<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Toboucha</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Toboucha"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Toboucha"/>
	<updated>2026-11-09T05:39:29Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Best_of_the_public&amp;diff=992317</id>
		<title>Best of the public</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Best_of_the_public&amp;diff=992317"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T03:26:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toboucha: Removed bullshit&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''&amp;quot;best of the public&amp;quot;''' is an approach to education, scholarship, and biblical translation that was coined during an interview with ''Conservapedia'' '''The hell would you source your own statements in an encyclopedia? Oh right, you aren't one. Derp.'''' and first published on December 3, 2009:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tom Breen. [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34270487/ns/us_news-faith/ Blessed are the conservative in Bible translation], ''Yahoo! News'', December 03, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''The best of the public is better than a group of experts.'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;}} '''Except normal people usually refer to 'the best of the public' as experts. Derp.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept then became a topic of discussion in the interview with the owner of ''Conservapedia'' on the Colbert Report on December 8, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/258144/december-08-2009/andy-schlafly The Colbert Report Videos: Andy Schlafly], ColbertNation.com, December 08, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In early February 2010, [[Supreme Court]] Justice [[Clarence Thomas]] implicitly endorsed the concept of the &amp;quot;best of the public&amp;quot; with this response to a question by a state college student:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abovethelaw.com/2010/02/clarence_thomas_rejects_ttt_label_for_his_law_clerks.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|I think there are smart kids a lot of places. ... [T]here is a bias. If you look at smart bloggers — or self-proclaimed smart bloggers — they referred to my clerks last year as TTT — 'third tier trash.' That's the attitude that you're up against.}} '''Probably taken out of context. Plus Schalaffy or whatever the hell his name is an out of this world crackpot.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Another way of expressing this concept is that &amp;quot;extraordinary achievements are attained by ordinary people.&amp;quot;  The enigmatic [[Christian]] term the &amp;quot;[[Son of Man]]&amp;quot; embodies how inspiration comes from the ostensibly ordinary rather than the esteemed experts.  Most [[prophet]]s were also ordinary men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Conservative Bible Project]] may be the first to adopt the &amp;quot;best of the public&amp;quot; approach for a scholarly project.  Other examples of approaches using the &amp;quot;best of the public&amp;quot; include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intellectual examples===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*the [[Bible]] '''No. A fairy-tale book peddled by opportunistic charlatans.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*the [[Gospel of Mark|earliest Gospel]] was likely written by a non-Apostle who witnessed the events as a young boy '''And couldn't recall them thirty years later. Unreliable witness.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*the [[Epistle to the Hebrews (Translated)|Epistle to the Hebrews]] was written by an anonymous individual, yet its intellectual force is at the highest level '''Probably another charlatan.'''&lt;br /&gt;
*the [[Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*pamphleting, as in ''[[Common Sense]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*the solution of one of the greatest unsolved problem of our time, the [[Poincaré conjecture]] (see below)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Coase]], an originally obscure economist, developed the now-accepted [[Coase theorem]] despite nearly unanimous rejection and opposition by experts&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evariste Galois]], an unknown teenager, developed [[group theory]] and it took the mathematical experts a century to appreciate it&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alexander Hamilton]], the most intellectually productive of the [[Founding Fathers]], was abandoned by his father, orphaned by the premature death of his mother, and then orphaned again by the suicide of his adopted father; he was stigmatized due to his social background and excluded from the local [[British]] school for it. &lt;br /&gt;
*the principle of trial by a jury of one's peers&lt;br /&gt;
*letters to the editor&lt;br /&gt;
*the design of Vietnam War Memorial (competition won by a college student, featuring ordinary soldiers)&lt;br /&gt;
*the design of the St. Louis Arch (competition won by an unknown architect, featuring openness) &lt;br /&gt;
*an obscure, unsuccessful author, [[Herman Melville]], wrote the greatest novel in English literature, ''[[Moby-Dick]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*an unknown and possibly uneducated playwright, [[William Shakespeare]], produced the greatest plays ever '''According to fallible, overblown academic opinion.'''&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Constitution of the United States of America]].  The [[Founding Fathers]], in their wisdom, chose to eschew the idea of &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; hereditary nobility, but were also wary of the mob rule that could result with pure democracy; thus, they chose a democratic republic instead. '''Stop trying to frame the situation into your fantasy world.'''&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Electoral College]] was intended to be composed of the best of the public, who would judge who was best qualified to be President.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''Conservapedia''''' posted [[Flaws in Richard Lenski Study|errors and flaws]] in a pro-[[evolution]] article by Professor [[Richard Lenski]] (published after a mere 14-day peer review), but [[PNAS]] [[Letter to PNAS|refused to correct the errors]] and Lenski responded with [[Conservapedia:Lenski dialog|petulant rants]] insisting his critic lacked &amp;quot;expertise&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*design of the distinctive Coca-Cola glass bottle, which resulted from a public contest in 1915.&lt;br /&gt;
*Internet blogs.  Anyone can start a blog, and readers read the best blog posts.  Such blogs have been responsible for breaking crucial news stories well before the &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; of the traditional media--for example, the [[Monica Lewinsky]] story and [[Rathergate]] '''Written by an opportunistic and lying idiot.'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Layman Allen devised games like &amp;quot;WFF 'n proof&amp;quot; and Equations which reduced absenteeism, increased math achievement and achieved voluntary integration in the segregated Chicago school system. [http://o.b5z.net/i/u/6035566/f/pdfs/articles/chicagoreader.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeschooled]] students tended to dominate the annual Math Counts competition to such an extent that the competition changed the rules to ban teams of homeschoolers from participating. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theaquilareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=2760:homeschoolers-count-national-math-competition-bans-homeschoolers&amp;amp;catid=49:people&amp;amp;Itemid=132&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toboucha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=992316</id>
