<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TexasRepublican</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=TexasRepublican"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/TexasRepublican"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T04:43:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788153</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788153"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:50:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin was the second coming of Jesus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no proof but what good is proof when you have faith huh? Realy you can't disprove that he was the second coming of Jesus you can just say it is very improbable but you can't disprove like the invisible unciorn , the flying spagghetti monster (ramen!) and god.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To Criticize a scientist for his religious views is stupid.Yes he was an agnostic but realy how does that matter? Very important contributions to mathematics have been made by muslims, does that disprove mathematics? I mean realy why this section is even included is beyond stupidity. Also before my edit it was unusualy long. Why? Does it realy matter what he believed? Judge him for his contribution to biology not for his faith. Also did you know that there are 4 times more historians that deny the holocaust than biologists who deny evolution? I mean Realy what is more probable  a world wide conspiracy or animals evolving. If you choose the latter you are beyond hope and should probably commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist just like 99% of the white people at that time but it is notable that he was against slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also find examples of male superiority in the bible by the way and he probably was a misoginist still doesn't disprove evolution , apologetics fail again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788152</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788152"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:46:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Religious Views of Charles Darwin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin was the second coming of Jesus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no proof but what good is proof when you have faith huh? Realy you can't disprove that he was the second coming of Jesus you can just say it is very improbable but you can't disprove like the invisible unciorn , the flying spagghetti monster (ramen!) and god.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To Criticize a scientist for his religious views is stupid.Yes he was an agnostic but realy how does that matter? Very important contributions to mathematics have been made by muslims, does that disprove mathematics? I mean realy why this section is even included is beyond stupidity. Also before my edit it was unusualy long. Why? Does it realy matter what he believed? Judge him for his contribution to biology not for his faith. Also did you know that there are 4 times more historians that deny the holocaust than biologists who deny evolution? I mean Realy what is more probable  a world wide conspiracy or animals evolving. If you choose the latter you are beyond hope and should probably commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist just like 99% of the white people at that time but it is notable that he was against slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist had a long funny beard and married his cousin. The only thing that atheist/freethinkers/other groups that aren't theistic like about him is the fact that he was smart to say otherwise is to lie. This paragraph was written by an atheist I neither revere Darwin nor have a picture of him on my wall I just read his books realy how much republicans are willing to lie is staggering at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788151</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788151"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:42:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* General Biography of Charles Darwin */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin was the second coming of Jesus==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have no proof but what good is proof when you have faith huh? Realy you can't disprove that he was the second coming of Jesus you can just say it is very improbable but you can't disprove like the invisible unciorn , the flying spagghetti monster (ramen!) and god.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Do not change this heading without also changing the link to it in [[Creationism]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CharlesDarwin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Charles Darwin in 1880 at the age of 71.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin likely abandoned [[Christianity]] as a student when he disappointed his father by refusing to become a minister.  In his autobiography Charles Darwin wrote about the diminishment of his religious faith and Darwin stated that he was an [[agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin wrote the following: &amp;quot;The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Darwin stated in his private notebooks that he was a [[materialism|materialist]], which is a type of [[atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1996 ''British Journal for the Philosophy of Science'' Kim Sterelny wrote in a book review the following: &amp;quot;I have no doubt that Darwin was a [[Materialism|materialist]] and a mechanist...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/view/00070882/ap020188/02a00130/1?frame=noframe&amp;amp;userID=80cdbf39@buffalo.edu/01cce4405c00501c2c38a&amp;amp;dpi=3&amp;amp;config=jstor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 47, 1996, page 641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Furthermore, Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of The Origin of Species appears to have been a merely a ploy to downplay the implications of his [[materialism|materialistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Creation Ministries International]] states the following regarding why it is maintained that Charles Darwin was privately a materialist:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Mayr]]’s recent book on Darwin, One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Evolutionary Thought, Harvard, 1991, also acknowledges that Darwin’s references to purpose were to appease both the public and his wife. His early, private notebooks show his materialism well established. For instance, in one of them he addresses himself as, ‘O, you materialist!’ and says, ‘Why is thought, being a secretion of [[brain]], more wonderful than [[gravity]] as a property of matter?’ He clearly already believed that the idea of a separate realm of the spirit was nonsense, as is further shown when he warns himself not to reveal his beliefs, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘to avoid saying how far I believe in materialism, say only that emotions, instincts, degrees of talent which are hereditary are so because brain of child resembles parent stock.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scholars refer to the private notebook in which Charles Darwin stated he was a materialist as the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; notebook of 1838.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote that &amp;quot;It is apparent that Darwin lost his faith in the years 1836-39, much of it clearly prior to the reading of [[Robert Malthus|Malthus]]. In order not to hurt the feelings of his friends and of his wife, Darwin often used deistic language in his publications, but much in his Notebooks indicates that by this time he had become a 'materialist' (more or less = atheist)&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the best explanation of Darwin's worldview from 1836 onwards was that Darwin was a [[weak atheism|weak atheist]] who often had overwhelming thoughts that nature was the product of a mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/site/c.muI1LaMNJrE/b.2548839/k.2A55/Is_Darwinism_Atheistic_an_Examination_of_the_Beliefs_and_Practices_of_Charles_Darwin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, Darwin wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Dr. Aveling has published an account of a conversation with my father. I think that the readers of this pamphlet ('The Religious Views of Charles Darwin,' Free Thought Publishing Company, 1883) may be misled into seeing more resemblance than really existed between the positions of my father and Dr. Aveling: and I say this in spite of my conviction that Dr. Aveling gives quite fairly his impressions of my father's views. Dr. Aveling tried to show that the terms &amp;quot;Agnostic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot; were practically equivalent-that an atheist is one who, without denying the existence of God, is without God, inasmuch as he is unconvinced of the existence of a Deity. My father's replies implied his preference for the unaggressive attitude of an Agnostic. Dr. Aveling seems (page 5) to regard the absence of aggressiveness in my father's views as distinguishing them in an unessential manner from his own. But, in my judgment, it is precisely differences of this kind which distinguish him so completely from the class of thinkers to which Dr. Aveling belongs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' states the following regarding Charles Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Scientism]] can also be seen in Darwin's worldview. The scientism in Darwins's worldview can be seen in the following quote of Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against Christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public; and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds which follows from the advance of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianitytoday.com/books/features/bccorner/020204.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Charles Darwin the &amp;quot;manifestly false history of the world&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recorded in the Old Testament and New Testament miracles led him to reject Biblical veracity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85-87.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Eminent Darwin biographer, Professor Janet Browne, sums up Darwin's views concerning religion: Darwin &amp;quot;mapped out a comparative evolution of the religious sense, proposing that religious belief was ultimately nothing more than a primitive urge to bestow a cause on otherwise inexplicable natural events...In short, he made no secret of his view that he did not believe religion to have any rational foundation at all&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Browne, Janet  ''Charles Darwin The Power of Place'' 2002:341&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. When he died in 1882 at the age of seventy-three, Darwin was buried at Westminster Abbey next to Sir [[Isaac Newton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There exists in hostile Darwin literature a story about a Christian called Lady Hope who visited and spoke with a dying Charles Darwin.  This appears to be merely a legend, and there is no evidence that Lady Hope ever converted or even visited Darwin on his deathbed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carm.org/evo_questions/deathbed.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist just like 99% of the white people at that time but it is notable that he was against slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist had a long funny beard and married his cousin. The only thing that atheist/freethinkers/other groups that aren't theistic like about him is the fact that he was smart to say otherwise is to lie. This paragraph was written by an atheist I neither revere Darwin nor have a picture of him on my wall I just read his books realy how much republicans are willing to lie is staggering at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788150</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788150"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:39:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Charles Darwin and the Cult of Personality */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General Biography of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin was born in [[Shrewsbury]], [[England]] in 1809 to his parents Dr. Robert Darwin and Susannah Wedgewood. Darwin's mother was a religious woman but his father was, for the most part, a weak deist. Despite his lack of theistic religious belief, the Darwin's father allowed Charles to be baptized into the Anglican Church and encouraged him to become a clergyman. Darwin's mother died in 1817. In 1825 Charles Darwin went on to study medicine at the University of Edinburgh. There, he became horrified with the brutality of surgery before anesthesia was invented and quit his medical studies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1831 Charles Darwin graduated from Christ's College at Cambridge with a BA degree in the classics and theology. On December 27 of the same year Charles Darwin departed on the ''HMS Beagle'' for a five year voyage of exploration. The ''Beagle'' returned to English shores on October 2 1836. In 1837, Charles Darwin drew his now famous depiction of [[common ancestry]] in the form of a branching tree.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles Darwin, Transmutation Notebook B 1837:36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The following year he discovered the concept of ''[[natural selection]].'' Darwin insists that naturally occurring phenomena and factors working together in blind tandem have produced nature and eventually mankind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Charles Darwin originally based the idea of human evolution on a racist assumption&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Milton, Richard ''Shattering the Myths of Darwinism'' 1997:186,287 says &amp;quot;Darwin [was] openly racist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [after God was rejected as Creator], made in the late 1830s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barlow, Nora (editor) ''The Autobiography of Charles Darwin'' 1958:130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that Fuegians (natives of Tierra del Fuego) resembled primates that he had observed in the London zoo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larson, Edward J. ''Evolution: The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory'' 2004:66,67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1842 he wrote out a ''sketch'' of his theory but did not publish it. Again, in 1844 Charles Darwin produced what is known today as an ''essay'' of the same theory more developed but he still chose not to publish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].'' On his deathbed, Darwin admitted that the idea of a human eye evolving out of nothing was absurd, and he repented and apparently died as a Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Do not change this heading without also changing the link to it in [[Creationism]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CharlesDarwin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Charles Darwin in 1880 at the age of 71.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin likely abandoned [[Christianity]] as a student when he disappointed his father by refusing to become a minister.  