<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TheNewRight</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TheNewRight"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TheNewRight"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T23:47:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2021351</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2021351"/>
		<updated>2024-01-29T02:30:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO Of The Year 2023 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/status-of-us-dollar-as-global-reserve-currency-and-usd-exchange-rates-long-slow-uneven-decline-continues.html Status of US Dollar as Global Reserve Currency and USD Exchange Rates: Long, Slow, Uneven Decline Continues].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election news==&lt;br /&gt;
===DeSantis and Haley challenge Trump to show up on the Debate Stage for which only 3 Candidates have qualified===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/donald-trump-plans-fox-news-town-hall-opposite-cnn-jan-10-iowa-republican-primary-debate-article-106493852&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Duck Trump needs to stop &amp;quot;ducking&amp;quot; the debates and show up sooner or later. He may show up before New Hampshire, but skip Iowa. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What a coincidence===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://therightscoop.com/breaking-active-shooter-situation-at-high-school-in-perry-iowa/ Active shooter in Hicktown, Iowa 10 days before caucuses].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we get to see who's pro-big government and who's pro-Second Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biden possible drop out and possible Michele Obama running ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems Democrats now admitting that Biden isnt favorite to win re election and even [[CNN]] admit that. Biden willnt get support of Black and minorities votes, so he will not win. But the what GOP isnt aware that possible Biden drop out and let [[Michelle Obama]] to be the Democrat candidate. According to JP Morgan strategist that Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race due to poor health sometime between Super Tuesday and the November election. Then the DNC would name a replacement candidate. Dems think that Michelle Obama will get Black and minorities votes and win --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:09, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1744059335909523689 --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:23, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Democrats are counting on Trump being reputationally damaged by a guilty verdict on the Washington, D.C. court case on J6 which favors Democrats because juries in this liberal district are Democrats and anti-Trump. It might backfire and make Trump the [[Nelson Mandela]] of the USA - especially if the Supreme Court speedily accepts the case and overrules the verdict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And Biden is hoping the economy will improve. But there is a lag between inflation moderating and people recognizing it is moderating. So even if inflation markedly improves, it could be too late for Biden. Plus, the economy could get worse. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if economy improved, Biden will still unfavorable, especially to Blacks. Thats why I think Dems will replace him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:48, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With all his broken border disastrous policy, Latinos, surprisingly, turn away from him.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:27, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/07/hes-baaaaack-obama-has-deep-concerns-about-bidens-ability-to-defeat-trump-and-protect-the-deep-state-system-he-built/ Obama and Clyburn have turned on Biden]. Biden time is over. I've wanted to say that for years. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Polls indicate that the economy is the number one issue.[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/economy-stupid-top-u-priorities-234445026.html] And Biden's foreign policy is a trainwreck. Many legal Latino immigrants don't like Biden's border policy. People want peace and prosperity and Biden is failing. So Biden is playing the J6 card and the lawfare card.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. You've been peddling the Biden/Deep State [[foreign policy]] religiously verbatim for 2 years, and no amount of spamming this page will change that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:59, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right now, the Democrats are very slightly favored to win the White House according to data compiled from the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The economy is going to be a key issue in the 2024 election. &amp;quot;The Federal Reserve’s forecasting tool currently puts the odds of a recession within 12 months at 51.84%, its highest reading in four decades.&amp;quot;[https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/01/07/buy-stocks-in-2024-advice-from-warren-buffett/]. &amp;quot;As a result, U.S. economic growth is projected to be 2.4% in 2023 and 1.5% in 2024. These figures are below the G20 averages of 3.1% for 2023 and 2.8% for 2024, but above the OECD averages of 1.7% and 1.4% for the same years&amp;quot;. - ''Forbes'', December 2023.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ankitmishra/2023/12/18/leading-experts-weigh-in-on-growing-the-us-economy-in-2024/?sh=4d276f5151a5] &amp;quot;Private sector experts expect inflation to drop below 2.5% in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Goldman Sachs projects core PCE inflation will fall to around 2.4% by December 2024. The firm anticipates rebalancing in the auto, labor and housing rental markets will spearhead the disinflation.&amp;quot; - Forbes, January 2024.[https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/inflation-outlook-2024/#:~:text=Private%20sector%20experts%20expect%20inflation,markets%20will%20spearhead%20the%20disinflation.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Since the economy is slightly favored to be in recession in 2024 and the public doesn't usually recognize that inflation is over until several months afterwards, that is why the Democrats are engaging in lawfare and hoping Biden's incumbency is going to be enough to win the 2024 presidential election. Presidents whose president terms that are under an economic recesssion during an election year never win the presidency. So that is the biggest risk to Biden's presidency. A signficant enough terrorism attack caused by terrorists crossing a pourous border would be devastating too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:18, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Michelle Obama has no fire in her belly when it comes to running for president or when it comes to politics.[https://katiecouric.com/news/politics-and-policy/is-michelle-obama-running-for-president-2024/] As far as Americans, &amp;quot;a mere 6% of respondents in this survey of 2,250 adults say that, overall, women make better political leaders than men.&amp;quot;[https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American diplomacy/relations with other nations could use some improvement. And its still a man's world - particularly in the key regions of the Middle East, China/Asia and Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:43, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I expect Biden to be replaced with Kamala Harris. I have not seen any news stories that suggest Michelle is in the running. Gavin Newsom obviously wants the job, but, come on, he's a white man. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:19, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the odds of Biden dying this year is greater than him dropping out of the race. The longer he is president, the less likely it is that he will face criminal charges. If Trump wins, Trump may go after the jugular when it comes to Biden so Biden and/or his family members could wind up in prison.  &amp;quot;Given those factors, it might be reasonable to bump up Biden’s 31.35 percent chance of dying in office to perhaps 50 percent.&amp;quot; - Source: [https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4089739-bidens-life-expectancy-and-its-implications/#:~:text=According%20to%20Iervasi%2C%20an%2080,within%20the%20next%2010%20years. Biden’s life expectancy — and its implications], The Hill, July 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Between 1936 and 2012, 11 out of 14 presidents seeking a second White House term were re-elected. This success rate convinced many that, as with other elected offices, incumbency offers distinct advantages for the presidency.&amp;quot;, source: [https://time.com/6549871/2024-presidential-elections-incumbency/ Incumbency Is No Longer an Advantage in Presidential Elections].  I still think the conventional wisdom is right and the author of this article is wrongheaded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately for Biden, his presidency is Jimmy Carter 2.0 so he might drop out, but I think the Democrats are better off with an incumbent because the Democrats don't have a deep bench when it comes to strong presidential candidates. Elizabeth &amp;quot;Pocahantas&amp;quot; Warren toasted her reputation with her DNA test. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::10 months is an eternity in politics. And presidents are loathe to give up power. Biden thinks he can still turn this around via the economy improving and bashing down Trump. And Biden has the MSM media on his side. Post Trump's first term, the MSM is not as strong as it used to be, but it still packs a punch. See: [https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx Media Confidence in U.S. Matches 2016 Record Low].  [[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If the Democrats were smart, they would kick Kamala Harris out of the White House and make Michelle Obama the VP. Then they would have 4 more years to develop a person to be the presidential candidate in 2028. But I don't think Barack/Michelle Obama want to have their legacy tied to the Biden legacy so that is probably a nonstarter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just in: [[Michelle Obama]] said that she is terrified from next election [https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1744430534753673549 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems Obamas want Michelle Obama to run but Biden family and especially [[Jill Biden]] arnt accept the drop out until now --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:11, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::From the comedian [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjNgm7TgsgA Bill Burr: Nothing Will Change With Trump As President]:  &amp;quot;I don't understand why everyone is so upset. You know what is going to happen to you? If you liked Obama did he call you at all in the last 8 years? Did he ever put a sandwhich on your table? You do that. You're going to keep doing that. You're gonna be fine... I feel like the president. You only see him once every three weeks.. It's like if you were dating a chick and she was a jerk and you only saw her once every 3 weeks. There is no way that she could break your heart.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There is something to be said for hard/smart work and having trust in God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And Michelle Obama is not terrified of the next election. Obama has a presidential salary until he dies and the Obamas make big bucks for speaking engagements and other means (Netflix, etc.). Michelle Obama's life will not change very much if Trump becomes president. It's just empty liberal virtue signaling and empty drama queen behavior. Liberal elites rarely move to Canada due to presidential elections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With that being said, I am grateful for Trump's SCOTUS appointments and the good economy under Trump before the pandemic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:42, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michael Robinson]] carries some baggage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Here is the latest from the ''New York Post'': &amp;quot;[https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/dont-be-shocked-if-michelle-obama-sneaks-her-way-into-2024-race/ Don’t be shocked if Michelle Obama sneaks her way into 2024 race].&amp;quot;  [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:27, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis is going to win Iowa, and it won't be close. DeSantis internal poll has 60,000 Caucus Commitment Cards ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;DeSantis internal poll is 60,000 caucus commitment cards!!!&amp;quot; https://twitter.com/jba437/status/1744566432988336283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For comparison: &amp;quot;Ted Cruz was able to defeat Donald Trump in the Iowa Caucus by winning over Evangelical caucus-goers;[1] Cruz won 51,666 caucus votes or 27.6%, giving him a net gain of one delegate over Trump. Cruz visited all 99 counties of Iowa and held small events.[2] Cruz outperformed his polling average, which predicted a narrow Trump victory in the caucus. Following poor performances in the caucuses, Rand Paul,[3] Mike Huckabee[4] and Rick Santorum[5] suspended their campaigns.&amp;quot; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget what the Liberal Media and their Liberal Polls are telling you. If that internal polling is even remotely accurate, with 60,000 to 100,000 caucus votes, likely somewhere between 30% to 50% of an estimated 200,000 voters, all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH. Don't be duped by the Zionist Psy-Op from the Liberal Media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a Mossad like operation. Remember the Deceptive Motto of Non-Abrahamic Deceptive Mossad...[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:All one has to see is , again NishantXavier bigoted spam and total inaccuracies. While conservative Jews' Zionism is in fact anti Liberal and against '''Soros - who is anti-Zionist'''. Zionist-Abrahamic is against  - Pro-Hamas-Soros[https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/george-soros-once-slammed-us-israel-for-not-working-with-hamas/amp/][https://www.foxnews.com/world/israels-un-ambassador-slams-soros-donations-pro-hamas-groups-seeking-destruction-jewish-state.amp][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 05:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::As per using Wikipedia as a source, Wikipedia founder [[Larry Sanger]] says [https://joannenova.com.au/2023/08/founder-says-cia-fbi-control-wikipedia-and-made-it-the-most-biased-encyclopedia/ CIA &amp;amp; FBI control Wikipedia]. Iowa is a contest for the second place finisher between DeSantis &amp;amp; the Deep State Democrat preferred Nikki Haley, which one will advance to Super Tuesday. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trump is doggedly pursuing another term as president. He is not going to drop out after Iowa. That is wishful thinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you missed the context of this discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:32, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier literally wrote above: &amp;quot;Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:39, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, okay. So evidently you agree with Nishant's analysis that [[Deep State]]-controlled Wikipedia is a valid source. That kinda contradicts why Conservapedia was founded. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::You know, me and LT joined [[Larry Sanger]]'s Slack group, but LT has a problem sticking to a plan and commitment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say that Trump will likely drop out after Iowa. Typical example of selective quoting. Here's the broader quotation for the context: &amp;quot;all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:I misread your material. The good news is that I am going to be getting a new pair of workable glasses soon with oversize lenses. Because the lenses are so big, my friend whose father is an academic, calls glasses such as these &amp;quot;professor glasses&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:51, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok MaGoo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another point/angle, with the DeSantis vs Haley on CNN tonight, whether one is for or against Nikki, I believe it's pretty smart of her not to go on the attack on Trump.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:17, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, Conservative. Understood. Btw, my prediction is already coming true. Christie dropped out of the race, even before Iowa. Vivek probably will next, as he didn't make the debate. It'll be down to DeSantis vs Trump before long, and I think he'll do very well then, and it effectively is down to Nikki, Vivek, DeSantis and Trump. I think one of the first two may end up being VP, but let's see. It could also be Kim Reynolds or Thomas Massie, both of whom I like too, and who are also close to the Governor, and campaigned with him.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:46, January 11, 2024 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
:Trump will carry Florida in the general election with or without DeSantis on the ticket - he doesn't need him. [[Kari Lake]] makes a lot more sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:49, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For better or worse, populism is where the GOP base is (Blue collar working class people especially). And they are not going to vote for the Trump-Lite candidate DeSantis as long as Trump is a viable candidate. Because why have Trump lite when you can have Trump. DeSantis is funded by the business/establishment part/class of the GOP. And Nikky Haley is too much of a neocon for the GOP base which is sick of America's forever wars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NishantXavier, I know you are going to come back that DeSantis is more of a family man and religious man, but unfortunately people like that don't win elections now ([[Rick Santorum]]'s and [[Mike Huckabee]]'s presidential candidicies failed). But this could change as religious people are having more kids than nonreligious/irreligious people and there is a growing backlash against the liberalism taught in public schools and universities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main ways America's Christian conservatives are getting their way on the federal level of government is by proverbially sneaking conservative Christian policies in through the back door by putting pressure on predidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges such as the SCOTUS court and to enact conservative policies. While this approach turned over Roe vs. Wade, the same SCOTUS court approved homosexual &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;. To give another illustration, the famous strategist [[Sun Tzu]] wrote: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.&amp;quot; Christian conservatism wins at the federal level are largely gained now by indirect methods (Puting pressure on presidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges and enact conservative policies) rather than directly getting a hardcore Christian conservative into the presidential office. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So let's analyze the meaning of the claim that DeSantis had 60,000 commitment cards out of 110,000 total caucus goers, and finished with 21%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What was the participation rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the source of the claim DeSantis had a 50% majority before going into the caucuses?&lt;br /&gt;
: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:05, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mixing unrelated things ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As for Mossad, it's not Abrahamic, because it's not Abrahamic in faith and values. Devout Jewish Conservatives who are anti-ADL are. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ADL is also not Abrahamic in faith and values, but rather Kabbalic and Satanic, as Jesus told some who bragged they were sons of Abraham, that they were rather sons of the Devil, because they were Devilish in faith and values, and were plotting to kill Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He who wants to kill and brutally torture Christian Children in Abortionist Terrorism is also Devilish rather than Abrahamic, and Conservapedia has well documented that the ADL is such: &amp;quot;Its general stance on prayer in secular schools is that it is &amp;quot;unconstitutional.&amp;quot;[2] The ADL also has a record of supporting gay rights, the separation of church and state,[3] hate crimes legislation, abortion and partial-birth abortion.[4] There is also evidence to suggest that the founders may have been Fabian socialists.[5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), originally known as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (&amp;quot;B'nai B'rith&amp;quot; meaning &amp;quot;Order of the Covenant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Order of the Cut&amp;quot;, referring to circumcision) is a left-wing Jewish organization founded in 1913 ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The League has been criticized for attacking politically conservative Jews such as Dr. Laura Schlessinger.[7] The Jewish World Review stated that the League was &amp;quot;demonizing exponents of Jewish values&amp;quot;,[8] while the National Prayer Network held that the ADL's past legislative involvement &amp;quot;empowered synagogue to mix with state by authorizing itself to teach the US Justice Department, FBI and all local police about hate crimes.&amp;quot;[9]&amp;quot; https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, well, promoting Separation of Church and State in Christian-Majority America, then empowering Synagogue to mix with State in persecuting Conservative Christians and Traditional Catholics. The Plot Thickens: Taken from Conservapedia's informative article on: https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League Well done to those editors. God Bless. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Another ranting hate posting by NishantXavier. A salad between the CIA Israeli version &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Mossad)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; unrelated to religion at all, and a group fighting antisemitism &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(but ADL's Greenblatt has been criticized by conservative Jews for getting involved in unrelated stuff like woke). BTW. Israel is mostly non religious. Though most do believe in God.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But ''NishantXavier'' has a routine of slamming Jews, or anything that is or preceived to be related to them, however the tool and opportunity arises.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it started when some ultra Orthodox Jews zealots were spitting on/towards Christian pilgrims and other Christians such as Christian clergy in Israel. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:27, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier spammed poison before that.  And at the time has only highlighted that case by exclusively stressing on those few but not on the ultra-Orthodox Talmudists who turned over the 2 youths spitters to Zionist authorities who punished them or omitted the overwhelming religious organizations groups, rabbis all against that thing. It's not that case at all. But a constant routine of hatred. Even his terminology+mixing unrelated things he uses, is often typically Neo Nazi or and KKK type. In addition, take a look at [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1999949 this] sample of his horrendous malicious lie - asides the fact that he mixes contradictory ideologies... one opposing the other into one salad - all for his unholy &amp;quot;holy war.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What rubbish. I did not spam any &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot;. I educated ignorant Souls about what the Talmud teaches. I'm a credible editor with a long history of seriousness, far more than some of you. I run ReasonstobeChristian.com website. More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us, or you can remain willfully blind. I will shake of the dust if you do. Everything I said, I documented with unimpeachable links and sources. I also specifically commended Good Jews like Dr. Laura Schlessinger and others. I'm not talking about. I'm talking about Talmudist Supremacy, which is as bad or worse than Communism and Nazism. If we can criticize Russians or Germans when some of them behave badly, we can perfectly legitimately criticize Jews when some of them behave badly. There are none so blind as will not see. Read the Talmud first, become an expert on what it teaches about &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot;, and then you can talk....[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:43, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a total rubbish out of infamous Hitlerist GDL flyers... on and on NishantXavier has no shame.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is no quick and easy solution to the Gaza situation. This difficult situation has been going on since the Jews won the 1967 [[Six Day War]]. With that being said, the Six Day War was remarkable and there were signs that God intervened on behalf of the Jews (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wMIq6X4zi4 GOD'S HAND IN THE SIX DAY WAR] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Did God Help Israel During The Six Day War?] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i3uIz7hoYs Six Days of Miracles] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Fmr Israeli Commander: God Protected us in Battle]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mixing things up .Nobody's talking about Gaza. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Dianne, you need to read this, from Jewish Site Ynet News: &amp;quot;Stalin's Jews We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish ... And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name &amp;quot;Genrikh Yagoda,&amp;quot; the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.&amp;quot; https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has nothing to do with Hitler, who I condemn. Even Churchill was aware that many of the Jewish Bolsheviks who persecuted some 60 MN Christians - as Alexander Solzhenitsyn estimated - were in fact Bolshevik Jews. So do you condemn those Bolshevik Jews who persecuted Christians?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;Terrorist Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.&amp;quot; https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, this is of relevance because Jews gain weapons from Western Christians, then use those weapons against Middle Eastern Christians. They do this in Armenia, in Palestine, and recently Mossad/IDF Snipers targeted and killed two Christian women going to the latrine. Those Christian women could have been you, Dianne. Do you not care about your sisters in Christ/in conservatism? Don't spread false lies and malicious slanders about me. I am a Catholic Christian, and I love everyone. But I boldly rebuke plain evil when I see it without fear or favor. I am not calling for any kind of genocide, but trying to stop the planned genocide of 2.5 MN Palestinians, many of whom, if the plans of Mossad succeed, will emigrate to America and Europe, and then be radicalized against the local Christian populations there. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yea, we. Noticed the G word thing, though it is anti zionists who use the Talmud for their ideology and Zionists use the Biblical text before Talmud expansion on it.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That phrase he used, was debunked, including at the Dreyfus trial. Talking about education.  But only racists interpret it the way as he wants to. BTW, Every religion things it is the true one and above all other religions)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;, the favorite by neo nezis. What's next? He has basically promoted that ancient (1903) invented canard idea -  [https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion Hitler]'s favorite pushing [https://www.google.com/search?q=protocols+forgery&amp;amp;oq=protocols+forgery &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot; forgery], wrapping it into contemporary excuses.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; (As a liar Nishant also portrays 97% Muslim &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; in Gaza as supposed &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::He pathetically links communists who are anti-religion and anti-Talmud. Whatever works for his Jihad.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:23, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nishant, seriously, you need to do some studying. These two sentences: &amp;quot;More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us&amp;quot; could have came straight out of ''Mein Kampf''. Seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish Virtual Library website (The website is run by the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise) indicates: &amp;quot;Since talmudic literature spans over half a millennium, covering a wide geographic area, attitudes toward gentiles expressed in it vary considerably. In fact, it reveals a whole spectrum of opinions from the extreme antipathy of the tormented Jew of Hadrian's time – e.g., Simeon b. Yoḥai's statement: The best of gentiles should be killed (TJ, Kid. 4:11, 66c) – to the moderate views expressed in the more friendly atmosphere of early Sassanid Babylon – witness Samuel's making no distinction between Israel and the nations on the Day of Judgment (TJ, RH 1:3, 57a). Thus all such statements must be seen in their specific geographical-historical context. Nevertheless, in general it may be said that the Jew's attitude toward the gentile was largely conditioned by the gentile's attitude toward him (see Esth. R. 2:3), so that a gentile's friendship to a Jew would be warmly and uninhibitedly reciprocated (see BK 38a, and witness the relationships between Meir and Avnimos ha-Gardi, Judah ha-Nasi and Antoninus, Samuel and Sapor, etc.).&amp;quot;[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/gentile] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:31, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''One of the old infamous persecution of Jews by using Talmud text erroneously, was the Beilis Trial. Which ended in embrassament for the prosecutors for ignorance.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The trial of Beilis took place in Kiev from September 25 through October 28, 1913. The chief prosecutor A.I. Vipper made anti-Jewish statements in his closing address and defended the Cheberiak gang against the charge of Yushchinsky's murder. Beilis was represented by the most able counsels of the Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Kiev bars: Vassily Maklakov, Oscar O. Grusenberg, N.P. Karabchevsky, A.S. Zarundy, and D.N. Grigorovitch-Barsky. The lamplighter and his wife, on whose testimony the indictment of Beilis rested, when questioned by the presiding judge, answered, &amp;quot;We know nothing at all.&amp;quot; They confessed that both had been confused by the secret police and made to answer questions they did not comprehend. &amp;quot;Scientific&amp;quot; foundation for the blood libel was supplied at the trial by a Catholic priest with a criminal record, Justin Pranaitis, who stated that the murder of Yushchinsky had all the characteristics of ritual murder enjoined by the Jewish religion. His arguments were refuted by the rabbi of Moscow, Jacob *Mazeh , who proved that Pranaitis was ignorant of the talmudic texts cited. Two Russian professors of high standing, Troitsky and Kokovtzoff, also spoke on behalf of the defense in praise of Jewish values and exposed the falsity of the ritual murder hypothesis. The jury, composed of simple Russian peasants, after several hours of deliberation unanimously declared Beilis &amp;quot;not guilty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/menahem-mendel-beilis JVL].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expedia cites this &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2363483/jewish/In-Defense-of-Chassidism.htm link].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, in Ezekiel.34.31:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.34.31?ven=Tanakh:_The_Holy_Scriptures,_published_by_JPS&amp;amp;vhe=Miqra_according_to_the_Masorah&amp;amp;lang=he]&lt;br /&gt;
'For you, My flock, flock that I tend, are ADAM; and I am your God—declares the Lord GOD.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which a Talmud verse is based on. (Like the entire Talmud is, based on the Hebrew Bible, [[Tanakh]]). This was misrepresented by the prosecutor at the trial. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''It's ludicrous to suggest that the Bible considers others supposedly &amp;quot;not human&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was part of what Rabbi Maze mentioned when replied to the antisemitic prosecutor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Hebrew words have multiple/different meaning, depending on the context. So what is the specific meaning of ADAM in this case?(Source - Rabbi Yaakov Galinsky &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;VeHigadeta&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vayikra, p. 196),  what it refers to in this case is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Adam&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; vs &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ish&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Adam as a unified one group of people. As opposed to many separate, unconnected individuals.[https://yated.com/100-years-since-the-mendel-beilis-trial-blood-libel-refuses-to-die/ 100 Years Since The Mendel Beilis Trial- Blood Libel Refuses To Die], [https://daat.ac.il/chazal/maamar.asp?id=365 &amp;quot;You're called Adam&amp;quot;], [https://www.ou.org/life/torah/reflections_shemot_5768_of_rachmanut_and_redemption/ Shemot: Of Rachmanut and Redemption].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the ''Talmud''  includes Gentiles specifically, twice. &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Temurah.2b Tmurah 2b] [https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.56a Sanhedrin 56a] and more. (Source, Galinsky, ibid).[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such Talmudsplaining avails nothing, one could justify the Quran too by such sophistry. Also, some people seem not to realize I oppose all Persecution of Christians, not only Jewish Persecution of Christians, like Itamir Ben Gvir is complicit in, but also Islamist Persecution of Christians. Any True Christian takes the side of Persecuted Christians, regardless of whether it is Jews or Muslims persecuting them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is prohibited to raise a gentile from a pit even in exchange for payment, because one can say an excuse to him, such as: My son is standing on the roof and I must go use this ladder to help him down from the roof. Alternatively, he can say to him: A time has been appointed for me to appear in the courthouse [bei davar] and I must attend to this matter. Since the Jew can provide a legitimate excuse for refusing to aid the gentile, there is no need to extract him from the pit.&amp;quot; https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talmud_on_gentiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In numerous ways, the Talmud shows over and over again that it is ok with killing Gentiles, that it views Goyim as subhuman without a right to life etc. Again, as St. Bernadette famously said, it is my duty to inform, not to convince. Anti-Gentilism is as much a sin as Anti-Semitism. I am not promoting Anti-Semitism, which means hatred or dislike of all Jews. I am calling out the Talmud on its Anti-Gentilism, which means hatred or dislike of all Gentiles, which it repeatedly promotes, even more than the Quran does of non-Muslims. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Talmud shows over and over again&amp;quot;. Have you read the Talmud? Have you ever even seen the Talmud?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is what's known in the art of rhetoric as &amp;quot;hyperbolic bluster&amp;quot;. You should choose your words better if you wish to maintain credibility. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:50, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I have read it. Have you? This is just argument from incredulity, you can't believe it could really say these things, therefore you accuse those criticizing it, after having read it, of not &amp;quot;really&amp;quot; reading it or something. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this too: &amp;quot;𝙎𝙚𝙭𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙜𝙞𝙧𝙡 𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙛 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙜𝙚.&lt;br /&gt;
(𝙆𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 11𝙗)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/itsmorganariel/status/1745551453618385108 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the &lt;br /&gt;
King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I have not read the Talmud. But I've read ''Mein Kampf'' in 3 different translations and bunch of other Holocaust literature and anti-Semitic writings and arguments from those times. And your whole presentation here comes straight out of the body of those anti-Semitic tracs that appeared after circulation of the ''Protocols'' in 1890s upto World War II. It's nothing new, and hardly a &amp;quot;revelation&amp;quot; as you try to sell it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:21, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look at the language you use: &amp;quot;Jewish Supremacist&amp;quot;. Where'd you get that phrase, [https://davidduke.com/the-roots-of-jewish-supremacism/ The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Note to others. My reply was and is not intended to that ''NishantXavier'' - a fanatic hater who won't listen to reason and truth, but to others on the site&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; About him mixing and linking three different ideologies including anti-Talmud-Commmnist to blend all into his venomous longtime campaign - I have mentioned above... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now it's Israel;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tomorrow, it's unrelated anti-Talmud-Communists; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
then it's about an opposite which is Talmud;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
his attemts to link secular dominated IDF to &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatevet chance he can bash that one group - his horrific obsession.  His verbatim-style sounds straight out of Neo Nazi sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May God have mercy on his soul. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;The entire &lt;br /&gt;
list &lt;br /&gt;
of those quotes &lt;br /&gt;
have been debunked and explained.&lt;br /&gt;
Long&lt;br /&gt;
before Nishant was born. &lt;br /&gt;
This is from 1937 at Nazis rise&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://www.jta.org/archive/oxford-professor-defends-talmud-against-nazi-accusation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;This is at the early years of internet&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Here is a&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://images.shulcloud.com/618/uploads/PDFs/Divrei_Torah/160615-Response%20to%20anti-semitic%20distortions%20of%20the%20Talmud.pdf pdf]&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; and&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://aish.com/misquoting-the-talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;and &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://blog.nli.org.il/en/against_the_talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;There is no need for me to do that here.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of TALMUD quotes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''To break a verbal engagement, though legally not binding, is a moral wrong.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a wise man? He who looks into the future.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Anger profiteth nobody.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ignorance and conceit go hand in hand.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom, Conceit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is a bounden duty to visit the sick.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The righteous control their desires, but the desires of the wicked control them.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is sinful to deceive any man, be he even a heathen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Examine the contents, not the bottle.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who loves thee scolds thee.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Envy, lust, ambition, bring a man to perdition.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''When a son is called to do a service for his parents, he must first see that his person is tidy and clean; for a child must attend to his parents as though they were his king and queen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who cannot bear one word of reproof will have to hear many.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who unjustly hands over one man’s goods to another, he shall pay God for it with his own soul.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Honesty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The value of the words uttered with the lips is determined by the devotion of the heart.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Prayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The love which shirks from reproving is no love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who gives way to his wrath makes desolate his house.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The disciples of the wise are engaged all their days in building up the world.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The less the merits of a person are, the more he will feel urged to proclaim them to the public.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The study of God’s Word is the only antidote against temptation.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Temptation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Guard thy mouth from uttering an unseemly word.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Slander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''A man commits sin in secret; but the Holy One proclaims it openly.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Sin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who turns away from the works of love and charity, turns away from God.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Charity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Regulate thy will in accordance with God’s will, and submit thy will to His will.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''There is a compensation for everything except our first love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a hero? He who conquers his urges.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Heroes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Do not appease thy fellow in his hour of anger; do not comfort him while the dead is still laid out before him; do not question him in the hour of his vow; and do not strive to see him in his hour of misfortune.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''What is sweeter than sweetness? Peace after enmity.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Thy friend has a friend, and thy friend’s friend has a friend; be discreet.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Gossip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''All ailings, only not the ailing of heart; all evils, but not an evil wife.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simon the Just…used to say, “Upon three things the world stands: On Torah, on (Divine) Service, and on Deeds of Lovingkindness.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Hillel used to say: ”If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simeon, the son of Rabban Gamliel, said: “I was brought up all my life among the Sages, and I have found nothing as good for the body as silence, and it is not the study/explication that is the essence – but the practice/doing, and whoever is profuse of words occasions sin.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabban Simeon, son of Gamliel, said, “On three things the world stands: On Judgment, on Truth, and on Peace…”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Yose said: ”Let your friend’s property be as precious to you as your own; Give yourself to studying the Torah, for it does not come to you by inheritance; and let all your deeds be done in the name of Heaven.”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He (Rabbi Tarfon) also used to say, “It is not your obligation to complete the task, but neither are you at liberty to desist from it entirely…”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Another teaching of Rabbi Akiva: “Everything is foreseen, yet free will is granted; By goodness is the universe judged,  yet all depends on the preponderance of (good) deeds….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 3:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ben Zoma said, “Who is wise? The one who learns from all people… “Who is mighty?  The one who subdues the evil inclination… “Who is rich? The who who rejoices in his portion…. “Who is honored? The one who honors other human beings….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Jacob used to say, “Better is one hour of t’shuvah (returning/repentance) and good deeds in this world than the whole life of the world-to-come and better is one hour of spiritual bliss in the world-to-come than all the the life of this world!”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi (Meir) said, ”Look not at the flask but at what is therein; There may be a new flask full of old wine, And an old flask wherein is not even new wine.”''''' [inner greatness...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;but again, his problem is not Talmud or unrelated to it IDF or unrelated opposite which is Communists or other opportunities he fanatically frantically jumps to bash..&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bigot NishantXavier (cherry picking to put Js. in a bad light):&lt;br /&gt;
''I'm very very very , but very much concerned about Christians, this is why, upto now I never wrote about Islamic persecution all over - especially in Iran, my-neighbouring-Pakistan, Africa anti-Christian genocide, etc.. but it's the juuz, I mean talmud (but I will use only a sentence that I can use in my war,  regardless of its true neaning or context), I mean DeSantis (is &amp;quot;like&amp;quot;) mossad, I mean bolsheviks who hate religion and talmud, I mean zionists, I mean communist-anti-Zionists, I mean secular Netanyahu...no, not non-Jewish Italian Fauci, not non-Jewish Greek Jeff Bezos, or non-Jewish Musk, or non-Jewish Buffet or Arab Carlos Slim, not at all. I mean the juuz want to &amp;quot;control&amp;quot; you, it's THEM...hey, I like KKKDavidduke language/ideology....''[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:59, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::So far I think I have given the most reasonable view about the Jews/Talmud that is somewhere between Dianne3000/Telling and NishantXavier. Given that I have read the Old Testament through, took took two classes related to the Nazis/Holocaust, worked for Jewish organization as their token gentile, and worked for a Jewish owned firm, this is not surprising. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, it appears as if the Talmud is a mixed bag of truth/error and I believe that the Jews made a mistake on having an overemphasis on the Talmud and not enough emphasis on the Torah, the Old Testament prophets and the Old Testament. And being a Christian, I believe that Jesus was the Messiah, the trinity, and the divine inspiration of the New Testament books. Being a non-Catholic Christian, I think the Catholics put too much emphasis on the proclamations of Popes who are also a mixed bag of truth/error. So the Jews are not alone on putting too much reliance on man and not enough on God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And being that the Jews have suffered under authoritarian regimes and are educated go getters, it does not surprise me that American Jews are often liberals who embrace [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy liberal democracy] (For example, American college educated people tend to be Democrats today). Also, as far as some Jews embracing atheism/Marxism, it is part rebellion against God and partly and errant anger at God for allowing the persecution of the Jews. When you abandon God like many leftists there is the danger of following ungodly, utopian, ideologies like Marxism. And unfortunately, the ADL is liberal/leftist in its ideology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, God hasn't abandoned the Jews and modern Israel (which fullfils various Old Testament prophecies) and the miraculous events surrounding the Six Day War are proof of this (see my posts previously on main page talk above). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:03, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, Mr. Moderator. Impressive. You've put up quite the defense for the &amp;quot;Semite-led untermensch&amp;quot; the past two years. [[User_talk:MayGodBless#Russian_soldier_and_looter_returning_to_Russia_from_Ukraine:_.22Honey.2C_we_now_have_a_great_luxury._We_now_have_a_toilet.21.22|The Semite-led untermensch don't even have indoor flush toilets.]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::NishantXavier does NOT have a &amp;quot;view on talmud,&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;view&amp;quot; on zionists. He has a Jew hatred problem. You know, they all (anti Zionist G. Soros meets with Netanyahu, everyday, sometimes 5 times a day, it depends on the anti Zionist Talmudists who refuse to serve in the IDF), meet in the heat of night and decide how to &amp;quot;rule.&amp;quot;...preferably with space lasers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::IMO, it shows the danger of anti-Semitic tracs and literature, cause it gets absorbed and repeated rotely without understanding what's being said. What's the solution? Censorship? No, education. Education, understanding, and compassion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:01, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, RobSmith. I showed via various socioeconomic indicators that some countries futures look bright, while others do not. Being mad at me about this is like being mad at the weatherman for forecasting tornados/hurricane for some regions or being mad at a seismologist for forecasting an earthquake for a region. Right now, it looks like significant deflation hitting China, the second biggest economy in the world, and China's current and upcoming steep demographic decline is going to have a BIG effect on the world. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The Semite-led untermensch don't have indoor flush toilets. Unfortunately, we have to re-hash this debate with the upcoming vote on the Continuing Resolution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Telling and Diane3000, I don't agree with NishantXavier's various opinions/views on the Jews, but for various reasons that will not get into, I think NishantXavier's anger towards the Jews will lesson down the pike. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to switch back into helping non talk page web pages get more web traffic and various websites get more web traffic. That has been far more impactful/fruitful as far as my past endeavors. I spent too much time on Conservavpedia talk pages in 2023/2024. Andy is right about talk, talk, talk not being a very fruitful endeavor. So am bowing out of this discussion. And I don't expect to get involved in main page talk again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Main page talk is like eating processed sugar. It will give you a sugar high and taste sweet at the time, but long term it is not good for you. One of my New Year's resolutions for 2024 is to stay off Conservapedia talk pages as much as possible. But doing friendly/constructive talk page edits can be useful/enjoyable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::MPR/talk should be about current news items and qualifying sources. The extraneous stuff belongs at the Community Portal, where anybody can spew their caca ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether NishantXavier's background (before becoming Christian per his saying), there '''in his India, is Islam or Hinduism, both maintain supremacism'''. And which religion does not hold itself above the other? While of the three Abrahamic religions, only Judaism does not prosletyze, still it's amazing the singling out.&lt;br /&gt;
I've lived with evangelicals, beautiful friends too, I've never seen such a rare, weird person, to be such a blind hater carrying that label (evangelical?) along.&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and about Talmud? It was Hillel who coined the golden rule..&lt;br /&gt;
(1) &amp;quot;If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And being for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) &amp;quot;That which is hateful to you, do not do unto your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation;[a] go and learn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is the expansion of the. Bible, oral interpretation that stems since Moses, through an unbroken chain...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. They said three things: Be patient in [the administration of] justice, raise many disciples and make a fence round the Torah.&amp;quot; (Avot, 1, 1).[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:52, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Re predicting [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]]===&lt;br /&gt;
That's a remarkable, unexpected prediction, Nishant, that [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]].  Startling, contrary predictions like that are what make [[Conservapedia]] great.  Thanks for being bold, while I expect [[Trump]] to prevail in these [[Iowa caucuses]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thank you, Andy. God Bless! It's great we can amicably disagree. I expect it to be DeSantis vs Trump one-on-one and head-to-head shortly after Iowa. Let's see if it pans out that way. But Christie dropping out already means it's effectively a 2 person race arguably, 2 persons in the top tier, Trump and DeSantis, and two persons perhaps running more for VP, namely Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's see if last night have an impact too. There were some fireworks but not a whole lot.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:17, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is still favored to win the Republican primary and the 2024 election according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html][https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] The political betting markets data indicates that DeSantis only has a 4% chance of winning the GOP primary.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] The improbable does happen sometimes, but it does very much look like Trump is going to win the GOP nomination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The odds of a Republican winning the 2024 presidential election is now about 3% higher than the Democrats winning it according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html] That's a slim margin. I think it is going to come down to the economy (which seems to have a 50/50 chance of getting worse before the election) and what the Supreme Court does in relation to the charges against Trump. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/polls-show-haley-closing-gap-trump-new-hampshire/story?id=106223644 polls] are any good, Haley closes gap.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;New Iowa Poll ranks Trump, DeSantis, Haley ahead of Iowa Caucuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/13/latest-iowa-poll-gop-presidential-candidates-iowa-caucus-donald-trump-nikki-haley-ron-desantis/72137628007/ The Des Moines Register][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:04, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only question is, will Trump received a majority or plurality in a three way contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Chris Christie drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 person race, soon to be 3, then 2: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/10/us/politics/chris-christie-drops-out.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== When do you estimate Haley and Vivek will drop out? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So with only (1) Nikki (2) Vivek (3) DeSantis and (4) Trump left in the race, let's look at when people are likely to drop out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My estimation is either one of Nikki or Vivek will cut a VP backroom deal with either Trump or DeSantis, then drop out once it is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be or may not be, let's wait and see. But here's the Calendar: https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-calendar/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, in the next one month, we have (1) Iowa - Jan 15 (2) NH - Jan 23 (3) SC - Feb 3 (4) Nev - Feb 6 etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion is Vivek may drop out after Iowa, maybe Jan 20th or so. Christie might have stayed in till NH, his home state after all, but he has already got out, which makes matters simpler for those looking to see when it will become a 2 man race. Nikki, since SC is her home State, might stay in until Feb 3, and then drop out around Feb 4th or 5th or so, but if she struggles to pick up traction, maybe earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's the way it seems to me. What do others think? [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis runs 2nd in Iowa and Haley has a chance to run 2nd in NH. If Desantis takes 2nd in NH, it's a two man race until Trump has enough delegates. If Haley survives NH, the Haley-DeSantis contest goes into overtime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An important factor is fundraising. If either DeSantis or Haley appear to have done less than expected, fundraising dries up. By contrast, if Haley does better than expected in Iowa (not likely) or NH (a long shot), then the money starts poring into Haley's coffers, and away from DeSantis to his detriment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis strategy is take 2nd in Iowa, 3rd in NH, and 2nd in SC. That keeps him in the race beyond Feb. 3. Haley's only prayer is to finish 2nd in two of those three races. Without that, she's cooked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:35, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternative theory (Trump's version): DeSantis staked everything on Iowa. If he finishes 2nd, he drops out., leaving Trump &amp;amp; Haley the last 2 men standing. Then it becomes a head-to-head matchup between Trump and Democrats preferred globalist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More on money in campaigns: What many people don't understand is, many campaigns run hand to mouth (due to current campaign finance laws). Candidates spend the entirety of 2023 raising money which ALL gets spent in Iowa. If they fail to meet that mark, they drop out (like Christie just did, or Kamala did in December 2019. She famously said in the fall of 2019, &amp;quot;I'm moving to Iowa&amp;quot;, meaning she bet the farm of her whole campaign war chest on Iowa, and didn't even last that long). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Each primary win gives a boost in fundraising for the next primary contest. Most candidates literally live hand to mouth. This is why Trump predicts DeSantis to drop out if he fails to win, or do less than expected. Christie was running on gas fumes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump OTOH, is not dependent on donors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Biden, who ran 5th in Iowa in 2020, didn't spend a dime in Iowa. He didn't really enter the primary campaign season until South Carolina, and bet it all there and on Super Tuesday. That's why Buttboy, Klobuchar, and others dropped out on election eve - they were running on fumes, knew they wouldn't pick up any new donors, and cut the best deal they could for career advancement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:26, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Beating a dead horse.gif|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Haley and DeSantis spilt 17%-19% or roughly 35%, 1-in-3, meaning they likewise have to split the anti-Trump donor money between them, with neither side being able to take full advantage. Haley probably has the edge, and has to sweep the next two. Trump predicted DeSantis to fold after IA, but DeSantis may stick around to NH for confirmation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iowan Patriots brave Cold to support future President Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It’s literally freezing in Ames, Iowa. Iowans chose to listen to their next president of the United States. RonDeSantis will win Iowa by a landslide.&amp;quot; Picture in the link. Rob or someone, can you pls post the pic here? https://twitter.com/BoricuaGOP/status/1745632851775668451 It is an epic pic, and it speaks a 1000 words. Let's see how it goes. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right. Trump colluded with Russia, Covid comes from people eating bats, Russia is about to run out of missiles, and DeSantis will defeat Trump. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the photo, half of em are Democrats. There is no Democrat caucus this year so they go to the GOP caucus to reek havoc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol, &amp;quot;half of them are Democrats&amp;quot;, that's quite a nice Conspiracy Theory you've got there, Mr. Rob Smith. Lazy Lib Dems are not going to brave Freezing Iowa Temperatures to show up in favor of a Candidate their Liberal Media tells them is already losing. Liberals haven't thought their strategies through. But it's ok because God is on the side of those who wish to confirm the RvW Victory and make it permanent. That's the number 1 reason I'm Pro DeSantis. But as a Pro-Trump Friend reminded me, it's good for Trump too if DeSantis wins, as we'll get him pardoned from any liberal phony Trumped up charge the Dems place against him. We don't agree with Trump, but we have no grudge against him, like the Dems trying to destroy him and his family do. We just need a young, 2 Term President to finish the job concerning RvW etc.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:34, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I'm from the Midwest. Why do you think we have elections and caucuses in the dead of winter? Cause there's nothing to do and it gives you an opportunity to get out of the house. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:51, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's wait for the caucuses to complete, then we can compare the results and the predictions. I'm working on another project right now, namely the History of Christendom, particularly the first 500 years. Will check back when caucuses are done. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:51, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gatewaypundit: [https://rumble.com/v46z9p0-democrats-may-switch-parties-to-vote-for-nikki-haley-in-iowa.html Democrats May Switch Parties to Vote for Nikki Haley in Iowa]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Joni Ernst today===&lt;br /&gt;
Joni Ernst was clever in walking a fine line  on MTP this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
Buy she is not ruling out endorsing Trump if he is the nominee....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hostages held in Gaza are innocent, they were celebrating the Jewish holiday and are held by terrorists in tunnels in in Gaza, they have been tortureed, raped...[https://ibb.co/TtqMrPZ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6 Americans held in Gaza need to be freed immediately, they are our brothers and sisters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Trump pardons convicted on J6, she won't oppose that, that is a president prerogative thing to do that, it will be his decision. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristen:&lt;br /&gt;
But you called them insurrectionists...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ernst: I did not use that term...They did break the law.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:50, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis grassroots support: more than 1,700 precinct captains ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis has 1700 precinct captains. Assuming each captain is able to mobilize even 50 voters, that's 85,000. Assuming 170,000 total voters, hitting 85,000 and 50% as a percentage is in no wise impossible. DeSantis has far better chances than the Lib Media is telling you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Grassroots support for Ron DeSantis in Iowa is incredibly strong. 💪💪💪&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 1,700 precinct captains are ready to turn out his supporters at the Republican caucus on Monday night!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://twitter.com/NvrBackDown24/status/1746372891791233437 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:00, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump wins Iowa===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's Trump all the way down in Iowa. With 99 percent of the vote counted, its Trump 51% (20 delegates), DeSantis 21% (8 delegates), Haley 19% (7 delegates), and Ramaswamy 8% (3 delegates), according to RCP. Biden has a net favorable rating of -17 while Trump has -15. When the winners are this unpopular, there's something wrong with the election system. Perhaps a nonpartisan primary with the top two candidates going on to the general election would help. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be worse. William Lai, Taiwan's newly elected president, is also super-unpopular. [https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/ He got only 40 percent of the vote in Saturday's election]. Fortunately the Chinese military is too corrupt to do anything about it. [https://www.businessinsider.com/china-corruption-rocket-force-water-fuel-xi-jinping-purge-scandal-2024-1?op=1 Water-filled rockets, anyone?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update:''' So happened to the rocket fuel? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lcyIf_7v6Q China's Military Whistleblower: Air Force Used Missile Fuel for Cooking] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:14, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The public's fickle, and they vote for idiots anyway. &amp;quot;The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversations with the average voter.&amp;quot; - Winston Churchill. Why do you think we have a $34 trillion [[national debt]]? cause the candidates promise freebies and the idiots keep voting for them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:28, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The [[U.S.]] has become a vast and enormously diverse country.  I think it may be unrealistic, in the absence of an attack by a foreign enemy (such as [[9/11]]), to expect high approval ratings for a president anymore.  [[Trump]] is the best hope to keep the [[U.S.]] united and strong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:40, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's hope.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:42, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is only going to be in office 4 more years if he runs. The most pernicious thing dividing America culturally is leftist/liberals taking over academia and indoctrinating students. That needs to be addressed because it is a root problem. 61.8% of high school (or equivalent) graduates go on to post-secondary study.[https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics#:~:text=Report%20Highlights.,decline%20in%20enrollment%20since%201951.]  Conservatives/Republicans have to get more serious via school choice and cutting off loans to college majors that offer a low return on investment to students in terms of employability and are often liberal indoctrination (Women's studies, etc.) and paring down the amount of required courses (There is no reason why an engineer needs to take liberal/leftist fluff courses). They also need to pare down frivolous spending by colleges (Top heavy administration costs, lavish facilities). Colleges need to focus on core competencies and be more spartan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I know of a clergman who visits relatives in a red state and his relatives have a messianic view of Trump and that he is going to solve all their problems. The clergyman pointed out that Trump is not going to solve all their problems. For example, his morbidly obese relatives in that red state are still going to be obese if Trump wins. Politicians can only do so much. More Americans need to turn to God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Read this article to see what some right-wing people are doing to transform colleges into more conservative institutions: [https://time.com/6319108/conservative-universities/ The History Behind the Right’s Effort to Take Over American Universities]. More Republican governors need to start implemnting what is starting to be done in Florida. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:29, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the tip, Conservative. Thanks to E. Stefanik's Dec. unmasking of academia dark reality.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:22, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Why Trump's ahead in GA (poll) matters===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President Biden trails former President Trump by eight percentage points in a hypothetical rematch in Georgia, according to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll of registered voters out Tuesday ((01.16.24)). Why it matters: The poll offers an early warning sign for Biden, who flipped Georgia blue in 2020 for the first time in nearly three decades[https://www.axios.com/2024/01/16/trump-biden-georgia-poll-2024-rematch Trump beating Biden in Georgia in early 2024 poll (01.16.24)].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If DEMS. oust Biden, it will be interesting HOW they do it. Recalling Sanders case.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:17, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vivek drops out===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has dropped out, and with that I say this: I am a hard no on Vivek for 2028.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past few weeks, hardcore cultists like Laura Loomer have been attacking Haley as ineligible but leaving Vivek alone despite him having the same eligibility issues as her. And now that he has dropped out, they are hypocritically proclaiming him the future of MAGA once Trump is done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These people stand for only one thing: as long as you're loyal to Trump on a personal level, EVERYTHING is negotiable. Even core tenets of MAGA ideology like immigration, trade, and foreign policy. As you may recall, it was this way of thinking that made it possible for neocons like Bolton and Pompeo to infiltrate Trump's first administration and destroy it from within. And if this faction continues to have Trump's ear, they will be just as responsible for the failure of his second administration as the second wave of neocon infiltrators who carry out the destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has now become the face of this faction, and unless he distances himself from them I cannot trust him going forward. MAGA is more than just Trump. It is an ideology and a way of life. Anyone who thinks MAGA is something negotiable is at best delusional and at worst a closet NeverTrumper. We cannot afford such people being at the wheel.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:07, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's already endorsed Trump. He's following the [[Ben Carson]] blueprint. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:25, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Expectedly, but still, Vivek (though re Ukraine many agreed with him, nevertheless), has been rubbing too many people, even at GOP, the wrong way, for various reasons.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:03, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with Geopolitician that the movement -at least in spirit- is larger than Trump.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now wait a minute...Geo, you just claimed [[Laura Loomer]] was a credible source for the [[Ron DeSantis]] page, and here you call her a &amp;quot;[[cult]]ist&amp;quot;. Make up your mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I explained on your talk page why such statements aren't mutually exclusice and why I stand by both statements. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith#Any_source_for_this.3F here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:26, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSNBC &amp;quot;warns...&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
MSNBC’s Scarborough Calls Trump Getting 51% of Iowa Vote ‘Bad News’ for GOP&lt;br /&gt;
'50% of people voting in the Iowa caucuses against a former president is bad news for that party’s prospects in the general election,' said Scarborough&lt;br /&gt;
Published 01/16/24 &lt;br /&gt;
[https://themessenger.com/politics/msnbcs-scarborough-calls-trump-getting-51-of-iowa-vote-bad-news-for-the-gop][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki in NH===&lt;br /&gt;
So Nikki's strategy is as follows: She's now claiming &amp;quot;It's a two person race&amp;quot;, following Trump's prediction that DeSantis will drop out if DeSAntis doesn't finish 1st in Iowa (where he was soundly beaten).  Joe Biden is not on the ballot in NH, leaving Democrats to vote in the Republican primary. That's why polls have Nikki at 40%. If Desantis stays in, the winner walks away with only a plurality; if DeSantis drops out, Trump wins a majority, again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:57, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Haley's donors and voters are mainly Democrats. It's not because they want the Republican Party to succeed. She's the new John Kasich. I was a DeSantis man, but now I'll take my chances with Trump. [https://youtu.be/7lhcZquLMX0 Matt Walsh exposes Haley as a Civil War idiot on YouTube].&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update'''. The problem is not just that Haley's supporters are Democrats. The pundits say they are &amp;quot;moderates,&amp;quot; but they are in fact the most partisan Democrats. They want all Republicans, including Haley, to lose in the general election. The primaries are set up on the assumption that people will vote for the candidate they support. The Haley Democrats are voting for the Republican that they think is most likely to lose in the general election. That is good argument for replacing partisan primaries with nonpartisan primaries, something that we already have in Washington State. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:51, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update:''' [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/01/21/opinion/haley-trump-new-hampshire-republican-gop-primary/ The ''Boston Globe'' is advising Democrats to vote for Haley], even though &amp;quot;Haley’s not this editorial board’s cup of tea.&amp;quot; Cross party lines and vote for someone you hate! By this logic, Republicans should vote in the Democratic primary for Dean Phillips. Then we can have a general election between Haley and Phillips. The system of partisan primaries is setup for this type of abuse. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 18:03, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Interesting that a few thousands still voted for DeSantis after endorsing Trump. NYT recent update - New Hampshire Republican Primary Election Results - Donald J. Trump wins the New Hampshire Republican primary. Donald J. Trump - &lt;br /&gt;
172,798	+54.4%	- 12 delegates - Nikki Haley - 137,670	+43.3%,	9 delegates.[https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/23/us/elections/results-new-hampshire-republican-primary.html][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:25, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::1/2 of a percent is about 1,500 voters - probably dedicated volunteer door knockers, etc, people who are not high paid consultants who have already found other employment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:36, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Let's do the math on Haley, cause how a candidate runs their campaign is a good clue on their decision making on how they would run an administration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::73% of Haley voters are Dmeocrats = 139,679 x .73 = 101,965 Democrat voters. She spent $31 million to lose = 31,000,000/139,679 = $222 per vote or $22,630,000 for 100,000 Democrat votes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump and the 14th Amendment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My story is the lead at ''The American Thinker'': &amp;quot;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/the_14th_amendments_history_militates_against_colorados_ruling_against_trump.html The 14th Amendment’s History Militates Against Colorado’s Ruling Against Trump].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:13, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, this is fantastic, Peter!!  Congratulations!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:14, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump's running mate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/17/the-woman-trump-reportedly-says-would-be-a-killer-vp-n2633793 Will it be New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik]? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 03:52, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope not.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump/Kari Lake would be the most interesting ticket on several levels. (1) It would help cement carrying the swing state of Arizona; (2) it would be the first ticket in history where neither candidate had prior government experience, insuring Kari Lake as one of Trump's anti-establishment successors (like [[Vivek]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::One thing is for sure, Dems. Do not want GOP to have any woman on the ballot..[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Kari Lake nominated herself to Senate, no way to be running mate. Hopefully she will defeat [[Ruben Gallego]]. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Arizona does not [https://ballotpedia.org/Running_for_U.S._Congress_and_the_presidency_simultaneously restrict running for Congress and the presidency at the same time (only a handful of states do).] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: [https://silvercircular.com/leaked-secret-audio-reveals-plot-to-bribe-kari-lake-theyre-gonna-have-to-kill-me/ 'They’re gonna have to kill me': leaked audio reveals plot to bribe Kari Lake.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trust me, she's in the running for VP, and right now makes the most sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:31, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How do we know? Timing. The audio tape apparently is from the 2020 election. It looks like it was given to [[Tucker]], who gave it to [[Benny Johnson]]. Benny Johnson works the stories Tucker is afraid of or doesn't have the time for.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:02, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Correction: The audio recording is 10 months old. Again, the timing of its release is a clue to the motive for its release. 20:28, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Update: [[Roger Stone]] says Kari Lake is the [https://rumble.com/v499s2l-kari-lake-bribe-attempt-exposedthe-stonezone-w-roger-stone.html best communicator] since [[Ronald Reagan]], quite the endorsement since Stone is the guy who convinced Trump to run for president. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://dailypresser.com/doug-g/kari-lake-responds-to-trump-vp-rumors-after-major-primary-victories/ Kari Lake Responds to Trump VP Rumors After Major Primary Victories]. Of course, they're always going to talk it down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This tweet from [[Red Eagle Politics]] is best description of the possible running mate &lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/RedEaglePatriot/status/1742398795269157037&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Can unite the party&lt;br /&gt;
-Isn't offensive to the core base&lt;br /&gt;
-Can debate well&lt;br /&gt;
-Is ideally younger&lt;br /&gt;
-Has a last name that looks good on a bumper sticker&lt;br /&gt;
-Won't be seen as the 2028 frontrunner&lt;br /&gt;
-Can help expand the base (optional)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki Haley scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daily Mail]] published today that [[Nikki Haley]] had affairs with many men, including many lobbyists before she become governor of [[South Carolina]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems how clear Nikki Haley got this political power in South Carolina first then in the entire GOP --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:58, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:WOW.  Posted.  Great catch from the British press, which is far more candid about [[Leftist]]s and [[RINO]]s than the American press is.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:51, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theconundrumcluster.com/p/political-post-mortem-of-ron-desantis Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis: The Caudillo who wasn't there]. ''&amp;quot;A fool and his money are soon parted&amp;quot;''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:22, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good riddance. Too bad Trump is accepting his endorsement, though. I wouldn't.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:36, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a contest now for who will take over as the successor of the Tea Party/MAGA movement once Trump's off the stage, [[Vivek]] or DeSantis. I wouldn't count [[Kari Lake]] out as an outside challenger. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:22, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd prefer someone other than those three.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:30, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You might as well start over from scratch, with different ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ideally, it should be someone like Rand Paul.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lee Zeldin most possible running mate choice===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems now that [[Lee Zeldin]] probably would be the running mate of Trump according to [[Sebastian Gorka]] who said on X space that Donald Trump has chosen his VP PICK! He gave four pieces of information, the choice is:&lt;br /&gt;
—A man&lt;br /&gt;
—A former politician&lt;br /&gt;
—A New Yorker&lt;br /&gt;
—Currently campaigning with Donald Trump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite that I would like Trump to choose more conservative one than Zeldin, but I think Zeldin would be smart choice who is well liked by all GOP wings, strong campaigner that can appeal to independents just like what he did in 2022, a great debater who will humiliate [[Kamala Harris]] at first debate. Zeldin is more conservative than Trump on issues like crime, he will not let another horrible [[First Step Act]] --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:09, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You would expect this ahead of the NY primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:15, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Zeldin was backed by John Bolton when he ran for Congress. I don't trust him.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:44, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Zeldin &amp;amp; Stefanik are 2 of the most high-profile Republican officeholders in the state. We'll be hearing more about them being considered for VP in advance of the NY primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:34, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Epstein leaked ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epistein documents have been released according to The Calvin Coolidge Project&lt;br /&gt;
according to this account [[Bill Clinton]] his name is on the list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also documents assure that president Trump didnt visit Epistein private island&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1742708101185216726&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:02, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setback for Atheists: [[Stephen Hawking]] had orgy for underage girls&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stephen-hawking-underage-orgy-claim-forced-jeffrey-epstein-to-offer-cash-reward/ar-AA1mrNzl Stephen Hawking underage orgy claim forced Jeffrey Epstein to offer cash reward]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:46, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The historical reality and facts show it was [[Donald J. Trump]] who exposed the entire Epstein scandal. The DOJ &amp;amp; FBI never would have done it themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 2006, Epstein recruited a 15 year old girl, Virginia Guiffre, an employee of [[Mar-a-Lago]], into the child sex trade. Trump immediately barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and watched as the [[DOJ]] covered up the scandal. Investigations exposed the [[Clinton]] connection. I believe the scandal so outraged Donald J. Trump, especially where his name was involved, he believed the only way to rectify the matter and bring justice for victims was by running for president himself to expose the corruption in the federal government. It may not have been his only motive to run in 2016, but fair-minded historians need to consider this matter carefully. And of course, if we can get some input from Trump himself in memoirs or personal interviews, that would help. It was only by Trump pushing the issue in the 2016 election (which the Democrats &amp;amp; [[MSM]] tried to counter and neutralize with the ''Hollywood Access'' video which did not include children) that the story ever came to light. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:00, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next they should expose which state actors were behind the honeypot operation. So we know which nations Trump should punish once back in office.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:16, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::While the list includes personalities of all political backgrounds, the sexual reference was rather to Clinton &amp;quot;likes them young&amp;quot; ol' Bill. Epstein's death looks more like a mafia hit. I hope scrutiny follows.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:03, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MSM/propaganda updates==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update: the [https://youtu.be/6-ZY11y6XNo upgraded version of the Lancet drone can now exceed Mach 1 (the sound barrier)] in its kamikaze dive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Austin had Prostatectomy&lt;br /&gt;
::''Why do they even bother trying to keep something like this secret when they know the truth, like the Ukraine casualty rate, will eventually come out? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alternatively, Austin may have been injured in a Kyiv missile strike while attending a secret meeting and was ferried back to DC, and the prostate cancer is a cover story. Initially, the Pentagon said it was &amp;quot;elective surgery&amp;quot;, later that story was changed to undergoing cancer treatment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Black Mountain Analysis: [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/ukraine-and-the-middle-east-i Ukraine and the Middle East] - Part 1[i] ''Fast forward to the abyss''&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcU75Mgt30ux/ ALMOST ENTIRE UKRAINIAN COMPANY REFUSES TO ASSAULT, COMMANDER SHOWS REFUSENIKS].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aearnur.substack.com/p/the-wests-geopolitical-chessboard THE WEST’S GEOPOLITICAL CHESSBOARD IS SOAKED IN UKRAINIAN BLOOD].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://rumble.com/v49abc3-benjamin-reed-exposes-war-crimes-committed-by-his-fellow-us-mercs-in-ukrain.html Benjamin Reed exposes war crimes committed by his fellow US mercs in Ukraine].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://citizenwatchreport.com/study-claims-almost-one-third-of-gen-z-are-sexual-deviants/ Study Claims Almost One Third of Gen Z Are Sexual Deviants].&lt;br /&gt;
:Interesting, 28% of [[Gen Z]]ers are sexual deviants, while in Russia 68% express concern over [[LGBTQ]] influence. [https://www.norc.org/research/library/new-survey-finds-most-russians-see-ukrainian-war-as-defense-against-west.html] People are the same everywhere, as [[Putin]] enjoys only 51% support of people under 30 years old. He's likely to be re-elected with a 62-64% majority, or 58-59% on the lower end. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:68% express concern over LGBT influence, while 67% support Putin's [[foreign policy]]. IOWS, only 1% think LGBT influence can be fought with non-military means. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:22, January 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CNN and Times of India Articles: The Future of the Internet is Indian===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Like nearly 900 million people in India, Devi has never used a smartphone or accessed the internet. The race to bring those millions online, adding to more than 500 million Indians already connected to the internet, is being contested by the biggest global names in tech. And they're shaping the future of the internet in the process.&amp;quot; https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2018/11/business/internet-usage-india-future/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The internet industry has come a long since the last few decades. Currently, India’s estimated internet users is set to reach 900 million by 2025. Combine that with the fact that 11% of the global web3 pool is from India, the answer is apparent: The future of the web will have India leading the way. And the revolution has already begun.&amp;quot; ]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/web3-and-its-future-in-india/And Social Media in particular is going to play a large part. I encourage every Aspiring Evangelist to have Social Media Platforms. And places like here on Conservapedia are also surely going to experience huge surges in traffic, as we continue to produce good content, and as more and more people use the Internet, and look for some kind of alternative to Wikipedia, so keep doing what we're doing and more. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:07, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;&amp;quot;Why Online Evangelism? There are approximately 7 billion people [editor's note: now 8 Billion] in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 billion use the internet [editor's note: now 5 Billion, and rapidly growing].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And 3 billion are on social media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital Evangelism helps us spread the Gospel into all the world at a rate we never could’ve imagined before. Moreover, it connects us to the younger generation.&amp;quot; [7]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.conservapedia.com/Number_of_Internet_Users [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Now you see why India did not take the neocon globalist Russophobic pro-LGBT bait and pass [[Russian sanctions]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:20, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:My user page has a few Lata Mangeshkar and Sridevi playlists. It also has a Aishwarya Rai Bachchan playlist. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyY58BNhn64&amp;amp;list=PLjs7_UtttXEA0Rif0XybxkkyQ_bbeFanz&amp;amp;index=1 Aa teri mahafil men qismat ajamaa kar ham bhi dekhenge.]  [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJNJm5DQFwk Taki Oh Taki!]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsIl0G0qlM&amp;amp;list=PLbjmSS6LZDGpo81ZM9SIqqoRqTgoVCRtm&amp;amp;index=1 Nimbooda Nimbooda]. I am ready for the Indian hordes about to descend on my user page! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:34, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, we're learning from you how to build algorithms to promote oneself on Google. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:25, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Burying the hatchet===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said at the outbreak of the NATO war, left and right idealogues needed to bury the hatchet if humanity and civilization is to survive the onslaught of [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s {my exact words were something like, 'If you don't have anything good say about socialists, just shut up, at least for the duration'). Well apparently leftwing socialist [[Jimmy Dore]] and rightwing fearmonger [[Alex Jones]] have done just that, and found common ground. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYzTwDOFCV8] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says===&lt;br /&gt;
*Defense One: [https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/01/delaying-aircraft-carrier-order-would-hurt-supply-chain-shipbuilder-says/393191/?oref=defense_one_breaking_nl Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we go. The federal government has used defense spending as a [[Keynesian]] [[stimulus]] since 1941. Aircraft carriers are obsolete as withdrawal of the USS Gerald R. Ford from the the Red Sea and [[Operation Prosperity Guardian]] just last week proves. They are vulnerable to [[hypersonic]] missiles and cheap drone swarms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:49, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The USS Gerald R. Ford was in the eastern Mediterranean. Deployment was extended three times. It was there for seven months of a planned eight month mission. Its the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower that's in the Red Sea. If carriers are obsolete, why is China building them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::China's building one small one, a copy of the ''Laoning'', which was purchased from the the Russian Federation at the end of the Cold War. It's not being built to &amp;quot;project power&amp;quot; throughout the globe. Basically, just for show, to show they can compete as China becomes a naval power. It takes years  and years of training just to learn how to operate a carrier. They'll need it for their plans to police the [[South China Sea]], but not much beyond (kinda like Japan &amp;quot;island hopping&amp;quot; in WWII). Call it &amp;quot;wasteful defense spending&amp;quot; as they copy the US. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:26, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Carriers are extraordinarily. expensive:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The ''Laoning'', originally the USSR's only planned carrier (which it didn't need) helped bankrupt the USSR and drive out of business;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The UK is currently cannibalizing its only carrier for spare parts;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The USS Gerald R. Ford is understaffed by 500-700 men of its 2,400 man crew because of recruitment shortfalls, which is probably a factor in withdrawing it from service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Defense spending is a key component of the [[UniParty]]. Republicans have signed onto Keynesian defense spending and deficits for decades. This is what earned them the reputation as &amp;quot;the party of [[Wall Street]]&amp;quot;. However, the GOP voter base today is more populist and blue collar, and the Dems have made inroads with corporate donors since the Clinton administration and end of the [[Cold War]]. A reversal of roles, so to speak. GOP voters are more aligned with &amp;quot;Main Street&amp;quot;, while the party elites and establishment remian aligned with the Uniparty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine/Biden corruption===&lt;br /&gt;
Zelensky is in possession of tapes made in 2015 by the [[Security Service of Ukraine]] of conversations between two of Zelensky main political rivals, [[Petro Poroshenko]] whom Zelensky defeated in the 2019 presidential election, and Joe Biden, who now is trying to cut Zelensky off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden told Poroshenko in 2015 to fire AG [[Victor Shokin]] to stop investigating the [[Biden family]] (&amp;quot;SOB, he got fired&amp;quot;). Zelensky is now trying to [[blackmail]] Biden and a potential presidential challenger should Ukraine ever have a presidential election again. Zelensky is trying to make it so both he and Biden can keep their jobs. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lloyd Austin's presumptive replacement===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/defense-secretary-austins-presumptive-replacement-woke-deep-stater-dr-kathleen-hicks/ AUSTIN’S PRESUMPTIVE REPLACEMENT WOKE DEEP-STATER, DR. KATHLEEN HICKS.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Level of war has gone up===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The level of war in the world seems to have risen to  1989 (post-WWII) peak levels and holding, ending the pacific 1989-2006 era. Does this contradict the Decline of Violence (Pinker) / End of History ([[Francis Fukuyama|Fukuyama]]) theses, or is it just a blip?&amp;quot;. - Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]], Twitter/X.[https://twitter.com/epkaufm/status/1744338524994748831], See: [https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace War and Peace]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think it is just a blip. And if we are living in the latter portion of the last days (Israel becoming a nation was important event concerning the &amp;quot;biblical prophetic clock&amp;quot;), then it definitely is not a blip because Jesus said that there would be wars and rumors of wars in the last days. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wager.PNG|1450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're a day late and a dollar short again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.: &amp;quot;Israel becoming a nation&amp;quot; in 1948 is one of the most abused phrases I've heard for decades (especially among many Christian writers and preachers). Israel became a nation when God promised Abraham, ''Of thee I will make a great nation''. There is simple confusion about what a. &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is; a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is not the same as a government or regime. The Navajo Indians are a nation. So are the Kurds. So are the Chechens, etc. etc etc. So is the argument that the Palestinian people are a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot;. Many governments are multi-'''nation'''-al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So using the phrase &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot; in the late 1940s only exposes the speaker as an ignorant idiot as far as [[geopolitics]] and [[history]], not to mention the [[Bible]], is concerned. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:53, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Prophecies about the land of Israel fulfilled in our lifetime: [https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&amp;amp;context=pretrib_arch Is Modern Israel Fulfilling Prophecy?] and [https://www.chosenpeople.com/is-the-modern-state-of-israel-2/ Is the modern state of Israel the fullfillment of prophecy] and [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/30/unveiling-mysteries-of-israel-four-biblical-prophe/ Unveiling the mysteries of Israel: Four biblical prophecies being fulfilled right now]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:58, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You miss the point; Israel was a nation 5,600 years before &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot;. You must be a product of the [[public school|American public school system]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The word nation according to Oxford Languages is: &amp;quot;a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, '''inhabiting a particular country or territory'''.&amp;quot;  The Jews were scattered to various places in the world (which fulfilled biblical prophecy) and then came back to their land (which also fulfilled biblical prophecy). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:47, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh, you mean like the valley of dry bones. Israel was a nation in the [[Pale of Settlement]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:55, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSM silence on...===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian attack on Christian holy site raises concern. “We know of no arrests that are made in such cases, nor do we see the P.A. placing any guards in those sensitive locations under regular attack.” (January 19, 2024 / JNS) A Palestinian mob caused extensive damage to a Christian holy site in Nablus (Shechem) known as Jacob’s Well on Sunday night.[https://www.jns.org/palestinian-attack-on-christian-holy-site-raises-concern/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:21, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A direct result of Islamization. All Mosques are under the totalitarian control of the PA.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:31, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Patriot missile shoots down Russian transport plane carrying Ukraine POWs===&lt;br /&gt;
There's no way to escape certain conclusions in this matter:&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite Starlink and advanced NATO communications technology, Ukraine internal command and control is in chaos;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Patriot missile systems are operated by American &amp;quot;mercenaries&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian [[Gen. Surovikin]] was relieved of command for mismanagement when 13 Russian pilots were killed by the [[Wagner group]] during the [[Wagner mutiny]]; will the Ukrainian side hold those responsible for the deaths of their own soldiers ''as the Russians do'', or will they follow the American example ''and not fire'' Gen Milley or Lloyd Austin after the suicide attack that killed 12 Americans during the [[Fall of Kabul]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:33, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ray Epps to be sentenced ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal media's favorite &amp;quot;Trump supporter&amp;quot; will be sentenced: &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/ray-epps-face-jan-6-conspiracies-to-be-sentenced Ray Epps, face of Jan. 6 conspiracies, to be sentenced].&amp;quot; The DOJ has requested six months for &amp;quot;disorderly conduct in a restricted area.&amp;quot; Sentencing Epps now avoids him getting a harsher sentence after Trump is reelected. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:14, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the immortal words of [[Lee Harvey Oswald]], [https://youtu.be/NR7JJHqD7_c &amp;quot;I'm just a patsy&amp;quot;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Have you guys followed the latest polling what many Americans think of Jan 6?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I uploaded [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Trump_legality.jpg this today from Zerohedge] about Trump &amp;amp; J6, but that probably doesn't answer your specific question about overall opinion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, JanuarFNy 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks. I meant the,[https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/04/fbi-conspiracy-jan-6-attack-misinformation/ WaPo][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:48, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;adopted the falsehood&amp;quot; - at least they're upfront about their [[bias]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The FBI has become absurdly powerful in recent years. Why was Tucker Carlson fired? He was asking questions about Epps and the FBI's involvement in January 6. There was also the advertiser boycott, but that wasn't spontaneous either.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::While the rest of the country was still trying figure out what to make of the January 6 demonstrations, Pelosi called for impeachment. What? Trump will leave office in a few days. That was when I become convinced that it was a plot that she instigated. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:17, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It goes back to the [[Patriot Act]] Amendments of 2006, allowing domestic spying. The FBI and National Security state no longer exist to protect the American people; on the contrary, the American people now are deemed a threat to the US government, as [[Russiagate]], the J6 false flag attack, and 2020 rigged election attest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-ray-epps-sentenced-no-jail-time/ No jail time for Epps], the media's favorite insurrectionist. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:39, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Woke updates==&lt;br /&gt;
===John Hopkins Wokeness list===&lt;br /&gt;
John Hopkins just sent out this hit list of people automatically guilty of &amp;quot;privilege&amp;quot; whether they know it or not  &lt;br /&gt;
Males &lt;br /&gt;
-Whites &lt;br /&gt;
-Christians &lt;br /&gt;
-Mid-aged people &lt;br /&gt;
-Able-bodied people &lt;br /&gt;
-Middle &amp;amp; owning class&lt;br /&gt;
-English-speaking people.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1745455765123649578]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Hopkins wokeness list.jpg|thumb|John Hopkins wokeness list]][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:02, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The ''[[Long march through the institutions]]'' has arrived. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Klaus Schwab?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:37, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No. Rudi Dutschke, a [[West German]] communist. He's an heir of [[Gramsci]] and Marx. He updated Gramsci for the 1960s updating the idea of [[cultural hegemony]] with &amp;quot;The Long March through the institutions&amp;quot; (the name borrowed from Mao &amp;amp; the CCP, as well). Basically, bring about [[revolution]] by infiltrating the institutions (academia, government, business, etc). Instead of sudden, violent overthrow of the past, a gradual infiltration and undermining of the dominant culture from within (with the election of Obama, the Long March had arrived, but most people outside of subversive circles didn't notice). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This John Hopkins is a perfect example of destructive DEI[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:16, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It tells a lot, WHO was out there to protest Claudine Gay exit, Al Sharpton non other, waving the DEI flag. 'Nuff said.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
===The OK insurrections?===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Floyd Palestine.jpeg|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Hamas pro Yemen rioters force partial evacuation of the White House&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Julio Rosas @Julio_Rosas11 -&lt;br /&gt;
🚨: DC police and Secret Service had to rush to one part of the security fence to prevent a breach from the '''Palestinian''' crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
6:46 PM · Jan 13, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1746317828158845367]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White House staff 'relocated' after pro-Palestinian rioters damage anti-scale fencing, hurl objects at cops.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-staff-relocated-pro-palestinian-rioters-damage-exterior-fencing-hurl-objects-cops][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:49, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just posted it on MPR. I'll add your links.  Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:23, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I missed it.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:31, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know, we made the connection between BLM rioters &amp;amp; the pro-Hamas camp sometime ago. I bet they are majority suburban white trash kids. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks RobS for rearranging the section...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:22, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Don't mess with TX===&lt;br /&gt;
'''How TX deals with those &amp;quot;protesters&amp;quot; '''&lt;br /&gt;
''JUST IN: Pro-Palestine protester gets pummeled by Texans after disrupting Texas governor Greg Abbott’s speech.&lt;br /&gt;
Gotta love Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened at a campaign event in Collin County.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened on the same day as pro-Palestine protesters tried breaching the fence outside of the White House.'' pic.twitter.com/QBsHADHgAd— Collin&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1746647516547047600][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:27, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outrageous statement by Tara Setmayer: &amp;quot;the religious Christian nationalists death cult&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lincoln Project’s Tara Setmayer &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;... It’s not necessarily the MAGAs who are in the death cult, the religious Christian nationalists death cult, because obviously they’re unmovable.” [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/01/16/lincoln-projects-setmayer-evangelicals-failed-this-country-by-following-their-golden-orange-god/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:30, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the liberals/leftist lose more and more power, they are going to angrier and nastier towards right-wingers and Christians. There are going to a bunch of right-wing victories in Europe in 2024 and Trump is somewhat favored to win the US presidential election in 2024 according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rabbi Jonathan Sacks declared: &amp;quot;...the 17th century was the beginning of an age of [[secularization]] which has lasted four centuries until now; the 21st century is exactly the opposite, it's the beginning of an age of [[desecularization]]. Religion is seizing power; they're not yielding power.&amp;quot;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/rabbi-jonathan-sacks-secularism-cant-solve-todays-religious-violence-answers-rooted-in-sibling-rivalry-of-jews-christians-muslims-140754/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0vf6eV6JE We shall not be moved]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:41, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Wokeism &amp;amp; secularism hand in hand[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:48, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
===Wokeness run amok===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NYPD detective fights to clear name after non-binary BLM activist complains that he asked ‘are you male or female?’.&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Post  | 01/20/2025 | Tina Moore [https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/metro/woke-gone-wild-decision-casts-shadow-on-homicide-detective/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Afternoon Jewish prayers help soldier spot terrorist.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Afternoon prayers help soldier spot terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;
A terrorist with an RPG tried to ambush IDF forces, but did not count on one soldier standing to the side to pray.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News, 14 Jan 2024&lt;br /&gt;
Malkiel Ben-Yosef, who fought in Gaza, related today how afternoon prayers helped him find a terrorist setting up an ambush for his division.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“At the entrance to Bureij, during our last sortie, we had several delays before being allowed to enter the city. We had to stop for a full day, until eventually the last approvals were given. We entered the city, but had to stop in the middle of our march.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We were the last platoon in the line, and I saw that sunset was approaching and had not yet recited the afternoon prayers. Our force stopped and I told myself that this would be the last chance to do so. I stood up to pray, facing Jerusalem, and as I prayed, I saw an open area opposite me where engineering vehicles had already passed through. Approximately 10 to 15 meters from me, I saw something metal rising out of the sand.”..&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/383561 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Telling. Inspiring. Our prayers to US, to have a better president and a better future. Amen.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:55, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crisis between Iran and Pakistan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.brtbart.com/middle-east/2024/01/17/iran-bombs-nuclear-armed-pakistan-triggering-diplomatic-crisis/#disqus_thread This] is interesting, and has the potential to disrupt the Sino-Russo-Iranian alliance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:06, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pakistan is a US/NATO stooge regime. It is there to provoke. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pakistan's first loyalty is Sunni fundamentalism, not NATO. It's been that way for decades. That's why it's consistently been a provocateur, even under NATO-skeptics like Imran Khan.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Pakistan doesn't want to be seen as supporting Israel against Iran and the Houthis. They responded with a missile strike against the same group in Balochistan. According to the Paki foreign ministry last night, India are the bad guys. In fact, the Paki foreign ministry borrowed the same language from the Russian foreign ministry: Pakistan and Iran are &amp;quot;fraternal peoples.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:59, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Only in the sense that they are both Indo-Iranian peoples. Aside from that, they are on opposing sides of the Sunni-Shia divide, and Iran has historically had closer ties with India than with Pakistan for precisely that reason.&lt;br /&gt;
::::On another note, I doubt Russia would appreciate Pakistan appropriating Russia's talking points to demonize one of Russia's closest friends.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:09, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Sunni split isn't so powerful outside of Arab countries. Sufism is prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan and Iran are both members of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organization]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:16, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The current crisis wouldn’t be the first time two SCO members were at each other’s throats. China and India had a major border standoff shortly after the latter joined the SCO.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Listen to this loop from the [https://youtu.be/-IoVsZefqm4 Pakistan Foreign Ministry Briefing After Retaliatory Strikes On Iran] from the Hindustan Times. What a joke. The retaliatory strike wasn't on Iran, it was on itself in Balochistan. Then she starts talking about a Kashmir massacre that occurred in 1990 that they blame India for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. First she talks about Pakistan's territorial integrity. Then speaks of the love and affection Pakistanis have for their &amp;quot;brotherly people&amp;quot; in Iran; then she condemns the 100 days of Gaza action. Then she trash talks India for a massacre in 1990. Diplomacy at its finest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:29, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Though, Pakistan - ISI was always a suspicious entity, however it is clear that Iranian Islamic Republic expansionist global domination was always looking for the opportunity. Be it stooges in Gaza ([[Hamas]] &amp;amp; Islamic Jihad [[PIJ]]), Lebanon ([[Hezbollah]]), Yemen ([[Houthis]]), Iraq (militias [https://www.state.gov/iran-aligned-militias-in-iraq/]), Syria (bases), Latin America (Venezuela - Alex Saab [https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article283330608.html][https://therecord.media/iran-venezuela-accused-of-coordinating-influence-campaign-to-free-colombian-businessman-report]  etc., Tri-Border Area Hezbollah crime operations). It's about IRAN.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:38, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The Venezuela connection is probably related to cocaine trafficking to Europe See [[Project Cassandra]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:39, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So Iran just attacked a nuclear power - Pakistan - and the Pakistani foreign ministry's official response is &amp;quot;we have nothing but respect and affection for our brotherly people in Iran.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:57, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I agree --with you-- that Pakistan fears Iran.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's an analysis of the [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/the-red-sea-show-i types of missiles Iran and the Houtis have, and the Yemneni launch sites.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I saw AP reporting, days ago, on Russian and NK weapons by Hamas. Will look at your link too. It wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan was directed by Obama/Biden-guys what to say...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:58, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I got two links, from Larry Johnson &amp;amp; Andrew Korybko, on Baklochi group Iran &amp;amp; Pakistan just bombed, the MEK. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
From that piece in your link, he says that only the Houthis acted militarily. He ommits Hezbollah. Maybe because Hezbollah has been attacking Israel since the 1980s?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:01, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a focus on the Red Sea &amp;amp; Houtis with Iranian missiles. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO Of The Year 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am late this year, but I am wondering if anyone has any suggestions on who should be RINO of the Year 2023. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and New Year! Thank you!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nikki Haley she is showing how she is extreme neocon and warhawk and turn her campaign to Hillary Clinton 2016 style --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TheNewRight has created a page for this topic. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/RINO_of_the_Year_2023 here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:08, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also agree with Haley.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 20:09, January 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Graham has it for 2023; Haley depends on what she does after she bows out of the 2024 presidential contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, January 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How about Graham being RINO of the Year, and Haley being the runner-up.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:21, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::For 2023, Mike Pence, [[Glitch McConnell]], Dan Crenshaw, and [[Chris Crispy Creme]] probably got Haley beat. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::A RINO of the Year needs to be selected soon. Maybe Lindsey Graham or Chris Christie as RINO of the Year and the other be the runner-up?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== E. Jean Carroll gets $83 million ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deny a baseless rape accusation and it could cost you $83 million, if we go by the recent E. Jean Carroll ruling. Why didn't Carroll sue Trump for over the alleged sexual assault? That was back in the 1990s. Carroll didn't bring the issue up in public until 2016, by which time the statute of limitations had passed. She brought it up so she could put Trump on a list of &amp;quot;hideous men.&amp;quot; It was a gimmick to promote her book. There is no evidence for the allegations beyond Carroll's say so, and she has changed her story more than once over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In short, Carroll is misusing the libel law as a way to get around the statute of limitations. Its absurd that she could end up making more money this way than she could have if she had followed the statute. See &amp;quot;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/27/15-facts-about-e-jean-carrolls-allegations-against-trump-media-dont-want-you-know/ 15 facts about E Jean Carroll's allegations against Trump media don't want you know].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:32, January 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Here's another good summary:&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis-post/kassam-the-trump-carroll-case-is-blatantly-the-greatest-miscarriage-of-justice-in-modern-american-history/ The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History], RAHEEM J. KASSAM, ''[[The National Pulse]]'', January 26, 2024. [https://archive.ph/ENFrj Archived version: The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History].&lt;br /&gt;
:We need someone to add it the article. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:00, January 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Montana Senate Race ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone been following it? Rosendale hasn't even announced yet, but it's getting UGLY.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:14, January 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Incident in Jordan. Who done it? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What are the chances that Biden's claim that Iranian proxies killed 3 American troops and injured 25 others is yet another lie?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:43, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Iranian proxies who?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's look at the logic: If Biden wants to hold Iran responsible for allowing proxies to attack Americans soldiers, the US will get nuked for arming, training, and funding Ukrainian proxies, not to mention providing intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance for murder and terrorist attacks on Russians, both in Ukraine, and Russian civilians in Russia proper. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Bu bu but Rob, we're the good guys,...&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, and Putin's a corrupt kleptocrat, so we need to nuke 145 million Russians along with Iran (but maybe 175 million Americans might survive on a contaminated planet. Seriously, this is the insane garbage you can find in Conservapedia Essay space). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Of course we shouldn't trust everything Biden says. But in this case, Islamic Republic of Iran's proxy claimed responsibility. &amp;quot;The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella organization of hardline Iran-backed militant groups, claimed attacks on three bases, including one on the Jordan-Syria border.[https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-says-three-us-service-members-killed-drone-attack-us-forces-jordan-2024-01-28/]. BTW Nikki's rhetoric of lumping Putin and Iran isn't helpful.  Though they're allies of convenience so far. Mixing Ukraine war with Gaza isn't  right.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Putin's just PO'd cause Biden stole the $163,000 a month that was being paid to other Russian kleptocrats. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:02, January 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2020602</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2020602"/>
		<updated>2024-01-27T00:21:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO Of The Year 2023 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/status-of-us-dollar-as-global-reserve-currency-and-usd-exchange-rates-long-slow-uneven-decline-continues.html Status of US Dollar as Global Reserve Currency and USD Exchange Rates: Long, Slow, Uneven Decline Continues].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election news==&lt;br /&gt;