		<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=992316"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T03:21:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toboucha: The only info you deserve to report on is the tombstone data. Nothing else&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Dictator bio&lt;br /&gt;
| image        =&lt;br /&gt;
| name         =Adolf Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
| birth        =April 20, 1889&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Braunau am Inn, Austria–Hungary&lt;br /&gt;
| parents      =Alois Hitler (Schicklgruber)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Klara Pölzl&lt;br /&gt;
| religion     =Roman Catholic (rejected)&lt;br /&gt;
| spouse       =Eva Braun&lt;br /&gt;
| children     =none&lt;br /&gt;
| death        =April 30, 1945&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Berlin, Germany&lt;br /&gt;
| deathmanner  =Suicide by gunshot&lt;br /&gt;
| education    =Realschule&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Linz, Austria&lt;br /&gt;
| country      =[[Third Reich|Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
| military     =16th Bavarian Reserve Regiment&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Imperial German Army (1914-1918)&lt;br /&gt;
| rank         =''Obergefreiter'' (Lance Corporal/Private First Class)&lt;br /&gt;
|burial = none, burned.&lt;br /&gt;
| polbeliefs   =[[Socialism]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[National socialism]] (Nazism)&lt;br /&gt;
| party        =German Workers' Party&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(Deutsche Arbeiterpartei 1920–1921)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Socialist German Workers' Party&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei 1921–1945)&lt;br /&gt;
| dictatordate =March 23, 1933&lt;br /&gt;
| war          =[[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
| deathnumber  =12,000,000+ exclusive of battle casualties&lt;br /&gt;
20,000,000 to 25,000,000 altogether&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rummel: 21,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toboucha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=992315</id>
		<title>Adolf Hitler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&amp;diff=992315"/>
		<updated>2012-07-08T03:19:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toboucha: Removed bull-shit sections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Dictator bio&lt;br /&gt;
| image        =&lt;br /&gt;
| name         =Adolf Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
| birth        =April 20, 1889&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Braunau am Inn, Austria–Hungary&lt;br /&gt;
| parents      =Alois Hitler (Schicklgruber)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Klara Pölzl&lt;br /&gt;
| religion     =Roman Catholic (rejected)&lt;br /&gt;
| spouse       =Eva Braun&lt;br /&gt;
| children     =none&lt;br /&gt;
| death        =April 30, 1945&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Berlin, Germany&lt;br /&gt;
| deathmanner  =Suicide by gunshot&lt;br /&gt;
| education    =Realschule&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Linz, Austria&lt;br /&gt;
| country      =[[Third Reich|Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
| military     =16th Bavarian Reserve Regiment&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Imperial German Army (1914-1918)&lt;br /&gt;
| rank         =''Obergefreiter'' (Lance Corporal/Private First Class)&lt;br /&gt;
|burial = none, burned.&lt;br /&gt;
| polbeliefs   =[[Socialism]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[National socialism]] (Nazism)&lt;br /&gt;
| party        =German Workers' Party&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(Deutsche Arbeiterpartei 1920–1921)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;National Socialist German Workers' Party&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;(Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei 1921–1945)&lt;br /&gt;
| dictatordate =March 23, 1933&lt;br /&gt;
| war          =[[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
| deathnumber  =12,000,000+ exclusive of battle casualties&lt;br /&gt;
20,000,000 to 25,000,000 altogether&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rummel: 21,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the common myth that Hitler was an atheist'''But you just said he WAS an atheist. Inconsistency doesn't matter, does it though?''', Hitler was actually a confirmed [[Roman Catholic]] Christian. In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote, “by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord”. However, he was not very strong in his religious beliefs, and it is likely he only mentioned [[Christianity]] in his speeches to gain the votes and favor of both Catholics and Protestants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Evolution|Evolutionist]] and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] stated in an interview: “What’s to prevent us from saying Hitler wasn’t right? I mean, that is a genuinely difficult question.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''Completely taken out of context. The interviewer is a wacko, too.''' The interviewer wrote, regarding the Hitler comment, &amp;quot;I was stupefied. He had readily conceded that his own [[philosophy|philosophical]] position did not offer a rational basis for moral judgments. His intellectual honesty was refreshing, if somewhat disturbing on this point.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://byfaithonline.com/page/in-the-world/richard-dawkins-the-atheist-evangelist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Absolute and complete, utter, bull-shit. Horse-plop. Socialism is an economic system where workers control the means of production, not the state, you moron. That's called state-capitalism. America and Nazi Germany is/were state-capitalist. Deal with it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==War==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1913 Hitler was in Munich, Germany, with war clouds on the horizon.  Classified as unfit for service in the Austrian army (possibly by faking, as he did not like the thought of serving Austria) in 1914, he volunteered for the German army, joining the 16th Bavarian Reserve Infantry Regiment, greeting the war with enthusiasm, and finding the military discipline and comradeship satisfying.  He served during the entire [[First World War]] as a messenger carrying dispatches between units, and often at the front lines under fire; he was wounded in 1916, and gassed in 1918.  His bravery during this time earned him the [[Iron Cross]], 2nd Class, in December, 1914, and in August 1918 he was awarded the Iron Cross, 1st Class – a rare decoration for a corporal.  But the gassing would take him out of the war and into a hospital, where he would be told the heart-wrenching news of Germany’s defeat the following November.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Path to power==&lt;br /&gt;
