<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Teddy</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Teddy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Teddy"/>
	<updated>2026-11-11T16:47:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=650831</id>
		<title>Moon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=650831"/>
		<updated>2009-04-09T21:48:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* The Moon as God's creation */ On the variance of the moon's apparent size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Planet|image=Moon2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=The Moon one week after [[full moon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|primary=Earth&lt;br /&gt;
|periapsis=363,300 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html Moon Fact Sheet],&amp;quot; [[NASA]], April 19, 2007. Accessed May 3, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|apoapsis=405,500 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|semimajor=384,400 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?sat_elem Planetary Satellite Mean Orbital Parameters].&amp;quot; [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory|JPL]], [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|NASA]]. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|orbitradius=378,000 km&lt;br /&gt;
|eccentricity=0.0549&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sidereal=27.3217 da&lt;br /&gt;
|synodic=29.530588 da&lt;br /&gt;
|orbitspeed=1.023 km/s&lt;br /&gt;
|inclination=18.28°&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|siderealday=27.3217 da&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|solarday=29.530588 da&lt;br /&gt;
|mass=7.35 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (1.23% earth)&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|density=3350 kg/m³&amp;lt;ref name=ssdphys&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?sat_phys_par Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters].&amp;quot; [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory|JPL]], [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|NASA]]. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacegrav=1.62 m/s² (0.165 ''g'')&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|escapespeed=2.38 km/s&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|meanradius=1737.1 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdphys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|equatorradius =1738.1 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|polarradius =1736.0 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacearea=37,919,000 km² (7.434% earth)&lt;br /&gt;
|mintemp=100 K&lt;br /&gt;
|meantemp=250 K&lt;br /&gt;
|maxtemp=400 K&lt;br /&gt;
|albedo=0.12&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|pmdm=1.3 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys&amp;gt;Humphreys, D. R. &amp;quot;[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields].&amp;quot; ''Creation Research Society Quarterly'' 21(3), December 1984. Accessed April 29, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|cmdm=1.73 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mdt=364 a&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mhl=252.3 a&amp;lt;ref name=calc&amp;gt;Calculated&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}The '''Moon''' is a natural [[satellite]] orbiting the [[Earth]] at an average distance of about 238,000 miles (380,000 km). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most planets in the [[solar system]], [[Earth]] has only one moon. To those on Earth the Moon appears as a pale disc which goes through phases in which greater or lesser amounts of the side lit by the sun are visible from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Moon as God's creation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Earth's moon has several striking characteristics. To many, these characteristics appear as &amp;quot;clues&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;hints&amp;quot; left by God for men to discover. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/gem-projects/hm/0102-1-phase/CALENDARS.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Size of its disc===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon appears to have the same size as the [[Sun]] when viewed from Earth.  This creates a unique symmetry and phenomenal solar eclipses.  The odds of this occurring by chance are nearly zero. The moon's apparent size varies considerably according to the Earth's distance to the Sun, which varies over the year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rotation and revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon presents the same side to [[Earth]] at all times.  That means that the rotation of the Earth offsets the separate effects of the revolution of the Moon. Physical explanations rely on [[tidal locking]], asserting that tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby creating a drag on the rotation of the Moon until its same face always presents to the Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The same theory suggested that the planet [[Mercury]] had a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. In fact, that is false.  [[Mercury]]'s tidal locking is incomplete and it does not always present the same face to the sun.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, current tidal forces exerted by the [[Earth]] on the Moon cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM Chapter 8, Section 3: The Rotation of the Moon],&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Astronomy Today&amp;quot;, Department of Physics, Fort Lewis College, Durango, [[Colorado|CO]]. Accessed February 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin theories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheistic]] theories of the [[origin of the Moon]], widely taught for decades despite lacking the falsifiability requirement of science (see [[Philosophy of science]]), have been proven false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lacking any other [[atheistic]] alternatives, some scientists assert that the Moon originated from a collision early in Earth's history which created an orbiting ring of debris from the [[iron]]-poor surface of the planet which eventually coalesced into the moon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;amp;id=2198&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This theory, however, is contrary to key observations of the Moon, such as the relatively low levels of [[iron]] in the Moon's crust. Additional tests fail to support the [[atheistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. H. Jones: [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf Tests of the Giant Impact Hypothesis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Biblical history records the Moon being created on the fourth day of [[creation week]], along with the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rate of recession===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon currently recedes from the Earth at a rate of 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) per year&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA [http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html Measuring the Moon's Distance], LPI Bulletin, No. 72, August, 1994.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is believed by mainstream scientists to be 4.6 billion years old &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA, [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-15-2.html Apollo Expeditions to the Moon], Chapter 15.2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The Moon could never have been closer than about 11,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/764/ The moon: the light that rules the night], ''Creation'' 20(4):36–39, September 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If the rate of recession stayed constant at 3.8 cm per year, it would take 9.6 billion years for the lunar distance to migrate from 11,000 miles to the present distance of about 240,000 miles.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;However, the rate of recession would not have been constant, but would have been greater in the past, so that extrapolating backwards in time results in the moon being in contact with the earth 1.37 billion years ago,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; seemingly (if the assumptions stated above are correct) contradicting the view of an [[Old Earth]] promoted by [[atheists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact Craters===&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformitarian astronomers assume that crater impacts are a reliable indicator of the age of a celestial body. True to the form and principles of [[uniformitarianism]] (as applied to [[astronomy]] rather than to [[geology]]), any such estimation relies upon uniform constants and weather/erosion trends. Recent research into crater impacts on the moon suggests that many of the assumptions previously made are unwarranted. Bonnie Buratti of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has asserted that space weathering &amp;quot;takes place very rapidly on the Moon.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David, Leonard. &amp;quot;[http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/lunar_impact_021214.html Lunar Crash of 1953: Impact Crater Identified].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;http://www.space.com&amp;gt;, December 14, 2002. Accessed January 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario insists that there is no absolute criteria for the dating of craters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hecht, Jeff. &amp;quot;[http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3242 New crater revives Moon mystery].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;http://www.newscientist.com&amp;gt;, January 11, 2003. Accessed January 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Danny Faulkner of the [[Institute for Creation Research]] has observed that many of the lunar maria contain ''ghost craters'', or craters that the lava flow that produced the maria seem to have filled only partially. In the [[deep time]] scale required by [[uniformitarianism]], the ghost craters are the result of impacts that occurred as much as half a gigayear before the crust-fracturing impacts that caused the lava flows.&amp;lt;ref name=Henderson&amp;gt;Henderson, Thomas H. &amp;quot;[http://www.hal-pc.org/~tom/HeavyCratering.html Do heavily cratered planets and moons demand an old age for the solar system]?&amp;quot; ''Tom Henderson's Creation Resources'', July 25, 2003. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is not a reasonable assumption, because any impact strong enough to crack the crust should have obliterated any craters previously extant. Faulkner thus concludes that the impacts that formed the ghost craters, and those that let loose the lava flows that formed the maria, occurred within days of one another&amp;lt;ref name=Faulkner1&amp;gt;Faulkner, Danny. &amp;quot;[http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_df_r01/ The Current State of Creation Astronomy].&amp;quot; ''Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creationism,'' Creation Science Fellowship, Pittsburgh, pp. 201–216, August 3-8, 1998. Hosted at ''[[Institute for Creation Research]].'' Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and were probably part of at least one system-wide catastrophe involving a narrow stream of meteoroids and/or comets that delivered a concentrated bombardment of the Earth and Moon in a short interval.&amp;lt;ref name=Faulkner2&amp;gt;Faulkner, Danny. &amp;quot;[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1637 A Biblically-based cratering theory].&amp;quot; ''Technical Journal'' (now ''Journal of Creation''), 13(1):100-104, April 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faulkner assumes that this system-wide catastrophe occurred during the year of the [[Great Flood]]. But in 1984, Russell Humphreys, then at the Sandia National Laboratories, developed evidence suggesting different dates entirely. Specifically, the [[Project Apollo]] exploration teams brought back many samples of [[basalt]] (an [[igneous rock]]) and [[brecchia]] (pulverized meteor-impact remains). Geologists analyzed both types of samples and found evidence that each type of rock had once been in a magnetic field far more powerful than that which the Moon has today. Using his model for the creation and decay of magnetic fields&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;, Humphreys determined that the basalt had been laid down about 370 years after creation, and the brecchia had been laid down 1840 years after creation, or about 190 years after the Flood.&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys2&amp;gt;Humphreys reasoned that the higher the magnetic dipole moment of the samples, the earlier in lunar history they were formed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These findings clearly suggest that the Moon, and presumably all other bodies in the solar system, have been subject to two separate system-wide bombardments, one occurring in the second or third generation after the [[fall of man]] and the other occurring well after the Flood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tides==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravitational force of the Moon causes the ocean [[tides]]; these tidal forces have other effects as well. These tidal forces have the effect of creating resistance which slows down the rotation of both objects. In the case of the Earth, the result is that the Earth's rotation slows on the order of one millisecond per century. The Moon's rotation is locked in to its period of revolution, and the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The &amp;quot;dark&amp;quot; or far side==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;the ''dark'' side of the Moon&amp;quot; is inaccurate because the Moon does rotate relative to the Sun, with the same period as its period of revolution, once every 29 days. Our view of the Moon from the Earth always shows the same side of the Moon, with the same markings and features. When the Moon is full, the entire side that faces us is experiencing lunar &amp;quot;day&amp;quot; and is lit by the Sun. Two weeks later, when the Moon is new, the side that faces us is experiencing solar &amp;quot;night&amp;quot; and is unlit (and virtually invisible).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The far side of the moon is far more heavily cratered than the near, and the predominant type of cratering is consistent with brecchia-forming meteor impact. This would suggest that the far side suffered its bombardment in the latter of the two catastrophes that Humphreys suggests that the Moon has suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a slight &amp;quot;wobble&amp;quot; in the lunar motion called ''libration,'' we actually see a little bit more than half of the Moon's surface; sometimes it is turned a bit one way and sometimes the other. However, nobody had any idea of what the far side of the Moon looked like until 1959, when a Soviet satellite photographed it and relayed pictures back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:oldmooninnew.jpg|200px|right|thumb|The &amp;quot;old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the old Scottish ballad ''Sir Patrick Spens''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Child, Francis James (1860), ''The English and Scottish Popular Ballads,'' [http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/child/ch058.htm No. 58]; the ballad is thought to refer to an actual event of the year A.D. 1290.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a sailor cautions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I saw the new moon late yestreen&lt;br /&gt;
::With the old moon in her arm;&lt;br /&gt;
:And if we go to sea, master,&lt;br /&gt;