In his autobiography Charles Darwin wrote about the diminishment of his religious faith and Darwin stated that he was an [[agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin wrote the following: &amp;quot;The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Darwin stated in his private notebooks that he was a [[materialism|materialist]], which is a type of [[atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1996 ''British Journal for the Philosophy of Science'' Kim Sterelny wrote in a book review the following: &amp;quot;I have no doubt that Darwin was a [[Materialism|materialist]] and a mechanist...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/view/00070882/ap020188/02a00130/1?frame=noframe&amp;amp;userID=80cdbf39@buffalo.edu/01cce4405c00501c2c38a&amp;amp;dpi=3&amp;amp;config=jstor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 47, 1996, page 641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Furthermore, Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of The Origin of Species appears to have been a merely a ploy to downplay the implications of his [[materialism|materialistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Creation Ministries International]] states the following regarding why it is maintained that Charles Darwin was privately a materialist:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Mayr]]’s recent book on Darwin, One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Evolutionary Thought, Harvard, 1991, also acknowledges that Darwin’s references to purpose were to appease both the public and his wife. His early, private notebooks show his materialism well established. For instance, in one of them he addresses himself as, ‘O, you materialist!’ and says, ‘Why is thought, being a secretion of [[brain]], more wonderful than [[gravity]] as a property of matter?’ He clearly already believed that the idea of a separate realm of the spirit was nonsense, as is further shown when he warns himself not to reveal his beliefs, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘to avoid saying how far I believe in materialism, say only that emotions, instincts, degrees of talent which are hereditary are so because brain of child resembles parent stock.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scholars refer to the private notebook in which Charles Darwin stated he was a materialist as the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; notebook of 1838.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote that &amp;quot;It is apparent that Darwin lost his faith in the years 1836-39, much of it clearly prior to the reading of [[Robert Malthus|Malthus]]. In order not to hurt the feelings of his friends and of his wife, Darwin often used deistic language in his publications, but much in his Notebooks indicates that by this time he had become a 'materialist' (more or less = atheist)&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the best explanation of Darwin's worldview from 1836 onwards was that Darwin was a [[weak atheism|weak atheist]] who often had overwhelming thoughts that nature was the product of a mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/site/c.muI1LaMNJrE/b.2548839/k.2A55/Is_Darwinism_Atheistic_an_Examination_of_the_Beliefs_and_Practices_of_Charles_Darwin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, Darwin wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Dr. Aveling has published an account of a conversation with my father. I think that the readers of this pamphlet ('The Religious Views of Charles Darwin,' Free Thought Publishing Company, 1883) may be misled into seeing more resemblance than really existed between the positions of my father and Dr. Aveling: and I say this in spite of my conviction that Dr. Aveling gives quite fairly his impressions of my father's views. Dr. Aveling tried to show that the terms &amp;quot;Agnostic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot; were practically equivalent-that an atheist is one who, without denying the existence of God, is without God, inasmuch as he is unconvinced of the existence of a Deity. My father's replies implied his preference for the unaggressive attitude of an Agnostic. Dr. Aveling seems (page 5) to regard the absence of aggressiveness in my father's views as distinguishing them in an unessential manner from his own. But, in my judgment, it is precisely differences of this kind which distinguish him so completely from the class of thinkers to which Dr. Aveling belongs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' states the following regarding Charles Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Scientism]] can also be seen in Darwin's worldview. The scientism in Darwins's worldview can be seen in the following quote of Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against Christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public; and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds which follows from the advance of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianitytoday.com/books/features/bccorner/020204.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Charles Darwin the &amp;quot;manifestly false history of the world&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recorded in the Old Testament and New Testament miracles led him to reject Biblical veracity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85-87.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Eminent Darwin biographer, Professor Janet Browne, sums up Darwin's views concerning religion: Darwin &amp;quot;mapped out a comparative evolution of the religious sense, proposing that religious belief was ultimately nothing more than a primitive urge to bestow a cause on otherwise inexplicable natural events...In short, he made no secret of his view that he did not believe religion to have any rational foundation at all&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Browne, Janet  ''Charles Darwin The Power of Place'' 2002:341&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. When he died in 1882 at the age of seventy-three, Darwin was buried at Westminster Abbey next to Sir [[Isaac Newton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There exists in hostile Darwin literature a story about a Christian called Lady Hope who visited and spoke with a dying Charles Darwin.  This appears to be merely a legend, and there is no evidence that Lady Hope ever converted or even visited Darwin on his deathbed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carm.org/evo_questions/deathbed.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist just like 99% of the white people at that time but it is notable that he was against slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist had a long funny beard and married his cousin. The only thing that atheist/freethinkers/other groups that aren't theistic like about him is the fact that he was smart to say otherwise is to lie. This paragraph was written by an atheist I neither revere Darwin nor have a picture of him on my wall I just read his books realy how much republicans are willing to lie is staggering at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788149</id>
		<title>Charles Darwin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Charles_Darwin&amp;diff=788149"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:35:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Darwin's Racism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Darwin1.jpg|right|thumb|225px|Charles Darwin]] &lt;br /&gt;
'''Charles Darwin''' (12 February 1809 - 19 April 1882) was a famous naturalist born in England. Charles Darwin is best known for the theory of [[Evolution|evolution]] by [[Natural selection|natural selection]].  The concept is that organisms are modified over vast amounts of time by naturally occurring processes, originating from common ancestors that lived tens of millions of years ago. Outside the area of evolutionary theory in particular, Charles Darwin was regarded as an expert on barnacles, as well as being credited with discovering how coral [[atoll]]s were formed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General Biography of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin was born in [[Shrewsbury]], [[England]] in 1809 to his parents Dr. Robert Darwin and Susannah Wedgewood. Darwin's mother was a religious woman but his father was, for the most part, a weak deist. Despite his lack of theistic religious belief, the Darwin's father allowed Charles to be baptized into the Anglican Church and encouraged him to become a clergyman. Darwin's mother died in 1817. In 1825 Charles Darwin went on to study medicine at the University of Edinburgh. There, he became horrified with the brutality of surgery before anesthesia was invented and quit his medical studies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1831 Charles Darwin graduated from Christ's College at Cambridge with a BA degree in the classics and theology. On December 27 of the same year Charles Darwin departed on the ''HMS Beagle'' for a five year voyage of exploration. The ''Beagle'' returned to English shores on October 2 1836. In 1837, Charles Darwin drew his now famous depiction of [[common ancestry]] in the form of a branching tree.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles Darwin, Transmutation Notebook B 1837:36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The following year he discovered the concept of ''[[natural selection]].'' Darwin insists that naturally occurring phenomena and factors working together in blind tandem have produced nature and eventually mankind. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Charles Darwin originally based the idea of human evolution on a racist assumption&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Milton, Richard ''Shattering the Myths of Darwinism'' 1997:186,287 says &amp;quot;Darwin [was] openly racist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [after God was rejected as Creator], made in the late 1830s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barlow, Nora (editor) ''The Autobiography of Charles Darwin'' 1958:130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, that Fuegians (natives of Tierra del Fuego) resembled primates that he had observed in the London zoo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larson, Edward J. ''Evolution: The Remarkable History Of A Scientific Theory'' 2004:66,67&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1842 he wrote out a ''sketch'' of his theory but did not publish it. Again, in 1844 Charles Darwin produced what is known today as an ''essay'' of the same theory more developed but he still chose not to publish. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, in 1859, Charles Darwin published his famous theory about how the species may have been produced without any aid from a Divine Creator. He titled his book ''On [[The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection]], or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life''. In 1871, well after his theory enjoyed widespread success, Darwin published his ideas on human evolution in a two-volume book titled ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]].'' On his deathbed, Darwin admitted that the idea of a human eye evolving out of nothing was absurd, and he repented and apparently died as a Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Views of Charles Darwin==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Do not change this heading without also changing the link to it in [[Creationism]] --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CharlesDarwin.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Charles Darwin in 1880 at the age of 71.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin likely abandoned [[Christianity]] as a student when he disappointed his father by refusing to become a minister.  In his autobiography Charles Darwin wrote about the diminishment of his religious faith and Darwin stated that he was an [[agnostic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin wrote the following: &amp;quot;The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble to us; and I for one must be content to remain an Agnostic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.update.uu.se/~fbendz/library/cd_relig.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, Darwin stated in his private notebooks that he was a [[materialism|materialist]], which is a type of [[atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the 1996 ''British Journal for the Philosophy of Science'' Kim Sterelny wrote in a book review the following: &amp;quot;I have no doubt that Darwin was a [[Materialism|materialist]] and a mechanist...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jstor.org/view/00070882/ap020188/02a00130/1?frame=noframe&amp;amp;userID=80cdbf39@buffalo.edu/01cce4405c00501c2c38a&amp;amp;dpi=3&amp;amp;config=jstor British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 47, 1996, page 641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Furthermore, Charles Darwin’s casual mentioning of a ‘creator’ in earlier editions of The Origin of Species appears to have been a merely a ploy to downplay the implications of his [[materialism|materialistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Creation Ministries International]] states the following regarding why it is maintained that Charles Darwin was privately a materialist:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[[Ernst Mayr]]’s recent book on Darwin, One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Evolutionary Thought, Harvard, 1991, also acknowledges that Darwin’s references to purpose were to appease both the public and his wife. His early, private notebooks show his materialism well established. For instance, in one of them he addresses himself as, ‘O, you materialist!’ and says, ‘Why is thought, being a secretion of [[brain]], more wonderful than [[gravity]] as a property of matter?’ He clearly already believed that the idea of a separate realm of the spirit was nonsense, as is further shown when he warns himself not to reveal his beliefs, as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘to avoid saying how far I believe in materialism, say only that emotions, instincts, degrees of talent which are hereditary are so because brain of child resembles parent stock.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scholars refer to the private notebook in which Charles Darwin stated he was a materialist as the &amp;quot;M&amp;quot; notebook of 1838.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barrett, Paul H. ''Darwin on Man'' 1974:276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Ernst Mayr]] wrote that &amp;quot;It is apparent that Darwin lost his faith in the years 1836-39, much of it clearly prior to the reading of [[Robert Malthus|Malthus]]. In order not to hurt the feelings of his friends and of his wife, Darwin often used deistic language in his publications, but much in his Notebooks indicates that by this time he had become a 'materialist' (more or less = atheist)&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Scientist''  May 1977:323&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the best explanation of Darwin's worldview from 1836 onwards was that Darwin was a [[weak atheism|weak atheist]] who often had overwhelming thoughts that nature was the product of a mind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/site/c.muI1LaMNJrE/b.2548839/k.2A55/Is_Darwinism_Atheistic_an_Examination_of_the_Beliefs_and_Practices_of_Charles_Darwin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, Darwin wrote the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Dr. Aveling has published an account of a conversation with my father. I think that the readers of this pamphlet ('The Religious Views of Charles Darwin,' Free Thought Publishing Company, 1883) may be misled into seeing more resemblance than really existed between the positions of my father and Dr. Aveling: and I say this in spite of my conviction that Dr. Aveling gives quite fairly his impressions of my father's views. Dr. Aveling tried to show that the terms &amp;quot;Agnostic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot; were practically equivalent-that an atheist is one who, without denying the existence of God, is without God, inasmuch as he is unconvinced of the existence of a Deity. My father's replies implied his preference for the unaggressive attitude of an Agnostic. Dr. Aveling seems (page 5) to regard the absence of aggressiveness in my father's views as distinguishing them in an unessential manner from his own. But, in my judgment, it is precisely differences of this kind which distinguish him so completely from the class of thinkers to which Dr. Aveling belongs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=j9MEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA65&amp;amp;lpg=PA65&amp;amp;dq=Dr.