Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User:Turbo

2007-05-23T20:41:00Z

Turbo: Turbo's conclusions about the illusions of mankind. True lies, whereever you watch, if you watch ...

High there. I'm a german, who doesn't believe in governmental stories.
My conclusion is, there are all men at work, who are only interested in Power, Money and so on. None of them is interested in reality on wellfare of the US-americans. All lies, and many persons believe all of them.
That's what I can see. - In germany it's the same. There the people again believes in the government. And in a new government, when a new is entering the theatre. Even, if they say the opposite. That's life, live.
Poor mankind, poor future on earth. Turbo

Talk:Dick Cheney

2007-05-23T20:36:11Z

Turbo:

{{protect|MountainDew}}
==Spelling==
There are several spelling errors on the page. Several links direct to the wrong article. Can this be fixed before he leaves office?
-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]][[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]] 01:03, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Can't we use his REAL first name, to avoid obscenity? --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:07, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

:If you mean the article name: I think it goes by what he's best known as, just like [[Bill Clinton]] is not at [[William Jefferson Clinton]] (it had been moved there briefly, but then got moved back). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:16, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

:Are you serious? His first name is obscene? Get real.[[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Whenever this article gets unprotected, it should be put under [[:Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]]. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 21:25, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

And what's the deal with the protection? That's lame -- are the party leaders to remain untouched by the editing of the masses? Surely they can take it. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:47, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

And speaking of the article, someone just edited and left it a mess -- look at the fifth section, unhelpfully entitled "S:" (after bouncing back and forth between "Accidents:" and "S:" a couple of times. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 00:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

==Daughters==

Cut from article:

:Mary is a controversial figure, as she is a lesbian, who has a daughter with her same-sex partner. This is direct contrast with the views of a large number of the Bush Administration's supporters, who are opposed to homosexuality on religious and moral grounds. Mr. Cheney believes same-sex marriage and other laws relating to homosexuality should be decided at State Level. [http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/24/cheney.samesex/2]

Is she controversial? Or do Cheney opponents want to use her as a pawn in a political battle?

Are we judged by what our children or other relatives are (or do)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

:He's a republican vice-president. His party is against [[same-sex marriage|gay marriage]], deleting this reference eliminates depth of the man. (He, personally, doesn't care one way or the other on gay marriage, IIRC.) BTW, I don't think anybody used Mary although they may have sought to try but I think ''she'' put a stop to any sorts of moves years ago. [[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]][[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|TALK]] 16:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

==Pic==
[[Image:rcheney.jpg|right|thumb]]

== Mary Cheney ==

Even though it has been widely used in an attempt to discredit Cheney, the fact that his daughter is living a homosexual lifestyle remains just that, a fact. To the effect that this personal matter likely affects Cheney's ideas about "gay marriage" is both public knowledge and instructive to who he is politically. I think in the interest of avoiding the pitfalls of wiki, one of which is leaving out facts which aren't convienent to the liberal mindset, we should strive to be inclusive with the truth.

== Broken link ==
The cite for Cheney's education (#1 I think) is linked incorrectly...should be http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/. A sysop should fix this as the page is locked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:24, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

==Picture==
Could someone put a picture of Cheney on the actual article, please? --[[User:Additioner]] 16:51, 15 April 2007

Thank you for the picture --[[User:Additioner]] 13:29, 16 April 2007

*No problem! Sorry, I didn't remember the picture you put here! If you'd like, I will switch them. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 23:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

==What's about Dicks other live==
Nobody knows nothing about Dicks involving in Bechtel and Haliburton and nowadays such projects through afghanistan. Oil pipeline from Caspian See to Pakistan through south afghanistan is not relevant enough? Dick was the boss of this project. Nobody knows...
Should be time, to open the books, to see behind the official stories?
--[[User:Turbo]]

==Category==
Might want to add this: <nowiki>[[category:United States]]</nowiki> to the article. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Talk:Dick Cheney

2007-05-23T20:34:47Z

Turbo: Dick has been a boss of big industry firms, involved in oilpipeline through afghanistan. No problematic interest-conflict at all?