::I fear we'll come to harm.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Earthshine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect known as &amp;quot;the old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot; can often be seen when the Moon is a narrow [[crescent]]. Within the intensely bright crescent, a dim and mysterious view of the entire circular moon is seen. The effect is also known as ''earthshine'' because it is light from the Sun reflected off the Earth to the Moon and back that lights up the darker portion of the Moon. The bright crescent is lit by the Sun and is in full daylight. The rest of the Moon is not lit by the Sun; but an [[astronaut]] standing in this area would see a &amp;quot;full Earth&amp;quot; dominating the nighttime sky, lighting it up by its earthshine. The brightness of Earthshine, and hence the visibility of the old Moon in the new Moon's arms, varies. When the Earth is covered with clouds, or when there is a lot of snow-pack on the side of the Earth facing the Moon, the Earth is a white and bright and the Earthshine is intense. When the Earth looks like a &amp;quot;big, blue marble,&amp;quot; it is less intense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lunar calendars==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, many calendar systems have been based on the phases of the moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The months of the [[Islam|Muslim]] [[calendar]] are determined by observations of the [[hilal]], the moment at which the thin crescent moon first becomes visible. This marks the start of a month. Traditionally, and today in [[Pakistan]] and [[Jordan]], hilal is determined by actual observation and can be affected by weather and other factors. When following the traditional method, it is not actually possible to be certain precisely when future months will begin. In most Muslim countries, actual observation has been replaced by [[astronomy|astronomical]] rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The moon in culture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Old Moon in the New Moon's Arms&amp;quot; is the title of a poem by [[Ella Wheeler Wilcox]], in which she interprets the effect as the New Moon wishing that her lost love, the Old Moon, be in her arms one last time; Venus grants the wish, and:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swift thro' the vapors and the golden mist&amp;amp;mdash;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::The Full Moon's shadowy shape shone on the night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The New Moon reached out clasping arms and kissed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Her phantom lover in the whole world's sight.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Moon is often described as revolving around the Earth, this is slightly inaccurate: the Earth and the Moon ''both'' revolve around their ''barycenter'', their common [[centroid|center of mass]]. This point is 1,700 below the earth's surface, which is about 1/4 of the earth's [[radius]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The radius of the Earth is 6,378 kilometers, so that means that the barycenter is located INSIDE the Earth about 1707 kilometers below its surface. [http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q665.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The combined motion is like an athlete performing an [[Olympics| Olympic]] hammer throw: one object swings in a large circle, the other almost pivots around a fixed point but actually performs a small opposing circle of its own. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Earth and the Moon orbit each other around a gravitational midpoint called the ''barycenter.'' This point is, however, actually inside the Earth, about 3/4 of its radius from its center. It is not the Earth, but the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system, that orbits the [[Sun]] in a near-perfect ellipse. Relative to this ellipse, Earth is 3,000 miles closer to the Sun at full moon and 3,000 miles further from the Sun at new moon.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When speaking of things having to do with the moon, the adjective ''lunar'' is used. The Greek-derived prefixed root ''selen-'' followed by the morpheme ''-o-'' is used as well; for example, the [[science]] of mapping the moon is called ''[[selenography]]'' (morphemes: ''selen-o-graph-y''). (Note, however, that the apsides of the orbits of the [[Project Apollo]] spacecraft were always called ''pericynthion'' and ''apocynthion'', not &amp;quot;periselene&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;aposelene.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other moons ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Many_Moons.jpg|250px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
While the Moon of [[Earth]] is the best-known satellite of any [[planet]], other planets in our solar system also have moons. Earth has the least number of moons (one), while [[Jupiter]] has sixty-two. The first extraterrestrial moons to be discovered were the four Galilean moons ([[Io]], [[Europa (moon)|Europa]], [[Ganymede]], and [[Callisto]]. Next to these, Earth's Moon is one of the largest, but Jupiter and [[Saturn]] have moons in orbit about them that might qualify as planets if they orbited the [[Sun]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sizes of moons ===&lt;br /&gt;
Most moons in the solar system are no larger than typical asteroids. They are of irregular shape, have light and variable surface gravities, and are often unstable in their orbits. [[Phobos]] and [[Deimos]], the moons of [[Mars]], fall into this category.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earth's own moon is an example of a [[dwarf planet]]-sized moon. These moons are so large that their own self-gravity forces them to collapse into spheres or spheroids. Some of them, like [[Ganymede]] and [[Titan (moon)|Titan]], are larger even than the planet [[Mercury]]. Earth's moon was, of course, known to the ancients, but the remaining dwarf-planet-sized moons were generally the first to be discovered in orbit around any given primary. [[Galileo Galilei]] discovered the first four of these in orbit about [[Jupiter]] early in the seventeenth century; [[Christiaan Huygens]] then discovered Titan of [[Saturn]] later in that same century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Symoblic Importance in Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
The crescent moon is an internationally recognised symbol of the [[faith]] of [[Islam]].  It appears on the flags of several Islamic nations and forms part of the official emblem of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://islam.about.com/od/history/a/crescent_moon.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Origin of the Moon]]&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.solarviews.com/eng/terms.htm Glossary]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Solarsystem}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doctor_Who&amp;diff=476474</id>
		<title>Doctor Who</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Doctor_Who&amp;diff=476474"/>
		<updated>2008-06-17T18:52:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* Political and social themes */ Frankly the show is just a platform for the lead writer's views&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Doctor Who''''' is a [[British Broadcasting Corporation|BBC]] science fiction television programme originally created in 1963. It centres around a character named the Doctor, who travels around the universe in a [[time machine]] called the TARDIS (&amp;quot;Time and Relative Dimensions in Space&amp;quot;), which resembles a 1940s British Police phone box, but is considerably larger on the inside than it is on the outside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The programme ran for twenty-six seasons between 1963 and 1989, at which point it was cancelled indefinitely. Various forms of the series continued after the cancellation, with popular series of novels published by Target and then BBC Books, along with audio serials and re-releases of past episodes on VHS and DVD. Since 2005, a &amp;quot;new series&amp;quot; has been produced by BBC Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Doctor has the ability to regenerate his body when mortally weakened, a useful plot device that has allowed the role to be played on TV by ten different actors so far.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Doctors==&lt;br /&gt;
===[[William Hartnell]] (1963-66)===&lt;br /&gt;
The first actor to play the Doctor portrayed him as a cantankerous old man. Initially a somewhat dark character, he became more grandfatherly in later episodes. Hartnell's era introduced the most well-known of the Doctor's foes, the [[Dalek]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Patrick Troughton]] (1966-1969)===&lt;br /&gt;
Troughton's Doctor was an impish figure, whose gimmicks included playing the recorder. In this period, much of which is lost, the program felt the influence of [[Star Trek]] somewhat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Jon Pertwee]] (1970-1974)===&lt;br /&gt;
The third Doctor was Earth-bound for much of his tenure, a move that was partly motivated by budgeting constraints in production. In the stories themselves, this was explained by the Doctor's race - the Time Lords - imposing an exile upon him due to alleged crimes prosecuted in ''The War Games''. During this time, the United Nations Intelligence Taskforce (&amp;quot;UNIT&amp;quot;) was a key element of plots - the Doctor was officially UNIT's scientific advisor, but he frequently attempts to break free of the Time Lords' imposition of exile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Tom Baker]] (1974-1981)===&lt;br /&gt;
Arguably the most well-known Doctor, Baker, with his seven-foot long scarf and fondness for jelly babies played the role for longer than any other actor. Considered to be an &amp;quot;eccentric&amp;quot; character, he was capable both of representing human attributes and being aloof and of being detached from others around him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Peter Davison]] (1981-1984)===&lt;br /&gt;
The fifth Doctor became something of a vulnerable character, which was a conscious decision by the production team (led by John Nathan-Turner) to remove the aura of invincibility that they had felt was becoming part of the Doctor's characterisation with Tom Baker. Shown to be a keen cricket fan, the Doctor was arguably more human than any of his predecessors and often relied more on his companions to assist throughout his missions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Colin Baker]] (1984-1986)===&lt;br /&gt;
The sixth Doctor was premised around being the antithesis of his predecessor, with his garish and colour-mismatched costume reflecting the vast contrast with the mild-mannered fifth Doctor. In terms of characterisation, the Doctor became something of an unstable character, often violently responding to people and events around him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Sylvester McCoy]] (1987-1989)===&lt;br /&gt;
After the departure of Colin Baker, McCoy's depiction of the Doctor saw the series shift mood considerably. Early stories within the era depicted a somewhat comic and light-hearted Doctor, but over time the Doctor's character became steadily darker - a development that has been commonly described as making the Doctor a manipulating, scheming character who influenced events like a chess game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Paul McGann]] (1996)===&lt;br /&gt;
McGann played the role for a television movie, with the creation of a new series by US producers dependent on the success of the movie. This was never made. The Doctor himself was perhaps more human than any other, with the revelation that he was &amp;quot;half-human&amp;quot; on his mother's side and displaying far greater emotional response than in the past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Christopher Eccleston]] (2005)===&lt;br /&gt;
The first Doctor in the &amp;quot;new series&amp;quot; created by [[Russell T. Davies]], Eccleston's portrayal saw much of the eccentricity of the past integrated into the ninth regeneration of the Doctor. An indefinite amount of time has elapsed since he was last seen on television screens, and it is clear that the events of the Time War have scarred him: he is the last of the Time Lord race. His character reflected a manic unpredictability that saw him capable of both compassion and apathy while maintaining a love-hate relationship with humans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[David Tennant]] (2006-)===&lt;br /&gt;
The current actor playing the Doctor was also well-known beforehand ([[Casanova]], [[Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]]). His portrayal is more humorous and vivacious than Eccleston's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political and social themes==&lt;br /&gt;
Several stories in the series have been subtly or overtly political in their themes. For instance, ''The Green Death'' (1973) emphasised the dangers of [[pollution]] and big business - while the following year's ''Invasion of the Dinosaurs'' featured a contrasting menace -pro-environment extremists. Other stories have taken their themes from current news stories of the time, such as the [[United Kingdom]]'s entry into the [[Common Market]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent episode, the Daleks - Doctor Who's most dangerous enemy, a race of creatures who are physically shriveled and weak but contained within an armored tank-like body - take over Manhattan. They ruthlessly exploit workers engaged in construction and repair on the Empire State Building. This was reported in the British newspaper [[The Independent]] as a metaphor for the rampant abuse of capitalism. Conservative writers in [[The Guardian]] have used this as supposed evidence of the BBC pumping out &amp;quot;relentless socialist propaganda&amp;quot;, although others argue that this assumes an inherently Marxist perspective. The lead writer of Dr. Who, [[Russell T Davies]] is also known for aggressively promoting the [[gay agenda]] in the show, with many openly gay or bisexual characters, including the lead of the spin-off [[Torchwood]], [[Captain Jack Harkness]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Among other countries, Doctor Who can be seen on:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[BBC One]] in the UK&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation|CBC Television]] in Canada&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SciFi Channel]] in the US&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Australian Broadcasting Corporation|ABC]] in Australia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other countries to receive Doctor Who include the Netherlands, France, Denmark and Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Broadcasting]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Cambridge&amp;diff=467675</id>
		<title>University of Cambridge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Cambridge&amp;diff=467675"/>
		<updated>2008-06-06T13:43:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: addenenum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''[[University]] of Cambridge''' commonly referred to as '''Cambridge University'''  or simply '''Cambridge''' is an institution of higher learning based in [[Cambridge]], [[England]], and the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world. Cambridge was established in 1209 [http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/pubs/history/records.html] by scholars fleeing the hostility of the townsmen in [[Oxford]], the historical reason for the competition between the two Universities and the origin of the traditional river &amp;quot;dunking&amp;quot; of Cambridge scholars visiting Oxford.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cambridge is a confederation of colleges, faculties, and institutions[http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/pubs/works/]. The University administration is relatively small compared to the size of the University. Many functions that are normally carried out by the central university bureaucracy in other universities are carried out by the colleges. The functions of the colleges include teaching and research. Degrees are however conferred by the University. A person with a degree from Cambridge can put ''Cantab.'' after their name and degree, ''Cantab.'' being short for the Latin name for the town, which is ''Cantabrigia''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge collectively are often known as &amp;quot;Oxbridge&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of colleges==&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a list of Cambridge colleges and halls as of 2008.[http://www.cam.ac.uk/colleges/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Caius College&lt;br /&gt;
*Christ's College&lt;br /&gt;
*Churchill College&lt;br /&gt;
*Clare College&lt;br /&gt;
*Clare Hall&lt;br /&gt;
*Corpus Christi College&lt;br /&gt;
*Darwin College&lt;br /&gt;
*Downing College&lt;br /&gt;
*Emmanuel College&lt;br /&gt;
*Fitzwilliam College&lt;br /&gt;
*Girton College&lt;br /&gt;
*Gonville College&lt;br /&gt;
*Homerton College&lt;br /&gt;
*Hughes Hall&lt;br /&gt;
*Jesus College&lt;br /&gt;
*Lucy Cavendish College&lt;br /&gt;
*Kings College&lt;br /&gt;
*Magdalen College&lt;br /&gt;
*New College&lt;br /&gt;
*Newham College&lt;br /&gt;
*Peterhouse College&lt;br /&gt;
*Queens College&lt;br /&gt;
*Robinson College&lt;br /&gt;
*St Catherine's College&lt;br /&gt;
*St Edmund College&lt;br /&gt;
*St John's College&lt;br /&gt;
*Selwyn College&lt;br /&gt;
*Sydney Sussex College&lt;br /&gt;
*Trinity College&lt;br /&gt;
*Trinity Hall&lt;br /&gt;
*Wolfson College&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cam.ac.uk University of Cambridge]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Universities]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Balloon_flies&amp;diff=465418</id>
		<title>Balloon flies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Balloon_flies&amp;diff=465418"/>