===DeSantis and Haley challenge Trump to show up on the Debate Stage for which only 3 Candidates have qualified===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/donald-trump-plans-fox-news-town-hall-opposite-cnn-jan-10-iowa-republican-primary-debate-article-106493852&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Duck Trump needs to stop &amp;quot;ducking&amp;quot; the debates and show up sooner or later. He may show up before New Hampshire, but skip Iowa. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What a coincidence===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://therightscoop.com/breaking-active-shooter-situation-at-high-school-in-perry-iowa/ Active shooter in Hicktown, Iowa 10 days before caucuses].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we get to see who's pro-big government and who's pro-Second Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biden possible drop out and possible Michele Obama running ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems Democrats now admitting that Biden isnt favorite to win re election and even [[CNN]] admit that. Biden willnt get support of Black and minorities votes, so he will not win. But the what GOP isnt aware that possible Biden drop out and let [[Michelle Obama]] to be the Democrat candidate. According to JP Morgan strategist that Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race due to poor health sometime between Super Tuesday and the November election. Then the DNC would name a replacement candidate. Dems think that Michelle Obama will get Black and minorities votes and win --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:09, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1744059335909523689 --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:23, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Democrats are counting on Trump being reputationally damaged by a guilty verdict on the Washington, D.C. court case on J6 which favors Democrats because juries in this liberal district are Democrats and anti-Trump. It might backfire and make Trump the [[Nelson Mandela]] of the USA - especially if the Supreme Court speedily accepts the case and overrules the verdict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And Biden is hoping the economy will improve. But there is a lag between inflation moderating and people recognizing it is moderating. So even if inflation markedly improves, it could be too late for Biden. Plus, the economy could get worse. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if economy improved, Biden will still unfavorable, especially to Blacks. Thats why I think Dems will replace him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:48, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With all his broken border disastrous policy, Latinos, surprisingly, turn away from him.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:27, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/07/hes-baaaaack-obama-has-deep-concerns-about-bidens-ability-to-defeat-trump-and-protect-the-deep-state-system-he-built/ Obama and Clyburn have turned on Biden]. Biden time is over. I've wanted to say that for years. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Polls indicate that the economy is the number one issue.[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/economy-stupid-top-u-priorities-234445026.html] And Biden's foreign policy is a trainwreck. Many legal Latino immigrants don't like Biden's border policy. People want peace and prosperity and Biden is failing. So Biden is playing the J6 card and the lawfare card.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. You've been peddling the Biden/Deep State [[foreign policy]] religiously verbatim for 2 years, and no amount of spamming this page will change that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:59, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right now, the Democrats are very slightly favored to win the White House according to data compiled from the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The economy is going to be a key issue in the 2024 election. &amp;quot;The Federal Reserve’s forecasting tool currently puts the odds of a recession within 12 months at 51.84%, its highest reading in four decades.&amp;quot;[https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/01/07/buy-stocks-in-2024-advice-from-warren-buffett/]. &amp;quot;As a result, U.S. economic growth is projected to be 2.4% in 2023 and 1.5% in 2024. These figures are below the G20 averages of 3.1% for 2023 and 2.8% for 2024, but above the OECD averages of 1.7% and 1.4% for the same years&amp;quot;. - ''Forbes'', December 2023.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ankitmishra/2023/12/18/leading-experts-weigh-in-on-growing-the-us-economy-in-2024/?sh=4d276f5151a5] &amp;quot;Private sector experts expect inflation to drop below 2.5% in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Goldman Sachs projects core PCE inflation will fall to around 2.4% by December 2024. The firm anticipates rebalancing in the auto, labor and housing rental markets will spearhead the disinflation.&amp;quot; - Forbes, January 2024.[https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/inflation-outlook-2024/#:~:text=Private%20sector%20experts%20expect%20inflation,markets%20will%20spearhead%20the%20disinflation.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Since the economy is slightly favored to be in recession in 2024 and the public doesn't usually recognize that inflation is over until several months afterwards, that is why the Democrats are engaging in lawfare and hoping Biden's incumbency is going to be enough to win the 2024 presidential election. Presidents whose president terms that are under an economic recesssion during an election year never win the presidency. So that is the biggest risk to Biden's presidency. A signficant enough terrorism attack caused by terrorists crossing a pourous border would be devastating too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:18, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Michelle Obama has no fire in her belly when it comes to running for president or when it comes to politics.[https://katiecouric.com/news/politics-and-policy/is-michelle-obama-running-for-president-2024/] As far as Americans, &amp;quot;a mere 6% of respondents in this survey of 2,250 adults say that, overall, women make better political leaders than men.&amp;quot;[https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American diplomacy/relations with other nations could use some improvement. And its still a man's world - particularly in the key regions of the Middle East, China/Asia and Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:43, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I expect Biden to be replaced with Kamala Harris. I have not seen any news stories that suggest Michelle is in the running. Gavin Newsom obviously wants the job, but, come on, he's a white man. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:19, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the odds of Biden dying this year is greater than him dropping out of the race. The longer he is president, the less likely it is that he will face criminal charges. If Trump wins, Trump may go after the jugular when it comes to Biden so Biden and/or his family members could wind up in prison.  &amp;quot;Given those factors, it might be reasonable to bump up Biden’s 31.35 percent chance of dying in office to perhaps 50 percent.&amp;quot; - Source: [https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4089739-bidens-life-expectancy-and-its-implications/#:~:text=According%20to%20Iervasi%2C%20an%2080,within%20the%20next%2010%20years. Biden’s life expectancy — and its implications], The Hill, July 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Between 1936 and 2012, 11 out of 14 presidents seeking a second White House term were re-elected. This success rate convinced many that, as with other elected offices, incumbency offers distinct advantages for the presidency.&amp;quot;, source: [https://time.com/6549871/2024-presidential-elections-incumbency/ Incumbency Is No Longer an Advantage in Presidential Elections].  I still think the conventional wisdom is right and the author of this article is wrongheaded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately for Biden, his presidency is Jimmy Carter 2.0 so he might drop out, but I think the Democrats are better off with an incumbent because the Democrats don't have a deep bench when it comes to strong presidential candidates. Elizabeth &amp;quot;Pocahantas&amp;quot; Warren toasted her reputation with her DNA test. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::10 months is an eternity in politics. And presidents are loathe to give up power. Biden thinks he can still turn this around via the economy improving and bashing down Trump. And Biden has the MSM media on his side. Post Trump's first term, the MSM is not as strong as it used to be, but it still packs a punch. See: [https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx Media Confidence in U.S. Matches 2016 Record Low].  [[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If the Democrats were smart, they would kick Kamala Harris out of the White House and make Michelle Obama the VP. Then they would have 4 more years to develop a person to be the presidential candidate in 2028. But I don't think Barack/Michelle Obama want to have their legacy tied to the Biden legacy so that is probably a nonstarter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just in: [[Michelle Obama]] said that she is terrified from next election [https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1744430534753673549 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems Obamas want Michelle Obama to run but Biden family and especially [[Jill Biden]] arnt accept the drop out until now --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:11, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::From the comedian [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjNgm7TgsgA Bill Burr: Nothing Will Change With Trump As President]:  &amp;quot;I don't understand why everyone is so upset. You know what is going to happen to you? If you liked Obama did he call you at all in the last 8 years? Did he ever put a sandwhich on your table? You do that. You're going to keep doing that. You're gonna be fine... I feel like the president. You only see him once every three weeks.. It's like if you were dating a chick and she was a jerk and you only saw her once every 3 weeks. There is no way that she could break your heart.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There is something to be said for hard/smart work and having trust in God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And Michelle Obama is not terrified of the next election. Obama has a presidential salary until he dies and the Obamas make big bucks for speaking engagements and other means (Netflix, etc.). Michelle Obama's life will not change very much if Trump becomes president. It's just empty liberal virtue signaling and empty drama queen behavior. Liberal elites rarely move to Canada due to presidential elections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With that being said, I am grateful for Trump's SCOTUS appointments and the good economy under Trump before the pandemic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:42, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michael Robinson]] carries some baggage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Here is the latest from the ''New York Post'': &amp;quot;[https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/dont-be-shocked-if-michelle-obama-sneaks-her-way-into-2024-race/ Don’t be shocked if Michelle Obama sneaks her way into 2024 race].&amp;quot;  [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:27, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis is going to win Iowa, and it won't be close. DeSantis internal poll has 60,000 Caucus Commitment Cards ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;DeSantis internal poll is 60,000 caucus commitment cards!!!&amp;quot; https://twitter.com/jba437/status/1744566432988336283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For comparison: &amp;quot;Ted Cruz was able to defeat Donald Trump in the Iowa Caucus by winning over Evangelical caucus-goers;[1] Cruz won 51,666 caucus votes or 27.6%, giving him a net gain of one delegate over Trump. Cruz visited all 99 counties of Iowa and held small events.[2] Cruz outperformed his polling average, which predicted a narrow Trump victory in the caucus. Following poor performances in the caucuses, Rand Paul,[3] Mike Huckabee[4] and Rick Santorum[5] suspended their campaigns.&amp;quot; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget what the Liberal Media and their Liberal Polls are telling you. If that internal polling is even remotely accurate, with 60,000 to 100,000 caucus votes, likely somewhere between 30% to 50% of an estimated 200,000 voters, all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH. Don't be duped by the Zionist Psy-Op from the Liberal Media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a Mossad like operation. Remember the Deceptive Motto of Non-Abrahamic Deceptive Mossad...[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:All one has to see is , again NishantXavier bigoted spam and total inaccuracies. While conservative Jews' Zionism is in fact anti Liberal and against '''Soros - who is anti-Zionist'''. Zionist-Abrahamic is against  - Pro-Hamas-Soros[https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/george-soros-once-slammed-us-israel-for-not-working-with-hamas/amp/][https://www.foxnews.com/world/israels-un-ambassador-slams-soros-donations-pro-hamas-groups-seeking-destruction-jewish-state.amp][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 05:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::As per using Wikipedia as a source, Wikipedia founder [[Larry Sanger]] says [https://joannenova.com.au/2023/08/founder-says-cia-fbi-control-wikipedia-and-made-it-the-most-biased-encyclopedia/ CIA &amp;amp; FBI control Wikipedia]. Iowa is a contest for the second place finisher between DeSantis &amp;amp; the Deep State Democrat preferred Nikki Haley, which one will advance to Super Tuesday. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trump is doggedly pursuing another term as president. He is not going to drop out after Iowa. That is wishful thinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you missed the context of this discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:32, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier literally wrote above: &amp;quot;Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:39, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, okay. So evidently you agree with Nishant's analysis that [[Deep State]]-controlled Wikipedia is a valid source. That kinda contradicts why Conservapedia was founded. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::You know, me and LT joined [[Larry Sanger]]'s Slack group, but LT has a problem sticking to a plan and commitment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say that Trump will likely drop out after Iowa. Typical example of selective quoting. Here's the broader quotation for the context: &amp;quot;all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:I misread your material. The good news is that I am going to be getting a new pair of workable glasses soon with oversize lenses. Because the lenses are so big, my friend whose father is an academic, calls glasses such as these &amp;quot;professor glasses&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:51, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok MaGoo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another point/angle, with the DeSantis vs Haley on CNN tonight, whether one is for or against Nikki, I believe it's pretty smart of her not to go on the attack on Trump.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:17, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, Conservative. Understood. Btw, my prediction is already coming true. Christie dropped out of the race, even before Iowa. Vivek probably will next, as he didn't make the debate. It'll be down to DeSantis vs Trump before long, and I think he'll do very well then, and it effectively is down to Nikki, Vivek, DeSantis and Trump. I think one of the first two may end up being VP, but let's see. It could also be Kim Reynolds or Thomas Massie, both of whom I like too, and who are also close to the Governor, and campaigned with him.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:46, January 11, 2024 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
:Trump will carry Florida in the general election with or without DeSantis on the ticket - he doesn't need him. [[Kari Lake]] makes a lot more sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:49, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For better or worse, populism is where the GOP base is (Blue collar working class people especially). And they are not going to vote for the Trump-Lite candidate DeSantis as long as Trump is a viable candidate. Because why have Trump lite when you can have Trump. DeSantis is funded by the business/establishment part/class of the GOP. And Nikky Haley is too much of a neocon for the GOP base which is sick of America's forever wars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NishantXavier, I know you are going to come back that DeSantis is more of a family man and religious man, but unfortunately people like that don't win elections now ([[Rick Santorum]]'s and [[Mike Huckabee]]'s presidential candidicies failed). But this could change as religious people are having more kids than nonreligious/irreligious people and there is a growing backlash against the liberalism taught in public schools and universities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main ways America's Christian conservatives are getting their way on the federal level of government is by proverbially sneaking conservative Christian policies in through the back door by putting pressure on predidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges such as the SCOTUS court and to enact conservative policies. While this approach turned over Roe vs. Wade, the same SCOTUS court approved homosexual &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;. To give another illustration, the famous strategist [[Sun Tzu]] wrote: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.&amp;quot; Christian conservatism wins at the federal level are largely gained now by indirect methods (Puting pressure on presidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges and enact conservative policies) rather than directly getting a hardcore Christian conservative into the presidential office. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So let's analyze the meaning of the claim that DeSantis had 60,000 commitment cards out of 110,000 total caucus goers, and finished with 21%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What was the participation rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the source of the claim DeSantis had a 50% majority before going into the caucuses?&lt;br /&gt;
: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:05, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mixing unrelated things ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As for Mossad, it's not Abrahamic, because it's not Abrahamic in faith and values. Devout Jewish Conservatives who are anti-ADL are. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ADL is also not Abrahamic in faith and values, but rather Kabbalic and Satanic, as Jesus told some who bragged they were sons of Abraham, that they were rather sons of the Devil, because they were Devilish in faith and values, and were plotting to kill Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He who wants to kill and brutally torture Christian Children in Abortionist Terrorism is also Devilish rather than Abrahamic, and Conservapedia has well documented that the ADL is such: &amp;quot;Its general stance on prayer in secular schools is that it is &amp;quot;unconstitutional.&amp;quot;[2] The ADL also has a record of supporting gay rights, the separation of church and state,[3] hate crimes legislation, abortion and partial-birth abortion.[4] There is also evidence to suggest that the founders may have been Fabian socialists.[5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), originally known as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (&amp;quot;B'nai B'rith&amp;quot; meaning &amp;quot;Order of the Covenant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Order of the Cut&amp;quot;, referring to circumcision) is a left-wing Jewish organization founded in 1913 ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The League has been criticized for attacking politically conservative Jews such as Dr. Laura Schlessinger.[7] The Jewish World Review stated that the League was &amp;quot;demonizing exponents of Jewish values&amp;quot;,[8] while the National Prayer Network held that the ADL's past legislative involvement &amp;quot;empowered synagogue to mix with state by authorizing itself to teach the US Justice Department, FBI and all local police about hate crimes.&amp;quot;[9]&amp;quot; https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, well, promoting Separation of Church and State in Christian-Majority America, then empowering Synagogue to mix with State in persecuting Conservative Christians and Traditional Catholics. The Plot Thickens: Taken from Conservapedia's informative article on: https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League Well done to those editors. God Bless. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Another ranting hate posting by NishantXavier. A salad between the CIA Israeli version &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Mossad)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; unrelated to religion at all, and a group fighting antisemitism &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(but ADL's Greenblatt has been criticized by conservative Jews for getting involved in unrelated stuff like woke). BTW. Israel is mostly non religious. Though most do believe in God.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But ''NishantXavier'' has a routine of slamming Jews, or anything that is or preceived to be related to them, however the tool and opportunity arises.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it started when some ultra Orthodox Jews zealots were spitting on/towards Christian pilgrims and other Christians such as Christian clergy in Israel. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:27, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier spammed poison before that.  And at the time has only highlighted that case by exclusively stressing on those few but not on the ultra-Orthodox Talmudists who turned over the 2 youths spitters to Zionist authorities who punished them or omitted the overwhelming religious organizations groups, rabbis all against that thing. It's not that case at all. But a constant routine of hatred. Even his terminology+mixing unrelated things he uses, is often typically Neo Nazi or and KKK type. In addition, take a look at [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1999949 this] sample of his horrendous malicious lie - asides the fact that he mixes contradictory ideologies... one opposing the other into one salad - all for his unholy &amp;quot;holy war.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What rubbish. I did not spam any &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot;. I educated ignorant Souls about what the Talmud teaches. I'm a credible editor with a long history of seriousness, far more than some of you. I run ReasonstobeChristian.com website. More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us, or you can remain willfully blind. I will shake of the dust if you do. Everything I said, I documented with unimpeachable links and sources. I also specifically commended Good Jews like Dr. Laura Schlessinger and others. I'm not talking about. I'm talking about Talmudist Supremacy, which is as bad or worse than Communism and Nazism. If we can criticize Russians or Germans when some of them behave badly, we can perfectly legitimately criticize Jews when some of them behave badly. There are none so blind as will not see. Read the Talmud first, become an expert on what it teaches about &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot;, and then you can talk....[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:43, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a total rubbish out of infamous Hitlerist GDL flyers... on and on NishantXavier has no shame.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is no quick and easy solution to the Gaza situation. This difficult situation has been going on since the Jews won the 1967 [[Six Day War]]. With that being said, the Six Day War was remarkable and there were signs that God intervened on behalf of the Jews (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wMIq6X4zi4 GOD'S HAND IN THE SIX DAY WAR] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Did God Help Israel During The Six Day War?] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i3uIz7hoYs Six Days of Miracles] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Fmr Israeli Commander: God Protected us in Battle]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mixing things up .Nobody's talking about Gaza. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Dianne, you need to read this, from Jewish Site Ynet News: &amp;quot;Stalin's Jews We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish ... And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name &amp;quot;Genrikh Yagoda,&amp;quot; the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.&amp;quot; https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has nothing to do with Hitler, who I condemn. Even Churchill was aware that many of the Jewish Bolsheviks who persecuted some 60 MN Christians - as Alexander Solzhenitsyn estimated - were in fact Bolshevik Jews. So do you condemn those Bolshevik Jews who persecuted Christians?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;Terrorist Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.&amp;quot; https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, this is of relevance because Jews gain weapons from Western Christians, then use those weapons against Middle Eastern Christians. They do this in Armenia, in Palestine, and recently Mossad/IDF Snipers targeted and killed two Christian women going to the latrine. Those Christian women could have been you, Dianne. Do you not care about your sisters in Christ/in conservatism? Don't spread false lies and malicious slanders about me. I am a Catholic Christian, and I love everyone. But I boldly rebuke plain evil when I see it without fear or favor. I am not calling for any kind of genocide, but trying to stop the planned genocide of 2.5 MN Palestinians, many of whom, if the plans of Mossad succeed, will emigrate to America and Europe, and then be radicalized against the local Christian populations there. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yea, we. Noticed the G word thing, though it is anti zionists who use the Talmud for their ideology and Zionists use the Biblical text before Talmud expansion on it.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That phrase he used, was debunked, including at the Dreyfus trial. Talking about education.  But only racists interpret it the way as he wants to. BTW, Every religion things it is the true one and above all other religions)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;, the favorite by neo nezis. What's next? He has basically promoted that ancient (1903) invented canard idea -  [https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion Hitler]'s favorite pushing [https://www.google.com/search?q=protocols+forgery&amp;amp;oq=protocols+forgery &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot; forgery], wrapping it into contemporary excuses.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; (As a liar Nishant also portrays 97% Muslim &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; in Gaza as supposed &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::He pathetically links communists who are anti-religion and anti-Talmud. Whatever works for his Jihad.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:23, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nishant, seriously, you need to do some studying. These two sentences: &amp;quot;More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us&amp;quot; could have came straight out of ''Mein Kampf''. Seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish Virtual Library website (The website is run by the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise) indicates: &amp;quot;Since talmudic literature spans over half a millennium, covering a wide geographic area, attitudes toward gentiles expressed in it vary considerably. In fact, it reveals a whole spectrum of opinions from the extreme antipathy of the tormented Jew of Hadrian's time – e.g., Simeon b. Yoḥai's statement: The best of gentiles should be killed (TJ, Kid. 4:11, 66c) – to the moderate views expressed in the more friendly atmosphere of early Sassanid Babylon – witness Samuel's making no distinction between Israel and the nations on the Day of Judgment (TJ, RH 1:3, 57a). Thus all such statements must be seen in their specific geographical-historical context. Nevertheless, in general it may be said that the Jew's attitude toward the gentile was largely conditioned by the gentile's attitude toward him (see Esth. R. 2:3), so that a gentile's friendship to a Jew would be warmly and uninhibitedly reciprocated (see BK 38a, and witness the relationships between Meir and Avnimos ha-Gardi, Judah ha-Nasi and Antoninus, Samuel and Sapor, etc.).&amp;quot;[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/gentile] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:31, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''One of the old infamous persecution of Jews by using Talmud text erroneously, was the Beilis Trial. Which ended in embrassament for the prosecutors for ignorance.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The trial of Beilis took place in Kiev from September 25 through October 28, 1913. The chief prosecutor A.I. Vipper made anti-Jewish statements in his closing address and defended the Cheberiak gang against the charge of Yushchinsky's murder. Beilis was represented by the most able counsels of the Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Kiev bars: Vassily Maklakov, Oscar O. Grusenberg, N.P. Karabchevsky, A.S. Zarundy, and D.N. Grigorovitch-Barsky. The lamplighter and his wife, on whose testimony the indictment of Beilis rested, when questioned by the presiding judge, answered, &amp;quot;We know nothing at all.&amp;quot; They confessed that both had been confused by the secret police and made to answer questions they did not comprehend. &amp;quot;Scientific&amp;quot; foundation for the blood libel was supplied at the trial by a Catholic priest with a criminal record, Justin Pranaitis, who stated that the murder of Yushchinsky had all the characteristics of ritual murder enjoined by the Jewish religion. His arguments were refuted by the rabbi of Moscow, Jacob *Mazeh , who proved that Pranaitis was ignorant of the talmudic texts cited. Two Russian professors of high standing, Troitsky and Kokovtzoff, also spoke on behalf of the defense in praise of Jewish values and exposed the falsity of the ritual murder hypothesis. The jury, composed of simple Russian peasants, after several hours of deliberation unanimously declared Beilis &amp;quot;not guilty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/menahem-mendel-beilis JVL].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expedia cites this &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2363483/jewish/In-Defense-of-Chassidism.htm link].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, in Ezekiel.34.31:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.34.31?ven=Tanakh:_The_Holy_Scriptures,_published_by_JPS&amp;amp;vhe=Miqra_according_to_the_Masorah&amp;amp;lang=he]&lt;br /&gt;
'For you, My flock, flock that I tend, are ADAM; and I am your God—declares the Lord GOD.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which a Talmud verse is based on. (Like the entire Talmud is, based on the Hebrew Bible, [[Tanakh]]). This was misrepresented by the prosecutor at the trial. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''It's ludicrous to suggest that the Bible considers others supposedly &amp;quot;not human&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was part of what Rabbi Maze mentioned when replied to the antisemitic prosecutor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Hebrew words have multiple/different meaning, depending on the context. So what is the specific meaning of ADAM in this case?(Source - Rabbi Yaakov Galinsky &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;VeHigadeta&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vayikra, p. 196),  what it refers to in this case is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Adam&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; vs &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ish&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Adam as a unified one group of people. As opposed to many separate, unconnected individuals.[https://yated.com/100-years-since-the-mendel-beilis-trial-blood-libel-refuses-to-die/ 100 Years Since The Mendel Beilis Trial- Blood Libel Refuses To Die], [https://daat.ac.il/chazal/maamar.asp?id=365 &amp;quot;You're called Adam&amp;quot;], [https://www.ou.org/life/torah/reflections_shemot_5768_of_rachmanut_and_redemption/ Shemot: Of Rachmanut and Redemption].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the ''Talmud''  includes Gentiles specifically, twice. &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Temurah.2b Tmurah 2b] [https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.56a Sanhedrin 56a] and more. (Source, Galinsky, ibid).[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such Talmudsplaining avails nothing, one could justify the Quran too by such sophistry. Also, some people seem not to realize I oppose all Persecution of Christians, not only Jewish Persecution of Christians, like Itamir Ben Gvir is complicit in, but also Islamist Persecution of Christians. Any True Christian takes the side of Persecuted Christians, regardless of whether it is Jews or Muslims persecuting them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is prohibited to raise a gentile from a pit even in exchange for payment, because one can say an excuse to him, such as: My son is standing on the roof and I must go use this ladder to help him down from the roof. Alternatively, he can say to him: A time has been appointed for me to appear in the courthouse [bei davar] and I must attend to this matter. Since the Jew can provide a legitimate excuse for refusing to aid the gentile, there is no need to extract him from the pit.&amp;quot; https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talmud_on_gentiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In numerous ways, the Talmud shows over and over again that it is ok with killing Gentiles, that it views Goyim as subhuman without a right to life etc. Again, as St. Bernadette famously said, it is my duty to inform, not to convince. Anti-Gentilism is as much a sin as Anti-Semitism. I am not promoting Anti-Semitism, which means hatred or dislike of all Jews. I am calling out the Talmud on its Anti-Gentilism, which means hatred or dislike of all Gentiles, which it repeatedly promotes, even more than the Quran does of non-Muslims. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Talmud shows over and over again&amp;quot;. Have you read the Talmud? Have you ever even seen the Talmud?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is what's known in the art of rhetoric as &amp;quot;hyperbolic bluster&amp;quot;. You should choose your words better if you wish to maintain credibility. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:50, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I have read it. Have you? This is just argument from incredulity, you can't believe it could really say these things, therefore you accuse those criticizing it, after having read it, of not &amp;quot;really&amp;quot; reading it or something. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this too: &amp;quot;𝙎𝙚𝙭𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙜𝙞𝙧𝙡 𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙛 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙜𝙚.&lt;br /&gt;
(𝙆𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 11𝙗)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/itsmorganariel/status/1745551453618385108 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the &lt;br /&gt;
King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I have not read the Talmud. But I've read ''Mein Kampf'' in 3 different translations and bunch of other Holocaust literature and anti-Semitic writings and arguments from those times. And your whole presentation here comes straight out of the body of those anti-Semitic tracs that appeared after circulation of the ''Protocols'' in 1890s upto World War II. It's nothing new, and hardly a &amp;quot;revelation&amp;quot; as you try to sell it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:21, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look at the language you use: &amp;quot;Jewish Supremacist&amp;quot;. Where'd you get that phrase, [https://davidduke.com/the-roots-of-jewish-supremacism/ The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Note to others. My reply was and is not intended to that ''NishantXavier'' - a fanatic hater who won't listen to reason and truth, but to others on the site&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; About him mixing and linking three different ideologies including anti-Talmud-Commmnist to blend all into his venomous longtime campaign - I have mentioned above... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now it's Israel;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tomorrow, it's unrelated anti-Talmud-Communists; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
then it's about an opposite which is Talmud;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
his attemts to link secular dominated IDF to &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatevet chance he can bash that one group - his horrific obsession.  His verbatim-style sounds straight out of Neo Nazi sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May God have mercy on his soul. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;The entire &lt;br /&gt;
list &lt;br /&gt;
of those quotes &lt;br /&gt;
have been debunked and explained.&lt;br /&gt;
Long&lt;br /&gt;
before Nishant was born. &lt;br /&gt;
This is from 1937 at Nazis rise&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://www.jta.org/archive/oxford-professor-defends-talmud-against-nazi-accusation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;This is at the early years of internet&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Here is a&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://images.shulcloud.com/618/uploads/PDFs/Divrei_Torah/160615-Response%20to%20anti-semitic%20distortions%20of%20the%20Talmud.pdf pdf]&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; and&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://aish.com/misquoting-the-talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;and &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://blog.nli.org.il/en/against_the_talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;There is no need for me to do that here.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of TALMUD quotes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''To break a verbal engagement, though legally not binding, is a moral wrong.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a wise man? He who looks into the future.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Anger profiteth nobody.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ignorance and conceit go hand in hand.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom, Conceit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is a bounden duty to visit the sick.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The righteous control their desires, but the desires of the wicked control them.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is sinful to deceive any man, be he even a heathen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Examine the contents, not the bottle.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who loves thee scolds thee.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Envy, lust, ambition, bring a man to perdition.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''When a son is called to do a service for his parents, he must first see that his person is tidy and clean; for a child must attend to his parents as though they were his king and queen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who cannot bear one word of reproof will have to hear many.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who unjustly hands over one man’s goods to another, he shall pay God for it with his own soul.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Honesty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The value of the words uttered with the lips is determined by the devotion of the heart.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Prayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The love which shirks from reproving is no love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who gives way to his wrath makes desolate his house.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The disciples of the wise are engaged all their days in building up the world.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The less the merits of a person are, the more he will feel urged to proclaim them to the public.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The study of God’s Word is the only antidote against temptation.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Temptation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Guard thy mouth from uttering an unseemly word.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Slander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''A man commits sin in secret; but the Holy One proclaims it openly.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Sin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who turns away from the works of love and charity, turns away from God.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Charity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Regulate thy will in accordance with God’s will, and submit thy will to His will.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''There is a compensation for everything except our first love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a hero? He who conquers his urges.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Heroes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Do not appease thy fellow in his hour of anger; do not comfort him while the dead is still laid out before him; do not question him in the hour of his vow; and do not strive to see him in his hour of misfortune.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''What is sweeter than sweetness? Peace after enmity.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Thy friend has a friend, and thy friend’s friend has a friend; be discreet.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Gossip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''All ailings, only not the ailing of heart; all evils, but not an evil wife.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simon the Just…used to say, “Upon three things the world stands: On Torah, on (Divine) Service, and on Deeds of Lovingkindness.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Hillel used to say: ”If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simeon, the son of Rabban Gamliel, said: “I was brought up all my life among the Sages, and I have found nothing as good for the body as silence, and it is not the study/explication that is the essence – but the practice/doing, and whoever is profuse of words occasions sin.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabban Simeon, son of Gamliel, said, “On three things the world stands: On Judgment, on Truth, and on Peace…”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Yose said: ”Let your friend’s property be as precious to you as your own; Give yourself to studying the Torah, for it does not come to you by inheritance; and let all your deeds be done in the name of Heaven.”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He (Rabbi Tarfon) also used to say, “It is not your obligation to complete the task, but neither are you at liberty to desist from it entirely…”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Another teaching of Rabbi Akiva: “Everything is foreseen, yet free will is granted; By goodness is the universe judged,  yet all depends on the preponderance of (good) deeds….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 3:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ben Zoma said, “Who is wise? The one who learns from all people… “Who is mighty?  The one who subdues the evil inclination… “Who is rich? The who who rejoices in his portion…. “Who is honored? The one who honors other human beings….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Jacob used to say, “Better is one hour of t’shuvah (returning/repentance) and good deeds in this world than the whole life of the world-to-come and better is one hour of spiritual bliss in the world-to-come than all the the life of this world!”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi (Meir) said, ”Look not at the flask but at what is therein; There may be a new flask full of old wine, And an old flask wherein is not even new wine.”''''' [inner greatness...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;but again, his problem is not Talmud or unrelated to it IDF or unrelated opposite which is Communists or other opportunities he fanatically frantically jumps to bash..&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bigot NishantXavier (cherry picking to put Js. in a bad light):&lt;br /&gt;
''I'm very very very , but very much concerned about Christians, this is why, upto now I never wrote about Islamic persecution all over - especially in Iran, my-neighbouring-Pakistan, Africa anti-Christian genocide, etc.. but it's the juuz, I mean talmud (but I will use only a sentence that I can use in my war,  regardless of its true neaning or context), I mean DeSantis (is &amp;quot;like&amp;quot;) mossad, I mean bolsheviks who hate religion and talmud, I mean zionists, I mean communist-anti-Zionists, I mean secular Netanyahu...no, not non-Jewish Italian Fauci, not non-Jewish Greek Jeff Bezos, or non-Jewish Musk, or non-Jewish Buffet or Arab Carlos Slim, not at all. I mean the juuz want to &amp;quot;control&amp;quot; you, it's THEM...hey, I like KKKDavidduke language/ideology....''[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:59, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::So far I think I have given the most reasonable view about the Jews/Talmud that is somewhere between Dianne3000/Telling and NishantXavier. Given that I have read the Old Testament through, took took two classes related to the Nazis/Holocaust, worked for Jewish organization as their token gentile, and worked for a Jewish owned firm, this is not surprising. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, it appears as if the Talmud is a mixed bag of truth/error and I believe that the Jews made a mistake on having an overemphasis on the Talmud and not enough emphasis on the Torah, the Old Testament prophets and the Old Testament. And being a Christian, I believe that Jesus was the Messiah, the trinity, and the divine inspiration of the New Testament books. Being a non-Catholic Christian, I think the Catholics put too much emphasis on the proclamations of Popes who are also a mixed bag of truth/error. So the Jews are not alone on putting too much reliance on man and not enough on God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And being that the Jews have suffered under authoritarian regimes and are educated go getters, it does not surprise me that American Jews are often liberals who embrace [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy liberal democracy] (For example, American college educated people tend to be Democrats today). Also, as far as some Jews embracing atheism/Marxism, it is part rebellion against God and partly and errant anger at God for allowing the persecution of the Jews. When you abandon God like many leftists there is the danger of following ungodly, utopian, ideologies like Marxism. And unfortunately, the ADL is liberal/leftist in its ideology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, God hasn't abandoned the Jews and modern Israel (which fullfils various Old Testament prophecies) and the miraculous events surrounding the Six Day War are proof of this (see my posts previously on main page talk above). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:03, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, Mr. Moderator. Impressive. You've put up quite the defense for the &amp;quot;Semite-led untermensch&amp;quot; the past two years. [[User_talk:MayGodBless#Russian_soldier_and_looter_returning_to_Russia_from_Ukraine:_.22Honey.2C_we_now_have_a_great_luxury._We_now_have_a_toilet.21.22|The Semite-led untermensch don't even have indoor flush toilets.]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::NishantXavier does NOT have a &amp;quot;view on talmud,&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;view&amp;quot; on zionists. He has a Jew hatred problem. You know, they all (anti Zionist G. Soros meets with Netanyahu, everyday, sometimes 5 times a day, it depends on the anti Zionist Talmudists who refuse to serve in the IDF), meet in the heat of night and decide how to &amp;quot;rule.&amp;quot;...preferably with space lasers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::IMO, it shows the danger of anti-Semitic tracs and literature, cause it gets absorbed and repeated rotely without understanding what's being said. What's the solution? Censorship? No, education. Education, understanding, and compassion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:01, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, RobSmith. I showed via various socioeconomic indicators that some countries futures look bright, while others do not. Being mad at me about this is like being mad at the weatherman for forecasting tornados/hurricane for some regions or being mad at a seismologist for forecasting an earthquake for a region. Right now, it looks like significant deflation hitting China, the second biggest economy in the world, and China's current and upcoming steep demographic decline is going to have a BIG effect on the world. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The Semite-led untermensch don't have indoor flush toilets. Unfortunately, we have to re-hash this debate with the upcoming vote on the Continuing Resolution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Telling and Diane3000, I don't agree with NishantXavier's various opinions/views on the Jews, but for various reasons that will not get into, I think NishantXavier's anger towards the Jews will lesson down the pike. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to switch back into helping non talk page web pages get more web traffic and various websites get more web traffic. That has been far more impactful/fruitful as far as my past endeavors. I spent too much time on Conservavpedia talk pages in 2023/2024. Andy is right about talk, talk, talk not being a very fruitful endeavor. So am bowing out of this discussion. And I don't expect to get involved in main page talk again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Main page talk is like eating processed sugar. It will give you a sugar high and taste sweet at the time, but long term it is not good for you. One of my New Year's resolutions for 2024 is to stay off Conservapedia talk pages as much as possible. But doing friendly/constructive talk page edits can be useful/enjoyable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::MPR/talk should be about current news items and qualifying sources. The extraneous stuff belongs at the Community Portal, where anybody can spew their caca ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether NishantXavier's background (before becoming Christian per his saying), there '''in his India, is Islam or Hinduism, both maintain supremacism'''. And which religion does not hold itself above the other? While of the three Abrahamic religions, only Judaism does not prosletyze, still it's amazing the singling out.&lt;br /&gt;
I've lived with evangelicals, beautiful friends too, I've never seen such a rare, weird person, to be such a blind hater carrying that label (evangelical?) along.&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and about Talmud? It was Hillel who coined the golden rule..&lt;br /&gt;
(1) &amp;quot;If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And being for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) &amp;quot;That which is hateful to you, do not do unto your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation;[a] go and learn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is the expansion of the. Bible, oral interpretation that stems since Moses, through an unbroken chain...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. They said three things: Be patient in [the administration of] justice, raise many disciples and make a fence round the Torah.&amp;quot; (Avot, 1, 1).[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:52, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Re predicting [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]]===&lt;br /&gt;
That's a remarkable, unexpected prediction, Nishant, that [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]].  Startling, contrary predictions like that are what make [[Conservapedia]] great.  Thanks for being bold, while I expect [[Trump]] to prevail in these [[Iowa caucuses]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thank you, Andy. God Bless! It's great we can amicably disagree. I expect it to be DeSantis vs Trump one-on-one and head-to-head shortly after Iowa. Let's see if it pans out that way. But Christie dropping out already means it's effectively a 2 person race arguably, 2 persons in the top tier, Trump and DeSantis, and two persons perhaps running more for VP, namely Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's see if last night have an impact too. There were some fireworks but not a whole lot.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:17, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is still favored to win the Republican primary and the 2024 election according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html][https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] The political betting markets data indicates that DeSantis only has a 4% chance of winning the GOP primary.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] The improbable does happen sometimes, but it does very much look like Trump is going to win the GOP nomination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The odds of a Republican winning the 2024 presidential election is now about 3% higher than the Democrats winning it according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html] That's a slim margin. I think it is going to come down to the economy (which seems to have a 50/50 chance of getting worse before the election) and what the Supreme Court does in relation to the charges against Trump. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/polls-show-haley-closing-gap-trump-new-hampshire/story?id=106223644 polls] are any good, Haley closes gap.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;New Iowa Poll ranks Trump, DeSantis, Haley ahead of Iowa Caucuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/13/latest-iowa-poll-gop-presidential-candidates-iowa-caucus-donald-trump-nikki-haley-ron-desantis/72137628007/ The Des Moines Register][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:04, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only question is, will Trump received a majority or plurality in a three way contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Chris Christie drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 person race, soon to be 3, then 2: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/10/us/politics/chris-christie-drops-out.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== When do you estimate Haley and Vivek will drop out? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So with only (1) Nikki (2) Vivek (3) DeSantis and (4) Trump left in the race, let's look at when people are likely to drop out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My estimation is either one of Nikki or Vivek will cut a VP backroom deal with either Trump or DeSantis, then drop out once it is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be or may not be, let's wait and see. But here's the Calendar: https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-calendar/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, in the next one month, we have (1) Iowa - Jan 15 (2) NH - Jan 23 (3) SC - Feb 3 (4) Nev - Feb 6 etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion is Vivek may drop out after Iowa, maybe Jan 20th or so. Christie might have stayed in till NH, his home state after all, but he has already got out, which makes matters simpler for those looking to see when it will become a 2 man race. Nikki, since SC is her home State, might stay in until Feb 3, and then drop out around Feb 4th or 5th or so, but if she struggles to pick up traction, maybe earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's the way it seems to me. What do others think? [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis runs 2nd in Iowa and Haley has a chance to run 2nd in NH. If Desantis takes 2nd in NH, it's a two man race until Trump has enough delegates. If Haley survives NH, the Haley-DeSantis contest goes into overtime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An important factor is fundraising. If either DeSantis or Haley appear to have done less than expected, fundraising dries up. By contrast, if Haley does better than expected in Iowa (not likely) or NH (a long shot), then the money starts poring into Haley's coffers, and away from DeSantis to his detriment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis strategy is take 2nd in Iowa, 3rd in NH, and 2nd in SC. That keeps him in the race beyond Feb. 3. Haley's only prayer is to finish 2nd in two of those three races. Without that, she's cooked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:35, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternative theory (Trump's version): DeSantis staked everything on Iowa. If he finishes 2nd, he drops out., leaving Trump &amp;amp; Haley the last 2 men standing. Then it becomes a head-to-head matchup between Trump and Democrats preferred globalist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More on money in campaigns: What many people don't understand is, many campaigns run hand to mouth (due to current campaign finance laws). Candidates spend the entirety of 2023 raising money which ALL gets spent in Iowa. If they fail to meet that mark, they drop out (like Christie just did, or Kamala did in December 2019. She famously said in the fall of 2019, &amp;quot;I'm moving to Iowa&amp;quot;, meaning she bet the farm of her whole campaign war chest on Iowa, and didn't even last that long). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Each primary win gives a boost in fundraising for the next primary contest. Most candidates literally live hand to mouth. This is why Trump predicts DeSantis to drop out if he fails to win, or do less than expected. Christie was running on gas fumes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump OTOH, is not dependent on donors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Biden, who ran 5th in Iowa in 2020, didn't spend a dime in Iowa. He didn't really enter the primary campaign season until South Carolina, and bet it all there and on Super Tuesday. That's why Buttboy, Klobuchar, and others dropped out on election eve - they were running on fumes, knew they wouldn't pick up any new donors, and cut the best deal they could for career advancement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:26, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Beating a dead horse.gif|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Haley and DeSantis spilt 17%-19% or roughly 35%, 1-in-3, meaning they likewise have to split the anti-Trump donor money between them, with neither side being able to take full advantage. Haley probably has the edge, and has to sweep the next two. Trump predicted DeSantis to fold after IA, but DeSantis may stick around to NH for confirmation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iowan Patriots brave Cold to support future President Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It’s literally freezing in Ames, Iowa. Iowans chose to listen to their next president of the United States. RonDeSantis will win Iowa by a landslide.&amp;quot; Picture in the link. Rob or someone, can you pls post the pic here? https://twitter.com/BoricuaGOP/status/1745632851775668451 It is an epic pic, and it speaks a 1000 words. Let's see how it goes. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right. Trump colluded with Russia, Covid comes from people eating bats, Russia is about to run out of missiles, and DeSantis will defeat Trump. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the photo, half of em are Democrats. There is no Democrat caucus this year so they go to the GOP caucus to reek havoc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol, &amp;quot;half of them are Democrats&amp;quot;, that's quite a nice Conspiracy Theory you've got there, Mr. Rob Smith. Lazy Lib Dems are not going to brave Freezing Iowa Temperatures to show up in favor of a Candidate their Liberal Media tells them is already losing. Liberals haven't thought their strategies through. But it's ok because God is on the side of those who wish to confirm the RvW Victory and make it permanent. That's the number 1 reason I'm Pro DeSantis. But as a Pro-Trump Friend reminded me, it's good for Trump too if DeSantis wins, as we'll get him pardoned from any liberal phony Trumped up charge the Dems place against him. We don't agree with Trump, but we have no grudge against him, like the Dems trying to destroy him and his family do. We just need a young, 2 Term President to finish the job concerning RvW etc.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:34, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I'm from the Midwest. Why do you think we have elections and caucuses in the dead of winter? Cause there's nothing to do and it gives you an opportunity to get out of the house. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:51, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's wait for the caucuses to complete, then we can compare the results and the predictions. I'm working on another project right now, namely the History of Christendom, particularly the first 500 years. Will check back when caucuses are done. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:51, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gatewaypundit: [https://rumble.com/v46z9p0-democrats-may-switch-parties-to-vote-for-nikki-haley-in-iowa.html Democrats May Switch Parties to Vote for Nikki Haley in Iowa]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Joni Ernst today===&lt;br /&gt;
Joni Ernst was clever in walking a fine line  on MTP this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
Buy she is not ruling out endorsing Trump if he is the nominee....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hostages held in Gaza are innocent, they were celebrating the Jewish holiday and are held by terrorists in tunnels in in Gaza, they have been tortureed, raped...[https://ibb.co/TtqMrPZ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6 Americans held in Gaza need to be freed immediately, they are our brothers and sisters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Trump pardons convicted on J6, she won't oppose that, that is a president prerogative thing to do that, it will be his decision. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristen:&lt;br /&gt;
But you called them insurrectionists...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ernst: I did not use that term...They did break the law.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:50, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis grassroots support: more than 1,700 precinct captains ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis has 1700 precinct captains. Assuming each captain is able to mobilize even 50 voters, that's 85,000. Assuming 170,000 total voters, hitting 85,000 and 50% as a percentage is in no wise impossible. DeSantis has far better chances than the Lib Media is telling you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Grassroots support for Ron DeSantis in Iowa is incredibly strong. 💪💪💪&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 1,700 precinct captains are ready to turn out his supporters at the Republican caucus on Monday night!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://twitter.com/NvrBackDown24/status/1746372891791233437 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:00, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump wins Iowa===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's Trump all the way down in Iowa. With 99 percent of the vote counted, its Trump 51% (20 delegates), DeSantis 21% (8 delegates), Haley 19% (7 delegates), and Ramaswamy 8% (3 delegates), according to RCP. Biden has a net favorable rating of -17 while Trump has -15. When the winners are this unpopular, there's something wrong with the election system. Perhaps a nonpartisan primary with the top two candidates going on to the general election would help. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be worse. William Lai, Taiwan's newly elected president, is also super-unpopular. [https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/ He got only 40 percent of the vote in Saturday's election]. Fortunately the Chinese military is too corrupt to do anything about it. [https://www.businessinsider.com/china-corruption-rocket-force-water-fuel-xi-jinping-purge-scandal-2024-1?op=1 Water-filled rockets, anyone?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update:''' So happened to the rocket fuel? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lcyIf_7v6Q China's Military Whistleblower: Air Force Used Missile Fuel for Cooking] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:14, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The public's fickle, and they vote for idiots anyway. &amp;quot;The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversations with the average voter.&amp;quot; - Winston Churchill. Why do you think we have a $34 trillion [[national debt]]? cause the candidates promise freebies and the idiots keep voting for them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:28, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The [[U.S.]] has become a vast and enormously diverse country.  I think it may be unrealistic, in the absence of an attack by a foreign enemy (such as [[9/11]]), to expect high approval ratings for a president anymore.  [[Trump]] is the best hope to keep the [[U.S.]] united and strong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:40, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's hope.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:42, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is only going to be in office 4 more years if he runs. The most pernicious thing dividing America culturally is leftist/liberals taking over academia and indoctrinating students. That needs to be addressed because it is a root problem. 61.8% of high school (or equivalent) graduates go on to post-secondary study.[https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics#:~:text=Report%20Highlights.,decline%20in%20enrollment%20since%201951.]  Conservatives/Republicans have to get more serious via school choice and cutting off loans to college majors that offer a low return on investment to students in terms of employability and are often liberal indoctrination (Women's studies, etc.) and paring down the amount of required courses (There is no reason why an engineer needs to take liberal/leftist fluff courses). They also need to pare down frivolous spending by colleges (Top heavy administration costs, lavish facilities). Colleges need to focus on core competencies and be more spartan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I know of a clergman who visits relatives in a red state and his relatives have a messianic view of Trump and that he is going to solve all their problems. The clergyman pointed out that Trump is not going to solve all their problems. For example, his morbidly obese relatives in that red state are still going to be obese if Trump wins. Politicians can only do so much. More Americans need to turn to God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Read this article to see what some right-wing people are doing to transform colleges into more conservative institutions: [https://time.com/6319108/conservative-universities/ The History Behind the Right’s Effort to Take Over American Universities]. More Republican governors need to start implemnting what is starting to be done in Florida. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:29, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the tip, Conservative. Thanks to E. Stefanik's Dec. unmasking of academia dark reality.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:22, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Why Trump's ahead in GA (poll) matters===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President Biden trails former President Trump by eight percentage points in a hypothetical rematch in Georgia, according to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll of registered voters out Tuesday ((01.16.24)). Why it matters: The poll offers an early warning sign for Biden, who flipped Georgia blue in 2020 for the first time in nearly three decades[https://www.axios.com/2024/01/16/trump-biden-georgia-poll-2024-rematch Trump beating Biden in Georgia in early 2024 poll (01.16.24)].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If DEMS. oust Biden, it will be interesting HOW they do it. Recalling Sanders case.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:17, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vivek drops out===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has dropped out, and with that I say this: I am a hard no on Vivek for 2028.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past few weeks, hardcore cultists like Laura Loomer have been attacking Haley as ineligible but leaving Vivek alone despite him having the same eligibility issues as her. And now that he has dropped out, they are hypocritically proclaiming him the future of MAGA once Trump is done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These people stand for only one thing: as long as you're loyal to Trump on a personal level, EVERYTHING is negotiable. Even core tenets of MAGA ideology like immigration, trade, and foreign policy. As you may recall, it was this way of thinking that made it possible for neocons like Bolton and Pompeo to infiltrate Trump's first administration and destroy it from within. And if this faction continues to have Trump's ear, they will be just as responsible for the failure of his second administration as the second wave of neocon infiltrators who carry out the destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has now become the face of this faction, and unless he distances himself from them I cannot trust him going forward. MAGA is more than just Trump. It is an ideology and a way of life. Anyone who thinks MAGA is something negotiable is at best delusional and at worst a closet NeverTrumper. We cannot afford such people being at the wheel.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:07, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's already endorsed Trump. He's following the [[Ben Carson]] blueprint. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:25, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Expectedly, but still, Vivek (though re Ukraine many agreed with him, nevertheless), has been rubbing too many people, even at GOP, the wrong way, for various reasons.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:03, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with Geopolitician that the movement -at least in spirit- is larger than Trump.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now wait a minute...Geo, you just claimed [[Laura Loomer]] was a credible source for the [[Ron DeSantis]] page, and here you call her a &amp;quot;[[cult]]ist&amp;quot;. Make up your mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I explained on your talk page why such statements aren't mutually exclusice and why I stand by both statements. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith#Any_source_for_this.3F here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:26, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSNBC &amp;quot;warns...&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
MSNBC’s Scarborough Calls Trump Getting 51% of Iowa Vote ‘Bad News’ for GOP&lt;br /&gt;
'50% of people voting in the Iowa caucuses against a former president is bad news for that party’s prospects in the general election,' said Scarborough&lt;br /&gt;
Published 01/16/24 &lt;br /&gt;
[https://themessenger.com/politics/msnbcs-scarborough-calls-trump-getting-51-of-iowa-vote-bad-news-for-the-gop][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki in NH===&lt;br /&gt;
So Nikki's strategy is as follows: She's now claiming &amp;quot;It's a two person race&amp;quot;, following Trump's prediction that DeSantis will drop out if DeSAntis doesn't finish 1st in Iowa (where he was soundly beaten).  Joe Biden is not on the ballot in NH, leaving Democrats to vote in the Republican primary. That's why polls have Nikki at 40%. If Desantis stays in, the winner walks away with only a plurality; if DeSantis drops out, Trump wins a majority, again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:57, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Haley's donors and voters are mainly Democrats. It's not because they want the Republican Party to succeed. She's the new John Kasich. I was a DeSantis man, but now I'll take my chances with Trump. [https://youtu.be/7lhcZquLMX0 Matt Walsh exposes Haley as a Civil War idiot on YouTube].&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update'''. The problem is not just that Haley's supporters are Democrats. The pundits say they are &amp;quot;moderates,&amp;quot; but they are in fact the most partisan Democrats. They want all Republicans, including Haley, to lose in the general election. The primaries are set up on the assumption that people will vote for the candidate they support. The Haley Democrats are voting for the Republican that they think is most likely to lose in the general election. That is good argument for replacing partisan primaries with nonpartisan primaries, something that we already have in Washington State. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:51, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update:''' [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/01/21/opinion/haley-trump-new-hampshire-republican-gop-primary/ The ''Boston Globe'' is advising Democrats to vote for Haley], even though &amp;quot;Haley’s not this editorial board’s cup of tea.&amp;quot; Cross party lines and vote for someone you hate! By this logic, Republicans should vote in the Democratic primary for Dean Phillips. Then we can have a general election between Haley and Phillips. The system of partisan primaries is setup for this type of abuse. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 18:03, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Interesting that a few thousands still voted for DeSantis after endorsing Trump. NYT recent update - New Hampshire Republican Primary Election Results - Donald J. Trump wins the New Hampshire Republican primary. Donald J. Trump - &lt;br /&gt;
172,798	+54.4%	- 12 delegates - Nikki Haley - 137,670	+43.3%,	9 delegates.[https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/23/us/elections/results-new-hampshire-republican-primary.html][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:25, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::1/2 of a percent is about 1,500 voters - probably dedicated volunteer door knockers, etc, people who are not high paid consultants who have already found other employment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:36, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Let's do the math on Haley, cause how a candidate runs their campaign is a good clue on their decision making on how they would run an administration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::73% of Haley voters are Dmeocrats = 139,679 x .73 = 101,965 Democrat voters. She spent $31 million to lose = 31,000,000/139,679 = $222 per vote or $22,630,000 for 100,000 Democrat votes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump and the 14th Amendment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My story is the lead at ''The American Thinker'': &amp;quot;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/the_14th_amendments_history_militates_against_colorados_ruling_against_trump.html The 14th Amendment’s History Militates Against Colorado’s Ruling Against Trump].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:13, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow, this is fantastic, Peter!!  Congratulations!!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 14:14, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump's running mate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/17/the-woman-trump-reportedly-says-would-be-a-killer-vp-n2633793 Will it be New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik]? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 03:52, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope not.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump/Kari Lake would be the most interesting ticket on several levels. (1) It would help cement carrying the swing state of Arizona; (2) it would be the first ticket in history where neither candidate had prior government experience, insuring Kari Lake as one of Trump's anti-establishment successors (like [[Vivek]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::One thing is for sure, Dems. Do not want GOP to have any woman on the ballot..[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Kari Lake nominated herself to Senate, no way to be running mate. Hopefully she will defeat [[Ruben Gallego]]. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Arizona does not [https://ballotpedia.org/Running_for_U.S._Congress_and_the_presidency_simultaneously restrict running for Congress and the presidency at the same time (only a handful of states do).] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: [https://silvercircular.com/leaked-secret-audio-reveals-plot-to-bribe-kari-lake-theyre-gonna-have-to-kill-me/ 'They’re gonna have to kill me': leaked audio reveals plot to bribe Kari Lake.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trust me, she's in the running for VP, and right now makes the most sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:31, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::How do we know? Timing. The audio tape apparently is from the 2020 election. It looks like it was given to [[Tucker]], who gave it to [[Benny Johnson]]. Benny Johnson works the stories Tucker is afraid of or doesn't have the time for.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:02, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Correction: The audio recording is 10 months old. Again, the timing of its release is a clue to the motive for its release. 20:28, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Update: [[Roger Stone]] says Kari Lake is the [https://rumble.com/v499s2l-kari-lake-bribe-attempt-exposedthe-stonezone-w-roger-stone.html best communicator] since [[Ronald Reagan]], quite the endorsement since Stone is the guy who convinced Trump to run for president. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:56, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://dailypresser.com/doug-g/kari-lake-responds-to-trump-vp-rumors-after-major-primary-victories/ Kari Lake Responds to Trump VP Rumors After Major Primary Victories]. Of course, they're always going to talk it down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This tweet from [[Red Eagle Politics]] is best description of the possible running mate &lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/RedEaglePatriot/status/1742398795269157037&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Can unite the party&lt;br /&gt;
-Isn't offensive to the core base&lt;br /&gt;
-Can debate well&lt;br /&gt;
-Is ideally younger&lt;br /&gt;
-Has a last name that looks good on a bumper sticker&lt;br /&gt;
-Won't be seen as the 2028 frontrunner&lt;br /&gt;
-Can help expand the base (optional)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki Haley scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daily Mail]] published today that [[Nikki Haley]] had affairs with many men, including many lobbyists before she become governor of [[South Carolina]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems how clear Nikki Haley got this political power in South Carolina first then in the entire GOP --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:58, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:WOW.  Posted.  Great catch from the British press, which is far more candid about [[Leftist]]s and [[RINO]]s than the American press is.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:51, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theconundrumcluster.com/p/political-post-mortem-of-ron-desantis Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis: The Caudillo who wasn't there]. ''&amp;quot;A fool and his money are soon parted&amp;quot;''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:22, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good riddance. Too bad Trump is accepting his endorsement, though. I wouldn't.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:36, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a contest now for who will take over as the successor of the Tea Party/MAGA movement once Trump's off the stage, [[Vivek]] or DeSantis. I wouldn't count [[Kari Lake]] out as an outside challenger. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:22, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd prefer someone other than those three.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:30, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You might as well start over from scratch, with different ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ideally, it should be someone like Rand Paul.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lee Zeldin most possible running mate choice===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems now that [[Lee Zeldin]] probably would be the running mate of Trump according to [[Sebastian Gorka]] who said on X space that Donald Trump has chosen his VP PICK! He gave four pieces of information, the choice is:&lt;br /&gt;
—A man&lt;br /&gt;
—A former politician&lt;br /&gt;
—A New Yorker&lt;br /&gt;
—Currently campaigning with Donald Trump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite that I would like Trump to choose more conservative one than Zeldin, but I think Zeldin would be smart choice who is well liked by all GOP wings, strong campaigner that can appeal to independents just like what he did in 2022, a great debater who will humiliate [[Kamala Harris]] at first debate. Zeldin is more conservative than Trump on issues like crime, he will not let another horrible [[First Step Act]] --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:09, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You would expect this ahead of the NY primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:15, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Zeldin was backed by John Bolton when he ran for Congress. I don't trust him.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:44, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Zeldin &amp;amp; Stefanik are 2 of the most high-profile Republican officeholders in the state. We'll be hearing more about them being considered for VP in advance of the NY primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:34, January 24, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Epstein leaked ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epistein documents have been released according to The Calvin Coolidge Project&lt;br /&gt;
according to this account [[Bill Clinton]] his name is on the list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also documents assure that president Trump didnt visit Epistein private island&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1742708101185216726&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:02, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setback for Atheists: [[Stephen Hawking]] had orgy for underage girls&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stephen-hawking-underage-orgy-claim-forced-jeffrey-epstein-to-offer-cash-reward/ar-AA1mrNzl Stephen Hawking underage orgy claim forced Jeffrey Epstein to offer cash reward]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:46, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The historical reality and facts show it was [[Donald J. Trump]] who exposed the entire Epstein scandal. The DOJ &amp;amp; FBI never would have done it themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 2006, Epstein recruited a 15 year old girl, Virginia Guiffre, an employee of [[Mar-a-Lago]], into the child sex trade. Trump immediately barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and watched as the [[DOJ]] covered up the scandal. Investigations exposed the [[Clinton]] connection. I believe the scandal so outraged Donald J. Trump, especially where his name was involved, he believed the only way to rectify the matter and bring justice for victims was by running for president himself to expose the corruption in the federal government. It may not have been his only motive to run in 2016, but fair-minded historians need to consider this matter carefully. And of course, if we can get some input from Trump himself in memoirs or personal interviews, that would help. It was only by Trump pushing the issue in the 2016 election (which the Democrats &amp;amp; [[MSM]] tried to counter and neutralize with the ''Hollywood Access'' video which did not include children) that the story ever came to light. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:00, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next they should expose which state actors were behind the honeypot operation. So we know which nations Trump should punish once back in office.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:16, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::While the list includes personalities of all political backgrounds, the sexual reference was rather to Clinton &amp;quot;likes them young&amp;quot; ol' Bill. Epstein's death looks more like a mafia hit. I hope scrutiny follows.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:03, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MSM/propaganda updates==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update: the [https://youtu.be/6-ZY11y6XNo upgraded version of the Lancet drone can now exceed Mach 1 (the sound barrier)] in its kamikaze dive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Austin had Prostatectomy&lt;br /&gt;
::''Why do they even bother trying to keep something like this secret when they know the truth, like the Ukraine casualty rate, will eventually come out? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alternatively, Austin may have been injured in a Kyiv missile strike while attending a secret meeting and was ferried back to DC, and the prostate cancer is a cover story. Initially, the Pentagon said it was &amp;quot;elective surgery&amp;quot;, later that story was changed to undergoing cancer treatment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Black Mountain Analysis: [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/ukraine-and-the-middle-east-i Ukraine and the Middle East] - Part 1[i] ''Fast forward to the abyss''&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcU75Mgt30ux/ ALMOST ENTIRE UKRAINIAN COMPANY REFUSES TO ASSAULT, COMMANDER SHOWS REFUSENIKS].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aearnur.substack.com/p/the-wests-geopolitical-chessboard THE WEST’S GEOPOLITICAL CHESSBOARD IS SOAKED IN UKRAINIAN BLOOD].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://rumble.com/v49abc3-benjamin-reed-exposes-war-crimes-committed-by-his-fellow-us-mercs-in-ukrain.html Benjamin Reed exposes war crimes committed by his fellow US mercs in Ukraine].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CNN and Times of India Articles: The Future of the Internet is Indian===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Like nearly 900 million people in India, Devi has never used a smartphone or accessed the internet. The race to bring those millions online, adding to more than 500 million Indians already connected to the internet, is being contested by the biggest global names in tech. And they're shaping the future of the internet in the process.&amp;quot; https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2018/11/business/internet-usage-india-future/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The internet industry has come a long since the last few decades. Currently, India’s estimated internet users is set to reach 900 million by 2025. Combine that with the fact that 11% of the global web3 pool is from India, the answer is apparent: The future of the web will have India leading the way. And the revolution has already begun.&amp;quot; ]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/web3-and-its-future-in-india/And Social Media in particular is going to play a large part. I encourage every Aspiring Evangelist to have Social Media Platforms. And places like here on Conservapedia are also surely going to experience huge surges in traffic, as we continue to produce good content, and as more and more people use the Internet, and look for some kind of alternative to Wikipedia, so keep doing what we're doing and more. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:07, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;&amp;quot;Why Online Evangelism? There are approximately 7 billion people [editor's note: now 8 Billion] in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 billion use the internet [editor's note: now 5 Billion, and rapidly growing].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And 3 billion are on social media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital Evangelism helps us spread the Gospel into all the world at a rate we never could’ve imagined before. Moreover, it connects us to the younger generation.&amp;quot; [7]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.conservapedia.com/Number_of_Internet_Users [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Now you see why India did not take the neocon globalist Russophobic pro-LGBT bait and pass [[Russian sanctions]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:20, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:My user page has a few Lata Mangeshkar and Sridevi playlists. It also has a Aishwarya Rai Bachchan playlist. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyY58BNhn64&amp;amp;list=PLjs7_UtttXEA0Rif0XybxkkyQ_bbeFanz&amp;amp;index=1 Aa teri mahafil men qismat ajamaa kar ham bhi dekhenge.]  [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJNJm5DQFwk Taki Oh Taki!]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsIl0G0qlM&amp;amp;list=PLbjmSS6LZDGpo81ZM9SIqqoRqTgoVCRtm&amp;amp;index=1 Nimbooda Nimbooda]. I am ready for the Indian hordes about to descend on my user page! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:34, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, we're learning from you how to build algorithms to promote oneself on Google. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:25, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Burying the hatchet===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said at the outbreak of the NATO war, left and right idealogues needed to bury the hatchet if humanity and civilization is to survive the onslaught of [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s {my exact words were something like, 'If you don't have anything good say about socialists, just shut up, at least for the duration'). Well apparently leftwing socialist [[Jimmy Dore]] and rightwing fearmonger [[Alex Jones]] have done just that, and found common ground. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYzTwDOFCV8] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says===&lt;br /&gt;
*Defense One: [https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/01/delaying-aircraft-carrier-order-would-hurt-supply-chain-shipbuilder-says/393191/?oref=defense_one_breaking_nl Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we go. The federal government has used defense spending as a [[Keynesian]] [[stimulus]] since 1941. Aircraft carriers are obsolete as withdrawal of the USS Gerald R. Ford from the the Red Sea and [[Operation Prosperity Guardian]] just last week proves. They are vulnerable to [[hypersonic]] missiles and cheap drone swarms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:49, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The USS Gerald R. Ford was in the eastern Mediterranean. Deployment was extended three times. It was there for seven months of a planned eight month mission. Its the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower that's in the Red Sea. If carriers are obsolete, why is China building them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::China's building one small one, a copy of the ''Laoning'', which was purchased from the the Russian Federation at the end of the Cold War. It's not being built to &amp;quot;project power&amp;quot; throughout the globe. Basically, just for show, to show they can compete as China becomes a naval power. It takes years  and years of training just to learn how to operate a carrier. They'll need it for their plans to police the [[South China Sea]], but not much beyond (kinda like Japan &amp;quot;island hopping&amp;quot; in WWII). Call it &amp;quot;wasteful defense spending&amp;quot; as they copy the US. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:26, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Carriers are extraordinarily. expensive:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The ''Laoning'', originally the USSR's only planned carrier (which it didn't need) helped bankrupt the USSR and drive out of business;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The UK is currently cannibalizing its only carrier for spare parts;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The USS Gerald R. Ford is understaffed by 500-700 men of its 2,400 man crew because of recruitment shortfalls, which is probably a factor in withdrawing it from service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Defense spending is a key component of the [[UniParty]]. Republicans have signed onto Keynesian defense spending and deficits for decades. This is what earned them the reputation as &amp;quot;the party of [[Wall Street]]&amp;quot;. However, the GOP voter base today is more populist and blue collar, and the Dems have made inroads with corporate donors since the Clinton administration and end of the [[Cold War]]. A reversal of roles, so to speak. GOP voters are more aligned with &amp;quot;Main Street&amp;quot;, while the party elites and establishment remian aligned with the Uniparty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine/Biden corruption===&lt;br /&gt;
Zelensky is in possession of tapes made in 2015 by the [[Security Service of Ukraine]] of conversations between two of Zelensky main political rivals, [[Petro Poroshenko]] whom Zelensky defeated in the 2019 presidential election, and Joe Biden, who now is trying to cut Zelensky off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden told Poroshenko in 2015 to fire AG [[Victor Shokin]] to stop investigating the [[Biden family]] (&amp;quot;SOB, he got fired&amp;quot;). Zelensky is now trying to [[blackmail]] Biden and a potential presidential challenger should Ukraine ever have a presidential election again. Zelensky is trying to make it so both he and Biden can keep their jobs. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lloyd Austin's presumptive replacement===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/defense-secretary-austins-presumptive-replacement-woke-deep-stater-dr-kathleen-hicks/ AUSTIN’S PRESUMPTIVE REPLACEMENT WOKE DEEP-STATER, DR. KATHLEEN HICKS.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Level of war has gone up===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The level of war in the world seems to have risen to  1989 (post-WWII) peak levels and holding, ending the pacific 1989-2006 era. Does this contradict the Decline of Violence (Pinker) / End of History ([[Francis Fukuyama|Fukuyama]]) theses, or is it just a blip?&amp;quot;. - Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]], Twitter/X.[https://twitter.com/epkaufm/status/1744338524994748831], See: [https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace War and Peace]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think it is just a blip. And if we are living in the latter portion of the last days (Israel becoming a nation was important event concerning the &amp;quot;biblical prophetic clock&amp;quot;), then it definitely is not a blip because Jesus said that there would be wars and rumors of wars in the last days. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wager.PNG|1450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're a day late and a dollar short again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.: &amp;quot;Israel becoming a nation&amp;quot; in 1948 is one of the most abused phrases I've heard for decades (especially among many Christian writers and preachers). Israel became a nation when God promised Abraham, ''Of thee I will make a great nation''. There is simple confusion about what a. &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is; a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is not the same as a government or regime. The Navajo Indians are a nation. So are the Kurds. So are the Chechens, etc. etc etc. So is the argument that the Palestinian people are a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot;. Many governments are multi-'''nation'''-al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So using the phrase &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot; in the late 1940s only exposes the speaker as an ignorant idiot as far as [[geopolitics]] and [[history]], not to mention the [[Bible]], is concerned. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:53, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Prophecies about the land of Israel fulfilled in our lifetime: [https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&amp;amp;context=pretrib_arch Is Modern Israel Fulfilling Prophecy?] and [https://www.chosenpeople.com/is-the-modern-state-of-israel-2/ Is the modern state of Israel the fullfillment of prophecy] and [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/30/unveiling-mysteries-of-israel-four-biblical-prophe/ Unveiling the mysteries of Israel: Four biblical prophecies being fulfilled right now]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:58, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You miss the point; Israel was a nation 5,600 years before &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot;. You must be a product of the [[public school|American public school system]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The word nation according to Oxford Languages is: &amp;quot;a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, '''inhabiting a particular country or territory'''.&amp;quot;  The Jews were scattered to various places in the world (which fulfilled biblical prophecy) and then came back to their land (which also fulfilled biblical prophecy). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:47, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh, you mean like the valley of dry bones. Israel was a nation in the [[Pale of Settlement]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:55, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSM silence on...===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian attack on Christian holy site raises concern. “We know of no arrests that are made in such cases, nor do we see the P.A. placing any guards in those sensitive locations under regular attack.” (January 19, 2024 / JNS) A Palestinian mob caused extensive damage to a Christian holy site in Nablus (Shechem) known as Jacob’s Well on Sunday night.[https://www.jns.org/palestinian-attack-on-christian-holy-site-raises-concern/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:21, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A direct result of Islamization. All Mosques are under the totalitarian control of the PA.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:31, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Patriot missile shoots down Russian transport plane carrying Ukraine POWs===&lt;br /&gt;
There's no way to escape certain conclusions in this matter:&lt;br /&gt;
*Despite Starlink and advanced NATO communications technology, Ukraine internal command and control is in chaos;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Patriot missile systems are operated by American &amp;quot;mercenaries&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian [[Gen. Surovikin]] was relieved of command for mismanagement when 13 Russian pilots were killed by the [[Wagner group]] during the [[Wagner mutiny]]; will the Ukrainian side hold those responsible for the deaths of their own soldiers ''as the Russians do'', or will they follow the American example ''and not fire'' Gen Milley or Lloyd Austin after the suicide attack that killed 12 Americans during the [[Fall of Kabul]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:33, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ray Epps to be sentenced ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal media's favorite &amp;quot;Trump supporter&amp;quot; will be sentenced: &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/ray-epps-face-jan-6-conspiracies-to-be-sentenced Ray Epps, face of Jan. 6 conspiracies, to be sentenced].&amp;quot; The DOJ has requested six months for &amp;quot;disorderly conduct in a restricted area.&amp;quot; Sentencing Epps now avoids him getting a harsher sentence after Trump is reelected. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:14, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the immortal words of [[Lee Harvey Oswald]], [https://youtu.be/NR7JJHqD7_c &amp;quot;I'm just a patsy&amp;quot;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Have you guys followed the latest polling what many Americans think of Jan 6?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I uploaded [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Trump_legality.jpg this today from Zerohedge] about Trump &amp;amp; J6, but that probably doesn't answer your specific question about overall opinion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, JanuarFNy 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks. I meant the,[https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/04/fbi-conspiracy-jan-6-attack-misinformation/ WaPo][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:48, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;adopted the falsehood&amp;quot; - at least they're upfront about their [[bias]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The FBI has become absurdly powerful in recent years. Why was Tucker Carlson fired? He was asking questions about Epps and the FBI's involvement in January 6. There was also the advertiser boycott, but that wasn't spontaneous either.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::While the rest of the country was still trying figure out what to make of the January 6 demonstrations, Pelosi called for impeachment. What? Trump will leave office in a few days. That was when I become convinced that it was a plot that she instigated. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:17, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It goes back to the [[Patriot Act]] Amendments of 2006, allowing domestic spying. The FBI and National Security state no longer exist to protect the American people; on the contrary, the American people now are deemed a threat to the US government, as [[Russiagate]], the J6 false flag attack, and 2020 rigged election attest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-ray-epps-sentenced-no-jail-time/ No jail time for Epps], the media's favorite insurrectionist. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:39, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Woke updates==&lt;br /&gt;
===John Hopkins Wokeness list===&lt;br /&gt;
John Hopkins just sent out this hit list of people automatically guilty of &amp;quot;privilege&amp;quot; whether they know it or not  &lt;br /&gt;
Males &lt;br /&gt;
-Whites &lt;br /&gt;
-Christians &lt;br /&gt;
-Mid-aged people &lt;br /&gt;
-Able-bodied people &lt;br /&gt;
-Middle &amp;amp; owning class&lt;br /&gt;
-English-speaking people.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1745455765123649578]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Hopkins wokeness list.jpg|thumb|John Hopkins wokeness list]][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:02, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The ''[[Long march through the institutions]]'' has arrived. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Klaus Schwab?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:37, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No. Rudi Dutschke, a [[West German]] communist. He's an heir of [[Gramsci]] and Marx. He updated Gramsci for the 1960s updating the idea of [[cultural hegemony]] with &amp;quot;The Long March through the institutions&amp;quot; (the name borrowed from Mao &amp;amp; the CCP, as well). Basically, bring about [[revolution]] by infiltrating the institutions (academia, government, business, etc). Instead of sudden, violent overthrow of the past, a gradual infiltration and undermining of the dominant culture from within (with the election of Obama, the Long March had arrived, but most people outside of subversive circles didn't notice). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This John Hopkins is a perfect example of destructive DEI[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:16, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It tells a lot, WHO was out there to protest Claudine Gay exit, Al Sharpton non other, waving the DEI flag. 'Nuff said.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
===The OK insurrections?===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Floyd Palestine.jpeg|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Hamas pro Yemen rioters force partial evacuation of the White House&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Julio Rosas @Julio_Rosas11 -&lt;br /&gt;
🚨: DC police and Secret Service had to rush to one part of the security fence to prevent a breach from the '''Palestinian''' crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
6:46 PM · Jan 13, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1746317828158845367]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White House staff 'relocated' after pro-Palestinian rioters damage anti-scale fencing, hurl objects at cops.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-staff-relocated-pro-palestinian-rioters-damage-exterior-fencing-hurl-objects-cops][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:49, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just posted it on MPR. I'll add your links.  Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:23, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I missed it.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:31, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know, we made the connection between BLM rioters &amp;amp; the pro-Hamas camp sometime ago. I bet they are majority suburban white trash kids. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks RobS for rearranging the section...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:22, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Don't mess with TX===&lt;br /&gt;
'''How TX deals with those &amp;quot;protesters&amp;quot; '''&lt;br /&gt;
''JUST IN: Pro-Palestine protester gets pummeled by Texans after disrupting Texas governor Greg Abbott’s speech.&lt;br /&gt;
Gotta love Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened at a campaign event in Collin County.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened on the same day as pro-Palestine protesters tried breaching the fence outside of the White House.'' pic.twitter.com/QBsHADHgAd— Collin&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1746647516547047600][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:27, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outrageous statement by Tara Setmayer: &amp;quot;the religious Christian nationalists death cult&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lincoln Project’s Tara Setmayer &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;... It’s not necessarily the MAGAs who are in the death cult, the religious Christian nationalists death cult, because obviously they’re unmovable.” [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/01/16/lincoln-projects-setmayer-evangelicals-failed-this-country-by-following-their-golden-orange-god/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:30, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the liberals/leftist lose more and more power, they are going to angrier and nastier towards right-wingers and Christians. There are going to a bunch of right-wing victories in Europe in 2024 and Trump is somewhat favored to win the US presidential election in 2024 according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rabbi Jonathan Sacks declared: &amp;quot;...the 17th century was the beginning of an age of [[secularization]] which has lasted four centuries until now; the 21st century is exactly the opposite, it's the beginning of an age of [[desecularization]]. Religion is seizing power; they're not yielding power.&amp;quot;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/rabbi-jonathan-sacks-secularism-cant-solve-todays-religious-violence-answers-rooted-in-sibling-rivalry-of-jews-christians-muslims-140754/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0vf6eV6JE We shall not be moved]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:41, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Wokeism &amp;amp; secularism hand in hand[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:48, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
===Wokeness run amok===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NYPD detective fights to clear name after non-binary BLM activist complains that he asked ‘are you male or female?’.&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Post  | 01/20/2025 | Tina Moore [https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/metro/woke-gone-wild-decision-casts-shadow-on-homicide-detective/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Afternoon Jewish prayers help soldier spot terrorist.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Afternoon prayers help soldier spot terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;
A terrorist with an RPG tried to ambush IDF forces, but did not count on one soldier standing to the side to pray.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News, 14 Jan 2024&lt;br /&gt;
Malkiel Ben-Yosef, who fought in Gaza, related today how afternoon prayers helped him find a terrorist setting up an ambush for his division.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“At the entrance to Bureij, during our last sortie, we had several delays before being allowed to enter the city. We had to stop for a full day, until eventually the last approvals were given. We entered the city, but had to stop in the middle of our march.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We were the last platoon in the line, and I saw that sunset was approaching and had not yet recited the afternoon prayers. Our force stopped and I told myself that this would be the last chance to do so. I stood up to pray, facing Jerusalem, and as I prayed, I saw an open area opposite me where engineering vehicles had already passed through. Approximately 10 to 15 meters from me, I saw something metal rising out of the sand.”..&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/383561 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Telling. Inspiring. Our prayers to US, to have a better president and a better future. Amen.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:55, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crisis between Iran and Pakistan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.brtbart.com/middle-east/2024/01/17/iran-bombs-nuclear-armed-pakistan-triggering-diplomatic-crisis/#disqus_thread This] is interesting, and has the potential to disrupt the Sino-Russo-Iranian alliance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:06, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pakistan is a US/NATO stooge regime. It is there to provoke. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pakistan's first loyalty is Sunni fundamentalism, not NATO. It's been that way for decades. That's why it's consistently been a provocateur, even under NATO-skeptics like Imran Khan.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Pakistan doesn't want to be seen as supporting Israel against Iran and the Houthis. They responded with a missile strike against the same group in Balochistan. According to the Paki foreign ministry last night, India are the bad guys. In fact, the Paki foreign ministry borrowed the same language from the Russian foreign ministry: Pakistan and Iran are &amp;quot;fraternal peoples.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:59, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Only in the sense that they are both Indo-Iranian peoples. Aside from that, they are on opposing sides of the Sunni-Shia divide, and Iran has historically had closer ties with India than with Pakistan for precisely that reason.&lt;br /&gt;
::::On another note, I doubt Russia would appreciate Pakistan appropriating Russia's talking points to demonize one of Russia's closest friends.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:09, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Sunni split isn't so powerful outside of Arab countries. Sufism is prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan and Iran are both members of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organization]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:16, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The current crisis wouldn’t be the first time two SCO members were at each other’s throats. China and India had a major border standoff shortly after the latter joined the SCO.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Listen to this loop from the [https://youtu.be/-IoVsZefqm4 Pakistan Foreign Ministry Briefing After Retaliatory Strikes On Iran] from the Hindustan Times. What a joke. The retaliatory strike wasn't on Iran, it was on itself in Balochistan. Then she starts talking about a Kashmir massacre that occurred in 1990 that they blame India for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. First she talks about Pakistan's territorial integrity. Then speaks of the love and affection Pakistanis have for their &amp;quot;brotherly people&amp;quot; in Iran; then she condemns the 100 days of Gaza action. Then she trash talks India for a massacre in 1990. Diplomacy at its finest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:29, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Though, Pakistan - ISI was always a suspicious entity, however it is clear that Iranian Islamic Republic expansionist global domination was always looking for the opportunity. Be it stooges in Gaza ([[Hamas]] &amp;amp; Islamic Jihad [[PIJ]]), Lebanon ([[Hezbollah]]), Yemen ([[Houthis]]), Iraq (militias [https://www.state.gov/iran-aligned-militias-in-iraq/]), Syria (bases), Latin America (Venezuela - Alex Saab [https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article283330608.html][https://therecord.media/iran-venezuela-accused-of-coordinating-influence-campaign-to-free-colombian-businessman-report]  etc., Tri-Border Area Hezbollah crime operations). It's about IRAN.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:38, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The Venezuela connection is probably related to cocaine trafficking to Europe See [[Project Cassandra]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:39, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So Iran just attacked a nuclear power - Pakistan - and the Pakistani foreign ministry's official response is &amp;quot;we have nothing but respect and affection for our brotherly people in Iran.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:57, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I agree --with you-- that Pakistan fears Iran.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's an analysis of the [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/the-red-sea-show-i types of missiles Iran and the Houtis have, and the Yemneni launch sites.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I saw AP reporting, days ago, on Russian and NK weapons by Hamas. Will look at your link too. It wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan was directed by Obama/Biden-guys what to say...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:58, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I got two links, from Larry Johnson &amp;amp; Andrew Korybko, on Baklochi group Iran &amp;amp; Pakistan just bombed, the MEK. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
From that piece in your link, he says that only the Houthis acted militarily. He ommits Hezbollah. Maybe because Hezbollah has been attacking Israel since the 1980s?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:01, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a focus on the Red Sea &amp;amp; Houtis with Iranian missiles. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO Of The Year 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am late this year, but I am wondering if anyone has any suggestions on who should be RINO of the Year 2023. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and New Year! Thank you!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nikki Haley she is showing how she is extreme neocon and warhawk and turn her campaign to Hillary Clinton 2016 style --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TheNewRight has created a page for this topic. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/RINO_of_the_Year_2023 here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:08, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also agree with Haley.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 20:09, January 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Graham has it for 2023; Haley depends on what she does after she bows out of the 2024 presidential contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, January 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How about Graham being RINO of the Year, and Haley being the runner-up.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:21, January 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2019913</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2019913"/>
		<updated>2024-01-24T01:09:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO Of The Year 2023 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/status-of-us-dollar-as-global-reserve-currency-and-usd-exchange-rates-long-slow-uneven-decline-continues.html Status of US Dollar as Global Reserve Currency and USD Exchange Rates: Long, Slow, Uneven Decline Continues].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election news==&lt;br /&gt;
===DeSantis and Haley challenge Trump to show up on the Debate Stage for which only 3 Candidates have qualified===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/donald-trump-plans-fox-news-town-hall-opposite-cnn-jan-10-iowa-republican-primary-debate-article-106493852&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Duck Trump needs to stop &amp;quot;ducking&amp;quot; the debates and show up sooner or later. He may show up before New Hampshire, but skip Iowa. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What a coincidence===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://therightscoop.com/breaking-active-shooter-situation-at-high-school-in-perry-iowa/ Active shooter in Hicktown, Iowa 10 days before caucuses].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we get to see who's pro-big government and who's pro-Second Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biden possible drop out and possible Michele Obama running ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems Democrats now admitting that Biden isnt favorite to win re election and even [[CNN]] admit that. Biden willnt get support of Black and minorities votes, so he will not win. But the what GOP isnt aware that possible Biden drop out and let [[Michelle Obama]] to be the Democrat candidate. According to JP Morgan strategist that Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race due to poor health sometime between Super Tuesday and the November election. Then the DNC would name a replacement candidate. Dems think that Michelle Obama will get Black and minorities votes and win --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:09, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1744059335909523689 --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:23, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Democrats are counting on Trump being reputationally damaged by a guilty verdict on the Washington, D.C. court case on J6 which favors Democrats because juries in this liberal district are Democrats and anti-Trump. It might backfire and make Trump the [[Nelson Mandela]] of the USA - especially if the Supreme Court speedily accepts the case and overrules the verdict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And Biden is hoping the economy will improve. But there is a lag between inflation moderating and people recognizing it is moderating. So even if inflation markedly improves, it could be too late for Biden. Plus, the economy could get worse. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if economy improved, Biden will still unfavorable, especially to Blacks. Thats why I think Dems will replace him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:48, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With all his broken border disastrous policy, Latinos, surprisingly, turn away from him.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:27, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/07/hes-baaaaack-obama-has-deep-concerns-about-bidens-ability-to-defeat-trump-and-protect-the-deep-state-system-he-built/ Obama and Clyburn have turned on Biden]. Biden time is over. I've wanted to say that for years. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Polls indicate that the economy is the number one issue.[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/economy-stupid-top-u-priorities-234445026.html] And Biden's foreign policy is a trainwreck. Many legal Latino immigrants don't like Biden's border policy. People want peace and prosperity and Biden is failing. So Biden is playing the J6 card and the lawfare card.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. You've been peddling the Biden/Deep State [[foreign policy]] religiously verbatim for 2 years, and no amount of spamming this page will change that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:59, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right now, the Democrats are very slightly favored to win the White House according to data compiled from the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The economy is going to be a key issue in the 2024 election. &amp;quot;The Federal Reserve’s forecasting tool currently puts the odds of a recession within 12 months at 51.84%, its highest reading in four decades.&amp;quot;[https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/01/07/buy-stocks-in-2024-advice-from-warren-buffett/]. &amp;quot;As a result, U.S. economic growth is projected to be 2.4% in 2023 and 1.5% in 2024. These figures are below the G20 averages of 3.1% for 2023 and 2.8% for 2024, but above the OECD averages of 1.7% and 1.4% for the same years&amp;quot;. - ''Forbes'', December 2023.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ankitmishra/2023/12/18/leading-experts-weigh-in-on-growing-the-us-economy-in-2024/?sh=4d276f5151a5] &amp;quot;Private sector experts expect inflation to drop below 2.5% in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Goldman Sachs projects core PCE inflation will fall to around 2.4% by December 2024. The firm anticipates rebalancing in the auto, labor and housing rental markets will spearhead the disinflation.&amp;quot; - Forbes, January 2024.[https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/inflation-outlook-2024/#:~:text=Private%20sector%20experts%20expect%20inflation,markets%20will%20spearhead%20the%20disinflation.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Since the economy is slightly favored to be in recession in 2024 and the public doesn't usually recognize that inflation is over until several months afterwards, that is why the Democrats are engaging in lawfare and hoping Biden's incumbency is going to be enough to win the 2024 presidential election. Presidents whose president terms that are under an economic recesssion during an election year never win the presidency. So that is the biggest risk to Biden's presidency. A signficant enough terrorism attack caused by terrorists crossing a pourous border would be devastating too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:18, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Michelle Obama has no fire in her belly when it comes to running for president or when it comes to politics.[https://katiecouric.com/news/politics-and-policy/is-michelle-obama-running-for-president-2024/] As far as Americans, &amp;quot;a mere 6% of respondents in this survey of 2,250 adults say that, overall, women make better political leaders than men.&amp;quot;[https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American diplomacy/relations with other nations could use some improvement. And its still a man's world - particularly in the key regions of the Middle East, China/Asia and Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:43, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I expect Biden to be replaced with Kamala Harris. I have not seen any news stories that suggest Michelle is in the running. Gavin Newsom obviously wants the job, but, come on, he's a white man. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:19, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the odds of Biden dying this year is greater than him dropping out of the race. The longer he is president, the less likely it is that he will face criminal charges. If Trump wins, Trump may go after the jugular when it comes to Biden so Biden and/or his family members could wind up in prison.  &amp;quot;Given those factors, it might be reasonable to bump up Biden’s 31.35 percent chance of dying in office to perhaps 50 percent.&amp;quot; - Source: [https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4089739-bidens-life-expectancy-and-its-implications/#:~:text=According%20to%20Iervasi%2C%20an%2080,within%20the%20next%2010%20years. Biden’s life expectancy — and its implications], The Hill, July 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Between 1936 and 2012, 11 out of 14 presidents seeking a second White House term were re-elected. This success rate convinced many that, as with other elected offices, incumbency offers distinct advantages for the presidency.&amp;quot;, source: [https://time.com/6549871/2024-presidential-elections-incumbency/ Incumbency Is No Longer an Advantage in Presidential Elections].  I still think the conventional wisdom is right and the author of this article is wrongheaded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately for Biden, his presidency is Jimmy Carter 2.0 so he might drop out, but I think the Democrats are better off with an incumbent because the Democrats don't have a deep bench when it comes to strong presidential candidates. Elizabeth &amp;quot;Pocahantas&amp;quot; Warren toasted her reputation with her DNA test. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::10 months is an eternity in politics. And presidents are loathe to give up power. Biden thinks he can still turn this around via the economy improving and bashing down Trump. And Biden has the MSM media on his side. Post Trump's first term, the MSM is not as strong as it used to be, but it still packs a punch. See: [https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx Media Confidence in U.S. Matches 2016 Record Low].  [[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If the Democrats were smart, they would kick Kamala Harris out of the White House and make Michelle Obama the VP. Then they would have 4 more years to develop a person to be the presidential candidate in 2028. But I don't think Barack/Michelle Obama want to have their legacy tied to the Biden legacy so that is probably a nonstarter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just in: [[Michelle Obama]] said that she is terrified from next election [https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1744430534753673549 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems Obamas want Michelle Obama to run but Biden family and especially [[Jill Biden]] arnt accept the drop out until now --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:11, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::From the comedian [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjNgm7TgsgA Bill Burr: Nothing Will Change With Trump As President]:  &amp;quot;I don't understand why everyone is so upset. You know what is going to happen to you? If you liked Obama did he call you at all in the last 8 years? Did he ever put a sandwhich on your table? You do that. You're going to keep doing that. You're gonna be fine... I feel like the president. You only see him once every three weeks.. It's like if you were dating a chick and she was a jerk and you only saw her once every 3 weeks. There is no way that she could break your heart.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There is something to be said for hard/smart work and having trust in God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And Michelle Obama is not terrified of the next election. Obama has a presidential salary until he dies and the Obamas make big bucks for speaking engagements and other means (Netflix, etc.). Michelle Obama's life will not change very much if Trump becomes president. It's just empty liberal virtue signaling and empty drama queen behavior. Liberal elites rarely move to Canada due to presidential elections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With that being said, I am grateful for Trump's SCOTUS appointments and the good economy under Trump before the pandemic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:42, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michael Robinson]] carries some baggage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Here is the latest from the ''New York Post'': &amp;quot;[https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/dont-be-shocked-if-michelle-obama-sneaks-her-way-into-2024-race/ Don’t be shocked if Michelle Obama sneaks her way into 2024 race].&amp;quot;  [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:27, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis is going to win Iowa, and it won't be close. DeSantis internal poll has 60,000 Caucus Commitment Cards ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;DeSantis internal poll is 60,000 caucus commitment cards!!!&amp;quot; https://twitter.com/jba437/status/1744566432988336283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For comparison: &amp;quot;Ted Cruz was able to defeat Donald Trump in the Iowa Caucus by winning over Evangelical caucus-goers;[1] Cruz won 51,666 caucus votes or 27.6%, giving him a net gain of one delegate over Trump. Cruz visited all 99 counties of Iowa and held small events.[2] Cruz outperformed his polling average, which predicted a narrow Trump victory in the caucus. Following poor performances in the caucuses, Rand Paul,[3] Mike Huckabee[4] and Rick Santorum[5] suspended their campaigns.&amp;quot; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget what the Liberal Media and their Liberal Polls are telling you. If that internal polling is even remotely accurate, with 60,000 to 100,000 caucus votes, likely somewhere between 30% to 50% of an estimated 200,000 voters, all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH. Don't be duped by the Zionist Psy-Op from the Liberal Media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a Mossad like operation. Remember the Deceptive Motto of Non-Abrahamic Deceptive Mossad...[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:All one has to see is , again NishantXavier bigoted spam and total inaccuracies. While conservative Jews' Zionism is in fact anti Liberal and against '''Soros - who is anti-Zionist'''. Zionist-Abrahamic is against  - Pro-Hamas-Soros[https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/george-soros-once-slammed-us-israel-for-not-working-with-hamas/amp/][https://www.foxnews.com/world/israels-un-ambassador-slams-soros-donations-pro-hamas-groups-seeking-destruction-jewish-state.amp][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 05:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::As per using Wikipedia as a source, Wikipedia founder [[Larry Sanger]] says [https://joannenova.com.au/2023/08/founder-says-cia-fbi-control-wikipedia-and-made-it-the-most-biased-encyclopedia/ CIA &amp;amp; FBI control Wikipedia]. Iowa is a contest for the second place finisher between DeSantis &amp;amp; the Deep State Democrat preferred Nikki Haley, which one will advance to Super Tuesday. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trump is doggedly pursuing another term as president. He is not going to drop out after Iowa. That is wishful thinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you missed the context of this discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:32, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier literally wrote above: &amp;quot;Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:39, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, okay. So evidently you agree with Nishant's analysis that [[Deep State]]-controlled Wikipedia is a valid source. That kinda contradicts why Conservapedia was founded. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::You know, me and LT joined [[Larry Sanger]]'s Slack group, but LT has a problem sticking to a plan and commitment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say that Trump will likely drop out after Iowa. Typical example of selective quoting. Here's the broader quotation for the context: &amp;quot;all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:I misread your material. The good news is that I am going to be getting a new pair of workable glasses soon with oversize lenses. Because the lenses are so big, my friend whose father is an academic, calls glasses such as these &amp;quot;professor glasses&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:51, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok MaGoo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another point/angle, with the DeSantis vs Haley on CNN tonight, whether one is for or against Nikki, I believe it's pretty smart of her not to go on the attack on Trump.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:17, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, Conservative. Understood. Btw, my prediction is already coming true. Christie dropped out of the race, even before Iowa. Vivek probably will next, as he didn't make the debate. It'll be down to DeSantis vs Trump before long, and I think he'll do very well then, and it effectively is down to Nikki, Vivek, DeSantis and Trump. I think one of the first two may end up being VP, but let's see. It could also be Kim Reynolds or Thomas Massie, both of whom I like too, and who are also close to the Governor, and campaigned with him.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:46, January 11, 2024 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
:Trump will carry Florida in the general election with or without DeSantis on the ticket - he doesn't need him. [[Kari Lake]] makes a lot more sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:49, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For better or worse, populism is where the GOP base is (Blue collar working class people especially). And they are not going to vote for the Trump-Lite candidate DeSantis as long as Trump is a viable candidate. Because why have Trump lite when you can have Trump. DeSantis is funded by the business/establishment part/class of the GOP. And Nikky Haley is too much of a neocon for the GOP base which is sick of America's forever wars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NishantXavier, I know you are going to come back that DeSantis is more of a family man and religious man, but unfortunately people like that don't win elections now ([[Rick Santorum]]'s and [[Mike Huckabee]]'s presidential candidicies failed). But this could change as religious people are having more kids than nonreligious/irreligious people and there is a growing backlash against the liberalism taught in public schools and universities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main ways America's Christian conservatives are getting their way on the federal level of government is by proverbially sneaking conservative Christian policies in through the back door by putting pressure on predidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges such as the SCOTUS court and to enact conservative policies. While this approach turned over Roe vs. Wade, the same SCOTUS court approved homosexual &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;. To give another illustration, the famous strategist [[Sun Tzu]] wrote: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.&amp;quot; Christian conservatism wins at the federal level are largely gained now by indirect methods (Puting pressure on presidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges and enact conservative policies) rather than directly getting a hardcore Christian conservative into the presidential office. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So let's analyze the meaning of the claim that DeSantis had 60,000 commitment cards out of 110,000 total caucus goers, and finished with 21%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What was the participation rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the source of the claim DeSantis had a 50% majority before going into the caucuses?&lt;br /&gt;
