<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Steve015</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Steve015"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Steve015"/>
	<updated>2026-10-14T02:02:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=312112</id>
		<title>Living Constitution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Living_Constitution&amp;diff=312112"/>
		<updated>2007-10-08T15:23:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steve015: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''living Constitution''' is one that changes based on perceptions of the changing views of the public.  As a practical matter, it means the [[U.S. Constitution]] should be interpreted however a majority of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] feels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The phrase &amp;quot;living Constitution&amp;quot; was expressly used by the [[liberal]] four-Justice dissent in ''Rummel v. Estelle'', 445 U.S. 263 (1980), and it has been implicitly embraced by the left side of the Court in numerous rulings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
((The Evil in it))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 You should also be aware of the evilness in a living constitution, and all liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Supreme Court]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Steve015</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>