		<updated>2008-06-03T12:06:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Change intro, bias&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Balloon flies''' are members of the species ''Hilara'', who have been designed with a complex [[mating ritual]] involving the giving of a large white balloon as a [[gift]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many species, [[female]]s will only mate with [[male]]s who come to them bearing gifts. Males who don't deliver the goods are rejected, and males bearing small gifts may only be given a short time in which to [[copulate]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of balloon flies, the male offers the female a large white balloon. Original research was carried out on this by Kessel in 1955&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kessel, E. L. 1955. The Mating Habits of Balloon Flies. (Diptera: Empididae). Syst. Zool. 4: 97-104.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like many [[evolution]]ary sequences, this ritual seems to have become more complex over evolutionary time. Other species of the same family of dance flies, the ''Empiidae'', to which the balloon family belongs, display mating behaviours that seem to point in the direction of the behaviour shown by the balloon fly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some [[species]] mate in a haphazard manner – males approach females, who sometimes mistake them for [[prey]] rather than potential mates and eat them – the ‘pick her up in the pub and risk getting your face slapped’ approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other species avoid this hazard by distracting the female by offering her a prey item and then mating with her while she is consuming her meal – the ‘take a bottle of wine to her house while she cooks you dinner’ approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some members of the species ''Hilara'' wrap the prey item in [[silk]]en threads in order to subdue it before presenting it to the female – the ‘take her out for a slap-up meal’ approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More advanced members of the species ''Hilara'' create a complex silken balloon that is either empty or contains a piece of vegetation - the balloon itself becoming more important as a signal of courtship – the ‘give her expensive gifts’ approach (because the creation of the silken balloons takes it out of the male balloon fly, reproductively speaking, as it consumes a lot of energy). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Males can lose a lot of their mass in producing these gifts. Thus the presentation of the silk balloon is the reproductive equivalent of the ‘max out your credit card on her’ approach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The balloon fly species ''Hilara sartor'' feeds on nectar, so the actual presentation of prey would be no use to the female. However, as a culmination of this sequence of evolutionary events, the presentation of the carefully woven (but empty) balloon is a species recognition cue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.holycross.edu/departments/biology/whealy/notes_text/c.text&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au/PSY_324/week_10/outline.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The University of Winnipeg's website makes a very good analogy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The ritual has evolved into bringing something that was once associated with food. It is as if, over evolutionary time, a suitor wooed a lady with diamonds, then with a box containing diamonds and finally with an empty box.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insects]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Time&amp;diff=462561</id>
		<title>Time</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Time&amp;diff=462561"/>
		<updated>2008-05-29T11:15:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: View of relativity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''For the news magazine, see [[Time Magazine]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Time''' is an abstract concept of measuring the sequence of events within the universe. It is the fourth known dimension of reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German physicist [[Albert Einstein]] believed that time was intrinsicly linked with space, although recent research may call this into question. See [[Theory_of_relativity#Ostensible_Paradoxes]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In legal proceedings, court rules specify how time is calculated for determining deadlines.  The [[Federal Rules of Civil Procedure]], for example, has a separate Rule 6 entitled &amp;quot;'''Time'''&amp;quot;.  As of 2008 it specifies that holidays and weekends are included in calculating time periods for deadlines unless the period &amp;quot;prescribed or allowed is less than 11 days.&amp;quot;  When the deadline falls on a weekend or holiday or day in which the office of the clerk is inaccessible due to &amp;quot;weather or other conditions,&amp;quot; then the deadline is the next day not aforementioned.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chronology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legal Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Genetic_code&amp;diff=461929</id>
		<title>Genetic code</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Genetic_code&amp;diff=461929"/>
		<updated>2008-05-28T12:34:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Genetic code''' is the instructions in a gene that tell the [[cell]] how to make a specific protein. A, T, G, and C are the &amp;quot;letters&amp;quot; of the [[DNA]] code; they stand for the chemicals [[adenine]], [[thymine]], [[guanine]], and [[cytosine]], respectively, that make up the nucleotide bases of DNA. Each gene's code combines the four chemicals in various ways to spell out 3-letter &amp;quot;words&amp;quot; that specify which amino acid is needed at every step in making a protein. The genetic code is identical in every organism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.genome.gov/glossary.cfm?key=genetic%20code%20%28ATGC%29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Genetics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Interbreed&amp;diff=461924</id>
		<title>Interbreed</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Interbreed&amp;diff=461924"/>
		<updated>2008-05-28T12:26:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: More on other groups&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Interbreeding ''' occurs when two nonhuman animals, or plants of two different species produce offspring.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition: [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/interbreeding&amp;quot;Interbreeding&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Examples of these offspring include common animals such as the [[mule]] and more obscure animals like the [[wholphin]]. Interbreeding is not possible in other kingdoms of life.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:genetics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tony_Blair&amp;diff=461288</id>
		<title>Tony Blair</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tony_Blair&amp;diff=461288"/>
		<updated>2008-05-27T13:21:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Rv. Liberal opinion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Tblair.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=73&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=May 2 1997&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=June 24 2007&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=John Major&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Labour Party&lt;br /&gt;
|next=Gordon Brown&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=May 6 1953&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Edinburgh&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Cherie Blair|Cherie Booth]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2=&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tony Blair''', full name '''Anthony Charles Lynton Blair''' (born May 6, 1953) is a former [[Prime Minister]] of the [[United Kingdom]] who preceded [[Gordon Brown]] and succeeded [[John Major]]. The [[Labour Party]]'s longest-serving Prime Minister, he served from May 2, 1997 to June 27, 2007. Blair is also the only person to have led the Labour Party to three consecutive general election victories, and the only Labour Prime Minister to serve more than one full consecutive term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was elected to the Labour Party leadership in 1994 following the unexpected death of his predecessor, John Smith. As well as being leader of the Labour Party and Prime Minister, Blair also served as the [[MP]] for Sedgefield, a constituency in [[County Durham]] in North East England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Labour Party is a self-described &amp;quot;democratic [[socialist]] party&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.labour.org.uk/index.php?id=labourdemocracy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Blair coined the phrase &amp;quot;[[New Labour]]&amp;quot; to distinguish his own pro-[[business]] policies from the more [[collectivist]] platform of his predecessors. He also used the phrase &amp;quot;[[The Third Way]]&amp;quot;. He was criticized by some more left-wing members of the Labour Party for &amp;quot;selling out&amp;quot; to conservative thinking, particularly in his support for the [[United States]] in the [[Iraq War]]. On the other hand, Blair's policies were decidedly [[liberal]] by American standards: they have included increases in taxation, increases in government spending (particularly on public schools and Britain's [[National Health Service|socialized healthcare system]]), the introduction of an increased minimum wage, and support for the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page4.asp] The son of a barrister and lecturer Leo Blair, Tony Blair was born in [[Edinburgh]], but spent most of his childhood in Durham. At the age of 14 he returned to Edinburgh to finish his education at Fettes College. Blair was known as a cheeky, rebellious, and argumentative schoolboy, and at 17 he was threatened with expulsion for persistently breaking school rules.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6506365.stm BBC News | UK | UK Politics | The Tony Blair Story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. After leaving Fettes with three A levels he studied law at [[Oxford University]], and went on to become a barrister (Lincoln's Inn) himself, before entering politics. Blair married his wife, Cherie Booth QC a barrister and daughter of the actor Tony Booth, in 1980, and they have four children. Cherie hails from [[Liverpool]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blair is a competent guitar player and at university was a member of a rock band called Ugly Rumours. His favourite music includes [[The Beatles]], [[The Rolling Stones]], [[Led Zeppelin]], [[Free (band)|Free]], [[Bruce Springsteen]], [[U2]], [[Coldplay]], [[The Foo Fighters]], and [[Simply Red]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Blair rarely discusses his religious faith in public, he is a convinced Christian&amp;lt;!--This needs to be examined: I think that he was criticized more because he often acted hypocritically, choosing to portray himself as a religios man only when it suited his political diary. , a fact for which he is often criticised or mocked by British commentators--&amp;gt;. His wife Cherie is a Catholic and Blair converted to Catholicism in 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7157409.stm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blair's political career==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A combination of the Labour Party's new-found moderation, Blair's personal popularity and the deep unpopularity of the Conservatives under [[John Major]] resulted in a landslide victory for Blair and his party in the 1997 general [[election]], ending 18 years of [[Conservative]] government. Labour easily won re-election in 2001 and in 2005, although with losses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blair became the first active prime minister to be interviewed in a police investigation, in December 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/6292033.stm BBC NEWS | UK | Scotland | Honours police quizzed McConnell]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and again in January 2007&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6320399.stm BBC NEWS | Politics | Blair interviewed again by police]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, over allegations he had illegally ''nominated'' donors to the Labour Party for peerages - the so called &amp;quot;Cash for Honours&amp;quot; scandal. The government stressed that he was being interviewed only as a witness however, and the nominations of the money lenders were rejected by the independent appointments' commission.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; However the allegations were a popular story in the media, and dogged his final months in office.&lt;br /&gt;
Tony Blair was superseded by [[Gordon Brown]] as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blair's policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Blair's tenure as Prime Minister, the [[Labour party|Labour]] government made the Bank of England independent, allowing them to set the nation's interest rates (which had previously been set by the Chancellor of the Exchequer), and has introduced a national [[minimum wage]], in 1998, which has gradually been increased over time. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have gained their own legislatures, and limited attempts have been made to devolve power to the regions of England (although these have not been successful). Blair's government has also banned fox-hunting and cigarette smoking in public places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most controversial aspects of Blair's premiership was been his commitment to and support of the Iraq war, which strongly divided opinion, both in Parliament and among the British people.  His strong support of America and President [[George W. Bush]] in particular have set him apart from most European leaders, especially with the parties of the left (including his own Labour Party). This came at considerable political cost with his own popularity suffering greatly, and the Government lost considerable support in the 2005 general election as a result.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blair and the media==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s in particular, Blair was seen as a charismatic leader, with formidable media performing skills. His most famous television appearance was his tribute to [[Diana, Princess of Wales]] on the morning after her death in August 1997, in which he described her as &amp;quot;the People's Princess&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the Queen of Hearts&amp;quot;. Blair has, however, acquired a reputation for excessive news management, and even for dishonesty, particularly after the Iraq War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is also the only Prime Minister to provide his own voice in an episode of ''[[The Simpsons]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[British politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Labour Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Blair, Tony}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Prime Ministers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beetle&amp;diff=449390</id>
		<title>Beetle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beetle&amp;diff=449390"/>
		<updated>2008-05-08T11:46:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: reword&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''beetle''' is an [[insect]] in the order ''Coleoptera'' (the largest order in the animal kingdom). This order is characterized by forewings that designed as hardened covers over a second pair of functional wings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beetles can be found in nearly all environments except conditions of extreme cold such as [[Antarctica]] and at great heights. There are fewer beetle species in temperate zones than in the tropics. Beetle sizes range from less than 0.04 inches (1 mm) long to over 8 inches (20 cm). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beetles can be helpful or destructive to man. Without dung beetles, some parts of the world would be buried in animal excrement. Beetles help to break down decayed matter. Some beetles are predators of insect pests, such as the Chrysomelid beetles. Some are destructive of crops and timber. Predators of beetles include other insects, bats, birds, reptiles and amphibians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2007 atheistic based study of beetle DNA and fossils, beetles first appeared 300 million years ago, long before the dinosaurs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20071226/sc_livescience/modernbeetlespredatedinosaurs Modern Beetles Predate Dinosaurs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beetles in the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over half of all described species are insects. Of these, approximately 300,000 are beetles. This led biologist J. B. S. Haldane to remark that God has &amp;quot;an inordinate fondness for beetles.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; 11:22 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the '''beetle''' after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also 23 references to 'creeping things', 21 in the Old Testament and 2 in the New Testament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insects]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=449387</id>
		<title>Moon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=449387"/>
		<updated>2008-05-08T11:44:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Intro look a little sparse, add a sentence on view from Earth and phases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Planet|image=Moon2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=The Moon one week after [[full moon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|primary=Earth&lt;br /&gt;
|periapsis=363,300 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html Moon Fact Sheet],&amp;quot; [[NASA]], April 19, 2007. Accessed May 3, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|apoapsis=405,500 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|semimajor=384,400 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?sat_elem Planetary Satellite Mean Orbital Parameters].&amp;quot; [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory|JPL]], [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|NASA]]. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|orbitradius=378,000 km&lt;br /&gt;
