<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thisisdumb</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thisisdumb"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Thisisdumb"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T05:20:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=467218</id>
		<title>Gun control</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=467218"/>
		<updated>2008-06-05T18:01:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thisisdumb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:No Weapons Allowed.gif|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gun control''' laws restrict the purchase or ownership of guns, a weapon acquired mostly for defensive or sporting purposes.  Gun control is unique among social programs in increasing the emotional and physical dependency of ''all'' voters on government. It is often promoted by [[liberal]]s. They are right, guns are tools of idiots. Conservapedia is an idiotic site. Leave now to keep your sanity, or your brain will melt from reading these obvious lies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control is a denial or limitation by [[government]]s of the right to armed [[self-defense]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;quot;In contrast to most other weaponry, firearms are preeminently defensive in effect.&amp;quot; [http://ls.wustl.edu/WULQ/75-3/753-4.html Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents use the discredited - but superficially appealing - claim that fewer lawfully-owned guns leads to less crime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gun control primarily restricts the lawful acquisition and use of guns.  Over 99% of the guns restricted by most gun control regulation are used in a lawful manner.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Because gun control increases the dependence of voters on government, its political effect is to shift the electorate leftward and its primary supporters are leftists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/quotes/repeal.html Quotes of Leftists Demanding Gun Control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In [[England]], which already has the strictest gun control in Europe, [[leftists]] demand control over 120,000 ''deactivated'' guns, even though their activation and use constitute only 0.04% of all gun offenses there. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3168607.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Fallacy and Motivation for Gun Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control potentially causes an increase in crime by restricting its main deterrent: [[self-defense]].  In the United States, law-abiding uses of guns outnumber criminal uses by at least a factor of 100 to 1,{{fact}} and the removal of guns from everyone eliminates the lawful use of self-defense and its deterrent effect.  &amp;quot;[[Americans]] use firearms to defend themselves from criminals at least 764,000 times a year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;This figure is the lowest among a group of 9 nationwide surveys done by organizations including Gallup and the Los Angeles Times.&amp;quot; (Just Facts - [http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp Gun Control])&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Specific examples of guns being used successfully in [[self-defense]] are easy to find.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two 70-ish store owners stopped armed robberies of their stores by shooting at the bandits.  &amp;quot;The person came in and pointed the gun at him and my father shot him.  I'm proud of him.&amp;quot; [http://www.buffalonews.com/cityregion/buffaloerie/story/253849.html Buffalo News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been &amp;quot;scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; When [[Florida]] began allowing its citizens to carry a concealed weapon, [[Florida]]'s firearm homicide rate fell by 37% while the national average ''increased'' by 15%.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  As explained below, the political effect of gun control is to cause voters to become more dependent emotionally on government and more supportive of bigger government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies by [[John Lott]] and others indicate that gun control causes higher crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnrlott.com/ John Lott's Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Washington, D.C.]] has one of the highest crime rates in [[America]] even though it completely bans private handguns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm District of Columbia Crime Rates 1960 - 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;Switzerland, Israel, Denmark and Finland, all of whom have a higher gun ownership rate than America, all have lower crime rates than America, in fact, their crime rates are among the lowest in the Western World.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slashdoc - [http://www.slashdoc.com/documents/71244 gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Lott demonstrates that in [[Britain]], [[Australia]] and [[Canada]], increased gun control in the late 1990s led to increased crime, the exact opposite of what the proponents of the gun control promised.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John R. Lott Jr. and Eli Lehrer - [http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/IBDGunConFailure.html Add Gun Control To Litany Of Misbegotten Gov't Plans]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  States in the [[U.S.]] that have enacted concealed-carry laws enjoy lower crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4706 Cato report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Robbery victims per 100K.png|300px|thumb|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Source data:  Australian Bureau of Statistics&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Australia]], where gun ownership was less widespread and the gun control measures were less strict, there was an immediate increase in robbery and armed robbery after the gun control went into effect in 1996 (see chart at right).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gun control passed in Australia because &amp;quot;public was immediately whipped into a gun control frenzy by the press&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Port Arthur massacre&amp;quot; in Tasmania on April 28, 1996, in which 32 were shot dead and 19 injured.  &amp;quot;Although polls done prior to the massacre indicated that the public was satisfied with the amount of 'gun control' they already had, a major newspaper did a poll just a few days after the massacre (while all minds were &amp;quot;clear&amp;quot;) and, not surprisingly, found high levels of support for extreme gun control measures.  This poll would be used forever by the commonwealth government and other gun controllers to claim that Australians supported the new gun laws to come.&amp;quot; - [http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html Gun Control in Australia] (by gunsandcrime.org)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
