't like it thats fine, but it doesn't give you the right to try and demonize something just because it doesn't appeal to your personal tastes.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:14, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I highly doubt Jesus would have &amp;quot;rocked out&amp;quot; to this garbage. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:I think if you feel that the music is &amp;quot;garbage&amp;quot; then we should find someone with a more neutral attitude to edit it, no? I'm not saying you shouldn't edit, but I would think hard about if you are the appropriate one. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:How do you know God's musical tastes?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:26, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::God is absolutely Holy, therefore he wouldn't indulge in music with satanic connotation. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Could you be a little more specific as to what you mean by &amp;quot;satanic connotation&amp;quot;.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:39, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::A lot of heavy metal is inspired by Satan and the occult. This definitely would not cater to God's taste. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jesus hanged (hung? I never get that right) out with sinners, beggars and prostitutes. If this music really is as evil as you say, shouldn't Christians get in there to converted these supposed evildoers? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:48, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many books are inspired by Satan and the occult, does that mean all books are against God?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 19:49, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus would have discouraged the prostitutes from whoring themselves and they would have discouraged these bands from playing the music they are playing. He wouldn't encourage more Christians to become prostitutes or play heavy metal. A certain category of books are inspired by satan and the occult and all within that category are against god, just like how heavy metal is a certain genre of music which is against god. Not all music is against god. True heavy metal is. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well I guess we know that these artists aren't Jesus himself then. It doesn't mean they aren't Christian, however. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 20:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jesus hung out with drunks and whores, I guess, him being so tolerant and all. But he also is famous for telling the adulterous woman to &amp;quot;go and sin no more&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My impression of metal is that it invokes a lot of nasty symbols: devils, long tongues, gloomy or morbid lyrics, etc. Within the genre I'm sure there are a handful of Christian groups like [[Stryper]] (which I wrote, hint hint!) who I suppose decided to &amp;quot;move into the neighborhood&amp;quot; and seek converts among metalheads. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:17, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
How does linking to lyrics prove the song is &amp;quot;promoting&amp;quot; satanism.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:01, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Funny the Fade to Black reference actually say the opposite of what is stated in the article.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Clearly you and ''Jose'' disagree on many aspects of this genre of music. I suggest you '''add''' everything you want, while letting him do the same. I'll check back from time to time and see if I can integrate your work and his. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stop==&lt;br /&gt;
The article has seen plenty of edits going on, with no real improvement to its state. I can see both sides of the argument, but unless Walker and Jose83 can start to learn to work together, then we're just going to end up with a bigger pile of cowcake than when we started. The article is dire right now, and frankly the best thing is for you two to step away from it for a day and work out what you want to say in it, get together your references, then we'll take it from there. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:40, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was following Ed Poor's instruction from above. I wasn't changing his edits.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:41, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not apportioning any kind of blame. And Ed's advice is good, excepting for the fact that the article is now a scab to both of you and you can't resist picking it. Leave it until tomorrow, it will be unlocked in about 12 hours, and we can try to put together a '''coherent''' article presenting the facts as we know them, instead of a point/counterpoint list of grievances. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 21:44, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::==Dial-the-Truth-Ministries==&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Dial-the-Truth-Ministry is a controversial religious group that is part of King James Only Movement. One of the main goals of the group is to denounce the evil that they believe Christian metal or rock music is. The group believes that any form of music with a beat is evil. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.av1611.org/ Dial-the-Truth-Ministries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ted Kirkpatrick, the drummer for the Christian metal band Tourniquet stated the following about the groups website, ''&amp;quot;This site is so full of inaccuracies, so devoid of sound Biblical principles, and uses such twisted logic, that some have emailed us asking if it was done as a joke.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tourniquet.net/faq/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I added the above here since the article is locked so I can move it to the article when it is unlocked.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 21:47, 31 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... this article needs to be a collaboration, not a rant, from both sides. Content: I'm working on adding some history and the &amp;quot;technicalities&amp;quot; of what HM is (&amp;quot;neutral to the facts&amp;quot;), and then the more controversial aspects can be worked in by you guys. As I said it would be, it's unprotected, but that doesn't mean you should just come along and edit in tiny soundbites. Try to edit cohesively, so that the article doesn't just resemble the transcript of two guys shouting each other down :) [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 08:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There needs to be SOME mention of Satanism in the article. Neglecting to do so is just plain irresponsible. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Try concentrating on an explanation of why some people believe there are Satanic elements in heavy metal. What satanic themes do they find in it? Imagery, lyrics? Be specific and provide references. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your work is being reverted, then create a user subpage like [[User:Jose83/metal]]. No one is allowed to edit there but you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imagery of certain metal bands definitely attempt to make Satan appear &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.teens411.com/newspics/mudvayne.jpg Mudvayne picture]] The guy actually looks like the Devil!&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://static.metal-archives.com/images/3/9/4/394.jpg Countless]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/de/Iron_Maiden-Dance_of_Death.jpg Iron Maiden]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.mystrands.com/photos/1/4/5/normal/14556.jpg Covers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[http://www.av1611.org/rock.html]] And lyrics of many metal songs clearly convey an Anti-Christian/Satanic message.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need to give an honest depiction of what this music is instead of trying to make it out to be wholesome Christian music like Walker is trying to do. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're preaching to the choir. Those are good links. Now do some writing. Don't worry about reverts; Fox and I can resurrect anything that gets killed. (Oops, am I getting arrogant?) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:30, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Instances of individual Satanic metal bands should only be used to argue against those bands being good, not just the whole genre. Should we argue that all movies of a certain genre are bad just because a few are rated R and point out instances of nudity and profanity in those movies? It's a logical fallacy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:00, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suicide==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:suicide is the only way out&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Ozzy quoting what the lad says to rebut it? Or is he promoting [[suicide]]? Perhaps it is this kind of ambiguity that makes parents and educators worry that metal is bad for kids. It's a far cry from, &amp;quot;Come and play / everything's A-OK&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I love you / You love me&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is the Scripture that follows promoting suicide? &amp;quot;Therefore Saul took a sword, and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead, he fell likewise upon his sword, and died with him.&amp;quot; (1 Samuel 31:4-5) &amp;quot;But he himself went a day's journey into the wilderness, and came and sat down under a juniper tree: and he requested for himself that he might die; and said, It is enough; now, O LORD, take away my life; for I am not better than my fathers.&amp;quot; (1 Kings 19:4 ) You have to put that line back into the context of the song, which is quite plainly about alcohol abuse, about how it is nothing glamorous, just a slow suicide for the alcoholic. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 18:25, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jolly good. So let's point out that '''not all''' references to suicide in heavy metal music are intended to glorify it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:32, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fact is you probaably can't find one example of a band '''glorifying''' suicide. Why would any band glorify suicide? If they are in the buisness of selling albums and filling the seats at concerts why would they want their fans to kill themselves? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 15:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The closest I can come to a band ''glorifying'' suicide would be ''Don't Fear the Reaper'' by Blue Oyster Cult. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 15:52, 28 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.thetruthforyouth.com/standard/main.htm - rock music&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/satanic_quotes.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20America/Rock-n-Roll/nature.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian metal is not evil ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is preposterous to say that all Christian metal is evil. Every claim is based upon specific instances of evil in secular metal, and thus not a valid comparison. This site defends Christian metal against every argument that groups like Dial-the-Truth can come up with: http://www.mindspring.com/~brucec/craindex.htm [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:59, 1 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes this is quite obvious and wow that site is wonderful. This site here http://www.metalforjesus.org/friorfoe.html is also pretty good although it doesn't contain nearly as much information. I'd also like to point out that although there are secular acts that promote immorality and blaspheme and stuff like that, many of them do not. First of all just because a song is about something does not mean a band is advocating or promoting it. Oftentimes they are just telling a story for entertainment value and they often use satire. There are many different styles of metal and many of them have totally different common lyrical themes. These links Jose is posting are laughable. I'd also like to know how Jose knows what Satan physically looks like. According to one of the links, apparently when Bruce Dickinson of Iron Maiden told Hit Parader magazine that, &amp;quot;We can play with conviction every night, because we totally believe in the music we're performing.&amp;quot; That means that he is a satanist. Also what does posting links of album covers prove. If you want to find viable criticisms of heavy metal that aren't going to make this article into one of the jokes of conservapedia you might want to stay away from using Terry Watkins as a source.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 22:25, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you admit there are many Metal bands to promote immorality and blasphemy.. We have progress! If an Artist makes a song about &amp;quot;Killing 'em all&amp;quot; they don't need to openly promote it as a band to promote it because the song is already out there and young impressionable children are already being brainwashed and programmed. And you can also play dumb and and pretend that the guy from Mudvayne isn't trying to look like Satan but he looks exactly how popular culture has made him out to look like. Iron Maiden heavily relies on demonic images to sell-out concerts and sell albums. This is especially prevelant on their album covers where the marketing of a demon-like mascot is irrefutable. Do you listen to these bands, Walker? -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iron Maiden isn't a good influence. They had a song called &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot;. Nobody's saying that Iron Maiden is a good band. The issue here is Christian metal bands, who tend not to have songs like that. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry another point I am trying to make is that much of secular metal does not stand as a polar opposite to Christian metal as well--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:13, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll concede that Christian Heavy Metal may not be ''evil'', but I think their Artists have selected the wrong medium in which to praise Jesus. I have not made any claims of Christian Metal being evil in the revised article. However, I will not write anything positive about it either. I shall leave that to you, Fox, or Walker. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I never denied that there weren't bands who did, you made the claim that either most or all bands do, which simply is not true. Also a question, if something is a medium that means it is neither right or wrong, so why is it wrong?--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:15, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A medium is not inherently neutral. All heavy metal is aggressive and violent so it incites aggressive, violent behavior in the listener. My former friend was in a car wreck because the music he was listening to {System of a Down} caused him to drive irresponsibly. Also, just read the news. Riots at heavy metal concerts are the norm. There is no denying that Rock music in general evokes aggressive feelings in the listener. I just don't believe that these feelings should be evoked while praising Jesus. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making generalizations.  [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your friend was in a car wreck because he's a reckless driver. - [[User:JasonAQuest|JasonAQuest]] 23:41, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes I admited there are some bands that blaspheme and promote immorality, you can find people that do that in pretty much every area of life so what is your point? That doesn't mean all of it is like that. There is no song called Killing Em All that I know of. I don't like Mudvayne but suppoesadly they are trying to look like aliens from a fictional story that they created and base there albums on. Well if you examine the lyrics of the song &amp;quot;Number of the Beast&amp;quot; which actually opens with a reading from the bible. The song is just a story about a guy who is trying to get away from a satanic cult and ultimately is unable to escape them. Apparently it was based on a nightmare Steve Harris had after seeing one of The Omen movies. Eddie is just a cartoon masscot and he is something different on pretty much every album cover. I've always thought of him as some sort of B horror movie type of zombie rather than a demon and by the logic you present I suppose the New Jersey Devils are also relying on satanism to promote their hockey team and Hot Tamales candies and other various hot sauce companies are doing the same? --[[User:Walker|Walker]] 00:12, 3 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article poses as unbiased. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would never expect a true conservative website to be so pro-heavy metal but here we are. The criticism section is laughable because it contains no real criticism at all whatsoever. I took the time to examine previous versions of the article and noticed that there were indeed previous examples of valid criticism, but they were removed by user [[User:Walker|Walker]]. I also noticed that a vast majority of his contributions involve removing criticism from articles of his Heavy Metal heroes. I believe this article should be revamped with some input from people who are willing to voice valid criticisms of the genre.  - [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please look at the reason for removing the criticism section before blindly adding it back in yourself (along with removing someone else's unrelated work). Most, if not all, of the references are junk; one actually leads you to a site where you can buy a &amp;quot;research paper&amp;quot; about heavy metal music. Plagiarism sites are not valid citations. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:10, 7 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]], if there are any real valid criticisms out there then find them and add them to the article since you find it to be lacking.--[[User:Walker|Walker]] 16:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps this site should be renamed Liberalpedia. Too deny that Heavy Metal is influenced by Satanists and Athiests is just downright looney. I cannot believe that blatantly un-christian music can be portrayed positively on a Conservative website. I readded the previous criticism section because it's the true conservative christian thing to do.  -- [[User:Osayat3|Osayat3]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a conservative ''encyclopedia''. Did you even look at anything Walker or I have said? Better yet, have you looked at the portion you keep adding? Please tell me how [http://www.directessays.com/viewpaper/64763.html this] is a reliable source. If heavy metal music is so unilaterally evil, surely you can find some better sources than that. Nobody is saying you can't have a critisism, but it has to follow our rules. If you readd the section again without better sources you will be blocked. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 17:33, 11 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dang! Since when is a particular type of music evil. It's the people behind the music and what they are promoting that can be evil...... not the music itself. [[User:Saksjn|Saksjn]] 21:54, 2 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== We need more ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty of web resources we can use, and books too, I have a few of them and plan to add the citations (I know not how to do that yet, however I realize it must be simple.) Right now the article seems to lack much historical description for the genre save what I just added, as well as a description of the music itself aside from commonly held conceptions about what heavy metal is. Certainly we can do better. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:21, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Something else to consider: the criticism is not really... criticism, at all. In fact I'm trying to figure out if we need a criticism section at all if what is currently there is the only thing anyone can find. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 16:25, 20 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Definite need of a revamp ==&lt;br /&gt;