+Aveling+has+published+an+account+of+a+conversation+with+my+father.+I+think+that+the+readers+of+this+pamphlet+(%27The+Religious+Views+of+Charles+Darwin,%27+Free+Thought+Publishing+Company,+1883)+may+be+misled+into+seeing+more+resemblance+than+really+existed&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=-eyumeD-3g&amp;amp;sig=V1ooJ7WLHqu1csnVz39scxdV4Mg&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' states the following regarding Charles Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilisation of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature—I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, “Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times,” and he shook his head vaguely, adding, “it seems to go away.”(Argyll 1885, 244] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Scientism]] can also be seen in Darwin's worldview. The scientism in Darwins's worldview can be seen in the following quote of Darwin:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It appears to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against Christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public; and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination of men's minds which follows from the advance of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianitytoday.com/books/features/bccorner/020204.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Charles Darwin the &amp;quot;manifestly false history of the world&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recorded in the Old Testament and New Testament miracles led him to reject Biblical veracity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ibid. Barlow 1958:85-87.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Eminent Darwin biographer, Professor Janet Browne, sums up Darwin's views concerning religion: Darwin &amp;quot;mapped out a comparative evolution of the religious sense, proposing that religious belief was ultimately nothing more than a primitive urge to bestow a cause on otherwise inexplicable natural events...In short, he made no secret of his view that he did not believe religion to have any rational foundation at all&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Browne, Janet  ''Charles Darwin The Power of Place'' 2002:341&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. When he died in 1882 at the age of seventy-three, Darwin was buried at Westminster Abbey next to Sir [[Isaac Newton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There exists in hostile Darwin literature a story about a Christian called Lady Hope who visited and spoke with a dying Charles Darwin.  This appears to be merely a legend, and there is no evidence that Lady Hope ever converted or even visited Darwin on his deathbed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.carm.org/evo_questions/deathbed.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charles Darwin and Pangenesis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Theories of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pangenesis]] was an [[evolution|evolutionary]] notion that was developed by Charles Darwin. [[Creation science|Creation scientist]] Dr. [[Jerry Bergman]] wrote concerning pangenesis:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Pangenesis is based on the idea that all somatic cells produce ‘gemmules’ or gene material that is ‘thrown off’ into the body’s circulatory system. These gemmules multiply by dividing, and eventually collect in the organism’s eggs and sperm (the gametes). Consequently, the experiences of their bearers are imprinted in the gemmules, and then can be passed on to the organism’s offspring. Darwin discussed his pangenesis idea in great detail, and felt confident that it would provide a feasible mechanism to produce new genetic information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite there being devastating experimental evidence against the notion of pangenesis provided by [[Francis Galton]], Charles Darwin stubbornly held to the notion of pangenesis as he had no [[naturalism|naturalistic]] explanation on how genetic information could be formed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j17_2/j17_2_19-25.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Darwin's Sickness and Controversy Regarding His Sickness ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more on this topic see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of his adult life Charles Darwin suffered from very poor health.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 1992 ''New Encyclopaedia Britannica '' stated that Darwin's illness was [[psychogenic]] in origin (A psychogenic illness is one that originates in the mind or in mental condition). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A 1997 article in the [[Journal of the American Medical Association]] entitled &amp;quot;Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder&amp;quot; states that the &amp;quot;variable intensity of symptoms and chronic, prolonged course without physical deterioration also indicate that his illness was [[Psychiatry|psychiatric]].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 [[Journal of the American Medical Association]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In regards to illness associated with evolutionary ideas a journal article in the [[American Journal of Medicine]] states that Darwin suffered from &amp;quot;[[psychoneurosis]] provoked and exaggerated by his [[theory of evolution|evolutionary]] ideas&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The American Journal of Medicine article also stated that his Darwin's wife, Emma, greatly disapproved of his evolutionist ideas and &amp;quot;This, facsimile of public reaction, must have kept lively his anxiety and torment&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Illness of Charles Darwin&amp;quot;, William B. Bean, September 1978, American Journal of Medicine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the abstract for a 1997 journal article in the [[Notes and Records of the Royal Society]] the psychogenic hypothesis for the origin of Darwin's illness &amp;quot;holds the field&amp;quot; but the article questions the validity of this diagnoses and mentions the work of [[Ralph Colp Jr.]] MD, a physician and psychiatrist (For details see: [[Darwin's Sickness]]). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/content/c5la8dhfh8v7tbx8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given Darwin's likely psychogenic or [[psychobiological]] illness various [[Creationism|creationists]] have stated that Darwin's illness was the result of guilt and/or fear. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i4/darwins_illness.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist06.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism of the Work of Charles Darwin by Cliff Lillo==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cliff Lillo wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Darwin was wrong when he says that science has not yet proved [[Lamarck]] in error about [[spontaneous generation]], wrong when he says that changes in habit can be [[inherited]], and wrong when he says that use or disuse of an organ can be passed along from parent to child, etc. [http://www.creationinthecrossfire.com/Articles/OriginofSpecies.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contemporary evolutionary biology strongly agrees that Lamarckian inheritance and spontaneous generation never or almost never occur.  The early 20th century synthesis between Mendelian genetics and natural selection provides a non-Lamarckian basis for inheritance of biological characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reaction of Charles Darwin to Criticism of His Work ==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin closely followed the general public's reaction to his evolutionary ideas.  In 2002, [[Richard Milner]] wrote an article entitled ''Putting Darwin in his Place'' and stated that Darwin ''&amp;quot;clipped, catalogued and indexed hundreds of offprints, about 350 reviews and 1,600 articles, as well as satires, parodies and Punch caricatures, with which he filled hefty scrapbooks...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Criticisms of his work troubled Darwin.  Milner wrote that after [[Charles Lyell]] published a weak endorsement of Darwin's work in Lyell's Antiquity of Man, &amp;quot;''Darwin's disappointment brought on 10 days of vomiting, faintness and stomach distress''&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Milner states when anatomist St. [[George Mivart]] made a negative review of Darwin's work The Descent of Man, it &amp;quot;triggered two months of &amp;quot;giddiness&amp;quot; and inability to work...&amp;quot; ''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000B62D6-7E63-1D7E-90FB809EC5880000#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Family Life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Author Peter Brent wrote of Darwin's relationship with his wife Emma and stated that &amp;quot;Their ties to each other were linked to childhood and the very beginnings of memory. They had a common history, a joint tradition. It is hard to think their relationship a passionate one, but it was happy, and the happiness had deep roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Brent, &amp;quot;Darwin: A Man of Enlarged Curiosity&amp;quot;, page 316&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charles Darwin displayed a dependency on his wife that was childlike.  Darwin wrote a letter to his wife in 1848 that said, &amp;quot;My dearest old Mammy ... Without you, when sick I feel most desolate .. Oh Mammy I do long to be with you and under your protection for then I feel safe.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Brent states that it is hard to imagine that the letter was from thirty-nine year old man writing to his wife rather than a young child writing to its mother.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar9.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In their article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, entitled Charles Darwin and Panic stated that Darwin felt &amp;quot;nervousness when Emma leaves me&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Charles Darwin and Panic Disorder''&amp;quot; by Thomas J. Barloon, MD and Russel Noyes, Jr., January 8, 1997 Journal of the American Medical Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Darwin had ten children with his wife Emma, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Browne_EmmaDiaries.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who was also his cousin. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1152536/The-descent-man-We-trace-claim-Charles-Darwin-ancestor.html The descent of man] Mail Online, February 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darwin was a racist just like 99% of the white people at that time but it is notable that he was against slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Darwin's Belief in Male Superiority==&lt;br /&gt;
Charles Darwin wrote in his work ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than can women—whether requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer, from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by Mr. Galton, in his work on “Hereditary Genius” that ... the average of mental power in man must be above that of women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2007/08/24/feedback-female-inferiority&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Charles Darwin and the Cult of Personality==&lt;br /&gt;
There is a cult of personality and type of religiousity currently surrounding Charles Darwin.  [[Stephen Jay Gould]] wrote the following in 1978: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;... all theories [of natural selection] cite God in their support, and ... Darwin comes close to this status among evolutionary biologists ...&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2002, Michael White similarly wrote: &amp;quot;Of course today, for biologists, Darwin is second only to God, and for many he may rank still higher.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/dar1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Galton Darwin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/charles-darwin/ What Liberals Say - Charles Darwin], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/02/12/deseno_darwin/ Darwin's Day for Dummies]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolutionary Racists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Darwin, Charles}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Andrew_Schlafly&amp;diff=788147</id>