After the war ended, Hitler's future seemed uncertain. There was much discontent among demobilized veterans because of the lack of employment. The German military had felt it had not been defeated; indeed, the German Army stood on foreign soil when the Armistice was signed November 11, 1918 and not a square inch of German soil had been occupied. This was despite the fact that the German Army's strongest position, the Hindenburg line, had been broken by the Allies, and the German Army itself was in full retreat. However, the Army felt they had done their job, and the nation had been &amp;quot;stabbed in the back&amp;quot; by a gang of traitors who sought to lay hands on the Fatherland.  The &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; that Germany had been defeated was the &amp;quot;big lie&amp;quot; Hitler spoke of, as if repeating it often enough would cause people to believe it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After his discharge from the hospital, Hitler acted as an army political agent, assigned in Munich to gather information on the various political parties which had spring up amid the social chaos following Germany’s defeat.  In September, 1919, he was given orders to investigate the relatively-minor German Workers’ Party (''Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''); intrigued by the party’s apparatus and its racial, pan-German nationalism, he joined, becoming its 55th member; he left the army soon after and devoted himself to improving the party’s propaganda, as well as his own position within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conditions in Germany fostered the development of the party.  Economic woes brought widespread discontent, added to the furor surrounding the loss of the war and the harsh terms heaped upon Germany by the Allied Powers in the Versailles Peace Treaty.  Bavaria’s traditional separatism from the central government in Berlin made current conditions especially sharp, and Hitler was savvy enough to take full advantage of them.  When he joined, he found the party ineffective in leadership and uncertain as to its aims; he accepted the party program, but regarded it as a means to an end.  He caused friction with other members of the party, and their attempts to control him caused a threat of resignation; realizing that the future of the party now depended on Hitler, who clearly had a talent of organization, fund collecting, and above all, speaking, they declined to accept it; from July, 1921 Hitler was regarded as the party leader with nearly unlimited power.  From his party newspaper, ''Völkischer Beobachter'' (“Popular Observer”), he spewed out endless propaganda.  His meetings where he spoke grew from handfuls to hundreds, and then on to thousands.  A man of charismatic personality, he quickly attracted a circle of loyal and devoted followers: Julius Streicher, Alfred Rosenberg, Hermann Göring, and Rudolf Hess.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Munich was also a gathering place for former servicemen dissatisfied with conditions in the country; members of the Freikorps, which had been organized after the war from army units that refused to return to civilian life; and those civilians who plotted against the republic. Many of these men joined the Nazi Party. Among them was a staff member of the district command who had joined the German Workers’ Party before Hitler, Ernst Röhm, a pudgy man with a scared face who saw his own ambition in helping further Hitler’s rise within the party.  Röhm recruited what came to be known as the “Brown Shirts”, the violent squads used to attack socialists and communists, and to protect party meetings whenever Hitler was speaking. By 1921 they were organized into a private army called the ''Sturmabteilung'', abbreviated to S.A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Beer Hall Putsch==&lt;br /&gt;
Germany in 1923 was marked by social and political unrest caused by hyperinflation. In this time Hitler was able convince [[Erich Ludendorff]], an accomplished  general and leader of the German forces in the first World War, to join him in a coup d'etat (''Putsch'' in German). When Hitler learned that the nationalist prime minister of Bavaria was giving a speech to 3000 officials in one of Munich's biggest beer halls (the Haufbrau Haus), he ordered his paramilitaries to surround the building. Hitler went inside and took the prime minister hostage, announced a revolution, and attempted to convince him to join the coup against Berlin and become member in his new administration. The Bavarian prime minister agreed under pressure, but informed the nation via radio later that night that he did not support Hitler. The prime minister also informed the federal government in Berlin; the putsch had begun to fail.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next morning, 9 November 1923, Hitler and Ludendorff were marching with approximately 2000 partly armed supporters through Munich in a show of strength to regain the momentum. In the ensuing fight between Hitler's marchers and a cordon of police and army units at least 14 Nazi supporters and three policemen were killed and hundreds wounded. Ludendorff handed himself over to the authorities, while Hitler fled soon after the fighting began. Hitler was arrested a few days later at a friend's house, were had been in hiding since the failed coup. Ludendorff was acquitted of all charges, while Hitler was sentenced to 5 years in prison (he would do eight months). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://history1900s.about.com/cs/thirdreich/a/beerhallputsch_2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/timeline/putsch2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Bavarian prime minister, who foiled the plan, was killed in 1934 in the &amp;quot;Night of the Long Knives&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''Mein Kampf''===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Mein Kampf}}&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler had his inner circle as frequent visitors in his prison cell, which was made more comfortable due to his celebrity.  While there, he dictated to Rudolf Hess the first volume of ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' (“My Struggle”), his political autobiography and a compendium of his many ideas, including his [[atheist]]'''He was a roman catholic. Contradiction''' and [[evolutionist]]'''social darwinist, not a believer of it.''' ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler believed in the inequality of the races, nations, and individuals as part of the natural order of mankind, and chief among them was the exalted “Aryan race”, and the greatest of the Aryans were the Germans.   It was the German, according to Hitler, that gave the world civilization and the arts; to safeguard the German people as a race (the “Volk”), they would need to be united under a single leader (the Führer), where they would be protected from their three principle enemies: Marxism, which included social democracy as well as communism; democracy and its mob-rule, as shown by the failings of the Weimar Republic; and above all what Hitler called the poisoners of humanity, the Jews.  “Rational anti-Semitism must lead to systematic legal opposition,” he wrote in 1919. “Its final objective must be the removal of the Jews altogether.” In Mein Kampf, he told the world that the Jew was the “destroyer of culture,” “a parasite within the nation,” and “a menace.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From &amp;quot;Mein Kampf&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Jew &amp;quot;... he blares out his merits to the rest of the world until people really begin to believe in them. Anyone who does not believe in them is doing him a bitter injustice. In a short time he begins to twist things around to make it look as if all the injustice in the world had always been done to him and not the other way around.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.hitler.org/writings/Mein_Kampf/mkv1ch11.html Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| Hitler portrays Jews as leaders in politics and banking, both groups seeking to strengthen their cause, [[Zionism]], to ensure Jewish domination. From his Social Darwinist perspective, Hitler perceived a racial war as inevitable and he sought to halt the &amp;quot;[[Jewish]] drive towards world conquest&amp;quot;... As Berlin collapsed around him, Adolf asserted: &amp;quot;Out of the ruins of our towns and monuments hatred will grow against those finally responsible for everything, International Jewry.