There is no clear evidence supporting a decrease in crime from gun control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Results&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gunsandcrime.org/auresult.html Results of the Australian Gun &amp;quot;Buyback&amp;quot; &amp;amp; New Gun Laws], October 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/azl084v1 Study showing lack of promised benefits from gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequent to gun control in England:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;from 1997 to 2001, the rate of violent crime more than doubled. Your chances of being mugged in London are now [as of 2002] six times greater than in New York. England's rates of assault, robbery, and burglary are far higher than America's, and 53 percent of English burglaries occur while occupants are at home, compared with 13 percent in the U.S., where burglars admit to fearing armed homeowners more than the police. In a United Nations study of crime in 18 developed nations published in July, England and Wales led the Western world's crime league, with nearly 55 crimes per 100 people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;However this increase in recorded violent crime between 1997 and 2001 is explained by the Home Office as a result of changes in the definition of violent crime and new counting rules introduced in 1998. [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr1804.pdf Violent Crime in England and Wales] According to the British Crime Survey, which is considered a more reliable guide to trends in crime[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/crime-statistics-independent-review-06.pdf], violent crime fell 24% between 1997 and 2001/02, and burglary fell 40% over the same period.[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hosb1105tab201.xls Trends in BCS incidents of crime]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control in [[Britain]] and [[Australia]] has been followed by a predictable shift to the left politically by voters as they lost their instrument of self-defense and became more emotionally dependent on government.  In [[Britain]], for example, the enactment of a ban on most handguns in February 1997&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As in Australia, gun control passed in [[Britain]] based on a highly publicized but isolated and statistically insignificant act of violence.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; directly resulted in the [[Labour Party]] winning a landslide 179 seat majority in the general election later that year, the first time it exceeded 40% of the popular vote in over 25 years. The new government soon extended the ban to cover nearly all handguns, and the [[Labour Party]] has remained in power in [[Britain]] for over a decade.  In [[Australia]],the passage of gun control in 1996 and its expansion in 2002 has led to a complete takeover of all nine federal, state and territory legislatures by the Labor Party, the first time a single party has ever achieved this in Australian history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sydney Morning Herald - [http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/either-way-its-history-in-the-making/2007/11/23/1195753310949.html Either way, it's history in the making]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) - [http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/ 2007 Federal Election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Contrast that with the [[United States]], where an effort to push gun control after the [[Columbine massacre]] failed in 2000 and the government has remained as [[conservative]] -- if not more so -- ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emasculation of the citizenry by gun control also arguably reduces the resistance of a society to intimidation, and exacerbates fear of consequences from causing offense. Subsequent to the passage of strict gun control in [[England]] some teachers have avoided teaching controversial subjects such as the [[Holocaust]], the Arab-Israeli conflict and the [[Crusades]] during history classes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RW100.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Teaching Emotive and Controversial History 3-19] (p.15) The anti-self-defense attitude of British authorities has also turned criminals into &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; and victims who fight back into &amp;quot;criminals.&amp;quot; One particularly egregious case involved a farmer being sentenced to life imprisonment for defending himself in his home after the home was repeatedly burglarized &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theinternetparty.org/commentary/c_s.php?td=200107200000&amp;amp;section_type=com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trends ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After decades of increasing gun control laws, the current trend in the [[United States]] is in the direction of more gun rights.  The 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill included a ban on certain new rifles labeled assault rifles solely because of features of their appearance, and on new high-capacity magazines.  This law recently expired and was not renewed by [[Congress]].  Also, Washington D.C.'s gun ban was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/washington/09cnd-gun.html?hp Appeals Court Says Gun Ban Violates 2nd Amendment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Washington Post - [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902416.html D.C.'s Ban On Handguns In Homes Is Thrown Out]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By removing the deterrent effect of guns, gun control causes dramatic increases in crimes committed with other weapons:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2656875.