<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TimS</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TimS"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TimS"/>
	<updated>2026-09-29T05:09:17Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Continuum&amp;diff=621017</id>
		<title>Talk:Continuum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Continuum&amp;diff=621017"/>
		<updated>2009-02-09T05:41:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* No additional numbers may be added to the continuum (real line) without losing its dense linear order. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I would like to make a change to this article. In the second paragraph the link from continuous goes to an article on continuous functions. However the context in the article is that of a continuous set. I propose adding an article about continuous sets and then linking to that article. Any objections? ([[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 09:00, 12 December 2008 (EST))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please, before anyone bans me for making the changes that I have made, I ask that you read http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Continuum.html. Thanks! [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 10:14, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathfrak{c}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is mainly used by topologists--the remaining mathematicians that think about such large cardinalities tend to use the aleph system. But since I doubt we'll get that far into the details on CP, I can agree to that symbol. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:43, 18 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No additional numbers may be added to the continuum (real line) without losing its dense linear order. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article asserts that &amp;quot;No additional numbers may be added to the continuum (real line) without losing its dense linear order.&amp;quot; This is not true. I don't know what the author is trying to get at here. Unless anyone has any objections could we please remove this line? If anyone has any doubts about this then here is a proof:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claim: An additional point can be added to the real line without the line losing its dense linear order.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proof: Let R denote the real line and &amp;lt; denote its natural linear ordering. Fix x not in R. Let X=R union {x}. Extend the order &amp;lt; on R to a new order &amp;lt;* on all of X as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a,b are in R then a&amp;lt;*b iff a&amp;lt;b.&lt;br /&gt;
If a is in R then a&amp;lt;*x.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All that remains is to show that &amp;lt;* is dense. It is obvious that &amp;lt;* is dense when restricted to R. If a&amp;lt;*x we need to find b such that a&amp;lt;*b&amp;lt;*x. But choosing b=a+1 will suffice. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 10:24, 29 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have added the phrase &amp;quot;without [[endpoint]]s&amp;quot;, which defeats your reasoning. The complex numbers cannot be linearly ordered naturally; any ordering needs the [[Axiom of Choice]] to be constructed. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 03:55, 5 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::AndyJM, I do not at all appreciate your reversion without discussion on the talk page. This is not how our wiki works, and based on your past history I'm going to say that you cannot make edits to the mathematics articles without first obtaining approval of your proposed edits from [[User:Aschlafly]], myself or [[User:Ed_Poor]].&lt;br /&gt;
::Your second example (mentioned only in the edit summary) is also not a counterexample: the long line needs the uncountable ordinal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to be constructed. The elements of the long line are not numbers, but cartesian pairs of numbers with infinite ordinals. So the long line cannot possibly be a counterargument to the statement &amp;quot;No additional ''numbers'' may be added to the continuum (real line) without losing its dense linear order.&amp;quot; (emph. added) which you removed now for the third time. The fact of the matter is, if you try to include another number into the reals, you will lose the dense linear ordering without endpoints of the reals. So including an imaginary number, for example, destroys the properties of the ordering. This is the issue at the crux of why the complex numbers cannot be linearly ordered without the Axiom of Choice: the additional elements all violate the essential properties of the original, natural ordering of the reals, and you need AC to rectify the situation artificially. Andy, you may be trying hard to insert your Wikipedia bias here, but the beauty of mathematics is that it follows logical reasoning and flawed arguments are often easy to pierce. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 14:51, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''No one given the right to block is going to be issuing instructions about who is allowed to edit, or imposing conditions like the above. That is the exclusive province of Administrators, and we only impose such restrictions after talking about the possibilities with each other.  ''You guys work it out amongst yourselves.'' That said, AndyJM, Foxtrot is correct about giving notice, on his user talk page, or here, about reverting major portions. That is simple courtesy. If you have further disputes on math topics, politely ask [[user:RSchlafly|Roger Schlafly]] and see if he will mediate.''' --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:20, 8 February 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;''That is the exclusive province of Administrators''&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
::You didn't seem to believe that when you weren't one. --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:41, 9 February 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_Indian&amp;diff=611800</id>
		<title>Talk:American Indian</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:American_Indian&amp;diff=611800"/>
		<updated>2009-01-16T18:31:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Sources */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Could this article possibly be broken down into more pieces?  American Indian in a broad sense refers to all the indigenous peoples of North and South America, which is alot of ground to cover.  Can we do an article on just North American Indians, and then maybe one on South Americans?[[User:Jnl001|Jnl001]] 12:46, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; vs. &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; does not mean the same thing as the phrase &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;.  (Sorry I didn't explain this edit in the comment line.  I can expand my explanation here if anyone wants to discuss.)--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 23:12, 25 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So what's the difference? And if you think that there was a punctuation error, why didn't you just correct the punctuation? Please don't just remove the sentence. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:36, 26 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry - I did a quick edit when I should have explained and discussed it here first.  Let me explain.  As you know, &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; refers to an American Indian, whereas &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; refers to someone who was born here.  (As opposed to &amp;quot;naturalized American&amp;quot;, which refers to someone who was born elsewhere but has become a citizen here - like Arnold Schwarzenegger, for example).  I think the context in which &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; is used is usually enough to differentiate them (especially because almost everyone who is Native American would also be native American).  If the context is not clear, one can always use &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;American Indian&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot;.  The original sentence in the article was ''&amp;quot;Furthermore, the term Native American literally means anyone who was born in American as an American, so it can also be used by any American who wants to distinguish himself from an American immigrant.&amp;quot;''  This sentence, as written, didn't make any sense to me, because I read it literally - that is, I read it to mean that any native-born American could call themselves a &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot;, with a capital N.  Now I see that's perhaps not what was meant by the original sentence.  Of course anyone can call themselves anything they want, but since &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (with a cap N) generally isn't used to mean &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot;, I thought (based on my original reading of it) the sentence didn't really add anything useful to the article and was confusing.  That's why I took it out - I didn't think the sentence would make sense if I changed the cap N to a lower case N.  However, since you put it back in, I assume you think it's important to the article to explain the two terms, and I can see that makes a certain amount of sense.  If we're going to include information about the term &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;, then I think the sentence needs a bit of tweaking.  How about ''The term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot;, with a capital N, should not be confused with the phrase &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;, with a lower-case N.  The term &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot; refers to an American who was born in America, as opposed to a &amp;quot;naturalized American&amp;quot;, who was born elsewhere but has become a citizen of America. ''  What do you think?  I welcome your input - let's work together to make this the best it can be.--[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 09:46, 26 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I believe that any native-born American is just as much a Native American as anyone else. I object to any implication that some people are more rightfully called Native Americans, with whatever punctuation, based on how many generations their ancestors lived in America. I don't think any more needs to be added.&lt;br /&gt;
::: Someone else tried to edit it to imply that using the term native American to refer to a native-born American went obsolete in the 19th century. However, I do not think that is true. In my experience, many non-Indians readily identify themselves as native Americans, and American Indians are happy to be called Indians. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:16, 26 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]]First, let me say I had *no idea* that this was being discussed over at &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; when I did the original edit! &lt;br /&gt;
::::I see your point that the term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; *could*, in theory, be used to refer to someone who was born in America but is not of indigenous decent.  However, my personal impression is that this usage is rare.  Do you find that people actually use it this way (with the capital N), or are you just making the argument that it *could* be used this way?  I agree with you that the use of &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; (with a lower-case N) to mean &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot;, is not obsolete, but we must be careful not to confuse the two.  In fact, I think it's important to explain the usage of both.  How's this for a compromise - I think it contains what you were saying, plus explains the different usage of the two terms:  &lt;br /&gt;
::::''The term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; literally means anyone who was born in America, and can be used that way; however the term is usually used to refer to an American Indian.  The phrase &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; (with a lower-case &amp;quot;N&amp;quot;) or &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot; is usually used to refer to an American who was born in America.  In contrast, the term &amp;quot;naturalized American&amp;quot; refers to someone who was born elsewhere but has become a citizen of America. ''  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 14:33, 26 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: You are making some statements about how terms are &amp;quot;usually&amp;quot; used. I doubt that you are correct, and I don't see how the statements are helpful even if they are. So I don't agree with your proposed change. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 00:46, 27 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]], you are right - I shouldn't expect you to see my point of view without references.  I did some looking - see below.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* native American –noun  a person born in the United States.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;native american.&amp;quot; Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 28 May. 2007. &amp;lt;Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/native%20american]&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Native American –noun  Indian  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Native American.&amp;quot; Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Random House, Inc. 28 May. 2007. &amp;lt;Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/native%20american]&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Native American  n.   A member of any of the indigenous peoples of the Western Hemisphere. The ancestors of the Native Americans are generally considered by scientists to have entered the Americas from Asia by way of the Bering Strait sometime during the late glacial epoch. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Native American.&amp;quot; The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. 28 May. 2007. &amp;lt;Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/native%20american]&amp;gt;  This entry includes the following usage note:  ''&amp;quot;Many Americans have come to prefer Native American over Indian both as a term of respect and as a corrective to the famous misnomer bestowed on the peoples of the Americas by a geographically befuddled Columbus. There are solid arguments for this preference. Native American eliminates any confusion between indigenous American peoples and the inhabitants of India, making it the clear choice in many official contexts. It is also historically accurate, despite the insistence by some that Indians are no more native to America than anyone else since their ancestors are assumed to have migrated here from Asia. But one sense of native is &amp;quot;being a member of the original inhabitants of a particular place,&amp;quot; and Native Americans' claim to being the original inhabitants of the Americas is unchallenged. · Accuracy and precision aside, however, the choice between these two terms is often made as a matter of principle. For many, Native American is the only choice for expressing respect toward America's indigenous peoples; Indian is seen as wrong and offensive. For others, the former smacks of bureaucracy and the manipulation of language for political purposes while the latter is the natural English term, its inaptness made irrelevant by long use. Fortunately, this controversy appears to have subsided somewhat in recent years, and it is now common to find the two terms used interchangeably in the same piece of writing. Furthermore, the issue has never been particularly divisive between Indians and non-Indians. While generally welcoming the respectful tone of Native American, most Indian writers have continued to use the older name at least as often as the newer one. · Native American and Indian are not exact equivalents when referring to the aboriginal peoples of Canada and Alaska. Native American, the broader term, is properly used of all such peoples, whereas Indian is customarily used of the northern Athabaskan and Algonquian peoples in contrast to the Eskimos, Inuits, and Aleuts. Alaska Native (or less commonly Native Alaskan) is also properly used of all indigenous peoples residing in Alaska.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Native American noun  American Indian  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Native American.&amp;quot; Kernerman English Multilingual Dictionary. K Dictionaries Ltd. 28 May. 2007. &amp;lt;Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/native%20american]&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* native american adjective  1. of or pertaining to American Indians or their culture or languages; &amp;quot;Native American religions&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Indian arrowheads&amp;quot; [syn: Indian] noun  1. any member of the peoples living in North or South America before the Europeans arrived [syn: Amerindian]  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;native american.&amp;quot; WordNet® 3.0. Princeton University. 28 May. 2007. &amp;lt;Dictionary.com [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/native%20american]&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our article currently says ''&amp;quot;Furthermore, the term Native American'' [with a capital N] ''literally means anyone who was born in American as an American, so it can also be used by any American who wants to distinguish himself from an American immigrant.&amp;quot;''  While I agree that it ''can'' be used this way, the references above seem to back up my understanding that this is not at all common usage, and I think if we are to be encyclopedic we should make that clear.  Of course, there may be contexts or communities where this usage is common, and I have not done extensive research - could you give some examples of where you see &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (with a capital N) used to mean &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot;? --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 13:25, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your source suggests that &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; is a politically motivated propaganda term that is intended to imply that American Indians are the original inhabitants of America. The source is wrong when it says that the implication is &amp;quot;historically accurate&amp;quot;. There is substantial evidence that American Indians were ''not'' the original inhabitants.&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't know why you are pursuing this, unless you want CP to use terminology that suggests that Indians are more native to America than anyone else. The current text is correct, and avoids the inaccurate implications. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:41, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''Your source suggests that &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; is a politically motivated propaganda term that is intended to imply that American Indians are the original inhabitants of America.''  I agree that &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; is a politically motivated term that is intended to imply that American Indians have been here for hundreds, thousands, or maybe even tens of thousands of years longer than European Americans.  (I have no idea exactly how long.)  I realize that you don't like the use of this term, because you believe that all Americans are equal, regardless of how long their ancestors have lived here.  I think you have a legitimate point, and I do not have a problem with this being expressed in the article.  But we can't pretend that the term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (with a capital N) really means &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot; if it isn't actually commonly used that way.&lt;br /&gt;
::''The source is wrong when it says that the implication is &amp;quot;historically accurate&amp;quot;. There is substantial evidence that American Indians were ''not'' the original inhabitants.''  I think the issue is more complex than this, but I'm willing to believe that current day Indians are not direct descendants of the earliest people who lived here, and I hope that CP articles will eventually expand on this point.  &lt;br /&gt;
::''I don't know why you are pursuing this, unless you want CP to use terminology that suggests that Indians are more native to America than anyone else.'' I am pursuing this because I want CP to have an accurate definition of the current usage of the term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (and, ideally, &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot; as well).  That's the whole point of an encyclopedia.  I don't care if you raise the point that Native American literally means anyone born in America (although I'm not sure what you mean by &amp;quot;as an American&amp;quot;, since everyone born here is a citizen), or if you add a paragraph discussing why the term is problematic.  I'm not expressing an opinion as to whether I think the term is a good one or a bad one.  I just don't want anyone to come away from the article thinking that the term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (with a capital N) is commonly used to mean &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot;, because at least so far I haven't ever seen it actually used that way.   (Though it's possible that it is sometimes used that way, no examples have yet been given.)  If we want to, in general, use &amp;quot;American Indian&amp;quot; here at CP instead of &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot;, that's fine with me.    &lt;br /&gt;
::''The current text is correct, and avoids the inaccurate implications.''  I disagree.  I believe the current text implies, incorrectly, that it is common to use the term &amp;quot;Native American&amp;quot; (instead of &amp;quot;native American&amp;quot;) to mean &amp;quot;native-born American&amp;quot;, and I believe (at least until shown otherwise), that this is not the case.  --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 13:14, 29 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References and Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 9300 years old? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However, the oldest American skeleton is the 9300 year old Kennewick Man that is physically dissimilar to modern American Indians&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How does this reconcile with the 6000-year age of the planet? [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 15:51, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: It doesn't. Hard-core Creationism fails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone have a source for the statement &amp;quot;But the facts are that American Indians have very different characteristics from Asians, ranging from blood types to DNA, making claims of such ancestry virtually absurd.&amp;quot; It is clear that any such confident statement about &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot; should have a source to back it up. Denying this is like denying that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i\times i=-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Or perhaps the author would deny that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i\times i=-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; just because some liberal says it is not true. [[User:AndyJM|AndyJM]] 10:59, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: No, AndyJM, look yourself first.  In just a few minutes of Google searches I found multiple examples of fundamental differences between the two ethnicities.  You would too, if you opened your mind and looked.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:54, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aren't all people descended from Adam?  Even from Noah?  Since that time there has been enough of a change in different people's genetic information to have Asians, Africans, American Indians, Caucasians, etc.  what makes it so unlikely that such changes could have occurred after some ancient inhabitants of Asia made there way to North America.  I'm not saying that it is true.  I have no personal knowledge and no way of forming an idea on the subject.  I am just pointing out that genetic differences do not prove the idea wrong.  --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:31, 16 January 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=607497</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &quot;tolerant&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=607497"/>
		<updated>2009-01-11T02:12:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* This page should be deleted. */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Red links==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking that since those liberal vandals listed no longer have user pages or talk pages that instead in linking them (pointless, as the links lead to basically nowhere) we could put them in bold instead???  Just a thought.  --[[User:AmeliaJ|AmeliaJ]] 18:01, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Done. Thanks for the suggestion. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 18:24, 5 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also agree very much. Great idea. [[User:AddisonDM]] 7 January 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This page should be deleted. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very existence of this page encourages vandalism.  It becomes a motive for people to commit vandalism. --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:12, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=602663</id>
		<title>Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &quot;tolerant&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=602663"/>
		<updated>2009-01-05T04:20:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{speedy}}&lt;br /&gt;
This is an essay showing some of the best examples of moronic and liberal vandalism. We all hear about vandalism, but how many of us, or how many visitors, have actually seen it? Now, you will see a list showing the user and the vandalism they &amp;quot;contributed.&amp;quot; Mild language may be included, but at least the vowels will be censored for now. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Specific Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NumaL]] writes in this very [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=601858 article]: The Message: be alert for parody vandals like Bugler and MexMax, who may often be indistinguishable from Andy Schlafly, and appear to have the weight of site authority behind them. Because the site administration can't tell the difference between parody and their wonky belief system, only YOU can prevent parodists! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Testament9]] enlightens our entry on [[Pope]] by inserting: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pope&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=50987 STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, OCTOPUSS. B*STARD!!!!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UberChristian]] turns the [[atheism]] article to: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=283816 &amp;quot;Atheism is the philosophy of individuals who don't require an invisible man in the sky to direct their lives.&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An unknown user wrote this article titled &amp;quot;Liberal vandal&amp;quot;: Anyone who is smarter or more knowledgable than Andy Schlafly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They sure have some great content for [[Creationism]]. [[N0izeterrorist]] adds: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=390370 This is actually all fckin' rubbish. If you believe this crap, you need your brain checked. SCIENCE: IT WORKS, B1TCHES!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Creationism again! [[Grammer]] reminds us that Creationism is: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=396361 A pseudo-theory which has no evidence to support it, but is still endorsed by butthurt Christians who are pissed because they can't prove evolution wrong.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Boogerman]] adds to [[homosexuality]]: Homosexuality is a sexual attraction between members of the same sex. It is approved by the Bible as an egregiously cool act. Also Jesus himself enjoyed a good homosexual orgy now and then. Of course, this can only be found in the Bible: Uncut. You know, the proper bible. ('''I am sorry this one is vulgar but it is a prime example''')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Holy Bible]]! [[Atheist11]] replaces the page with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=438932 is not true.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cwlhandluc]] tells us (and how could we forget?) that: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=445797 The bible is rubbish its an absolute lie!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ILoveJesus8888]] replaces the [[Islam]] article with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=537900 STOP BEING SUCH NARROW-MINDED, ETHNOCENTRIC, DOUCHE-BAGS, CONSERVAPEDIA.] ('''That's the most Christ-loving person I've seen in a while!)'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Another Islam addition: islam&amp;gt;jews&amp;gt;catholics. Also jews did wtc &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[I Want My Thunder]] moved [[Andrew Schlafly]] to: Andrew Schlafly is a ****. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moby]] adds to the first paragraph of [[Christmas]]: Christmas is a Christian holiday which celebrates the recieving of presents, and sex with an attractive lady dressed as one of &amp;quot;santa's little helpers&amp;quot;. Christmas is typically celebrated on December 25th, with the annual hangover of December 26th. The word Christmas comes from a quote from Moses when he said &amp;quot;Jesus 'christ, mass' orgy or what?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[JudgeKing]] replaces the [[Conservative]] article [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=551848 with]: 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa&lt;br /&gt;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservative again. [[Mikedenney]] intelligently defines &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=71077 A BIG FAT IDIOT THAT MAKES A CRAPPY WEBSITE LIKE THIS!!! GO WIKIPEDIA!!!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On the [[abstinence]] page, [[Yukikonielsen]] writes: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abstinence&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=593696 &amp;quot;Abstinence doesn't always work; Mary tried it, but got pregnant anyway.&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johnnycochran]] replaced the [[Wikipedia]] page with the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=112101&amp;amp;oldid=107498 following] (while not denying that Wikipedia in fact has a bias): RICKA TICKA TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TOCK RIIIING RING A DING DING RING A DING DING RICK A DICK DICK RICK A DICK DICK RINGA DINGA DING DING DOOOOONG &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DurhamFalks]] (again without actually challenging the page's POV) replaces Wikipedia with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=247484 Andrew Schlafly is a D.U.M.B.A.S.S.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=602662</id>
		<title>Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &quot;tolerant&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;diff=602662"/>
		<updated>2009-01-05T04:20:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{delete}}&lt;br /&gt;
This is an essay showing some of the best examples of moronic and liberal vandalism. We all hear about vandalism, but how many of us, or how many visitors, have actually seen it? Now, you will see a list showing the user and the vandalism they &amp;quot;contributed.&amp;quot; Mild language may be included, but at least the vowels will be censored for now. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Specific Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NumaL]] writes in this very [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Examples_of_Moronic_Vandalism_by_the_%22tolerant%22&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=601858 article]: The Message: be alert for parody vandals like Bugler and MexMax, who may often be indistinguishable from Andy Schlafly, and appear to have the weight of site authority behind them. Because the site administration can't tell the difference between parody and their wonky belief system, only YOU can prevent parodists! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Testament9]] enlightens our entry on [[Pope]] by inserting: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pope&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=50987 STUPID, STUPID, STUPID, OCTOPUSS. B*STARD!!!!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UberChristian]] turns the [[atheism]] article to: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=283816 &amp;quot;Atheism is the philosophy of individuals who don't require an invisible man in the sky to direct their lives.&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An unknown user wrote this article titled &amp;quot;Liberal vandal&amp;quot;: Anyone who is smarter or more knowledgable than Andy Schlafly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*They sure have some great content for [[Creationism]]. [[N0izeterrorist]] adds: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=390370 This is actually all fckin' rubbish. If you believe this crap, you need your brain checked. SCIENCE: IT WORKS, B1TCHES!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Creationism again! [[Grammer]] reminds us that Creationism is: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=396361 A pseudo-theory which has no evidence to support it, but is still endorsed by butthurt Christians who are pissed because they can't prove evolution wrong.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Boogerman]] adds to [[homosexuality]]: Homosexuality is a sexual attraction between members of the same sex. It is approved by the Bible as an egregiously cool act. Also Jesus himself enjoyed a good homosexual orgy now and then. Of course, this can only be found in the Bible: Uncut. You know, the proper bible. ('''I am sorry this one is vulgar but it is a prime example''')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Holy Bible]]! [[Atheist11]] replaces the page with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=438932 is not true.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cwlhandluc]] tells us (and how could we forget?) that: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=445797 The bible is rubbish its an absolute lie!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ILoveJesus8888]] replaces the [[Islam]] article with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Islam&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=537900 STOP BEING SUCH NARROW-MINDED, ETHNOCENTRIC, DOUCHE-BAGS, CONSERVAPEDIA.] ('''That's the most Christ-loving person I've seen in a while!)'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Another Islam addition: islam&amp;gt;jews&amp;gt;catholics. Also jews did wtc &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[I Want My Thunder]] moved [[Andrew Schlafly]] to: Andrew Schlafly is a ****. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moby]] adds to the first paragraph of [[Christmas]]: Christmas is a Christian holiday which celebrates the recieving of presents, and sex with an attractive lady dressed as one of &amp;quot;santa's little helpers&amp;quot;. Christmas is typically celebrated on December 25th, with the annual hangover of December 26th. The word Christmas comes from a quote from Moses when he said &amp;quot;Jesus 'christ, mass' orgy or what?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[JudgeKing]] replaces the [[Conservative]] article [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=551848 with]: 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa&lt;br /&gt;
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservative again. [[Mikedenney]] intelligently defines &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=71077 A BIG FAT IDIOT THAT MAKES A CRAPPY WEBSITE LIKE THIS!!! GO WIKIPEDIA!!!] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On the [[abstinence]] page, [[Yukikonielsen]] writes: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abstinence&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=593696 &amp;quot;Abstinence doesn't always work; Mary tried it, but got pregnant anyway.&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johnnycochran]] replaced the [[Wikipedia]] page with the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=112101&amp;amp;oldid=107498 following] (while not denying that Wikipedia in fact has a bias): RICKA TICKA TICK TOCK TICK TOCK TOCK RIIIING RING A DING DING RING A DING DING RICK A DICK DICK RICK A DICK DICK RINGA DINGA DING DING DOOOOONG &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DurhamFalks]] (again without actually challenging the page's POV) replaces Wikipedia with: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=247484 Andrew Schlafly is a D.U.M.B.A.S.S.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPWebmaster&amp;diff=599820</id>
		<title>User talk:CPWebmaster</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:CPWebmaster&amp;diff=599820"/>
		<updated>2009-01-02T22:25:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Look */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--------------------------------------&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- STOP! LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW! THANKS--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--------------------------------------&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;width: 100%; background-color: #4f402b; height: 180px; color: white; padding: 0;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float:left; background-color: #97c000; width: 85%; height: 160px; margin-top: 10px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size: 200%; text-align: center; padding-top: 10px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Welcome to CPWebmaster's talk page&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Please leave your comments/suggestions/anything else below&lt;br /&gt;
* I will get back to you ASAP&lt;br /&gt;
* Please, no complaints&lt;br /&gt;
* Archives are on the right -&amp;gt; over there&lt;br /&gt;
* Thanks and happy editing!&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;float: right; background-color: #74c0fa; width: 10%; height: 160px; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size: 120%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive1|Archive1]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive2|Archive2]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:CPWebmaster/Archive3|Archive3]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|right|'''CPWebmaster''' is hereby awarded the prestigious &amp;amp; coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar  for tireless vigilence against fascists, vandals &amp;amp; trolls!]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--------------------------------------&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW THIS LINE ----------------------------------------------- THANKS!--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Look ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at my talk page. --[[User:TimS|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User talk:TimS|Talk]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Formerly CPAdmin1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:25, 2 January 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598313</id>
		<title>Compound meter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598313"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:57:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: 90/10 rule&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[music]], '''compound meter''' refers to a meter in which the first subdivision of a beat is into 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of compound meter are 6/8, 9/8, 12/8, and 6/4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Simple meter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Simple_meter&amp;diff=598310</id>
		<title>Simple meter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Simple_meter&amp;diff=598310"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:56:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[music]], '''simple meter''' refers to a meter in which the first subdivision of a beat is into 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some examples of simple meter are 4/4, 3/4, 2/4, and 2/2.&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Compound meter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Simple_meter&amp;diff=598308</id>
		<title>Simple meter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Simple_meter&amp;diff=598308"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:55:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[music]], '''simple meter''' refers to a meter in which the first subdivision of a beat is into 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Compound meter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598306</id>
		<title>Compound meter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598306"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:55:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[music]], '''compound meter''' refers to a meter in which the first subdivision of a beat is into 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Simple meter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598304</id>
		<title>Compound meter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compound_meter&amp;diff=598304"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:54:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[music]], ''compound meter'' refers to a meter in which the first subdivision of a beat is into 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Musical terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pounds&amp;diff=598296</id>
