<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Stevo</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Stevo"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Stevo"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T16:16:37Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&amp;diff=960881</id>
		<title>Mystery:Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Non-Conservatives_Exist%3F&amp;diff=960881"/>
		<updated>2012-02-13T17:11:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Conservative principles (which are actually very Darwinist in nature) are based on &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot;.  So why do non-conservatives still exist?  Here are some reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Statistical Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Estimates)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* 20%: did not hear about conservative principles until ''after'' they made up their mind and, perhaps due to pervasive societal bias, refuse to reconsider&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: genuinely lack of desire to find the truth, and instead desire attention, praise by liberal teachers, getting along by going along, and not standing up to liberal bullies&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: refuse to forgive themselves and let go of their past mistakes and image&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: believe myths created around government programs like the &amp;quot;New Deal&amp;quot; that liberal policies create jobs instead of destroying them and depriving people of liberty through government control.&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: fooled by the demonizing of conservatives and mistakenly feel that conservative benefits are available only to those who are from an intact family or privileged background &lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: refuse to rise above their personal temptations, often self-destructive, and hate conservatives who criticize their self-indulgent behavior&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: feel that they deserve to make more money than they do, as in public school teachers and university professors, and refuse to rise above self-interest&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: harbor a grudge against a conservative, typically a parent but sometimes an ex-spouse, and refuse to forgive or rise above the animosity&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: like an anarchist, genuinely want to believe in and propagate destructive ideas&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: are susceptible to marketing and suggestion to an overlarge degree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What Triggers Reconsideration of [[Liberal]] Beliefs? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What triggers reconsideration of liberal beliefs?  Here are some estimates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* 25%: raising or teaching children, and realizing how destructive liberal values are to many of them&lt;br /&gt;
:* 15%: a religious conversion followed by taking the [[Bible]] to heart&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: a loss of a loved one that resulted from accepting or promoting liberal values, as in losing a loved one to crime caused by pornography, drug addiction, gambling, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: a new friendship with someone who is conservative, and realizing how much good flows from the conservative values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', the conversion of [[Ronald Reagan]] based in his friendship with his [[conservative]] father-in-law, Loyal Davis.[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,921293,00.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:* 10%: simply by maturing and seeing liberalism's impact around them, and realizing what they were taught as youth was wrong&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: a desire to learn the truth, and a dislike for those who mislead&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: a genuine divine experience that can not be explained.&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: using conservative values to overcome an addiction, and then realizing the benefits of conservative values in many other ways&lt;br /&gt;
:* 5%: taking a truthful course in [[economics]], or learning it in the workforce&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', the conversion of Nobel Laureate [[Ronald Coase]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cultural indoctrination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Brainwashing and deceit: &lt;br /&gt;
:* They pride themselves on doing well in school or reading the newspaper, can't accept that what they were taught was incorrect or biased.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Dangerous professors who impose their opinions upon vulnerable youth.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Television programs posing as comedies, such as [[South Park]], [[Family Guy]], and [[The Simpsons]], which inject liberal beliefs and mock conservative values&lt;br /&gt;
:* Exposed to incorrect liberal ideas throughout education. Standard American kindergartens up to the fourth grade.  Wastes the potential of most children&amp;amp;mdash;does not expose them to foreign languages and other learning tasks their minds are obviously and mysteriously suited for.  All helping to make them think they need liberal man-made structures that in fact limit their potential in a self-defeating sort of cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Indoctrination by liberal churches which have a disproportionate focus on biblical passages that appear to support liberal positions, eg. the adulteress story, the disciples holding everything in common, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:* A blind obsession to be famous, act and imitate the ways of their famous idols, to absorb their ideals as their own.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Failure to realize that modern science and modern wealth are the result of historical processes set into motion by God-fearing Christian Conservatives like [[Blaise Pascal]], [[Robert Boyle]], [[Isaac Newton]], and [[James Maxwell]]. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(When the obvious importance of  Christianity to these scientific figures' everyday lives comes up in an academic situation, dangerous professors&amp;amp;mdash;[[liberal]] historians and [[liberal]] scientists&amp;amp;mdash;have been known to label it as &amp;quot;some mental disorder&amp;quot;.)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Elementary through high school textbooks having appalling and reprehensible omissions on the basic facts of American life (religion, marriage, politics, and business)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X, (this book contains the results of a federally funded research project analyzing children's textbooks) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*For decades Universities have discriminated against hiring conservatives, especially social conservatives and religious believers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=zGOuAAAACAAJ A Student's Guide to Religious Studies], D. G. Hart, ISI Books, 2005, ISBN 1932236589, 9781932236583, 108 pages; see page 38 and note on page 107. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This has resulted in most college graduates being exposed to liberals prejudiced against conservatives and conservative thought. These graduates become the teachers and other professionals who are unwitting soldiers in liberalism's battle against a Christian Reformed, Roman-Catholic/Anglican/Orthodox, obedient-to-God reality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*No exposure:&lt;br /&gt;
:* Current fashions in American professional behavior make expressions of Christian faith awkward in the workaday world.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Increasing zone of publicly funded anti-religious fanaticism (e.g., no prayer in public schools)&lt;br /&gt;
:* Spectacle of entertainment industry (e.g., movies and T.V.) cuts into traditionally popular Christian church social activities&lt;br /&gt;
:* Most universities and hospitals have forgotten or have been forced to deny (to get various grants and even retirement benefits for their professors) their religious roots.  Catholic affiliated institutions remain one of the few exceptions (few or possibly no other body of Christians can make legitimate claims of offering modern [[Pastoral care]] as the Roman Catholic church)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Peer Pressure: &lt;br /&gt;
:* They have liberal friends, and want their approval or acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;
:* They live in a predominantly liberal state or community and fear rejection from said community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Systemic bias: &lt;br /&gt;
:* Some people are [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|inherently irrational]], and are thus driven to liberal ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Their job and salary, such as working for public schools, depends on keeping conservatives out of power.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Media bias acts to caricature conservatism, making it seem unpalatable, conditioning people to reject its teachings.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Schools reward politically correct, liberal answers on tests.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Negative focusing by the media highlights personal flaws of conservatives, driving people to choose to identify with liberals rather than be categorized with those traits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*See also: [[Mystery:Why Do Black Americans Vote For Liberal Candidates?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal characteristics ==&lt;br /&gt;
*Poor abstract thinking: &lt;br /&gt;
:* They have trouble understanding some of the slightly abstract concepts in conservatism, such as &amp;quot;more guns, less crime,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;less taxes, more revenue.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:* They are more comfortable discussing simple issues like race and poverty than complex issues like globalism.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Intellectual myopia - failure to heed the long-term consequences of ideological positions that seem beneficial in the short term.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Stereotyping: They knew a conservative whom they disliked for some reason, and tar all others with the same brush.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Ignorance: politics isn't a priority for some people. Without any wish to learn to think for themselves, some liberals don't bother to think through what's right, and just go with what's &amp;quot;cool.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Closed-minded: &lt;br /&gt;
:* They made up their mind before hearing conservative principles, and will not reconsider their views.&lt;br /&gt;
:* They have something criticized by conservatives in their personal background, and feel compelled to defend it rather than let it go.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Slavish adherence to the ideals of liberal parents&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Naivety: &lt;br /&gt;
:* Non-conservatives demonstrate just how prone mankind is to arrogance.&lt;br /&gt;
:* An admiration for historical figures whom liberals claim were liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
:* A desire for large government inculcated by personal weakness and reluctance to take personal responsibility.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Impressionable individuals buying into [[Bush derangement syndrome]], and reacting with emotion rather than reason.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Reliance on charisma: Charismatic leaders trading on image, rather than experience, can dupe the unsuspecting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Self-destructive or contrarian behavior:&lt;br /&gt;
:* Some choose to do what is irrational.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Use of mind-altering drugs, which encourages one to become a liberal to reconcile the cognitive dissonance, or dulls mental acuity resulting in mindless conformity.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Sexual experimentation to make up for lack of self-esteem, often with multiple partners, with partners of the same gender, or in public places&lt;br /&gt;
:* Unthinking rebellion against conservative parents.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Determined to prove their &amp;quot;independence of mind&amp;quot; by denying authority&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mystery]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution_and_science&amp;diff=960875</id>
		<title>Evolution and science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution_and_science&amp;diff=960875"/>
		<updated>2012-02-13T16:52:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]], [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]], and creation &amp;quot;science&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid &amp;quot;[[logic]]&amp;quot; of creation &amp;quot;science&amp;quot;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution_and_science&amp;diff=960873</id>
		<title>Evolution and science</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Evolution_and_science&amp;diff=960873"/>
		<updated>2012-02-13T16:51:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Evolution and science''' conflict with each other. [[Evolution]] is clearly [[atheism|atheistic]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[liberal]] pseudo or [[junk science]] which is easily disproven by the numerous [[Counterexamples to Evolution|counterexamples to evolution]] that exist. Evolution is also unscientific because it is based on a [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|time frame]] which predates [[creation]], and creation &amp;quot;science&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intelligent people who can distinguish real [[science]] from atheistic secular junk science are incresingly embracing the rigid &amp;quot;[[logic]]&amp;quot; of [[creation &amp;quot;science&amp;quot;]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=David_Cameron&amp;diff=960846</id>
		<title>David Cameron</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=David_Cameron&amp;diff=960846"/>
		<updated>2012-02-13T13:13:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Prime Minister&lt;br /&gt;
