<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shigruu</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shigruu"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Shigruu"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T03:40:25Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679456</id>
		<title>Fox News Channel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679456"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T05:24:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Fox Versus Obama */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|thumb|right|Fox News Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Fox News Channel''' is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia|Australian]]-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]]. [[Roger Ailes]] was named Chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group on August 15, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News was started in 1996 by Murdoch and Roger Ailes. The two of them perceived a need for a news organization that offered more balanced reporting, one where the facts from all sides would be presented. Main-stream media &amp;quot;Political Correctness&amp;quot; was banished, with the news [[anchor]]s calling [[terrorist]]s what they were, (terrorists), instead of referring to them as &amp;quot;militants.&amp;quot;  As of February, 2007, polls show that over 20% of Americans say their main source of news is the Fox News Channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News uses the slogan &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced,&amp;quot; carries bipartisan shows like [[Hannity and Colmes]], and daily guest pundits from all sides of the [[political spectrum]]. Fox News also is non-hostile to conservative and [[Christian]] values, viewpoints, spokesmen, and ideas. Fox News has gained the reputation for reporting the news in an unbiased manner and then allowing the viewer to decide; &amp;quot;We Report, You Decide&amp;quot; is another of their on-air slogans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News has dominated the [[ratings]] of other cable news outlets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched by media [[tycoon]] Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived liberal bias everywhere in the so-called &amp;quot;[[mainstream media]]&amp;quot;, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.  It's been trouncing [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] and [[CNBC]] for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fair and Balanced==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fair_balanced.jpg‎ |thumb|left|Fair And Balanced Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] critics have been known to complain about the &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; slogan.  Former President [[Bill Clinton]] exploded at ''Fox News Sunday'' anchor [[Chris Wallace]] in September of 2006, accusing him of &amp;quot;a nice little conservative hit job&amp;quot; after being lightly pressed by Wallace about his record on fighting [[Al Qaeda]].   Democratic politicians and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, sometimes accusing it of being a Republican [[propaganda mill]].  Former Vice-President and environmentalist [[Al Gore]] has likened Fox to a right-wing &amp;quot;[[fifth column]].&amp;quot;  Groups, such as [[MoveOn.org]], funded a classic [[schlockumentary]] entitled ''[[Outfoxed]]'', which purports to expose the channel's 'nefarious Republican agenda'.  Some have referred to FOX News as &amp;quot;the propaganda arm of the Republican Party&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Faux News&amp;quot; or the more critical and racist &amp;quot;Faux Jews.&amp;quot; In a grandstanding gesture of political theater the group unsuccessfully petitioned the [[Federal Trade Commission]] to stop Fox's from using its slogan as &amp;quot;deceptive advertising&amp;quot;. It was unanimously rejected. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.showbizdata.com/news/36127/FTC-REJECTS-COMPLAINTS-AGAINST-FOX-NEWS  FTC: &amp;quot;It's best to ignore nuts&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told today's (Tuesday) Wall Street Journal: &amp;quot;If they can attack Fox News to this extreme, ''then all news organizations are at risk to be targeted by similar attacks. ... It's best to ignore nuts.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent comprehensive study by [[UCLA]] political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri-Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found [[Brit Hume]]'s ''Special Report'' — Fox's most straightforward news show — more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which are liberal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rcp.missouri.edu/articles/milyo_media.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The program is a model of smart news television. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And although it's true that the Fox's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, frequently bombastic and opinionated, it's equally true that Fox's biggest super-star, [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not a mainstream Republican, but a registered [[Independent]] who sides with conservatives. He regularly charges the oil companies with [[price-gouging]] and attacks big business for quashing the little guy. [[Greta Van Susteren]]'s politics are unclear, as she mostly covers the [[crime]]-of-the-day stories. [[Geraldo Rivera]] is traditionally liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for [[sex offender]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal commentaors, such as host [[Alan Colmes]], news analyst [[Marvin Kalb]], and [[Eleanor Clift]], are affiliated with the channel. In general, Fox News is closer to mainstream America than [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[NBC]] or [[CNN]], its founding mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives have criticism for Fox. Their 'Fair and Balanced' motto allows [[liberal]] [[propaganda]], lies, deceit, and half-truths to gain an audience. In reality, Fox was judged to actually provide a more &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; coverage in the 2008 Presidential race than all three MSM networks, who had a decidedly pro-Obama tilt, a study by the ''Center for Media and Public Affairs''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/08summer.pdf Center for Media and Public Affairs: ''How TV News Has Covered McCain, Obama and Hillary'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ratings Dominance ==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News Channel was the 2nd highest rated cable channel on all of television during the first quarter of 2009 in prime time Total Viewers. CNN was 17th and MSNBC 24th for the first three months of the year. FNC beat CNN and MSNBC combined and gained the most compared to the first quarter of 2008, up 24%.  2009's first quarter was FNC's 3rd highest rated quarter in prime time in the network's history — just behind Q4 '08 and Q3 '05. In prime time, ages 25-54 demo, and in total day in both categories, FNC grew more year-to-year than CNN and MSNBC combined. FNC had nine of the top 10 programs on cable news in Total Viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bill O'Reilly|The O'Reilly Factor]] has now been #1 on cable news for 100 consecutive months, up 27% in Total Viewers year-over-year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glenn Beck]] has increased the 5pmET time period 90% in Total Viewers and 115% in the demo vs. Q1 '08, ''and is the fastest growing program in cable news for March''. Special Report with Bret Baier is up 39% in Total Viewers and 41% in the demo. [[Sean Hannity|&amp;quot;Hannity&amp;quot;]] is up 36% in Total Viewers and up 35% in the demo since going solo for the hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those three new programs beat CNN and MSNBC ''combined'' in total viewers during their respective time slots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Record with [[Greta Van Susteren]] is up 55% in total viewers and 75% in the demo. Your World with Neil Cavuto is up 60% in Total Viewers and 102% in the demo. Glenn Beck, is up 212% in the demo and up 128% in total viewers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp Media Bistro: April Ratings: FNC Beats CNN and MSNBC Combined]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-elitist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives argue that Fox's real ethos is not Republican or conservative, but anti-[[elitist]] — a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. &amp;quot;There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,&amp;quot; Ailes once observed. &amp;quot;What people resent deeply out there are those in the 'blue states' thinking they're smarter.&amp;quot;  This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq war]]s and its broadcasters' use of terms such as &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; instead of the politically correct &amp;quot;militant&amp;quot; to refer to terrorists. Since the [[Vietnam War]] era, mainstream [[journalist]]s have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic [[objectivity]], or perhaps their own ingrained biases against government in general.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism is the treatment of [[evangelical]] and [[fundamentalist Christian]]s with respect, far from the normal liberal media's depiction as as lunatics or extremists. &amp;quot;We regularly have on the [[Rev. Franklin Graham]], [[Dr. James Dobson]] and other religious leaders, just as we put on [[Pat Ireland]] and Eleanor Clift,&amp;quot; Ailes said, continuing,  ''&amp;quot;Most Americans believe in God and have that as their foundation in life. So why shouldn't we have as guests people that they like, respect and want to hear from?&amp;quot; '' Ailes said he didn't get &amp;quot;too worked up&amp;quot; by a [[Pew Foundation]] study that showed that Fox has more Republican viewers than CNN, CNBC or MSNBC and that his reporters and anchors insert their opinions into stories far more than competitors do. Numbers might have something to do with it: Fox is beating the combined audience of the other three. But Ailes dismissed Pew as a &amp;quot;liberal [[lobbyist|lobbying]] organization.&amp;quot; He said, &amp;quot;Most polls today are not taken to provide information to the public but to get press for the organization taking the polls. I took a poll of Pew, and 98% of my organization found that they were biased&amp;quot;, Ailes said with a wink. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Project director Tom Rosenstiel said the study &amp;quot;was not a poll. It was a content analysis designed by a four-university research team and executed at the [[University of Alabama]].&amp;quot; ''One plus for Fox, he said, was that researchers found Fox News stories were more forthcoming about sourcing than their cable rivals.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Fringe Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with [[talk radio]] and the conservative [[blogosphere]], it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a fair hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown&amp;quot;, said columnist [[Brian Anderson]]. &amp;quot;Even more significant, Fox came on the scene a decade ago as a professional news organization that could define and report news as something different from what the elite consensus says it is. To take one of many examples, the corruption of the [[United Nations]]' [[oil-for-food]] initiative in [[Iraq]], initially downplayed by the mainstream media because of their sympathy for internationalism, was uncovered — deemed newsworthy — on Fox.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this wouldn't matter if Fox News wasn't so influential. But it is. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 20% of Americans now claim to get news from it, and lots of them (37%) are Democrats or independents. The network's success has also sparked a &amp;quot;Fox effect,&amp;quot; leading some competitors to become more open to right-of-center opinions: MSNBC's &amp;quot;Scarborough Country,&amp;quot; hosted by former Republican congressman [[Joe Scarborough]], is a prime example. Until a few years ago, Democrats never had to deal with all these mediatized conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ailes said Fox News has no agenda. His charge to his reporters and anchors is simple: &amp;quot;If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework. Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools. They actually come to the job with some ideas and biases.&amp;quot; When asked whether the media have a &amp;quot;conscious bias,&amp;quot; Ailes said: &amp;quot;I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I think people who are biased to the left and right are by and large honest people who bring their life experience to whatever their beliefs are. I don't think there's some conspiracy of bias to the left, ''but I do think that [[New York]] and [[Los Angeles]] have different views than many people that I know from other parts of the country.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Obama ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Hussein Obama]] has thin skin when it comes to criticism of his policies. The entire [[mainstream media]] has thrown its support to Obama. Fox News is the lone station that will criticize Obama fairly. Obama said, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/media_critic_fox_news/2009/06/19/227121.html Media Critic: Fox Only Press Doing Its Job] NewsMax, June 19, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|  “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration… That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.” }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Media critic David Zurawik said “Thank goodness at least one TV outlet, Fox, is questioning Team Obama as it pushes for the kind of massive change in American life not seen since the era of Franklin Roosevelt,” and &amp;quot;...ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and the others allow their news operations to be used by the White House for partisan political reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roger Ailes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerailes_1.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Roger Ailes, Fox News CEO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205966,00.html This is a transcript] of Ailes speaking to the Television Critics Association, which will be enlightening to readers digging into the Fox take on reporting and its reaction to controversy about its mission.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 20, 2008, [[Roger Ailes]], who now holds the titles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FOX News and Chairman of FOX Television Stations, signed a new five year contract with News Corporation, it was announced by Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/roger_ailes_signs_new_5year_deal_with_news_corp_101312.asp Ailes Inks 5 Year Deal With NewsCorp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Ailes' time with [[News Corporation|News Corp]], [[FNC]] passed [[CNN]] in ratings in all day parts in 2002 to become the number one news network in the country, nearing full distribution with more than 90 million subscribers. In 2007, he launched the [[Fox Business News]] which currently reaches more than 40 million homes and served as the biggest launch in cable television history. Throughout Mr. Ailes' tenure, FOX Television Stations has increased its market share each of the last three years with all time record shares in the last two years. In addition, Fox Television Stations has expanded its local news presence by nearly 100 hours a week in a challenging economic climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tony Snow ==&lt;br /&gt;
In April, 2006 the [[White House]] selected [[Tony Snow]], Fox News Anchorman, to be the new White House Press Secretary. &amp;quot;Snow, who in his roles as a [[pundit]] on Fox News and elsewhere has rapped Bush on several occasions, joined the White House only after extracting a promise that he would become an adviser to the president on day-to-day strategy...the former columnist will be the first outsider to become part of Bush's revamped inner circle.&amp;quot;, said the [[Washington Post]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042600558.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snow, 50, worked most recently as host for ''Fox News Sunday, with Tony Snow'' and as host of his own radio talk show. He was a director of speech-writing for President [[George H.W. Bush]] and has worked as a [[USA Today]] columnist, Editorial Page Editor of the [[Washington Times]], deputy editorial page editor of the [[Detroit News]] and frequent substitute for radio host [[Rush Limbaugh]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060426.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill O'Reilly==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[O'Reilly Factor]] has been the most watched cable news segment for eight years. [[Bill O'Reilly]] has interviewed Barack Obama and other high profile guests on his show.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;FOX News destroys NBC and CNN on cable every night. We cover the news. We don't ignore it. And we don't denigrate it.&amp;quot; - Bill O'Reilly&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent, but sides with Republicans on most issues, excluding several Christian causes.  Bill O'Reilly wrote the best seller &amp;quot;A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity.&amp;quot; Like [[Sean Hannity]] and other commentators on Fox, O'Reilly's role is that of an independent contractor, expressing his on opinions, not those of Fox News, as opposed to the networks news anchors, like Sheppard Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.foxnews.com/ Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cable TV Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative news organizations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679455</id>