		<title>Pounds</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pounds&amp;diff=598296"/>
		<updated>2009-01-01T00:52:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Pounds''' (abbreviated '''lb''' or '''lbs''') are the [[United States customary units]] tool for measuring [[weight]]. Although pounds can vary depending on where they are used, its most common form is the [[French]] [[avoirdupois pound]] (which was adopted by the United States and later abandoned by France in favor of the [[Metric System]]) - which equates 1 pound to 16 [[ounces]] or 0.45359237 [[kilogram]]s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CalculateOunces&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.metric-conversions.org/weight/ounces-to-pounds.htm|title=Ounces to Pounds conversions|work=[http://www.metric-conversions.org/ metric-conversions.org/]|accessdate=2007-09-02|format=HTML|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EncyclopediaKiloGs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1E1-pound.html|quote=1 lb avdp is equal to 0.45359237 kg|format=HTML|language=English|work=Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition|date=2007|accessdate=2007-09-02|title=pound}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pounds can also refer to the currency of the [[United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Units of Measurement]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=598265</id>
		<title>Conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=598265"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T23:31:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: remove picture with sarcastic caption&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''conservative''' is one who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values.  A conservative would likely agree with the statement in [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that &amp;quot;religion and morality are indispensable supports&amp;quot; to political prosperity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Conservatism arose in the 19th century as a response to [[liberalism]], particularly as manifested in the [[French Revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In addition, Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: &amp;quot;tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL&amp;quot;[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservatives in the United States ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by adherence to limited government, public morality and free enterprise.  Specifically, conservatives tend to adhere to the following principles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Return of prayer in school&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of abortion&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to same-sex marriage licenses and homosexuals&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of laws against pornography&lt;br /&gt;
* The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, as long as such possession does not threaten national security&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)&lt;br /&gt;
* Stronger law enforcement and anti-crime laws, including the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
** Seeing rehabilitation as adversarial towards deterrence and punishment, and favoring deterrence and punishment over rehabilitation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental control of education&lt;br /&gt;
* Private medical care and retirement plans&lt;br /&gt;
* Weakening or canceling failed social support programs&lt;br /&gt;
* Generally opposed to the United Nations&lt;br /&gt;
* Support enforcement of current laws regarding immigration&lt;br /&gt;
* Support tightening of border security&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for our military... past and present&lt;br /&gt;
* Literal interpretation of the [[Bible]] and rejection of [[evolutionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Low taxes, especially for families&lt;br /&gt;
* Opening foreign markets to U.S. products&lt;br /&gt;
* Less power for the federal government and more for local and state governments&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong national defense&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About every 20-60 years a conservative has been elected president of the United States.  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Monroe]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Howard Taft]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Warren G. Harding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In America, most conservatives tend to align with the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative News Organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[Fox News]], [[WorldNetDaily]], [[NewsMax]], [[Accuracy In Media]], and [[Cybercast News Service]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Magazines and Blogs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Two well known conservative magazines in the United States are The Weekly Standard and the [[National Review]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable [[Conservative political blogs|conservative political blogs]] are Power Line, Captain's Quarters, the blog of [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, the Heritage Policy Weblog, Humanevents, Townhall, and the Conservative Caucus blog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= &amp;quot;What Is a 'Conservative'?&amp;quot;], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# A deep suspicion of the power of the state.&lt;br /&gt;
# A preference for liberty over equality. &lt;br /&gt;
# Patriotism. &lt;br /&gt;
# A belief in established institutions and hierarchies. &lt;br /&gt;
# Skepticism about the idea of progress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, neoconservatives generally support government power and are indifferent to liberty and equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paleoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on opposing [[multiculturalism]], and suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean more towards isolating America from the problems of other continents. Neoconservatives might criticize this as &amp;quot;isolationism&amp;quot;, as they believe we can promote [[democracy]] worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of [[Western Goals]]. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the Soviets in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterised by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in the United Kingdom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United Kingdom the present parliamentary opposition party is called the [[Conservative Party]]. Its current leader is [[David Cameron]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, UK conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterised it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for abortion on demand and gay civil partnership and the Kyoto Treaty and to oppose capital punishment (although it should be noted that such policies have little support amongst the party's grassroots membership) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830 (Second Edition)'', 2008 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in the [[U.K.]] than in the [[U.S.]]{{fact}}, and religious issues thereby play less of a role in [[England]]. Religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common with conservatives in many other countries, UK Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than [[internationalist]] outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United Kingdom the broadcast media is exclusively liberal in tone. The print media is exclusively liberal in tone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative|Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=597745</id>
		<title>Sarah Palin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&amp;diff=597745"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T01:44:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Reverted edits by LeeRush (Talk) to last version by PhilipV&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sarah Palin.jpg|right|thumb|Governor Sarah Palin]] '''Sarah Louise Heath Palin''' (pronounced pay'-lynn) (born February 11, 1964) is the [[conservative]] first-term [[Republican Party|Republican]] [[Governor]] of [[Alaska]]. She is the youngest person to hold this office as well as the first woman to do so in the state's history. Palin was Senator [[John McCain]]'s Vice Presidential running mate in the [[2008 Presidential Election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/palins_vp_selection_speech.html Acceptance Speech by Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She brought a [[populism|populist]] image and a record of cutting wasteful spending and reforming government to McCain's ticket.  In the summer of 2007, she was the most popular governor in America, after cutting 13% of [[Alaska]]'s budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/013/851orcjq.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She is strongly [[pro-life]].  She favors more competition in health care, and pushed for abolishing the [[certificate of need]] regulations that interfere with opening new medical clinics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/04/AR2008090403253.html?referrer=emailarticle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Married for 20 years, Sarah Palin's husband is a member of the United Steelworkers Union and her eldest son (of five children) is in the [[United States Army]], scheduled to go to Iraq.  In an appearance on August 30, 2008 in Washington, Pennsylvania, she was greeted by a surprisingly large crowd as she promoted the new McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She earned her Journalism degree from the University of [[Idaho]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adn.com/palin/story/516085.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and worked in the media and the utility industry before beginning her public service 14 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sarah Palin Todd Trig.jpg|thumb|right|In this April 23, 2008 file photo, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, left, and her husband, Todd Palin, hold their baby boy Trig in Anchorage, Alaska. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Photo courtesy of Newsmax.com'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Palin arrived in Alaska with her family in 1964, when her parents came to teach school in Skagway.  Palin attended Wasilla High School where her extracurricular activities included captaining the basketball team  which went on to win the state championship &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after graduating in 1982. She went on to college, after attending several institutions she received a bachelor of science degree in communications-journalism from the University of Idaho in 1987. Over the course of her 44 years in Alaska she has lived in Skagway, Eagle River and Wasilla. To earn money for college, Palin entered beauty pageants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is married to [[Todd Palin]], part Yupik [[Eskimo]], who is a lifelong Alaskan, works at a non-management union job in the oil industry, and also as a commercial salmon fisherman.  He is a four-time champion of the Iron Dog, the world's longest snowmobile race. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin is a [[Labor union | union]] member, a [[moose]] hunter and holds a membership in the [[NRA]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/29/mccain-to-name-running-mate-on-friday/ McCain Names Alaska Gov. Palin as Running Mate] Fox News, August 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Todd and Sarah have five children together: Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has been widely praised among conservatives for acting on her [[pro-life]] beliefs in the case of her youngest son, Trig, who was diagnosed with [[Down syndrome]] in the fourth month of her pregnancy. After researching the condition, she and her husband agreed to continue to pregnancy:&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;[My husband Todd said,] we shouldn't be asking 'Why us?' We should be saying 'Well, why not us?' We've both been very vocal about being pro life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential. I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection. Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/05/gov-sarah-palin.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=29242 Canadian Doctors 'Fear' Sarah Palin's Choice May Start a Trend] Catholic Online, Septmeber 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trig was born on April 18, 2008, four months before his mother was announced as the vice-presidential candidate.  Palin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;This new person in your life can help everyone put things in perspective and bind us together, and get everyone focused on what really matters ... Those who love him will think less about self and focus less on what the world tells [us] is 'normal' or 'perfect.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It's a sign of the times to be able to do this,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;I can think of so many male candidates who watched a families grow while they were in office.  There is no reason to believe a woman can't do it with a growing family. My baby will not be at all or in any sense neglected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alaska governor balances newborn's needs, official duties [http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-05-10-4082128881_x.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's older son, Track, serves in the U.S. Army, and was deployed to [[Iraq War|Iraq]] in September 2008. Palin says, &amp;quot;I'm proud of him but I worry.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;people&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[People magazine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, Palin announced that her daughter Bristol was five months pregnant. After having been given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child.  Palin stated &amp;quot;We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin_daughter Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin Family..jpg|thumb|left|Palin family members at the announcement of Palin's vice presidential selection, August 29, 2008. From left: Todd, Piper, Willow, Bristol, and Trig.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Career==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin was elected to two terms on the Wasilla City Council, and then two terms as the Mayor / Manager of Alaska's fastest growing community (Population: 5400 in 2000)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wasilla.areaconnect.com/statistics.htm Wasilla Population and Demographics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. During her time as mayor, Palin hired a Washington lobbying firm to help secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, otherwise known as earmarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-08-31-palin-bridge_N.htm Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ms. Palin's leadership qualities were recognized when she was elected as President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors.  In 2002, she ran for Lieutenant Governor, but came in second in a four-way race.  Later that year, when [[Frank Murkowski]] resigned his [[Senate]] seat to become [[governor]], she interviewed for the opening.  Instead, Murkowski appointed his daughter to the seat.  From there, she went on to run for governor and won, becoming the first female governor of Alaska and its youngest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, then-Governor Mukowski appointed Palin to serve as Panel Ethics Commissioner of Alaska's Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska's [[non-renewable energy|non-renewable]] resources: [[oil]] and [[gasoline|gas]].  She resigned in 2004 as a protest over the &amp;quot;lack of ethics&amp;quot; of fellow panelists who had ignored her complaints of legal violations and conflicts of interest.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To help cultivate influence and political clout in the state, Palin served from 2003 - June, 2005 as one of three directors of the &amp;quot;Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.&amp;quot;, a 527 group that raised funds from corporate donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/09/01/palin_was_a_director_of_embatt.html#more Palin Was a Director of Embattled Sen. Ted Stevens's 527 Group]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The stated purpose of the group is, &amp;quot;To increase the number of Republican women in elected offices and in appointed governmental and political positions, including advisory and regulatory commissions through training and education.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/527/ted_stevens_excellence_in_public_service_inc.asp Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She ran for Governor in 2006 on a clean government platform, and accomplished a political rarity in defeating the incumbent Governor [[Frank Murkowski]] in his own Republican primary.  Palin went on to defeat former Governor [[Tony Knowles]] in the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has also served on the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. She was named one of Alaska's &amp;quot;Top 40 Under 40&amp;quot;, Alaska's Public Works &amp;quot;Person of the Year&amp;quot;, and was recently inducted into the Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society at Alaska Pacific University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has served on numerous boards and commissions throughout the State, and stays active as a marathon runner, sports team mom, hockey manager and school volunteer.   A lifetime member of the [[NRA]], she enjoys hunting, fishing, and Alaska history. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gov.state.ak.us/bio.php Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, Palin's 18-year old son, Track, enlisted in the [[Army]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6920410,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''I am pro-life and I believe that marriage should only be between and man and a woman. I am opposed to any expansion of gambling in Alaska.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Source: Campaign website, www.palinforgovernor.com, &amp;quot;Issues&amp;quot; Nov 7, 2006 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record as Governor==&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy and Oil===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A strong supporter of harnessing [[oil]] and natural [[gas]] resources, Palin presented the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) in March 2007, which would be the new legal vehicle for building a natural gas pipeline from the state's North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsminer.com/news/2008/aug/29/palin-alaska-gasline-inducement-act-nears-completi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It received bipartisan support and was signed into law by Governor Palin in June. In August of 2008 she signed legislation giving state authority to award TransCanada Corp a license to build and operate a multibillion-dollar pipeline to ship natural gas from the North Slope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2e84b1e8-9a4a-4558-ad05-21b517c50fae&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As Governor, Palin created a new subcabinet that will develop policies to reduce greenhouse gases and help the state adapt to [[climate change]]. She supports oil production in ANWR, connecting it with national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GE11URmmnc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, over the objections of oil companies, Palin worked with the Alaska state legislature to approve a major increase in taxes on the oil industry. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008103325_alaskatax07.html Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The state then gave Alaskans a $1200 check to pay for increased gas prices, using the increased revenues from the tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/11/palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/ Palin backed Alaskan windfalls-profit tax]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also announced on May 21, 2008 that the state would challenge a recent listing of [[polar bears]] as a threatened species as she and other Alaska elected officials feared such a listing would cripple oil and gas development in prime polar bear habitat off the state's northern and northwestern coasts.  Palin's belief is that there is not enough evidence to support a listing, asserting that polar bears are well-managed and their population has dramatically increased over 30 years as a result of conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Govp_2008stos_large.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Gov. Sarah Palin delivering her 2008 State of the State address]] At first, Palin supported the Gravina Island Bridge Project, otherwise known as the &amp;quot;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;quot;.  In September 2006, during a stop in Ketchikan as part of her gubernatorial campaign, Palin stated, &amp;quot;OK, you've got Valley trash standing here in the middle of nowhere,&amp;quot; Palin said, according to an account in the Ketchikan Daily News. &amp;quot;I think we're going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/sarahpalin/story/511471.html Palin touts stance on 'Bridge to Nowhere']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The $398 million bridge would have connected Ketchikan, on one island in southeastern Alaska, to its airport on another nearby island.  The Anchorage Daily News also quoted her in an October, 2006 article as saying yes, she would continue state funding for the bridge because she wanted swift action on infrastructure projects. &amp;quot;The window is now while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist,&amp;quot; she said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere;_ylt=Am.NkRx1mLWk9A34FLhn8IADW7oF Critics: Palin used 'Bridge to Nowhere' for gain]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin announced her opposition to the project in a 2007 press release.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She has stated her opposition arose because of the excessive amount of pork-barrel spending in the project, and that she would not fund the $329 million that was short for the budget.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/22/alaska.bridge.ap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This reversal cost her the support of prominent Alaskan Republicans like Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, who said, &amp;quot;You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it&amp;quot;.  Palin instead said that the best option would be to upgrade the ferry system.  However, the money that was retained from the earmark was not used for the ferry system, but was spent building a road on Gravina Island that links to the site of the canceled bridge.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901 Palin &amp;quot;bridge to nowhere&amp;quot; line angers many Alaskans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prominent Alaskan politicians criticized Palin for not &amp;quot;giving back&amp;quot; money earmarked for the project.  These critics included her Republican campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, who stated that &amp;quot;She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bridge&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However, state governments do not &amp;quot;give back&amp;quot; money in the manner proposed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three times during Palin's time as mayor, earmark funding for projects in Wasilla were noted in [[John McCain]]'s list of &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; spending in 2001 and 2002. McCain's list of spending approved without normal budget scrutiny identified a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in the city and a $1 million earmark for an emergency communications center while $450,000 was set aside for an agricultural processing facility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,6145252.story McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Palin, of course, as mayor of a small town had no ability to put these items in a Congressional bill, but her town did benefit from earmarked spending given to Alaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Palin was true to her word and slashed the amount of earmarked money that Alaska requested from the federal government cutting the number of projects from 54 to 31, in 2008 Alaska still requested more earmarks per capita than any other state at $500 per citizen. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/10/palin.earmarks/index.html McCain criticized Wasilla earmarks in 2001]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Foreign Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ftwainwright_govp_05s.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Governor Sarah Palin visits Strykers at Fort Wainwright, where she is briefed on how the troops are trained and what the training grounds provide.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Palin is Commander in Chief of the Alaska Army [[National Guard]]. In 2007 she visited troops in [[Germany]] and [[Kuwait]].  According to Major General Craig E. Campbell, the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard who commands the roughly 3,800 state militia members, the Alaskan governor is not in the site's chain of command and has no authority over its operations.  He told the Associated Press on August 31st that he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. He went on to state that the entire operation is under federal control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/31/ap/politics/main4401854.shtml GOP Cites Palin's Skill, But How Relevant Is It?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During her first major interview, with ABC's [[Charlie Gibson]], Gibson asked Palin if she agreed with the &amp;quot;[[Bush Doctrine]]&amp;quot;. Palin responded, &amp;quot;In what respect, Charlie?&amp;quot; Gibson followed, &amp;quot;What do you interpret it to be?&amp;quot; Palin answered with another question, &amp;quot;His world view?&amp;quot; Gibson still refused to answer directly but instead stated it was the doctrine Bush had proposed in September of 2002, before the Iraq war. Palin gave a response concerning Bush's attempt to eradicate Islamic extremism. Gibson then explained that the Bush doctrine refers to the right of anticipatory defense, a right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpJsQch9uZo Asked about the Bush Doctrine...Palin is Clueless]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What Gibson did not point out is that he himself once gave a definition of the &amp;quot;Bush doctrine&amp;quot; (a concept made up by the press that has no clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislature Investigation===&lt;br /&gt;
In August of 2008, the [[Alaska]] state legislature began an investigation of Palin and her staff for potential abuse of power in regards to a firing of Commissioner of Public Safety Walter Monegan.  Legally, Palin could dismiss Monegan at any time as he serves at the pleasure of the governor. Monegan was dismissed from his position in July of 2008, which Palin's political opponents claim was due to Monegan's refusal to fire trooper Mike Wooten, Palin's former brother-in-law who had a history of complaints including tasering his 10 year old stepson.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_212168861.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palin says she released Monegan due to differences on budgeting. In an interview Monegan said that he was never told specifically by Sarah Palin to fire the state trooper Mike Wooten.  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin has denied the charges and, as is customary, the State of Alaska has hired a lawyer to represent her office in the investigation. August 25th, the Legislative Council voted 12-0 to hire Hollis French as the investigator. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=59d_1220063478 Investigation into Governor Sarah Palin's abuse of powers] CBS 11, August 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 3-2 and the House Judiciary Committee voted 7-0. The State's attorney released this statement:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/cvn_palin_troopergate Palin hires attorney for Troopergate investigation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The governor of every state gets legal counsel and this attorney is part of a weeks-old effort to provide this governor defense in a series of outlandish politically motivated charges.  This legal defense is neither new nor uncommon nor at all political. It is a matter of her job and is not recent and it is not related to her selection on the McCain-Palin ticket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The McCain campaign came out with a picture that includes three lead state Democratic legislators investigating the Branchflower probe, known as ‘Troopergate'. The photo shows the three of them at [[Obama]] headquarters in Anchorage, Alaska in July. The McCain campaign said the whole investigation is politically tainted and compromised. Republican Rep. John Coghill of North Pole called on managing investigator, legislator French to step down from the probe, saying he no longer had confidence in his objectivity. &amp;quot;These statements cause me to think that the report is already written even though the investigation is only just begun and the most important witnesses have not even been interviewed,” Coghill wrote in a letter calling for French’s replacement. “The investigation appears to be lacking in fairness, neutrality and due process.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2078644/posts McCain Camp has pictures of &amp;quot;troopergate&amp;quot; investigators at Obama Headquarters] FreeRepublic.com, September 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democratic State Senator Kim Elton, head of the legislative council overseeing the investigation, said the decisions made by Sen. Hollis French &amp;quot;have been appropriate, bipartisan ... and unchallenged&amp;quot; and that French has called the comments he made last week &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/08/palin.investigation/ Head of Palin trooper probe will stay, lawmaker says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lawyer Thomas Van Flein called the investigation &amp;quot;unlawful and unconstitutional&amp;quot; and said the man hired to run it, former prosecutor Stephen Branchflower, has a conflict of interest because he is a friend of the fired commissioner. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adn.com/troopergate/story/522488.html Palin's attorney calls investigator biased] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investigation issued its report for the Alaska State Legislative Council on October 10, 2008, concluding that Monegan's refusal to fire the trooper was not the sole reason he was dismissed, but was likely a contributing factor.  The author of the report, Stephen Branchflower, focused on two questions of the inquiry:  did Palin fire Walt Monegan improperly, and was the firing solely because of his refusal to fire her ex brother-in-law. &amp;quot;Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Based on this, Branchflower claims that &amp;quot;I find that Governor Sarah Palin abused her power by violating Alaska Statute 39.52.110(a) of the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/DOWNLOAD.pdf Page 8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In accordance with the second question the report focused on, Branchflower wrote, &amp;quot;I find that, although Walt Monegan's refusal to fire Trooper Michael Wooten was not the sole reason he was fired by Governor Sarah Palin, it was likely a contributing factor to his termination as Commissioner of Public Safety,&amp;quot; Branchflower wrote. The second finding of the report reads: &amp;quot;In spite of that, Governor Palin's firing of Commissioner Monegan was a proper and lawful exercise of her constitutional and statutory authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.&amp;quot;  Branchflower also dismissed the Palins' assertions that they were afraid of Wooten because of threats they said he made. &amp;quot;Such claims of fear were not bona fide and were offered to provide cover for the Palins' real motivation: to get Trooper Wooten fired for personal family related reasons,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_10692757?source=most_viewed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;A preemptive response to this report was issued by the McCain/Palin campaign on October 9th, in which the campaign's own investigation concluded that Palin &amp;quot;acted within her proper and lawful authority in the reassignment of Walt Monegan&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE4998X420081011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end the &amp;quot;October Surprise&amp;quot; predicted by the head of the commission came to pass.  Although the commission was asked not to release its findings until after the election to avoid political posturing, they refused to do so.  Apart from tarring and feathering Palin, the report made no recommendations for any further inquiries or punishment, as it was understood that there was no case to do so.  No direct reports of Sarah Palin abusing her power were ever produced or asking for the official to be fired were ever produced, but that didn't stop the report from drawing its conclusions based upon conjecture without evidence.  Indeed, after the hoopla over the report subsided, the state personnel board released its finding that exonnerated her of any wrongdoing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081104/ap_on_el_pr/palin_troopergate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vice Presidential Candidate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 29, 2008, Palin was announced to be the Vice Presidential nominee for Republican Senator John McCain &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/sarah_palin_vp/2008/08/29/126138.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The selection was a surprise, as those in the media were expecting [[Minnesota]] Governor [[Tim Pawlenty]] or former [[Massachusetts]]'s Governor [[Mitt Romney]].  Palin adds youth and executive experience to the ticket. She is the second female Vice Presidential candidate of a major party in U.S. history and the first one on a Republican ticket.  The first was [[Geraldine Ferraro]], who the Democratic Party put on the ticket under [[Walter Mondale]] in 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin's speech before the Republican convention on Wednesday, September 3rd was watched by over 40 million people.  She had as many people turn in to see her as watched Obama's acceptance speech on the final day of the Democratic convention.  Palin has also been attacked by the press on a level not seen since [[Dan Quayle]], although she ultimately handled it much better.  &lt;br /&gt;
===Democratic responses===&lt;br /&gt;
In a possible problem for the Democratic ticket, a majority of the people believed that the press is trying to hurt Palin&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.yahoo.com/story/rasmussen/20080904/pl_rasmussen/palinmedia20080904;_ylt=AqErk__wZIKdoVvqUXdr44Nh24cA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that type of unwarranted attack could have backfired into more support for the McCain/Palin ticket especially with unaffiliated voters believing the press is purposely attacking Palin by a 49% to 32% margin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats had advised the Obama campaign to ignore Palin, fearing that emphasis on her inexperience will backfire against Obama himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/capital/2008/09/05/tips-for-obama-ignore-palin-dis-mccain  Matt Coopoer, &amp;quot;Tips for Obama: Ignore Palin, Dis McCain,&amp;quot; Sept. 5, 2008, ''Conde-Nast Portfoloio.com'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She participated in a debate with the Democratic VP candidate Joe Biden on October 2, 2008, ending up being declared the winner by most credible news sources that are not  influenced by liberal bias.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mydesert.com/article/20081004/OPINION02/810040311/1139/news01]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://m.nypost.com/ms/p/nyp/nyp/view.m?id=127899&amp;amp;storyid=131936]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Barack Obama said of the McCain/Palin ticket's similar policies, &amp;quot;...You can put lipstick on a pig, it's still a pig.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_lipstick_mccain/2008/09/09/129274.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Given the fact that she's stated &amp;quot;The difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull (is) lipstick&amp;quot; and the fact that only a female candidate would wear lipstick, the McCain camp released a web ad implying that the comment was targeting Governor Palin. The ad featured video clips of Gov. Palin convention speech, Obama's remarks at the campaign event, and a clip of Katie Couric commenting on pervasive sexism in the campaign. After extensive discussion in the news media, the ad was removed from McCain's website and other video sites following a copyright claim by CBS news. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/CBS_takes_down_McCain_webad_suggests_its_misleading.html?showall]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact on Ticket===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the run-up to the Vice-Presidential debate on October 2, 2008, a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center attempted to measure the degree to which Palin impacted the GOP ticket positively or negatively in September.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/456/obama-regains-lead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The survey compared the answers to two identical questions about her qualifications and overall favorable/unfavorable rating between polls taken in early and late September.  The results show that public opinion of Palin has fallen significantly since the Republican convention, particularly in the public's opinion of her qualification to be Vice President.  Faced with a barrage of negative press attacks after her nomination, some prominent Republicans like [[Mitt Romney]] believe that the isolation of Palin from the media in September was a mistake, and are calling for an increase in unscripted encounters with the press and public to counter that perception.  According to Romney, &amp;quot;Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake.  I think they’d be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/09/30/doubts-about-palin-grow-even-among-conservatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Exit polling from the election itself had the final say on the matter of her impact on the ticket.  For those who considered her nomination on the ticket to be unimportant, 57% voted for Obama.  For those who considered her nomination to be important, 53% voted for Obama, thereby showing a positive overall impact on the ticket.  Considering that exit polling tilts Democratic, the actual impact may have been greater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Future==&lt;br /&gt;
It is suspected that Palin may spend the next four years building a base for a 2012 run for the Republican nomination against Barack Obama.  Given her personal charisma and Reagan-esque connection with average, conservative Americans, she may be able to pull off a resounding victory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.capitalcityweekly.com/stories/120308/new_363163237.shtml Sarah Palin hits Republican talking points while stumping in Georgia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
Palin filled out a policy questionnaire for the Eagle Forum Alaska during her 2006 gubernatorial race.  One question asked, &amp;quot;Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?&amp;quot;  Palin responded, &amp;quot;Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.&amp;quot;  Yet [[public schools]] still resist teaching abstinence and instead promote sexual behavior by teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another question asked, &amp;quot;Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?&amp;quot;  Palin replied, &amp;quot;Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the founding fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many liberals ignorant of the history of &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an &amp;quot;idiot&amp;quot; for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892, and George Washington's phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; was added to it in June 1954.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, the origin of the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; is the General Orders of [[George Washington]] on July 2 and 9, 1776: &amp;quot;The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army&amp;quot; (July 2); &amp;quot;the peace and safety of the Country now depends, under God, solely on the success of our arms&amp;quot; (July 9).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  George Washington was indeed a [[Founding Father]], and the Founding Fathers made no secret of their Christian faith and unfailing belief in God in the [[Declaration of Independence]] and later writings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin also believes that students need to learn of the controversy surrounding the [[Theory of evolution|'Theory' of evolution]], and that discussing Creationism should not be banned from schools.  During the 2006 campaign for the Alaskan Governorship, Palin was answering a question from the moderator near the conclusion of Wednesday night's televised debate on KAKM Channel 7 when she said, &amp;quot;Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important, and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She later clarified her position by stating &amp;quot;I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.&amp;quot;  She added that, if elected, she would not push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum.  As of September 2008 she has kept that pledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a typical example of liberal mockery, the [[Huffington Post]] attempted to make light of Sarah Palin's creationist beliefs, highlighting the creationary belief that [[dinosaur|dinosaurs]] and man coexisted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/28/palin-claimed-dinosaurs-a_n_130012.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; SNL likewise did a skit in which they had her refer to the Museum of Natural History as &amp;quot;that evolution museum&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Church Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Sarah Palin was baptized as a Roman Catholic and, at age 12, she was rebaptized in the Wasilla Assembly of God church.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate=2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-mccainveepbio30-2008aug30,0,2159346.story&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Palin has risen quickly from PTA to VP pick&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Decker, Cathleen and Michael Finnegan,&lt;br /&gt;