|eccentricity=0.0549&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sidereal=27.3217 da&lt;br /&gt;
|synodic=29.530588 da&lt;br /&gt;
|orbitspeed=1.023 km/s&lt;br /&gt;
|inclination=18.28°&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|siderealday=27.3217 da&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdorbit/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|solarday=29.530588 da&lt;br /&gt;
|mass=7.35 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (1.23% earth)&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|density=3350 kg/m³&amp;lt;ref name=ssdphys&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?sat_phys_par Planetary Satellite Physical Parameters].&amp;quot; [[Jet Propulsion Laboratory|JPL]], [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration|NASA]]. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacegrav=1.62 m/s² (0.165 ''g'')&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|escapespeed=2.38 km/s&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|meanradius=1737.1 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=ssdphys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|equatorradius =1738.1 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|polarradius =1736.0 km&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|surfacearea=37,919,000 km² (7.434% earth)&lt;br /&gt;
|mintemp=100 K&lt;br /&gt;
|meantemp=250 K&lt;br /&gt;
|maxtemp=400 K&lt;br /&gt;
|albedo=0.12&amp;lt;ref name=moonfact/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|pmdm=1.3 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys&amp;gt;Humphreys, D. R. &amp;quot;[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields].&amp;quot; ''Creation Research Society Quarterly'' 21(3), December 1984. Accessed April 29, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|cmdm=1.73 * 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;22&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; N-m/T&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mdt=364 a&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|mhl=252.3 a&amp;lt;ref name=calc&amp;gt;Calculated&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}The '''Moon''' is a natural [[satellite]] orbiting the [[Earth]] at an average distance of about 238,000 miles (380,000 km). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most planets in the [[solar system]], [[Earth]] has only one moon. To those on Earth the Moon appears as a pale disc which goes through phases caused by the Earth's shadow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Moon as God's creation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Earth's moon has several striking characteristics. To many, these characteristics appear as &amp;quot;clues&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;hints&amp;quot; left by God for men to discover. [http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/gem-projects/hm/0102-1-phase/CALENDARS.htm]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Size of its disc===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon appears to have the same size as the [[Sun]] when viewed from Earth.  This creates a unique symmetry and phenomenal solar eclipses.  The odds of this occurring by chance are nearly zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rotation and revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon presents the same side to [[Earth]] at all times.  That means that the rotation of the Earth offsets the separate effects of the revolution of the Moon. Physical explanations rely on [[tidal locking]], asserting that tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby creating a drag on the rotation of the Moon until its same face always presents to the Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The same theory suggested that the planet [[Mercury]] had a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. In fact, that is false.  [[Mercury]]'s tidal locking is incomplete and it does not always present the same face to the sun.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, current tidal forces exerted by the [[Earth]] on the Moon cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM Chapter 8, Section 3: The Rotation of the Moon],&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Astronomy Today&amp;quot;, Department of Physics, Fort Lewis College, Durango, [[Colorado|CO]]. Accessed February 18, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Origin theories===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheistic]] theories of the [[origin of the Moon]], widely taught for decades despite lacking the falsifiability requirement of science (see [[Philosophy of science]]), have been proven false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lacking any other [[atheistic]] alternatives, some scientists assert that the Moon originated from a collision early in Earth's history which created an orbiting ring of debris from the [[iron]]-poor surface of the planet which eventually coalesced into the moon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;amp;id=2198&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This theory, however, is contrary to key observations of the Moon, such as the relatively low levels of [[iron]] in the Moon's crust. Additional tests fail to support the [[atheistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. H. Jones: [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf Tests of the Giant Impact Hypothesis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Biblical history records the Moon being created on the fourth day of [[creation week]], along with the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rate of recession===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon currently recedes from the Earth at a rate of 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) per year&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA [http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html Measuring the Moon's Distance], LPI Bulletin, No. 72, August, 1994.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is believed by mainstream scientists to be 4.6 billion years old &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA, [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-15-2.html Apollo Expeditions to the Moon], Chapter 15.2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The Moon could never have been closer than about 11,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/764/ The moon: the light that rules the night], ''Creation'' 20(4):36–39, September 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If the rate of recession stayed constant at 3.8 cm per year, it would take 9.6 billion years for the lunar distance to migrate from 11,000 miles to the present distance of about 240,000 miles.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;However, the rate of recession would not have been constant, but would have been greater in the past, so that extrapolating backwards in time results in the moon being in contact with the earth 1.37 billion years ago,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; seemingly (if the assumptions stated above are correct) contradicting the view of an [[Old Earth]] promoted by [[atheists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Impact Craters===&lt;br /&gt;
Uniformitarian astronomers assume that crater impacts are a reliable indicator of the age of a celestial body. True to the form and principles of [[uniformitarianism]] (as applied to [[astronomy]] rather than to [[geology]]), any such estimation relies upon uniform constants and weather/erosion trends. Recent research into crater impacts on the moon suggests that many of the assumptions previously made are unwarranted. Bonnie Buratti of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has asserted that space weathering &amp;quot;takes place very rapidly on the Moon.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David, Leonard. &amp;quot;[http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/lunar_impact_021214.html Lunar Crash of 1953: Impact Crater Identified].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;http://www.space.com&amp;gt;, December 14, 2002. Accessed January 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario insists that there is no absolute criteria for the dating of craters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hecht, Jeff. &amp;quot;[http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn3242 New crater revives Moon mystery].&amp;quot; &amp;lt;http://www.newscientist.com&amp;gt;, January 11, 2003. Accessed January 16, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Danny Faulkner of the [[Institute for Creation Research]] has observed that many of the lunar maria contain ''ghost craters'', or craters that the lava flow that produced the maria seem to have filled only partially. In the [[deep time]] scale required by [[uniformitarianism]], the ghost craters are the result of impacts that occurred as much as half a gigayear before the crust-fracturing impacts that caused the lava flows.&amp;lt;ref name=Henderson&amp;gt;Henderson, Thomas H. &amp;quot;[http://www.hal-pc.org/~tom/HeavyCratering.html Do heavily cratered planets and moons demand an old age for the solar system]?&amp;quot; ''Tom Henderson's Creation Resources'', July 25, 2003. Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is not a reasonable assumption, because any impact strong enough to crack the crust should have obliterated any craters previously extant. Faulkner thus concludes that the impacts that formed the ghost craters, and those that let loose the lava flows that formed the maria, occurred within days of one another&amp;lt;ref name=Faulkner1&amp;gt;Faulkner, Danny. &amp;quot;[http://www.icr.org/research/index/researchp_df_r01/ The Current State of Creation Astronomy].&amp;quot; ''Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creationism,'' Creation Science Fellowship, Pittsburgh, pp. 201–216, August 3-8, 1998. Hosted at ''[[Institute for Creation Research]].'' Accessed March 25, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and were probably part of at least one system-wide catastrophe involving a narrow stream of meteoroids and/or comets that delivered a concentrated bombardment of the Earth and Moon in a short interval.&amp;lt;ref name=Faulkner2&amp;gt;Faulkner, Danny. &amp;quot;[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1637 A Biblically-based cratering theory].&amp;quot; ''Technical Journal'' (now ''Journal of Creation''), 13(1):100-104, April 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faulkner assumes that this system-wide catastrophe occurred during the year of the [[Great Flood]]. But in 1984, Russell Humphreys, then at the Sandia National Laboratories, developed evidence suggesting different dates entirely. Specifically, the [[Project Apollo]] exploration teams brought back many samples of [[basalt]] (an [[igneous rock]]) and [[brecchia]] (pulverized meteor-impact remains). Geologists analyzed both types of samples and found evidence that each type of rock had once been in a magnetic field far more powerful than that which the Moon has today. Using his model for the creation and decay of magnetic fields&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys/&amp;gt;, Humphreys determined that the basalt had been laid down about 370 years after creation, and the brecchia had been laid down 1840 years after creation, or about 190 years after the Flood.&amp;lt;ref name=Humphreys2&amp;gt;Humphreys reasoned that the higher the magnetic dipole moment of the samples, the earlier in lunar history they were formed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These findings clearly suggest that the Moon, and presumably all other bodies in the solar system, have been subject to two separate system-wide bombardments, one occurring in the second or third generation after the [[fall of man]] and the other occurring well after the Flood.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tides==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravitational force of the Moon causes the ocean [[tides]]; these tidal forces have other effects as well. These tidal forces have the effect of creating resistance which slows down the rotation of both objects. In the case of the Earth, the result is that the Earth's rotation slows on the order of one millisecond per century. The Moon's rotation is locked in to its period of revolution, and the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The &amp;quot;dark&amp;quot; or far side==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;the ''dark'' side of the Moon&amp;quot; is inaccurate because the Moon does rotate relative to the Sun, with the same period as its period of revolution, once every 29 days. Our view of the Moon from the Earth always shows the same side of the Moon, with the same markings and features. When the Moon is full, the entire side that faces us is experiencing lunar &amp;quot;day&amp;quot; and is lit by the Sun. Two weeks later, when the Moon is new, the side that faces us is experiencing solar &amp;quot;night&amp;quot; and is unlit (and virtually invisible).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The far side of the moon is far more heavily cratered than the near, and the predominant type of cratering is consistent with brecchia-forming meteor impact. This would suggest that the far side suffered its bombardment in the latter of the two catastrophes that Humphreys suggests that the Moon has suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a slight &amp;quot;wobble&amp;quot; in the lunar motion called ''libration,'' we actually see a little bit more than half of the Moon's surface; sometimes it is turned a bit one way and sometimes the other. However, nobody had any idea of what the far side of the Moon looked like until 1959, when a Soviet satellite photographed it and relayed pictures back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:oldmooninnew.jpg|200px|right|thumb|The &amp;quot;old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the old Scottish ballad ''Sir Patrick Spens''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Child, Francis James (1860), ''The English and Scottish Popular Ballads,'' [http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/child/ch058.htm No. 58]; the ballad is thought to refer to an actual event of the year A.D. 1290.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a sailor cautions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I saw the new moon late yestreen&lt;br /&gt;
::With the old moon in her arm;&lt;br /&gt;
:And if we go to sea, master,&lt;br /&gt;
::I fear we'll come to harm.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Earthshine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect known as &amp;quot;the old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot; can often be seen when the Moon is a narrow [[crescent]]. Within the intensely bright crescent, a dim and mysterious view of the entire circular moon is seen. The effect is also known as ''earthshine'' because it is light from the Sun reflected off the Earth to the Moon and back that lights up the darker portion of the Moon. The bright crescent is lit by the Sun and is in full daylight. The rest of the Moon is not lit by the Sun; but an [[astronaut]] standing in this area would see a &amp;quot;full Earth&amp;quot; dominating the nighttime sky, lighting it up by its earthshine. The brightness of Earthshine, and hence the visibility of the old Moon in the new Moon's arms, varies. When the Earth is covered with clouds, or when there is a lot of snow-pack on the side of the Earth facing the Moon, the Earth is a white and bright and the Earthshine is intense. When the Earth looks like a &amp;quot;big, blue marble,&amp;quot; it is less intense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lunar calendars==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, many calendar systems have been based on the phases of the moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The months of the [[Islam|Muslim]] [[calendar]] are determined by observations of the [[hilal]], the moment at which the thin crescent moon first becomes visible. This marks the start of a month. Traditionally, and today in [[Pakistan]] and [[Jordan]], hilal is determined by actual observation and can be affected by weather and other factors. When following the traditional method, it is not actually possible to be certain precisely when future months will begin. In most Muslim countries, actual observation has been replaced by [[astronomy|astronomical]] rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The moon in culture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Old Moon in the New Moon's Arms&amp;quot; is the title of a poem by [[Ella Wheeler Wilcox]], in which she interprets the effect as the New Moon wishing that her lost love, the Old Moon, be in her arms one last time; Venus grants the wish, and:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swift thro' the vapors and the golden mist&amp;amp;mdash;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::The Full Moon's shadowy shape shone on the night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The New Moon reached out clasping arms and kissed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Her phantom lover in the whole world's sight.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Moon is often described as revolving around the Earth, this is slightly inaccurate: the Earth and the Moon ''both'' revolve around their ''barycenter'', their common [[centroid|center of mass]]. This point is 1,700 below the earth's surface, which is about 1/4 of the earth's [[radius]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The radius of the Earth is 6,378 kilometers, so that means that the barycenter is located INSIDE the Earth about 1707 kilometers below its surface. [http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q665.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The combined motion is like an athlete performing an [[Olympics| Olympic]] hammer throw: one object swings in a large circle, the other almost pivots around a fixed point but actually performs a small opposing circle of its own. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Earth and the Moon orbit each other around a gravitational midpoint called the ''barycenter.'' This point is, however, actually inside the Earth, about 3/4 of its radius from its center. It is not the Earth, but the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system, that orbits the [[Sun]] in a near-perfect ellipse. Relative to this ellipse, Earth is 3,000 miles closer to the Sun at full moon and 3,000 miles further from the Sun at new moon.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When speaking of things having to do with the moon, the adjective ''lunar'' is used. The Greek-derived prefixed root ''selen-'' followed by the morpheme ''-o-'' is used as well; for example, the [[science]] of mapping the moon is called ''[[selenography]]'' (morphemes: ''selen-o-graph-y''). (Note, however, that the apsides of the orbits of the [[Project Apollo]] spacecraft were always called ''pericynthion'' and ''apocynthion'', not &amp;quot;periselene&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;aposelene.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other moons ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Many_Moons.jpg|250px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