|image=674uyyhju.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=75&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=May 11 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=present&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Gordon Brown&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Conservative Party&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=October 6, 1966&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=London&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Samantha Sheffield&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Church of England]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''David Cameron''', born 9 October 1966, is the current Prime Minister of the [[United Kingdom]] and leader of the British [[Conservative Party]] (a centre-right political group). Following the May 2010 election, the Conservatives won the most seats but were short of a majority, resulting in a hung parliament. Labour Leader [[Gordon Brown]] resigned, and Cameron was appointed Prime Minister, leading a Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was born in [[London]], but spent his early years near Wantage in [[Oxfordshire]], [[England]], though his family's roots lie in [[Inverness]], [[Scotland]], and &amp;quot;Cameron&amp;quot; is well known in Britain as a Scottish name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was educated at [[Eton College | Eton]], Britain's most prestigious public school (a &amp;quot;public school&amp;quot; in the UK referring to a privately run institution, as opposed to a &amp;quot;state school&amp;quot;), and at [[Brasenose College]], [[Oxford University|Oxford]], Britain's most ancient and prestigious university.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron is self-described as &amp;quot;upper middle class&amp;quot;, though his bloodline is noble, and he is a direct descendent of William IV, and thus a distant cousin of HRH Queen Elizabeth II. His family has historically been involved in finance and banking, with his great great grandfather being head of HSBC in the late 19th century, and worked alongside the Rothschilds to finance the Russo-Japanese war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's leadership and indeed his own party are supported by businesses, as opposed to the liberal, socialist aligned Labour Party, led by [[Ed Miliband]]; which is funded and largely controlled by the [[trade union]]s. Many intervening leaders have been middle-class ([[Edward Heath]], [[Margaret Thatcher]]) or even working-class ([[John Major]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's reluctance to discuss his past, citing the right to a private life before politics&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4340328.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has led to class-based attacks on his education and ancestry from a small proportion of left-wing media sources and opposition members of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He has been married to Samantha since 1996.  She is of direct noble bloodline, the daughter of 8th Baronet Sheffield, and a descendent of Charles II. They have two sons and a daughter. Their eldest son, Ivan Cameron, died on February 25, 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[BBC News]] - [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7909562.stm Cameron's 'beautiful boy' dies]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political career==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron's pre-parliamentary career included spells as a staffer for controversial Conservative politician [[Norman Lamont]] and as a PR executive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was elected to Parliament as MP for Witney in Oxfordshire at the 2001 general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron was elected leader of the [[Conservative Party]] in December 2005, succeeding [[Michael Howard]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late June 2007, at the end of then-Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]]'s final Prime Minister's Questions session in the [[House of Commons]], David Cameron led his opposition party in giving the outgoing leader a standing ovation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1555758/Tony-Blair-steps-down-to-a-standing-ovation.html Tony Blair steps down to standing ovation] - Daily Telegraph, June 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron has attempted to move the Conservative party towards what is perceived by some to be the centre ground of British politics. While the party under his leadership has expressed support for some traditional elements of Conservative policy, such as the importance of the [[family]], Cameron has also expressed a passionate concern about [[global warming]]. He has suggested a move towards [[privatization]] within the strongly-socialist [[National Health Service]], in an attempt to combat the economic failures resulting from the flawed socialist ideas upon which the organisation is based. Designed and originated by the leftist [[Labour Party]], the organisation is notorious for its bureaucracy and the failure of its left-wing values in an economic sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some traditional Conservatives, particularly those on the [[Thatcherism|Thatcherite]] wing of the party, have criticized Cameron for moving the party too far to the left. They point to surveys showing that many voters feel they no longer know what the Conservative Party stands for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.yougov.com/archives/pdf/TEL060101018_1.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, he has stated that he is &amp;quot;certainly a big [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcher]] fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;new identity&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4446864.stm &amp;quot;Cameron: Tories need new identity&amp;quot;], ''BBC News Online'', 17 November 2005, accessed 6 November 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has also described himself as a &amp;quot;liberal Conservative&amp;quot; (though &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in British English does not have the same meaning as in the United States, and instead has the meaning of &amp;quot;centrist,&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;libertarian&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Rawnsley&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Andrew Rawnsley, [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,,1669957,00.html &amp;quot;'I'm not a deeply ideological person. I'm a practical one'&amp;quot;], ''Guardian Unlimited'', 18 December 2005, accessed 6 November 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some have gone so far as to claim that true conservatism is today represented in Britain not by the Conservative Party but by the [[UK Independence Party]]. On the other hand, the approval ratings of Cameron and his party continue to compare very favourably with those of the Labour Party and its leadership, which is undoubtedly unpopular.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cameron has said: &amp;quot;My aim is to promote social justice, making sure that everyone has access to good schools, good healthcare and decent housing, take a lead in ending global poverty and do all we can to meet the great environmental threats of our age.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=david.cameron.about.page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some conservative politicians and commentators, notably [[Norman Tebbit]], have criticised him for prioritising issues of the environment and social justice over more traditionally Conservative policy areas, such as tax, immigration and foreign relations. Tebbit said: &amp;quot;Is he the party's [[Chairman Mao]] or [[Pol Pot]], intent on purging even the memory and name of [[Margaret Thatcher|Thatcherism]] before building a new modern compassionate green globally aware party somewhere on the left side of the middle?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://politics.guardian.co.uk/conservatives/story/0,,1698576,00.html Tories must retake centre ground says Cameron], ''Guardian Unlimited'', 31 January 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Cameron has responded extensively to such criticisms by pointing out that the economic and social problems faced by modern-day Britain are radically different from those faced in the past; he has argued that the Conservative Party needs to re-take the [[centrist|centre ground]] of politics from the [[Labour Party]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4661024.stm Cameron denies 'betraying' Tories], BBC News, 30 January 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He argued: &amp;quot;The change is not a betrayal. It is a recognition that the challenges faced by Britain are not the challenges of the 1970s. Social justice and economic efficiency are the common ground of British politics. We have to find the means of succeeding where the government has failed.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[British politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mydavidcameron.com/ Cameron Election Campaign 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.herald.co.zw/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=13223:pm-cameron-brushes-off-libyan-war-talk&amp;amp;catid=45:international-news&amp;amp;Itemid=137 British prime minister brushes off Libyan war talk.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Cameron, David}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anglicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom Prime Ministers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:British Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=960842</id>
		<title>Feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=960842"/>
		<updated>2012-02-13T12:58:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Braque woman 400pix.jpg|thumb|200px|''Woman with a guitar'' by [[Georges Braque]], 1913.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Feminism''' originally was an expression used by [[suffragettes]] -who were predominantly [[pro-life]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.godlessprolifers.org/library/wallace4.html ''Susan B. Anthony opposed abortion'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is no question that she deplored the practice of abortion, as did every one of her colleagues in the suffrage movement.&amp;quot;'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13schiff.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''Desperately Seeking Susan''] [[New York Times]] (13 October 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.feministsforlife.org/history/foremoth.htm ''Voices of our Feminist Foremothers''] Feminists for Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;- to obtain the right for women to vote in the early 1900s in the [[United States]] and the [[United Kingdom]].  By the 1970s, however, [[liberals]] had changed the meaning to represent people who favored [[abortion]] and identical roles or quotas for women in the military and in society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, a modern feminist denies or downplays differences between men and women, opposes the encouragement of homemaking and child-rearing for women, and seeks to participate in predominantly male activities, including, but not limited to, sexual intercourse with women.  Modern feminists:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* never wanted gender equality; they want power for the female left&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2011/feb11/11-02-11.html Phyllis Schlafly, &amp;quot;Feminism Has Become a Hot Topic&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* in movies, portray the men as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality)&lt;br /&gt;
* support biased [[liberal]] causes that clearly favor women (such as [[VAWA]], while men are much more likely to become victims of violence).&lt;br /&gt;
* pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances [[liberal]] causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., [[VAWA]] funding of women's groups)&lt;br /&gt;
* oppose [[chivalry]] and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes)&lt;br /&gt;
* view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably patriarchal&lt;br /&gt;
* belittle and mock other women who desire to have children or raise a family&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/03261992.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Being a [[housewife]] is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of  [[radical feminism]] is to change that.&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, &amp;quot;The Daily Illini,&amp;quot; April 25, 1981. [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/You_Don_t_Know_Feminism_744100744.shtml         &amp;quot;You Don't Know Feminism&amp;quot;] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* shirk traditional gender activities, like baking&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough.&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support [[affirmative action]] for women&lt;br /&gt;
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[T]he wearing of pantsuits is often a useful feminism signifier, depending on the culture of the law firm.&amp;quot; [http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2640]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I was part of a growing tribe of pesky women called feminists by friends and enemies alike.  We women stormed out the door in our imitation men's suits ....&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* seek [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines&lt;br /&gt;
* refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller. http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2003/10/16/names/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* believe marriage implies female servitude when it is in fact a mutual bond&lt;br /&gt;
* distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (Eg: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)&lt;br /&gt;
* often condemn the God-Given order of gender roles, as laid out in the Holy [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
* object to being addressed as &amp;quot;ma'am,&amp;quot; or feminine nicknames such as &amp;quot;sweetheart&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;honey&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-talk-boxer-maamjun19,0,5804401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; object to other female-only names, such as &amp;quot;temptress&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* take offense at grammatical rules of the English language, like using the pronoun &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.'&lt;br /&gt;