		<title>Fox News Channel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679455"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T05:20:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Fair and Balanced */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|thumb|right|Fox News Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Fox News Channel''' is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia|Australian]]-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]]. [[Roger Ailes]] was named Chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group on August 15, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News was started in 1996 by Murdoch and Roger Ailes. The two of them perceived a need for a news organization that offered more balanced reporting, one where the facts from all sides would be presented. Main-stream media &amp;quot;Political Correctness&amp;quot; was banished, with the news [[anchor]]s calling [[terrorist]]s what they were, (terrorists), instead of referring to them as &amp;quot;militants.&amp;quot;  As of February, 2007, polls show that over 20% of Americans say their main source of news is the Fox News Channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News uses the slogan &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced,&amp;quot; carries bipartisan shows like [[Hannity and Colmes]], and daily guest pundits from all sides of the [[political spectrum]]. Fox News also is non-hostile to conservative and [[Christian]] values, viewpoints, spokesmen, and ideas. Fox News has gained the reputation for reporting the news in an unbiased manner and then allowing the viewer to decide; &amp;quot;We Report, You Decide&amp;quot; is another of their on-air slogans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News has dominated the [[ratings]] of other cable news outlets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched by media [[tycoon]] Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived liberal bias everywhere in the so-called &amp;quot;[[mainstream media]]&amp;quot;, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.  It's been trouncing [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] and [[CNBC]] for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fair and Balanced==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fair_balanced.jpg‎ |thumb|left|Fair And Balanced Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] critics have been known to complain about the &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; slogan.  Former President [[Bill Clinton]] exploded at ''Fox News Sunday'' anchor [[Chris Wallace]] in September of 2006, accusing him of &amp;quot;a nice little conservative hit job&amp;quot; after being lightly pressed by Wallace about his record on fighting [[Al Qaeda]].   Democratic politicians and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, sometimes accusing it of being a Republican [[propaganda mill]].  Former Vice-President and environmentalist [[Al Gore]] has likened Fox to a right-wing &amp;quot;[[fifth column]].&amp;quot;  Groups, such as [[MoveOn.org]], funded a classic [[schlockumentary]] entitled ''[[Outfoxed]]'', which purports to expose the channel's 'nefarious Republican agenda'.  Some have referred to FOX News as &amp;quot;the propaganda arm of the Republican Party&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Faux News&amp;quot; or the more critical and racist &amp;quot;Faux Jews.&amp;quot; In a grandstanding gesture of political theater the group unsuccessfully petitioned the [[Federal Trade Commission]] to stop Fox's from using its slogan as &amp;quot;deceptive advertising&amp;quot;. It was unanimously rejected. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.showbizdata.com/news/36127/FTC-REJECTS-COMPLAINTS-AGAINST-FOX-NEWS  FTC: &amp;quot;It's best to ignore nuts&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told today's (Tuesday) Wall Street Journal: &amp;quot;If they can attack Fox News to this extreme, ''then all news organizations are at risk to be targeted by similar attacks. ... It's best to ignore nuts.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent comprehensive study by [[UCLA]] political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri-Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found [[Brit Hume]]'s ''Special Report'' — Fox's most straightforward news show — more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which are liberal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rcp.missouri.edu/articles/milyo_media.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The program is a model of smart news television. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And although it's true that the Fox's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, frequently bombastic and opinionated, it's equally true that Fox's biggest super-star, [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not a mainstream Republican, but a registered [[Independent]] who sides with conservatives. He regularly charges the oil companies with [[price-gouging]] and attacks big business for quashing the little guy. [[Greta Van Susteren]]'s politics are unclear, as she mostly covers the [[crime]]-of-the-day stories. [[Geraldo Rivera]] is traditionally liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for [[sex offender]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal commentaors, such as host [[Alan Colmes]], news analyst [[Marvin Kalb]], and [[Eleanor Clift]], are affiliated with the channel. In general, Fox News is closer to mainstream America than [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[NBC]] or [[CNN]], its founding mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives have criticism for Fox. Their 'Fair and Balanced' motto allows [[liberal]] [[propaganda]], lies, deceit, and half-truths to gain an audience. In reality, Fox was judged to actually provide a more &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; coverage in the 2008 Presidential race than all three MSM networks, who had a decidedly pro-Obama tilt, a study by the ''Center for Media and Public Affairs''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/08summer.pdf Center for Media and Public Affairs: ''How TV News Has Covered McCain, Obama and Hillary'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ratings Dominance ==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News Channel was the 2nd highest rated cable channel on all of television during the first quarter of 2009 in prime time Total Viewers. CNN was 17th and MSNBC 24th for the first three months of the year. FNC beat CNN and MSNBC combined and gained the most compared to the first quarter of 2008, up 24%.  2009's first quarter was FNC's 3rd highest rated quarter in prime time in the network's history — just behind Q4 '08 and Q3 '05. In prime time, ages 25-54 demo, and in total day in both categories, FNC grew more year-to-year than CNN and MSNBC combined. FNC had nine of the top 10 programs on cable news in Total Viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bill O'Reilly|The O'Reilly Factor]] has now been #1 on cable news for 100 consecutive months, up 27% in Total Viewers year-over-year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glenn Beck]] has increased the 5pmET time period 90% in Total Viewers and 115% in the demo vs. Q1 '08, ''and is the fastest growing program in cable news for March''. Special Report with Bret Baier is up 39% in Total Viewers and 41% in the demo. [[Sean Hannity|&amp;quot;Hannity&amp;quot;]] is up 36% in Total Viewers and up 35% in the demo since going solo for the hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those three new programs beat CNN and MSNBC ''combined'' in total viewers during their respective time slots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Record with [[Greta Van Susteren]] is up 55% in total viewers and 75% in the demo. Your World with Neil Cavuto is up 60% in Total Viewers and 102% in the demo. Glenn Beck, is up 212% in the demo and up 128% in total viewers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp Media Bistro: April Ratings: FNC Beats CNN and MSNBC Combined]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-elitist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives argue that Fox's real ethos is not Republican or conservative, but anti-[[elitist]] — a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. &amp;quot;There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,&amp;quot; Ailes once observed. &amp;quot;What people resent deeply out there are those in the 'blue states' thinking they're smarter.&amp;quot;  This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq war]]s and its broadcasters' use of terms such as &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; instead of the politically correct &amp;quot;militant&amp;quot; to refer to terrorists. Since the [[Vietnam War]] era, mainstream [[journalist]]s have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic [[objectivity]], or perhaps their own ingrained biases against government in general.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism is the treatment of [[evangelical]] and [[fundamentalist Christian]]s with respect, far from the normal liberal media's depiction as as lunatics or extremists. &amp;quot;We regularly have on the [[Rev. Franklin Graham]], [[Dr. James Dobson]] and other religious leaders, just as we put on [[Pat Ireland]] and Eleanor Clift,&amp;quot; Ailes said, continuing,  ''&amp;quot;Most Americans believe in God and have that as their foundation in life. So why shouldn't we have as guests people that they like, respect and want to hear from?&amp;quot; '' Ailes said he didn't get &amp;quot;too worked up&amp;quot; by a [[Pew Foundation]] study that showed that Fox has more Republican viewers than CNN, CNBC or MSNBC and that his reporters and anchors insert their opinions into stories far more than competitors do. Numbers might have something to do with it: Fox is beating the combined audience of the other three. But Ailes dismissed Pew as a &amp;quot;liberal [[lobbyist|lobbying]] organization.&amp;quot; He said, &amp;quot;Most polls today are not taken to provide information to the public but to get press for the organization taking the polls. I took a poll of Pew, and 98% of my organization found that they were biased&amp;quot;, Ailes said with a wink. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Project director Tom Rosenstiel said the study &amp;quot;was not a poll. It was a content analysis designed by a four-university research team and executed at the [[University of Alabama]].&amp;quot; ''One plus for Fox, he said, was that researchers found Fox News stories were more forthcoming about sourcing than their cable rivals.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Fringe Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with [[talk radio]] and the conservative [[blogosphere]], it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a fair hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown&amp;quot;, said columnist [[Brian Anderson]]. &amp;quot;Even more significant, Fox came on the scene a decade ago as a professional news organization that could define and report news as something different from what the elite consensus says it is. To take one of many examples, the corruption of the [[United Nations]]' [[oil-for-food]] initiative in [[Iraq]], initially downplayed by the mainstream media because of their sympathy for internationalism, was uncovered — deemed newsworthy — on Fox.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this wouldn't matter if Fox News wasn't so influential. But it is. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 20% of Americans now claim to get news from it, and lots of them (37%) are Democrats or independents. The network's success has also sparked a &amp;quot;Fox effect,&amp;quot; leading some competitors to become more open to right-of-center opinions: MSNBC's &amp;quot;Scarborough Country,&amp;quot; hosted by former Republican congressman [[Joe Scarborough]], is a prime example. Until a few years ago, Democrats never had to deal with all these mediatized conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ailes said Fox News has no agenda. His charge to his reporters and anchors is simple: &amp;quot;If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework. Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools. They actually come to the job with some ideas and biases.&amp;quot; When asked whether the media have a &amp;quot;conscious bias,&amp;quot; Ailes said: &amp;quot;I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I think people who are biased to the left and right are by and large honest people who bring their life experience to whatever their beliefs are. I don't think there's some conspiracy of bias to the left, ''but I do think that [[New York]] and [[Los Angeles]] have different views than many people that I know from other parts of the country.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Obama ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Hussein Obama]] has thin skin when it comes to criticism of his policies. The entire [[mainstream media]] has thrown its support to Obama and refuses to questions his policies. Fox News is the lone station that will criticize Obama fairly. Obama said, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/media_critic_fox_news/2009/06/19/227121.html Media Critic: Fox Only Press Doing Its Job] NewsMax, June 19, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|  “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration…That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.” }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Media critic David Zurawik said “Thank goodness at least one TV outlet, Fox, is questioning Team Obama as it pushes for the kind of massive change in American life not seen since the era of Franklin Roosevelt,” and &amp;quot;...ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and the others allow their news operations to be used by the White House for partisan political reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roger Ailes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerailes_1.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Roger Ailes, Fox News CEO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205966,00.html This is a transcript] of Ailes speaking to the Television Critics Association, which will be enlightening to readers digging into the Fox take on reporting and its reaction to controversy about its mission.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 20, 2008, [[Roger Ailes]], who now holds the titles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FOX News and Chairman of FOX Television Stations, signed a new five year contract with News Corporation, it was announced by Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/roger_ailes_signs_new_5year_deal_with_news_corp_101312.asp Ailes Inks 5 Year Deal With NewsCorp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Ailes' time with [[News Corporation|News Corp]], [[FNC]] passed [[CNN]] in ratings in all day parts in 2002 to become the number one news network in the country, nearing full distribution with more than 90 million subscribers. In 2007, he launched the [[Fox Business News]] which currently reaches more than 40 million homes and served as the biggest launch in cable television history. Throughout Mr. Ailes' tenure, FOX Television Stations has increased its market share each of the last three years with all time record shares in the last two years. In addition, Fox Television Stations has expanded its local news presence by nearly 100 hours a week in a challenging economic climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tony Snow ==&lt;br /&gt;
In April, 2006 the [[White House]] selected [[Tony Snow]], Fox News Anchorman, to be the new White House Press Secretary. &amp;quot;Snow, who in his roles as a [[pundit]] on Fox News and elsewhere has rapped Bush on several occasions, joined the White House only after extracting a promise that he would become an adviser to the president on day-to-day strategy...the former columnist will be the first outsider to become part of Bush's revamped inner circle.&amp;quot;, said the [[Washington Post]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042600558.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snow, 50, worked most recently as host for ''Fox News Sunday, with Tony Snow'' and as host of his own radio talk show. He was a director of speech-writing for President [[George H.W. Bush]] and has worked as a [[USA Today]] columnist, Editorial Page Editor of the [[Washington Times]], deputy editorial page editor of the [[Detroit News]] and frequent substitute for radio host [[Rush Limbaugh]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060426.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill O'Reilly==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[O'Reilly Factor]] has been the most watched cable news segment for eight years. [[Bill O'Reilly]] has interviewed Barack Obama and other high profile guests on his show.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;FOX News destroys NBC and CNN on cable every night. We cover the news. We don't ignore it. And we don't denigrate it.&amp;quot; - Bill O'Reilly&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent, but sides with Republicans on most issues, excluding several Christian causes.  Bill O'Reilly wrote the best seller &amp;quot;A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity.&amp;quot; Like [[Sean Hannity]] and other commentators on Fox, O'Reilly's role is that of an independent contractor, expressing his on opinions, not those of Fox News, as opposed to the networks news anchors, like Sheppard Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.foxnews.com/ Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cable TV Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative news organizations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679454</id>