While the Moon of [[Earth]] is the best-known satellite of any [[planet]], other planets in our solar system also have moons. Earth has the least number of moons (one), while [[Jupiter]] has sixty-two. The first extraterrestrial moons to be discovered were the four Galilean moons ([[Io]], [[Europa]], [[Ganymede]], and [[Callisto]]. Next to these, Earth's Moon is one of the largest, but Jupiter and [[Saturn]] have moons in orbit about them that might qualify as planets if they orbited the [[Sun]] instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sizes of moons ===&lt;br /&gt;
Most moons in the solar system are no larger than typical asteroids. They are of irregular shape, have light and variable surface gravities, and are often unstable in their orbits. [[Phobos]] and [[Deimos]], the moons of [[Mars]], fall into this category.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earth's own moon is an example of a [[dwarf planet]]-sized moon. These moons are so large that their own self-gravity forces them to collapse into spheres or spheroids. Some of them, like [[Ganymede]] and [[Titan (moon)|Titan]], are larger even than the planet [[Mercury]]. Earth's moon was, of course, known to the ancients, but the remaining dwarf-planet-sized moons were generally the first to be discovered in orbit around any given primary. [[Galileo Galilei]] discovered the first four of these in orbit about [[Jupiter]] early in the seventeenth century; [[Christiaan Huygens]] then discovered Titan of [[Saturn]] later in that same century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Origin of the Moon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Solarsystem}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beetle&amp;diff=430711</id>
		<title>Beetle</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Beetle&amp;diff=430711"/>
		<updated>2008-04-14T14:01:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Qualifiers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''beetle''' is an [[insect]] in the order ''Coleoptera'' (the largest order in the animal kingdom). This order is characterized by forewings that are modified into hardened covers over a second pair of functional wings. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beetles can be found in nearly all environments except conditions of extreme cold such as [[Antarctica]] and at great heights. There are fewer beetle species in temperate zones than in the tropics. Beetle sizes range from less than 0.04 inches (1 mm) long to over 8 inches (20 cm). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beetles can be helpful or destructive to man. Without dung beetles, some parts of the world would be buried in animal excrement. Beetles help to break down decayed matter. Some beetles are predators of insect pests. Some are destructive of crops and timber. Predators of beetles include other insects, bats, birds, reptiles and amphibians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2007 atheistic based study of beetle DNA and fossils, beetles first appeared 300 million years ago, long before the dinosaurs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20071226/sc_livescience/modernbeetlespredatedinosaurs Modern Beetles Predate Dinosaurs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beetles in the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over half of all described species are insects. Of these, approximately 300,000 are beetles. This led biologist J. B. S. Haldane to remark that God has &amp;quot;an inordinate fondness for beetles.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; 11:22 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the '''beetle''' after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also 23 references to 'creeping things', 21 in the Old Testament and 2 in the New Testament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insects]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&amp;diff=377264</id>
		<title>Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&amp;diff=377264"/>
		<updated>2008-01-20T18:07:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* Criticism and controversy */ Add link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed''' is a documentary by [[Ben Stein]] set for release in the spring of 2008, which alleges that those supporting [[intelligent design]] theory are suppressed and persecuted within schools, universities and the scientific community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.expelledthemovie.com/news.php Expelled the movie website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film highlights several academic disputes which, according to Stein, demonstrate that [[scientist]]s and [[educator]]s who promote intelligent design are persecuted by the scientific establishment.&amp;lt;ref name=pressrelease&amp;gt;{{cite web |author=Lesley Burbridge-Bates|publisher=[http://www.premisemedia.com/ Premise Media]|date=[[2007-08-22]] |url=http://www.premisemedia.com/EXPELLED-PressRelease_08-22-07.pdf |title=''Expelled'' [[Press Release]] |accessdate=2007-09-29 |format= |work=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Examples given by the film of those who have allegedly been persecuted for their support of intelligent design include [[Richard Sternberg]], a [[biology|biologist]] and an unpaid research associate at the National Museum of [[natural history|Natural History]], and [[Guillermo Gonzalez]], a pro-[[Intelligent design]] [[astrophysics|astrophysicist]] denied tenure at [[Iowa State University]] in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html?_r=3&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin&amp;amp;oref=slogin Scientists Feel Miscast in Film on Life's Origin], New York Times, 27 September 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the film has attracted considerable criticism and controversy, both on scientific grounds and for the methods used in its making.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Claims portrayed in the film==&lt;br /&gt;
In the film's trailer, Stein states that there are &amp;quot;people out there who want to keep science in a little box where it can’t possibly touch God&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry have been expelled from publicly-funded high schools, universities and research institutions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The film also implies that [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s theory of evolution was responsible for the [[Holocaust]],&amp;lt;ref name=trailer&amp;gt;[http://www.expelledthemovie.com/video.php Expelled Movie trailers]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0709/S00184.htm ''Ben Stein to battle `anti-religious dogmatism`''],   [http://www.mediatransparency.org/authorprofile.php?authorID=1 Bill Berkowitz], Top Scoops, [http://www.scoop.co.nz/ Scoop Independent News], [[11 September]] [[2007]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a view which has previously been put forward by the [[Discovery Institute]], a scientific [[think tank]] which endorses intelligent design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.darwintohitler.com/ New book by Discovery Institute Fellow shows influence of Darwinian principles on Hitler's Nazi regime], [[Discovery Institute]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism and controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
A number of members of the scientific community have criticized the film for portraying intelligent design as an alternative scientific theory to evolution; they claim that intelligent design lacks scientific credibility and is a form of [[creationism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.hnn.us/articles/45776.html Is the Theory of Evolution Really a Matter of Faith?], Leonard and Charles Steinhorn, George Mason University, 31 December 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=IDiscreationism&amp;gt;&amp;quot;for most members of the mainstream scientific community, ID is not a scientific theory, but a [[creationist]] [[pseudoscience]].&amp;quot; ([http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~hsr/fall2005/mu.pdf ''Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design''], David Mu, [http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~hsr/ Harvard Science Review], Volume 19, Issue 1, Autumn 2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They highlight the fact that a large majority of scientists endorse evolution.&amp;lt;ref name=NIHrecord&amp;gt; [http://nihrecord.od.nih.gov/pdfs/2006/07282006Record.pdf ''Finding the Evolution in Medicine''], Cynthia Delgado, [[National Institutes of Health]],  July 28, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, advocates of intelligent design argue that it is a legitimate scientific theory and is distinct from the concept of [[creationism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the scientists interviewed in the film, notably [[Richard Dawkins]], claim that they were deceived as to the film's purpose and title, and would not have agreed to participate in it had they known of its pro-intelligent design message.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; See [[Liberal deceit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creation-evolution controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5007508 Intelligent Design and Academic Freedom] by Barbara Bradley Hagerty at NPR.com&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Movies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinesh_D%27Souza&amp;diff=372605</id>
		<title>Dinesh D'Souza</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinesh_D%27Souza&amp;diff=372605"/>
		<updated>2008-01-16T16:16:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Currect activities&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Dinesh D'Souza''' (b. 1961) is a [[conservative]] scholar, author, blogger and [[commentator]].  In college he was a prominent writer with the [[conservative]] ''The Dartmouth Review'', and he continues to speak and debate at college campuses.  In 2007 he is a fellow at the [[Hoover Institute]] at [[Stanford University]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Christian]] [[immigrant]] from [[India]] who wrote a book entitled &amp;quot;What's So Great About Christianity,&amp;quot; D'Souza wrote a piece entitled &amp;quot;Thank God for America&amp;quot; on his blog on November 21, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/bloggers/dinesh-dsouza&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today he is mostly involved with exposing the contradictions and hypocrisy of [[atheists]], and the censorship of Christian leadership in the modern world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=372127</id>
		<title>Gun control</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=372127"/>
		<updated>2008-01-15T22:21:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* The Fallacy and Motivation for Gun Control */ This was a direct result&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Gun control''' laws restrict the purchase or ownership of guns and often involve the recall of guns by law-abiding citizens.  Gun control is unique among social programs in increasing the emotional and physical dependency of ''all'' voters on government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control is a denial by [[government]]s of the right to armed [[self-defense]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In contrast to most other weaponry, firearms are preeminently defensive in effect.&amp;quot; [http://ls.wustl.edu/WULQ/75-3/753-4.html Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents use the discredited - but superficially appealing - claim that fewer lawfully-owned guns leads to less crime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gun control primarily restricts the lawful acquisition and use of guns.  Over 99% of the guns restricted by most gun control regulation are used in a lawful manner.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Because gun control increases the dependence of voters on government, its political effect is to shift the electorate leftward and its primary supporters are leftists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/quotes/repeal.html Quotes of Leftists Demanding Gun Control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In [[England]], which already has the strictest gun control in Europe, [[leftists]] demand control over 120,000 ''deactivated'' guns, even though their activation and use constitute only 0.04% of all gun offenses there. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article3168607.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Fallacy and Motivation for Gun Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control potentially causes an increase in crime by restricting its main deterrent: [[self-defense]].  In the United States, law-abiding uses of guns outnumber criminal uses by at least a factor of 100 to 1,&amp;lt;!-- Fill in cite here about percentage of guns used for unlawful purposes. --&amp;gt; and the removal of guns from everyone eliminates the lawful use of self-defense and its deterrent effect.  &amp;quot;[[Americans]] use firearms to defend themselves from criminals at least 764,000 times a year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;This figure is the lowest among a group of 9 nationwide surveys done by organizations including Gallup and the Los Angeles Times.&amp;quot; (Just Facts - [http://www.justfacts.com/guncontrol.asp Gun Control])&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;In 1982, a survey of imprisoned criminals found that 34% of them had been &amp;quot;scared off, shot at, wounded or captured by an armed victim.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; When [[Florida]] began allowing its citizens to carry a concealed weapon, [[Florida]]'s firearm homicide rate fell by 37% while the national average ''increased'' by 15%.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Gallup_LAT&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  As explained below, the political effect of gun control is to cause voters to become more dependent emotionally on government and more supportive of bigger government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies by [[John Lott]] and others indicate that gun control causes higher crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnrlott.com/ John Lott's Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Washington, D.C.]] has one of the highest crime rates in [[America]] even though it completely bans private handguns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm District of Columbia Crime Rates 1960 - 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;Switzerland, Israel, Denmark and Finland, all of whom have a higher gun ownership rate than America, all have lower crime rates than America, in fact, their crime rates are among the lowest in the Western World.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Slashdoc - [http://www.slashdoc.com/documents/71244 gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Lott demonstrates that in [[Britain]], [[Australia]] and [[Canada]], increased gun control in the late 1990s led to increased crime, the exact opposite of what the proponents of the gun control promised.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John R. Lott Jr. and Eli Lehrer - [http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/IBDGunConFailure.html Add Gun Control To Litany Of Misbegotten Gov't Plans]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  States in the [[U.S.]] that have enacted concealed-carry laws enjoy lower crime rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4706 Cato report]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:Robbery victims per 100K.png|300px|thumb|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Source data:  Australian Bureau of Statistics&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Australia]], where gun ownership was less widespread and the gun control measures were less strict, there was an immediate increase in robbery and armed robbery after the gun control went into effect in 1996 (see chart at right).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gun control passed in Australia because &amp;quot;public was immediately whipped into a gun control frenzy by the press&amp;quot; after the &amp;quot;Port Arthur massacre&amp;quot; in Tasmania on April 28, 1996, in which 32 were shot dead and 19 injured.  &amp;quot;Although polls done prior to the massacre indicated that the public was satisfied with the amount of 'gun control' they already had, a major newspaper did a poll just a few days after the massacre (while all minds were &amp;quot;clear&amp;quot;) and, not surprisingly, found high levels of support for extreme gun control measures.  This poll would be used forever by the commonwealth government and other gun controllers to claim that Australians supported the new gun laws to come.&amp;quot; - [http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html Gun Control in Australia] (by gunsandcrime.org)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