|work=Los Angeles Times&lt;br /&gt;
|date=August 30, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
| last = Gorsk| first = Eric&lt;br /&gt;
| url = http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g4-w_DCWffagBaQb8Il9a0R2hkPAD92SL7E00&lt;br /&gt;
| title = Evangelicals energized by McCain-Palin ticket&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher =Associated Press&lt;br /&gt;
| date = 2008-08-30&lt;br /&gt;
| accessdate = 2008-08-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin attends the Wasilla Bible Church&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |first=David |last=Pepper |title=Regarding Governor Palin: A Letter from Pastor David Pepper |url=http://churchontherockak.org/Regarding-Sarah-Palin.html |publisher=Church on the Rock |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, an independent congregation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wasillabible.org/faq.htm |title=Wasilla Bible Church FAQ |accessdate=2008-09-05 |work= |publisher= |date= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;miller&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lisa Miller and Amanda Coyne. &amp;quot;[http://www.newsweek.com/id/156679 A Visit to Palin's Church: Scripture and discretion on the program in Wasilla].&amp;quot; ''Newsweek''. Sept. 2, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when at home and the Juneau Christian Center when in Juneau as governor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Statement Concerning Sarah Palin |url=http://www.jccalaska.com/images/10000/3000/582JU/user/palin.htm |publisher=Juneau Christian Center |date=2008-09-03 |accessdate=2008-09-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Popularity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether or not people say that they like Sarah Palin, they gravitate to see her.  She earned the highest TV ratings at the Republican convention when she spoke, even surpassing McCain's acceptance speech, and matched Obama's acceptance speech when he was in front of a Greek temple with a stadium of people.  As a Vice Presidential candidate, that was unprecedented.  Likewise her Vice Presidential debate with Joe Biden had more viewers than any of the three debates between McCain and Obama.  Finally, her briefly appearing on Saturday Night Live gave the show its highest ratings in 14 years, and was actually the third highest ranked show for the week based on the number of people who tuned in originally to watch her, 17 million, even though it ran at midnight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/20/ustelevision-tvratings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palin.JPG|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ State of Alaska - Governor Sarah Palin Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.29fab9fb4add37305ddcbeeb501010a0/?vgnextoid=864bb9006da3f010VgnVCM1000001a01010aRCRD National Governor's Association - Alaska Governor Sarah Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=27200 Project Vote Smart - Governor Sarah H. Palin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Sarah_Palin.htm Sarah Palin On the issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://parentingfreedom.com/2008/09/03/sarah-palin-mother-and-first-female-vice-president-pictures-children-parenting/ Sarah Palin: Mother and First Female Vice President], ''Parenting Freedom'', September 03, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Palin, Sarah}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Alaska Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Mayors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=597703</id>
		<title>Talk:Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=597703"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T01:06:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* remove some or move the page? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Clarification==&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly all of those who accomplished great deeds while being teenagers made even greater contributions when they became adults. Especially, this list can't be used to bolster up the claim that ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 16:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heavenly voices ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is hearing heavenly voices an acheivement?  Is was it leading France to victory that was the acheivement?  It rather reads as if the hearing of voices was the acheivement.  --[[User:TCochrane|TCochrane]] 18:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reversion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously if someone produced a work ''before'' becoming a teenager it proves the same point; hence the reversion.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:34, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then how about renaming the page to keep it accurate? &amp;quot;Great Achievements by Minors&amp;quot;, maybe? [[User:DRussell|DRussell]] 21:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Karl Benz ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed [[Karl Benz]]: Though he was a child prodigy, at the given age ('''15'''), he ''&amp;quot;only&amp;quot;'' passed the entrance exam of the University of [[Karlsruhe]]. His genius really flourished in his late thirties. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 07:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Later Achievments==&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin: made his last recording age 82&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] Cubism: age 30 &lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] Piano Concert No. 1: age 20&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] &amp;quot;Traité du triangle arithmétique&amp;quot;: age 30&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[John]] stays a mistery&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] inspired and led [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Anne Frank]] began writing her diary, later published as &amp;quot;Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] World Chess Champion: age 29&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - [[Mozart]]&amp;quot;Don Giovanni&amp;quot;: age 32&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Christopher Paolini]] writes the first draft of his [[Eragon]] trilogy which is published when he is 19.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion: deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]] age 32&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, most of the persons in the list made contributions to their field works overshadowing there achievements as teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:57, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A corrosive attitude is not beneficial. If, as Andy suggested, you opened your mind you might find nmany more examples to support this case. Bear in mind: demolition is easy, to build takes effort! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:59, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Jesus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not entirely certain I'm comfortable with including Jesus on a list of &amp;quot;teenagers.&amp;quot;  Part of that may just be a visceral reaction against applying the term to the Almighty, but setting that aside, I'm still not entirely sure he belongs on the list.  After all, despite His physical age at the time he preached, He was still God, and therefore timeless and eternal.  It's going to be a little hard for anyone, teenager or adult, to measure up to His list of accomplishments!  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:18, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==IQ Peak==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is a hotly debated subject, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that IQ peaks in the pre-teen/teenage years. The linked article provides evidence to support that the rate of brain development peaks at this time, but this is idependant of a person's IQ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To highlight the diparate viewpoints, it is possible to show an IQ peak at anywhere from 14-16yrs old, all the way up to 50yrs+ - depending on what you measure, how you measure and how you interpret your findings (as with many stats i suppose).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More info: http://www.albion.edu/psychology/fac_psyc/jwilson/psy101/intell.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope my edit is satisfactory --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 18:22, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mary as &amp;quot;17&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can I suggest using the word &amp;quot;uncertain&amp;quot; for Mary's age instead of assuming that it's 17?  That takes nothing away from the assumption that she was a teenager when she gave birth, but it doesn't seem right for CP to state a specific age as if it were a fact when the comment goes on to acknowledge that the actual age was unknown.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:20, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The footnote is clear enough.  No one doubts she was a teenager, and 17 was an average age of betrothal.  The purpose of this list is plainly not to pinpoint precise ages, but merely to show the teenagers as a group.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't disagree with that.  I've added an asterisk after her age to highlight that it's an approximation, and leaving the rest as-is.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:03, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It could be even earlier; in the middle ages it was not uncommon for girls to give birth at 14, so in this case I think it could be as young as 15 (but I think it's 16, personally). [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:29, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I too was given to believe she was younger than 17 at the time. My maternal family line has a long tradition of Mary-derived names in firstborn daughters, (I'm Regina, yes, that's Mary Derived, have &amp;quot;Ave Regina&amp;quot;) and my mother always told the story that she was around 15. When I was little that seemed quite grown up, but when I was 15 myself, it struck me just how very brave she was, and how young. I think the note of approximation is important for this reason, it is true she could have been as old as 17, but at that young age, two years is a world of difference in maturity and self assurance. If she was indeed younger than 17, bumping up her age underestimates the greatness of her faith. Best err on the side of caution and reverence. [[User:BirdieA|Birdie]] 13:25, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I side with Birdie, I have always understood it as the age of 15. --Jpatt 14:27, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill Gates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 13-year-old programming is not a remarkable achievement, and Gates' significant accomplishments occurred as a young adult, not a teen.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:06, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand your point and I for one do not wish to glorify an atheist. By todays standards, that is not an achievement. At age thirteen in 1968, think about the computer he was working with? It is a bright child that succeeded, is it a great achievement? --Jpatt 14:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== remove some or move the page? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it is going to be Great achievements be teenagers, then we need to limit the list to teenagers only, not 8 and 10 year olds and 20 year olds.  We need to remove the non-teenagers from the list, or else change it to something like &amp;quot;great achievements by young people&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:12 year olds are also not teenagers. It sounds like we're getting technical, but saying that 8, 10, 12 and 20 year olds are teenagers is effectively the same as saying girls who wear pants are boys. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 20:02, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::not really.  It is more like saying that 4 is an odd number because it is close to 5 which is an odd number.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:06, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=597699</id>
		<title>Talk:Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=597699"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T00:55:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* remove some or move the page? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Clarification==&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly all of those who accomplished great deeds while being teenagers made even greater contributions when they became adults. Especially, this list can't be used to bolster up the claim that ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 16:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Heavenly voices ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is hearing heavenly voices an acheivement?  Is was it leading France to victory that was the acheivement?  It rather reads as if the hearing of voices was the acheivement.  --[[User:TCochrane|TCochrane]] 18:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reversion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously if someone produced a work ''before'' becoming a teenager it proves the same point; hence the reversion.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:34, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then how about renaming the page to keep it accurate? &amp;quot;Great Achievements by Minors&amp;quot;, maybe? [[User:DRussell|DRussell]] 21:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Karl Benz ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed [[Karl Benz]]: Though he was a child prodigy, at the given age ('''15'''), he ''&amp;quot;only&amp;quot;'' passed the entrance exam of the University of [[Karlsruhe]]. His genius really flourished in his late thirties. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 07:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Later Achievments==&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin: made his last recording age 82&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] Cubism: age 30 &lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] Piano Concert No. 1: age 20&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] &amp;quot;Traité du triangle arithmétique&amp;quot;: age 30&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[John]] stays a mistery&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] inspired and led [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Anne Frank]] began writing her diary, later published as &amp;quot;Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] World Chess Champion: age 29&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - [[Mozart]]&amp;quot;Don Giovanni&amp;quot;: age 32&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Christopher Paolini]] writes the first draft of his [[Eragon]] trilogy which is published when he is 19.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion: deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]] age 32&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, most of the persons in the list made contributions to their field works overshadowing there achievements as teenagers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:57, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A corrosive attitude is not beneficial. If, as Andy suggested, you opened your mind you might find nmany more examples to support this case. Bear in mind: demolition is easy, to build takes effort! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:59, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Jesus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not entirely certain I'm comfortable with including Jesus on a list of &amp;quot;teenagers.&amp;quot;  Part of that may just be a visceral reaction against applying the term to the Almighty, but setting that aside, I'm still not entirely sure he belongs on the list.  After all, despite His physical age at the time he preached, He was still God, and therefore timeless and eternal.  It's going to be a little hard for anyone, teenager or adult, to measure up to His list of accomplishments!  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 14:18, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==IQ Peak==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is a hotly debated subject, there is no concrete evidence to suggest that IQ peaks in the pre-teen/teenage years. The linked article provides evidence to support that the rate of brain development peaks at this time, but this is idependant of a person's IQ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To highlight the diparate viewpoints, it is possible to show an IQ peak at anywhere from 14-16yrs old, all the way up to 50yrs+ - depending on what you measure, how you measure and how you interpret your findings (as with many stats i suppose).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More info: http://www.albion.edu/psychology/fac_psyc/jwilson/psy101/intell.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hope my edit is satisfactory --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 18:22, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mary as &amp;quot;17&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can I suggest using the word &amp;quot;uncertain&amp;quot; for Mary's age instead of assuming that it's 17?  That takes nothing away from the assumption that she was a teenager when she gave birth, but it doesn't seem right for CP to state a specific age as if it were a fact when the comment goes on to acknowledge that the actual age was unknown.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 09:20, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The footnote is clear enough.  No one doubts she was a teenager, and 17 was an average age of betrothal.  The purpose of this list is plainly not to pinpoint precise ages, but merely to show the teenagers as a group.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I don't disagree with that.  I've added an asterisk after her age to highlight that it's an approximation, and leaving the rest as-is.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 10:03, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It could be even earlier; in the middle ages it was not uncommon for girls to give birth at 14, so in this case I think it could be as young as 15 (but I think it's 16, personally). [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 14:29, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I too was given to believe she was younger than 17 at the time. My maternal family line has a long tradition of Mary-derived names in firstborn daughters, (I'm Regina, yes, that's Mary Derived, have &amp;quot;Ave Regina&amp;quot;) and my mother always told the story that she was around 15. When I was little that seemed quite grown up, but when I was 15 myself, it struck me just how very brave she was, and how young. I think the note of approximation is important for this reason, it is true she could have been as old as 17, but at that young age, two years is a world of difference in maturity and self assurance. If she was indeed younger than 17, bumping up her age underestimates the greatness of her faith. Best err on the side of caution and reverence. [[User:BirdieA|Birdie]] 13:25, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: I side with Birdie, I have always understood it as the age of 15. --Jpatt 14:27, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill Gates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 13-year-old programming is not a remarkable achievement, and Gates' significant accomplishments occurred as a young adult, not a teen.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:06, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I understand your point and I for one do not wish to glorify an atheist. By todays standards, that is not an achievement. At age thirteen in 1968, think about the computer he was working with? It is a bright child that succeeded, is it a great achievement? --Jpatt 14:24, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== remove some or move the page? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it is going to be Great achievements be teenagers, then we need to limit the list to teenagers only, not 8 and 10 year olds and 20 year olds.  We need to remove the non-teenagers from the list, or else change it to something like &amp;quot;great achievements by young people&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:55, 30 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=597347</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=597347"/>
		<updated>2008-12-30T16:23:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great undefeatable flag of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin!&amp;quot;  This is Leninism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' is an [[atheistic]], undemocratic system of government, by which the means of production and distribution are controlled by government rather than individuals.  This denies the right to [[private property]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Leninism==&lt;br /&gt;
First there is Marxian Socialism or '''Leninism''' as revised by Lenin and practiced in the Soviet Union by [[Stalin]] (and his successors) and in China by [[Mao Zedong]] (but not by his successors), as well as Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam.  The first version is totalitarian, with no democracy and all decision made by the leaders of the Communist party. Virtually all property (apart from clothes and some personal possessions) is controlled by the Party, as are all jobs and all economic activity.  Conservatives have been very hostile.  China after Mao's death remained politically totalitarian under the Communist party, but allows a vibrant capitalism and free enterprise system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism in Communist countries such as the old [[Soviet Union]], [[China]] in the 1949-1980 period, [[Cuba]], [[North Korea]] and [[Vietnam]] had government ownership practically everything. That led to severe inefficiency and widespread shortages of basic goods and services. These Communist countries used an &amp;quot;[[Iron Curtain]]&amp;quot; to keep their citizens from emigrating and an elaborate, brutal secret police to ensure there was no freedom of ideas or action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Democratic socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The second form (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Western Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the British Labour Party. It was democratic and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europa and Canada) have largely dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted capitalism. However they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism, but they have praised its vigorous anti-Communism.  Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In countries such as [[Sweden]], a form of democratic socialism has been much more successful, leading to high social equity and a burgeoning economy, as well as general content. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communal socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual. Sometimes that has led to totalitarianism, as in &amp;quot;National Socialism&amp;quot; practiced by the German Nazis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;National Socialism&amp;quot; in German means something like &amp;quot;national society&amp;quot;, with &amp;quot;national&amp;quot; meaning Aryan-and-not-Jewish; it called for an overwhelmingly powerful government alongside capitalism. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]], and where investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulate the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation and regularized and institutionalized aggressive coercion. However, the majority of socialists would reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected, with increased socio-economic equality associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people, and deplores the devastating effects of gross inequality on society in terms of increased crime, mental illness, unhappiness and lack of life chances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists--they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismark]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd=George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of the [[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communist persecution notwithstanding, the earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with the aims of socialism.  Acts 4:32-5:11 not only describes community redistribution of property, but describes punishment of a husband and wife for failing to completely share the proceeds from selling their land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marx, Karl|Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the western world throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Britain, the Labour Party and socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British State and the [[Westminster model]] of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best known example is the [[nationalization of health care]] to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the election to government of the Labour Party in 1997, many &amp;quot;[[progressive]]&amp;quot; measures have been introduced, such as the Minimum Wage, Child Tax Credits, union recognition legislation, increased maternity and paternity leave, the Child Trust Fund, refurbishment of [[council housing]], free bus travel for the elderly, increased paid leave for all workers, free nursery-school places, and large cuts in unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.towerhamlets.labour.co.uk/a1c1ce9b-1488-7bb4-a528-14436f084ba3]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, over a million children and a million pensioners have been [[lifted out of poverty]]; however, many in the [[Labour Movement]] are extremely critical of [[New Labour]]'s tentative approach to reducing [[inequality]], and are frustrated that the government has not been more willing to make the case to the public for the [[redistribution of wealth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism is often criticized by conservatives such as [[Bill O'Reilly]]. In his book ''''Culture Warrior'''' O'Reilly starts the book out by painting a bleak picture of what America would look like with a socialistic government. He states problems such as lawlessness, lack of morals and ethics and an overbearing politically correct &amp;quot;feel good&amp;quot; government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=XPY4AAAACAAJ&amp;amp;dq=Culture+Warrior |title=Google books |accessdate=2008-02-22}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was popularly elected in Chile in 1970 under the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism by democratic means. Strongly influenced by [[John Maynard Keynes]], the Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first year of Allende's, the economic policy showed decidedly positive results, including a 12% industrial growth an 8.6% increase in GDP, as well as major declines in inflation (down from 34.9% to 22.1%) and unemployment (down to 3.8%). However, these gains were only temporary due to American intervention. American copper interests in Chile, which controlled 80% of Chile's copper production, reacted violently to Allende's nationalization. The United States set about placing an economic stranglehold on Chile designed to, in a famous quote by Richard Nixon, &amp;quot;make the (Chilean) economy scream&amp;quot;. Classified documents have also revealed the extent of the United States' involvement in the 1973 coup d'etat that overthrew Allende, installing and supporting dictator [[Augusto Pinochet]] in power. Pinochet is known to have detained and tortured thousands of domestic dissidents by its secret police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB8/nsaebb8i.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current )==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950's and has declared Cuba to be Communist since then. Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their Fundamental Rights. ([[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by Kim Il Sung and carried on by current leader Kim Jong Il. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Different Strands of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Welfare state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Jude P. Dougherty, &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [http://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], bu leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp. 417-420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_countries]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=596569</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=596569"/>
		<updated>2008-12-29T19:03:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great undefeatable flag of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin!&amp;quot;  This is Leninism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' is an [[atheistic]], undemocratic system of government, by which the means of production and distribution are controlled by society rather than individuals.  This denies the right to [[private property]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Leninism==&lt;br /&gt;
First there is Marxian Socialism or '''Leninism''' as revised by Lenin and practiced in the Soviet Union by [[Stalin]] (and his successors) and in China by [[Mao Zedong]] (but not by his successors), as well as Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam.  The first version is totalitarian, with no democracy and all decision made by the leaders of the Communist party. Virtually all property (apart from clothes and some personal possessions) is controlled by the Party, as are all jobs and all economic activity.  Conservatives have been very hostile.  China after Mao's death remained politically totalitarian under the Communist party, but allows a vibrant capitalism and free enterprise system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism in Communist countries such as the old [[Soviet Union]], [[China]] in the 1949-1980 period, [[Cuba]], [[North Korea]] and [[Vietnam]] had government ownership practically everything. That led to severe inefficiency and widespread shortages of basic goods and services. These Communist countries used an &amp;quot;[[Iron Curtain]]&amp;quot; to keep their citizens from emigrating and an elaborate, brutal secret police to ensure there was no freedom of ideas or action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Democratic socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The second form (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Western Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the British Labour Party. It was democratic and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europa and Canada) have largely dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted capitalism. However they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism, but they have praised its vigorous anti-Communism.  Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In countries such as [[Sweden]], a form of democratic socialism has been much more successful, leading to high social equity and a burgeoning economy, as well as general content. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communal socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual. Sometimes that has led to totalitarianism, as in &amp;quot;National Socialism&amp;quot; practiced by the German Nazis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;National Socialism&amp;quot; in German means something like &amp;quot;national society&amp;quot;, with &amp;quot;national&amp;quot; meaning Aryan-and-not-Jewish; it called for an overwhelmingly powerful government alongside capitalism. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]], and where investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulate the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation and regularized and institutionalized aggressive coercion. However, the majority of socialists would reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected, with increased socio-economic equality associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people, and deplores the devastating effects of gross inequality on society in terms of increased crime, mental illness, unhappiness and lack of life chances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists--they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismark]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd=George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of the [[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communist persecution notwithstanding, the earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with the aims of socialism.  Acts 4:32-5:11 not only describes community redistribution of property, but describes punishment of a husband and wife for failing to completely share the proceeds from selling their land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marx, Karl|Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the western world throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Britain, the Labour Party and socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British State and the [[Westminster model]] of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best known example is the [[nationalization of health care]] to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the election to government of the Labour Party in 1997, many &amp;quot;[[progressive]]&amp;quot; measures have been introduced, such as the Minimum Wage, Child Tax Credits, union recognition legislation, increased maternity and paternity leave, the Child Trust Fund, refurbishment of [[council housing]], free bus travel for the elderly, increased paid leave for all workers, free nursery-school places, and large cuts in unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.towerhamlets.labour.co.uk/a1c1ce9b-1488-7bb4-a528-14436f084ba3]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, over a million children and a million pensioners have been [[lifted out of poverty]]; however, many in the [[Labour Movement]] are extremely critical of [[New Labour]]'s tentative approach to reducing [[inequality]], and are frustrated that the government has not been more willing to make the case to the public for the [[redistribution of wealth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism is often criticized by conservatives such as [[Bill O'Reilly]]. In his book ''''Culture Warrior'''' O'Reilly starts the book out by painting a bleak picture of what America would look like with a socialistic government. He states problems such as lawlessness, lack of morals and ethics and an overbearing politically correct &amp;quot;feel good&amp;quot; government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=XPY4AAAACAAJ&amp;amp;dq=Culture+Warrior |title=Google books |accessdate=2008-02-22}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was popularly elected in Chile in 1970 under the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism by democratic means. Strongly influenced by [[John Maynard Keynes]], the Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the first year of Allende's, the economic policy showed decidedly positive results, including a 12% industrial growth an 8.6% increase in GDP, as well as major declines in inflation (down from 34.9% to 22.1%) and unemployment (down to 3.8%). However, these gains were only temporary due to American intervention. American copper interests in Chile, which controlled 80% of Chile's copper production, reacted violently to Allende's nationalization. The United States set about placing an economic stranglehold on Chile designed to, in a famous quote by Richard Nixon, &amp;quot;make the (Chilean) economy scream&amp;quot;. Classified documents have also revealed the extent of the United States' involvement in the 1973 coup d'etat that overthrew Allende, installing and supporting dictator [[Augusto Pinochet]] in power. Pinochet is known to have detained and tortured thousands of domestic dissidents by its secret police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB8/nsaebb8i.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current )==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950's and has declared Cuba to be Communist since then. Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their Fundamental Rights. ([[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
North Korea's form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by Kim Il Sung and carried on by current leader Kim Jong Il. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Different Strands of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Welfare state]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Jude P. Dougherty, &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [http://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], bu leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp. 417-420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_countries]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jerboa&amp;diff=596567</id>
		<title>Jerboa</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jerboa&amp;diff=596567"/>
		<updated>2008-12-29T19:00:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Jerboa.jpg|300x|thumb|A jerboa]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''jerboa''' is a species of mouse from the Palestinian area. It's most well-known features are its long tail and the fact that it jumps like a [[kangaroo]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Parable_of_the_Talents&amp;diff=596168</id>
		<title>Talk:Parable of the Talents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Parable_of_the_Talents&amp;diff=596168"/>
		<updated>2008-12-29T04:09:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: New page: The parable of the talents is talking about spiritual riches, not earthly treasures. --~~~~&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The parable of the talents is talking about spiritual riches, not earthly treasures. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:09, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595759</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595759"/>