		<title>Fox News Channel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=679454"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T05:18:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Fair and Balanced */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|thumb|right|Fox News Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Fox News Channel''' is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia|Australian]]-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]]. [[Roger Ailes]] was named Chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group on August 15, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News was started in 1996 by Murdoch and Roger Ailes. The two of them perceived a need for a news organization that offered more balanced reporting, one where the facts from all sides would be presented. Main-stream media &amp;quot;Political Correctness&amp;quot; was banished, with the news [[anchor]]s calling [[terrorist]]s what they were, (terrorists), instead of referring to them as &amp;quot;militants.&amp;quot;  As of February, 2007, polls show that over 20% of Americans say their main source of news is the Fox News Channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News uses the slogan &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced,&amp;quot; carries bipartisan shows like [[Hannity and Colmes]], and daily guest pundits from all sides of the [[political spectrum]]. Fox News also is non-hostile to conservative and [[Christian]] values, viewpoints, spokesmen, and ideas. Fox News has gained the reputation for reporting the news in an unbiased manner and then allowing the viewer to decide; &amp;quot;We Report, You Decide&amp;quot; is another of their on-air slogans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News has dominated the [[ratings]] of other cable news outlets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched by media [[tycoon]] Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived liberal bias everywhere in the so-called &amp;quot;[[mainstream media]]&amp;quot;, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.  It's been trouncing [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] and [[CNBC]] for years, and it quite often draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, combined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fair and Balanced==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fair_balanced.jpg‎ |thumb|left|Fair And Balanced Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] critics have been known to complain about the &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; slogan.  Former President [[Bill Clinton]] exploded at ''Fox News Sunday'' anchor [[Chris Wallace]] in September of 2006, accusing him of &amp;quot;a nice little conservative hit job&amp;quot; after being lightly pressed by Wallace about his record on fighting [[Al Qaeda]].   Democratic politicians and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, sometimes accusing it of being a Republican [[propaganda mill]].  Former Vice-President and environmentalist [[Al Gore]] has likened Fox to a right-wing &amp;quot;[[fifth column]].&amp;quot;  Groups, such as [[MoveOn.org]], funded a classic [[schlockumentary]] entitled ''[[Outfoxed]]'', which purports to expose the channel's 'nefarious Republican agenda'.  Some have referred to FOX News as &amp;quot;the propaganda arm of the Republican Party&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Faux News.&amp;quot; or the more critical and racist &amp;quot;Faux Jews&amp;quot; In a grandstanding gesture of political theater the group unsuccessfully petitioned the [[Federal Trade Commission]] to stop Fox's from using its slogan as &amp;quot;deceptive advertising&amp;quot;. It was unanimously rejected. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.showbizdata.com/news/36127/FTC-REJECTS-COMPLAINTS-AGAINST-FOX-NEWS  FTC: &amp;quot;It's best to ignore nuts&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told today's (Tuesday) Wall Street Journal: &amp;quot;If they can attack Fox News to this extreme, ''then all news organizations are at risk to be targeted by similar attacks. ... It's best to ignore nuts.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent comprehensive study by [[UCLA]] political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri-Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found [[Brit Hume]]'s ''Special Report'' — Fox's most straightforward news show — more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which are liberal. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rcp.missouri.edu/articles/milyo_media.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The program is a model of smart news television. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And although it's true that the Fox's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, frequently bombastic and opinionated, it's equally true that Fox's biggest super-star, [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not a mainstream Republican, but a registered [[Independent]] who sides with conservatives. He regularly charges the oil companies with [[price-gouging]] and attacks big business for quashing the little guy. [[Greta Van Susteren]]'s politics are unclear, as she mostly covers the [[crime]]-of-the-day stories. [[Geraldo Rivera]] is traditionally liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for [[sex offender]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal commentaors, such as host [[Alan Colmes]], news analyst [[Marvin Kalb]], and [[Eleanor Clift]], are affiliated with the channel. In general, Fox News is closer to mainstream America than [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[NBC]] or [[CNN]], its founding mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives have criticism for Fox. Their 'Fair and Balanced' motto allows [[liberal]] [[propaganda]], lies, deceit, and half-truths to gain an audience. In reality, Fox was judged to actually provide a more &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; coverage in the 2008 Presidential race than all three MSM networks, who had a decidedly pro-Obama tilt, a study by the ''Center for Media and Public Affairs''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/08summer.pdf Center for Media and Public Affairs: ''How TV News Has Covered McCain, Obama and Hillary'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ratings Dominance ==&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News Channel was the 2nd highest rated cable channel on all of television during the first quarter of 2009 in prime time Total Viewers. CNN was 17th and MSNBC 24th for the first three months of the year. FNC beat CNN and MSNBC combined and gained the most compared to the first quarter of 2008, up 24%.  2009's first quarter was FNC's 3rd highest rated quarter in prime time in the network's history — just behind Q4 '08 and Q3 '05. In prime time, ages 25-54 demo, and in total day in both categories, FNC grew more year-to-year than CNN and MSNBC combined. FNC had nine of the top 10 programs on cable news in Total Viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bill O'Reilly|The O'Reilly Factor]] has now been #1 on cable news for 100 consecutive months, up 27% in Total Viewers year-over-year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glenn Beck]] has increased the 5pmET time period 90% in Total Viewers and 115% in the demo vs. Q1 '08, ''and is the fastest growing program in cable news for March''. Special Report with Bret Baier is up 39% in Total Viewers and 41% in the demo. [[Sean Hannity|&amp;quot;Hannity&amp;quot;]] is up 36% in Total Viewers and up 35% in the demo since going solo for the hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those three new programs beat CNN and MSNBC ''combined'' in total viewers during their respective time slots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Record with [[Greta Van Susteren]] is up 55% in total viewers and 75% in the demo. Your World with Neil Cavuto is up 60% in Total Viewers and 102% in the demo. Glenn Beck, is up 212% in the demo and up 128% in total viewers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp Media Bistro: April Ratings: FNC Beats CNN and MSNBC Combined]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-elitist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives argue that Fox's real ethos is not Republican or conservative, but anti-[[elitist]] — a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. &amp;quot;There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,&amp;quot; Ailes once observed. &amp;quot;What people resent deeply out there are those in the 'blue states' thinking they're smarter.&amp;quot;  This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq war]]s and its broadcasters' use of terms such as &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; instead of the politically correct &amp;quot;militant&amp;quot; to refer to terrorists. Since the [[Vietnam War]] era, mainstream [[journalist]]s have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic [[objectivity]], or perhaps their own ingrained biases against government in general.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism is the treatment of [[evangelical]] and [[fundamentalist Christian]]s with respect, far from the normal liberal media's depiction as as lunatics or extremists. &amp;quot;We regularly have on the [[Rev. Franklin Graham]], [[Dr. James Dobson]] and other religious leaders, just as we put on [[Pat Ireland]] and Eleanor Clift,&amp;quot; Ailes said, continuing,  ''&amp;quot;Most Americans believe in God and have that as their foundation in life. So why shouldn't we have as guests people that they like, respect and want to hear from?&amp;quot; '' Ailes said he didn't get &amp;quot;too worked up&amp;quot; by a [[Pew Foundation]] study that showed that Fox has more Republican viewers than CNN, CNBC or MSNBC and that his reporters and anchors insert their opinions into stories far more than competitors do. Numbers might have something to do with it: Fox is beating the combined audience of the other three. But Ailes dismissed Pew as a &amp;quot;liberal [[lobbyist|lobbying]] organization.&amp;quot; He said, &amp;quot;Most polls today are not taken to provide information to the public but to get press for the organization taking the polls. I took a poll of Pew, and 98% of my organization found that they were biased&amp;quot;, Ailes said with a wink. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Project director Tom Rosenstiel said the study &amp;quot;was not a poll. It was a content analysis designed by a four-university research team and executed at the [[University of Alabama]].&amp;quot; ''One plus for Fox, he said, was that researchers found Fox News stories were more forthcoming about sourcing than their cable rivals.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Fringe Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with [[talk radio]] and the conservative [[blogosphere]], it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a fair hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown&amp;quot;, said columnist [[Brian Anderson]]. &amp;quot;Even more significant, Fox came on the scene a decade ago as a professional news organization that could define and report news as something different from what the elite consensus says it is. To take one of many examples, the corruption of the [[United Nations]]' [[oil-for-food]] initiative in [[Iraq]], initially downplayed by the mainstream media because of their sympathy for internationalism, was uncovered — deemed newsworthy — on Fox.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this wouldn't matter if Fox News wasn't so influential. But it is. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 20% of Americans now claim to get news from it, and lots of them (37%) are Democrats or independents. The network's success has also sparked a &amp;quot;Fox effect,&amp;quot; leading some competitors to become more open to right-of-center opinions: MSNBC's &amp;quot;Scarborough Country,&amp;quot; hosted by former Republican congressman [[Joe Scarborough]], is a prime example. Until a few years ago, Democrats never had to deal with all these mediatized conservatives. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ailes said Fox News has no agenda. His charge to his reporters and anchors is simple: &amp;quot;If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework. Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools. They actually come to the job with some ideas and biases.&amp;quot; When asked whether the media have a &amp;quot;conscious bias,&amp;quot; Ailes said: &amp;quot;I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I think people who are biased to the left and right are by and large honest people who bring their life experience to whatever their beliefs are. I don't think there's some conspiracy of bias to the left, ''but I do think that [[New York]] and [[Los Angeles]] have different views than many people that I know from other parts of the country.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox Versus Obama ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Hussein Obama]] has thin skin when it comes to criticism of his policies. The entire [[mainstream media]] has thrown its support to Obama and refuses to questions his policies. Fox News is the lone station that will criticize Obama fairly. Obama said, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/media_critic_fox_news/2009/06/19/227121.html Media Critic: Fox Only Press Doing Its Job] NewsMax, June 19, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|  “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration…That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.” }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Media critic David Zurawik said “Thank goodness at least one TV outlet, Fox, is questioning Team Obama as it pushes for the kind of massive change in American life not seen since the era of Franklin Roosevelt,” and &amp;quot;...ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and the others allow their news operations to be used by the White House for partisan political reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roger Ailes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerailes_1.jpg‎ |thumb|right|300px|Roger Ailes, Fox News CEO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205966,00.html This is a transcript] of Ailes speaking to the Television Critics Association, which will be enlightening to readers digging into the Fox take on reporting and its reaction to controversy about its mission.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 20, 2008, [[Roger Ailes]], who now holds the titles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FOX News and Chairman of FOX Television Stations, signed a new five year contract with News Corporation, it was announced by Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/roger_ailes_signs_new_5year_deal_with_news_corp_101312.asp Ailes Inks 5 Year Deal With NewsCorp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Ailes' time with [[News Corporation|News Corp]], [[FNC]] passed [[CNN]] in ratings in all day parts in 2002 to become the number one news network in the country, nearing full distribution with more than 90 million subscribers. In 2007, he launched the [[Fox Business News]] which currently reaches more than 40 million homes and served as the biggest launch in cable television history. Throughout Mr. Ailes' tenure, FOX Television Stations has increased its market share each of the last three years with all time record shares in the last two years. In addition, Fox Television Stations has expanded its local news presence by nearly 100 hours a week in a challenging economic climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tony Snow ==&lt;br /&gt;
In April, 2006 the [[White House]] selected [[Tony Snow]], Fox News Anchorman, to be the new White House Press Secretary. &amp;quot;Snow, who in his roles as a [[pundit]] on Fox News and elsewhere has rapped Bush on several occasions, joined the White House only after extracting a promise that he would become an adviser to the president on day-to-day strategy...the former columnist will be the first outsider to become part of Bush's revamped inner circle.&amp;quot;, said the [[Washington Post]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042600558.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snow, 50, worked most recently as host for ''Fox News Sunday, with Tony Snow'' and as host of his own radio talk show. He was a director of speech-writing for President [[George H.W. Bush]] and has worked as a [[USA Today]] columnist, Editorial Page Editor of the [[Washington Times]], deputy editorial page editor of the [[Detroit News]] and frequent substitute for radio host [[Rush Limbaugh]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060426.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill O'Reilly==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[O'Reilly Factor]] has been the most watched cable news segment for eight years. [[Bill O'Reilly]] has interviewed Barack Obama and other high profile guests on his show.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;FOX News destroys NBC and CNN on cable every night. We cover the news. We don't ignore it. And we don't denigrate it.&amp;quot; - Bill O'Reilly&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent, but sides with Republicans on most issues, excluding several Christian causes.  Bill O'Reilly wrote the best seller &amp;quot;A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity.&amp;quot; Like [[Sean Hannity]] and other commentators on Fox, O'Reilly's role is that of an independent contractor, expressing his on opinions, not those of Fox News, as opposed to the networks news anchors, like Sheppard Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.foxnews.com/ Fox News]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cable TV Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative news organizations]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&amp;diff=679452</id>
		<title>Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&amp;diff=679452"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T04:57:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #d0d0d0; background: #d0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[/Archives|Archives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- ===============Archive below this line! Do not remove anything above this line.=========================== --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Validity of claims of Evolution page bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find this statement to be rather hypocritical:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Wikipedia's evolution article certainly does not have robust and relevant &amp;quot;Criticism and controversy&amp;quot; section its evolution article which is not surprising since liberals are rather enamored of the evolutionary position despite the evolutionary view having a total lack of evidence supporting it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems like a vindictive ad hominem attack against &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; rather than a legitimate argument. You cannot assert that &amp;quot;which is not surprising since liberals are rather enamored...etc.&amp;quot; and honestly think that you are being unbiased. Sarcasm is not a valid way to respectfully argue against another's theories.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A liberal could just as easily state,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservapedia's creationism article certainly does not have a robust and relevant &amp;quot;Criticism and controversy&amp;quot; section, which is not surprising since conservatives are rather enamored of the creationism position despite having a total lack of evidence supporting it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and be just as &amp;quot;accurate&amp;quot; as whoever wrote the original conservative criticism. I'm not debating whether evolution or creationism is the correct theory (I'm neutral), but rather trying to suggest a way to improve your arguments. If you want to accuse someone of being baised, then you can't be biased yourself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I deleted &amp;quot;Wikipedia makes no mention of the fact that Eric Holder...&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted &amp;quot;Wikipedia makes no mention of the fact that [[Obama]]'s Attorney General [[Eric Holder]] called the United States a &amp;quot;nation of cowards&amp;quot; when it comes to the discussion of race.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The citation was a link to an old revision of a Wikipedia page. The new revision DOES mention this. --[[User:Andrew1123|Andrew1123]] 17:22, 8 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference Needed for Claim that Wikipedia Called Bush a Nazi==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that G. W. Bush &amp;quot;was called a supporter of the Nazi regime&amp;quot; on his wikipedia page is very believable, but could someone find a reference proving it? [[User:Sjay|Sjay]] 20:50, 9 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is #150 really relevant? (The criticism of GWB/BHO) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking back at the history of the &amp;quot;Presidency of George W. Bush&amp;quot; article, the Criticism section was not added to the article until July 5th, 2006. If Wikipedia had a liberal bias wouldn't they have added that much sooner? BHO has been in power for less then two months, not enough time to form a valid criticism of his presidency as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm sorry - and you are?&lt;br /&gt;
