<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thommie</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thommie"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Thommie"/>
	<updated>2026-10-05T05:10:25Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:New_Zealand&amp;diff=49248</id>
		<title>Talk:New Zealand</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:New_Zealand&amp;diff=49248"/>
		<updated>2007-03-19T22:37:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thommie: Doesnt make sense&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Very well written. The only part I would possibly dispute is your statement that the Maori Party are in opposition to the government. While this would certainly be true on issues such as the seabed and foreshore legislation, it is a bit of a stretch to say they are in opposition. They have voted with the government on sevveral issues, and it is important to bear in mind that the Maori electorate traditionally votes on a slightly more left of centre basis. Despite this minor detail, I thought it was a well written and well balanced article. - Tom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know what i find funny? the fact that conservapedia claims to be better than Wikipedia and yet it used wikipedia as a source, check the external links for this article, one is for wikitravel, a part of wikipedia, how are you supposed to be better than someone else if you get your info from them?. - John.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Entirely True, i applaud the work of this historian&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Doesnt make sense ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is their any support at all that Japan and Russia came to New Zealand before america was found? and that they founded a city called &amp;quot;Vodka City&amp;quot; and that australia, in 1796 invaded these two &amp;quot;capitals&amp;quot; and defeated a nation that has been established for many years? makes no sense nor is their any factual backing.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thommie</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>