		<updated>2008-12-28T14:57:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::All of your &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; are simply sites citing the exact same source, Thayer's Greek-English lexicon.  To suggest that questioning that ''single'' definition is rejecting all authority is absurd.  Healthy skepticism is necessary to any intellectual project such as this.  Relying on a single authority as definitive is absurd.  The biblical concept of &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far different than the present.  Denying that is patently ridiculous, and ignores millenia of economic and social change. That is why this project is necessary.  Like Luther's 500 years ago, it is an attempt to ground our knowledge in the original ''meaning'' of God's word. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Undent) Well I have 2 more (different) in hard copy.  ''The Complete Word Study New Testament'' Spiros Zodhiates, which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; And the ''Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament'' Rienecker and Rogers.  which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That doesn't change the obvious fact that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in Jesus' time is worlds away from &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in the present, and thus its implications and connotations when used in God's word.  What confuses me is your motive in attempting to censor this obvious information. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:17, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, the specific things that we have are completely different, but that doesn't mean that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; was any different.  It just means that a person has &amp;quot;an abundance&amp;quot; of material possessions.  It doesn't matter whether those possessions are sheep and goats, or if they are gold and silver, or cars and televisions, or lots of digits that represent money in a bank.  The point is that the person has many more possessions than they need.  The concept is not bounded by time.  Solomon had great wealth.  Possibly greater than anyone since.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone care to respond?--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:31, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sorry, Tim, I didn't notice your edits in the middle here.  The Greek word does not mean &amp;quot;many more possessions than they need&amp;quot; as you suggest.  Rather, it means &amp;quot;fully supplied&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;  The term refers equally well to the person who has just what he needs and no more.  In short, it applies to virtually everyone in developed nations, fully fed and entertained.  That's why the term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; no longer works because very few of the &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; view themselves as &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; today, yet Jesus is addressing them.  The key to the Greek term and the translation is to capture the vice of an unwillingness to try harder due to the complacently of being fully fed and entertained.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:11, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The word also means rich, the 2 definitions are very close in meaning.  Abundantly supplied means more than enough.  I agree that many or most of the &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; would not consider themselves rich, but I don't think that they'd consider themselves abundantly supplied either.  You say that the greek term is about unwillingness to &amp;quot;try harder,&amp;quot; and complacency.  That is not true.  The word means rich, and abundantly supplied. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:57, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Tim, the essence of this project is to open your mind and think for yourself, and not rely on an argument that &amp;quot;the experts say such-and-such.&amp;quot;  Yes, some and perhaps all of the unnamed experts are liberals.  The process of inducing people to rely on &amp;quot;the perceived view of experts is a misleading one.  In courts of law it is generally not allowed without also hearing from an expert with the opposite view.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; say there is [[global warming]].  Most experts say that government should raise taxes.  Most experts say that government should increase spending.  In fact, you can go down the entire list of liberal viewpoints and find that most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; support them.  Give up your ability to think for yourself, just a little, and you will probably never get it back.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::: But those are experts in other fields. These are experts IN THE LANGUAGE. This is less being open-minded, and has now been degraded to Ostrich theory. What does the meaning of ONE WORD have to do with what Dr. John Q. Scientist has to say about [[global warming]]? You are basically saying &amp;quot;disregard all science, all research, all facts, make junk up as you go along.&amp;quot;[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 23:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I'm happy with &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; as a translation in this case, though it seems a little prolix. Perhaps we could work on a more mellifluous alternative - possibly &amp;quot;over-replete&amp;quot; or something of that ilk, maybe even something with a nuance of luxury rather than mere adequacy. As a side question, does the &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; gloss apply to `ashir as well as to plousios, and if so, why? [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:13, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think you are right that &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; is prolix.  I think the nuance that needs to be added is the laziness when some humans are abundantly supplied with food and entertainment.  I'm not familiar with `ashir but look forward to learning more.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:40, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In general, I can recommend Weingreen's excellent work ''[http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Grammar-Classical-Hebrew/dp/0198154224?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 A Practical Grammar for Classical Hebrew]'' for the novice to Biblical Hebrew grammar. It's not a guide to vocabulary, obviously, and it's not in itself sufficient to give the experience and fluency necessary to attempt a translation project of this magnitude, but it's a good place to start. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:52, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For vocabulary, [http://www.amazon.com/Brown-Driver-Briggs-Hebrew-English-Lexicon-Francis/dp/1565632060?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 Brown/Driver/Briggs] is the standard reference work, as far as I know. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 11:01, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think what is needed are more nuanced definitions. The Bible uses the term rich as a blanket reference to those of monetary as well as spiritual wealth, and I think having cotextual definitions for each occurrence would be a generally good idea - such as avaricious (ie desire for riches beyond one's needs) for the cited example and others, and e.g. rich-spirited (or similar) for other occurrences. Plus further definitions as appropriate --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 11:49, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks, J00ni, this is a lovely explanation! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:26, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:J00ni, your point is well taken, but the fact remains that there are millions who are misled by the term &amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; in many instances of its use.  They may like the sound, but they think it is something other than what was intended.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Peace ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The retranslation of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; is based on the Greek word.  Why is there a citation to the Old Testament on this point?  The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, not Greek.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: cf LXX: ''καὶ εἶπεν αὐτοῖς εἰ εἰς '''εἰρήνην''' οὗτοι ἐκπορεύονται συλλάβετε αὐτοὺς ζῶντας καὶ εἰ εἰς πόλεμον ζῶντας συλλάβετε αὐτούς'' - your Greek is likely better than mine, but I don't see the issue with this translation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 06:35, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't dispute at all εἰρήνη has a meaning of tranquility, but it ''also'' has a meaning of absence-of-war - much as ''peace'' does in English. See also [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/vor?lookup=ei)rh%2Fnh&amp;amp;lang=greek&amp;amp;group=bilevel these sources] - e.g. “ἢ μέγα φρονει̂ς,” ἔφη, “ἐπὶ ται̂ς ἐψηφισμέναις μὲν πεντήκοντα ναυσίν, οὐδέποτε δὲ πληρωθησομέναις; οὕτω γὰρ ἠρέθικας Φίλιππον καὶ τοιαυ̂τα εἴρηκας, '''ἐξ ὡ̂ν οὐκ εἰρήνη γένοιτ' ἂν ἐκ πολέμου, ἀλλ' ἐξ εἰρήνης πόλεμος ἀκήρυκτος'''.” ([[Aeschines]]) [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 06:46, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, you link to a superb online source!  It's amazing what is available now on the internet!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The point is that &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; in English is increasingly taken to mean an absence of war, thanks (or &amp;quot;no thanks&amp;quot;) to the influence of the media and politics on culture.  Very few people take &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot; any more.  But Jesus was not telling the Apostles to oppose Roman wars when He said, &amp;quot;peace be with you.&amp;quot;  He was speaking about an inner tranquility and lack of fear or anxiety.  That's a meaning that needs to be restored against the ravages of the [[devolution of language]], particularly with the rise in anxiety disorders.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 07:16, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I don't doubt your assertion that at the moment, the primary meaning of the English &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; is as you say. However, I do question the recency of this semantic position, and also whether this was not the case with eirene. I'd assume that someone listening to Jesus would have understood the Aramaic term he used to have a hefty flavour of non-war about it (in general, if not necessarily in context). In the same way, a reader of the English would understand that &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; has multiple shades of meaning, and will select as appropriate.  [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 07:29, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: But virtually no one today understands &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;anxiety free,&amp;quot; and Jesus never spoke about foreign policy in His time.  It's a complete mismatch, I think, due to the cultural changes in the meaning of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; to most people.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:02, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: An absence of interpersonal strife is not just foreign policy. Also, I think that virtually ''everyone'' today uses the adjective &amp;quot;peaceful&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;without anxieties or distractions&amp;quot;; it's easy to underestimate people in general. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 08:08, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Relinquish or Release ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;relinquish&amp;quot; has negative connotations: it means giving up something that may not have been properly yours.  I don't see how that is an improvement over &amp;quot;release&amp;quot;, which has positive connotations of resulting in a greater good.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 07:21, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: yes, good point, but &amp;quot;release&amp;quot; sounds too much like what one does to a captive. I think possibly something more like &amp;quot;hand over&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;give away&amp;quot; is in line with paradidomi - am I reading it too literally? [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 07:29, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: &amp;quot;Release&amp;quot; does have that political/legal connotation, but I don't see that as causing a problem in the context.  &amp;quot;Hand over&amp;quot; has a negative connotation, and requires a recipient who does not exist in this context; &amp;quot;give away&amp;quot; implies an inappropriate abandonment of something typically having little value, and that doesn't fit.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:00, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595569</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595569"/>
		<updated>2008-12-28T04:31:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::All of your &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; are simply sites citing the exact same source, Thayer's Greek-English lexicon.  To suggest that questioning that ''single'' definition is rejecting all authority is absurd.  Healthy skepticism is necessary to any intellectual project such as this.  Relying on a single authority as definitive is absurd.  The biblical concept of &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far different than the present.  Denying that is patently ridiculous, and ignores millenia of economic and social change. That is why this project is necessary.  Like Luther's 500 years ago, it is an attempt to ground our knowledge in the original ''meaning'' of God's word. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Undent) Well I have 2 more (different) in hard copy.  ''The Complete Word Study New Testament'' Spiros Zodhiates, which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; And the ''Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament'' Rienecker and Rogers.  which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That doesn't change the obvious fact that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in Jesus' time is worlds away from &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in the present, and thus its implications and connotations when used in God's word.  What confuses me is your motive in attempting to censor this obvious information. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:17, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, the specific things that we have are completely different, but that doesn't mean that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; was any different.  It just means that a person has &amp;quot;an abundance&amp;quot; of material possessions.  It doesn't matter whether those possessions are sheep and goats, or if they are gold and silver, or cars and televisions, or lots of digits that represent money in a bank.  The point is that the person has many more possessions than they need.  The concept is not bounded by time.  Solomon had great wealth.  Possibly greater than anyone since.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone care to respond?--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:31, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Tim, the essence of this project is to open your mind and think for yourself, and not rely on an argument that &amp;quot;the experts say such-and-such.&amp;quot;  Yes, some and perhaps all of the unnamed experts are liberals.  The process of inducing people to rely on &amp;quot;the perceived view of experts is a misleading one.  In courts of law it is generally not allowed without also hearing from an expert with the opposite view.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; say there is [[global warming]].  Most experts say that government should raise taxes.  Most experts say that government should increase spending.  In fact, you can go down the entire list of liberal viewpoints and find that most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; support them.  Give up your ability to think for yourself, just a little, and you will probably never get it back.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::: But those are experts in other fields. These are experts IN THE LANGUAGE. This is less being open-minded, and has now been degraded to Ostrich theory. What does the meaning of ONE WORD have to do with what Dr. John Q. Scientist has to say about [[global warming]]? You are basically saying &amp;quot;disregard all science, all research, all facts, make junk up as you go along.&amp;quot;[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 23:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I'm happy with &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; as a translation in this case, though it seems a little prolix. Perhaps we could work on a more mellifluous alternative - possibly &amp;quot;over-replete&amp;quot; or something of that ilk, maybe even something with a nuance of luxury rather than mere adequacy. As a side question, does the &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; gloss apply to `ashir as well as to plousios, and if so, why? [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:13, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think you are right that &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; is prolix.  I think the nuance that needs to be added is the laziness when some humans are abundantly supplied with food and entertainment.  I'm not familiar with `ashir but look forward to learning more.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:40, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In general, I can recommend Weingreen's excellent work ''[http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Grammar-Classical-Hebrew/dp/0198154224?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 A Practical Grammar for Classical Hebrew]'' for the novice to Biblical Hebrew grammar. It's not a guide to vocabulary, obviously, and it's not in itself sufficient to give the experience and fluency necessary to attempt a translation project of this magnitude, but it's a good place to start. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:52, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For vocabulary, [http://www.amazon.com/Brown-Driver-Briggs-Hebrew-English-Lexicon-Francis/dp/1565632060?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 Brown/Driver/Briggs] is the standard reference work, as far as I know. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 11:01, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I think what is needed are more nuanced definitions. The Bible uses the term rich as a blanket reference to those of monetary as well as spiritual wealth, and I think having cotextual definitions for each occurrence would be a generally good idea - such as avaricious (ie desire for riches beyond one's needs) for the cited example and others, and e.g. rich-spirited (or similar) for other occurrences. Plus further definitions as appropriate --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 11:49, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks, J00ni, this is a lovely explanation! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:26, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:J00ni, your point is well taken, but the fact remains that there are millions who are misled by the term &amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; in many instances of its use.  They may like the sound, but they think it is something other than what was intended.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Peace ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The retranslation of &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; is based on the Greek word.  Why is there a citation to the Old Testament on this point?  The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, not Greek.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:10, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595116</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=595116"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T16:41:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::All of your &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; are simply sites citing the exact same source, Thayer's Greek-English lexicon.  To suggest that questioning that ''single'' definition is rejecting all authority is absurd.  Healthy skepticism is necessary to any intellectual project such as this.  Relying on a single authority as definitive is absurd.  The biblical concept of &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far different than the present.  Denying that is patently ridiculous, and ignores millenia of economic and social change. That is why this project is necessary.  Like Luther's 500 years ago, it is an attempt to ground our knowledge in the original ''meaning'' of God's word. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Undent) Well I have 2 more (different) in hard copy.  ''The Complete Word Study New Testament'' Spiros Zodhiates, which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; And the ''Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament'' Rienecker and Rogers.  which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That doesn't change the obvious fact that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in Jesus' time is worlds away from &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in the present, and thus its implications and connotations when used in God's word.  What confuses me is your motive in attempting to censor this obvious information. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:17, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, the specific things that we have are completely different, but that doesn't mean that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; was any different.  It just means that a person has &amp;quot;an abundance&amp;quot; of material possessions.  It doesn't matter whether those possessions are sheep and goats, or if they are gold and silver, or cars and televisions, or lots of digits that represent money in a bank.  The point is that the person has many more possessions than they need.  The concept is not bounded by time.  Solomon had great wealth.  Possibly greater than anyone since.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyone care to respond?--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Tim, the essence of this project is to open your mind and think for yourself, and not rely on an argument that &amp;quot;the experts say such-and-such.&amp;quot;  Yes, some and perhaps all of the unnamed experts are liberals.  The process of inducing people to rely on &amp;quot;the perceived view of experts is a misleading one.  In courts of law it is generally not allowed without also hearing from an expert with the opposite view.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; say there is [[global warming]].  Most experts say that government should raise taxes.  Most experts say that government should increase spending.  In fact, you can go down the entire list of liberal viewpoints and find that most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; support them.  Give up your ability to think for yourself, just a little, and you will probably never get it back.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::: But those are experts in other fields. These are experts IN THE LANGUAGE. This is less being open-minded, and has now been degraded to Ostrich theory. What does the meaning of ONE WORD have to do with what Dr. John Q. Scientist has to say about [[global warming]]? You are basically saying &amp;quot;disregard all science, all research, all facts, make junk up as you go along.&amp;quot;[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 23:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I'm happy with &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; as a translation in this case, though it seems a little prolix. Perhaps we could work on a more mellifluous alternative - possibly &amp;quot;over-replete&amp;quot; or something of that ilk, maybe even something with a nuance of luxury rather than mere adequacy. As a side question, does the &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; gloss apply to `ashir as well as to plousios, and if so, why? [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:13, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think you are right that &amp;quot;abundantly supplied&amp;quot; is prolix.  I think the nuance that needs to be added is the laziness when some humans are abundantly supplied with food and entertainment.  I'm not familiar with `ashir but look forward to learning more.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:40, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: In general, I can recommend Weingreen's excellent work ''[http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Grammar-Classical-Hebrew/dp/0198154224?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 A Practical Grammar for Classical Hebrew]'' for the novice to Biblical Hebrew grammar. It's not a guide to vocabulary, obviously, and it's not in itself sufficient to give the experience and fluency necessary to attempt a translation project of this magnitude, but it's a good place to start. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:52, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: For vocabulary, [http://www.amazon.com/Brown-Driver-Briggs-Hebrew-English-Lexicon-Francis/dp/1565632060?tag=1672411-20&amp;amp;ie=UTF8 Brown/Driver/Briggs] is the standard reference work, as far as I know. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 11:01, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks, J00ni, this is a lovely explanation! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 10:26, 27 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594893</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594893"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T04:23:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::All of your &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; are simply sites citing the exact same source, Thayer's Greek-English lexicon.  To suggest that questioning that ''single'' definition is rejecting all authority is absurd.  Healthy skepticism is necessary to any intellectual project such as this.  Relying on a single authority as definitive is absurd.  The biblical concept of &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far different than the present.  Denying that is patently ridiculous, and ignores millenia of economic and social change. That is why this project is necessary.  Like Luther's 500 years ago, it is an attempt to ground our knowledge in the original ''meaning'' of God's word. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Undent) Well I have 2 more (different) in hard copy.  ''The Complete Word Study New Testament'' Spiros Zodhiates, which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; And the ''Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament'' Rienecker and Rogers.  which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:That doesn't change the obvious fact that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in Jesus' time is worlds away from &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; in the present, and thus its implications and connotations when used in God's word.  What confuses me is your motive in attempting to censor this obvious information. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:17, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, the specific things that we have are completely different, but that doesn't mean that &amp;quot;wealth&amp;quot; was any different.  It just means that a person has &amp;quot;an abundance&amp;quot; of material possessions.  It doesn't matter whether those possessions are sheep and goats, or if they are gold and silver, or cars and televisions, or lots of digits that represent money in a bank.  The point is that the person has many more possessions than they need.  The concept is not bounded by time.  Solomon had great wealth.  Possibly greater than anyone since.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Tim, the essence of this project is to open your mind and think for yourself, and not rely on an argument that &amp;quot;the experts say such-and-such.&amp;quot;  Yes, some and perhaps all of the unnamed experts are liberals.  The process of inducing people to rely on &amp;quot;the perceived view of experts is a misleading one.  In courts of law it is generally not allowed without also hearing from an expert with the opposite view.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; say there is [[global warming]].  Most experts say that government should raise taxes.  Most experts say that government should increase spending.  In fact, you can go down the entire list of liberal viewpoints and find that most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; support them.  Give up your ability to think for yourself, just a little, and you will probably never get it back.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::: But those are experts in other fields. These are experts IN THE LANGUAGE. This is less being open-minded, and has now been degraded to Ostrich theory. What does the meaning of ONE WORD have to do with what Dr. John Q. Scientist has to say about [[global warming]]? You are basically saying &amp;quot;disregard all science, all research, all facts, make junk up as you go along.&amp;quot;[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 23:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594885</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594885"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T04:14:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::All of your &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; are simply sites citing the exact same source, Thayer's Greek-English lexicon.  To suggest that questioning that ''single'' definition is rejecting all authority is absurd.  Healthy skepticism is necessary to any intellectual project such as this.  Relying on a single authority as definitive is absurd.  The biblical concept of &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; is far different than the present.  Denying that is patently ridiculous, and ignores millenia of economic and social change. That is why this project is necessary.  Like Luther's 500 years ago, it is an attempt to ground our knowledge in the original ''meaning'' of God's word. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 23:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Undent) Well I have 2 more (different) in hard copy.  ''The Complete Word Study New Testament'' Spiros Zodhiates, which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; And the ''Linguistic Key to the Greek New Testament'' Rienecker and Rogers.  which says it means &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Tim, the essence of this project is to open your mind and think for yourself, and not rely on an argument that &amp;quot;the experts say such-and-such.&amp;quot;  Yes, some and perhaps all of the unnamed experts are liberals.  The process of inducing people to rely on &amp;quot;the perceived view of experts is a misleading one.  In courts of law it is generally not allowed without also hearing from an expert with the opposite view.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::: Most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; say there is [[global warming]].  Most experts say that government should raise taxes.  Most experts say that government should increase spending.  In fact, you can go down the entire list of liberal viewpoints and find that most &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; support them.  Give up your ability to think for yourself, just a little, and you will probably never get it back.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::: But those are experts in other fields. These are experts IN THE LANGUAGE. This is less being open-minded, and has now been degraded to Ostrich theory. What does the meaning of ONE WORD have to do with what Dr. John Q. Scientist has to say about [[global warming]]? You are basically saying &amp;quot;disregard all science, all research, all facts, make junk up as you go along.&amp;quot;[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 23:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594869</id>
		<title>Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594869"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T03:59:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Reverted edits by FrankS (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Teenagers throughout history have have had many great achievements in the fields of art, culture, science and technology. This may be because they are able to think in new and innovative ways, or their thinking is not hidebound by discredited nostrums; it may be attributable to great teachers and great schooling - including homeschooling. It may simply be the emergence of God-given talent at an early age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Achievements, listed by age at which they were made==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin gives his first solo violin performance with the San Francisco Symphony in 1923&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] paints his &amp;quot;Picador&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] plays his first public piano performance, having already authored two polonaises (G minor and B flat major) at age 7.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] had secretly worked out the first twenty-three propositions of Euclid by himself.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[John]] wrote the first draft of the [[Gospel of John]], the greatest written work of all time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Mystery:Was John a Child?]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] inspired and led [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Anne Frank]] began writing her diary, later published as &amp;quot;Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] became an International Grandmaster&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - [[Mozart]] wrote the opera, &amp;quot;Mitridate Rè di Ponto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - Karl Benz &lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Christopher Paolini]] writes the first draft of his [[Eragon]] trilogy which is published when he is 19.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion, can speak a dozen languages and delivers a paper on the Coptic language to the Grenoble Academy. By 20, he can speak another 13 languages and at 22 he deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(add more, sorted by age and then alphabetically)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Achievement]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-child-prodigies/ Top 10 Child Prodigies]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594865</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594865"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T03:53:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus' time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::: Since when is consulting people who have dedicated themselves to studying a subject and trusting them over the layman liberal? That is equivalent to me, having no ability in building anything whatsoever, designing and constructing my house myself as opposed to hiring people who make their living doing that because getting their help is liberal. Your definition of liberal is a bit silly Andy, and seems to fall along the lines of &amp;quot;whoever does not wholly agree with what you, Andy Schalfly, believe. If trusting experts makes somebody a liberal, then I'd rather be a liberal than blindly rush into something as major as translating God's Word passed down to mankind without somebody who knows what they are talking about.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:15, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::: Folks, blindly follow your chosen &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; somewhere else.  This is a wiki devoted to the pursuit of knowledge.  Understand?  That means opening your mind and actually using it.  Parroting what you perceive to be an &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; view might help you win the favor of some liberals, but our project is at a higher level than that.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:35, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::So we should not listen to any experts because to do so would be liberal.  In that case, how are we supposed to learn anything.  Are we supposed to make up our own facts because we can't trust anyone else's?  Should we automatically contradict any expert because to agree with them would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;?  Should I disagree with you because it would be &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; to trust your knowledge?  If you do not rely on the knowledge of others, it is impossible to progress very far in the area of knowledge.  A faulty appeal to authority is a fallacy.  That does not mean that every appeal to authority is a fallacy.  It is only a fallacy when the subject at hand is not the same subject that the person is an authority on.  Obviously an authority can be wrong, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  Should I not believe that 2+2=4 because some expert said that it is?  If you discredit all authority, then how can you gain knowledge? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:53, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;abundantly supplied,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Rich in mercy&amp;quot; is an awkward translation at best.  The context must be considered to find the right English word for &amp;quot;abundantly supplied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your comment on &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was silly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:04, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594833</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594833"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T02:54:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::: I still don't quite see how your reading squares with the Joseph of Arimathea citation. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 19:18, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Tim, that is such a liberal argument:  &amp;quot;the experts say that it means ....&amp;quot;  The &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; also say that [[global warming]] is a crisis and that more government spending is needed.  God gave us all the ability to think for ourselves.  Let's use it.  Denise, I don't know what you're referencing specifically.  If you mean a reference that Joseph of Arimathea was &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; and yet a follower of Jesus, that would not disprove the translation of &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;  Indeed, Joseph had the time to intervene as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::What? It is a liberal argument to say that people who have spent their life studying a language know that language better than someone who does can not even speak it.  That argument sounds good to me.  Are you saying that you have a better understanding of biblical greek than the people who have written those lexicons? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::: Everyone today is &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; by the standards of Jesus's time, so presumably the term is more nuanced than that common term.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The interpretation of &amp;quot;miserliness to the point of laziness and being unproductive	&amp;quot; for plousios has implications at Ephesians 2:4 &amp;quot;But God, who is rich (plousios) in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us&amp;quot;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Eph&amp;amp;c=2&amp;amp;v=4&amp;amp;t=KJV#conc/4] .  Applying miserly and lazy to God is near blasphemy.  The original interpretation of simply 'wealthy' is likely the intended and best interpretation.  A benevolent God would never be miserly with His mercy, and He certainly isn't lazy or unproductive. --[[User:JohnnyS|JohnnyS]] 21:38, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Grace==&lt;br /&gt;
I think the translation of grace is overly simplistic. To me grace is not merely generosity, but generosity towards those in whom it is undeserved. And is a gift specifically ftom the Lord to mankind, and allows for forgivness of the unrepentant sinner and ultimately is the reason God loves each and every one of His creation irrespective of whether they honour His word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate what you are trying to achieve, and it is an honourable cause, it's just that IMO grace has always been a concept requiring more understanding than the word itself conveys, and is a central concept to Christianity itself, and by changing it to 'generosity' may hinder people from seeking its true, deeper meaning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grace is one of my favourite concepts to learn about and (attempt to) explain to others as I feel not only the concept, but the word itself, has a beauty to it that shouldn't be tampered with --[[User:J00ni|J00ni]] 19:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594743</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594743"/>
		<updated>2008-12-27T00:11:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::: Having checked in my Liddell &amp;amp; Scott, I think it's safe to remove it pending a scholarly source that supports the variant reading. This is a wiki, we can always put it back if more research turns up such a reference. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 18:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::: Not so fast, folks.  There is a key insight here that I've just learned from, as have others.  The term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; DOES change in meaning over time, and the Greek term could not possibly mean what is meant today by &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;.  Instead, the Greek term means &amp;quot;fully supplied.&amp;quot;  Perhaps &amp;quot;idle rich&amp;quot; would be a better translation or, in modern terms, the &amp;quot;complacent&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;lazy miser.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 19:03, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::The experts say that it means rich.  Do you know better than the experts?  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594715</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594715"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T23:50:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Someone please provide a linguistic source that backs up the claim, or I will remove it. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:50, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594672</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594672"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T23:09:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good idea! I'll change it, thanks Bugler. Good to see you again.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:47, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::a footnote to the CP commandments says &amp;quot;Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others.&amp;quot;--[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Also, Aschlafly, while I share your concern with CPAdmin1's edits, I have to point out that he's right, it's not censorship to remove information because you think it's incorrect. Censorship requires (1) state or state-like action, and (2) removal of information (3) for subjective, viewpoint-discriminatory reasons. Even if he's wrong, it's assuming bad faith to call his deletions censorship.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 17:49, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tetragrammata ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the planned translation of the tetragrammaton? In English translations it's often been rendered as 'Lord', sometimes with all-caps, based on the Jewish custom of the pronunciation &amp;quot;Adonai&amp;quot;, used to avoid saying the name; others use YHWH/YHVH/JHWH based on the unvowelled consonants; others go with &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; based on a Latin form, fairly discredited now, I understand. Still others try and capture the &amp;quot;to be&amp;quot; root of it, opting for &amp;quot;the one who is&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the eternal&amp;quot;. Thoughts? I personally prefer one of the latter forms, though I think there is room for innovation here! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 17:46, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594656</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594656"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T22:40:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: The underlying insight is promising, given the very different nature of the &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; then compared to now.  Improvement rather than [[censorship]] is the better approach here.  My research reveals that the Greek term really means &amp;quot;fully supplied,&amp;quot;[http://time2changechurches.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html] as in being pampered or lazy.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your source is a blog.  I gave 4 separate sources that are greek lexicons.  Which do you think is more reliable? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:40, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594645</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594645"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T22:21:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The problem here is that the statement is being assumed true, even though there is no reason to believe that it is, aside from the claim of one user who has agreed to the removal of the item.  --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:21, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594638</id>