* support of the [[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom include the [[suffrage|Women's Suffrage]] movement of the early 1900s and the Women's Liberation (or &amp;quot;Second Wave Feminist&amp;quot;) movement of the 1960s and 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Equal Rights Amendment]], which proponents claimed would address the inadequacies of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] concerning women and citizenship, was proposed in the US in 1923.  The amendment passed Congress in 1972 but was ultimately defeated, falling just three states short of the required [[three-quarters majority]] on June 30, 1982. Some conservatives, particularly [[Phyllis Schlafly]], felt that its passage would entail adverse consequences, including making girls subject to the [[military draft]], requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] the end of [[single-sex schools]] and classes, requiring the issuance of [[homosexual marriage]] licenses, and the revocation of laws that protect women in dangerous jobs, such as factory or mining work.  Indeed, in states that passed their own state versions of ERA, several of these results were subsequently ordered by courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the [[Hawaii]] and [[Massachusetts]] Supreme Courts ordered the issuance of homosexual marriage licenses based in part on their on their state ERAs, and the [[New Mexico]] Supreme Court ordered taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] based on its state ERA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The feminist movement in the West evolved in the 1980s with the rise of so-called [[Post-Feminism]] (also called &amp;quot;[[Third-Wave]]&amp;quot; feminism), which stresses that women have many rights that go unrecognized, often by women themselves, in everyday life, and in the American legal structure. Most members of the feminist movement support reproductive rights currently guaranteed by American law, including the legal right to [[abortion]]. This stance is opposed by many conservatives, leading political commentator [[Rush Limbaugh]] to coin the term &amp;quot;Femi-nazis&amp;quot; to refer to extreme feminist activists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the major features of feminism prior to the 1990s was opposition to women being treated as [[sex objects]]. However, feminists today support women being sex objects, viewing it as a means of empowerment over the traditional [[Judeo-Christian]] family structure and [[conservative values]]. Continuing this same promotion of [[liberalism]] and [[anti-Christian]] values, feminists today treat [[Women's rights and Islam|Islam's cruel treatment of women]] as a matter of &amp;quot;personal choice&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the administration of [[Bill Clinton]], feminism made a partial resurgence, although feminist leadership was criticized{{who}} for largely failing to criticize President Clinton's [[sexist]] behavior toward female employees as both Arkansas Governor and U.S. President.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Odone, Christina [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article528875.ece ''Left-wing misogyny is alive and well: The party’s feminist agenda allows Labour men to get away with sexist behaviour''] (2 June 2005) [[The Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, Candice E. ''&amp;quot;Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine&amp;quot;'' (World Ahead Publishing; 2005) ISBN 0-9746-7013-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], a staunch advocate of [[civil rights]] and [[non-violence]] said, &amp;quot;When a mother has to work she does violence to motherhood by depriving her children of her loving guidance and protection.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 203.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Larrey Anderson, philosopher, writer and submissions editor for American Thinker, links feminism to Marxism, and concludes, &amp;quot;Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the state.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larrey Anderson, ''The Feminine Mistake'', American Thinker], November 29, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Robin Morgan]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel that 'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the [[oppressed]] have a right to [[class-hatred]] against the class that is oppressing them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;(1970)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero-sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary-vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the sh*twork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html From] her introduction to &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.feministcampus.org/network/chat/morgan04232003.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_/ai_n9357217 From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199903/ai_n8831317 From] &amp;quot;Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrea Dworkin]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] her book &amp;quot;Letters from a War Zone&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrea Dworkin: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4024585,00.html &amp;quot;'They took my body from me and used it'&amp;quot;] (Guardian Unlimited)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: &amp;quot;I am.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIID.html &amp;quot;Nervous Interview&amp;quot;], 1978 (Background: &amp;quot;Norman Mailer managed to publish lots of interviews with himself, none of which made much sense, all of which were taken seriously by literati of various stripes. So this is half parody of him and his chosen form and half parody of myself and my chosen movement.&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men use the night to erase us.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIb.html The Night and Danger]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Marilyn French]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Marilyn French.gif|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women ... he can sexually molest his daughters ... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 182 (her emphasis)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women ... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 186 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations ... obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 21 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In fiction authored by [[Marilyn French]]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter&amp;quot; - ''The Women's Room''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All men are rapists and that's all they are&amp;quot; - The character Mia in her novel ''The Women's Room'', p. 462&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0345353617/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process&amp;quot; - Linda Gordon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women ... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The feminista agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a [[socialist]], anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, [[abortion|kill their children]], practice [[witchcraft]], destroy capitalism, and become [[lesbian]]s&amp;quot; - Pat Robertson, fundraising letter, 1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gainesvillehumanists.org/patr.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I'm furious with the Women's Liberationists. They keep getting up on soapboxes and proclaiming women are brighter than men. That's true, but it should be kept quiet or it ruins the whole racket&amp;quot; - Anita Loos &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex&amp;quot; - [[Valerie Solanas]], author of the SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things&amp;quot; - Jilly Cooper&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It matters more what's in a woman's face than what's on it.&amp;quot; - Claudette Colbert, quoted in Kindling the Spirit by Lois P. Frankel &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear&amp;quot; - Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression&amp;quot; - Sheila Jeffrys &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; Universities of Michigan &amp;amp; Yale) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in ''Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men&amp;quot; - Sharon Stone, Actress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive ... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not [[Rambo]]&amp;quot; - Jodie Foster, Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race&amp;quot; - Sally Miller Gearhart, in ''The Future - If There Is One - Is Female'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference&amp;quot; - Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males&amp;quot; - Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them&amp;quot; - David Angier &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;To use the word [rape] carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him. &amp;amp;hellip; They [men unjustly accused of rape] have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions.&amp;quot; - Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar in 1991 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,973077-6,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it&amp;quot; - Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release&amp;quot; - [[Germaine Greer]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love' for the men women share their lives with - husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, co-workers.&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress of My Enemy, My love &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts' ... includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder&amp;quot; - Judith Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document (A Southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as &amp;quot;The F---ing Molesters Society&amp;quot; (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SH*T; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do&amp;quot; {{Fact|Date=March 2008}} -- Popular Feminist Graffiti &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal&amp;quot; - Sylvia Fraser, Journalist &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catharine MacKinnon]] maintains that &amp;quot;the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor.&amp;quot; In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid - ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed - they're &amp;quot;hiding from the truth&amp;quot; The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to &amp;quot;breed&amp;quot; them for that purpose - Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, [[Gloria Steinem]] et al, tenets of misandric belief) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal - a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students - I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment ... of persuading students that women are oppressed&amp;quot; - Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact.&amp;quot; - Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another posting on FEMISA: &amp;quot;Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers.&amp;quot; (Both above quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work, [[Heterophobia]]) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages.&amp;quot; {{fact}} - Heather Hart 7 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here are 10 reasons why we are concerned about feminism and the National Organisation for Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist&amp;quot; - National NOW Times, January, 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - feminist leader Sheila Cronan &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. In response to a question concerning China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard responded, &amp;quot;I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world&amp;quot; - Gary Bauer, &amp;quot;Abetting Coercion in China&amp;quot; The Washington Times, Oct. 10, 1989 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole ... patriarch!&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], radical feminist leader, editor of Ms. Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women.... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], editor of Ms. Magazine) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. &amp;quot;Let's forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement, solace, and inspiration from real women ... Two thousand years of patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn women toward the feminist 'salvation' of this world&amp;quot; - Annie Laurie Gaylor, &amp;quot;Feminist Salvation,&amp;quot; The Humanist, p. 37, July/August 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. &amp;quot;In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them&amp;quot; - Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. &amp;quot;Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. &amp;quot;The most merciful thing a large family can to do one of its infant members is to kill it&amp;quot; - Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in &amp;quot;Women and the New Race&amp;quot; p. 67 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women's chains have been forged by men, not by anatomy.&amp;quot; - Estelle R. Ramey &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I would have girls regard themselves not as adjectives but as nouns.&amp;quot; - Elizabeth Cady Stanton, &amp;quot;Our Girls&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men&amp;quot; - [[Elizabeth Cady Stanton]], from her diary of December 27, 1890, quoting a letter she wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=CIsEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA270&amp;amp;lpg=PA270&amp;amp;dq=%22we+are+as+a+sex+infinitely+superior+to+men%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=FqYVyWK-s6&amp;amp;sig=tnXoiGvopCcO1vFaoF7nmSvtXPM&amp;amp;hl=en#PPA270,M1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants ... the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MAN: ... an obsolete life form ... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched ...a contradictory baby-man ... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... 'Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from &amp;quot;testosterone poisoning&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Letter to editor: &amp;quot;Women's Turn to Dominate&amp;quot; &amp;quot;... Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down&amp;quot; Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 February, 1996 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism” - Catharine MacKinnon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The English novelist and critic [[Rebecca West]] said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/rebecca_west.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; : &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;I myself have never been able to find out what feminism is; I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and housewives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist style]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender equality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender police]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminists for Life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and reason]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Battered woman syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ The Feminist eZine] Archive of articles about Feminist History.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html Gloria Steinem and the CIA], ''The New York Times'', February 21, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg02217.html Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem], Nancy Borman,  ''The Village Voice''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?], Christina Hoff Sommers, ''The American'' March/April 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Communism&amp;diff=960331</id>