		<title>Andrew Schlafly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Andrew_Schlafly&amp;diff=788147"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:31:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:ASchlafly.JPG|thumb|175px|right|Andrew Schlafly]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Andrew Schlafly''' is a [[conservative]] lawyer and former [[engineer]]. Mr. Schlafly is also the founder of Conservapedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He teaches one of the largest homeschool classes in the country, including one class in fall 2006 with 58 students in [[World_History_Lectures|World History]].  In spring 2007 he taught [[Economics_Lectures|Economics]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia developed as a result of his World History course.  Andrew Schlafly and several of his top students continue to lead the project, and most of his students have contributed entries to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andrew Schlafly has taught homeschoolers online since the late 1990s, and in person since fall 2002.  Several of Andrew Schlafly's prior course materials are available on [http://www.eagleforumu.org Eagle Forum University].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andrew Schlafly is the fifth child of attorney John Fred Schlafly, Jr. and noted political activist [[Phyllis Schlafly]]. His great-grandfather, August Schlafly, was founder of the Union Trust and Savings Bank of East St. Louis, Ill., the First National Bank of Edwardsville, Ill., and other banks in Western states. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE3DB1638F936A15752C1A962948260 Catherine Kosarek] Wedding news. November 25, 1984.&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He graduated from [[Princeton University|Princeton]] University with a bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and from Harvard Law School as an attorney. A magna cum laude graduate from [[Harvard]] Law School, he was an editor of the Harvard Law Review. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.blogsforterri.com/archives/2005/03/medical_attorne.php Medical Attorney Andrew Schlafly] Posted on March 23, 2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andrew Schlafly not only has an weird name but is also inherently evil! Aproach this man with caution. He will kill you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Academics]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schlafly, Andrew}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788146</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788146"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:28:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Liberals and Uncharitableness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But it would be a nice reminder that atheist didn't realy mass murder people in order to convert them(see crusades,jihad etc)I don't know if the charity thingy is actualy true but maybe they are giving more just becouse they feel guilty about all the killing in Jesus's name. And by the way Jesus WAS a LIBERAl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand liberals own the place. Naturaly republicans will lie and call european liberals politicaly center not left but when do republicans realy tell the truth. Come to the liberal side we have cookies ;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as lack of moral values and tradition.But realy most of our founding fathers and even Abe Lincoln the founder of the Republican Party would be characterized today as liberals , so what exactly are conservatives conservating ? Maybe the confederacy...just a sugestion. And yes Licoln is rolling in his grave each time he hears what his party has become.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788145</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788145"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:25:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Original meaning: Classical Liberalism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand liberals own the place. Naturaly republicans will lie and call european liberals politicaly center not left but when do republicans realy tell the truth. Come to the liberal side we have cookies ;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as lack of moral values and tradition.But realy most of our founding fathers and even Abe Lincoln the founder of the Republican Party would be characterized today as liberals , so what exactly are conservatives conservating ? Maybe the confederacy...just a sugestion. And yes Licoln is rolling in his grave each time he hears what his party has become.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788144</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788144"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:23:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Original meaning: Classical Liberalism */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand liberals own the place. Naturaly republicans will lie and call european liberals politicaly center not left but when do republicans realy tell the truth. Come to the liberal side we have cookies ;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as lack of moral values and tradition.But realy most of our founding fathers and even Abe Lincoln the founding father would be characterized today as liberals , so what exactly are conservatives conservating ? Maybe the confederacy...just a sugestion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788142</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788142"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:21:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Liberalism in Europe today */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand liberals own the place. Naturaly republicans will lie and call european liberals politicaly center not left but when do republicans realy tell the truth. Come to the liberal side we have cookies ;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788141</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=788141"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:17:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Liberal politicians and uncharitableness */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Liberal Brain.jpg|thumb|450px|top|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;A satirical conception of the liberal brain.&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (also '''leftist''') is someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons.  There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As one liberal website candidly observes, &amp;quot;Obama is a shallow narcissist, not a believer in any cause higher than himself. Every American president has had a healthy ego, but none has ever been as purely motivated by vanity as the childishly self-loving [[Barack Obama]].&amp;quot;[http://www.opednews.com/articles/Barack-Obama-s-ego-driven-by-Christopher-Calder-091210-804.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[socialist]]ic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of teacher-lead [[prayer]] in classrooms and school sponsored events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity and pornography as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography. These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Income redistribution]], usually through progressive taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-rationed medical care, such as [[Universal Health Care]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of inherent [[gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Implementation of [[affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Teaching acceptance of promiscuity through sexual &amp;quot;education&amp;quot; rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Greenpeace]], for example.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Disarmament treaties]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to an interventionalist American foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stefaan Walgrave and Joris Verhulst, [http://nicomedia.math.upatras.gr/conf/CAWM2003/Papers/Verhulst.pdf The February 15 Worldwide Protests against a War in Iraq: An Empirical Test of Transnational Opportunities. Outline of a Research Programme](PDF).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. The theory of [[evolution]] is a key component of [[atheistic]] ideologies in the [[Western World]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Calling anyone they agree with a &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; regardless of whether he earned that distinction based on a real peer review of his work (see, e.g., [[Richard Dawkins]] and [[Barack Obama]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The long romance of Western leftists with some of the bloodiest regimes and political movements in history is a story not told often enough ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.city-journal.org/2009/bc0605bt.html Dupes by Bruce S. Thornton], City Journal - 5 June 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition,  [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proven that liberals are smarter , richer and healthier on average than republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] scares republicans. [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|150px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith -- it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and many media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are often [[liberal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Some argue that liberals typically support economic policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternative meanings of 'liberal'==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One definition of liberal is anything that is not conservative.  For example, the American Heritage Dictionary includes this definition of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
* Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism and art]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=788140</id>
		<title>Abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=788140"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:14:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* American Liberals and Abortion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Baby.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A human fetus in the womb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion''' is the induced termination of a [[pregnancy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Heritage Dictionary definition, [http://www.bartleby.com/61/7/A0020700.html abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; often causing [[fetal pain]].  Abortion is a billion-dollar industry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/03/09/fetal.tissue/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthy.net/scr/news.asp?Id=8247&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Dr. George Tiller &amp;quot;estimated that he performed 250 to 300 late-term abortions in 2003, each costing an average of $6,000.&amp;quot;[http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090327/D976JVSG4.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the [[United States]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Over 52,000,000 babies have been aborted in the United States since 1973.[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?/library/view.php&amp;amp;articleid=1042]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Western Europe except for [[Ireland]], [[Malta]] and [[Poland]], where it has been abolished.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On April 10, 2007, Portugal legalized abortion up until the 10th week of pregnancy, with some conditions placed on the obtaining of consent for the abortion.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;God warns in His word that a nation that sheds innocent blood will not prosper. (Deuteronomy 19:11-13)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Abortion in Poland]] declined by 99% after [[communism]] was overthrown, and women's health has dramatically improved there due to fewer abortions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their fetus (unborn child) decide not to abort'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/145703/abortion_foes_use_ultrasound__focus_on_the_family_budgets/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/20020120abortion0120p3.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children.  &amp;quot;I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The quote is by [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; highlights the [[deceit]] of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Abortion doesn't solve your problems, it only creates different ones,&amp;quot; warned a full-page ad by many women who had abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/signaturead/ad.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''Many women begin regretting their abortion before they even leave the abortion clinic'''.  In some cases, women begin regretting their abortion just before it is performed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In one case where a woman changed her mind from inside the abortion clinic, she &amp;quot;called her friend from inside the abortion clinic and arranged for her to come 'rescue' her.&amp;quot; [http://www.40daysforlife.com/southfield/index.cfm?load=page&amp;amp;page=30]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but are told by abortionists that it is too late to change their mind because they already signed a consent form (which is a lie - it is never too late to withdraw consent for an abortion).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Health risks from abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by stopping his or her beating heart.  Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Documented Incidents of 365 Women Who Have Been Killed by &amp;quot;Safe&amp;quot; and Legal Abortion.&amp;quot; [http://abortionviolence.com/DEATHS.HTM 365 women who have been killed by 'Legal' abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Abortion and Breast Cancer ===&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2010, LifeNews reported that a [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher admitted there was a link between abortion and breast cancer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center published in 2009 confirmed a 40% increase in risk in breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/breast-cancer-oral-contraceptives-abortion-and-lies.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It is undisputed that childbirth protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Tobacco-ChronologyJul98.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Abortion Hurts Women.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Walk for Life rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
A new study on breast cancer in Turkey published in April 2009 in the peer-reviewed World Journal of Surgical Oncology found, through a surveying process, that induced abortion was a statistically significant cause of breast cancer risk. The study concludes, “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk….”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, the study found that Turkish women who received one or more induced abortions had a 66% higher risk of breast cancer than women who never had an abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072903.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/090728/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself supportive of a right to perform abortions, brought the abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream with her federally funded research on the topic.  Her report, released in 1994, found a 50% increase in breast cancer risk due to induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Janet R. Daling et al., &amp;quot;Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,&amp;quot; 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/032801.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She said, &amp;quot;I have three sisters with breast cancer and I resent people messing with the scientific data to further their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life.  I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L.A. Daily News, Sept. 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Similarly, an early study published in Japan in 1957 showed that women who have abortions have a much higher risk of breast cancer than those who decide to keep their baby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Segi M, et al. An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan. GANN. 1957; 48:1-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg‎|thumb|275px|right|In 1942, [[Adolf Hitler]] declared: &amp;quot;In view of the large families of the [[Slavic|Slav]] native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a peer-reviewed medical journal, Karen Malec observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirty-eight epidemiological studies exploring an independent link [between abortion and] breast cancer have been published.  Twenty-nine report risk elevations.  Thirteen out of 15 American studies found risk elevations.  Seventeen studies are statistically significant, 16 of which report increased risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S., a specialist in breast cancer an a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, has explained the physiology and epidemiology of the abortion-breast cancer link.  