		<title>Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594638"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T22:14:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: meaning&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Bible Retranslation Project''' recognizes that a modern language changes and devolves quickly.  There are several reasons for this, including attempts by non-believers to dilute and distort powerful religious concepts for political ends, the corrosive effect of cultural changes on language, and the impact of politics on the meaning of terminology.  Terms that were clear and meaningful to one generation are often unclear and less meaningful to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of [[devolution of language]] may be increasing as communications increase.  If a word inevitably alters its meaning after an approximate number of uses, then the time period for the change in meaning will shorten due to improved technology, just as the length of a [[sound bite]] likewise shortens.  In the [[internet]] era, combating the effect of language degradation on the understanding of the [[Bible]] becomes more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a first step to the Bible Retranslation Project, it is useful to identify modern terms having changing, unclear or altered meaning, which appear in important passages in translations of the Bible into the corresponding modern language:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original Term&lt;br /&gt;
!English Translation&lt;br /&gt;
!Usage&lt;br /&gt;
!Lack of Clarity&lt;br /&gt;
!Real meaning&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggested Improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek λόγος transliteration:&amp;quot;logos&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;word&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.&amp;quot; John 1:1 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; now means a short utterance of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&lt;br /&gt;
|underlying logic or profound statement of the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another.&amp;quot; John 1:16 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; has become a female name and a sports term to refer primarily to smoothness in style&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual and majestic gift-giving&lt;br /&gt;
|replace some instances of &amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generosity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. ... Of the increase of his government and peace there will be no end.&amp;quot; Isaiah 9:6-7 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot; now means officials paid by mandatory taxes and accountable to a democratic vote&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;kingdom&amp;quot; - I dislike this - I don't think that monarchy metaphors are really as strong or as relevant as they used to be in the days of the ubiquity absolute rulers. Also &amp;quot;kingdom&amp;quot; is an area of land, I think we want something like &amp;quot;rulership&amp;quot;? Though that sounds a bit ugly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... [[Jesus]] came and stood among them and said, 'Peace be with you!'&amp;quot; John 20:19 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; now means an absence of war&lt;br /&gt;
|an inner peace and lack of personal fear or anxiety&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot; - but this then gives possible issues for verses like I Kings 20:18, which now reads ''And he said, Whether they be come out for tranquility, take them alive; or whether they be come out for war, take them alive.'' Perhaps we could keep &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; for ''shalom'', and &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot; for ''eirene''? Except Jesus, saying &amp;quot;Peace be with you&amp;quot;, is presumably using shalom alechem, or Aramaic cognate, which leads to some interesting issues of consistency.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek πλούσιος transliteration: &amp;quot;plousios&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;wealthy, abounding in material resources&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;rich&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven&amp;quot; (Matthew 19:24)&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; now refers simply to one with many possessions, and this verse is sometimes misunderstood to justify laziness or even socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|having a love of possession for its own sake; miserliness&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;miserly&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill&amp;quot; Exodus 20.13 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilization. The commandment referred to unjustifiable homicides - murder and manslaughter - rather than advocating blanket pacifism, as many Leftists today interpret it.&lt;br /&gt;
|to murder or take up arms without sufficient justification&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;commit murder&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth&amp;quot; Matthew 5:5 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; now means excessively mild, passive, pathetically submissive.&lt;br /&gt;
|showing humility before God&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;God-fearing&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mahlon'' and ''Chilion'' (e.g.)&lt;br /&gt;
| Ruth 1:2 ''Mahlon'' and ''Chilion''&lt;br /&gt;
|The Hebrew forms mean nothing to a modern reader&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Weak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Sick&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|I think we could afford to be bold and translate these names. Footnotes are a cowardly choice. If we had ''the name of his two sons were Feeble and Poorly'', it'd make much more of an impression.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself&amp;quot; Proverbs 11:25 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now means adhering to leftist or socialistic political or social doctrines&lt;br /&gt;
|showing generosity&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generous&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek ᾅδου transliteration: Hades&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;No, you will go down to the depths. If the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day.&amp;quot; Matthew 11:23 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; is now understood to mean the ocean. &amp;quot;Hades&amp;quot; was used by Matthew to help Greeks comprehend Christianity's Hell. The LXX use &amp;quot;haidon&amp;quot; in Psalm 115 to translate the hebrew &amp;quot;dumah&amp;quot;, so it's applicable to other concepts as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell/depths of Hell&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Hell&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible Versions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594633</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594633"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T22:12:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your link does not explain the meaning of the Greek term, but only its view of the Biblical meaning.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:05, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What about [http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=4145 this] and [http://biblestudy.crosswalk.com/mybst/default.aspx?type=library&amp;amp;contentid=114459&amp;amp;category=REF this] and [http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=4145&amp;amp;version=kjv this]? --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594615</id>
		<title>Talk:Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594615"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T22:00:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: /* Rich */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Word==&lt;br /&gt;
I admit that I am not as great a linguist, translator and biblical scholar as Andy is, so pardon my question, but when did &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; ''not'' mean &amp;quot;a short expression of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&amp;quot;? From what I see, the issue at hand seems to be rather how you actually translate &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; (a.k.a. &amp;quot;the '''W'''ord&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;a '''w'''ord&amp;quot;). If you just want to directly translate it to &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;, that would sound plausible to me, but redefining &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; to ''really'' mean &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot; is somewhat pushing it in my eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But like I said in the beginning, this isn't exactly my special field of study, so I'm open for any source Andy or somebody else can show me to understand things better. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 15:04, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AlanS, the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful.  In response to your comment, the primary meaning of &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in English at the time of its incorporation in translating John 1:1 was a &amp;quot;command&amp;quot; or series of speech sounds, not false or vulgar.  Today its primary meaning in English is quite different from about 400 years ago, as in &amp;quot;he had a word with so-and-so&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 17:07, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Aschlafly, the less you rely on belittling and dismissing other people and posts (&amp;quot;the more you rely on silly sarcasm, the less likely you will be insightful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]]&amp;quot;), the more respect people will give you. I assume/hope you don't treat your students like this, so why your fellow editors? I came to this talk page to learn, not to get the wagging finger treatment from you. And I assumed that you, somebody who is going to ''retranslate the Word Of God'', have some experience as a linguist, translator and biblical scholar - no sarcasm intended. Because otherwise, I'd seriously ask what you were thinking when you started this. No offense, but this is a task more talented people than you and I have to study years for, so the thought of somebody with ''no'' experience or training in this field translating the Bible makes me frown to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::More on-topic, I find your explanation interesting, but I would welcome a source for your claim because I couldn't find any. I'm not here to doubt the you, but I want to verify it. Also, what is your explanation for the newer translations not having updated that word? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 08:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: AlanS, don't rant on these pages.  Contribute, or please leave.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 08:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; sounds better in my opinion. Also, which editions are you using as a source for your translating, the original Hebrew and Greek, or one of the many English versions? And how far do you plan on taking this? I personally find it superfluous, but since linguistically I am a prescriptionist, that may just be me.[[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:49, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I don't think &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; means the same to people anymore as it did a generation ago.  As to your second sentence, all early manuscripts were in Greek, and the term used was &amp;quot;logos&amp;quot; as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think the table is merely scratching the surface.  The English language is devolving quickly, and retranslation of many key terms is worth considering.  This exercise itself is illuminating.  I'm confident we've all learned something new just from reading the first three examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 22:53, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: But evolution isn't real, right? :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Joking aside, I'll help you with my basic knowledge of linguistics if you honestly want it. Just want to avoid this degenerating into an exercise in Newspeak or playing with deeper meanings. [[User:ENorman|ENorman]] 22:58, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Wow, that's bizarre: where did your comment on evolution come from?  No, I'm not interested in wasting my time with someone suffering from [[evolution syndrome]].  If you have an open mind, then I do welcome your efforts; if not, then maybe Wikipedia is a better place for you.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 23:05, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Logos==&lt;br /&gt;
ASchlafly: The word &amp;quot;Logos&amp;quot; does not translate to truth. It is generally translated to &amp;quot;word, thought, principle, or speech.&amp;quot; Good luck on rewriting the Bible! [[User:MReynolds|MReynolds]] 22:20, 25 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alternative Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This project is quite ambitious, and generally, I'd say it is out of the reach of the high-school pupils you're addressing.  &lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn't it be more effective to write a commentary to the ''gold standard of Biblical translations'', i.e., KJB, to explain its verses to the contemporary audience? The language of the KJB is so vigorous that any alteration  just weakens it. &lt;br /&gt;
Of course, I'm coming from a German perspective: It took a genius like Martin Luther to come up with a usable German translation for the Bible. He introduced numerous metaphors and proverbs into the German language which still live on. Granted, there are more modern translation - esp. the ''Einheitsübersetzung'' of the EKD (Protestant churches in Germany) and the German Conference of Catholic Bishops. But though it's more exact historically, it lacks the power of Luther's language. &lt;br /&gt;
Another thought: The Bible in its old translations has inspired or at least influenced countless works of literature. This influence is more easily spotted using the traditional translations.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 08:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: BRichtigen, with all due respect, the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students.  Moreover, many of my students likely have a better command of history and linguistics than you do.  Try your hand at [[American_History_Midterm_Exam_-_Boys]] and see how you stack up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your put-down aside, your approach does not address the problem of how culture changes the meaning of modern terms used by ''all'' translations of the [[Bible]].  An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the greatest works throughout history have been produced by teenagers like my students&amp;quot; A closer examination of the greatest work of history (perhaps we could agree on a list of the TOP 100) will show that the statement is just wrong. In fact, the few cases of teenagers who excelled in their fields are so well known as they '''were''' rare. (There is only ''one'' Mozart...)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure that your students have a better command of '''American''' history than I do. And they should speak better English than I do. I don't know about their German, Latin, Dutch or French...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: ''An accurate translation using terms &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; becomes inaccurate when culture modifies the meaning of &amp;quot;x, y, and z&amp;quot; to listeners.'' A reasonable thing would be to explain the meaning of ''x, y, and z'' to the listeners as used in the translations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The Greek originals were in use for a couple of centuries while Ancient Greek was still a living language. Somehow, no one so the necessity to rewrite the originals... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 09:41, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::BRichtigen, you're welcome to start a list of the greatest works in history, but I'm confident most will be accomplished by people who were teenagers.  Your point about x, y, z, is not clear; the retranslation is precisely designed to explain x, y, z in a more accurate way as culture changes language.  Ancient Greek, which I have studied (have you?) was not as vulnerable to cultural changes to language as today's society is.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 10:30, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked into the claim ''most of the greatest works in history were accomplished by people who were teenagers'', and the more I research, the more absurd it becomes. &lt;br /&gt;
::::Take for instance mathematics, one of the fields were prodigies are said to be found quite often. Granted, there are accomplishments by young men (Abel, Galois), and Gauss constructed the regular heptadekagon age 18. But these examples are few, and most times, the works of the teenage mathematician  will be overshadowed by the works  of the matured one - if he is allowed to life long enough.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another area: Music. Mozart is the child prodigy par excellence, and others tried to imitate his success (Beethoven's father lied about the age of his son...). But there are only few works of teenagers worth listening to...&lt;br /&gt;
::::Which ''accomplishments in history'' are you thinking about?&lt;br /&gt;
::::And my Greek is negligible, I'm afraid... --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Addendum: Your class voted on the [[Voted_Most_Influential_Person_in_American_History|most influential person in American history]]. None of the top four made his most important attributions to American history as a teenager... [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 11:39, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::[http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=496962 This] paper examines the age at which Nobel-winning economists published their important works, and also the ages at which they began their Nobel-related research. Table 1 lists the age at which they began their Nobel work; the youngest was 21, and the average was 29.3. They also briefly examine other fields: the mean &amp;quot;beginning age&amp;quot; for Nobel-winning physicists was 33.6, for chemists it was 31.6, and for physiology/medicine it was 33.2. Note that these are the ages when they began the work, not when the Nobel prize was awarded, as it often takes a number of years for the true importance of significant work to be recognised. [[User:BrianW|BrianW]] 11:57, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: Well, fine, but few or none of those examples would rank as the greatest &amp;quot;works&amp;quot; in history.  And as to BRichtigen's comment above, the issue of the &amp;quot;most influential person&amp;quot; is obviously very different from the issue of the &amp;quot;greatest works.&amp;quot;--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:22, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::: Could you give a few examples of the greatest works in history, preferably done by teenagers? Thanks, [[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:58, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unique and useful project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatever the claims of your distractors and critics be, I believe it is a great project and quite suitable to the intended audience of the encyclopedia. You are quite right in spotting that the meaning of words change as the language evolves or change. This is especially true for English which has become the universal language and the de facto official language of the internet.I wonder whether any one has done this before. It may also be beneficial to recruit some one with special expertise in this field. --[[User:MRain|MRain]] 12:06, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks for your encouragement.  I'm not aware of anyone else doing this (or anyone who has &amp;quot;special expertise&amp;quot; in the devolution of modern English).  We welcome contributions to the project ... starting with yourself!  I'll be adding new items as I discover them.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 12:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I think that this is an interesting project, and a good opportunity to try and get across some of the wordplay in the original language that the KJV and most other translations just lack; things like Gen 15:2 or Num 21:9 to give a couple of simple examples - also there's very often the case when words are conflated - like the &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; example - it's good you want to distinguish the more murderous הרג from נכה- there are a number of separate roots that get translated inconsistently as &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;slay&amp;quot;, but you'll perhaps want also to distinguish הרג from רצח and נכה from שחט? Also the names are often clumsily translated as footnotes, if at all, rather than elegantly worked in - sometimes the transliteration of a name is inferior to its translation (IMHO, naturally). Added to that, the KJV (which is very bad in this respect) is incredibly inaccurate when it comes to plants and animals, and it'd be nice to see a scholarly yet poetic translation that is sensibly consistent. I look forward to seeing the results of this! [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:23, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thanks for your insights, Denise, and I look forward to your contributions to this project!--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:26, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Sadly I'm rather busy these days (and my Greek is not much good compared to my Hebrew, and my Aramaic is near non-existent), but I'll try and make some helpful suggestions. Do you mind if I add my twopennyworth to the project page, as far as examples of things I'd like to see included or avoided? I'm not necessarily always able to talk with reference to the KJV, and my interests (as you'll have gathered) are linguistic, aesthetic, and exactitude-focused rather than centred around political considerations. [[User:DeniseM|DeniseM]] 16:33, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divine Right==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry if I offended with the Divine Right translation.  My intent was to say that only Christ has the ultimate authority to rule, not to suggest that claims of Divine Right by kings and despots had and validity.  [[User:QWest|QWest]] 14:19, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bearing arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The text reads: &amp;quot;In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilisation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I corrected the British spelling in compliance with the MoS. Second, this description of the culture of arms  is against the evidence, at least as far as the Greeks. In &amp;quot;History of the Peloponnesian War,&amp;quot; Thucydides [http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html spoke] of wearing arms as a custom of the barbarians, and waxes poetic about the lack of necessity of bearing arms in Greece: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And even at the present day many of Hellas still follow the old fashion, the Ozolian Locrians for instance, the Aetolians, the Acarnanians, and that region of the continent; and the custom of carrying arms is still kept up among these continentals, from the old piratical habits. The whole of Hellas used once to carry arms, their habitations being unprotected and their communication with each other unsafe; indeed, to wear arms was as much a part of everyday life with them as with the barbarians. And the fact that the people in these parts of Hellas are still living in the old way points to a time when the same mode of life was once equally common to all. The Athenians were the first to lay aside their weapons, and to adopt an easier and more luxurious mode of life.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should I correct it?-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 15:56, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Greeks believed in false Gods. Surely the correctness of Judaeo-Christian beliefs is obvious? Also, your reference to 'improper' spellings is unnecessary. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You know I agree with you on that first point Bugler, but I don't think their being pagans affects their beliefs towards weapons. And I'm sorry, I didn't mean &amp;quot;improper&amp;quot; in the pejorative: it's just that the Manual of Style says not to use British spellings.-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 16:01, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Alex, I'm not that hung up about the spellings so if you wish to copy-edit go ahead. As for the other thing, how about 'hallmark of Judaeo-Christian civilization'? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:07, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Kill vs Murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the differences cites Ex. 20:13 and the clarification is to use &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;. I agree with this clarification. I use the KJV with explanatory notes from the LDS church and the reference for Ex. 20:13 for the word &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; says in an alternate translation from the Hebrew it means &amp;quot;murder&amp;quot;. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 15:59, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Wow, I never knew that.  By the way, Dean, does the standard LDS Bible use the [[KJV]] plus explanatory footnotes?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:27, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, it's a KJV with explanatory footnotes. The title page says it's the &amp;quot;Authorized King James Version with explanatory notes and cross references to the standard works of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints&amp;quot;. There are also footnotes and appendix referring to the &amp;quot;JST&amp;quot; which is the ''Joseph Smith Translation''. These are excerpts from the Prophet Joseph Smith's translation of the Bible. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 16:43, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rich ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The entry is blatantly false.  You have to look it up.  You cant take someone's word for it.  Just because it sounds interesting does not make it true.  see [http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G4145&amp;amp;t=KJV here]. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(CPAdmin1)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 26 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594605</id>
		<title>Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594605"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T21:57:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: The entry is false.  The greek word refers to rich.  meaning &amp;quot;having an abundance.&amp;quot;  It is blatantly false to translate it otherwise.  Just because someone says it means miserly, does not make it true&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Bible Retranslation Project''' recognizes that a modern language changes and devolves quickly.  There are several reasons for this, including attempts by non-believers to dilute and distort powerful religious concepts for political ends, the corrosive effect of cultural changes on language, and the impact of politics on the meaning of terminology.  Terms that were clear and meaningful to one generation are often unclear and less meaningful to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of [[devolution of language]] may be increasing as communications increase.  If a word inevitably alters its meaning after an approximate number of uses, then the time period for the change in meaning will shorten due to improved technology, just as the length of a [[sound bite]] likewise shortens.  In the [[internet]] era, combating the effect of language degradation on the understanding of the [[Bible]] becomes more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a first step to the Bible Retranslation Project, it is useful to identify modern terms having changing, unclear or altered meaning, which appear in important passages in translations of the Bible into the corresponding modern language:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original Term&lt;br /&gt;
!English Translation&lt;br /&gt;
!Usage&lt;br /&gt;
!Lack of Clarity&lt;br /&gt;
!Real meaning&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggested Improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek λόγος transliteration:&amp;quot;logos&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;word&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.&amp;quot; John 1:1 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; now means a short utterance of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&lt;br /&gt;
|underlying logic or profound statement of the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another.&amp;quot; John 1:16 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; has become a female name and a sports term to refer primarily to smoothness in style&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual and majestic gift-giving&lt;br /&gt;
|replace some instances of &amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generosity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. ... Of the increase of his government and peace there will be no end.&amp;quot; Isaiah 9:6-7 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot; now means officials paid by mandatory taxes and accountable to a democratic vote&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;kingdom&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... [[Jesus]] came and stood among them and said, 'Peace be with you!'&amp;quot; John 20:19 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; now means an absence of war&lt;br /&gt;
|an inner peace and lack of personal fear or anxiety&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot; - but this then gives possible issues for verses like I Kings 20:18, which now reads ''And he said, Whether they be come out for tranquility, take them alive; or whether they be come out for war, take them alive.'' Perhaps we could keep &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; for ''shalom'', and &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot; for ''eirene''?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill&amp;quot; Exodus 20.13 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilization. The commandment referred to unjustifiable homicides - murder and manslaughter - rather than advocating blanket pacifism, as many Leftists today interpret it.&lt;br /&gt;
|to murder or take up arms without sufficient justification&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;commit murder&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth&amp;quot; Matthew 5:5 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; now means excessively mild, passive, pathetically submissive.&lt;br /&gt;
|showing humility before God&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;God-fearing&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself&amp;quot; Proverbs 11:25 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now means adhering to leftist or socialistic political or social doctrines&lt;br /&gt;
|showing generosity&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generous&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek ᾅδου transliteration: Hades&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;No, you will go down to the depths. If the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day.&amp;quot; Matthew 11:23 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; is now understood to mean the ocean. &amp;quot;Hades&amp;quot; was used by Matthew to help Greeks comprehend Christianity's Hell. The LXX use &amp;quot;haidon&amp;quot; in Psalm 115 to translate the hebrew &amp;quot;dumah&amp;quot;, so it's applicable to other concepts as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell/depths of Hell&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Hell&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible Versions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594519</id>
		<title>Bible Retranslation Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible_Retranslation_Project&amp;diff=594519"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T21:31:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: misapplication does not equal mistranslation.  It does mean rich in the sense of having many possessions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Bible Retranslation Project''' recognizes that a modern language changes and devolves quickly.  There are several reasons for this, including attempts by non-believers to dilute and distort powerful religious concepts for political ends, the corrosive effect of cultural changes on language, and the impact of politics on the meaning of terminology.  Terms that were clear and meaningful to one generation are often unclear and less meaningful to the next.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of [[devolution of language]] may be increasing as communications increase.  If a word inevitably alters its meaning after an approximate number of uses, then the time period for the change in meaning will shorten due to improved technology, just as the length of a [[sound bite]] likewise shortens.  In the [[internet]] era, combating the effect of language degradation on the understanding of the [[Bible]] becomes more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a first step to the Bible Retranslation Project, it is useful to identify modern terms having changing, unclear or altered meaning, which appear in important passages in translations of the Bible into the corresponding modern language:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original Term&lt;br /&gt;
!English Translation&lt;br /&gt;
!Usage&lt;br /&gt;
!Lack of Clarity&lt;br /&gt;
!Real meaning&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggested Improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Greek λόγος transliteration:&amp;quot;logos&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;word&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.&amp;quot; John 1:1 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; now means a short utterance of a single concept, which can include a vulgarity or a falsehood&lt;br /&gt;
|underlying logic or profound statement of the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;Word&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Truth&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;From the fullness of his grace we have all received one blessing after another.&amp;quot; John 1:16 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; has become a female name and a sports term to refer primarily to smoothness in style&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual and majestic gift-giving&lt;br /&gt;
|replace some instances of &amp;quot;grace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generosity&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. ... Of the increase of his government and peace there will be no end.&amp;quot; Isaiah 9:6-7 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;government&amp;quot; now means officials paid by mandatory taxes and accountable to a democratic vote&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual kingdom&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;government&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;kingdom&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... [[Jesus]] came and stood among them and said, 'Peace be with you!'&amp;quot; Isaiah 20:19 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; now means an absence of war&lt;br /&gt;
|an inner peace and lack of personal fear or anxiety&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;tranquility&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;kill&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Thou shalt not kill&amp;quot; Exodus 20.13 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|In Biblical times, as today, the bearing of arms to defend ones family and society was the hallmark of civilization. The commandment referred to unjustifiable homicides - murder and manslaughter - rather than advocating blanket pacifism, as many Leftists today interpret it.&lt;br /&gt;
|to murder or take up arms without sufficient justification&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;kill&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;commit murder&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth&amp;quot; Matthew 5:5 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; now means excessively mild, passive, pathetically submissive.&lt;br /&gt;
|showing humility before God&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;meek&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;God-fearing&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself&amp;quot; Proverbs 11:25 ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now means adhering to leftist or socialistic political or social doctrines&lt;br /&gt;
|showing generosity&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;generous&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;No, you will go down to the depths. If the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Sodom, it would have remained to this day.&amp;quot; Matthew 11:23 ([[NIV]])&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; is now understood to mean the ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell/depths of Hell&lt;br /&gt;
|replace &amp;quot;depths&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;Hell&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible Versions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594424</id>
		<title>Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594424"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T19:17:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Reword first sentence to make it accurate.  otherwise, we have to get rid of Mozart, Chopin, and others because their greatest works were done when they were older.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Teenagers throughout history have have had many great achievements in the fields of art, culture, science and technology. This may be because they are able to think in new and innovative ways, or their thinking is not hidebound by discredited nostrums; it may be attributable to great teachers and great schooling - including homeschooling. It may simply be the emergence of God-given talent at an early age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Achievements, listed by age at which they were made==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin gives his first solo violin performance with the San Francisco Symphony in 1923&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] paints his &amp;quot;Picador&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] plays his first public piano performance, having already authored two polonaises (G minor and B flat major) at age 7.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] had secretly worked out the first twenty-three propositions of Euclid by himself.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] heard the heavenly voices that prompted her to lead [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] became an International Grandmaster&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - [[Mozart]] wrote the opera, &amp;quot;Mitridate Rè di Ponto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - Karl Benz &lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion, can speak a dozen languages and delivers a paper on the Coptic language to the Grenoble Academy. By 20, he can speak another 13 languages and at 22 he deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;lt;20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-child-prodigies/ Top 10 Child Prodigies]&lt;br /&gt;
(add more, sorted by age and then alphabetically)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594423</id>
