https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Taxman 2026-11-08T07:32:17Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Young_Earth_Creationism&diff=258960 2007-08-02T17:58:30Z

<p>Taxman: Idiocy</p> <hr /> <div>{{protect|Conservative}}<br /> <br /> *[[Talk:Young Earth Creationism/Archive_1|Archive 1]]<br /> <br /> == 15. Too few Supernovas ==<br /> <br /> This section actually discusses comets, not supernovas. I thought I should point this out. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:52, 22 June 2007 (EDT)<br /> ::Thanks, I made the correction. I have been doing some work on this article in the last two days and I saw your comment on this page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT)<br /> :::Glad I could help. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:55, 2 July 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Idiocy ==<br /> <br /> This page might just be the funniest thing I've read in a while:<br /> <br /> 30. Human population growth<br /> &quot;If humans had been around more than a few thousand years, they would have populated the earth more quickly.&quot;<br /> <br /> 34. Only recently known civilizations<br /> &quot;Earliest known civilizations are only a few thousand years old.&quot;<br /> <br /> The Young Earth Creationism hypothesis is a joke, just like this whole wiki. You state that &quot;Everything you post must be true and verifiable&quot;, yet one look at any of your articles prove that it's just empty words. Everybody except true morons realize that this &quot;encyclopedia&quot; is complete bullocks. My account will probably be banned because of this post, but that will only prove that you can't take any criticism. --[[User:Taxman|Taxman]] 13:58, 2 August 2007 (EDT)</div>

Taxman