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.historytoday.com/MainArticle.aspx?m=32043&amp;amp;amid=30237234 Mein Kampf – The Text, its Themes and Hitler’s Vision] Robert Carr dissects a book frequently referred to but seldom read. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rebuilding the Nazi Party==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internal dissension within the party caused it to languish while Hitler was in prison.  When he was released he saw difficulties in the country that had not existed before the Putsch, namely currency reform that brought economic stability, and the scaling back of the war reparations as a result of the Dawes Plan.  Hitler was also forbidden to speak in public, and remained so until 1928; nonetheless he worked to rebuild the party and re-establish his own position within it as leader, despite Gregor Strasser’s opposition in northern Germany.  By 1927 the number of Nazis was in the hundreds of thousands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A new period of political and economic instability began with the onset of the Great Depression which threw millions out of work in Europe and North America.  To campaign against the [[Young Plan]] (a second renegotiation of war reparations payments) Hitler made an alliance with one of Germany’s leading nationalists, Alfred Hugenberg, whose newspapers enabled Hitler to reach a national audience for the first time. The alliance also had another advantage: it enabled him to seek support from many in business and industry who controlled funds going into politics, and who themselves were desirous of seeing Germany under the control of a strong anti-Soviet and anti-Communist regime.  The subsidies Hitler received placed the Nazi Party on a strong financial footing, enabling him to make his emotional appeal to the lower middle class and the unemployed in his faith that Germany would recover from its suffering and be a great nation once more. The alliance with the industrialists also demonstrated another aspect of Hitler, a skill of effectively using those that would use him, which many would discover when it was too late.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The electoral strength of the Nazis grew during the Depression, as unceasing propaganda accused the government of failing to improve conditions for the working man.  By the fall of 1930 the Nazis captured more than 18 percent of the vote, compared to just 2.6 percent in 1928.  Hitler captured 36.8 percent of the vote when he opposed Paul von Hindenburg in the 1932 presidential election; his mass following put him in such a strong position that he entered a series of closed-door intrigues with Franz von Papen, Oskar Hindenburg, and Otto Meissner, all sharing a fear and loathing of a communist government.  Despite the party losing votes in the November, 1932 election, Hitler insisted on nothing less than the office of chancellor for himself.  For him, it was all or nothing.  Hindenburg offered it to him on January 30, 1933.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In power==&lt;br /&gt;
Almost immediately, Hitler established himself as dictator.  Less than a month after taking office, on February 27 the Reichstag building was set on fire under mysterious circumstances (but officially blamed on a feeble-minded Dutch communist, Marinus van der Lubbe); Hitler soon after succeeded in getting several decrees passed removing much of the freedom guaranteed the constitution in the name of state security, and which also allowed an intensified campaign of violence against dissidents.  Incredibly, in a special election set in those conditions on March 5, the Nazis won 43.9 percent of the vote.  On March 21, the new Reichstag assembled at the Potsdam Church, as much a show of unity between the old guard under Hindenburg and the Nazis as it was a show of peace.  Two days later the Enabling Act was passed, giving Hitler full powers; with the exception of the Nazis, all other political parties, including those which had helped pass the Enabling Act, ceased to exist within three months.  Many of their leaders were imprisoned in concentration camps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Night of the Long Knives===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, however, did not wish to start an immediate revolution. In order to implement his ideas he still needed the support of the army.  But he did have one growing problem that was a thorn in the army’s side, the million-plus men of the S.A. and their leader, Ernst Röhm, who wanted nothing less than the merger of the S.A. into the army, with himself in overall command.  At first, Hitler tried getting Röhm’s support by persuasion, but Hitler’s inner circle was for removing him by any means possible.  On June 29, 1934, Hitler ordered a purge, flew towards a resort near Munich where a number of S.A. leaders were vacationing, and had them all arrested; many would be shot without trial.  Refusing to shoot himself when offered, Röhm was killed in his cell at Dachau, his last words, ironically, “Mein Führer, mein Führer!” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, Hitler gave speech in the Reichstag, announcing that some seventy-four individuals had been shot for threatening the stability of the Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;If anyone reproaches me and asks why I did not resort to the regular courts of justice, then all I can say is this: In this hour I was responsible for the fate of the German people, and thereby I became the supreme judge of the German people…It was no secret that this time the revolution would have to be bloody; when we spoke of it we called it 'The Night of the Long Knives.' Everyone must know for all future time that if he raises his hand to strike the State, then certain death is his lot.&amp;quot; ''&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler also used this event to settle his account with other opponents, such as Georg Strasser, who stood for a more socialist and less racist national socialism, and the former Bavarian prime minister who foiled the Beer Hall Putsch in 1923. Satisfied that the S.A. leadership was thoroughly broken up (thousands of S.A. members were either arrested or killed that night), the army approved of Hitler’s actions.  Hindenburg died a few days later on August 2, and Hitler merged the office of president with the chancellorship, and with it the supreme command of the German armed forces.  During this time the world was slowly recovering economically from the Depression, but it quickened in Germany, coincidently with Hitler’s rise to power.  Taking credit for the recovery made him very popular, bringing him a 90 percent approval rating in a voter  plebiscite that year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beginnings of expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In matters of state, the running of domestic affairs was left to subordinates, which was something Hitler had little attention for. Foreign policy always peaked his interest, in so much as to the advantages of a “Greater Germany”, which was his chief ambition.  The first part of realizing this, according to ''Mein Kampf'', was to be a reunion of the German peoples within Europe; the second would be an expansion of Germany to the east (lebensraum).  Expanding would mean a renewed conflict with the Slavic peoples, whom Hitler intended to serve as slaves to the “New German Order.”  