She made the following observation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S, &amp;quot;The breast physiology and the epidemiology of the abortion breast cancer link,&amp;quot; 12 Imago Hominis, No. 3, 228 (2005) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This past August in Minneapolis, Patrick Carroll, director of the Pension and Population Research Institute of London, presented a paper to the largest gathering of statisticians in North America.  '''He showed that abortion was the best predictor of breast cancer in Britain.'''  Breast cancer is the only cancer in Britain which has its highest incidence and mortality rate among the upper rather than lower social classes.  Abortion before a full term pregnancy and late pregnancy were the best explanations for this incidence.  He also found that there had been a 70% increase risk of breast cancer between 1971 and 2002 and that for women between 50 and 54 years of age incidence was highly correlated with abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of abortion causing breast cancer includes the following.  Breast cancer rates are far lower in Western countries that prohibited abortion than in those that promoted it.  Ireland, which virtually bans abortion, reportedly has a lifetime rate of breast cancer of only 1 in 13, nearly half the rate of 1 in 7.5 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Probability of breast cancer in American Women,&amp;quot; National Cancer Institute (Apr. 15, 2005);  K. O'Flaherty, R. Oakley, &amp;quot;Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight,&amp;quot; Sunday Tribune (Ireland), at 8 (Oct. 6, 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rate of breast cancer increases steadily as one travels from Ireland, where abortion is illegal, to Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal but rare, to England, where abortion is common. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; R. O'Reilly, &amp;quot;New weapon in war against breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Press Association Limited (Dec. 17, 1998); &amp;quot;Portugal-abortion referendum,&amp;quot; Associated Press Worldstream (June 27, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Romania, abortion was illegal under two decades of rule by the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and the country enjoyed one of the lowest breast cancer rates in the entire world during that time, far lower than comparable Western countries. Romania's breast cancer rate was an astounding one-sixth the rate of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Khan, &amp;quot;The role of fat in breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Independent (May 18, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But after the execution of Ceausescu on Christmas Day, 1989, Romania has taken the opposite approach, embracing abortion to the point that Romania now has one of the highest abortion rates in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Abdullaev, &amp;quot;Russians are quickest to marry and divorce,&amp;quot; Moscow Times (Dec 8, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One Romanian observer decried, &amp;quot;The liberalization of abortions in Romania in 1990, the significant increase of the number of abortions at relatively short intervals, determined a rise in the incidence of breast and uterine cervix cancer in my country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Information packet, Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) World Conference on Breast Cancer (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies on rats, which are an accepted method for identifying causes of cancer in humans,  further confirm that abortion does indeed increase the risk of breast cancer.  As Dr. [[Joel Brind]] observed, &amp;quot;Researchers also widely admit to the biological plausibility of abortion as an independent cause of breast cancer, through the estrogen-mediated stimulation of breast growth in the absence of differentiation. This was demonstrated experimentally in rats in the landmark experiments of Russo and Russo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Joel Brind]], &amp;quot;Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Recent Studies Based on Prospective Data,&amp;quot; J. of Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 105 (Winter 2005) [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf] (citing Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to&lt;br /&gt;
carcinogenesis. 1980;100:497-512).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additional scientific information on the abortion-breast cancer link is available [http://www.bcpinstitute.org here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expert (Dr. Lynn Rosenberg) hired to defend abortion felt compelled to admit, under cross-examination, that a woman increases her risk for breast cancer by having an abortion compared to carrying her pregnancy to childbirth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/rosenbergs_testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question by the attorney: 'So in other words, a woman who finds herself pregnant at age 15 will have a higher breast cancer risk if she chooses to abort that pregnancy, than if she carries the pregnancy to term, [is that] correct?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'Probably, yes.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: 'Looking at that another way, let's compare two women. Let's say both got pregnant at age 15-- one terminates the pregnancy, but the other carries the pregnancy to term. And both women go on to get married and have two kids, say, at age 30 and age 35. Is the risk of breast cancer higher for the woman who had an abortion at age 15 or the woman who had a baby at age 15, all other things being equal?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'It's probably higher for the one who had an abortion at age 15.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the overwhelming evidence -- and inescapable logic -- for abortion increasing breast cancer, promoters of abortion cite flawed articles in an attempt to deny the link.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The flaws in these articles are exposed in [[Harvard abortion study]] and [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Lanfranchi has explained:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well-documented breast physiology accounts for the fact that oral contraceptives and abortion are risk factors for breast cancer.  There is an effort to suppress this information by federal agencies and those in academic medicine.  Without this information, women cannot make a fully informed choice about their method of fertility control or about whether to maintain an unplanned pregnancy.  Medical ethics demands that they be informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-choice should include ''informed'' choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Archdiocese of St. Louis, for example, remarked about abortions and increased risk for breast cancer: &amp;quot;To dismiss that link is irresponsible.&amp;quot; [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5620863.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet efforts continue to suppress awareness that abortion increases breast cancer.  Pro-life scientists were almost entirely barred from the National Cancer Institute's &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the link, and its resulting statements were fatally flawed as explained in  [[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg|right|thumb|250px| The Smellie's double crochet abortion tool was used to grab and rip the baby out.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Abortion Causes Future Harm with Premature Births ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At least 49 studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births (PB) or low birth weight (LBW) risk in women with prior induced abortions (IAs).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney and Byron C. Calhoun, &amp;quot;Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births,&amp;quot; 8 J. Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 46 (Summer 2003). [http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Premature birth tragically causes brain damage, and an array of other severe, lifelong injuries ranging from Cerebral Palsy to blindness, or even death, and few mothers would knowingly increase the risk of that happening.  &amp;quot;There are at least seventeen (17) studies that have found that previous induced abortions increase preterm birth risk” and thereby increase debilitating Cerebral Palsy in children.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney, Letter, 96 European Journal of Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 239 (2001) (citations omitted).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the generally pro-abortion British medical journal, ''The Lancet'', admitted that a procedure often used in abortion increase the risk of premature birth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr, Jay D. Iams, Dr. Robert Romero, Jennifer F. Culhane (PhD), Dr. Robert L. Goldenberg.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet   2008;371:164-175.  While the text of this article conceals the connection with abortion, it cites as support for its claims two studies showing how abortion increases risk of premature birth: the 2004 'Ancel' study of ten (10) European countries and the 2005 'Moreau' study that used French subjects.  Ancel P-Y,  Lelong  N,  Papiernik  E, Saurel-Cubizoilles M-J, Kaminski M.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Human Reproduction. 2004;112:734-740.  Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel PY et al.  Previous I induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery; Results of the EPIPAGE study.  British J Obstetrics Gynaecology 2005; 112:430-437.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;For example, greater public and professional awareness of evidence that repeated uterine instrumentation--eg, uterine curettage or endometrial biopsy--is associated with increased risk of subsequent preterm birth might over time influence decision-making about the procedure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers Rooney and Calhoun observed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Large studies have reported a doubling of [early premature birth] EPB risk from two prior IAs.  Women who had four or more IAs experienced, on average, nine times the risk of [extremely early premature births] XPB, an increase of 800 percent.  These results suggest that women contemplating IA should be informed of this potential risk to subsequent pregnancies, and that physicians should be aware of the potential liability and possible need for intensified prenatal care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of how abortion increases premature birth includes the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): &amp;quot;[T]he abortion rate for black women has been approximately '''three times''' as high as that for white women (range: 2.6--3.1) since 1991&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Science Daily'''s report on a study by the Washington University School of Medicine: &amp;quot;African-American women are '''three times''' more likely to deliver babies three to 17 weeks prematurely than Caucasian women&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070209074144.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 an article entitled &amp;quot;Preterm Birth: A Continuing Challenge&amp;quot; noted that premature births are abnormally high in the United States, citing a study that observed that a previous abortion is a &amp;quot;risk factor[] for both infertility and preterm birth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1595132/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of premature birth is elevated by the same amount as the abortion rate, as expected if abortion increases the risk of premature birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other Health Risks from Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in 2007 that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 127 S. Ct. 1610, 1634 (2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano ''et al.'' as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp 22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ''ibid.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study published in the Southern Medical Journal observed that there are higher death rates association with women who have abortion, and that these higher death rates persist over time and across socioeconomic boundaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D.C. Reardon, P.G. Ney, F.J. Scheuren, J.R. Cougle, P.K. Coleman, T. Strahan, &amp;quot;Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women,&amp;quot; 95 Southern Medical Journal 8, at 834-41 (August 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[England]], the &amp;quot;Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.&amp;quot;  The medical royal college warned that women who have abortions may be at risk of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A New Zealand study found that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=pubmed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=16405636&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The researcher in this study, who was not pro-life, was shaken by the study and had to go to four journals before he could find one who would publish it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The study concludes with the following statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|These findings are inconsistent with the current consensus on the psychological effects of abortion. In particular, in its 2005 statement on abortion, the [[American Psychological Association]] concluded that “well-designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age” (American Psychological Association, 2005). This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion (Cougle et al., 2003; Gissler et al., 1996; Reardon &amp;amp; Cougle, 2002). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor David Fergusson, lead author of the New Zealand study stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It borders on scandalous that one of the most common surgical procedures performed on young women is so poorly researched and evaluated. If this were Prozac or Vioxx, reports of associated harm would be taken much more seriously with more careful research and monitoring procedures.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060120-091648-6456r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study published in the OB/GYN Survey detailed long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J.M. Thorp, Jr., K.E. Hartmann, and E.M. Shadigian, &amp;quot;Long-Term Physical &amp;amp; Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence,&amp;quot; 58 OB/GYN Survey 1, at 67-79 (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suicide rates among women who had abortions are six times higher than women who gave birth in the prior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionrecoverycounseling.com/Page8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Overall, deaths from suicide, homicide and accidents were 248% higher after an abortion, as found by a 13-year study in Finland of its entire population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, only one state (Missouri) requires that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mo. Rev. Stat. § 188.080 prohibits an abortion by a physician &amp;quot;who does not have clinical privileges at a hospital which offers obstetrical or gynecological care located within thirty miles of the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the other 49 states, an abortion patient can and often is left without prompt medical care by the treating physician.