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are now six times more likely to be mugged in [[London]] than [[New York]]. Why? Because as common law appreciated, not only does an armed individual have the ability to protect himself or herself but criminals are less likely to attack them. They help keep the peace. A study found American burglars fear armed home-owners more than the police. As a result burglaries are much rarer and only 13% occur when people are at home, in contrast to 53% in England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of gun control argue that homicide with guns is much less in [[England]] than in the [[United States]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2005/06, the total number of victims of homicide by shooting (including crossbows) in England and Wales was 50 and there were 212 victims of homicide by sharp instruments. [Home Office Statistical Bulletin - [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosb0207.pdf Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2005/2006][http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb0104.pdf]  The data for gun deaths in the United States include guns used in self-defense, as in fending off an assault, robbery or rape, and there were a total of 11,350 gun deaths (including deaths of criminals) in 2005.[US Department of Justice, FBI - [http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1986 - 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that was true even before gun control and is likely due to cultural reasons.  &amp;quot;A study comparing New York and London over 200 years found the New York homicide rate consistently five times the London rate, although for most of that period residents of both cities had unrestricted access to firearms.  When guns were available in England they were seldom used in crime. A government study for 1890-1892 found an average of one handgun homicide a year in a population of 30 million.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control laws are often seen to conflict with the [[Second Amendment]] to the [[United States Constitution]], which recognizes the right to bear arms.  The Second Amendment reads: &amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right to keep and bear arms&amp;quot; is a right guaranteed to the American citizen by the Bill of Rights through the virtue of a selective reading of said Bill. The phrase &amp;quot;a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state&amp;quot; precedes the statement, and most federal Courts of Appeals have held that this phrase requires that the &amp;quot;right to bear arms&amp;quot; relates to the collective rights of state militias, as opposed to the individual's rights to have any weapon desired.  Just recently, the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit went against nine other circuits in holding that the Second Amendment constitutes an individual right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/washington/10gun.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin Court Rejects Strict Gun Law as Unconstitutional]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FOX News - [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258067,00.html Appeals Court Strikes Down Washington, D.C. Handgun Ban]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only six cities in the [[United States]] ban handguns:  [[Washington, D.C.]], [[Chicago]], and four of its suburbs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Kopel, &amp;quot;The Democrats and Gun Control,&amp;quot; Wall St.J., Page A19, April 17, 2008 [http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB120839466717921537-lMyQjAxMDI4MDE4NzMxOTc0Wj.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gun control&amp;quot; can include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting which persons can own firearms.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on the number of firearms a person may own, or purchase during a given time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Requirements that privately owned firearms be registered with the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bans on certain types of firearms; for example, &amp;quot;handguns&amp;quot; or assault rifles&lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on where firearms may be carried, for example into restaurants or post offices&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring a &amp;quot;background check&amp;quot; and/or a &amp;quot;waiting period&amp;quot; to purchase a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting when and where firearms may be bought and sold, for example banning their sale through the mail&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring licenses or some other form of permission from the government to buy and/or sell a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring some form of permission from the government to carry a firearm in public, either concealed or openly&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws granting special gun rights for some people, for example retired law enforcement officers, which are denied the rest of the public, which was used in several southern states.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on carrying firearms in public&lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on private possession of firearms, though this has never occurred in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States the three primary federal gun control laws are:&lt;br /&gt;
* National Firearms Act (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Gun Control Act (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Brady Bill (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These laws have further been amended by other laws such as the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986) and the Omnibus Crime Bill (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constitutional Debate==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Second Amendment]] reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most constitutional scholars agree that since the amendment refers to &amp;quot;the right of the People&amp;quot; instead of the right of the militia, it protects an individual right to own guns. The extent of that right has been debated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Racism of gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States of America]], gun control has a strong racist origin and reasoning. Before the Civil War ended, State &amp;quot;Slave Codes&amp;quot; prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President [[Abraham Lincoln]] issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed &amp;quot;Black Codes.