To follow through on his ambitions, he would have to remove Poland and the Soviet Union as countries; France also would have to be stabilized in the west, as she was Germany’s enemy for more than a century.  He counted as possible allies Italy, with its fascist government under &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before any of his ambitions could take place, there was one thing he detested which needed immediate removal: the restrictions placed upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I.  Posing as a man of peace to allay suspicions, he insisted that he was a champion of Europe wishing only for the removal of the inequalities leveled by the treaty, and  posturing as a shield against Bolshevism.  In October, 1933, he had Germany withdraw from the [[League of Nations]].  The following January he signed a non-aggression treaty with Poland.  His individual repudiations of parts of the treaty were followed by offers of negotiations for new agreements, while maintaining Germany’s limited ambitious nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this was going on, Germany was steadily building up the armed forces.  Rigorous training using wooden guns and trucks marked as “tanks” got needed battlefield training for officers.  Potential fighter pilots began their training in gliders at public demonstrations – Germany, under terms of the treaty, was not allowed an air force – and later they would fly in new civilian stunt planes and transports, which on the drawing board were designed to be rapidly turned into fighters and bombers.  Conscription was introduced in January, 1935, and in June of that year Hitler successfully signed a naval treaty with Britain, giving him rights to a respectable navy; but even while the ink was drying, Germany was secretly building a large U-boat fleet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The matter of reuniting the German peoples came into being in July, 1934, and here Hitler overreached.  German organizations were covertly aiding Austrian Nazis in the overthrow of their government, culminating in an attempted revolt as well as murdering Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss.  When the attempt clearly failed, Hitler denied involvement.  In January, 1935, a plebecite was introduced in the Saarland; more than 90 percent voted to return the territory to Germany.  Then in March, 1936, came his greatest slap to the Versailles Treaty: against the advice of his generals, and in open defiance of France and Britain, he ordered troops into the demilitarized Rhineland.  Germany was once again becoming the leading power in continental Europe.  By October, 1936, Germany had signed an alliance with Italy, proclaiming a “Rome-Berlin axis,” followed by the Anti-Comintern Pact with Japan.  All three countries would sign a single, mutual alliance pact, the following year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anschluss==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Removed from their offices in January 1938 were Hjalmar Schacht (economic ministry); Werner von Fritsch (soldiers’ representative); and Konstantin von Neurath (foreign office); the reason being was they were not fully accepting of Nazism.  Beginning his plans of German conquest, he started with Austria.  Kurt von Schuschnigg, the Austrian chancellor, was invited to Berchtesgaden in February, where he was browbeaten and forced to sign an agreement placing Austrian Nazis in the government.   When Schuschnigg resisted and announced a plebiscite for Austrian voters concerning independence, Hitler ordered German troops into Austria, completely taking over the country within days.  His return to Vienna was in triumph; enthusiastic crowds greeted him by the tens of thousands, in sharp contrast to the scenes of privation he had gone through there in his youth.  Austria was annexed (Anschluss) to the Reich a short time later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Anschluss was going on, Hitler was speaking in friendly terms with Czechoslovakia; nearly as soon as Austria ceased to exist, Hitler proceeded with his plans against the Czechs.  The northwestern region of Czechoslovakia was the Sudetenland, inhabited by a German minority, and the leader of them, Konrad Henlein, was instructed to make impossible demands for those Germans on the Czech government.  In the interest of preventing a general war (which Hitler wanted), Mussolini and British prime minister Neville Chamberlain concluded a peaceful agreement in Munich on September 30, giving Hitler the Sudetenland without firing a shot.  Chamberlain would return to Britain, waving the agreement signed between himself and Hitler, declaring it to be “peace for our time”, but his act of appeasement would ensure the peace would last only a few more months.  Despite assurances that the Sudetenland was his last territorial demands, “Czechia”, as the remainder of Czechoslovakia was called, became a German protectorate on March 15, 1939, when Hitler ordered it occupied.  Just over a week later, Lithuania was forced to cede to Germany the territory of Memel (Klaipeda), on the border of East Prussia.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Poland==&lt;br /&gt;
Poland’s turn was next, and listening to the rumblings was France and Britain, which signed guarantees of mutual assistance to the Polish nation should it be attacked by Germany.  Hitler also signed pacts: a “Pact of Steel” with Italy, strengthening the alliance between Rome and Berlin, and then a treaty that caught many off-guard: a non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union on August 23.  A secret clause in the pact allowed for the simultaneous invasion of Poland, and the division of the country in the center from north to south.  Poland was invaded on September 1; two days later, Britain and France declared war on Germany.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler assumed his own war strategy.  Poland was conquered within weeks, and when a desired peace accord with Britain failed to materialize, he ordered the army to prepare for a western offensive.  Norway was invaded and occupied, forestalling a British move on that country; Denmark was occupied by April, 1940.  Hitler than adopted General Erich von Manstien’s plan for an offensive against France itself, which would move through neutral Belgium’s Ardenne Forest on May 10, taking that country as a matter of convenience, as well as avoiding the static fortifications of France’s Maginot Line.  The German forces, extremely successful in their operations, reached the coastal ports on the English Channel in 10 days; Holland and Belgium both surrendered within days.  But south of Dunkirk was where the army was ordered to halt.  Hitler had hoped even at this stage in the battle that Britain would commit to peace; instead, the halting of the German army allowed the British to remove 170,000 fighting men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 10, Italy entered the war as German tanks were sweeping across northern France.  Hitler signed an armistice with France on June 22, the signing taking place in the same rail car at the same site where the Germans surrendered in 1918.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having failed in getting the British to sign an armistice, Hitler prepared his forces for “Operation Sea Lion,” the invasion of Britain. However, the Luftwaffe was defeated in its attempt to gain air superiority over British airspace, also known as the Battle Of Britain, which forced the permanent postponement of Sealion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Facing the failure of the British to give in, Hitler started to prepare to double-cross his erstwhile partner in the Poland conquest, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union.  Then Mussolini invaded Greece, got bogged down in the Balkans, and the threat loomed that he would lose his whole army there.  Hitler found it necessary to come to his aid, while at the same time taking direct control of Yugoslavia in the wake of the overthrow of the pro-Nazi government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbarossa==&lt;br /&gt;
