<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=StanleyisWeird1</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=StanleyisWeird1"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/StanleyisWeird1"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T01:23:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_myths&amp;diff=2208939</id>
		<title>Feminist myths</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_myths&amp;diff=2208939"/>
		<updated>2026-10-14T03:43:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;StanleyisWeird1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Feminist Myths''' are commonly perpetrated by the [[feminist agenda]] to give the impression that women have been (a) more unfairly treated in history than they actually have and (b) are unfairly treated today. Pushing these myths onto the public is intended to generate public support for the feminist movement and specific feminist issues, by creating &amp;quot;male guilt&amp;quot; and underlining the need for the equivalent of reparations (i.e. a sort of &amp;quot;affirmative action&amp;quot; for women).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In fact, feminist myths are resulting in inequality that ''disfavours'' men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1083966/Feminist-myths-making-equality-laws-unfair-men.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Common myths&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deltabravo.net/custody/tenmyths.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; include:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
;Women make only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes &lt;br /&gt;
::Although technically correct, this figure is misleading as it implies that a woman will earn less than a man ''for the same job''. The 77-cents-on-the-dollar statistic is calculated by dividing the median earnings of all women working full-time by the median earnings of all men working full-time. But these calculations do not reveal a gender wage injustice because it does not take into account occupation, position, education, or hours worked per week. A study by the American Association of University Women, a feminist organization, shows that the actual wage gap shrinks to only 6.6 cents when you factor in different choices men and women make. The small wage gap that does exist has nothing to do with paying women less or sexism, but rather differences in individual career choices that men and women make. Even within the same profession, men and women make different career choices that impact how much money they make. For example, in nursing, where male nurses on the whole earn 18% more than female nurses. Male nurses gravitate to the best-paying nursing specialties, they work longer hours and disproportionately find jobs in cities with the highest compensation. Nobody knows for sure why there even is a gender wage gap, as there are too many variables that drive wages, but it only exists to the point of vanishing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.prageru.com/video/there-is-no-gender-wage-gap/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
;Women have disproportionately less medical research funds allocated to issues that affect them&lt;br /&gt;
::Though true in the past, this effectively stopped happening in the 1980's. However, feminist groups refuse to acknowledge this.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
;A third of emergency room visits by women are for injuries from domestic violence&lt;br /&gt;
::This wildly exaggerated figure is probably the result of continuous rounding up as the myth is spread from person to person and organization to organization. The higher the figure, the more volatile the myth, and so the faster it spreads. The true figure, as determined by government figures, is closer to 14%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961000002452&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Official government figures for homosexual domestic partners who are victims of domestic violence are sketchy. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
;Women are held back from careers by institutionalized [[paternalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
::This myth stems from the idea that, given the opportunity, just as many women would seek a career as do men. In reality, this is nowhere near the truth; women are far more likely to choose another life path (such as focusing on a family).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Women, until the 1960s, were barred from education and/or literacy&lt;br /&gt;
::In actuality, while not necessarily in the public education system, most women DID get an education of sorts even before the 20th century, and in the 1900s, they had been taught in at the very least the public education system. In fact, besides acting as a housewife, the four main careers they had during the 1950s (schoolteacher, secretary, nurse, and flight attendant) all required some degree of literacy and educational backgrounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>StanleyisWeird1</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gallup_Poll&amp;diff=2208937</id>
		<title>Gallup Poll</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gallup_Poll&amp;diff=2208937"/>
		<updated>2026-10-14T03:38:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;StanleyisWeird1: updated it for the latest data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Gallup Poll''' is the oldest [[polling]] organization in the world, and is often cited to make a point about [[politics]] and human interest stories. The organization was founded by George Gallup in 1934. In October 2024, its highly reputable poll showed a shift to a 31-28% lead in party affiliation for [[Republican]]s over [[Democrat]]s, compared with a ``31-27% lead by Dems the prior month. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The remainder (41-42%) are independents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2025, there was an even 27-27% split &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.gallup.com/poll/15370/party-affiliation.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the remainder being Independents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gallup polls have more integrity than most other polls cited by the [[mainstream media]].  Some of the best Gallup polls, which are done periodically, include:&lt;br /&gt;
*Presidential approval rating, taken ever since [[Harry Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.gallup.com/interactives/185273/r.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*religious views as they change over time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.gallup.com/poll/1690/religion.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public Opinion Poll]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Polling]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>StanleyisWeird1</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:J6_Capitol_protests&amp;diff=2208936</id>
		<title>Talk:J6 Capitol protests</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:J6_Capitol_protests&amp;diff=2208936"/>
		<updated>2026-10-14T03:28:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;StanleyisWeird1: /* okay but where's the Gallup poll? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Garbage that needs to be fixed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Refusing to accept that Biden won, there were protesters that attacked the capitol.. Donald Trump condoned the attack and was banned on both Twitter and Facebook. &amp;quot; This stub that doesn't even have 200 bytes in information is ridiculous. Rather than mark it for deletion, I'm going to fix the mess. —[[User:Liberaltears|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:black; background:#FFABAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 15:39, 10 January 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, good point. I didn’t know that. I learned something new from the article. I am not good at finding sources, although it’s my desire for there to be sources. I am a conservative myself. [[User:WorldQuestioneer|WorldQuestioneer]] ([[User talk:WorldQuestioneer|talk]]) 18:23, 10 January 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==This page is a train wreck==&lt;br /&gt;
Capital is spelled wrong, lol. Come on, what can we do to fix this? --[[User:Man O Wisdom|Man O Wisdom]] ([[User talk:Man O Wisdom|talk]]) 11:28, January 7, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Have at it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Let's Go Brandon!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:27, January 8, 2022 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==30,000 page views==&lt;br /&gt;
This page has just under 30,000 unique page views. Since [[User:Conservative]]'s internal [[shadow banning]] of [[Conservapedia]] editors with [[negative SEO]], page creations that continue on the same subject have fallen to 2,000 or less unique views. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:23, September 27, 2025 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== okay but where's the Gallup poll? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which Gallup poll are we using in the second paragraph? Couldn't find it :/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>StanleyisWeird1</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>