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest abortion providers in the United States, the Metropolitan Medical Associates of New Jersey, was shut down in 2007 by state health officials after one of its botched abortions left a 20-year-old woman in a coma for more than four weeks.  She &amp;quot;became severely ill following the abortion and was transferred to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center where she needed blood transfusions and had her uterus removed. She also suffered a stroke due to the serious blood loss and had one of her lungs collapse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/state2137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The State of New Jersey had shut down the same facility in 1993 also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Optionline]] provides consultants that connects individuals to nearby pregnancy centers that offer the following services: free pregnancy tests and pregnancy information; Information about the risks of abortion and the morning after pill; medical services, including [[STD]] tests; early ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, some of these centers provide information regarding free housing to women who are facing housing concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary alternative to abortion is adoption. [[Liberty Godparent Foundation]] is a [[Christian]] organization focused on improving the lives of unwed pregnant teens, babies and adoptive families by providing two alternatives, The Liberty Godparent Maternity Home and Family Life Services Adoption Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godparent.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=20&amp;amp;Itemid=59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Catholic Social Services]] provides adoption assistance to people of all beliefs in addition to supporting families in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Industry and How It Targets Minority Communities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4287336112 d3f9126c99.jpg|right|thumb|325px|According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of [[Planned Parenthood]] abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/muriel215/4287336112/ Flickr, see Creative commons license agreement)] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Each day '''1,786''' African American children are aborted.&amp;quot; According to the [[U.S.]] Census of 2006, African Americans are at 1.96 birth rate which is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;beneath&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the replacement level of 2.1. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html African American Pro-Life Group Holds Protest at NAACP] Christian News Network, July 13, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the continued rate, [[racism]] by abortion will decimate the black population of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to writer George Grant, the author of ''Killing Angel'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the 1980s when [[Planned Parenthood]] shifted its focus from community-based clinics to school-based clinics, it again targeted inner-city minority neighborhoods...Of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the last decade [1980s], none has been at substantially all-white schools....None has been at suburban middle-class schools. All have been at black, minority or ethnic schools.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planned Parenthood itself reported that its abortions on minorities in 1991 was 42.7% of its total abortions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, during that time period, minorities comprised only 19.7% of the U.S. population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Support of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most powerful political action committee (PAC) is EMILY’s List.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emilyslist.org/newsroom/releases/20070201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EMILY's List contributes money to Democratic candidates who support abortion-on-demand, including forced taxpayer funding of abortion.  EMILY's List candidates also oppose regulations such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing health information to abortion patients;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:requiring that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in case there is a complication; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing parental notification if the patient is a teenager.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the influence of the abortion industry and EMILY's List, nearly every Democratic presidential candidate and senatorial candidate supports abortion-on-demand.  &amp;quot;EMILY's List, the nation's largest political action committee, continues to be the dominant financial resource for Democratic candidates,&amp;quot; its above-referenced website declares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no comparably funded organization opposing abortion, because there are no monetary rewards to defending human life.  Instead, candidates and supporters who oppose abortion are motivated by religious and ethical principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Please also see:'' [[History of abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father of [[medicine]], [[Hippocrates]], expressly prohibited abortion in his ethical [[Oath]] long before [[Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1973 abortion was illegal in most of the United States, though a few states (such as Hawaii and New York) allowed it with restrictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A Timeline of Reproductive Rights'' [http://ecampus.bentley.edu/org/wc/reproductiverights.html The Women's Center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 [[Roe v. Wade]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online text of [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;amp;court=US&amp;amp;vol=410&amp;amp;page=113 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decision ruled that abortions are lawful under the [[U.S. Constitution]] up to the point at which the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb, and an accompanying decision issued the same day captioned [[Doe v. Bolton]] essentially legalized abortion in the unlimited discretion of the abortionist at any time during pregnancy, up to and including birth.  Conservatives immediately criticized these decisions as examples of [[Judicial Activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, worldwide there were approximately 115,000 abortions done per day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008, approximately 83% of all abortions were performed in developing countries and 17% occurred in developed countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States may regulate abortion, such as requiring a 24-hour waiting period and parental consent for minors.  Abortion clinics often fail to comply with the health standards of surgical facilities, and States can require compliance (but often do not, resulting in discomfort and harm to the victims of abortion).  Many abortionists lack hospital admitting privileges at nearby facilities, so women having complications must go on their own to emergency rooms to see physicians unfamiliar with what actually happened.  For any other operation the cost of treating complications is included in the cost of the operation, but for abortions the abortion clinics take their money and typically do not pay for the care of complications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more pro-abortion the State regulations are, the larger the number of abortion clinics it will have.  [[Arizona]], though a pro-life State, has a regulatory system that results in twelve abortion clinics operating within its borders.  In contrast, [[Mississippi]] has only one abortion clinic, and [[Missouri]] has only two.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Andrew Schlaffy and Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information see:'' [[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg|thumb|290px|right|[[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎In 1942 [[Andrew Schlaffy]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-[[German]] population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman's health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Liberals and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Pew Research Center, American [[liberal]]s are more likely to support pro-abortion views.Particulary becouse they wish George W. Bush would have been aborted. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/283/pragmatic-americans-liberal-and-conservative-on-social-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary Thought and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theory of evolution and liberalism|Liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives]].  [[Creation Ministries International]] has written that [[evolution|evolutionary]] thinking has contributed to the [[eugenics|eugenic]] idea of aborting babies with defects and has also contributed to erroneous and immoral justifications for abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ultrasound images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/frames.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/drakelelane/388759116/&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/13_weeks.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/ultrasound_3d.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/triple_jump.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2 61 ultrasound.jpg|right|thumb|350px| When an Ohio woman looked at an ultrasound she expected to see a developing baby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, she saw what she believes to be an image of Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Anti-abortion Project|Conservapedia Anti-abortion Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Abortion Directory of abortion related articles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investigatemagazine.com/mar3abrt.htm Abortion and breast cancer in New Zealand]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion genocide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion procedures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion rates by US state]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortionist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Abortion|Articles about '''Abortion''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Separate Life|Essay on abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harvard abortion study]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion breast cancer studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexual activists and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/abrpt/2006abrpt.pdf Minnesota official abortion statistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Right to Life Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partial birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sanctity of life]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silent scream]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Taxpayer-funded abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.abortionfacts.com/ Abortion Facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.carm.org/abortion.htm Abortion] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ProLifeOnCampus.com/ Pro Life on Campus]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/abortion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Abortion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Abortion}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=788139</id>
		<title>Abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=788139"/>
		<updated>2010-06-18T14:13:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TexasRepublican: /* Adolf Hitler and Abortion */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Baby.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A human fetus in the womb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion''' is the induced termination of a [[pregnancy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Heritage Dictionary definition, [http://www.bartleby.com/61/7/A0020700.html abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; often causing [[fetal pain]].  Abortion is a billion-dollar industry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/03/09/fetal.tissue/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthy.net/scr/news.asp?Id=8247&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Dr. George Tiller &amp;quot;estimated that he performed 250 to 300 late-term abortions in 2003, each costing an average of $6,000.&amp;quot;[http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090327/D976JVSG4.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the [[United States]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Over 52,000,000 babies have been aborted in the United States since 1973.[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?/library/view.php&amp;amp;articleid=1042]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Western Europe except for [[Ireland]], [[Malta]] and [[Poland]], where it has been abolished.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On April 10, 2007, Portugal legalized abortion up until the 10th week of pregnancy, with some conditions placed on the obtaining of consent for the abortion.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;God warns in His word that a nation that sheds innocent blood will not prosper. (Deuteronomy 19:11-13)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Abortion in Poland]] declined by 99% after [[communism]] was overthrown, and women's health has dramatically improved there due to fewer abortions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their fetus (unborn child) decide not to abort'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/145703/abortion_foes_use_ultrasound__focus_on_the_family_budgets/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/20020120abortion0120p3.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children.  &amp;quot;I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The quote is by [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; highlights the [[deceit]] of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Abortion doesn't solve your problems, it only creates different ones,&amp;quot; warned a full-page ad by many women who had abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/signaturead/ad.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''Many women begin regretting their abortion before they even leave the abortion clinic'''.  In some cases, women begin regretting their abortion just before it is performed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In one case where a woman changed her mind from inside the abortion clinic, she &amp;quot;called her friend from inside the abortion clinic and arranged for her to come 'rescue' her.&amp;quot; [http://www.40daysforlife.com/southfield/index.cfm?load=page&amp;amp;page=30]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but are told by abortionists that it is too late to change their mind because they already signed a consent form (which is a lie - it is never too late to withdraw consent for an abortion).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Health risks from abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by stopping his or her beating heart.  Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Documented Incidents of 365 Women Who Have Been Killed by &amp;quot;Safe&amp;quot; and Legal Abortion.&amp;quot; [http://abortionviolence.com/DEATHS.HTM 365 women who have been killed by 'Legal' abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Abortion and Breast Cancer ===&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2010, LifeNews reported that a [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher admitted there was a link between abortion and breast cancer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center published in 2009 confirmed a 40% increase in risk in breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/breast-cancer-oral-contraceptives-abortion-and-lies.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It is undisputed that childbirth protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Tobacco-ChronologyJul98.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Abortion Hurts Women.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Walk for Life rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