This looks like the kind of article [[Wikipedia]] would have for Heavy Metal. In order to clean this article up, we should start by redoing the criticism section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Jose83/Heavy_Metal_music &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I plan on using the above link as a rough guideline for how the article should look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  Having substantive content, as per wikipedia, is not necessarily a bad thing.  By all means add info you feel would be censored by wikipedia - but to censor material which has been added without justifiable reasons (such as when material is unable to be backed up by citations) is against Conservapedia's commandments --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 10:04, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. The recent additions, while not broadly incorrect or out of place, reek of bias and ignorance. Not to play the authority card, but why not let people who /know/ something about heavy metal edit the article instead? I swear facts actually do help articles. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:15, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I figured that there was a difference between this article and Jose's talk page at first glance, but really it's just the same unsourced material from her talk page shoe-horned into this page without any sources whatsoever that actually back up her assertions. Indeed, as a long time Pantera and Megadeth fan, I can say your interpretations of their song lyrics or literal to the point of deception. If Phil and Owns thought suicide was so spectacular in the vein /you/ seem to believe then they would have sliced their own wrists by now. But obviously that is not the case. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 14:57, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I refuse to tolerate your ignorant behavior. If &amp;quot;liberal denial&amp;quot; is the best you can come up with then kindly stop editing this page and let us who know a thing or two about this subject handle it. It's quite obvious that you cannot. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:07, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your deception is weak, Jirby. It's obvious to me that you are attempting to hide the harmful effects of Heavy Metal music because you are in denial of them, being a devout follower of the genre. We don't believe in censorship here at Conservapedia and if you want to exhibit more [[Liberal denial]] in the form of Rule #60, maybe you will feel more at home here [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music]]. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: AAHAHAHAHAHAHAA! I love it. If I argue then I'm in denial. If I don't argue, this article is allowed to exist in it's current deceitful form. Alright now seriously. Either source (which you can't) your assertions or don't expect them to remain in the article for more than five minutes before someone who knows better (me and the other actual CONTRIBUTORS to the article) remove them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, whilst I don't oft go into the personal details of my life, yes I love heavy metal. Big deal. You hate it. Big deal. If you can come up with a sourced, logical position, then I don't care what your personal tastes are, however, right now you're simply directing all of your hate onto a MORALLY NEUTRAL abstraction. As I said. I won't tolerate it. Now source, or delete. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ball is in your court. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:16, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources will be posted within minutes -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:25, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... GnR are not considered heavy metal, first and foremost. Even if they were, riots are not EXPECTED to occur at heavy metal shows any more than with other shows of other musical genres. Also, Heavy Metal is /considered/ anti-christian by some, HENCE THE CRITICISM SECTION. Simply calling it anti-christian because you /perceive/ it to be anti-christian is not encyclopedic.[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:40, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guns N Roses are Heavy Metal and your claim that a riot is as likely to occur at any concert of any musical genre is ridiculous. I've never heard of a full-scale riot breaking out at an Elton John concert. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incorrect. GnR is hardrock, you can't argue this/ If you think GnR is typical metal then you're hopelessly ignorant of what most metal sounds like. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 19:43, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request intervention ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose is beginning to annoy me, and I refuse to participate in an edit war with someone who obviously has such a strong anti-metal bent that the article is virtually untouchable by anyone with any sense. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:41, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And now she is beginning to vandalize the talk page. See talk page edit history. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:50, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Quit it with the childish name calling. You have been refering to me as a female when I am actual a male in order to annoy me. Stop now. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Jose is usually a girl's name. My bad. You can take yourself off the cross now. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 15:58, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have yet to meet a single women in my life that went by &amp;quot;Jose&amp;quot;. Jose is typically a man's name, especially with Latinos. -- [[User:Jose83|Jose83]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jose83 is a parodist. Check his block log. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, wasn't this solved, like, months ago? The description of &amp;quot;anti-Christian&amp;quot; does not belong in the first sentence of the article; it is not a fact, will never be a fact, and your website reference has no authority. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:39, 7 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not enough information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article fails even to mention doom metal, death metal, melodic death metal, or any modern trends in metal, despite having sections devoted to the 1980s and 1990s, decades notable for far more musical innovation than just groove or black metal. I've stuck some bands in as examples and edit in some more in due course - as it stands I've missed out a lot of stuff.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744227</id>
		<title>Heavy metal music</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heavy_metal_music&amp;diff=744227"/>