&amp;quot; They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in its infamous 1857 decision in ''[[Dred Scott v. Sandford]]'' to uphold slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States Congress overrode most portions of the Black Codes by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The legislative histories of both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867, are replete with denunciations of those particular statutes that denied blacks equal access to firearms. [Kates, &amp;quot;Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment,&amp;quot; 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204, 256 (1983)] However, facially neutral disarming through economic means laws remain in effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1878, most States turned to &amp;quot;facially neutral&amp;quot; business or transaction taxes on handgun purchases. However, the intention of these laws was not neutral. An article in Virginia's official university law review called for a &amp;quot;prohibitive tax...on the privilege&amp;quot; of selling handguns as a way of disarming &amp;quot;the son of Ham,&amp;quot; whose &amp;quot;cowardly practice of 'toting' guns has been one of the most fruitful sources of crime.... Let a negro board a railroad train with a quart of mean whiskey and a pistol in his grip and the chances are that there will be a murder, or at least a row, before he alights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Comment, Carrying Concealed Weapons, 15 Va L. Reg. 391, 391-92 (1909); George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (GMU CR LJ), Vol. 2, No. 1, &amp;quot;Gun Control and Racism,&amp;quot; Stefan Tahmassebi, 1991, p. 75.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thus, many Southern States imposed high taxes or banned inexpensive guns so as to price blacks and poor whites out of the gun market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, &amp;quot;gun control&amp;quot; laws continue to be enacted so as to have a racist effect if not intent:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Police-issued license and permit laws, unless drafted to require issuance to those not prohibited by law from owning guns, are routinely used to prevent lawful gun ownership among &amp;quot;unpopular&amp;quot; populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Public housing residents, approximately 3 million Americans, are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Gun sweeps&amp;quot; by police in &amp;quot;high crime neighborhoods&amp;quot; whereby vehicles and &amp;quot;pedestrians who meet a specific profile that might indicate they are carrying a weapon&amp;quot; are searched are becoming popular, and are being studied by the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] as &amp;quot;Operation Ceasefire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some U.S. cities with high minority populations, such as Washington, D.C., are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Project Exile&amp;quot; began in the U.S. city of Richmond, Virginia and mandated that people arrested for technical firearms violations (note: not for violent crimes committed with a firearm, but for technical violations of the law) be tried in federal court where they would be subject to lengthy mandatory minimum sentences rather than in state court under the more lenient Virginia laws. As with many other restrictions this was aimed primarily at the city's Black residents. It has since been copied in many other cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sexism of gun control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firearms, especially lower recoiling ones such as handguns, allow any person to wield enough power to stop another person from attacking them.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;genderDiscrimination1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/03/19/firearms-rights-are-a-gender-equality-issue-too/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many women (quite reasonably) fear the threat of attack by a physically stronger man, and a firearm could prevent many of these attacks, but gun bans leave these women vulnerable. Take the case of the “North Side Rapist” in Chicago, a city where hand guns are banned, as an example: The rapist broke in to the womens homes, and at least one of the women heard him break in and then climb the stairs. Had this woman had a handgun, she almost certainly could have stopped the rapist before it was too late. This would have prevented her from enduring such a horrific crime, as well as preventing the rapist’s future victims from experiencing the same thing. Instead, Chicago law prevented her from being able to defend herself, and gave the advantage to the rapist/home-invader. This is not an isolated incident, and similar events happen every day across the county. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elitism  of gun control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the most ardent American anti-gun politicians, such as Chicago’s Mayor Daley, are protected by taxpayer-sponsored armed body guards, but deny law abiding citizens the right to defend themselves with a gun. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;classDiscrimination1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.learnaboutguns.com/2008/04/16/a-double-standard-anti-gun-politicians-and-their-gun-toting-bodyguards/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These politicians seemingly believe themselves to be part of an elite group who deserve to be protected against violent criminals, while ordinary law-abiding citizens are left with less-effective means to defend themselves, and must instead rely on the police arriving in time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun control outside the USA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control advocates cite foreign countries to argue that gun control can reduce crime, but such comparison can be difficult due to the presence of other factors.  For example, they cite [[Singapore]] as having gun control and a lower crime rate than the [[United States]], but Singapore has less than 5 million persons and one of the highest literacy and average wealth in the world. It lacks many of the freedoms found in the [[United States]] and strictly imposes harsh physical punishment, such as caning and the [[death penalty]], for crimes that are not punished so harshly in the [[United States]]. The real issue of the security in Singapore is its tight criminal control, not the gun control itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control supporters also cite [[Japan]], where firearms are illegal and crime rates are relatively low.  But [[Japan]] also lacks many freedoms and diversity which exist in the [[United States]], and [[Japan]] has strong cultural deterrents to crime.  