::20:34, March 9, 2009 Dparker (Talk | contribs | block) New user ‎ &lt;br /&gt;
::20:44, March 9, 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia‎ (→Is #150 really relavent? (The criticism of GWB/BHO):  new section) &lt;br /&gt;
:Do you have any interest here other than this issue?&lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, to answer your question, the articles are not simply about criticism of the men as they acted as president. They are about them in general. B.O. has been around quite a while before January 20, 2009. Was there no criticism of him before that date? Has there been no criticism of him after it? And what, pray tell, defines criticism as &amp;quot;valid&amp;quot; or not and what is the official figure for how much time must pass for the criticism to be worthy of Wikipedia? I mean, is criticism of George W. Bush's personality - his ''personality'' for crying out loud! - valid? This is a ridiculous line from the ridiculous WP article:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Raised in West Texas, Bush's accent, vacations on his Texas ranch, and penchant for country metaphors contribute to his folksy, American cowboy image, which occasionally served as fodder for criticism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, my dear Lord in Heaven, NOOOOOO!!!! His accent! His ranch! His metaphors! Why did we ever let such a man be president with all these valid criticisms?! Chimpeachment!&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, I freely admit that was gratuitous sarcasm, but it sure felt good.&lt;br /&gt;
:Bottom line: the excuses people are putting forth to excuse the blatant B.O. worship and kowtowing on WP are lame and don't hold water. I know it. You know it. Everyone knows it. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:28, 16 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WP articles are referenced in the &amp;quot;example of bias&amp;quot; are &amp;quot;Presidency of&amp;quot; articles, not general articles. You would know if you read them. But I guess reading an article on a site with a &amp;quot;liberal bias&amp;quot; is a lot to expect from someone here. Laying the sarcasm so thick isn't helping your argument either. If you think that line is so ridiculous then you've obviously blocked out the last eight years from your memory, not to mention that his attitude is probably the weakest criticism anyone has of GWB. Also, it should be mentioned that if that page on WP is ridiculous, then how do you describe this: [[Religion of Barack Obama]]. The rabbit hole of crazy goes really deep here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Your unsigned comment is incoherent.  But in answer to your question, it is biased to point of absurdity to criticize Bush for his &amp;quot;accent&amp;quot; and his &amp;quot;ranch&amp;quot;.  Do you see similar criticisms of Obama and Ted Kennedy on Wikipedia???--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 21:13, 16 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gothic architecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am confused by the entry. It is maybe linked to the wrong wikipedia article? Because right now anyway, the article &amp;quot;Gothic Architecture&amp;quot; has its whole 3rd paragraph, out of 5 in the introduction section, about churches and cathedrals. And after that, there is the section &amp;quot;Religious influences&amp;quot; which is talking about christian monastary orders. Then it does mention moslems but only to say that their architecture had pointed arches, and i agree this is bias because there is no reason to think christians did not invent pointed arches themselves, but i still think that the entry bullet point makes little sense. The article mentions christianty in the third paragraph, after maybe 100 words not 1 500. It credits Christianity first and not moslems. It mentions christians many times through out, not &amp;quot;never mentioning christianity again.&amp;quot; I am not saying it is unbiased but what we say about it is incorrect in fact. And it is strange to open with this, too. The list should start with the worst, like the black-list on intelligent design and climate sceptics, the celebirty gossip, and then on. [[User:ELeger|ELeger]] 00:24, 27 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Drudge Bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have the time now but will somebody compare (and post a summary of) the existing Wikipedia DRUDGE REPORT and MATT DRUDGE entries with the existing Wikipedia entries for BILL MAHER, ARIANNA HUFFINGTON, and KEITH OLBERMANN? You will see that the DR and Matt Drudge, '''news aggregators,''' are cited in the first sentence as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; while no such labels are applied to the latter '''pundits''' in even the first paragraph. Instead, they are buried well down the page or omitted entirely. In fact, it was the case recently that none were objectively called liberals but instead made use of sleight of hand, e.g., saying they had been critical of certain right-wingers at certain times, but not mentioning that they were proudly liberal. Good example of Wiki bias, in my estimation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You're right.  Thanks for your insight.  Please add a point about this, or I will if you don't get around to it. {{unsigned|Aschlafly}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, whilst I don't disagree as such with your observations, there is still an element of bias in them as well. You have cited just 3 'liberal' examples against 2 'conservative' examples. Who's to say there aren't others on each side which in fact show the opposite to what these do. It seems highly selective to select these few for comparison. The Michael Moore article for example does state in the opening that he is a 'liberal', so basically I think you would have to see how wide ranging this is before calling it bias. [[User:RobertWDP|RobertWDP]] 18:59, 28 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You're right that we cannot make sweeping generalizations from a handful of articles, but that was never my intention. My point was that '''at this point in time and on each of those articles,''' there was resistance to &amp;quot;equalizing&amp;quot; the labels so that they were applied to all or none. The most dedicated editors made sure to protect accusations of conservatism while preventing--EVEN BANNING--those who suggested the others were liberal. Additionally, Matt Drudge is a '''news aggregator''' who has claimed to be libertarian, and he gets the 'conservative' label even while '''pundits''' who are proud and open of their liberalism get to play shy about it? And until recently, the Drudge Report was labeled while its openly liberal challenger, The Drudge Retort, was described as merely &amp;quot;left-leaning.&amp;quot; In summary, I don't mean to make broad claims from narrow examples, just to acknowledge that those examples are there. Added together, hundreds or thousands of examples can suggest, if nothing else, an important trend. [[User:Iamchipdouglas|Iamchipdouglas]] 21:21, 30 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Organizing instances in order of severity? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I don't really agree with the comment about &amp;quot;Gothic Architecture&amp;quot; above, the author may have a point: would it be better to list the most egregious examples of bias first?  Perhaps have a section for the most blatant instances of bias, and then a section for other instances?  It just seems like good common sense to present the strongest arguments first.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 18:00, 27 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Conservapedia editors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, I would like to disclose that I am a regular Wikipedia editor.  I wanted to thank this site for this particular article.  I regularly review it for errors Wikipedia might have missed, and whilst I don't agree that every complaint raised in this article is valid, a reasonable number have proven to be correct.  This site, and I wish to stress I don't agree with a lot of it, does serve as a watchdog which many Wikipedia editors value for its investigations, and helps to keep us on our toes.  Thanks again. [[User:Breithaupt|Breithaupt]] 14:52, 28 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you!  No place is immune from the benefits of &amp;quot;outside&amp;quot; eyes, offering suggestions or solutions. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;/Admin&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 28 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you as well! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you as well!  I am sure that a growing number of contributors to Wikipedia are beginning to rethink their alleged objectivity and purveyors of unfettered information in a quest for the unvarnished truth, as well as a genuine effort &amp;quot;to present all sides&amp;quot; in a so-called fair manner, especially when &amp;quot;fairness&amp;quot; is tangible and wholly subjective in a multitude of cases.  Their editorial staff once seemed to be the paragon of inclusion; now, an increasingly harsh tone of what cannot but be considered pious liberal subterfuge seems to confront the participant. Indeed, the forbearance manifested by the editors of Conservapedia - apparently from editors secure in their own intellect and the resilience of their faith - is a most nonthreatening and refreshing antithesis to those of us who have been savaged by an ever-noxious and insipid constriction of the truth or, as said, objectivity of the presentation.  What one unfortunately faces on WP is a sort of editorial goon squad set about to investigate the alleged self-serving proprieties of them who deign to taint their presuppositions--tragic denial of their quest for greater information.  I see in the current socio-religious (and socio-political) culture wars which currently afflict this nation a most disturbing phenomenon played out in the generation of information made available to the masses through the internet:  The war of words and information waged between what appears to be an encroaching governmental superiority vs. the rights of man.  If we are not careful, that which we feared the most shall come upon us--God help us all if the truth that sets us free is submerged in the blather of the self-righteous platitudes of so-called progressives whose purposeful and/or inadvertent desire is to manifest their disdain of any and all absolutes (especially those which the faithful project) - and in so doing, descend to a most horrible absolute wherein truth becomes fiction and fiction becomes the truth.  The matter astounds - they who profess such indignity toward personal aggrandizement are countered (thankfully) by the accused who embrace their absolutes with calm and persistent expression of unfettered information which irritates the so-called guardians of information.  Keep up the good work! [[User:Kriegerdwm|Kriegerdwm]] 00:13, 29 March 2009 (EDT)kriegerdwm[[User:Kriegerdwm|Kriegerdwm]] 00:13, 29 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Update regarding the &amp;quot;Controversies and criticism&amp;quot; section at Wikipedia's Presidency of George W. Bush article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding current example 153: &amp;quot;Wikipedia clearly adds a &amp;quot;Controversies&amp;quot; sections to their article for the &amp;quot;Presidency of George W. Bush&amp;quot;... but not to their article on the &amp;quot;Presidency of Barack Obama&amp;quot;&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After consensus was reached on Wikipedia that this section on George W. Bush was not appropriate, it has now been removed.  [[User:Breithaupt|Breithaupt]] 14:10, 9 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The word &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;critics&amp;quot; appears 24 times in the George W. Bush article. It only appears twice in the article on Obama, one referring to his criticism of others. So they can reshuffle the page all they want, but it's the content that matters.--[[User:FredCorps|FredCorps]] 14:15, 9 April 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why do they do it?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's turn this article into a table with two columns: next to each example should be the '''reason''' Wikipedia presents the information the way they do. For example, is it policy, or just the current editorial consensus? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:29, 11 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cassie Bernall==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Number 11, as it stands, is simply not true. The Wikipedia page currently echoes what is written on the truthorfiction site: &amp;quot;Emily Wyant, who had been sitting with Bernall in the library as the shootings began, asserted that the exchange did not take place. Wyant stated that she and Bernall were studying together when the gunmen broke in. According to her account Bernall exclaimed, &amp;quot;Dear God, dear God! Why is this happening? I just want to go home.&amp;quot; Wyant described how Eric Harris suddenly slammed his hand onto the table top and yelled &amp;quot;Peek-a-boo!&amp;quot; before fatally shooting Cassie Bernall.&amp;quot; This is exactly what is described at the truthorfiction site. In fact, the Wikipedia article has been accurate about this since at least 2006, ''before'' the Conservapedia article was amended to include this example of supposed &amp;quot;bias.&amp;quot; It should be removed. [[User:TaKess|TaKess]] 12:47, 12 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please quote the sentence in Number 11 which you feel is not true. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 12 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Wikipedia's entry about the Christian martyr at Columbine refuses to admit that she was murdered by an atheist as she was expressing her faith in God, as confirmed by multiple witnesses.&amp;quot;--Actually, the Wikipedia article acknowledges that Cassie was praying, &amp;quot;Dear God, dear God! Why is this happening? I just want to go home,&amp;quot; before Eric Harris shot her. This is what the link cited as a reference also claims. [[User:TaKess|TaKess]] 12:59, 12 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So you are saying that Wikipedia '''does''' admit she was murdered by an atheist? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:03, 12 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Is Wikipedia's failure to note Eric Harris's atheism what is considered &amp;quot;biased&amp;quot;? If so, I guess 11 should stand. The sentence makes it sound like Wikipedia didn't note that Bernall was praying when she was shot (which it does). In any case, the truthorfiction site linked doesn't note Harris as an atheist, either. I'm sure he was but I don't have a link off-hand for it--I'll try to find one later. [[User:TaKess|TaKess]] 13:15, 12 May 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Negative Words ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While alot of this article is valid, alot of negative words are using. This simply makes the facts come across as angry attacks at wikipedia. Words like &amp;quot;vulger&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;frivolous&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;blatant&amp;quot; aren't neccessary and make this wikipedia look very unprofessional. If anybody has any concern with the removal of these words, let me know. --[[User:Carceous|Carceous]] 08:00, 5 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Racistpedia===&lt;br /&gt;
I checked the link, and a good majority of the search results are from book titles, song/album names, direct quotes, and other such media. In the first 50 results, only 8 instances can be justified as being frivolous--not in the form of a proper noun or direct quotes. [[User:JonathanG|JonG]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:JonathanG|Tennisu no Boifriendo]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:40, 27 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cover up ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like Wikipedia is trying to hide up an embarrassing scandal it's involved in. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Blacketer_controversy]  Check out how it has been nominated for deletion.  Maybe this is significant enough for a front-page report?  [[User:Breithaupt|Breithaupt]] 09:26, 8 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This ref [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191474/Labour-councillor-David-Boothroyd-caught-altering-David-Camerons-Wikipedia-entry.html] says &amp;quot;Wikipedia appoints &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;supposedly&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; impartial and unpaid moderators to review and correct changes,&amp;quot; about one member of its 15-strong international arbitration committee is a fraud. Plus, another ref [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&amp;amp;objectid=10577178]--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:09, 8 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Messy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I removed a few lines of things that were off topic, such as the 'while wikipedia has a rainbow banner on the page regarding homosexuality it fails to list the related higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think mentioning that they have rainbow banners is relevant to anything, that is until I see a cult of conservatives who secretly love rainbows. This is highly unlikely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&amp;diff=679450</id>