		<title>Communism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Communism&amp;diff=960331"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T18:13:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:HammerAndSickle.png|right|175px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Communism''' is a [[left-wing]] materialistic and violently atheistic ideology created to justify the overthrow of [[Capitalism]], replacing [[free market]] economics and [[democracy]] with a &amp;quot;[[dictatorship of the proletariat]]&amp;quot;. Under Communism, the [[political]] system replaces the [[private property|private ownership]] of the [[means of production]] with &amp;quot;[[collective ownership]]&amp;quot; of the economy, this is to be accomplished through direct &amp;quot;democratic&amp;quot; control by the workers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.marxists.org/archive/mandel/1968/11/workersdem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Twentieth century Communism was based on [[Karl Marx]]'s manifesto which proposed to establishment of a &amp;quot;[[classless society]].&amp;quot;  However, all Communist societies have had a [[class structure]], notably the [[USSR]], which was dominated by a self appointed ''[[Nomenklatura]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the belief that &amp;quot;people cannot change&amp;quot;, governments under the banner of Communism have caused the death of somewhere between 40 million to 260 million human lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/finalconflict/fcrevb102.html The Black Book of Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/lelivrenoir.htm The Black Book of Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm Source List and Detailed Death Tolls for the Twentieth Century Hemoclysm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sarasotamagazine.com/blog/template_permalink.asp?id=365 Memory and Ideology]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2526 The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Dr.  R. J. Rummel, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Hawaii, is the scholar who first coined the term [[democide]] (death by government).  Dr. R. J. Rummel's mid estimate regarding the loss of life due to communism is that it caused the death of approximately 148,286,000 people between 1917 and 1987.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President [[Ronald Reagan]] in an address before the British [[House of Commons]] said, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|'''What I am describing now is a plan and hope for the long term -- the march of freedom and democracy which will leave [[Marxism-Leninism]] on the ash heap of history as it has left other tyrannies which stifle the freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Ronald Reagan [http://www.iri.org/history_ReaganSpeech.asp Speech to the British Parliament], June 8, 1982. Retrieved from International Republican Institute 05/24/07. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, communism continues to rule over at least one-fifth of the world's people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/history_communism.php Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation], Documenting Communism's Crimes Against Humanity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br clear=all&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communist Theory and Practice==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Captive-nations-01b----07-19-06.jpg|thumbnail|180px|left|A monument to the Captive Nations stands at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation in [[Washington, D.C.]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
Communism is based upon [[Marxism]], a philosophy which uses [[materialism]] to explain all physical and social phenomena.  The theory of [[evolution]] influenced the thinking of the Communists, including Marx, [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin]], and [[Joseph Stalin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Marx wrote, &amp;quot;[[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the [[class struggle]] in history.&amp;quot; Marx offered to dedicate the second German edition of his polemic &amp;quot;Das Kapital&amp;quot; to [[Charles Darwin]], but Darwin declined the &amp;quot;honour.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&amp;amp;action=view&amp;amp;ID=276&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karl Marx's Social and Political Thought, Bob Jessop, ISBN 0415193265 (pg 476)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economically, communism advocates a [[socialist]] economy in which the government owns the [[means of production]]. In countries where communism has been imposed, the government has taken ownership of farms, factories, stores and so on in the name of the people; see &amp;quot;[[dictatorship of the proletariat]]&amp;quot;. This drives all [[free market|market-based]] economic activity underground and leads to inefficiencies and shortages. In both the Soviet Union and Red China, the number of people who starved to death when the government confiscated their farm products (animals and grain) is estimated in the tens of millions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even more important, one party controls every organization from the local labor union to the the army to the national government.  The party is not elected. Its top officials (the &amp;quot;Politburo&amp;quot;) select replacements when there is a vacancy.  usually a dictator (like Stalin, Mao or Castro) controls the Politburo, but sometimes power is shared among five or six people.  No dissent is allowed--all news media are controlled, and the Internet is heavily censored. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elites do not disappear. Members of the ruling party (see [[Nomenklatura]]) have special stores in which ordinary people are barred, stores which are allegedly immune to the shortages which the lower class must endure.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Various communist doctrines have evolved or been adapted to the time and place they have been implemented. Marxism, developed by [[Karl Marx]], and its modifications under [[Vladimir Ilyich Lenin| Vladimir Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin]], and [[Mao Zedong]], advocates the overthrow of the existing order by a revolution of the proletariat, the social group which does not control the means of production. The goal of Marxism is supposedly to create a classless society which would result in no longer the need for any [[government]] (Communism).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most famous government to label itself &amp;quot;communist&amp;quot; is the former [[USSR]] or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; the Communist Party controlled its government from 1918 to 1991. This government was officially [[atheist]] and attempted to suppress all religion until World War II, when it discovered religion was needed to rally the people against the Nazi invaders.  Like all authoritarian regimes, it tried to cultivate reverence for the state as a psychological substitute for religion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist theory is intended to appeal to its adherents with the phrase, &amp;quot;from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs&amp;quot;, which essentially states point blank a worker does not get paid according to his abilities, and there is no [[incentive]] within the economic theory. Another quote by Marx was, &amp;quot;The theory of the Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property,&amp;quot; or as some have phrased it, legalized theft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communism and militant atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] established [[atheism]] as a key part of communism.  He famously said,  &amp;quot;Religion ... is the opium of the masses.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, K. [http://www.quotationspage.com/quote/31765.html Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right] (Classic Quotations) (Standard translation from the original German).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He believed it was part of the &amp;quot;superstructure,&amp;quot; a  culture built to maintain the status quo.  Thus he considered Christianity a fictional religion.  Instead, Marx was an avowed atheist, as he wrote, &amp;quot;Communism begins from the outset with [[atheism]]; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl, [http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm Private Property and Communism], 1944.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] similarly wrote: &amp;quot;A Marxist must be a materialist, i. e., an enemy of religion, but a dialectical materialist, i. e., one who treats the struggle against religion not in an abstract way, not on the basis of remote, purely theoretical, never varying preaching, but in a concrete way, on the basis of the class struggle which is going on ''in practice'' and is educating the masses more and better than anything else could.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich, ''Proletary'', No. 45, May 13 (26), 1909, translated by Andrew Rothstein and Bernard Issacs, quote from [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1955, [[China|Chinese]] communist leader Chou En-lai declared, &amp;quot;We Communists are atheists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Noebel, David, The Battle for Truth, Harvest House, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[atheism]] in communist regimes has been and continues to be [[militant atheism]] and various acts of repression including the razing of thousands of religious buildings and the killing, imprisoning, and oppression of religious leaders and believers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.academia.org/campus_reports/2000/March_2000_4.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/frroman1.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/7/120250.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_26_116/ai_56249447&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theworldnow.wordpress.com/tag/around-the-world/asia/china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, it is important to note that claiming atheism is important to communism has been disproven constantly and is a typical dried-up Creationist argument. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxists justification for its persecution of the Russian Orthodox Church was based upon the claim that the Church was a &amp;quot;willing tool of Tsarism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.marxist.com/religion-soviet-union170406-6.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The clergy openly stated its support for the counter-revolution (White Revolution). Lenin proclaimed that a communist regime must show itself to be merciless toward the question of religion. There was no place for the church in Lenin's regime. This led to anti-religious decrees and propaganda. All church property was expropriated by the new Soviet government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-42047/Union-of-Soviet-Socialist-Republics#277888.hook&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the late 1930's and later 1940's the restrictions on church activity were loosened as Stalin needed all the support he could get for the war. This doctrine of co-operation between the church and state continued through out the existence of the Soviet republics and the other Warszawa pact nations. Though never going as far as a leader of the Soviet Union asking [http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/simon_barrow/2007/03/hiding_behind_god.html god to bless the country] the clause in the Soviet Unions constitution addressing the separation of church and state was rendered useless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King]] said, &amp;quot;for the Communist there is no divine government, no absolute moral order, there are no fixed, immutable principles; consequently almost anything - force, violence, murder, lying - is a justifiable means.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 92.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stalin-kill.jpg|thumb|300px|left|Exhumed skeletons of [[class war]] victims murdered by communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mega.nu/ampp/rummel/rm1.stalin.kill.htm.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Apologists maintain communism has never really been tried.  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atrocities and Repression ==&lt;br /&gt;