Ironically, [[Japan]] is home to [[Tokyo Marui]], the world's largest [[airsoft]] gun manufacturer, which designs airsoft guns that are made to the same scale and with the same materials as the real counterpart and which have been mistaken by police for real guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[European Union]], gun control is more strict than in the United States, but gun ownership differs widely between member states, from 36 per 100 people in [[Cyprus]] to one per 100 in [[Poland]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/29/europe/union.php EU legislators push tougher gun controls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In November 2007, the [[European Parliament]] passed legislation to tighten and harmonize gun control across the EU, and oblige each member state to set up a computerized database of firearms, as it &amp;quot;hoped to prevent Europe from becoming a gun-friendly culture like the United States&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Parliament wanted to limit cross-border trade from states with less control to those with tougher laws, such as from [[Lithuania]], where replica guns can cost as little as [[Euro|€]]100 (US$150), to the [[United Kingdom]], where all replicas are outlawed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EU&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and Genocide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control &amp;quot;contributes to the probability of its government engaging&amp;quot; in [[genocide]], including the three worst instances in the 20th century:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[A] society's weapons policy might be one of the institutional arrangements that contributes to the probability of its government engaging in some of the more extreme varieties of outrage. ... [I]t is [] an arresting reality that not one of the principal genocides of the twentieth century, and there have been dozens, has been inflicted on a population that was armed.&amp;quot; [http://ls.wustl.edu/WULQ/75-3/753-4.html Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1911, [[Turkey]] imposed gun control and then, from 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million defenseless Armenians were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1929, the [[Soviet Union]] imposed gun control and over the next 24 years about 20 million defenseless dissidents were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1938, [[Germany]] imposed gun control and then over the next seven years 13 million defenseless Jews and other victims were exterminated. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegunzone.com/rkba/rkba-12.html The True Face of Gun Control], Dean Speir, The Gun Zone RKBA, Accessed December 26, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Nazis made only two important changes to the Weapons Law that was in place when they came to power. First, they forbade Jews from owning guns or any other weapon. Second, they exempted members of the Sturmabteilung (SA) and many Nazi party officials from the law's strictures.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The German Firearms Act of 1937 stated &amp;quot;No civilian is to have a firearm without a permit and permits shall not be issued to persons suspected of acting against the state. ''For Jews, this permission will not be granted.'' Those people who do not require permission to carry weapons include the whole of the SS, and the SA - including the Deaths Head group, and the officers of the Hitler youth.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38d04d5c7c40.htm The Journalist's Guide to Gun Policy Scholars and Second Amendment Scholars], Professor Eugene Volokh, FreeRepublic.com, March 15, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolph Hitler said, &amp;quot;The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and young mass murderers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Main article: [[Young mass murderers]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strict gun control failed and still fails to prevent mass murderers from starting killing sprees while the victims are unable to defend themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare the cases of Pekka-Eric Auvinen ([[Finland]]) and Robert Steinhäuser ([[Germany]]) with the case of Matthew Murray. The latter was stopped by an armed citizen before he could harm more victims; Auvinen killed 8 people and Steinhäuser killed 16. Both Finland and Germany have gun control laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Switzerland==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Switzerland has one of the world's lowest gun crime rates  [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1566715.stm] yet there are 2 million privately owned firearms (including 0.6 million automatic rifles and 0.5 million pistols) in a population of only 6 million people.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1566715.stm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other terms==&lt;br /&gt;
Other terms sometimes used by those who are opposed to gun control include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Rights restriction&lt;br /&gt;
* Victim disarmament&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:US Armed Citizens and Crime Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Lott]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.2asisters.org/ Second Amendment Sisters]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org/ The National Rifle Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nrapublications.org/AC/index.asp Armed citizens defending themselves.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.a-human-right.com/ A Human Right] Discussion of the human right to self defense with a firearm.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.learnaboutguns.com/ Learn About Guns] Firearm information and politics from a pro-firearms perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gunowners.org/ Gun Owners of America] A no-compromise pro-gun lobby in Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/gun-control/ What Liberals Say - Category: Gun Control], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guncite.com/ GunCite: Gun Control and Second Amendment Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guninformation.org/ Gun Control and the Second Amendment]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm Myth: Switzerland proves that high gun-ownership doesn't increase murder]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thisisdumb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=467211</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=467211"/>