The attack on Soviet Russia began June 22, 1941.  Rapid in its advancement, the German army captured a large swath of territory between the Baltic and Black seas, and captured close to 3,000,000 prisoners.  But Hitler, already micro-managing military operations, became overbearing to his generals; he preferred to go after many targets, while his generals argued for a single objective.  A few miles in front of Moscow, the German army was halted by a Russian offensive in December, as well as something he had absolutely no control over: the severe Russian winter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the lands already occupied by German forces, S.S. chief Heinrich Himmler was preparing the ground for Hitler’s new German order.  Expelling the Jews from Germany was the first step, and this was carried out by laws and decrees beginning in 1933; the Germans would switch to outright force in 1939, as Jews were first deported en-masse to Poland, then walled into ghettos after the occupation began.  By 1941, a policy crafted under S.S. general Reinhard Heydrich had changed expulsion for extermination in what was called &amp;quot;a final solution to the Jewish question&amp;quot; (''die Endlösung der Judenfrage'').  The system of concentration camps was supplemented by the creation of specialized killing centers in the occupied countries, especially in Poland, where camps such as Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzac “processed” thousands of victims daily.  Some six million Jews died during what was called the [[Holocaust]], as well as an additional five million Slavs, Gypsies, the handicapped, the aged, and many others that the Nazis considered “subhuman” in accordance with German racial policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beginning of the end==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Adolf_hitler6.jpg‎ |right|200px|thumb|Hitler in 1944, by now looking tired and strained.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler grew increasingly strained by the end of 1942, depending on large amounts of drugs supplied by his physician, Theodor Morell, as a result of the twin defeats of El Alamein (which he lost the bulk of his Afrika corps to British general Montgomery), and Stalingrad (where he lost an entire army of 250,000 men to the Russians).  He spent more time in his headquarters in East Prussia, and his time in the public eye ceased to exist.  He refused to visit bombed German cities, and, as with Stalingrad, refused to allow German armies to withdraw from the battlefield when the situation was lost.  Still, he could make stunning, decisive decisions when called for, such as the commando raid that resulted in the rescue of Benito Mussolini from Italian partisans in July, 1943.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the defeat of Germany in the war was looming closer.  Hitler’s relations with his leading commanders grew strained, the more so as he allowed units of the S.S. to take positions traditionally held by the army.  The line at the eastern front was slowly being pushed back by the Soviets, while in the Atlantic his U-boats campaign had faltered.  German cities were constantly being bombed, and a successful invasion on the Normandy coast of France in June, 1944 marked the beginning of the end.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Assassination attempt===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:NWT Hitler dead.jpg|left|200px|thumb|Hitler's death as covered by the ''New York Times'', May 2, 1945.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Seeing Germany’s chances of surviving the war were desperate, a group of officers plotted to assassinate Hitler, planning several attempts in 1943-44, but nearly successful on July 20, 1944, when a bomb hidden in a briefcase by Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg went off under a table that Hitler and others were leaning over; four were killed outright, several suffered injuries, but Hitler escaped relatively unharmed (the bomb itself was set down away from Hitler behind a solid oak table leg, saving him).  The conspirators were quickly rounded up; Stauffenberg was shot.  The remainder were put on show trials and condemned to hang on meat hooks with piano wire.  It was said that Hitler enjoyed watching film of their executions.  As a result of the bomb, Nazi members were employed at key positions within the army, removing any trace of the army’s independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within months nearly all of the territory occupied by Germany was now in Allied hands.  A last offensive in December, 1944 to take the port of Antwerp, Belgium, failed.  Hitler had by them grown ill; his hopes for a German victory bordered on the fantastical and the imagination.  By January, 1945 he had moved into his command bunker in Berlin, where he gave orders deploying fictional divisions to counter the ever-closer Soviets.  When all seemed lost, he gave out his final orders: first, appointing Admiral Karl Dönitz as head of the state and his successor, and Josef Goebbels as chancellor; and second, dictating his last political will which was an attempt to justify his life’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 29, he committed the one truly-chivalrous act of his life: he married Eva Braun, his long-time mistress.  After retiring to his room in the bunker the next day, Eva took poison, and Hitler put a bullet in his head.  In accordance with his wishes, both bodies were burned.  His Third Reich would outlive him for another week.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Elie Wiesel]] wrote the following in [[Time Magazine]] regarding Hitler: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Adolf Hitler or the incarnation of absolute evil; this is how future generations will remember the all-powerful Fuehrer of the criminal Third Reich. Compared with him, his peers [[Mussolini]] and [[Franco]] were novices. Under his hypnotic gaze, humanity crossed a threshold from which one could see the abyss. &amp;quot;Before Hitler, we thought we had sounded the depths of human nature,&amp;quot; argues Ron Rosenbaum, author of &amp;quot;Explaining Hitler.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;He showed how much lower we could go, and that's what was so horrifying. It gets us wondering not just at the depths he showed us but whether there is worse to come. The power of Hitler was to confound the modernist notion that judgments about good and [[evil]] were little more than matters of taste, reflections of social class and power and status. Although some modern scholars drive past the notion of evil and instead explain Hitler's conduct as a reflection of his childhood and self-esteem issues, for most survivors of the 20th century he is confirmation of our instinctive sense that evil does exist. It moves among us; it leads us astray and deploys powerful, subtle weapons against even the sturdiest souls.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;time&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, Hitler survived over forty assassination attempts.  The Stauffenburg attempt was the closest anyone ever came to killing Hitler.  George Elser, a communist, came very close in 1938, having planted a bomb in a beam that Hitler stood in front of while giving a speech.  Luck saved Hitler, as he left the hall early and twelve minutes later the bomb exploded.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toboucha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hearsay_society&amp;diff=991893</id>