There is no clear evidence supporting a decrease in crime from gun control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Results&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gunsandcrime.org/auresult.html Results of the Australian Gun &amp;quot;Buyback&amp;quot; &amp;amp; New Gun Laws], October 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bjc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/azl084v1 Study showing lack of promised benefits from gun control]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequent to gun control in England:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;from 1997 to 2001, the rate of violent crime more than doubled. Your chances of being mugged in London are now [as of 2002] six times greater than in New York. England's rates of assault, robbery, and burglary are far higher than America's, and 53 percent of English burglaries occur while occupants are at home, compared with 13 percent in the U.S., where burglars admit to fearing armed homeowners more than the police. In a United Nations study of crime in 18 developed nations published in July, England and Wales led the Western world's crime league, with nearly 55 crimes per 100 people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;However this increase in recorded violent crime between 1997 and 2001 is explained by the Home Office as a result of changes in the definition of violent crime and new counting rules introduced in 1998. [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr1804.pdf Violent Crime in England and Wales] According to the British Crime Survey, which is considered a more reliable guide to trends in crime[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/crime-statistics-independent-review-06.pdf], violent crime fell 24% between 1997 and 2001/02, and burglary fell 40% over the same period.[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hosb1105tab201.xls Trends in BCS incidents of crime]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control in [[Britain]] and [[Australia]] has been followed by a predictable shift to the left politically by voters as they lost their instrument of self-defense and became more emotionally dependent on government.  In [[Britain]], for example, the enactment of a ban on most handguns in February 1997&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;As in Australia, gun control passed in [[Britain]] based on a highly publicized but isolated and statistically insignificant act of violence.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; directly resulted in the [[Labour Party]] winning a landslide 179 seat majority in the general election later that year, the first time it exceeded 40% of the popular vote in over 25 years. The new government soon extended the ban to cover nearly all handguns, and the [[Labour Party]] has remained in power in [[Britain]] for over a decade.  In [[Australia]],the passage of gun control in 1996 and its expansion in 2002 has led to a complete takeover of all nine federal, state and territory legislatures by the Labor Party, the first time a single party has ever achieved this in Australian history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sydney Morning Herald - [http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/either-way-its-history-in-the-making/2007/11/23/1195753310949.html Either way, it's history in the making]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) - [http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/ 2007 Federal Election]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Contrast that with the [[United States]], where an effort to push gun control after the [[Columbine massacre]] failed in 2000 and the government has remained as [[conservative]] -- if not more so -- ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emasculation of the citizenry by gun control also arguably reduces the resistance of a society to intimidation, and exacerbates fear of consequences from causing offense. Subsequent to the passage of strict gun control in [[England]] some teachers have avoided teaching controversial subjects such as the [[Holocaust]], the Arab-Israeli conflict and the [[Crusades]] during history classes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RW100.pdf Teaching Emotive and Controversial History 3-19] (p.15)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trends ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After decades of increasing gun control laws, the current trend in the [[United States]] is in the direction of more gun rights.  The 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill included a ban on certain new rifles labeled assault rifles solely because of features of their appearance, and on new high-capacity magazines.  This law recently expired and was not renewed by [[Congress]].  Also, Washington D.C.'s gun ban was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/09/washington/09cnd-gun.html?hp Appeals Court Says Gun Ban Violates 2nd Amendment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Washington Post - [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030902416.html D.C.'s Ban On Handguns In Homes Is Thrown Out]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By removing the deterrent effect of guns, gun control causes dramatic increases in crimes committed with other weapons:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2656875.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are now six times more likely to be mugged in [[London]] than [[New York]]. Why? Because as common law appreciated, not only does an armed individual have the ability to protect himself or herself but criminals are less likely to attack them. They help keep the peace. A study found American burglars fear armed home-owners more than the police. As a result burglaries are much rarer and only 13% occur when people are at home, in contrast to 53% in England.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of gun control argue that homicide with guns is much less in [[England]] than in the [[United States]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 2005/06, the total number of victims of homicide by shooting (including crossbows) in England and Wales was 50 and there were 212 victims of homicide by sharp instruments. [Home Office Statistical Bulletin - [http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosb0207.pdf Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2005/2006][http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/hosb0104.pdf]  The data for gun deaths in the United States include guns used in self-defense, as in fending off an assault, robbery or rape, and there were a total of 11,350 gun deaths (including deaths of criminals) in 2005.[US Department of Justice, FBI - [http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1986 - 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that was true even before gun control and is likely due to cultural reasons.  &amp;quot;A study comparing New York and London over 200 years found the New York homicide rate consistently five times the London rate, although for most of that period residents of both cities had unrestricted access to firearms.  When guns were available in England they were seldom used in crime. A government study for 1890-1892 found an average of one handgun homicide a year in a population of 30 million.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2656875.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control laws are often seen to conflict with the [[Second Amendment]] to the [[United States Constitution]], which recognizes the right to bear arms.  The Second Amendment reads: &amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right to keep and bear arms&amp;quot; is a right guaranteed to the American citizen by the Bill of Rights through the virtue of a selective reading of said Bill. The phrase &amp;quot;a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state&amp;quot; precedes the statement, and most federal Courts of Appeals have held that this phrase requires that the &amp;quot;right to bear arms&amp;quot; relates to the collective rights of state militias, as opposed to the individual's rights to have any weapon desired.  Just recently, the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit went against nine other circuits in holding that the Second Amendment constitutes an individual right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The New York Times - [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/washington/10gun.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin Court Rejects Strict Gun Law as Unconstitutional]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FOX News - [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258067,00.html Appeals Court Strikes Down Washington, D.C. Handgun Ban]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gun control&amp;quot; can include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting which persons can own firearms.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on the number of firearms a person may own, or purchase during a given time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Requirements that privately owned firearms be registered with the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bans on certain types of firearms; for example, &amp;quot;handguns&amp;quot; or assault rifles&lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on where firearms may be carried, for example into restaurants or post offices&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring a &amp;quot;background check&amp;quot; and/or a &amp;quot;waiting period&amp;quot; to purchase a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting when and where firearms may be bought and sold, for example banning their sale through the mail&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring licenses or some other form of permission from the government to buy and/or sell a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring some form of permission from the government to carry a firearm in public, either concealed or openly&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws granting special gun rights for some people, for example retired law enforcement officers, which are denied the rest of the public, which was used in several southern states.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on carrying firearms in public&lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on private possession of firearms, though this has never occurred in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States the three primary federal gun control laws are:&lt;br /&gt;
* National Firearms Act (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Gun Control Act (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Brady Bill (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These laws have further been amended by other laws such as the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986) and the Omnibus Crime Bill (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constitutional Debate==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Second Amendment]] reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most constitutional scholars agree that since the amendment refers to &amp;quot;the right of the People&amp;quot; instead of the right of the militia, it protects an individual right to own guns. The extent of that right has been debated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Racism of gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States of America]], gun control has a strong racist origin and reasoning. Before the Civil War ended, State &amp;quot;Slave Codes&amp;quot; prohibited slaves from owning guns. After President [[Abraham Lincoln]] issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, and after the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishing slavery was adopted and the Civil War ended in 1865, States persisted in prohibiting blacks, now freemen, from owning guns under laws renamed &amp;quot;Black Codes.&amp;quot; They did so on the basis that blacks were not citizens, and thus did not have the same rights, including the right to keep and bear arms protected in the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as whites. This view was specifically articulated by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in its infamous 1857 decision in ''Dred Scott v. Sandford'' to uphold slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States Congress overrode most portions of the Black Codes by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The legislative histories of both the Civil Rights Act and the Fourteenth Amendment, as well as The Special Report of the Anti-Slavery Conference of 1867, are replete with denunciations of those particular statutes that denied blacks equal access to firearms. [Kates, &amp;quot;Handgun Prohibition and the Original Meaning of the Second Amendment,&amp;quot; 82 Mich. L. Rev. 204, 256 (1983)] However, facially neutral disarming through economic means laws remain in effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1878, most States turned to &amp;quot;facially neutral&amp;quot; business or transaction taxes on handgun purchases. However, the intention of these laws was not neutral. An article in Virginia's official university law review called for a &amp;quot;prohibitive tax...on the privilege&amp;quot; of selling handguns as a way of disarming &amp;quot;the son of Ham,&amp;quot; whose &amp;quot;cowardly practice of 'toting' guns has been one of the most fruitful sources of crime.... Let a negro board a railroad train with a quart of mean whiskey and a pistol in his grip and the chances are that there will be a murder, or at least a row, before he alights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Comment, Carrying Concealed Weapons, 15 Va L. Reg. 391, 391-92 (1909); George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (GMU CR LJ), Vol. 2, No. 1, &amp;quot;Gun Control and Racism,&amp;quot; Stefan Tahmassebi, 1991, p. 75.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thus, many Southern States imposed high taxes or banned inexpensive guns so as to price blacks and poor whites out of the gun market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, &amp;quot;gun control&amp;quot; laws continue to be enacted so as to have a racist effect if not intent:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Police-issued license and permit laws, unless drafted to require issuance to those not prohibited by law from owning guns, are routinely used to prevent lawful gun ownership among &amp;quot;unpopular&amp;quot; populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Public housing residents, approximately 3 million Americans, are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Gun sweeps&amp;quot; by police in &amp;quot;high crime neighborhoods&amp;quot; whereby vehicles and &amp;quot;pedestrians who meet a specific profile that might indicate they are carrying a weapon&amp;quot; are searched are becoming popular, and are being studied by the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] as &amp;quot;Operation Ceasefire.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Some U.S. cities with high minority populations, such as Washington, D.C., are singled out for gun bans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Project Exile&amp;quot; began in the U.S. city of Richmond, Virginia and mandated that people arrested for technical firearms violations (note: not for violent crimes committed with a firearm, but for technical violations of the law) be tried in federal court where they would be subject to lengthy mandatory minimum sentences rather than in state court under the more lenient Virginia laws. As with many other restrictions this was aimed primarily at the city's Black residents. It has since been copied in many other cities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun control outside the USA ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control advocates cite foreign countries to argue that gun control can reduce crime, but such comparison can be difficult due to the presence of other factors.  For example, they cite [[Singapore]] as having gun control and a lower crime rate than the [[United States]], but Singapore has less than 5 million persons and one of the highest literacy and average wealth in the world.  