: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:05, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mixing unrelated things ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As for Mossad, it's not Abrahamic, because it's not Abrahamic in faith and values. Devout Jewish Conservatives who are anti-ADL are. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ADL is also not Abrahamic in faith and values, but rather Kabbalic and Satanic, as Jesus told some who bragged they were sons of Abraham, that they were rather sons of the Devil, because they were Devilish in faith and values, and were plotting to kill Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He who wants to kill and brutally torture Christian Children in Abortionist Terrorism is also Devilish rather than Abrahamic, and Conservapedia has well documented that the ADL is such: &amp;quot;Its general stance on prayer in secular schools is that it is &amp;quot;unconstitutional.&amp;quot;[2] The ADL also has a record of supporting gay rights, the separation of church and state,[3] hate crimes legislation, abortion and partial-birth abortion.[4] There is also evidence to suggest that the founders may have been Fabian socialists.[5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), originally known as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (&amp;quot;B'nai B'rith&amp;quot; meaning &amp;quot;Order of the Covenant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Order of the Cut&amp;quot;, referring to circumcision) is a left-wing Jewish organization founded in 1913 ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The League has been criticized for attacking politically conservative Jews such as Dr. Laura Schlessinger.[7] The Jewish World Review stated that the League was &amp;quot;demonizing exponents of Jewish values&amp;quot;,[8] while the National Prayer Network held that the ADL's past legislative involvement &amp;quot;empowered synagogue to mix with state by authorizing itself to teach the US Justice Department, FBI and all local police about hate crimes.&amp;quot;[9]&amp;quot; https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, well, promoting Separation of Church and State in Christian-Majority America, then empowering Synagogue to mix with State in persecuting Conservative Christians and Traditional Catholics. The Plot Thickens: Taken from Conservapedia's informative article on: https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League Well done to those editors. God Bless. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Another ranting hate posting by NishantXavier. A salad between the CIA Israeli version &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Mossad)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; unrelated to religion at all, and a group fighting antisemitism &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(but ADL's Greenblatt has been criticized by conservative Jews for getting involved in unrelated stuff like woke). BTW. Israel is mostly non religious. Though most do believe in God.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But ''NishantXavier'' has a routine of slamming Jews, or anything that is or preceived to be related to them, however the tool and opportunity arises.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it started when some ultra Orthodox Jews zealots were spitting on/towards Christian pilgrims and other Christians such as Christian clergy in Israel. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:27, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier spammed poison before that.  And at the time has only highlighted that case by exclusively stressing on those few but not on the ultra-Orthodox Talmudists who turned over the 2 youths spitters to Zionist authorities who punished them or omitted the overwhelming religious organizations groups, rabbis all against that thing. It's not that case at all. But a constant routine of hatred. Even his terminology+mixing unrelated things he uses, is often typically Neo Nazi or and KKK type. In addition, take a look at [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1999949 this] sample of his horrendous malicious lie - asides the fact that he mixes contradictory ideologies... one opposing the other into one salad - all for his unholy &amp;quot;holy war.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What rubbish. I did not spam any &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot;. I educated ignorant Souls about what the Talmud teaches. I'm a credible editor with a long history of seriousness, far more than some of you. I run ReasonstobeChristian.com website. More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us, or you can remain willfully blind. I will shake of the dust if you do. Everything I said, I documented with unimpeachable links and sources. I also specifically commended Good Jews like Dr. Laura Schlessinger and others. I'm not talking about. I'm talking about Talmudist Supremacy, which is as bad or worse than Communism and Nazism. If we can criticize Russians or Germans when some of them behave badly, we can perfectly legitimately criticize Jews when some of them behave badly. There are none so blind as will not see. Read the Talmud first, become an expert on what it teaches about &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot;, and then you can talk....[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:43, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a total rubbish out of infamous Hitlerist GDL flyers... on and on NishantXavier has no shame.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is no quick and easy solution to the Gaza situation. This difficult situation has been going on since the Jews won the 1967 [[Six Day War]]. With that being said, the Six Day War was remarkable and there were signs that God intervened on behalf of the Jews (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wMIq6X4zi4 GOD'S HAND IN THE SIX DAY WAR] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Did God Help Israel During The Six Day War?] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i3uIz7hoYs Six Days of Miracles] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Fmr Israeli Commander: God Protected us in Battle]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mixing things up .Nobody's talking about Gaza. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Dianne, you need to read this, from Jewish Site Ynet News: &amp;quot;Stalin's Jews We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish ... And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name &amp;quot;Genrikh Yagoda,&amp;quot; the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.&amp;quot; https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has nothing to do with Hitler, who I condemn. Even Churchill was aware that many of the Jewish Bolsheviks who persecuted some 60 MN Christians - as Alexander Solzhenitsyn estimated - were in fact Bolshevik Jews. So do you condemn those Bolshevik Jews who persecuted Christians?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;Terrorist Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.&amp;quot; https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, this is of relevance because Jews gain weapons from Western Christians, then use those weapons against Middle Eastern Christians. They do this in Armenia, in Palestine, and recently Mossad/IDF Snipers targeted and killed two Christian women going to the latrine. Those Christian women could have been you, Dianne. Do you not care about your sisters in Christ/in conservatism? Don't spread false lies and malicious slanders about me. I am a Catholic Christian, and I love everyone. But I boldly rebuke plain evil when I see it without fear or favor. I am not calling for any kind of genocide, but trying to stop the planned genocide of 2.5 MN Palestinians, many of whom, if the plans of Mossad succeed, will emigrate to America and Europe, and then be radicalized against the local Christian populations there. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yea, we. Noticed the G word thing, though it is anti zionists who use the Talmud for their ideology and Zionists use the Biblical text before Talmud expansion on it.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That phrase he used, was debunked, including at the Dreyfus trial. Talking about education.  But only racists interpret it the way as he wants to. BTW, Every religion things it is the true one and above all other religions)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;, the favorite by neo nezis. What's next? He has basically promoted that ancient (1903) invented canard idea -  [https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion Hitler]'s favorite pushing [https://www.google.com/search?q=protocols+forgery&amp;amp;oq=protocols+forgery &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot; forgery], wrapping it into contemporary excuses.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; (As a liar Nishant also portrays 97% Muslim &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; in Gaza as supposed &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::He pathetically links communists who are anti-religion and anti-Talmud. Whatever works for his Jihad.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:23, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nishant, seriously, you need to do some studying. These two sentences: &amp;quot;More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us&amp;quot; could have came straight out of ''Mein Kampf''. Seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish Virtual Library website (The website is run by the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise) indicates: &amp;quot;Since talmudic literature spans over half a millennium, covering a wide geographic area, attitudes toward gentiles expressed in it vary considerably. In fact, it reveals a whole spectrum of opinions from the extreme antipathy of the tormented Jew of Hadrian's time – e.g., Simeon b. Yoḥai's statement: The best of gentiles should be killed (TJ, Kid. 4:11, 66c) – to the moderate views expressed in the more friendly atmosphere of early Sassanid Babylon – witness Samuel's making no distinction between Israel and the nations on the Day of Judgment (TJ, RH 1:3, 57a). Thus all such statements must be seen in their specific geographical-historical context. Nevertheless, in general it may be said that the Jew's attitude toward the gentile was largely conditioned by the gentile's attitude toward him (see Esth. R. 2:3), so that a gentile's friendship to a Jew would be warmly and uninhibitedly reciprocated (see BK 38a, and witness the relationships between Meir and Avnimos ha-Gardi, Judah ha-Nasi and Antoninus, Samuel and Sapor, etc.).&amp;quot;[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/gentile] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:31, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''One of the old infamous persecution of Jews by using Talmud text erroneously, was the Beilis Trial. Which ended in embrassament for the prosecutors for ignorance.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The trial of Beilis took place in Kiev from September 25 through October 28, 1913. The chief prosecutor A.I. Vipper made anti-Jewish statements in his closing address and defended the Cheberiak gang against the charge of Yushchinsky's murder. Beilis was represented by the most able counsels of the Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Kiev bars: Vassily Maklakov, Oscar O. Grusenberg, N.P. Karabchevsky, A.S. Zarundy, and D.N. Grigorovitch-Barsky. The lamplighter and his wife, on whose testimony the indictment of Beilis rested, when questioned by the presiding judge, answered, &amp;quot;We know nothing at all.&amp;quot; They confessed that both had been confused by the secret police and made to answer questions they did not comprehend. &amp;quot;Scientific&amp;quot; foundation for the blood libel was supplied at the trial by a Catholic priest with a criminal record, Justin Pranaitis, who stated that the murder of Yushchinsky had all the characteristics of ritual murder enjoined by the Jewish religion. His arguments were refuted by the rabbi of Moscow, Jacob *Mazeh , who proved that Pranaitis was ignorant of the talmudic texts cited. Two Russian professors of high standing, Troitsky and Kokovtzoff, also spoke on behalf of the defense in praise of Jewish values and exposed the falsity of the ritual murder hypothesis. The jury, composed of simple Russian peasants, after several hours of deliberation unanimously declared Beilis &amp;quot;not guilty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/menahem-mendel-beilis JVL].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expedia cites this &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2363483/jewish/In-Defense-of-Chassidism.htm link].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, in Ezekiel.34.31:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.34.31?ven=Tanakh:_The_Holy_Scriptures,_published_by_JPS&amp;amp;vhe=Miqra_according_to_the_Masorah&amp;amp;lang=he]&lt;br /&gt;
'For you, My flock, flock that I tend, are ADAM; and I am your God—declares the Lord GOD.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which a Talmud verse is based on. (Like the entire Talmud is, based on the Hebrew Bible, [[Tanakh]]). This was misrepresented by the prosecutor at the trial. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''It's ludicrous to suggest that the Bible considers others supposedly &amp;quot;not human&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was part of what Rabbi Maze mentioned when replied to the antisemitic prosecutor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Hebrew words have multiple/different meaning, depending on the context. So what is the specific meaning of ADAM in this case?(Source - Rabbi Yaakov Galinsky &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;VeHigadeta&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vayikra, p. 196),  what it refers to in this case is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Adam&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; vs &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ish&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Adam as a unified one group of people. As opposed to many separate, unconnected individuals.[https://yated.com/100-years-since-the-mendel-beilis-trial-blood-libel-refuses-to-die/ 100 Years Since The Mendel Beilis Trial- Blood Libel Refuses To Die], [https://daat.ac.il/chazal/maamar.asp?id=365 &amp;quot;You're called Adam&amp;quot;], [https://www.ou.org/life/torah/reflections_shemot_5768_of_rachmanut_and_redemption/ Shemot: Of Rachmanut and Redemption].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the ''Talmud''  includes Gentiles specifically, twice. &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Temurah.2b Tmurah 2b] [https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.56a Sanhedrin 56a] and more. (Source, Galinsky, ibid).[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such Talmudsplaining avails nothing, one could justify the Quran too by such sophistry. Also, some people seem not to realize I oppose all Persecution of Christians, not only Jewish Persecution of Christians, like Itamir Ben Gvir is complicit in, but also Islamist Persecution of Christians. Any True Christian takes the side of Persecuted Christians, regardless of whether it is Jews or Muslims persecuting them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is prohibited to raise a gentile from a pit even in exchange for payment, because one can say an excuse to him, such as: My son is standing on the roof and I must go use this ladder to help him down from the roof. Alternatively, he can say to him: A time has been appointed for me to appear in the courthouse [bei davar] and I must attend to this matter. Since the Jew can provide a legitimate excuse for refusing to aid the gentile, there is no need to extract him from the pit.&amp;quot; https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talmud_on_gentiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In numerous ways, the Talmud shows over and over again that it is ok with killing Gentiles, that it views Goyim as subhuman without a right to life etc. Again, as St. Bernadette famously said, it is my duty to inform, not to convince. Anti-Gentilism is as much a sin as Anti-Semitism. I am not promoting Anti-Semitism, which means hatred or dislike of all Jews. I am calling out the Talmud on its Anti-Gentilism, which means hatred or dislike of all Gentiles, which it repeatedly promotes, even more than the Quran does of non-Muslims. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Talmud shows over and over again&amp;quot;. Have you read the Talmud? Have you ever even seen the Talmud?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is what's known in the art of rhetoric as &amp;quot;hyperbolic bluster&amp;quot;. You should choose your words better if you wish to maintain credibility. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:50, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I have read it. Have you? This is just argument from incredulity, you can't believe it could really say these things, therefore you accuse those criticizing it, after having read it, of not &amp;quot;really&amp;quot; reading it or something. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this too: &amp;quot;𝙎𝙚𝙭𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙜𝙞𝙧𝙡 𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙛 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙜𝙚.&lt;br /&gt;
(𝙆𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 11𝙗)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/itsmorganariel/status/1745551453618385108 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the &lt;br /&gt;
King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I have not read the Talmud. But I've read ''Mein Kampf'' in 3 different translations and bunch of other Holocaust literature and anti-Semitic writings and arguments from those times. And your whole presentation here comes straight out of the body of those anti-Semitic tracs that appeared after circulation of the ''Protocols'' in 1890s upto World War II. It's nothing new, and hardly a &amp;quot;revelation&amp;quot; as you try to sell it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:21, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look at the language you use: &amp;quot;Jewish Supremacist&amp;quot;. Where'd you get that phrase, [https://davidduke.com/the-roots-of-jewish-supremacism/ The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Note to others. My reply was and is not intended to that ''NishantXavier'' - a fanatic hater who won't listen to reason and truth, but to others on the site&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; About him mixing and linking three different ideologies including anti-Talmud-Commmnist to blend all into his venomous longtime campaign - I have mentioned above... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now it's Israel;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tomorrow, it's unrelated anti-Talmud-Communists; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
then it's about an opposite which is Talmud;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
his attemts to link secular dominated IDF to &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatevet chance he can bash that one group - his horrific obsession.  His verbatim-style sounds straight out of Neo Nazi sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May God have mercy on his soul. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;The entire &lt;br /&gt;
list &lt;br /&gt;
of those quotes &lt;br /&gt;
have been debunked and explained.&lt;br /&gt;
Long&lt;br /&gt;
before Nishant was born. &lt;br /&gt;
This is from 1937 at Nazis rise&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://www.jta.org/archive/oxford-professor-defends-talmud-against-nazi-accusation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;This is at the early years of internet&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Here is a&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://images.shulcloud.com/618/uploads/PDFs/Divrei_Torah/160615-Response%20to%20anti-semitic%20distortions%20of%20the%20Talmud.pdf pdf]&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; and&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://aish.com/misquoting-the-talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;and &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://blog.nli.org.il/en/against_the_talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;There is no need for me to do that here.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of TALMUD quotes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''To break a verbal engagement, though legally not binding, is a moral wrong.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a wise man? He who looks into the future.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Anger profiteth nobody.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ignorance and conceit go hand in hand.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom, Conceit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is a bounden duty to visit the sick.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The righteous control their desires, but the desires of the wicked control them.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is sinful to deceive any man, be he even a heathen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Examine the contents, not the bottle.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who loves thee scolds thee.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Envy, lust, ambition, bring a man to perdition.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''When a son is called to do a service for his parents, he must first see that his person is tidy and clean; for a child must attend to his parents as though they were his king and queen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who cannot bear one word of reproof will have to hear many.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who unjustly hands over one man’s goods to another, he shall pay God for it with his own soul.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Honesty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The value of the words uttered with the lips is determined by the devotion of the heart.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Prayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The love which shirks from reproving is no love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who gives way to his wrath makes desolate his house.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The disciples of the wise are engaged all their days in building up the world.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The less the merits of a person are, the more he will feel urged to proclaim them to the public.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The study of God’s Word is the only antidote against temptation.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Temptation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Guard thy mouth from uttering an unseemly word.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Slander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''A man commits sin in secret; but the Holy One proclaims it openly.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Sin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who turns away from the works of love and charity, turns away from God.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Charity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Regulate thy will in accordance with God’s will, and submit thy will to His will.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''There is a compensation for everything except our first love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a hero? He who conquers his urges.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Heroes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Do not appease thy fellow in his hour of anger; do not comfort him while the dead is still laid out before him; do not question him in the hour of his vow; and do not strive to see him in his hour of misfortune.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''What is sweeter than sweetness? Peace after enmity.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Thy friend has a friend, and thy friend’s friend has a friend; be discreet.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Gossip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''All ailings, only not the ailing of heart; all evils, but not an evil wife.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simon the Just…used to say, “Upon three things the world stands: On Torah, on (Divine) Service, and on Deeds of Lovingkindness.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Hillel used to say: ”If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simeon, the son of Rabban Gamliel, said: “I was brought up all my life among the Sages, and I have found nothing as good for the body as silence, and it is not the study/explication that is the essence – but the practice/doing, and whoever is profuse of words occasions sin.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabban Simeon, son of Gamliel, said, “On three things the world stands: On Judgment, on Truth, and on Peace…”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Yose said: ”Let your friend’s property be as precious to you as your own; Give yourself to studying the Torah, for it does not come to you by inheritance; and let all your deeds be done in the name of Heaven.”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He (Rabbi Tarfon) also used to say, “It is not your obligation to complete the task, but neither are you at liberty to desist from it entirely…”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Another teaching of Rabbi Akiva: “Everything is foreseen, yet free will is granted; By goodness is the universe judged,  yet all depends on the preponderance of (good) deeds….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 3:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ben Zoma said, “Who is wise? The one who learns from all people… “Who is mighty?  The one who subdues the evil inclination… “Who is rich? The who who rejoices in his portion…. “Who is honored? The one who honors other human beings….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Jacob used to say, “Better is one hour of t’shuvah (returning/repentance) and good deeds in this world than the whole life of the world-to-come and better is one hour of spiritual bliss in the world-to-come than all the the life of this world!”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi (Meir) said, ”Look not at the flask but at what is therein; There may be a new flask full of old wine, And an old flask wherein is not even new wine.”''''' [inner greatness...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;but again, his problem is not Talmud or unrelated to it IDF or unrelated opposite which is Communists or other opportunities he fanatically frantically jumps to bash..&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bigot NishantXavier (cherry picking to put Js. in a bad light):&lt;br /&gt;
''I'm very very very , but very much concerned about Christians, this is why, upto now I never wrote about Islamic persecution all over - especially in Iran, my-neighbouring-Pakistan, Africa anti-Christian genocide, etc.. but it's the juuz, I mean talmud (but I will use only a sentence that I can use in my war,  regardless of its true neaning or context), I mean DeSantis (is &amp;quot;like&amp;quot;) mossad, I mean bolsheviks who hate religion and talmud, I mean zionists, I mean communist-anti-Zionists, I mean secular Netanyahu...no, not non-Jewish Italian Fauci, not non-Jewish Greek Jeff Bezos, or non-Jewish Musk, or non-Jewish Buffet or Arab Carlos Slim, not at all. I mean the juuz want to &amp;quot;control&amp;quot; you, it's THEM...hey, I like KKKDavidduke language/ideology....''[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:59, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::So far I think I have given the most reasonable view about the Jews/Talmud that is somewhere between Dianne3000/Telling and NishantXavier. Given that I have read the Old Testament through, took took two classes related to the Nazis/Holocaust, worked for Jewish organization as their token gentile, and worked for a Jewish owned firm, this is not surprising. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, it appears as if the Talmud is a mixed bag of truth/error and I believe that the Jews made a mistake on having an overemphasis on the Talmud and not enough emphasis on the Torah, the Old Testament prophets and the Old Testament. And being a Christian, I believe that Jesus was the Messiah, the trinity, and the divine inspiration of the New Testament books. Being a non-Catholic Christian, I think the Catholics put too much emphasis on the proclamations of Popes who are also a mixed bag of truth/error. So the Jews are not alone on putting too much reliance on man and not enough on God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And being that the Jews have suffered under authoritarian regimes and are educated go getters, it does not surprise me that American Jews are often liberals who embrace [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy liberal democracy] (For example, American college educated people tend to be Democrats today). Also, as far as some Jews embracing atheism/Marxism, it is part rebellion against God and partly and errant anger at God for allowing the persecution of the Jews. When you abandon God like many leftists there is the danger of following ungodly, utopian, ideologies like Marxism. And unfortunately, the ADL is liberal/leftist in its ideology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, God hasn't abandoned the Jews and modern Israel (which fullfils various Old Testament prophecies) and the miraculous events surrounding the Six Day War are proof of this (see my posts previously on main page talk above). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:03, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, Mr. Moderator. Impressive. You've put up quite the defense for the &amp;quot;Semite-led untermensch&amp;quot; the past two years. [[User_talk:MayGodBless#Russian_soldier_and_looter_returning_to_Russia_from_Ukraine:_.22Honey.2C_we_now_have_a_great_luxury._We_now_have_a_toilet.21.22|The Semite-led untermensch don't even have indoor flush toilets.]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::NishantXavier does NOT have a &amp;quot;view on talmud,&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;view&amp;quot; on zionists. He has a Jew hatred problem. You know, they all (anti Zionist G. Soros meets with Netanyahu, everyday, sometimes 5 times a day, it depends on the anti Zionist Talmudists who refuse to serve in the IDF), meet in the heat of night and decide how to &amp;quot;rule.&amp;quot;...preferably with space lasers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::IMO, it shows the danger of anti-Semitic tracs and literature, cause it gets absorbed and repeated rotely without understanding what's being said. What's the solution? Censorship? No, education. Education, understanding, and compassion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:01, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, RobSmith. I showed via various socioeconomic indicators that some countries futures look bright, while others do not. Being mad at me about this is like being mad at the weatherman for forecasting tornados/hurricane for some regions or being mad at a seismologist for forecasting an earthquake for a region. Right now, it looks like significant deflation hitting China, the second biggest economy in the world, and China's current and upcoming steep demographic decline is going to have a BIG effect on the world. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The Semite-led untermensch don't have indoor flush toilets. Unfortunately, we have to re-hash this debate with the upcoming vote on the Continuing Resolution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Telling and Diane3000, I don't agree with NishantXavier's various opinions/views on the Jews, but for various reasons that will not get into, I think NishantXavier's anger towards the Jews will lesson down the pike. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to switch back into helping non talk page web pages get more web traffic and various websites get more web traffic. That has been far more impactful/fruitful as far as my past endeavors. I spent too much time on Conservavpedia talk pages in 2023/2024. Andy is right about talk, talk, talk not being a very fruitful endeavor. So am bowing out of this discussion. And I don't expect to get involved in main page talk again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Main page talk is like eating processed sugar. It will give you a sugar high and taste sweet at the time, but long term it is not good for you. One of my New Year's resolutions for 2024 is to stay off Conservapedia talk pages as much as possible. But doing friendly/constructive talk page edits can be useful/enjoyable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::MPR/talk should be about current news items and qualifying sources. The extraneous stuff belongs at the Community Portal, where anybody can spew their caca ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether NishantXavier's background (before becoming Christian per his saying), there '''in his India, is Islam or Hinduism, both maintain supremacism'''. And which religion does not hold itself above the other? While of the three Abrahamic religions, only Judaism does not prosletyze, still it's amazing the singling out.&lt;br /&gt;
I've lived with evangelicals, beautiful friends too, I've never seen such a rare, weird person, to be such a blind hater carrying that label (evangelical?) along.&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and about Talmud? It was Hillel who coined the golden rule..&lt;br /&gt;
(1) &amp;quot;If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And being for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) &amp;quot;That which is hateful to you, do not do unto your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation;[a] go and learn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is the expansion of the. Bible, oral interpretation that stems since Moses, through an unbroken chain...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. They said three things: Be patient in [the administration of] justice, raise many disciples and make a fence round the Torah.&amp;quot; (Avot, 1, 1).[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:52, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Re predicting [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]]===&lt;br /&gt;
That's a remarkable, unexpected prediction, Nishant, that [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]].  Startling, contrary predictions like that are what make [[Conservapedia]] great.  Thanks for being bold, while I expect [[Trump]] to prevail in these [[Iowa caucuses]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thank you, Andy. God Bless! It's great we can amicably disagree. I expect it to be DeSantis vs Trump one-on-one and head-to-head shortly after Iowa. Let's see if it pans out that way. But Christie dropping out already means it's effectively a 2 person race arguably, 2 persons in the top tier, Trump and DeSantis, and two persons perhaps running more for VP, namely Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's see if last night have an impact too. There were some fireworks but not a whole lot.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:17, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is still favored to win the Republican primary and the 2024 election according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html][https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] The political betting markets data indicates that DeSantis only has a 4% chance of winning the GOP primary.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] The improbable does happen sometimes, but it does very much look like Trump is going to win the GOP nomination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The odds of a Republican winning the 2024 presidential election is now about 3% higher than the Democrats winning it according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html] That's a slim margin. I think it is going to come down to the economy (which seems to have a 50/50 chance of getting worse before the election) and what the Supreme Court does in relation to the charges against Trump. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/polls-show-haley-closing-gap-trump-new-hampshire/story?id=106223644 polls] are any good, Haley closes gap.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;New Iowa Poll ranks Trump, DeSantis, Haley ahead of Iowa Caucuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/13/latest-iowa-poll-gop-presidential-candidates-iowa-caucus-donald-trump-nikki-haley-ron-desantis/72137628007/ The Des Moines Register][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:04, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only question is, will Trump received a majority or plurality in a three way contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Chris Christie drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 person race, soon to be 3, then 2: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/10/us/politics/chris-christie-drops-out.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== When do you estimate Haley and Vivek will drop out? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So with only (1) Nikki (2) Vivek (3) DeSantis and (4) Trump left in the race, let's look at when people are likely to drop out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My estimation is either one of Nikki or Vivek will cut a VP backroom deal with either Trump or DeSantis, then drop out once it is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be or may not be, let's wait and see. But here's the Calendar: https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-calendar/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, in the next one month, we have (1) Iowa - Jan 15 (2) NH - Jan 23 (3) SC - Feb 3 (4) Nev - Feb 6 etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion is Vivek may drop out after Iowa, maybe Jan 20th or so. Christie might have stayed in till NH, his home state after all, but he has already got out, which makes matters simpler for those looking to see when it will become a 2 man race. Nikki, since SC is her home State, might stay in until Feb 3, and then drop out around Feb 4th or 5th or so, but if she struggles to pick up traction, maybe earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's the way it seems to me. What do others think? [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis runs 2nd in Iowa and Haley has a chance to run 2nd in NH. If Desantis takes 2nd in NH, it's a two man race until Trump has enough delegates. If Haley survives NH, the Haley-DeSantis contest goes into overtime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An important factor is fundraising. If either DeSantis or Haley appear to have done less than expected, fundraising dries up. By contrast, if Haley does better than expected in Iowa (not likely) or NH (a long shot), then the money starts poring into Haley's coffers, and away from DeSantis to his detriment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis strategy is take 2nd in Iowa, 3rd in NH, and 2nd in SC. That keeps him in the race beyond Feb. 3. Haley's only prayer is to finish 2nd in two of those three races. Without that, she's cooked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:35, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternative theory (Trump's version): DeSantis staked everything on Iowa. If he finishes 2nd, he drops out., leaving Trump &amp;amp; Haley the last 2 men standing. Then it becomes a head-to-head matchup between Trump and Democrats preferred globalist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More on money in campaigns: What many people don't understand is, many campaigns run hand to mouth (due to current campaign finance laws). Candidates spend the entirety of 2023 raising money which ALL gets spent in Iowa. If they fail to meet that mark, they drop out (like Christie just did, or Kamala did in December 2019. She famously said in the fall of 2019, &amp;quot;I'm moving to Iowa&amp;quot;, meaning she bet the farm of her whole campaign war chest on Iowa, and didn't even last that long). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Each primary win gives a boost in fundraising for the next primary contest. Most candidates literally live hand to mouth. This is why Trump predicts DeSantis to drop out if he fails to win, or do less than expected. Christie was running on gas fumes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump OTOH, is not dependent on donors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Biden, who ran 5th in Iowa in 2020, didn't spend a dime in Iowa. He didn't really enter the primary campaign season until South Carolina, and bet it all there and on Super Tuesday. That's why Buttboy, Klobuchar, and others dropped out on election eve - they were running on fumes, knew they wouldn't pick up any new donors, and cut the best deal they could for career advancement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:26, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Beating a dead horse.gif|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Haley and DeSantis spilt 17%-19% or roughly 35%, 1-in-3, meaning they likewise have to split the anti-Trump donor money between them, with neither side being able to take full advantage. Haley probably has the edge, and has to sweep the next two. Trump predicted DeSantis to fold after IA, but DeSantis may stick around to NH for confirmation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iowan Patriots brave Cold to support future President Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It’s literally freezing in Ames, Iowa. Iowans chose to listen to their next president of the United States. RonDeSantis will win Iowa by a landslide.&amp;quot; Picture in the link. Rob or someone, can you pls post the pic here? https://twitter.com/BoricuaGOP/status/1745632851775668451 It is an epic pic, and it speaks a 1000 words. Let's see how it goes. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right. Trump colluded with Russia, Covid comes from people eating bats, Russia is about to run out of missiles, and DeSantis will defeat Trump. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the photo, half of em are Democrats. There is no Democrat caucus this year so they go to the GOP caucus to reek havoc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol, &amp;quot;half of them are Democrats&amp;quot;, that's quite a nice Conspiracy Theory you've got there, Mr. Rob Smith. Lazy Lib Dems are not going to brave Freezing Iowa Temperatures to show up in favor of a Candidate their Liberal Media tells them is already losing. Liberals haven't thought their strategies through. But it's ok because God is on the side of those who wish to confirm the RvW Victory and make it permanent. That's the number 1 reason I'm Pro DeSantis. But as a Pro-Trump Friend reminded me, it's good for Trump too if DeSantis wins, as we'll get him pardoned from any liberal phony Trumped up charge the Dems place against him. We don't agree with Trump, but we have no grudge against him, like the Dems trying to destroy him and his family do. We just need a young, 2 Term President to finish the job concerning RvW etc.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:34, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I'm from the Midwest. Why do you think we have elections and caucuses in the dead of winter? Cause there's nothing to do and it gives you an opportunity to get out of the house. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:51, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's wait for the caucuses to complete, then we can compare the results and the predictions. I'm working on another project right now, namely the History of Christendom, particularly the first 500 years. Will check back when caucuses are done. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:51, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gatewaypundit: [https://rumble.com/v46z9p0-democrats-may-switch-parties-to-vote-for-nikki-haley-in-iowa.html Democrats May Switch Parties to Vote for Nikki Haley in Iowa]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Joni Ernst today===&lt;br /&gt;
Joni Ernst was clever in walking a fine line  on MTP this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
Buy she is not ruling out endorsing Trump if he is the nominee....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hostages held in Gaza are innocent, they were celebrating the Jewish holiday and are held by terrorists in tunnels in in Gaza, they have been tortureed, raped...[https://ibb.co/TtqMrPZ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6 Americans held in Gaza need to be freed immediately, they are our brothers and sisters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Trump pardons convicted on J6, she won't oppose that, that is a president prerogative thing to do that, it will be his decision. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristen:&lt;br /&gt;
But you called them insurrectionists...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ernst: I did not use that term...They did break the law.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:50, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis grassroots support: more than 1,700 precinct captains ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis has 1700 precinct captains. Assuming each captain is able to mobilize even 50 voters, that's 85,000. Assuming 170,000 total voters, hitting 85,000 and 50% as a percentage is in no wise impossible. DeSantis has far better chances than the Lib Media is telling you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Grassroots support for Ron DeSantis in Iowa is incredibly strong. 💪💪💪&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 1,700 precinct captains are ready to turn out his supporters at the Republican caucus on Monday night!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://twitter.com/NvrBackDown24/status/1746372891791233437 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:00, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump wins Iowa===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's Trump all the way down in Iowa. With 99 percent of the vote counted, its Trump 51% (20 delegates), DeSantis 21% (8 delegates), Haley 19% (7 delegates), and Ramaswamy 8% (3 delegates), according to RCP. Biden has a net favorable rating of -17 while Trump has -15. When the winners are this unpopular, there's something wrong with the election system. Perhaps a nonpartisan primary with the top two candidates going on to the general election would help. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be worse. William Lai, Taiwan's newly elected president, is also super-unpopular. [https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/ He got only 40 percent of the vote in Saturday's election]. Fortunately the Chinese military is too corrupt to do anything about it. [https://www.businessinsider.com/china-corruption-rocket-force-water-fuel-xi-jinping-purge-scandal-2024-1?op=1 Water-filled rockets, anyone?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update:''' So happened to the rocket fuel? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lcyIf_7v6Q China's Military Whistleblower: Air Force Used Missile Fuel for Cooking] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:14, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The public's fickle, and they vote for idiots anyway. &amp;quot;The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversations with the average voter.&amp;quot; - Winston Churchill. Why do you think we have a $34 trillion [[national debt]]? cause the candidates promise freebies and the idiots keep voting for them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:28, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The [[U.S.]] has become a vast and enormously diverse country.  I think it may be unrealistic, in the absence of an attack by a foreign enemy (such as [[9/11]]), to expect high approval ratings for a president anymore.  [[Trump]] is the best hope to keep the [[U.S.]] united and strong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:40, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's hope.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:42, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is only going to be in office 4 more years if he runs. The most pernicious thing dividing America culturally is leftist/liberals taking over academia and indoctrinating students. That needs to be addressed because it is a root problem. 61.8% of high school (or equivalent) graduates go on to post-secondary study.[https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics#:~:text=Report%20Highlights.,decline%20in%20enrollment%20since%201951.]  Conservatives/Republicans have to get more serious via school choice and cutting off loans to college majors that offer a low return on investment to students in terms of employability and are often liberal indoctrination (Women's studies, etc.) and paring down the amount of required courses (There is no reason why an engineer needs to take liberal/leftist fluff courses). They also need to pare down frivolous spending by colleges (Top heavy administration costs, lavish facilities). Colleges need to focus on core competencies and be more spartan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I know of a clergman who visits relatives in a red state and his relatives have a messianic view of Trump and that he is going to solve all their problems. The clergyman pointed out that Trump is not going to solve all their problems. For example, his morbidly obese relatives in that red state are still going to be obese if Trump wins. Politicians can only do so much. More Americans need to turn to God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Read this article to see what some right-wing people are doing to transform colleges into more conservative institutions: [https://time.com/6319108/conservative-universities/ The History Behind the Right’s Effort to Take Over American Universities]. More Republican governors need to start implemnting what is starting to be done in Florida. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:29, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the tip, Conservative. Thanks to E. Stefanik's Dec. unmasking of academia dark reality.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:22, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Why Trump's ahead in GA (poll) matters===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President Biden trails former President Trump by eight percentage points in a hypothetical rematch in Georgia, according to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll of registered voters out Tuesday ((01.16.24)). Why it matters: The poll offers an early warning sign for Biden, who flipped Georgia blue in 2020 for the first time in nearly three decades[https://www.axios.com/2024/01/16/trump-biden-georgia-poll-2024-rematch Trump beating Biden in Georgia in early 2024 poll (01.16.24)].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If DEMS. oust Biden, it will be interesting HOW they do it. Recalling Sanders case.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:17, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vivek drops out===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has dropped out, and with that I say this: I am a hard no on Vivek for 2028.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past few weeks, hardcore cultists like Laura Loomer have been attacking Haley as ineligible but leaving Vivek alone despite him having the same eligibility issues as her. And now that he has dropped out, they are hypocritically proclaiming him the future of MAGA once Trump is done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These people stand for only one thing: as long as you're loyal to Trump on a personal level, EVERYTHING is negotiable. Even core tenets of MAGA ideology like immigration, trade, and foreign policy. As you may recall, it was this way of thinking that made it possible for neocons like Bolton and Pompeo to infiltrate Trump's first administration and destroy it from within. And if this faction continues to have Trump's ear, they will be just as responsible for the failure of his second administration as the second wave of neocon infiltrators who carry out the destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has now become the face of this faction, and unless he distances himself from them I cannot trust him going forward. MAGA is more than just Trump. It is an ideology and a way of life. Anyone who thinks MAGA is something negotiable is at best delusional and at worst a closet NeverTrumper. We cannot afford such people being at the wheel.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:07, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's already endorsed Trump. He's following the [[Ben Carson]] blueprint. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:25, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Expectedly, but still, Vivek (though re Ukraine many agreed with him, nevertheless), has been rubbing too many people, even at GOP, the wrong way, for various reasons.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:03, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with Geopolitician that the movement -at least in spirit- is larger than Trump.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now wait a minute...Geo, you just claimed [[Laura Loomer]] was a credible source for the [[Ron DeSantis]] page, and here you call her a &amp;quot;[[cult]]ist&amp;quot;. Make up your mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I explained on your talk page why such statements aren't mutually exclusice and why I stand by both statements. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith#Any_source_for_this.3F here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:26, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSNBC &amp;quot;warns...&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
MSNBC’s Scarborough Calls Trump Getting 51% of Iowa Vote ‘Bad News’ for GOP&lt;br /&gt;
'50% of people voting in the Iowa caucuses against a former president is bad news for that party’s prospects in the general election,' said Scarborough&lt;br /&gt;
Published 01/16/24 &lt;br /&gt;
[https://themessenger.com/politics/msnbcs-scarborough-calls-trump-getting-51-of-iowa-vote-bad-news-for-the-gop][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki in NH===&lt;br /&gt;
So Nikki's strategy is as follows: She's now claiming &amp;quot;It's a two person race&amp;quot;, following Trump's prediction that DeSantis will drop out if DeSAntis doesn't finish 1st in Iowa (where he was soundly beaten).  Joe Biden is not on the ballot in NH, leaving Democrats to vote in the Republican primary. That's why polls have Nikki at 40%. If Desantis stays in, the winner walks away with only a plurality; if DeSantis drops out, Trump wins a majority, again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:57, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Haley's donors and voters are mainly Democrats. It's not because they want the Republican Party to succeed. She's the new John Kasich. I was a DeSantis man, but now I'll take my chances with Trump. [https://youtu.be/7lhcZquLMX0 Matt Walsh exposes Haley as a Civil War idiot on YouTube].&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update'''. The problem is not just that Haley's supporters are Democrats. The pundits say they are &amp;quot;moderates,&amp;quot; but they are in fact the most partisan Democrats. They want all Republicans, including Haley, to lose in the general election. The primaries are set up on the assumption that people will vote for the candidate they support. The Haley Democrats are voting for the Republican that they think is most likely to lose in the general election. That is good argument for replacing partisan primaries with nonpartisan primaries, something that we already have in Washington State. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:51, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update:''' [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/01/21/opinion/haley-trump-new-hampshire-republican-gop-primary/ The ''Boston Globe'' is advising Democrats to vote for Haley], even though &amp;quot;Haley’s not this editorial board’s cup of tea.&amp;quot; Cross party lines and vote for someone you hate! By this logic, Republicans should vote in the Democratic primary for Dean Phillips. Then we can have a general election between Haley and Phillips. The system of partisan primaries is setup for this type of abuse. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 18:03, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump and the 14th Amendment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My story is the lead at ''The American Thinker'': &amp;quot;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/the_14th_amendments_history_militates_against_colorados_ruling_against_trump.html The 14th Amendment’s History Militates Against Colorado’s Ruling Against Trump].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:13, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump's running mate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/17/the-woman-trump-reportedly-says-would-be-a-killer-vp-n2633793 Will it be New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik]? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 03:52, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope not.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump/Kari Lake would be the most interesting ticket on several levels. (1) It would help cement carrying the swing state of Arizona; (2) it would be the first ticket in history where neither candidate had prior government experience, insuring Kari Lake as one of Trump's anti-establishment successors (like [[Vivek]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::One thing is for sure, Dems. Do not want GOP to have any woman on the ballot..[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Kari Lake nominated herself to Senate, no way to be running mate. Hopefully she will defeat [[Ruben Gallego]]. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This tweet from [[Red Eagle Politics]] is best description of the possible running mate &lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/RedEaglePatriot/status/1742398795269157037&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Can unite the party&lt;br /&gt;
-Isn't offensive to the core base&lt;br /&gt;
-Can debate well&lt;br /&gt;
-Is ideally younger&lt;br /&gt;
-Has a last name that looks good on a bumper sticker&lt;br /&gt;
-Won't be seen as the 2028 frontrunner&lt;br /&gt;
-Can help expand the base (optional)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki Haley scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daily Mail]] published today that [[Nikki Haley]] had affairs with many men, including many lobbyists before she become governor of [[South Carolina]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems how clear Nikki Haley got this political power in South Carolina first then in the entire GOP --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:58, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:WOW.  Posted.  Great catch from the British press, which is far more candid about [[Leftist]]s and [[RINO]]s than the American press is.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:51, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theconundrumcluster.com/p/political-post-mortem-of-ron-desantis Political post-mortem of Ron DeSantis: The Caudillo who wasn't there]. ''&amp;quot;A fool and his money are soon parted&amp;quot;''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:22, January 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good riddance. Too bad Trump is accepting his endorsement, though. I wouldn't.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 17:36, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a contest now for who will take over as the successor of the Tea Party/MAGA movement once Trump's off the stage, [[Vivek]] or DeSantis. I wouldn't count [[Kari Lake]] out as an outside challenger. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:22, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'd prefer someone other than those three.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:30, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You might as well start over from scratch, with different ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Ideally, it should be someone like Rand Paul.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lee Zeldin most possible running mate choice===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems now that [[Lee Zeldin]] probably would be the running mate of Trump according to [[Sebastian Gorka]] who said on X space that Donald Trump has chosen his VP PICK! He gave four pieces of information, the choice is:&lt;br /&gt;
—A man&lt;br /&gt;
—A former politician&lt;br /&gt;
—A New Yorker&lt;br /&gt;
—Currently campaigning with Donald Trump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite that I would like Trump to choose more conservative one than Zeldin, but I think Zeldin would be smart choice who is well liked by all GOP wings, strong campaigner that can appeal to independents just like what he did in 2022, a great debater who will humiliate [[Kamala Harris]] at first debate. Zeldin is more conservative than Trump on issues like crime, he will not let another horrible [[First Step Act]] --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:09, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You would expect this ahead of the NY primary. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:15, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Zeldin was backed by John Bolton when he ran for Congress. I don't trust him.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:44, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Epstein leaked ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epistein documents have been released according to The Calvin Coolidge Project&lt;br /&gt;
according to this account [[Bill Clinton]] his name is on the list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also documents assure that president Trump didnt visit Epistein private island&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1742708101185216726&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:02, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setback for Atheists: [[Stephen Hawking]] had orgy for underage girls&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stephen-hawking-underage-orgy-claim-forced-jeffrey-epstein-to-offer-cash-reward/ar-AA1mrNzl Stephen Hawking underage orgy claim forced Jeffrey Epstein to offer cash reward]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:46, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The historical reality and facts show it was [[Donald J. Trump]] who exposed the entire Epstein scandal. The DOJ &amp;amp; FBI never would have done it themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 2006, Epstein recruited a 15 year old girl, Virginia Guiffre, an employee of [[Mar-a-Lago]], into the child sex trade. Trump immediately barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and watched as the [[DOJ]] covered up the scandal. Investigations exposed the [[Clinton]] connection. I believe the scandal so outraged Donald J. Trump, especially where his name was involved, he believed the only way to rectify the matter and bring justice for victims was by running for president himself to expose the corruption in the federal government. It may not have been his only motive to run in 2016, but fair-minded historians need to consider this matter carefully. And of course, if we can get some input from Trump himself in memoirs or personal interviews, that would help. It was only by Trump pushing the issue in the 2016 election (which the Democrats &amp;amp; [[MSM]] tried to counter and neutralize with the ''Hollywood Access'' video which did not include children) that the story ever came to light. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:00, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next they should expose which state actors were behind the honeypot operation. So we know which nations Trump should punish once back in office.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:16, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::While the list includes personalities of all political backgrounds, the sexual reference was rather to Clinton &amp;quot;likes them young&amp;quot; ol' Bill. Epstein's death looks more like a mafia hit. I hope scrutiny follows.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:03, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MSM/propaganda updates==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update: the [https://youtu.be/6-ZY11y6XNo upgraded version of the Lancet drone can now exceed Mach 1 (the sound barrier)] in its kamikaze dive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Austin had Prostatectomy&lt;br /&gt;
::''Why do they even bother trying to keep something like this secret when they know the truth, like the Ukraine casualty rate, will eventually come out? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alternatively, Austin may have been injured in a Kyiv missile strike while attending a secret meeting and was ferried back to DC, and the prostate cancer is a cover story. Initially, the Pentagon said it was &amp;quot;elective surgery&amp;quot;, later that story was changed to undergoing cancer treatment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Black Mountain Analysis: [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/ukraine-and-the-middle-east-i Ukraine and the Middle East] - Part 1[i] ''Fast forward to the abyss''&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcU75Mgt30ux/ ALMOST ENTIRE UKRAINIAN COMPANY REFUSES TO ASSAULT, COMMANDER SHOWS REFUSENIKS].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://aearnur.substack.com/p/the-wests-geopolitical-chessboard THE WEST’S GEOPOLITICAL CHESSBOARD IS SOAKED IN UKRAINIAN BLOOD].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CNN and Times of India Articles: The Future of the Internet is Indian===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Like nearly 900 million people in India, Devi has never used a smartphone or accessed the internet. The race to bring those millions online, adding to more than 500 million Indians already connected to the internet, is being contested by the biggest global names in tech. And they're shaping the future of the internet in the process.&amp;quot; https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2018/11/business/internet-usage-india-future/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The internet industry has come a long since the last few decades. Currently, India’s estimated internet users is set to reach 900 million by 2025. Combine that with the fact that 11% of the global web3 pool is from India, the answer is apparent: The future of the web will have India leading the way. And the revolution has already begun.&amp;quot; ]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/web3-and-its-future-in-india/And Social Media in particular is going to play a large part. I encourage every Aspiring Evangelist to have Social Media Platforms. And places like here on Conservapedia are also surely going to experience huge surges in traffic, as we continue to produce good content, and as more and more people use the Internet, and look for some kind of alternative to Wikipedia, so keep doing what we're doing and more. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:07, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;&amp;quot;Why Online Evangelism? There are approximately 7 billion people [editor's note: now 8 Billion] in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 billion use the internet [editor's note: now 5 Billion, and rapidly growing].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And 3 billion are on social media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital Evangelism helps us spread the Gospel into all the world at a rate we never could’ve imagined before. Moreover, it connects us to the younger generation.&amp;quot; [7]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.conservapedia.com/Number_of_Internet_Users [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Now you see why India did not take the neocon globalist Russophobic pro-LGBT bait and pass [[Russian sanctions]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:20, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:My user page has a few Lata Mangeshkar and Sridevi playlists. It also has a Aishwarya Rai Bachchan playlist. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyY58BNhn64&amp;amp;list=PLjs7_UtttXEA0Rif0XybxkkyQ_bbeFanz&amp;amp;index=1 Aa teri mahafil men qismat ajamaa kar ham bhi dekhenge.]  [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJNJm5DQFwk Taki Oh Taki!]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsIl0G0qlM&amp;amp;list=PLbjmSS6LZDGpo81ZM9SIqqoRqTgoVCRtm&amp;amp;index=1 Nimbooda Nimbooda]. I am ready for the Indian hordes about to descend on my user page! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:34, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, we're learning from you how to build algorithms to promote oneself on Google. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:25, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Burying the hatchet===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said at the outbreak of the NATO war, left and right idealogues needed to bury the hatchet if humanity and civilization is to survive the onslaught of [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s {my exact words were something like, 'If you don't have anything good say about socialists, just shut up, at least for the duration'). Well apparently leftwing socialist [[Jimmy Dore]] and rightwing fearmonger [[Alex Jones]] have done just that, and found common ground. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYzTwDOFCV8] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says===&lt;br /&gt;
*Defense One: [https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/01/delaying-aircraft-carrier-order-would-hurt-supply-chain-shipbuilder-says/393191/?oref=defense_one_breaking_nl Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we go. The federal government has used defense spending as a [[Keynesian]] [[stimulus]] since 1941. Aircraft carriers are obsolete as withdrawal of the USS Gerald R. Ford from the the Red Sea and [[Operation Prosperity Guardian]] just last week proves. They are vulnerable to [[hypersonic]] missiles and cheap drone swarms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:49, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The USS Gerald R. Ford was in the eastern Mediterranean. Deployment was extended three times. It was there for seven months of a planned eight month mission. Its the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower that's in the Red Sea. If carriers are obsolete, why is China building them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::China's building one small one, a copy of the ''Laoning'', which was purchased from the the Russian Federation at the end of the Cold War. It's not being built to &amp;quot;project power&amp;quot; throughout the globe. Basically, just for show, to show they can compete as China becomes a naval power. It takes years  and years of training just to learn how to operate a carrier. They'll need it for their plans to police the [[South China Sea]], but not much beyond (kinda like Japan &amp;quot;island hopping&amp;quot; in WWII). Call it &amp;quot;wasteful defense spending&amp;quot; as they copy the US. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:26, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Carriers are extraordinarily. expensive:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The ''Laoning'', originally the USSR's only planned carrier (which it didn't need) helped bankrupt the USSR and drive out of business;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The UK is currently cannibalizing its only carrier for spare parts;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The USS Gerald R. Ford is understaffed by 500-700 men of its 2,400 man crew because of recruitment shortfalls, which is probably a factor in withdrawing it from service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Defense spending is a key component of the [[UniParty]]. Republicans have signed onto Keynesian defense spending and deficits for decades. This is what earned them the reputation as &amp;quot;the party of [[Wall Street]]&amp;quot;. However, the GOP voter base today is more populist and blue collar, and the Dems have made inroads with corporate donors since the Clinton administration and end of the [[Cold War]]. A reversal of roles, so to speak. GOP voters are more aligned with &amp;quot;Main Street&amp;quot;, while the party elites and establishment remian aligned with the Uniparty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine/Biden corruption===&lt;br /&gt;
Zelensky is in possession of tapes made in 2015 by the [[Security Service of Ukraine]] of conversations between two of Zelensky main political rivals, [[Petro Poroshenko]] whom Zelensky defeated in the 2019 presidential election, and Joe Biden, who now is trying to cut Zelensky off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden told Poroshenko in 2015 to fire AG [[Victor Shokin]] to stop investigating the [[Biden family]] (&amp;quot;SOB, he got fired&amp;quot;). Zelensky is now trying to [[blackmail]] Biden and a potential presidential challenger should Ukraine ever have a presidential election again. Zelensky is trying to make it so both he and Biden can keep their jobs. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lloyd Austin's presumptive replacement===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/defense-secretary-austins-presumptive-replacement-woke-deep-stater-dr-kathleen-hicks/ AUSTIN’S PRESUMPTIVE REPLACEMENT WOKE DEEP-STATER, DR. KATHLEEN HICKS.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Level of war has gone up===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The level of war in the world seems to have risen to  1989 (post-WWII) peak levels and holding, ending the pacific 1989-2006 era. Does this contradict the Decline of Violence (Pinker) / End of History ([[Francis Fukuyama|Fukuyama]]) theses, or is it just a blip?&amp;quot;. - Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]], Twitter/X.[https://twitter.com/epkaufm/status/1744338524994748831], See: [https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace War and Peace]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think it is just a blip. And if we are living in the latter portion of the last days (Israel becoming a nation was important event concerning the &amp;quot;biblical prophetic clock&amp;quot;), then it definitely is not a blip because Jesus said that there would be wars and rumors of wars in the last days. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wager.PNG|1450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're a day late and a dollar short again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.: &amp;quot;Israel becoming a nation&amp;quot; in 1948 is one of the most abused phrases I've heard for decades (especially among many Christian writers and preachers). Israel became a nation when God promised Abraham, ''Of thee I will make a great nation''. There is simple confusion about what a. &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is; a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is not the same as a government or regime. The Navajo Indians are a nation. So are the Kurds. So are the Chechens, etc. etc etc. So is the argument that the Palestinian people are a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot;. Many governments are multi-'''nation'''-al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So using the phrase &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot; in the late 1940s only exposes the speaker as an ignorant idiot as far as [[geopolitics]] and [[history]], not to mention the [[Bible]], is concerned. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:53, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Prophecies about the land of Israel fulfilled in our lifetime: [https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&amp;amp;context=pretrib_arch Is Modern Israel Fulfilling Prophecy?] and [https://www.chosenpeople.com/is-the-modern-state-of-israel-2/ Is the modern state of Israel the fullfillment of prophecy] and [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/30/unveiling-mysteries-of-israel-four-biblical-prophe/ Unveiling the mysteries of Israel: Four biblical prophecies being fulfilled right now]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:58, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You miss the point; Israel was a nation 5,600 years before &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot;. You must be a product of the [[public school|American public school system]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The word nation according to Oxford Languages is: &amp;quot;a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, '''inhabiting a particular country or territory'''.&amp;quot;  The Jews were scattered to various places in the world (which fulfilled biblical prophecy) and then came back to their land (which also fulfilled biblical prophecy). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:47, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh, you mean like the valley of dry bones. Israel was a nation in the [[Pale of Settlement]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:55, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSM silence on...===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian attack on Christian holy site raises concern. “We know of no arrests that are made in such cases, nor do we see the P.A. placing any guards in those sensitive locations under regular attack.” (January 19, 2024 / JNS) A Palestinian mob caused extensive damage to a Christian holy site in Nablus (Shechem) known as Jacob’s Well on Sunday night.[https://www.jns.org/palestinian-attack-on-christian-holy-site-raises-concern/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:21, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A direct result of Islamization. All Mosques are under the totalitarian control of the PA.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:31, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ray Epps to be sentenced ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal media's favorite &amp;quot;Trump supporter&amp;quot; will be sentenced: &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/ray-epps-face-jan-6-conspiracies-to-be-sentenced Ray Epps, face of Jan. 6 conspiracies, to be sentenced].&amp;quot; The DOJ has requested six months for &amp;quot;disorderly conduct in a restricted area.&amp;quot; Sentencing Epps now avoids him getting a harsher sentence after Trump is reelected. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:14, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the immortal words of [[Lee Harvey Oswald]], [https://youtu.be/NR7JJHqD7_c &amp;quot;I'm just a patsy&amp;quot;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Have you guys followed the latest polling what many Americans think of Jan 6?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I uploaded [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Trump_legality.jpg this today from Zerohedge] about Trump &amp;amp; J6, but that probably doesn't answer your specific question about overall opinion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, JanuarFNy 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks. I meant the,[https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/04/fbi-conspiracy-jan-6-attack-misinformation/ WaPo][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:48, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;adopted the falsehood&amp;quot; - at least they're upfront about their [[bias]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The FBI has become absurdly powerful in recent years. Why was Tucker Carlson fired? He was asking questions about Epps and the FBI's involvement in January 6. There was also the advertiser boycott, but that wasn't spontaneous either.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::While the rest of the country was still trying figure out what to make of the January 6 demonstrations, Pelosi called for impeachment. What? Trump will leave office in a few days. That was when I become convinced that it was a plot that she instigated. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:17, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It goes back to the [[Patriot Act]] Amendments of 2006, allowing domestic spying. The FBI and National Security state no longer exist to protect the American people; on the contrary, the American people now are deemed a threat to the US government, as [[Russiagate]], the J6 false flag attack, and 2020 rigged election attest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-ray-epps-sentenced-no-jail-time/ No jail time for Epps], the media's favorite insurrectionist. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:39, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Woke updates==&lt;br /&gt;
===John Hopkins Wokeness list===&lt;br /&gt;
John Hopkins just sent out this hit list of people automatically guilty of &amp;quot;privilege&amp;quot; whether they know it or not  &lt;br /&gt;
Males &lt;br /&gt;
-Whites &lt;br /&gt;
-Christians &lt;br /&gt;
-Mid-aged people &lt;br /&gt;
-Able-bodied people &lt;br /&gt;
-Middle &amp;amp; owning class&lt;br /&gt;
-English-speaking people.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1745455765123649578]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Hopkins wokeness list.jpg|thumb|John Hopkins wokeness list]][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:02, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The ''[[Long march through the institutions]]'' has arrived. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Klaus Schwab?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:37, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No. Rudi Dutschke, a [[West German]] communist. He's an heir of [[Gramsci]] and Marx. He updated Gramsci for the 1960s updating the idea of [[cultural hegemony]] with &amp;quot;The Long March through the institutions&amp;quot; (the name borrowed from Mao &amp;amp; the CCP, as well). Basically, bring about [[revolution]] by infiltrating the institutions (academia, government, business, etc). Instead of sudden, violent overthrow of the past, a gradual infiltration and undermining of the dominant culture from within (with the election of Obama, the Long March had arrived, but most people outside of subversive circles didn't notice). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This John Hopkins is a perfect example of destructive DEI[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:16, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It tells a lot, WHO was out there to protest Claudine Gay exit, Al Sharpton non other, waving the DEI flag. 'Nuff said.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
===The OK insurrections?===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Floyd Palestine.jpeg|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Hamas pro Yemen rioters force partial evacuation of the White House&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Julio Rosas @Julio_Rosas11 -&lt;br /&gt;
🚨: DC police and Secret Service had to rush to one part of the security fence to prevent a breach from the '''Palestinian''' crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
6:46 PM · Jan 13, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1746317828158845367]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White House staff 'relocated' after pro-Palestinian rioters damage anti-scale fencing, hurl objects at cops.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-staff-relocated-pro-palestinian-rioters-damage-exterior-fencing-hurl-objects-cops][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:49, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just posted it on MPR. I'll add your links.  Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:23, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I missed it.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:31, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know, we made the connection between BLM rioters &amp;amp; the pro-Hamas camp sometime ago. I bet they are majority suburban white trash kids. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks RobS for rearranging the section...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:22, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Don't mess with TX===&lt;br /&gt;
'''How TX deals with those &amp;quot;protesters&amp;quot; '''&lt;br /&gt;
''JUST IN: Pro-Palestine protester gets pummeled by Texans after disrupting Texas governor Greg Abbott’s speech.&lt;br /&gt;
Gotta love Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened at a campaign event in Collin County.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened on the same day as pro-Palestine protesters tried breaching the fence outside of the White House.'' pic.twitter.com/QBsHADHgAd— Collin&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1746647516547047600][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:27, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outrageous statement by Tara Setmayer: &amp;quot;the religious Christian nationalists death cult&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lincoln Project’s Tara Setmayer &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;... It’s not necessarily the MAGAs who are in the death cult, the religious Christian nationalists death cult, because obviously they’re unmovable.” [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/01/16/lincoln-projects-setmayer-evangelicals-failed-this-country-by-following-their-golden-orange-god/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:30, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the liberals/leftist lose more and more power, they are going to angrier and nastier towards right-wingers and Christians. There are going to a bunch of right-wing victories in Europe in 2024 and Trump is somewhat favored to win the US presidential election in 2024 according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rabbi Jonathan Sacks declared: &amp;quot;...the 17th century was the beginning of an age of [[secularization]] which has lasted four centuries until now; the 21st century is exactly the opposite, it's the beginning of an age of [[desecularization]]. Religion is seizing power; they're not yielding power.&amp;quot;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/rabbi-jonathan-sacks-secularism-cant-solve-todays-religious-violence-answers-rooted-in-sibling-rivalry-of-jews-christians-muslims-140754/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0vf6eV6JE We shall not be moved]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:41, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Wokeism &amp;amp; secularism hand in hand[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:48, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
===Wokeness run amok===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NYPD detective fights to clear name after non-binary BLM activist complains that he asked ‘are you male or female?’.&lt;br /&gt;
The New York Post  | 01/20/2025 | Tina Moore [https://nypost.com/2024/01/20/metro/woke-gone-wild-decision-casts-shadow-on-homicide-detective/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:43, January 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Afternoon Jewish prayers help soldier spot terrorist.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Afternoon prayers help soldier spot terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;
A terrorist with an RPG tried to ambush IDF forces, but did not count on one soldier standing to the side to pray.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News, 14 Jan 2024&lt;br /&gt;
Malkiel Ben-Yosef, who fought in Gaza, related today how afternoon prayers helped him find a terrorist setting up an ambush for his division.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“At the entrance to Bureij, during our last sortie, we had several delays before being allowed to enter the city. We had to stop for a full day, until eventually the last approvals were given. We entered the city, but had to stop in the middle of our march.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We were the last platoon in the line, and I saw that sunset was approaching and had not yet recited the afternoon prayers. Our force stopped and I told myself that this would be the last chance to do so. I stood up to pray, facing Jerusalem, and as I prayed, I saw an open area opposite me where engineering vehicles had already passed through. Approximately 10 to 15 meters from me, I saw something metal rising out of the sand.”..&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/383561 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Telling. Inspiring. Our prayers to US, to have a better president and a better future. Amen.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:55, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crisis between Iran and Pakistan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.brtbart.com/middle-east/2024/01/17/iran-bombs-nuclear-armed-pakistan-triggering-diplomatic-crisis/#disqus_thread This] is interesting, and has the potential to disrupt the Sino-Russo-Iranian alliance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:06, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pakistan is a US/NATO stooge regime. It is there to provoke. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pakistan's first loyalty is Sunni fundamentalism, not NATO. It's been that way for decades. That's why it's consistently been a provocateur, even under NATO-skeptics like Imran Khan.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Pakistan doesn't want to be seen as supporting Israel against Iran and the Houthis. They responded with a missile strike against the same group in Balochistan. According to the Paki foreign ministry last night, India are the bad guys. In fact, the Paki foreign ministry borrowed the same language from the Russian foreign ministry: Pakistan and Iran are &amp;quot;fraternal peoples.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:59, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Only in the sense that they are both Indo-Iranian peoples. Aside from that, they are on opposing sides of the Sunni-Shia divide, and Iran has historically had closer ties with India than with Pakistan for precisely that reason.&lt;br /&gt;
::::On another note, I doubt Russia would appreciate Pakistan appropriating Russia's talking points to demonize one of Russia's closest friends.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:09, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Sunni split isn't so powerful outside of Arab countries. Sufism is prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan and Iran are both members of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organization]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:16, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The current crisis wouldn’t be the first time two SCO members were at each other’s throats. China and India had a major border standoff shortly after the latter joined the SCO.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Listen to this loop from the [https://youtu.be/-IoVsZefqm4 Pakistan Foreign Ministry Briefing After Retaliatory Strikes On Iran] from the Hindustan Times. What a joke. The retaliatory strike wasn't on Iran, it was on itself in Balochistan. Then she starts talking about a Kashmir massacre that occurred in 1990 that they blame India for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. First she talks about Pakistan's territorial integrity. Then speaks of the love and affection Pakistanis have for their &amp;quot;brotherly people&amp;quot; in Iran; then she condemns the 100 days of Gaza action. Then she trash talks India for a massacre in 1990. Diplomacy at its finest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:29, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Though, Pakistan - ISI was always a suspicious entity, however it is clear that Iranian Islamic Republic expansionist global domination was always looking for the opportunity. Be it stooges in Gaza ([[Hamas]] &amp;amp; Islamic Jihad [[PIJ]]), Lebanon ([[Hezbollah]]), Yemen ([[Houthis]]), Iraq (militias [https://www.state.gov/iran-aligned-militias-in-iraq/]), Syria (bases), Latin America (Venezuela - Alex Saab [https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article283330608.html][https://therecord.media/iran-venezuela-accused-of-coordinating-influence-campaign-to-free-colombian-businessman-report]  etc., Tri-Border Area Hezbollah crime operations). It's about IRAN.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:38, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The Venezuela connection is probably related to cocaine trafficking to Europe See [[Project Cassandra]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:39, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So Iran just attacked a nuclear power - Pakistan - and the Pakistani foreign ministry's official response is &amp;quot;we have nothing but respect and affection for our brotherly people in Iran.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:57, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I agree --with you-- that Pakistan fears Iran.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's an analysis of the [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/the-red-sea-show-i types of missiles Iran and the Houtis have, and the Yemneni launch sites.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I saw AP reporting, days ago, on Russian and NK weapons by Hamas. Will look at your link too. It wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan was directed by Obama/Biden-guys what to say...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:58, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I got two links, from Larry Johnson &amp;amp; Andrew Korybko, on Baklochi group Iran &amp;amp; Pakistan just bombed, the MEK. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
From that piece in your link, he says that only the Houthis acted militarily. He ommits Hezbollah. Maybe because Hezbollah has been attacking Israel since the 1980s?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:01, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a focus on the Red Sea &amp;amp; Houtis with Iranian missiles. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO Of The Year 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am late this year, but I am wondering if anyone has any suggestions on who should be RINO of the Year 2023. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and New Year! Thank you!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nikki Haley she is showing how she is extreme neocon and warhawk and turn her campaign to Hillary Clinton 2016 style --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 19:29, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TheNewRight has created a page for this topic. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/RINO_of_the_Year_2023 here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 22:08, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I also agree with Haley.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 20:09, January 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2018939</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2018939"/>
		<updated>2024-01-20T00:20:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO Of The Year 2023 */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01/status-of-us-dollar-as-global-reserve-currency-and-usd-exchange-rates-long-slow-uneven-decline-continues.html Status of US Dollar as Global Reserve Currency and USD Exchange Rates: Long, Slow, Uneven Decline Continues].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Election news==&lt;br /&gt;
===DeSantis and Haley challenge Trump to show up on the Debate Stage for which only 3 Candidates have qualified===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.timesnownews.com/world/donald-trump-plans-fox-news-town-hall-opposite-cnn-jan-10-iowa-republican-primary-debate-article-106493852&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Duck Trump needs to stop &amp;quot;ducking&amp;quot; the debates and show up sooner or later. He may show up before New Hampshire, but skip Iowa. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What a coincidence===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://therightscoop.com/breaking-active-shooter-situation-at-high-school-in-perry-iowa/ Active shooter in Hicktown, Iowa 10 days before caucuses].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now we get to see who's pro-big government and who's pro-Second Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biden possible drop out and possible Michele Obama running ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems Democrats now admitting that Biden isnt favorite to win re election and even [[CNN]] admit that. Biden willnt get support of Black and minorities votes, so he will not win. But the what GOP isnt aware that possible Biden drop out and let [[Michelle Obama]] to be the Democrat candidate. According to JP Morgan strategist that Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race due to poor health sometime between Super Tuesday and the November election. Then the DNC would name a replacement candidate. Dems think that Michelle Obama will get Black and minorities votes and win --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:09, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1744059335909523689 --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:23, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The Democrats are counting on Trump being reputationally damaged by a guilty verdict on the Washington, D.C. court case on J6 which favors Democrats because juries in this liberal district are Democrats and anti-Trump. It might backfire and make Trump the [[Nelson Mandela]] of the USA - especially if the Supreme Court speedily accepts the case and overrules the verdict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And Biden is hoping the economy will improve. But there is a lag between inflation moderating and people recognizing it is moderating. So even if inflation markedly improves, it could be too late for Biden. Plus, the economy could get worse. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:34, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Even if economy improved, Biden will still unfavorable, especially to Blacks. Thats why I think Dems will replace him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:48, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With all his broken border disastrous policy, Latinos, surprisingly, turn away from him.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:27, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/07/hes-baaaaack-obama-has-deep-concerns-about-bidens-ability-to-defeat-trump-and-protect-the-deep-state-system-he-built/ Obama and Clyburn have turned on Biden]. Biden time is over. I've wanted to say that for years. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Polls indicate that the economy is the number one issue.[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/economy-stupid-top-u-priorities-234445026.html] And Biden's foreign policy is a trainwreck. Many legal Latino immigrants don't like Biden's border policy. People want peace and prosperity and Biden is failing. So Biden is playing the J6 card and the lawfare card.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. You've been peddling the Biden/Deep State [[foreign policy]] religiously verbatim for 2 years, and no amount of spamming this page will change that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:59, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Right now, the Democrats are very slightly favored to win the White House according to data compiled from the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The economy is going to be a key issue in the 2024 election. &amp;quot;The Federal Reserve’s forecasting tool currently puts the odds of a recession within 12 months at 51.84%, its highest reading in four decades.&amp;quot;[https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/01/07/buy-stocks-in-2024-advice-from-warren-buffett/]. &amp;quot;As a result, U.S. economic growth is projected to be 2.4% in 2023 and 1.5% in 2024. These figures are below the G20 averages of 3.1% for 2023 and 2.8% for 2024, but above the OECD averages of 1.7% and 1.4% for the same years&amp;quot;. - ''Forbes'', December 2023.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ankitmishra/2023/12/18/leading-experts-weigh-in-on-growing-the-us-economy-in-2024/?sh=4d276f5151a5] &amp;quot;Private sector experts expect inflation to drop below 2.5% in 2024, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Goldman Sachs projects core PCE inflation will fall to around 2.4% by December 2024. The firm anticipates rebalancing in the auto, labor and housing rental markets will spearhead the disinflation.&amp;quot; - Forbes, January 2024.[https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/inflation-outlook-2024/#:~:text=Private%20sector%20experts%20expect%20inflation,markets%20will%20spearhead%20the%20disinflation.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Since the economy is slightly favored to be in recession in 2024 and the public doesn't usually recognize that inflation is over until several months afterwards, that is why the Democrats are engaging in lawfare and hoping Biden's incumbency is going to be enough to win the 2024 presidential election. Presidents whose president terms that are under an economic recesssion during an election year never win the presidency. So that is the biggest risk to Biden's presidency. A signficant enough terrorism attack caused by terrorists crossing a pourous border would be devastating too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:18, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Michelle Obama has no fire in her belly when it comes to running for president or when it comes to politics.[https://katiecouric.com/news/politics-and-policy/is-michelle-obama-running-for-president-2024/] As far as Americans, &amp;quot;a mere 6% of respondents in this survey of 2,250 adults say that, overall, women make better political leaders than men.&amp;quot;[https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2008/08/25/men-or-women-whos-the-better-leader/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American diplomacy/relations with other nations could use some improvement. And its still a man's world - particularly in the key regions of the Middle East, China/Asia and Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:43, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I expect Biden to be replaced with Kamala Harris. I have not seen any news stories that suggest Michelle is in the running. Gavin Newsom obviously wants the job, but, come on, he's a white man. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 12:19, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the odds of Biden dying this year is greater than him dropping out of the race. The longer he is president, the less likely it is that he will face criminal charges. If Trump wins, Trump may go after the jugular when it comes to Biden so Biden and/or his family members could wind up in prison.  &amp;quot;Given those factors, it might be reasonable to bump up Biden’s 31.35 percent chance of dying in office to perhaps 50 percent.&amp;quot; - Source: [https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4089739-bidens-life-expectancy-and-its-implications/#:~:text=According%20to%20Iervasi%2C%20an%2080,within%20the%20next%2010%20years. Biden’s life expectancy — and its implications], The Hill, July 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Between 1936 and 2012, 11 out of 14 presidents seeking a second White House term were re-elected. This success rate convinced many that, as with other elected offices, incumbency offers distinct advantages for the presidency.&amp;quot;, source: [https://time.com/6549871/2024-presidential-elections-incumbency/ Incumbency Is No Longer an Advantage in Presidential Elections].  I still think the conventional wisdom is right and the author of this article is wrongheaded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately for Biden, his presidency is Jimmy Carter 2.0 so he might drop out, but I think the Democrats are better off with an incumbent because the Democrats don't have a deep bench when it comes to strong presidential candidates. Elizabeth &amp;quot;Pocahantas&amp;quot; Warren toasted her reputation with her DNA test. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::10 months is an eternity in politics. And presidents are loathe to give up power. Biden thinks he can still turn this around via the economy improving and bashing down Trump. And Biden has the MSM media on his side. Post Trump's first term, the MSM is not as strong as it used to be, but it still packs a punch. See: [https://news.gallup.com/poll/512861/media-confidence-matches-2016-record-low.aspx Media Confidence in U.S. Matches 2016 Record Low].  [[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:06, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If the Democrats were smart, they would kick Kamala Harris out of the White House and make Michelle Obama the VP. Then they would have 4 more years to develop a person to be the presidential candidate in 2028. But I don't think Barack/Michelle Obama want to have their legacy tied to the Biden legacy so that is probably a nonstarter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just in: [[Michelle Obama]] said that she is terrified from next election [https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1744430534753673549 link]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems Obamas want Michelle Obama to run but Biden family and especially [[Jill Biden]] arnt accept the drop out until now --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:11, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::From the comedian [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjNgm7TgsgA Bill Burr: Nothing Will Change With Trump As President]:  &amp;quot;I don't understand why everyone is so upset. You know what is going to happen to you? If you liked Obama did he call you at all in the last 8 years? Did he ever put a sandwhich on your table? You do that. You're going to keep doing that. You're gonna be fine... I feel like the president. You only see him once every three weeks.. It's like if you were dating a chick and she was a jerk and you only saw her once every 3 weeks. There is no way that she could break your heart.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There is something to be said for hard/smart work and having trust in God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And Michelle Obama is not terrified of the next election. Obama has a presidential salary until he dies and the Obamas make big bucks for speaking engagements and other means (Netflix, etc.). Michelle Obama's life will not change very much if Trump becomes president. It's just empty liberal virtue signaling and empty drama queen behavior. Liberal elites rarely move to Canada due to presidential elections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::With that being said, I am grateful for Trump's SCOTUS appointments and the good economy under Trump before the pandemic. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:42, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michael Robinson]] carries some baggage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Here is the latest from the ''New York Post'': &amp;quot;[https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/dont-be-shocked-if-michelle-obama-sneaks-her-way-into-2024-race/ Don’t be shocked if Michelle Obama sneaks her way into 2024 race].&amp;quot;  [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:27, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis is going to win Iowa, and it won't be close. DeSantis internal poll has 60,000 Caucus Commitment Cards ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;DeSantis internal poll is 60,000 caucus commitment cards!!!&amp;quot; https://twitter.com/jba437/status/1744566432988336283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For comparison: &amp;quot;Ted Cruz was able to defeat Donald Trump in the Iowa Caucus by winning over Evangelical caucus-goers;[1] Cruz won 51,666 caucus votes or 27.6%, giving him a net gain of one delegate over Trump. Cruz visited all 99 counties of Iowa and held small events.[2] Cruz outperformed his polling average, which predicted a narrow Trump victory in the caucus. Following poor performances in the caucuses, Rand Paul,[3] Mike Huckabee[4] and Rick Santorum[5] suspended their campaigns.&amp;quot; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Iowa_Republican_presidential_caucuses&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forget what the Liberal Media and their Liberal Polls are telling you. If that internal polling is even remotely accurate, with 60,000 to 100,000 caucus votes, likely somewhere between 30% to 50% of an estimated 200,000 voters, all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH. Don't be duped by the Zionist Psy-Op from the Liberal Media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a Mossad like operation. Remember the Deceptive Motto of Non-Abrahamic Deceptive Mossad...[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:All one has to see is , again NishantXavier bigoted spam and total inaccuracies. While conservative Jews' Zionism is in fact anti Liberal and against '''Soros - who is anti-Zionist'''. Zionist-Abrahamic is against  - Pro-Hamas-Soros[https://nypost.com/2023/10/12/george-soros-once-slammed-us-israel-for-not-working-with-hamas/amp/][https://www.foxnews.com/world/israels-un-ambassador-slams-soros-donations-pro-hamas-groups-seeking-destruction-jewish-state.amp][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 05:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::As per using Wikipedia as a source, Wikipedia founder [[Larry Sanger]] says [https://joannenova.com.au/2023/08/founder-says-cia-fbi-control-wikipedia-and-made-it-the-most-biased-encyclopedia/ CIA &amp;amp; FBI control Wikipedia]. Iowa is a contest for the second place finisher between DeSantis &amp;amp; the Deep State Democrat preferred Nikki Haley, which one will advance to Super Tuesday. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trump is doggedly pursuing another term as president. He is not going to drop out after Iowa. That is wishful thinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:00, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think you missed the context of this discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:32, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier literally wrote above: &amp;quot;Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:39, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, okay. So evidently you agree with Nishant's analysis that [[Deep State]]-controlled Wikipedia is a valid source. That kinda contradicts why Conservapedia was founded. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::You know, me and LT joined [[Larry Sanger]]'s Slack group, but LT has a problem sticking to a plan and commitment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:49, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say that Trump will likely drop out after Iowa. Typical example of selective quoting. Here's the broader quotation for the context: &amp;quot;all beside DeSantis and Trump will likely drop out shortly after Iowa, and DeSantis will have the momentum going into NH&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:I misread your material. The good news is that I am going to be getting a new pair of workable glasses soon with oversize lenses. Because the lenses are so big, my friend whose father is an academic, calls glasses such as these &amp;quot;professor glasses&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:51, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok MaGoo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another point/angle, with the DeSantis vs Haley on CNN tonight, whether one is for or against Nikki, I believe it's pretty smart of her not to go on the attack on Trump.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:17, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fair enough, Conservative. Understood. Btw, my prediction is already coming true. Christie dropped out of the race, even before Iowa. Vivek probably will next, as he didn't make the debate. It'll be down to DeSantis vs Trump before long, and I think he'll do very well then, and it effectively is down to Nikki, Vivek, DeSantis and Trump. I think one of the first two may end up being VP, but let's see. It could also be Kim Reynolds or Thomas Massie, both of whom I like too, and who are also close to the Governor, and campaigned with him.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:46, January 11, 2024 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
:Trump will carry Florida in the general election with or without DeSantis on the ticket - he doesn't need him. [[Kari Lake]] makes a lot more sense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:49, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For better or worse, populism is where the GOP base is (Blue collar working class people especially). And they are not going to vote for the Trump-Lite candidate DeSantis as long as Trump is a viable candidate. Because why have Trump lite when you can have Trump. DeSantis is funded by the business/establishment part/class of the GOP. And Nikky Haley is too much of a neocon for the GOP base which is sick of America's forever wars. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NishantXavier, I know you are going to come back that DeSantis is more of a family man and religious man, but unfortunately people like that don't win elections now ([[Rick Santorum]]'s and [[Mike Huckabee]]'s presidential candidicies failed). But this could change as religious people are having more kids than nonreligious/irreligious people and there is a growing backlash against the liberalism taught in public schools and universities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main ways America's Christian conservatives are getting their way on the federal level of government is by proverbially sneaking conservative Christian policies in through the back door by putting pressure on predidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges such as the SCOTUS court and to enact conservative policies. While this approach turned over Roe vs. Wade, the same SCOTUS court approved homosexual &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;. To give another illustration, the famous strategist [[Sun Tzu]] wrote: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;In all fighting, the direct method may be used for joining battle, but indirect methods will be needed in order to secure victory. In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack – the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.&amp;quot; Christian conservatism wins at the federal level are largely gained now by indirect methods (Puting pressure on presidential candidates and presidents to appoint conservative judges and enact conservative policies) rather than directly getting a hardcore Christian conservative into the presidential office. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So let's analyze the meaning of the claim that DeSantis had 60,000 commitment cards out of 110,000 total caucus goers, and finished with 21%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What was the participation rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What is the source of the claim DeSantis had a 50% majority before going into the caucuses?&lt;br /&gt;
: [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:05, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mixing unrelated things ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As for Mossad, it's not Abrahamic, because it's not Abrahamic in faith and values. Devout Jewish Conservatives who are anti-ADL are. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ADL is also not Abrahamic in faith and values, but rather Kabbalic and Satanic, as Jesus told some who bragged they were sons of Abraham, that they were rather sons of the Devil, because they were Devilish in faith and values, and were plotting to kill Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He who wants to kill and brutally torture Christian Children in Abortionist Terrorism is also Devilish rather than Abrahamic, and Conservapedia has well documented that the ADL is such: &amp;quot;Its general stance on prayer in secular schools is that it is &amp;quot;unconstitutional.&amp;quot;[2] The ADL also has a record of supporting gay rights, the separation of church and state,[3] hate crimes legislation, abortion and partial-birth abortion.[4] There is also evidence to suggest that the founders may have been Fabian socialists.[5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), originally known as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (&amp;quot;B'nai B'rith&amp;quot; meaning &amp;quot;Order of the Covenant&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Order of the Cut&amp;quot;, referring to circumcision) is a left-wing Jewish organization founded in 1913 ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The League has been criticized for attacking politically conservative Jews such as Dr. Laura Schlessinger.[7] The Jewish World Review stated that the League was &amp;quot;demonizing exponents of Jewish values&amp;quot;,[8] while the National Prayer Network held that the ADL's past legislative involvement &amp;quot;empowered synagogue to mix with state by authorizing itself to teach the US Justice Department, FBI and all local police about hate crimes.&amp;quot;[9]&amp;quot; https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, well, promoting Separation of Church and State in Christian-Majority America, then empowering Synagogue to mix with State in persecuting Conservative Christians and Traditional Catholics. The Plot Thickens: Taken from Conservapedia's informative article on: https://www.conservapedia.com/Anti-Defamation_League Well done to those editors. God Bless. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Another ranting hate posting by NishantXavier. A salad between the CIA Israeli version &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Mossad)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; unrelated to religion at all, and a group fighting antisemitism &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(but ADL's Greenblatt has been criticized by conservative Jews for getting involved in unrelated stuff like woke). BTW. Israel is mostly non religious. Though most do believe in God.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:05, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But ''NishantXavier'' has a routine of slamming Jews, or anything that is or preceived to be related to them, however the tool and opportunity arises.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:02, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it started when some ultra Orthodox Jews zealots were spitting on/towards Christian pilgrims and other Christians such as Christian clergy in Israel. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:27, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::NishantXavier spammed poison before that.  And at the time has only highlighted that case by exclusively stressing on those few but not on the ultra-Orthodox Talmudists who turned over the 2 youths spitters to Zionist authorities who punished them or omitted the overwhelming religious organizations groups, rabbis all against that thing. It's not that case at all. But a constant routine of hatred. Even his terminology+mixing unrelated things he uses, is often typically Neo Nazi or and KKK type. In addition, take a look at [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1999949 this] sample of his horrendous malicious lie - asides the fact that he mixes contradictory ideologies... one opposing the other into one salad - all for his unholy &amp;quot;holy war.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:What rubbish. I did not spam any &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot;. I educated ignorant Souls about what the Talmud teaches. I'm a credible editor with a long history of seriousness, far more than some of you. I run ReasonstobeChristian.com website. More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us, or you can remain willfully blind. I will shake of the dust if you do. Everything I said, I documented with unimpeachable links and sources. I also specifically commended Good Jews like Dr. Laura Schlessinger and others. I'm not talking about. I'm talking about Talmudist Supremacy, which is as bad or worse than Communism and Nazism. If we can criticize Russians or Germans when some of them behave badly, we can perfectly legitimately criticize Jews when some of them behave badly. There are none so blind as will not see. Read the Talmud first, become an expert on what it teaches about &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot;, and then you can talk....[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:43, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a total rubbish out of infamous Hitlerist GDL flyers... on and on NishantXavier has no shame.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is no quick and easy solution to the Gaza situation. This difficult situation has been going on since the Jews won the 1967 [[Six Day War]]. With that being said, the Six Day War was remarkable and there were signs that God intervened on behalf of the Jews (See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wMIq6X4zi4 GOD'S HAND IN THE SIX DAY WAR] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Did God Help Israel During The Six Day War?] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i3uIz7hoYs Six Days of Miracles] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CR-8pmLBStA Fmr Israeli Commander: God Protected us in Battle]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mixing things up .Nobody's talking about Gaza. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Dianne, you need to read this, from Jewish Site Ynet News: &amp;quot;Stalin's Jews We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish ... And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name &amp;quot;Genrikh Yagoda,&amp;quot; the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.&amp;quot; https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has nothing to do with Hitler, who I condemn. Even Churchill was aware that many of the Jewish Bolsheviks who persecuted some 60 MN Christians - as Alexander Solzhenitsyn estimated - were in fact Bolshevik Jews. So do you condemn those Bolshevik Jews who persecuted Christians?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;Terrorist Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek – all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing.&amp;quot; https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, this is of relevance because Jews gain weapons from Western Christians, then use those weapons against Middle Eastern Christians. They do this in Armenia, in Palestine, and recently Mossad/IDF Snipers targeted and killed two Christian women going to the latrine. Those Christian women could have been you, Dianne. Do you not care about your sisters in Christ/in conservatism? Don't spread false lies and malicious slanders about me. I am a Catholic Christian, and I love everyone. But I boldly rebuke plain evil when I see it without fear or favor. I am not calling for any kind of genocide, but trying to stop the planned genocide of 2.5 MN Palestinians, many of whom, if the plans of Mossad succeed, will emigrate to America and Europe, and then be radicalized against the local Christian populations there. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yea, we. Noticed the G word thing, though it is anti zionists who use the Talmud for their ideology and Zionists use the Biblical text before Talmud expansion on it.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(That phrase he used, was debunked, including at the Dreyfus trial. Talking about education.  But only racists interpret it the way as he wants to. BTW, Every religion things it is the true one and above all other religions)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;, the favorite by neo nezis. What's next? He has basically promoted that ancient (1903) invented canard idea -  [https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion Hitler]'s favorite pushing [https://www.google.com/search?q=protocols+forgery&amp;amp;oq=protocols+forgery &amp;quot;protocols&amp;quot; forgery], wrapping it into contemporary excuses.&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; (As a liar Nishant also portrays 97% Muslim &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; in Gaza as supposed &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::He pathetically links communists who are anti-religion and anti-Talmud. Whatever works for his Jihad.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:23, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Nishant, seriously, you need to do some studying. These two sentences: &amp;quot;More and more of the evil that the Talmud teaches is coming to Light. You can either educate yourself about Jewish Supremacist ideologies that view &amp;quot;Goyim&amp;quot; or Gentiles as sub-human cattle and want to kill or enslave millions of us&amp;quot; could have came straight out of ''Mein Kampf''. Seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
The Jewish Virtual Library website (The website is run by the American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise) indicates: &amp;quot;Since talmudic literature spans over half a millennium, covering a wide geographic area, attitudes toward gentiles expressed in it vary considerably. In fact, it reveals a whole spectrum of opinions from the extreme antipathy of the tormented Jew of Hadrian's time – e.g., Simeon b. Yoḥai's statement: The best of gentiles should be killed (TJ, Kid. 4:11, 66c) – to the moderate views expressed in the more friendly atmosphere of early Sassanid Babylon – witness Samuel's making no distinction between Israel and the nations on the Day of Judgment (TJ, RH 1:3, 57a). Thus all such statements must be seen in their specific geographical-historical context. Nevertheless, in general it may be said that the Jew's attitude toward the gentile was largely conditioned by the gentile's attitude toward him (see Esth. R. 2:3), so that a gentile's friendship to a Jew would be warmly and uninhibitedly reciprocated (see BK 38a, and witness the relationships between Meir and Avnimos ha-Gardi, Judah ha-Nasi and Antoninus, Samuel and Sapor, etc.).&amp;quot;[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/gentile] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:31, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''One of the old infamous persecution of Jews by using Talmud text erroneously, was the Beilis Trial. Which ended in embrassament for the prosecutors for ignorance.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The trial of Beilis took place in Kiev from September 25 through October 28, 1913. The chief prosecutor A.I. Vipper made anti-Jewish statements in his closing address and defended the Cheberiak gang against the charge of Yushchinsky's murder. Beilis was represented by the most able counsels of the Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Kiev bars: Vassily Maklakov, Oscar O. Grusenberg, N.P. Karabchevsky, A.S. Zarundy, and D.N. Grigorovitch-Barsky. The lamplighter and his wife, on whose testimony the indictment of Beilis rested, when questioned by the presiding judge, answered, &amp;quot;We know nothing at all.&amp;quot; They confessed that both had been confused by the secret police and made to answer questions they did not comprehend. &amp;quot;Scientific&amp;quot; foundation for the blood libel was supplied at the trial by a Catholic priest with a criminal record, Justin Pranaitis, who stated that the murder of Yushchinsky had all the characteristics of ritual murder enjoined by the Jewish religion. His arguments were refuted by the rabbi of Moscow, Jacob *Mazeh , who proved that Pranaitis was ignorant of the talmudic texts cited. Two Russian professors of high standing, Troitsky and Kokovtzoff, also spoke on behalf of the defense in praise of Jewish values and exposed the falsity of the ritual murder hypothesis. The jury, composed of simple Russian peasants, after several hours of deliberation unanimously declared Beilis &amp;quot;not guilty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/menahem-mendel-beilis JVL].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Expedia cites this &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2363483/jewish/In-Defense-of-Chassidism.htm link].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, in Ezekiel.34.31:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Ezekiel.34.31?ven=Tanakh:_The_Holy_Scriptures,_published_by_JPS&amp;amp;vhe=Miqra_according_to_the_Masorah&amp;amp;lang=he]&lt;br /&gt;
'For you, My flock, flock that I tend, are ADAM; and I am your God—declares the Lord GOD.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which a Talmud verse is based on. (Like the entire Talmud is, based on the Hebrew Bible, [[Tanakh]]). This was misrepresented by the prosecutor at the trial. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''It's ludicrous to suggest that the Bible considers others supposedly &amp;quot;not human&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was part of what Rabbi Maze mentioned when replied to the antisemitic prosecutor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Hebrew words have multiple/different meaning, depending on the context. So what is the specific meaning of ADAM in this case?(Source - Rabbi Yaakov Galinsky &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;VeHigadeta&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vayikra, p. 196),  what it refers to in this case is &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Adam&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; vs &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Ish&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Adam as a unified one group of people. As opposed to many separate, unconnected individuals.[https://yated.com/100-years-since-the-mendel-beilis-trial-blood-libel-refuses-to-die/ 100 Years Since The Mendel Beilis Trial- Blood Libel Refuses To Die], [https://daat.ac.il/chazal/maamar.asp?id=365 &amp;quot;You're called Adam&amp;quot;], [https://www.ou.org/life/torah/reflections_shemot_5768_of_rachmanut_and_redemption/ Shemot: Of Rachmanut and Redemption].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact, the ''Talmud''  includes Gentiles specifically, twice. &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.sefaria.org/Temurah.2b Tmurah 2b] [https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.56a Sanhedrin 56a] and more. (Source, Galinsky, ibid).[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such Talmudsplaining avails nothing, one could justify the Quran too by such sophistry. Also, some people seem not to realize I oppose all Persecution of Christians, not only Jewish Persecution of Christians, like Itamir Ben Gvir is complicit in, but also Islamist Persecution of Christians. Any True Christian takes the side of Persecuted Christians, regardless of whether it is Jews or Muslims persecuting them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is prohibited to raise a gentile from a pit even in exchange for payment, because one can say an excuse to him, such as: My son is standing on the roof and I must go use this ladder to help him down from the roof. Alternatively, he can say to him: A time has been appointed for me to appear in the courthouse [bei davar] and I must attend to this matter. Since the Jew can provide a legitimate excuse for refusing to aid the gentile, there is no need to extract him from the pit.&amp;quot; https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talmud_on_gentiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In numerous ways, the Talmud shows over and over again that it is ok with killing Gentiles, that it views Goyim as subhuman without a right to life etc. Again, as St. Bernadette famously said, it is my duty to inform, not to convince. Anti-Gentilism is as much a sin as Anti-Semitism. I am not promoting Anti-Semitism, which means hatred or dislike of all Jews. I am calling out the Talmud on its Anti-Gentilism, which means hatred or dislike of all Gentiles, which it repeatedly promotes, even more than the Quran does of non-Muslims. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:42, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Talmud shows over and over again&amp;quot;. Have you read the Talmud? Have you ever even seen the Talmud?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is what's known in the art of rhetoric as &amp;quot;hyperbolic bluster&amp;quot;. You should choose your words better if you wish to maintain credibility. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:50, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I have read it. Have you? This is just argument from incredulity, you can't believe it could really say these things, therefore you accuse those criticizing it, after having read it, of not &amp;quot;really&amp;quot; reading it or something. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See this too: &amp;quot;𝙎𝙚𝙭𝙪𝙖𝙡 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙨𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙖 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙜𝙞𝙧𝙡 𝙞𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙛 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙚𝙚 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙖𝙜𝙚.&lt;br /&gt;