		<title>Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594423"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T19:14:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Reverted edits by CPAdmin1 (Talk) to last version by JessicaT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Many, perhaps most of the greatest achievements in human history - in the fields of art, culture, science and technology - have been brought about by teenagers. This may be because they are able to think in new and innovative ways, or their thinking is not hidebound by discredited nostrums; it may be attributable to great teachers and great schooling - including homeschooling. It may simply be the emergence of God-given talent at an early age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Achievements, listed by age at which they were made==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin gives his first solo violin performance with the San Francisco Symphony in 1923&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] paints his &amp;quot;Picador&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] plays his first public piano performance, having already authored two polonaises (G minor and B flat major) at age 7.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] had secretly worked out the first twenty-three propositions of Euclid by himself.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] heard the heavenly voices that prompted her to lead [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] became an International Grandmaster&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - [[Mozart]] wrote the opera, &amp;quot;Mitridate Rè di Ponto&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - Karl Benz &lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion, can speak a dozen languages and delivers a paper on the Coptic language to the Grenoble Academy. By 20, he can speak another 13 languages and at 22 he deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;lt;20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-child-prodigies/ Top 10 Child Prodigies]&lt;br /&gt;
(add more, sorted by age and then alphabetically)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594421</id>
		<title>Great Achievements by Teenagers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Great_Achievements_by_Teenagers&amp;diff=594421"/>
		<updated>2008-12-26T19:13:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: sorry but all of mozart's greatest works were written when he was older.  The last few years of his life was the time when his greatest works were written.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Many, perhaps most of the greatest achievements in human history - in the fields of art, culture, science and technology - have been brought about by teenagers. This may be because they are able to think in new and innovative ways, or their thinking is not hidebound by discredited nostrums; it may be attributable to great teachers and great schooling - including homeschooling. It may simply be the emergence of God-given talent at an early age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Achievements, listed by age at which they were made==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''7''' - Yehudi Menuhin gives his first solo violin performance with the San Francisco Symphony in 1923&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Pablo Picasso]] paints his &amp;quot;Picador&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* '''8''' - [[Frederic Chopin]] plays his first public piano performance, having already authored two polonaises (G minor and B flat major) at age 7.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''12''' - [[Blaise Pascal]] had secretly worked out the first twenty-three propositions of Euclid by himself.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''13''' - [[Joan of Arc]] heard the heavenly voices that prompted her to lead [[France]] to victory in the [[Hundred Years War]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''14''' - chess-player [[Bobby Fischer]] became an International Grandmaster&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - [[Louis Braille]] invented the [[Braille]] system&lt;br /&gt;
* '''15''' - Karl Benz &lt;br /&gt;
* '''16''' - Jean-François Champollion, can speak a dozen languages and delivers a paper on the Coptic language to the Grenoble Academy. By 20, he can speak another 13 languages and at 22 he deciphers the [[Rosetta Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''18''' - [[Mary Shelley]] writes Frankenstein (The Modern Prometheus) - it is only published when she is 21, however.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;lt;20''' - Carl Friedrich Gauss makes his first mathematical discoveries, which will lead to the completion of &amp;quot;Disquisitiones Arithmeticae&amp;quot;, his magnum opus, at the age of 21.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top-10-child-prodigies/ Top 10 Child Prodigies]&lt;br /&gt;
(add more, sorted by age and then alphabetically)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=594078</id>
		<title>Liberal bigotry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=594078"/>
		<updated>2008-12-25T20:17:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Not giving an opinion on whether obama is a muslim here.  But the statement &amp;quot;an apparent muslim&amp;quot;  has nothing to do with the topic of bigotry&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Bigotry''' is the expression of [[hatred]] or [[aggression]] towards those who are different. Examples of bigotry include [[racism]] and [[religious intolerance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bigotry is a common among [[atheists]], [[elitism|elitists]], [[liberals]], [[Muslims]] and [[homosexuals]] towards critics of their ideologies. Some liberals [[deceit|deceitfully]] claim to uphold equality of all viewpoints and free speech, but are in fact routinely prejudiced against opposing viewpoints.  They are particularly bigoted against Christians (and indeed [[faith]] in general) and [[Family Values]].  It is typical to see liberals refer to their opponents as [[racism|racists]], [[fascists]], [[Nazis]], [[redneck|rednecks]], [[fanaticism|fanatics]], or any number of more profane slurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The infamous [[Hamilton Square Baptist Church Riot]], in which gays maliciously attacked a church.&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal and Pro-Abortion attacks on Pregnancy Centers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/458992.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Students threaten and verbally abuse a student wearing a McCain T-Shirt &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-13-nov13,0,2881384.column?page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gay rights]] supporters protested outside of Los Angeles' largest Mormon temple because members of the Mormon church gave millions of dollars to the campaigning for [[Proposition 8]], which banned homosexual marriage in [[California]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mormon-stars-face-backlash-after-gay-marriage-ban-1003967.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- is this bigotry? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Gay rights protesters at a pro-Proposition 8 rally tore a cross out of an elderly woman's hands and stomped on it. They then proceeded to verbally accost the woman for at least 10 minutes, some of which was on live TV&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80711&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* An ad for the campaign against Proposition 8 depicts Mormons as a type of religious [[gestapo]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80047&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--Bigoted? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Radical homosexual anarchists shouted profanities and blasphemies in a Michigan church, before unfurling a banner, throwing glitter and pulling the fire alarm&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/11/12/national-press-ignores-mi-media-whitewash-lansing-church-homosexual-anar&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Someone hacked the website of the Mormon church and replaced the front page with a video of gay porn &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081110hate.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Maher]]'s movie [[Religulous]] uses lies and distortions to mock most major religions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=76123&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[ACLU]] attempted to stop a Christian band from playing at a city festival&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80649&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- it's not bigotry, it's their interpretation of the Constitution; even though I don't agree, a city giving money to a Christian band can easily be interpreted as &amp;quot;endorsing a religion&amp;quot;--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York Times]] correspondent Dan Mitchell allegedly sent a harassing [[Facebook]] email to a conservative correspondent for [[World Net Daily]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2008/11/03/ny-times-reporters-iat-again-facebook-miller-says-nb-contributor-vadum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- this, too, is not bigotry; there's no known motivation for the act, and the assumed motivation has nothing to do with bigotry --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hate speech]] laws might be able to be used to ban the Bible&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78339&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Colorado law SB200 bans discriminatory references to homosexuals, which might include the Bible &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77383&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- I'd *really* like to see a primary source for this; where is he banning the speech? Government documents? Public schools? Private universities? Any books published in CO? Any books *distributed* in CO? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal [[Paul Krugman]] calls [[Republican Party]] a haven for racists &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/11/03/krugman-gop-haven-racists-reactionaries&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- I'm confused how this is bigoted --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal Charles Karel Bouley calls for the death of [[Joe the Plumber]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kerry-picket/2008/11/02/lib-radio-host-karel-calls-joe-wurzelbachers-death-air-obscenity-laced&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- Bouly is bigoted against plumbers? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Franken]] mocks Christians&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/10/22/media-skipping-over-al-frankens-acidulous-mockery-christians&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democrat]] [[John Murtha]] called his constituents rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]] accuses the public of clinging to guns and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Muslims]] in India rioted when an author critcized Islam &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.times.com/books/99/04/18/specials/rushdie-riot.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edmund_Ward_Poor&amp;diff=594066</id>
		<title>Edmund Ward Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edmund_Ward_Poor&amp;diff=594066"/>
		<updated>2008-12-25T19:44:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Whether this article should even exist is a question, but that photo definitely doesn't belong&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ed Poor''' was the co-founder and first treasurer of [[Grumman Aircraft Company]] in [[Long Island]]. He died in the late 1960s, but his [[User:Ed Poor|grandson]] edits encyclopedia articles for various wikis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Grumman Corporation first opened its doors for business in 1930 in a small unused garage in Baldwin, New York. Founded by Leroy R. Grumman, and his partners Leon &amp;quot;Jake&amp;quot; Swirbul, Bill Schwendler, Clint Towl and Ed Poor, this small enterprise began by making floats for Vought scout aircraft. [http://www.anft.net/f-14/grumman-gmp.htm] }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Grumman and his partners (Edmund Ward Poor, William Schwendler, Jake Swirbul, and Clint Towl) started their own company in an old Cox-Klemin Aircraft Co. factory in Baldwin on Long Island, NY. [http://www.scripophily.net/graienconewy.html] }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Poor, Edward}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_agenda&amp;diff=593661</id>
		<title>Atheist agenda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_agenda&amp;diff=593661"/>
		<updated>2008-12-24T21:15:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Josephstalin.jpg‎|right|300px|thumb|[[Joseph Stalin]] forced atheism on the [[Soviet Union]] using its education system.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''atheist agenda''' refers to an extensive [[ideology]] and programme, common to avowed [[atheists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It involves the following objectives:&lt;br /&gt;
# Removing [[Creation Science]] from curricula and outlawing its teaching in schools&lt;br /&gt;
# Outlawing ''personal'' [[religion]] in schools under the guise of &amp;quot;separation of church and state&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Indoctrinating atheistic and [[evolution|evolutionary]] ideology into students, and thus the public at large&lt;br /&gt;
# Undermining [[Christianity]] and other organized religion through widespread misinformation and [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Creation Science and Evolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
The agenda begins with education, as it is the most powerful way to impact the views of a populace.  Atheists force the teaching of evolution ''as fact'' into scientific curricula, while using lawsuits to silence critics and remove and prohibit [[intelligent design]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fleshandstone.net/healthandsciencenews/1431.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=29374&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/11/09/creationism/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By doing so, atheists can remove the necessity of God in the universe in the minds of students, providing a foothold for atheist ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outlawing Personal Religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists seek to not only make school sanctioning of religious activity illegal, but to make any profession or personal act of religion illegal in educational institutions.  This has had some limited success in the [[United States]], but is state policy in [[France]], where wearing religious clothing or symbols is an expulsion offense.  By limiting or removing religious expression in schools, atheists hope to reduce its impact in students' lives and, most importantly, limit opportunities to spread the word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Hitler_Youth.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Adolf Hitler]] similarly indoctrinated German children with atheism via the [[Hitler Youth]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Indoctrinating Atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists use biology and religious studies classes to:&lt;br /&gt;
# Instill the idea that man is just another animal&lt;br /&gt;
# Suggest that [[Christianity]] is &amp;quot;just another religion,&amp;quot; not inspired truth&lt;br /&gt;
# Belittle those who hold viewpoints opposed to evolution, atheism, or liberalism in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Establish that there are no 'absolute' morals, and belittle those who think there are&lt;br /&gt;
# Hide the facts connecting atheism to crime, poor mental health, and suicide&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists also promote atheist propaganda through books, television, and film, such as the thinly veiled ''[[His Dark Materials]]'' trilogy and accompanying film ''[[The Golden Compass]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Undermining Religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This is perhaps the broadest aspect of the atheist agenda.  It involves activity in virtually all spheres of public discourse, but especially [[broadcast]] and [[print]] media, as well as higher educational institutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=81459&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary route is through the liberal mainstream media, which routinely portrays religion and the faithful in a negative light.  Pro-atheist and anti-religious articles are routinely printed in newspapers and magazines, and even letters to the editor are selected in a biased fashion.  Portraying adherents of religion as intolerant, racist, or otherwise foolish is a key tactic in painting it in a negative manner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists and liberals are avidly attempting to discredit the impact of [[Providence]] in human [[history]] (see [[Essay:Liberal Denials about History| Liberal Denials about History]]), despite it being easily proven for centuries, since [[Francis Bacon|Bacon]] and [[John Foxe]], and its acceptance by the American [[founding fathers]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheistic tools]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb Atheism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_Agenda&amp;diff=593660</id>
		<title>Atheist Agenda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_Agenda&amp;diff=593660"/>
		<updated>2008-12-24T21:15:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Atheist Agenda moved to Atheist agenda over redirect: formatting rules&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Atheist agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_agenda&amp;diff=593659</id>
		<title>Atheist agenda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_agenda&amp;diff=593659"/>
		<updated>2008-12-24T21:15:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Atheist Agenda moved to Atheist agenda over redirect: formatting rules&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Josephstalin.jpg‎|right|300px|thumb|[[Joseph Stalin]] forced atheism on the [[Soviet Union]] using its education system.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{move|Atheist agenda}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''atheist agenda''' refers to an extensive [[ideology]] and programme, common to avowed [[atheists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It involves the following objectives:&lt;br /&gt;
# Removing [[Creation Science]] from curricula and outlawing its teaching in schools&lt;br /&gt;
# Outlawing ''personal'' [[religion]] in schools under the guise of &amp;quot;separation of church and state&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Indoctrinating atheistic and [[evolution|evolutionary]] ideology into students, and thus the public at large&lt;br /&gt;
# Undermining [[Christianity]] and other organized religion through widespread misinformation and [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Creation Science and Evolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
The agenda begins with education, as it is the most powerful way to impact the views of a populace.  Atheists force the teaching of evolution ''as fact'' into scientific curricula, while using lawsuits to silence critics and remove and prohibit [[intelligent design]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fleshandstone.net/healthandsciencenews/1431.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=29374&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/11/09/creationism/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By doing so, atheists can remove the necessity of God in the universe in the minds of students, providing a foothold for atheist ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Outlawing Personal Religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists seek to not only make school sanctioning of religious activity illegal, but to make any profession or personal act of religion illegal in educational institutions.  This has had some limited success in the [[United States]], but is state policy in [[France]], where wearing religious clothing or symbols is an expulsion offense.  By limiting or removing religious expression in schools, atheists hope to reduce its impact in students' lives and, most importantly, limit opportunities to spread the word.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Hitler_Youth.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Adolf Hitler]] similarly indoctrinated German children with atheism via the [[Hitler Youth]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Indoctrinating Atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists use biology and religious studies classes to:&lt;br /&gt;
# Instill the idea that man is just another animal&lt;br /&gt;
# Suggest that [[Christianity]] is &amp;quot;just another religion,&amp;quot; not inspired truth&lt;br /&gt;
# Belittle those who hold viewpoints opposed to evolution, atheism, or liberalism in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Establish that there are no 'absolute' morals, and belittle those who think there are&lt;br /&gt;
# Hide the facts connecting atheism to crime, poor mental health, and suicide&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists also promote atheist propaganda through books, television, and film, such as the thinly veiled ''[[His Dark Materials]]'' trilogy and accompanying film ''[[The Golden Compass]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Undermining Religion ==&lt;br /&gt;
This is perhaps the broadest aspect of the atheist agenda.  It involves activity in virtually all spheres of public discourse, but especially [[broadcast]] and [[print]] media, as well as higher educational institutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=81459&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary route is through the liberal mainstream media, which routinely portrays religion and the faithful in a negative light.  Pro-atheist and anti-religious articles are routinely printed in newspapers and magazines, and even letters to the editor are selected in a biased fashion.  Portraying adherents of religion as intolerant, racist, or otherwise foolish is a key tactic in painting it in a negative manner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists and liberals are avidly attempting to discredit the impact of [[Providence]] in human [[history]] (see [[Essay:Liberal Denials about History| Liberal Denials about History]]), despite it being easily proven for centuries, since [[Francis Bacon|Bacon]] and [[John Foxe]], and its acceptance by the American [[founding fathers]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Atheistic tools]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb Atheism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:atheism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593043</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593043"/>
		<updated>2008-12-23T22:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: Better?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' &lt;br /&gt;
(allegedly born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=82033]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) &lt;br /&gt;
served as a first-term [[Democratic party|Democratic]] [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004-2008) and then, along with his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]], won the presidential election&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after twenty-three months of campaigning, raising and spending an unprecedented $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors.  Post-election, Obama's aides surprised some by indicating that he would make an unprecedented speech within his first 100 days from a Muslim capital.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21roy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama will use his Muslim middle name when sworn into office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/Obama_to_take_oath_using_middle_name_/articleshow/3813120.cms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/10/politics/main4660590.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_4660590&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There is no set rules for whether or not a president will use their full name, or just their first and last name.  Previous presidents have done it both ways.  [[Ronald Reagan]] did not use his middle name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the [[Socialism|socialist]] idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.&amp;quot; [http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152008/news/politics/obama_fires_a_robin_hood_warning_shot_133685.htm OBAMA FIRES A 'ROBIN HOOD' WARNING SHOT], N.Y. Post &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay [[income taxes]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008.  The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During Obama's youth in Hawaii, he developed a strong, almost Father/Son relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/aim-report/is-barack-obama-a-marxist-mole/ &amp;quot;Is Barack Obama a Marxist Mole?&amp;quot;, Accuracy in Media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer,'&amp;quot; in Obama's hometown of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he takes office, President Obama will be the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill requisitioned a comparison of the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres may have ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book; also he wrote &amp;quot;None of this, of course, proves Ayers’ authorship conclusively, but the evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written the best parts of Dreams&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Ayers is also an admitted atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make [[partial-birth abortion]] legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008.  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of [[mind control]] in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President-Elect Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that Obama is a Muslim is largely based on his Islamic background. It also includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which most Christians would not retain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when the Italian journalist Magdi Allam recently converted to Christianity, he took a new name: &amp;quot;Cristiano&amp;quot;.[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=30814]  When Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently mentioned his religion as &amp;quot;[[my Muslim faith]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [[Arabic]] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail, Obama was reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has chosen the [[Secret Service]] code name &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot; conventionally describes someone who goes against normal conventions of behavior, but its first usage was to describe someone who has turned from their religion. It is a word derived from the [[Spanish]] ''renegado'', meaning &amp;quot;Christian turned Muslim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3452281/Renegade-and-Renaissance-Obama-to-replace-Trailblazer-and-Tempo-Bush-in-the-White-House.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama enjoyed a bigger increase in voter support in 2008 (compared to 2004) by Muslims than by any other voting group, including blacks;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/2873/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Muslim turnout in the U.S. elections reached 95 percent, the highest Muslim turnout in U.S. history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/islamsadvance/2008/11/is_obama_the_muslim_worlds_sup.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;President-elect [[Barack Obama]] has yet to attend church services since winning the [[White House]] earlier this month, a departure from the example of his two immediate predecessors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15902.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics, or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008, when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join. Obama was sworn into the US senate on a [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II claims to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 127 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 8 million total votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] are focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mcca)n/]`Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blamed the media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, stating “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and called Wright's rhetoric &amp;quot;&amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official. Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama Administration‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593042</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593042"/>
		<updated>2008-12-23T22:22:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: add ref that states that he will use middle name.  Other one does not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' &lt;br /&gt;
(allegedly born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=82033]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) &lt;br /&gt;
served as a first-term [[Democratic party|Democratic]] [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004-2008) and then, along with his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]], won the presidential election&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after twenty-three months of campaigning, raising and spending an unprecedented $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors.  Post-election, Obama's aides surprised some by indicating that he would make an unprecedented speech within his first 100 days from a Muslim capital.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21roy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama will use his Muslim middle name when sworn into office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/Obama_to_take_oath_using_middle_name_/articleshow/3813120.cms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/10/politics/main4660590.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_4660590&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the [[Socialism|socialist]] idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.&amp;quot; [http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152008/news/politics/obama_fires_a_robin_hood_warning_shot_133685.htm OBAMA FIRES A 'ROBIN HOOD' WARNING SHOT], N.Y. Post &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay [[income taxes]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008.  The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During Obama's youth in Hawaii, he developed a strong, almost Father/Son relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/aim-report/is-barack-obama-a-marxist-mole/ &amp;quot;Is Barack Obama a Marxist Mole?&amp;quot;, Accuracy in Media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer,'&amp;quot; in Obama's hometown of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he takes office, President Obama will be the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill requisitioned a comparison of the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres may have ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book; also he wrote &amp;quot;None of this, of course, proves Ayers’ authorship conclusively, but the evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written the best parts of Dreams&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Ayers is also an admitted atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make [[partial-birth abortion]] legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008.  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of [[mind control]] in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President-Elect Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that Obama is a Muslim is largely based on his Islamic background. It also includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which most Christians would not retain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when the Italian journalist Magdi Allam recently converted to Christianity, he took a new name: &amp;quot;Cristiano&amp;quot;.[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=30814]  When Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently mentioned his religion as &amp;quot;[[my Muslim faith]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [[Arabic]] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail, Obama was reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has chosen the [[Secret Service]] code name &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot; conventionally describes someone who goes against normal conventions of behavior, but its first usage was to describe someone who has turned from their religion. It is a word derived from the [[Spanish]] ''renegado'', meaning &amp;quot;Christian turned Muslim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3452281/Renegade-and-Renaissance-Obama-to-replace-Trailblazer-and-Tempo-Bush-in-the-White-House.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama enjoyed a bigger increase in voter support in 2008 (compared to 2004) by Muslims than by any other voting group, including blacks;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/2873/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Muslim turnout in the U.S. elections reached 95 percent, the highest Muslim turnout in U.S. history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/islamsadvance/2008/11/is_obama_the_muslim_worlds_sup.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;President-elect [[Barack Obama]] has yet to attend church services since winning the [[White House]] earlier this month, a departure from the example of his two immediate predecessors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15902.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics, or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008, when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join. Obama was sworn into the US senate on a [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II claims to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 127 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 8 million total votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] are focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mcca)n/]`Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blamed the media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, stating “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and called Wright's rhetoric &amp;quot;&amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official. Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama Administration‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593039</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593039"/>
		<updated>2008-12-23T21:27:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: better ref&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' &lt;br /&gt;
(allegedly born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=82033]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) &lt;br /&gt;
served as a first-term [[Democratic party|Democratic]] [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004-2008) and then, along with his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]], won the presidential election&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after twenty-three months of campaigning, raising and spending an unprecedented $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors.  Post-election, Obama's aides surprised some by indicating that he would make an unprecedented speech within his first 100 days from a Muslim capital.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21roy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama will use his Muslim middle name when sworn into office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/10/politics/main4660590.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_4660590&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The last three presidents have also used their middle names when sworn in. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/498489.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the [[Socialism|socialist]] idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.&amp;quot; [http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152008/news/politics/obama_fires_a_robin_hood_warning_shot_133685.htm OBAMA FIRES A 'ROBIN HOOD' WARNING SHOT], N.Y. Post &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay [[income taxes]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008.  The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During Obama's youth in Hawaii, he developed a strong, almost Father/Son relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/aim-report/is-barack-obama-a-marxist-mole/ &amp;quot;Is Barack Obama a Marxist Mole?&amp;quot;, Accuracy in Media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer,'&amp;quot; in Obama's hometown of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he takes office, President Obama will be the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill requisitioned a comparison of the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres may have ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book; also he wrote &amp;quot;None of this, of course, proves Ayers’ authorship conclusively, but the evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written the best parts of Dreams&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Ayers is also an admitted atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make [[partial-birth abortion]] legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008.  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of [[mind control]] in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President-Elect Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that Obama is a Muslim is largely based on his Islamic background. It also includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which most Christians would not retain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when the Italian journalist Magdi Allam recently converted to Christianity, he took a new name: &amp;quot;Cristiano&amp;quot;.[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=30814]  When Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently mentioned his religion as &amp;quot;[[my Muslim faith]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [[Arabic]] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail, Obama was reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has chosen the [[Secret Service]] code name &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot; conventionally describes someone who goes against normal conventions of behavior, but its first usage was to describe someone who has turned from their religion. It is a word derived from the [[Spanish]] ''renegado'', meaning &amp;quot;Christian turned Muslim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3452281/Renegade-and-Renaissance-Obama-to-replace-Trailblazer-and-Tempo-Bush-in-the-White-House.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama enjoyed a bigger increase in voter support in 2008 (compared to 2004) by Muslims than by any other voting group, including blacks;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/2873/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Muslim turnout in the U.S. elections reached 95 percent, the highest Muslim turnout in U.S. history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/islamsadvance/2008/11/is_obama_the_muslim_worlds_sup.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;President-elect [[Barack Obama]] has yet to attend church services since winning the [[White House]] earlier this month, a departure from the example of his two immediate predecessors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15902.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics, or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008, when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join. Obama was sworn into the US senate on a [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II claims to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 127 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 8 million total votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] are focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mcca)n/]`Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blamed the media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, stating “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and called Wright's rhetoric &amp;quot;&amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official. Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama Administration‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593038</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=593038"/>
		<updated>2008-12-23T21:26:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TimS: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' &lt;br /&gt;
(allegedly born in Honolulu,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=82033]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg Large, high-resolution picture of his birth certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kitv.com/politics/17860890/detail.html?rss=hon&amp;amp;psp=news KITV Honolulu report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; August 4, 1961) &lt;br /&gt;