Communist regimes have engaged in mass killings on a scale of millions of individuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/comfaq.htm#part3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A work entitled ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]'' published by the [[Harvard]] Press focuses on the crimes, terror, and repression of modern communist regimes over a 70 year period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/COUBLA.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This book is fairly controversial partly due to the various estimates regarding the millions of people who died under communist regimes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/finalconflict/fcrevb102.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/lelivrenoir.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sarasotamagazine.com/blog/template_permalink.asp?id=365&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2526&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, a influential book which concerns itself with Russian communist torture, repression and atrocities is [[Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn]]'s ''[[The Gulag Archipelago]]'' which won Solzhenitsyn a [[Nobel Prize]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/03/01/home/solz-gulag.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1983, Alexander Solzhenitsyn in which he gave his explanation of the cause of why millions of people died under Russian communism:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: &amp;quot;Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened. Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: &amp;quot;Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In communist [[North Korea]], abuse and killing in prison camps is occurring today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5596&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kimsoft.com/korea/nkdefec3.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the North Korean government practices brutal repression and atrocities against North Korean Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/7/120250.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, the publication [[Christian Century]] reported that &amp;quot;China has persecuted religious believers by means of &amp;quot;harassment, prolonged detention, and incarceration in prison or `reform-through-labor' camps and police closure of places of worship.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_26_116/ai_56249447&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2003, owners of Bibles in China were sent to prison camps and 125 Chinese churches were closed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China continues to practice religious oppression today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theworldnow.wordpress.com/tag/around-the-world/asia/china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
![[Communism|Communist]] Manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nazi]] Party Platform&lt;br /&gt;
!Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The stripping away of land from private owners.  [[Liberalism]] today demands &amp;quot;eminent domain&amp;quot; on property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them.  Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberalism today demands a &amp;quot;death tax&amp;quot; on anyone inheriting an estate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Nuremburg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the financial system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the press.  Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &amp;amp;c, &amp;amp;c.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way.  Liberals today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communists cite scripture==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Communist ideology has made its way into the Church as a [[Social Gospel]], interpreting the Gospel as less redemptive of sin and more of a public works campaign and activism. They often cite Jesus feeding the masses and warnings to the wealthy who believed self-seeking is all this world has to offer. Communists often cite the Acts of the Apostles, as early Christians practicing some form of sharing for the common good:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. (Acts 2:44-45, KJV)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed Barnabas, (which is, being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of the country of Cyprus,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet.(Acts 4:34-7, KJV)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as Arnold Toynbee has pointed out, this Marxist view denies the most crucial points,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The passage in the Acts represents the philanthropy of the primitive Christian Society as flowing from a God-given grace which was the fruit of a belief in the divinity of Jesus. In other words, the charity which is here depicted as moving the primitive Christians to go—in their mutual concern for one another's welfare—to the extreme length of sharing all their worldly goods is not a mere love of Man for Man (which is the limited literal meaning of the word ‘philanthropy’), but is a spiritual relation to which God is a party as well as His human creatures. In fact, this Christian Socialism is a practical application, on the economic surface of life, of the fundamental religious truth that the brotherhood of man is a consequence of the fatherhood of God - a truth which is driven home with special force by a religion which teaches that God is not only the Father and Creator of man, but also his Savior, Who has been incarnate in human shape and has suffered, and triumphed over, death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585, ''Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cummunisms shared totalitarian ideals with facism and nazism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Adolf Hitler]] noted that Communists made excellent converts to Nazism, because the same personality type was attracted to both. &amp;quot;[T]here is more that binds us to [[Bolshevik|Bolshevism]] than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois [[Social democracy|Social-Democrat]] and the trade-union boss will never make a [[National Socialist]], but the Communists always will.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;quoted in Hermann Rauschning, ''Hitler Speaks''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Josef Stalin]] also recognized that ex-Nazis and ex-[[fascist]]s were natural recruits for post-war Communist regimes. As Stanley Payne notes in his ''A History of Fascism: 1914-1945'', &amp;quot;All over Soviet-occupied eastern Europe, most rank-and-file former fascist party members, together with many lower-level leaders, were welcomed to fill the ranks of the initially exiguous local Communist parties. The psychological transition seems to have been an easy one, for obvious reasons.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lietuvos.org/istorija/communism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cuban communism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Cuba]] remains a communist state controlled by the Castro brothers since 1960 and under U.S economic sanctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Asian communism==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[CCP]] in China retains an autocratic regime controlled by the Communist party, which allows no democracy or dissent. However it does allow capitalism, and has experienced a very rapid growth of the private sector and the middle class. Observers expect that the regime's efforts to control public opinion and forestall the will of the people will be more and more difficult. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]] remains a brutal dictatorship controlled by the same family. [[Laos]], and [[Vietnam]] are also run by the old Communist cliques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Collapse of the Soviet bloc==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The shooting down by the Soviets on Sept. 1, 1983 of [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] may have been a contributing factor for the downfall of the Soviet Union as well as for the whole Soviet block. It being a catalyst for the collapse of the Soviet Union may be inferred from the fact that NATO had decided, under the impetus of the U.S. administration, to deploy Pershing II and cruise missiles in Europe, primarily West Germany. This deployment would have placed missiles just 6-10 minutes striking distance from Moscow. But support for the deployment was wavering and many doubted that the missile deployment would find enough support to effect it. When the Soviet Union shot down Flight 007 with 269 people aboard, including conservative Democratic Congressman [[Larry McDonald]] —an act which U.S. President Ronald Reagan characterized as a &amp;quot;massacre&amp;quot;—enough support was galvanized for the deployment. The deployment caused great resources of the Soviet Union to be diverted from inner economic use to military expenditures to counter the U.S. and NATO missile deployment. &lt;br /&gt;
Between 1989 and 1991, many communist governments fell. The [[Berlin Wall]] in [[Germany]], which had become a symbol for the division between the West and communist states, was torn down largely in response to Ronald Reagan in 1989, and there was also a large revolution against Romanian dictator [[Nicolaie Ceausescu]]. In 1991, the USSR broke up into several countries - each which reformed to capitalism. Some of these remained under autocratic governments, but some have embraced democracy.  With the collapse the remnants of Communist parties have dropped their old names and ideologies, but still operate on the left of the political spectrum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American communism==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Committees of Correspondence]]''&lt;br /&gt;
With the collapse of Soviet communism and the conversion of Chinese communism to &amp;quot;state run capitalism,&amp;quot; the spiritual and ideological center of world of communism and the [[Marxist-Leninist]] tradition shifted to the [[United States]]. Several prominent American communists, rudderless without [[Moscow]] direction, formed a new organization in 1992 called the [[Committees of Correspondence for Democratic Socialism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial organizational conference was held in [[Berkeley]], [[California]], July 17-19, 1992. Charlene Mitchell, a former leader of the California Communist Party, speaking at the conference said, &amp;quot;the collapse of [[socialism]] in [[Eastern Europe]] left the [[United States]] in a near unchallenged position of world leadership.&amp;quot; Mitchell continued, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|What began as a moment to take stock and ponder where to go from there has now become a very different entity. People from the Communist Party, from CrossRoads, from the [[Democratic Socialists of America]], from NCIPA [National Committee for Independent Political Action], from Solidarity, from the Socialist Organizing Network and many others, including independent leftists and independent socialists, have come together here in Berkeley.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Criticizing U.S. actions in the [[First Gulf War]], Mitchell stated, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|[[progressive]] forces were nearly powerless in the face of an onslaught of demagogic, [[patriotic]] [[jingoism]] and yellow ribbons. This war, fought for no legitimate reason, was the crowning height of [[George H.W. Bush|President [George H.W.] Bush]]'s [[New World Order]].  Previously, the Soviet Union helped to provide a certain balance to rein in the crazies in this country. Now, that balance is no longer there. It is now up to us, the American people, to rein in our own crazies. The [[left]] must take a major responsibility in organizing this task.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notorious communists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well known communists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Ayers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fidel Castro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Chavez]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Davidson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frank Marshall Davis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernardine Dohrn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Che Guevara]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Van Jones]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kim Jong Il]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lazar Kaganovich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vladimir Lenin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mao Zedong]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ho Chi Minh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pol Pot]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Robeson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yakov Sverdlov]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leon Trotsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Genrikh Yagoda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yakov Yurovsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Salvador Allende]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Benjamin Jones&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
** Pipes, Richard. ''History of Communism: A Brief History'' (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* Priestland, David. ''The Red Flag: A History of Communism'' (2009) &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.archive.org/stream/100thingsyoushou1949unit#page/n3/mode/2up 100 Things You Should Know About Communism'']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Communist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communist Party of the United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cold War]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Iron Curtain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] for the connection of the shootdown by the Soviets of KAL 007, with 269 people aboard, on Sept. 1, 1983 with the heightened U.S./Soviet confrontations of 1983-4.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Soviet/ U.S naval confrontation]] over KAL 007&lt;br /&gt;
*[[KAL 007 and the Soviet Top Secret Memos]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes and references==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.memorialsighet.ro/en/colectie.asp?id=3 Memorial to the Victims of Communism and the Resistance]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/communism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Communism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Forms of Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Anti-American]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Buddhism&amp;diff=960330</id>
