Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:Extinct

2009-08-07T12:13:58Z

Teelbal: Created page with '"Cloning is a new technology that is being developed that could possibly bring back organisms into existence. The woolly mammoth and other organisms whose DNA is preserved such a...'

"Cloning is a new technology that is being developed that could possibly bring back organisms into existence. The woolly mammoth and other organisms whose DNA is preserved such as the Thylacine of Australia are realistic options to be brought back using the cloning technique."
:This doesn't seem possible without a mother Mammoth to provide the egg cell and the womb. --[[user:Teelbal]] 08:13, 7 August 2009 (EDT)

Antipsychiatry

2009-08-07T12:03:03Z

Teelbal: reference to relevant book

Antipsychiatry is a school of psychiatric, humanist, and religious thought that holds [[psychiatry]] to be based on false assumptions and to be far more harmful than helpful to its patients. Noteable figures include psychiatrist [[Thomas Szasz]], University of Illinois professor of psychology [[Orval Hobart Mowrer]], Presbyterian minister [[Jay E. Adams]], and Scottish psychiatrist [[Ronald David Laing]].

Some of the opposition to psychiatry is based on the observation that patients who do not receive psychiatric treatment tend to improve at the same rate as (or faster than) patients who do.<ref>Crossley, N., Contesting psychiatry, Routledge, 2006, ISBN 978-0415354172</ref>

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
''Affirming Websites''
*[http://www.antipsychiatry.org/ Antipsychiatry Coalition] webpage
*[http://www.critpsynet.freeuk.com/antipsychiatry.htm Critical Psychiatry Website]
''Affirming video''
*[http://www.archive.org/details/foucault_tribunal The Foucault Tribunal] (Free University Berlin, 1998)

[[Category:Psychiatry]]
[[Category:Mental health]]

User:Teelbal

2009-06-13T16:37:37Z

Teelbal: Created page with 'if I'm doing something wrong (or right you can tell me on my talk page'

if I'm doing something wrong (or right you can tell me on my [[User Talk:Teelbal|talk page]]

Talk:Christian Democrat

2009-06-13T16:35:33Z

Teelbal: Created page with 'I don't think this should be a redirect, other countries have Christion Democrats parties too. --~~~~'

I don't think this should be a redirect, other countries have Christion Democrats parties too. --Teelbal 12:35, 13 June 2009 (EDT)

Talk:Gay disease

2009-06-13T16:28:34Z

Teelbal: /* proposed merging with AIDS */ new section

Where in the reference does it say '''anything''' about people being unsure as to homosexuals standing in terms of the AIDS epidemic? Fantomas 09:43, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

<blockquote>
"Through media attention to AIDS and homosexual groups which have taken a stand both for their rights and against AIDS, homosexual practices and lifestyles have become more accepted. '''Many people, however, remain unsure whether to blame gays for AIDS or to view them as unfortunate victims in a public health nightmare.''' Media coverage has also caused many homosexuals to question their personal and social acceptance, and ultimately grow scared about their future. The author notes the gulf between religious and moral conservatives who condemn gay sex and homosexuality on the one hand, and Bacchanalian proponents who defend their freedom to have consensual sex with anyone and as often as they please."
</blockquote>
You may not agree with it, but it is there.
--[[User:OfficerDibble|OfficerDibble]] 09:59, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

oops, sorry, i read it twice, i thought - i retract my question. and yes, i don't agree with it. Fantomas 10:31, 28 May 2007 (EDT)

== Is this for real? ==
I don't recall HIV/Aids ever being referred to as "Gay disease". It was initially termed GRID, for "Gay-related immune deficiency". [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 13:43, 18 January 2008 (EST)

== proposed merging with [[AIDS]] ==

Should be merged because the article says it's just another word for it. A section in the AIDS article could replace this one.