		<updated>2008-06-05T17:57:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thisisdumb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is a religion taking its name from [[Jesus Christ]] meaning &amp;quot;the Savior&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the Anointed One&amp;quot;. Adherents are called Christians, meaning &amp;quot;of Christ&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It seems that at first the religion was called &amp;quot;The Way&amp;quot; and the adherents were called Nazarenes (after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived). The name Christian arose in [[Antioch]] in the first century A. D. and its use spread, probably closer to mid-century since it is recorded in the [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) It is a foolish theory with no factual base. You have to be an idiot to believe these lies. Athiesm FTW!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] who Catholic believed established the Church and the succession of the [[Pope]]s as the spiritual authority over the Christian body of believers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) also trace their roots back to the beginnings of Christianity, but do not believe in the Primacy of the Pope.  Different theological perspectives led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]], the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 77 million baptized members) and the Lutheran World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. It first broke away from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of faith and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]] could not be adequately reconciled with Papal prescriptions as well as other practices that Luther saw in the Catholic Church at that time that he did not agree with. Other preachers and movements then followed Luther's example and also left the Catholic fold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of faith is the [[Nicene Creed| Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed]] below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I believe in one God, [[God the Father|the Father Almighty]], Maker of [[heaven]] and [[earth]], and of all things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages. Light of Light; true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made; who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the [[Holy Spirit]] and the [[Virgin Mary]], and became man. And He was crucified for us under [[Pontius Pilate]], and suffered, and was buried. And the third day He rose again, according to the [[Bible|Scriptures]]; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; whose Kingdom shall have no end. And in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of Life, who proceeds from the Father; who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified; who spoke by the prophets. In one Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. I look for the [[Resurrection]] of the dead, and the life of the world to come.  Amen.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine and disagree on others. According to an online Harris poll from 2003  99% of all American Christians believe in God, 96% in the [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in Heaven, 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in Hell, 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious dogma of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Nicea-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See also: the [[Apostle's Creed]], [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Velasco Padre Eterno.jpg|thumb|The Father by [[Jose Maria Velasco]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
The God of the Christians is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Persons: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. Christians reject the idea that they are polytheists because of the oneness of the divine nature (or essence).  Though to non-Christians and even many Christians, it might seem like an inconsequential dogma, the doctrine of the Trinity is central to all of Christian theology and life. This is especially true in the relationship between God and human beings.  The major theme of the Bible is love.  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  The picture that the Biblical writers draw with these words is of a lover (God) who is entirely self-sufficient, needing nothing, and a beloved (human beings) in desperate need of salvation but unable to obtain it for himself. But God the lover is willing to suffer, knows He is going to suffer, even endure death to save the beloved human beings. This love of God for human beings is an extension of the love the Three Persons in the Trinity have for each other.  Each loves the others infinitely.  Their love for each other and for their creation is such that the [[Apostle John]] equates God and love, in an almost mathematical way saying, &amp;quot;God is love.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the God of the Christians is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
Christians hold that during the reign of [[Caeser Augustus]] the Son (e.g. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnate as a man.  He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At the age of thirty he was baptized by his cousin, the [[John the Baptist|Prophet John]], and began to preach in the area [[Palestine]].  About three years after his baptism, he raised his friend Lazarus from the dead, prompting the Jewish power establishment to plot Jesus death.  Jesus was [[crucified]].  He came back from the dead and was seen by over 500 people.  He ascended to heaven.  The four [[Gospels]] contain the records of some of what Jesus did and said, but he did much more than those four books relate, as the Apostle John admitted in his Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is love and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. Jesus summarized his teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constant debate has resulted as to how a person should express love for God in their moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Book of Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.&amp;quot; (John 13:35)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Atonement of Jesus on the Cross===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, along with His resurrection, is an indispensable proclamation of a crucial event for the reconcilation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to understanding His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and perservered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. Though there is ample recognition in the New Testament that others desired Him to die, and that the circumstances in which His path took him would bring Him to His end on earth, the mover of all these things was Himself and the will of the Father. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect that way. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many.