(𝙆𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 11𝙗)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it. Similarly, the ruptured hymen of the girl younger than three is restored.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/itsmorganariel/status/1745551453618385108 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the &lt;br /&gt;
King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I have not read the Talmud. But I've read ''Mein Kampf'' in 3 different translations and bunch of other Holocaust literature and anti-Semitic writings and arguments from those times. And your whole presentation here comes straight out of the body of those anti-Semitic tracs that appeared after circulation of the ''Protocols'' in 1890s upto World War II. It's nothing new, and hardly a &amp;quot;revelation&amp;quot; as you try to sell it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:21, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look at the language you use: &amp;quot;Jewish Supremacist&amp;quot;. Where'd you get that phrase, [https://davidduke.com/the-roots-of-jewish-supremacism/ The Talmudic Roots of Jewish Supremacism by Dr. David Duke]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Note to others. My reply was and is not intended to that ''NishantXavier'' - a fanatic hater who won't listen to reason and truth, but to others on the site&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; About him mixing and linking three different ideologies including anti-Talmud-Commmnist to blend all into his venomous longtime campaign - I have mentioned above... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now it's Israel;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
tomorrow, it's unrelated anti-Talmud-Communists; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
then it's about an opposite which is Talmud;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
his attemts to link secular dominated IDF to &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whatevet chance he can bash that one group - his horrific obsession.  His verbatim-style sounds straight out of Neo Nazi sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May God have mercy on his soul. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;The entire &lt;br /&gt;
list &lt;br /&gt;
of those quotes &lt;br /&gt;
have been debunked and explained.&lt;br /&gt;
Long&lt;br /&gt;
before Nishant was born. &lt;br /&gt;
This is from 1937 at Nazis rise&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://www.jta.org/archive/oxford-professor-defends-talmud-against-nazi-accusation&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;This is at the early years of internet&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.angelfire.com/mt/talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Here is a&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://images.shulcloud.com/618/uploads/PDFs/Divrei_Torah/160615-Response%20to%20anti-semitic%20distortions%20of%20the%20Talmud.pdf pdf]&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; and&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://aish.com/misquoting-the-talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;and &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;https://blog.nli.org.il/en/against_the_talmud/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;There is no need for me to do that here.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking of TALMUD quotes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''To break a verbal engagement, though legally not binding, is a moral wrong.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a wise man? He who looks into the future.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Anger profiteth nobody.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ignorance and conceit go hand in hand.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom, Conceit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is a bounden duty to visit the sick.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The righteous control their desires, but the desires of the wicked control them.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''It is sinful to deceive any man, be he even a heathen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Truth&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Examine the contents, not the bottle.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who loves thee scolds thee.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Envy, lust, ambition, bring a man to perdition.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''When a son is called to do a service for his parents, he must first see that his person is tidy and clean; for a child must attend to his parents as though they were his king and queen.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who cannot bear one word of reproof will have to hear many.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who unjustly hands over one man’s goods to another, he shall pay God for it with his own soul.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Honesty&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The value of the words uttered with the lips is determined by the devotion of the heart.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Prayer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The love which shirks from reproving is no love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who gives way to his wrath makes desolate his house.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Anger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The disciples of the wise are engaged all their days in building up the world.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The less the merits of a person are, the more he will feel urged to proclaim them to the public.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''The study of God’s Word is the only antidote against temptation.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Temptation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Guard thy mouth from uttering an unseemly word.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Slander&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''A man commits sin in secret; but the Holy One proclaims it openly.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Sin&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He who turns away from the works of love and charity, turns away from God.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Charity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Regulate thy will in accordance with God’s will, and submit thy will to His will.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''There is a compensation for everything except our first love.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Love&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Who is a hero? He who conquers his urges.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Heroes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Do not appease thy fellow in his hour of anger; do not comfort him while the dead is still laid out before him; do not question him in the hour of his vow; and do not strive to see him in his hour of misfortune.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''What is sweeter than sweetness? Peace after enmity.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Thy friend has a friend, and thy friend’s friend has a friend; be discreet.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
Topics: Gossip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''All ailings, only not the ailing of heart; all evils, but not an evil wife.'''''&lt;br /&gt;
—The Talmud&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simon the Just…used to say, “Upon three things the world stands: On Torah, on (Divine) Service, and on Deeds of Lovingkindness.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Hillel used to say: ”If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Simeon, the son of Rabban Gamliel, said: “I was brought up all my life among the Sages, and I have found nothing as good for the body as silence, and it is not the study/explication that is the essence – but the practice/doing, and whoever is profuse of words occasions sin.”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabban Simeon, son of Gamliel, said, “On three things the world stands: On Judgment, on Truth, and on Peace…”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 1:18&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Yose said: ”Let your friend’s property be as precious to you as your own; Give yourself to studying the Torah, for it does not come to you by inheritance; and let all your deeds be done in the name of Heaven.”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''He (Rabbi Tarfon) also used to say, “It is not your obligation to complete the task, but neither are you at liberty to desist from it entirely…”'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 2:16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Another teaching of Rabbi Akiva: “Everything is foreseen, yet free will is granted; By goodness is the universe judged,  yet all depends on the preponderance of (good) deeds….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 3:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Ben Zoma said, “Who is wise? The one who learns from all people… “Who is mighty?  The one who subdues the evil inclination… “Who is rich? The who who rejoices in his portion…. “Who is honored? The one who honors other human beings….”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi Jacob used to say, “Better is one hour of t’shuvah (returning/repentance) and good deeds in this world than the whole life of the world-to-come and better is one hour of spiritual bliss in the world-to-come than all the the life of this world!”''''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:17&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Rabbi (Meir) said, ”Look not at the flask but at what is therein; There may be a new flask full of old wine, And an old flask wherein is not even new wine.”''''' [inner greatness...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pirke Avot 4:20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
___&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;but again, his problem is not Talmud or unrelated to it IDF or unrelated opposite which is Communists or other opportunities he fanatically frantically jumps to bash..&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Bigot NishantXavier (cherry picking to put Js. in a bad light):&lt;br /&gt;
''I'm very very very , but very much concerned about Christians, this is why, upto now I never wrote about Islamic persecution all over - especially in Iran, my-neighbouring-Pakistan, Africa anti-Christian genocide, etc.. but it's the juuz, I mean talmud (but I will use only a sentence that I can use in my war,  regardless of its true neaning or context), I mean DeSantis (is &amp;quot;like&amp;quot;) mossad, I mean bolsheviks who hate religion and talmud, I mean zionists, I mean communist-anti-Zionists, I mean secular Netanyahu...no, not non-Jewish Italian Fauci, not non-Jewish Greek Jeff Bezos, or non-Jewish Musk, or non-Jewish Buffet or Arab Carlos Slim, not at all. I mean the juuz want to &amp;quot;control&amp;quot; you, it's THEM...hey, I like KKKDavidduke language/ideology....''[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:59, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::So far I think I have given the most reasonable view about the Jews/Talmud that is somewhere between Dianne3000/Telling and NishantXavier. Given that I have read the Old Testament through, took took two classes related to the Nazis/Holocaust, worked for Jewish organization as their token gentile, and worked for a Jewish owned firm, this is not surprising. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, it appears as if the Talmud is a mixed bag of truth/error and I believe that the Jews made a mistake on having an overemphasis on the Talmud and not enough emphasis on the Torah, the Old Testament prophets and the Old Testament. And being a Christian, I believe that Jesus was the Messiah, the trinity, and the divine inspiration of the New Testament books. Being a non-Catholic Christian, I think the Catholics put too much emphasis on the proclamations of Popes who are also a mixed bag of truth/error. So the Jews are not alone on putting too much reliance on man and not enough on God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And being that the Jews have suffered under authoritarian regimes and are educated go getters, it does not surprise me that American Jews are often liberals who embrace [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy liberal democracy] (For example, American college educated people tend to be Democrats today). Also, as far as some Jews embracing atheism/Marxism, it is part rebellion against God and partly and errant anger at God for allowing the persecution of the Jews. When you abandon God like many leftists there is the danger of following ungodly, utopian, ideologies like Marxism. And unfortunately, the ADL is liberal/leftist in its ideology. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With the above being said, God hasn't abandoned the Jews and modern Israel (which fullfils various Old Testament prophecies) and the miraculous events surrounding the Six Day War are proof of this (see my posts previously on main page talk above). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:03, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, Mr. Moderator. Impressive. You've put up quite the defense for the &amp;quot;Semite-led untermensch&amp;quot; the past two years. [[User_talk:MayGodBless#Russian_soldier_and_looter_returning_to_Russia_from_Ukraine:_.22Honey.2C_we_now_have_a_great_luxury._We_now_have_a_toilet.21.22|The Semite-led untermensch don't even have indoor flush toilets.]] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:25, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::NishantXavier does NOT have a &amp;quot;view on talmud,&amp;quot; or a &amp;quot;view&amp;quot; on zionists. He has a Jew hatred problem. You know, they all (anti Zionist G. Soros meets with Netanyahu, everyday, sometimes 5 times a day, it depends on the anti Zionist Talmudists who refuse to serve in the IDF), meet in the heat of night and decide how to &amp;quot;rule.&amp;quot;...preferably with space lasers.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::IMO, it shows the danger of anti-Semitic tracs and literature, cause it gets absorbed and repeated rotely without understanding what's being said. What's the solution? Censorship? No, education. Education, understanding, and compassion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:01, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::No, RobSmith. I showed via various socioeconomic indicators that some countries futures look bright, while others do not. Being mad at me about this is like being mad at the weatherman for forecasting tornados/hurricane for some regions or being mad at a seismologist for forecasting an earthquake for a region. Right now, it looks like significant deflation hitting China, the second biggest economy in the world, and China's current and upcoming steep demographic decline is going to have a BIG effect on the world. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The Semite-led untermensch don't have indoor flush toilets. Unfortunately, we have to re-hash this debate with the upcoming vote on the Continuing Resolution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Telling and Diane3000, I don't agree with NishantXavier's various opinions/views on the Jews, but for various reasons that will not get into, I think NishantXavier's anger towards the Jews will lesson down the pike. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:14, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am going to switch back into helping non talk page web pages get more web traffic and various websites get more web traffic. That has been far more impactful/fruitful as far as my past endeavors. I spent too much time on Conservavpedia talk pages in 2023/2024. Andy is right about talk, talk, talk not being a very fruitful endeavor. So am bowing out of this discussion. And I don't expect to get involved in main page talk again. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:23, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Main page talk is like eating processed sugar. It will give you a sugar high and taste sweet at the time, but long term it is not good for you. One of my New Year's resolutions for 2024 is to stay off Conservapedia talk pages as much as possible. But doing friendly/constructive talk page edits can be useful/enjoyable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:42, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::MPR/talk should be about current news items and qualifying sources. The extraneous stuff belongs at the Community Portal, where anybody can spew their caca ideas. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Whether NishantXavier's background (before becoming Christian per his saying), there '''in his India, is Islam or Hinduism, both maintain supremacism'''. And which religion does not hold itself above the other? While of the three Abrahamic religions, only Judaism does not prosletyze, still it's amazing the singling out.&lt;br /&gt;
I've lived with evangelicals, beautiful friends too, I've never seen such a rare, weird person, to be such a blind hater carrying that label (evangelical?) along.&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and about Talmud? It was Hillel who coined the golden rule..&lt;br /&gt;
(1) &amp;quot;If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And being for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) &amp;quot;That which is hateful to you, do not do unto your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation;[a] go and learn.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is the expansion of the. Bible, oral interpretation that stems since Moses, through an unbroken chain...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Moses received the Torah at Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, and the elders to the prophets, and the prophets to the Men of the Great Assembly. They said three things: Be patient in [the administration of] justice, raise many disciples and make a fence round the Torah.&amp;quot; (Avot, 1, 1).[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:52, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Re predicting [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]]===&lt;br /&gt;
That's a remarkable, unexpected prediction, Nishant, that [[DeSantis]] will win [[Iowa]].  Startling, contrary predictions like that are what make [[Conservapedia]] great.  Thanks for being bold, while I expect [[Trump]] to prevail in these [[Iowa caucuses]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:54, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Thank you, Andy. God Bless! It's great we can amicably disagree. I expect it to be DeSantis vs Trump one-on-one and head-to-head shortly after Iowa. Let's see if it pans out that way. But Christie dropping out already means it's effectively a 2 person race arguably, 2 persons in the top tier, Trump and DeSantis, and two persons perhaps running more for VP, namely Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's see if last night have an impact too. There were some fireworks but not a whole lot.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:17, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is still favored to win the Republican primary and the 2024 election according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html][https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] The political betting markets data indicates that DeSantis only has a 4% chance of winning the GOP primary.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] The improbable does happen sometimes, but it does very much look like Trump is going to win the GOP nomination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The odds of a Republican winning the 2024 presidential election is now about 3% higher than the Democrats winning it according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/PresidentialParty2024.html] That's a slim margin. I think it is going to come down to the economy (which seems to have a 50/50 chance of getting worse before the election) and what the Supreme Court does in relation to the charges against Trump. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If [https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/polls-show-haley-closing-gap-trump-new-hampshire/story?id=106223644 polls] are any good, Haley closes gap.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:08, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;New Iowa Poll ranks Trump, DeSantis, Haley ahead of Iowa Caucuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/13/latest-iowa-poll-gop-presidential-candidates-iowa-caucus-donald-trump-nikki-haley-ron-desantis/72137628007/ The Des Moines Register][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:04, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only question is, will Trump received a majority or plurality in a three way contest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Chris Christie drops out ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 person race, soon to be 3, then 2: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/10/us/politics/chris-christie-drops-out.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:18, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== When do you estimate Haley and Vivek will drop out? ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So with only (1) Nikki (2) Vivek (3) DeSantis and (4) Trump left in the race, let's look at when people are likely to drop out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My estimation is either one of Nikki or Vivek will cut a VP backroom deal with either Trump or DeSantis, then drop out once it is finalized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It may be or may not be, let's wait and see. But here's the Calendar: https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-calendar/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, in the next one month, we have (1) Iowa - Jan 15 (2) NH - Jan 23 (3) SC - Feb 3 (4) Nev - Feb 6 etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My opinion is Vivek may drop out after Iowa, maybe Jan 20th or so. Christie might have stayed in till NH, his home state after all, but he has already got out, which makes matters simpler for those looking to see when it will become a 2 man race. Nikki, since SC is her home State, might stay in until Feb 3, and then drop out around Feb 4th or 5th or so, but if she struggles to pick up traction, maybe earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's the way it seems to me. What do others think? [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:14, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis runs 2nd in Iowa and Haley has a chance to run 2nd in NH. If Desantis takes 2nd in NH, it's a two man race until Trump has enough delegates. If Haley survives NH, the Haley-DeSantis contest goes into overtime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An important factor is fundraising. If either DeSantis or Haley appear to have done less than expected, fundraising dries up. By contrast, if Haley does better than expected in Iowa (not likely) or NH (a long shot), then the money starts poring into Haley's coffers, and away from DeSantis to his detriment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis strategy is take 2nd in Iowa, 3rd in NH, and 2nd in SC. That keeps him in the race beyond Feb. 3. Haley's only prayer is to finish 2nd in two of those three races. Without that, she's cooked. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:35, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Alternative theory (Trump's version): DeSantis staked everything on Iowa. If he finishes 2nd, he drops out., leaving Trump &amp;amp; Haley the last 2 men standing. Then it becomes a head-to-head matchup between Trump and Democrats preferred globalist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::More on money in campaigns: What many people don't understand is, many campaigns run hand to mouth (due to current campaign finance laws). Candidates spend the entirety of 2023 raising money which ALL gets spent in Iowa. If they fail to meet that mark, they drop out (like Christie just did, or Kamala did in December 2019. She famously said in the fall of 2019, &amp;quot;I'm moving to Iowa&amp;quot;, meaning she bet the farm of her whole campaign war chest on Iowa, and didn't even last that long). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Each primary win gives a boost in fundraising for the next primary contest. Most candidates literally live hand to mouth. This is why Trump predicts DeSantis to drop out if he fails to win, or do less than expected. Christie was running on gas fumes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump OTOH, is not dependent on donors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Biden, who ran 5th in Iowa in 2020, didn't spend a dime in Iowa. He didn't really enter the primary campaign season until South Carolina, and bet it all there and on Super Tuesday. That's why Buttboy, Klobuchar, and others dropped out on election eve - they were running on fumes, knew they wouldn't pick up any new donors, and cut the best deal they could for career advancement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:26, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Beating a dead horse.gif|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::Haley and DeSantis spilt 17%-19% or roughly 35%, 1-in-3, meaning they likewise have to split the anti-Trump donor money between them, with neither side being able to take full advantage. Haley probably has the edge, and has to sweep the next two. Trump predicted DeSantis to fold after IA, but DeSantis may stick around to NH for confirmation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iowan Patriots brave Cold to support future President Ron DeSantis===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It’s literally freezing in Ames, Iowa. Iowans chose to listen to their next president of the United States. RonDeSantis will win Iowa by a landslide.&amp;quot; Picture in the link. Rob or someone, can you pls post the pic here? https://twitter.com/BoricuaGOP/status/1745632851775668451 It is an epic pic, and it speaks a 1000 words. Let's see how it goes. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right. Trump colluded with Russia, Covid comes from people eating bats, Russia is about to run out of missiles, and DeSantis will defeat Trump. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the photo, half of em are Democrats. There is no Democrat caucus this year so they go to the GOP caucus to reek havoc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol, &amp;quot;half of them are Democrats&amp;quot;, that's quite a nice Conspiracy Theory you've got there, Mr. Rob Smith. Lazy Lib Dems are not going to brave Freezing Iowa Temperatures to show up in favor of a Candidate their Liberal Media tells them is already losing. Liberals haven't thought their strategies through. But it's ok because God is on the side of those who wish to confirm the RvW Victory and make it permanent. That's the number 1 reason I'm Pro DeSantis. But as a Pro-Trump Friend reminded me, it's good for Trump too if DeSantis wins, as we'll get him pardoned from any liberal phony Trumped up charge the Dems place against him. We don't agree with Trump, but we have no grudge against him, like the Dems trying to destroy him and his family do. We just need a young, 2 Term President to finish the job concerning RvW etc.[[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:34, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, I'm from the Midwest. Why do you think we have elections and caucuses in the dead of winter? Cause there's nothing to do and it gives you an opportunity to get out of the house. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:51, January 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's wait for the caucuses to complete, then we can compare the results and the predictions. I'm working on another project right now, namely the History of Christendom, particularly the first 500 years. Will check back when caucuses are done. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:51, January 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gatewaypundit: [https://rumble.com/v46z9p0-democrats-may-switch-parties-to-vote-for-nikki-haley-in-iowa.html Democrats May Switch Parties to Vote for Nikki Haley in Iowa]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Joni Ernst today===&lt;br /&gt;
Joni Ernst was clever in walking a fine line  on MTP this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
Buy she is not ruling out endorsing Trump if he is the nominee....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hostages held in Gaza are innocent, they were celebrating the Jewish holiday and are held by terrorists in tunnels in in Gaza, they have been tortureed, raped...[https://ibb.co/TtqMrPZ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6 Americans held in Gaza need to be freed immediately, they are our brothers and sisters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Trump pardons convicted on J6, she won't oppose that, that is a president prerogative thing to do that, it will be his decision. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kristen:&lt;br /&gt;
But you called them insurrectionists...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ernst: I did not use that term...They did break the law.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:50, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DeSantis grassroots support: more than 1,700 precinct captains ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis has 1700 precinct captains. Assuming each captain is able to mobilize even 50 voters, that's 85,000. Assuming 170,000 total voters, hitting 85,000 and 50% as a percentage is in no wise impossible. DeSantis has far better chances than the Lib Media is telling you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Grassroots support for Ron DeSantis in Iowa is incredibly strong. 💪💪💪&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 1,700 precinct captains are ready to turn out his supporters at the Republican caucus on Monday night!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://twitter.com/NvrBackDown24/status/1746372891791233437 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:00, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump wins Iowa===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's Trump all the way down in Iowa. With 99 percent of the vote counted, its Trump 51% (20 delegates), DeSantis 21% (8 delegates), Haley 19% (7 delegates), and Ramaswamy 8% (3 delegates), according to RCP. Biden has a net favorable rating of -17 while Trump has -15. When the winners are this unpopular, there's something wrong with the election system. Perhaps a nonpartisan primary with the top two candidates going on to the general election would help. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It could be worse. William Lai, Taiwan's newly elected president, is also super-unpopular. [https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2024-taiwan-election/ He got only 40 percent of the vote in Saturday's election]. Fortunately the Chinese military is too corrupt to do anything about it. [https://www.businessinsider.com/china-corruption-rocket-force-water-fuel-xi-jinping-purge-scandal-2024-1?op=1 Water-filled rockets, anyone?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update:''' So happened to the rocket fuel? [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lcyIf_7v6Q China's Military Whistleblower: Air Force Used Missile Fuel for Cooking] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:14, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The public's fickle, and they vote for idiots anyway. &amp;quot;The best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversations with the average voter.&amp;quot; - Winston Churchill. Why do you think we have a $34 trillion [[national debt]]? cause the candidates promise freebies and the idiots keep voting for them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:28, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The [[U.S.]] has become a vast and enormously diverse country.  I think it may be unrealistic, in the absence of an attack by a foreign enemy (such as [[9/11]]), to expect high approval ratings for a president anymore.  [[Trump]] is the best hope to keep the [[U.S.]] united and strong.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:40, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Andy. Let's hope.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:42, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Trump is only going to be in office 4 more years if he runs. The most pernicious thing dividing America culturally is leftist/liberals taking over academia and indoctrinating students. That needs to be addressed because it is a root problem. 61.8% of high school (or equivalent) graduates go on to post-secondary study.[https://educationdata.org/college-enrollment-statistics#:~:text=Report%20Highlights.,decline%20in%20enrollment%20since%201951.]  Conservatives/Republicans have to get more serious via school choice and cutting off loans to college majors that offer a low return on investment to students in terms of employability and are often liberal indoctrination (Women's studies, etc.) and paring down the amount of required courses (There is no reason why an engineer needs to take liberal/leftist fluff courses). They also need to pare down frivolous spending by colleges (Top heavy administration costs, lavish facilities). Colleges need to focus on core competencies and be more spartan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Also, I know of a clergman who visits relatives in a red state and his relatives have a messianic view of Trump and that he is going to solve all their problems. The clergyman pointed out that Trump is not going to solve all their problems. For example, his morbidly obese relatives in that red state are still going to be obese if Trump wins. Politicians can only do so much. More Americans need to turn to God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Read this article to see what some right-wing people are doing to transform colleges into more conservative institutions: [https://time.com/6319108/conservative-universities/ The History Behind the Right’s Effort to Take Over American Universities]. More Republican governors need to start implemnting what is starting to be done in Florida. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:29, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the tip, Conservative. Thanks to E. Stefanik's Dec. unmasking of academia dark reality.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:22, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Why Trump's ahead in GA (poll) matters===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President Biden trails former President Trump by eight percentage points in a hypothetical rematch in Georgia, according to an Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll of registered voters out Tuesday ((01.16.24)). Why it matters: The poll offers an early warning sign for Biden, who flipped Georgia blue in 2020 for the first time in nearly three decades[https://www.axios.com/2024/01/16/trump-biden-georgia-poll-2024-rematch Trump beating Biden in Georgia in early 2024 poll (01.16.24)].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If DEMS. oust Biden, it will be interesting HOW they do it. Recalling Sanders case.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:17, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vivek drops out===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has dropped out, and with that I say this: I am a hard no on Vivek for 2028.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past few weeks, hardcore cultists like Laura Loomer have been attacking Haley as ineligible but leaving Vivek alone despite him having the same eligibility issues as her. And now that he has dropped out, they are hypocritically proclaiming him the future of MAGA once Trump is done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These people stand for only one thing: as long as you're loyal to Trump on a personal level, EVERYTHING is negotiable. Even core tenets of MAGA ideology like immigration, trade, and foreign policy. As you may recall, it was this way of thinking that made it possible for neocons like Bolton and Pompeo to infiltrate Trump's first administration and destroy it from within. And if this faction continues to have Trump's ear, they will be just as responsible for the failure of his second administration as the second wave of neocon infiltrators who carry out the destruction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vivek has now become the face of this faction, and unless he distances himself from them I cannot trust him going forward. MAGA is more than just Trump. It is an ideology and a way of life. Anyone who thinks MAGA is something negotiable is at best delusional and at worst a closet NeverTrumper. We cannot afford such people being at the wheel.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 13:07, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:He's already endorsed Trump. He's following the [[Ben Carson]] blueprint. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:25, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Expectedly, but still, Vivek (though re Ukraine many agreed with him, nevertheless), has been rubbing too many people, even at GOP, the wrong way, for various reasons.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:03, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree with Geopolitician that the movement -at least in spirit- is larger than Trump.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:43, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now wait a minute...Geo, you just claimed [[Laura Loomer]] was a credible source for the [[Ron DeSantis]] page, and here you call her a &amp;quot;[[cult]]ist&amp;quot;. Make up your mind. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:49, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I explained on your talk page why such statements aren't mutually exclusice and why I stand by both statements. See [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith#Any_source_for_this.3F here].--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:26, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MSNBC &amp;quot;warns...&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
MSNBC’s Scarborough Calls Trump Getting 51% of Iowa Vote ‘Bad News’ for GOP&lt;br /&gt;
'50% of people voting in the Iowa caucuses against a former president is bad news for that party’s prospects in the general election,' said Scarborough&lt;br /&gt;
Published 01/16/24 &lt;br /&gt;
[https://themessenger.com/politics/msnbcs-scarborough-calls-trump-getting-51-of-iowa-vote-bad-news-for-the-gop][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:38, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Epstein leaked ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epistein documents have been released according to The Calvin Coolidge Project&lt;br /&gt;
according to this account [[Bill Clinton]] his name is on the list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also documents assure that president Trump didnt visit Epistein private island&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/TheCalvinCooli1/status/1742708101185216726&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:02, January 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Setback for Atheists: [[Stephen Hawking]] had orgy for underage girls&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stephen-hawking-underage-orgy-claim-forced-jeffrey-epstein-to-offer-cash-reward/ar-AA1mrNzl Stephen Hawking underage orgy claim forced Jeffrey Epstein to offer cash reward]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 16:46, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The historical reality and facts show it was [[Donald J. Trump]] who exposed the entire Epstein scandal. The DOJ &amp;amp; FBI never would have done it themselves. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 2006, Epstein recruited a 15 year old girl, Virginia Guiffre, an employee of [[Mar-a-Lago]], into the child sex trade. Trump immediately barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, and watched as the [[DOJ]] covered up the scandal. Investigations exposed the [[Clinton]] connection. I believe the scandal so outraged Donald J. Trump, especially where his name was involved, he believed the only way to rectify the matter and bring justice for victims was by running for president himself to expose the corruption in the federal government. It may not have been his only motive to run in 2016, but fair-minded historians need to consider this matter carefully. And of course, if we can get some input from Trump himself in memoirs or personal interviews, that would help. It was only by Trump pushing the issue in the 2016 election (which the Democrats &amp;amp; [[MSM]] tried to counter and neutralize with the ''Hollywood Access'' video which did not include children) that the story ever came to light. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:00, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next they should expose which state actors were behind the honeypot operation. So we know which nations Trump should punish once back in office.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 18:16, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::While the list includes personalities of all political backgrounds, the sexual reference was rather to Clinton &amp;quot;likes them young&amp;quot; ol' Bill. Epstein's death looks more like a mafia hit. I hope scrutiny follows.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:03, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MSM/propaganda updates==&lt;br /&gt;
*Update: the [https://youtu.be/6-ZY11y6XNo upgraded version of the Lancet drone can now exceed Mach 1 (the sound barrier)] in its kamikaze dive. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Austin had Prostatectomy&lt;br /&gt;
::''Why do they even bother trying to keep something like this secret when they know the truth, like the Ukraine casualty rate, will eventually come out? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:05, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alternatively, Austin may have been injured in a Kyiv missile strike while attending a secret meeting and was ferried back to DC, and the prostate cancer is a cover story. Initially, the Pentagon said it was &amp;quot;elective surgery&amp;quot;, later that story was changed to undergoing cancer treatment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Black Mountain Analysis: [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/ukraine-and-the-middle-east-i Ukraine and the Middle East] - Part 1[i] ''Fast forward to the abyss''&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcU75Mgt30ux/ ALMOST ENTIRE UKRAINIAN COMPANY REFUSES TO ASSAULT, COMMANDER SHOWS REFUSENIKS].&lt;br /&gt;
===CNN and Times of India Articles: The Future of the Internet is Indian===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Like nearly 900 million people in India, Devi has never used a smartphone or accessed the internet. The race to bring those millions online, adding to more than 500 million Indians already connected to the internet, is being contested by the biggest global names in tech. And they're shaping the future of the internet in the process.&amp;quot; https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2018/11/business/internet-usage-india-future/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The internet industry has come a long since the last few decades. Currently, India’s estimated internet users is set to reach 900 million by 2025. Combine that with the fact that 11% of the global web3 pool is from India, the answer is apparent: The future of the web will have India leading the way. And the revolution has already begun.&amp;quot; ]https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/web3-and-its-future-in-india/And Social Media in particular is going to play a large part. I encourage every Aspiring Evangelist to have Social Media Platforms. And places like here on Conservapedia are also surely going to experience huge surges in traffic, as we continue to produce good content, and as more and more people use the Internet, and look for some kind of alternative to Wikipedia, so keep doing what we're doing and more. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:07, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;&amp;quot;Why Online Evangelism? There are approximately 7 billion people [editor's note: now 8 Billion] in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 billion use the internet [editor's note: now 5 Billion, and rapidly growing].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And 3 billion are on social media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Digital Evangelism helps us spread the Gospel into all the world at a rate we never could’ve imagined before. Moreover, it connects us to the younger generation.&amp;quot; [7]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.conservapedia.com/Number_of_Internet_Users [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Now you see why India did not take the neocon globalist Russophobic pro-LGBT bait and pass [[Russian sanctions]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:20, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:My user page has a few Lata Mangeshkar and Sridevi playlists. It also has a Aishwarya Rai Bachchan playlist. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyY58BNhn64&amp;amp;list=PLjs7_UtttXEA0Rif0XybxkkyQ_bbeFanz&amp;amp;index=1 Aa teri mahafil men qismat ajamaa kar ham bhi dekhenge.]  [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJNJm5DQFwk Taki Oh Taki!]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLsIl0G0qlM&amp;amp;list=PLbjmSS6LZDGpo81ZM9SIqqoRqTgoVCRtm&amp;amp;index=1 Nimbooda Nimbooda]. I am ready for the Indian hordes about to descend on my user page! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:34, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, we're learning from you how to build algorithms to promote oneself on Google. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:25, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Burying the hatchet===&lt;br /&gt;
As I said at the outbreak of the NATO war, left and right idealogues needed to bury the hatchet if humanity and civilization is to survive the onslaught of [[globalist]] [[warmonger]]s {my exact words were something like, 'If you don't have anything good say about socialists, just shut up, at least for the duration'). Well apparently leftwing socialist [[Jimmy Dore]] and rightwing fearmonger [[Alex Jones]] have done just that, and found common ground. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYzTwDOFCV8] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says===&lt;br /&gt;
*Defense One: [https://www.defenseone.com/business/2024/01/delaying-aircraft-carrier-order-would-hurt-supply-chain-shipbuilder-says/393191/?oref=defense_one_breaking_nl Delaying aircraft carrier order would hurt supply chain, shipbuilder says]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we go. The federal government has used defense spending as a [[Keynesian]] [[stimulus]] since 1941. Aircraft carriers are obsolete as withdrawal of the USS Gerald R. Ford from the the Red Sea and [[Operation Prosperity Guardian]] just last week proves. They are vulnerable to [[hypersonic]] missiles and cheap drone swarms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:49, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The USS Gerald R. Ford was in the eastern Mediterranean. Deployment was extended three times. It was there for seven months of a planned eight month mission. Its the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower that's in the Red Sea. If carriers are obsolete, why is China building them? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::China's building one small one, a copy of the ''Laoning'', which was purchased from the the Russian Federation at the end of the Cold War. It's not being built to &amp;quot;project power&amp;quot; throughout the globe. Basically, just for show, to show they can compete as China becomes a naval power. It takes years  and years of training just to learn how to operate a carrier. They'll need it for their plans to police the [[South China Sea]], but not much beyond (kinda like Japan &amp;quot;island hopping&amp;quot; in WWII). Call it &amp;quot;wasteful defense spending&amp;quot; as they copy the US. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:26, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Carriers are extraordinarily. expensive:&lt;br /&gt;
::*The ''Laoning'', originally the USSR's only planned carrier (which it didn't need) helped bankrupt the USSR and drive out of business;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The UK is currently cannibalizing its only carrier for spare parts;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The USS Gerald R. Ford is understaffed by 500-700 men of its 2,400 man crew because of recruitment shortfalls, which is probably a factor in withdrawing it from service. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Defense spending is a key component of the [[UniParty]]. Republicans have signed onto Keynesian defense spending and deficits for decades. This is what earned them the reputation as &amp;quot;the party of [[Wall Street]]&amp;quot;. However, the GOP voter base today is more populist and blue collar, and the Dems have made inroads with corporate donors since the Clinton administration and end of the [[Cold War]]. A reversal of roles, so to speak. GOP voters are more aligned with &amp;quot;Main Street&amp;quot;, while the party elites and establishment remian aligned with the Uniparty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:10, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine/Biden corruption===&lt;br /&gt;
Zelensky is in possession of tapes made in 2015 by the [[Security Service of Ukraine]] of conversations between two of Zelensky main political rivals, [[Petro Poroshenko]] whom Zelensky defeated in the 2019 presidential election, and Joe Biden, who now is trying to cut Zelensky off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden told Poroshenko in 2015 to fire AG [[Victor Shokin]] to stop investigating the [[Biden family]] (&amp;quot;SOB, he got fired&amp;quot;). Zelensky is now trying to [[blackmail]] Biden and a potential presidential challenger should Ukraine ever have a presidential election again. Zelensky is trying to make it so both he and Biden can keep their jobs. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:10, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lloyd Austin's presumptive replacement===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/defense-secretary-austins-presumptive-replacement-woke-deep-stater-dr-kathleen-hicks/ AUSTIN’S PRESUMPTIVE REPLACEMENT WOKE DEEP-STATER, DR. KATHLEEN HICKS.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:02, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Level of war has gone up===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The level of war in the world seems to have risen to  1989 (post-WWII) peak levels and holding, ending the pacific 1989-2006 era. Does this contradict the Decline of Violence (Pinker) / End of History ([[Francis Fukuyama|Fukuyama]]) theses, or is it just a blip?&amp;quot;. - Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]], Twitter/X.[https://twitter.com/epkaufm/status/1744338524994748831], See: [https://ourworldindata.org/war-and-peace War and Peace]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think it is just a blip. And if we are living in the latter portion of the last days (Israel becoming a nation was important event concerning the &amp;quot;biblical prophetic clock&amp;quot;), then it definitely is not a blip because Jesus said that there would be wars and rumors of wars in the last days. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:13, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wager.PNG|1450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're a day late and a dollar short again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S.: &amp;quot;Israel becoming a nation&amp;quot; in 1948 is one of the most abused phrases I've heard for decades (especially among many Christian writers and preachers). Israel became a nation when God promised Abraham, ''Of thee I will make a great nation''. There is simple confusion about what a. &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is; a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot; is not the same as a government or regime. The Navajo Indians are a nation. So are the Kurds. So are the Chechens, etc. etc etc. So is the argument that the Palestinian people are a &amp;quot;nation&amp;quot;. Many governments are multi-'''nation'''-al.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So using the phrase &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot; in the late 1940s only exposes the speaker as an ignorant idiot as far as [[geopolitics]] and [[history]], not to mention the [[Bible]], is concerned. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:53, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Prophecies about the land of Israel fulfilled in our lifetime: [https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&amp;amp;context=pretrib_arch Is Modern Israel Fulfilling Prophecy?] and [https://www.chosenpeople.com/is-the-modern-state-of-israel-2/ Is the modern state of Israel the fullfillment of prophecy] and [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/30/unveiling-mysteries-of-israel-four-biblical-prophe/ Unveiling the mysteries of Israel: Four biblical prophecies being fulfilled right now]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:58, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You miss the point; Israel was a nation 5,600 years before &amp;quot;Israel became a nation&amp;quot;. You must be a product of the [[public school|American public school system]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:33, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The word nation according to Oxford Languages is: &amp;quot;a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, '''inhabiting a particular country or territory'''.&amp;quot;  The Jews were scattered to various places in the world (which fulfilled biblical prophecy) and then came back to their land (which also fulfilled biblical prophecy). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:47, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Oh, you mean like the valley of dry bones. Israel was a nation in the [[Pale of Settlement]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:55, January 9, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ray Epps to be sentenced ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal media's favorite &amp;quot;Trump supporter&amp;quot; will be sentenced: &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/ray-epps-face-jan-6-conspiracies-to-be-sentenced Ray Epps, face of Jan. 6 conspiracies, to be sentenced].&amp;quot; The DOJ has requested six months for &amp;quot;disorderly conduct in a restricted area.&amp;quot; Sentencing Epps now avoids him getting a harsher sentence after Trump is reelected. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:14, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:In the immortal words of [[Lee Harvey Oswald]], [https://youtu.be/NR7JJHqD7_c &amp;quot;I'm just a patsy&amp;quot;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Have you guys followed the latest polling what many Americans think of Jan 6?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:03, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I uploaded [https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Trump_legality.jpg this today from Zerohedge] about Trump &amp;amp; J6, but that probably doesn't answer your specific question about overall opinion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, JanuarFNy 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks. I meant the,[https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/01/04/fbi-conspiracy-jan-6-attack-misinformation/ WaPo][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:48, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;adopted the falsehood&amp;quot; - at least they're upfront about their [[bias]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The FBI has become absurdly powerful in recent years. Why was Tucker Carlson fired? He was asking questions about Epps and the FBI's involvement in January 6. There was also the advertiser boycott, but that wasn't spontaneous either.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::While the rest of the country was still trying figure out what to make of the January 6 demonstrations, Pelosi called for impeachment. What? Trump will leave office in a few days. That was when I become convinced that it was a plot that she instigated. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 19:17, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It goes back to the [[Patriot Act]] Amendments of 2006, allowing domestic spying. The FBI and National Security state no longer exist to protect the American people; on the contrary, the American people now are deemed a threat to the US government, as [[Russiagate]], the J6 false flag attack, and 2020 rigged election attest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, January 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/breaking-ray-epps-sentenced-no-jail-time/ No jail time for Epps], the media's favorite insurrectionist. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:39, January 10, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Woke updates==&lt;br /&gt;
===John Hopkins Wokeness list===&lt;br /&gt;
John Hopkins just sent out this hit list of people automatically guilty of &amp;quot;privilege&amp;quot; whether they know it or not  &lt;br /&gt;
Males &lt;br /&gt;
-Whites &lt;br /&gt;
-Christians &lt;br /&gt;
-Mid-aged people &lt;br /&gt;
-Able-bodied people &lt;br /&gt;
-Middle &amp;amp; owning class&lt;br /&gt;
-English-speaking people.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1745455765123649578]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Hopkins wokeness list.jpg|thumb|John Hopkins wokeness list]][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:02, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The ''[[Long march through the institutions]]'' has arrived. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Klaus Schwab?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:37, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No. Rudi Dutschke, a [[West German]] communist. He's an heir of [[Gramsci]] and Marx. He updated Gramsci for the 1960s updating the idea of [[cultural hegemony]] with &amp;quot;The Long March through the institutions&amp;quot; (the name borrowed from Mao &amp;amp; the CCP, as well). Basically, bring about [[revolution]] by infiltrating the institutions (academia, government, business, etc). Instead of sudden, violent overthrow of the past, a gradual infiltration and undermining of the dominant culture from within (with the election of Obama, the Long March had arrived, but most people outside of subversive circles didn't notice). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This John Hopkins is a perfect example of destructive DEI[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:16, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It tells a lot, WHO was out there to protest Claudine Gay exit, Al Sharpton non other, waving the DEI flag. 'Nuff said.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:48, January 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
===The OK insurrections?===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Floyd Palestine.jpeg|right|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Hamas pro Yemen rioters force partial evacuation of the White House&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Julio Rosas @Julio_Rosas11 -&lt;br /&gt;
🚨: DC police and Secret Service had to rush to one part of the security fence to prevent a breach from the '''Palestinian''' crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
6:46 PM · Jan 13, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/Julio_Rosas11/status/1746317828158845367]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White House staff 'relocated' after pro-Palestinian rioters damage anti-scale fencing, hurl objects at cops.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/white-house-staff-relocated-pro-palestinian-rioters-damage-exterior-fencing-hurl-objects-cops][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:49, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just posted it on MPR. I'll add your links.  Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:23, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks. I missed it.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:31, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know, we made the connection between BLM rioters &amp;amp; the pro-Hamas camp sometime ago. I bet they are majority suburban white trash kids. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks RobS for rearranging the section...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:22, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Don't mess with TX===&lt;br /&gt;
'''How TX deals with those &amp;quot;protesters&amp;quot; '''&lt;br /&gt;
''JUST IN: Pro-Palestine protester gets pummeled by Texans after disrupting Texas governor Greg Abbott’s speech.&lt;br /&gt;
Gotta love Texas.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened at a campaign event in Collin County.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident happened on the same day as pro-Palestine protesters tried breaching the fence outside of the White House.'' pic.twitter.com/QBsHADHgAd— Collin&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1746647516547047600][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:27, January 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Afternoon Jewish prayers help soldier spot terrorist.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Afternoon prayers help soldier spot terrorist.&lt;br /&gt;
A terrorist with an RPG tried to ambush IDF forces, but did not count on one soldier standing to the side to pray.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News, 14 Jan 2024&lt;br /&gt;
Malkiel Ben-Yosef, who fought in Gaza, related today how afternoon prayers helped him find a terrorist setting up an ambush for his division.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“At the entrance to Bureij, during our last sortie, we had several delays before being allowed to enter the city. We had to stop for a full day, until eventually the last approvals were given. We entered the city, but had to stop in the middle of our march.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We were the last platoon in the line, and I saw that sunset was approaching and had not yet recited the afternoon prayers. Our force stopped and I told myself that this would be the last chance to do so. I stood up to pray, facing Jerusalem, and as I prayed, I saw an open area opposite me where engineering vehicles had already passed through. Approximately 10 to 15 meters from me, I saw something metal rising out of the sand.”..&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/383561 [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:30, January 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Telling. Inspiring. Our prayers to US, to have a better president and a better future. Amen.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:55, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Nikki in NH==&lt;br /&gt;
So Nikki's strategy is as follows: She's now claiming &amp;quot;It's a two person race&amp;quot;, following Trump's prediction that DeSantis will drop out if DeSAntis doesn't finish 1st in Iowa (where he was soundly beaten).  Joe Biden is not on the ballot in NH, leaving Democrats to vote in the Republican primary. That's why polls have Nikki at 40%. If Desantis stays in, the winner walks away with only a plurality; if DeSantis drops out, Trump wins a majority, again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:57, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Haley's donors and voters are mainly Democrats. It's not because they want the Republican Party to succeed. She's the new John Kasich. I was a DeSantis man, but now I'll take my chances with Trump. [https://youtu.be/7lhcZquLMX0 Matt Walsh exposes Haley as a Civil War idiot on YouTube].&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update'''. The problem is not just that Haley's supporters are Democrats. The pundits says they are &amp;quot;moderates,&amp;quot; but they are very partisan Democrats who want all Republicans, including Haley, to lose in the general election. The primaries are set up on the assumption that people will vote for the candidate they support, the one that they want to hold the position. That Democrats abuse partisan primaries in this way is good argument for replacing them with nonpartisan primaries, something that we already have in Washington State. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:51, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump and the 14th Amendment ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My story is the lead at ''The American Thinker'': &amp;quot;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/01/the_14th_amendments_history_militates_against_colorados_ruling_against_trump.html The 14th Amendment’s History Militates Against Colorado’s Ruling Against Trump].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:13, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Outrageous statement by Tara Setmayer: &amp;quot;the religious Christian nationalists death cult&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lincoln Project’s Tara Setmayer &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;... It’s not necessarily the MAGAs who are in the death cult, the religious Christian nationalists death cult, because obviously they’re unmovable.” [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/01/16/lincoln-projects-setmayer-evangelicals-failed-this-country-by-following-their-golden-orange-god/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:30, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As the liberals/leftist lose more and more power, they are going to angrier and nastier towards right-wingers and Christians. There are going to a bunch of right-wing victories in Europe in 2024 and Trump is somewhat favored to win the US presidential election in 2024 according to the [[political betting markets]].[https://electionbettingodds.com/President2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rabbi Jonathan Sacks declared: &amp;quot;...the 17th century was the beginning of an age of [[secularization]] which has lasted four centuries until now; the 21st century is exactly the opposite, it's the beginning of an age of [[desecularization]]. Religion is seizing power; they're not yielding power.&amp;quot;[http://www.christianpost.com/news/rabbi-jonathan-sacks-secularism-cant-solve-todays-religious-violence-answers-rooted-in-sibling-rivalry-of-jews-christians-muslims-140754/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0vf6eV6JE We shall not be moved]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:41, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Wokeism &amp;amp; secularism hand in hand[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:48, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crisis between Iran and Pakistan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2024/01/17/iran-bombs-nuclear-armed-pakistan-triggering-diplomatic-crisis/#disqus_thread This] is interesting, and has the potential to disrupt the Sino-Russo-Iranian alliance.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 20:06, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Pakistan is a US/NATO stooge regime. It is there to provoke. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, January 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Pakistan's first loyalty is Sunni fundamentalism, not NATO. It's been that way for decades. That's why it's consistently been a provocateur, even under NATO-skeptics like Imran Khan.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Pakistan doesn't want to be seen as supporting Israel against Iran and the Houthis. They responded with a missile strike against the same group in Balochistan. According to the Paki foreign ministry last night, India are the bad guys. In fact, the Paki foreign ministry borrowed the same language from the Russian foreign ministry: Pakistan and Iran are &amp;quot;fraternal peoples.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:59, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Only in the sense that they are both Indo-Iranian peoples. Aside from that, they are on opposing sides of the Sunni-Shia divide, and Iran has historically had closer ties with India than with Pakistan for precisely that reason.&lt;br /&gt;
::::On another note, I doubt Russia would appreciate Pakistan appropriating Russia's talking points to demonize one of Russia's closest friends.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:09, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Sunni split isn't so powerful outside of Arab countries. Sufism is prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan and Iran are both members of the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organization]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:16, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The current crisis wouldn’t be the first time two SCO members were at each other’s throats. China and India had a major border standoff shortly after the latter joined the SCO.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 19:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Listen to this loop from the [https://youtu.be/-IoVsZefqm4 Pakistan Foreign Ministry Briefing After Retaliatory Strikes On Iran] from the Hindustan Times. What a joke. The retaliatory strike wasn't on Iran, it was on itself in Balochistan. Then she starts talking about a Kashmir massacre that occurred in 1990 that they blame India for. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::What a joke. First she talks about Pakistan's territorial integrity. Then speaks of the love and affection Pakistanis have for their &amp;quot;brotherly people&amp;quot; in Iran; then she condemns the 100 days of Gaza action. Then she trash talks India for a massacre in 1990. Diplomacy at its finest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:29, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Though, Pakistan - ISI was always a suspicious entity, however it is clear that Iranian Islamic Republic expansionist global domination was always looking for the opportunity. Be it stooges in Gaza ([[Hamas]] &amp;amp; Islamic Jihad [[PIJ]]), Lebanon ([[Hezbollah]]), Yemen ([[Houthis]]), Iraq (militias [https://www.state.gov/iran-aligned-militias-in-iraq/]), Syria (bases), Latin America (Venezuela - Alex Saab [https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article283330608.html][https://therecord.media/iran-venezuela-accused-of-coordinating-influence-campaign-to-free-colombian-businessman-report]  etc., Tri-Border Area Hezbollah crime operations). It's about IRAN.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:38, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The Venezuela connection is probably related to cocaine trafficking to Europe See [[Project Cassandra]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:39, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So Iran just attacked a nuclear power - Pakistan - and the Pakistani foreign ministry's official response is &amp;quot;we have nothing but respect and affection for our brotherly people in Iran.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:57, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I agree --with you-- that Pakistan fears Iran.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's an analysis of the [https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/the-red-sea-show-i types of missiles Iran and the Houtis have, and the Yemneni launch sites.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I saw AP reporting, days ago, on Russian and NK weapons by Hamas. Will look at your link too. It wouldn't surprise me if Pakistan was directed by Obama/Biden-guys what to say...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:58, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::I got two links, from Larry Johnson &amp;amp; Andrew Korybko, on Baklochi group Iran &amp;amp; Pakistan just bombed, the MEK. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:10, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
From that piece in your link, he says that only the Houthis acted militarily. He ommits Hezbollah. Maybe because Hezbollah has been attacking Israel since the 1980s?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:01, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a focus on the Red Sea &amp;amp; Houtis with Iranian missiles. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:08, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump's running mate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/17/the-woman-trump-reportedly-says-would-be-a-killer-vp-n2633793 Will it be New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik]? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 03:52, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope not.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 10:40, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump/Kari Lake would be the most interesting ticket on several levels. (1) It would help cement carrying the swing state of Arizona; (2) it would be the first ticket in history where neither candidate had prior government experience, insuring Kari Lake as one of Trump's anti-establishment successors (like [[Vivek]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:11, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::One thing is for sure, Dems. Do not want GOP to have any woman on the ballot..[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Kari Lake nominated herself to Senate, no way to be running mate. Hopefully she will defeat [[Ruben Gallego]]. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:22, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This tweet from [[Red Eagle Politics]] is best description of the possible running mate &lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/RedEaglePatriot/status/1742398795269157037&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Can unite the party&lt;br /&gt;
-Isn't offensive to the core base&lt;br /&gt;
-Can debate well&lt;br /&gt;
-Is ideally younger&lt;br /&gt;
-Has a last name that looks good on a bumper sticker&lt;br /&gt;
-Won't be seen as the 2028 frontrunner&lt;br /&gt;
-Can help expand the base (optional)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:33, January 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==MSM silence on...==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian attack on Christian holy site raises concern. “We know of no arrests that are made in such cases, nor do we see the P.A. placing any guards in those sensitive locations under regular attack.” (January 19, 2024 / JNS) A Palestinian mob caused extensive damage to a Christian holy site in Nablus (Shechem) known as Jacob’s Well on Sunday night.[https://www.jns.org/palestinian-attack-on-christian-holy-site-raises-concern/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:21, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:A direct result of Islamization. All Mosques are under the totalitarian control of the PA.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:31, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nikki Haley scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daily Mail]] published today that [[Nikki Haley]] had affairs with many men, including many lobbyists before she become governor of [[South Carolina]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12970377/Nikki-Haley-cheated-affair-husband-affidavits-witnesses.html Nikki Haley DID cheat on husband Michael - had affairs with her comms consultant and a MARRIED South Carolina lobbyist before she became governor, sworn affidavits and new witnesses claim]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems how clear Nikki Haley got this political power in South Carolina first then in the entire GOP --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:58, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO Of The Year 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello everyone, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know I am late this year, but I am wondering if anyone has any suggestions on who should be RINO of the Year 2023. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and New Year! Thank you!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 19:20, January 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2017620</id>
		<title>Talk:RINO of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2017620"/>
		<updated>2024-01-15T16:21:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Geopolitician's nominations==&lt;br /&gt;
*Don Bacon, for threatening to vote for a Democrat speaker if Kevin McCarthy were rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dan Crenshaw, for comparing conservative opponents of Kevin McCarthy to terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Rogers, for comparing &lt;br /&gt;
*Marjorie Taylor Greene, once Conservative of the Year (2021), for repeatedly falsely smearing conservative opponents of Kevin McCarthy as NeverTrumpers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jim Jordan, for his outspoken support for Kevin McCarthy's RINO sellout measures.&lt;br /&gt;
*The 16 House Republicans who opposed Kevin McCarthy in January only to sell out to him once he became Speaker and later refused to support the motion to vacate.&lt;br /&gt;
*Matt Gaetz, for repeatedly floating DeSantis supporters such as Bob Good and NeverTrumpers such as Tom Emmer as acceptable alternatives to Kevin McCarthy after forcing a vote to oust him.&lt;br /&gt;
*Thomas Massie, once Conservative of the Year (2022), for selling out first to Kevin McCarthy and then to Ron DeSantis.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chip Roy, for selling out to Ron DeSantis and then attacking Trump supporters in childish and immature ways.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for publicly and completely renouncing America First conservatism and attacking those who support it despite once serving as Donald Trump's vice president.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chris Christie, for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nikki Haley, for running as a neocon candidate despite previously promising to stand aside of Donald Trump ran in 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron DeSantis, for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
*Christina Pushaw, for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kim Reynolds, for publicly endorsing Ron DeSantis despite previously promising to remain neutral in her state's caucuses.&lt;br /&gt;
*The various neocons who continue to grift of of Donald Trump's popularity by supporting him for no reason other than to advance the neocon cause.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dishonorable mention, because he's a foreign leader: Benjamin Netanyahu, for covertly backing Ron DeSantis, and intentionally allowing the October 7 attacks to happen.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dishonorable mention, because he's a foreign leader: Javier Millei, for selling out on multiple issues almost immediately after being sworn in.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dishonorable mention, because she's a foreign leader: Georgia Meloni, for selling out on multiple issues.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dishonorable mention, because he's a foreign leader: Mateusz Morawiecki, for driving his country's economy into the ground and causing his party to be ousted for government all in the name of supporting Ukraine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's all, for now.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:36, January 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Matt Gaetz cut the [[Zelensky regime]] off. He's my pick for Conservative of the Year if it weren't an election year and we weren't looking for a VP choice. Jim Jordan, MTG, and Massie also I'd take umbrage about their nominations. Enough McCarthy bashing. He's dead meat and nobody cares. Nikki I'd move up to near the top. And where's Mitt Romney? He deserves a RINO lifetime achievement award. Also, I agree with all your foreign nominees. Just wikify and post em up. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:00, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Will wikify. On another note:&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't care if Gaetz cut Zelensky off. The fact that he was so vocal against McCarthy only to advocate DeSantis supporters and NeverTrumpers as acceptable alternatives speaks many volumes about his true allegiance. He wants to be the next governor of Florida, so he's appeasing DeSantis hoping that will earn him an endorsement. This is unacceptable. He is dead to me.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Jordan and MTG played major roles in both McCarthy rising to the Speakership and his passage of RINO initiatives. Neither have expressed any remorse, and MTG continues to trash McCarthy opponents and falsely smear them as NeverTrumpers even after McCarthy's ouster. They are dead to me too.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Massie is a different story. I nominated him for both Conservative of the Year and RINO of the year, because he had both very good moments and very bad moments. He's... an enigma to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The only reason I didn't nominate Kevin McCarthy himself is because he was already nominated. But he did a ''lot'' of damage in 2023. Not only does he deserve to be a nominee, he may well deserve to win RINO of the Year.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Romney was already nominated when I wrote down my choices, hence why I left him out.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 14:05, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::By that reasoning, you might as well nominate the whole GOP caucus cause they all voted for McCarthy in January 2021 and January 2023. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:11, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis too may not be deserving of being a called a RINO. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:10, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::*Ron DeSantis has waged an incredibly dishonest presidential campaign. Worse than Ted Cruz. He absolutely deserves to be nominated, and he's my personal choice for RINO of the Year.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 14:05, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hey, if you were a billionaire oligarch, it's what you hire and pay a guy to do. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:12, January 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Lindsey Graham should be RINO of the Year 2023.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 11:21, January 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;diff=2015928</id>
		<title>User talk:Aschlafly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;diff=2015928"/>
		<updated>2024-01-06T04:08:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO Of The Year, 2023 */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''Welcome to Aschlafly's talk page. Please place complaints about other users or other [[trolling]] content at [[Conservapedia:User complaints]]. If Andy is interested in hearing your complaint, he will respond there. Thank you.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Topic ban==&lt;br /&gt;
Please impose a [[topic ban]] on [[User:Conservative]]'s [[foreign policy]] and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 [[primary election]] season. His deliberate [[CP:Trolling]], &amp;quot;employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to '''distract them from productive editing''' and making mainspace article contributions&amp;quot; occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in [[politics]], and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his [[neocon]] [[racist]] content to his heart's content. Thank you.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy told you on your talk page: &amp;quot;...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing &amp;quot;neocon racist content&amp;quot; to [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=Off topic. We are not talking about your atheism content or anything else|content=::::And people like my content - especially my [[atheism]] article which has the highest page view count article on the website. My articles on homosexuality are very popular too. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:57, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And just because you throw out a spurious and gossipy allegation about me, it does not obligate me to respond. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:00, December 28, 2023 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
Let's examine [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/motivational&amp;amp;curid=122579&amp;amp;diff=2014055&amp;amp;oldid=2012688 this edit today User:Conservative calls &amp;quot;motivational&amp;quot;:] &amp;quot;The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...&amp;quot;. The &amp;quot;Eastern Bloc&amp;quot; was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the &amp;quot;Eastern Bloc&amp;quot; - [[communism]] - was defeated by the [[Russian Orthodox Church]] in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another [[Russophobic]] cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can only assume User:Conservative is &amp;quot;motivated&amp;quot; by the same racial fear and disdain for the &amp;quot;Slavic hordes&amp;quot; of [[Eastern Europe]] that his sources broadcast.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{warning collapse|reason=Non-responsive|content=:If you have a good case, feel free to create a counteressay. Andy likes content - not talk, talk, talk, talk. Godspeed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:18, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your challenges to create counteressays violates the clause of &amp;quot;employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users&amp;quot;. Your challenges have been answered many times, yet you re-employ that argument. &lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Counteressays&amp;quot; would '''&amp;quot;occupy and waste the time''', efforts, or energies of other users&amp;quot; in spurious arguments. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Furthermore, this is precisely why I make this appeal to Andy - your maliciously motivated trolling is an impediment to my creation of content. And your racist, neocon screeds nobody should consider conservative, or acceptable &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; for [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservapedia]] Essay space should not be a platform for [[Liberal fascist|Liberal fascism]], and that is all [[User:Conservative#General_international_politics_essays|User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays]] amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you explain this? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can you explain what happened with [[User:BHathorn]] as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''I am guessing that his password was hacked.'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. [[User: PeterKa]] blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave [[User:BHathorn]] my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::P.S. The [[User: Conservative]] account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the [[Decline of the atheist movement|dead atheist movement]] resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into [[User:BHathorn]]'s account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA.  I am awaiting hearing a reply from [[User:BHathorn]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked [[User:BHathorn]]. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not a problem.  Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree.  As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights).  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you!  Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO Of The Year, 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Schlafly, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2015043</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2015043"/>
		<updated>2024-01-01T03:30:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: Created page with &amp;quot;RINO of the Year list:  *Lindsey Graham, for promoting endless war.  *Mitt Romney, for opposing Conservatives.  *Kevin McCarthy, for standing with the Swamp on spending.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;RINO of the Year list: &lt;br /&gt;
*Lindsey Graham, for promoting endless war. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for opposing Conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
*Kevin McCarthy, for standing with the Swamp on spending.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2014153</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2014153"/>
		<updated>2023-12-29T03:44:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* RINO of the Year 2023 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Warning: [[User:Conservative]] has used editors' nominations to this list to attack the integrity of editors making nominations. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, November 9, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intimidation tactics should not be used to limit nominations to this list and the Admin should be admonished. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, December 6, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nomination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to nominate those figures:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeff Landry]] for his big victory in Louisiana gubernatorial race&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tucker Carlson]] for his courage to going against establishment until he was fired from Fox news&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jim Caviezel]] for his successful work in [[Sound of Freedom]] movie&lt;br /&gt;
* Alejandro Gómez Monteverde for his direction of Sound of Freedom movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his standing against globalist [[ICC]] order to escalate war with Russia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Fico]] for his victory in Slovak election&lt;br /&gt;
I would add [[Javier Milei]] if he win at Argentine presidential election&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:49, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. Go ahead, add them to the list. Don't let other editors try to intimidate you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:54, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about [[Elon Musk]]? I don't know if he's deserving of winning the title, but can we rate him as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; (despite extensive ties to the [[MIC]] and globalists?) He's fearless in taking on Big Media. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:18, November 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are so many good candidates it is hard to pick, but I would say that [[Elon Musk]] is an agnostic who explicitly has said that he is &amp;quot;not a conservative&amp;quot;.  On July 14, 2018, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;To be clear, I am not a conservative.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018265614295523328?lang=en]  Are we to believe that he became a conservative in the last 4 years? I don't think so. And he certainly hasn't called himself a conservative in the last 4 years. And Mr. Musk doesn't appear to be a social conservative in some respects (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have other reasons why Musk should not be conservative of the year for 2023 (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With that being said, Elon Musk is a superb ally of conservatives as he leans to the political right on many issues. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:56, December 17, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I nominate [[Tucker Carlson]] for Conservative of the Year in 2023. And I hope [[Mike Johnson]] merits being conservative of the year in 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I will agree with either Tucker Carlson or Matt Gaetz to be conservative of the year --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:44, December 19, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I switch my Conservative of the Year vote from Tucker Carlson to [[Ken Paxton]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:01, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it okay if I add Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony? Although Oliver Anthony has stated that he is a Centrist rather than a Conservative, his song &amp;quot;Rich Men North of Richmond&amp;quot; has Conservative messaging and the song's popularity has infuriated Leftists.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:31, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: I see no reason why not. Anthony, if I'm not mistaken, is highly critical of Republicans (but then again, he's living in the backwoods of Virginia and still living in the Reconstruction era). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:11, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both would be great additions ... to the top tier!  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:17, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you! I will add them both! I think Mr. Anthony's criticism of Republicans was more about criticizing the establishment and the globalists rather than criticizing them for solely being Republicans. Have a very Merry Christmas!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 22:49, December 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judge Loretta A. Preska and Marsha Blackburn ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lately conservatives Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered to release Epistein documents at the Jan 1 2024. Sen [[Marsha Blackburn]] also worked for this documents to be released, can we add their names or should add them at Conservative of the Year 2024? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:30, December 21, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh yah, Marsha Blackburn definitely. The other one I know nothing about. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:35, December 21, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RINO of the Year 2023 ==&lt;br /&gt;
I formally request that such a page be created, as was the case for the previous two years.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:56, December 26, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will create a page if that is okay with Mr. Schlafly.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 22:44, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I oppose the following nominees ==&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Fico- He is conservative only on social issues. On economics and on the European Union, he is well to the left of the GOP and even many European conservative parties. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matt Gaetz- For advocating DeSantis supporter Bob Good, and later NeverTrumper Tom Emmer as potential successors of Kevin McCarthy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marjorie Taylor Greene- For not only standing by Kevin McCarthy before, during, and after his speakership, but also falsely smearing conservative McCarthy opponents as NeverTrumpers on multiple occasions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mike Johnson- For selling out on multiple issues after being elected Speaker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ron Johnson- For being one of the Senators who cowardly dropped their opposition to certifying the 2020 election results in response to the January 6 incident.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Javier Millei- For selling out on multiple issues after being elected President of Argentina.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk- For bankrolling Ron DeSantis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:05, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Milei is the only one I would agree with. He just appears to be a PO'd populist at the establishment, which doesn't make him a conservative. The rest we can weigh in the balance and make excuses for, particularly Gaetz and Ron Johnson.  Gaetz undermined the whole Deep State/NATO conspiracy to exterminate the adult male population of Ukraine without calling attention to himself, as well as de-canonizing Nazi war criminal Saint Zelensky with no blowback on himself. Sheer genius. Ron Johnson is one of a few Senators to speak up and openly about the reality of Ukraine, which forgives much. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:14, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to reactions to J6, they all experienced a &amp;quot;My Pet Goat&amp;quot; moment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:20, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Riley Gaines and Kyriakos Mitsotakis!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right; font-size:85%; width:1ex; line-height:17px; margin: 0px 0px 5px 50px&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:A German soldier cutting through barbedwire during an assault, 1942. A print from Signal, April 1942..PNG|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:TIME Magazine Cover The End in Sight - Feb. 25, 1991.jpg|272px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;(Left) Nazi propaganda from 1942 (right) ''Time'' magazine propaganda from 1991. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I oppose also this nominations Riley Gaines which is just a grifter who want to got attention and fame that has nothing to do with conservative women values, and the evidence her latest released softporn calendar. I am embarrassed how she has been in top tier while [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]] not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.newsweek.com/conservative-womens-swimsuit-calendar-angers-christians-demonic-1855774 Conservative Women's Swimsuit Calendar Angers Christians: 'Demonic']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I oppose also [[Kyriakos Mitsotakis]] prime minister of Greece, he didnt do anything to immigration, he only sold his country to NATO and Ukraine agenda despite being Orthodox. He choose unmarried woman to be president of Greece, and now he seeks to legalize gay marriage to satisfy his globalist &lt;br /&gt;
[https://time.com/6292128/greece-same-sex-marriage/ Greece’s Prime Minister Plans to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am embarrassed how he ended up in top tier and not [[Viktor Orbán]] to stood against globalists on every single issue &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope that last top tier to be review --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:52, December 27, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OMG! This reminds me of when jihadists beheaded mannequins in store windows. I think it's just an effort by ''TIME'' magazine to slander conservative Christians as &amp;quot;extremists&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:05, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would like any Conservative father to let his daughter be [[Softporn]] model, its up to you --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:17, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, ''Time''' magazine is the last source I'd go to for a discussion or debate on what is and what isn't conservative values. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:20, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/12/14/conservative-women-shouldnt-be-calendar-girls-for-a-beer-company-we-can-do-better/ Conservative Women Shouldn’t Be Calendar Girls for a Beer Company. We Can Do Better.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its in all sources and you can check twitter to realize how much conservatives are mad against her --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:26, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably Ukrainian bots. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:31, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its called Poisoning the well fallacy Rob, you just can goggle it to see by yourself --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:32, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, I'm sorry girls are beautiful and attractive. That's something I'll just have to take up with God someday. I'll ask him why he didn't make all women look like User:Conservative's [[racist]] and [[bigot]]ted stereotype of what Russian women look like, so we wouldn't have any problems. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:48, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its not necessary to involve another user, and I am questioning if you are know god judging by your last comment --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:59, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:By my estimation, God made women to be beautiful and to be attractive to men (1 Cor 11:7). And I don't quite see how beheading mannequins serves God.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:03, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So you really dont know god. God made women beautiful only for her husband not for public, God also made women to be respectable mother, good mother and wife dont made softporn commercials ads for alcohols --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 01:34, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's ''Time'' magazine. When ''Time'' magazine stops taking money from the alcohol industry to post softporn on its pages, and/or conservatives stop polluting their minds with ''Time'' magazine, there might be something to talk about. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:37, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OMG poisoning the the Well again, I just showed another sources. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 01:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh, a coordinated attack. What a coincidence, coming just days apart. Why do I have a feeling somebody is trying to persuade me of something different from my initial impressions? No, I'm not going to drop my beer and go back to Bud Lite. Neither am I going to switch to a brand that exploits some godless hooker or lost soul in need of Christ to ease my conscience and make me feel better. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:28, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ooops! I have a confession, and an apology to make. I just realized it's ''Newsweek'', not ''Time''. My apologies to ''Time'' magazine for casting unfair aspersions upon them. All the same. ''Newsweek'' is just as bad as ''Time'' and pushes the same [[neo-fascist]] rot. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:53, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But I can understand the outrage people have when a professional swimmer poses in a swimsuit. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:04, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: You lost the argument. You dont have anything to defend those nomination but just Well poisoning fallacy --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:11, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Okay, you got me. Conservative men should not financially support a conservative professional swimmer posing in a swimsuit, and should stick with financially supporting [[Dylan Mulvaney]] and other non-Chrisitan models. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:55, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::False dilemma fallacy, you are need to much to know how to win argument. There are many pornstars who consider themselves as &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot; probably you should nominate them too --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:50, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Oh, now you compare a professional swimmer to a pornstar. Bit of strectch, hmmm? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:56, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::She is only grifter and not &amp;quot;professional&amp;quot; at all TBW. Since she is doing softporn ads to alcohols, she isnt different from pornstars, whether she is doing that in conservative name or not --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:04, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I stand corrected. Let's call her a &amp;quot;swimming champion&amp;quot; who was robbed. Maybe you'd be happier with a Lia Thomas pin-up? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:13, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::It's a whole easier to condemn by name a girl who got robbed by the NCAA than a couple million perverts who buy the calendar, I 'spose. ''Let he among you without sin....'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:19, December 28, 2023 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012919</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012919"/>
		<updated>2023-12-24T04:00:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Top Tier */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative of the Year 2023''' has 33 strong contenders, among our most ever!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Top Tier ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Texas]] Attorney General [[Ken Paxton]], who beat back an ambush [[sham impeachment]] (''see'' [[Paxton impeachment]]) to prevail by a landslide in the Texas Senate, and then won a unanimous Texas Supreme Court decision against media-hyped late [[abortion]] (after 20 weeks). Paxton also appealed a federal ruling against the [[Biden regime]] for destruction of the [[Biden border crisis|border fence]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Matt Gaetz]] (R–FL), for cleverly and quickly deposing the compromising, establishmentarian [[Kevin McCarthy]] from House Speaker and curtailing [[Ukraine funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Speaker of the House]] [[Mike Johnson]] (R-LA), for becoming perhaps the most [[conservative]] [[Speaker of the House]] in history&lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[J.D. Vance]] (R-OH) for leading against endless [[U.S.]] funding the [[NATO War in Ukraine]], and for campaigning against the [[pro-abort]]s on [[Ohio]] Issue 1 [[ballot initiative]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rand Paul]] (R-IN), for opposing endless funding of the [[NATO War in Ukraine]] and for saving a fellow senator's life with the Heimlich maneuver.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sen. Tommy Tuberville]] for his righteous stand against [[taxpayer funded abortion]] in the [[US military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rep. [[Jason Smith]] (R-MO), a [[conservative populism|conservative populist]] who was a late entry and then stunning winner of the coveted chairmanship of the [[House]] [[Ways and Means Committee]], on Jan. 9, 2023.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/trump-ally-jason-smith-to-lead-congress-s-powerful-tax-committee-1.1867784&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Rep. Smith became its youngest chairman ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/pdfgen/2023/01/09/rep-jason-smith-picked-to-lead-house-ways-and-means-committee/75642/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sen. Ron Johnson]] for his courageous stand against [[Biden]]'s [[neo-fascist]] Ukraine policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/O9vi-lFo0Sg Ron Johnson DESTROYS Biden's Depraved Ukraine Policy, GREEDY Weapons Manufacturers: Rising], ''[[The Hill]], Dec 20, 2023.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[True the Vote|Catherine Englebrecht]], a tireless [[voter fraud]] fighter&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dinesh D'Souza]], producer of ''[[2000 Mules]]'' and ''Police State'' documentaries, and for generously supporting the [[J6]] victims of the [[Deep State]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]] (R-GA), for her continued fearless leadership in the [[House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeff Landry]] for his big victory as a [[conservative]] in Louisiana gubernatorial race&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tucker Carlson]] for his courage to going against establishment until he was fired from [[Fox News]], and for his courageous shows afterwards on [[Twitter|X]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jim Caviezel]] for his successful work in ''[[Sound of Freedom]]'' movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elon Musk]] for fighting for [[freedom of speech]] and criticizing [[globalism|globalist]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kelsey Grammer]] for overcoming [[liberal]] opposition to make the [[Jesus Revolution (film)|Jesus Revolution]] a spectacular success (grossing 3x its costs), and for reaffirming his support of [[Trump]] in an interview by the liberal [[BBC]] in Dec. 2023.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/05/entertainment/kelsey-grammer-interview-donald-trump-scli-intl/?dicbo=v2-WukKXrA&amp;amp;iid=ob_lockedrail_longstory_pool&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Aldean, for writing the popular song, &amp;quot;Try That in a Small Town,&amp;quot; which promotes Conservative and small-town values, drawing vast ire from Leftists. &lt;br /&gt;
* Oliver Anthony, although not entirely Conservative, for writing the popular song &amp;quot;Rich Men North of Richmond,&amp;quot; which promotes hard work and criticizes the establishment and the welfare state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Strong Contenders ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Alejandro Gómez Monteverde for his direction of Sound of Freedom movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his standing against globalist [[ICC]] order to escalate war with Russia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vivek Ramaswamy]] for exposing how incompetent Ronna McDaniel is and other services to the conservative movement&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Fico]] for his victory in Slovak election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judge Andrew Napolitano]] for his objective programming on international affairs&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Luxon]], for leading his party to victory in New Zealand election, ending the socialist dominance in the country&lt;br /&gt;
* Riley Gaines for her courage in standing against men competing in women's sports, and thus against the [[transgender agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Steven Crowder]] for revealing Nashville shooter anti-White and anti-Christian manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]], after her conversion to Christianity, she approved importance of Christianity for facing woke agenda and anti-West agenda&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nayib Bukele]] for his successful efforts to fight and reduce crime in [[El Salvador]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victoria Villarruel]] for successfully defeating leftists in Argentine election along with Javier Mileli&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Geert Wilders]] for successfully winning Dutch election, being first nationalist-populist to win in North western Europe&lt;br /&gt;
* William Cogswell for winning [[Charleston]] mayor election, and being first Republican to win this seat&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conor McGregor]] for standing against globalist Irish government&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Javier Milei]], for successfully ending decades of leftist domination in Argentina&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Josh Hawley]] (R-MO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Jim Jordan]] (R-OH), for his investigations into [[weaponization of government]] and [[Big Tech]] [[censorship]], but his committee did not accomplish as much as it should have in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012918</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012918"/>
		<updated>2023-12-24T04:00:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Top Tier */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative of the Year 2023''' has 33 strong contenders, among our most ever!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Top Tier ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Texas]] Attorney General [[Ken Paxton]], who beat back an ambush [[sham impeachment]] (''see'' [[Paxton impeachment]]) to prevail by a landslide in the Texas Senate, and then won a unanimous Texas Supreme Court decision against media-hyped late [[abortion]] (after 20 weeks). Paxton also appealed a federal ruling against the [[Biden regime]] for destruction of the [[Biden border crisis|border fence]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Matt Gaetz]] (R–FL), for cleverly and quickly deposing the compromising, establishmentarian [[Kevin McCarthy]] from House Speaker and curtailing [[Ukraine funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Speaker of the House]] [[Mike Johnson]] (R-LA), for becoming perhaps the most [[conservative]] [[Speaker of the House]] in history&lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[J.D. Vance]] (R-OH) for leading against endless [[U.S.]] funding the [[NATO War in Ukraine]], and for campaigning against the [[pro-abort]]s on [[Ohio]] Issue 1 [[ballot initiative]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rand Paul]] (R-IN), for opposing endless funding of the [[NATO War in Ukraine]] and for saving a fellow senator's life with the Heimlich maneuver.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sen. Tommy Tuberville]] for his righteous stand against [[taxpayer funded abortion]] in the [[US military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rep. [[Jason Smith]] (R-MO), a [[conservative populism|conservative populist]] who was a late entry and then stunning winner of the coveted chairmanship of the [[House]] [[Ways and Means Committee]], on Jan. 9, 2023.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/trump-ally-jason-smith-to-lead-congress-s-powerful-tax-committee-1.1867784&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Rep. Smith became its youngest chairman ever.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/pdfgen/2023/01/09/rep-jason-smith-picked-to-lead-house-ways-and-means-committee/75642/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sen. Ron Johnson]] for his courageous stand against [[Biden]]'s [[neo-fascist]] Ukraine policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/O9vi-lFo0Sg Ron Johnson DESTROYS Biden's Depraved Ukraine Policy, GREEDY Weapons Manufacturers: Rising], ''[[The Hill]], Dec 20, 2023.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[True the Vote|Catherine Englebrecht]], a tireless [[voter fraud]] fighter&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dinesh D'Souza]], producer of ''[[2000 Mules]]'' and ''Police State'' documentaries, and for generously supporting the [[J6]] victims of the [[Deep State]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]] (R-GA), for her continued fearless leadership in the [[House]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeff Landry]] for his big victory as a [[conservative]] in Louisiana gubernatorial race&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tucker Carlson]] for his courage to going against establishment until he was fired from [[Fox News]], and for his courageous shows afterwards on [[Twitter|X]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jim Caviezel]] for his successful work in ''[[Sound of Freedom]]'' movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elon Musk]] for fighting for [[freedom of speech]] and criticizing [[globalism|globalist]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kelsey Grammer]] for overcoming [[liberal]] opposition to make the [[Jesus Revolution (film)|Jesus Revolution]] a spectacular success (grossing 3x its costs), and for reaffirming his support of [[Trump]] in an interview by the liberal [[BBC]] in Dec. 2023.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/05/entertainment/kelsey-grammer-interview-donald-trump-scli-intl/?dicbo=v2-WukKXrA&amp;amp;iid=ob_lockedrail_longstory_pool&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Aldean, for writing the popular song, &amp;quot;Try That in a Small Town,&amp;quot; which promotes Conservative and small-town values, drawing vast ire from Leftist. &lt;br /&gt;
* Oliver Anthony, although not entirely Conservative, for writing the popular song &amp;quot;Rich Men North of Richmond,&amp;quot; which promotes hard work and criticizes the establishment and the welfare state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Additional Strong Contenders ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Alejandro Gómez Monteverde for his direction of Sound of Freedom movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his standing against globalist [[ICC]] order to escalate war with Russia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Vivek Ramaswamy]] for exposing how incompetent Ronna McDaniel is and other services to the conservative movement&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Fico]] for his victory in Slovak election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judge Andrew Napolitano]] for his objective programming on international affairs&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Christopher Luxon]], for leading his party to victory in New Zealand election, ending the socialist dominance in the country&lt;br /&gt;
* Riley Gaines for her courage in standing against men competing in women's sports, and thus against the [[transgender agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Steven Crowder]] for revealing Nashville shooter anti-White and anti-Christian manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ayaan Hirsi Ali]], after her conversion to Christianity, she approved importance of Christianity for facing woke agenda and anti-West agenda&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nayib Bukele]] for his successful efforts to fight and reduce crime in [[El Salvador]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victoria Villarruel]] for successfully defeating leftists in Argentine election along with Javier Mileli&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Geert Wilders]] for successfully winning Dutch election, being first nationalist-populist to win in North western Europe&lt;br /&gt;
* William Cogswell for winning [[Charleston]] mayor election, and being first Republican to win this seat&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conor McGregor]] for standing against globalist Irish government&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Javier Milei]], for successfully ending decades of leftist domination in Argentina&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Josh Hawley]] (R-MO)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Jim Jordan]] (R-OH), for his investigations into [[weaponization of government]] and [[Big Tech]] [[censorship]], but his committee did not accomplish as much as it should have in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012917</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2012917"/>
		<updated>2023-12-24T03:49:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Warning: [[User:Conservative]] has used editors' nominations to this list to attack the integrity of editors making nominations. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, November 9, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intimidation tactics should not be used to limit nominations to this list and the Admin should be admonished. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, December 6, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nomination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to nominate those figures:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeff Landry]] for his big victory in Louisiana gubernatorial race&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tucker Carlson]] for his courage to going against establishment until he was fired from Fox news&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jim Caviezel]] for his successful work in [[Sound of Freedom]] movie&lt;br /&gt;
* Alejandro Gómez Monteverde for his direction of Sound of Freedom movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his standing against globalist [[ICC]] order to escalate war with Russia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Fico]] for his victory in Slovak election&lt;br /&gt;
I would add [[Javier Milei]] if he win at Argentine presidential election&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:49, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. Go ahead, add them to the list. Don't let other editors try to intimidate you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:54, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about [[Elon Musk]]? I don't know if he's deserving of winning the title, but can we rate him as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; (despite extensive ties to the [[MIC]] and globalists?) He's fearless in taking on Big Media. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:18, November 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are so many good candidates it is hard to pick, but I would say that [[Elon Musk]] is an agnostic who explicitly has said that he is &amp;quot;not a conservative&amp;quot;.  On July 14, 2018, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;To be clear, I am not a conservative.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018265614295523328?lang=en]  Are we to believe that he became a conservative in the last 4 years? I don't think so. And he certainly hasn't called himself a conservative in the last 4 years. And Mr. Musk doesn't appear to be a social conservative in some respects (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have other reasons why Musk should not be conservative of the year for 2023 (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With that being said, Elon Musk is a superb ally of conservatives as he leans to the political right on many issues. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:56, December 17, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I nominate [[Tucker Carlson]] for Conservative of the Year in 2023. And I hope [[Mike Johnson]] merits being conservative of the year in 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I will agree with either Tucker Carlson or Matt Gaetz to be conservative of the year --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:44, December 19, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it okay if I add Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony? Although Oliver Anthony has stated that he is a Centrist rather than a Conservative, his song &amp;quot;Rich Men North of Richmond&amp;quot; has Conservative messaging and the song's popularity has infuriated Leftists.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:31, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: I see no reason why not. Anthony, if I'm not mistaken, is highly critical of Republicans (but then again, he's living in the backwoods of Virginia and still living in the Reconstruction era). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:11, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both would be great additions ... to the top tier!  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:17, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you! I will add them both! I think Mr. Anthony's criticism of Republicans was more about criticizing the establishment and the globalists rather than criticizing them for solely being Republicans. Have a very Merry Christmas!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 22:49, December 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Judge Loretta A. Preska and Marsha Blackburn ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lately conservatives Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered to release Epistein documents at the Jan 1 2024. Sen [[Marsha Blackburn]] also worked for this documents to be released, can we add their names or should add them at Conservative of the Year 2024? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:30, December 21, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh yah, Marsha Blackburn definitely. The other one I know nothing about. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:35, December 21, 2023 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2011895</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2023</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2023&amp;diff=2011895"/>
		<updated>2023-12-20T21:31:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Warning: [[User:Conservative]] has used editors' nominations to this list to attack the integrity of editors making nominations. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:45, November 9, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intimidation tactics should not be used to limit nominations to this list and the Admin should be admonished. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:09, December 6, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nomination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I want to nominate those figures:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeff Landry]] for his big victory in Louisiana gubernatorial race&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tucker Carlson]] for his courage to going against establishment until he was fired from Fox news&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jim Caviezel]] for his successful work in [[Sound of Freedom]] movie&lt;br /&gt;
* Alejandro Gómez Monteverde for his direction of Sound of Freedom movie&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his standing against globalist [[ICC]] order to escalate war with Russia&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Fico]] for his victory in Slovak election&lt;br /&gt;
I would add [[Javier Milei]] if he win at Argentine presidential election&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:49, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. Go ahead, add them to the list. Don't let other editors try to intimidate you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:54, November 13, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about [[Elon Musk]]? I don't know if he's deserving of winning the title, but can we rate him as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; (despite extensive ties to the [[MIC]] and globalists?) He's fearless in taking on Big Media. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:18, November 23, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are so many good candidates it is hard to pick, but I would say that [[Elon Musk]] is an agnostic who explicitly has said that he is &amp;quot;not a conservative&amp;quot;.  On July 14, 2018, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;To be clear, I am not a conservative.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018265614295523328?lang=en]  Are we to believe that he became a conservative in the last 4 years? I don't think so. And he certainly hasn't called himself a conservative in the last 4 years. And Mr. Musk doesn't appear to be a social conservative in some respects (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I have other reasons why Musk should not be conservative of the year for 2023 (See: [[Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::With that being said, Elon Musk is a superb ally of conservatives as he leans to the political right on many issues. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:56, December 17, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I nominate [[Tucker Carlson]] for Conservative of the Year in 2023. And I hope [[Mike Johnson]] merits being conservative of the year in 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I will agree with either Tucker Carlson or Matt Gaetz to be conservative of the year --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:44, December 19, 2023 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it okay if I add Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony? Although Oliver Anthony has stated that he is a Centrist rather than a Conservative, his song &amp;quot;Rich Men North of Richmond&amp;quot; has Conservative messaging and the song's popularity has infuriated Leftists.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:31, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TheNewRight&amp;diff=2011894</id>
		<title>User talk:TheNewRight</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TheNewRight&amp;diff=2011894"/>
		<updated>2023-12-20T21:26:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Your user page would look great with this item on it = */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Your user page would look great with this item on it ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please join the [[Conservapedia:CP Civility Association]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your user page would look great with the below item on it: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox&lt;br /&gt;
|border-c=#000&lt;br /&gt;
|border-s=1&lt;br /&gt;
|id-c=#fff&lt;br /&gt;
|id-s=&lt;br /&gt;
|id-fc=&lt;br /&gt;
|info-c=#99CCCC&lt;br /&gt;
|info-s=13&lt;br /&gt;
|info-fc=#000&lt;br /&gt;
|id=[[File:Icon-team.jpg|80px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|info=&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;'''This user is part of the [[Conservapedia:CP Civility Association|CP Civility Association]].'''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User: Conservative [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:32, October 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I have not been on for a while! I will add it! Thank you very much!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:26, December 20, 2023 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1962553</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1962553"/>
		<updated>2023-07-12T17:50:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Please Add To In The News  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. This begins with education on programmed [[MSM]] narratives and sources.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Posts not related to Main Page content will be summarily removed!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Our intent is to get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]] herd [[brainwashing]] and gain a deeper understanding&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; of events shaping our daily lives. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants, or rehashing MSM garbage&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; can be posted at the [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]].''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NATO/Ukraine==&lt;br /&gt;