		<title>Buddhism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Buddhism&amp;diff=960330"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T18:09:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Buddhism''' is a religious system whose followers seek liberation from suffering through adherence to the teachings of the Buddha [[Siddhartha Gautama]]. To Buddhists, sentient beings are trapped in an eternal cycle of death and rebirth (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;samsara&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;), characterized by continual dissatisfaction or suffering (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;dukkha&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;). Buddhism provides a practical set of teachings (the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;dharma&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;) designed to help sentient beings achieve a state of freedom from dukkha. Buddhism teaches that individuals reincarnate involuntarily and repeatedly in the world of samsara, a cyclic process which ends for an individual when they attain Nirvana (Theravada) or Enlightenment (Mahayana), either in a human body or immediately upon death in their last involuntary cycle of samsara. Mahayana Buddhism holds, in addition, that the goal of Enlightenment is not merely release from one's own personal suffering in samsara, but also the release of all sentient beings, toward which an enlightened being or &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Buddha&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; is, by nature, committed to work through compassionate action. To this end, a Buddha may voluntarily reincarnate to help release all sentient beings from samsara.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Nara.jpg|thumb|200px|Great Buddha at [[Nara]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism was founded by an [[India|Indian]] prince, [[Siddhartha Gautama]], who, after being sheltered from coming into contact with suffering due to disease, poverty and death until adulthood, finally observed the suffering of his people during his first walk outside the palace grounds.  After that he worked to discover the reason for suffering and pain. He studied a number of the disciplines of the day, seeking ultimate truth. After finding other approaches to understanding lacking, he went into meditation for 49 days, vowing not to move until he had attained enlightenment. After great personal struggle he achieved enlightenment, and began to teach the principles that are now associated with Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The philosophy has its roots in [[Hinduism]] and Vedic religion, to which Gautama belonged until the foundation of Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==View of God==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mandala of Prajnaparamit.jpg|thumb|Mandala of Prajnaparamit, [[Tibet]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some Buddhist scriptures and some sects, like the Mahayana school, believe that gods exist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wri.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/buddhism.html Buddhism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma3/budgod.html Do Buddhists Believe in God?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but do not consider that knowledge crucial to an individual's practice of Buddhist teachings since as incarnated beings, they too are bound to the wheel of Samsara and thus it is pointless to submit to them. The Buddha taught that we should not speculate about what we cannot know, and that speculation about [[God]] is pointless. Buddhists' priorities are release from suffering (by learning to cease striving after objects of desire and avoiding objects of discomfort) and direct experience of the true nature of reality. Many modern strains of Buddhism are [[atheist|atheistic]] in nature, thus creating a paradox as to why they are called a religion. They can be considered to be philosophies of life. Certain denominations, such as the Mahayana tradition, believe in [[Bodhisattvas]], or quasi-divine cosmic beings that seek to benefit others by remaining in a state of [[Samsara]], or eternal rebirth. These are prayed to, for advice and spiritual guidance, and often venerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teachings==&lt;br /&gt;
The highest ideal for a Buddhist is the state of Nirvana, or release from eternal rebirth, a state beyond conceptual thought. This descibes a state that is achieved through meditation and practice that is beyond the categories and conditioning that are a result of our education, experiences and the limitations of language. This state has been described by the Buddha as follows:  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is O monks, an Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed.  Were there not, o monks, this Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed, there would be no escape from the world of the born, originated, created, formed. ~ Udana, 80-81&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adherents claim that Buddhism is a very practical [[philosophy]], which teaches us to focus our attention on personal experience, to determine what is the cause of our discontents (&amp;quot;dukkha&amp;quot;) and to find a way to liberate ourselves from these, all the while expressing &amp;quot;metta&amp;quot;, which is universal, unconditional love, and &amp;quot;karuna&amp;quot;, which roughly translates to &amp;quot;compassion&amp;quot;, towards others.  These teachings are encapsulated in the [[Four Noble Truths]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.parami.org/buddhistanswers/four_noble_truths.htm Four Noble Truths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism is commonly held to be a relatively peaceful religion, due to its less &amp;quot;absolutist&amp;quot; view of morality and the fluid nature of thought that encouraged not just acceptance of other faiths and ideas, but also examination of those ideas and, if necessary, applying them to one's life. This also allows people to follow Buddhism as a philosophy, and Islam, Judaism or Christianity as a faith, without contradicting any principles of either following.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://buddhism.about.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the ideals of tolerance and introspection among the Buddhist faithful were often ignored by the leaders of Buddhist nations (much like the leaders of most other nations often disobeyed their own religions' fundamental laws in the interest of what was practical) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://buddhism.about.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and persecution of Christians in predominantly Buddhist nations does occur today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.persecution.org/whitepapers/vietnam-2002-03.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianpersecution.info/news/new-evidence-of-religious-persecution-in-vietnam-despite-release-prisoner/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://persecution.org/Countries/laos.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to note here that the beliefs of the populace and those of the leadership do not necessarily always coincide (ref. Israel under Roman control). It is important to note that only around 55% of Vietnam is Buddhist (see below), and that Buddhist monks took an active role in protesting the corrupt Diem regime and the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of Buddhism's tenets might be considered to promote a 'liberal' lifestyle: vegetarianism, absolute pacifism, tolerance, lack of condemnation of homosexuality, agnosticism, etc. In particular, altered forms of Buddhism have been used in the atheistic American [[New Age]] movement. [[Liberals]], in keeping with [[relativism]], have been known to pick and choose which aspects of Buddhism to follow, while openly breaking other Buddhist teachings, like those forbidding drug use and sexual promiscuity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Eightfold Path==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Noble Eightfold Path]] is a teaching in Buddhism used to enlighten the individual, helping them to see the ultimate truth behind things like greed, suffering, and hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right View - Is the way of looking at the world as it really is, to understand how it really works. &lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Intention - The purging of qualities the person knows to be wrong or immoral from themselves. Right View helps to identify which intentions are good and which are not. Exemplified by a commitment to nonviolence against other living beings.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Speech - Instructs the practitioner of Buddhism in how to speak to others. Emphasizes telling the truth, avoiding gossip and idle chatter, and speaking in a polite, pacifying manner. This path also scorns against hateful, divisive speech.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Action - This path instructs the practitioner in how to act in a morally upright manner, abstaining from violence, stealing, taking a life, and sexual misconduct.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Livelihood -  This instructs the practitioner to not engage in trades which, either directly or indirectly, result in harm to another living thing. These include Arms dealing, Human trade, working with animals raised to be slaughtered, or selling alcohol or drugs.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right effort - This is the teaching of ridding oneself of all harmful thought, words, and deeds, and prevent new ones from emerging.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Mindfulness - This teaches the practitioner to be focused on their own mind and aware or changes and phenomena affecting them, never to act or speak in error due to inattention or forgetfulness.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Concentration - This path teaches the practitioner how to meditate, calming the body and mind through measured breathing and repetition of a word or phrase. Using this practice allows the person to focus on what they have learned, and through dwelling on those teachings, gain knowledge of the world around them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buddhism in Antiquity==&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism has been an important part of the culture in many eastern countries, such as [[Cambodia]], [[Thailand]], and [[India]].  It has endured active persecution when conflicting with older beliefs such as [[Hinduism]], and led in many countries to the rise of Buddhist warrior-dissidents, as well as such interesting anomalies as ''shinshi'' (transliterated from the Khmer), a form of torture wherein strips of flesh are removed slowly from the forehead.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schlesinger, Robert.  ''Schlesinger's History of the East'', 2nd ed.  New York: Camport &amp;amp; Sons, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Branches of Buddhism==&lt;br /&gt;
Like many other religions of the world, Buddhism has developed into numerous branches and variation on the themes taught by the Buddha.  While it would be impossible to give a truly succinct description of every permutation, the schools of thought encompassing Buddhism are generally broken into three major divisions, discussed briefly below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Theravada'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therevaden Buddhism, sometimes derisively known as Hinyama (lesser vehicle) by some Mahayana Buddhist practitioners, is what can be described as the earliest advent of Buddhism and the closest to the original philosophy founded by the Buddha and is regarded by practitioners as the more conservative of the three divisions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central to the Theravadan school of thought is the notion of Vibhajjavada&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://palikanon.com/english/wtb/u_v/vibhajja_vaada.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or Teaching of Analysis.  This notion holds that true insight for a student comes from a combination of critical reasoning and non-reliance on blind faith, though the teachings and writings of one's elders should be considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Theravada teaches that enlightenment is not attainable in a single lifetime, nor should it be thought to be.  Instead, one must break free of their worldly fetters (hatred, lust, shame) before being reborn and continuing on the path to eventual enlightenment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theravadan Buddhism's main text can be considered the Pali Cannon, though a wealth of scripture, sutras and treatises have arisen and shall continue to be written as the philosophy continues to diversify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mahayana'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mahayana Buddhism, literally &amp;quot;Great Vehicle,&amp;quot; is one of the other main branches of Buddhism and is popular in East Asian countries such as [[China]], [[Korea]], [[Japan]] and [[Tibet]]. Whereas Theravada Buddhism focuses on induvidual enlightenment, Mahayana is Buddhism for the masses. Indeed, it is often called Buddhism for the masses. Furthermore, Mahayana holds bodhivisattvas in esteem. To put an analogy to it, bodhivisattvas are similar to saints, preachers, or even teachers in Christianity. Bodhivisattvas are enlightened ones who choose to remain in the cycle of samsara for the hope of helping others towards enlightenment. Gautama is perhaps the most famous of these bodhivisattvas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adherents of this branch of Buddhism believe in improving both their own consciousness and the world. They acknowledge that this approach would slow down the goal of overcoming suffering and have adopted &amp;quot;We should reach Nirvana as the last ones&amp;quot; as their bodhisattva vow.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cs.ru.nl/~henk/BP/bp1.html#SECTION00022000000000000000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buddhism Today==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:China B.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism is currently the majority religion in the following states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Country'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Percent'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thailand&lt;br /&gt;
|95% &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cambodia&lt;br /&gt;
|90 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Myanmar&lt;br /&gt;
|88&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bhutan&lt;br /&gt;
|75 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sri Lanka&lt;br /&gt;
|70 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tibet*&lt;br /&gt;
|65 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laos&lt;br /&gt;
|60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Vietnam&lt;br /&gt;