		<title>Examples of Bias in Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&amp;diff=679450"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T04:51:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;The following is a growing list of examples of '''[[liberal bias]], [[deceit]], frivolous [[gossip]], and blatant errors on [[Wikipedia]].'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] cites vulgar blogs and liberal rants as though they are encyclopedic authorities.  For example, its entry about [[Conservapedia]] claims that &amp;quot;[s]everal articles on the site have reputations for bias and inaccuracy,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but its citations for that falsehood consist of a vulgar blog, a liberal rant, and an article that takes a neutral position.  None of Wikipedia's three &amp;quot;authorities&amp;quot; make any statement about the &amp;quot;reputation&amp;quot; of Conservapedia as Wikipedia claims.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] bias against [[movement conservative]]s is intense.  [[Michele Bachmann]] won reelection in 2008 by 3% in a state that went heavily [[Democratic]], but instead of crediting her [[conservative]] positions the biased Wikipedia entry states, &amp;quot;Despite fallout from controversial statements that she had made, Bachmann defeated her Democratic opponent Elwyn Tinklenberg in the 2008 election.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann#cite_ref-33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#In its entry on the heavily Christian Gothic architecture,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_architecture&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia]] credits [[Islam]] before [[Christianity]], does not even mention Christianity until after more than 1500 words, and then does not mention Christianity again.&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's [[evolution]] article certainly does not have robust and relevant &amp;quot;Criticism and controversy&amp;quot; section its evolution article which is not surprising since [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals are rather enamored of the evolutionary position]] despite the [[evolution|evolutionary view having a total lack of evidence supporting it]]. &lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's article on [[atheism]] fails to mention that [[United States|American]] [[atheist]]s [[Atheism and Uncharitableness|give significantly less to charity than American theists on a per capita basis even when church giving is not counted for theists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, Wikipedia's article on atheism fails to mention [[Atheism and deception|how key proponents of atheism have been deceptive]].  Wikipedia's article on [[atheism]] also fails to mention that [[Christianity and Science|Christianity and not atheism was foundational in regards to the development of modern science]]. Wikipedia's article attempts to associate atheism with scientific progress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Wikipedia's article on atheism fails to mention that [[Atheism and suicide|atheism is a causal factor for suicide]].&lt;br /&gt;
#  The Wikipedia entry for [[homosexuality]] fails to mention the [[Homosexuality and health|many diseases associated with homosexuality]], the [[Homosexuality_Statistics|high promiscuity rates of the male homosexual community]], the [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence|higher incidences of domestic violence]] among homosexual couples compared to heterosexual couples, and the [[Homosexuality and health|substantially higher mental illness and drug usage rates of the homosexuality community]]. In addition, the Wikipedia article on homosexuality fails to mention that the American Psychiatric Association issued a fact sheet in May of 2000 stating that &amp;quot;..there are no replicated scientific studies supporting a specific biological etiology for homosexuality.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/bornorbred.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia made no mention of the fact that President [[Obama]]'s Attorney General [[Eric Holder]] called the United States a &amp;quot;nation of cowards&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2009/ag-speech-090218.html?loc=interstitialskip&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Holder&amp;amp;oldid=273538810&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2009/02/19/cnn-talking-heads-unanimously-praise-holders-coward-remarks&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when it comes to the discussion of race until about two weeks after Holder insulted America. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Holder&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=274455687&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In typical Wikipedia fashion, it was made to sound as if only conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh objected to the attorney general's crass insult and obvious contempt for the citizens of the United States of America. As of 3/8/09, there is no mention on Wikipedia of Obama's rebuke of Holder's &amp;quot;cowards&amp;quot; insult or of the fact that Holder wants an assault weapons ban. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Holder&amp;amp;oldid=275247574&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#''Alma mater'' normally refers to a college that a person actually graduated from. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/alma%20mater&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, at [[Wikipedia]], the biography for co-founder Jimbo Wales prominently lists two colleges he didn't graduate from as alma maters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jimmy_Wales&amp;amp;oldid=272581018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Sean Hannity]] attended but did not graduate from NYU. Wikipedia does not list NYU as Sean Hannity's alma mater because he is a conservative. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sean_Hannity&amp;amp;oldid=272201242&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The Wikipedia page for Republican Mark Kirk&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Kirk&amp;amp;oldid=263357766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; made no mention of the widely-reported and significant fact that, as a Navy reservist, he is the first U.S. Representative since WWII to make an overseas deployment to an imminent danger area (Afghanistan).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/il10_kirk/Kirk_Completes_Reserve_Tour.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Instead, the Wikipedia page devotes an entire section titled &amp;quot;contributors&amp;quot; that attempts to smear Kirk with tenuous associations to controversial figures because of relatively small campaign donations. A grammatically-incorrect acknowledgment of Kirk's deployment eventually appeared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Kirk&amp;amp;oldid=263472629&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kirk's wikipedia page mentioned a $1,000 donation from Tony Rezko &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Kirk&amp;amp;oldid=268845790&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but Obama's page does not mention the $54,416 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/353782,CST-NWS-rezpols23.article&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rezko donation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barack_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=272320979&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Only after this issue was brought up were issues corrected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_Kirk&amp;amp;oldid=274813568&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia smears [[conservative]] groups with prominent &amp;quot;Criticism and controversy&amp;quot; sections,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association#Criticism_and_controversy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; usually featuring name-calling by obscure groups, but Wikipedia flatters [[liberal]] groups by downplaying what it euphemistically entitles as &amp;quot;Controversial stances.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACLU#Controversial_stances&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's entry about the [[Christian]] martyr at [[Columbine]] refuses to admit that she was murdered by an [[atheist]] as she was expressing her [[faith]] in [[God]], as confirmed by multiple witnesses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassie_Bernall&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/c/cassie.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#*Version of May 12, 2009: &lt;br /&gt;
#*:Initial reports suggested that one of the assailants, either Eric Harris or Dylan Klebold, asked Bernall if she believed in God moments before fatally shooting her. She was reported to have answered &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot;. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cassie_Bernall&amp;amp;oldid=289313205]&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's entry about [[Conservapedia]] contains four unsupported smears in its very first sentence,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and conceals from readers how Conservapedia offers free online courses for teenagers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Conservapedia:Index]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The result of this bias by Wikipedia, which raises money as a charity, is the concealing and demonizing of a free learning resource that Wikipedia itself does not offer. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's entry on the [[Scopes trial]] downplays the fact that Darrow cowardly reneged in his agreement to take the witness stand, and pled his client guilty in order to avoid it.  Instead, Wikipedia deceptively claims that &amp;quot;Darrow asked the judge to bring in the jury '''only''' to have them come to a guilty verdict.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thanks much to a student in our [[American_History_Lectures|American History course]] for pointing this out.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[California]]'s Proposition 8 states that &amp;quot;only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.&amp;quot; The Wikipedia article&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8_(2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; does not mention that only those marriages are recognized under federal law anyway, and editors have removed any mention of the federal [[Defense of Marriage Act]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:California_Proposition_8_(2008)#DOMA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The articles on both [[Saul Alinsky]] and his book, ''Rules for Radicals'' make no mention of his dedication to &amp;quot;the original radical&amp;amp;mdash;Lucifer.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_Radicals&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul_Alinsky&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Augusto Pinochet]], who overthrew [[communism]] in [[Chile]] and then restored democracy before voluntarily giving up power himself, is called a &amp;quot;dictator&amp;quot; by [[Wikipedia]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinochet&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but [[Fidel Castro]], the communist dictator of [[Cuba]] for four decades, is instead called a &amp;quot;leader&amp;quot; or even a &amp;quot;president&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidel_Castro&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fidel_Castro&amp;amp;oldid=235182888&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The founder of the Weather Channel and 100's of other climatologists have been removed from the category &amp;quot;Global warming skeptics&amp;quot;, which Wikipedia decided to delete.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Coleman_(news_weathercaster)&amp;amp;diff=232272809&amp;amp;oldid=227980118&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_August_7#Global_warming_and_ozone_hole_skeptics_categories&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's entry on [[Gardasil]], an [[HPV Vaccine]] promoted by [[liberals]] and Merck, is filled with falsehoods and omits key facts.  As of Aug. 9, 2008, Wikipedia's entry claimed that cervical cancer was &amp;quot;the second leading cause of death from cancer in women world-wide&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (which is nonsense), and that the &amp;quot;HPV types 16 and 18 '''cause''' about 70% of cervical cancer cases&amp;quot; (not even Merck claims that); the entry downplays how the vaccine loses its effectiveness in a few years, and only about 3% of teenage recipients are likely to be exposed to the strains of HPV that the vaccine targets - at a cost of about $13,000 per child to possibly protect her against a cancer that does not arise until 30 years in the future.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[HPV Vaccine]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia tries to smear [[conservatives]] as &amp;quot;conspiracy theorists,&amp;quot; even when they are not, and yet omits that epithet for [[liberals]] who insist there are vast conspiracies, such as [[Hillary Clinton]]'s claim of a &amp;quot;vast right-wing conspiracy.&amp;quot;  Compare Wikipedia's entry on [[Phyllis Schlafly]], which repeats a false assertion that she &amp;quot;veers off into conspiracy theories,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with Wikipedia's entry on Hillary Clinton, which provides her quote of a &amp;quot;vast&amp;quot; conspiracy yet refuses to describe her as a conspiracy theorist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wikipedia's entry on [[liberal]] [[Michael Moore]], the biggest conspiracy theorist of all, does not even include any reference to the word &amp;quot;conspiracy&amp;quot;!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Moore&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's entry on the [[conservative]] [[Oklahoma]] legislator Sally Kern is seething with bias, unjustified smears and outright distortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Kern&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia understates that over 1500 supporters rallied in support of her criticisms of the [[homosexual agenda]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsok.com/article/3224704/1207238655&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and instead Wikipedia highlights predictable [[Hollywood Values|Hollywood]] criticisms of her stance.  Wikipedia then smears her with false accusations about her family and emphasizes charges that were never brought against her.  If that isn't enough, the Wikipedia entry even misrepresents a bill that Kern introduced to protect &amp;quot;a student's voluntary expression of a religious viewpoint&amp;quot;; Wikipedia relies on an anti-[[Christian]] blog to distort Kern's bill.&lt;br /&gt;
# The Wikipedia entry on [[baraminology]] (a form of taxonomy) describes it as &amp;quot;pseudoscience&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unrelated to science&amp;quot; simply because it was devised by a creationist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/baraminology&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# If anyone posts a profane quote on Wikipedia with the expletives censored (e.g. d--n), editors quickly restore the profanity. Wikipedia's guidelines, which its liberal editors selectively ignore, suggest to include the profanity &amp;quot;if and only if&amp;quot; such expressions will contribute to the meaning of the article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Profanity&amp;amp;oldid=227187296&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia editors tried strenuously to come up with reasons to censor embarrassing stories about the [[liberal]] John Edwards,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Edwards&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite frequently including smears against [[conservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Wikipedia ''does'' mention the [[liberal]] New York Times' poorly-researched allegations that John McCain had an affair [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain_presidential_campaign%2C_2008#Alleged_inappropriate_involvement_with_lobbyists] in spite of the fact that the NYT's own ombudsman said there was &amp;quot;no proof&amp;quot; the story was true.[http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hiZBfIDZs3P-I5ERtItxUcQ8JwGw]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several sites have stories about Wikipedia's obvious liberal bias on this issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/07/28/wikipedia-disallows-any-mention-alleged-john-edwards-scandal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gawker.com/5029921/john-edwards-wikipedia-page-strangely-love-child+free&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservativepulse.com/home/2008/07/edwards-sex-scandal-still-hasnt-surfaced-in-the-mainstream-press/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's article on [[cold fusion]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presents it as a continuing controversy. [[Liberals]] hope that cold fusion will rescue us from our oil dependency without the need to drill for oil off our coasts. Cold fusion experiments are actually widely discredited. Wikipedia also presents the widely-discredited &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/jan09/7127&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hydrino theory &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randell_Mills&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a possible energy source so that politically incorrect sources of power such as coal and nuclear fission seem less necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Liberals]] loathe self-defense, and [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on the national self-defense system of the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]] is seething with bias and outright falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Long passages are devoted to irrational criticisms of the programs, with inexplicable prominence given to criticisms by Hans Bethe, a European-raised scientist who later endorsed [[John Kerry]] for president.  