''Some discussions moved to [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==='Yats is the guy'===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nuland-in-ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ukrainian [[neo-Nazi]] [[Oleh Tyahnybok]] with (left) Victoria Nuland (center), [[Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk]], and (right) [[Vitali Klitschko]] (rear).]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Maidan coup]], the notorious &amp;quot;F the EU&amp;quot; conversation between State Dept employees [[Victoria Nuland]] and Amb Pyatt when they were deciding on which puppet to make Prime Minister, Nuland said, &amp;quot;Yats is  the guy. He's got the governing experience bla bla bla&amp;quot;.  Well, &amp;quot;Yats&amp;quot;, or [[Arseniy Yatsenyuk]] apparently now has had [https://www.bitchute.com/video/8YRQXb0TRlBF/ an epiphany about Nazism in Ukraine.] Is he ambling for a job in a post-Zelensky Ukraine? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, June 27, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===France looks like Bakhmut===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.bitchute.com/video/z50jXR1dd3jx/][https://www.bitchute.com/video/xUFrmgckg50L/][https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZLbx5ErFXpDv/][https://www.bitchute.com/video/yTpkFSTNCSvp/] Is this the end result of supplying Storm Shadow missiles to Ukraine in a [[hybrid war]]? What goes around comes around. &lt;br /&gt;
:The US and NATO have a 9 year head start in spreading [[terrorism]] in Russian and [[Ukraine]]. Maybe the Russians are only getting started. And the US &amp;quot;[[color revolution]]&amp;quot; playbook is largely stolen from the global communist [[National Liberation Movement]] playbook, with modern technology upgrades. The [[KGB]] taught the [[CIA]] everything it knows. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[[Zelensky]] may be an SOB, but he's our SOB.&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Just as the United States trains terrorists to subvert a society from within, as they did in Ukraine and Libya, attempted in Syria, are now actively doing in Belarus, Russia, Armenia and other former Soviet Republics, are doing in Thailand, Sri Lanka and Pakistan, it's an old trick they learned from the Soviet Communists. The USSR did it in the United States in the 1960s during the Vietnam war - and eventually won the war when they convinced American public opinion to turn against the war and their leaders (you all just witnessed the CIA's amateurish and lame attempts to get the Russian people to turn against Putin and the war with a drone strike on the Kremlin and the [[Wagner mutiny]]. It had the opposite effect of strengthening public support for the war against NATO, and seeing NATO as an existential threat to Russia's existence. None of that was [[censor]]ed in Russia's supposed &amp;quot;dictatorship&amp;quot; or media).  This is why talk of a &amp;quot;negotiated settlement&amp;quot; in Ukraine is ridiculous, cause the hybrid terrorist attacks will continue in Russia, and eventually reprisal actions will come to America. This hybrid terrorist war will continue for decades - until we get rid of the globalist fascists from the [[Davos party]] who run the planet. We need leaders willing to make peace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:25, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.bitchute.com/video/VluUt2SqxK5C/ UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDIST DMITRY GORDON SAYS THE FRANCE SITUATION IS RUSSIA'S FAULT]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Did a mercenary order a pizza with missile topping?===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/did-some-merc-here-order-a-pizza] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:55, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Note: What's interesting about Radio Sputnik operating in Washington, D.C. is, it is an agreement dating back to [[Richard Nixon]] where each side allows the operation of an uncensored, government-funded propaganda radio station in other's capital (kinda like the exchange of embassies, almost). I forget the American chapter in Moscow, it's probably Radio Liberty, or maybe Radio Free Europe. Could even be NPR but I doubt it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Khodorkovsky]] &amp;amp; Pence Want The World To Think Putin Can’t Control The Russian Military===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://korybko.substack.com/p/khodorkovsky-and-pence-want-the-world] Hmmm, must not be an absolute dictator, I 'spose. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:44, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But a [[racist]] [[CIA]] stooge and peacenik like [[Navalny]] can stand up to those armed big brutes who were never communists and survived the collapse of the Soviet Union. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:47, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 60 Minutes Australia: Is Vladimir Putin's Power coming to an End? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;For 24 years there was no dispute about who was the boss in Russia. Vladimir Putin seemed to proudly wear the label of the world’s most feared strongman. But last weekend, all of sudden, his iron rule was challenged. Putin stumbled and for the first time appeared weak and vulnerable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The man threatening to topple the Russian tyrant was Yevgeny Prigozhin, arguably an even nastier piece of work than Putin himself. As the head of the Wagner group, he controls the brutal mercenaries who have been fighting alongside Russian forces in the illegal war against Ukraine. Tom Steinfort reports that what worries the world now is figuring out what Prigozhin’s next move could be. And where.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ux98Xl_lIWk [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:05, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Time for some facts.&lt;br /&gt;
:(a) Prigozhin was working with Ukrainian and Western intelligence;&lt;br /&gt;
:(b) the [[Wagner group]] formerly had 25,000; about 4,000 went to Belarus with Prigozhin. The remainder were officially incorporated into the Russian armed services yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did your source report any of that? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The problem with relying on Western [[MSM]] is, you get a very distorted picture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:29, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(c) Putin's approval rating went from 80% to 90% for his handling of the situation - another Western Itelligence failure - more than a failure - a complete mis-assessment that accomplished the exact opposite of they had hoped and intended. Will anybody be fired? Will there be any investigations in to the [[intelligence community]]? Doubtful. That's where the real news story is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:32, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And as the Russian Foreign Ministry rightly pointed out, during the [[J6 protests]], Russia did not issue public support for one side or the other, neither covertly offer assistance to the &amp;quot;insurrectionists&amp;quot;. Which side abides by the &amp;quot;laws of civilized nations&amp;quot;? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:36, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(d) Many of the 6,000 troops who went with Prigozhin from Ukraine to Rostov did not know they were being used to participate in mutiny. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, because of the propaganda now Western intelligence is putting out to [[coverup]] their botched operation, the opportunity now is being lost on the public to gain some understanding about the mysterious internal workings of Russia politics and government. But our intelligence agencies and media don't care about informing you, they are too busy trying to cover their butt and keep up the ruse about Russia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:24, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine War Analyses===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Everyone knows the western media narrative already. The western narrative is that [[Putin]] is insane, dying, and trying to rebuild the [[Soviet Union]]. If you are content with that, stick with [[MSNBC]]. Our normal format is daily reports. This section is for articles, discussions, and data that remain relevant over time. Each is a clickable link to a full article.'' [https://askeptic.substack.com/p/analyses-ukraine]&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:54, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The above is a subscription service for qualified updates on Ukraine war news; below is essential background reading on [[MSM]] sources.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://fair.org/home/report-shows-how-military-industrial-complex-sets-media-narrative-on-ukraine/ Reports shows how military industrial complex sets media narrative on Ukraine].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://quincyinst.org/report/defense-contractor-funded-think-tanks-dominate-ukraine-debate/ Defense Contractor Funded Think Tanks Dominate Ukraine Debate].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://swprs.org/the-propaganda-multiplier/ The Propaganda Multiplier].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:09, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://nonzero.substack.com/p/biden-the-blob-and-cluster-munitions Biden, the Blob, and cluster munitions]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:37, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/background-paper-russia-united-states-ukraine/ BACKGROUND PAPER: RUSSIA, UNITED STATES &amp;amp; UKRAINE]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:47, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://rwasamizdat.substack.com/p/roots-of-ukrainian-hatred Roots of Ukrainian hatred]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:45, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://news.yahoo.com/why-no-one-end-ukraine-230205086.html Why no one can end the Ukraine war], Edward Luttwak. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:09, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/UD9n7MwuvHA Patrick Lancaster joins a discussion panel]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:11, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CSIS: Russia Isn’t Going to Run Out of Missiles===&lt;br /&gt;
The Quincy Institute link above states:&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Of the 15 [[think tank]]s most often mentioned in the coverage, only one—Human Rights Watch—does not take funding from [[Pentagon]] contractors. Quincy’s analysis found that the media were seven times more likely to cite think tanks with war industry ties than they were to cite think tanks without war industry ties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''With 157 mentions each, the top two think tanks were the [[Atlantic Council]] and the [[Center for Strategic and International Studies]] (CSIS). Both of these think tanks receive millions from the war industry. The Atlantic Council has long been the brain trust of [[NATO]], the military organization whose expansion towards Russia’s borders was a critical factor in Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine. (See FAIR.org, 3/4/22.) Both think tanks receive hundreds of thousands of dollars from [[Raytheon]] and [[Lockheed Martin]], companies which have already been awarded billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts as a result of the war in Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''''CSIS was revealed in a [[New York Times]] expose (8/7/16) to produce content that reflected the weapons industry priorities of its funders.'''  It also “initiated meetings with [[Defense Department]] officials and congressional staff to push for the recommendations” of military funders.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.csis.org/analysis/russia-isnt-going-run-out-missiles CSIS: Russia Isn’t Going to Run Out of Missiles] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:11, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alex Christoforou describes the report as a sales brochure for [[Raytheon]] &amp;amp; the [[MIC]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:04, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Top US and NATO Military and other Leaders: Vilnius, 2023, should pave the way for Ukraine to join NATO at Washington, 2024 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recall I said it's quite possible the War will end in about a year, i.e. June 2024. I said that before I knew about the below. That there's been planned a 2024 NATO Summit in Washington, America itself shows imo that would be an excellent time for Ukraine to join. And not in my opinion only, but also in the opinion of these esteemed military/other American/European experts below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Vilnius, the alliance should launch a roadmap that will lead clearly to Ukraine’s membership in NATO at the earliest achievable date. As with Finland and Sweden, the process can bypass the Membership Action Plan in light of the close and ongoing interactions between NATO and Ukraine. NATO heads of state and government should task the Council in permanent session to develop recommendations on the timing and modalities of an accession process for Ukraine for decision at the next NATO summit in Washington in 2024...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gen. Philip Breedlove (ret.)&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Air Force, 17th Supreme Allied Commander Europe; distinguished professor at the Sam Nunn School, Georgia Institute of Technology ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/07/05/ukraine-nato-open-letter-00104575&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;esteemed&amp;quot; [[woke]] military officers and other [[neocon]] warmongers. LOL. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:09, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The other side of the coin: [https://youtu.be/A1nJjQ_ELd4 Radkin Delusions, NATO copes] by [https://www.claritypress.com/book-author/andrei-martyanov/ Andrey Martynov], an American citizen and Russian military expert. Radkin is the commander of British naval forces; the [[UK]] doesn't have much of an army - about the twice the size of how many NATO/Ukrainians Russia has killed in the past 30 days. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:14, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who will the French recruit for their armed services? the same rioters in the street today? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:17, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://www.bitchute.com/video/HjXlo9yBYO7g/ KIEV'S BUXOM NEW SPOKESWOMAN HAS MAJOR WAR UPDATE ON ADVANCES TO MELITOPOL LIVE FROM COMMAND CENTER]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:48, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Stoltenberg explains NATO's view on welcoming Ukraine and Vilnius ===&lt;br /&gt;
{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right; font-size:85%; width:1ex; line-height:17px; margin: 0px 0px 5px 50px&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Ukraine as long as it takes.PNG|320px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:As long as it takes.PNG|310px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;[[Lord Austin]] borrowed the same [[propaganda]] fairy tale from the UK's top general 12 years before NATO's hasty exit from Afghanistan, having failed to secure &amp;quot;[[democracy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;hr/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Good afternoon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NATO Heads of State and Government will meet in Vilnius next week, at a critical moment for our transatlantic security. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine continues to rage on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For 500 days, Moscow has brought death and destruction to the heart of Europe, seeking to destroy Ukraine and divide NATO. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our Summit will send a clear message.&lt;br /&gt;
NATO stands united. &lt;br /&gt;
And Russia’s aggression will not pay.&amp;quot; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9i1cvPVeVJw [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:04, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Korybko: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/pay-attention-to-what-nato-chief Pay Attention To What NATO Chief Stoltenberg Conspicuously Omitted From His Latest Speech].&lt;br /&gt;
:Stoltenberg don't care; he's gone in three months. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:11, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What Korybko is saying is, gone is the &amp;quot;for as long as it takes&amp;quot; rhetoric. Watch now, over the next few days, which buffoons didn't get the memo and still use that line. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:33, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No he isn't. His term got extended: &amp;quot;NATO extends boss Stoltenberg's term by a year&amp;quot; https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-agrees-extend-boss-stoltenbergs-term-by-year-stoltenberg-twitter-2023-07-04/ He does care, that's why he's on the Right Side in this Fight. You, sadly, aren't. We'll see where things are 1 year from now, where it would be much clearer for those who really want to see the Truth to actually see it. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Extended a year? Ok, the end is in sight. Zelensky ought to be safely tucked away in his Italian villa by the time Stoltenberg's contract expires. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:43, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Estonia's PM might be the next head of NATO: https://estonianworld.com/security/nyt-estonias-kaja-kallas-a-strong-contender-to-be-the-next-nato-chief/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:46, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nah, they need somebody qualified who knows what they're talking about. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:49, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Kaja Kallas is a [[Young Global Leaders]] stooge. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Will 11th Hour Diplomacy get Sweden into NATO===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey is bargaining and bargaining hard to be sure, but just like they ultimately did with Finland, I believe they'll let Sweden in too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With the NATO summit set to begin July 11, Sweden, alongside several allies and Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, are making a last-minute push with high-level meetings in Washington and Brussels to ensure that Stockholm’s membership will get a green light from Turkey—the final big step before it can join the Alliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Wednesday, Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson met with US President Joe Biden in Washington DC, followed by a meeting between Swedish, Finnish, and Turkish foreign ministers in Brussels on Thursday. The central message: Sweden is ready to become an ally—immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For several months, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has kept Sweden and NATO allies on the edge of their seats over Swedish extraditions of individuals connected to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Stockholm and Ankara have been at an impasse, trading arguments over due process and terrorist threats. Enflaming the whole process has been a series of Quran burnings, something which Kristersson has said is legal, but not respectful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just like at the NATO Summit in Madrid last year, Erdogan has placed himself in the role of kingmaker. All allies except Turkey and Hungary have ratified Sweden’s membership, and Hungary is widely considered to be following Turkey’s lead.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/will-eleventh-hour-diplomacy-get-sweden-into-nato-by-the-vilnius-summit/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:10, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, the [[neo-fascist]] [[Atlantic Council]], hmmm. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:23, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How is it neo-fascist? by the definition given, of a corporation working hand in glove with a government to achieve totalitarian objectives, it is not: &amp;quot;The Atlantic Council promotes constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs based on the Atlantic Community’s central role in meeting global challenges. The Council provides an essential forum for navigating the dramatic economic and political changes defining the twenty-first century by informing and galvanizing its uniquely influential network of global leaders. The Atlantic Council—through the papers it publishes, the ideas it generates, the future leaders it develops, and the communities it builds—shapes policy choices and strategies to create a more free, secure, and prosperous world ... 2022 was the most successful year in the Atlantic Council’s history, with our work helping to provide policymakers and the public with solutions to the world’s most difficult challenges.&amp;quot; https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/about/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:07, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Read the [[Atlantic Council]] page top to bottom and tell me what you think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Incidentally, most of it was posted in 2019, including this: &amp;quot;The Atlantic Council was pushing to ramp up the [[proxy war]] between Russian Ukrainians and nationalist Ukrainians.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Russian Ukrainians&amp;quot; would be citizens of the [[Donbas]], and &amp;quot;nationalist Ukrainians&amp;quot; would be &amp;quot;[[Banderite]]s&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:15, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://azradale.substack.com/p/why-would-sweden-want-to-join-nato &amp;quot;Why would Sweden want to join NATO?&amp;quot; – Colonel Douglas Macgregor]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Ukraine ‘deserves’ NATO membership, Turkey’s Erdogan says&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, President Erdogan: well done to you. I stand by my prediction, which is confirmed by Muslim Turkey being so co-operative with the Judeo-Christian West: NATO will welcome (1) Sweden as NATO Member 32 by this year end, if not Vilnius, and (2) Ukraine as Member #33.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Erdogan is in favor, as the below news shows, it will almost certainly go through when the time comes. Perhaps Washington Summit, 2024, perhaps some where late next year. And yes, I do think Christians - though it might be Atheists doing it - should not burn the Quran, at least not in public, provoking 2 BN Muslims, while gaining nothing. The Christian World and Muslim World should work together. It is possible, and Blessed are the Peace-Makers. Below from Islamic News Site Al Jazeera: &amp;quot;A Fair Peace creates no losers&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also called for a return to peace talks saying, ‘a fair peace creates no losers’.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/7/8/ukraine-deserves-nato-membership-turkeys-erdogan-says?traffic_source=KeepReading&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Turkey supports Ukraine’s NATO membership aspirations, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy, but he also urged for a “return to peace efforts” to end the conflict that has now raged for 500 days since Russia invaded Ukraine last year. “There is no doubt that Ukraine deserves membership of NATO,” Erdogan told a joint press conference with the Ukrainian president in Istanbul early on Saturday, adding that the two sides should go back to peace talks.&amp;quot; [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:16, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Both NATO &amp;amp; the [[EU]] are struggling for survival. Both appear hell bent on a suicidal path. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Incidentally, al Jazeera is just another Western propaganda mouthpiece aimed at the Islamic world in the Middle East. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:16, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What Turkiye likes about Ukraine is, it sells its [[Bayraktar]] drones to Ukraine (which actually is American money). But it sells the same drones to Russia, as well. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:20, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Excerpts from the Joint NATO Communique at Vilnius ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;3.           We welcome Finland as the newest member of our Alliance. This is an historic step for Finland and for NATO. For many years, we worked closely as partners; we now stand together as Allies. NATO membership makes Finland safer, and NATO stronger.&lt;br /&gt;
4.           We reaffirm our commitment to NATO’s Open Door policy and to Article 10 of the Washington Treaty. Every nation has the right to choose its own security arrangements. We look forward to welcoming Sweden as a full member of the Alliance and, in this regard, welcome the agreement reached between the NATO Secretary General, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Sweden ...&lt;br /&gt;
6.           Strategic competition, pervasive instability and recurrent shocks define our broader security environment.  Conflict, fragility and instability in Africa and the Middle East directly affect our security and the security of our partners.  The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) stated ambitions and coercive policies challenge our interests, security and values.  We remain open to constructive engagement with the PRC, including to build reciprocal transparency, with a view to safeguarding the Alliance’s security interests.  We continue to be confronted by cyber, space, hybrid and other asymmetric threats, and by the malicious use of emerging and disruptive technologies.&lt;br /&gt;
7.           Russia bears full responsibility for its illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine, which has gravely undermined Euro-Atlantic and global security and for which it must be held fully accountable.  We continue to condemn in the strongest terms Russia’s blatant violations of international law, the Charter of the United Nations, and OSCE commitments and principles.  We do not and will never recognise Russia’s illegal and illegitimate annexations, including Crimea.  There can be no impunity for Russian war crimes and other atrocities, such as attacks against civilians and the destruction of civilian infrastructure that deprives millions of Ukrainians of basic human services.  All those responsible must be held accountable for violations and abuses of human rights and international humanitarian law, particularly against Ukraine’s civilian population, including the forced deportation of children and conflict-related sexual violence.  The destruction of the Kakhovka dam highlights the brutal consequences of the war started by Russia.  Russia’s war has had a profound impact on the environment, nuclear safety, energy and food security, the global economy, and the welfare of billions of people around the world.  Allies are working to enable exports of Ukrainian grain and actively support international efforts to alleviate the global food crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
8.           Russia must immediately stop this illegal war of aggression, cease its use of force against Ukraine, and completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its forces and equipment from the territory of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders, extending to its territorial waters.  We urge all countries not to provide any kind of assistance to Russia’s aggression and condemn all those who are actively facilitating Russia’s war...&lt;br /&gt;
11.         We fully support Ukraine’s right to choose its own security arrangements.  Ukraine’s future is in NATO.  We reaffirm the commitment we made at the 2008 Summit in Bucharest that Ukraine will become a member of NATO, and today we recognise that Ukraine’s path to full Euro-Atlantic integration has moved beyond the need for the Membership Action Plan.  Ukraine has become increasingly interoperable and politically integrated with the Alliance, and has made substantial progress on its reform path.  In line with the 1997 Charter on a Distinctive Partnership between NATO and Ukraine and the 2009 Complement, Allies will continue to support and review Ukraine’s progress on interoperability as well as additional democratic and security sector reforms that are required.  NATO Foreign Ministers will regularly assess progress through the adapted Annual National Programme.  The Alliance will support Ukraine in making these reforms on its path towards future membership.  We will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the Alliance when Allies agree and conditions are met.&amp;quot; https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:47, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/07/underestimate-russia-at-your-own-risk-a-comparison-of-hubris-by-germany-during-wwii-and-todays-collective-west.html Underestimate Russia at your own risk: a comparison of hubris by Nazi Germany and NATO]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://weapons.substack.com/p/stoltenberg-continues-to-back-nato Stoltenberg continues to back NATO expansion as NATO's future grows cloudy].&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:58, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==China updates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Terrorism: China engineered Covid 19 to purposely infect people, reveals Wuhan researcher ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[pls move to Conservapedia Community Portal if that is deemed more suitable for this discussion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw someone say that, because the American Deep State (as opposed to Good Conservative Leaders) is evil (it is), therefore, allegedly, the Communist Party of China, responsible for an ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims, is supposedly not evil (it is, too). That's a Non Sequitur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;The Chinese government has reportedly arbitrarily detained more than a million Muslims in reeducation camps since 2017. Most of the people who have been detained are Uyghur, a predominantly Turkic-speaking ethnic group primarily in China’s northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beyond the detentions, Uyghurs in the region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labor, and involuntary sterilizations, among other rights abuses. The United States and several other foreign governments have described China’s actions in Xinjiang as genocide, while the UN human rights office said that the violations could constitute crimes against humanity. Chinese officials have said that they have not infringed on Uyghurs’ rights and claimed that they closed the reeducation camps in 2019. However, international journalists and researchers have documented an ongoing system of mass detention throughout the region using satellite images, individual testimonies, and leaked Chinese government documents.&amp;quot; https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Covid, this just in: one must have a broad international perspective, and not think of the whole world in terms of American domestic politics alone. Just because there are some bad people in the Deep State, and hardly anyone in the know denies there are, this doesn't mean there aren't bad Communist/Dictatorial Regimes in the world, like the Commie CCP is. Neither is it Anti-Chinese people to say so; in fact, we're being the voice of the good and innocent Chinese people who are suffering under the regime when we critique the CCP regime, just as one would be the voice of the voiceless when standing up against abortion etc; remember the millions who died/suffered under Covid and consider fairly whether the below could be true. It's an astonishing claim and worthy of a fair international investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A researcher from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has made an astonishing claim that coronavirus was purposely engineered by China to infect people. Chao Shao, a researcher, said his colleagues were given four strains of the virus to find out which could spread best.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.livemint.com/news/world/biological-terrorism-china-engineered-covid-19-to-purposely-infect-people-reveals-wuhan-researcher-11687928751255.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:34, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We do need some discussion on this subject, however scapegoating China and the CCP isn't the way to go. It was collaboration between [[Fauci]] and certain American private interests along with the [[Wuhan lab]]. I would recommend go over CP's Wuhan lab &amp;amp; Fauci articles, and look for information that builds on the sources there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a concerted effort now to take the heat off the American taxpayer money that funded the Wuhan lab, and point the finger at China as solely responsible. This obvious from the [[CFR]] pushing Sinophobia now to justify war with China. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Commie CCP and the Commie Deep State should fall. One of the reasons I support De Santis is I think he is a No-Nonsense Administrator. If you don't follow the agenda of the elected government, you should be packing your bags. The govt. answers to the people. Whom do Deep State Bureacrats answer to? No one/special interests. It's very bad, and I agree it's a perfectly legitimate concern to be concerned about the Deep State, especially given the amount of power it has, the amount of evil it does, and the amount of good it can frustrate. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:49, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well now your getting off topic bringing DeSantis name into it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Here is a thumbnail sketch of the narrative outfits like CFR are trying to [[coverup]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::In 2015, there were a breakthrough in [[gain of function]] research at the Wuhan lab published in scientific journals; the response among many scientists was that this research was too dangerous and people should back away from further research. The Obama administration issued an Executive Order banning more research - but there's a catch - it only banned such research in the United States. So Fauci transferred the research to Wuhan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:55, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't think it is off topic. One of the reasons people supported Trump is to destroy the Deep State. He did do some good things, but he couldn't do that. I think De Santis would, or at least would significantly reduce their power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most conservatives don't understand that &amp;quot;laissez-faire&amp;quot; anarchism is not acceptable in government. That's not what &amp;quot;limited government&amp;quot; should mean when it comes to dealing with evildoers. If you can't be tough in dealing with bad guys, you don't belong in government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what Saint Paul taught on that in the Epistle to the Romans: &amp;quot;3For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you want to be unafraid of the one in authority? Then do what is right, and you will have his approval. 4For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not carry the sword in vain. He is God’s servant, an agent of retribution to the wrongdoer. 5Therefore it is necessary to submit to authority, not only to avoid punishment, but also as a matter of conscience&amp;quot; (Roman 13:3-5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You mentioned Gain of Function research, and that's Exhibit A: &amp;quot;DeSantis signs bills banning vaccine mandates, gain of function research&amp;quot; https://www.thecentersquare.com/florida/article_f0320380-f024-11ed-9f74-7f94c974e2ac.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:01, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Fauci should have been fired long ago. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:04, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The focus of this thread is countering the deep state narrative that China is soley responsible for the pandemic. Let's stick to countering that with facts from re[putable source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ideological arguments about conservativism or political candidates go on other threads in other articles, for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok. The issue is, how to ensure (1) something like Covid (from the development of the virus, to its release and outbreak, to the Deep State coverup, to the unsafe vaccines) never happens again, and (2) how to hold accountable those whose actions led to the loss of millions of lives, and caused many more millions to suffer worldwide. For that, we need something like (1) a Nuremberg II Tribunal, with (2) bad actors internationally, whether in the US like Fauci, or the Commie CCP, or anywhere else, held accountable for their actions, after a thorough investigation of all malpractice. That is in principle. Procedurally, you're only going to get that with strong Conservative Leadership. Commie Stalin said: &amp;quot;The death of a single person is a tragedy. The death of millions, a statistic&amp;quot;. That shows how his warped Commie-mind thought. It isn't true and we conservatives shouldn't allow it to be so. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(ec) okay, very good. You see a larger picture. Right now we need adequate documentation of the crimes that took place. Remember, the globalists and [[deep state]]rs have much more powerful influence in media, academia, [[think tank]]s, and government.  Despite being vastly outgunned, the [[censorship]] they employ should be viewed as a sign of weakness. They fear the truth and reality getting out to general public. So we need to focus on the knowledgeable sources and help them, get what they know out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We can begin with people like Sen. [[Rand Paul]] and Rep. [[Jim Jordan]] who have a pretty clear understanding of the facts of what happened. Journalists like Lee Smith and [[Glenn Greenwald]] and a few others also are very good. [[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.]] also has a very clear understanding. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nikki Haley on Commie China===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nikki Haley, take a bow. She rightly points out how liberal Blinked allowed Commie Thug Xi to scold him and thus America by extension. Again, conservative brothers and sisters, from the fact that the liberal Biden-Blinken duo is kowtowing to and bootlicking Xi, draw the right conclusion that the truly Conservative Approach/Position toward Commie China is Raeganite Peace through Strength, and inexorable/invincible American/European/NATO Strength, as well as fresh modern Alliances in the Indo-Pacific and Global South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the Video: https://youtu.be/JVz1mgcayAw Absolutely brutal in criticizing the Biden Administration's bad policies making everything worse. She also mentions how important it is to draw in the Arab World as partners and Biden's foolish policies pushing them away. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch between 17-19 mins: &amp;quot;I gave the example. To me, the most glaring is, you don't congratulate the [[Chinese Communist Party]] for taking over China 70 years ago. We don't congratulate Communism, we condemn it [makes sense considering Communism is responsible for over 65+ Million Deaths in China alone. See: https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/the-legacy-mao-zedong-mass-murder]. That's the Moral Clarity that I'm talking about. We have to know Right from Wrong. You never go and tell someone who is stealing, &amp;quot;Oh you go get them&amp;quot;, Oh keep oppressing&amp;quot;, you don't tell a Dictator that the way they sit there and hold their hand down on their People is a Good Thing. You congratulate Freedom, you congratulate Democracy, you congratulate when People have the Individual Liberties ... You NEVER congratulate Communism&amp;quot;. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heritage Foundation was once a very respected conservative [[think tank]] during the Reagan years. However now it has a reputation as being overtaken by globalist views - at least on foreign policy and trade matters. It's stuff on election fraud is excellent, unsurpassed by any other DC think tank, IMO. However its perspectives on Russia and China should be suspect, and not viewed as authoritive (unless at some point there's a big shake up in management. But here again, the globalists got the big bucks to buy think tanks like Heritage, and there's not really any big sources of funding for anti-neocon perspectives). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:50, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Funding is not as important as Truth. If something is Truth, either the funding will follow, or the Truth will get out anyway, supported by powerful arguments for the Truth: &amp;quot;there is nothing hidden that shall not be brought to light&amp;quot;. The Commies and Communist-sympathizers/supporters in the West always tried to diminish/downplay the Victims of Communism. But Truth is slowly getting out, also thanks to the Internet. Nikki Haley on Commie China, continued:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Indian-American Republican Presidential candidate Nikki Haley said that China is the biggest threat to America since World War II. &amp;quot;Communist China is the greatest threat to American security and prosperity by far,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;As president, my top priority will be strengthening America's economy and...military. We'll protect America's prosperity and homeland from Chinese aggression,&amp;quot; she added.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://inshorts.com/en/news/china-is-the-biggest-threat-to-america-since-ww-ii-nikki-haley-1688295043697 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:24, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== China/Taiwan - the Coming War. Within community of security experts, no longer if but when. Most likely by 2027. Prepare ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lavrov March 19 2022.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov comment during Q &amp;amp; A at the Leaders of Russia Management Competition, Moscow, March 19, 2022. [https://thesaker.is/foreign-minister-sergey-lavrov-leaders-of-russia-management-competition-moscow-march-19-2022/]  ''[[NYT]]'' journalist Tom Friedman joked, ''&amp;quot;Grandma always said never fight Russia and China at the same time.&amp;quot;'' [https://archive.ph/YHRPS] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
We are in the Great Calm before the Storm. But don't be deceived. The Storm's Coming. Prepare. Don't panic, but prepare. Spiritually, and in every other way. Including by educating and spreading awareness about the Great Evils of Communism, including the 65+ MN dead under the CCP in Mao's time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tweets: &amp;quot;Translated from Spanish by Google:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;On the possibility of a war, @jmhumir assures that, within the community of security experts, the issue is no longer about if the war between China and the US will happen, but when it will happen&amp;quot; https://twitter.com/AmericanoMedia/status/1674873742797750283&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and: &amp;quot;When we talk about China 🇨🇳 #PCC there are three dates that we should all keep in mind:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2049 - Anniversary of the PRC and China wants to dominate the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2030 - China wants to be the world economic power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2027 - China wants to annex Taiwan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question is not whether there will be a conflict with China, the question is whether we are prepared to stop them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/jmhumire/status/1674903598029783047 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:03, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:China doesn't need to annex Taiwan, it's already part of China. [[Blinken]] just said so. [https://news.yahoo.com/blinken-declares-us-does-not-173627449.html] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:30, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This war was originally suppose to happen in 2021, but got cancelled cause of the pandemic, I suppose. Then it was pushed back to 2022; last week we were told 2025, Now it's 2027 cause the [[globalists]] and [[military industrial complex]] got themselves in a bind in Ukraine, and the original plan was to knock out Russia first. They can't carry out their aggression against China without knocking out Russia first, which will never happen cause Russia will [[nuke]] the globalists before that ever happens.&lt;br /&gt;
:This planned US aggression against China looks more and more like scare tactics, like [[lockdown]]s, social distancing, and mask wearing - scare tactics for expanded government surveillance and societal control. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:44, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The globalists and [[deep state]] want people to live in fear, whether it's the pandemic, Russia, China, white supremacists, etc etc etc.  It is the source of their power, to get people to beg government for protection. ''We have not been given a spirit of fear, but of love, power, and a sound mind.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:48, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Red China has been on the verge of attacking Taiwan for a long time. It's a journalism evergreen. There was more tension in 1996, when China was threatening to nuke Taiwan. Japan is planning a major defense buildup, so time is not necessarily on China's side. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:21, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why is it okay for the US to support [[Taiwan]] separatists but Russia can't back [[Donbas]] separatists?  Oh, and don't gimme this 'Ukraine is a [[democracy]]' BS. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:25, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The options are to be pro-separatist across the board or anti-separatist across the board? That seems rather limiting. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 06:39, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I just have a hard time figuring out if separatists are good guys or bad guys. I note Western propaganda never refers to &amp;quot;US-backed Taiwan separatists&amp;quot; while the US official position recognizes Taiwan as part of China. And it's a little odd, seeing that providing arms to separatists is a violation of Chinese sovereignty and the  UN Charter. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:15, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I mean, I thought Putin was a bad guy cause he provided aid to Donbas, but the US has been doing the same thing to Taiwan for 50 years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;15:21, July 1, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The real international law is, &amp;quot;the enemy of the my enemy is my friend.&amp;quot; As long as China threatens U.S. interests in the South China Sea and elsewhere, Taiwan is America's friend. The legal basis for U.S. policy is the [https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/president-reagans-six-assurances-taiwan-and-their-meaning-today Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 and the &amp;quot;Six Assurances&amp;quot; given by Ronald Reagan in 1982]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:56, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Ok, so that is American law; but is it legal under international law to interfere in the domestic affairs of a [[sovereign]] nation, China, when the United States officially recognizes Taiwan as part of China? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:02, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Let's revisit what you said here, &amp;quot;The options are to be pro-separatist across the board or anti-separatist across the board? That seems rather limiting.&amp;quot;  That was a good observation. &amp;quot;Separatists&amp;quot; evidently is a [[propaganda]] term intended to bias the reader against those people labeled as &amp;quot;separatist&amp;quot;. For example the [[Donbas]] Republics declared independence in early 2014 and were rejected for annexation by the Russian State Duma. The [[Minsk Accords]] were negotiated in Feb 2015, and the Donbas Republics rejected separatism agreeing to return to Ukraine, provided they were granted autonomy. In the ensuing years the [[Kyiv regime]] failed to implement the agreement and grant them autonomy. The [[Donbas war]] persisted (with NATO weapons and training), and Western media called them &amp;quot;separatists&amp;quot;.  As early as 2015, the people of Donbas could see they were being set-up for NATO aggression, based upon Western media reporting. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Side note: Now for those of you asking, &amp;quot;What is autonomy?&amp;quot;, it's like the [[Chechen Republic]] in the Russian federation. It has its own President, a title equal to Putin's. It agrees to allow [[Moscow]] to handle all [[foreign policy]], and Moscow doesn't interfere in its internal affairs. Its legal system is based upon [[Islamic]] law, so in matters like abortion or divorce for example, you can expect it to be handled quite differently than it would be in Moscow or St. Peterburg. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:54, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 26 Years since the Hong Kong Handover, the World Learns that the Commie CCP cannot be trusted to keep its Promises ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Twenty-six years ago today, Hong Kong was handed over to China on a promise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beijing made the commitment, under an international treaty, to protect Hong Kong’s freedoms, the rule of law, human rights, way of life and autonomy for at least fifty years. Over the past decade, and especially in the past few years, Beijing has completely broken its promises, torn up the treaty and dismantled Hong Kong’s freedoms. It has turned Hong Kong from one of Asia’s most open cities into one of its most repressive police states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The erosion of Hong Kong’s freedoms began a decade or more ago, but Beijing dealt a hammer-blow to whatever was left of liberty when it imposed a draconian National Security Law on the city, with no debate, no discussion and precious little warning.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/07/01/twenty-six-years-since-the-hong-kong-handover-china-has-rip/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:43, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was an open secret that China would break its promises to Hong Kong as soon as it could. Zeng Qinghong tried to impose a national security law in 2003, provoking massive protests. In those days, Hong Kong was more important for China economically than it is now, so Beijing backed down. Not coincidentally, Zeng was Xi Jinping's mentor. Xi's campaign against Hong Kong began in 2012, when he proposed a pro-communist curriculum called &amp;quot;Moral and National Education.&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 10:14, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::It was a genuine tragedy to sit and watch, as Donald Trump was neutered by the deep state to say or do anything, while those people pleaded for help. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:43, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://youtu.be/8fwgVUfW_O4 A walk down memory lane]. ''The people have spoken'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In July 2020, Trump signed a law to impose sanctions if China acted against Hong Kong. It was certainly a big deal in Hong Kong. For a few months, it seemed like the crisis was over. From December 2020 to February 2022, the city was under covid lockdown. In May 2021, Hong Kong was caught by surprise when Beijing announced that it would impose a national security law after all. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 11:56, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(a) sanctions don't work, that is one of the lessons of WWII; (b) acting big and tuff (''&amp;quot;I'm going to huff, and puff, and blooooww your house down&amp;quot;'') fails when push comes to shove, and the world sees what a wimp you are. That happened in Hong Kong, and it happened when the US didn't send manpower and blood as it promised to enforce the [[Budapest Security Memorandum]]. We've gone from &amp;quot;speak softly and carry a big stick&amp;quot; {like Russia and China do) to &amp;quot;Make threats like a windbag and carry a useless Javelin missile&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:33, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's comic tragedy when you hear stuff like &amp;quot;Strategic Ambiguity&amp;quot; when you might as well say &amp;quot;We're only bluffing&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::All this talk of invasion is a joke, when the CCP learned from the US to do a [[Maidan coup|Maidan-style coup]] in Taiwan. What? Are US policymakers and the American public that racist that they really believe the Chinese are too stupid to figure that much out? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:47, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The story of Hong Kong suggests that the Chinese backed off several times for fear of economic consequences and sanctions. I don't think Xi had a plan to take over Hong Kong over the course of ten years. He was thinking that resistance would collapse as soon as he laid down a hard line. Money problems forced Putin to disband the Wagner Group, so sanctions can by given credit for that as well. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:48, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::In the case of the Wagner group, Russian law prohibits PMCs (private military companies) from operating on Russian territory. (Believe it or not, Russia is a nation of laws).  So with the annexation of the [[Donbas]], it became a problem. Wagner group will continue operating in Belarus and Africa eventually under a different name.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Above you stated it was an open secret China would take control. They simply measured the risks and costs against what was to be gained, knowing the US and UK were too weak to do anything about it, and seized the opportunity. And it was done by CCP infiltration into the Hong Kong government. The same thing is happening in Taiwan through the [[Kuomintang]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All the talk of invasion is simply money for the US [[MIC]] and its stockholders, paid by the US taxpayer. None of thew weapons will ever be used, and eventually fall into the hands of the [[PLA]]. Another Afghan withdrawal scenario. They don't care what happens to the weapons after the US taxpayer gets bilked and the weapons get shipped abroad.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:17, July 2, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &amp;quot;Republican presidential hopeful Ron DeSantis supports revoking China's trade status&amp;quot; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De Santis has Common Sense. Sadly among some others, including former Presidents and Presidential Candidates, who just aren't tough enough on the Commie CCP in China, common sense is a most uncommon virtue these days. De Santis is shining the Light of Truth. China needs to needs to change and become democratic if it wants to retain these privileges, from which it has benefited; and the CCP has used it for Grave Evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US Senate voted in 2000 to grant that status to China as it prepared to join the World Trade Organization. Any step to remove it would also need congressional approval. The status is a legal designation in the United States for free trade with a foreign nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.firstpost.com/world/republican-presidential-hopeful-ron-desantis-supports-revoking-chinas-trade-status-12846222.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a very good and important development. However, it cannot stand alone in isolation. We need names and numbers of US Senators vocalizing the same thing before its ready for MPR. IOWs, follow up by you, the citizen journalist researcher. And the stance is fraught with risks, cause of the accusation of [[racism]].  So the public must be brought along and educated step-by-step of the significance and importance of this position.&lt;br /&gt;
:It likely would take a major precipitating event for the US Senate to cancel the status. We can't just toss off headlines like this without educating the public first of the stakes invovled. &lt;br /&gt;
:In the old days, Senators defined bipartisanship as being for motherhood and against sin. Headlines that state this or that position of a candidate  tell us very little about anything. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:30, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the people would need to be brought along; some executive action would be possible to kickstart it, but final Congressional approval would probably be needed; will read more about it in the coming days: &amp;quot;I favour doing that. I think we probably need Congress, but I would take executive action as appropriate to be able to move us in that direction,&amp;quot; DeSantis said. &amp;quot;We are going to have a new commitment to hard power in the Indo-Pacific. At the end of the day, what China respects is strength,&amp;quot; he added.&amp;quot; https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/us-republican-candidate-florida-governor-ron-desantis-revoking-china-trade-status-2024-president-election-2404360-2023-07-10 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You start here: [[Most_favored_nation#China]]. &lt;br /&gt;
:There's more here and elsewhere in  the same article: [[MAGAnomics#Free_trade_as_a_Cold_War_weapon]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:55, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SCOTUS news==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Add To In The News ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Add To ''In The News'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/u-s-supreme-court-strikes-down-affirmative-action/ar-AA1dcM3C --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 10:15, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also there needs to be a spelling correction, instead of &amp;quot;mayor&amp;quot; it should read &amp;quot;major&amp;quot;. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 11:14, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:17, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I used the [[John Solomon]] link; msn is probably Yahoo news or some other [[neo-fascist]] [[propaganda]] organ. We need to begin paying attention to to sources and links used. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:35, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you! Also, Supreme Court sides with Christian graphic designer. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-graphic-designer-who-refused-to-create-same-sex-wedding-websites/ar-AA1dg4M7 --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 10:22, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::What does John Solomon's ''Just the News'' or ''Daily Caller'' say about it? MSN, Yahoo, and others have little credibility among conservative readers. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:16, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biden updates==&lt;br /&gt;
::If Biden wants to win, he'll win. America certainly has the weapons and the technology. But as we saw in Afghanistan, Biden often prefers to lose. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 03:01, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like Biden's puppet master's will toss him overboard between now and the primaries/convention (in the process Kamala goes, too) and elevate [[Newsom]]. 2024 is an Open Seat, they just don't want to announce it. They're trying to give the appearance the GOP side is the only side that's contested. It'll be funny to watch when they toss Biden - they'll have to do to Kamala what they're doing to RFK Jr. now, only for a shorter duration. They have to keep up the appearance of Democrat unity. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:56, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://youtu.be/Qj-FFRPxdws Biden thinks Afghanistan was a big success (0:36)]: &amp;quot;All the evidence is coming back to remember what I said about Afghanistan? I said al-Qaeda would not be there. I said it wouldn't be there. I said we get help from the Taliban....I was right.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::Remember when Biden used to put on a sad face and claim that Afghanistan was all Trump's fault? Those days are over. Afghanistan is a model. Look at his face! The memory losing a war makes him happy. Ukrainians, he is going to be even happier when you lose. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:31, July 3, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biden corruption===&lt;br /&gt;
With the accession of [[Romania]] to [[NATO]], the Biden family became co-owners of Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises in Romania. The multinational corporate conglomerate drove numerous native ethnic Romania mom n pop entrepreneurs, which grew up in Romania since 1991, out of business. This was done under the guise of &amp;quot;capitalism, freedom and democracy&amp;quot; with NATO protecting the multinational corporate conglomerate's financial interests. The same thing is happening in Ukraine. Romanian  and Ukrainian entrepreneurs who are victims of this multinational corporate collusion view it as a [[neo-fascist]] invasion of their state and loss of [[sovereignty]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Who left cocaine at the White House? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Honest, it wasn't me. I never go to the White House library. At any rate, I never do blow there. I mean, not that I remember.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no part of the White House that isn't under 24-hour surveillance. What about fingerprints and cell phone records? The Secret Service has to know whose cocaine it is. They plan to keep this information secret for as long as possible. [https://nypost.com/2023/07/05/cocaine-substance-found-in-west-wing-was-in-dime-size-bag/ Hey, “People walk by there all the time.”] Yeah, and sometimes dogs really do eat homework.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, it is Hunter's. No one else on planet Earth has this level of clout. If the coke turns out to be Hunter's, his plea deal will be suspended and he will go to jail. There is nothing that the Biden White House won't do to prevent that from happening. The bookies are treating Hunter as the leading suspect, with [https://nypost.com/2023/07/06/bookies-bet-hunter-biden-is-the-culprit-behind-white-house-cocaine/ odds of +170 compared to +15000 for Joe and +10000 for Jill].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update''':  Okay, I think I am off the hook now: &amp;quot;[https://www.newsweek.com/trump-jr-cocaine-white-house-biden-1811200 The substance was discovered in the West Wing of the White House in a cubby hole where visitors place their cell phones and other belongings before going on a tour].&amp;quot; It was somebody who treated coke as just another thing that you put in a cubby hole before going on a tour. That narrows it down. It also makes it even less likely that the Secret Service doesn't know who it is. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:15, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How long ago did [https://www.bitchute.com/video/Y6CGIO0d8Tue/ Zelensky visit the White house?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, this story has suspicious parallels to the [[Democrat IT scandal]] where [[Wasserman Schultz]]'s laptop was found in an abandoned House public telephone booth (we'll never get to the bottom of that cause the [[Capitol Police]] is not a Executive Branch agency, subject to [[FOIA]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We can't rule out the possibility it was planted by [[deep state]]rs to eliminate Biden's chance of surviving a primary challenge. Prosecutions may not be necessary if the [[MSM]] is allowed to do its work on [[public opinion]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:06, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We're not ready for, '''Smartest man alive leaves cocaine in White House cubby hole, destroys dad's chances for re-election,''' ''developing story''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:13, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::When Joe was nominated in 2020, the media was like, &amp;quot;Don't worry about his age, it will just be for one term.&amp;quot; At some point after the election, Jill decided she liked being first lady. Now we have a Hunter-Jill copresidency. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 02:46, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Looks like its narrowed down to Joe, Jill, and Hunter. I guess we'll never know: &amp;quot;[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2023/07/07/wh-visitors-go-through-multiple-security-checkpoints-suggests-cocaine-must-belong-to-a-biden-member-n2625452 WH Visitors Go Through 'Multiple Security Checkpoints,' Suggests Cocaine Must Belong to a Biden Member].&amp;quot; The more security points, the less secure. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:27, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I think it's [[Anita Dunn]] running the whole shebang. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:30, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''The Atlantic'' says its time for Joe to go===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check it out: [https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2023/07/07/step-aside-joe-biden-atlantic-writer-says-80-year-old-president-has-no-business-running-for-office-n772774 'Step Aside, Joe Biden': Atlantic Writer Says 80-Year-Old President Has No Business Running for Office]' [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:12, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yep. IMO, he's toast. I said some time ago 2024 was an open seat. The crisis Dems face now is how not to look [[racist]] as they dump [[Kamala]] for a white boy, [[Newsom]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:25, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The solution could be quite simple: Have Joe pull out after a few early primary losses to Newsom and RFK, and it's too late for Kamala to mount a serious effort. Then after California racists in the Democrat party rig the vote between two hometown kids, Newsom and Kamala, the issue's decided fair and square. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:56, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Alternative scenario: [https://youtu.be/QAtwuoBdjzk Kamala goes down in the White House cocaine bust], the VP position remains open, and impeachment negotiations between [[Speaker McCarthy]] and 17 Dem Senator procced. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We live in an age of mass psychosis (not the first time ever). To think Joe Biden could ever get the DNC nomination for 2024 is about as [[delusion]]al as thinking Ukraine could ever defeat Russia, or that a man could become a woman. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:47, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*A week ago, the MSM would have happily sold its firstborn for Biden. Now they sound like disappointed parents. &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/08/opinion/hunter-biden-child.html It’s Seven Grandkids, Mr. President]&amp;quot; (Maureen Dowd!, ''New York Times''). This is about Navy Roberts, Hunter's illegitimate daughter. Then there is &amp;quot;[https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4086058-when-is-the-optimal-time-for-biden-to-drop-out-of-the-race/ When is the optimal time for Biden to drop out of the race?]&amp;quot; (''The Hill'') Ouch!&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;So when is the best time for an incumbent president to drop out of the race for reelection? Both Truman in 1952 and Johnson in 1968 dropped out after disappointing results in the New Hampshire primary. In both cases, the New Hampshire result was a pretext, or at least not the whole story. As with Biden, Johnson's health was declining. He died of heart disease in 1973. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 17:53, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::God observation. Remember, Biden's a party man, not really an egoist. I think if Anita Dunn and other party bosses go to him and say, &amp;quot;it's time to do the honorable thing,&amp;quot; (like the GOP Senators did to Nixon, too) he'll drop out. As to Kamala, they may think they can control her as they did Biden, but then again, maybe not. There certainly is no love lost between her, the White House staff, and the Biden family. So the big problem is to get rid of 'em both at the same time, which is a Truman/LBJ scenario. &lt;br /&gt;
::So the '''media's job is to sow disaffection''' with the public and party loyalists, while still trying to keep RFK down on the farm before they let Newsom out of the gate (kinda of a replay how the GOP party machine brought DeSantis along. But there's still plenty of time). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:42, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::'''Drip drip drip...[https://dailypresser.com/eric/angry-joe-biden-screams-at-staffers-abuses-his-aides-behind-closed-doors/ Angry Joe Biden Screams at Staffers, Abuses His Aides Behind Closed Doors].''' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Drip drip drip...[https://billingsreport.com/new-york-times-columnist-its-a-problem-for-u-s-if-elites-censor-speech/ Biden Is In Trouble: NY Times Writes Hit Piece]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:14, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2023/07/10/medias-new-nickname-for-angry-biden-is-going-to-make-him-melt-down-n774317 With all the yelling, we can call Biden &amp;quot;Old Yeller,&amp;quot; according to Axios]. The bile that the MSM has been holding down for years is finally coming up. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 10:16, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It's programmed. Somewhere deep in the bowels of the swamp, the deep state politburo made the decision, &amp;quot;My God, this man cannot remain in power&amp;quot;. and media attack dogs were given the green light. [https://youtu.be/Ro-hmKOyehw They already have a chosen successor]. Biden will find out, like Nixon, Reagan, the Bushes, and Trump learned - what they print doesn't even have to be true. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:44, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Drip drip drip...[https://youtu.be/IlLav6McSVo MSNBC Host Slams Biden Aides for Letting Him Fall Down So Much]. It's open season, even on his staff. The [[Cluster munitions]] could have the opposite effect of mobilizing the traditional leftwing anti-war movement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:58, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::We all set for a rerun of 1968, with Joe Biden as the sickly Lyndon Johnson and RFK Jr as Eugene McCarthy. Gavin Newsom and Kamala Harris are RFK Sr. and Hubert Humphrey. The dominant issue in 1968 was race riots. Hopefully, those don't come back. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:24, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Very good and insightful analysis. I would say specifically Newsom in the role of [[HHH]] once RFK is eliminated (no joke, I wouldn't be surprised to see &amp;quot;extreme measures&amp;quot; taken against RFK Jr or Kamala either, as the stakes are as high or higher today as then, or at least perceived to be so).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Side note: As a kid, I [https://youtu.be/CJeLoMCF6Jo watched this live,] wondering who, after having brought the country to chaos and ruin in 5 short years, who he was talking to with those dramatic pauses? Later on I realized it was the [[New Deal]] generation, which left me wondering about their capacity to be suckered in with lies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Another side note: When LBJ says &amp;quot;President of your country&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;President of the United States&amp;quot;, he betrays his [https://youtu.be/m36uOUSJFjE Confederate &amp;quot;Johnny Reb&amp;quot; roots] as he can't bring himself to say, &amp;quot;United States&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Maybe for us, it's better (unpopular) Biden stays...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::That's what [https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/07/07/dreizin-new-material-since-june-16th-big-video-dump-1-the-dump-awakens/ Jake Dreizin says], let the Dems win for another 4 years - it'll lead to the complete self-immolation of [[Globohomo]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:30, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::... In line that it was radical Obama Nation that pushed the pendulum towards Trump rise...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Indictment of Dr. Gal Luft:''' This really is turning into tragi-comedy. Even since the [[deep state]] has decided to dump Biden, they indict the [[whistleblower]], not to protect Biden, but to protect from exposure the deep staters who protected and promoted Biden thus far. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:10, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis outflanks Trump on trans issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis's [https://twitter.com/i/status/1674899610379116546 latest ad] leans into the gay issue. I don't know what to make of the Brad Pitt clip from the movie ''Troy.'' Is this is a reference to the theory that Achilles went on a rampage because Patroclus was his gay lover? Either way, the ad is a tour-de-force. After watching it, I want to get a &amp;quot;Don't say gay&amp;quot; T-shirt. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 11:15, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, but is this really a Main page issue? we could all get [[nuke]]d well before the primaries, convention, or general election. Who's to say our votes will count at all anyway? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:21, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I expect this video to be a top level news event. There are 24.1 million views already. Then again, I could be wrong. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 11:27, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ehh, I can't see it. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/07/01/elon-musk-is-self-immolating-on-twitter-and-being-disingenuous-about-the-reasoning/ Elon Musk's trouble paying the bills seems like a bigger story for current news]. Especially since he's probably gonna have to bail on [[Twitter]] by October or give it back to [[DHS]]/[[NSA]] for surveillance and social media control. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'll try to thumbnail the Musk/Twitter issue as succinctly as possible: whenever you &amp;quot;Like&amp;quot; a tweet, Twitter has to process it in real time to tens and hundreds of thousands of users. Twitter never had the server capacity for that, so the federal government was subsidizing it as part of its domestic surveillance programs. When Musk let Trump back on, that terminated the deal. Now Musk has to pick up the costs. He can't. Twitter will never be financially sound without a US government subsidy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:44, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Either way, it appears Twitter will be back in the [[FBI]]'s hands by October so they can rig another election and re-ban Trump, or maybe ban President DeSantis in 2025 for his transphobic views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doesn't seem very democratic to me, that I can't even see a video 24 million of my fellow citizens are seeing right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:58, July 4, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, thanks for sharing, Peter. Nice video, and I agree with it. It's at 25 MN views now. And I agree with Rob's point also, that Twitter, Social Media, and websites generally, so including Conservapedia, are a big threat to the Radical Left. They will try to clamp down on free speech, because they know they cannot win in a fair and free debate, because Truth will defeat falsehood. But Social Media is playing an important role in getting the Truth out, including on the trans issue and how some in the Radical Left are pushing it too far, for e.g. by wanting to mutilate the genitals of innocent children, or force women to have to accept men in their bathrooms/locker room etc. Exhibit A of why I support De Santis. Thanks for the video. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:05, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Any comment on our lead story headline:&lt;br /&gt;
:''The United States has more political prisoners languishing in prison than Russia and freedom of expression, especially for [[Christian]]s, is attacked with increasing ferocity by a corporate media eager to shill for the U.S. Government. The U.S. intelligence and military organizations are a woke, hot mess. U.S. military leaders are fixated on promoting [[transgender]] degeneracy, routinely failing to meet recruitment goals and destroying the foundation of “uniformity” that is an essential trait of successful armies.''&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:30, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just 3 Words. De Santis 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
When you support that, I'll know you really want to beat the Woke Left on these issues. Not till then. Watch the 25 MN viewed You Tube Video. Trump didn't defeat the Trans Agenda, he enabled it at every turn. De Santis's Candidacy, and Presidency would be the godsend America needs. As for the godsend Russia needs, it may be Navalny or someone else, but it's extremely unlikely it could be Putin, given his past actions. He's persecuted both Navalny and Nemtsov, beside other Russian leaders. He is bad for Russia. Being Anti-Putin is not being Anti-Russia, otherwise I will say you are Anti-America for being Anti-Biden. I am Anti-Biden, but not Anti-America. I am Anti-Putin, but not Anti-Russia. De Santis 2024, period, to end this woke transgender and child genital mutilation nonsense once and for all. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:02, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'd be saying &amp;quot;DeSantis 2024&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Trump 2024&amp;quot; if there was any evidence that American democracy still exists, but I don't believe in hoaxing tens of millions of American voters with false hope. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:20, July 6, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Al Jazeera: Most Swedes want ban on Quran burnings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I actually agree with this. There's no reason to burn the Quran and alienate 2 BN Muslims in doing so, especially when the West increasingly needs the support of Muslim Countries like Turkey, not to mention the Arab World. One can criticize or disagree with the Quran without doing this. Careless and imprudent on the part of the Swedes to allow such things, which could delay their accession to NATO. Hopefully, it won't, and they will realize they shouldn't, but still. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/7/6/most-swedes-want-ban-on-quran-burnings-after-global-outcry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most Swedes want ban on Quran burnings after global outcry&lt;br /&gt;
Opinion is shifting amid an international political fallout over the burnings and a spike in new applications.&amp;quot; [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:21, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's an interesting issue, and certainly a few years ago we would have taken much time to explore all aspects of it. But it's taken a backseat now to the pressing issues of our time, and is probably viewed as appeasement by many of the European Union's vaunted &amp;quot;[[free speech]]&amp;quot; values. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:59, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would be in favor of a Christian-Muslim Alliance against Godless Communism, especially because for e.g. even Muslims, like the Uyghur Muslims, along with Christians, are persecuted by the Commie CCP and Xi in China. As we spread awareness of that and help educate the Muslim World, it's quite conceivable they would draw closer to Christendom and the West. Then, we can educate them on the religious issues as well: btw, they already believe Jesus Christ was a Great Prophet, Worked Miracles, was the True Messiah, and even Virgin Born of His Blessed Virgin Mother Mary. They don't of course believe He's the Son of God, or died on the Cross, and that we have to show historically and logically. Dr. William Craig has some good apologetics on that. Anyway, needlessly alienating the Muslim world, and it was probably some atheists in Sweden who burnt the Quran, is self-defeating and shortsighted imo. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:07, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow. You sure are into warmongering. ''My kingdom is not of this world.'' ''To be carnally minded is death.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:12, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol. Another false accusation. I am a Raeganite and believe in Peace through Strength. Blessed are the Peace-Makers, as Jesus Christ said. As Communism in the Soviet Union fell peacefully, with sufficient Peace throught Strength, and Global Alliances, so it can in China too. Everyone benefits, including the good Chinese people, except only the Commie CCP itself. If you want to support the CCP, go for it. But I don't, and it's hardly Conservative to do so. You should listen to De Santis, Nikki Haley, or someone who gets it, speak about the CCP. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:31, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being concerned about Persecuted Christians and Muslims is not &amp;quot;warmongering&amp;quot;. The CCP is doing that by persecuting Christians and Muslims. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:35, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey, didn't you just post the other day something about how Reagan violated international law and told ICJ to flip off? Now you're screaming for justice from the ICJ? Seems a little confused or hypocritical. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:51, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nope, I don't think that was me. Maybe you confused me with someone else? The only recent article I remember sharing on the ICJ is Uk, Ukraine etc taking Iran to the ICJ over its downing of a civlian airplane. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:59, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's at [[Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Ukraine.2C_UK_etc_go_to_the_ICJ_to_hold_Iran_accountable_for_killing_civilians_and_shooting_down_a_civilian_airplane]]. We generally don't use [[neo-fascist]] propaganda on main page news. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:03, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I know it's there, and that's fine; but there was no mention of Raegan in the article as I recall. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:07, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::''&amp;quot;After the court ruled that the United States's covert war against Nicaragua was in violation of international law (Nicaragua v. United States), the United States withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986'' [Reagan era, see [[Iran Contra]] ] ''to accept the court's jurisdiction only '''on a discretionary basis'''.[12]'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:04, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;If you want to support the CCP, go for it.&amp;quot; You should read the substance of Conservapedia's '''[[China]], [[Peoples Republic of China]], [[Communist Party of China]], and [[Communism]]''' articles. Not to mention [[Peoples Liberation Army]] and few others. All these articles are more than 90% written by me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:55, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to hear. I'll take a look. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:01, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, just the intro is off to a great start. Haven't checked the logs yet, did you write that? &amp;quot;The Chinese Communist Party (pinyin Gongchandang) or CCP, officially the Communist Party of China (CPC), is the left-wing single party socialist ruling regime of Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The party is infamous for placing no value on human life and its ruthlessness to maintain and exercise power. According to the authoritative Black Book of Communism, an estimated 65 million Chinese died as a result of the CCP's merciless attempts to create a new “socialist” China. Anyone who gets in the way is done away with by execution, imprisonment or forced famine. No single individual of the CCP has ever faced an international tribunal for crimes against humanity.&amp;quot; That's pretty much exactly my perspective too, so not sure why you'd oppose applying Raeganite-John Paul II style- Peace through Strength against the Commie CCP. Just like bringing down Communism in the Soviet Union helped the Russian people, bringing down Communism in China will help the Chinese people, not just Christians and Muslims, but also other innocent victims of Communism. Pathetic, Carterite style liberal appeasement, however, will not. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:05, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I stand by every word of it. However, given the damage the [[neo-fascist]] [[Biden junta]] has done to American [[foreign policy]] for the coming decades, I may be forced into moderating somewhat my stance toward the CCP after NATO gets its butt kicked in Ukraine and the Russian victory. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:'':15, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Years after leaving office, while writing a book about leaders (my personal favorite of all his writings), he reviewed the concept of DÉTENTE in light of the failed policies of Jimmy Carter and the increasingly successful ones of Ronald Reagan. “LEADERS: Profiles and Reminiscences of Men Who Have Shaped the Modern World” was written in 1982 ... President Carter, with the best of intentions, tried unilateral restraint in the hopes that the Soviets would follow suit. The result was disastrous. As he cut back on American arms programs, the Soviets stepped up theirs. Consequently, President Reagan has had to institute an arms buildup to restore the nuclear balance of power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two kinds of détente: hard-headed and soft-headed. Hard-headed détente is based on effective deterrence. This kind of détente encourages the Soviets to negotiate, because it makes the cost of Soviet aggression too high. Soft-headed détente, by contrast, discourages negotiation, because it makes the cost of Soviet expansion so low that the Soviets find the rewards of aggression too tempting. Hard-headed détente, backed by the force to make deterrence credible, preserves peace. Soft-headed détente invites either war or surrender without war. We need detente, but it must be the right kind of détente.” We need the same against the Commie CCP today. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:05, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(ec) Look at [[Carter Doctrine]], I wrote that too. I started that same page title in Wikipedia about 2004, but haven't looked to see how butchered its been since. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:15, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Above from: https://www.nixonfoundation.org/2008/06/appeasement-and-detente-two-very-different-things/ See how, 40 years later, the World is re-learning the same lessons once more, which Peace through Strength Raeganite Conservatives already knew. Truly, those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. Truer words were hardly ever spoken. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:09, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, so much for my lifelong dream of burning a Koran by the side of a Swedish fjord. 😥 '''Update''' From the article, it seems that Turkey may no longer be able to veto Koran burnings after Sweden joins NATO. So there is still hope. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 21:55, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::NATO doesn't care about free speech, democracy, and human rights or &amp;quot;European values&amp;quot;; as soon as NATO lets in the [[racist]] [[Kyiv regime]] which banned the Russian language, that's all you need to know. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:48, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't thinking about free speech, just a little humor to &amp;quot;own the libs.&amp;quot; Back in 2016, Trump's Muslim ban had them all hepped up. Is there any issue less likely to win over middle America than bringing in more Muslims? [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:43, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Things are changing; Muslims are the only group that can stand up to [[LGBT]] school boards without [[FBI]] harassment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The most powerful - ''Libs of TikTok'' (and others) is &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;not&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; Muslim...'nuf said. Any peace between groups is good. It's just that CAIR and such, cynically abuse it for harm.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
==='Peace Through Strength'===&lt;br /&gt;
IMO, you are making a bad comparison between the Soviet Union and modern Communist China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan was able to spend the USSR out of existence cause it was in terrible economic shape after 40 years of no trade with the West, and its continued defense spending as a percent of [[GDP]] at World War II levels (at that time, China was not the economic powerhouse it is today that could make up the difference in loss of trade from the West). Modern China, OTW -- its defense spending is fueled by Wal Mart customers in the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pity the poor Wal Mart customer; all the profits from Chinese made goods sold at Wal Mart are translated into Chinese military spending, which then the Wal Mart shopper has to pay higher taxes and inflation to feed the American [[military industrial complex]] to compete with the Chinese military. He's getting it in both ends.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump had the right idea in imposing tariffs, and you saw the resistance that met. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:22, July 7, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There never was a peace treaty after World War II (well, there was the Nuremberg Tribunal, the UN Charter, and much later the 1976 Helsinki Accords, but never a formal treaty). After 1945, the Soviet Union never stopped fighting [[fascism]] from [[the West]]. The [[Anti-Comintern Pact]] and Angelo-American alliance ([[Atlantic Charter]]) reorganized itself and merged into [[NATO]] beginning in 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 1941, the Soviet Union was on its knees when the Germans invaded; by 1945 its economy and industrial output was fully mobilized for war, and it never looked back. The Soviet economy never did a &amp;quot;peacetime transition&amp;quot; after WWII. By the late 1950s and 1960s it did produce a few cars, TV sets, and refrigerators as rewards for party members and &amp;quot;hero workers&amp;quot; in an non-incentivized capitalist economy, but its domestic consumer market was always plagued by shortages up to the very end (compare that to modern China). By 1989, the Soviet Union's chief export was still the [[AK-47]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:11, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So it was the Soviet Union's ''overspending'' on defense that didn't leave any room for increase when Reagan challenged it to expand further after 1981. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:20, July 8, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communist China led by the Commie CCP is worse and a more Evil Empire than even the evil Communist Soviet Union was. Those who don't see this, and are Comsymps, Communist-appeasers and Communist-enablers, will be the first to suffer from their folly if Communism actually prevails. We who do will follow the Noble Path of Pro-Life Christians and Devout Anti-Communists Pope St. John Paul II and President Reagan. Down with Communism! No Compromise. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:08, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's all true, and more than true. The [[PRC]] is way bigger and more powerful than the USSR &amp;amp; [[Third Reich]] combined. Whether the PRC is a threat to [[sovereign]] states, is another matter (and no, [[Taiwan]] is not a &amp;quot;sovereign state&amp;quot; as Western propaganda would have you believe). Our first priority is to terminate and put to shame the Russophobic bigots who began this insane war against Christian Russia and drove Russia into alliance with China (what did they expect [[Russian sanctions]] to do otherwise?). That won't be undone in two years or with the election of this or that president or Congress. It may take decades. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:12, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Nixon imposed price controls as an anti-inflation measure in August 1971. They made him extremely popular and got him reelected by an enormous margin. Most price controls were dropped as soon as Nixon was safely reelected. But the ones on oil continued. U.S. price controls obviously didn't cover the international price, but they did make domestic production less profitable. That turned the Soviet Union into an oil superpower. High energy prices were a factor in the collapse of South Vietnam in 1975. Reagan lifted the price controls on oil when he entered office in 1981. [https://fee.org/articles/nixon-knew-his-price-controls-wouldnt-work/ Newsom in California just adopted oil price controls], so we may be headed down the same road again. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 01:09, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Soviet Union didn't sell much oil abroad until the 1990s, for a variety of factors. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:04, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the early 1980s, oil was one-third of Soviet exports. That's lower than I thought, but certainly quite significant. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:52, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::That was to Comecon states (Eastern bloc or 'iron curtain' countries). The [https://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/russia_and_the_imf_thoughts_prompted_by_an_important_anniversary_dbf/ USSR was never a member] or the [[WTO]] of [[IMF]]. The one-third figure is suspect, given Soviet official records were all faked.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The principal recipients of Russian oil were East Germany, Poland, Hungary, and Cuba, mostly sold at a loss. There wasn't widespread vehicle ownership in these countries.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::One needs to look at the volume of oil production, not just export. The Soviet oil industry was drilling with 1930s technology, and lacked modern technological upgrades. The Soviets didn't even know the size of its reserves; it wasn't until after the collapse of the USSR that oil prospectors could enter Russia and assess. With the discovery of North Slope oil in Alaska in the 1970s it was speculated that the USSR might have vast reserves on its Arctic shoreline, and was only confirmed decades later. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:06, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Wikipedia article on the 1986 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reykjav%C3%ADk_Summit Reykjavik Summit] says this: Reagan &amp;quot;also promised to share SDI technology, a promise which [[Gorbachev]] said he doubted would be fulfilled, as the Americans would not even share oil-drilling technology.&amp;quot; Had the US shared oil drilling technology prior to the end of the Cold War, and the USSR allowed to sell oil to IMF member states, the USSR might possibly been able to compete with the Reagan defense buildup. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:34, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Put succinctly, the [[Cold War]] was one big, gigantic [[Russia sanctions]] package throughout its entirety, embargoing the Soviet Union and the [[Eastern bloc]] nations from the [[Bretton Woods]] system of global trade. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:24, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[Cold War II]] can formally be dated from the day Russia was kicked out of the [[G8]] cause it refused to bend the knee to US hegemony. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:30, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Protesters shut down LGBTQ festival in Republic of Georgia (VIDEOS)==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.rt.com/russia/579414-tbilisi-pride-protest-georgia/ Democracy in action]. Citizens thwart the [[Biden regime]] /[[USAID]] /[[NED]] /[[CIA]] /[[OSF]] /[[Soros]] (what the [https://therightscoop.com/thousands-of-protesters-bust-up-a-pride-event-yesterday-in-the-capital-of-georgia-video/ Right Scoop calls &amp;quot;alphabet mafia&amp;quot;]) efforts to overthrow the legitimate government and expand [[NATO]] with another US-backed [[color revolution]],. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:31, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: the [https://www.barrons.com/news/georgian-pride-event-cancelled-as-far-right-groups-storm-venue-c1ec3f36 ''Barrons'' article says &amp;quot;From AFP&amp;quot; or  Agence France Presse]. Earlier this week we discussed ''[https://swprs.org/the-propaganda-multiplier/ The Propaganda Multiplier]'' which says, &amp;quot;It is one of the most important aspects of our media system, and yet hardly known to the public: most of the international news coverage in Western media is provided by only three global news agencies based in New York, London and Paris....AP, Reuters, and [[AFP]] ([[Agence France Presse]]}.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:44, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: When you read about how the Republic of Georgia (or anywhere else for that matter) &amp;quot;decriminalized&amp;quot; homosexuality a few years back, it is only because of the threat of US sanctions for &amp;quot;human rights violations&amp;quot;, and not due to any &amp;quot;democratic&amp;quot; [[grassroots]] movement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:58, July 9, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Breaking: Turkey's Erdogan to back Sweden joining NATO - Stoltenberg! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally! This is awesome news for NATO supporters. The next step, after Ukraine, is NATO expanding to Asia, with Japan, South Korea, India, then Australia etc. But this is a day for rejoicing for those who've been supporting NATO. American, European, Transatlantic, and International Security just got stronger by a lot. And btw, a prediction of mine came true to the letter. Maybe I should add it to CP proven right? lol. Anyway, here's the news:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Turkey's Erdogan to back Sweden joining Nato - Stoltenberg&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has agreed to support Sweden's bid to join Nato, the military alliance's chief Jens Stoltenberg has said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the Turkish leader would forward Sweden's bid to the parliament in Ankara and &amp;quot;ensure ratification&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said: &amp;quot;I am very happy, it is a good day for Sweden.&amp;quot; https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66160319 [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://youtu.be/bc5Nk1DXyEY War Pigs]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://unherd.com/2023/07/the-reason-nato-wont-admit-ukraine/ The Nato mindset leads to war]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:58, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==‘NATO’ is the Nazi Alliance Treaty Organization==&lt;br /&gt;
''The Duran:'' [https://theduran.com/nato-is-the-nazi-alliance-treaty-organization/ Don't say you Nazisymps weren't warned weeks ago]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:13, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Stalin was a sensitive man, eh? You're certifiable, Quint. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 18:45, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Our Robscist pal here is indeed a certified ☭Comsymp☭. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 18:50, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ask him about his Donbas &amp;quot;cauldron&amp;quot; sometime. ''Destroy the Entire Ukrainian JFO Instantly With This One Weird Trick!''  [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 20:20, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know much about the Donbas &amp;quot;cauldron,&amp;quot; and there's plenty more ways to foil his arguments that result in some interesting confessions from the horse's mouth. His simultaneous defense of Putin-supporting Communists and insistence that calling Putin a commie constitutes &amp;quot;Nazi propaganda&amp;quot; is hilarious. In essence, he's now a [[fellow traveller]]. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 20:25, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Even Truman, the great protector of Alger Hiss and other spies, wasn't pro-communist enough, according to Zuesse. Hiss engineered the pre-war oil embargo on Japan as a favor to Stalin. Truman had to adjust course after the Republicans won the November 1946 midterms on the issue of anti-Communism. But his natural instinct was always to treat the communists as potential allies against the &amp;quot;fascist&amp;quot; GOP. Don't forget that he fired MacArthur for trying to win the Korean War. The Red Chinese had to save face, don't you know. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:16, July 10, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::That was actually [[Harry Dexter White]] in the Treasury Dept, not Hiss. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:05, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::It's funny that most of the internationalist Cold War warriors who made a great talk of anti-Communist action to protect global democracy so bitterly opposed the [[Dies Committee]] investigations, McCarthyism, and the [[Reece Committee]]. Entrenched establishmentarians such as Eisenhower actively undermined efforts to root out domestic Communist subversion, particularly attempting to derail the Reece Committee's crusade by slandering it as &amp;quot;antisemitic&amp;quot; ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM according] to [[Norman Dodd]], it was merely ''one staff member'' who promoted anti-Jewish literature, and they were disciplined). In the U.S. House vote to reestablish the [[Select Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations]], which became known as the Reece Committee, [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/83-1953/h61 most of the Conservative Coalition rallied behind in support along with a scant amount of liberal Southern Democrats] while basically all Northern Democrats and a group of moderate establishment Republicans ([[Gerald Ford|Ford]], [[Peter Frelinghuysen, Jr.|Frelinghuysen]], [[Jacob Javits|Javits]], etc.) comprised much of the opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The reestablishment of the SCITEFCO was necessary; the previous [[Cox Committee]] ran an investigation dubbed by Reece, absent for most sessions due to family illnesses, as having [https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&amp;amp;httpsredir=1&amp;amp;article=1291&amp;amp;context=gov_fac_pubs &amp;quot;insufficient time for the magnitUde of its task.&amp;quot;] And years later, neo-Jacksonian liberal Democrat [[Wright Patman]] continued the investigations of tax-exempt foundations for tax evasion, as recommended by the report of the Cox Committee. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 14:28, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Misguided anti-communism led the United States into asinine conflicts like the [[Vietnam war]] and Korea. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:34, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I lack the military-related knowledge to understand the background of those wars, though as a whole, the [[Old Right]] was definitely right about sticking to domestic anti-Communist investigations of subversion rather than feeding the warmongering establishment. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 14:51, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Unfortunately, conservatives were deceived by Goldwater Republicanism, which was nothing more than an outgrowth of the modern Eastern Establishment that developed among internationalist Moderate Republicans during the 1940s. (and also! Goldwater was a 33-degree Freemason, I believe, which means he must've secretly been a Luciferian occultist) &amp;quot;A Choice Not An Echo&amp;quot; only got half the picture right: [[Robert A. Taft]] indeed was a diligent opponent of the liberal globalists whose ambitions they destroyed, but Goldwater [https://mises.org/library/swan-song-old-right had no connection with the Taft-aligned Old Right]. While the book is popular among New Right, modern conservative discourse, it embraced a deceptive form of &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot; thought deviant from the authentic conservative principles of the Old Right. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 14:55, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::The Vietnam war was insane. Look at Peter's comment, above: Truman's &amp;quot;natural instinct was always to treat the communists as potential allies against the &amp;quot;fascist&amp;quot; GOP. Don't forget that he fired MacArthur for trying to win the Korean War.&amp;quot; MacArthur was for a long time a serious GOP challenger for president against both FDR &amp;amp; Truman; when Eisenhower was elected, MacArthur remarked that Ike was the best staff officer he ever had. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:00, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Democratic accusations of the GOP as &amp;quot;fascist&amp;quot; [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Troubled_Journey/W6PfgysFDXYC?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;dq=henry+wallace+republicans+fascist&amp;amp;pg=PT14&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover goes back] to [[Henry A. Wallace]]. The irony here, of course, is that actual Fascists [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Three_New_Deals/0Kz_609jDZwC?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;dq=three+new+deals+henry+wallace&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover gave quite a glowing review of Henry Wallace's book ''New Frontiers''.] —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 15:04, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::That's right; anyone not onboard with Russia's war effort against [[Nazi Germany]] was deemed a &amp;quot;[[fascist]]&amp;quot;, for example, union workers who went on strike for higher wages in wartime, which would break wartime wage and price controls, were called &amp;quot;fascists&amp;quot;. Just as today anyone who does not support Russia's defense against NATO aggression is a fascist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:13, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::[EC] [EC] Ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha XD- so now you're just parroting New Deal–era left-wing propaganda tactics. The horse's mouth spouts new admissions every day! Karajou hereby is fully vindicated for calling you a liberal two years ago. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 15:17, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::No, that's what [[America First]]er and isolationist John Flynn reported: &amp;quot;Wages were held down in slaughter houses. The workers quit the legitimate slaughterers and went to work for black-market slaughterers at twice the legal wages, or went into munitions plants, and scores of slaughter houses were put out of business. The unfortunate slaughterer or meat dealer or packer who complained was called a fascist.&amp;quot; [https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Roosevelt%20Myth_2.pdf pg 314]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::There's something wrong with your basic logic and reasoning; everyday you try to draw a straight line from the 19th and early 20th century progressivism to modern day leftist and socialist sentiments. You make arguments about the [[Old Right]], etc. Then you turn a blind eye, using your own rhetoric, logic, and reasoning to your fascist opposition to Vladimir Putin and Russia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:37, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::Get away from the ideologues, and come over to the ''Realist school''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::No. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 16:24, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::It's a dead end, cause when you come into conflict with the real world, you're trapped just like leftist dreamers in a world that never existed and never will exist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:27, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::IOWs, what you think is your &amp;quot;ideology&amp;quot;, is an ideology created and defined by leftists. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:30, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::Oh, ''I'm'' now like a leftist? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 16:31, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::No, your ideology guides you to such conclusions, regardless of facts.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::You're right, Trump is not a &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;; you're wrong, Trump is not a socialist. Trump is a realist. And he's got the record of personal success to prove it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:34, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::The bible should be a close enough guide on realism, and it warns you off of false ideologies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:36, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::::Yes, the Bible indeed exhorts believers not to believe in sun- er, Sunday worship, Commu-Putinism, &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot; populism, &amp;quot;Christian Nationalism,&amp;quot; worldly rabble-rousers, and otherwise children of the devil (Matt. 13:38, John 8:44) damned to eternal perdition. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 19:22, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::::Congrats; you just invented a new false ideology: Commu-Putinism. A lie from the pit of hell. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::::::Putin was a member of the Soviet KGB. 'Nuff said. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 21:23, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::::::Paul was a persecutor of Christians. 'Nuff said. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:01, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::::::What do you think it means to &amp;quot;repent&amp;quot; and be &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot;? But thy impenitent and unforgiving heart treasurest up wrath against thyself... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:22, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::::::::Oh, you ''actually'' think that Putin is some repentant, godly individual? Are you going to ignore [https://www.businessinsider.com/list-of-people-putin-is-suspected-of-assassinating-2016-3?op=1 all the critics brutally murdered] [[Arkancide]]-style or the countless civilian deaths by Commuputinist bombs? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 22:27, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::::::::No man can say that Jesus is the Lord, except by the Holy Spirit. Who am I supposed to believe, God or the [[BBC]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Let's look at you argument that &amp;quot;Christian nationalism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;rightwing populism&amp;quot; trace their origins to 19th century [[Progressivism]]; or your argument that my failure to &amp;quot;Sieg Heil&amp;quot; contemporary [[MSM]] anti-Putin propaganda makes me a [[comysymp]]; by that same logic you are a fascist and nazisymp. You leave yourself no flexibility. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Your argument is as terrible as your grammar. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Tuesday, 19:09, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry. My brain isn't attuned to popular culture and [[MSM]]. I know my grammar appears awkward at times. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And your brain also clearly isn't attuned to a sound understanding of historical realities. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 21:25, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::yes and no; I understand history and life is organic, and doesn't necessarily follow strict patterns and rules. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:01, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ambassador/Gov. Haley has raised $34.3 MN - arguably the 3rd Strongest Candidate in the Race, and an Ideal Choice for Vice President ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley raised $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2023, her campaign announced Monday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haley has raised $15.6 million since launching her run, according to her campaign. Haley’s super PAC, Stand For America Inc., raised $18.7 million this quarter, bringing the total since the campaign launch to $34.3 million.&amp;quot; https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4089423-haley-raises-7-3-million-in-second-quarter/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:58, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Doesn't mean much without telling us how much came from donors under $250, and how much from Big Money lobbyists over $250.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another way to figure it is to take the $34 million and divide by the reported number of donors. But even that's old school, cause it doesn't account for [[dark money]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:09, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:DeSantis &amp;amp; Haley are sponsored by Big Money globalists to muddy the waters of the stream in advance of the Maga movement. Wanna hear something ''really'' funny? listen to Haley and DeSantis talk about globalism and globalists. Both are paid-for shills of the [[military industrial complex]] warmongers.  Integrity, character, and principles don't enter in. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, July 11, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As opposed to Trump, who has bragged about fornication and adultery, and molesting the genitals of multiple women - that too in a very vulgar way? Pls, Trump was a worldling through and through, you remember the Access Hollywood tapes, right? Only those who themselves use vulgarities all the time can't see it, since we live in a liberal/worldly culture. Yes, he became more Conservative as time went by, and as he surrounded himself with Christians etc. Now, he is regressing, and going back to some of his former ways. His weakness on the Woke Issue, Vaccine Issue etc are examples. De Santis, Haley et al have criticized the globalists at the WEF, not to mention Fauci etc, multiple times. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:30, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The election betting markets indicate that Donald Trump has 66.3% chance of winning the Republican primary while Nicky Haley has a 3.1% chance of winning the GOP primary.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump's odds of winning the presidency has gone up about 10% points in the last 3 days according to the political betting markets.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] Trump's odds of winning the presidency have gone up A LOT in 2023 according to the political betting markets.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As a former Catholic, I am guessing you might be praying to St. Jude for Nickey Haley to win the GOP primary and USA presidency. After all, St. Jude is the patron saint of hopeless causes and desperate situations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::By the way, according to the political betting markets, DeSantis odds of winning the GOP has been dropping like a rock in 2023.[https://electionbettingodds.com/GOPPrimary2024.html] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Your Ukraine cheerleading is a lost cause too. In the war in Ukraine, Ukraine/West has been reduced to soon using cluster bombs due to them soon running out of other more conventional munitions. And if the USA economy worsens (Or knowledge of Biden scandals significantly increases or Biden's deteriorating health gets much worse), Ukraine may face a GOP president who is less favorable to supplying the Ukrainians with arms. Zelinksky/Ukraine should have honored the [[Minsk Agreements]] and not done things to provoke Russia. When you are in a cage with a 600 pound gorilla (Russia is a much bigger country with more resources than Ukraine), you don't do things to provoke him. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:20, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please Add To In The News  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add to ''In The News'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Georgia State Representative Mesha Mainor abandons the Democrat Party for the Republican Party. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6331067107112 --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 13:49, July 12, 2023 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1958929</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1958929"/>
		<updated>2023-06-30T14:22:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Add To In The News */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for discussion of Main Page content. All other discussions are at the [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]].''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Desantis updates==&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions moved to [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NATO/Ukraine==&lt;br /&gt;
''Some discussions moved to [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==='Yats is the guy'===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nuland-in-ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ukrainian [[neo-Nazi]] [[Oleh Tyahnybok]] with (left) Victorias Nuland (center), [[Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk]], and (right) [[Vitali Klitschko]] (rear).]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Maidan coup]], the notorious &amp;quot;F the EU&amp;quot; conversation between State Dept employees [[Victoria Nuland]] and Amb Pyatt when they were deciding on which puppet to make Prime Minister, Nuland said, &amp;quot;Yats is  the guy. He's got the governing experience bla bla bla&amp;quot;.  Well, &amp;quot;Yats&amp;quot;, or [[Arseniy Yatsenyuk]] apparently now has had [https://www.bitchute.com/video/8YRQXb0TRlBF/ an epiphany about Nazism in Ukraine.] Is he ambling for a job in a post-Zelensky Ukraine? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, June 27, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biological Terrorism: China engineered Covid 19 to purposely infect people, reveals Wuhan researcher ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[pls move to Conservapedia Community Portal if that is deemed more suitable for this discussion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw someone say that, because the American Deep State (as opposed to Good Conservative Leaders) is evil (it is), therefore, allegedly, the Communist Party of China, responsible for an ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims, is supposedly not evil (it is, too). That's a Non Sequitur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;The Chinese government has reportedly arbitrarily detained more than a million Muslims in reeducation camps since 2017. Most of the people who have been detained are Uyghur, a predominantly Turkic-speaking ethnic group primarily in China’s northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beyond the detentions, Uyghurs in the region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labor, and involuntary sterilizations, among other rights abuses. The United States and several other foreign governments have described China’s actions in Xinjiang as genocide, while the UN human rights office said that the violations could constitute crimes against humanity. Chinese officials have said that they have not infringed on Uyghurs’ rights and claimed that they closed the reeducation camps in 2019. However, international journalists and researchers have documented an ongoing system of mass detention throughout the region using satellite images, individual testimonies, and leaked Chinese government documents.&amp;quot; https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Covid, this just in: one must have a broad international perspective, and not think of the whole world in terms of American domestic politics alone. Just because there are some bad people in the Deep State, and hardly anyone in the know denies there are, this doesn't mean there aren't bad Communist/Dictatorial Regimes in the world, like the Commie CCP is. Neither is it Anti-Chinese people to say so; in fact, we're being the voice of the good and innocent Chinese people who are suffering under the regime when we critique the CCP regime, just as one would be the voice of the voiceless when standing up against abortion etc; remember the millions who died/suffered under Covid and consider fairly whether the below could be true. It's an astonishing claim and worthy of a fair international investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A researcher from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has made an astonishing claim that coronavirus was purposely engineered by China to infect people. Chao Shao, a researcher, said his colleagues were given four strains of the virus to find out which could spread best.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.livemint.com/news/world/biological-terrorism-china-engineered-covid-19-to-purposely-infect-people-reveals-wuhan-researcher-11687928751255.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:34, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We do need some discussion on this subject, however scapegoating China and the CCP isn't the way to go. It was collaboration between [[Fauci]] and certain American private interests along with the [[Wuhan lab]]. I would recommend go over CP's Wuhan lab &amp;amp; Fauci articles, and look for information that builds on the sources there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a concerted effort now to take the heat off the American taxpayer money that funded the Wuhan lab, and point the finger at China as solely responsible. This obvious from the [[CFR]] pushing Sinophobia now to justify war with China. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Commie CCP and the Commie Deep State should fall. One of the reasons I support De Santis is I think he is a No-Nonsense Administrator. If you don't follow the agenda of the elected government, you should be packing your bags. The govt. answers to the people. Whom do Deep State Bureacrats answer to? No one/special interests. It's very bad, and I agree it's a perfectly legitimate concern to be concerned about the Deep State, especially given the amount of power it has, the amount of evil it does, and the amount of good it can frustrate. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:49, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well now your getting off topic bringing DeSantis name into it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Here is a thumbnail sketch of the narrative outfits like CFR retrying to [[coverup]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::In 2015, there were a breakthrough in [[gain of function]] research at the Wuhan lab published in scientific journals; the response among many scientists was that this research was too dangerous and people should back away from further research. The Obama administration issued an Executive Order banning more research - but there's a catch - it only banned such research in the United States. So Fauci transferred the research to Wuhan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:55, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't think it is off topic. One of the reasons people supported Trump is to destroy the Deep State. He did do some good things, but he couldn't do that. I think De Santis would, or at least would significantly reduce their power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most conservatives don't understand that &amp;quot;laissez-faire&amp;quot; anarchism is not acceptable in government. That's not what &amp;quot;limited government&amp;quot; should mean when it comes to dealing with evildoers. If you can't be tough in dealing with bad guys, you don't belong in government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what Saint Paul taught on that in the Epistle to the Romans: &amp;quot;3For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you want to be unafraid of the one in authority? Then do what is right, and you will have his approval. 4For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not carry the sword in vain. He is God’s servant, an agent of retribution to the wrongdoer. 5Therefore it is necessary to submit to authority, not only to avoid punishment, but also as a matter of conscience&amp;quot; (Roman 13:3-5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You mentioned Gain of Function research, and that's Exhibit A: &amp;quot;DeSantis signs bills banning vaccine mandates, gain of function research&amp;quot; https://www.thecentersquare.com/florida/article_f0320380-f024-11ed-9f74-7f94c974e2ac.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:01, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Fauci should have been fired long ago. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:04, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The focus of this thread is countering the deep state narrative that China is soley responsible for the pandemic. Let's stick to countering that with facts from re[putable source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ideological arguments about conservativism or political candidates go on other threads in other articles, for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok. The issue is, how to ensure (1) something like Covid (from the development of the virus, to its release and outbreak, to the Deep State coverup, to the unsafe vaccines) never happens again, and (2) how to hold accountable those whose actions led to the loss of millions of lives, and caused many more millions to suffer worldwide. For that, we need something like (1) a Nuremberg II Tribunal, with (2) bad actors internationally, whether in the US like Fauci, or the Commie CCP, or anywhere else, held accountable for their actions, after a thorough investigation of all malpractice. That is in principle. Procedurally, you're only going to get that with strong Conservative Leadership. Commie Stalin said: &amp;quot;The death of a single person is a tragedy. The death of millions, a statistic&amp;quot;. That shows how his warped Commie-mind thought. It isn't true and we conservatives shouldn't allow it to be so. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(ec) okay, very good. You see a larger picture. Right now we need adequate documentation of the crimes that took place. Remember, the globalists and [[deep state]]rs have much more powerful influence in media, academia, [[think tank]]s, and government.  Despite being vastly outgunned, the [[censorship]] they employ should be viewed as a sign of weakness. They fear the truth and reality getting out to general public. So we need to focus on the knowledgeable sources and help them, get what they know out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We can begin with people like Sen. [[Rand Paul]] and Rep. [[Jim Jordan]] who have a pretty clear understanding of the facts of what happened. Journalists like Lee Smith and [[Glenn Greenwald]] and a few others also are very good. [[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.]] also has a very clear understanding. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nikki Haley on Commie China ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nikki Haley, take a bow. She rightly points out how liberal Blinked allowed Commie Thug Xi to scold him and thus America by extension. Again, conservative brothers and sisters, from the fact that the liberal Biden-Blinken duo is kowtowing to and bootlicking Xi, draw the right conclusion that the truly Conservative Approach/Position toward Commie China is Raeganite Peace through Strength, and inexorable/invincible American/European/NATO Strength, as well as fresh modern Alliances in the Indo-Pacific and Global South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the Video: https://youtu.be/JVz1mgcayAw Absolutely brutal in criticizing the Biden Administration's bad policies making everything worse. She also mentions how important it is to draw in the Arab World as partners and Biden's foolish policies pushing them away. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch between 17-19 mins: &amp;quot;I gave the example. To me, the most glaring is, you don't congratulate the [[Chinese Communist Party]] for taking over China 70 years ago. We don't congratulate Communism, we condemn it [makes sense considering Communism is responsible for over 65+ Million Deaths in China alone. See: https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/the-legacy-mao-zedong-mass-murder]. That's the Moral Clarity that I'm talking about. We have to know Right from Wrong. You never go and tell someone who is stealing, &amp;quot;Oh you go get them&amp;quot;, Oh keep oppressing&amp;quot;, you don't tell a Dictator that the way they sit there and hold their hand down on their People is a Good Thing. You congratulate Freedom, you congratulate Democracy, you congratulate when People have the Individual Liberties ... You NEVER congratulate Communism&amp;quot;. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heritage Foundation was once a very respected conservative [[think tank]] during the Reagan years. However now it has a reputation as being overtaken by globalist views - at least on foreign policy and trade matters. It's stuff on election fraud is excellent, unsurpassed by any other DC think tank, IMO. However its perspectives on Russia and China should be suspect, and not viewed as authoritive (unless at some point there's a big shake up in management. But here again, the globalists got the big bucks to buy think tanks like Heritage, and there's not really any big sources of funding for anti-neocon perspectives). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:50, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add To In The News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Add To ''In The News'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/u-s-supreme-court-strikes-down-affirmative-action/ar-AA1dcM3C --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 10:15, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Also there needs to be a spelling correction, instead of &amp;quot;mayor&amp;quot; it should read &amp;quot;major&amp;quot;. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 11:14, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:17, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I used the [[John Solomon]] link; msn is probably Yahoo news or some other [[neo-fascist]] [[propaganda]] organ. We need to begin paying attention to to sources and links used. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:35, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you! Also, Supreme Court sides with Christian graphic designer. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-colorado-graphic-designer-who-refused-to-create-same-sex-wedding-websites/ar-AA1dg4M7 --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 10:22, June 30, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biden corruption==&lt;br /&gt;