{{protect|MountainDew}}
==Spelling==
There are several spelling errors on the page. Several links direct to the wrong article. Can this be fixed before he leaves office?
-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]][[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]] 01:03, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Can't we use his REAL first name, to avoid obscenity? --[[User:Ballon|Ballon]] 21:07, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

:If you mean the article name: I think it goes by what he's best known as, just like [[Bill Clinton]] is not at [[William Jefferson Clinton]] (it had been moved there briefly, but then got moved back). --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:16, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

:Are you serious? His first name is obscene? Get real.[[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Whenever this article gets unprotected, it should be put under [[:Category:Vice Presidents of the United States]]. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 21:25, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

And what's the deal with the protection? That's lame -- are the party leaders to remain untouched by the editing of the masses? Surely they can take it. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 23:47, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

And speaking of the article, someone just edited and left it a mess -- look at the fifth section, unhelpfully entitled "S:" (after bouncing back and forth between "Accidents:" and "S:" a couple of times. [[User:McTavidge|McTavidge]] 00:04, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

==Daughters==

Cut from article:

:Mary is a controversial figure, as she is a lesbian, who has a daughter with her same-sex partner. This is direct contrast with the views of a large number of the Bush Administration's supporters, who are opposed to homosexuality on religious and moral grounds. Mr. Cheney believes same-sex marriage and other laws relating to homosexuality should be decided at State Level. [http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/24/cheney.samesex/2]

Is she controversial? Or do Cheney opponents want to use her as a pawn in a political battle?

Are we judged by what our children or other relatives are (or do)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 16:37, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

:He's a republican vice-president. His party is against [[same-sex marriage|gay marriage]], deleting this reference eliminates depth of the man. (He, personally, doesn't care one way or the other on gay marriage, IIRC.) BTW, I don't think anybody used Mary although they may have sought to try but I think ''she'' put a stop to any sorts of moves years ago. [[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]][[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|TALK]] 16:47, 29 March 2007 (EDT)

==Pic==
[[Image:rcheney.jpg|right|thumb]]

== Mary Cheney ==

Even though it has been widely used in an attempt to discredit Cheney, the fact that his daughter is living a homosexual lifestyle remains just that, a fact. To the effect that this personal matter likely affects Cheney's ideas about "gay marriage" is both public knowledge and instructive to who he is politically. I think in the interest of avoiding the pitfalls of wiki, one of which is leaving out facts which aren't convienent to the liberal mindset, we should strive to be inclusive with the truth.

== Broken link ==
The cite for Cheney's education (#1 I think) is linked incorrectly...should be http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/. A sysop should fix this as the page is locked. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 13:24, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

==Picture==
Could someone put a picture of Cheney on the actual article, please? --[[User:Additioner]] 16:51, 15 April 2007

Thank you for the picture --[[User:Additioner]] 13:29, 16 April 2007

*No problem! Sorry, I didn't remember the picture you put here! If you'd like, I will switch them. --~ [[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 23:23, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

==What's about Dicks other live==
Nobody knows nothing about Dicks involving in Bechtel and Haliburton and nowadays such projects through afghanistan. Oil pipeline from Caspian See to Pakistan through south afghanistan is not relevant enough? Dick was the boss of this project. Nobody knows...
Should be time, to open the books, to see behind the official stories?

==Category==
Might want to add this: <nowiki>[[category:United States]]</nowiki> to the article. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 14:31, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

Afghanistan

2007-05-23T20:29:01Z

Turbo: Caspian See Oil-Pipeline as background for US-engagement and drug-logistics for US-cities as another gigantic business-opportunity for the military-industrial-komplex as buck-printing institution

[[Image:Af-map.gif|thumbnail|right|250px|Map of Afghanistan]]

'''Afghanistan''' is a landlocked country in southern [[Asia]], bordering [[Pakistan]] to the south and east and [[Iran]] to the west. Afghanistan is known in the modern world for the decade-long influence of the [[Islamism|Islamist]] [[Taliban]] government, which was overthrown by American-led forces in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks, but still retains strong influence and is currently conducting a campaign of guerilla warfare. Most Afghans are [[Sunni]] [[Muslims]]. The current President of Afghanistan is Hamid Karzai. Afghanistan has two Vice Presidents, Ahmad Zia Masood and Abdul Karim Khalili. <ref>[https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html CIA World Factbook]</ref> Afghanistan's capital is Kabul.