		<updated>2010-01-12T20:35:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Heavy metal''' is a musical genre that was developed mainly in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, heavy metal is primarily noted for an emphasis on distortion, palm muting, aggressive lyrical content, bass-heavy sounds, as well as the influence of blues scales and classical structures. Heavy Metal has also spawned numerous sub genres which omit or improve upon standard technique, or invent new one altogether, giving heavy metal as a genre an impressive variety of styles and sounds. Heavy metal's origins are both rooted in the cultural upheavals that occurred during the 1960s, such as the conflict in Vietnam and the reevaluation and mass rejection of previous social schema, and the enormous influence of bands such as [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]], [[Led Zeppelin]], and [[Black Sabbath]] that are regarded as proto-metal as well as hard rock. Other musical influences include psychedelic rock, blues rock, and the still developing progressive rock genre. Though heavy metal initially borrowed heavily from the blues in terms of playing style, this was later largely discarded by future metal acts such as [[Judas Priest]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first style of rock which grew from this was distorted [[blues]] sound created by [[San Francisco]] based [[psychedelia]] band, '''Blue Cheer''', whose influence on electric blues bands could be seen from [[Cream (rock band)|Cream]] to [[Jimi Hendrix]] to '''ZZ Top'''. The second style was [[progressive rock]], which in 1968 was led by [[England|English]] band '''King Crimson''', combining jazz, classical, experimental, psychedelic and folk music. The precursor to this sound was [[The Beatles]], arguably the first band to leave the standard rock format, creating longer song structures, many of which were narrative or [[opera|neo-operatic]]. This was the main inspiration for later bands such as '''Camel''', [[Genesis (band)|Genesis]] and [[Yes (band)|Yes]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1969, the influence of these seminal artists had saturated those parts of the public consciousness which were focused on rock music as a developing art form, and contributed to the explosion of hard rock by, for example,  [[Led Zeppelin]] and [[Deep Purple]] and the so-called &amp;quot;proto-metal&amp;quot; of '''Black Sabbath'''. This year is now seen as the watershed moment in the development of what soon became heavy metal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Sabbath originally began as an electric blues outfit named &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;, but after discovering there was already a band using that name, changed to Black Sabbath after the 1964 [[Boris Karloff]] movie of the same name. Developing a new sound that was born both out of a change in attitude and the loss of lead Guitarist Tony Iommi's finger tips, Black Sabbath are largely credited with developing the more heavily distorted and crunchy elements that later became staples of the heavy metal style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1970s==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1973 the leading exponents of heavy metal were undoubtedly Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, and Black Sabbath, each having a technical prowess and a compositional inventiveness unseen before in mainstream popular music. This era also marked the beginnings of [[Satanism|Satanic]] imagery and of the spectacular, energetic live shows which became a hallmark of later heavy metal spin offs. Led Zeppelin's [[guitar|guitarist]] Jimmy Page had a strong personal fascination with the [[occult]], while many of Black Sabbath's lyrics dealt with it as well. Unlike many future bands, however, Black Sabbath never claimed to be Satanic. Singer Ozzy Osbourne claims that they were actually looking for a way to tap into the success and popularity of the horror genre, where people willingly paid to see a movie or read a novel intended solely to frighten them; to do so, they began to purposely write dark, ominous songs in an attempt to be music's answer to horror films. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Live shows were becoming bigger and more theatrical, notably Led Zeppelin's &amp;quot;rock till you drop&amp;quot; performances lasting two hours, and Alice Cooper's colossal shows following in the American tradition of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &amp;amp; Bailey Circus, promising &amp;quot;The Greatest Show On Earth&amp;quot;. Cooper's shows featured [[boa]] constrictors, horrific freak-show mannequins, and dramatic fake-beheading scenes. Other key artists that emerged at this time included High Tide, Black Cat Bones, Black Widow, Uriah Heep, UFO and Blue Oyster Cult, and glam rockers Kiss. Each of the four members of Kiss took the on-stage persona of a cartoon-like character using elaborate face make-up and a science fiction style clothing. Another American band, Aerosmith, took the basic R 'n' B and rock 'n' roll structures of bands such as the Faces and Rolling Stones and transformed them into a new harder form. The late 70s saw a decline in the popularity of heavy metal, as the Punk movement, beginning in 1976, dominated the musical counterculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1980s==&lt;br /&gt;
During the early 1970s three British bands were formed that would arguably become the most dramatically influential of the genre during the 1980s: [[Judas Priest]], Motorhead, and [[Iron Maiden]]. The 1980s also gave rise to the American thrash metal movement with notable bands being [[Metallica]], [[Megadeth]], Anthrax, and Slayer. During the 1980s glam metal also became very popular with bands including Twisted Sister, Def Leppard, and [[Stryper]]. The mid to late 1980s also saw the creation and evolution of death metal, spearheaded by early bands such as [[Death]] (their early demos, when they were known as [[Mantas]], were highly influential), [[Possessed]], [[Morbid Angel]] and many others. Many early death metal bands credited [[Slayer]] as an influence, citing the relentless riffs, speed and dark lyrics which made them so popular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1990s==&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of Grunge in the early 90s is seen as the end of glam metal dominance. Nirvana's 'Nevermind' caused widespread public interest in alternative forms of music. [[Groove Metal]] became popular with Pantera's 'Cowboys from Hell' and Sepultura's 'Chaos AD'. The normally marginalized sub-genres of metal, that began forming in the early to mid 80s, soon enjoyed much wider exposure. [[Black Metal]], especially in the Scandinavian countries, began to see a huge rise in popularity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;fact&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Marduk]], [[Mayhem]], and [[Burzum]] were see at the forefront of the early black metal scene, and continued to see popularity due to the controversies that surrounded the bands, such as Marduk's fascination with the Third Reich and anti-christian lyrical content; the murder of Mayhem's lead guitarist Euronymous by Burzum's Varg Vikernes, as well as the lyrical content and album themes of everything post 'Deathcrush'. Death metal rapidly evolved and diversified into many different sub-genres: [[Suffocation]] are often credited with the more mid-tempo sub-genre of brutal death, while pioneers [[Atheist]] and [[Cynic]] brought strong jazz, jazz fusion and progressive elements to the genre. The Swedish death metal scene, which was originally known for a distinctive 'buzzsaw' guitar sound and strong hardcore punk influences, soon took the genre in a different direction. In particular, the Gothenburg scene produced extemely popular melodic death metal bands such as [[At the Gates]], [[In Flames]] and [[Dark Tranquillity]]. Other sub-genres of death metal include technical death metal ([[Necrophagist]], [[Origin]]), blackened death metal ([[Akercocke]]), death-doom metal (which was pioneered in the early 1990s by acts such as [[Autopsy]]), and deathcore, which mixes