It lacks many of the freedoms found in the [[United States]] and strictly imposes harsh physical punishment, such as caning and the [[death penalty]], for crimes that are not punished so harshly in the [[United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control supporters also cite [[Japan]], where firearms are illegal and crime rates are relatively low.  But [[Japan]] also lacks many freedoms and diversity which exist in the [[United States]], and [[Japan]] has strong cultural deterrents to crime.  Ironically, [[Japan]] is home to [[Tokyo Marui]], the world's largest [[airsoft]] gun manufacturer, which designs airsoft guns that are made to the same scale and with the same materials as the real counterpart and which have been mistaken by police for real guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and Genocide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gun control &amp;quot;contributes to the probability of its government engaging&amp;quot; in [[genocide]], including the three worst instances in the 20th century:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[A] society's weapons policy might be one of the institutional arrangements that contributes to the probability of its government engaging in some of the more extreme varieties of outrage. ... [I]t is [] an arresting reality that not one of the principal genocides of the twentieth century, and there have been dozens, has been inflicted on a population that was armed.&amp;quot; [http://ls.wustl.edu/WULQ/75-3/753-4.html Washington University Law Quarterly]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1911, [[Turkey]] imposed gun control and then, from 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million defenseless Armenians were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1929, the [[Soviet Union]] imposed gun control and over the next 24 years about 20 million defenseless dissidents were killed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In 1938, [[Germany]] imposed gun control and then over the next seven years 13 million defenseless Jews and other victims were exterminated. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thegunzone.com/rkba/rkba-12.html The True Face of Gun Control], Dean Speir, The Gun Zone RKBA, Accessed December 26, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Nazis made only two important changes to the Weapons Law that was in place when they came to power. First, they forbade Jews from owning guns or any other weapon. Second, they exempted members of the Sturmabteilung (SA) and many Nazi party officials from the law's strictures.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Washington University Law Quarterly&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The German Firearms Act of 1937 stated &amp;quot;No civilian is to have a firearm without a permit and permits shall not be issued to persons suspected of acting against the state. ''For Jews, this permission will not be granted.'' Those people who do not require permission to carry weapons include the whole of the SS, and the SA - including the Deaths Head group, and the officers of the Hitler youth.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38d04d5c7c40.htm The Journalist's Guide to Gun Policy Scholars and Second Amendment Scholars], Professor Eugene Volokh, FreeRepublic.com, March 15, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolph Hitler said, &amp;quot;The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Volokh&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gun Control and young mass murderers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Main article: [[Young mass murderers]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strict gun control failed and still fails to prevent mass murderers from starting killing sprees while the victims are unable to defend themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare the cases of Pekka-Eric Auvinen ([[Finland]]) and Robert Steinhäuser ([[Germany]]) with the case of Matthew Murray. The latter was stopped by an armed citizen before he could harm more victims; Auvinen killed 8 people and Steinhäuser killed 16. Both Finland and Germany have gun control laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other terms==&lt;br /&gt;
Other terms sometimes used by those who are opposed to gun control include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Rights restriction&lt;br /&gt;
* Victim disarmament&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:US Armed Citizens and Crime Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org/ The National Rifle Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nrapublications.org/armed%20citizen/Index.asp Armed citizens defending themselves.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Cambridge&amp;diff=364152</id>
		<title>University of Cambridge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=University_of_Cambridge&amp;diff=364152"/>
		<updated>2008-01-04T14:42:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Down note on current town/gown interactions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''[[University]] of Cambridge''' commonly referred to as '''Cambridge University'''  or simply '''Cambridge''' is an institution of higher learning based in [[England]], and the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world. Cambridge was established in 1209 [http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/pubs/history/records.html] by scholars fleeing the hostility of the townsmen in [[Oxford]], which continues to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cambridge is a confederation of colleges, faculties and institutions[http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/pubs/works/]. The University administration is relatively small compared to the size of the University. Many functions that are normally carried out by the central university bureaucracy in other universities are carried out by the colleges. The functions of the colleges include teaching and research. Degrees are however conferred by the University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cam.ac.uk University of Cambridge]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Colleges and Universities]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:England]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=347574</id>
		<title>Moon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Moon&amp;diff=347574"/>
		<updated>2007-12-06T18:02:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Add mention of lack of falsifiability&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[image:Moon2.jpg|right|thumb|350px|The Moon one week after [[full moon]]]] &lt;br /&gt;
The '''Moon''' is a natural [[satellite]] orbiting the [[Earth]] at an average distance of about 238,000 miles (380,000 km). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most planets in the solar system, [[Earth]] has only one moon, and it has several striking characteristics:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#The Moon appears to have the same size as the [[Sun]] when viewed from Earth.  This creates a unique symmetry and phenomenal solar eclipses.  The odds of this occurring by chance are nearly zero. &lt;br /&gt;
#The Moon presents the same side to [[Earth]] at all times.  That means that the rotation of the Earth offsets the separate effects of the revolution of the Moon. [[Atheistic]] explanations rely on [[tidal locking]], suggesting that tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby creating a drag on the rotation of the Moon until its same face always presents to the Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The same theory suggested that the planet [[Mercury]] had a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. In fact, that is false.  [[Mercury]]'s tidal locking is incomplete and it does not always present the same face to the sun.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, current tidal forces exerted by the [[Earth]] on the Moon cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Atheistic]] theories of the [[origin of the Moon]], widely taught for decades despite lacking the falsifiability requirement of science (see [[Philosophy of science]]), have been proven false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Lacking any other [[atheistic]] alternatives, some scientists assert that the Moon originated from a collision early in Earth's history which created an orbiting ring of debris from the [[iron]]-poor surface of the planet which eventually coalesced into the moon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&amp;amp;id=2198&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This theory, however, is contrary to key observations of the Moon, such as the relatively low levels of [[iron]] in the Moon's crust. Additional tests fail to support the [[atheistic]] theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. H. Jones: [http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf Tests of the Giant Impact Hypothesis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Biblical history records the Moon being created on the fourth day of [[Creation Week|creation week]], along with the Sun.&lt;br /&gt;
# The Moon currently recedes from the Earth at a rate of 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) per year&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA [http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html Measuring the Moon's Distance], LPI Bulletin, No. 72, August, 1994.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and is believed by mainstream scientists to be 4.6 billion years old &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;NASA, [http://history.nasa.gov/SP-350/ch-15-2.html Apollo Expeditions to the Moon], Chapter 15.2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The Moon could never have been closer than about 11,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/764/ The moon: the light that rules the night], ''Creation'' 20(4):36–39, September 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;If the rate of recession stayed constant at 3.8 cm per year, it would take 9.6 billion years for the lunar distance to migrate from 11,000 miles to the present distance of about 240,000 miles.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;However, the rate of recession would not have been constant, but would have been greater in the past, so that extrapolating backwards in time results in the moon being in contact with the earth 1.37 billion years ago,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;js&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; seemingly (if the assumptions stated above are correct) contradicting the view of an [[Old Earth]] promoted by [[atheists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trivia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Moon is often described as revolving around the Earth, this is slightly inaccurate: the Earth and the Moon ''both'' revolve around their ''barycenter'', their common [[centroid|center of mass]]. The combined motion is like an athlete performing an [[Olympics| Olympic]] hammer throw: one object swings in a large circle, the other almost pivots around a fixed point but actually performs a small opposing circle of its own. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Earth and the Moon orbit each other around a gravitational midpoint called the ''barycenter.'' This point is, however, actually inside the Earth, about 3/4 of its radius from its center. It is not the Earth, but the barycenter of the Earth-Moon system, that orbits the [[Sun]] in a near-perfect ellipse. Relative to this ellipse, Earth is 3,000 miles closer to the Sun at full moon and 3,000 miles further from the Sun at new moon.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When speaking of things having to do with the moon, the adjective ''lunar'' is used. The Greek-derived prefixed root ''selen-'' followed by the morpheme ''-o-'' is used as well; for example, the [[science]] of mapping the moon is called ''[[selenography]]'' (morphemes: ''selen-o-graph-y'').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tides==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The gravitational force of the Moon causes the ocean [[tides]]; these tidal forces have other effects as well. These tidal forces have the effect of creating resistance which slows down the rotation of both objects. In the case of the Earth, the result is that the Earth's rotation slows on the order of one millisecond per century. The Moon's rotation is locked in to its period of revolution, and the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The &amp;quot;dark&amp;quot; or far side==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;the ''dark'' side of the Moon&amp;quot; is inaccurate because the Moon does rotate relative to the Sun, with the same period as its period of revolution, once every 29 days. Our view of the Moon from the Earth always shows the same side of the Moon, with the same markings and features. When the Moon is full, the entire side that faces us is experiencing lunar &amp;quot;day&amp;quot; and is lit by the Sun. Two weeks later, when the Moon is new, the side that faces us is experiencing solar &amp;quot;night&amp;quot; and is unlit (and virtually invisible).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a slight &amp;quot;wobble&amp;quot; in the lunar motion called ''libration,'' we actually see a little bit more than half of the Moon's surface; sometimes it is turned a bit one way and sometimes the other. However, nobody had any idea of what the far side of the Moon looked like until 1959, when a Soviet satellite photographed it and relayed pictures back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:oldmooninnew.jpg|200px|right|thumb|The &amp;quot;old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the old Scottish ballad ''Sir Patrick Spens''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Child, Francis James (1860), ''The English and Scottish Popular Ballads,'' [http://www.sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/child/ch058.htm No. 58]; the ballad is thought to refer to an actual event of the year A.D. 1290.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, a sailor cautions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I saw the new moon late yestreen&lt;br /&gt;
::With the old moon in her arm;&lt;br /&gt;
:And if we go to sea, master,&lt;br /&gt;
::I fear we'll come to harm.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Earthshine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effect known as &amp;quot;the old Moon in the new Moon's arms&amp;quot; can often be seen when the Moon is a narrow [[crescent]]. Within the intensely bright crescent, a dim and mysterious view of the entire circular moon is seen. The effect is also known as ''earthshine'' because it is light from the Sun reflected off the Earth to the Moon and back that lights up the darker portion of the Moon. The bright crescent is lit by the Sun and is in full daylight. The rest of the Moon is not lit by the Sun; but an [[astronaut]] standing in this area would see a &amp;quot;full Earth&amp;quot; dominating the nighttime sky, lighting it up by its earthshine. The brightness of Earthshine, and hence the visibility of the old Moon in the new Moon's arms, varies. When the Earth is covered with clouds, or when there is a lot of snow-pack on the side of the Earth facing the Moon, the Earth is a white and bright and the Earthshine is intense. When the Earth looks like a &amp;quot;big, blue marble,&amp;quot; it is less intense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lunar calendars==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout history, many calendar systems have been based on the phases of the moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The months of the [[Islam|Muslim]] [[calendar]] are determined by observations of the [[hilal]], the moment at which the thin crescent moon first becomes visible. This marks the start of a month. Traditionally, and today in [[Pakistan]] and [[Jordan]], hilal is determined by actual observation and can be affected by weather and other factors. When following the traditional method, it is not actually possible to be certain precisely when future months will begin. In most Muslim countries, actual observation has been replaced by [[astronomy|astronomical]] rules.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The moon in culture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Old Moon in the New Moon's Arms&amp;quot; is the title of a poem by [[Ella Wheeler Wilcox]], in which she interprets the effect as the New Moon wishing that her lost love, the Old Moon, be in her arms one last time; Venus grants the wish, and:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Swift thro' the vapors and the golden mist&amp;amp;mdash;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::The Full Moon's shadowy shape shone on the night,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:The New Moon reached out clasping arms and kissed&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
::Her phantom lover in the whole world's sight.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Origin of the Moon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes and References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Origin_of_the_Moon&amp;diff=346051</id>
		<title>Origin of the Moon</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Origin_of_the_Moon&amp;diff=346051"/>