With the accession of [[Romania]] to [[NATO]], the Biden family became co-owners of Kentucky Fried Chicken franchises in Romania. The multinational corporate conglomerate drove numerous native ethnic Romania mom n pop entrepreneurs, which grew up in Romania since 1991, out of business. This was done under the guise of &amp;quot;capitalism, freedom and democracy&amp;quot; with NATO protecting the multinational corporate conglomerate's financial interests. The same thing is happening in Ukraine. Romanian  and Ukrainian entrepreneurs who are victims of this multinational corporate collusion view it as a [[neo-fascist]] invasion of their state and loss of [[sovereignty]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:50, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1958763</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=1958763"/>
		<updated>2023-06-29T14:15:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Add To In The News */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for discussion of Main Page content. All other discussions are at the [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]].''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Desantis updates==&lt;br /&gt;
''Discussions moved to [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NATO/Ukraine==&lt;br /&gt;
''Some discussions moved to [[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==='Yats is the guy'===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nuland-in-ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ukrainian [[neo-Nazi]] [[Oleh Tyahnybok]] with (left) Victorias Nuland (center), [[Yarsenyi Yatsenyuk]], and (right) [[Vitali Klitschko]] (rear).]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Maidan coup]], the notorious &amp;quot;F the EU&amp;quot; conversation between State Dept employees [[Victoria Nuland]] and Amb Pyatt when they were deciding on which puppet to make Prime Minister, Nuland said, &amp;quot;Yats is  the guy. He's got the governing experience bla bla bla&amp;quot;.  Well, &amp;quot;Yats&amp;quot;, or [[Arseniy Yatsenyuk]] apparently now has had [https://www.bitchute.com/video/8YRQXb0TRlBF/ an epiphany about Nazism in Ukraine.] Is he ambling for a job in a post-Zelensky Ukraine? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, June 27, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biological Terrorism: China engineered Covid 19 to purposely infect people, reveals Wuhan researcher ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[pls move to Conservapedia Community Portal if that is deemed more suitable for this discussion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw someone say that, because the American Deep State (as opposed to Good Conservative Leaders) is evil (it is), therefore, allegedly, the Communist Party of China, responsible for an ongoing genocide of Uyghur Muslims, is supposedly not evil (it is, too). That's a Non Sequitur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: &amp;quot;The Chinese government has reportedly arbitrarily detained more than a million Muslims in reeducation camps since 2017. Most of the people who have been detained are Uyghur, a predominantly Turkic-speaking ethnic group primarily in China’s northwestern region of Xinjiang. Beyond the detentions, Uyghurs in the region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labor, and involuntary sterilizations, among other rights abuses. The United States and several other foreign governments have described China’s actions in Xinjiang as genocide, while the UN human rights office said that the violations could constitute crimes against humanity. Chinese officials have said that they have not infringed on Uyghurs’ rights and claimed that they closed the reeducation camps in 2019. However, international journalists and researchers have documented an ongoing system of mass detention throughout the region using satellite images, individual testimonies, and leaked Chinese government documents.&amp;quot; https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Covid, this just in: one must have a broad international perspective, and not think of the whole world in terms of American domestic politics alone. Just because there are some bad people in the Deep State, and hardly anyone in the know denies there are, this doesn't mean there aren't bad Communist/Dictatorial Regimes in the world, like the Commie CCP is. Neither is it Anti-Chinese people to say so; in fact, we're being the voice of the good and innocent Chinese people who are suffering under the regime when we critique the CCP regime, just as one would be the voice of the voiceless when standing up against abortion etc; remember the millions who died/suffered under Covid and consider fairly whether the below could be true. It's an astonishing claim and worthy of a fair international investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A researcher from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has made an astonishing claim that coronavirus was purposely engineered by China to infect people. Chao Shao, a researcher, said his colleagues were given four strains of the virus to find out which could spread best.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.livemint.com/news/world/biological-terrorism-china-engineered-covid-19-to-purposely-infect-people-reveals-wuhan-researcher-11687928751255.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:34, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We do need some discussion on this subject, however scapegoating China and the CCP isn't the way to go. It was collaboration between [[Fauci]] and certain American private interests along with the [[Wuhan lab]]. I would recommend go over CP's Wuhan lab &amp;amp; Fauci articles, and look for information that builds on the sources there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a concerted effort now to take the heat off the American taxpayer money that funded the Wuhan lab, and point the finger at China as solely responsible. This obvious from the [[CFR]] pushing Sinophobia now to justify war with China. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:42, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Commie CCP and the Commie Deep State should fall. One of the reasons I support De Santis is I think he is a No-Nonsense Administrator. If you don't follow the agenda of the elected government, you should be packing your bags. The govt. answers to the people. Whom do Deep State Bureacrats answer to? No one/special interests. It's very bad, and I agree it's a perfectly legitimate concern to be concerned about the Deep State, especially given the amount of power it has, the amount of evil it does, and the amount of good it can frustrate. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:49, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well now your getting off topic bringing DeSantis name into it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Here is a thumbnail sketch of the narrative outfits like CFR retrying to [[coverup]]:&lt;br /&gt;
:::In 2015, there were a breakthrough in [[gain of function]] research at the Wuhan lab published in scientific journals; the response among many scientists was that this research was too dangerous and people should back away from further research. The Obama administration issued an Executive Order banning more research - but there's a catch - it only banned such research in the United States. So Fauci transferred the research to Wuhan. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:55, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't think it is off topic. One of the reasons people supported Trump is to destroy the Deep State. He did do some good things, but he couldn't do that. I think De Santis would, or at least would significantly reduce their power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most conservatives don't understand that &amp;quot;laissez-faire&amp;quot; anarchism is not acceptable in government. That's not what &amp;quot;limited government&amp;quot; should mean when it comes to dealing with evildoers. If you can't be tough in dealing with bad guys, you don't belong in government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's what Saint Paul taught on that in the Epistle to the Romans: &amp;quot;3For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Do you want to be unafraid of the one in authority? Then do what is right, and you will have his approval. 4For he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not carry the sword in vain. He is God’s servant, an agent of retribution to the wrongdoer. 5Therefore it is necessary to submit to authority, not only to avoid punishment, but also as a matter of conscience&amp;quot; (Roman 13:3-5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You mentioned Gain of Function research, and that's Exhibit A: &amp;quot;DeSantis signs bills banning vaccine mandates, gain of function research&amp;quot; https://www.thecentersquare.com/florida/article_f0320380-f024-11ed-9f74-7f94c974e2ac.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:01, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Fauci should have been fired long ago. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:04, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The focus of this thread is countering the deep state narrative that China is soley responsible for the pandemic. Let's stick to countering that with facts from re[putable source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ideological arguments about conservativism or political candidates go on other threads in other articles, for now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok. The issue is, how to ensure (1) something like Covid (from the development of the virus, to its release and outbreak, to the Deep State coverup, to the unsafe vaccines) never happens again, and (2) how to hold accountable those whose actions led to the loss of millions of lives, and caused many more millions to suffer worldwide. For that, we need something like (1) a Nuremberg II Tribunal, with (2) bad actors internationally, whether in the US like Fauci, or the Commie CCP, or anywhere else, held accountable for their actions, after a thorough investigation of all malpractice. That is in principle. Procedurally, you're only going to get that with strong Conservative Leadership. Commie Stalin said: &amp;quot;The death of a single person is a tragedy. The death of millions, a statistic&amp;quot;. That shows how his warped Commie-mind thought. It isn't true and we conservatives shouldn't allow it to be so. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(ec) okay, very good. You see a larger picture. Right now we need adequate documentation of the crimes that took place. Remember, the globalists and [[deep state]]rs have much more powerful influence in media, academia, [[think tank]]s, and government.  Despite being vastly outgunned, the [[censorship]] they employ should be viewed as a sign of weakness. They fear the truth and reality getting out to general public. So we need to focus on the knowledgeable sources and help them, get what they know out. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We can begin with people like Sen. [[Rand Paul]] and Rep. [[Jim Jordan]] who have a pretty clear understanding of the facts of what happened. Journalists like Lee Smith and [[Glenn Greenwald]] and a few others also are very good. [[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.]] also has a very clear understanding. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:26, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nikki Haley on Commie China ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nikki Haley, take a bow. She rightly points out how liberal Blinked allowed Commie Thug Xi to scold him and thus America by extension. Again, conservative brothers and sisters, from the fact that the liberal Biden-Blinken duo is kowtowing to and bootlicking Xi, draw the right conclusion that the truly Conservative Approach/Position toward Commie China is Raeganite Peace through Strength, and inexorable/invincible American/European/NATO Strength, as well as fresh modern Alliances in the Indo-Pacific and Global South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the Video: https://youtu.be/JVz1mgcayAw Absolutely brutal in criticizing the Biden Administration's bad policies making everything worse. She also mentions how important it is to draw in the Arab World as partners and Biden's foolish policies pushing them away. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Watch between 17-19 mins: &amp;quot;I gave the example. To me, the most glaring is, you don't congratulate the [[Chinese Communist Party]] for taking over China 70 years ago. We don't congratulate Communism, we condemn it [makes sense considering Communism is responsible for over 65+ Million Deaths in China alone. See: https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/the-legacy-mao-zedong-mass-murder]. That's the Moral Clarity that I'm talking about. We have to know Right from Wrong. You never go and tell someone who is stealing, &amp;quot;Oh you go get them&amp;quot;, Oh keep oppressing&amp;quot;, you don't tell a Dictator that the way they sit there and hold their hand down on their People is a Good Thing. You congratulate Freedom, you congratulate Democracy, you congratulate when People have the Individual Liberties ... You NEVER congratulate Communism&amp;quot;. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Heritage Foundation was once a very respected conservative [[think tank]] during the Reagan years. However now it has a reputation as being overtaken by globalist views - at least on foreign policy and trade matters. It's stuff on election fraud is excellent, unsurpassed by any other DC think tank, IMO. However its perspectives on Russia and China should be suspect, and not viewed as authoritive (unless at some point there's a big shake up in management. But here again, the globalists got the big bucks to buy think tanks like Heritage, and there's not really any big sources of funding for anti-neocon perspectives). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:50, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== De Santis gets it on Covid/Commie CCP/Deep State/Fauci/Mask Mandates/Vaccine Mandtes Everything ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proof: &amp;quot;Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis took former White House chief medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci to task in Iowa Friday over his actions during the COVID-19 pandemic, saying he and other elites “lied about the lab leak” theory and must “be held accountable.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We know now today,” DeSantis, 44, told attendees at a Davenport event promoting his new book, “The Courage to be Free,” “the elites were wrong about lockdowns; they were wrong about forced masking; they were wrong about closing schools; they were wrong about denying natural immunity; they were wrong about the efficacy of mRNA shots; and they were wrong — and indeed they lied — about the lab leak.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“They said it was natural — we know it came from that lab,” added DeSantis, who was joined by Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, to cheers and applause from the crowd at the Rhythm City Casino Resort. “And I think we need some accountability here. Fauci needs to be held accountable. All these agencies. The CCP [Chinese Communist Party] ... “He needs to be held accountable,” DeSantis said on Feb. 28. “The lab leak, the lockdowns — he was wrong. Masks, he was wrong. School closures, he was wrong. He was wrong about the vax — saying you wouldn’t get COVID if you took it. He was wrong about passports.” And people wonder why I think De Santis can better represent our Conservative Cause than Trump can. It's plain. https://nypost.com/2023/03/10/anthony-fauci-lied-about-covid-lab-leak-ron-desantis/ [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:31, June 28, 2023 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Add To In The News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please Add To ''In The News'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supreme Court strikes down affirmative action. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/u-s-supreme-court-strikes-down-affirmative-action/ar-AA1dcM3C --[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 10:15, June 29, 2023 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kevin_McCarthy&amp;diff=1920529</id>
		<title>Kevin McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kevin_McCarthy&amp;diff=1920529"/>
		<updated>2023-01-07T06:30:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Kevin McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
|image=House Maj. Leader Kevin McCarthy official photo.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Judy Wages&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Baptist]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pewforum.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2019/01/Detailed-tables-NUMBER-CHECK-COMPLETE-1-3.pdf Religious affiliation of members of 116th Congress]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
{{Officeholder/misc&lt;br /&gt;
	|office=[[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 7, 2023&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
        {{Officeholder/representative&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=California&lt;br /&gt;
	|district=23rd&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2013 – present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Lois Capps]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/representative&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=California&lt;br /&gt;
	|district=22nd&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2007 – January 3, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Bill Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Devin Nunes]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Officeholder/misc&lt;br /&gt;
	|office=Member of the [[California]] State Assembly from the 32nd District&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=December 2, 2002 – November 30, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Roy Ashburn&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Jean Fuller&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kevin Owen McCarthy''' (born January 26, 1965, age {{age|1965|1|26}}) is the [[United States Representative]] for [[California]]'s 23rd congressional district. A [[Republican Party|Republican]], he was from 2014 to 2019 the House Majority Leader, elected by his colleagues to succeed [[Eric Cantor]] of [[Virginia]], who resigned from the House after his primary defeat by [[conservative]] [[Dave Brat]]. From 2007 to 2013, McCarthy represented the 22nd district of California. Prior to that time, he served in the [[California State Assembly]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 15, 2022, McCarthy was re-elected the [[House Majority Leader]] for the remainder of the 117th session of [[Congress]] ending in January 2023. This made him the frontrunner to become [[Speaker of the House]] at the beginning of the next session of Congress, but it is not guaranteed that he will become Speaker due to fierce opposition from [[RINO|RINOs]] and conservatives alike.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://omaha.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/bacon-would-work-with-dems-to-elect-moderate-house-speaker-if-gops-mccarthy-falls-short/article_ecfa7c66-6491-11ed-9123-5393236e49c4.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11430623/Gaetz-members-waterboarded-Liz-Cheney-vote-McCarthy-speaker.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While many hope that, as Speaker, he will reverse the [[Leftist]] [[tyranny]] imposed under [[Democrat]] [[Nancy Pelosi]]'s reign of terror against patriotic Americans (for example, the illegal [[Pelosi Panel]] witchhunt) and despite his endorsement by [[Donald J. Trump|President Trump]] himself,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newsmax.com/politics/trump-endorse-kevin-mccarthy/2022/11/08/id/1095483/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3512413-trump-endorses-mccarthy-as-strong-and-fearless-house-gop-leader/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/08/us/politics/trump-mccarthy-mcconnell-speaker.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McCarthy has often promoted the interests of the [[Deep State]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==U.S. House of Representatives==&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2020, McCarthy joined 71 House Republicans and all Democrats in voting to remove Civil War-era statues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/23/the-list-72-republicans-vote-with-democrats-to-remove-civil-war-era-memorabilia-from-u-s-capitol/ The List: 72 Republicans Vote with Democrats to Remove Civil War-Era Memorabilia from U.S. Capitol]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Rep. [[Louie Gohmert]] tested positive for the coronavirus, McCarthy accidentally referred to the former as “Congressman COVID.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/07/29/watch-house-minority-leader-mccarthy-accidentally-calls-rep-gohmert-congressman-covid/ Watch: House Minority Leader McCarthy Accidentally Calls Rep. Gohmert ‘Congressman COVID’]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.newsweek.com/republican-leader-kevin-mccarthy-accidentally-calls-louie-gohmert-congressman-covid-1521640 Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy Accidentally Calls Louie Gohmert 'Congressman COVID']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===118th Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|118th United States Congress}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Opposition to Steve King===&lt;br /&gt;
After the strongly [[conservative]], anti-[[establishment]] representative [[Steve King]] made a blunt comment that was exaggerated by the media to promote the narrative of him being a “racist”, McCarthy and other House [[Republicans]] quickly stripped King of his committee assignments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/425328-gop-leaders-strip-steve-king-of-committee-assignments GOP leaders strip Steve King of committee assignments]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In mid-May 2020, McCarthy stubbornly continued to vow that King “cannot be exonerated” over the mere comment that was made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/15/kevin-mccarthy-refutes-steve-kings-white-supremaci/ McCarthy nixes Steve King talk of return after 'white supremacist' comments: 'Cannot be exonerated']&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/498016-gop-leader-says-he-never-told-steve-king-hed-back-reinstating-him-on-panels GOP leader says he never told Steve King he'd back reinstating him on panels]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.mccarthyforcongress.com/ Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://kevinmccarthy.house.gov/ House Website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://ballotpedia.org/Kevin_McCarthy_(California) Kevin McCarthy (California) - Ballotpedia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Kevin}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{republican establishment}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Representatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Establishment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:State Representatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:114th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:115th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:116th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:117th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:118th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Establishment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Neoconservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1917722</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1917722"/>
		<updated>2022-12-30T17:00:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Runner-up tier */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative of the Year 2022''' has many strong contenders. Please add to or revise this draft list, or comment on the talk page!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Very Top tier ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elon Musk]], [[free speech]] advocate and [[conservative populism|conservative populist]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left, for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]], for unblocking former President Trump and many conservative pages like [[Babylon Bee]], and for rebuking [[Chuck Schumer]] and [[Mitch McConnell]] for impoverishing [[American]]s by passing the bloated $1.7 trillion spending bill just before the end of the year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musk-taunts-schumer-mcconnell-twitter-poll-shows-opposition-omnibus-bill-people-spoken?dicbo=v2-6a1a2b915757b6cd324b2dd72ce5813a&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Rep. [[Thomas Massie]] (R-KY), an [[MIT]] graduate, for taking on the pompous [[John Kerry]] for his socialistic, unjustified [[climate change]] alarmism (while Massie himself lives in an entirely green, energy self-sufficient home), for boycotting the presentation to [[Congress]] to perpetuate at enormous [[American]] cost the [[NATO War in Ukraine]], for being outspoken against the [[Covid vaccine]] mandates, and for being the runner-up for the highest lifetime score from ''The New American'' for an incumbent member of Congress at the end of the 117th Congress, at a whopping 99 percent.[https://thenewamerican.com/freedom-index/legislator/?search=&amp;amp;congress=&amp;amp;state=&amp;amp;party=&amp;amp;chamber=]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Top tier ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] (R-WI), for leading against [[Anthony Fauci]], for defeating the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and for leading on the [[conservative populism]] that is the political future.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Johnson said about the $1.7 trillion omnibus boondoggle, “To declare that a victory, to say that’s a win, that’s like a football team that just lost the game 60 to 0, and they kick a field goal in the waning seconds and say the field goal is a big win,” Johnson said. “No, we just got our you-know-whats handed to us.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3787689-gop-senators-slam-mcconnell-republican-colleagues-for-supporting-omnibus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading his very successful America First Senate campaign, and for speaking out against the [[NATO war in Ukraine]] despite predictions that it would cost him the election in Ukrainian-populated [[Ohio]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state while his coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[Rand Paul]], for voting against the [[Ukraine aid]] scam&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.ph/FsPEZ#selection-731.0-963.226&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and upholding the [[Old Right]] tradition of the Republican Party in opposing reckless war financing, last well-represented by congressman [[Eugene Siler]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[Josh Hawley]] (R-MO), for leading against perpetuating the [[NATO war in Ukraine]] at [[American]] expense.&lt;br /&gt;
* Project Veritas, for obtaining definitive evidence (through DARPA) that COVID was an artificially created virus sponsored by the American and Chinese governments.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sundance, for leading the charge in exposing Ron DeSantis for what he truly is before he can succeed in thwarting Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
* Peaceful protesters and political prisoners of the [[DC gulag]], unjustly held by the [[Biden regime]] without trial for nearly two years.&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Samuel Alito]] for writing the bold and assertive majority opinion for overturning ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Clarence Thomas]] for his role in overturning evil ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' and for his role for possibly overturning [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] in future. &lt;br /&gt;
* Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Donald Trump]], for resisting the Deep State as it continues to persecute him. He also went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he has since endorsed Kevin McCarthy as Speaker, which is a sign he has yet more to learn about who to trust in Washington.[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3725558-trump-backs-mccarthy-for-speaker-stefanik-for-house-gop-chair/]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dinesh D'Souza]] for producing [[2000 Mules]] movie, and for generously donating to the families brutalized by the [[Leftist]]'s [[DC Gulag]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Freedom Convoy|2022 Canadian Freedom Convoy]] protesters for their standing against Trudeau totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kris Kobach]] for winning as Attorney General of Kansas, in the political comeback of the year&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harriet Hageman]] for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tulsi Gabbard]] for leaving [[Democrat Party]] on grounds considerably more impressive than those of Kyrsten Sinema.[https://www.instagram.com/p/CjkjW30D5ne/?hl=en] Also is a leading voice against the [[War in Ukraine]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for being the only Republican to flip a governorship (Nevada) in the midterms.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his big victory in the Hungarian election, and for his moderate stance on Ukraine war.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kari Lake]], [[Arizona]] gubernatorial candidate for challenging naked [[Democrat election fraud]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Runner-up tier ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Matt Rosendale]], for being the only incumbent member of Congress to have a perfect lifetime score from ''The New American'' at the end of the 117th Congress.[https://thenewamerican.com/freedom-index/legislator/?search=&amp;amp;congress=&amp;amp;state=&amp;amp;party=&amp;amp;chamber=] Rosendale maintains Montana's isolationist tradition and principally votes in a consistent manner against interventionist legislation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas P. Tiffany, who along with Marjorie Taylor Greene is tied for the third-highest lifetime score from ''The New American'' for an incumbent member of Congress at the end of the 117th Congress, at a whopping 97 percent.[https://thenewamerican.com/freedom-index/legislator/?search=&amp;amp;congress=&amp;amp;state=&amp;amp;party=&amp;amp;chamber=]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election, but by the end of the year she more interested in visiting [[Ukraine]] than saving [[Italy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://kalkinemedia.com/news/world-news/italys-meloni-seeks-ukraine-trip-early-next-year&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mike Lawler]] for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia, although his loyalty to Trump is questionable and he may be using law enforcement to go after conservative critics.[https://twitter.com/MattForVA/status/1603556876108578816]&lt;br /&gt;
* Congressman [[Chip Roy]], for persistently being outspoken in prioritizing denunciations of [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/dec/18/gop-rep-chip-roy-accuses-dems-using-migrants-polit/][https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/top-biden-admin-official-looked-at-me-and-lied-about-the-border-says-rep-chip-roy/ar-AA14nB1P] both the [[Biden Administration]] and halfhearted establishment Republicans (including [https://news.yahoo.com/chip-roy-why-doesnt-tillis-234153645.html Thom Tillis] and [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/chip-roy-slams-john-cornyn-for-spending-bill-vote-tired-old-swampgop/ar-AA15x1gD John Cornyn]), particularly as he emphasizes the [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/chip-roy-torches-biden-for-teaming-up-with-mayorkas-to-endanger-americans-and-dismissing-idea-of-border-visit/ar-AA14YDvv leading issue of the border crisis] and currently plays [https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/house-gop-group-vowing-retribution-on-pro-omnibus-republicans-grows/ar-AA15zn5n hardball against the omnibus] that will sink the U.S. further into the depraved depths of national debt; however, Roy does not particularly focus on [[election integrity]] nor [[Deep State]] issues.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kyrsten Sinema]], although not a true conservative, for abandoning the radical Leftist [[Democrat Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina [[Mark Robinson]] for his courage to speak against gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled that ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' should be overturned despite previously showing RINO tendencies ([[Neil Gorsuch]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Amy Coney Barrett]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalist Society]] for playing a vital role in getting ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ashley Moody]], for being the top vote-getter in [[Florida]] by a landslide of 61-39% points in her reelection as its [[Trump]]-supporting Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]]. She is also tied with Thomas P. Tiffany for for the third-highest lifetime score from ''The New American'' for an incumbent member of Congress at the end of the 117th Congress, at a whopping 97 percent.[https://thenewamerican.com/freedom-index/legislator/?search=&amp;amp;congress=&amp;amp;state=&amp;amp;party=&amp;amp;chamber=] However, she has very recently become an outspoken supporter of Kevin McCarthy for Speaker and has inappropriately compared fellow conservatives to NeverTrumpers for opposing him.[https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1605254678471618560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1605254678471618560%7Ctwgr%5E35f3025414e213f3cb43102f64215edbec7250db%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2F12%2F20%2Fmtg-torches-mccarthys-opponents-risking-gavel-no-plan-speaker%2F]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sen. [[Rick Scott]], for challenging the failed GOP Senate leadership by [[globalist]], anti-Trump [[Mitch McConnell]], although he did so too late.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, and whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives; but DeSantis failed to help [[Herschel Walker]] and thereby was [[AWOL]] as [[Dem]]s retook the [[U.S. Senate]]. He also has been incredibly disloyal to President Trump and forged alliances with [[NeverTrump]] donors in anticipation for 2024. In addition, he hogged RGA money in order to fund his 2024 war chest, to the detriment of fellow candidates.[https://nationalfile.com/republican-governors-association-builds-anti-trump-war-chest-with-ron-desantis/] He also may have resorted to cheating in order to inflate his margin of victory.[https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-accuses-ron-desantis-benefitting-voter-fraud-1769100]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Benjamin Netanyahu]], for becoming Prime Minister of Israel again and forming a conservative government of Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1917326</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1917326"/>
		<updated>2022-12-28T18:03:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;RINO of the Year 2022 shortlist. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitch McConnell_ for supporting establishment Republicans over more conservative Republicans. &lt;br /&gt;
* Mitt Romney- for critizing President Trump and other conservative Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
*Liz Cheney- For participating in the January 6 committee.&lt;br /&gt;
*Adam Kinzinger- For participating in the January 6 committee.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kevin McCarthy- For supporting establishment Republicans in the midterms and then [https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republican-kevin-mccarthy-under-fire-after-audio-shows-he-urged-trump-resign-2022-04-22/ lying about where he stands] in hopes of being elected Speaker of the House.&lt;br /&gt;
*The 54 Republican Congressmen who wore &amp;quot;Only Kevin&amp;quot; pins in anticipation of the 2023 Speaker election.&lt;br /&gt;
*Marjorie Taylor Greene- For [https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1605254678471618560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1605254678471618560%7Ctwgr%5E35f3025414e213f3cb43102f64215edbec7250db%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.breitbart.com%2Fpolitics%2F2022%2F12%2F20%2Fmtg-torches-mccarthys-opponents-risking-gavel-no-plan-speaker%2F inappropriately comparing] conservative critics of Kevin McCarthy to NeverTrumpers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron DeSantis- For his dishonest conduct in preparation for 2024. For using media sycophants to exaggerate his record as governor. For repeatedly stabbing Trump in the back behind the scenes, especially after August. For making alliances with megadonors who are known NeverTrumpers.[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/10/27/president-trump-announces-midterm-election-rallies-in-key-states-including-florida-as-democrats-abandon-the-sunshine-state/] For hogging RGA donation money in order to fund his 2024 campaign.[https://nationalfile.com/republican-governors-association-builds-anti-trump-war-chest-with-ron-desantis/] For inappropriate publicity stunts during his re-election campaign which were clearly designed to condition people for 2024.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epwnsVTM-YA][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8jz7Cwjo3c] And, if Mike Lindell's allegations are correct, rigging the results in Dade County in order to artificially boost his numbers, presumably to boost his &amp;quot;street cred&amp;quot; for 2024.[https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-accuses-ron-desantis-benefitting-voter-fraud-1769100]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pete Ricketts- For greenlighting the diversion of RGA funds to support Ron DeSantis' 2024 campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
*Doug Ducey- See above. Also, he blatantly lied to Kari Lake when he said he would use RGA money to support her campaign, which he didn't.[https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2022/08/07/gov-doug-ducey-lying-kari-lake-arizona/10258637002/][https://www.transparencyusa.org/az/donor/republican-governors-association-federal/donations][https://www.transparencyusa.org/fl/donor/republican-governors-association-federal/donations]&lt;br /&gt;
*Glenn Youngkin- For being the Republican establishment's back-up plan in case Ron DeSantis doesn't go anywhere for 2024. Also, if Matt Strickland's allegations are correct, for collaborating with corrupt law enforcement officials to persecute conservative critics of his policies.[https://twitter.com/MattForVA/status/1603059715155849216][https://twitter.com/MattForVA/status/1603556876108578816]&lt;br /&gt;
*John Bolton- For unofficially announcing that he's running against Trump in 2024.[https://art19.com/shows/john-solomon-reports/episodes/f79383bb-fb15-409d-a5b2-ee0f76c013b2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Asa Hutchinson- See above.[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/hutchinson-says-ll-decide-2024-run-early-year-trump-accelerated-everyo-rcna62289]&lt;br /&gt;
*Any GOP Senator or Congressman who voted to arm or give money to Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
*Any GOP Senator or Congressman who votes on the omnibus bill ([https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-republican-senators-who-voted-pass-1-7-trillion-omnibus-bill-1769176 here they are]!).&lt;br /&gt;
*Josh Mandel- For his dishonest conduct during the Ohio Senate primary, falsely labeling JD Vance as a NeverTrumper while simultaneously trying to sell intervention in Ukraine as a MAGA position.[https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1506319090130067467]&lt;br /&gt;
*Dr. Oz- Do I even need to explain this one?&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pompeo- For resorting to blatantly xenophibic rhetoric to discredit Dr. Oz while simultaneously backing another RINO candidate in the same race.[https://nypost.com/2022/05/06/mike-pompeo-calls-senate-wannabe-dr-oz-potential-security-threat/]&lt;br /&gt;
*Kathy Barnette- For her dishonest conduct during the Pennsylvania Senate primary, basically lying about everything to cover up her leftist past.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mo Brooks- For throwing a temper tantrum after Trump withdrew his endorsement in the Alabama Senate race, and going full [[Joe Walsh]] on him.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ronna Romney McDaniel- For supporting establishment Republicans in the midterms.&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Waltz- For his exceptionally hawkish rhetoric on China and Russia in the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael McCaul- For basically calling Tucker Carlson a Russian agent.[https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-cries-slander-after-gop-congressman-calls-his-show-organ-of-russian-disinformation/]&lt;br /&gt;
*Lindsey Graham- For advocating Vladimir Putin's assassination and acting like that's not an escalation of the crisis in Ukraine at all.[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-lindsey-graham-defends-calling-russians-assassinate-putin-rcna18703]&lt;br /&gt;
*Sean Hannity- See above.[https://www.businessinsider.com/sean-hannity-suggests-putin-be-assassinated-nato-bomb-russian-convoy-2022-3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Geoff Duncan- For [https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/georgia-runoff-election-walker-warnock-geoff-duncan openly discouraging] GOP voters from voting for Herschel Walker in the Georgia Senate runoff, possibly costing him enough votes to throw the election to radical leftist Raphael Warnock.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for opposing Republicans and supporting Democrats.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1915147</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1915147"/>
		<updated>2022-12-22T20:36:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Supreme Court  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I took down Kemp. Also, if we're going to have Youngkin up there, we might as well have [[Tulsi Gabbard]]. They're [[YGL]] alum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, November 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I favor either Zeldin or Youngkin for Conservative of the Year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of them follow a more reasonable path of conservatism as opposed to the excesses of populist demagoguery demonstrated by the rest of the contenders. Youngkin and Zeldin have made strong Republican inroads in blue states and symbolize the practical future of the GOP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 19:24, November 23, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is definition of populist demagoguery? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:27, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sam Alito wins, no question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
Our article on [[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]] rightly says (with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1869184 Mr. Schlafly's endorsement], might I add), '''''Dobbs was the biggest victory for the [[pro-life]] and conservative legal movements in over 50 years.''''' It ended the mass slaughter of innocent unborn life. Alito has saved millions of unborn lives. He delivered the largest conservative victory in over 50 years. While he did it with some assistance from [[Donald Trump]], he did not appoint any SCOTUS justices this year. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:13, November 26, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas both deserve to win this year. After disappointment of Kansas, Kentucky, Montana and Michigan referendums on abortion. Conservatives need to push back and celebrate those who overturn evil Roe v Wade. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:24, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that [[Justice Alito]] alone should get the title. Yes, [[Justice Thomas]] wrote a stellar concurring opinion, but he was unable to persuade a single other justice to join it. Only Justice Alito was able to craft an opinion that got 5 votes to stop legalized [[murder]]. ''[[Conservative of the Year]]'' is not an award for the most Conservative person that year. If this were the case, how did President [[Donald Trump]] win the award? He is a [[Conservative]], but he is not the '''most''' conservative person. For example, he supports part of the [[homosexual agenda]]. It is for the person who gets the most Conservative ''results'' that year. This year, that man is indisputably Justice Samuel Alito. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 13:37, December 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason why I add Justice Thomas because he said that he would target [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] next. This is something that conservatives should all support. They need to push back after congress codify Same sex marriage --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:40, December 9, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But that is something in the future, not this year. When he, by the grace of God, succeeds, ''then'' we ca talk about awarding him the title of [[Conservative of the Year]]. But not in 2022. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:28, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Atleast Justice Thomas has courage to talk about it, it rare for conservatives today to push back against homosexual agendas --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 17:52, December 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A problem with picking a [[Supreme Court]] Justice now is that [[conservative populism]] is the political movement of the year, and justices don't really fit that mold.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:45, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three Frontrunners  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I think that Ron DeSantis, Justice Alito, and Elon Musk are the three obvious frontrunners. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:45, December 14, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:52, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Elon Musk is a libertarian and not a conservative. There is a lot of pro-Trump and anti-Desantis sentiments at the wiki so DeSantis is out. Both Conservative SCOTUS judges minus Roberts or Rand Paul make sense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Doug MacGregor appeared on Russia Today and he takes Russia's position in the Russia-Ukraine War. I will explain why I am against MacGregor being the conservative of the year. George Washington said &amp;quot;It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.&amp;quot; I take the position that the USA should not take any position in the Russia-Ukraine War as both sides are corrupt/authoritarian and Putin is hated by some of our allies (For example, the UK has met their NATO obligations so I would consider the UK to be an ally and not merely a protectorate. Also, Poland will raise defence spending to the equivalent of 5% of GDP, ruling party chairman Jarosław Kaczyński has announced so they are an ally and not a protectorate.) I argue that the Europeans who have a population of 446.8 million should handle the Ukraine issue since it is in their backyard. In addition, Europe has been slackers for decades in terms of their defense. After the dust settles, given the threat of China that will exist for awhile (unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, their increasing agression in the China Sea, exporting of authoritarian systems/technology to other countries and their threats against Taiwan), it makes sense for the USA to have friendlier relations with Russia after the Russia-Ukraine War settles. China poses a temporary threat as it has the worst aging population problem in the world and a ton of debt so their economy is headed for trouble. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:20, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Europeans can't handle the Ukraine war cause the United States started the war, and both EU &amp;amp; NATO take orders from the United States. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::All your Ukrainian troll bots just got banned from [[Twitter]], so you're going to need new talking points. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I think the [[Twitter files]], especially those released today, dispels the notion that MacGregor &amp;quot;takes Russia's position&amp;quot; or is a Putin stooge, and demonstrates the extent of [[deep state]] and mass media [[brainwashing]] infiltrating the conservative movement and even into Conservedia. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:11, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This makes no sense: you begin quoting [[George Washington]], &amp;quot;It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.&amp;quot; Then proceed to say how sacred and holy the NATO alliance is with Britain, Poland and others. Doug MacGregor holds up the words of Washington, not Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:44, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
::::Why would DeSantis be out? Just because some people prefer him over Trump? He has had an extraordinary year as Governor of Florida, pushing Conservative legislation, such as parental rights in schools, despite strong backlash from the Left and from the media. As for Musk, as stated above, this is not about who is the most Conservative, which he is clearly not, but about who has been the most successful or effective at pushing Conservatism and / or resisting Leftism. I agree that Justice Alito should probably be the Conservative of the Year, with DeSantis as the 1st Runner-Up and Musk as the 2nd Runner-Up. Also, I will be creating the RINO of the Year, 2022 page soon. Thanks!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:00, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Thanks. I'll be posting my opinions there as well.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:44, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Read: [[Desantisites]].  But if push comes to shove and DeSantis runs against Biden, I would vote for DeSantis. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:03, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I agree that some of DeSantis's supporters are establishment / RINO Republicans. However, DeSantis has had many Conservative accomplishments this year. Examples: Florida Parental Rights in Education Act; House Bill 395, which mandates that schools teach about the oppression of Communism; SB 1054, which requires high school students to take a financial literacy course, making Florida the largest state to do so; stood up to Fauci / vaccine supporters on many occasions; decided against ordering COVID vaccines for children younger than 5 years old, making Florida the only state not to preorder vaccines for young children; signed a pro-Republican house map, resulting in 4 additional Republicans in the House; won re-election in a historic landslide, winning the traditionally Democratic strongholds of Miami-Beach County, Osceola County, and Palm Beach County.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:05, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I agree with Alito and Musk being in the top two, but would not rank DeSantis that high.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:31, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I personally would rank DeSantis high for ''RINO'' of the Year. What do you think, Andy?--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 01:25, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Since Alito wrote the majority opinion in an assertive manner that overturned Roe vs. Wade, I think he should win. Musk is only partially conservative since he ia a libertarian and not a conservative. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:26, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Colonel Doug MacGregor is a more important figure than I thought. He not only wants the USA to take a wiser approach to the Russia-Ukraine War, but he also wants to restructure the USA military and reorder its priorities/strategies in way that will that would be very good reforms (see: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIIM043x_FI Odessa falls and Ukraine becomes a landlocked country -  Colonel Doug MacGregor]). But the sad, cold, hard reality is that he is very much in the minority as far as influential people and he will not be listened to in the foreseeable future. Maybe the USA will learn from its foreign policy and military strategy mistakes sooner rather than later, but I would not count on it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:04, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He's off the Twitter blacklist. People can link to him now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:06, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And the Ukro troll bots have been reined in - the [[propaganda]] mess created by CIA/NATO has been slapped down. Mass brainwashing has been curbed, for a while , at least. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:09, December 17, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::My only thinking on the matter is, we should not reward someone who supports the insane Ukraine war policy, which then either favors a judge (or judges) or an outspoken critic of the insanity. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:09, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 reasons why Elon Musk should not be conservative of the year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are 5 reasons why Elon Musk should not be conservative of year:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. On July 14, 2018, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;To be clear, I am not a conservative.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1018265614295523328?lang=en]  Are we to believe that he became a conservative in the last 4 years? I don't think so. And he certainly hasn't called himself a conservative in the last 4 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Elon Musk does not believe in the existence of God because he is an [[agnosticism|agnostic]]. Here is a video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv0bx8XXquQ Elon Musk is an agnostic]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. In 2017, Elon Musk [https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/06/elon-musk-breaks-up-with-amber-heard-report-says/ broke up] with his bisexual, liberal girlfriend Amber Heard who is a Hollywood actress. Amber Heard said, &amp;quot;[https://ffrf.org/ftod-cr/item/26072-amber-heard I will never be a religious person]&amp;quot;. In 2018, Elon Musk [https://people.com/movies/amber-heard-on-elon-musk-relationship/ broke up] with Amber Heard a second time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. On November 7, 2022, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;And I’m open to the idea of voting Democrat again in the future.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589730392420278272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1589730392420278272%7Ctwgr%5E268fdef007e7e8a5012c2632f0a25ff1f8a10e53%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2022%2F12%2F10%2Fbusiness%2Fmedia%2Felon-musk-politics-twitter.html]  Does any person believe that the Democrats are largely going to be conservatives in Elon Musk's lifetime? I very much doubt Musk believes that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. On November 7, 2022, Elon Musk said, &amp;quot;I am neither conventionally right nor left, but I agree with your point.&amp;quot;[https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1596083744728928257] Why would Conservapedia pick someone who is not even on the right side of the political spectrum to be conservative of the year? Conservapedians might was well pick the political moderate Mitch McConnell to be the conservative of the year if they are going to pick a moderate to be the conservative of the year. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:06, December 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
:Agreed. It's my observation that &amp;quot;Conservative of the Year&amp;quot; has increasingly become less about exemplifications of consistent traditional conservative principles grounded in Judeo-Christian morality, and instead views whatever greatest perceived contemporary obstacle against the neo-Marxist left, whether authentic or expedient, as the ''de jure'' figurehead for the conservative movement's future. Given that Musk is known as a flip-flopping, self-admittedly promiscuous, clout-obsessed, opportunistic, [https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-tesla-abortions-roe-v-wade-marco-rubio-2022-5?op=1 abortion-financing], [https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/not-good-elon-musks-satanic-outfit-befuddles-conservatives%E2%80%94who-now-worry-they-championed-the-anti-christ/ar-AA13CsxA Satanism-promoting], [https://nypost.com/2022/04/29/elon-musk-says-woke-progressive-extremists-make-him-look-right-wing/ self-described] '''[[liberal]]''', I think his record speaks for itself. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(Exodus 23:2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 23:30, December 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geopolitician's two sense==&lt;br /&gt;
Alright, time to (finally) participate in a Conservative of the Year discussion after nearly six years of being a member of this wiki. Stay tuned, I'm compiling my opinions now and I've got a lot of catching up to do.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 23:49, December 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Here we go.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Samuel Alito- Yes. Writing the majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, would make him a candidate for Conservative of the Decade, much less Conservative of the Year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Elon Musk- Ugh. He's such a contrarian. One moment he's a libertarian, another moment he's advocating that we be more like the CCP. And then take into account him backing DeSantis for 2024, while for some odd reason not voting at all in the midterms. I'm leaning toward a no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Douglas MacGregor- Yes. He may or may not be a conservative outside of foreign policy, but his hardline stance against the Ukraine war is highly commendable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ashley Moody- No. Getting re-elected by a large margin is not noteworthy in and of itself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ron DeSantis- NO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Donald Trump- Yes, but not because of his record in the midterms. That's peanuts compared to being persecuted by the Deep State for purely political reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Marjorie Taylor Greene- A few days ago I would've been a yes, but her recent comments comparing opponents of Kevin McCarthy to NeverTrumpers was way out of line. For this reason I'm now a no.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Clarence Thomas- Yes, although he is clearly overshadowed by Alito on the Roe v. Wade overturn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Neil Gorsuch- Yes, for proving me wrong. I feared he would capitulate and vote to keep Roe v. Wade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Brett Kavanaugh- Yes, see above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Amy Coney Barrett- Yes, see above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Federalist Society- No. They have a history of recommending judges who turn out to be flakes. The fact that their picks for SCOTUS happened to vote the right way on overturning Roe v. Wade doesn't change that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rick Scott- No. He may have challenged McConnell, but he did it once it was too late to change the outcome of the midterms. He should've stood up to McConnell much earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Dinesh D'Souza- Yes. The release of 2,000 Mules was a significant event for conservatism in 2022, even if you don't agree with everything it says.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rand Paul- Yes. His hardline stance against both COVID tyranny and the Ukraine war make him a top candidate in my book. He's also my first choice for Trump's running mate in 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Lee Zeldin- Yes. Not a fan of him, but his near-win in New York cannot be ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mark Robinson- No. His statements against gay marriage didn't get enough national attention make him competitive with some of the other choices on the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Canadian Freedom Convoy Protestors- Yes, for obvious reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*JD Vance- Yes. From best-selling author to subject of Academy Award-nominated movie to Senator, this guy is going places. Also, he's solid on most of the major issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Joe Lombardo- Yes. He was the only Republican to flip a governorship this year, and he did it in a state that hasn't voted GOP in a presidential election in nearly 20 years. That's significant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Greg Abbott- Yes. I may not be the biggest fan of him, but his confrontation with Beto O'Rourke at that press conference on the Uvalde shooting cannot be ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Viktor Orban- Yes. The Deep State and their allies in Poland and Ukraine tried to oust him this year over his stances on the Ukraine war, but he survived. That alone makes him a top contender in my book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Kari Lake- Yes. She got played dirty by the GOP Establishment and quite possibly the Arizonan Department of State. She's one of my top choices for Trump's VP pick in 2024. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Harriet Hageman- Yes, because of how significant of a figure her opponent was.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ron Johnson- No. His actions on January 6 show that he is nothing more than an opportunist, and that his recent &amp;quot;maverick&amp;quot; political moves likely were calculated and insincere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Marco Rubio- No. He's highly overrated and I personally believe he should be in prison for helping Obama decieve the world into believing he was arming moderate rebels in Libya and Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mike Lawler- I don't know who he is, so I'll abstain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Giorgia Meloni- No. She almost immediately sold out to the Russophobic warmongers once elected, which is a disqualifier in my book.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Kris Kobach- I don't know the details of his political comeback, so I'll abstain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Glenn Youngkin, Right now I'm leaning toward a no. Not only is he possibly challenging Trump in 2024 but he is also now facing allegations of collaborating with corrupt law enforcement officials to persecute conservative critics of his policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Kyrsten Sinema- No. She's not going at the DNC hard like Tulsi Gabbard did when she left the party earlier this year. In fact, I would replace Sinema with Gabbard on this list.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 00:27, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My input ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ron Johnson? Sure, since his blunt style and streak of victory over the left leaves a good legacy for the conservative movement to emulate? &amp;quot;D.C. prisoners&amp;quot;? A hard no, because a) it's not even properly clarified specifically who (all of them, or some?), b) some probably are the violent criminals rather than peaceful protesters, and c) it's not a good example to hastily martyr loosely defined collectives simply because they are victims of one specific oppressor without analyzing the details of the individuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justices Alito and Thomas? Sounds fair. Musk? No, as I've explained above in response to User:Conservative's similar criticisms of him. MacGregor? No, since he's a proponent of the [[great replacement hoax]], which was invented by far-left progressives (conservationist Madison Grant and KKK [[Exalted Cyclops]] [[Lothrop Stoddard]]) and a prominent white supremacist canard. I even more strongly object to Orbán, since [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/24/viktor-orban-against-race-mixing-europe-hungary his horrendous demagoguery against &amp;quot;race-mixing&amp;quot;] makes him sound more like a far-left Nazi (since, you know, National Socialists are on the political left) than any serious traditional right-winger. Racism is a form of socialism (since a &amp;quot;race&amp;quot; can be considered a social group), and therefore Orbán's racism technically means he's a socialist rather than a true right-winger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump? No, since the large majority of his political activity this year reflects a desire to expediently boost his future prospects (essentially using the conservative movement to selfishly help himself) magnitudes more than representing a selfless devotion to the conservative movement. Greene? ...no, since she has a history of embarrassing gaffes sometimes to Biden levels, and thus is not an ideal figurehead for the movement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moody, Vance, Meloni, Kobach, Hageman, Lombardo, Rubio, and Lawler aren't notable ''merely'' for winning elections, IMO. For one, Moody and Rubio were basically guaranteed to win since Florida in general moved sharply to the right primarily due to DeSantis's coattails, and also because of drastically increasing pro-GOP shifts in Miami-Dade. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(Exodus 23:2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 15:18, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(edit conflict) Appreciate your candor.  Please tell us what you really think!  That's what makes this debate fun and enlightening.  I don't pretend to have the answer, and we still have a few days.&lt;br /&gt;
:As feedback, I think the Supreme Court Justices are not populist enough in a populist year.  Also, many of their rulings in favor of the [[Deep State]] and even deferring to the Fulton County prosecutor(!!) were harmful.  Sen. [[Ron Johnson]] deserves more credit than he gets, and he hit all the right notes all year long.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:29, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Supreme Court  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that the 5 Supreme Court Justice who voted to strike down Roe v. Wade should be Conservative of the Year, rather than just Justice Alito, as Justice Alito alone could not have overturned Roe v. Wade. Also, the Supreme Court had other conservative victories such as on religious liberty and gun rights where the 5 justices sided with the conservative position.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:36, December 22, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1914846</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1914846"/>
		<updated>2022-12-21T18:59:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: Created page with &amp;quot;RINO of the Year 2022 shortlist. Please add to the list!   * Mitch McConnell, for supporting establishment Republicans over more conservative Republicans.  * Mitt Romney, for...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;RINO of the Year 2022 shortlist. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Mitch McConnell, for supporting establishment Republicans over more conservative Republicans. &lt;br /&gt;
* Mitt Romney, for critizing President Trump and other conservative Republicans.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1913004</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1913004"/>
		<updated>2022-12-18T16:32:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Samuel Alito]] for writing the bold and assertive majority opinion for overturning ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elon Musk]], [[free speech]] advocate; although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left, for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]], and for unblocking former President Trump and many conservative pages like [[Babylon Bee]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ashley Moody]], for being the top vote-getter in [[Florida]] by a landslide of 61-39% points in her reelection as its [[Trump]]-supporting Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning evil ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled that Roe vs. Wade should be overturned ([[Samuel Alito]], [[Clarence Thomas]], [[Neil Gorsuch]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Amy Coney Barrett]]). &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalist Society]] for playing a vital role in getting Roe vs. Wade overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dinesh D'Souza]] for producing [[2000 Mules]] movie, and for generously donating to the families brutalized by the [[Leftist]]'s [[DC Gulag]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rand Paul]], for voting against the [[Ukraine aid]] scam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.ph/FsPEZ#selection-731.0-963.226&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina [[Mark Robinson]] for his courage to speak against gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Freedom Convoy|2022 Canadian Freedom Convoy]] protesters for their standing against Trudeau totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his big victory in the Hungarian election, and for his moderate stance on Ukraine war.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kari Lake]], [[Arizona]] gubernatorial candidate for challenging naked [[Democrat election fraud]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harriet Hageman]] for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mike Lawler]] for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kris Kobach]] for winning as Attorney General of Kansas, in the political comeback of the year&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for For his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kyrsten Sinema]], although not a true Conservative, for abandoning the radical Leftist [[Democrat Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1913003</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1913003"/>
		<updated>2022-12-18T16:32:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Samuel Alito]] for writing the bold and assertive majority opinion for overturning ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elon Musk]], [[free speech]] advocate; although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left, for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]], and for unblocking former President Trump and many conservative pages like [[Babylon Bee]]. &lt;br /&gt;
 *Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ashley Moody]], for being the top vote-getter in [[Florida]] by a landslide of 61-39% points in her reelection as its [[Trump]]-supporting Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning evil ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled that Roe vs. Wade should be overturned ([[Samuel Alito]], [[Clarence Thomas]], [[Neil Gorsuch]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Amy Coney Barrett]]). &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalist Society]] for playing a vital role in getting Roe vs. Wade overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dinesh D'Souza]] for producing [[2000 Mules]] movie, and for generously donating to the families brutalized by the [[Leftist]]'s [[DC Gulag]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rand Paul]], for voting against the [[Ukraine aid]] scam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.ph/FsPEZ#selection-731.0-963.226&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina [[Mark Robinson]] for his courage to speak against gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Freedom Convoy|2022 Canadian Freedom Convoy]] protesters for their standing against Trudeau totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his big victory in the Hungarian election, and for his moderate stance on Ukraine war.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kari Lake]], [[Arizona]] gubernatorial candidate for challenging naked [[Democrat election fraud]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harriet Hageman]] for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mike Lawler]] for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kris Kobach]] for winning as Attorney General of Kansas, in the political comeback of the year&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for For his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kyrsten Sinema]], although not a true Conservative, for abandoning the radical Leftist [[Democrat Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912385</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912385"/>
		<updated>2022-12-15T21:06:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Three Frontrunners */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:50, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I took down Kemp. Also, if we're going to have Youngkin up there, we might as well have [[Tulsi Gabbard]]. They're [[YGL]] alum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, November 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I favor either Zeldin or Youngkin for Conservative of the Year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of them follow a more reasonable path of conservatism as opposed to the excesses of populist demagoguery demonstrated by the rest of the contenders. Youngkin and Zeldin have made strong Republican inroads in blue states and symbolize the practical future of the GOP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 19:24, November 23, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is definition of populist demagoguery? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:27, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sam Alito wins, no question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
Our article on [[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]] rightly says (with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1869184 Mr. Schlafly's endorsement], might I add), '''''Dobbs was the biggest victory for the [[pro-life]] and conservative legal movements in over 50 years.''''' It ended the mass slaughter of innocent unborn life. Alito has saved millions of unborn lives. He delivered the largest conservative victory in over 50 years. While he did it with some assistance from [[Donald Trump]], he did not appoint any SCOTUS justices this year. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:13, November 26, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas both deserve to win this year. After disappointment of Kansas, Kentucky, Montana and Michigan referendums on abortion. Conservatives need to push back and celebrate those who overturn evil Roe v Wade. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:24, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that [[Justice Alito]] alone should get the title. Yes, [[Justice Thomas]] wrote a stellar concurring opinion, but he was unable to persuade a single other justice to join it. Only Justice Alito was able to craft an opinion that got 5 votes to stop legalized [[murder]]. ''[[Conservative of the Year]]'' is not an award for the most Conservative person that year. If this were the case, how did President [[Donald Trump]] win the award? He is a [[Conservative]], but he is not the '''most''' conservative person. For example, he supports part of the [[homosexual agenda]]. It is for the person who gets the most Conservative ''results'' that year. This year, that man is indisputably Justice Samuel Alito. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 13:37, December 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason why I add Justice Thomas because he said that he would target [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] next. This is something that conservatives should all support. They need to push back after congress codify Same sex marriage --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:40, December 9, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But that is something in the future, not this year. When he, by the grace of God, succeeds, ''then'' we ca talk about awarding him the title of [[Conservative of the Year]]. But not in 2022. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:28, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three Frontrunners  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I think that Ron DeSantis, Justice Alito, and Elon Musk are the three obvious frontrunners. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:45, December 14, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:52, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Elon Musk is a libertarian and not a conservative. There is a lot of pro-Trump and anti-Desantis sentiments at the wiki so DeSantis is out. Both Conservative SCOTUS judges minus Roberts or Rand Paul make sense. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Doug MacGregor appeared on Russia Today and he takes Russia's position in the Russia-Ukraine War. I will explain why I am against MacGregor being the conservative of the year. George Washington said &amp;quot;It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.&amp;quot; I take the position that the USA should not take any position in the Russia-Ukraine War as both sides are corrupt/authoritarian and Putin is hated by some of our allies (For example, the UK has met their NATO obligations so I would consider the UK to be an ally and not merely a protectorate. Also, Poland will raise defence spending to the equivalent of 5% of GDP, ruling party chairman Jarosław Kaczyński has announced so they are an ally and not a protectorate.) I argue that the Europeans who have a population of 446.8 million should handle the Ukraine issue since it is in their backyard. In addition, Europe has been slackers for decades in terms of their defense. After the dust settles, given the threat of China that will exist for awhile (unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, their increasing agression in the China Sea, exporting of authoritarian systems/technology to other countries and their threats against Taiwan), it makes sense for the USA to have friendlier relations with Russia after the Russia-Ukraine War settles. China poses a temporary threat as it has the worst aging population problem in the world and a ton of debt so their economy is headed for trouble. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:20, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why would DeSantis be out? Just because some people prefer him over Trump? He has had an extraordinary year as Governor of Florida, pushing Conservative legislation, such as parental rights in schools, despite strong backlash from the Left and from the media. As for Musk, as stated above, this is not about who is the most Conservative, which he is clearly not, but about who has been the most successful or effective at pushing Conservatism and / or resisting Leftism. I agree that Justice Alito should probably be the Conservative of the Year, with DeSantis as the 1st Runner-Up and Musk as the 2nd Runner-Up. Also, I will be creating the RINO of the Year, 2022 page soon. Thanks!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:00, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Read: [[Desantisites]].  But if push comes to shove and DeSantis runs against Biden, I would vote for DeSantis. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:03, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I agree that some of DeSantis's supporters are establishment / RINO Republicans. However, DeSantis has had many Conservative accomplishments this year. Examples: Florida Parental Rights in Education Act; House Bill 395, which mandates that schools teach about the oppression of Communism; SB 1054, which requires high school students to take a financial literacy course, making Florida the largest state to do so; stood up to Fauci / vaccine supporters on many occasions; decided against ordering COVID vaccines for children younger than 5 years old, making Florida the only state not to preorder vaccines for young children; signed a pro-Republican house map, resulting in 4 additional Republicans in the House; won re-election in a historic landslide, winning the traditionally Democratic strongholds of Miami-Beach County, Osceola County, and Palm Beach County.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:05, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912384</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912384"/>
		<updated>2022-12-15T21:05:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Three Frontrunners */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:50, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I took down Kemp. Also, if we're going to have Youngkin up there, we might as well have [[Tulsi Gabbard]]. They're [[YGL]] alum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, November 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I favor either Zeldin or Youngkin for Conservative of the Year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of them follow a more reasonable path of conservatism as opposed to the excesses of populist demagoguery demonstrated by the rest of the contenders. Youngkin and Zeldin have made strong Republican inroads in blue states and symbolize the practical future of the GOP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 19:24, November 23, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is definition of populist demagoguery? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:27, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sam Alito wins, no question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
Our article on [[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]] rightly says (with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1869184 Mr. Schlafly's endorsement], might I add), '''''Dobbs was the biggest victory for the [[pro-life]] and conservative legal movements in over 50 years.''''' It ended the mass slaughter of innocent unborn life. Alito has saved millions of unborn lives. He delivered the largest conservative victory in over 50 years. While he did it with some assistance from [[Donald Trump]], he did not appoint any SCOTUS justices this year. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:13, November 26, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas both deserve to win this year. After disappointment of Kansas, Kentucky, Montana and Michigan referendums on abortion. Conservatives need to push back and celebrate those who overturn evil Roe v Wade. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:24, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that [[Justice Alito]] alone should get the title. Yes, [[Justice Thomas]] wrote a stellar concurring opinion, but he was unable to persuade a single other justice to join it. Only Justice Alito was able to craft an opinion that got 5 votes to stop legalized [[murder]]. ''[[Conservative of the Year]]'' is not an award for the most Conservative person that year. If this were the case, how did President [[Donald Trump]] win the award? He is a [[Conservative]], but he is not the '''most''' conservative person. For example, he supports part of the [[homosexual agenda]]. It is for the person who gets the most Conservative ''results'' that year. This year, that man is indisputably Justice Samuel Alito. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 13:37, December 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason why I add Justice Thomas because he said that he would target [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] next. This is something that conservatives should all support. They need to push back after congress codify Same sex marriage --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:40, December 9, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But that is something in the future, not this year. When he, by the grace of God, succeeds, ''then'' we ca talk about awarding him the title of [[Conservative of the Year]]. But not in 2022. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:28, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three Frontrunners  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I think that Ron DeSantis, Justice Alito, and Elon Musk are the three obvious frontrunners. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:45, December 14, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:52, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Elon Musk is a libertarian and not a conservative. There is a lot of pro-Trump and anti-Desantis sentiments at the wiki so DeSantis is out. Both Conservative SCOTUS judges minus Roberts or Rand Paul make sense. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Doug MacGregor appeared on Russia Today and he takes Russia's position in the Russia-Ukraine War. I will explain why I am against MacGregor being the conservative of the year. George Washington said &amp;quot;It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.&amp;quot; I take the position that the USA should not take any position in the Russia-Ukraine War as both sides are corrupt/authoritarian and Putin is hated by some of our allies (For example, the UK has met their NATO obligations so I would consider the UK to be an ally and not merely a protectorate. Also, Poland will raise defence spending to the equivalent of 5% of GDP, ruling party chairman Jarosław Kaczyński has announced so they are an ally and not a protectorate.) I argue that the Europeans who have a population of 446.8 million should handle the Ukraine issue since it is in their backyard. In addition, Europe has been slackers for decades in terms of their defense. After the dust settles, given the threat of China that will exist for awhile (unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, their increasing agression in the China Sea, exporting of authoritarian systems/technology to other countries and their threats against Taiwan), it makes sense for the USA to have friendlier relations with Russia after the Russia-Ukraine War settles. China poses a temporary threat as it has the worst aging population problem in the world and a ton of debt so their economy is headed for trouble. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:20, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why would DeSantis be out? Just because some people prefer him over Trump? He has had an extraordinary year as Governor of Florida, pushing Conservative legislation, such as parental rights in schools, despite strong backlash from the Left and from the media. As for Musk, as stated above, this is not about who is the most Conservative, which he is clearly not, but about who has been the most successful or effective at pushing Conservatism and / or resisting Leftism. I agree that Justice Alito should probably be the Conservative of the Year, with DeSantis as the 1st Runner-Up and Musk as the 2nd Runner-Up. Also, I will be creating the RINO of the Year, 2022 page soon. Thanks!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:00, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Read: [[Desantisites]].  But if push comes to shove and DeSantis runs against Biden, I would vote for DeSantis. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:03, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I agree that some of DeSantis's supporters are establishment / RINO Republicans. However, DeSantis has had many Conservative accomplishments this year. Examples: Florida Parental Rights in Education Act; House Bill 395, which mandates that schools teach about the oppression of Communism; SB 1054, which requires high school students to take a financial literacy course, making Florida the largest state to so; stood up to Fauci / vaccine supporters on many occasions; decided against ordering COVID vaccines for children younger than 5 years old, making Florida the only state not to preorder vaccines for young children; signed a pro-Republican house map, resulting in 4 additional Republicans in the House; won re-election in a historic landslide, winning the traditionally Democratic strongholds of Miami-Beach County, Osceola County, and Palm Beach County.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:05, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912341</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912341"/>
		<updated>2022-12-15T20:00:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Three Frontrunners */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:50, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I took down Kemp. Also, if we're going to have Youngkin up there, we might as well have [[Tulsi Gabbard]]. They're [[YGL]] alum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, November 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I favor either Zeldin or Youngkin for Conservative of the Year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of them follow a more reasonable path of conservatism as opposed to the excesses of populist demagoguery demonstrated by the rest of the contenders. Youngkin and Zeldin have made strong Republican inroads in blue states and symbolize the practical future of the GOP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 19:24, November 23, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is definition of populist demagoguery? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:27, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sam Alito wins, no question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
Our article on [[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]] rightly says (with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1869184 Mr. Schlafly's endorsement], might I add), '''''Dobbs was the biggest victory for the [[pro-life]] and conservative legal movements in over 50 years.''''' It ended the mass slaughter of innocent unborn life. Alito has saved millions of unborn lives. He delivered the largest conservative victory in over 50 years. While he did it with some assistance from [[Donald Trump]], he did not appoint any SCOTUS justices this year. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:13, November 26, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas both deserve to win this year. After disappointment of Kansas, Kentucky, Montana and Michigan referendums on abortion. Conservatives need to push back and celebrate those who overturn evil Roe v Wade. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:24, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that [[Justice Alito]] alone should get the title. Yes, [[Justice Thomas]] wrote a stellar concurring opinion, but he was unable to persuade a single other justice to join it. Only Justice Alito was able to craft an opinion that got 5 votes to stop legalized [[murder]]. ''[[Conservative of the Year]]'' is not an award for the most Conservative person that year. If this were the case, how did President [[Donald Trump]] win the award? He is a [[Conservative]], but he is not the '''most''' conservative person. For example, he supports part of the [[homosexual agenda]]. It is for the person who gets the most Conservative ''results'' that year. This year, that man is indisputably Justice Samuel Alito. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 13:37, December 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason why I add Justice Thomas because he said that he would target [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] next. This is something that conservatives should all support. They need to push back after congress codify Same sex marriage --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:40, December 9, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But that is something in the future, not this year. When he, by the grace of God, succeeds, ''then'' we ca talk about awarding him the title of [[Conservative of the Year]]. But not in 2022. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 11:28, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three Frontrunners  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I think that Ron DeSantis, Justice Alito, and Elon Musk are the three obvious frontrunners. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:45, December 14, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I like the collective conservative members of the Supreme Court (minus Roberts and possibly whoever), Doug MacGregor for his courage against prevailing headwinds, and Rand Paul for a variety of reasons (Fauci, Ukraine, etc.). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:52, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Elon Musk is a libertarian and not a conservative. There is a lot of pro-Trump and anti-Desantis sentiments at the wiki so DeSantis is out. Both Conservative SCOTUS judges minus Roberts or Rand Paul make sense. &lt;br /&gt;
:::Doug MacGregor appeared on Russia Today and he takes Russia's position in the Russia-Ukraine War. I will explain why I am against MacGregor being the conservative of the year. George Washington said &amp;quot;It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.&amp;quot; I take the position that the USA should not take any position in the Russia-Ukraine War as both sides are corrupt/authoritarian and Putin is hated by some of our allies (For example, the UK has met their NATO obligations so I would consider the UK to be an ally and not merely a protectorate. Also, Poland will raise defence spending to the equivalent of 5% of GDP, ruling party chairman Jarosław Kaczyński has announced so they are an ally and not a protectorate.) I argue that the Europeans who have a population of 446.8 million should handle the Ukraine issue since it is in their backyard. In addition, Europe has been slackers for decades in terms of their defense. After the dust settles, given the threat of China that will exist for awhile (unfair trade practices, intellectual property theft, their increasing agression in the China Sea, exporting of authoritarian systems/technology to other countries and their threats against Taiwan), it makes sense for the USA to have friendlier relations with Russia after the Russia-Ukraine War settles. China poses a temporary threat as it has the worst aging population problem in the world and a ton of debt so their economy is headed for trouble. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:20, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why would DeSantis be out? Just because some people prefer him over Trump? He has had an extraordinary year as Governor of Florida, pushing Conservative legislation, such as parental rights in schools, despite strong backlash from the Left and from the media. As for Musk, as stated above, this is not about who is the most Conservative, which he is clearly not, but about who has been the most successful or effective at pushing Conservatism and / or resisting Leftism. I agree that Justice Alito should probably be the Conservative of the Year, with DeSantis as the 1st Runner-Up and Musk as the 2nd Runner-Up. Also, I will be creating the RINO of the Year, 2022 page soon. Thanks!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:00, December 15, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912058</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1912058"/>
		<updated>2022-12-15T02:45:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Three Frontrunners  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I took down Kemp. Also, if we're going to have Youngkin up there, we might as well have [[Tulsi Gabbard]]. They're [[YGL]] alum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, November 21, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I favor either Zeldin or Youngkin for Conservative of the Year ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of them follow a more reasonable path of conservatism as opposed to the excesses of populist demagoguery demonstrated by the rest of the contenders. Youngkin and Zeldin have made strong Republican inroads in blue states and symbolize the practical future of the GOP. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 19:24, November 23, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is definition of populist demagoguery? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:27, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sam Alito wins, no question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
Our article on [[Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization]] rightly says (with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1869184 Mr. Schlafly's endorsement], might I add), '''''Dobbs was the biggest victory for the [[pro-life]] and conservative legal movements in over 50 years.''''' It ended the mass slaughter of innocent unborn life. Alito has saved millions of unborn lives. He delivered the largest conservative victory in over 50 years. While he did it with some assistance from [[Donald Trump]], he did not appoint any SCOTUS justices this year. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 20:13, November 26, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree Sam Alito and Clarence Thomas both deserve to win this year. After disappointment of Kansas, Kentucky, Montana and Michigan referendums on abortion. Conservatives need to push back and celebrate those who overturn evil Roe v Wade. --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 13:24, November 30, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe that [[Justice Alito]] alone should get the title. Yes, [[Justice Thomas]] wrote a stellar concurring opinion, but he was unable to persuade a single other justice to join it. Only Justice Alito was able to craft an opinion that got 5 votes to stop legalized [[murder]]. ''[[Conservative of the Year]]'' is not an award for the most Conservative person that year. If this were the case, how did President [[Donald Trump]] win the award? He is a [[Conservative]], but he is not the '''most''' conservative person. For example, he supports part of the [[homosexual agenda]]. It is for the person who gets the most Conservative ''results'' that year. This year, that man is indisputably Justice Samuel Alito. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 13:37, December 6, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: The reason why I add Justice Thomas because he said that he would target [[Obergefell v. Hodges]] next. This is something that conservatives should all support. They need to push back after congress codify Same sex marriage --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 18:40, December 9, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Three Frontrunners  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello! I think that Ron DeSantis, Justice Alito, and Elon Musk are the three obvious frontrunners. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:45, December 14, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1910553</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1910553"/>
		<updated>2022-12-10T18:45:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ashley Moody]], for being the top vote-getter in [[Florida]] by a landslide of 61-39% points in her reelection as its [[Trump]]-supporting Attorney General&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], [[free speech]] advocate; although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left, for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]], and for unblocking former President Trump and many conservative pages like [[Babylon Bee]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for For his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rand Paul]], for voting against the [[Ukraine aid]] scam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.ph/FsPEZ#selection-731.0-963.226&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kari Lake]], [[Arizona]] gubernatorial candidate for challenging naked [[Democrat election fraud]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mike Lawler]] for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harriet Hageman]] for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kris Kobach]] for winning as Attorney General of Kansas, in the political comeback of the year&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Samuel Alito]] for writing the bold and assertive majority opinion for overturning Roe vs. Wade. &lt;br /&gt;
* Justice [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning evil ''[[Roe v. Wade]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* U.S. Supreme Court justices who ruled that Roe vs. Wade should be overturned ([[Samuel Alito]], [[Clarence Thomas]], [[Neil Gorsuch]], [[Brett Kavanaugh]], and [[Amy Coney Barrett]]). &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalist Society]] for playing a vital role in getting Roe vs. Wade overturned.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina [[Mark Robinson]] for his courage to speak against gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dinesh D'Souza]] for producing [[2000 Mules]] movie, and for generously donating to the families brutalized by the [[Leftist]]'s [[DC Gulag]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Victor Orban]] for his big victory in the Hungarian election, and for his moderate stance on Ukraine war.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Freedom Convoy|2022 Canadian Freedom Convoy]] protesters for their standing against Trudeau totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kyrsten Sinema]], although not a true Conservative, for abandoning the radical Leftist [[Democrat Party]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903664</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903664"/>
		<updated>2022-11-20T23:12:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* DeSantis  */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He is an agnostic libertarian who has been divorced three times. He also had the very liberal Amber Heard as a girlfriend. He is not a conservative. But he is a very hardworking and a job creator. He is also for free speech to some degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In November 6, 2022, the corporate cancer of the problem of censorship remains and it is probably due to not wanting to lose corporate advertisers.[https://voxday.net/2022/11/06/the-problem-remains/] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::RT.com: &amp;quot;Social media platform Twitter has made good on its warnings and slashed 50% of its workforce, the company’s head of safety and integrity Yoel Roth announced in a tweet on Saturday. “Yesterday’s reduction in force affected approximately 15% of our Trust &amp;amp; Safety organization (as opposed to approximately 50% cuts company-wide), with our front-line moderation staff experiencing the least impact,” he tweeted, emphasizing that the team responsible for monitoring and preventing misinformation and harmful content on the platform has remained largely intact. According to Roth, battling misinformation on the platform will remain a top priority for Twitter. The same goal was emphasized by the company’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk, in his own tweet.&amp;quot;[https://www.rt.com/business/565982-twitter-confirms-staff-layoffs/] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 22:52, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know you're not giving us misinformation? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:57, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I cited RT.com and a right-winger. But if you want to believe it is misinformation, go right ahead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Elon Musk knows technology and is an innovator. But he also has Asperger's so perhaps being the owner of a social media company is not the best fit for him.[https://www.axios.com/2022/04/15/elon-musk-aspergers-syndrome] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:06, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Now wait a minute, if say RT looks good, I'm a Putin stooge. If I say it looks bad, I'm a Russophobe. Maybe I don't want to play that game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:39, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Well, he's made [[Pollyanna]]...er, [[AOC]] look like the fool she is on Twitter on several occasions, so that's a start. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 23:18, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://people.com/movies/elon-musk-and-amber-heard-relationship-timeline/ Amber Heard and Elon Musk had a romantic relationship and a picture is provided.] Amber Heard is a liberal bisexual.[https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/women/amber-heard-bisexual-sxsw-family-religion-johnny-depp-tasya-van-ree-a8820366.html] Musk has been divorced three times (Two times with the same person).[https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2845514/elon-musk-three-marriages-tesla-spacex-billionaire/][https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddShlUX60EI] [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:14, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, so if she ''didn't'' crap in his bed, that means there's no animosity and possibly a lingering relationship? I'm really getting confused now by this reasoning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:43, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk quote: &amp;quot;I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative.&amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/elon-musk-takes-metaphorical-flamethrower-to-self-proclaimed-socialists] Musk is a libertarian. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 23:16, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nominations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that I can add many nominations such as &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Glenn Youngkin]] deserve nomination for for his reforms in education and elections laws after assuming the position of governor of Virginia.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[JD Vance]] for leading successful America first Senate campaign&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Clarence Thomas]] for his rule to overturning [[Roe V. Wade]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joe Lombardo]] for winning Nevada gubernatorial election&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Greg Abbott]] for his efforts to secure the borders and stop illegal immigration, and for his big win over [[Beto O'Rourke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marco Rubio]] for his big victory over [[Val Demings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Lawler for his victory over [[Sean Patrick Maloney]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brian Kemp]] I dislike him, but ending [[Stacey Abrams]] political career have blessed our heart&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herschel Walker]] in case he defeating [[Raphael Warnock]] in the run-off&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Giorgia Meloni]] for winning the Italian election&lt;br /&gt;
* Harreit Hageman for defeating [[Liz Cheney]] in Wyoming&lt;br /&gt;
:They all look good. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I want also add [[Kris Kobach]] for his victory in Kansas attorney general election, despite liberal overspent to defeat him --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 23:40, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices that clearly ruled in favor of oveturning Roe vs. Wade should win in 2022. &amp;quot;The majority opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Chief Justice John Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which he advocated for a more narrow ruling.&amp;quot;[https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/251550/supreme-court-justices-who-overturned-roe-v-wade]  Maybe the 6th judge John Roberts should be left out of winning. Andy Schlafy would know better than I whether Roberts should be left out since he probably knows more about the ruling than I do. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 03:28, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The advantage of giving the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices instead of just giving Clarence Thomas the award is that Samuel Alito is deserving of the award just was much as Clarence Thomas. Overturning Roe vs. Wade was a long sought over and hard fought goal of conservatives so the 5 U.S. Supreme Court Justices should win. Alternatively, The Federalist Society or Donald Trump should win since they both were responsible for more conservative SCOTUS judges. In retrospect, maybe giving the award to the Federalist Society might be the way to go since they were most responsible for overturning Roe vs. Wade. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 09:47, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Alito was strong in the running last year, and for a couple years now, I think. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:26, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How's this: We give recognition to Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Amy Coney Barrett {Kavanagh we could debate). Brian Kemp I'd toss out (Stacy Abrams &amp;amp; Beto seem to have made careers out of losing). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DeSantis  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that Ron DeSantis is a clear frontrunner. Under his leadership, he promoted Conservative policies despite massive opposition from liberals, the Mainstream Media, and RINOs. Despite constant criticism, he won reelection in a historic landslide, transforming Florida into a borderline safe Republican state. He also provided coattails for down ballot Republicans, giving Republicans control of all statewide offices for the first time in more than a century, as well as 4 additional Republican United States Representatives.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 18:12, November 20, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903266</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903266"/>
		<updated>2022-11-20T02:30:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Elon Musk */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Elon Musk ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elon Musk is going to be somewhat/largely constrained by corporate advertisers. But there are alternatives to the major brands run by liberals beginning to rise  which [[Steve Turley]] recently commented on. See: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjFXnEH41g The Parallel Economy Is EXPLODING]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the world is turning into more a multipolar world so the USA/Western liberal corporations/governments are going to become powerful. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the day, maybe Elon Musk seriously harming Twitter financially may be the best thing that comes out of him taking over Twitter. Similarweb.com says Twitter is the 4rth most popular website in the world.[https://www.similarweb.com/website/twitter.com/#overview] But hopefully, it will somewhat increase free speech in the USA and lower the alliance between big tech and big government such as the Twitter blocking the Hunter Biden story shortly before the 2022 election. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 19:37, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A $44 billion net loss carry forward when he sells Twitter for scrap would pretty much guarantee the world's richest man being tax-free for life. And the IRS would have difficulty proving it was sham investment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:50, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I still think that Musk should remain on the list for the following reasons: (1) He announced he voted for a Republican (Mayra Flores) for the first time; (2) He encouraged his massive following to vote Republican; and (3) He unblocked Donald Trump.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 21:30, November 19, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903252</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1903252"/>
		<updated>2022-11-20T01:47:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left, for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]], and for unblocking former President Trump. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902767</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902767"/>
		<updated>2022-11-18T17:15:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left and for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902766</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902766"/>
		<updated>2022-11-18T17:12:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies, for winning in a historic landslide, ad whose House map helped the [[Republican Party|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left and for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lee Zeldin]], for running a solid campaign, only losing by less than 6 points in a strongly [[Democratic Party|Democrat]] state, and whose coattails helped the [[Republican Perty|Republicans]] win the House of Representatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902763</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902763"/>
		<updated>2022-11-18T16:57:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies and winning in a historic landslide. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left and for encouraging his followers to vote for [[Republican Party|Republicans]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902762</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902762"/>
		<updated>2022-11-18T16:56:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2022 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies and winning in a historic landslide. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[Dropbox Dems]] in the State of [[Wisconsin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/anonymous-wisconsin-heroes-proved-collapse-democrat-ballot-gathering-apparatus/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump]], went 147 for 158 candidate endorsements to win back the [[U.S. House of Representatives]] in to [[2022 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marjorie Taylor Greene]], CP Conservative of the Year alum who opposed the [[Ukraine aid]]/[[FTX scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Rick Scott]], challenged [[Mitch McConnell]] for GOP Senate leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
*Col. [[Douglas MacGregor]], outspoken critic of [[globalism]] and defender of [[freedom]] and [[democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Elon Musk]], although not entirely [[Conservative]], for purchasing [[Twitter]] despite massive opposition from the Left and for encouraging his followers for voting for [[Republican Party|Republicans]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902170</id>
		<title>Conservative of the Year 2022</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_of_the_Year_2022&amp;diff=1902170"/>
		<updated>2022-11-16T15:45:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Start of the Conservative of the Year 2021 page. Please add to the list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron DeSantis]], for standing up for [[Conservative]] policies and winning in a historic landslide. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Johnson]], defeated the corrupt [[ballot box stuffing]] Democrats in the State of [[Wisconsin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative of the Year]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberalism_and_racism&amp;diff=1892458</id>
		<title>Liberalism and racism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberalism_and_racism&amp;diff=1892458"/>
		<updated>2022-10-11T15:09:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Examples of liberal racism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:''See also: [[History of Democrat racism]], [[U.S. &amp;quot;Party-switch&amp;quot; myth]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Southern Democrat filibuster of anti-lynching legislation.png|thumb|right|320px|Democrat [[segregation]]ist senators [[Tom Connally]], [[Walter F. George]], [[Richard Russell, Jr.]], and [[Claude Pepper]] filibustering an anti-lynching bill in January 1938; all four were [[liberal]] [[New Deal]]ers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mormino, Gary R. (October 30, 2020). [https://www.tampabay.com/opinion/2020/10/30/the-strange-career-of-claude-pepper-column/ The strange career of Claude Pepper | Column]. ''Tampa Bay Times''. Retrieved April 29, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/connally-thomas-terry Connally, Thomas Terry (1877–1963)]. ''Texas State Historical Association''. Retrieved April 29, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williamson, Kevin D. (August 29, 2018). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/08/senator-richard-russell-history-of-racist-progressives/ Was Senator Russell a ‘Conservative’ Democrat?]. ''National Review''. Retrieved April 29, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/walter-f-george-1878-1957 Walter F. George (1878-1957)]. ''New Georgia Encyclopedia''. Retrieved April 29, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is infamously renowned for perpetuating a system of race-based prejudice in societies where it has taken root. For instance, in the [[socialist]] and [[Communist]] former nation of the [[U.S.S.R.]], the regime of [[Joseph Stalin]], an avowed [[Marxist-Leninist]] and liberal enacted a policy of the deportation of the Soviet Jewish population to the far-eastern regions in Siberia, under a new puppet government, the &amp;quot;Jewish Autonomous Oblast&amp;quot;. Those who did not cooperate with these laws and statutes were put on trial under the infamous &amp;quot;Doctor's Plot&amp;quot;, the blatant racism of which shattered the communist sympathies of many liberals in the Western World. It is largely as a legacy of these policies which have forever stained the ideology of [[liberalism]] as a racist political system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What generally makes liberals racist is that they tend to judge and value people based on their race or skin color instead of character and merit and treat them accordingly (such as in their use of [[affirmative action]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-woke-left-vs-martin-luther-king-jr The woke Left vs. Martin Luther King Jr.], ''[[Washington Examiner]]'', January 20, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as their overt abusive attacks on people of color for supporting conservatism and [[traditional values]]), as well as playing the &amp;quot;[[race card]]&amp;quot; at every opportunity and engaging in [[race baiting]] against conservatives and moderates, regardless of skin color or race, and they attempt to impose race into discussions, topics and issues having nothing to do with race due to their obsession with race.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite [[liberal]]s claiming to be for &amp;quot;equality of all people&amp;quot;, a large number of liberals have indeed exhibited [[racist]] qualities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples of liberal racism==&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[liberal media]]'s obsession with race and imposition of it into stories that have nothing to do with race, as well as [[liberal projection|falsely accusing conservatives of &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot;]] for refusing to support racist policies by liberal politicians (such as [[affirmative action]] and the [[Great Society]]).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joe Biden]] said &amp;quot;You can't go to a 7-Eleven without having a slight Indian accent&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals frequently attack critics of [[Barrack Obama]], claiming that any criticism of him is somehow &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;. By using his ethnicity as a shield to his critics, the liberals make themselves appear racist.&lt;br /&gt;
*Historically, the [[Democrat Party]] was the party that favored slave owners and racist policies. This is clearly seen in [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Clinton]] was endorsed by [[Ku Klux Klan]] grand dragon [[Will Quigg]] in the [[2016 U.S. presidential election]] campaign and [[Hillary Rodham Clinton#Racism|never rejected their endorsement]]. The KKK, in fact, was founded by Democrats as its terrorist wing, was supported by them for decades and continues to be supported by them to this day (albeit covertly, while colluding to publicly pretend that the Republicans &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; them, even though the Republicans have always opposed the KKK and despise what they stand for).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democrats]] supported racism and segregation and liberals such as [[George Wallace]] and [[Lester Maddox]] attacked civil rights protesters with dogs and fire hoses and arrested and jailed [[Martin Luther King]] several times.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bill Maher]] called [[conservative]] black Congressman [[Allen West]] an &amp;quot;ape&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Keith Olberman]] has an obsession with racial demographics at [[Tea Party]] rallies.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon Johnson]] after passing the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] quoted &amp;quot;I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals attack Republican president [[Richard Nixon]] for his so-called [[Southern strategy]] in 1968 as a method to attract white Southern voters with racist &amp;quot;code words&amp;quot; (when in fact Nixon supported civil rights throughout his tenure in political office), but ignore the fact that it was Democrats that used [[Jim Crow]] to make segregation legal.  The ridiculous notion that the parties &amp;quot;switched&amp;quot; on civil rights upon Nixon's election has been repeated constantly as historical revisionism by liberals and Democrats since 1964 to paint the [[Republican Party]] as &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;, when clearly Democrats have the more racist past.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2009/01/14/democrat-race-lie/ The Democrat Race Lie] at Black &amp;amp; Right&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/ The Dixiecrat Myth] at Black &amp;amp; Right&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Jackson]] and [[Al Sharpton]] engaged in racial [[demagogue]]ry by calling white Republicans &amp;quot;crackers&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-antisemitic-3.jpg|right|350px|thumb|A blatantly [[anti-Semitic]] cartoon depicting [[Israel]]i [[Prime Minister]] [[Benjamin Netanyahu]] as a guide dog with a [[Star of David]] collar leading a blind [[President Trump]] wearing a skullcap. The cartoon accompanied an op-ed published 4/25/19 in the International Edition of the ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/media/440957-ny-times-opinion-apologizes-for-cartoon-depicting-anti-semitic-tropes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jesse Jackson engaged in [[anti-Semitism]] by calling New York City his &amp;quot;Hymietown&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*In August 2018, ''[[The New York Times]]'' defended a [[racist]] editor it had just hired, and it even defended her racism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Flood, Brian (August 2, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/02/new-york-times-stands-by-new-tech-writer-sarah-jeong-after-racist-tweets-surface.html New York Times stands by new tech writer Sarah Jeong after racist tweets surface]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved August 2, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Caplan, Joshua (August 2, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/08/02/sarah-jeong-new-york-times-dumb-ss-f-ing-white-people/ NYT: New Hire Sarah Jeong ‘Regrets’ Professing Hate for ‘Dumbass F*cking White People’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 2, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (August 2, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/2/nyt-defends-sarah-jeong-after-anti-white-tweets/ NYT defends newly hired opinion writer with history of anti-white tweets]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 3, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (August 3, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/29702-ny-times-stands-by-new-editor-who-sent-vile-anti-white-tweets NY Times Stands by New Editor Who Sent Vile Anti-white Tweets]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 3, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Vespa, Matt (August 3, 2018). [https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/08/03/dumba-fking-white-people-an-introduction-to-the-newest-nyt-editorial-writer-n2506164 Stay Classy: New NYT Editorial Writer Apparently Has A Problem With 'Dumba** F**king White People']. ''Townhall''. Retrieved August 3, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Marsh, Kristine (August 2, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/08/02/new-york-times-hypocrites-knowingly-hire-racist-writer-who-wants-to-cancelwhitepeople.html New York Times hypocrites knowingly hire racist writer who wants to '#CancelWhitePeople']. ''Fox News'' (from ''NewsBusters''). Retrieved August 2, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
* https://twitter.com/AreaAway/status/1025052681180573696&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding her bigotry against men and the police:&lt;br /&gt;
*Athey, Amber (August 3, 2018). [https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/03/nyt-sarah-jeong-cop-men-tweets/ NYT's Sarah Jeong Also Sent Anti-Cop, Anti-Men Tweets]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved August 3, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Houck, Curtis (August 3, 2018). [https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/curtis-houck/2018/08/03/course-racist-nyt-editorialist-also-wrote-tweets-attacking-men Of Course: Racist NYT Editorialist Also Wrote Tweets Attacking Men, Police]. ''NewsBusters''. Retrieved August 3, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Starr, Penny (August 6, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/06/black-conservatives-times-hiring-racist-vulgar-sarah-jeong/ Black Conservatives Speak Out Against NY Times Hiring ‘Racist,’ ‘Vulgar’ Sarah Jeong]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ma, Ying (August 7, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-new-face-of-racism-is-an-asian-woman-blinded-by-identity-politics The new face of racism is an Asian woman blinded by identity politics]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved August 7, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a blatant display of liberal [[double standard]]s, while this editor's racism was directed at white-skinned people, the NYT immediately fired another editor only a few months prior for anti-black and -gay tweets, even though that instance was not as severe as the former.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Re, Gregg (February 14, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/02/14/new-york-times-hires-writer-to-cover-consequences-technology-fires-her-for-tweets-hours-later.html New York Times hires writer to cover 'consequences of technology,' fires her for tweets hours later]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved August 2, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nolte, John (February 14, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/02/14/nyt-discovers-latest-left-wing-writer-befriends-nazis-calls-people-fgs/ NYT Discovers Its Latest Left-wing Editorial Writer Befriends Nazis, Calls People F*gs]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 2, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Athey, Amber (August 2, 2018). [https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/02/new-york-times-sarah-jeong-racist/ NYTimes' Newest Hire Sent Tons of Anti-White Racist Tweets]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved August 2, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-Trump ''New York Times'' publishes anti-Semitic cartoon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/Flood-of-condemnations-of-NYT-for-anti-Semitic-cartoon-588044&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump-hater, a student at the state-funded California State University San Marcos, shot up a California [[synagogue]], killing one and injuring several. The shooter left a manifesto saying  “Jews Deserve Hell” and calling President Trump a “Zionist, Anti-White, Traitorous, C*********.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/9rV3Y&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Seattle]], Democrat city councilmen Larry Gossett objected to cleaning the sidewalks surrounding the courthouse in 2019 because pressure washing the sidewalks of urine and excrement, in the Democrat councilman's words, &amp;quot;is racist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/political/leftist-politician-decides-cleaning-poop-seattles-streets-pressure-washer-racist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*On some college campuses, liberals have supported and even implemented [[segregated college housing]], with the segregation based purely on one's skin color.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (September 10, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/30025-leftists-are-now-advocating-racial-segregation Leftists Are Now Advocating Racial Segregation]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 10, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These actions are akin to what Democrats and their liberal supporters did to blacks in the South with the above-mentioned segregation policies prior to the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2018 study by researchers at [[Yale University]] and [[Princeton University]] found that liberals patronize minorities and present themselves as less competent when speaking to them, while conservatives speak and present themselves the same way to everyone regardless of skin color.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (November 29, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30775-study-liberals-treat-minorities-as-if-they-re-stupid Study: Liberals Treat Minorities as if They’re Stupid]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (November 29, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/28/white-liberals-patronize-minorities-downplaying-co/ White liberals more likely to 'patronize' minorities than conservatives, study finds]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A [[University of Georgia]] TA stated that &amp;quot;some white people may have to die&amp;quot; for blacks to advance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chasmar, Jessica (January 18, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/18/university-georgia-ta-some-white-people-may-have-d/ University of Georgia TA: 'Some white people may have to die' for blacks to advance]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2019, the mainstream media, left-wingers, and many [[token conservative]]s rushed to judgment against [[Covington kids|a group of Catholic students]] wearing [[MAGA]] hats, claiming they harassed an [[American Indian]] activist when the activist actually harassed them in a publicity stunt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (January 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/20/critics-covington-maga-critics-push-back-against-portrayal-of-catholic-high-school-as-racist-to-native-american/ Critics Push Back Against Media Reports Covington Catholic High School Students Racist Toward Native American Drummer]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lim, Naomi; Chaitin, Daniel (January 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/rush-to-judgment-new-details-emerge-on-native-american-elders-standoff-with-maga-hat-wearing-teens Rush to judgment? New details emerge on Native American elder's standoff with MAGA-hat-wearing teens]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/20/nathan-phillips-confronts-teens-maga-hats-march-li/ New video shows Native American man confronting Catholic teens with MAGA hats at March for Life]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/21/nick-sandmann-nathan-phillips-video-sparks-targeti/ Questions arise over whether Catholic teens were targeted by Native elder with activist history]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Chamberlain, Samuel (January 20, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/kentucky-student-seen-in-viral-confrontation-with-native-american-speaks-out Kentucky student seen in viral confrontation with Native American speaks out]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 20, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/21/catholic-teen-viral-video-condemns-outright-lies/ Catholic teen in viral video condemns 'outright lies,' feared adults sought 'larger conflict']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covington-catholic-students-full-statement-on-encounter-with-native-america Covington Catholic student’s full statement on encounter with Native American protestor]. ''LifeSiteNews''. January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (January 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019/01/20/covington-catholic-high-school-student-nick-sandmann-i-was-not-going-to-become-angry-i-am-a-faithful-christian/ Covington Catholic High School Student Nick Sandmann: ‘I Was Not Going to Become Angry … I Am a Faithful Christian’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Smith, Kyle (January 20, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/01/nathan-phillips-lied-the-media-bought-it/ Nathan Phillips Lied. The Media Bought It.] ''National Review''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Caplan, Joshua (January 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/22/washington-post-correction-nathan-phillips-was-never-deployed-to-vietnam/ Washington Post Correction: Nathan Phillips ‘Was Never Deployed to Vietnam’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