&amp;quot;  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben),  or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth..&amp;quot;, it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was forplanned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). And so, &amp;quot;The Just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# It was the belief in Scripture, that in His death a way back to God was made possible for those that were near to God&amp;amp;mdash;the Jews. And a way back to God for those that were far away&amp;amp;mdash;the Gentiles. That is why the New Testament saw in the requirements of God for Israel a fullfillment in Jesus the Messiah. He was the perfect Israel, taken out of Egypt, to redeem Israel. And that is why the New Testament saw in Jesus, a  deepness to the incarnation of the Son of God, deeper than just a Jew of His time of a certain tribe. He was the &amp;quot;Second Adam&amp;quot; to redeem the sons of Adam. This encompassing perspective had further implications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself - How can I make reconciliation with my enemies, with even the members of my own family, of race with race and  people with people?; Does His death for the sins of the world include those who only partially understand, for the baby aborted, the feeble minded, and severly retarded?; For those who have never heard of Jesus, never been &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot;, distant and remote in place and time?;  Does His death for the sins of the world  also include a remedy for the ills that have come as a result of those sins&amp;amp;mdash;certain sicknesses, ills of the mind, body and the soul? Do they &amp;quot;hold&amp;quot; for today?; Does His death make good, turn to the better, show the way, effect the way, of the illnesses that have befallen the world, not only by sin, but simply by the circumstances of life, of degeneration, of compounded disfunction? How does the fruit of His death bring in somehow the Kingdom &amp;quot;among us&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The death of the Son of God on the cross has provided the solution for sin, and it still holds its sway over the imagination and aspirations for the people of our generation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God&amp;quot; (Romans 3:23). This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.&amp;quot; (Mark 2:17, and &amp;quot;Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men&amp;quot; (Mark 2:28)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3).  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often use the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; interchangeably.  Other Christians, notably the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]].  &amp;quot;Jesus answered, Amen, amen, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and [of] the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.&amp;quot; (John 3:5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot; (Ephesians 5:8-10). Some believe that this is necessary in order to stay saved. However, this is a common misconception of the text. It is rather referring to proving that one is a child of God by their &amp;quot;fruit&amp;quot; (things that they do and how they behave). Christians in the Reformed tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer [[John Calvin]], as well as the faith outlined in the Belgic and Heidleberg Confessions) say that salvation is irrevocable and that it cannot be lost, if it were genuinely part of one's life to begin with.  Reformed Christians (often called [[Calvinists]]) often point to Romans 8:38-39 as validation of their belief: &amp;quot;For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord&amp;quot; (Romans 8:38-39; NASB). According to Calvinists, the reason it cannot be lost by natural things is because salvation was obtained through a supernatural being, namely Jesus Christ. This does not negate Jesus' human side, only that he was both one-hundred percent God and one-hundred percent man, according to the [[Council of Chalcedon]] (A. D. 451). The Bible also makes it clear that mankind cannot earn their salvation, and that it is a free gift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Resurrection of Jesus Christ|resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history Gary Habermas is considered the foremost [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection:&lt;br /&gt;
The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fact of the Resurrection of Christ is a key element of the preaching of the message about Jesus and an essential of Christian belief. But there are also certain effects that this belief has on the lives of believers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead, that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The  New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion. He was &amp;quot;declared to be the Son of God&amp;quot;  by His resurrection. This brings believers in Him to a strong confidence in the determined power of God to both vindicate in their own lives and to bring His reign upon earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, their sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. His resurrection, carries with it our knowledge that our sin with its attendant death has been totally and finally paid for. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life - as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life, and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully under the Spirt's control, guidance, and empowerment. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolations, and consider that even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him, a restoration, and that tears, even now, are wiped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Evangelism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted, however, that Jesus said it was the Holy Spirit, not man, who was sent to convict the world concerning sin and righteousness (John 16:8). This relieves Christians of needing to worry when they evangelize. God is the one who gets the credit with the growth and maturity of the Church: &amp;quot;So then neither the one who plants nor the one who waters is anything, but God who causes the growth&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 3:7).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orthodox Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Church of England]] or ''Anglican Church''&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Episcopal Church in the United States of America]] (or ''Episcopal Church'' or ''Episcopalians'') (Non-UK branch of the Anglican Church)&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thisisdumb</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>