		<updated>2007-12-02T17:37:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* Criticism of the Giant-Impact Model */ Putting it into more scientific language&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;All the prevailing, [[atheistic]] theories of the origin of the [[Moon]] were completely disproven by the lunar landings and studies of the lunar rocks afterwards.  The material lacked [[iron]] that permeates the [[Earth]]'s crust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, each of these prevailing scientific theories were disproven by the lunar landings:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;PSI&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Moon]] formed in an orbit around Earth at the same time that Earth formed.&lt;br /&gt;
**This theory was disproven upon learning that the Moon has proportionally far less iron in it than the [[Earth]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Moon]] formed in a part of the solar system that was low in iron, and was later captured into an orbit arount the Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
**This was also disproven by examination of lunar rocks, which exhibit the same oxygen isotope composition as the Earth, unlike rocks known to come from other sources in the solar system, e.g. [[Mars]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Earth]] was originally spinning so fast that it spun off a fragment of lower density (iron-poor) material which became the [[Moon]].&lt;br /&gt;
**This solves the isotopic similarity and the relative lack of iron, but an analysis of the total angular momentum and energy involved ruled out this possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Giant-Impact Model ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For ten years after the lunar landings, non-creationist scientists lacked any accepted theory about the Moon's origin.  In 1984, an international meeting was convened in Kona, Hawaii, for the purpose of agreeing on a new theory for the origin of the Moon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The attendees at the meeting agreed upon the following &amp;quot;giant-impact model,&amp;quot; which was first proposed in 1975 but which had not yet been generally accepted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This theory proposes an impact with a large planetesimal (asteroid-like body) released a great quantity of debris into orbit, a portion of which collected under the influence of gravity. There is no direct evidence for this theory.  It is supported by non-creationist scientists, however, because only it might explain the following:&lt;br /&gt;
**The lack of iron, provided the impact of the planetesimal happened relatively late in the earth's formation and after the Earth's iron had sunk towards its core.  In that manner the Moon could pick up mantle from the Earth that has less iron.  Most of the planetesimal itself would have sunk into the earth's core.&lt;br /&gt;
**The similar oxygen isotope composition between the Moon and Earth could be explained by such a collision, provided the Moon were then formed from debris dislodged from the Earth by the collision.&lt;br /&gt;
**A high-velocity collision might be sufficient to release enough energy to place a substantial mass of the Earth's crust into orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of the Giant-Impact Model ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This new theory fail lacks testability and falsifiability, which are essential aspects of science as explained by [[Karl Popper]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scientists did find that none of three proposed tests are &amp;quot;supportive of the Giant Impact model.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another article noted that the Moon is lacking in siderophilic elements (Au, Co, Fe, Ir, Mn, Mo, Ni, Os, Pd, Pt, Re, Rh, Ru) found on Earth, and this indicates that the Moon was not formed by materials broken off of Earth, thereby falsifying the theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ias.ac.in/jessci/dec2005/ilc-3.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A third study found that &amp;quot;the bulk composition of the Moon differs significantly from that of the terrestrial mantle&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;[t]he high&lt;br /&gt;
bulk FeO content of the Moon rules out the derivation of the proto-lunar material from any but a small fraction of the terrestrial mantle.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc97/pdf/1070.PDF&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two decades after the Giant-Impact Model was embraced at the Hawaii convention, ''Scientific American'' observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&amp;amp;colID=5&amp;amp;articleID=000A90B0-C919-1C6E-84A9809EC588EF21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, researchers have had trouble getting the giant-impact model to work without the contrivances that scuttled earlier theories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Four facts and three parameters is a recipe for contradiction. To explain the moon's low iron content, you need to avoid a grazing collision (corresponding to a large impact angle), lest too much of the impactor's iron spill into orbit. Then, to explain the angular momentum, you need to compensate for the smallish angle with a hefty impactor. Then, to explain the moon's mass, you need to adjust the proto-Earth's mass. In the end, you might find that the total mass is incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Scientific American'' concluded:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Considering all the twists and turns in lunar science, nobody claims that the models are complete just yet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Astronomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lice&amp;diff=314780</id>
		<title>Lice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lice&amp;diff=314780"/>
		<updated>2007-10-12T15:30:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Start work on lice&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Lice'' are a family of parasitic insects which feed on blood. They are known to transmit a range of diseases. Head lice are the most commonly encountered by humans, and are distinguished by their lateral flattening and sucking mouthparts.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tick&amp;diff=313669</id>
		<title>Tick</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tick&amp;diff=313669"/>
		<updated>2007-10-10T16:27:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Add data on Ixodes ricinus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Ticks'' are a species of insect known for their parasitic life-style. They have four pairs of legs and are effectively balloons with mouth parts. They are known for transmitting [[Lyme's disease]], usually by the human tick, '''Ixodes ricinus'''. &lt;br /&gt;
Ticks have a complex lifecycle involving both nymphal and pupal stages, which requires blood meals between each.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tick&amp;diff=313663</id>
		<title>Tick</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tick&amp;diff=313663"/>
		<updated>2007-10-10T16:20:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Creating stub.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Ticks'' are a species of insect known for their parasitic life-style. They have four pairs of legs and are effectively balloons with mouth parts. They are known for transmitting [[Lyme's disease]]. Predictably, they are more commonly found amongst those leading sinful lifestyles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ticks have a complex lifecycle involving both nymphal and pupal stages, which requires blood meals between each.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unicorn&amp;diff=313116</id>
		<title>Unicorn</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unicorn&amp;diff=313116"/>
		<updated>2007-10-09T19:38:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: /* Unicorns in the Judeo-Christian Tradition */ strengthen&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''unicorn''' is a mythical beast, commonly resembling a white horse with a single horn grown out of its forehead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unicorn&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unicorns in the Judeo-Christian Tradition==&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; is included in the text of the [[King James Version|King James]] translation of [[The Bible]] nine times&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/what_about_the_unicorn_and_the_satyr&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The existence of unicorns is controversial. Secular opinion is that they are mythical, however some young earth believing [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologists]] have advanced various highly valid arguments that the biblical unicorn was not a fantasy animal and that the animal did not have one horn. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v14/i2/unicorn.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the original texts, unicorns go by the [[Hebrew]] name ''Re-em'' whereas the [[Greek]] [[Septuagint]] used the word ''monokeros'', meaning &amp;quot;one-horned&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dinobible&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.genesispark.com/genpark/bible/bible.htm &amp;quot;Dinosaurs in the Bible&amp;quot;], Genesis Park&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The English word &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; is derived from the [[Latin]], ''ūnicornis'', also meaning &amp;quot;one-horned&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While popularly characterized as a horned member of the horse [[baramin]], it is likely that the &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; was actually quite un-horselike. One recognized theory is that &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; actually refers to a [[rhinoceros]], and a growing number of Creation researchers are theorizing that the unicorn was actually a member of the [[triceratops | ceratopsian]] baramin. However no fossil evidence of unicorns has been found to date.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dinobible&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In the past, narwhal tusks, with their distinctive spiraled shape, have often been mistaken for or inaccurately advanced as unicorn horns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:reem.png|Remains of hypothetical two horned ceratopsian ''re-em'']]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symbolic &amp;amp; Heraldic Usage==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:unicorn.vinycomb1907.png|right|Heraldic rendering of a unicorn|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unicorns in [[heraldry]] typically have the body and head of a horse, the tail of a [[lion]], the limbs and hoofs of a stag, and a twisted horn growing from the forehead&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;vinycomb&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Fictitious &amp;amp; Symbolic Creatures in Art with special reference to their use in British Heraldry'', by John Vinycomb, 1907&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It is typically used to symbolize virtue of mind and strength of body, but has also been used as an emblem of [[Christ]] as the horn of our [[Salvation]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;vinycomb&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Artificial Unicorns==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984 the U.S. patent office granted patent number 4,429,685 to Timothy G. Zell for his development of a surgical procedure to create a &amp;quot;unicorn&amp;quot; from a horned animal&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Patent 4,429,685 [http://colitz.com/site/4429685/4429685f.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The basis for the patent was &amp;quot;Lancelot the living unicorn&amp;quot; (actually a goat) bred by Timothy &amp;quot;Otter&amp;quot; Zell and his wife Morning Glory Zell&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lancelot[http://www.lair2000.net/Unicorn_Dreams/Unicorns_Man_Made/unicorns_man_made.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Leviathan]], [[Behemoth]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cryptids]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mythology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biblical animals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homing&amp;diff=307139</id>
		<title>Homing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Homing&amp;diff=307139"/>
		<updated>2007-10-03T12:50:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Further evidence of&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Homing is an animal's ability to return precisely to its home from a significant distance away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homing suggests an obvious question: how do the animals find their way home?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Encyclopedia Britannica&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vol. 14, p. 668, 1991 edition&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; describes this remarkable confirmation of extraordinary homing powers of a bird:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus) returned from Massachusetts to [its nest in] Britain, 4,900 kilometres (3,050 miles) across the Atlantic, in 12½ days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Laysan albatrosses (Diomedea immutabilis) returned to Midway Island in the Pacific after being released at Whidbey Island, Washington; the journey covered 5,100 kilometres (3,200 miles) and took 10.1 days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Encyclopedia added that certain fishes and mammals &amp;quot;have demonstrated similar homing ability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Materialists]] once sought to explain such homing by saying that the birds use landmarks or magnetism or the sun's angle or stars' patterns.  But homing occurs in any compass direction, any climate, and at any season.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Racing and homing pigeons have this skill.  Other birds are even better at it.  Swallows, for example, can exhibit homing abilities that are even superior to pigeons'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Materialists have even suggested that birds must somehow sense gravity waves and engage in homing based on them.  But not even our most sophisticated laboratory equipment can sense gravity waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discussions of homing abilities are omitted from grade and high school textbooks, thereby ignoring this unexplained but widespread phenomenon. This is further evidence that examples of divine influence in the natural world are systematically censored by the &amp;quot;scientific&amp;quot; community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:zoology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Spider&amp;diff=278512</id>
		<title>Spider</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Spider&amp;diff=278512"/>
		<updated>2007-08-27T17:39:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: New page: '''Spiders''' are a group of arachnids characterized by possessing eight legs and eyes, a fused head and thorax and a large abdomen. Both land and sea varieties are known, with many of the...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Spiders''' are a group of arachnids characterized by possessing eight legs and eyes, a fused head and thorax and a large abdomen. Both land and sea varieties are known, with many of the sea spiders being known for their spindly legs and often strange appearances. Spiders feed on flies, although some exotic varieties are blood-drinkers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Teddy&amp;diff=278493</id>
		<title>User talk:Teddy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Teddy&amp;diff=278493"/>
		<updated>2007-08-27T17:25:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:20, 27 August 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you very much! I'm sorry to say I made a page before reading the guide, but I will now do so post-haste.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scorpion&amp;diff=278492</id>
		<title>Scorpion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scorpion&amp;diff=278492"/>
		<updated>2007-08-27T17:24:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: Add new article. I plan on expanding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scorpions are very similar to [[spiders]], but are generally considered to have been created separately during Genesis due to some key features, such as their pincers and venomous tail. Before the [[Fall]] the tail would not have been venomous, but would likely have served some useful function, such as containing digestive juices for use on various fruits.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Teddy&amp;diff=278488</id>
		<title>User:Teddy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Teddy&amp;diff=278488"/>
		<updated>2007-08-27T17:18:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Teddy: New page: Howdy.  I heard about this site from my flatmate, and hope that I can bring my experience as a British Christian conservative to the site.  Please leave me lots of messages! :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Howdy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I heard about this site from my flatmate, and hope that I can bring my experience as a British Christian conservative to the site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please leave me lots of messages! :)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teddy</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>