A new study on breast cancer in Turkey published in April 2009 in the peer-reviewed World Journal of Surgical Oncology found, through a surveying process, that induced abortion was a statistically significant cause of breast cancer risk. The study concludes, “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk….”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, the study found that Turkish women who received one or more induced abortions had a 66% higher risk of breast cancer than women who never had an abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072903.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/090728/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself supportive of a right to perform abortions, brought the abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream with her federally funded research on the topic.  Her report, released in 1994, found a 50% increase in breast cancer risk due to induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Janet R. Daling et al., &amp;quot;Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,&amp;quot; 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/032801.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She said, &amp;quot;I have three sisters with breast cancer and I resent people messing with the scientific data to further their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life.  I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L.A. Daily News, Sept. 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Similarly, an early study published in Japan in 1957 showed that women who have abortions have a much higher risk of breast cancer than those who decide to keep their baby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Segi M, et al. An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan. GANN. 1957; 48:1-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg‎|thumb|275px|right|In 1942, [[Adolf Hitler]] declared: &amp;quot;In view of the large families of the [[Slavic|Slav]] native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a peer-reviewed medical journal, Karen Malec observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirty-eight epidemiological studies exploring an independent link [between abortion and] breast cancer have been published.  Twenty-nine report risk elevations.  Thirteen out of 15 American studies found risk elevations.  Seventeen studies are statistically significant, 16 of which report increased risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S., a specialist in breast cancer an a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, has explained the physiology and epidemiology of the abortion-breast cancer link.  She made the following observation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S, &amp;quot;The breast physiology and the epidemiology of the abortion breast cancer link,&amp;quot; 12 Imago Hominis, No. 3, 228 (2005) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This past August in Minneapolis, Patrick Carroll, director of the Pension and Population Research Institute of London, presented a paper to the largest gathering of statisticians in North America.  '''He showed that abortion was the best predictor of breast cancer in Britain.'''  Breast cancer is the only cancer in Britain which has its highest incidence and mortality rate among the upper rather than lower social classes.  Abortion before a full term pregnancy and late pregnancy were the best explanations for this incidence.  He also found that there had been a 70% increase risk of breast cancer between 1971 and 2002 and that for women between 50 and 54 years of age incidence was highly correlated with abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of abortion causing breast cancer includes the following.  Breast cancer rates are far lower in Western countries that prohibited abortion than in those that promoted it.  Ireland, which virtually bans abortion, reportedly has a lifetime rate of breast cancer of only 1 in 13, nearly half the rate of 1 in 7.5 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Probability of breast cancer in American Women,&amp;quot; National Cancer Institute (Apr. 15, 2005);  K. O'Flaherty, R. Oakley, &amp;quot;Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight,&amp;quot; Sunday Tribune (Ireland), at 8 (Oct. 6, 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rate of breast cancer increases steadily as one travels from Ireland, where abortion is illegal, to Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal but rare, to England, where abortion is common. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; R. O'Reilly, &amp;quot;New weapon in war against breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Press Association Limited (Dec. 17, 1998); &amp;quot;Portugal-abortion referendum,&amp;quot; Associated Press Worldstream (June 27, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Romania, abortion was illegal under two decades of rule by the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and the country enjoyed one of the lowest breast cancer rates in the entire world during that time, far lower than comparable Western countries. Romania's breast cancer rate was an astounding one-sixth the rate of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Khan, &amp;quot;The role of fat in breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Independent (May 18, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But after the execution of Ceausescu on Christmas Day, 1989, Romania has taken the opposite approach, embracing abortion to the point that Romania now has one of the highest abortion rates in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Abdullaev, &amp;quot;Russians are quickest to marry and divorce,&amp;quot; Moscow Times (Dec 8, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One Romanian observer decried, &amp;quot;The liberalization of abortions in Romania in 1990, the significant increase of the number of abortions at relatively short intervals, determined a rise in the incidence of breast and uterine cervix cancer in my country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Information packet, Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) World Conference on Breast Cancer (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies on rats, which are an accepted method for identifying causes of cancer in humans,  further confirm that abortion does indeed increase the risk of breast cancer.  As Dr. [[Joel Brind]] observed, &amp;quot;Researchers also widely admit to the biological plausibility of abortion as an independent cause of breast cancer, through the estrogen-mediated stimulation of breast growth in the absence of differentiation. This was demonstrated experimentally in rats in the landmark experiments of Russo and Russo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Joel Brind]], &amp;quot;Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Recent Studies Based on Prospective Data,&amp;quot; J. of Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 105 (Winter 2005) [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf] (citing Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to&lt;br /&gt;
carcinogenesis. 1980;100:497-512).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additional scientific information on the abortion-breast cancer link is available [http://www.bcpinstitute.org here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expert (Dr. Lynn Rosenberg) hired to defend abortion felt compelled to admit, under cross-examination, that a woman increases her risk for breast cancer by having an abortion compared to carrying her pregnancy to childbirth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/rosenbergs_testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question by the attorney: 'So in other words, a woman who finds herself pregnant at age 15 will have a higher breast cancer risk if she chooses to abort that pregnancy, than if she carries the pregnancy to term, [is that] correct?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'Probably, yes.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: 'Looking at that another way, let's compare two women. Let's say both got pregnant at age 15-- one terminates the pregnancy, but the other carries the pregnancy to term. And both women go on to get married and have two kids, say, at age 30 and age 35. Is the risk of breast cancer higher for the woman who had an abortion at age 15 or the woman who had a baby at age 15, all other things being equal?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'It's probably higher for the one who had an abortion at age 15.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the overwhelming evidence -- and inescapable logic -- for abortion increasing breast cancer, promoters of abortion cite flawed articles in an attempt to deny the link.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The flaws in these articles are exposed in [[Harvard abortion study]] and [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Lanfranchi has explained:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well-documented breast physiology accounts for the fact that oral contraceptives and abortion are risk factors for breast cancer.  There is an effort to suppress this information by federal agencies and those in academic medicine.  Without this information, women cannot make a fully informed choice about their method of fertility control or about whether to maintain an unplanned pregnancy.  Medical ethics demands that they be informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-choice should include ''informed'' choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Archdiocese of St. Louis, for example, remarked about abortions and increased risk for breast cancer: &amp;quot;To dismiss that link is irresponsible.&amp;quot; [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5620863.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet efforts continue to suppress awareness that abortion increases breast cancer.  Pro-life scientists were almost entirely barred from the National Cancer Institute's &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the link, and its resulting statements were fatally flawed as explained in  [[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg|right|thumb|250px| The Smellie's double crochet abortion tool was used to grab and rip the baby out.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Abortion Causes Future Harm with Premature Births ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At least 49 studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births (PB) or low birth weight (LBW) risk in women with prior induced abortions (IAs).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney and Byron C. Calhoun, &amp;quot;Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births,&amp;quot; 8 J. Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 46 (Summer 2003). [http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Premature birth tragically causes brain damage, and an array of other severe, lifelong injuries ranging from Cerebral Palsy to blindness, or even death, and few mothers would knowingly increase the risk of that happening.  &amp;quot;There are at least seventeen (17) studies that have found that previous induced abortions increase preterm birth risk” and thereby increase debilitating Cerebral Palsy in children.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney, Letter, 96 European Journal of Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 239 (2001) (citations omitted).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the generally pro-abortion British medical journal, ''The Lancet'', admitted that a procedure often used in abortion increase the risk of premature birth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr, Jay D. Iams, Dr. Robert Romero, Jennifer F. Culhane (PhD), Dr. Robert L. Goldenberg.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet   2008;371:164-175.  While the text of this article conceals the connection with abortion, it cites as support for its claims two studies showing how abortion increases risk of premature birth: the 2004 'Ancel' study of ten (10) European countries and the 2005 'Moreau' study that used French subjects.  Ancel P-Y,  Lelong  N,  Papiernik  E, Saurel-Cubizoilles M-J, Kaminski M.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Human Reproduction. 2004;112:734-740.  Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel PY et al.  Previous I induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery; Results of the EPIPAGE study.  British J Obstetrics Gynaecology 2005; 112:430-437.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;For example, greater public and professional awareness of evidence that repeated uterine instrumentation--eg, uterine curettage or endometrial biopsy--is associated with increased risk of subsequent preterm birth might over time influence decision-making about the procedure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers Rooney and Calhoun observed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Large studies have reported a doubling of [early premature birth] EPB risk from two prior IAs.  Women who had four or more IAs experienced, on average, nine times the risk of [extremely early premature births] XPB, an increase of 800 percent.  These results suggest that women contemplating IA should be informed of this potential risk to subsequent pregnancies, and that physicians should be aware of the potential liability and possible need for intensified prenatal care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of how abortion increases premature birth includes the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): &amp;quot;[T]he abortion rate for black women has been approximately '''three times''' as high as that for white women (range: 2.6--3.1) since 1991&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Science Daily'''s report on a study by the Washington University School of Medicine: &amp;quot;African-American women are '''three times''' more likely to deliver babies three to 17 weeks prematurely than Caucasian women&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070209074144.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 an article entitled &amp;quot;Preterm Birth: A Continuing Challenge&amp;quot; noted that premature births are abnormally high in the United States, citing a study that observed that a previous abortion is a &amp;quot;risk factor[] for both infertility and preterm birth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1595132/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of premature birth is elevated by the same amount as the abortion rate, as expected if abortion increases the risk of premature birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other Health Risks from Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in 2007 that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 127 S. Ct. 1610, 1634 (2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano ''et al.'' as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp 22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ''ibid.