The entry even claims that SDI brought &amp;quot;the nuclear standoff with the Soviet Union to its most critical point!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] biographies for conservatives such as [[Rush Limbaugh]] and [[Michelle Malkin]] are usually saddled with large sections titled “controversies”. These “controversies” are often nothing but quotes or complaints by fringe [[liberal]] elements, and Wikipedia advises against such sections, but its liberal editors ensure the biased use of such sections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Criticism&amp;amp;oldid=225325117&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt; However, the Wikipedia page for “Hanoi” Jane Fonda describes her obviously controversial propagandizing for the North Vietnamese government during the Vietnam War as “political activism” rather than “controversy”. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Fonda&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] promoted to good status, or GA, its smear entry about Conservapedia, in which Wikipedia claims that Conservapedia &amp;quot;has received much criticism from those who have accused it of factual inaccuracies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia#cite_ref-Clarke_6-0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  When Conservapedia pointed out the lack of support (which violates stated Wikipedia policy) for this false smear of Conservapedia, Wikipedia simply replaced its prior cite with a new one that also failed to support its smear.  After this was pointed out, [[Wikipedia]] simply changed its sentence to try to smear Conservapedia in another way.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] will give often great prominence to [[liberal]] criticism of someone, while almost never giving such prominence to [[conservative]] criticism of a [[liberal]].  For example, Wikipedia's entry for [[conservative]] [[Texas]] legislator Debbie Riddle is devoted mostly to [[liberal]] criticism of an obscure quote of hers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Riddle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But Wikipedia's entry for [[liberal]] [[Chuck Schumer]] consists of glowing praise without including any [[conservative]] criticism of him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Schumer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Barack Obama]] claims that he &amp;quot;was selected as an editor of the law review based on his grades and a writing competition,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when in fact the Harvard Law Review has long used racial quotas for admission.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=513672 (partially explaining the race-based selection system)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[censorship]] omits any reference to [[liberal]] censorship of [[classroom prayer]], [[pro-life]] advertisements, [[conservative]] newspapers on college campuses, or mentioning [[intelligent design]] in school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] falsely smears Conservapedia by claiming that it has &amp;quot;come under significant criticism for factual inaccuracies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In fact, such criticisms are rare or non-existent, and Wikipedia's former cite to a ''[[New York Times]]'' article for support actually criticizes [[Wikipedia]] because it &amp;quot;does dwell on the ''idea'' that 'others' have 'criticized and mocked the Conservapedia website for factual inaccuracy.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/conservapedia-the-word-says-it-all/ (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wikipedia persists in asserting that falsehood about Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Wikipedia]] gives favored treatment to anyone who promotes the [[homosexual agenda]], and smears those who oppose it.  For example, [[Robert Mapplethorpe]] glorified [[homosexuality]] in photographs before himself dying of [[AIDS]].  His own biographer identified him as a racist, providing quotes to prove it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/mapplethorpe_a_biography_patricia_morrisroe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet the [[Wikipedia]] entry about him conceals any reference to his racism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapplethorpe&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Meanwhile, [[Wikipedia]] smears the [[American Family Association]] and claims it is racist for reasons not supported by its citation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Family_Association#Anti-Semitism (March 2005 issue reference)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Given that one of Wikipedia's co-founders, [[Jimbo Wales]], is an [[atheism|atheist]], it is not particularly surprising that [[Wikipedia]] is particularly biased against prayer in school, as illustrated by its description of Coach [[Marcus Borden]]'s attempts merely to bow his head while his football players pray. [[Wikipedia]]'s biased description disparages community support of Borden by saying it is &amp;quot;regardless of federal law&amp;quot;; the entry says he returned to coaching as urged by the community &amp;quot;ostensibly&amp;quot; to assert a right to bow his head during prayer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Brunswick_Public_Schools#Controversy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] has an entry on &amp;quot;Gun Politics in the United States&amp;quot; that falsely claims that &amp;quot;Gun politics as a political issue dates to the earliest days of the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_States&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It shows a statue of a Revolutionary Minuteman carrying a rifle as &amp;quot;proof&amp;quot; of its claim!  Wikipedia's entry is astoundingly biased, concealing how guns deter crime and refusing to cite [[John Lott]], the leading expert whose studies support guns.&lt;br /&gt;
#''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]'' is listed under the category &amp;quot;Propaganda films&amp;quot;, alongside other [[conservative]] documentary films.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Propaganda_films&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, the lying, deceitful films of [[Michael Moore]] and other [[liberals]] are never described as &amp;quot;propaganda&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
#Here's another example of why [[Wikipedia]] is declining:  it locked its entry about [[Richard Dawkins]] to censor one of his quotes, despite being verified with a reference.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=162688862&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Perhaps the [[atheists]] on [[Wikipedia]] don't want people to learn what Dawkins really said!  After criticism here, Wikipedia eventually unlocked the entry.&lt;br /&gt;
# The body of the [[Islamic terrorism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism#.22Islamic.22_terrorism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; page opens with ''&amp;quot;Islamic terrorism&amp;quot; is itself a controversial phrase'' while the body of the Christian terrorism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism#Racism.2C_Sexism.2C_.26_Terrorism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; page opened with ''Juergensmeyer wrote, &amp;quot;It is good to remember, however, that despite its central tenets of love and peace, Christianity - like most traditions - has always had a violent side.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism#Theological_justification_of_Christian_violence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] has an extensive entry on &amp;quot;[[Creation]] myth&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Describing [[Creationism]] as a &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; is yet another attempt to disparage [[Christian]]s, and although the [[Evolution]] satisfies Wikipedia's definition of &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot;, Wikipedia never describes it as a &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Peter Singer]] downplayed his advocacy for infanticide and moral disdain for human life. Quotes such as &amp;quot;Simply killing an infant is never equivalent to killing a person&amp;quot; were ''removed'' as being &amp;quot;POV&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Singer&amp;amp;diff=200849646&amp;amp;oldid=199494933&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite appearing in the like-minded ''[[New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Zielbauer, [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C04E2D91530F930A25753C1A96F958260 Princeton Bioethics Professor Debates Views on Disability and Euthanasia]. ''The New York Times'': Oct. 13, 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A week after this criticism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=443352&amp;amp;oldid=443152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; an editor restored the former quote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Singer&amp;amp;diff=209935940&amp;amp;oldid=209392718&amp;lt;/reF&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Predictably, [[Wikipedia]] insists on a completely biased, one-sided, negative entry about the movie ''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]'', and then locked the page to prevent balance from being included.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In characteristic fashion, [[Wikipedia]] misrepresents the views of those it dislikes, and uses smears (like &amp;quot;conspiracy-theory,&amp;quot; a favorite Wikipedia epithet) to [[demonize]] them.  Also in [[Wikipedia]]-style, it quotes [[liberal]] newspaper opinions as though they are fact, but ignores, downplays or censors opposite published opinions (e.g., by [[National Review]]).&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] changes the meaning of a key quote from an [[abortion]]-breast cancer article in the Lancet medical journal (Beral, ''et al.''), falsely stating that it &amp;quot;concluded that [[abortion]] does 'not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-breast_cancer_hypothesis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Lancet article said no such thing about a woman's decision to have an abortion, which does increase the woman's risk of breast cancer.  Rather, the Lancet article limited its assertion to a claim about the overall effect of a ''pregnancy'' that terminates early.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15051280&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] described the [[People for the American Way]], which is a [[liberal]] advocacy group,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200507060931.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a &amp;quot;progressive advocacy organization&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_For_the_American_Way&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and did not mention the term [[liberal]] in its lengthy description of it until well after this deficiency was first mentioned here.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People_For_the_American_Way&amp;amp;diff=198768678&amp;amp;oldid=195716955&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# On Feb. 19, 2008, an editor removed bias in the form of incorrect and misleading information&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The article incorrectly refers to the sticker as &amp;quot;creationist&amp;quot;, and claims that &amp;quot;Claiming that evolution is &amp;quot;only a theory&amp;quot; ... is a common creationist tactic.&amp;quot;, ignoring that the largest creationists groups specifically reject this tactic.[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2996/84/#just_theory]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; from the [[Wikipedia]] entry about evolution stickers in Cobb County, Georgia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Selman_v._Cobb_County_School_District&amp;amp;diff=192393310&amp;amp;oldid=190591826&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The editor then predicted on [[Conservapedia]] that the [[liberal bias]] would inevitably be reinserted at Wikipedia, and it was: within 8 hours the liberal falsehoods and bias were reinserted by a Wikipedian.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Selman_v._Cobb_County_School_District&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=192393310&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] allows hundreds of thousands of obscure and offensive entries, such as unsuccessful punk rock groups and silly television shows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D'oh Such as the entry on D'oh]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But within hours [[liberals]] on [[Wikipedia]] completely deleted an informative and well-referenced entry about [[Hollywood Values]], in order to censor examples of how the [[liberal]] ideology harms people.  (This deletion occurred on Feb. 15, 2008; the deleting administrator considered the page to be &amp;quot;vandalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;page=Hollywood+values&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the first deletion, another Wikipedia user re-created the &amp;quot;Hollywood values&amp;quot; article as a joke with just this sentence: &amp;quot;Aw, whine, why can't Andrew Schlafly's perspective be told here??? After all, he runs the Trusworthy Encyclopedia!!!&amp;lt;/snark&amp;gt; Sorry, please don't block me.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huw_Powell&amp;amp;oldid=226552177#February_2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] often smears [[conservatives]] with falsehoods, using references that do not support its claim.  For example, [[Wikipedia]] falsely claims that &amp;quot;children&amp;quot; wrote most of the initial entries on [[Conservapedia]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but [[Wikipedia]]'s references for that claim do not even mention &amp;quot;children&amp;quot;.  The average age of contributors on [[Conservapedia]] is likely older than on [[Wikipedia]], so its smear is particularly hypocritical.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[conservative]] [[Ron Paul]] smears him with unsubstantiated statements (newsletter &amp;quot;issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ron_Paul&amp;amp;oldid=183792833&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), misleading attributions of statements (Paul renounced the statements in 2001), and an overall political hatchet job ... and then locks the page to prevent correction!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The page was locked from January 8 to August 6, 2008. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=protect&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;page=Ron+Paul&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Benazir Bhutto]] has nearly 8,000 words on all aspects of her life, and yet not one word acknowledging that she was [[pro-life]] and led the movement against the [[United Nations]]' creating a new international right to [[abortion]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Type in &amp;quot;[[conservative]]&amp;quot; on [[Wikipedia]] and you will be redirected to over 4500 words of confusion without any mention of [[marriage]], gun rights or personal accountability.  [[Wikipedia]] even claims that [[conservatives]] opposed to [[abortion]] are described as &amp;quot;anti-baby&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;anti-family&amp;quot;.  [[Wikipedia]] removed this bias only after it was identified here.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;That statement remained on the article from [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism&amp;amp;diff=173316636&amp;amp;oldid=173314241 November 23] to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservatism&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=179870132 December 26, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The [[Wikipedia]] entry on [[conservative]] [[Rick Scarborough]] falsely claimed that he said that [[HPV]], a sexually transmitted disease, is [[God]]'s punishment for sexually active young women.  [[Wikipedia]] admits it has no support for this claim, yet has allowed the statement to remain in his entry for most of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] entries contain [[liberal]] claims followed by citations that do not actually support the claims.  For example, [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Michael Farris]] states that it &amp;quot;was speculated that Farris' close connection to [[conservative]] leaders ... alienated some voters&amp;quot; in his campaign for lieutenant governor,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Farris&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but its citation for that [[liberal]] claim actually attributes his loss to his opponent's [[television]] ads that (falsely) claimed Farris wanted &amp;quot;to ban children's books such as 'The Wizard of Oz', 'Rumpelstiltskin,' and 'Cinderella'.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_n1_v15/ai_14891141&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# In a typical example of [[placement bias]] on [[Wikipedia]], it claims in its first sentence that [[Matthew Shepard]] was murdered &amp;quot;because of his [[homosexuality]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Only  near the end of the entry does [[Wikipedia]] quote a 20/20 report and knowledgeable sources which provide persuasive evidence that the crime was caused by drugs, not hatred towards [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s pervasive anonymous editing vandalizes numerous [[conservative]] entries, such as that of [[pro-life]] scholar [[Mary Ann Glendon]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Ann_Glendon&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For nearly two weeks her entry on [[Wikipedia]] has featured the disrespectful and unsupported statement that &amp;quot;She is a notable pro-life feminist, and ''a fan of the Dropkick Murphys,&amp;quot; which is a punk rock group''. [[Liberal]] editors monitor anonymous editing, but often allow attempts to embarrass [[conservatives]] to remain for a long time.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] allows countless entries flattering obscure [[liberals]], but lacks many entries about leading [[conservatives]]. For example, the [[Wikipedia]] entry on pro-life leader [[Judie Brown]] was previously nothing but a redirect&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judie_Brown&amp;amp;redirect=no&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to an entry about an organization which barely mentions her.