https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Talleyrand 2026-11-02T15:28:09Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:France&diff=47776 2007-03-19T13:38:42Z

<p>Talleyrand: /* Spelling */</p> <hr /> <div>Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war?<br /> -[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :It is very important to know who is &quot;with us&quot; and who is &quot;against us&quot;.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --[[User:Daerean|Daerean]] 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Spelling ==<br /> <br /> I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.<br /> <br /> == War on Terror ==<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> See: http://www.nato.int/ISAF/index.htm<br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.</div>

Talleyrand https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:France&diff=47770 2007-03-19T13:37:43Z

<p>Talleyrand: </p> <hr /> <div>Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war?<br /> -[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :It is very important to know who is &quot;with us&quot; and who is &quot;against us&quot;.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --[[User:Daerean|Daerean]] 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Spelling ==<br /> <br /> I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.<br /> <br /> == War on Terror ==<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> See: http://www.nato.int/ISAF/index.htm<br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.</div>

Talleyrand https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:France&diff=47768 2007-03-19T13:37:01Z

<p>Talleyrand: </p> <hr /> <div>Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war?<br /> -[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :It is very important to know who is &quot;with us&quot; and who is &quot;against us&quot;.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --[[User:Daerean|Daerean]] 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Spelling ==<br /> <br /> I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.<br /> <br /> == War on Terror ==<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> See: http://www.nato.int/ISAF/index.htm<br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.</div>

Talleyrand https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:France&diff=47741 2007-03-19T13:24:43Z

<p>Talleyrand: War on Terror</p> <hr /> <div>Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war?<br /> -[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :It is very important to know who is &quot;with us&quot; and who is &quot;against us&quot;.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --[[User:Daerean|Daerean]] 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Spelling ==<br /> <br /> I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.<br /> <br /> == War on Terror ==<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.</div>

Talleyrand https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:France&diff=47735 2007-03-19T13:16:25Z

<p>Talleyrand: </p> <hr /> <div>Unless you go into a full discussion of France's politics, which could very well happen in the future, I suppose, the statement about France not supporting the invasion of Iraq seems to be a bit irrelevant. Are we going to list every single country's stance on the Iraq war?<br /> -[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 14:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)<br /> <br /> :It is very important to know who is &quot;with us&quot; and who is &quot;against us&quot;.&lt;/sarcasm&gt; (Seriously: I technically agree, but I'd leave it in so that a politics section can grow around it.) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 16:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> :Seriously if you want an unbiased article then one country's (i.e; Americas) opinion on another really does have no place in it... --[[User:Daerean|Daerean]] 12:24, 18 March 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> == Spelling ==<br /> <br /> I made a bunch of fixes to the non-American spellings in this article. Let's keep those double-L's (rivalled) and silent U's (behaviour) out of Conservapedia as per the Commandments.<br /> <br /> Why do we find under Germany :<br /> <br /> War on Terror<br /> <br /> Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led operation in Afghanistan, but did not support the invasion of Iraq. <br /> <br /> And why it is not showing the same information under France? <br /> <br /> Also, the last comment about the French kings after Clovis is showing that the writer of this article has no knowledge of French history.</div>

Talleyrand