|55 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Japan**&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; [[China]]: Is the country with the most Buddhists, with an estimated 100 million adherents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; Tibet is an estimate, as there has never been a reliable survey. Furthermore, it is debatable whether Tibet should be considered an independent nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; [[Japan]] is an &amp;quot;odd&amp;quot; case, as surveys of adherence are conducted rather differently. Firstly it is debatable at what point various Japanese beliefs shift from being traditions to being religions. This is indicated by the fact that &amp;quot;85% of Japanese claim Buddhism as their preferred religion&amp;quot;, yet &amp;quot;75% percent claim to practice and believe in no religion&amp;quot; -a more accurate estimate may be 20%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_buddhist.html The Largest Buddhist Communities]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Obon.jpg|thumb|Obon remains one of the most important Buddhist observances]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Obon Festival is one of Japan’s oldest Buddhist celebrations; it marks the time that it’s believed the spirits of dead ancestors return to the Earth. The gathering included the Bon Odori dance, which remembers Japanese ancestors by imitating motions of picking cherries and mining coal. [http://www.culturesdiary.com/]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kamakura]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nara]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity in Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wri.leaderu.com/wri-table2/buddhism.html#intro Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ Access to Insight: Readings in Theravada Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kalachakranet.org/buddhism/history_japanese_buddhism.htm History of Japanese Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further reading ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Buddhism1.jpg|thumb|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chodron, Thubten. ''Buddhism for Beginners'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Beginners-Thubten-Chodron/dp/1559391537/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262317083&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Harding, John S. et al, eds. ''Wild Geese: Buddhism in Canada'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
* Landaw, Jonathan, and Stephan Bodian. ''Buddhism For Dummies'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Dummies-Religion-Spirituality/dp/0764553593/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262317083&amp;amp;sr=1-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rahula, Walpola.  ''What the Buddha Taught: Revised and Expanded Edition with Texts from Suttas and Dhammapada''.  Grove, 1994.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Rapaport, Al,  and Brian Hotchkiss. ''Buddhism in America'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-America-Al-Rapaport/dp/0804831521/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262316921&amp;amp;sr=1-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Seager, Richard Hughes. ''Buddhism in America'' (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-America-Richard-Hughes-Seager/dp/0231108699/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262316921&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dharmic Religions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&amp;diff=960329</id>
		<title>Pseudoscience</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&amp;diff=960329"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T18:02:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Pseudoscience''' is theory or speculation which has the trappings and [[rhetoric]] of [[science]], and is presented as science, but is not valid science. Theories are typically classed as pseudoscientific if they fail the [[scientific method]].  Pseudoscientific theories are typically not [[falsifiable]], lack objectivity, and their purveyors show unwillingness to allow neutral outsiders to observe, test, or replicate their findings.  There is no definitive or objective definition of the term &amp;quot;pseudoscience&amp;quot;, which is also sometimes used as a pejorative term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. G. A. Dolby, ''Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World'', Published by Cambridge University Press, 2002. ISBN 0521892627, 9780521892629, 380 pages. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xd3ylT3WTLEC&amp;amp;pg=PA191&amp;amp;dq=pseudoscience+pejorative&amp;amp;num=100&amp;amp;as_brr=3 Page 191]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brian Stableford, ''Science Fact and Science Fiction'', Published by CRC Press, 2006, ISBN 0415974607, 9780415974608, 729 pages. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uefwmdROKTAC&amp;amp;pg=PA410&amp;amp;dq=pseudoscience+pejorative&amp;amp;num=100&amp;amp;as_brr=3 Page 410]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Falsifiability ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most cited element of scientific theory is [[falsifiability]], established by [[philosopher]] [[Karl Popper]].  A falsifiable theory makes predictions, which can be used to test it.  Thus, the theory of gravity is falsifiable, as it predicts that an apple held above the ground and released will fall.  If it fails the test, it is discarded, and if it passes, it is not proven, but better supported. Another example is evolution. If a fossil appears out of place in the fossil record (which has never happened), the whole theory of evolution would crumple. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disproven science ==&lt;br /&gt;
The term pseudoscience is also often applied to theories which ''are'' falsifiable and have in fact been falsified and discarded.  [[Phrenology]] predicted that psychological traits could be inferred from the shape of the skull, but no actual link was ever found.  Various [[astrology|astrological]] theories predicted regular planetary effects on the earth and human health, but testing those failed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The existence of God is thus not considered scientific theory, as no test can possibly be conceived which categorically disproves His existence.  The same is the case for [[string theory]], which is a mathematical unification of scientific theory, but makes no predictions.  Such things fall outside the realm of science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charlatanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The label ''pseudoscientist'' is commonly given to cranks and charlatans, who claim abnormal powers and abilities, but refuse to demonstrate them in objective, controlled, monitored environments.  For example, Uri Geller claims to be able to bend spoons without applying pressure to them, but he cannot do it in front of scientists or journalists&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3vGGf-ZIkc  Uri Geller debunked by James Randi and Johnny Carson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Countless conjurers and mediums claim to be able to speak with the dead, but controlled circumstances reveal that they are really only conducting clever psychological tricks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Metaphysics ==&lt;br /&gt;
Spiritual, metaphysical, philosophical, and religious beliefs are occasionally confused with pseudoscience, as there is often an overlap in rhetoric, and charlatans blur the lines between scientific and philosophical ideas of knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public belief ==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite evidence and logic against pseudoscientific theories, many remain popular among the public.  Homeopathic medicine is available at most health-food stores and is a multi-billion dollar business, and 31% of Americans believe in astrology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notably, twice as many [[Democrats]] believe in astrology as [[Republicans]], showing a strong bent of irrationality and scientific illiteracy among [[liberals]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples of pseudosciences==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Within the [[evolution|evolutionary]] science community and the [[creation science]] community, Richard Dawkins has faced charges of engaging in pseudoscience and also has faced charges of committing elementary errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/send-clowns-–-richard-dawkins-obliges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/the-greatest-hoax-on-earth/main.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For more information, please see: [[Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal magnetism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Astrology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dianetics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dominionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.parentcompany.com/science_kit/sk3b.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/reprints/Evolution-Fact-or-Theory.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Free Energy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Graphology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Iridology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lysenkoism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mesmerism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Much of the work of [[PZ Myers]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/pz-myers-pseudoscienceblogscom&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orgone therapy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Parapsychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phrenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Population control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pseudoarchaeology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Psychoanalysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reflexology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transgenderism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ufology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: You obviously don't understand how science works|You obviously don't understand how science works]] - [[Satire]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scientism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Refutations of Pseudoscience ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Pseudoscience]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&amp;diff=960328</id>
		<title>Pseudoscience</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pseudoscience&amp;diff=960328"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T18:01:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Pseudoscience''' is theory or speculation which has the trappings and [[rhetoric]] of [[science]], and is presented as science, but is not valid science. Theories are typically classed as pseudoscientific if they fail the [[scientific method]].  Pseudoscientific theories are typically not [[falsifiable]], lack objectivity, and their purveyors show unwillingness to allow neutral outsiders to observe, test, or replicate their findings.  There is no definitive or objective definition of the term &amp;quot;pseudoscience&amp;quot;, which is also sometimes used as a pejorative term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. G. A. Dolby, ''Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World'', Published by Cambridge University Press, 2002. ISBN 0521892627, 9780521892629, 380 pages. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xd3ylT3WTLEC&amp;amp;pg=PA191&amp;amp;dq=pseudoscience+pejorative&amp;amp;num=100&amp;amp;as_brr=3 Page 191]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brian Stableford, ''Science Fact and Science Fiction'', Published by CRC Press, 2006, ISBN 0415974607, 9780415974608, 729 pages. [http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uefwmdROKTAC&amp;amp;pg=PA410&amp;amp;dq=pseudoscience+pejorative&amp;amp;num=100&amp;amp;as_brr=3 Page 410]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Falsifiability ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most cited element of scientific theory is [[falsifiability]], established by [[philosopher]] [[Karl Popper]].  A falsifiable theory makes predictions, which can be used to test it.  Thus, the theory of gravity is falsifiable, as it predicts that an apple held above the ground and released will fall.  If it fails the test, it is discarded, and if it passes, it is not proven, but better supported. Another example is evolution. If a fossil appears out of place in the fossil record (which has never happened), the whole theory of evolution would crumple. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Disproven science ==&lt;br /&gt;
The term pseudoscience is also often applied to theories which ''are'' falsifiable and have in fact been falsified and discarded.  [[Phrenology]] predicted that psychological traits could be inferred from the shape of the skull, but no actual link was ever found.  Various [[astrology|astrological]] theories predicted regular planetary effects on the earth and human health, but testing those failed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The existence of God is thus not considered scientific theory, as no test can possibly be conceived which categorically disproves His existence.  The same is the case for [[string theory]], which is a mathematical unification of scientific theory, but makes no predictions.  Such things fall outside the realm of science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Charlatanism ==&lt;br /&gt;
The label ''pseudoscientist'' is commonly given to cranks and charlatans, who claim abnormal powers and abilities, but refuse to demonstrate them in objective, controlled, monitored environments.  For example, Uri Geller claims to be able to bend spoons without applying pressure to them, but he cannot do it in front of scientists or journalists&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3vGGf-ZIkc  Uri Geller debunked by James Randi and Johnny Carson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Countless conjurers and mediums claim to be able to speak with the dead, but controlled circumstances reveal that they are really only conducting clever psychological tricks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Metaphysics ==&lt;br /&gt;