elements of metalcore into death metal (early [[Job for a Cowboy]], [[Whitechapel]], [[Despised Icon]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its association with the counter culture movement and the more extreme forms that it has taken over the years, heavy metal has faced criticism from parents groups, school administrators, politicians, music critics, and religious organizations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A musicologist wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The development of heavy metal music in the '60s and its continuing popularity through the '70s, '80s, and '90s coincides, for one thing, with the period of the greatest popularity horror films and books have ever known. Both mark a transitional moment in our history: the end of Pax Americana; new economic crises; de-industrialization, the decline of unions and the rise of low-pay service jobs; revelations of corrupt leadership; powerful social movements challenging dominant policies on race, gender, ecology, and consumer rights; new challenges to the stability of social institutions such as the family; and redefinitions of political themes such as freedom. Much of the culture of the past twenty years has functioned to restore the sense of security undermined by these disruptions. Heavy metal, like horror films, has provided ways of producing meaning in an irrational society. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.superseventies.com/stairway.html Dr. Robert Walser, Professor of Musicology, Dartmouth College] - author of ''Running With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The term was first used in a musical context by [[Canada|Canadian]] rock band '''Steppenwolf''' in their 1968 hit record&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Billboard Hot 100 singles chart: highest position #2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Born To Be Wild'', which contained the line: &amp;quot;I like smoke and lightning, heavy metal thunder...&amp;quot; The song received worldwide exposure the following year when it was used in the soundtrack of the 1969 [[counterculture]] movie ''[[Easy Rider]]''. However, the phrase &amp;quot;heavy metal&amp;quot; had previously been used in 1962 by [[William Burroughs]] in his novel ''The Soft Machine'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133290 ISBN-13: 978-0802133298&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  which contained a character named &amp;quot;Uranian Willy, the Heavy Metal Kid&amp;quot;. In 1964, he used it to describe mass technological destruction to the point of biological toxicity in his novel ''Nova Express''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ISBN-10: 0802133304  ISBN-13: 978-0802133304 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Metal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Rock &amp;amp; Roll]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743960</id>
		<title>Donoghue v. Stevenson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743960"/>
		<updated>2010-01-11T21:51:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Donoghue v Stevenson is a landmark case in English, Scottish and Welsh law, in which the House of Lords effectively greatly widened the existing criteria for finding a duty of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Facts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mrs. May Donoghue ordered an ice-cream drink, which included ginger beer, from a café. When she had already consumed some of the drink, her friend tipped out some more ginger beer into the drink, and it became apparent that the decomposing remains of a snail had been present in the bottle of ginger beer. Mrs. Donoghue later suffered from shock and gastroenteritis, and sued the manufacturer of the ginger beer for the harm she suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judgment == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Atkin famously derived his 'neighbour principle', under which the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed a duty of care to the consumer, from Christian principles (specifically, Luke 10). He ruled that the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed Mrs. Donoghue a duty of care under this principle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[1932] A.C. 562 Page 580&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The full text of the case can be found [http://www.scottishlawreports.org.uk/resources/dvs/donoghue-v-stevenson-report.html here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Grand_Theft_Auto&amp;diff=743530</id>
		<title>Grand Theft Auto</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Grand_Theft_Auto&amp;diff=743530"/>
		<updated>2010-01-10T14:13:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Corrected a small english mistake. Probably just a typo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Grand Theft Auto''' is a popular [[video game]] series that glamorizes car theft and other forms of [[illegal]] and [[immoral]] activity. Its title derives from police and legal classification of stealing car as a type of [[grand theft]]. It has been subject to criticism and controversy as it encourages the player to perform various [[crime]]s ranging from [[speeding]] to serial [[murder]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352835,00.html 'Grand Theft Auto' Promo Campaign Kept Quiet], [[Associated Press]], ''[[Fox News Channel]]'', April 28, 2008. &amp;quot;As Bellic, players can hijack cars, earn cash for criminal activities, flee from police, drive drunk, kill innocent bystanders and patronize strip clubs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which may contribute to an increase in aggressive behavior in the player.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apa.org/science/psa/sb-anderson.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that the game is designed to be as realistic as possible has led to speculation that Rockstar is in fact actively encouraging real-life mischief and violence for publicity. One of the games, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, originally contained a minigame featuring adult content involving the main character and any of his girlfriends, it is activated through the use of a modification file called Hot Coffee mod. Rockstar North denied ever creating the minigame.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Games==&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto ([[PSX]], [[PC]], [[GBC]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto 2 ([[PSX]], [[PC]], [[Dreamcast]], [[GBC]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto III ([[PS2]], [[Xbox]], [[PC]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto: Vice City ([[PS2]], [[Xbox]], [[PC]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas ([[PS2]], [[Xbox]], [[PC]]. [[ESRB]] rating: AO (changed to M in the second edition (one with no minigame)))&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto Advance ([[GBA]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto: Liberty City Stories ([[PSP]], [[PS2]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories ([[PSP]], [[PS2]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