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study published in the Southern Medical Journal observed that there are higher death rates association with women who have abortion, and that these higher death rates persist over time and across socioeconomic boundaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D.C. Reardon, P.G. Ney, F.J. Scheuren, J.R. Cougle, P.K. Coleman, T. Strahan, &amp;quot;Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women,&amp;quot; 95 Southern Medical Journal 8, at 834-41 (August 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[England]], the &amp;quot;Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.&amp;quot;  The medical royal college warned that women who have abortions may be at risk of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A New Zealand study found that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=pubmed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=16405636&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The researcher in this study, who was not pro-life, was shaken by the study and had to go to four journals before he could find one who would publish it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The study concludes with the following statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|These findings are inconsistent with the current consensus on the psychological effects of abortion. In particular, in its 2005 statement on abortion, the [[American Psychological Association]] concluded that “well-designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age” (American Psychological Association, 2005). This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion (Cougle et al., 2003; Gissler et al., 1996; Reardon &amp;amp; Cougle, 2002). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor David Fergusson, lead author of the New Zealand study stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It borders on scandalous that one of the most common surgical procedures performed on young women is so poorly researched and evaluated. If this were Prozac or Vioxx, reports of associated harm would be taken much more seriously with more careful research and monitoring procedures.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060120-091648-6456r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study published in the OB/GYN Survey detailed long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J.M. Thorp, Jr., K.E. Hartmann, and E.M. Shadigian, &amp;quot;Long-Term Physical &amp;amp; Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence,&amp;quot; 58 OB/GYN Survey 1, at 67-79 (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suicide rates among women who had abortions are six times higher than women who gave birth in the prior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionrecoverycounseling.com/Page8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Overall, deaths from suicide, homicide and accidents were 248% higher after an abortion, as found by a 13-year study in Finland of its entire population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, only one state (Missouri) requires that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mo. Rev. Stat. § 188.080 prohibits an abortion by a physician &amp;quot;who does not have clinical privileges at a hospital which offers obstetrical or gynecological care located within thirty miles of the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the other 49 states, an abortion patient can and often is left without prompt medical care by the treating physician.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest abortion providers in the United States, the Metropolitan Medical Associates of New Jersey, was shut down in 2007 by state health officials after one of its botched abortions left a 20-year-old woman in a coma for more than four weeks.  She &amp;quot;became severely ill following the abortion and was transferred to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center where she needed blood transfusions and had her uterus removed. She also suffered a stroke due to the serious blood loss and had one of her lungs collapse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/state2137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The State of New Jersey had shut down the same facility in 1993 also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Optionline]] provides consultants that connects individuals to nearby pregnancy centers that offer the following services: free pregnancy tests and pregnancy information; Information about the risks of abortion and the morning after pill; medical services, including [[STD]] tests; early ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, some of these centers provide information regarding free housing to women who are facing housing concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary alternative to abortion is adoption. [[Liberty Godparent Foundation]] is a [[Christian]] organization focused on improving the lives of unwed pregnant teens, babies and adoptive families by providing two alternatives, The Liberty Godparent Maternity Home and Family Life Services Adoption Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godparent.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=20&amp;amp;Itemid=59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Catholic Social Services]] provides adoption assistance to people of all beliefs in addition to supporting families in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Industry and How It Targets Minority Communities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4287336112 d3f9126c99.jpg|right|thumb|325px|According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of [[Planned Parenthood]] abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/muriel215/4287336112/ Flickr, see Creative commons license agreement)] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Each day '''1,786''' African American children are aborted.&amp;quot; According to the [[U.S.]] Census of 2006, African Americans are at 1.96 birth rate which is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;beneath&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the replacement level of 2.1. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html African American Pro-Life Group Holds Protest at NAACP] Christian News Network, July 13, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the continued rate, [[racism]] by abortion will decimate the black population of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to writer George Grant, the author of ''Killing Angel'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the 1980s when [[Planned Parenthood]] shifted its focus from community-based clinics to school-based clinics, it again targeted inner-city minority neighborhoods...Of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the last decade [1980s], none has been at substantially all-white schools....None has been at suburban middle-class schools. All have been at black, minority or ethnic schools.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planned Parenthood itself reported that its abortions on minorities in 1991 was 42.7% of its total abortions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, during that time period, minorities comprised only 19.7% of the U.S. population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Support of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most powerful political action committee (PAC) is EMILY’s List.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emilyslist.org/newsroom/releases/20070201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EMILY's List contributes money to Democratic candidates who support abortion-on-demand, including forced taxpayer funding of abortion.  EMILY's List candidates also oppose regulations such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing health information to abortion patients;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:requiring that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in case there is a complication; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing parental notification if the patient is a teenager.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the influence of the abortion industry and EMILY's List, nearly every Democratic presidential candidate and senatorial candidate supports abortion-on-demand.  &amp;quot;EMILY's List, the nation's largest political action committee, continues to be the dominant financial resource for Democratic candidates,&amp;quot; its above-referenced website declares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no comparably funded organization opposing abortion, because there are no monetary rewards to defending human life.  Instead, candidates and supporters who oppose abortion are motivated by religious and ethical principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Please also see:'' [[History of abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father of [[medicine]], [[Hippocrates]], expressly prohibited abortion in his ethical [[Oath]] long before [[Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1973 abortion was illegal in most of the United States, though a few states (such as Hawaii and New York) allowed it with restrictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A Timeline of Reproductive Rights'' [http://ecampus.bentley.edu/org/wc/reproductiverights.html The Women's Center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 [[Roe v. Wade]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online text of [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;amp;court=US&amp;amp;vol=410&amp;amp;page=113 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decision ruled that abortions are lawful under the [[U.S. Constitution]] up to the point at which the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb, and an accompanying decision issued the same day captioned [[Doe v. Bolton]] essentially legalized abortion in the unlimited discretion of the abortionist at any time during pregnancy, up to and including birth.  Conservatives immediately criticized these decisions as examples of [[Judicial Activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, worldwide there were approximately 115,000 abortions done per day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008, approximately 83% of all abortions were performed in developing countries and 17% occurred in developed countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States may regulate abortion, such as requiring a 24-hour waiting period and parental consent for minors.  Abortion clinics often fail to comply with the health standards of surgical facilities, and States can require compliance (but often do not, resulting in discomfort and harm to the victims of abortion).  Many abortionists lack hospital admitting privileges at nearby facilities, so women having complications must go on their own to emergency rooms to see physicians unfamiliar with what actually happened.  For any other operation the cost of treating complications is included in the cost of the operation, but for abortions the abortion clinics take their money and typically do not pay for the care of complications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more pro-abortion the State regulations are, the larger the number of abortion clinics it will have.  [[Arizona]], though a pro-life State, has a regulatory system that results in twelve abortion clinics operating within its borders.  In contrast, [[Mississippi]] has only one abortion clinic, and [[Missouri]] has only two.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Andrew Schlaffy and Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information see:'' [[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg|thumb|290px|right|[[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎In 1942 [[Andrew Schlaffy]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-[[German]] population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman's health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Liberals and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Pew Research Center, American [[liberal]]s are more likely to support pro-abortion views. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/283/pragmatic-americans-liberal-and-conservative-on-social-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary Thought and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theory of evolution and liberalism|Liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives]].  [[Creation Ministries International]] has written that [[evolution|evolutionary]] thinking has contributed to the [[eugenics|eugenic]] idea of aborting babies with defects and has also contributed to erroneous and immoral justifications for abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ultrasound images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/frames.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/drakelelane/388759116/&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/13_weeks.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/ultrasound_3d.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/triple_jump.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2 61 ultrasound.jpg|right|thumb|350px| When an Ohio woman looked at an ultrasound she expected to see a developing baby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, she saw what she believes to be an image of Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Anti-abortion Project|Conservapedia Anti-abortion Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Abortion Directory of abortion related articles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investigatemagazine.com/mar3abrt.htm Abortion and breast cancer in New Zealand]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion genocide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion procedures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion rates by US state]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortionist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Abortion|Articles about '''Abortion''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Separate Life|Essay on abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harvard abortion study]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion breast cancer studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexual activists and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/abrpt/2006abrpt.pdf Minnesota official abortion statistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Right to Life Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partial birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sanctity of life]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silent scream]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Taxpayer-funded abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.abortionfacts.com/ Abortion Facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.carm.org/abortion.htm Abortion] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ProLifeOnCampus.com/ Pro Life on Campus]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/abortion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Abortion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Abortion}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TexasRepublican</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>