Phillips rejected meeting with the students and continued slandering them:&lt;br /&gt;
*Stieber, Zachary (January 22, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/native-american-activist-rejects-meeting-with-covington-students_2774731.html Native American Activist Rejects Meeting with Covington Students]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The media engaged in character assassination and falsely smeared the students as &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;bigots,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://video.foxnews.com/v/5992146931001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips Tucker: Covington students smeared by media]. ''Fox News Video''. January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Freiburger, Calvin (January 22, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/tucker-carlson-slams-bigoted-mainstream-media-for-destroying...mocking-covi Tucker Carlson slams ‘bigoted’ mainstream media for ‘destroying…mocking’ Covington boys]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Starnes, Todd (January 21, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/covington-catholic-high-school-students-smeared-by-mainstream-media-lies-dont-expect-an-apology Covington Catholic High School students smeared by mainstream media lies -- Don't expect an apology]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (January 21, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/31247-media-shamelessly-frame-covington-kids-for-scorn-and-abuse Media Shamelessly Frame Covington Kids for Scorn and Abuse]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Soave, Robby (January 20, 2019). [https://reason.com/blog/2019/01/20/covington-catholic-nathan-phillips-video The Media Wildly Mischaracterized That Video of Covington Catholic Students Confronting a Native American Veteran]. ''Reason''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kurtz, Howard (January 21, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reckless-media-inflame-buzzfeed-mess-slander-catholic-students-at-protest Reckless media inflame BuzzFeed mess, slander Catholic students at protest]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Van Maren, Jonathon (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/anti-trump-media-touts-fake-news-to-whip-up-mob-against-pro-life-kids.-they Anti-Trump media touts fake news to whip up mob against pro-life kids. They should be ashamed]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Houck, Curits (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covington-catholic-story-a-total-disaster-for-liberal-medias-credibility Covington Catholic story a total disaster for liberal media’s credibility]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Flood, Brian (January 22, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/media-treatment-of-covington-students-way-worse-than-kavanaugh-coverage-critic-says Media treatment of Covington students ‘way worse’ than Kavanaugh coverage, critic says]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Berry, Susan (January 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/22/report-networks-spend-19-minutes-smearing-catholic-teens-58-seconds-march-life/ Report: Networks Spend 19 Minutes Smearing Catholic Teens, 58 Seconds on March for Life]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
Double standards by ''The New York Times'':&lt;br /&gt;
*Adams, Becket (January 24, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/new-york-times-gives-friendlier-coverage-to-actual-hate-group-than-maga-teens New York Times gives friendlier coverage to actual hate group than 'MAGA'-teens]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nolte, John (January 24, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/new-york-times-blistered-for-sympathetic-portrait-of-black-nationalists-who-taunted-covington-kids/ New York Times Blistered for Sympathetic Portrait of Black Nationalists Who Taunted Covington Kids]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Kraychik, Robert (January 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/21/limbaugh-nro-pushed-covington-hoax-to-win-approval-of-the-mainstream-media/ Limbaugh: NRO Pushed Covington Hoax to Win ‘Approval of the Mainstream Media’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ernst, Douglas (January 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/21/ben-shapiro-rips-manufactured-media-lie-against-co/ Ben Shapiro rips 'manufactured media lie' against Covington Catholic High School boys]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williams, Thomas D. (January 24, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/24/rabbi-media-attacks-maga-boys-motivated-anti-christianism/ Rabbi: Media Attacks on MAGA Boys Motivated by ‘Anti-Christianism’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 28, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while self-righteous pundits and liberal activists made racist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1087343295964041216&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bomberger, Ryan (January 22, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/those-pro-life-covington-catholic-teens-werent-the-racists Those pro-life Covington Catholic teens weren’t the racists]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and nasty attacks against them&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Delingpole, James (January 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/20/delingpole-left-wing-and-the-right-attack-kids-to-demonstrate-virtue/ Delingpole: Left-Wing (and the Right) Attack Kids to Demonstrate Virtue]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Wong, Kristina (January 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/21/pundits-condemning-covington-kids-backtrack-after-seeing-fuller-video/ Pundits Condemning Covington Kids Backtrack After Seeing Fuller Video]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 23, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/22/jim-carrey-covington-catholic-teens-painting-label/ Jim Carrey posts painting of Covington Catholic teens with label 'baby snakes']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 23, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kirkwood, R. Cort (January 24, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/31289-muslim-rep-defamed-convington-boys-in-now-deleted-tweet-what-will-congress-do Muslim Rep Defamed Covington Boys in Now-deleted Tweet. What Will Congress Do?] ''The New American''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Perkins, Tony (January 25, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/covington-shows-that-sorry-is-not-in-the-lefts-vocabulary Covington shows that ‘sorry’ is not in the left’s vocabulary]. ''LifeSiteNews'' (from the ''Family Research Council''). Retrieved January 26, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
A rush to judgment from the [[establishment]] conservative media:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nolte, John (January 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/01/21/fake-news-never-sleeps-national-review-falls-for-more-anti-trump-media-hoaxes/ Fake News Never Sleeps: National Review Falls for More Anti-Trump Media Hoaxes]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Caralle, Katelyn (January 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/conservative-press-apologizes-for-saying-students-harassed-a-native-american-protester Conservative press apologizes for saying students harassed a Native American protester]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawler, Phil (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/covington-catholic-incident-a-black-eye-for-the-pro-life-movement Covington Catholic incident a black eye for pro-life leadership]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Freiburger, Calvin (January 24, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/rush-limbaugh-unloads-on-conservative-media-orgs-that-joined-anti-covington Rush Limbaugh unloads on conservative media orgs that joined anti-Covington bandwagon]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
Several Roman Catholics caved to the Left rather than defend their students:&lt;br /&gt;
*Barillas, Martin M.; Baklinski, Pete (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covington-bishop-continues-to-condemn-catholic-students-despite-videos-prov Covington bishop continues to ‘condemn’ Catholic students, despite videos proving innocence]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williams, Thomas D. (January 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/faith/2019/01/22/catholic-leaders-refuse-to-retract-slander-of-school-boys-at-march-for-life/ Catholic Leaders Refuse to Retract Slander of School Boys at March for Life]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Abbott, Matt C. (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/priest-calls-march-for-life-reprehensible-over-covington-catholic-hoax Priest calls March for Life ‘repulsive’ over Covington Catholic hoax]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*McLean, Dorothy Cummings (January 22, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-covington-bishop-speaks-of-corrective-action-offers-no-apology Covington bishop speaks of ‘corrective action’, offers no apology to mistreated boys]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hichborn, Michael (January 22, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/fr.-james-martin-is-a-hypocrite-to-condemn-covington-boys-while-preaching-b Fr. James Martin is a hypocrite to condemn Covington boys while preaching ‘bridge-building’]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brown, Michael L. (January 24, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/were-christians-who-condemned-covington-boys-virtue-signaling-to-the-left Were Christians who condemned Covington boys virtue signaling to the left?] ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mikelionis, Lukas (January 26, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/covington-bishop-apologizes-for-prematurely-condemning-students-in-viral-incident-with-native-american-elder Covington bishop apologizes for prematurely condemning students in viral incident with Native American elder]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 26, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williams, Thomas D. (January 26, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/26/covington-bishop-says-bullied-making-statement-maga-boys/ Covington Bishop Says He Was ‘Bullied’ into Making Statement About MAGA Boys]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 26, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kirkwood, R. Cort (January 26, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/31305-one-ky-bishop-apologizes-for-denouncing-covington-catholic-boys-a-second-doubles-down One Ky. Bishop Apologizes for Denouncing Covington Catholic Boys; a Second Doubles Down]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 27, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*McLean, Dorothy Cummings (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/mainstream-medias-blatant-slander-of-covington-kids-shows-why-the-world-nee Mainstream media’s blatant slander of Covington kids shows why the world needs pro-life media]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chretien, Claire (January 21, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/rand-paul-local-congressman-stand-with-covington-kids-a-brutal-lesson-in-so Sen. Rand Paul defends Covington kids: They’re ‘taking all sorts of abuse they do not deserve’]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy, James (January 22, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/31266-some-in-twitter-mob-delete-or-apologize-for-tweets-about-covington-students Some in Twitter Mob Delete or Apologize for Tweets About Covington Students]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (January 28, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31312-covington-and-killing-conservative-dissent Covington and Killing Conservative Dissent]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 28, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and they called for violence against them, all based solely on contrived and manipulated [[fake news]] opinion pieces disguised as &amp;quot;news&amp;quot; churned out by the liberal media to fit its narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bokhari, Allum (January 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/01/21/twitter-allows-verified-calls-for-violence-against-conservative-high-school-kids/ Twitter Allows ‘Verified’ Calls for Violence Against Conservative High School Kids]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Stieber, Zachary (January 22, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/journalist-who-called-for-death-of-covington-catholic-students-fired-from-job_2774671.html Journalist Who Called for Death of Covington Catholic Students Fired From Job]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Laila, Cristina (January 20, 2019). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/hollywood-producer-calls-for-covington-catholic-kids-to-go-screaming-into-the-woodchipper/ Hollywood Producer Calls For the Murder of Covington Catholic Kids: ‘Go Screaming – Into the WOODCHIPPER’]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
Twitter refused to remove death threats against the students from its site:&lt;br /&gt;
*Hall, Alexander (January 24, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/twitter-refuses-to-remove-insane-vicious-death-threats-against-covington-st Twitter refuses to remove insane, vicious death threats against Covington students]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Barillas, Martin M. (January 22, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/covington-catholic-high-school-closes-for-safety-after-students-receive-dea Covington Catholic high school closes for ‘safety’ after students receive death threats]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved January 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In January 2019, Webster University, in [[St. Louis]], Missouri, announced it would create a &amp;quot;safe space&amp;quot; for whites to admit they are anti-black racists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (January 29, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/31323-reeducation-camp-planned-for-whites-at-university-in-st-louis Reeducation Camp Planned for Whites at University in St. Louis]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 29, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals have frequently demonized white men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Walter E. (January 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/31343-demonizing-white-men Demonizing White Men]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 2, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even though the majority of liberals are themselves white and many of them are also male.&lt;br /&gt;
*In February 2019, a white Democrat legislator described Maryland's Prince George as a &amp;quot;n***r district&amp;quot; and then claimed that &amp;quot;everyone&amp;quot; uses the term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caplan, Joshua (February 26, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/26/maryland-democrat-may-ann-lisanti-sorry-for-calling-county-ner-district/ Maryland Democrat May Ann Lisanti Sorry for Calling County ‘N***er District’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*An event intended only for black mayoral candidates in Savannah, Georgia, only allowed black reporters to report on that event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Church, Nate (March 29, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/03/29/white-reporters-excluded-from-georgia-mayoral-event-for-black-politicians/ White Reporters Excluded from Georgia Mayoral Event for Black Politicians]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 29, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In 2019, a Democrat Ohio state representative proposed an amendment that would have excluded black babies from the state's [[heartbeat Bill]] that protects unborn babies who have a heartbeat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clabough, Raven (April 16, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/32032-black-congresswoman-tries-to-exempt-black-babies-from-pro-life-law Black Congresswoman Tries to Exempt Black Babies From Pro-life Law]. ''The New American''. Retrieved April 16, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A professor at Trinity College in Connecticut claimed on Twitter that &amp;quot;whiteness is terrorism,&amp;quot; something the university defended as &amp;quot;academic scholarship.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ernst, Douglas (April 29, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/29/johnny-eric-williams-trinity-college-professor-whi/ Trinity College defends professor's 'whiteness is terrorism' message]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved April 29, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*When liberals criticize those they disagree with on any issue, no matter how closely related to race, they try to paint their opponents as &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; or point out a lack of skin color variation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Folley, Aris (May 15, 2019). [https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/443838-white-male-gop-lawmakers-face-viral-criticism-after-voting-to Twitter users call out white male GOP lawmakers for voting to pass Alabama's abortion ban]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 15, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Racial segregation is increasing on liberal college campuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clabough, Raven (May 22, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/32423-segregation-returning-to-american-college-campuses Segregation Returning to American College Campuses]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 23, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A driver, who is white himself, admitted to running over an 11-year-old girl because her skin color was white following his arrest for the crime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (June 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/32523-eleven-year-old-girl-run-over-for-being-white Eleven-year-old Girl Run Over for Being White]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 5, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://heavy.com/news/2019/06/steven-ray-becky/ Utah Man Steven Ray Becky Intentionally Hits Girl With His Car: Cops]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A group of four far-Left Democrat U.S. representatives – [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]], [[Ilhan Omar]], [[Rashida Tlaib]], and [[Ayanna Pressley]] – have made multiple blatantly racist statements despite claiming that U.S. President Trump is somehow a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; for criticizing their consistent trashing of American values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (July 16, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/16/list-of-racist-statements-by-members-of-the-squad-so-far/ List of Racist Statements by Members of the ‘Squad’ (So Far)]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 16, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal actress/singer Bette Midler drew heavy flack on Twitter for a racist tweet she posted where she accused black attendees at a Donald Trump rally of having been &amp;quot;paid&amp;quot; to attend the event, basically implying that blacks cannot think for themselves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/25/bette-midler-slammed-as-racist-after-saying-black-people-at-trump-rallies-are-paid-blackground-props/ Bette Midler Slammed as &amp;quot;Racist&amp;quot; After Saying Black People at Trump Rallies Are Paid &amp;quot;Blackground&amp;quot; Props] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftist ''Will &amp;amp; Grace'' star Debra Messing outed herself as a racist when she showed support via a since-deleted tweet on Twitter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/09/03/debra-messing-deletes-racist-black-trump-voters-are-mentally-ill-tweet/ Debra Messing Deletes Racist Tweet About Black Trump Voters Being &amp;quot;Mentally Ill&amp;quot;] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for a racist sign that attacked both black and white supporters of Donald Trump at an Alabama Baptist church.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/09/01/debra-messing-celebrates-sign-calling-black-trump-voters-mentally-ill/ Debra Messing Celebrates Sign Calling Black Trump Voters &amp;quot;Mentally Ill&amp;quot;] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The sign attacked black Trump supporters as &amp;quot;mentally ill&amp;quot; while falsely labeling white Trump supporters as &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.  She subsequently tweeted a hollow, excuse-filled &amp;quot;apology&amp;quot; where she doubled down on her attack on black Trump supporters (in response to one such supporter whose hashtag &amp;quot;#RacistDebraMessing&amp;quot;, created in response to the original tweet by Messing, subsequently went viral on Twitter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/09/04/racist-debra-messing-trends-on-twitter-following-tweet-about-mentally-ill-black-trump-voters/ &amp;quot;Racist Debra Messing&amp;quot; Trends on Twitter Following Tweet About &amp;quot;Mentally Ill&amp;quot; Black Trump Voters] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) and denied also supporting a blacklist of Trump supporters, but she was not believed by an overwhelming majority of Twitter critics,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/DebraMessing/status/1169341534292127745 Debra Messing: &amp;quot;NUMBER 1– I apologized for liking that church sign. I said I regret it&amp;quot;] at Twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and President Trump himself weighed in on the controversy and also denounced Messing as a racist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/05/donald-trump-slams-debra-the-mess-messing-as-racist/ Donald Trump Slams &amp;quot;Debra The Mess Messing&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;Racist&amp;quot;] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Far-Left terrorists, acting in concert with some First Nations sympathizers, used the &amp;quot;race card&amp;quot; as a shield against criticism of criminal activity by those groups during illegal blockades of the Canadian railway system and roadways while &amp;quot;protesting&amp;quot; against a natural gas pipeline under construction in British Columbia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqVZjnjSTfE Indigenous GasLink blockade “the only card left to play”: Opioids, job concerns in BC] at Rebel News YouTube channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These actions drew criticism from First Nations official representatives and other individuals, who stated that such actions by the Left and aboriginal supporters serve only to make First Nations look bad and do not represent Canadian First Nations as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals, who have frequently been racist against minorities and are now racist against whites as well, now delusionally deny that racism against whites exists, despite evidence proving otherwise (including a recent incident where intolerant leftists posted racist signs against whites, including one saying &amp;quot;White lives don't matter&amp;quot; while another one delivered a contradictory message, saying &amp;quot;Racism against whites doesn't exist&amp;quot; while another line above it, &amp;quot;It's okay to hate white people&amp;quot;, contradicted the second line).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XBL1Czw880 &amp;quot;Tolerant&amp;quot; Lefties Posting Signs Saying &amp;quot;White Lives Don't Matter&amp;quot;] at Salty Cracker YouTube channel ('''Warning:''' Contains foul language)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Ahead of [[Independence Day]] 2020, [[Steven Crowder]] hosted a black history segment with historical experts David Barton and &amp;quot;Tim&amp;quot; wherein they thoroughly discussed historical liberal racism, including the racism of Progressive icon [[Woodrow Wilson]], which itself was largely inspired by the racism of liberal/[[evolutionist]] icon [[Charles Darwin]] (see [[Evolutionary racism]]), racist history books written by liberal Democrats, and the racist Democrat [[Confederate]]s, who seceded from the U.S. because of [[slavery]]. Wilson's screening of The Birth of a Nation, a propaganda recruitment film for the racist Democrat [[Ku Klux Klan]], in the White House was also discussed, as well as the consistent anti-racism of Republicans and the [[Southern Strategy]] myth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_KlDf-Wgoc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Former ''America's Got Talent'' host Nick Cannon outed himself as both a racist and an anti-Semite when he called whites and Jews &amp;quot;savages&amp;quot; and claimed they were &amp;quot;closer to animals&amp;quot; during a rant on his online podcast ''Cannon's Class''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/closer-animals-americas-got-talent-host-says-whites-jews-true-savages/ 'Closer to animals': 'America's Got Talent' host says whites, Jews are 'true savages'] at WorldNetDaily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Cannon made the comments while hosting rapper Professor Griff, who likewise has a history of racism and anti-Semitism and adheres to long-discredited pseudo-scientific claims, conspiracies and falsehoods about the Jewish people.  Cannon has since been forced to apologize for his comments after he was fired from ViacomCBS and Skyview Networks ended production of his syndicated radio show as a result.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://radioink.com/2020/07/17/your-star-host-just-crossed-the-line-now-what/ Your Star Host Just Crossed The Line. Now What?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.insideradio.com/free/skyview-networks-ceases-production-of-nick-cannon-s-syndicated-radio-show/article_e3edaa50-c77f-11ea-bb97-0f428c345c4c.html UPDATED: Skyview ‘Pauses’ Production Of Nick Cannon Radio Show. ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Caucus Club, an upscale restaurant in Detroit which had ordered customers to adhere to a dress code and to not show up smelling like [[marijuana]], was targeted on Facebook by clueless SJW liberals who accused the restaurant of &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot;, even though the restaurant's anti-pot edict had nothing to do with race.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/upscale-detroit-restaurant-tells-people-not-come-smelling-like-marijuana-leftists-idiots-scream-racism/ Upscale Detroit Restaurant Tells People Not to Come in Smelling Like Marijuana — Leftist Idiots Scream It’s Racism] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The SJWs who made the &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; accusations later got their own racism and their ignorance of societal rules pointed out to them on the restaurant's Facebook page by other commenters, which the SJWs, in their lack of self-awareness, cluelessly refused to get.  Caucus Club owner George Sboukis subsequently weighed in and pointed out the racism in the SJWs' uninformed comments, saying that their implication that people are incapable of following restaurant codes based on race is in itself racist.&lt;br /&gt;
*Florida State University received major criticism after it planned to offer a racist anti-white female class titled &amp;quot;The History of Karen&amp;quot;, leading to the cancellation of that class shortly after news of it went public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/win-florida-state-university-cancels-racist-class-bashing-white-women-push-back/ WIN: Florida State University Cancels Racist Class Bashing White Women After Push Back] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A far-Left group of &amp;quot;[[critical race theory]]&amp;quot; teachers, school board members and other activists in [[Loudoun County, Virginia]]'s public school system (the membership of which includes the county's [[George Soros]]-funded prosecutor) were outed as planning on targeting parents who opposed the plans of the racist anti-white teachers/activists, whose group has the ironic name &amp;quot;Anti-Racist Parents of Loudoun County&amp;quot; and are also ironically white themselves, to indoctrinate their students with CRT by compiling a list of opposed parents to target with harassment campaigns including infiltration of anti-CRT parent groups, [[hacker]]s (for the purposes of disrupting the parents' online communications) and &amp;quot;exposing&amp;quot; the parents via illegal doxxing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-04-02-public-school-teachers-compiling-lists-expose-parents.html Vile public school teachers now compiling “lists” to “expose” parents who reject far-left curriculum] at Natural News&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/public-school-teachers-compile-list-of-parents-who-dissent-from-racist-liberal-curriculum-plan-to-expose-them Public school teachers compile list of parents who dissent from racist liberal curriculum, plan to ‘expose’ them] at LifeSiteNews&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One of the group's members, Loudoun County school board member Beth Barts, was temporarily removed from her duties after her plans to expose and target anti-CRT parents (including the use of aggressive civil unrest), along with other group members sending Barts the names and other info of anti-CRT parents to use for doxxing purposes, was publicly exposed, putting the CRT group in violation of Virginia law regarding felony anti-[[First Amendment]] criminal activity.  The information regarding the CRT group has been forwarded to the Loudoun County Sheriff's Office for investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Republican]] Sen. [[Tim Scott]] was called &amp;quot;Uncle Tim&amp;quot; as well as the n-word by left-wing snowflakes for saying that the U.S. is not a racist country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Two references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Moore, Mark (April 29, 2021). [https://nypost.com/2021/04/29/sen-tim-scott-attacked-as-uncle-tim-on-twitter-after-gop-rebuttal/ Twitter allows ‘Uncle Tim’ to trend for hours after Sen. Tim Scott’s rebuttal, and then took action]. ''New York Post''. Retrieved April 29, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hains, Tim (April 29, 2021). [https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/04/29/tim_scott_intolerance_so_often_comes_from_the_left_with_words_like_uncle_tim_and_the_n-word.html#! Tim Scott: Intolerance So Often Comes From The Left, With Words Like &amp;quot;Uncle Tim&amp;quot; And The N-Word]. ''RealClearPolitics''. Retrieved Ap2il 29, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Democrat Los Angeles Council President Nury Martinez resigns after making racist comments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2022/10/10/la-city-council-prez-nury-martinez-resigns-after-racist-comments/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communist Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Left-wing Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Segregated college housing]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Liberalism is the root of all racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5ebC8u8MJg Who's More Racist: Biden or Bloomberg? | Sara Gonzales Unfiltered] [[the Blaze|BlazeTV]] on [[YouTube]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph Telushkin. ''Jewish Literacy''. NY: William Morrow and Co., 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891982</id>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891982"/>
		<updated>2022-10-08T23:22:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: Undo revision 1891981 by TheNewRight (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Elizabeth Warren&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]] (before 1996)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democrat]] (1996 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Jim Warren (1968 – 1978)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bruce Mann (1980 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Methodist]] ([[Christian In Name Only|in name only]])&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2013 – present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Scott Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|status=s&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Godwin's Law.png|thumb|right|400px|Warren is seen here at the 2016 Democratic National Convention performing a [[Nazi]] salute.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Elizabeth Ann Warren''' (Also called '''Senator Karen''' and &amp;quot;Fauxcahontas&amp;quot; by some, due to her misrepresentation and claim of [[Native American]] ancestry)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fee, Gayle; Johnson, Megan; Raposa, Laura (May 17, 2012). [https://web.archive.org/web/20120525003643/http://bostonherald.com:80/track/inside_track/view/20120517elizabeth_warren_not_alone_on_the_trail Elizabeth Warren not history’s only Fauxcahontas]. ''Boston Herald''. Herald Media. Retrieved January 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the senior [[far-left]] [[Democrat Party|Democrat]] [[U.S. Senate|United States Senator]] from liberal [[Massachusetts]].  Warren robbed [[affirmative action]] programs to promote herself; she has built her entire career on [[fraud]]. Even [[Stephen Colbert]] called her out on her nonsense healthcare solutions proposals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2019/09/19/yikes-colbert-corners-warren-on-middle-tax-class-increases-then-calls-her-out-when-she-dodges-n2553342&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After her fake Indian claims were exposed, Warren was busted again for lying when she tried playing the victim card claiming to have been fired for being pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/records-show-elizabeth-warren-lied-about-being-fired-for-being-visibly-pregnant/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has robbed money from needy, oppressed, and deserving minorities to line her own pockets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has been accused of lying on federal forms to gain preferential treatment in hiring, claiming minority status in order to gain access to affirmative action programs.  Warren boasts of being the first &amp;quot;person of color&amp;quot; on the [[Harvard]] Law faculty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/will-elizabeth-warrens-woman-of-color-sham-come-back-to-haunt-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She has gained a reputation as a rancorous [[partisan]] [[demagogue]] and science denier for rejecting solid DNA evidence that she is not a Native American.  While she has repudiated her [[Native American]] heritage in order to run for president, she has yet to repudiate her Professorship at [[Harvard University]] or [[U.S. Senate]] seat which were gained under false pretenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While still posing as a Native American, Warren also became somewhat infamous for chugging down a beer in front of a [[Youtube]] audience.  She is a sponsor of the [[Democratic Socialist]] [[Green New Deal]] and [[Medicare for All]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/demsocialists/photos/if-we-want-medicare-for-all-a-green-new-deal-or-free-public-college-we-need-demo/1902965156468958/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren is a socialist [[mass murder]] denier and advocate of a [[democidal]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren announced her candidacy for Democrat presidential nomination in January 2019, running on re-cycled Clintonisms such as &amp;quot;work hard and play by the rules,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is falling behind,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is getting hollowed out,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is under attack,&amp;quot; and so forth.  Warren has been notified to preserve evidence of [[slander]], [[defamation]] and a possible [[hate crime]] for her actions in relation to the [[Covington kids]] incident.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/42988/nick-sandmanns-lawyer-sends-letters-these-54-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_campaign=benshapiro&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Family and background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0102-NWS-BHR-L-warren98.jpg|right|200x|thumb|Elizabeth Warren using a [[racist]] and vulgar stereotype of her chosen ethnic identity.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was born Elizabeth Ann Herring on June 22, 1949 in Oklahoma City where the entire family, according to Warren, fantasized about being Native American. Warren attended [[George Washington University]] for two years, but dropped out to get married.  She married Jim Warren, who she met in high school, in 1968.  The couple had two children and divorced in 1978.  Warren is a graduate of the [[University of Houston]] and  the [[Rutgers University]] Law School.  She married Bruce Mann, a law professor, in 1980.  She taught at University of Pennsylvania Law School from 1990 to 1995 and at Harvard Law School since 1995.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Warren, Elizabeth (2008). &amp;quot;[http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/ewarren/Warren%20CV%20062508.pdf Curriculum Vitae]&amp;quot;. Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren was a [[registered Republican]] from 1991 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (Jan. 9, 2019), &amp;quot;[https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/08/opinions/elizabeth-warren-koczela/index.html Fifteen Things You Didn’t Know about Elizabeth Warren]&amp;quot;, ''National Review''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren published a cookbook of Native American recipes allegedly handed down by her Irish grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, Warren was elected U.S. senator from Massachusetts, defeating Republican [[Scott Brown]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren is the great-great-great granddaughter of Jonathan Crawford, a member of the Tennessee Militia who rounded up Cherokees from their family homes in the Southeastern United States and herded them into government-built stockades in what was then called Ross's Landing (now Chattanooga), Tennessee–the point of origin for the horrific [[Trail of Tears]], which began in January, 1837.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After giving up on pretending to be a Native American, Warren confided another fantasy to a journalist that if she had a [[penis]], she would be president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/jTP81PFts5s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On the issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Dumps socialism for Clinton Foundation donors===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton.jpg|left|275px|thumb|Warren, a Clinton protégé, loyalties have never been with the Obama, Biden, or Sanders' klans.]]&lt;br /&gt;
For all her Socialist rhetoric, Warren's fraud was on full display when she refused to support Senator [[Bernie Sanders]] in the 2016 Democrat presidential primaries and supported the [[corrupt]] machine candidacy of [[Hillary Clinton]].  Additionally, many [[multinational corporation]]s that Warren built her career attacking are pay-to-play recipients of [[Clinton Foundation]] schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's rise to fame was entirely built upon espousing [[Marxist]] [[class warfare|class hate and envy]], a position she still advocates.  She is the original author of the &amp;quot;[[You didn't build that|You didn't build that business]]&amp;quot; speech, later infamously plagiarized by [[Barack Obama]].  Warren has proposed &amp;quot;nationalization&amp;quot; of U.S. corporations to achieve a socialist America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;i.e. [[national socialism]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Nn-3gpjmSPI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal hypocrisy|Despite voicing opposition to Wall Street]], Warren attended a donor retreat in Martha's Vineyard with several CEOs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jashinsky, Emily (September 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/elizabeth-warren-is-hypocritically-meeting-with-wall-street-ceos/article/2635061 Elizabeth Warren is hypocritically meeting with Wall Street CEOs]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the pre-primary period Warren was being secretly advised by Hillary Clinton;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/warren-clinton-talk-behind-scenes-2020-race-intensifies-n1049701&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; she is a longtime operative of the anti-Obama, anti-Sanders, Clinton camp; in 2016, Warren dumped on [[Progressive]]s when she supported Hillary Clinton over [[Comrade]] Sanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the ''New York Times'' admits Warren is a corporate con posing as a [[grassroots]] Leftie.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/even-the-nyt-admits-warren-is-a-corporate-con-posing-as-a-grassroots-leftie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Semitism and the Women's March===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Weiombxsa (2).JPG|right|300px|thumb|Warren (right in light blue) with Women's March organizer [[Linda Sarsour]] (left in [[hijab]]) at the [[Kavanaugh smear|Kavanaugh hearings]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat Party leaders have been accused of enabling anti-Semitism.  [[Women's March]] co-founders [[Linda Sarsour]] has been criticized for her outspoken support of anti-Semitic demagogue [[Louis Farrakhan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (January 19, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/womens-march-supporters-peel-off-amid-anti-semitism-scandal Women’s March losing steam, supporters amid anti-Semitism concerns]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two directors of the U.S.-based Jewish NGO the Anti-Defamation League, along with the president of the Zionist Organization of America, have criticized Sarsour's stance on Israel.  Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL's director, has said that Sarsour's support of BDS &amp;quot;encourages and spreads anti-Semitism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sales&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[http://www.jta.org/2017/05/02/news-opinion/united-states/linda-sarsour-why-the-palestinian-american-activist-has-courted-controversy Linda Sarsour: Why the Palestinian-American activist is controversial]|agency=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |date=May 2, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has refused to condemn Farrakhan's extremely anti-Semitic rhetoric.&amp;lt;ref name=jpost&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Womens-March-leaders-refuse-to-condemn-Farrakhan-after-antisemitic-speech-544074 Women’s March leaders refuse to condemn Farrakhan after antisemitic speech ]|work=The Jerusalem Post|date=March 3, 2018}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has called for adherents of [[Islam]] to carry out [[jihad]] against [[President Trump]] and has praised Imam Siraj Wahhaj,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Siraj Wahhaj has said, &amp;quot;It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the [[U.S. Constitution]] with the Quran.&amp;quot;  He has also said, &amp;quot;If [[Allah]] says 100 strikes, 100 strikes it is.  If Allah says cut off their hand, you cut off their hand.  If Allah says stone them to death, through the [[Prophet Muhammad]], then you stone them to death, because it’s the obedience of Allah and his messenger—nothing personal.&amp;quot;  Siraj Wahhaj is also the father of one of two men arrested on August 8, 2018, in [[New Mexico]].  The two were training 11 children to carry out [[Young mass murderers|school shootings]].  A 3-year-old boy was killed during an exorcism at the desert compound.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; named in court documents as an alleged “co-conspirator” in the [[1993 World Trade Center bombing]].  Awad is co-founder and Executive Director of the [[Council on American Islamic Relations]] (CAIR) which has direct ties to [[Hamas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has made Max Berger her campaign's director of progressive partnerships. Berger was the co-founder of an anti-Israel group called [[If Not Now]] (INN). In July 2014, Berger and other INN activists were arrested after occupying the lobby of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.  Berger was protesting Israel's efforts to stop rocket attacks. Berger tweeted (but later deleted): “What Israel is doing in Gaza should be familiar to Jews. It’s called a pogrom. You’d think Jews would be against those.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2014 Berger tweeted: “I dare anyone to visit Hebron and tell me what’s happening there doesn’t look an awful lot like [[apartheid]].” The accusation that Israel is an apartheid state is a classic anti-Semitic canard. That smear is the premise of the BDS movement, which Berger supports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Berger also defended [[Ilhan Elmi Omar]] and her anti-Semitic colleague, Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]]. He even wrote a piece in the now bankrupt ''Think Progress'' titled “American Jews must stand with Ilhan Omar.” In the column, he defended Omar's attacks on American supporters of Israel with the same anti-Semitic tropes, writing that “American politicians of both parties have been afraid to criticize apartheid in Israel and occupation in Palestine for fear of angering pro-Israel lobbying groups and right-wing Evangelical supporters of Israel.”  Berger has also defended Linda Sarsour, tweeting that she “embodies solidarity in a way her Jewish critics do not. #JewsForLinda.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Progressive Zionists of California (PZC) have written two letters to Warren's campaign asking that Berger “step down” from his position.  “He has positioned himself firmly against even the most progressive Zionism, the liberation movement that helps to ensure a safe and secure homeland for the Jewish people while also standing for Palestinian sovereignty and self-determination,” PZC co-founders Susan George and Paul Kujawsky wrote. “We must stress that Berger is not merely criticizing Israel’s policies he deems unfair or unjust–progressive and liberal Zionists do that regularly—Berger is opposing the very existence of Israel as a Jewish state.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/11/warren-mimics-bernies-promotion-anti-semite-linda-sarsour-campaign-surrogate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Slashing retirement benefits===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's proposed Accountable Capitalism Act would require [[corporation]]s to not serve the interests of [[shareholder]]s. Almost 50% of  all stocks in the United States are held by 401(1)k shareholders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/09/22/elizabeth-warrens-plan-slash-retirement-funds/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Green New Deal and Amazon===&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. [[Carolyn Maloney]] of [[New York]], who also supports the [[Green New Deal]], was livid when her fellow [[Communist]]s killed the prospect of [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] bringing its main headquarters to New York and creating 25,000 jobs with wages averaging $150,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/nnVS-Zah54k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Elizabeth Warren and [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] took credit for killing the deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amazon was promised up to $1.5 billion in tax abatements in exchange for the promise of creating 25,000 jobs.  Ocasio-Cortez believes a tax abatement, which is a deferment against future taxes, is a bucket of cash the government can spend now on subways or teachers.  And no one ever explained to her that the $1.5 in future taxes would never be paid or even exist if the company chose not to locate in her district.  Warren called the tax incentives &amp;quot;bribes.&amp;quot;   Warren tweeted {{quotebox|&amp;quot;How long will we allow giant [[corporation]]s to hold our democracy hostage?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/14/politics/amazon-aoc-democrats-future/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the planet from the scourge of &amp;quot;[[global warming]],&amp;quot; Warren campaigns in a private jet, the purview of millionaires and billionaires. When discovered using the elitist mode of transportation leaving a massive carbon footprint, Warren tried to hide behind staffers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/02/05/watch-green-new-deal-elizabeth-warren-try-to-hide-after-getting-off-of-a-private-jet-n2560742&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020 presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:D-B-j9nXUAUy876.jpg|right|275px|thumb|[[NBC]] and the [[DNC]] rigged the First Debate to favor Elizabeth Warren.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Elizabeth Warren presidential campaign|2020 presidential election|2020 Democratic party issues}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren declared her intention to run for president in January 2019. Allegedly by the luck of the draw, the DNC spotlighted Elizabeth Warren who was rising in the polls the night of the First Debate.  Warren of course, was given more speaking time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1144058895863832577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1144058895863832577&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdailycaller.com%2F2019%2F06%2F26%2Ftulsi-gabbard-warren-more-time-debate%2F Tulsi Gabbard Twitter account].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Beto O'Rourke]] was scripted in as her chief rival. Warren proclaimed, &amp;quot;The 71 percent of Americans who say the economy is doing well are wrong.&amp;quot;  A [[Drudge Report]] poll afterward showed [[Tulsi Gabbard]] scored 41% among viewers compared to Warren's 11% The two old white guys, [[Bernie Sanders]] and [[Joe Biden]] were paired off the second night along with the upstart [[gay]] Mayor [[Pete Buttigieg]].  Viewers patiently awaited the Socialist cage match, Bernie vs. Liz.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/24/socialist-thunderdome-bernie-vs-liz-warren-who-comes-out-on-top/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the first debate, Warren introduced the term, &amp;quot;Latinx,&amp;quot; which the [[thought police]] intend to replace &amp;quot;Latina&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Latino&amp;quot; with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/26/elizabeth-warren-uses-pc-term-latinx-first-dem-debate-will-catch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A poll found 98% of Latinos do not like the term &amp;quot;Latinx&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://medium.com/@ThinkNowTweets/progressive-latino-pollster-trust-me-latinos-do-not-identify-with-latinx-63229adebcea&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren claims that too many black and brown people being born is a &amp;quot;problem&amp;quot; for Israel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtMibsG7eP4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fears over [[Biden's age]] and mental capacities propelled Warren to frontrunner status, yet ''Politico'' reported fundamental questions of honesty and character remained in the minds of voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/27/pocahontas-elizabeth-warrens-biggest-vulnerability-227912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon moving into first place Warren began courting black voters, promising a seat on the back of the bus to the &amp;quot;toxic masculinity&amp;quot; of a black man as [[vice president]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/hilariously-desperate-moves-by-democratic-candidates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[African American]] scholar Kevin Jackson has dubbed her &amp;quot;Donald Trump roadkill 2.0&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/in-case-you-missed-it-biden-unofficially-quit-the-race/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Warren's campaign flamed out in the [[Iowa Caucus]]es, Warren operatives blamed the [[sexism]] of Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2qPFLmZDPo Warren Supporter Blames Lagging Polls Numbers on Dems Being Sexist]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After her humiliating [[New Hampshire]] defeat Warren told supporters to breathe deep, eat chocolate, and ‘hug your pet’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/warren-comforts-supporters-after-new-hampshire-defeat-by-saying-breathe-deep-eat-chocolate-and-hug-your-pet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two days after [[Super Tuesday]] Warren bowed out, endorsing no one.  President Trump aptly observed Warren cost Bernie Sanders the nomination in favor of the DNC [[establishment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1235598653114511360&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In all, Warren played a role in killing off three contenders in the bloated field of 2020 - [[Bernie Sanders]], [[Michael Bloomberg]], and herself.  Upon her demise [[Andrew Klavan]] commented:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;It's true that at one point Democrat voters made war on their frontrunner, but a rampant and sudden [[sexism]] changed all that when she announced her unworkable and unaffordable health care plan and voters suddenly realized that women can't do math or use reason. This disgusting prejudice has to stop so that a person without the ability to reason can become president, otherwise we're just going to keep electing Republicans. Other Democrat pundits lamented that we now probably won't get a female president in their lifetime, when it was pointed out that [[Nikki Haley]] could win the presidency in 2024. Democrats objected that Haley was not a woman but a Republican.  Then they retired behind closed doors to change the rules so that [[Tulsi Gabbard]] couldn't get into the next debate.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Identity politics===&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2019 Democrat rising star&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|last1=Dreier|first1=Peter|title=50 Young Progressive Activists Who Are Changing America|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-dreier/progressive-activists_b_2226919.html|accessdate=|work=The Huffington Post|date=December 12, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Andrew Gillum]] was reported by ''[[Vanity Fair]]'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/elizabeth-warren-andrew-gillum-ticket&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[The Daily Beast]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/elizabeth-warren-has-been-talking-to-andrew-gillum-sparking-vice-president-buzz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other [[liberal]] [[mainstream media]] news outlets as with Warren as a possible [[Vice President]]ial running mate.  On the same day ''[[The Washington Post]]'' recommended Gillum for the VP spot,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://archive.is/QfvFt If Democrats want to win, they need a black politician on the ticket]'', Theodore R. Johnson, ''The Washington Post'', March 13, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gillum was found by Miami emergency responders to a [[methamphetamine]] overdose nude in a hotel room with two other nude men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1241426486302662656&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Under the precedent established by Democrats in the [[Monica Lewinsky|Monica Lewinsky scandal]], ''what a person does in their private life is nobody's business''.  However, Gillum is [[African American]], so the Democrats' own precedent standard may not apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cultural appropriation====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren claimed her parents eloped because her father's family did not want him to marry a woman who was part Native American.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was a lateral hire onto the faculty of the Harvard Law School in 1995 after having listed herself as a minority of American Indian (specifically, Cherokee) descent, despite her fair-skinned appearance and a lack of persuasive documentary evidence for her claim to minority status.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-controversy-over-elizabeth-warrens-claimed-native-american-heritage/2012/09/27/d0b7f568-08a5-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html?utm_term=.367f03c92d5d Detailed summary of Warren's claimed minority status]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The fair-skinned Warren obtained [[affirmative action]] preferences by falsely claiming that she was of &amp;quot;[[American Indian]]&amp;quot; descent, when in fact her heritage does not support her claim under widely accepted standards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100165458/elizabeth-warrens-native-american-claims-if-she-was-a-republican-the-media-would-call-her-a-racist/ &amp;quot;Elizabeth Warren's 'Native American' claims: if she was a Republican, the media would call her a racist.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When President [[Donald Trump]] ridiculed Warren's false claims of American Indian ancestry and challenged her to prove it by taking a DNA test, she responded by falsely branding Trump as a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.  She released the results of a DNA test obtained at Stanford University in October 2018 initially claiming her as having between 1/64th and 1/512th Indigenous ancestry, but was later revealed to be as little as 1/1024th ancestry, not even involving American Indian DNA samples, but instead samples from Mexico, Peru and Colombia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warren-melts-down-in-wake-of-dna-disaster/ Elizabeth Warren Melts Down in Wake of DNA Disaster] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats criticized Warren's stunt which hampered enthusiasm and fundraising two weeks before the [[2018 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/411477-former-obama-campaign-manager-questions-timing-of-warren?amp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even [[CNN]] attempted to mitigate its reputation for [[fake news]] by overtly criticizing Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/politics/elizabeth-warren-donald-trump-pocahontas/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a charter member of the Hate America movement; like [[Obama]], who passed himself off as being born in [[Kenya]] to a literary agent in 1992, Warren denied her white immigrant American heritage as early as 1987 in order gain access to [[affirmative action]] programs.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite her claims, Warren's grandfather fought American Indians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leahy, Michael Patrick (September 12, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/12/elizabeth-warren-a-direct-descendant-of-militia-indian-fighter-who-fought-seminole-tribe/ Elizabeth Warren a Direct Descendant of Militia ‘Indian Fighter’ Who Fought Seminole Tribe]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 10 debate appearances, Elizabeth Warren was never asked once by the [[fake news]] media complex about her false claims of Native American heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/06/warren-went-all-10-debates-without-one-question-about-her-native-american-claims-894450&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cherokee Nation rejects her claims====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren fraud.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren fraudulently claims American Indian heritage on her Texas Bar Registration card.  Elizabeth Warren has an established pattern of stealing funds from affirmative action programs intended for oppressed minorities.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Cherokee Nation repudiated Warren's attempts to link herself to them through DNA testing in this statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship.  Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America.  Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation.  Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong.  It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven.  Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/cherokee-nation-issues-statement-on-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results Cherokee Nation issues statement on Sen. Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to having her American Indian ancestry claims publicly discredited, Warren went on an erratic and unhinged Twitter rant, falsely accusing Trump of making &amp;quot;creepy physical threats&amp;quot; against her and making other false allegations against him.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Despite Warren being proven as a fraud by the DNA test, however, the liberal media (including [[CNN]], [[CNBC]], [[NPR]] and the ''[[Washington Post]]'') continues to unquestioningly stand by her lies and false ancestral claims and to attack her critics, including Trump, by falsely accusing them of &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot;, which serves only to further discredit both themselves and Warren in the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/dna-tests-prove-elizabeth-warren-only-has-1-1024th-indian-heritage-and-is-a-fraud-liberal-media-reports-the-opposite/ DNA Tests Prove Elizabeth Warren Only Has 1/1024th Indian Heritage and Is a Fraud — Liberal Media Reports the Opposite] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After 35 years of advancing her career by falsely claiming to have American Indian ancestry and expropriating affirmative action funds intended for real minorities, Warren eventually apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (February 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31418-warren-s-sorry-for-indian-tale-but-she-s-been-telling-it-for-at-least-35-years Warren’s Sorry for Indian Tale, but She’s Been Telling It for At Least 35 Years]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Racism, race baiting and anti-Semitism====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Racist.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has struggled to name three black Americans who have been influential to her, dancing around the question in separate interviews [[liberal wordiness|with lengthy responses that did very little to actually answer the question]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/11/09/elizabeth-warren-struggles-to-name-three-prominent-black-americans-she-would-appoint-850708 Elizabeth Warren struggles to name three black Americans influential to her]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To compensate, Warren claimed Michael Brown, who spawned the [[Obama riots]], was &amp;quot;murdered by a white police officer&amp;quot; (a claim later discredited by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/11/sharyl-attkisson-fact-check-2020-democrats-murder-michael-brown/ Sharyl Attkisson Fact-Checks 2020 Democrats Over The ‘Murder’ Of Michael Brown] at the Daily Caller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; provoking widespread criticism for Warren's attempt to politicize the incident.  Even the far-Left ''Washington Post'' fact checkers awarded her four Pinocchios for lying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren threatened a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' to cut off aid to [[Israel]], which drew criticism against her on Twitter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/21/elizabeth-warren-warns-she-may-cut-off-us-aid-to-israel-if-elected-842133 Elizabeth Warren warns she may cut off US aid to Israel if elected]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of taking responsibility for her campaign's own actions when minority staffers were quitting the campaign (stating that they were merely being used as tokens because of their race instead of having their ideas utilized), Warren chose to blame America's racist &amp;quot;legacy&amp;quot;, ignoring that her own Democrat Party was, and still is, responsible for that racism and oppression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/07/warren-blames-americas-racist-legacy-for-minority-staffers-resigning-from-her-campaign/ Warren Blames America’s Racist ‘Legacy’ For Minority Staffers Resigning From Her Campaign] at the Federalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren dropped a truth bomb in the 2020 New Hampshire presidential debate:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;I’m glad to stand on this stage with my fellow Democrats who talk about how important the black community is, at least at election time. Year after year after year, election after election after election, Democrats go to people in the black community and say “Boy, we really care about these issues. Racism is terrible, we all want to do something,” and then somehow the problem just seems to keep getting worse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/video-warren-drops-shocking-truth-in-last-debate-trump-is-right-the-democrat-party-has-been-making-life-worse-for-black-families-not-better/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Private prisons====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bought $50,000 in shares of a Vanguard Group fund that heavily invested in private prison companies. The fund was the largest shareholder of America's largest private prison corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren invested in Vanguard Target Retirement 2025—a retirement account run by the Vanguard Group, an investment management company—which in turn invested more than 30 percent of its money in Vanguard's domestic stock index fund. Vanguard was the top shareholder of Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), and one of the largest of GEO Group, both private prison companies, according to data from the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]]. Vanguard owned more than 12 million CCA shares and nearly 9 million GEO Group shares, which were worth roughly $456 million and $216 million, respectively, in March 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CCA, now called CoreCivic, was already the country's largest owner of private prisons in 2013, according to an annual report. The company owned or controlled more than 50 correctional or detention facilities in the country, &amp;quot;with a total design capacity of approximately 86,000 beds in 20 states and the [[District of Columbia]].&amp;quot; GEO Group is also one of the largest private prison providers in the country with 66 prison facilities across the world as of 2013. The two companies also operate many Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-invested-in-private-prisons/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Immigration====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is an advocate for free healthcare&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/Catching-Up-With-Elixabeth-Warren-on-Immigration-and-Health-Care-560527801.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for [[transgender]] migrants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1185546131738124290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren also backs [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]'s proposal for [[welfare]] for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-backs-aocs-illegal-immigrant-welfare-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  AOC did not return the favor and endorsed Bernie Sanders for president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/video/2019/10/19/aoc-endorses-bernie-sanders-at-nyc-rally?videoId=614927977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013 Warren voted for S.744 providing for 700 miles of a border wall;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://votesmart.org/bill/16819/44567/141272/border-security-economic-opportunity-and-immigration-modernization-act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in February 2019 Warren referred to a border wall as a &amp;quot;monument of hate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nomosshere.tumblr.com/post/186866604027/warren-supporters-asked-about-her-voting-for-700&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has deceptively misrepresented [[immigration]] issues on the campaign trail; illegal entry is a criminal act, not seeking asylum. People who seek asylum at a port of entry are not charged with a crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
At a Democrat primary debate on June 26, 2019, Warren could not think of any restriction on abortion that she supported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Givas, Nicholas (June 26, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/warren-abortion-restriction-democratic-debate Warren can't think of a single abortion restriction she supports during Democratic debate]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Free stuff===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bamboozles childish voters with vague pledges of free stuff, free healthcare, free debt forgiveness, free dope needles, open borders, etc. The cost, of course, will be paid for by anyone who has a job or wants to raise a family. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fellow Massachusettsan Rep. [[Seth Moulton]] says of Warren's free tuition plan, &amp;quot;You could literally end [[poverty]] in America for five or six years for what she's going to give to kids who are trying to pay for their own college. Half of America goes to college and it's not the bottom half.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/seth-moulton-bashes-warrens-free-college-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the [[extremist]] [[Bill de Blasio]], Warren is one of the few Democrats openly advocating for the destruction of private health insurance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-private-health-insurance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren supports the [[Democratic Socialists of America|Democratic Socialist]]s call for [[slave]] reparations as a way to maintain Black dependency on government and buy votes for Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/us/politics/2020-democrats-race-policy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/430999-warren-harris-back-reparations-for-black-americans-affected-by-slavery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.leftvoice.org/DSA-Votes-for-BDS-Reparations-and-Out-of-the-Socialist-International&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren did not elaborate if descendants of people who did not own slaves such as [[Native American]]s, [[Republican]]s, [[Italian]]s, [[Polish|Pole]]s, [[Jew]]s, [[Hispanic]]s and other [[ethnic group]]s that migrated to the United States after the [[American Civil War]] would be granted an exemption from paying reparations, or if Americans such as [[Kamala Harris]] and [[Barack Obama]] who have no ancestry connected to North American slaves would qualify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren criticizes Obama's Bailout of Wall Street and says it paved way for Trump's election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-obamas-bailout-of-wall-street-failure-paved-way-trumps-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren wants free taxpayer-funded surgeries for the gender-confused, despite the fact many such people have come out of the closet to express regret over their choice of permanent life-altering surgical mutilation to fit what they once thought was the gender they preferred.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/10/05/hundreds-transgenders-want-return-biological-sex-shunned-traitors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unrealized capital gains tax====&lt;br /&gt;
After much prodding and being attacked by Joe Biden for &amp;quot;vagueness,&amp;quot; Warren finally released a cost estimate for her collectivized healthcare proposal; the cost estimate came in at $52 Trillion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/warren-releases-52-trillion-medicare-for-all-plan-funded-by-unicorn-farts/ Warren Releases $52 Trillion ‘Medicare For All’ Plan Funded By Unicorn Farts], Chrissy Clark, ''The Federalist'', November 2, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - two and one half times [[GDP]] - with no specifics as to whom will bare the cost. Her estimate is based on a cluster of assumptions and veiled tax hikes on the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea that payroll tax hikes, repealing the Trump tax cuts, unregulated immigration, and slamming businesses with new taxes wouldn't hugely damage the middle class was received as pure fantasy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/01/ben-sasse-responds-elizabeth-warrens-medicare-plan-gold/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    Additionally, Warren promises free healthcare for illegal immigrants. No less than leftist loon Grand Puba [[Nancy Pelosi]] trashed Warren's insane Medicare for All proposal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/02/nancy-pelosi-cuts-elizabeth-warren-off-knees/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even Hillary Clinton trashed her insane healthcare ideas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-warrens-medicare-for-all-plan-wouldnt-pass-the-senate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's wealth tax is basically an unrealized capital gains tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2019/11/08/warren-wants-to-tax-unrealized-capital-gains-n2556165&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  John Hinderaker writing in ''Powerline'' blog analyzed the proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Part of the plan is a “wealth tax,” which means taxing unrealized [[capital gain]]s at [[ordinary income]] rates. Combined with other elements of her plan, this implies that unrealized capital gains will be taxed at more than 50%.  Taxing unrealized gains as ordinary income (from the new M4A plan, applies to top 1% of households), plus the 14.6% payroll tax she wants to levy on investment income, plus the financial transactions tax when you have to sell something to get the cash to pay the taxes....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren’s whole idea is so obviously [[stupid]] and incapable of implementation that one is tempted to laugh....lawyers are a core constituency of the Democratic Party, and nearly every lawyer in the U.S. (along with many others, of course) tolerates paying 50% marginal tax rates on his or her income only because a chunk of that income is sheltered in 401(k)s. The 401(k) and the house are where the vast majority of high income earners accumulate wealth. Warren’s proposal essentially destroys the ability to build wealth via retirement savings. This may be OK with those who are already rich, like Elizabeth Warren, but it will be [[anathema]] to younger people who are trying to become wealthy....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessing a “wealth tax” that invades previously tax-free 401(k)s at a 50%+ rate will destroy Warren’s support in what has been, in recent years, a core Democratic Party constituency. “Wall Street,” i.e. the financial industry, has already warned that if Warren is the Democrats’ nominee, it will not support her. That in itself is seismic; no industry has ever supported a politician to the extent that [[Wall Street]] supported [[Barack Obama]] and [[Hillary Clinton]]. But the loss of support from America’s lawyers might be even more deadly to the Democratic Party....One unfortunate thing about targeting lawyers (and their often-liberal wives) is that many of them actually understand the implications of policy proposals. Here as usual, understanding is fatal to Liz Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/warren-loses-the-lawyers.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Education====&lt;br /&gt;
A father confronted Warren on her proposals for free tuition, asking if he could get his money back for working double shifts and sacrificed buying new cars and vacations to pay off student loans. Warren refused.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/01/22/can-i-have-my-money-back-father-confronts-elizabeth-warren-over-student-loan-forgiveness/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Father : My daughter is in school, I saved all my money just to pay student loans Can I have my money back? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren: of course not &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Father: so you want to help those who don't save any money and the ones that do the right thing get  screwed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has pledged to have a 9 year old transgender person vet her choice for [[Secretary of Education]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Doomsday cult===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{days until|2029|12|31}} Days Until Final Destruction of the Planet'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a leader in the [[Green New Deal]] doomsday cult.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1169437706469990401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Green New Deal====&lt;br /&gt;
As part of a fundraising scheme,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://secure.actblue.com/donate/have-a-drink-with-ew?refcode=WFP2019-DD-NATL-TW-US-BCON&amp;amp;refcode2=INT-EW-21%5E65-MF-BCON-STA-LGBK-BCD&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has offered to burn thousands of gallons of fossil fuels emitting thousands of pounds of carbon fuel emissions into the atmosphere, destroying the planet, to fly the winner of a drawing to have a [[beer]] with Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1155515626527612928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fossil fuels====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren promises to ban [[fracking]] on her first day in office, which would rebuild the [[Russia]]n economy.  Russia, [[China]], [[Iran]] and [[Venezuela]] would be the biggest winners, American consumers the biggest losers. Warren's promise in her first 24 hours would immediately:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren tweet.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren sent a fake news tweet claiming Mark Zuckerberg endorsed Donald Trump.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Hand [[Vladimir Putin]] hundreds of billions worth of enhanced Russian energy exports.  A windfall of economic growth that will mean Russian policy expansion globally.&lt;br /&gt;
*Support the regime of Venezuelan dictator [[Nicolas Maduro]] who relies on oil production and pricing to keep his socialist government in place.&lt;br /&gt;
*Expand the influence of China; and increase the value of [[Beijing]]’s investments in Russian energy and 49% state in PDVSA (Venezuela).&lt;br /&gt;
*Immediately help the Iranian economy; enhance the stranglehold of power by the Mullah’s over the Iranian people; help fund [[terrorist]] actions globally, and specifically create terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya and Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
*Return U.S. policy and strategy back to a position of dependence on [[OPEC]] nations; so we can expect more U.S. military involvement in the middle-east.&lt;br /&gt;
*Destroy growth in American wages , and set up energy policy that will drive further industrial manufacturing out of the U.S. and into Mexico and Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Simultaneously drive up the price of electricity in the U.S, further exacerbating the financial costs and losses to the U.S. middle-class.&lt;br /&gt;
*Raise gas prices back to Obama-era rates $5/gal.&lt;br /&gt;
*In turn this will drive up the cost of transported products, and U.S. food prices will jump approximately 20% as massive inflation hits highly-consumable categories first.&lt;br /&gt;
*The collective impact of the four domestic points above will drive down the ability of consumers to spend on other goods.  The U.S. economy is two-thirds dependent on consumer spending. The collective impact means economic contraction (i.e [[Recession]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Violence===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has taken credit for the [[Occupy Wall Street]] movement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street-2011-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which has employed [[violence]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/occupy-wall-street-protests-turn-violent-when-demonstrators-clash-with-police&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the name of &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; and socialism.  [[Connor Betts]], an Elizabeth Warren supporter, [[Antifa]] member and registered Democrat,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; murdered 9 people in the [[Dayton nightclub shooting]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/report-networks-silent-shocking-leftist-leanings-dayton-shooter-support-antifa-elizabeth-warren/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including 6 [[African American]]s. Warren supports the [[Abolish ICE]] movement.  Betts posted to Twitter, “I do not consider ICE agents to be human beings,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1158420694092242944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; echoed [[Ocasio-Cortez]]' statement that [[ICE]] detention facilities were &amp;quot;[[concentration camp]]s&amp;quot; and praised the Seattle ICE bomber as a &amp;quot;martyr.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Lives Matter]] [[Louisville]] leader Chanelle Helm is a political activist who has met with numerous high-profile politicians,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/08/22/black-lives-matter-activist-unveils-list-demands-white-people-give-up-home/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/KamVTV/status/1159236848717160448&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chanelle Helm posted video to her [[Facebook]] page showing a protest at Senate Majority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]]’s house. Helm was shouting: “just stab the motherf—er in the heart.”  “F*ck yo neck, b*tch. Murder Turtle! Murder Turtle! … F*ck yo thoughts and prayers … F*ck you, f*ck yo wife, f*ck everything you stand for.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/06/protesters-gather-outside-mitch-mcconnell-louisville-home-monday-night/1930377001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook and censorship===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren should expect a huge legal battle if she becomes the next US president and tries to lead a breakup of [[Facebook]]. In an internal employee meeting in July 2019, Facebook [[CEO]] [[Mark Zuckerberg]] threatened “to go to the mat” and “fight” attempts to breakup Facebook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/10/1/20893133/mark-zuckerberg-elizabeth-warren-facebook-sue-us-government-tech-breakup&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gun rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like rich leftwing [[pedophile]]s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime], By Margo Kaplan Op-ed, ''[[The New York Times]]'', Oct. 5, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren wants only the rich to have legal protection to own a gun.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2019/08/12/elizabeth-warren-wants-make-expensive-exercise-rights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impeachment scam===&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Sen. [[Lisa Murkowski]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowskis-statement-on-senate-impeachment-process-vote&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; whom Democrats pinned their impeachment hopes on, explained her decision to vote against calling more witnesses when Warren attacked Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] during the Senate trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/elizabeth-warren-john-roberts-impeachment-trial&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Deceptive employment practices===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has built much of her career as a champion of workers and consumers against the deceptive and exploitative practices of employers.  Several volunteers describe the process for entry into her campaign as deceptive and exploitative. They were pushed toward unpaid positions over paid ones, misled over the availability of financial assistance, and asked to sign highly irregular restrictive nondisclosure agreements. The positions were advertised as a paid intern, while actually only that of an unpaid volunteer for academic credit. Victims called it a &amp;quot;great scam.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/sen-elizabeth-warren-fellowship-applicants-say-campaign-program-was-a-great-scam&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mental fitness===&lt;br /&gt;
Like Rachel Dolezal, a white [[NAACP]] official who insisted that she was &amp;quot;[[African American]]&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/2015/06/21/dolezal-is-not-just-an-imposter-she-is-mentally-ill/ Dolezal is not just an imposter, she is mentally ill]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many have questioned Elizabeth Warren's mental fitness to hold office as a bitter clinger to her appropriated cultural identity despite [[science]] proving her delusional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Wikipedia]]: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Particularly in the 21st century, cultural appropriation is often considered harmful, and to be a violation of the collective intellectual property rights of the originating, minority cultures, notably indigenous cultures and those living under colonial rule....Such practices may be seen as particularly harmful in schools and universities which have a stated purpose of promoting ethnic diversity and inclusion...}} ''Bustle'' noted when {{quotebox|&amp;quot;privileged individuals cherry-picks part of a culture belonging to a group of marginalized people, then uses it for fashion or performance purposes, leaving behind the true meaning of the characteristic and thus disrespecting the culture from which it was born. When we hear retorts about the offensiveness of cultural appropriation, people will often say they're simply &amp;quot;appreciating the culture&amp;quot;. While cultural appreciation is possible, the line often gets crossed into appropriation because these representations lead to overgeneralized racial stereotypes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bustle.com/articles/160328-how-cultural-appropriation-hurts-us-all&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} An article in ''Psychology Today'' compares cultural identity theft to credit card fraud and theft: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;The thief was clever enough to hack your account, so the company lets them use it. This is what happens in cultural appropriation—the adoption and misuse of another culture’s practices. Someone takes something from your culture and uses it for their own benefit. And there are no consequences.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/life-in-the-intersection/201706/cultural-identity-theft&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Like Dolezal, Warren and supporters claim &amp;quot;transracial identity&amp;quot; to justify cultural appropriation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is in the habit of drinking alone, which is symptomatic of an advanced degree of [[alcoholism]].  Some speculate her claim to Native American heritage was a crude effort to hide her use of alcohol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren once eulogized a former colleague by accusing him of [[sexual harassment]] in front of his ex-wife and children, according to a profile of the presidential candidate in the ''Washington Post''.  Warren, who got her first full-time teaching job at the University of Houston, returned to campus 15 years later to deliver a eulogy for UH law professor Eugene Smith. Smith was a “champion” of Warren, according to WaPo, and specifically requested she speak at his funeral after he passed away from polio complications.  During her [[eulogy]] Warren reportedly “stunned” funeral attendees when she told what was meant to be a lighthearted story about Smith chasing her around his office.  From WaPo:&lt;br /&gt;
:“With a smile on her face and humor in her voice, Warren described how Smith had invited her to his office one day just a few months after she had been hired. He shut the door and lunged for her, she said, and as she protested, he chased her around his desk before she was able to escape out the door.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/15/liz-warren-me-too-eulogy-professor-widow-funeral/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2018 Senate campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
A racist Warren volunteer was taken down by supporters of [[Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai]] of [[MIT]] and arrested when he assaulted Dr.  Ayyadurai, who was running against Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/RzFqx-avBS4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lPKqkzzYkmJb?t=65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CFPB corruption==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] (CFPB) was created in 2009 by a majority Democrat Congress and signed into law by President Obama with Elizabeth Warren's as its first head.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2010-09-19-1.html Obama Spits on the Constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The CFPB was found to be a massive fundraising scam, tapping into the [[U.S. Treasury]] to support Democrat pet projects by awarding contracts to Democrat operatives and organizations. ''The Daily Caller'' reported: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Obama’s presidential campaign advertising agency received nearly $60 million in federal contracts after he took office...The overwhelming majority of the $58 million funneled to GMMB came from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) created by Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2011.  The CFPB awarded the agency a whopping $43.7 million, about 75 percent of GMMB’s total federal funding stream.  The second-most lucrative government account for GMMB is a community service agency founded by Bill Clinton, the Corporation for National and Community Service, which awarded GMMB $13.1 million worth of contracts....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/09/13/exclusive-obamas-top-campaign-ad-firm-got-nearly-60m-in-federal-contracts ''Obama’s Top Campaign Ad Firm Got Nearly $60M In Federal Contracts''], The Daily Caller, September 13th, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' reported, &amp;quot;The pride of Harvard Law School, Ms. Warren is a hero to the political Left for proposing a new bureaucracy to micromanage the services that banks can offer consumers.  But she is also so politically controversial that no less a liberal lion than Connecticut Senator [[Chris Dodd]] has warned the White House that she probably isn't confirmable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=wsj&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748703440604575495681843430198-lMyQjAxMTAwMDEwODExNDgyWj.html Elizabeth III - Obama to Senate: Stick that in your advice and consent clause.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2019, [[Antifa]] leader José Alcoff, who had previously advocated for murder, was arrested in connection with an attack on two U.S. Marines a few months earlier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (January 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/31338-d-c-antifa-leader-who-advocated-murder-arrested-in-attack-on-marines D.C. Antifa Leader Who Advocated Murder Arrested for Attack on Marines]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Alcoff was working with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB  is a corrupt bureaucracy created out of the [[2008 Financial Crisis]] and Stimulus bill  under the doctrine of 'not letting a crisis go to waste', whose purpose is to funnel government contracts and federal money to far leftist media consulting firms to aid Democrat electoral aims.  It is the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren who served as its first head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government report chronicles several instances of [[discrimination]], many with an emphasis on unfair promotion practices and lopsided pay scales for minorities working at CFPB.  There are currently “scores of cases of U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau employees seeking protection from [[racial]]ly offensive, [[sexist]] or discriminatory behavior.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2014/08/29/federal-agency-elizabeth-warren-helped-found-is-rife-with-discrimination-employees-say&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In Popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://babylonbee.com/news/elizabeth-warren-admits-to-wearing-paleface-at-college-costume-party Elizabeth Warren Admits To Wearing Paleface At College Costume Party], ''The Babylon Bee''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cultural Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[White privilege]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cloward-Piven]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Warren, Elizabeth}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:115th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:116th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Presidential Election, 2020]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blame America Crowd]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tricksters]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891981</id>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891981"/>
		<updated>2022-10-08T23:21:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Redirect2|Senator Karen}} &lt;br /&gt;
{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Elizabeth Warren&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]] (before 1996)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democrat]] (1996 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Jim Warren (1968 – 1978)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bruce Mann (1980 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Methodist]] ([[Christian In Name Only|in name only]])&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2013 – present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Scott Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|status=s&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Godwin's Law.png|thumb|right|400px|Warren is seen here at the 2016 Democratic National Convention performing a [[Nazi]] salute.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Elizabeth Ann Warren''' (Also called '''Senator Karen''' and &amp;quot;Fauxcahontas&amp;quot; by some, due to her misrepresentation and claim of [[Native American]] ancestry)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fee, Gayle; Johnson, Megan; Raposa, Laura (May 17, 2012). [https://web.archive.org/web/20120525003643/http://bostonherald.com:80/track/inside_track/view/20120517elizabeth_warren_not_alone_on_the_trail Elizabeth Warren not history’s only Fauxcahontas]. ''Boston Herald''. Herald Media. Retrieved January 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the senior [[far-left]] [[Democrat Party|Democrat]] [[U.S. Senate|United States Senator]] from liberal [[Massachusetts]].  Warren robbed [[affirmative action]] programs to promote herself; she has built her entire career on [[fraud]]. Even [[Stephen Colbert]] called her out on her nonsense healthcare solutions proposals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2019/09/19/yikes-colbert-corners-warren-on-middle-tax-class-increases-then-calls-her-out-when-she-dodges-n2553342&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After her fake Indian claims were exposed, Warren was busted again for lying when she tried playing the victim card claiming to have been fired for being pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/records-show-elizabeth-warren-lied-about-being-fired-for-being-visibly-pregnant/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has robbed money from needy, oppressed, and deserving minorities to line her own pockets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has been accused of lying on federal forms to gain preferential treatment in hiring, claiming minority status in order to gain access to affirmative action programs.  Warren boasts of being the first &amp;quot;person of color&amp;quot; on the [[Harvard]] Law faculty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/will-elizabeth-warrens-woman-of-color-sham-come-back-to-haunt-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She has gained a reputation as a rancorous [[partisan]] [[demagogue]] and science denier for rejecting solid DNA evidence that she is not a Native American.  While she has repudiated her [[Native American]] heritage in order to run for president, she has yet to repudiate her Professorship at [[Harvard University]] or [[U.S. Senate]] seat which were gained under false pretenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While still posing as a Native American, Warren also became somewhat infamous for chugging down a beer in front of a [[Youtube]] audience.  She is a sponsor of the [[Democratic Socialist]] [[Green New Deal]] and [[Medicare for All]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/demsocialists/photos/if-we-want-medicare-for-all-a-green-new-deal-or-free-public-college-we-need-demo/1902965156468958/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren is a socialist [[mass murder]] denier and advocate of a [[democidal]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren announced her candidacy for Democrat presidential nomination in January 2019, running on re-cycled Clintonisms such as &amp;quot;work hard and play by the rules,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is falling behind,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is getting hollowed out,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is under attack,&amp;quot; and so forth.  Warren has been notified to preserve evidence of [[slander]], [[defamation]] and a possible [[hate crime]] for her actions in relation to the [[Covington kids]] incident.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/42988/nick-sandmanns-lawyer-sends-letters-these-54-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_campaign=benshapiro&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Family and background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0102-NWS-BHR-L-warren98.jpg|right|200x|thumb|Elizabeth Warren using a [[racist]] and vulgar stereotype of her chosen ethnic identity.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was born Elizabeth Ann Herring on June 22, 1949 in Oklahoma City where the entire family, according to Warren, fantasized about being Native American. Warren attended [[George Washington University]] for two years, but dropped out to get married.  She married Jim Warren, who she met in high school, in 1968.  The couple had two children and divorced in 1978.  Warren is a graduate of the [[University of Houston]] and  the [[Rutgers University]] Law School.  She married Bruce Mann, a law professor, in 1980.  She taught at University of Pennsylvania Law School from 1990 to 1995 and at Harvard Law School since 1995.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Warren, Elizabeth (2008). &amp;quot;[http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/ewarren/Warren%20CV%20062508.pdf Curriculum Vitae]&amp;quot;. Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren was a [[registered Republican]] from 1991 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (Jan. 9, 2019), &amp;quot;[https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/08/opinions/elizabeth-warren-koczela/index.html Fifteen Things You Didn’t Know about Elizabeth Warren]&amp;quot;, ''National Review''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren published a cookbook of Native American recipes allegedly handed down by her Irish grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, Warren was elected U.S. senator from Massachusetts, defeating Republican [[Scott Brown]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren is the great-great-great granddaughter of Jonathan Crawford, a member of the Tennessee Militia who rounded up Cherokees from their family homes in the Southeastern United States and herded them into government-built stockades in what was then called Ross's Landing (now Chattanooga), Tennessee–the point of origin for the horrific [[Trail of Tears]], which began in January, 1837.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After giving up on pretending to be a Native American, Warren confided another fantasy to a journalist that if she had a [[penis]], she would be president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/jTP81PFts5s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On the issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Dumps socialism for Clinton Foundation donors===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton.jpg|left|275px|thumb|Warren, a Clinton protégé, loyalties have never been with the Obama, Biden, or Sanders' klans.]]&lt;br /&gt;
For all her Socialist rhetoric, Warren's fraud was on full display when she refused to support Senator [[Bernie Sanders]] in the 2016 Democrat presidential primaries and supported the [[corrupt]] machine candidacy of [[Hillary Clinton]].  Additionally, many [[multinational corporation]]s that Warren built her career attacking are pay-to-play recipients of [[Clinton Foundation]] schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's rise to fame was entirely built upon espousing [[Marxist]] [[class warfare|class hate and envy]], a position she still advocates.  She is the original author of the &amp;quot;[[You didn't build that|You didn't build that business]]&amp;quot; speech, later infamously plagiarized by [[Barack Obama]].  Warren has proposed &amp;quot;nationalization&amp;quot; of U.S. corporations to achieve a socialist America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;i.e. [[national socialism]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Nn-3gpjmSPI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal hypocrisy|Despite voicing opposition to Wall Street]], Warren attended a donor retreat in Martha's Vineyard with several CEOs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jashinsky, Emily (September 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/elizabeth-warren-is-hypocritically-meeting-with-wall-street-ceos/article/2635061 Elizabeth Warren is hypocritically meeting with Wall Street CEOs]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the pre-primary period Warren was being secretly advised by Hillary Clinton;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/warren-clinton-talk-behind-scenes-2020-race-intensifies-n1049701&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; she is a longtime operative of the anti-Obama, anti-Sanders, Clinton camp; in 2016, Warren dumped on [[Progressive]]s when she supported Hillary Clinton over [[Comrade]] Sanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the ''New York Times'' admits Warren is a corporate con posing as a [[grassroots]] Leftie.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/even-the-nyt-admits-warren-is-a-corporate-con-posing-as-a-grassroots-leftie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Semitism and the Women's March===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Weiombxsa (2).JPG|right|300px|thumb|Warren (right in light blue) with Women's March organizer [[Linda Sarsour]] (left in [[hijab]]) at the [[Kavanaugh smear|Kavanaugh hearings]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat Party leaders have been accused of enabling anti-Semitism.  [[Women's March]] co-founders [[Linda Sarsour]] has been criticized for her outspoken support of anti-Semitic demagogue [[Louis Farrakhan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (January 19, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/womens-march-supporters-peel-off-amid-anti-semitism-scandal Women’s March losing steam, supporters amid anti-Semitism concerns]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two directors of the U.S.-based Jewish NGO the Anti-Defamation League, along with the president of the Zionist Organization of America, have criticized Sarsour's stance on Israel.  Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL's director, has said that Sarsour's support of BDS &amp;quot;encourages and spreads anti-Semitism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sales&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[http://www.jta.org/2017/05/02/news-opinion/united-states/linda-sarsour-why-the-palestinian-american-activist-has-courted-controversy Linda Sarsour: Why the Palestinian-American activist is controversial]|agency=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |date=May 2, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has refused to condemn Farrakhan's extremely anti-Semitic rhetoric.&amp;lt;ref name=jpost&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Womens-March-leaders-refuse-to-condemn-Farrakhan-after-antisemitic-speech-544074 Women’s March leaders refuse to condemn Farrakhan after antisemitic speech ]|work=The Jerusalem Post|date=March 3, 2018}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has called for adherents of [[Islam]] to carry out [[jihad]] against [[President Trump]] and has praised Imam Siraj Wahhaj,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Siraj Wahhaj has said, &amp;quot;It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the [[U.S. Constitution]] with the Quran.&amp;quot;  He has also said, &amp;quot;If [[Allah]] says 100 strikes, 100 strikes it is.  If Allah says cut off their hand, you cut off their hand.  If Allah says stone them to death, through the [[Prophet Muhammad]], then you stone them to death, because it’s the obedience of Allah and his messenger—nothing personal.&amp;quot;  Siraj Wahhaj is also the father of one of two men arrested on August 8, 2018, in [[New Mexico]].  The two were training 11 children to carry out [[Young mass murderers|school shootings]].  A 3-year-old boy was killed during an exorcism at the desert compound.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; named in court documents as an alleged “co-conspirator” in the [[1993 World Trade Center bombing]].  Awad is co-founder and Executive Director of the [[Council on American Islamic Relations]] (CAIR) which has direct ties to [[Hamas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has made Max Berger her campaign's director of progressive partnerships. Berger was the co-founder of an anti-Israel group called [[If Not Now]] (INN). In July 2014, Berger and other INN activists were arrested after occupying the lobby of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.  Berger was protesting Israel's efforts to stop rocket attacks. Berger tweeted (but later deleted): “What Israel is doing in Gaza should be familiar to Jews. It’s called a pogrom. You’d think Jews would be against those.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2014 Berger tweeted: “I dare anyone to visit Hebron and tell me what’s happening there doesn’t look an awful lot like [[apartheid]].” The accusation that Israel is an apartheid state is a classic anti-Semitic canard. That smear is the premise of the BDS movement, which Berger supports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Berger also defended [[Ilhan Elmi Omar]] and her anti-Semitic colleague, Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]]. He even wrote a piece in the now bankrupt ''Think Progress'' titled “American Jews must stand with Ilhan Omar.” In the column, he defended Omar's attacks on American supporters of Israel with the same anti-Semitic tropes, writing that “American politicians of both parties have been afraid to criticize apartheid in Israel and occupation in Palestine for fear of angering pro-Israel lobbying groups and right-wing Evangelical supporters of Israel.”  Berger has also defended Linda Sarsour, tweeting that she “embodies solidarity in a way her Jewish critics do not. #JewsForLinda.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Progressive Zionists of California (PZC) have written two letters to Warren's campaign asking that Berger “step down” from his position.  “He has positioned himself firmly against even the most progressive Zionism, the liberation movement that helps to ensure a safe and secure homeland for the Jewish people while also standing for Palestinian sovereignty and self-determination,” PZC co-founders Susan George and Paul Kujawsky wrote. “We must stress that Berger is not merely criticizing Israel’s policies he deems unfair or unjust–progressive and liberal Zionists do that regularly—Berger is opposing the very existence of Israel as a Jewish state.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/11/warren-mimics-bernies-promotion-anti-semite-linda-sarsour-campaign-surrogate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Slashing retirement benefits===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's proposed Accountable Capitalism Act would require [[corporation]]s to not serve the interests of [[shareholder]]s. Almost 50% of  all stocks in the United States are held by 401(1)k shareholders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/09/22/elizabeth-warrens-plan-slash-retirement-funds/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Green New Deal and Amazon===&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. [[Carolyn Maloney]] of [[New York]], who also supports the [[Green New Deal]], was livid when her fellow [[Communist]]s killed the prospect of [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] bringing its main headquarters to New York and creating 25,000 jobs with wages averaging $150,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/nnVS-Zah54k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Elizabeth Warren and [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] took credit for killing the deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amazon was promised up to $1.5 billion in tax abatements in exchange for the promise of creating 25,000 jobs.  Ocasio-Cortez believes a tax abatement, which is a deferment against future taxes, is a bucket of cash the government can spend now on subways or teachers.  And no one ever explained to her that the $1.5 in future taxes would never be paid or even exist if the company chose not to locate in her district.  Warren called the tax incentives &amp;quot;bribes.&amp;quot;   Warren tweeted {{quotebox|&amp;quot;How long will we allow giant [[corporation]]s to hold our democracy hostage?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/14/politics/amazon-aoc-democrats-future/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the planet from the scourge of &amp;quot;[[global warming]],&amp;quot; Warren campaigns in a private jet, the purview of millionaires and billionaires. When discovered using the elitist mode of transportation leaving a massive carbon footprint, Warren tried to hide behind staffers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/02/05/watch-green-new-deal-elizabeth-warren-try-to-hide-after-getting-off-of-a-private-jet-n2560742&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020 presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:D-B-j9nXUAUy876.jpg|right|275px|thumb|[[NBC]] and the [[DNC]] rigged the First Debate to favor Elizabeth Warren.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Elizabeth Warren presidential campaign|2020 presidential election|2020 Democratic party issues}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren declared her intention to run for president in January 2019. Allegedly by the luck of the draw, the DNC spotlighted Elizabeth Warren who was rising in the polls the night of the First Debate.  Warren of course, was given more speaking time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1144058895863832577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1144058895863832577&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdailycaller.com%2F2019%2F06%2F26%2Ftulsi-gabbard-warren-more-time-debate%2F Tulsi Gabbard Twitter account].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Beto O'Rourke]] was scripted in as her chief rival. Warren proclaimed, &amp;quot;The 71 percent of Americans who say the economy is doing well are wrong.&amp;quot;  A [[Drudge Report]] poll afterward showed [[Tulsi Gabbard]] scored 41% among viewers compared to Warren's 11% The two old white guys, [[Bernie Sanders]] and [[Joe Biden]] were paired off the second night along with the upstart [[gay]] Mayor [[Pete Buttigieg]].  Viewers patiently awaited the Socialist cage match, Bernie vs. Liz.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/24/socialist-thunderdome-bernie-vs-liz-warren-who-comes-out-on-top/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the first debate, Warren introduced the term, &amp;quot;Latinx,&amp;quot; which the [[thought police]] intend to replace &amp;quot;Latina&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Latino&amp;quot; with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/26/elizabeth-warren-uses-pc-term-latinx-first-dem-debate-will-catch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A poll found 98% of Latinos do not like the term &amp;quot;Latinx&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://medium.com/@ThinkNowTweets/progressive-latino-pollster-trust-me-latinos-do-not-identify-with-latinx-63229adebcea&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren claims that too many black and brown people being born is a &amp;quot;problem&amp;quot; for Israel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtMibsG7eP4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fears over [[Biden's age]] and mental capacities propelled Warren to frontrunner status, yet ''Politico'' reported fundamental questions of honesty and character remained in the minds of voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/27/pocahontas-elizabeth-warrens-biggest-vulnerability-227912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon moving into first place Warren began courting black voters, promising a seat on the back of the bus to the &amp;quot;toxic masculinity&amp;quot; of a black man as [[vice president]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/hilariously-desperate-moves-by-democratic-candidates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[African American]] scholar Kevin Jackson has dubbed her &amp;quot;Donald Trump roadkill 2.0&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/in-case-you-missed-it-biden-unofficially-quit-the-race/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Warren's campaign flamed out in the [[Iowa Caucus]]es, Warren operatives blamed the [[sexism]] of Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2qPFLmZDPo Warren Supporter Blames Lagging Polls Numbers on Dems Being Sexist]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After her humiliating [[New Hampshire]] defeat Warren told supporters to breathe deep, eat chocolate, and ‘hug your pet’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/warren-comforts-supporters-after-new-hampshire-defeat-by-saying-breathe-deep-eat-chocolate-and-hug-your-pet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two days after [[Super Tuesday]] Warren bowed out, endorsing no one.  President Trump aptly observed Warren cost Bernie Sanders the nomination in favor of the DNC [[establishment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1235598653114511360&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In all, Warren played a role in killing off three contenders in the bloated field of 2020 - [[Bernie Sanders]], [[Michael Bloomberg]], and herself.  Upon her demise [[Andrew Klavan]] commented:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;It's true that at one point Democrat voters made war on their frontrunner, but a rampant and sudden [[sexism]] changed all that when she announced her unworkable and unaffordable health care plan and voters suddenly realized that women can't do math or use reason. This disgusting prejudice has to stop so that a person without the ability to reason can become president, otherwise we're just going to keep electing Republicans. Other Democrat pundits lamented that we now probably won't get a female president in their lifetime, when it was pointed out that [[Nikki Haley]] could win the presidency in 2024. Democrats objected that Haley was not a woman but a Republican.  Then they retired behind closed doors to change the rules so that [[Tulsi Gabbard]] couldn't get into the next debate.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Identity politics===&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2019 Democrat rising star&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|last1=Dreier|first1=Peter|title=50 Young Progressive Activists Who Are Changing America|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-dreier/progressive-activists_b_2226919.html|accessdate=|work=The Huffington Post|date=December 12, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Andrew Gillum]] was reported by ''[[Vanity Fair]]'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/elizabeth-warren-andrew-gillum-ticket&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[The Daily Beast]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/elizabeth-warren-has-been-talking-to-andrew-gillum-sparking-vice-president-buzz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other [[liberal]] [[mainstream media]] news outlets as with Warren as a possible [[Vice President]]ial running mate.  On the same day ''[[The Washington Post]]'' recommended Gillum for the VP spot,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://archive.is/QfvFt If Democrats want to win, they need a black politician on the ticket]'', Theodore R. Johnson, ''The Washington Post'', March 13, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gillum was found by Miami emergency responders to a [[methamphetamine]] overdose nude in a hotel room with two other nude men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1241426486302662656&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Under the precedent established by Democrats in the [[Monica Lewinsky|Monica Lewinsky scandal]], ''what a person does in their private life is nobody's business''.  However, Gillum is [[African American]], so the Democrats' own precedent standard may not apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cultural appropriation====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren claimed her parents eloped because her father's family did not want him to marry a woman who was part Native American.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was a lateral hire onto the faculty of the Harvard Law School in 1995 after having listed herself as a minority of American Indian (specifically, Cherokee) descent, despite her fair-skinned appearance and a lack of persuasive documentary evidence for her claim to minority status.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-controversy-over-elizabeth-warrens-claimed-native-american-heritage/2012/09/27/d0b7f568-08a5-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html?utm_term=.367f03c92d5d Detailed summary of Warren's claimed minority status]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The fair-skinned Warren obtained [[affirmative action]] preferences by falsely claiming that she was of &amp;quot;[[American Indian]]&amp;quot; descent, when in fact her heritage does not support her claim under widely accepted standards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100165458/elizabeth-warrens-native-american-claims-if-she-was-a-republican-the-media-would-call-her-a-racist/ &amp;quot;Elizabeth Warren's 'Native American' claims: if she was a Republican, the media would call her a racist.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When President [[Donald Trump]] ridiculed Warren's false claims of American Indian ancestry and challenged her to prove it by taking a DNA test, she responded by falsely branding Trump as a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.  She released the results of a DNA test obtained at Stanford University in October 2018 initially claiming her as having between 1/64th and 1/512th Indigenous ancestry, but was later revealed to be as little as 1/1024th ancestry, not even involving American Indian DNA samples, but instead samples from Mexico, Peru and Colombia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warren-melts-down-in-wake-of-dna-disaster/ Elizabeth Warren Melts Down in Wake of DNA Disaster] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats criticized Warren's stunt which hampered enthusiasm and fundraising two weeks before the [[2018 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/411477-former-obama-campaign-manager-questions-timing-of-warren?amp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even [[CNN]] attempted to mitigate its reputation for [[fake news]] by overtly criticizing Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/politics/elizabeth-warren-donald-trump-pocahontas/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a charter member of the Hate America movement; like [[Obama]], who passed himself off as being born in [[Kenya]] to a literary agent in 1992, Warren denied her white immigrant American heritage as early as 1987 in order gain access to [[affirmative action]] programs.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite her claims, Warren's grandfather fought American Indians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leahy, Michael Patrick (September 12, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/12/elizabeth-warren-a-direct-descendant-of-militia-indian-fighter-who-fought-seminole-tribe/ Elizabeth Warren a Direct Descendant of Militia ‘Indian Fighter’ Who Fought Seminole Tribe]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 10 debate appearances, Elizabeth Warren was never asked once by the [[fake news]] media complex about her false claims of Native American heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/06/warren-went-all-10-debates-without-one-question-about-her-native-american-claims-894450&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cherokee Nation rejects her claims====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren fraud.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren fraudulently claims American Indian heritage on her Texas Bar Registration card.  Elizabeth Warren has an established pattern of stealing funds from affirmative action programs intended for oppressed minorities.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Cherokee Nation repudiated Warren's attempts to link herself to them through DNA testing in this statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship.  Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America.  Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation.  Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong.  It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven.  Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/cherokee-nation-issues-statement-on-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results Cherokee Nation issues statement on Sen. Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to having her American Indian ancestry claims publicly discredited, Warren went on an erratic and unhinged Twitter rant, falsely accusing Trump of making &amp;quot;creepy physical threats&amp;quot; against her and making other false allegations against him.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Despite Warren being proven as a fraud by the DNA test, however, the liberal media (including [[CNN]], [[CNBC]], [[NPR]] and the ''[[Washington Post]]'') continues to unquestioningly stand by her lies and false ancestral claims and to attack her critics, including Trump, by falsely accusing them of &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot;, which serves only to further discredit both themselves and Warren in the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/dna-tests-prove-elizabeth-warren-only-has-1-1024th-indian-heritage-and-is-a-fraud-liberal-media-reports-the-opposite/ DNA Tests Prove Elizabeth Warren Only Has 1/1024th Indian Heritage and Is a Fraud — Liberal Media Reports the Opposite] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After 35 years of advancing her career by falsely claiming to have American Indian ancestry and expropriating affirmative action funds intended for real minorities, Warren eventually apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (February 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31418-warren-s-sorry-for-indian-tale-but-she-s-been-telling-it-for-at-least-35-years Warren’s Sorry for Indian Tale, but She’s Been Telling It for At Least 35 Years]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Racism, race baiting and anti-Semitism====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Racist.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has struggled to name three black Americans who have been influential to her, dancing around the question in separate interviews [[liberal wordiness|with lengthy responses that did very little to actually answer the question]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/11/09/elizabeth-warren-struggles-to-name-three-prominent-black-americans-she-would-appoint-850708 Elizabeth Warren struggles to name three black Americans influential to her]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To compensate, Warren claimed Michael Brown, who spawned the [[Obama riots]], was &amp;quot;murdered by a white police officer&amp;quot; (a claim later discredited by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/11/sharyl-attkisson-fact-check-2020-democrats-murder-michael-brown/ Sharyl Attkisson Fact-Checks 2020 Democrats Over The ‘Murder’ Of Michael Brown] at the Daily Caller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; provoking widespread criticism for Warren's attempt to politicize the incident.  Even the far-Left ''Washington Post'' fact checkers awarded her four Pinocchios for lying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren threatened a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' to cut off aid to [[Israel]], which drew criticism against her on Twitter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/21/elizabeth-warren-warns-she-may-cut-off-us-aid-to-israel-if-elected-842133 Elizabeth Warren warns she may cut off US aid to Israel if elected]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of taking responsibility for her campaign's own actions when minority staffers were quitting the campaign (stating that they were merely being used as tokens because of their race instead of having their ideas utilized), Warren chose to blame America's racist &amp;quot;legacy&amp;quot;, ignoring that her own Democrat Party was, and still is, responsible for that racism and oppression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/07/warren-blames-americas-racist-legacy-for-minority-staffers-resigning-from-her-campaign/ Warren Blames America’s Racist ‘Legacy’ For Minority Staffers Resigning From Her Campaign] at the Federalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren dropped a truth bomb in the 2020 New Hampshire presidential debate:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;I’m glad to stand on this stage with my fellow Democrats who talk about how important the black community is, at least at election time. Year after year after year, election after election after election, Democrats go to people in the black community and say “Boy, we really care about these issues. Racism is terrible, we all want to do something,” and then somehow the problem just seems to keep getting worse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/video-warren-drops-shocking-truth-in-last-debate-trump-is-right-the-democrat-party-has-been-making-life-worse-for-black-families-not-better/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Private prisons====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bought $50,000 in shares of a Vanguard Group fund that heavily invested in private prison companies. The fund was the largest shareholder of America's largest private prison corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren invested in Vanguard Target Retirement 2025—a retirement account run by the Vanguard Group, an investment management company—which in turn invested more than 30 percent of its money in Vanguard's domestic stock index fund. Vanguard was the top shareholder of Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), and one of the largest of GEO Group, both private prison companies, according to data from the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]]. Vanguard owned more than 12 million CCA shares and nearly 9 million GEO Group shares, which were worth roughly $456 million and $216 million, respectively, in March 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CCA, now called CoreCivic, was already the country's largest owner of private prisons in 2013, according to an annual report. The company owned or controlled more than 50 correctional or detention facilities in the country, &amp;quot;with a total design capacity of approximately 86,000 beds in 20 states and the [[District of Columbia]].&amp;quot; GEO Group is also one of the largest private prison providers in the country with 66 prison facilities across the world as of 2013. The two companies also operate many Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-invested-in-private-prisons/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Immigration====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is an advocate for free healthcare&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/Catching-Up-With-Elixabeth-Warren-on-Immigration-and-Health-Care-560527801.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for [[transgender]] migrants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1185546131738124290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren also backs [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]'s proposal for [[welfare]] for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-backs-aocs-illegal-immigrant-welfare-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  AOC did not return the favor and endorsed Bernie Sanders for president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/video/2019/10/19/aoc-endorses-bernie-sanders-at-nyc-rally?videoId=614927977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013 Warren voted for S.744 providing for 700 miles of a border wall;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://votesmart.org/bill/16819/44567/141272/border-security-economic-opportunity-and-immigration-modernization-act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in February 2019 Warren referred to a border wall as a &amp;quot;monument of hate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nomosshere.tumblr.com/post/186866604027/warren-supporters-asked-about-her-voting-for-700&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has deceptively misrepresented [[immigration]] issues on the campaign trail; illegal entry is a criminal act, not seeking asylum. People who seek asylum at a port of entry are not charged with a crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