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Life_League&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A proper page for her has since been added&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judie_Brown&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
# As far as [[Richard Dawkins]] title of professor while at [[Oxford]], [[Wikipedia]] fails to mention Rabbi Shmuley Boteach's contention that the special terms of the endowment for the position might have allowed Dawkins to bypass the peer review promotion process customarily required before receiving the title of &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-shmuley-boteach/rabbi-shmuley-responds-to_b_100275.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Rabbi Boteach stated a decree by Oxford seems to imply this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-shmuley-boteach/rabbi-shmuley-responds-to_b_100275.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[Richard Sternberg]] has falsely stated that a journal &amp;quot;withdrew&amp;quot; a peer-reviewed [[intelligent design]] paper that he reviewed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Sternberg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, the journal never withdrew the paper.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] has a strong bias against the [[Discovery Institute]], a prominent proponent of [[intelligent design]]. Wikipedia articles about the Institute's campaigns (Physicians and Surgeons who Dissent from Darwinism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicians_and_Surgeons_who_Dissent_from_Darwinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Scientific_Dissent_From_Darwinism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) devote most space to the criticism of the campaigns, instead of describing the campaigns themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] displays a similar bias against the [[Institute for Creation Research]] and its affiliated graduate school--or else displays an appalling lack of critical thinking for a publication that calls itself an encyclopedia. Their reportage on the controversies surrounding the accreditation of the [[ICR Graduate School]], first in [[California]] and now in [[Texas]], relies almost totally on the rants and raves by the group calling itself Texas Citizens for Science and fails utterly to consider or even to mention several key facts about those controversies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Creation_Research Institute for Creation Research] by [[Wikipedia]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;tes&amp;gt;Schafersman,&amp;quot; Steven. &amp;quot;[http://www.texscience.org/reviews/icr-thecb-certification.htm The Institute for Creation Research and It's (''sic'') Quest for Official Texas Certification to Award Masters Degrees in Science Education].&amp;quot; ''Texas Citizens for Science'', December 17, 2007; updated January 6 and January 28, 2008. Accessed March 19, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rae&amp;gt;Bergman,&amp;quot; Jerry. &amp;quot;[http://www.rae.org/ICRcase.html The Religion of Vague: An Unsuccessful Attempt by the State of California to Close a College].&amp;quot; ''Revolution Against Evolution'', May 22, 2003. Accessed March 19, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on the [[Prodigal Son]] devotes more words to obscure rock band and [[liberal media]] references to it (e.g., &amp;quot;'The Prodigal Son' is the Season 2 opener of the TV series Miami Vice, although it has virtually nothing to do with the parable itself.&amp;quot;) than to the parable and its spiritual meaning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_Prodigal_Son&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]]'s [[gossip]] and policy allowing edits by anonymous IP addresses struck again: for over two weeks the entry on former [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[Byron White]] stated he was the father of former Cowboy great Danny White.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Byron_White&amp;amp;diff=159734800&amp;amp;oldid=154431838&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The statement was utterly false, but misled everyone who read that.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.funtrivia.com/en/subtopics/Are-They-Related-213708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Wikipedia]] displays pervasive bias in making [[liberal]] statements with citations that do not support the statements, as illustrated by its entry about [[Conservapedia]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia]] states that &amp;quot;Conservapedia has asserted that Wikipedia is 'six times more [[liberal]] than the American public', a statistic which has been criticized for its poor extrapolation and lack of credibility.&amp;quot; But the two citations for this claim of &amp;quot;poor extrapolation and lack of credibility&amp;quot; are to articles that say nothing about extrapolation or credibility and instead tend to confirm the [[liberal bias]] on [[Wikipedia]].&lt;br /&gt;
# A user named [[Richard Dawkins]] apparently edited his own article on [[Wikipedia]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/RichardDawkins&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even linked to a DVD being sold from his personal website. Illustrating [[Wikipedia]]'s favoritism towards [[liberals]], it took a long time (well over a year after he first edited his own article)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RichardDawkins&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for anybody to confront this well-known [[atheist]] for this conflict of interest, despite being against [[Wikipedia]]'s own rules.&lt;br /&gt;
# Arbitration Committee member Fred Bauder told the Wikien-1 mailing list in regards to [[Michael Moore]], whose official website published attacks on a [[Wikipedia]] editor with an open invitation to vandalize [[Wikipedia]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence# Michael_Moore] and was proposed to be designated as an Attack site, &amp;quot;Obviously we need to make an exception for prominent people whose viewpoint we support. And by the way, I am not joking. Writing this down in black and white is important, if that is what we do in practice. And, if it not clear, I support him too, although I am not enamored of anyone's [[propaganda]]. Even that which supports my own position.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082987.html] When asked, &amp;quot;How, then, is this remotely compatible with NPOV?&amp;quot;, Bauder responded, &amp;quot;Not at all.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082993.html] [[Wikipedia]]'s Neutral Point of View (NPOV), laid down by founder [[Jimbo Wales]] allegedly is &amp;quot;absolute and non-negotiable.&amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view# _note-0] The editor Michaelmoore.com was urging its viewers to attack and harass is described as &amp;quot;a Fellow at the [[American Enterprise Institute]], a [[conservative]] [[think tank]].&amp;quot;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083230.html] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] heavily promotes [[liberals]] in inappropriate places. Go to Wikipedia's entry on ''[[Boy Scouts v. Dale]]'', a [[conservative]] [[Supreme Court]] decision, and for months you'd see a top-screen promotion for &amp;quot;gay/lesbian rights advocate&amp;quot; Evan Wolfson with a claim that he is &amp;quot;one of the '100 most influential people in the world.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boy_Scouts_of_America_v._Dale&amp;amp;oldid=152256885 (quoting a 2004 [[liberal]] list by Time magazine).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Wikipedia]] eventually removed that [[liberal]] promotion, but kept its inappropriate emphasis on this attorney who, by the way, lost this case.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boy_Scouts_of_America_v._Dale&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] has once again deleted all content on the [[North American Union]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_american_union&amp;amp;redirect=no]. The old pages are inaccessible, and re-creation is blocked.&lt;br /&gt;
#  For a long time [[Wikipedia]] led with a falsehood in describing [[Conservapedia]]: &amp;quot;Conservapedia is a wiki based web encyclopedia project with '''the stated purpose''' of creating an encyclopedia written from a socially and economically conservative viewpoint supportive of Conservative Christianity and '''Young Earth creationism'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia&amp;amp;oldid=160604712 (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That was defamatory in attempting to smear [[Conservapedia]] in front of [[Wikipedia]]'s [[evolutionist]] audience. [[Wikipedia]] also welcomes edits by anonymous IP addresses to the [[Conservapedia]] and other entries, resulting in frequent defamation.&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] has a lengthy entry on &amp;quot;Jesus H. Christ,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_H._Christ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a term that is an idiotic mockery of the [[Christian]] [[faith]]. [[Wikipedia]] calls the term &amp;quot;often humorous,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;joking&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;comedic&amp;quot;, and relishes in repeating disrespectful uses of the term, without admitting that the phrase is an anti-[[Christian]] mockery. Meanwhile, [[Wikipedia]] does not describe mockery of any other religion as &amp;quot;humorous&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
#  The [[Wikipedia]] article on [[Eritrea]] refuses to concede that [[Eritrea]] is a one-party state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eritrea&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another example of [[Wikipedia]] [[liberal bias]]: &amp;quot;Oh, they aren't really a dictatorship, their charter specifically denies it!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] often inserts bias by downplaying a [[liberal]] outrage or fallacy amid thousands of words of nearly irrelevant information. For example, no one credibly disputes that [[liberals]] forced [[Larry Summers]] to resign as president of [[Harvard]] because he dared to suggest that the under-representation of women in math, science and engineering may be due to innate differences between women and men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.davisenterprise.com/articles/2007/09/14/news/114new1.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19181-2005Jan18.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But the verbose entry for Larry Summers on [[Wikipedia]] implies that his obscure other positions were more important in causing his ouster.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] welcomes and allows edits by anonymous IP addresses, which results in rampant vandalism that is overwhelmingly [[liberal]]. Credible wikis, including [[Conservapedia]], do not permit editing by anonymous IP addresses.&lt;br /&gt;
#  For nearly two months, from at least as early as July 15 through September 9, 2007, [[Wikipedia]] classified its critics, including [[Conservapedia]], as &amp;quot;Fanatics and Special Interests.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Wikipedia&amp;amp;oldid=144741567# Fanatics_and_special_interests&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] has two million entries, but not one for [[liberal]]. Users who go to that term are ''redirected'' to the Wikipedia entry on [[liberalism]] that conceals the [[liberal]] support of [[gun control]] and taxpayer funding of [[abortion]], and [[liberal]] censorship of [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;amp;redirect=no&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]], its own entries (including talk pages) filled with smears and [[deceit]], features an entry on &amp;quot;deceit (album)&amp;quot; that gushes with a description of it as &amp;quot;austere, brilliant and indescribable&amp;quot; music that is &amp;quot;post-punk&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deceit_(album)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The word &amp;quot;deceit&amp;quot; has no entry on [[Wikipedia]]. It was ''redirected'' to a different term having a different meaning, and then this redirect was changed 7 times in two days in response to this criticism here.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Deceit&amp;amp;action=history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even now it lacks a clear definition and the numerous examples provided in the entry on [[deceit]] here.&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] promotes suicide with 21,544 entries that mention this depravity, including many entries that feature it (Conservapedia will not provide citations to the more depraved entries on this subject at Wikipedia as Conservapedia affirms the [[Sanctity of Life|sanctity of life]]). For example, Wikipedia referred to it needlessly in the very first sentence of distinguished jurist Henry Friendly's entry,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Friendly&amp;amp;oldid=151873451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Wikipedia's entry about [[Zerah Colburn]] ended with a claim that his distant ''nephew'' committed suicide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zerah_Colburn_(math_prodigy)&amp;amp;oldid=147253074&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After this criticism appeared here, these two entries were fixed (and in the case of Friendly, reinstated before being fixed again); there has been no system-wide removal of this bias on [[Wikipedia]]. In yet another example, [[Wikipedia]] has an entry for &amp;quot;suicide by cop&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_by_cop&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to discuss attacking a police officer to provoke a suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]] uses guilt-by-association far worse than [[Joseph McCarthy]] ever did. [[Wikipedia]] smears numerous persons and organizations by giving the false impression that they are associated with the [[John Birch Society]] (JBS). Examples have included:&lt;br /&gt;
#* pro-life Congressman [[Jerry Costello]], merely because JBS gave him a favorable rating&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerry_Costello&amp;amp;oldid=142488803&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#* anti-communist Fred Schwarz, merely because JBS agreed with him&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Schwarz&amp;amp;oldid=143791808&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#* the conservative [[Association of American Physicians and Surgeons]], by repeating a '''40 year old''' newspaper claim that some of its leaders once belonged to the JBS&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#* conservative baseball pitcher Dave Dravecky, a cancer survivor, merely because a newspaper claimed he once belonged to JBS&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dave_Dravecky&amp;amp;oldid=155924640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  In response to this criticism, Wikipedia removed ... only the smears against the more [[liberal]] targets, such as the ''[[Democrat]]'' [[Jerry Costello]], or the less influential entries, such as the deceased Fred Schwarz. Additionally, as of August 5, 2008, the Dravecky article no longer mentions anything about JBS.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dave_Dravecky&amp;amp;oldid=225907517&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia left intact the smear against the AAPS. After removal of the smear against Costello, it was then reinserted before being removed again.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerry_Costello&amp;amp;diff=156607328&amp;amp;oldid=156100194&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Wikipedia]]'s last sentence on [[Human Life International]] claimed that a killer &amp;quot;confessed that pamphets (sic) from the group led&amp;quot; him to kill. This is a complete lie designed to smear a [[conservative]] group. But this was approved by [[Wikipedia]] and remained for over a month.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Human_Life_International&amp;amp;oldid=138698827] Only in response to Conservapedia's criticism was the smear removed.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  A devastating critique of [[Wikipedia]] by [[Fox News]] describes the impact of [[Wikipedia]] smears on popular golfer Fuzzy Zoeller.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In addition to the [[Fox News]] report, numerous stories on the Internet describe the smears, which we will not repeat here. &amp;quot;The Wikipedia entry has since been cleansed of the remarks, first posted last August, then again in December before being removed January 2nd. However, several sites like Answers.com have copies of Wikipedia entries, and as of press time still had the defamatory content in place.&amp;quot;[http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/02/22/fuzzy-zoeller-incensed-over-wikipedia-edit]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Smears in [[Wikipedia]]'s entry on [[United States of America|U.S.]] Congressman Steve LaTourette were totally false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1184402220217510.xml&amp;amp;coll=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;quot;[[Larry Sanger]], who founded [[Wikipedia]] in 2001 with [[Jimmy Wales]] only to leave shortly afterwards, said that even as far back as 2001 the [[Wikipedia]] community 'had no respect for experts.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single8794&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikpedia's entry on [[liberal]] former Vice President [[Al Gore]] contains no mention of the drug charges against his son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But Wikipedia's entry on [[conservative]] Vice President [[Dick Cheney]] prominently mentions his adult daughter's sexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for seven weeks about [[Thad Cochran]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thad_Cochran&amp;amp;oldid=135420256 (revised only after being exposed on Conservapedia, but then the smear was reinserted again before being removed again)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a conservative Republican member of the [[U.S. Senate]], smeared him with an offensive, unsupported quotation not of Cochran, but of a Democratic Mississippi governor for whom Cochran's mother campaigned when Cochran was age 14. The unsupported quote was never spoken or endorsed by Cochran, but Wikipedia featured it near the top of Cochran's entry to mislead the reader into thinking Cochran is somehow a racist.