		<title>Hearsay society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hearsay_society&amp;diff=991893"/>
		<updated>2012-07-06T01:17:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Toboucha: Fixed an article to read correctly. Umad, social conservatives?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Jdfu6r7.JPG|right|thumb|''Sapere aude!'' The Enlightenment thinker [[John Locke]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''hearsay society''' is a term used to describe a prevailing current of thought, stemming in large part from the popularity of [[Wikipedia]], that discourages making statements unless a reference can be found to others having said them already;  '''Incorrect. This is only for highly dubious statements presented as fact which are not widely acknowledged throughout the academic/scientific community. For example, if writing a paper on the discovery of DNA, there would be no need to cite the source for the date &amp;quot;1953&amp;quot;. It's a widely known and accepted fact that the discovery of DNA was 1953. Now, if a contestable statement is presented, it would need to be corroborated by authoritative/reliable sources (e.g. no sources with obvious political bias like Conservapedia) to be accepted as having some sort of truth-value. If it's from an obviously unreliable source, then it wouldn't be credited as being true.''' and if a reference is found, then the statements are considered true regardless of whether the reference consists of unreliable [[hearsay]]. '''Incorrect. Refer to the previous bolded statement.''' This is a form of [[intellectual cowardice]], and can lead to the propagation of misleading, incorrect or deliberately untrue information, while some individuals abandon even the attempt at using their own [[logic]] or thinking for themselves. '''Interestingly, this article doesn't source its own outlandish statements, in some hilarious ironic act of defiance against the non-existent &amp;quot;liberal media&amp;quot;'''  In the hearsay society the use of [[hearsay]] is so rampant that participants can lose the ability to recognize the difference between what is hearsay, and what is not. '''Except that a society of such scale would never emerge from even a remote intellectual undercurrent. Slipperly slope fallacy.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Example''': when confronted with the logic and even miracles performed by [[Jesus]], [[Pharisees]] insisted that Jesus cite &amp;quot;authorities&amp;quot; for his truths.  Imagine listening to the [[Prodigal Son]] and then asking the absurd question, ''do you have any references for this?'' &lt;br /&gt;
'''Except that parables are meant to illustrate lessons or specific points through metaphorical trope. This would not be a conceivable question in the first place. Yet another attempt by wacko conservatives to shame free-thinking individuals.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia's role==&lt;br /&gt;
The online encyclopedia [[Wikipedia]] is fundamentally based on a form of [[hearsay]]. Assertions made in Wikipedia articles are required to be supported by references; this superficially gives an impression of rigor, but in practice it leads to a [[parrot]]ting of the opinions of others and a negation of the individual's ability to use his intelligence to make connections and insights based on [[logic]]. '''No, not at all. Wikipedia is an encylopedia, first and foremost. Encyclopedias are compendiums of pre-established knowledge held to wide consensus and most importantly corroborated by verifiable fact. What's held as accurate knowledge changes over time, so Wikipedia will adjust its references as new knowledge pours in. Further, Wiki explicitly forbids the presentation of articles from a first-person/essay-style perspective. This is original thought; primary knowledge as opposed to the tertiary, pre-established nature of encyclopedias. Generally, Wikipedia allows both sides of a story a fair hearing. This is why you would see wacko creationists listed on Wiki along with criticisms of it. It's just reporting fact in a neutral manner. But it knows better than to treat every claim as if it were equal in truth, which is what you pitiful editors want it to do.''' Wikipedia typically dismisses logical inferences as original research; according to Wikipedia policy, this is contrary to the aspiration (itself highly problematic) that articles should present topics from a neutral point of view. As a result, such inferences are swiftly deleted, regardless of their insight or obvious truth. '''Again, original research is not tertiary knowledge.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While original research is permitted on other Wikimedia projects, such as [[Wikiversity]] and [[Wikibooks]],'''because those are institutions which disseminate original research to academia for wide consideration before being inculcated into the body of knowledge as (more or less) established fact. This is a standard process of verifying knowledge. What you describe is an integrity issue, nothing more.''' these sites are typically obscure and have negligible impact compared to Wikipedia '''they serve different audiences and have different goals. Derp'''. They may even have been established deliberately to channel original thought away from the mass exposure it would receive on Wikipedia.'''Yeah, no. There's no conspiracy there, buddy. God, you're more divorced from reality than I initially thought.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to the growth and popularity of Wikipedia, the flawed expectation that all statements must be referenced has spread elsewhere '''Nope. Not all statements, just dubious ones presented as fact. This attitude has always existed. It has nothing to do with Wiki's popularity. Wiki just formatted itself in accordance with its project. If it's going to be an encyclopedia, you cite reliable sources when making particular statements about things.''', both in online communities and wider society, to the point where many are reluctant to express any view unless others have said it first. '''Lol no.''' The result is a '''hearsay society''', where popularly-espoused &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot; are repeated and circulated endlessly, while truths and new insights are shut out, ignored or actively [[censorship|censored]].'''Not at all. Novel, controversial yet well-sourced and corroborated information is given a very fair hearing. You also reduce the sphere of intellectual interactions tot hat of hearsay. This is problematic because the process is much wider and complex than what it and isn't hearsay. It's the broader problematic of verifying knowledge. Science in particular is very self-criticizing and is always looking to improve presently existing bodies of knowledge in accordance with novel, corroborated information. This willingness to adapt to change is beneficial for several reasons.'''  Influenced by Wikipedia, some individuals will vehemently demand references in all kinds of situations where it is patently unnecessary or even absurd to do so.'''Yeah, no. Slippery slope fallacy again.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Degradation of standards===&lt;br /&gt;