*Grand Theft Auto IV ([[PS3]], [[XBox 360]]. [[ESRB]] rating: M)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Video Games]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743524</id>
		<title>Donoghue v. Stevenson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743524"/>
		<updated>2010-01-10T12:48:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Donoghue v Stevenson is a landmark case in English, Scottish and Welsh law, in which the House of Lords effectively greatly widened the existing criteria for finding a duty of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Facts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mrs. May Donoghue ordered an ice-cream drink which included ginger beer from the a café. When she had already consumed some of the drink, her friend tipped out some more ginger beer into the drink, and it became apparent that the decomposing remains of a snail had been present in the bottle of ginger beer. Mrs. Donoghue later suffered from shock and gastroenteritis, and sued the manufacturer of the ginger beer for the harm she suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judgment == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Atkin famously derived his 'neighbour principle', under which the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed a duty of care to the consumer, from Christian principles (specifically, Luke 10). He ruled that the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed Mrs. Donoghue a duty of care under this principle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[1932] A.C. 562 Page 580&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The full text of the case can be found [http://www.scottishlawreports.org.uk/resources/dvs/donoghue-v-stevenson-report.html here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743523</id>
		<title>Donoghue v. Stevenson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donoghue_v._Stevenson&amp;diff=743523"/>
		<updated>2010-01-10T12:47:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: Created page with ''''Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562'''    Donoghue v Stevenson is a landmark case in English, Scottish and Welsh law, in which the House of Lords effectively greatly widened ...'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donoghue v Stevenson is a landmark case in English, Scottish and Welsh law, in which the House of Lords effectively greatly widened the existing criteria for finding a duty of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Facts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mrs. May Donoghue ordered an ice-cream drink which included ginger beer from the a café. When she had already consumed some of the drink, her friend tipped out some more ginger beer into the drink, and it became apparent that the decomposing remains of a snail had been present in the bottle of ginger beer. Mrs. Donoghue later suffered from shock and gastroenteritis, and sued the manufacturer of the ginger beer for the harm she suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judgment == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Atkin famously derived his 'neighbour principle', under which the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed a duty of care to the consumer, from Christian principles (specifically, Luke 10). He ruled that the manufacturer of the ginger beer owed Mrs. Donoghue a duty of care under this principle:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[1932] A.C. 562 Page 580&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The full text of the case can be found [http://www.scottishlawreports.org.uk/resources/dvs/donoghue-v-stevenson-report.html here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_of_Lords&amp;diff=743231</id>
		<title>House of Lords</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_of_Lords&amp;diff=743231"/>
		<updated>2010-01-09T16:27:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''House of Lords''', or, more properly, ''The Right Honourable the House of Lords'', is the [[upper house]] of the [[British]] [[legislature]]. Together with the [[Queen]] and the [[House of Commons (UK)|House of Commons]], it comprises one of the three elements of the British [[Parliament]]. It was formerly the highest appellate court in the UK until October 2009; the Supreme Court, as created by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2005/en/ukpgaen_20050004_en_1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, has now taken over this function, although the Law Lords previously appointed to the House of Lords remain Lords and Supreme Court judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reform of the House of Lords may be regarded as a second-tier current political issue in the UK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The House of Lords is composed of two categories of member: the Lords Spiritual and the Lords Temporal. It presently has 731 members in total, 26 Lords Spiritual and 705 Lords Temporal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lords Spiritual==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lords Spiritual consist of the two Archbishops of the [[Church of England]] (the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] and the [[Archbishop of York]]) and 24 other senior bishops of the Church of England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lords Temporal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the House of Lords was composed of aristocrats (peers) who had either inherited their aristocratic titles or been awarded them by the Monarch (in later times, the Monarch would act in such circumstances at the request of the Prime Minister). The Life Peerages Act of 1958 gave the Monarch the power to confer the noble title of ''Baron'' (or ''Baroness'') on individuals for life only, without their children inheriting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1998, the [[Labour Party|Labour]] Government of [[Tony Blair]] removed most of the hereditary peers from the House: as part of a compromise deal, 92 have remained, though these are expected to be removed during the next round of reform of the House. The House accordingly now consists almost entirely of &amp;quot;life peers&amp;quot; appointed as Barons with non-inheritable titles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life peers are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister. In making his recommendations to the Queen, the Prime Minister receives representations from opposition parties and an independent House of Lords Appointments Commission, and appointments of a highly political nature are scrutinised by a Political Honours Scrutiny Committee. However, following the 2005 election, it has been suggested a number of wealthy donors of money to the Labour Party (and also some Conservative donors) made their donations in return for being granted peerages and seats in the Lords. A police investigation into these allegations is ongoing, and Tony Blair has been interviewed by the Metropolitan (London) Police as a witness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final category of Lords Temporal are the &amp;quot;Law Lords&amp;quot;, who exercise the House's function as the highest