<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Sixsixsix</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Sixsixsix"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Sixsixsix"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T13:45:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Controversy&amp;diff=471126</id>
		<title>Global Warming Controversy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Controversy&amp;diff=471126"/>
		<updated>2008-06-11T17:12:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sixsixsix: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''controversy over the science of [[global warming]]''' is mainly over the extent of [[human]] contribution to warming, as well as a dispute over predictions of near-future warming and its effect on human beings and the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among registered U.S. voters, opinion is split neatly down the middle, with 75% of Democrats believing that &amp;quot;the science is settled&amp;quot; in favor of Al Gore's view and 73% of Republicans affirming that there is no scientific consensus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any event, it is important to remember that public opinion does not change the physical reality. Even if 100% of people of both parties believe in anthropogenic climate change, if the reality is that mankind is not responsible, then public opinion to the contrary does not change that fact--and vast amounts of money could be wasted in curbing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when there is no need. On the other hand, if anthropogenic warming is occurring, then no amount of public denial will cool the climate down again--only positive action will, and curbing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions could save people money (such as with more efficient cars and homes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=303 Global Warming: A Divide on Causes and Solutions] - public opinion poll by Pew Research Center&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport#report Senate Minority Report] lists four hundred (400) scientists who disagree with the current state of climate alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:propaganda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sixsixsix</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Controversy&amp;diff=471125</id>
		<title>Global Warming Controversy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_Warming_Controversy&amp;diff=471125"/>
		<updated>2008-06-11T17:12:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sixsixsix: praise jesus the lord hallelujah *blah blah blah*&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''controversy over the science of [[global warming]]''' is mainly over the extent of [[human]] contribution to warming, as well as a dispute over predictions of near-future warming and its effect on human beings and the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among registered U.S. voters, opinion is split neatly down the middle, with 75% of Democrats believing that &amp;quot;the science is settled&amp;quot; in favor of Al Gore's view and 73% of Republicans affirming that there is no scientific consensus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any event, it is important to remember that public opinion does not change the physical reality. Even if 100% of people of both parties believe in anthropogenic climate change, if the reality is that mankind is not responsible, then public opinion to the contrary does not change that fact--and vast amounts of money could be wasted in curbing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions when there is no need. On the other hand, if anthropogenic warming is occurring, then no amount of public denial will cool the climate down again--only positive action will, and curbing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions could save people money (such as with more efficient cars and homes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=303 Global Warming: A Divide on Causes and Solutions] - public opinion poll by Pew Research Center&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport#report Senate Minority Report] lists four hundred (400) scientists who disagree with the current state of climate alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:propoganda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sixsixsix</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>