served as a first-term [[Democratic party|Democratic]] [[Senator]] from [[Illinois]] (2004-2008) and then, along with his running mate [[Senator Joseph Biden]], won the presidential election&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_wins_presidency/2008/11/04/147788.html?utm_medium=RSS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after twenty-three months of campaigning, raising and spending an unprecedented $650 million, most of which came from anonymous donors.  Post-election, Obama's aides surprised some by indicating that he would make an unprecedented speech within his first 100 days from a Muslim capital.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21roy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama will use his Muslim middle name when sworn into office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ET_Cetera/Obama_to_take_oath_using_middle_name_/articleshow/3813120.cms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The last three presidents have also used their middle names when sworn in. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/498489.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has espoused the [[Socialism|socialist]] idea of &amp;quot;spreading the wealth,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody.&amp;quot; [http://www.nypost.com/seven/10152008/news/politics/obama_fires_a_robin_hood_warning_shot_133685.htm OBAMA FIRES A 'ROBIN HOOD' WARNING SHOT], N.Y. Post &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in other words raising the tax rates on business and the wealthy to a burdensome level in order to redistribute their income to low income individuals, many of whom don't currently pay [[income taxes]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;To which John McCain replied &amp;quot;He's running for Redistributor In Chief, I'm running for Commander In Chief.&amp;quot;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/mccain-hungry-upset-obama-eyes-landslide/ McCain Attacks Obama's Faith in Americans] Fox News, 10-31-2008.  The slogan &amp;quot;from each according to their ability to each according to their need&amp;quot; is an idea originally proposed by [[Karl Marx]] and could be the inspiration for the centrally planned economy Obama plans to introduce to the US when he is installed into office.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His health care plan forces employers to purchase health care or pay a fine and will force many into a poorly run single payer system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The socialization of health care will force taxpayers to pay for healthcare for those who refuse to or can not afford to purchase it themselves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To announce his trip to [[Berlin]] in July 2008, Obama used posters which show a marked similarity to posters of [[Lenin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://andrightlyso.com/2008/07/24/obama-lenin-gaffe/ Obama's direct copy of a Lenin poster for his Berlin visit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During Obama's youth in Hawaii, he developed a strong, almost Father/Son relationship with Frank Marshall Davis, a known Communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/aim-report/is-barack-obama-a-marxist-mole/ &amp;quot;Is Barack Obama a Marxist Mole?&amp;quot;, Accuracy in Media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Democrat Obama during the Pledge.jpg|325px|thumb|right|Obama, on the campaign trail, stands with folded hands while [[Bill Richardson]] and [[Hillary Clinton]] honor the flag by placing their hands over their heart during the [[National Anthem]]. [http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Obama_doesnt_put_hand_over_heart_1022.html See Video] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The October 2008 crimes against Academy Award winner Jennifer Hudson's family highlight Obama's record against law and order, as he voted against making it a crime in Illinois &amp;quot;for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obamas-crime-votes-are-fodder-for-rivals-2007-03-13.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The person of interest in the murders of Hudson's mother, brother, and 7-year-old nephew is the estranged husband of Hudson's sister and a convicted felon who had violated his parole conditions.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/chi-julian-king-autopsy-1029,0,2752431.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;'We've got 75,000 gang members - that's almost six gang members to one police officer,'&amp;quot; in Obama's hometown of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;More people have been murdered in Chicago this year than in New York - even though New York's population is three times greater. When Hudson's mother, brother and nephew were killed last month, they pushed the city's homicide total for the year to 436 and counting. New York has had 430 homicides.&amp;quot; [http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2008/11/01/2008-11-01_chicago_buried_in_murders.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he takes office, President Obama will be the first person having ties to a known former terrorist to gain control over America's nuclear weapons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/26/obama-associate-bill-ayers-unrepentant-for-acts-of-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author and blogger Jack Cashill requisitioned a comparison of the writing style of Bill Ayers' 2001 memoir, ''Fugitive Days'', with Barack Obama's earlier 1995 book, ''Dreams From My Father'', and came to the conclusion that Ayres may have ghostwritten Dreams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.cashill.com, ''Who Wrote “Dreams From My Father&amp;quot;?'', by Jack Cashill, October 9, 2008, retrieved on 10/16/2008 [http://www.cashill.com/natl_general/who_wrote_dreams_from.htm] Cashill states that a computer comparison of Obama's so-called autobiography with that of the terrorist Bill Ayers, supports the theory that Ayers actually wrote parts of Obama's book; also he wrote &amp;quot;None of this, of course, proves Ayers’ authorship conclusively, but the evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written the best parts of Dreams&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;In assessing the signature of sample passages from Dreams,&amp;quot; the experienced analyst found &amp;quot;a very strong match to all of the Ayers samples&amp;quot; that he processed.  He did not address the possibility that Ayers had plagiarized from Obama's earlier book.  A philosophy professor from England disagreed.[http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77815]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers admitted that he was &amp;quot;guilty as hell&amp;quot; in planting bombs in the 1970s, and that he has no regrets and felt he &amp;quot;should have done more.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/7127]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Ayers is also an admitted atheist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholic Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, where Obama received his Democratic Party nomination, recently criticized Obama as the &amp;quot;most committed&amp;quot; [[abortion]]-supporting candidate &amp;quot;since the ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' abortion decision in 1973.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14088&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama said &amp;quot;the first thing I'd do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiannewswire.com/news/560716251.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That bill &amp;quot;would invalidate virtually all state and federal limitations on abortion, and would make [[partial-birth abortion]] legal again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3961.html, Pro-Life Voters Must Work Overtime to Stop Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 4, 2008.  Indeed, Obama was upset with the decision of the [[United States Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] not to strike down the law passed by the [[United States Congress]] to prohibit partial-birth abortion, believing that partial-birth abortion is guaranteed right of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]] and that there should be no ability to legislate against it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of [[mind control]] in his speeches and campaign symbols.  For example, one speech declared, &amp;quot;a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mind control&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.aapsonline.org/newsoftheday/0089 .  The doctors observe that &amp;quot;Obama's logo is noteworthy. It is always there, a small one in the middle of the podium, providing a point of visual fixation ... [that] resembles a crystal ball, a favorite of hypnotists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama will likely be the first Muslim President==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:OBAMA MUSULMAN.jpg|thumb|President-Elect Obama wearing traditional African garb, a gift from his hosts while visiting Kenya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-wore-muslim-gear-during-kenya-trip]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that Obama is a Muslim is largely based on his Islamic background. It also includes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's background, education, and outlook are [[Muslim]], and fewer than 1% of Muslims convert to Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religionnewsblog.com/17736/barack-obama-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina31103.htm.  During the third and fourth grades, Obama learned about Islam for two hours each week in religion class, according to the LATimes. [http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.obama16mar16,0,1634059,print.story?coll=bal_news_nation_promo Campaign downplays his connection during boyhood in Indonesia, Baltimore Sun, March 16, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's middle name (Hussein) references '''Husayn''', who was the grandson of [[Muhammad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Oxford Dictionary of First Names, 2nd edition (2007).[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277459/al-Husayn-ibn-Ali].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which most Christians would not retain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Only after Obama became politically ambitious did he declare himself to be a [[Christian]], yet he never replaced his [[Muslim]] name &amp;quot;Hussein&amp;quot; with a Christian one as most do when they undergo a religious conversion.  For example, when the Italian journalist Magdi Allam recently converted to Christianity, he took a new name: &amp;quot;Cristiano&amp;quot;.[http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=30814]  When Saul became a Christian, he changed his name to &amp;quot;Paul&amp;quot;; when the famous boxer Cassius Clay converted to [[Islam]], he took the Muslim name of [[Muhammad Ali]].  &amp;quot;It is common for those converting to a new religion to change their name on conversion&amp;quot;[http://www.ukdp.co.uk/pages/religiousconversion.php] or adopt a Christian name at [[baptism]].[http://www.answers.com/topic/christian-name]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama recently mentioned his religion as &amp;quot;[[my Muslim faith]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama declared, &amp;quot;John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQqIpdBOg6I]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama said the Muslim call to prayer is &amp;quot;one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,&amp;quot; and recited &amp;quot;with a first-class [[Arabic]] accent&amp;quot; the opening lines: Allah is Supreme! ... I witness that there is no god but Allah ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=78309&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama stated that the autobiography of Malcolm X, a Nation of Islam leader who became a Muslim, inspired him in his youth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama writes in his own autobiography, &amp;quot;Only Malcolm X's autobiography seemed to offer something different. His repeated acts of self-creation spoke to me. The blunt poetry of his words, his unadorned insistence on respect, promised a new and uncompromising order, martial in its discipline, forged through sheer force of will. ... [E]ven as I imagine myself following Malcolm's call, one line in the book stayed with me. He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged.&amp;quot;[http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/does_obama_know_america.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama raised nearly $1 million and campaigned for a [[Kenyan]] presidential candidate who had a written agreement with [[Muslim]] leaders promising to convert Kenya to an Islamic state that bans Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78324] Text of the agreement, as three images: [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78323]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama's claims of conversion to Christianity arose after he became politically ambitious, lacking a date of conversion or baptism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In his book, Obama oddly claims to have been baptized without giving his age or date, and later gave a date that postdates his political ambition (1992).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On the campaign trail, Obama was reading &amp;quot;The Post-American World&amp;quot; by Fareed Zakaria,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fa8cf1bf-2cc8-4d6e-b72d-a07d406e19ff&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which is written from a Muslim point-of-view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/2005-08-09/news/the-interpreter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Contrary to [[Christianity]], the Islamic doctrine of [[taqiyya]] encourages adherents to deny they are Muslim if it advances the cause of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama uses the Muslim Pakistani pronunciation for &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; rather than the common American one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama repeatedly pronounced &amp;quot;Pakistan&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Pokiston&amp;quot; in the first presidential debate.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Obama was thoroughly exposed to Christianity as an adult in Chicago prior to attending law school, yet no one at law school saw him display any interest in converting. Obama unabashedly explained how he became &amp;quot;churched&amp;quot; in a 2007 speech: &amp;quot;It's around that time [while working as an organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago] that some pastors I was working with came around and asked if I was a member of a church. 'If you're organizing churches,' they said, 'it might be helpful if you went to a church once in a while.' And I thought, 'I guess that makes sense.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15363 Obama, ACORN, and the churches] SperoNews, October 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama is mentioned as helping to organize the 1995 million man march led by black [[Muslim]] leader [[Louis Farrakhan]] from the [[Nation of Islam]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=9291850 Louis Farrakhan Biography] Biography.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama has chosen the [[Secret Service]] code name &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot;.  &amp;quot;Renegade&amp;quot; conventionally describes someone who goes against normal conventions of behavior, but its first usage was to describe someone who has turned from their religion. It is a word derived from the [[Spanish]] ''renegado'', meaning &amp;quot;Christian turned Muslim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/3452281/Renegade-and-Renaissance-Obama-to-replace-Trailblazer-and-Tempo-Bush-in-the-White-House.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama enjoyed a bigger increase in voter support in 2008 (compared to 2004) by Muslims than by any other voting group, including blacks;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.altmuslim.com/a/a/a/2873/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Muslim turnout in the U.S. elections reached 95 percent, the highest Muslim turnout in U.S. history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/islamsadvance/2008/11/is_obama_the_muslim_worlds_sup.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;President-elect [[Barack Obama]] has yet to attend church services since winning the [[White House]] earlier this month, a departure from the example of his two immediate predecessors.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15902.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama tries to downplay his [[Islamic]] background by claiming that his [[Kenya|Kenyan]] [[Muslim]] father was a &amp;quot;confirmed [[atheist]]&amp;quot; before Obama was born, but in fact less than 1% of Kenyans are atheists, agnostics, or non-religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/Na/Na_14.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  There is apparently no evidence of any Christian activities or local church participation by Obama while he was in Massachusetts from 1988 to 1991, nor of Barack Obama's joining of a Mosque (The Islamic house of worship) at any time in his life.  Finally, Obama abruptly left his radical Christian church in Chicago in 2008, when it became politically controversial, without first finding another church to join. Obama was sworn into the US senate on a [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Obama and Elitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has consistently shown himself to be an elitist who looks down on &amp;quot;ordinary&amp;quot; Americans.  Asked to explain why working-class [[Democrats]] do not support him while campaigning for the [[Pennsylvania]] primary, Obama replied &amp;quot;it's not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to outrage when his remarks were unexpectedly publicized, Obama did not recount his statement but instead replied, I &amp;quot;didn't say it as well as I should have.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7344532.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although many rural counties went for McCain, Obama carried the state with 54.6% of the vote, compared to 44.3% for John McCain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.electionreturns.state.pa.us/ElectionsInformation.aspx?FunctionID=13&amp;amp;ElectionID=28&amp;amp;OfficeID=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt counter the view by many that Obama is an elitist, he began running campaign ads claiming that he &amp;quot;worked his way through college and Harvard Law.&amp;quot; This claim is at best an exaggeration, as Obama only held summer jobs while in college and law school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obamas_work_claim.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and he would have likely benefited from special scholarships not available to most students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama almost always reads from prepared text on a [[teleprompter]] and rarely allows tough questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;After one debate against [[Hillary Clinton]] in Philadelphia, the Obama campaign announced that the questions were too difficult and that Obama would not agree to future debates with her.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Daily Standard, ''Obama Unplugged Lost without a Teleprompter'', by Dean Barnett, 02/12/2008[http://www.weeklystandard.com/content/public/articles/000/000/014/728ofzey.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Indeed, when unable to read from prepared text he often fails at articulating his positions and is caught tripping over his own feet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was first displayed in the Saddleback Forum, and has occurred subsequently also.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His most recent debate performances illustrate that he may have been extensively coached over the course of 2008, although he still repeatedly fumbles at moments where he moves off his memorized remarks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insights==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama displayed ignorance about American history when he said, &amp;quot;Throughout our history, America's confronted constantly evolving danger, from the oppression of an empire, to the lawlessness of the frontier, '''from the bomb that fell on Pearl Harbor''', to the threat of nuclear annihilation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/07/obama_ignorance_watch_1.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1995 memoir, ''Dreams from My Father'', Obama admitted using illegal drugs, including cocaine and marijuana, which he referred to as &amp;quot;blow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pot&amp;quot; respectively, in his high school years and into his college years, before claiming to choose a different path in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama wore an American flag lapel pin after [[9/11]], but later stopped wearing it without adequate explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/10/when_did_obama_stop_wearing_a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Presumably it would have hurt him with anti-military campaign donors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2007, at critical moments in his campaign for the nomination, Obama had difficulties securing the support of anti-war activists. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/04/politics/main2645861.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Recently, he has begun wearing one again for reasons that are likely political pandering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his memoirs, Obama claimed a ''[[Life]]'' magazine article about a man who had become ill after trying to lighten his skin color by chemical means had a major impact on him.  In fact, ''Life'' never published any such article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/26/AR2007032601583.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then there's the copy of Life magazine that Obama presents as his racial awakening at age 9. In it, he wrote, was an article and two accompanying photographs of an African-American man physically and mentally scarred by his efforts to lighten his skin. In fact, the Life article and the photographs don't exist, say the magazine's own historians.&amp;quot; [http://newsbusters.org/node/11641]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama said that &amp;quot;[t]here was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, [[Alabama]], because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born.&amp;quot;  In fact, Obama was born in 1961 and the Selma march took place in 1965.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/21/barack-obama-gaffe-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama states that he has consistently opposed the [[Iraq War]] since 2002, a claim and position that former President [[Bill Clinton]] criticized as &amp;quot;the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1131516320080111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his famous 2002 speech&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barackobama.com/2002/10/02/remarks_of_illinois_state_sen.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at an anti-war rally, Obama said that he was against &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot; and expressed some reservations about the Iraq War because he disagrees with the ideological agendas of the Bush administration, but he did not explicitly oppose the war. In his 2004 Democrat Convention speech, Obama said that he did not know how he would have voted on the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign &amp;quot;is proud to be actively participating in over 60 local and state wide [[homosexual]] Pride events over the summer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gG5VLs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claimed to have visited 57 states while campaigning for President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  [http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2008/col20080528.asp Barack Potatoe Obama?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/05/12/obamas-freudian-slip-there-are-57-islamic-states/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charitable Giving==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years 2000 through 2004, before becoming a United States Senator and being in the public spotlight, Obama gave 1% of his earnings to charity even though he made $250,000 per year.  Since becoming a national figure, that amount has jumped to 6%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://patterico.com/2008/10/31/obama-and-bidens-charitable-giving-they-dont-want-to-spread-their-own-wealth-around/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's small donations are consistent with atheism and were perhaps influenced by his nonbelieving mother.  According to a study by the Barna Group, atheists give less per capita in donations than religious Americans &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdateNarrow&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=272 The Barna Update, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Aunt is in the United States Illegally==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of October 2008 it came to light that Obama's aunt is in the United States illegally and has been since 2004 when her request for asylum was turned down.  She has been living in public tax payer funded housing in Boston. This may have some bearing on Obama's immigration policy given that a member of his own family is in violation of current US immigration law. There are also questions about how much Obama knew about this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27481680 Obama's Aunt Living in US Illegally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Obama campaign issued a statement to the effect that they had no knowledge of this situation and returned the donation she made to his campaign; in the United states it is illegal to accept campaign contributions from people who are not currently citizens or legal residents of the united states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/01/obama.aunt/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statements==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has been noted by several independent sources as misquoting historical events and statements by famous persons. A notable example came after Obama's win in the [[North Carolina]] democratic primary. Obama was quoted as saying, &amp;quot;I trust the American people to understand that it is not weakness, but wisdom to talk not just to our friends, but to our enemies as Roosevelt did, and Kennedy did, and Truman did.&amp;quot; (Franklin Delano) Roosevelt spoke with none of the [[Axis]] or [[Japanese]] leaders and the the only communication that was sent to them was unconditional surrender. (President) [[Harry Truman]] took over for FDR and continued his unconditional surrender philosophy as well as ending [[World War II]] with an atomic bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/obama_needs_to_study_history_b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life and education==&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Hussein Obama II claims to have been born in [[Honolulu]], [[Hawaii]] to Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham in 1961, but there is evidence that he may have actually been born in Kenya. In 1967, he moved with his mother and new stepfather to Jakarta, [[Indonesia]]. He attended a [[Catholic]] elementary school for two years, followed by an Indonesian public school for two years.  Media scrutiny in the light of Obama's campaign for President revealed that the Indonesia public school was not a madrassa, teaching Islam. His days off of school in observance of Islamic holidays were spent praying in a Mosque with his stepfather. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/pipes_obama_muslim/2008/10/09/138898.html Obama 'Lying' About Muslim Past, Expert Says] NewsMax, October 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Indonesia, he returned to the United States with his mother where he attended the Punahou School, the leading private preparatory school in [[Hawaii]], until he graduated in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, [[California]], before transferring to [[Columbia University]] in New York, [[New York]] and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.  Obama refuses to describe his academic performance at Columbia despite commenting about New York during this period and despite disclosures of the academic record for all other major-party presidential candidates since at least 2000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/new-york/obamas-years-at-columbia-are-a-mystery/85015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After working as a community organizer in New York City and Chicago, Illinois, Obama enrolled at [[Harvard]] Law School.  He became a member of the ''Harvard Law Review'', which uses racial quotas, in 1989. He was then elected by popular vote as its first African American president in 1990, a story that was immediately promoted in the [[New York Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A966958260&amp;amp;scp=3&amp;amp;sq=Obama%201990&amp;amp;st=cse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He graduated ''magna cum laude'' with his J.D. in 1991, but did not serve in a clerkship. Federal clerkships are the typical post-graduate position for top law students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described himself as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He held the position of Lecturer, an adjunct position, from 1992 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He held the position of Senior Lecturer from 1996 until his election to the senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, has pointed that Obama was only a senior lecturer and not a full professor. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/03/30/politics/p132303D74.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The University states that Senior Lecturers are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure track.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal career==&lt;br /&gt;
Following law school, Obama continued his work as a community organizer in Chicago as the director of Illinois Project Vote. In 1993 he was hired as an associate at the Chicago law firm Miner, Barnhill &amp;amp; Galland, P.C., and began lecturing in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. He remains on the faculty on leave of absence through today.  During this time he wrote his first book, ''Dreams from My Father'', detailing his background, his youth, and his education.  ''Dreams'' was published in 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate career==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was elected to the Illinois State Senate for the first time in 1996 and served there for the next eight years.  Following a failed campaign for the House of Representatives, Obama ran for the open Senate seat from Illinois in 2004.  Obama delivered the keynote address at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.  He won a seat in the [[U.S. Senate]] after [[liberals]] obtained the release of confidential and personally embarrassing divorce records of his opponent, Jack Ryan, forcing him to resign from the race and be replaced by the out-of-state candidate [[Alan Keyes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A March 16th, 2005 AP article puts Senator Obama on record to ban oil drilling in the Alaska frontier known as ANWR &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0316-13.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2007 voting record in the U.S. [[Senate]] makes him as its most [[liberal]] member. Among fellow Senate Democrats, he was further left than liberals like [[Ted Kennedy]], [[John Kerry]], [[Dianne Feinstein]], [[Charles Schumer]], [[Russ Feingold]], [[Carl Levin]], [[Joseph Biden]] and [[Harry Reid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has grown steadily more liberal since arriving at the Senate: the same analysis assessed him as 10th most liberal in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and 16th most liberal in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nationaljournal.com/members/news/2007/voteratings/sen/lib_cons.htm?o1=lib_composite&amp;amp;o2=desc]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2006, Obama's second book, ''The Audacity of Hope'', was published.  Its title was supplied by the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., a minister who has stated that &amp;quot;racism is how this country was founded and how this country was run ....  We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/03/14/obama_condemns_pastors_remarks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The book contains more of Senator Obama's personal story including the roles of both family and politics.  ''Audacity'' spent 30 weeks on the ''New York Times'' Nonfiction Best Sellers list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/books/bestseller/0527besthardnonfiction.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin New York Times Best Sellers Non Fiction]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama is the chairman of an important subcommittee that has oversight of our efforts in Afghanistan. He has not held a single hearing on Afghanistan even though American forces are risking their lives in a theatre of war. Since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a &amp;quot;new strategy&amp;quot; in [[Afghanistan]], a country he only visited in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-absent-at-afghanistan-hearings-2008-03-01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama clinched his party's nomination for President after 16 straight months of campaigning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008, Obama voted with the Democratic party to kill the sunset provision of the [[Bush]] tax cuts. By letting these tax cuts expire, single mothers with two kids will pay an additional $1,800 annually. Married couples with incomes of $50,000 will pay an additional $2,180 annually. Elderly couples will pay an additional $2,000 annually and a family of four will pay 191% more per year in taxes. Barack Obama often claims to be for taxing the rich their fair share. By voting to eliminate the Bush tax cuts, Obama is taxing most middle class and blue collar families.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and the Democratic-led Congress has voted for the upgraded GI Bill despite the opposition from the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Pentagon, the generals in combat zones and the GOP Presidential nominee. It was crafted to increase veteran benefits. Yet, the strain on our military is great.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php] http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_to_obama_dont_demagogue.php , McCain To Obama: Don't Demagogue The GI Bill, May 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill would cost $2.8 to $4 billion per month. Some argue that this bill depletes the US's volunteer military personnel by enticing them to leave service rather than be re-deployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As senator, Obama has requested nearly $936 million in earmarks which averages to $500,000. per day over four years, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122108935141721343.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama Can't Win Against Palin] Wall Street Journal, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for which the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste has given him a rating of 10% in 2007 (18% lifetime).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/DocServer/2007_Senate_Ratings_Final.pdf?docID=3242 2007 Senate Scorecard]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A score of 100% represents voting against all pork, and 0% represents voting ''for'' all pork. Democrats averaged 5% in 2007, whereas Republicans averaged 60%. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://councilfor.cagw.org/site/News2?abbr=CCAGW_&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=11590 CCAGW Releases ''2007 Congressional Ratings'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a Fox News report on October 5th, Obama has taken more than $126,000. in campaign contribution from [[Fannie Mae]] in a little over three years. This ranks him second, only Chris Dodd has received more campaign contribution dollars from Fannie Mae.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bills co-sponsored ===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's principal legislation was S. 2433, which was an attempt to force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars under the guise of reducing global poverty, which was subsequently blocked by [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200802/POL20080225a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did support and co-sponsor a bill championed by [[Tom Coburn]] and known as the Coburn-Obama Government Transparency Act of 2006, which was signed into law by President [[George W. Bush]] on Sept. 9, 2006. This law created a website that will list the federal government's grants and contracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between Jan 13, 2007 and March 13, 2008, Sen. Obama has sponsored 120 mostly [[liberal]] resolutions and bills in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  His supporters cite the following less liberal examples, but this list is not representative:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.117 : A bill to amend titles 10 and 38, United States Code, to improve benefits and services for members of the Armed Forces, veterans of the Global War on Terrorism, and other veterans, to require reports on the effects of the Global War on Terrorism, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.133 : A bill to promote the national security and stability of the economy of the United States by reducing the dependence of the United States on oil through the use of alternative fuels and new technology, and for other purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.453 : A bill to prohibit deceptive practices in Federal elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*S.713 : A bill to ensure dignity in care for members of the Armed Forces recovering from injuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accomplishments while serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2008, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee approved Obama's proposal on a new strategy to reduce poverty throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama worked with Sen. Lugar writing legislation aimed at improving conventional and nuclear non-proliferation efforts.  This legislation was signed by [[George W. Bush|President Bush]] in January 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the Senate passed his resolution condemning violence by the [[Zimbabwe]] government. It also passed legislation co-sponsored by Obama that financed a Special Court for Sierra Leone to prosecute former [[Liberia | Liberian]] President [[Charles Taylor]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/02/26/obamas_senate_foreign_relations_work/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama continued to collect money for a 2010 Senate re-election campaign as late as June 2008, and has filed reports recently indicating that money is still pouring into this fund. This is especially notable because it is an efficient way of sidetracking donations from his Presidential race. The website&amp;lt;obamasenate2010.gov&amp;gt; is now defunct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|right|Senator Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama began his candidacy for President of the United States on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, Illinois.  His announcement speech largely avoided specific campaign issues and focused on his general political message of hope for the future.  It also attempted to strongly invoke the memory of Abraham Lincoln and his &amp;quot;House Divided&amp;quot; speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/02/10/obama.president/index.html &amp;quot;Obama declares he's running for President&amp;quot;] 11 February 2007, www.CNN.com &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's campaign has been financed largely by [[leftist]] donors opposed to the war and to the [[American]] military in general.  Obama has encouraged this by refusing to wear the customary flag on his lapel during appearances (asserting that he would prefer his patriotism to be represented through his actions rather than an arbitrary symbol) and by other less-than-patriotic gestures and symbols, such as declining to put his hand over his heart during a patriotic recitation. In an appearance on May 16 where he addressed President Bush's statements that some politicians would prefer appeasing terrorists through negotiations, Senator Obama once again wore the flag pin as he did following 9-11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By early April 2007, his campaign generated over $25 million from over 100,000 contributors.  $23.5 million of that money will be available for the Democratic Primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/05/us/politics/05obama.html Obama Shows His Strength in a Fund-Raising Feat on Par With Clinton], 4 April 2007, Jeff Zeleny and Patrick Healy,'' The New York Times''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After the first Democratic presidential debate in Columbia, South Carolina, Obama's image as an &amp;quot;articulate&amp;quot; spokesman came into question after his failure to state right away that he would retaliate in case of further terrorist strikes against the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/27/AR2007042702162.html?hpid=moreheadlines Clinton Campaign Tries to Keep Heat on Obama Over Debate Response], Dan Balz, ''Washington Post'' April 28, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chicago Sun-Times, &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/362269,CST-NWS-sweet29.article 'I was a little nervous' at debate'], Lynn Sweet, &lt;br /&gt;