court of the UK. The Law Lords (who, strictly speaking, constitute the &amp;quot;Appellate Committee&amp;quot; of the House) are appointed (by being awarded life peerages) from among the highest ranks of the British judiciary, and are roughly equivalent to the justices of the United States' [[Supreme Court]], though their powers are a little less extensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the reform of 1998, the Labour Government has taken steps to effect further reform to the House of Lords. It is not clear whether these steps will result in legislation in the near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political composition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current political composition of the House of Lords is as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Labour Party]]: 211 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative Party]]: 203 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal Democrats]]: 77 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[UK Independence Party]]: 2 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Green Party]]: 1 seat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Independents (&amp;quot;Cross-benchers&amp;quot;): 202 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others: 35 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOTAL: 731&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Parliament]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[House of Commons (UK)|House of Commons]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:British Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British History]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
    ==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    {{reflist}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_of_Lords&amp;diff=743230</id>
		<title>House of Lords</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=House_of_Lords&amp;diff=743230"/>
		<updated>2010-01-09T16:25:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Twitcher: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''House of Lords''', or, more properly, ''The Right Honourable the House of Lords'', is the [[upper house]] of the [[British]] [[legislature]]. Together with the [[Queen]] and the [[House of Commons (UK)|House of Commons]], it comprises one of the three elements of the British [[Parliament]]. It was formerly the highest appellate court in the UK until October 2009; the Supreme Court, as created by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2005/en/ukpgaen_20050004_en_1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, has now taken over this function, although the Law Lords previously appointed to the House of Lords remain Lords and Supreme Court judges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reform of the House of Lords may be regarded as a second-tier current political issue in the UK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Composition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The House of Lords is composed of two categories of member: the Lords Spiritual and the Lords Temporal. It presently has 731 members in total, 26 Lords Spiritual and 705 Lords Temporal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lords Spiritual==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lords Spiritual consist of the two Archbishops of the [[Church of England]] (the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] and the [[Archbishop of York]]) and 24 other senior bishops of the Church of England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lords Temporal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the House of Lords was composed of aristocrats (peers) who had either inherited their aristocratic titles or been awarded them by the Monarch (in later times, the Monarch would act in such circumstances at the request of the Prime Minister). The Life Peerages Act of 1958 gave the Monarch the power to confer the noble title of ''Baron'' (or ''Baroness'') on individuals for life only, without their children inheriting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1998, the [[Labour Party|Labour]] Government of [[Tony Blair]] removed most of the hereditary peers from the House: as part of a compromise deal, 92 have remained, though these are expected to be removed during the next round of reform of the House. The House accordingly now consists almost entirely of &amp;quot;life peers&amp;quot; appointed as Barons with non-inheritable titles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life peers are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Prime Minister. In making his recommendations to the Queen, the Prime Minister receives representations from opposition parties and an independent House of Lords Appointments Commission, and appointments of a highly political nature are scrutinised by a Political Honours Scrutiny Committee. However, following the 2005 election, it has been suggested a number of wealthy donors of money to the Labour Party (and also some Conservative donors) made their donations in return for being granted peerages and seats in the Lords. A police investigation into these allegations is ongoing, and Tony Blair has been interviewed by the Metropolitan (London) Police as a witness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A final category of Lords Temporal are the &amp;quot;Law Lords&amp;quot;, who exercise the House's function as the highest court of the UK. The Law Lords (who, strictly speaking, constitute the &amp;quot;Appellate Committee&amp;quot; of the House) are appointed (by being awarded life peerages) from among the highest ranks of the British judiciary, and are roughly equivalent to the justices of the United States' [[Supreme Court]], though their powers are a little less extensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reform==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the reform of 1998, the Labour Government has taken steps to effect further reform to the House of Lords. It is not clear whether these steps will result in legislation in the near future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political composition==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current political composition of the House of Lords is as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Labour Party]]: 211 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative Party]]: 203 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal Democrats]]: 77 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[UK Independence Party]]: 2 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Green Party]]: 1 seat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Independents (&amp;quot;Cross-benchers&amp;quot;): 202 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others: 35 seats&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOTAL: 731&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Parliament]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[House of Commons (UK)|House of Commons]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:British Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Twitcher</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>