Afghanistan is the world's leading producer of opium. The fact that the opium trade is a funding source for terrorist organizations has led to attempts to curtail the Afghan opium trade, but this has been difficult due to the lack of profitability of growing other crops. About a third of Afghanistan's economy is dependent upon the drug trade. <ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5308180.stm</ref>

An oil-pipeline from Caspian See to Pakistan through Afghanistan, built by Bechtel, Haliburton and other big US-american firms, one former boss of them was Dick Cheney, has to be protected and some people say, the opium-logistics for US-America too. Nobody helps the developement of the country, but the business of oil-proliferation for US-interests. Afghanistan politicians are completely corrupt and protegeed by foreig n governments, like elsewhere in the world. String-Puppets of big business worldwide.

<references/>

[[Category:Asian Countries]]

9/11 conspiracy theories

2007-05-23T20:17:36Z

Turbo:

9/11 conspiracy theories are usually claims that the [[United States]] government attacked it's own country on [[9/11|September 11]], 2001. The "evidence" provided by the conspiracy theorists, also known as "[[9/11 truthers]]" is widely debunked. Some information is provided here.
Not debunked are the sentences of housekeeper Rodriguez of the north-tower of WTC, who clearly says, that big explosions had been in the downstairs rooms of the WTC very short before the impact of the plane and he and others pulled out bleeding people out of the cellars there into the open air. Nobody of the press has ever brought this sentences of this eye-witness and others up to now. They interviewed Mr. Rodriguez - and no word appeared on this to the people of US-America. Other facts - never published by the Commission, nobody wanted to hear such facts. Mystery, or complot of inner circles behind governmental business, that's the question for a lot of people.

==World trade Center #7==
There are claims that WTC #7 was brought down by controlled demolition on 9/11. Supporters of this theory show photographs of the building from a misleading angle (it omits the smoke that seemed to pour out of the building due to fires inside). Many more photos exist that show massive fires burned throughout the building.

Some quote an owner of WTC #7 as saying they demolished the building. These people say that when he said in an interview that they decided to "pull" the building, he meant demolish. However, in this instance, "pull" does not mean demolish; it means to pull-out.

[[Rosie O'Donnell]] recently said that she believes WTC #7 was brought down by the government.<ref>http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272612184.shtml</ref>

==Black smoke==
Black smoke was seen coming out of WTC #7 and other places on 9/11. A common conspiracy theory says that black smoke means that a fire is starved of oxygen, and therefore can easily be put out. It is said that the firefighter's did not attempt to put out the fire, in this case. In the past, this might have been true, but petroleum burns very hot and is difficult to put out, and yet it also gives off black smoke. There was probably petroleum in the seventh tower.

==References==
<references/>
[[category:politics]]

9/11 conspiracy theories

2007-05-23T20:16:58Z

Turbo: Forgotten eye-witnesses and their hard-evidence-facts on explosions in WTC, housekeeper Rodriguez silenced in united media.

9/11 conspiracy theories are usually claims that the [[United States]] government attacked it's own country on [[9/11|September 11]], 2001. The "evidence" provided by the conspiracy theorists, also known as "[[9/11 truthers]]" is widely debunked. Some information is provided here.
Not debunked are the sentences of housekeeper Rodriguez of the north-tower of WTC, who clearly says, that big explosions had been in the downstairs romms of the WTC very short before the impact of the plane and he and others pulled out bleeding people out of the cellars there into the open air. Nobody of the press has ever brought this sentences of this eye-witness and others up to now. They interviewed Mr. Rodriguez - and no word appeared on this to the people of US-America. Other facts - never published by the Commission, nobody wanted to hear such facts. Mystery, or complot of inner circles behind governmental business, that's the question for a lot of people.

==World trade Center #7==
There are claims that WTC #7 was brought down by controlled demolition on 9/11. Supporters of this theory show photographs of the building from a misleading angle (it omits the smoke that seemed to pour out of the building due to fires inside). Many more photos exist that show massive fires burned throughout the building.

Some quote an owner of WTC #7 as saying they demolished the building. These people say that when he said in an interview that they decided to "pull" the building, he meant demolish. However, in this instance, "pull" does not mean demolish; it means to pull-out.

[[Rosie O'Donnell]] recently said that she believes WTC #7 was brought down by the government.<ref>http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272612184.shtml</ref>

==Black smoke==
Black smoke was seen coming out of WTC #7 and other places on 9/11. A common conspiracy theory says that black smoke means that a fire is starved of oxygen, and therefore can easily be put out. It is said that the firefighter's did not attempt to put out the fire, in this case. In the past, this might have been true, but petroleum burns very hot and is difficult to put out, and yet it also gives off black smoke. There was probably petroleum in the seventh tower.

==References==
<references/>
[[category:politics]]