Spiritual, metaphysical, philosophical, and religious beliefs are occasionally confused with pseudoscience, as there is often an overlap in rhetoric, and charlatans blur the lines between scientific and philosophical ideas of knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public belief ==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite evidence and logic against pseudoscientific theories, many remain popular among the public.  Homeopathic medicine is available at most health-food stores and is a multi-billion dollar business, and 31% of Americans believe in astrology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notably, twice as many [[Democrats]] believe in astrology as [[Republicans]], showing a strong bent of irrationality and scientific illiteracy among [[liberals]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples of pseudosciences==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:5712dawkins.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Within the [[evolution|evolutionary]] science community and the [[creation science]] community, Richard Dawkins has faced charges of engaging in pseudoscience and also has faced charges of committing elementary errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/send-clowns-–-richard-dawkins-obliges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/the-greatest-hoax-on-earth/main.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For more information, please see: [[Richard Dawkins and pseudoscience]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Animal magnetism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Astrology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dianetics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dominionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution|Evolutionary biology]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.grisda.org/origins/04004.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/there-is-no-theory-of-evolution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://members.iinet.net.au/~sejones/PoE/pe05scnc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.parentcompany.com/science_kit/sk3b.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/reprints/Evolution-Fact-or-Theory.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Free Energy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Graphology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homeopathy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Iridology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lysenkoism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mesmerism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Much of the work of [[PZ Myers]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/pz-myers-pseudoscienceblogscom&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Orgone therapy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Parapsychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phrenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Population control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pseudoarchaeology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Psychoanalysis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reflexology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transgenderism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ufology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: You obviously don't understand how science works|You obviously don't understand how science works]] - [[Satire]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scientism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Refutations of Pseudoscience ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Pseudoscience]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;diff=960327</id>
		<title>Darwinism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Darwinism&amp;diff=960327"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T17:58:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Darwinism''' &amp;quot;is the doctrine that all living things are biological descendants of [[common ancestors]] that have been modified by [[unguided variations]] and [[natural selection]].&amp;quot; [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2009/01/art_as_lust015681.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is named for the nineteenth-century English naturalist [[Charles Darwin]], who held that [[natural selection]] in combination with sucessful [[mutation]] is the directive or creative force of [[evolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Darwinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[theory of natural selection]] is one of two major evolutionary theories advanced by Darwin, the other being the [[theory of descent with modification]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Darwinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A popular documentary, ''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]'', aptly described how Adolf Hitler followed Darwin's ideas to their logical conclusion:  the wholesale slaughter of millions of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern version of the [[theory of evolution]], based on Darwin's original theory, is sometimes called &amp;quot;[[Neo-Darwinism]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mikhail_Gorbachev&amp;diff=960326</id>
		<title>Mikhail Gorbachev</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mikhail_Gorbachev&amp;diff=960326"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T17:54:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:03-026.jpg|right|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev''' born March 2, 1931, was the last effective leader of the [[Soviet Union]]. Embarking on a new openness with the outside world not previously seen under Soviet rule, Gorbachev became quite popular in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the agricultural region of [[Stavropol]], Gorbachev attended [[Moscow]] University, where he studied law. In 1953 he married Raisa Titorenko, a fellow student. He returned to [[Stavropol]] and began to move gradually upward in the Communist Party. Following the death of Communist leader [[Konstantin Chernenko]] in 1985, Gorbachev was elected General Secretary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9037405/Mikhail-Gorbachev&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As General Secretary, Gorbachev improved relations with the [[United States]] and embarked on an extensive mission of reforming the Communist Soviet Union. He succeeded in reforming it politically, economically, and socially under policies known as ''[[glasnost]]''(&amp;quot;openness&amp;quot;) and ''[[perestroika]]'' (&amp;quot;restructuring&amp;quot;). It is questioned to what extent he intended to bring about the wholesale changes that swept the Soviet Union and its satellites and how much events moved out of control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1990, Gorbachev granted a one-on-one meeting to arch anti-Communist [[Sun Myung Moon]]. &lt;br /&gt;
Father Moon urged him to grant religious freedom to his nation, saying:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Mr. President, you have already achieved much success through perestroika, but that alone will not be sufficient for reform. You need to immediately allow [[freedom of religion]] in the Soviet Union. If you try to reform only the material world, without the involvement of [[God]], perestroika will be doomed to fail. [[Communism]] is about to end. The only way to save this nation is to allow the freedom of religion. The time is now for you to act with the courage that you have shown in reforming the Soviet Union and become a president of the world who works to bring about [[world peace]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://cheonilguk2013.blogspot.com/2010/12/allow-freedom-of-religion-in-soviet_7230.html “Allow Freedom of Religion in the Soviet Union”]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also asked him to revive diplomatic relations with [[South Korea]]. &lt;br /&gt;
:President Gorbachev met President Roh in San Francisco in June that year for a bilateral summit. Then, on September 30, 1990, South Korea and the Soviet Union signed a historic agreement to open diplomatic relations for the first time in eighty six years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://cheonilguk2013.blogspot.com/2010/12/allow-freedom-of-religion-in-soviet_8021.html “Allow Freedom of Religion in the Soviet Union”]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Bush and Gorbachev sign agreements.jpg|thumb|300px|Left|Gorbachev (left) signs agreement with President G.H.W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
After surviving the unsuccessful August Coup of 1991, and following subsequent referendums in the constituent Soviet republics seeking independence, Gorbachev was forced to resign office on December 25, 1991. The Soviet Union was dissolved the following day. Although still thought of fondly in the West, Gorbachev did not maintain his popularity at home.  After his &amp;quot;retirement&amp;quot; he was forced to live on a pension that deteriorated quickly in value as the Russian currency collapsed in the post-Communist era.  Gorbachev was awarded the 1990 [[Nobel Peace Prize]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/ Nobel Peace Prize]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992 Gorbachev founded The International Foundation for Socio-Economic and Political Studies (The Gorbachev Foundation), an independent think tank committed to &amp;quot;democratic values and moral, humanistic principles in the life of society&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gorby.ru/en/rubrs.asp?rubr_id=302&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He is also the founding president and a board member of the environmental group Green Cross International.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dev.gci.creativ-conseil.ch/joomy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Attitude toward religion==&lt;br /&gt;
Gorbachev, as Soviet president, campaigned for the establishment of [[freedom of religion]] laws in the Soviet Union, viewing the exercise of religious expression as a valuable source of societal cohesion. He himself is an atheist. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianpost.com/article/20080324/31660_Gorbachev_Dispels_'Closet_Christian'_Rumors%3B_Says_He_is_Atheist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mikhailgorbachev.org/ Official website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gorby.ru/en/default.asp The Gorbachev Foundation]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dev.gci.creativ-conseil.ch/joomy/ Green Cross International]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gorbachev, Mikhail}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Leaders]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cold War]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Atheists_Dislike_Underdogs%3F&amp;diff=960325</id>
		<title>Mystery:Why Do Atheists Dislike Underdogs?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mystery:Why_Do_Atheists_Dislike_Underdogs%3F&amp;diff=960325"/>
		<updated>2012-02-10T17:51:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Stevo: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[Britain]], where 55% of the population describe themselves as Christian&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brin.ac.uk/news/2011/yougovcambridge-on-religion/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, people dislike [[underdog]]s and tend to root for the contestant who is favored to win.  The opposite is true in the [[Christian]] [[United States]], where the underdogs have traditionally been the favorites of the people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, as the [[liberal media]] in the United States becomes increasingly atheistic, victories by underdogs are increasingly met with dismay or disapproval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The failure by atheists to build hospitals illustrates their tendencies not to help the weak.  The underdog epitomizes the weaker side in a contest, and atheists are fine with the underdog losing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why do atheists dislike underdogs? This article is just laughable&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Belief in Survival of the Fittest ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists are fervent believers in &amp;quot;survival of the fittest,&amp;quot; and this implies that the underdog will lose and '''''should''''' lose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheism Denies Faith and Hope -- the Keys to Underdog Success ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism is a denial of [[faith]] and hope, but these are essential ingredients to rooting for an underdog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists are Wannabes, Craving Recognition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists are wannabes, craving recognition by others whom they perceive to be smarter.  This leads them to side with the team or candidate who is favored by others, particularly by other atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Clinging to a Belief Against Surprises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The belief system of an atheist clings to a denial that there will be any surprises like [[Hell]].  Victory by an underdog is a surprise, which is unsettling for atheists who insist that there must not be any big surprises in an afterlife.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Optimized for an audience IQ of perhaps 105 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism is optimized for an audience having an IQ only slightly above average, perhaps 105.  That audience can be more easily persuaded that because something is probable, it will happen 100% of the time. This is flawed by not recognizing the possibility of  unlikely outcomes, which often result in important upsets. (Such as predictions against the existence of [[Hell]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheism Is About Control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One obvious reason is that atheism is about control.  Stalin, a famous atheist in the 20th century, probably did not like underdogs.  Underdogs threaten the status quo and the worldview of atheists.  Upset victories are unsettling to people like Stalin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Militant Atheism&amp;quot; Is a Bullying Ideology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Militant atheism]] is, obviously, a bullying ideology.  For example, it demands [[censorship]] of [[classroom prayer]] '''''even when everyone in the classroom wants to pray'''''.  A bullying attitude is incompatible with rooting for underdogs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists Cling to &amp;quot;Conventional Wisdom&amp;quot; of (Atheistic) [[Public Schools]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheism relies heavily on clinging to &amp;quot;conventional wisdom&amp;quot; as taught in atheistic [[public schools]].  The underdog is a counterexample to government-style conventional wisdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheism is a Self-Centered Ideology; No Room for Underdogs  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Self-centered ideologies obviously have less room for underdogs.  Atheism is a self-centered belief system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists Prefer Policies that Thwart Social Mobility ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upward social mobility is much easier in the United States than in atheistic nations, reflecting the very different views of Christianity and atheism toward underdogs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mystery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stevo</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>