April 29, 2007,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a fund raising event in Virginia in May 2007 Obama told donors,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This week there was a tragedy in Kansas. Ten thousand people died. An entire town destroyed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271357,00.html Transcript: 'Special Report with Brit Hume,' May 9, 2007], retrieved from ''FOX News'', 06/13/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In reality, the tornado which touched down in Kansas cost the lives of nine people in the town of Greensburg, and twelve overall in Kansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking regarding his knowledge of the Afghanistan conflict, Obama points the finger at U.S. troops and American policy &amp;quot;...just airraiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous problems there.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,293365,00.html Barack Obama Caught on Tape Accusing U.S. Troops of 'Killing Civilians'] Fox News, August 15, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrW4fOGIMVY See Video]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By August it appeared Obama was running to be left off the ticket completely rather than the much ballyhooed Hillary/Obama ticket the [[mainstream media]] was pushing.  After a series of ill-advised foreign policy statements, Obama was openly criticized as a lightweight even by liberals, in much the same vein as [[John Edwards]] and [[Dan Quayle]] had been depicted.  First, Obama said he would have face-to-face meetings with two of Florida's most feared enemies, [[Fidel Castro]] and [[Hugo Chavez]].  Florida is a key state to any presidential ambitions.  Then Obama claimed that he would be willing to invade the sovereign territory of a U.S. ally without prior consultation.  Finally, Obama broke the cardinal rule of declaring he would not use nuclear weapons, removing the element of bluff U.S. Presidents had vitally depended upon throughout the [[Cold War]] era.  The incidents all added up to a picture of a candidate ill-prepared and ill-advised, lacking in a basic understanding of the office of the Presidency, and failing to surround himself with appointees able to make up for his deficiencies. However, Obama won the Iowa Democratic caucuses, pushing [[Hillary Clinton]] into third place, and went on to become the unofficial Democratic nominee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At a campaign event in Elkhart, Indiana, a seven-year-old girl asked Barack Obama why he wants to be President. He replies, &lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/08/09/mostly-mia-obamas-downer-america-delivered-7-year-old Media Mostly MIA on Obama's 'America No Longer What It Once Was' Downer Delivered to 7 Year-Old] Newsbusters.org, August 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama became the presumptive Democratic nominee on June 3rd after receiving a majority of pledged delegates and superdelegates. His only remaining primary opponent, [[Hillary Clinton]], conceded the race on June 7th. On August 23, Joe Biden was announced as Obama's vice-presidential nominee. Obama became the official Democratic nominee on August 27 at the Democratic National Convention, when Hillary Clinton's motion to end the roll call vote of the states and select Obama by acclamation was passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 5th, Obama spoke at Briston, Virginia- Healthcare Town Hall forum regarding Political Action Committees and his campaign. &amp;quot;Well, we’re here today because we know that if we’re going to make real progress, this time must be different. Throughout my career, in Illinois and the United States senate, I’ve worked to reduce the power of the special interests by leading the fight for ethics reform. I’ve sent a strong signal in this campaign by refusing the contributions of registered federal lobbyists and PACs. And today, I’m announcing that going forward, the Democratic National Committee will uphold the same standard and won’t take another dime from Washington lobbyists or special interest PACs. They do not fund my campaign. They will not fund our party. And they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I’m President of the United States.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6th, an [[AP]] article &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DEMOCRATS_MONEY?SITE=KING&amp;amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT Transcript: 'Democratic Party returns lobbyist, PAC money ,' June 6, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presented the rules for lobbyist donations to the DNC and for the Presidential nominee. Obama does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. And the DNC ban is also not retroactive, which means the DNC will keep lobbyist and PAC contributions it received earlier in the election cycle. Retroactive period being the date Barack Obama started his campaign, February 10, 2007. The DNC possibly the day after the November 2006 Congressional elections until June 5th, 2008. In addition, Barack Obama's ban does not apply to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee nor to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Unlike [[John McCain]], Barack Obama has not disclosed the lobbyists working in his campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama visited U.S. troops in Iraq in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops in Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Afghanistan and Kuwait in 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=3794382 Obama visits troops and officials in Afghanistan and Kuwait]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's tax plan calls for increasing taxes on the wealthiest 1% of Americans, while cutting taxes for the middle class.  According to the non-partisan [[Tax Policy Center]], most Americans would pay less taxes than under Senator McCain's plan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411749 An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans: Updated September 12, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to another non-partisan group, Americans for Tax Reform, tax-payers would clearly be burdened by an Obama Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.atr.org/content/html/2008/june/0616-obama_mccaintaxes.html McCain vs. Obama on Taxes] Americans For Tax Reform, June 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Campaign financing=== &lt;br /&gt;
Obama is the first presidential candidate to reject public financing. He broke his promise to accept it in the hope that his powerful fund-raising machine would generate far more money than the $84.1 million McCain is getting in public funding. Indeed, on August 14th, the Obama campaign announced it had received donations from 2 million individuals, setting new records. Obama raised $272 million for the primaries and expects to raise $300 million for the general election. However the Republican National Committee has been raising much more than the Democratic National Committee and each candidate had about $100 million in cash on September 1. Each expects to spend about $300 million by November. However, Obama is obliged to devote much of his time to fund raising among supporters rather than campaigning among undecided voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see [http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/09/was-obama-right-to-opt-out-of-public-financing.aspx Andrew Romano, &amp;quot;Was Obama Right to Opt Out of Public Financing?,&amp;quot; ''Newsweek'' (Sept. 9, 2008) online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among his backers is homosexual pornography baron [[Terrence Bean]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Secrecy=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party feels it necessary to keep all questions about Obama at a safe distance. It is an unprecedented move to keep secrets about a presidential candidate. The following questions remain sealed from the public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-sent-obama-why-has-he-refused-to.html Who sent Obama? Why has he refused to release these basic documents?] ObamaWTF.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Certified Copy of original Birth certificate(see certificate controversy below)&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Columbia Thesis paper&lt;br /&gt;
# Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Harvard]] College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Illinois State Senate records&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Illinois]] State Senate schedule&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Law]] practice client list and billing records/summary&lt;br /&gt;
# Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers&lt;br /&gt;
# Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)&lt;br /&gt;
# Occidental College records&lt;br /&gt;
# Parent's [[Marriage]] Certificate&lt;br /&gt;
# Record of baptism&lt;br /&gt;
# Selective Service Registration&lt;br /&gt;
# Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007&lt;br /&gt;
# Scholarly articles&lt;br /&gt;
# Access to his Grandmother (Obama's Grandmother has since passed away from cancer [http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3m4YaeYwDHXS6hHdZJi8pm6cZdAD947RJKO0])&lt;br /&gt;
# List of all campaign workers that are lobbyists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama keeps donations secret by exploiting a loophole that allows campaigns to refuse to divulge donations under $200.00. This is useful to the candidate because many of his contributions are from dubious foreign or illegal sources. It is described as the &amp;quot;largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tone===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many observers have criticized Obama's campaign for its incivility. For instance, John McCain's wife Cindy noted that Obama is running &amp;quot;the dirtiest campaign in American history.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's smears usually fall into two categories: race-baiting and distortions. On October 10, 2008, Obama surrogate Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) typified the campaign by comparing Sen. McCain to racial segregationists and Klansmen. &amp;quot;Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are sowing the seeds of hatred and division,&amp;quot; Lewis exclaimed before comparing Sen. McCain to segregationist Democrat George Wallace, further noting that he, &amp;quot;...never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged [the attacks in which] four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/11/mccain.lewis/index.html?eref=rss_politics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is particularly harsh to Sen. McCain because he fondly admires Lewis. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rickwarrennews.com/transcript/civil_forum_transcript-04.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the distortions and personal attacks, Obama mocks Sen. McCain's for his age and Gov. Palin for being a woman and outsider. For instance, Obama responded with a subtle reference to Alzheimer's disease when Sen. McCain criticized his foreign policy in May 2008, alleging that Sen. McCain &amp;quot;lost his bearings&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0508/Obama_McCain_offensive_losing_his_bearings.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Senior Adviser Mark Salter noted, &amp;quot;He used the words 'losing his bearings' intentionally, a not particularly clever way of raising John McCain's age as an issue. This is typical of the Obama style of campaigning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/05/salter_obama_attacked_mccains.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In reference to Gov. Palin, Obama was caught for his quiet hiring of Winner &amp;amp; Associates to disseminate a sexist smear video against her. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/194057.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some argue this is a FEC violation because it lacked obligatory label denoting it was sponsored by the Obama Campaign. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eclipseweb.blogspot.com/2008/09/vicious-anti-sarah-palin-smear-campaign.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of the biggest distortions by Obama is that 95% of all taxpayers will get a tax cut. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122385651698727257.html?mod=googlenews_wsj Obama's 95% Illusion] Wall Steet Journal, October 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Without the distortion, Obama is proposing income re-distribution because those families that pay no taxes, one-third, will get money from the wealthy top 5%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another feature of the Obama campaign is the unruly audience. CNN reported in October of 2008 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.findinternettv.com/Video,item,3565842635.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that people are calling John McCain a terrorist at these events. According to Sen. McCain, &amp;quot;I've heard the [label terrorist], unfortunately, at Senator Obama's rallies being said about me. There's always a fringe element.&amp;quot; Other eyewitness reports are harsher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama won the 2008 Presidential election, with over 52% of the popular vote.  He carried every state that [[John Kerry]] won in 2004, in addition to Iowa, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida, and Indiana. Of the 127 million votes cast, Obama beat John McCain by 8 million total votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [http://images.newsmax.com/misc/2008_Election_Map.jpg See county breakdown map] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.cnn.com/election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positions and Qualifications ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama is [[pro-abortion]].  The leading abortion providers and PAC supporters have wholeheartedly endorsed Barack Obama. The National Abortion Rights Action League [[NARAL]] has given Barack a 100% rating for his efforts in Congress 2005, 2006 and 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/elections/statements/obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. EMILY's List, a political action committee that funds female candidates who support abortion rights backs Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/06/emilys_list_bac.html],EMILY's List backs Obama, June 6,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood has begun the process necessary to endorse pro-abortion presidential candidate Barack Obama. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html], http://www.lifenews.com/nat3971.html, Planned Parenthood Begins Process to Endorse Pro-Abortion Barack Obama, June 10,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The board of directors of the pro-abortion group's political operation met on Friday June 6, 2008 and unanimously voted to recommend an endorsement for Obama. Obama has steadfastly advocated support for partial birth abortion as an Illinois legislator. Barack's wife, Michelle Obama, wrote a fundraising letter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php], http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2006/10/post_5.php, February 17,2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in support of partial birth abortion and against the proposed ban. Barack voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act to give a child who survived an abortion procedure life support healthcare. Obama wanted the life terminated even if he or she survived outside the  mother's womb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm], http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm, Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the context of sex, he quipped about his daughters, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/03/30/sunday-meditation-obama-and-the-punishment-of-unborn-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{QuoteBox|&amp;quot;If they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.&amp;quot;}} Obama makes it clear if his daughters had an unplanned pregnancy, he would support terminating the life of his grandchild and it is undeniable that Michelle Obama agrees with that decision.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Features ayers1.jpg|175px|thumb|right|[[Weather Underground]] co-founder Bill Ayers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://foia.fbi.gov/weather/weath1a.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stomps on the American flag in this 2001 pose for Chicago Magazine.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama, having been asked about his associations with [[William Ayers]], an unrepentant [[terrorist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/August-2001/No-Regrets/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he explained that the views of his associates are not necessarily his own.  Ayers and his wife, [[Bernardine Dohrn]], hosted a fundraiser for Obama in their home in 1995 at the start of Obama's political career. Obama compares his friendship with Ayers whose actions led to the loss of a life to his friendship with pro-life doctor and representative Tom Coburn&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html]http://www.lifenews.com/nat3894.html, LifeNews.com, April 25,2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Obama explained that his friendship with Ayers, shouldn't be construed as implying he endorsed the terrorist-like tactics Ayers used to drive home his political point. Barack Obama brought up the pro-life colleague to make the dubious comparison that he's friends with other people who take &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; positions or would use terrorist tactics.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is, is that I'm also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has no military or executive experience and little foreign policy experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Fresh doubts over Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials were expressed on both sides of the Atlantic last night, after it emerged that he had made only one brief official visit to London – and none elsewhere in Western Europe or Latin America. ...  Mr. Obama had failed to convene a single policy meeting of the Senate European subcommittee, of which he is chairman.&amp;quot;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article3080794.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet he is the favorite of the leftist attack site &amp;quot;MoveOn.org&amp;quot; for the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[President of the United States]] in the [[2008 Presidential Election|2008 election]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;MoveOn.org reportedly favored Obama by 70-30% over Clinton. [http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/moveonorg_obama.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; campaigning to the left of [[Hillary Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Obama promised not to use nuclear weapons against terrorists, a promise Hillary Clinton refused to make. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202288.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of [[affirmative action]].  Some examples border on the absurd: Obama has no background in [[physics]], yet it is claimed that &amp;quot;Obama analyzed and integrated [[Albert Einstein|Einstein]]'s [[theory of relativity]], the [[Heisenberg uncertainty principle]], as well as the concept of curved space as an alternative to [[gravity]], for a Law Review article that Tribe, for whom Obama worked as a research assistant, wrote titled, 'The Curvature of Constitutional Space'.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cbs2chicago.com/politics/barack.obama.harvard.2.334825.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; for Constitutional Law Professor Tribe on this article also raises issues about preferences, as Obama had not yet even completed any law school courses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama did not start his second year of law school until September 1989, the earliest he could have taken constitutional law, yet this article must have been written, submitted and accepted prior to that time to be published in the November 1989 issue of the Law Review.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The liberal Professor Tribe saw the best law students for several decades, yet insisted that Obama was the &amp;quot;best student I ever had&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;most exciting research assistant.&amp;quot; [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071114/NEWS01/711140429/1217/NEWS98]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout his career, Obama repeatedly ducked controversial stands in a transparent attempt to make it easier to be elected to higher office.  In example, as a state senator in [[Illinois]], he voted &amp;quot;present&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;aye&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;nay&amp;quot; nearly an astounding 130 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  During that same period, he was planning to run for the [[House of Representatives]], which was unsuccessful, and then for [[U.S. Senate]], which was successful after his opponent Jack Ryan, a millionaire school teacher, was smeared with a court-ordered disclosure of confidential divorce records that both he and his ex-wife wanted to remain sealed.  A newspaper that favored Obama  took the unusual step of suing to force the confidential divorce information to become public, and a California judge opened the records at a pivotal time in the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/2898641/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/news/3289561/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbc5.com/politics/3444371/detail.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a [[teleprompter]].  &amp;quot;Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. ...  The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. ... [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;teleprompter&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  The [[New York Times]] noted that &amp;quot;Mr. Obama excels at inspirational speeches read from a teleprompter before television cameras, critics have noted, but many of his other speeches on the campaign trail have failed to electrify.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/20/fashion/20speechwriter.html?_r=2&amp;amp;ex=1358485200&amp;amp;en=bb179297e5f61acb&amp;amp;ei=5090&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama ridiculed [[Hillary Clinton]] for being like [[Annie Oakley]], it is apparent that he was not writing his own speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Some Obama adviser probably earned his or her dollars for that cut,&amp;quot; the USA Today wrote. [http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/columnist/raasch/2008-04-17-2008-04-17-raasch_N.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama often makes reference to his &amp;quot;two decades of experience&amp;quot; in public service work. During most of that time he claims experience, he was either going to school, working for a law firm, writing a book, or organizing community events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political views ==&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's political views have been subjected to controversy even before he put himself forward as a presidential candidate. Former House majority leader [[Tom DeLay]] has described Obama's record in the Illinois Senate as that of a [[Communism|“Marxist leftist&amp;quot;.]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121306/content/stop_the_tape.guest.html|Sexy Rock Star Obama Whines About His Ears], RushLimbaugh.com, December 13 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In May 2007, Obama (and Sen. Hillary Clinton) voted against funding the Iraq War for the first time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm HR 2206 - Emergency Appropriations], Kathy Gill, Your Guide to U.S. Politics: Current Events. May 26 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's views on [[gun control]] are focused on an opinion article in the [[Wall Street Journal]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he &amp;quot;never saw or approved the questionnaire,&amp;quot; and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[D.C. v. Heller]], Obama claimed to support Second Amendment rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has said, &amp;quot;Doing the Lord's work is a thread that runs through our politics since the very beginning,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it puts the lie to the notion that [[separation of church and state]] in America means somehow that faith should have no role in public life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.siouxcityjournal.com/articles/2007/06/17/news/iowa/8db7c1a17d2b51f9862572fd000fc9f4.txt Obama says religion has place in politics], By Todd Dorman, ''Sioux City Journal'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He believes children should be taught sex education in kindergarten, although in what he refers to as &amp;quot;an age-appropriate manner&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Barack Obama reaffirmed to [[Planned Parenthood]] this week that he believes elements of sex education should begin in kindergarten.&amp;quot; [http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3395856 (ABC News)] July 20, 2007 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama spoke at the May 1, 2006, illegal immigration march in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nomoreblather.com/barack-obama-and-the-immigration-marches Immigration marches&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''We are hungry for change!'' S.C. January 26, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama, in his short stint as Senator of Illinois, has made clear his opposition to the [[U.S. Military]] in policy and in rhetoric. Obama has spent much energy to argue that the Iraq War should have never been waged and that we should not be there at all, in any way.  In 2002, as an unknown Chicago representative to the state of Illinois, he declared his opposition to &amp;quot;dumb wars&amp;quot;. At the time, America was united in the stance against terrorism and the prospects of a rogue enemy with WMD worried the United States. Obama, has said that he does not know whether he would have voted for or against the Iraq War. Since elected to Congress, he voted against the Emergency War Supplemental. Obama did not oppose his party debating the bill long past the timeframe requested. This action directly affects troop deployment in combat zones. Obama has repeatedly called for the return of troops in Iraq. Barack Obama has a no confidence vote for the 'Surge' before the measure was put forth by General Petraeus to Congress. Obama would not denounce MoveOn.org's slander NY Times advertising against the General.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator Obama often refers to the office that he seeks, without the proper respect of those that came before him. When talking of the President, he frequently refuses to call him [[George W. Bush|President George Bush]] or even Mr. George Bush. Obama has also disrespectfully called him 'George Bush'.  Oddly, when Bill Clinton spoke with Obama on September 11th, 2008 predicting he would win handily, Obama responded, &amp;quot;There you go, you can take it from the President of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/11/campaign.wrap/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It appears Obama will use the term for a former President, but will not do the same for the actual President. Examples of Obama's treatment of our current President: &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I am happy to have a debate with John McCain and George Bush about foreign policy,&amp;quot; Obama said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/16/obama.bush.mccain/], CNN Obama blasts Bush McCain, May 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;For all his talk about independence, the centerpiece of John McCain's economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies,&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/10/obama_takes_the_offensive_vs_mcca)n/]`Boston Globe Obama takes offensive vs. McCain, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7403386.stm], BBC Obama attacks Bush over Iran , May 15, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Obama called the U.S. economy a disaster thanks to &amp;quot;John McCain's President, George W. Bush&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/obama_mccain/2008/08/18/122924.html No More Hugs: Obama Tears Into McCain] AP, August 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Side note, George W. Bush is also Barack Obama's President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Foreign policy experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
In his presidential campaign, Obama stated&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/obama-says-no-to-foreign_b_95357.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that &amp;quot;foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident&amp;quot; and then cited &amp;quot;having lived in Indonesia for four years, having family that is impoverished in small villages in Africa&amp;quot;. He lived in Indonesia from age 6 to 10, and he later discovered that his father had some other children in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While campaigning, he has visited several foreign countries. In [[Russia]] and the former Soviet republics, he met with representatives of the International Republican Institute and National Democratic Institute to discuss democracy in the former Soviet republics. He also met with Russian military officials and visited several nuclear and biological weapons destruction sites in Russia, [[Ukraine]], and [[Azerbaijan]] with Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN). On the same tour, he visited London, UK, and met with [[Tony Blair]], sitting UK Prime Minister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/press/050823-obama_to_visit/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama visited South Africa, Kenya, Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Chad; he discussed his tour of Robben Island prison, met with U.S. troops, and visited refugee camps of the people fleeing Darfur. He also addressed Africa's growing [[AIDS]] epidemic. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://obama.senate.gov/podcast/060906-090606_africa_t/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a ten-day-long tour of the Middle East, he talked with government leaders in Qatar, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, and Israel.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://obama.senate.gov/news/060113-obama_wraps_up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious affiliations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tucc.org/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago. The church embraces [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering oppressed groups against establishment forces. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays, women and blacks as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html], http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html, Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines, March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his sister, Obama was baptized at this church the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2 http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/30/america/30obama.php?page=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Obama describes his conversion in ''The Audacity of Hope''. The title of this book is taken from one of Pastor Wright's sermons. &lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, Obama disavowed Pastor Wright's views. In May 2008, Obama left his church. His response blamed the media &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/], Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago, may 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, stating “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and called Wright's rhetoric &amp;quot;&amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA TODAY, ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS'', by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson [http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;''[http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statements &amp;quot;G-d damn America&amp;quot; and describing the September 11th attacks, he said &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Barack Obama Jeremiah Wright.jpg|thumb|Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Pipes]] claims that Obama was raised a [[Muslim]] because he attended classes on the Koran while attending a Muslim school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/article/5286 Was Barack Obama a Muslim&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama did attend a school administrated by Muslims but [[CNN]] reports that it was a non-religious public school attended by students of many faiths, not a [[madrassa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/22/obama.madrassa/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In Indonesia, I'd spent 2 years at a Muslim school, 2 years at a Catholic school. In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to tell mother I made faces during Koranic studies. In the Catholic school, when it came time to pray, I'd pretend to close my eyes, then peek around the room. Nothing happened. No angels descended. Just a parched old nun and 30 brown children, muttering words. Sometimes the nun would catch me, and her stern look would force my lids back shut. But that didn't change how I felt inside.&amp;quot;}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreams from My Father, by Barack Obama, p.142 Aug 1, 1996 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has described his upbringing as occurring in a non-religious environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist that she would become; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well. Moreover, as a child I rarely came in contact with those who might offer a substantially different view of faith. My father was almost entirely absent from my childhood, having been divorced from my mother when I was 2 years old; in any event, although my father had been raised a Muslim, by the time he met my mother he was a confirmed atheist, thinking religion to be so much superstition.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
And yet for all her professed secularism, my mother was in many ways the most spiritually awakened person that I've ever known. She had an unswerving instinct for kindness, charity, and love, and spent much of her life acting on that instinct, sometimes to her detriment. Without the help of religious texts or outside authorities, she worked mightily to instill in me the values that many Americans learn in Sunday school: honesty, empathy, discipline, delayed gratification, and hard work. She raged at poverty and injustice.}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1546579-4,00.html My Spiritual Journey] Time Magazine, October 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance.'' (B. Obama and, allegedly, William Ayers) ISBN 0307383415&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.'' (B. Obama) ISBN 0307455874&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Barack Obama in His Own Words.'' (B. Obama and Lisa Rogak) ISBN 0786720573&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Change We Can Believe In. Barack Obama's Plan to Renew America's Promise.'' (B. Obama)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Case Against Barack Obama. The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate. '' (David Freddso) ISBN 1596985666 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Obama Nation. Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.'' (Jerome R. Corsi) ISBN 1416598065 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama Unmasked. Did Slick Hollywood Handlers Create the Perfect Candidate?'' (Floyd Brown and Lee Trexler) ISBN 0936783591 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Obama: The Man Behind The Mask.'' (Andy Martin) ISBN 0965781240 &lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Audacity of Deceit. Barack Obama's War on American Values.'' (Brad O'Leary) ISBN 1935071025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Published criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 11, 2007, staff writers of ''The Boston Globe'' reported the criticisms of several black commentators regarding Obama's apparent hesitation to join the race to condemn acclaimed radio personality [[Don Imus]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who made a racially insensitive remark&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSN1237895620070412|title=Furor over Imus puts heat on other broadcasters], Daniel Trotta, Reuters, 2007-04-12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; on the air during the April 4 broadcast. Obama did not comment on Imus's remarks until well after prominent civil rights leaders [[Al Sharpton]] and [[Jesse Jackson]] had called Imus to account and after Imus was suspended by MSNBC and CBS Radio. Obama later weighed in on April 10 by saying, &amp;quot;The comments of Don Imus were divisive, hurtful, and offensive to Americans of all backgrounds.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Globe'' reported that Obama's perceived delay in addressing Don Imus's remarks was described by Melissa Harris Lacewell, a professor of politics and African-American studies at Princeton University, as &amp;quot;miss[ing] an opportunity to prove himself to blacks and white liberals who would have wanted Obama take the lead in denouncing Imus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2007/04/11/obamas_silence_on_imus_alarms_some_blacks/ Obama's silence on Imus alarms some blacks], Rick Klein and Joseph Williams, ''The Boston Globe'', April 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/04/obama_race_and_the_election.html Obama, Race, and The Election,] ''Real Clear Politics.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2007 the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' reported Obama had actually received nearly three times more campaign cash from indicted slum landlord Tony Rezko&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353829,CST-NWS-rez23.article Barack Obama and his slumlord patron], Tim Novak, Chicago Sun-Times, April 23, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his associates than Obama has publicly acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/432197,CST-NWS-obama18.article Rezko cash triple what Obama says], Chris Fusco and Tim Novak, ''Chicago Sun-Times'', June 18, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive vice president Wayne LaPierre of the [[NRA]] accuses Barack Obama of &amp;quot;mouthing pro-Second amendment words and pandering to gun owners&amp;quot; on the campaign trail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml], http://www.gopusa.com/news/2008/may/0514_nra_mccain.shtml, NRA chief stresses common ground with McCain, Associated Press, May 14, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[McCain]] Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set &amp;quot;an extremely dangerous and extremely naive approach toward terrorism&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/mccain_obama/2008/06/17/105265.html], AP McCain Aide Says Obama Has Sept. 10 Mind-Set, June 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth Certificate Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
During  the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is intelligible for Presidency. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTgxZmIwNTg0OWVhMWJkODNmZjI4ZjY4Mjg2OWRmNzI=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as &lt;br /&gt;
authentic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/12/11012/6168/320/534616 Obama's Birth Certificate]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk= http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWVjN2I1MjlhM2ZjZjRjYzBkODAxZjZkZGQyYWNkMDk=]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm http://web.israelinsider.com/Articles/Politics/12939.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html Born in the U.S.A.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The site stated, &amp;quot;FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship.&amp;quot;  In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number.  The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the ''Honolulu Advertiser '' on Sunday, August 13, 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/07/23/obama-was-born-in-hawaii-wrong-can-of-worms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The &amp;quot;dual loyalties&amp;quot; which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://neighbors.denverpost.com/viewtopic.php?t=10815605&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official. Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081031/BREAKING01/81031064/0/BREAKING04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama Administration‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Barack Obama|Articles about '''Barack Obama''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Hitchens|Hitchens, Peter]] [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=511901&amp;amp;in_page_id=1811 ''The Black Kennedy: But does anyone know the real Barack Obama?''] [[Daily Mail]]. Accessed 4 February 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.barackobama.com/ Offical Obama for President Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://obama.senate.gov/about/ Official Senate Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opensecrets.org/pfds/pfd2005/N00009638_2005.pdf Barack Obama Personal Financial Disclosures Summary: 2005], retrieved from opensecrets.org 17 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Biographical Directory of the United States Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/obama/cv.html University of Chicago Law School] Faculty Listing&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biography.com/search/article.do?id=12782369 Barack Obama Biography] from Biography.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/barack_obama/index.html?inline=nyt-per New York Times Topics, Barack Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE Documentary on Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/voting_category.php?can_id=9490 Voting Record of Barack Hussein Obama]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barrack}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslims]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Socialism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimS</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>