An insistence that all statements must be referenced also leads to a gradual lowering of standards for what references are acceptable. For example, a contributor might want to add obvious statement A to an article, but has difficulty finding a reference. '''If it's a self-evident statement, it wouldn't need to be sourced. Derp.''' He eventually finds statement A made in source B, which is of questionable quality'''If the statement itself is reliable, you would publish it.'''; he adds the reference and the source is allowed to pass in that instance because of a commonsense desire among those involved to have statement A in the article.'''No.''' But future contributors can then take that use of source B as a precedent and use it to reference other, more questionable statements. Over time, this flawed system inevitably leads to progressively worse and worse sources being used, resulting in ever more hearsay and misleading or wrong information diluting the usable content.'''Slippery slope fallacy. And you suspiciously forget to mention that Wikipedia and other publications actively monitor for factually inaccurate information as part of their platform to maintain academic integrity.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparison with the Enlightenment==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:392.jpg|right|thumb|180px|[[Voltaire]]: An opponent of [[censorship]] who would not have approved of the hearsay society. '''Because the concept is ridiculous. And it's not censorship. You're twisting his ideals to fit your grotesque caricature of a liberal-dominated world.''']]&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, this subservience to hearsay and the authority of others is antithetical to the spirit of the [[Enlightenment]] which gave birth to the first encyclopedia and the [[scientific method]] - even though many of its most diligent proponents would claim to be scientists themselves. The motto of the Enlightenment was ''Sapere aude!'' - ie &amp;quot;Dare to know [for yourself]!&amp;quot; rather than uncritically accept what you are told.'''And this is what scientists do, you moron.''' This has been twisted out of all recognition by today's self-proclaimed &amp;quot;scientific community&amp;quot; and other groups, as they claim to idolize the great scientific thinkers while rejecting the spirit of inquiry that brought them their success.'''What inquiry is that? The 15 supposed &amp;quot;loopholes&amp;quot; in Darwinian evolution? What about the religious bias behind the inquiry? How can you criticize scientists for refusing to engage crackpot self-appointed 'skeptics' when its clear they have a less than honest agenda?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hearsay society attitude also compares unfavorably with [[Voltaire]]'s famous maxim &amp;quot;I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the [[death]] your right to say it.&amp;quot;'''Except that this isn't an issue about abstract opinion. This is an issue of academic integrity and the verification of claimed knowledge. Who 'disagrees' with fact? Oh right, you guys. Derp.''' Those who insist on censoring obvious truths on the pretext that no one can be found to have said them before are effectively saying the exact opposite: &amp;quot;I do not necessarily dispute what you say, but I am nevertheless going to try to stop you from saying it.&amp;quot; '''If it were self-evidenct, it wouldn't need to be sourced. This has nothing to do with censorship of opinion, you idiot.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comparison with Declaration of Independence==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the founding documents of the [[United States of America]], the [[Declaration of Independence]], begins by asserting certain truths as &amp;quot;self-evident&amp;quot;. The [[Founding Fathers]] who wrote it did not see the need to look for references or other parties who had made the assertions before, and that tone of self-reliance and confidence chimes throughout the rest of the Declaration, and indeed has informed the US's enterprising and pragmatic spirit in the centuries that followed.'''That has nothing to do with academic integrity. Derp.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This example shows how Wikipedia and the hearsay society are at odds with the approach taken by history's great men - including those with great practical achievements as well as thinkers. The hearsay society might even be considered &amp;quot;un-American&amp;quot;.'''More like unbelievable, because it doesn't exist.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conversely, [[socialist]] and other left- or [[liberal]]-leaning societies have been characterized by a deference to authority, even when those in authority are clearly mistaken or deliberately acting against the interests of the society in question.'''I love how you don't source this statement. Please, continue making false claims. It's delicious.'''This deferential tendency is of a piece with the attitudes that drive the hearsay society - supposed authorities, whether scientific, political, social or trivial, are taken as arbiters of truth regardless of their real credentials, and even when individuals' own logic ought to guide them otherwise.'''No, scientists are careful not to commit the fallacy of appealing to authority. We judge statements based on veracity and consistent observations, not the source behind it.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biblical commentary==&lt;br /&gt;
===Pharisees===&lt;br /&gt;
The similarities between the hearsay society and the [[Pharisee]]s who opposed [[Jesus]] are marked. As a group, the Pharisees were characterised by a petty and inflexible adherence to rules whose observance had long been divorced from their original purpose; and by a scandalized reaction to anyone who dared to think for himself rather than accept the views of authorities who they saw as beyond question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hearsay society is perhaps the most common modern manifestation of both of these Pharisee-like tendencies. Where the Pharisees ignored or tried to suppress truths because they came from Jesus (a carpenter by trade) rather than the priests of the temple, the hearsay society similarly censors or refuses to acknowledge anything not recycled from a limited pool of approved sources. Where the Pharisees tried to trap Jesus for spurious violations of the [[Sabbath]], so the hearsay society censors through recourse to rules on citation, regardless of how badly they might be misapplied, or how irrelevant they might be to the case in question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus's teaching===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] also touched more directly on the topic of hearsay when speaking to his disciples. [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] chapter 8 contains the following (verses 27-29):&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And Jesus went out with His disciples into the towns of Caesarea Philippi; and on the way He asked His disciples, saying unto them, “Who do men say that I am?”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And they answered, “[[John the Baptist]]; but some say [[Elijah]], and others, one of the prophets.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And He said unto them, “But whom say ye that I am?” And [[Peter]] answered and said unto Him, “Thou art the [[Messiah|Christ]].&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a great deal of hearsay circulating about Jesus himself, much of it apparently unfounded speculation about his identity. Jesus warns his disciples to put what they have heard second-hand to one side, and instead make their  own interpretation of the evidence they have seen: not &amp;quot;who do men say&amp;quot; but &amp;quot;whom say ye&amp;quot;. Disregarding the hearsay, [[Peter]] then finds that he can provide the correct answer - despite its surprising and challenging nature, and despite his own lack of scholarly education. '''Nothing but irrelevant biblical claptrap.'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Epistemology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Censorship]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Toboucha</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>