At a Democrat primary debate on June 26, 2019, Warren could not think of any restriction on abortion that she supported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Givas, Nicholas (June 26, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/warren-abortion-restriction-democratic-debate Warren can't think of a single abortion restriction she supports during Democratic debate]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Free stuff===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bamboozles childish voters with vague pledges of free stuff, free healthcare, free debt forgiveness, free dope needles, open borders, etc. The cost, of course, will be paid for by anyone who has a job or wants to raise a family. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fellow Massachusettsan Rep. [[Seth Moulton]] says of Warren's free tuition plan, &amp;quot;You could literally end [[poverty]] in America for five or six years for what she's going to give to kids who are trying to pay for their own college. Half of America goes to college and it's not the bottom half.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/seth-moulton-bashes-warrens-free-college-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the [[extremist]] [[Bill de Blasio]], Warren is one of the few Democrats openly advocating for the destruction of private health insurance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-private-health-insurance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren supports the [[Democratic Socialists of America|Democratic Socialist]]s call for [[slave]] reparations as a way to maintain Black dependency on government and buy votes for Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/us/politics/2020-democrats-race-policy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/430999-warren-harris-back-reparations-for-black-americans-affected-by-slavery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.leftvoice.org/DSA-Votes-for-BDS-Reparations-and-Out-of-the-Socialist-International&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren did not elaborate if descendants of people who did not own slaves such as [[Native American]]s, [[Republican]]s, [[Italian]]s, [[Polish|Pole]]s, [[Jew]]s, [[Hispanic]]s and other [[ethnic group]]s that migrated to the United States after the [[American Civil War]] would be granted an exemption from paying reparations, or if Americans such as [[Kamala Harris]] and [[Barack Obama]] who have no ancestry connected to North American slaves would qualify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren criticizes Obama's Bailout of Wall Street and says it paved way for Trump's election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-obamas-bailout-of-wall-street-failure-paved-way-trumps-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren wants free taxpayer-funded surgeries for the gender-confused, despite the fact many such people have come out of the closet to express regret over their choice of permanent life-altering surgical mutilation to fit what they once thought was the gender they preferred.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/10/05/hundreds-transgenders-want-return-biological-sex-shunned-traitors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unrealized capital gains tax====&lt;br /&gt;
After much prodding and being attacked by Joe Biden for &amp;quot;vagueness,&amp;quot; Warren finally released a cost estimate for her collectivized healthcare proposal; the cost estimate came in at $52 Trillion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/warren-releases-52-trillion-medicare-for-all-plan-funded-by-unicorn-farts/ Warren Releases $52 Trillion ‘Medicare For All’ Plan Funded By Unicorn Farts], Chrissy Clark, ''The Federalist'', November 2, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - two and one half times [[GDP]] - with no specifics as to whom will bare the cost. Her estimate is based on a cluster of assumptions and veiled tax hikes on the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea that payroll tax hikes, repealing the Trump tax cuts, unregulated immigration, and slamming businesses with new taxes wouldn't hugely damage the middle class was received as pure fantasy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/01/ben-sasse-responds-elizabeth-warrens-medicare-plan-gold/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    Additionally, Warren promises free healthcare for illegal immigrants. No less than leftist loon Grand Puba [[Nancy Pelosi]] trashed Warren's insane Medicare for All proposal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/02/nancy-pelosi-cuts-elizabeth-warren-off-knees/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even Hillary Clinton trashed her insane healthcare ideas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-warrens-medicare-for-all-plan-wouldnt-pass-the-senate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's wealth tax is basically an unrealized capital gains tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2019/11/08/warren-wants-to-tax-unrealized-capital-gains-n2556165&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  John Hinderaker writing in ''Powerline'' blog analyzed the proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Part of the plan is a “wealth tax,” which means taxing unrealized [[capital gain]]s at [[ordinary income]] rates. Combined with other elements of her plan, this implies that unrealized capital gains will be taxed at more than 50%.  Taxing unrealized gains as ordinary income (from the new M4A plan, applies to top 1% of households), plus the 14.6% payroll tax she wants to levy on investment income, plus the financial transactions tax when you have to sell something to get the cash to pay the taxes....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren’s whole idea is so obviously [[stupid]] and incapable of implementation that one is tempted to laugh....lawyers are a core constituency of the Democratic Party, and nearly every lawyer in the U.S. (along with many others, of course) tolerates paying 50% marginal tax rates on his or her income only because a chunk of that income is sheltered in 401(k)s. The 401(k) and the house are where the vast majority of high income earners accumulate wealth. Warren’s proposal essentially destroys the ability to build wealth via retirement savings. This may be OK with those who are already rich, like Elizabeth Warren, but it will be [[anathema]] to younger people who are trying to become wealthy....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessing a “wealth tax” that invades previously tax-free 401(k)s at a 50%+ rate will destroy Warren’s support in what has been, in recent years, a core Democratic Party constituency. “Wall Street,” i.e. the financial industry, has already warned that if Warren is the Democrats’ nominee, it will not support her. That in itself is seismic; no industry has ever supported a politician to the extent that [[Wall Street]] supported [[Barack Obama]] and [[Hillary Clinton]]. But the loss of support from America’s lawyers might be even more deadly to the Democratic Party....One unfortunate thing about targeting lawyers (and their often-liberal wives) is that many of them actually understand the implications of policy proposals. Here as usual, understanding is fatal to Liz Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/warren-loses-the-lawyers.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Education====&lt;br /&gt;
A father confronted Warren on her proposals for free tuition, asking if he could get his money back for working double shifts and sacrificed buying new cars and vacations to pay off student loans. Warren refused.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/01/22/can-i-have-my-money-back-father-confronts-elizabeth-warren-over-student-loan-forgiveness/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Father : My daughter is in school, I saved all my money just to pay student loans Can I have my money back? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren: of course not &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Father: so you want to help those who don't save any money and the ones that do the right thing get  screwed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has pledged to have a 9 year old transgender person vet her choice for [[Secretary of Education]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Doomsday cult===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{days until|2029|12|31}} Days Until Final Destruction of the Planet'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a leader in the [[Green New Deal]] doomsday cult.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1169437706469990401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Green New Deal====&lt;br /&gt;
As part of a fundraising scheme,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://secure.actblue.com/donate/have-a-drink-with-ew?refcode=WFP2019-DD-NATL-TW-US-BCON&amp;amp;refcode2=INT-EW-21%5E65-MF-BCON-STA-LGBK-BCD&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has offered to burn thousands of gallons of fossil fuels emitting thousands of pounds of carbon fuel emissions into the atmosphere, destroying the planet, to fly the winner of a drawing to have a [[beer]] with Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1155515626527612928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fossil fuels====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren promises to ban [[fracking]] on her first day in office, which would rebuild the [[Russia]]n economy.  Russia, [[China]], [[Iran]] and [[Venezuela]] would be the biggest winners, American consumers the biggest losers. Warren's promise in her first 24 hours would immediately:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren tweet.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren sent a fake news tweet claiming Mark Zuckerberg endorsed Donald Trump.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Hand [[Vladimir Putin]] hundreds of billions worth of enhanced Russian energy exports.  A windfall of economic growth that will mean Russian policy expansion globally.&lt;br /&gt;
*Support the regime of Venezuelan dictator [[Nicolas Maduro]] who relies on oil production and pricing to keep his socialist government in place.&lt;br /&gt;
*Expand the influence of China; and increase the value of [[Beijing]]’s investments in Russian energy and 49% state in PDVSA (Venezuela).&lt;br /&gt;
*Immediately help the Iranian economy; enhance the stranglehold of power by the Mullah’s over the Iranian people; help fund [[terrorist]] actions globally, and specifically create terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya and Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
*Return U.S. policy and strategy back to a position of dependence on [[OPEC]] nations; so we can expect more U.S. military involvement in the middle-east.&lt;br /&gt;
*Destroy growth in American wages , and set up energy policy that will drive further industrial manufacturing out of the U.S. and into Mexico and Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Simultaneously drive up the price of electricity in the U.S, further exacerbating the financial costs and losses to the U.S. middle-class.&lt;br /&gt;
*Raise gas prices back to Obama-era rates $5/gal.&lt;br /&gt;
*In turn this will drive up the cost of transported products, and U.S. food prices will jump approximately 20% as massive inflation hits highly-consumable categories first.&lt;br /&gt;
*The collective impact of the four domestic points above will drive down the ability of consumers to spend on other goods.  The U.S. economy is two-thirds dependent on consumer spending. The collective impact means economic contraction (i.e [[Recession]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Violence===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has taken credit for the [[Occupy Wall Street]] movement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street-2011-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which has employed [[violence]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/occupy-wall-street-protests-turn-violent-when-demonstrators-clash-with-police&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the name of &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; and socialism.  [[Connor Betts]], an Elizabeth Warren supporter, [[Antifa]] member and registered Democrat,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; murdered 9 people in the [[Dayton nightclub shooting]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/report-networks-silent-shocking-leftist-leanings-dayton-shooter-support-antifa-elizabeth-warren/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including 6 [[African American]]s. Warren supports the [[Abolish ICE]] movement.  Betts posted to Twitter, “I do not consider ICE agents to be human beings,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1158420694092242944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; echoed [[Ocasio-Cortez]]' statement that [[ICE]] detention facilities were &amp;quot;[[concentration camp]]s&amp;quot; and praised the Seattle ICE bomber as a &amp;quot;martyr.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Lives Matter]] [[Louisville]] leader Chanelle Helm is a political activist who has met with numerous high-profile politicians,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/08/22/black-lives-matter-activist-unveils-list-demands-white-people-give-up-home/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/KamVTV/status/1159236848717160448&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chanelle Helm posted video to her [[Facebook]] page showing a protest at Senate Majority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]]’s house. Helm was shouting: “just stab the motherf—er in the heart.”  “F*ck yo neck, b*tch. Murder Turtle! Murder Turtle! … F*ck yo thoughts and prayers … F*ck you, f*ck yo wife, f*ck everything you stand for.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/06/protesters-gather-outside-mitch-mcconnell-louisville-home-monday-night/1930377001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook and censorship===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren should expect a huge legal battle if she becomes the next US president and tries to lead a breakup of [[Facebook]]. In an internal employee meeting in July 2019, Facebook [[CEO]] [[Mark Zuckerberg]] threatened “to go to the mat” and “fight” attempts to breakup Facebook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/10/1/20893133/mark-zuckerberg-elizabeth-warren-facebook-sue-us-government-tech-breakup&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gun rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like rich leftwing [[pedophile]]s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime], By Margo Kaplan Op-ed, ''[[The New York Times]]'', Oct. 5, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren wants only the rich to have legal protection to own a gun.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2019/08/12/elizabeth-warren-wants-make-expensive-exercise-rights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impeachment scam===&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Sen. [[Lisa Murkowski]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowskis-statement-on-senate-impeachment-process-vote&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; whom Democrats pinned their impeachment hopes on, explained her decision to vote against calling more witnesses when Warren attacked Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] during the Senate trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/elizabeth-warren-john-roberts-impeachment-trial&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Deceptive employment practices===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has built much of her career as a champion of workers and consumers against the deceptive and exploitative practices of employers.  Several volunteers describe the process for entry into her campaign as deceptive and exploitative. They were pushed toward unpaid positions over paid ones, misled over the availability of financial assistance, and asked to sign highly irregular restrictive nondisclosure agreements. The positions were advertised as a paid intern, while actually only that of an unpaid volunteer for academic credit. Victims called it a &amp;quot;great scam.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/sen-elizabeth-warren-fellowship-applicants-say-campaign-program-was-a-great-scam&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mental fitness===&lt;br /&gt;
Like Rachel Dolezal, a white [[NAACP]] official who insisted that she was &amp;quot;[[African American]]&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/2015/06/21/dolezal-is-not-just-an-imposter-she-is-mentally-ill/ Dolezal is not just an imposter, she is mentally ill]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many have questioned Elizabeth Warren's mental fitness to hold office as a bitter clinger to her appropriated cultural identity despite [[science]] proving her delusional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Wikipedia]]: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Particularly in the 21st century, cultural appropriation is often considered harmful, and to be a violation of the collective intellectual property rights of the originating, minority cultures, notably indigenous cultures and those living under colonial rule....Such practices may be seen as particularly harmful in schools and universities which have a stated purpose of promoting ethnic diversity and inclusion...}} ''Bustle'' noted when {{quotebox|&amp;quot;privileged individuals cherry-picks part of a culture belonging to a group of marginalized people, then uses it for fashion or performance purposes, leaving behind the true meaning of the characteristic and thus disrespecting the culture from which it was born. When we hear retorts about the offensiveness of cultural appropriation, people will often say they're simply &amp;quot;appreciating the culture&amp;quot;. While cultural appreciation is possible, the line often gets crossed into appropriation because these representations lead to overgeneralized racial stereotypes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bustle.com/articles/160328-how-cultural-appropriation-hurts-us-all&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} An article in ''Psychology Today'' compares cultural identity theft to credit card fraud and theft: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;The thief was clever enough to hack your account, so the company lets them use it. This is what happens in cultural appropriation—the adoption and misuse of another culture’s practices. Someone takes something from your culture and uses it for their own benefit. And there are no consequences.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/life-in-the-intersection/201706/cultural-identity-theft&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Like Dolezal, Warren and supporters claim &amp;quot;transracial identity&amp;quot; to justify cultural appropriation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is in the habit of drinking alone, which is symptomatic of an advanced degree of [[alcoholism]].  Some speculate her claim to Native American heritage was a crude effort to hide her use of alcohol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren once eulogized a former colleague by accusing him of [[sexual harassment]] in front of his ex-wife and children, according to a profile of the presidential candidate in the ''Washington Post''.  Warren, who got her first full-time teaching job at the University of Houston, returned to campus 15 years later to deliver a eulogy for UH law professor Eugene Smith. Smith was a “champion” of Warren, according to WaPo, and specifically requested she speak at his funeral after he passed away from polio complications.  During her [[eulogy]] Warren reportedly “stunned” funeral attendees when she told what was meant to be a lighthearted story about Smith chasing her around his office.  From WaPo:&lt;br /&gt;
:“With a smile on her face and humor in her voice, Warren described how Smith had invited her to his office one day just a few months after she had been hired. He shut the door and lunged for her, she said, and as she protested, he chased her around his desk before she was able to escape out the door.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/15/liz-warren-me-too-eulogy-professor-widow-funeral/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2018 Senate campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
A racist Warren volunteer was taken down by supporters of [[Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai]] of [[MIT]] and arrested when he assaulted Dr.  Ayyadurai, who was running against Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/RzFqx-avBS4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lPKqkzzYkmJb?t=65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CFPB corruption==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] (CFPB) was created in 2009 by a majority Democrat Congress and signed into law by President Obama with Elizabeth Warren's as its first head.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2010-09-19-1.html Obama Spits on the Constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The CFPB was found to be a massive fundraising scam, tapping into the [[U.S. Treasury]] to support Democrat pet projects by awarding contracts to Democrat operatives and organizations. ''The Daily Caller'' reported: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Obama’s presidential campaign advertising agency received nearly $60 million in federal contracts after he took office...The overwhelming majority of the $58 million funneled to GMMB came from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) created by Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2011.  The CFPB awarded the agency a whopping $43.7 million, about 75 percent of GMMB’s total federal funding stream.  The second-most lucrative government account for GMMB is a community service agency founded by Bill Clinton, the Corporation for National and Community Service, which awarded GMMB $13.1 million worth of contracts....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/09/13/exclusive-obamas-top-campaign-ad-firm-got-nearly-60m-in-federal-contracts ''Obama’s Top Campaign Ad Firm Got Nearly $60M In Federal Contracts''], The Daily Caller, September 13th, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' reported, &amp;quot;The pride of Harvard Law School, Ms. Warren is a hero to the political Left for proposing a new bureaucracy to micromanage the services that banks can offer consumers.  But she is also so politically controversial that no less a liberal lion than Connecticut Senator [[Chris Dodd]] has warned the White House that she probably isn't confirmable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=wsj&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748703440604575495681843430198-lMyQjAxMTAwMDEwODExNDgyWj.html Elizabeth III - Obama to Senate: Stick that in your advice and consent clause.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2019, [[Antifa]] leader José Alcoff, who had previously advocated for murder, was arrested in connection with an attack on two U.S. Marines a few months earlier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (January 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/31338-d-c-antifa-leader-who-advocated-murder-arrested-in-attack-on-marines D.C. Antifa Leader Who Advocated Murder Arrested for Attack on Marines]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Alcoff was working with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB  is a corrupt bureaucracy created out of the [[2008 Financial Crisis]] and Stimulus bill  under the doctrine of 'not letting a crisis go to waste', whose purpose is to funnel government contracts and federal money to far leftist media consulting firms to aid Democrat electoral aims.  It is the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren who served as its first head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government report chronicles several instances of [[discrimination]], many with an emphasis on unfair promotion practices and lopsided pay scales for minorities working at CFPB.  There are currently “scores of cases of U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau employees seeking protection from [[racial]]ly offensive, [[sexist]] or discriminatory behavior.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2014/08/29/federal-agency-elizabeth-warren-helped-found-is-rife-with-discrimination-employees-say&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In Popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://babylonbee.com/news/elizabeth-warren-admits-to-wearing-paleface-at-college-costume-party Elizabeth Warren Admits To Wearing Paleface At College Costume Party], ''The Babylon Bee''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cultural Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[White privilege]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cloward-Piven]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Warren, Elizabeth}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:115th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:116th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Presidential Election, 2020]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blame America Crowd]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tricksters]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891980</id>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Warren&amp;diff=1891980"/>
		<updated>2022-10-08T23:18:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Elizabeth Warren&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]] (before 1996)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democrat]] (1996 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Jim Warren (1968 – 1978)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bruce Mann (1980 – present)&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Methodist]] ([[Christian In Name Only|in name only]])&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2013 – present&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Scott Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|status=s&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Godwin's Law.png|thumb|right|400px|Warren is seen here at the 2016 Democratic National Convention performing a [[Nazi]] salute.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Elizabeth Ann Warren''' (Also called '''Senator Karen''' and &amp;quot;Fauxcahontas&amp;quot; by some, due to her misrepresentation and claim of [[Native American]] ancestry)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fee, Gayle; Johnson, Megan; Raposa, Laura (May 17, 2012). [https://web.archive.org/web/20120525003643/http://bostonherald.com:80/track/inside_track/view/20120517elizabeth_warren_not_alone_on_the_trail Elizabeth Warren not history’s only Fauxcahontas]. ''Boston Herald''. Herald Media. Retrieved January 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the senior [[far-left]] [[Democrat Party|Democrat]] [[U.S. Senate|United States Senator]] from liberal [[Massachusetts]].  Warren robbed [[affirmative action]] programs to promote herself; she has built her entire career on [[fraud]]. Even [[Stephen Colbert]] called her out on her nonsense healthcare solutions proposals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2019/09/19/yikes-colbert-corners-warren-on-middle-tax-class-increases-then-calls-her-out-when-she-dodges-n2553342&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After her fake Indian claims were exposed, Warren was busted again for lying when she tried playing the victim card claiming to have been fired for being pregnant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/records-show-elizabeth-warren-lied-about-being-fired-for-being-visibly-pregnant/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has robbed money from needy, oppressed, and deserving minorities to line her own pockets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has been accused of lying on federal forms to gain preferential treatment in hiring, claiming minority status in order to gain access to affirmative action programs.  Warren boasts of being the first &amp;quot;person of color&amp;quot; on the [[Harvard]] Law faculty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/will-elizabeth-warrens-woman-of-color-sham-come-back-to-haunt-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She has gained a reputation as a rancorous [[partisan]] [[demagogue]] and science denier for rejecting solid DNA evidence that she is not a Native American.  While she has repudiated her [[Native American]] heritage in order to run for president, she has yet to repudiate her Professorship at [[Harvard University]] or [[U.S. Senate]] seat which were gained under false pretenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While still posing as a Native American, Warren also became somewhat infamous for chugging down a beer in front of a [[Youtube]] audience.  She is a sponsor of the [[Democratic Socialist]] [[Green New Deal]] and [[Medicare for All]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/demsocialists/photos/if-we-want-medicare-for-all-a-green-new-deal-or-free-public-college-we-need-demo/1902965156468958/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren is a socialist [[mass murder]] denier and advocate of a [[democidal]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren announced her candidacy for Democrat presidential nomination in January 2019, running on re-cycled Clintonisms such as &amp;quot;work hard and play by the rules,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is falling behind,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is getting hollowed out,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;middle class is under attack,&amp;quot; and so forth.  Warren has been notified to preserve evidence of [[slander]], [[defamation]] and a possible [[hate crime]] for her actions in relation to the [[Covington kids]] incident.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/42988/nick-sandmanns-lawyer-sends-letters-these-54-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_campaign=benshapiro&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Family and background==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0102-NWS-BHR-L-warren98.jpg|right|200x|thumb|Elizabeth Warren using a [[racist]] and vulgar stereotype of her chosen ethnic identity.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was born Elizabeth Ann Herring on June 22, 1949 in Oklahoma City where the entire family, according to Warren, fantasized about being Native American. Warren attended [[George Washington University]] for two years, but dropped out to get married.  She married Jim Warren, who she met in high school, in 1968.  The couple had two children and divorced in 1978.  Warren is a graduate of the [[University of Houston]] and  the [[Rutgers University]] Law School.  She married Bruce Mann, a law professor, in 1980.  She taught at University of Pennsylvania Law School from 1990 to 1995 and at Harvard Law School since 1995.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Warren, Elizabeth (2008). &amp;quot;[http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/ewarren/Warren%20CV%20062508.pdf Curriculum Vitae]&amp;quot;. Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren was a [[registered Republican]] from 1991 to 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (Jan. 9, 2019), &amp;quot;[https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/08/opinions/elizabeth-warren-koczela/index.html Fifteen Things You Didn’t Know about Elizabeth Warren]&amp;quot;, ''National Review''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren published a cookbook of Native American recipes allegedly handed down by her Irish grandmother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, Warren was elected U.S. senator from Massachusetts, defeating Republican [[Scott Brown]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren is the great-great-great granddaughter of Jonathan Crawford, a member of the Tennessee Militia who rounded up Cherokees from their family homes in the Southeastern United States and herded them into government-built stockades in what was then called Ross's Landing (now Chattanooga), Tennessee–the point of origin for the horrific [[Trail of Tears]], which began in January, 1837.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2012/05/08/elizabeth-warren-ancestor-trail-of-tears/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After giving up on pretending to be a Native American, Warren confided another fantasy to a journalist that if she had a [[penis]], she would be president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/jTP81PFts5s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On the issues==&lt;br /&gt;
===Dumps socialism for Clinton Foundation donors===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton.jpg|left|275px|thumb|Warren, a Clinton protégé, loyalties have never been with the Obama, Biden, or Sanders' klans.]]&lt;br /&gt;
For all her Socialist rhetoric, Warren's fraud was on full display when she refused to support Senator [[Bernie Sanders]] in the 2016 Democrat presidential primaries and supported the [[corrupt]] machine candidacy of [[Hillary Clinton]].  Additionally, many [[multinational corporation]]s that Warren built her career attacking are pay-to-play recipients of [[Clinton Foundation]] schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's rise to fame was entirely built upon espousing [[Marxist]] [[class warfare|class hate and envy]], a position she still advocates.  She is the original author of the &amp;quot;[[You didn't build that|You didn't build that business]]&amp;quot; speech, later infamously plagiarized by [[Barack Obama]].  Warren has proposed &amp;quot;nationalization&amp;quot; of U.S. corporations to achieve a socialist America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;i.e. [[national socialism]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Nn-3gpjmSPI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal hypocrisy|Despite voicing opposition to Wall Street]], Warren attended a donor retreat in Martha's Vineyard with several CEOs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jashinsky, Emily (September 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/elizabeth-warren-is-hypocritically-meeting-with-wall-street-ceos/article/2635061 Elizabeth Warren is hypocritically meeting with Wall Street CEOs]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the pre-primary period Warren was being secretly advised by Hillary Clinton;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/warren-clinton-talk-behind-scenes-2020-race-intensifies-n1049701&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; she is a longtime operative of the anti-Obama, anti-Sanders, Clinton camp; in 2016, Warren dumped on [[Progressive]]s when she supported Hillary Clinton over [[Comrade]] Sanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the ''New York Times'' admits Warren is a corporate con posing as a [[grassroots]] Leftie.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/even-the-nyt-admits-warren-is-a-corporate-con-posing-as-a-grassroots-leftie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-Semitism and the Women's March===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Weiombxsa (2).JPG|right|300px|thumb|Warren (right in light blue) with Women's March organizer [[Linda Sarsour]] (left in [[hijab]]) at the [[Kavanaugh smear|Kavanaugh hearings]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat Party leaders have been accused of enabling anti-Semitism.  [[Women's March]] co-founders [[Linda Sarsour]] has been criticized for her outspoken support of anti-Semitic demagogue [[Louis Farrakhan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (January 19, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/womens-march-supporters-peel-off-amid-anti-semitism-scandal Women’s March losing steam, supporters amid anti-Semitism concerns]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two directors of the U.S.-based Jewish NGO the Anti-Defamation League, along with the president of the Zionist Organization of America, have criticized Sarsour's stance on Israel.  Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL's director, has said that Sarsour's support of BDS &amp;quot;encourages and spreads anti-Semitism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sales&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[http://www.jta.org/2017/05/02/news-opinion/united-states/linda-sarsour-why-the-palestinian-american-activist-has-courted-controversy Linda Sarsour: Why the Palestinian-American activist is controversial]|agency=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |date=May 2, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has refused to condemn Farrakhan's extremely anti-Semitic rhetoric.&amp;lt;ref name=jpost&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=[https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Womens-March-leaders-refuse-to-condemn-Farrakhan-after-antisemitic-speech-544074 Women’s March leaders refuse to condemn Farrakhan after antisemitic speech ]|work=The Jerusalem Post|date=March 3, 2018}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Sarsour has called for adherents of [[Islam]] to carry out [[jihad]] against [[President Trump]] and has praised Imam Siraj Wahhaj,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Siraj Wahhaj has said, &amp;quot;It is my duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the [[U.S. Constitution]] with the Quran.&amp;quot;  He has also said, &amp;quot;If [[Allah]] says 100 strikes, 100 strikes it is.  If Allah says cut off their hand, you cut off their hand.  If Allah says stone them to death, through the [[Prophet Muhammad]], then you stone them to death, because it’s the obedience of Allah and his messenger—nothing personal.&amp;quot;  Siraj Wahhaj is also the father of one of two men arrested on August 8, 2018, in [[New Mexico]].  The two were training 11 children to carry out [[Young mass murderers|school shootings]].  A 3-year-old boy was killed during an exorcism at the desert compound.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; named in court documents as an alleged “co-conspirator” in the [[1993 World Trade Center bombing]].  Awad is co-founder and Executive Director of the [[Council on American Islamic Relations]] (CAIR) which has direct ties to [[Hamas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has made Max Berger her campaign's director of progressive partnerships. Berger was the co-founder of an anti-Israel group called [[If Not Now]] (INN). In July 2014, Berger and other INN activists were arrested after occupying the lobby of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.  Berger was protesting Israel's efforts to stop rocket attacks. Berger tweeted (but later deleted): “What Israel is doing in Gaza should be familiar to Jews. It’s called a pogrom. You’d think Jews would be against those.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2014 Berger tweeted: “I dare anyone to visit Hebron and tell me what’s happening there doesn’t look an awful lot like [[apartheid]].” The accusation that Israel is an apartheid state is a classic anti-Semitic canard. That smear is the premise of the BDS movement, which Berger supports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Berger also defended [[Ilhan Elmi Omar]] and her anti-Semitic colleague, Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]]. He even wrote a piece in the now bankrupt ''Think Progress'' titled “American Jews must stand with Ilhan Omar.” In the column, he defended Omar's attacks on American supporters of Israel with the same anti-Semitic tropes, writing that “American politicians of both parties have been afraid to criticize apartheid in Israel and occupation in Palestine for fear of angering pro-Israel lobbying groups and right-wing Evangelical supporters of Israel.”  Berger has also defended Linda Sarsour, tweeting that she “embodies solidarity in a way her Jewish critics do not. #JewsForLinda.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Progressive Zionists of California (PZC) have written two letters to Warren's campaign asking that Berger “step down” from his position.  “He has positioned himself firmly against even the most progressive Zionism, the liberation movement that helps to ensure a safe and secure homeland for the Jewish people while also standing for Palestinian sovereignty and self-determination,” PZC co-founders Susan George and Paul Kujawsky wrote. “We must stress that Berger is not merely criticizing Israel’s policies he deems unfair or unjust–progressive and liberal Zionists do that regularly—Berger is opposing the very existence of Israel as a Jewish state.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/11/warren-mimics-bernies-promotion-anti-semite-linda-sarsour-campaign-surrogate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Slashing retirement benefits===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's proposed Accountable Capitalism Act would require [[corporation]]s to not serve the interests of [[shareholder]]s. Almost 50% of  all stocks in the United States are held by 401(1)k shareholders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/jazz-shaw/2019/09/22/elizabeth-warrens-plan-slash-retirement-funds/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Green New Deal and Amazon===&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. [[Carolyn Maloney]] of [[New York]], who also supports the [[Green New Deal]], was livid when her fellow [[Communist]]s killed the prospect of [[Amazon.com|Amazon]] bringing its main headquarters to New York and creating 25,000 jobs with wages averaging $150,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/nnVS-Zah54k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Elizabeth Warren and [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] took credit for killing the deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amazon was promised up to $1.5 billion in tax abatements in exchange for the promise of creating 25,000 jobs.  Ocasio-Cortez believes a tax abatement, which is a deferment against future taxes, is a bucket of cash the government can spend now on subways or teachers.  And no one ever explained to her that the $1.5 in future taxes would never be paid or even exist if the company chose not to locate in her district.  Warren called the tax incentives &amp;quot;bribes.&amp;quot;   Warren tweeted {{quotebox|&amp;quot;How long will we allow giant [[corporation]]s to hold our democracy hostage?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/14/politics/amazon-aoc-democrats-future/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to save the planet from the scourge of &amp;quot;[[global warming]],&amp;quot; Warren campaigns in a private jet, the purview of millionaires and billionaires. When discovered using the elitist mode of transportation leaving a massive carbon footprint, Warren tried to hide behind staffers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/02/05/watch-green-new-deal-elizabeth-warren-try-to-hide-after-getting-off-of-a-private-jet-n2560742&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2020 presidential campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:D-B-j9nXUAUy876.jpg|right|275px|thumb|[[NBC]] and the [[DNC]] rigged the First Debate to favor Elizabeth Warren.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Elizabeth Warren presidential campaign|2020 presidential election|2020 Democratic party issues}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren declared her intention to run for president in January 2019. Allegedly by the luck of the draw, the DNC spotlighted Elizabeth Warren who was rising in the polls the night of the First Debate.  Warren of course, was given more speaking time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1144058895863832577?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1144058895863832577&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdailycaller.com%2F2019%2F06%2F26%2Ftulsi-gabbard-warren-more-time-debate%2F Tulsi Gabbard Twitter account].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Beto O'Rourke]] was scripted in as her chief rival. Warren proclaimed, &amp;quot;The 71 percent of Americans who say the economy is doing well are wrong.&amp;quot;  A [[Drudge Report]] poll afterward showed [[Tulsi Gabbard]] scored 41% among viewers compared to Warren's 11% The two old white guys, [[Bernie Sanders]] and [[Joe Biden]] were paired off the second night along with the upstart [[gay]] Mayor [[Pete Buttigieg]].  Viewers patiently awaited the Socialist cage match, Bernie vs. Liz.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/24/socialist-thunderdome-bernie-vs-liz-warren-who-comes-out-on-top/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the first debate, Warren introduced the term, &amp;quot;Latinx,&amp;quot; which the [[thought police]] intend to replace &amp;quot;Latina&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Latino&amp;quot; with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/26/elizabeth-warren-uses-pc-term-latinx-first-dem-debate-will-catch/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A poll found 98% of Latinos do not like the term &amp;quot;Latinx&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://medium.com/@ThinkNowTweets/progressive-latino-pollster-trust-me-latinos-do-not-identify-with-latinx-63229adebcea&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren claims that too many black and brown people being born is a &amp;quot;problem&amp;quot; for Israel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtMibsG7eP4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fears over [[Biden's age]] and mental capacities propelled Warren to frontrunner status, yet ''Politico'' reported fundamental questions of honesty and character remained in the minds of voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/27/pocahontas-elizabeth-warrens-biggest-vulnerability-227912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon moving into first place Warren began courting black voters, promising a seat on the back of the bus to the &amp;quot;toxic masculinity&amp;quot; of a black man as [[vice president]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/hilariously-desperate-moves-by-democratic-candidates/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[African American]] scholar Kevin Jackson has dubbed her &amp;quot;Donald Trump roadkill 2.0&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2019/10/in-case-you-missed-it-biden-unofficially-quit-the-race/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Warren's campaign flamed out in the [[Iowa Caucus]]es, Warren operatives blamed the [[sexism]] of Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2qPFLmZDPo Warren Supporter Blames Lagging Polls Numbers on Dems Being Sexist]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After her humiliating [[New Hampshire]] defeat Warren told supporters to breathe deep, eat chocolate, and ‘hug your pet’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/warren-comforts-supporters-after-new-hampshire-defeat-by-saying-breathe-deep-eat-chocolate-and-hug-your-pet/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Two days after [[Super Tuesday]] Warren bowed out, endorsing no one.  President Trump aptly observed Warren cost Bernie Sanders the nomination in favor of the DNC [[establishment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1235598653114511360&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In all, Warren played a role in killing off three contenders in the bloated field of 2020 - [[Bernie Sanders]], [[Michael Bloomberg]], and herself.  Upon her demise [[Andrew Klavan]] commented:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;It's true that at one point Democrat voters made war on their frontrunner, but a rampant and sudden [[sexism]] changed all that when she announced her unworkable and unaffordable health care plan and voters suddenly realized that women can't do math or use reason. This disgusting prejudice has to stop so that a person without the ability to reason can become president, otherwise we're just going to keep electing Republicans. Other Democrat pundits lamented that we now probably won't get a female president in their lifetime, when it was pointed out that [[Nikki Haley]] could win the presidency in 2024. Democrats objected that Haley was not a woman but a Republican.  Then they retired behind closed doors to change the rules so that [[Tulsi Gabbard]] couldn't get into the next debate.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Identity politics===&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2019 Democrat rising star&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|last1=Dreier|first1=Peter|title=50 Young Progressive Activists Who Are Changing America|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-dreier/progressive-activists_b_2226919.html|accessdate=|work=The Huffington Post|date=December 12, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Andrew Gillum]] was reported by ''[[Vanity Fair]]'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/elizabeth-warren-andrew-gillum-ticket&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[The Daily Beast]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/elizabeth-warren-has-been-talking-to-andrew-gillum-sparking-vice-president-buzz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other [[liberal]] [[mainstream media]] news outlets as with Warren as a possible [[Vice President]]ial running mate.  On the same day ''[[The Washington Post]]'' recommended Gillum for the VP spot,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://archive.is/QfvFt If Democrats want to win, they need a black politician on the ticket]'', Theodore R. Johnson, ''The Washington Post'', March 13, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gillum was found by Miami emergency responders to a [[methamphetamine]] overdose nude in a hotel room with two other nude men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/PamelaGeller/status/1241426486302662656&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Under the precedent established by Democrats in the [[Monica Lewinsky|Monica Lewinsky scandal]], ''what a person does in their private life is nobody's business''.  However, Gillum is [[African American]], so the Democrats' own precedent standard may not apply.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cultural appropriation====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren claimed her parents eloped because her father's family did not want him to marry a woman who was part Native American.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren was a lateral hire onto the faculty of the Harvard Law School in 1995 after having listed herself as a minority of American Indian (specifically, Cherokee) descent, despite her fair-skinned appearance and a lack of persuasive documentary evidence for her claim to minority status.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-controversy-over-elizabeth-warrens-claimed-native-american-heritage/2012/09/27/d0b7f568-08a5-11e2-a10c-fa5a255a9258_blog.html?utm_term=.367f03c92d5d Detailed summary of Warren's claimed minority status]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The fair-skinned Warren obtained [[affirmative action]] preferences by falsely claiming that she was of &amp;quot;[[American Indian]]&amp;quot; descent, when in fact her heritage does not support her claim under widely accepted standards.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100165458/elizabeth-warrens-native-american-claims-if-she-was-a-republican-the-media-would-call-her-a-racist/ &amp;quot;Elizabeth Warren's 'Native American' claims: if she was a Republican, the media would call her a racist.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When President [[Donald Trump]] ridiculed Warren's false claims of American Indian ancestry and challenged her to prove it by taking a DNA test, she responded by falsely branding Trump as a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.  She released the results of a DNA test obtained at Stanford University in October 2018 initially claiming her as having between 1/64th and 1/512th Indigenous ancestry, but was later revealed to be as little as 1/1024th ancestry, not even involving American Indian DNA samples, but instead samples from Mexico, Peru and Colombia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/15/elizabeth-warren-melts-down-in-wake-of-dna-disaster/ Elizabeth Warren Melts Down in Wake of DNA Disaster] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Democrats criticized Warren's stunt which hampered enthusiasm and fundraising two weeks before the [[2018 Midterm elections]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/411477-former-obama-campaign-manager-questions-timing-of-warren?amp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even [[CNN]] attempted to mitigate its reputation for [[fake news]] by overtly criticizing Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/16/politics/elizabeth-warren-donald-trump-pocahontas/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a charter member of the Hate America movement; like [[Obama]], who passed himself off as being born in [[Kenya]] to a literary agent in 1992, Warren denied her white immigrant American heritage as early as 1987 in order gain access to [[affirmative action]] programs.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite her claims, Warren's grandfather fought American Indians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leahy, Michael Patrick (September 12, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/12/elizabeth-warren-a-direct-descendant-of-militia-indian-fighter-who-fought-seminole-tribe/ Elizabeth Warren a Direct Descendant of Militia ‘Indian Fighter’ Who Fought Seminole Tribe]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 10 debate appearances, Elizabeth Warren was never asked once by the [[fake news]] media complex about her false claims of Native American heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/06/warren-went-all-10-debates-without-one-question-about-her-native-american-claims-894450&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cherokee Nation rejects her claims====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren fraud.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren fraudulently claims American Indian heritage on her Texas Bar Registration card.  Elizabeth Warren has an established pattern of stealing funds from affirmative action programs intended for oppressed minorities.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Cherokee Nation repudiated Warren's attempts to link herself to them through DNA testing in this statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship.  Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person's ancestors were indigenous to North or South America.  Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation.  Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong.  It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is proven.  Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/cherokee-nation-issues-statement-on-sen-elizabeth-warren-s-dna-test-results Cherokee Nation issues statement on Sen. Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to having her American Indian ancestry claims publicly discredited, Warren went on an erratic and unhinged Twitter rant, falsely accusing Trump of making &amp;quot;creepy physical threats&amp;quot; against her and making other false allegations against him.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Warren meltdown&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Despite Warren being proven as a fraud by the DNA test, however, the liberal media (including [[CNN]], [[CNBC]], [[NPR]] and the ''[[Washington Post]]'') continues to unquestioningly stand by her lies and false ancestral claims and to attack her critics, including Trump, by falsely accusing them of &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot;, which serves only to further discredit both themselves and Warren in the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/dna-tests-prove-elizabeth-warren-only-has-1-1024th-indian-heritage-and-is-a-fraud-liberal-media-reports-the-opposite/ DNA Tests Prove Elizabeth Warren Only Has 1/1024th Indian Heritage and Is a Fraud — Liberal Media Reports the Opposite] at the Gateway Pundit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After 35 years of advancing her career by falsely claiming to have American Indian ancestry and expropriating affirmative action funds intended for real minorities, Warren eventually apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (February 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/31418-warren-s-sorry-for-indian-tale-but-she-s-been-telling-it-for-at-least-35-years Warren’s Sorry for Indian Tale, but She’s Been Telling It for At Least 35 Years]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Racism, race baiting and anti-Semitism====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Racist.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has struggled to name three black Americans who have been influential to her, dancing around the question in separate interviews [[liberal wordiness|with lengthy responses that did very little to actually answer the question]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/11/09/elizabeth-warren-struggles-to-name-three-prominent-black-americans-she-would-appoint-850708 Elizabeth Warren struggles to name three black Americans influential to her]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To compensate, Warren claimed Michael Brown, who spawned the [[Obama riots]], was &amp;quot;murdered by a white police officer&amp;quot; (a claim later discredited by investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/11/sharyl-attkisson-fact-check-2020-democrats-murder-michael-brown/ Sharyl Attkisson Fact-Checks 2020 Democrats Over The ‘Murder’ Of Michael Brown] at the Daily Caller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; provoking widespread criticism for Warren's attempt to politicize the incident.  Even the far-Left ''Washington Post'' fact checkers awarded her four Pinocchios for lying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren threatened a ''[[quid pro quo]]'' to cut off aid to [[Israel]], which drew criticism against her on Twitter.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/21/elizabeth-warren-warns-she-may-cut-off-us-aid-to-israel-if-elected-842133 Elizabeth Warren warns she may cut off US aid to Israel if elected]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of taking responsibility for her campaign's own actions when minority staffers were quitting the campaign (stating that they were merely being used as tokens because of their race instead of having their ideas utilized), Warren chose to blame America's racist &amp;quot;legacy&amp;quot;, ignoring that her own Democrat Party was, and still is, responsible for that racism and oppression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2020/02/07/warren-blames-americas-racist-legacy-for-minority-staffers-resigning-from-her-campaign/ Warren Blames America’s Racist ‘Legacy’ For Minority Staffers Resigning From Her Campaign] at the Federalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren dropped a truth bomb in the 2020 New Hampshire presidential debate:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;I’m glad to stand on this stage with my fellow Democrats who talk about how important the black community is, at least at election time. Year after year after year, election after election after election, Democrats go to people in the black community and say “Boy, we really care about these issues. Racism is terrible, we all want to do something,” and then somehow the problem just seems to keep getting worse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/video-warren-drops-shocking-truth-in-last-debate-trump-is-right-the-democrat-party-has-been-making-life-worse-for-black-families-not-better/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Private prisons====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bought $50,000 in shares of a Vanguard Group fund that heavily invested in private prison companies. The fund was the largest shareholder of America's largest private prison corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren invested in Vanguard Target Retirement 2025—a retirement account run by the Vanguard Group, an investment management company—which in turn invested more than 30 percent of its money in Vanguard's domestic stock index fund. Vanguard was the top shareholder of Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), and one of the largest of GEO Group, both private prison companies, according to data from the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]]. Vanguard owned more than 12 million CCA shares and nearly 9 million GEO Group shares, which were worth roughly $456 million and $216 million, respectively, in March 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CCA, now called CoreCivic, was already the country's largest owner of private prisons in 2013, according to an annual report. The company owned or controlled more than 50 correctional or detention facilities in the country, &amp;quot;with a total design capacity of approximately 86,000 beds in 20 states and the [[District of Columbia]].&amp;quot; GEO Group is also one of the largest private prison providers in the country with 66 prison facilities across the world as of 2013. The two companies also operate many Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facilities for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-invested-in-private-prisons/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Immigration====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is an advocate for free healthcare&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/Catching-Up-With-Elixabeth-Warren-on-Immigration-and-Health-Care-560527801.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for [[transgender]] migrants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1185546131738124290?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren also backs [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]'s proposal for [[welfare]] for [[illegal immigrant]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-backs-aocs-illegal-immigrant-welfare-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  AOC did not return the favor and endorsed Bernie Sanders for president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/video/2019/10/19/aoc-endorses-bernie-sanders-at-nyc-rally?videoId=614927977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013 Warren voted for S.744 providing for 700 miles of a border wall;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://votesmart.org/bill/16819/44567/141272/border-security-economic-opportunity-and-immigration-modernization-act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in February 2019 Warren referred to a border wall as a &amp;quot;monument of hate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nomosshere.tumblr.com/post/186866604027/warren-supporters-asked-about-her-voting-for-700&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has deceptively misrepresented [[immigration]] issues on the campaign trail; illegal entry is a criminal act, not seeking asylum. People who seek asylum at a port of entry are not charged with a crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Abortion===&lt;br /&gt;
At a Democrat primary debate on June 26, 2019, Warren could not think of any restriction on abortion that she supported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Givas, Nicholas (June 26, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/warren-abortion-restriction-democratic-debate Warren can't think of a single abortion restriction she supports during Democratic debate]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 27, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Free stuff===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren bamboozles childish voters with vague pledges of free stuff, free healthcare, free debt forgiveness, free dope needles, open borders, etc. The cost, of course, will be paid for by anyone who has a job or wants to raise a family. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fellow Massachusettsan Rep. [[Seth Moulton]] says of Warren's free tuition plan, &amp;quot;You could literally end [[poverty]] in America for five or six years for what she's going to give to kids who are trying to pay for their own college. Half of America goes to college and it's not the bottom half.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/seth-moulton-bashes-warrens-free-college-plan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the [[extremist]] [[Bill de Blasio]], Warren is one of the few Democrats openly advocating for the destruction of private health insurance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-private-health-insurance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Warren supports the [[Democratic Socialists of America|Democratic Socialist]]s call for [[slave]] reparations as a way to maintain Black dependency on government and buy votes for Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/us/politics/2020-democrats-race-policy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/430999-warren-harris-back-reparations-for-black-americans-affected-by-slavery&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.leftvoice.org/DSA-Votes-for-BDS-Reparations-and-Out-of-the-Socialist-International&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren did not elaborate if descendants of people who did not own slaves such as [[Native American]]s, [[Republican]]s, [[Italian]]s, [[Polish|Pole]]s, [[Jew]]s, [[Hispanic]]s and other [[ethnic group]]s that migrated to the United States after the [[American Civil War]] would be granted an exemption from paying reparations, or if Americans such as [[Kamala Harris]] and [[Barack Obama]] who have no ancestry connected to North American slaves would qualify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren criticizes Obama's Bailout of Wall Street and says it paved way for Trump's election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/warren-obamas-bailout-of-wall-street-failure-paved-way-trumps-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren wants free taxpayer-funded surgeries for the gender-confused, despite the fact many such people have come out of the closet to express regret over their choice of permanent life-altering surgical mutilation to fit what they once thought was the gender they preferred.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/10/05/hundreds-transgenders-want-return-biological-sex-shunned-traitors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Unrealized capital gains tax====&lt;br /&gt;
After much prodding and being attacked by Joe Biden for &amp;quot;vagueness,&amp;quot; Warren finally released a cost estimate for her collectivized healthcare proposal; the cost estimate came in at $52 Trillion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/warren-releases-52-trillion-medicare-for-all-plan-funded-by-unicorn-farts/ Warren Releases $52 Trillion ‘Medicare For All’ Plan Funded By Unicorn Farts], Chrissy Clark, ''The Federalist'', November 2, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - two and one half times [[GDP]] - with no specifics as to whom will bare the cost. Her estimate is based on a cluster of assumptions and veiled tax hikes on the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The idea that payroll tax hikes, repealing the Trump tax cuts, unregulated immigration, and slamming businesses with new taxes wouldn't hugely damage the middle class was received as pure fantasy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/01/ben-sasse-responds-elizabeth-warrens-medicare-plan-gold/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    Additionally, Warren promises free healthcare for illegal immigrants. No less than leftist loon Grand Puba [[Nancy Pelosi]] trashed Warren's insane Medicare for All proposal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/02/nancy-pelosi-cuts-elizabeth-warren-off-knees/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even Hillary Clinton trashed her insane healthcare ideas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-clinton-warrens-medicare-for-all-plan-wouldnt-pass-the-senate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren's wealth tax is basically an unrealized capital gains tax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2019/11/08/warren-wants-to-tax-unrealized-capital-gains-n2556165&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  John Hinderaker writing in ''Powerline'' blog analyzed the proposal:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Part of the plan is a “wealth tax,” which means taxing unrealized [[capital gain]]s at [[ordinary income]] rates. Combined with other elements of her plan, this implies that unrealized capital gains will be taxed at more than 50%.  Taxing unrealized gains as ordinary income (from the new M4A plan, applies to top 1% of households), plus the 14.6% payroll tax she wants to levy on investment income, plus the financial transactions tax when you have to sell something to get the cash to pay the taxes....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren’s whole idea is so obviously [[stupid]] and incapable of implementation that one is tempted to laugh....lawyers are a core constituency of the Democratic Party, and nearly every lawyer in the U.S. (along with many others, of course) tolerates paying 50% marginal tax rates on his or her income only because a chunk of that income is sheltered in 401(k)s. The 401(k) and the house are where the vast majority of high income earners accumulate wealth. Warren’s proposal essentially destroys the ability to build wealth via retirement savings. This may be OK with those who are already rich, like Elizabeth Warren, but it will be [[anathema]] to younger people who are trying to become wealthy....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessing a “wealth tax” that invades previously tax-free 401(k)s at a 50%+ rate will destroy Warren’s support in what has been, in recent years, a core Democratic Party constituency. “Wall Street,” i.e. the financial industry, has already warned that if Warren is the Democrats’ nominee, it will not support her. That in itself is seismic; no industry has ever supported a politician to the extent that [[Wall Street]] supported [[Barack Obama]] and [[Hillary Clinton]]. But the loss of support from America’s lawyers might be even more deadly to the Democratic Party....One unfortunate thing about targeting lawyers (and their often-liberal wives) is that many of them actually understand the implications of policy proposals. Here as usual, understanding is fatal to Liz Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/warren-loses-the-lawyers.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Education====&lt;br /&gt;
A father confronted Warren on her proposals for free tuition, asking if he could get his money back for working double shifts and sacrificed buying new cars and vacations to pay off student loans. Warren refused.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/01/22/can-i-have-my-money-back-father-confronts-elizabeth-warren-over-student-loan-forgiveness/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Father : My daughter is in school, I saved all my money just to pay student loans Can I have my money back? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren: of course not &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Father: so you want to help those who don't save any money and the ones that do the right thing get  screwed?}}&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has pledged to have a 9 year old transgender person vet her choice for [[Secretary of Education]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Doomsday cult===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{days until|2029|12|31}} Days Until Final Destruction of the Planet'''&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is a leader in the [[Green New Deal]] doomsday cult.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1169437706469990401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Green New Deal====&lt;br /&gt;
As part of a fundraising scheme,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://secure.actblue.com/donate/have-a-drink-with-ew?refcode=WFP2019-DD-NATL-TW-US-BCON&amp;amp;refcode2=INT-EW-21%5E65-MF-BCON-STA-LGBK-BCD&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Warren has offered to burn thousands of gallons of fossil fuels emitting thousands of pounds of carbon fuel emissions into the atmosphere, destroying the planet, to fly the winner of a drawing to have a [[beer]] with Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1155515626527612928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fossil fuels====&lt;br /&gt;
Warren promises to ban [[fracking]] on her first day in office, which would rebuild the [[Russia]]n economy.  Russia, [[China]], [[Iran]] and [[Venezuela]] would be the biggest winners, American consumers the biggest losers. Warren's promise in her first 24 hours would immediately:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warren tweet.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warren sent a fake news tweet claiming Mark Zuckerberg endorsed Donald Trump.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Hand [[Vladimir Putin]] hundreds of billions worth of enhanced Russian energy exports.  A windfall of economic growth that will mean Russian policy expansion globally.&lt;br /&gt;
*Support the regime of Venezuelan dictator [[Nicolas Maduro]] who relies on oil production and pricing to keep his socialist government in place.&lt;br /&gt;
*Expand the influence of China; and increase the value of [[Beijing]]’s investments in Russian energy and 49% state in PDVSA (Venezuela).&lt;br /&gt;
*Immediately help the Iranian economy; enhance the stranglehold of power by the Mullah’s over the Iranian people; help fund [[terrorist]] actions globally, and specifically create terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya and Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
*Return U.S. policy and strategy back to a position of dependence on [[OPEC]] nations; so we can expect more U.S. military involvement in the middle-east.&lt;br /&gt;
*Destroy growth in American wages , and set up energy policy that will drive further industrial manufacturing out of the U.S. and into Mexico and Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
*Simultaneously drive up the price of electricity in the U.S, further exacerbating the financial costs and losses to the U.S. middle-class.&lt;br /&gt;
*Raise gas prices back to Obama-era rates $5/gal.&lt;br /&gt;
*In turn this will drive up the cost of transported products, and U.S. food prices will jump approximately 20% as massive inflation hits highly-consumable categories first.&lt;br /&gt;
*The collective impact of the four domestic points above will drive down the ability of consumers to spend on other goods.  The U.S. economy is two-thirds dependent on consumer spending. The collective impact means economic contraction (i.e [[Recession]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Violence===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has taken credit for the [[Occupy Wall Street]] movement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/elizabeth-warren-i-created-occupy-wall-street-2011-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which has employed [[violence]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/occupy-wall-street-protests-turn-violent-when-demonstrators-clash-with-police&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the name of &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; and socialism.  [[Connor Betts]], an Elizabeth Warren supporter, [[Antifa]] member and registered Democrat,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; murdered 9 people in the [[Dayton nightclub shooting]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/report-networks-silent-shocking-leftist-leanings-dayton-shooter-support-antifa-elizabeth-warren/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including 6 [[African American]]s. Warren supports the [[Abolish ICE]] movement.  Betts posted to Twitter, “I do not consider ICE agents to be human beings,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1158420694092242944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; echoed [[Ocasio-Cortez]]' statement that [[ICE]] detention facilities were &amp;quot;[[concentration camp]]s&amp;quot; and praised the Seattle ICE bomber as a &amp;quot;martyr.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Black Lives Matter]] [[Louisville]] leader Chanelle Helm is a political activist who has met with numerous high-profile politicians,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/08/22/black-lives-matter-activist-unveils-list-demands-white-people-give-up-home/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including Elizabeth Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/KamVTV/status/1159236848717160448&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Chanelle Helm posted video to her [[Facebook]] page showing a protest at Senate Majority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]]’s house. Helm was shouting: “just stab the motherf—er in the heart.”  “F*ck yo neck, b*tch. Murder Turtle! Murder Turtle! … F*ck yo thoughts and prayers … F*ck you, f*ck yo wife, f*ck everything you stand for.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/06/protesters-gather-outside-mitch-mcconnell-louisville-home-monday-night/1930377001/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Facebook and censorship===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren should expect a huge legal battle if she becomes the next US president and tries to lead a breakup of [[Facebook]]. In an internal employee meeting in July 2019, Facebook [[CEO]] [[Mark Zuckerberg]] threatened “to go to the mat” and “fight” attempts to breakup Facebook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/10/1/20893133/mark-zuckerberg-elizabeth-warren-facebook-sue-us-government-tech-breakup&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gun rights===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like rich leftwing [[pedophile]]s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime], By Margo Kaplan Op-ed, ''[[The New York Times]]'', Oct. 5, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Warren wants only the rich to have legal protection to own a gun.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2019/08/12/elizabeth-warren-wants-make-expensive-exercise-rights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impeachment scam===&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Sen. [[Lisa Murkowski]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.murkowski.senate.gov/press/release/murkowskis-statement-on-senate-impeachment-process-vote&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; whom Democrats pinned their impeachment hopes on, explained her decision to vote against calling more witnesses when Warren attacked Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] during the Senate trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/elizabeth-warren-john-roberts-impeachment-trial&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Deceptive employment practices===&lt;br /&gt;
Warren has built much of her career as a champion of workers and consumers against the deceptive and exploitative practices of employers.  Several volunteers describe the process for entry into her campaign as deceptive and exploitative. They were pushed toward unpaid positions over paid ones, misled over the availability of financial assistance, and asked to sign highly irregular restrictive nondisclosure agreements. The positions were advertised as a paid intern, while actually only that of an unpaid volunteer for academic credit. Victims called it a &amp;quot;great scam.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/sen-elizabeth-warren-fellowship-applicants-say-campaign-program-was-a-great-scam&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mental fitness===&lt;br /&gt;
Like Rachel Dolezal, a white [[NAACP]] official who insisted that she was &amp;quot;[[African American]]&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/2015/06/21/dolezal-is-not-just-an-imposter-she-is-mentally-ill/ Dolezal is not just an imposter, she is mentally ill]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many have questioned Elizabeth Warren's mental fitness to hold office as a bitter clinger to her appropriated cultural identity despite [[science]] proving her delusional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Wikipedia]]: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Particularly in the 21st century, cultural appropriation is often considered harmful, and to be a violation of the collective intellectual property rights of the originating, minority cultures, notably indigenous cultures and those living under colonial rule....Such practices may be seen as particularly harmful in schools and universities which have a stated purpose of promoting ethnic diversity and inclusion...}} ''Bustle'' noted when {{quotebox|&amp;quot;privileged individuals cherry-picks part of a culture belonging to a group of marginalized people, then uses it for fashion or performance purposes, leaving behind the true meaning of the characteristic and thus disrespecting the culture from which it was born. When we hear retorts about the offensiveness of cultural appropriation, people will often say they're simply &amp;quot;appreciating the culture&amp;quot;. While cultural appreciation is possible, the line often gets crossed into appropriation because these representations lead to overgeneralized racial stereotypes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bustle.com/articles/160328-how-cultural-appropriation-hurts-us-all&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} An article in ''Psychology Today'' compares cultural identity theft to credit card fraud and theft: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;The thief was clever enough to hack your account, so the company lets them use it. This is what happens in cultural appropriation—the adoption and misuse of another culture’s practices. Someone takes something from your culture and uses it for their own benefit. And there are no consequences.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/life-in-the-intersection/201706/cultural-identity-theft&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Like Dolezal, Warren and supporters claim &amp;quot;transracial identity&amp;quot; to justify cultural appropriation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren is in the habit of drinking alone, which is symptomatic of an advanced degree of [[alcoholism]].  Some speculate her claim to Native American heritage was a crude effort to hide her use of alcohol.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren once eulogized a former colleague by accusing him of [[sexual harassment]] in front of his ex-wife and children, according to a profile of the presidential candidate in the ''Washington Post''.  Warren, who got her first full-time teaching job at the University of Houston, returned to campus 15 years later to deliver a eulogy for UH law professor Eugene Smith. Smith was a “champion” of Warren, according to WaPo, and specifically requested she speak at his funeral after he passed away from polio complications.  During her [[eulogy]] Warren reportedly “stunned” funeral attendees when she told what was meant to be a lighthearted story about Smith chasing her around his office.  From WaPo:&lt;br /&gt;
:“With a smile on her face and humor in her voice, Warren described how Smith had invited her to his office one day just a few months after she had been hired. He shut the door and lunged for her, she said, and as she protested, he chased her around his desk before she was able to escape out the door.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/15/liz-warren-me-too-eulogy-professor-widow-funeral/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2018 Senate campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
A racist Warren volunteer was taken down by supporters of [[Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai]] of [[MIT]] and arrested when he assaulted Dr.  Ayyadurai, who was running against Warren.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/RzFqx-avBS4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.pscp.tv/w/1lPKqkzzYkmJb?t=65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CFPB corruption==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]] (CFPB) was created in 2009 by a majority Democrat Congress and signed into law by President Obama with Elizabeth Warren's as its first head.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2010-09-19-1.html Obama Spits on the Constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The CFPB was found to be a massive fundraising scam, tapping into the [[U.S. Treasury]] to support Democrat pet projects by awarding contracts to Democrat operatives and organizations. ''The Daily Caller'' reported: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Obama’s presidential campaign advertising agency received nearly $60 million in federal contracts after he took office...The overwhelming majority of the $58 million funneled to GMMB came from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) created by Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2011.  The CFPB awarded the agency a whopping $43.7 million, about 75 percent of GMMB’s total federal funding stream.  The second-most lucrative government account for GMMB is a community service agency founded by Bill Clinton, the Corporation for National and Community Service, which awarded GMMB $13.1 million worth of contracts....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/09/13/exclusive-obamas-top-campaign-ad-firm-got-nearly-60m-in-federal-contracts ''Obama’s Top Campaign Ad Firm Got Nearly $60M In Federal Contracts''], The Daily Caller, September 13th, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' reported, &amp;quot;The pride of Harvard Law School, Ms. Warren is a hero to the political Left for proposing a new bureaucracy to micromanage the services that banks can offer consumers.  But she is also so politically controversial that no less a liberal lion than Connecticut Senator [[Chris Dodd]] has warned the White House that she probably isn't confirmable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=wsj&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748703440604575495681843430198-lMyQjAxMTAwMDEwODExNDgyWj.html Elizabeth III - Obama to Senate: Stick that in your advice and consent clause.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2019, [[Antifa]] leader José Alcoff, who had previously advocated for murder, was arrested in connection with an attack on two U.S. Marines a few months earlier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (January 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/31338-d-c-antifa-leader-who-advocated-murder-arrested-in-attack-on-marines D.C. Antifa Leader Who Advocated Murder Arrested for Attack on Marines]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Alcoff was working with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB  is a corrupt bureaucracy created out of the [[2008 Financial Crisis]] and Stimulus bill  under the doctrine of 'not letting a crisis go to waste', whose purpose is to funnel government contracts and federal money to far leftist media consulting firms to aid Democrat electoral aims.  It is the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren who served as its first head.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government report chronicles several instances of [[discrimination]], many with an emphasis on unfair promotion practices and lopsided pay scales for minorities working at CFPB.  There are currently “scores of cases of U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau employees seeking protection from [[racial]]ly offensive, [[sexist]] or discriminatory behavior.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2014/08/29/federal-agency-elizabeth-warren-helped-found-is-rife-with-discrimination-employees-say&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==In Popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://babylonbee.com/news/elizabeth-warren-admits-to-wearing-paleface-at-college-costume-party Elizabeth Warren Admits To Wearing Paleface At College Costume Party], ''The Babylon Bee''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cultural Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[White privilege]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cloward-Piven]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Warren, Elizabeth}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:115th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:116th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Presidential Election, 2020]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blame America Crowd]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tricksters]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Maher&amp;diff=1891430</id>
		<title>Bill Maher</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Maher&amp;diff=1891430"/>
		<updated>2022-10-05T23:38:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Bill Maher.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|Bill Maher]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bill Maher''' (born 1956) is a [[left-wing]] talk show host. He is also a [[Socialism|socialist]], [[atheist]] and [[liberal]] comedian, actor, writer, producer, and [[Democratic Party]] activist (see also: [[Celebrity atheists]]). Maher supports the legalization of [[marijuana]], [[gay marriage]], [[gambling]] and [[prostitution]]. He is most notable as the host of ''[[Real Time|Real Time with Bill Maher]]'', which airs on the [[HBO]] television network. Maher formerly hosted ''Politically Incorrect'' on [[ABC]]. However, recently, Maher has criticized certain progressive orthodoxies, such as political correctness, the &amp;quot;defund the police&amp;quot; movement, and transgenderism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
Maher was born in [[New York City]], the son of Julie (née Berman), a nurse, and William Maher, Sr., a network news editor and radio announcer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://www.filmreference.com/film/32/Bill-Maher.html |title = Bill Maher Biography (1956–)|accessdate = January 17, 2008|publisher = Film Reference}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was raised in his Irish American father's [[Catholic]] religion, remaining unaware that his mother was [[Jews|Jew]]ish until his early teenage years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url = http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0205/24/lkl.00.html|title = Interview With Bill Maher|date = May 24, 2002|accessdate = January 17, 2008|publisher = CNN}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news&lt;br /&gt;
|date= May 24, 2002&lt;br /&gt;
|last= King&lt;br /&gt;
|first= Larry&lt;br /&gt;
|authorlink= Larry King&lt;br /&gt;
|url= http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0205/24/lkl.00.html&lt;br /&gt;
|title= CNN LARRY KING LIVE Interview With Bill Maher&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher= CNN&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate= Aug 13, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|quote= But I never even knew I was half-Jewish until I was a teenager.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web&lt;br /&gt;
|year= 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|month= November/December&lt;br /&gt;
|last= Carlin-McCall&lt;br /&gt;
|first= Kelly&lt;br /&gt;
|url= http://www.irishabroad.com/irishworld/irishamericamag/octnov08/features/bill-maher-octnov08.asp&lt;br /&gt;
|title= The Real Bill&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher= [[Irish America magazine]]&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate= Aug 13, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|quote= So the fact that I’m half Irish and half Jewish, they both contributed to a sense of humor.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news&lt;br /&gt;
|year= 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|month= July&lt;br /&gt;
|last= Morgan&lt;br /&gt;
|first= Piers&lt;br /&gt;
|url= http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2011/07/12/maher-on-religion/&lt;br /&gt;
|title= Bill Maher explains his 'apatheism,' apathetic atheism&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher= CNN&lt;br /&gt;
|accessdate= Aug 13, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|quote= &amp;quot;...and I was raised Catholic.  I was never Jewish&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Maher was 13, his father disagreed with the [[Catholic Church]]'s position on [[birth control]] and stopped taking Maher and his sister to Catholic church services.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20081221013449/http://media.www.diamondbackonline.com/media/storage/paper873/news/2008/10/03/Diversions/Getting.Blasphemous.In.The.Presence.Of.Bill.Maher-3467097.shtml |title=Getting Blasphemous in the Presence of Bill Maher |publisher=Media.www.diamondbackonline.com |date=Oct. 3, 2008|archivedate=Dec. 21, 2008 |accessdate=Aug 13, 2012|url=http://media.www.diamondbackonline.com/media/storage/paper873/news/2008/10/03/Diversions/Getting.Blasphemous.In.The.Presence.Of.Bill.Maher-3467097.shtml}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maher grew up in River Vale, New Jersey, and graduated from Pascack Hills High School in Montvale, New Jersey in 1974. He earned a [[Bachelor of Arts|B.A.]] in English literature and [[history]] from [[Cornell University]] in 1978.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-ivyleague/18/ |title=Entertainment; Ivy League Celebrities |publisher=Comcast.net|accessdate=Aug 13, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Following college, Maher worked as a standup comedian and television actor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Television shows and other media ==&lt;br /&gt;
ABC decided not to renew Maher's contract for ''Politically Incorrect'' in 2002 after he agreed with a point posed by conservative commentator and guest [[Dinesh D'Souza]] that the terrorists in the September 11, 2001 attacks should not be called cowards. Maher expanded on his point, saying &amp;quot;We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=14941]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the aftermath of the attacks, the remark made him too controversial for some of the show's most prominent advertisers. Companies including FedEx and Sears Roebuck pulled their advertisements from the show, causing it to become unprofitable. The show was subsequently canceled on June 16, 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maher's comment accusing America of cowardice followed another controversial comment he made on ''Politically Incorrect'' where he compared mentally handicapped children to dogs:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|But I've often said that if I had &amp;amp;mdash; I have two dogs &amp;amp;mdash; if I had two retarded children, I'd be a hero. And yet the dogs, which are pretty much the same thing. What? They're sweet. They're loving. They're kind, but they don't mentally advance at all ... Dogs are like retarded children.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ABC was still dealing with the fallout from this statement when it decided not to renew Maher's contract.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, Maher became the host of ''Real Time with Bill Maher'' on the HBO cable television network, a debate show somewhat similar to ''Politically Incorrect'', but with a narrower selection of guests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political claims and statements ==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite claims of being a [[Libertarianism|libertarian]], his views are more line with socialism. In fact, most of his views are in direct opposition to libertarian ideology, such as his support of government regulation of corporations, foreign aid, public schooling, a ban on homeschooling, campaign finance restrictions, restricting carbon emissions and creating other radical &amp;quot;environmental protection&amp;quot; laws, affirmative action, minimum wage laws, absolute gun control, support for the [[United Nations]], income redistribution through higher taxation, and socialized medicine. He endorsed Bob Dole in 1996.&amp;lt;ref name=salon&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2001/08/01/maher_4/|title=Is Bill Maher a libertarian?|first=Dan|last=Halem|date=Aug 1, 2001|accessdate=Aug 13, 2012|work=Salon.com}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He supported [[Ralph Nader]] in the 2000 U.S. presidential election, but not in 2004. He has even praised [[Janet Reno]] and the ATF for its action in the massacre in Waco, Texas. He supports personal choice on moral issues, including abortion, the use of drugs, gambling, and prostitution. Salon.com characterizes him as a &amp;quot;A flaming liberal&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=salon/&amp;gt; In addition, he also infamously encouraged people to &amp;quot;bring on the recession&amp;quot; by crashing the economy in order to force Donald Trump out of the presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/06/08/bill-maher-hopes-for-crashing-economy-to-get-rid-of-trump-bring-on-the-recession/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only a few things Bill Maher will agree with conservatives on. Besides radial Islam, he has been increasingly condemning political correctness since 2015 as he understands that things like campus safe spaces and transgender overreach are not winning issues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFeDFva6tcg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When asked why he is going after the left more often, he reacted saying, &amp;quot;Because you're embarrassing me!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dee4zAuAGQk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If Bill Maher ever criticizes the left, he is sending them a clear warning that his cause is in trouble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maher was formerly involved in a relationship with model Nancy Johnson a.k.a. &amp;quot;Coco Johnsen&amp;quot;. However, Ms. Johnson ended it and in November 2004 sued Maher for palimony amid allegations of verbal and physical abuse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1111041coco1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Maher said that he never promised to marry her and that the claims of abuse were a money making scam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/12-1-2004-62384.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Somewhat anachronistically, he voted for [[Bob Dole]] in the 1996 Presidential election, calling him an &amp;quot;old-fashioned&amp;quot; Republican. He is also a personal friend of fellow Cornell ''alma mater'' [[Ann Coulter]], despite (or perhaps because of) their widely divergent views. She was a frequent guest on ''Politically Incorrect.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''Bill Maher: Victory Begins at Home''==&lt;br /&gt;
Not surprisingly, the ''[[New York Times]]'' raved about his 2003 overtly anti-Catholic, one-man Broadway show ''Bill Maher: Victory Begins at Home''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/295903/Bill-Maher-Victory-Begins-at-Home/overview NYTIMES review]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/annualreport.php?year=2003&amp;amp;id=80&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''Religulous''==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, Maher starred in a spoof [[documentary]] movie called ''[[Religulous]]''. It was directed by [[Larry Charles]] (who also directed ''[[Borat]]'').  The film derives its name from a combination of the words &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ridiculous&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0708/14/lkl.01.html CNN LARRY KING LIVE, Interview With Bill Maher, aired August 14, 2007 - 21:00ET]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Originally destined for an [[Easter]] 2008 release, the film had a limited theater-release in [[October]] 2008 after being first shown at the [[Toronto]] International Film Festival in early [[September]] 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0815241/releaseinfo IMDb: Release dates for ''Religulous'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The film criticizes [[religion]], particularly Christianity and to a lesser extent Judaism and Islam.  To Maher, radical Islam and its hate-filled terrorism has no difference from regular religious worship, as he blends pictures of the attack on the World Trade center with a benediction by the Pope and Jews praying at the Wailing Wall at the very end of the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the film, Maher explains his stance on religion as he interviews the faithful from mainstream religions as well as from many lesser known [[cult]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some individuals featured in the film&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tiff07.ca/filmsandschedules/filmdetails.aspx?ID=707111610451386 RELIGULOUS: A Conversation with Bill Maher and Larry Charles]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism|Hasidic]] scholars&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus]] impersonators&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messianic Judaism|Messianic Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Islam|Muslims]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints#Polygamy|Polygamists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Satanism|Satanists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young Earth Creationism|Creationists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Recreational users of [[cannabis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*A US senator who believes in the &amp;quot;[[Rapture]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Raelism|Rael]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Box office performance===&lt;br /&gt;
The film made $3.5 million in its opening weekend&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=weekend&amp;amp;id=religulous.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in a limited release, surpassing expectations.  In total, it made just over $13 million during its theatrical release, and over $7 million in US DVD sales &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2008/RELIG.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
The already controversial film gained increased notoriety on the morning of 30 September 2008 when Bill Maher made an appearance on ''The View'' to promote ''Religulous''. Maher frivolously suggested during the interview that anyone who hears the &amp;quot;voice&amp;quot; of God should check themselves in to a psychiatric hospital.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/30/sherri-shepherd-bill-mahe_n_130581.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18224 Bill Maher Owes Another Apology] - A war veteran responds to Maher's anti-military comments&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/aim_column/A3735_0_3_0_C/ Is Bill Maher the Jane Fonda of the Iraq War?] - Another response to Maher's anti-military comments&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/bill-maher/ What Liberals Say - Bill Maher], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0815241/ ''Religulous''] at IMDB.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Maher, Bill}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blame America Crowd]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comedians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Talk Show Hosts]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Directors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Elites]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Multimillionaires]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827638</id>
		<title>Talk:RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827638"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T06:35:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Any opinions on who should be RINO of the Year?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:52, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Due to lack of discussion, I have declared [[Liz Cheney]] RINO of the year and [[Adam Kinzinger]] first runner-up. Happy New Year everyone!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 01:35, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827637</id>
		<title>Talk:RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827637"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T06:30:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Any opinions on who should be RINO of the Year?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:52, December 26, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Due to lack of discussion, I have declared [[Liz Cheney]] RINO of the year and [[Adam Kinzinger]] first runner-up.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 01:30, January 1, 2022 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827633</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827633"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:32:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Winner: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''First Runner-up: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, also for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other prominent RINOs of 2021 == &lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for his constant criticism of President Trump and conservatives and for supporting far-left Democrat Joe Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for supporting the unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump and voting for the socialist infrastructure bill. &lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Kristol, for supporting Terry McAuliffe over conservative Glenn Youngkin.&lt;br /&gt;
*Former President George W. Bush, for implying that Trump supporters are terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for refusing to support President Trump in his fight against election fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for not having the courage to overturn the election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827631</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827631"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:22:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Short start for this new page. Please add to this list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Winner: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''First Runner-up: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, also for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other prominent RINOs of 2021 == &lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for his constant criticism of President Trump and conservatives and for supporting far-left Democrat Joe Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for supporting the unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump and voting for the socialist infrastructure bill. &lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Kristol, for supporting Terry McAuliffe over conservative Glenn Youngkin.&lt;br /&gt;
*Former President George W. Bush, for implying that Trump supporters are terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for refusing to support President Trump in his fight against election fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for not having the courage to overturn the election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827630</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827630"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:22:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Short start for this new page. Please add to this list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Winner: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''First Runner-up: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, also for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other prominent RINOs of 2021 == &lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for his constant criticism of President Trump and conservatives and for supporting far-left Democrat Joe Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for supporting the unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump and voting for the socialist infrastructure bill. &lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Kristol, for supporting Terry McAuliffe over conservative Glenn Youngkin.&lt;br /&gt;
*Former President George W. Bush, for implying that Trump supporters are terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for refusing to support President Trump in his fight against election fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for not having the courage to overturn the election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827629</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827629"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:22:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Short start for this new page. Please add to this list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''Winner: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY)''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;''First Runner-up: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL)''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, also for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other prominent RINOs of 2021 == &lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for his constant criticism of President Trump and conservatives and for supporting far-left Democrat Joe Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for supporting the unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump and voting for the socialist infrastructure bill. &lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Kristol, for supporting Terry McAuliffe over conservative Glenn Youngkin.&lt;br /&gt;
*Former President George W. Bush, for implying that Trump supporters are terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for refusing to support President Trump in his fight against election fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for not having the courage to overturn the election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827628</id>
		<title>RINO of the Year, 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=RINO_of_the_Year,_2021&amp;diff=1827628"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:21:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Short start for this new page. Please add to this list! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Winner: Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY)&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;, for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;First Runner-up: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), also for supporting the Democrat's unconstitutional impeachment and for attacking conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other prominent RINOs of 2021 == &lt;br /&gt;
*Joe Walsh, for his constant criticism of President Trump and conservatives and for supporting far-left Democrat Joe Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
*Mitt Romney, for supporting the unconstitutional impeachment of President Trump and voting for the socialist infrastructure bill. &lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Kristol, for supporting Terry McAuliffe over conservative Glenn Youngkin.&lt;br /&gt;
*Former President George W. Bush, for implying that Trump supporters are terrorists.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mitch McConnell, for refusing to support President Trump in his fight against election fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Pence, for not having the courage to overturn the election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2021&amp;diff=1827627</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2021&amp;diff=1827627"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T04:15:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Rand Paul or MTG as the winner? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Fascinating start!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Mr. Schlafly! Please feel free to remove or add anyone as you see fit!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 11:22, November 19, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My vote is for Senator Manchin for Conservative of the Year and Governor-Elect Youngkin for runner-up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, I think that Senator Manchin should be Conservative of the Year. Although he is clearly not entirely a conservative, he has been instrumental in sinking some of the far-left's policy proposals, such as the Green New Deal and the Build Back Better bill as well as opposing the nomination of Neera Tanden as Director of the Office of Management and Budget. His opposition to these policy proposals drew significant backlash from the far-left. I think Governor-Elect Youngkin should be runner-up because he was elected Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia in what was considered to be a massive rebuke of President Biden and his policies. He also laid a pathway forward for Republicans going into the 2022 Midterms. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 01:00, December 25, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Great points.  Thank you.  We need to narrow this down and pick the winners soon!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:48, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::My vote is for Oklahoma Rep. [[Markwayne Mullin]], who successfully evacuated an American family from Afghanistan amidst the chaos caused by Biden's foreign policy disasters. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 16:52, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My vote for for Arizona Representative [[Paul Gosar]], who voted against sealing the election results, was the strongest vote against the Juneteenth National Independence holiday, and was censured for merely posting a meme on Twitter. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 20:04, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I like Sen. John Kennedy. This video [https://youtu.be/Zdmf2UlNuhs should be a permanent exhibit in the Museum of Conservativism] as a model of how to talk to a liberal communist. But I know we probably need a younger winner for a role model this year. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:12, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://youtu.be/s6Pw-Sisry0 Part 2: Epilogue]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:18, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I still think Senator Manchin should be Conservative of the Year. He has done more for Conservativism than many Republicans in the Congress.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 13:21, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Manchin is up for reelection in 2024, when Trump will carry his state by 40+ points.  I think Manchin's stance reflects where his constituents are.  That's fine, but I don't see it as award-winning.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:05, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Politics is a funny business. If Manchin were to run as a Republican in 2024, there is no guarantee he could win against a strong Democrat who would call him a traitor. An honor like this would be turned into a smear against him. Everybody is happy just the way things are. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downgrading Manchin because he's just doing what 50 Republican senators are already doing, and which the overwhelming number of [[West Virginia]] constituents of Manchin want.  It's also what Manchin campaigned on to get elected in 2010.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:13, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I love [[Jim Jordan]] who is an ex wrestling coach.  He reminds me of myself during the &amp;quot;fighting Irish&amp;quot; stage of my life. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:44, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::If it's not Lady Space Lasers, then I'm storming the servers on account of the obvious massive electoral fraud going on here. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:07, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Joe Biden is going to mauled by the she bears of Covid-19, inflation, crime and the southern border. Trump could win the presidency in 2024. [[Grover Cleveland]] won nonconsecutive presidential terms. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:57, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If neither Manchin nor Youngkin are Conservative of the Year, then I would vote for DeSantis. He has been a strong Conservative.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 22:19, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the two frontrunners. I hope it's not a coin toss. Rand is a multiple CPAC winner, too.  Maybe we should have an unwritten rule discouraging repeat winners, and do our best to recognize fresh faces and encourage new blood. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:24, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It should be won on merit. Paul exposed Fauci via his bulldog tenacity. He deserves to win. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:20, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;ssssh&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;I was trying to give Andy an excuse to choose MTG.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;Yah, on merit. Right. I fully agree. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:57, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Rand Paul]] or [[MTG]] as the winner? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think a strong case can be made for making [[MTG]] the winner.  It's between her and [[Rand Paul]] as the leading two contestants in a very strong field of contenders.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:34, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Seconded. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:24, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that DeSantis should be the winner. He has arguably been the most vocal against Vaccine mandates. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 15:16, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::We have two or three years yet for that honor; thus far his accomplishments are limited to Florida, and much of it is still in the courts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think MTG should be the winner. She has received more attention than Rand Paul.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:52, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree.  The more I think about what [[MTG]] accomplished, it's phenomenal:&lt;br /&gt;
::::* completely stymied [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[The Squad]] all year&lt;br /&gt;
::::* exposed the [[DC Gulag]] such that its unhinged, [[Opposition to Donald Trump|Anti-Trump]] warden had to delete her prior tweets&lt;br /&gt;
::::* was instrumental in discrediting [[Liz Cheney]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::* is so overwhelmingly supported by her constituents that redistricting with an infusion of [[Dem]]s doesn't diminish her certain reelection&lt;br /&gt;
::::* enormously helpful to [[Donald Trump]], calling him her favorite president of all time&lt;br /&gt;
::::* helps other candidates in other districts&lt;br /&gt;
::::* all the above despite being wrongly excluded from committees by [[Dem]]s, which would have ended the political career of anyone else&lt;br /&gt;
::::--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:59, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Great! I think MTG is the winner! Any thoughts on who should be RINO of the year?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:35, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[Liz Cheney]], [[Mitt Romney]], and [[Pat Toomey]] are strong contenders for [[RINO]] of the year.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:37, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that [[Liz Cheney]] should be RINO of the year. Also, there is an error on the homepage: It says Ron Paul is the first runner-up instead of Rand Paul.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 20:23, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Great catch on the error!  You're in line for a promotion on your account in 2022!!!!  Also, I agree about [[Liz Cheney]] being [[RINO]] of the year.  Would you (or anyone else) like to start that entry?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:43, December 31, 2021 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Thank you very much, Mr. Schlafly! I will work on RINO of the year now! Happy New Year!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 23:15, December 31, 2021 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
MTG challenged OTC to a debate on the Green New Deal and AOC wimped out like the left always does concerning debates (Because they cannot defend their nonsense). :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:05, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2021&amp;diff=1827607</id>
		<title>Talk:Conservative of the Year 2021</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Conservative_of_the_Year_2021&amp;diff=1827607"/>
		<updated>2022-01-01T01:24:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TheNewRight: /* Rand Paul or MTG as the winner? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Fascinating start!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:24, November 18, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Mr. Schlafly! Please feel free to remove or add anyone as you see fit!--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 11:22, November 19, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My vote is for Senator Manchin for Conservative of the Year and Governor-Elect Youngkin for runner-up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my opinion, I think that Senator Manchin should be Conservative of the Year. Although he is clearly not entirely a conservative, he has been instrumental in sinking some of the far-left's policy proposals, such as the Green New Deal and the Build Back Better bill as well as opposing the nomination of Neera Tanden as Director of the Office of Management and Budget. His opposition to these policy proposals drew significant backlash from the far-left. I think Governor-Elect Youngkin should be runner-up because he was elected Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia in what was considered to be a massive rebuke of President Biden and his policies. He also laid a pathway forward for Republicans going into the 2022 Midterms. Any thoughts?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 01:00, December 25, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Great points.  Thank you.  We need to narrow this down and pick the winners soon!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:48, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::My vote is for Oklahoma Rep. [[Markwayne Mullin]], who successfully evacuated an American family from Afghanistan amidst the chaos caused by Biden's foreign policy disasters. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;(The Old Right was right!)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 16:52, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::My vote for for Arizona Representative [[Paul Gosar]], who voted against sealing the election results, was the strongest vote against the Juneteenth National Independence holiday, and was censured for merely posting a meme on Twitter. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 20:04, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I like Sen. John Kennedy. This video [https://youtu.be/Zdmf2UlNuhs should be a permanent exhibit in the Museum of Conservativism] as a model of how to talk to a liberal communist. But I know we probably need a younger winner for a role model this year. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:12, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://youtu.be/s6Pw-Sisry0 Part 2: Epilogue]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:18, December 29, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I still think Senator Manchin should be Conservative of the Year. He has done more for Conservativism than many Republicans in the Congress.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 13:21, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Manchin is up for reelection in 2024, when Trump will carry his state by 40+ points.  I think Manchin's stance reflects where his constituents are.  That's fine, but I don't see it as award-winning.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 16:05, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Politics is a funny business. If Manchin were to run as a Republican in 2024, there is no guarantee he could win against a strong Democrat who would call him a traitor. An honor like this would be turned into a smear against him. Everybody is happy just the way things are. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:13, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downgrading Manchin because he's just doing what 50 Republican senators are already doing, and which the overwhelming number of [[West Virginia]] constituents of Manchin want.  It's also what Manchin campaigned on to get elected in 2010.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 20:13, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I love [[Jim Jordan]] who is an ex wrestling coach.  He reminds me of myself during the &amp;quot;fighting Irish&amp;quot; stage of my life. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:44, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::If it's not Lady Space Lasers, then I'm storming the servers on account of the obvious massive electoral fraud going on here. [[User:ConwayIII|ConwayIII]] ([[User talk:ConwayIII|talk]]) 21:07, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Joe Biden is going to mauled by the she bears of Covid-19, inflation, crime and the southern border. Trump could win the presidency in 2024. [[Grover Cleveland]] won nonconsecutive presidential terms. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:57, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If neither Manchin nor Youngkin are Conservative of the Year, then I would vote for DeSantis. He has been a strong Conservative.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 22:19, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I like the two frontrunners. I hope it's not a coin toss. Rand is a multiple CPAC winner, too.  Maybe we should have an unwritten rule discouraging repeat winners, and do our best to recognize fresh faces and encourage new blood. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:24, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It should be won on merit. Paul exposed Fauci via his bulldog tenacity. He deserves to win. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:20, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;lt;ssssh&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;I was trying to give Andy an excuse to choose MTG.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;Yah, on merit. Right. I fully agree. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:57, December 30, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Rand Paul]] or [[MTG]] as the winner? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I think a strong case can be made for making [[MTG]] the winner.  It's between her and [[Rand Paul]] as the leading two contestants in a very strong field of contenders.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:34, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Seconded. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:24, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that DeSantis should be the winner. He has arguably been the most vocal against Vaccine mandates. [[User:Bytemsbu|Bytemsbu]] ([[User talk:Bytemsbu|talk]]) 15:16, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::We have two or three years yet for that honor; thus far his accomplishments are limited to Florida, and much of it is still in the courts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:20, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think MTG should be the winner. She has received more attention than Rand Paul.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 15:52, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I agree.  The more I think about what [[MTG]] accomplished, it's phenomenal:&lt;br /&gt;
::::* completely stymied [[Nancy Pelosi]] and [[The Squad]] all year&lt;br /&gt;
::::* exposed the [[DC Gulag]] such that its unhinged, [[Opposition to Donald Trump|Anti-Trump]] warden had to delete her prior tweets&lt;br /&gt;
::::* was instrumental in discrediting [[Liz Cheney]]&lt;br /&gt;
::::* is so overwhelmingly supported by her constituents that redistricting with an infusion of [[Dem]]s doesn't diminish her certain reelection&lt;br /&gt;
::::* enormously helpful to [[Donald Trump]], calling him her favorite president of all time&lt;br /&gt;
::::* helps other candidates in other districts&lt;br /&gt;
::::* all the above despite being wrongly excluded from committees by [[Dem]]s, which would have ended the political career of anyone else&lt;br /&gt;
::::--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 15:59, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Great! I think MTG is the winner! Any thoughts on who should be RINO of the year?--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 16:35, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[Liz Cheney]], [[Mitt Romney]], and [[Pat Toomey]] are strong contenders for [[RINO]] of the year.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:37, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I think that [[Liz Cheney]] should be RINO of the year. Also, there is an error on the homepage: It says Ron Paul is the first runner-up instead of Rand Paul.--[[User:TheNewRight|TheNewRight]] ([[User talk:TheNewRight|talk]]) 20:23, December 31, 2021 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
MTG challenged OTC to a debate on the Green New Deal and AOC wimped out like the left always does concerning debates (Because they cannot defend their nonsense). :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:05, December 31, 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TheNewRight</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>