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia smears prominent [[Conservative Christianity|Christian conservatives]], including [[James Dobson]] and [[D. James Kennedy]], with an allegation that they are part of a grand scheme Wikipedia calls &amp;quot;Dominionism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominionism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term was made up by [[liberals]] and this conspiracy theory has no factual basis, but Wikipedia smears these [[conservatives]] with elaborate templates in their own entries depicting them as part of this fictional scheme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D._James_Kennedy D. James Kennedy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eagle_Forum&amp;amp;curid=3647552&amp;amp;diff=165330150&amp;amp;oldid=165044484] calls Eagle Forum dominionist, even though there is not even any source that says so. The Eagle Forum article now has a &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; section that alleges various associations with theocracy and dominionism citing various left-wing opinion web sites, but none of those sites even says that Eagle Forum supports theocracy or dominionism. One editor was blocked just for trying to fix it.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry about the anti-[[Christian]] and anti-[[Semitic]] [[H.L. Mencken]] praises him profusely because he, Wikipedia's words, &amp;quot;notably assaulted America's preoccupation with [[Christian fundamentalism|fundamentalist]] [[Christianity]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mencken&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After 3,500 words of adulation, Wikipedia then buries a concession that Mencken &amp;quot;has been referred to as anti-Semitic and misogynistic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedians like Mencken's hostility to religion too much to admit that his biographer (Terry Teachout) and his close Jewish friend (Charles Angoff) described him as racist and anti-Semitic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cjrarchives.org/issues/2003/1/mencken-payne.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entries about the 2007 Masters&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Masters_Tournament&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its champion [[Zach Johnson]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zach_Johnson&amp;amp;oldid=154500732&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who won an upset come-from-behind victory against Tiger Woods, omitted any reference to Johnson's public statements crediting his [[faith]] in [[Jesus Christ]] for strengthening him as he overcame enormous odds to prevail. Months later, after criticism here, Johnson's attibution to [[Jesus Christ]] was included, but with the [[Wikipedia]] trick of placing it late in a wordy entry so that few are likely to see it, and even then with a silly &amp;quot;citation needed&amp;quot; to suggest that the quote may not be true.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zach_Johnson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia asserts that &amp;quot;One 1987 estimate found that more than 99.84% of almost 500,000 US scientists in the earth and life sciences supported evolution over creation science.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This statement is false, but Wikipedians won't correct it and it has been repeated thousands of times by other [[liberals]] in reliance on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070519145312AACvfJA&amp;amp;show=7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The truth is that 700 scientists signed a statement rejecting evolution, but evolutionists then made the illogical claim that a large majority of other scientists must support evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;By one count there are some 700 scientists (out of a total of 480,000 U.S. earth and life scientists) who give credence to creation-science, the general theory that complex life forms did not evolve but appeared 'abruptly'.&amp;quot; Martz, Larry &amp;amp; Ann McDaniel (1987-06-29), &amp;quot;Keeping God out of the Classroom (Washington and bureau reports)&amp;quot;, Newsweek CIX(26): 23-24, ISSN 0028-9604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under that reasoning, if 1000 persons signed a statement opposing President [[George W. Bush]], then nearly 300 million Americans must support him! Funny how Wikipedia does not claim that.&lt;br /&gt;
#  The 5,400-word Wikipedia entry on The John Birch Society&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_John_Birch_Society&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attempts to smear unrelated [[conservatives]] who had nothing to do with the society, simply by calling them &amp;quot;allies&amp;quot;. Under that reasoning [[Ronald Reagan]], [[Pope John Paul II]], and [[George W. Bush]] should also be in that entry! And this is by a resource that criticizes [[McCarthyism]]???&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia has a substantial anti-intellectual element, as reflected by silly administrator names and nonsensical entries. For a long time Wikipedia had an entry for &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Duh is an American English slang exclamation that is used to express disdain for someone missing the obviousness of something. For example, if one read a headline saying 'Scientific study proves pain really does hurt' or 'New reports show death is bad for one's health', the response might be 'Well, duh!'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia ultimately deleted its entry after it was critized here&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; How about a new slogan: ''Wikipedia: well, duh!''&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia recently moved further away from Judaeo-Christian beliefs by complaining that &amp;quot;[t]he average Wikipedian ... is from a predominantly Christian country&amp;quot; and that Wikipedia was built on Christian encyclopedias and &amp;quot;the Jewish Encyclopedia.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias (later &amp;quot;predominantly Christian&amp;quot; was changed to &amp;quot;nominally Christian&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the same time, Wikipedia complains about the &amp;quot;enormous significance&amp;quot; given by entries to &amp;quot;Al-Qaeda attacks on the U.S., UK and Spain, killing slightly over 3,000 people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia has a banner to criticize an American treatment of a topic: &amp;quot;The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;A worldwide view&amp;quot; is fictional [[liberal]] terminology for [[globalists]].&lt;br /&gt;
#  Though Wikipedia is non-profit, the Wikia project of its co-founder is very much for-profit and has raised millions of dollars in investments. Already Wikipedia has been criticized for favoring Wikia. When Wikipedia community voted 61-39% percent to treat all links to other sites equally by removing nofollow (Google-ignored) tags for all of them, the Wikipedia co-founder overruled this decision and Wikipedia now favors Wikia in its treatment of nofollow tags.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/28/wikipedia-special-treatment-for-wikia-and-other-wikis/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia is sympathetic to Fidel Castro in its entry about Cuba.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia blames President Dwight Eisenhower for choosing &amp;quot;to attend a golf tournament&amp;quot; rather than meet the revolutionary Castro in 1959, and then Wikipedia claims that Castro became a communist because of the American-backed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961. Conservapedia tells the truth up-front: &amp;quot;Cuba has been ruled by a communist dictator named Fidel Castro since 1959.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Cuba]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Often Wikipedia's biased assertions are unsupported by its citations. For example, the Wikipedia entry about Conservapedia states that it &amp;quot;has come under significant criticism for alleged factual inaccuracies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But check out Wikipedia's cited source for that statement: its citation does not identify a single factual inaccuracy on Conservapedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/index.php?id=1910&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thus Wikipedia relies on a factual inaccuracy to accuse someone else of factual inaccuracies! After this criticism was posted here, Wikipedia removed the said citation but replaced it with a few other biased citations.&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Liberal]] icon [[Bertrand Russell]] receives glowing adoration on Wikipedia, which calls him &amp;quot;a prophet of the creative and rational life,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;one of the world's best-known intellectuals&amp;quot; whose &amp;quot;voice carried great moral authority, even into his mid 90s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After 7,700 words about [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Wikipedia]] finally mentions Russell's support of the communist revolution, but pretends that Russell quickly opposed it. Instead, Russell wrote that &amp;quot;I believe that [[Communism]] is necessary to the world, and I believe ... Bolshevism deserves the gratitude and admiration of all the progressive part of mankind.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Bertrand Russell]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia]] allows greater and easier copying of its materials than [[Wikipedia]] does, but Wikipedia's entry about [[Conservapedia]] claims that its policy &amp;quot;has led to some concerns.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And who supposedly had these concerns? In Wikipedia's citation, it was only the founder of Wikipedia in trying to find a way to criticize Conservapedia!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/190501&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  April 24th was the anniversary of [[Operation Eagle Claw]], which was President [[Jimmy Carter]]'s failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Iran. The Conservapedia [[Operation Eagle Claw|entry]] explains Carter's political motivation for this. But the Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw entry] omits Carter's political motivation and instead implies that this bad luck cost Carter the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia states, &amp;quot;The operation was a failure, and had a severe impact on U.S. President Jimmy Carter's re-election prospects ....&amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw entry]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, Newsweek did not even mention this after July 14th, and Reagan beat Carter for reasons other than bad luck. &lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry on James Monroe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Monroe&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; omits any mention of how he was a conservative and omits Monroe's veto of a key appropriation on the Cumberland Road Bill, when Monroe stated that &amp;quot;congress does not possess the power under the constitution to pass such a law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[James Monroe]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After this criticism was posted here, an editor at Wikipedia added Monroe's Cumberland Road Bill opposition to the article,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=James_Monroe&amp;amp;oldid=226448821#Presidency_1817.E2.80.931825:_The_Era_of_Good_Feelings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the article still has yet to mention that Monroe was politically conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Polls show that about twice as many Americans identify themselves as &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; compared with &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot;, and that ratio has been increasing for two decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=444&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But on Wikipedia, about three times as many editors identify themselves as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; compared with &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Based on a comparison of how many users are under categories [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Liberal_Wikipedians Liberal Wikipedians] with those in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Conservative_Wikipedians Conservative Wikipedians]. Both categories were [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/August_2007#Category:All_Wikipedian_by_political_ideology_categories deleted] on Aug. 10, 2007 as editors have argued that &amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOAP Wikipedia is not a soapbox]&amp;quot; among other reasons. However, the userboxes for users to declare themselves as &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rcej/conservative conservative]&amp;quot; have been allowed to stay. Wikipedia's own records show, as of July 28, 2008, that far more users choose the &amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=User%3AUBX%2Fliberal&amp;amp;namespace= liberal]&amp;quot; userbox than the &amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Rcej/conservative conservative]&amp;quot; userbox.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That suggests '''Wikipedia is six times more [[liberal]] than the American public'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Liberal bias&amp;quot; can be defined as the ratio of [[liberals]] to conservatives in a group, such that no [[liberals]] would equate to zero [[liberal bias]]. Wikipedia's ratio of 3:1 for liberals to conservatives is six times the ratio in the American public of 1:2 for [[liberals]] to conservatives.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also [[liberal quotient]].&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia awarded &amp;quot;good article&amp;quot; status&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to a biased description of [[liberal]] Balboa High School, saying it has &amp;quot;a progressively nurturing environment&amp;quot; undergoing &amp;quot;a steady renaissance marked by academic innovation.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balboa_High_School_(San_Francisco)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nowhere in Wikipedia's 4,468-word description does it admit that half the 9th graders lacked proficiency on a statewide English test.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jill Tucker, &amp;quot;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/16/MNGE2KJB5K1.DTL Student Successes Defy Urban Trends]&amp;quot; San Francisco Chronicle (Aug. 16, 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Instead, Wikipedia editors apparently like how this public school converted its metal shop into a sex-based &amp;quot;health&amp;quot; clinic. &lt;br /&gt;
#  One can confirm that sex-related entries are attracting many to Wikipedia, including young viewers, by viewing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics Wikipedia statistics]. But Wikipedia gives no specific warning to parents or viewers about the pornographic images on popular pages, and Wikipedia would probably be disabled in many homes and schools if a proper warning were given.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia merely has a general disclaimer that avoids any reference to its sexual images, pornography, and adult content.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_disclaimer]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry on the &amp;quot;Palestinian People&amp;quot; omits any mention of terrorism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_people (the entry also contained an unjustified picture of children for sympathy purposes, but that was removed after criticism here)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Click on the PLO and you'll find no discussion of its connection to the massacre of innocent athletes at the 1972 Olympics in Munich.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Liberation_Organization&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia features an entry on &amp;quot;anti-racist mathematics&amp;quot; that &amp;quot;emphasizes the sociocultural context of mathematics education and suggests that the study of mathematics (as it is traditionally known in western societies) does exhibit racial or cultural bias.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-racist_mathematics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#  In the mid-20th century, a Soviet encyclopedia contained the assertion that Jesus was a myth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bede.org.uk/books,jmyth.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia's entry on [[Jesus]] has the following: &amp;quot;A small number of scholars and authors question the historical existence of Jesus, with some arguing for a completely mythological Jesus.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But no credible historian makes such a claim.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for the [[Renaissance]] denies any credit to Christianity, its primary inspiration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikipedia has since updated its entry with a backhanded reference to Christianity, but even then not for inspiring the Renaissance but rather for providing subject matter for the works.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Renaissance&amp;amp;oldid=138439803]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  About 60% of Americans accept the account of the Great Flood in the [[Bible]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040216-113955-2061r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But enter &amp;quot;Great Flood&amp;quot; into Wikipedia and it automatically converts that to an entry entitled &amp;quot;Deluge (mythology).&amp;quot; That entry then uses &amp;quot;myth&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;mythology&amp;quot; nearly 70 times in its description.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Flood&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Its entry on &amp;quot;Noah's Ark&amp;quot; is just as biased.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah's_Ark&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia editors are about 4 times as [[atheist]]ic or non-religious as the American public. In a Newsweek poll in 2006, 92% of Americans said they believed in God and only 8% said they did not believe in God or didn't know. But among Wikipedia editors responding to a request for identification of beliefs, 35% described themselves in the categories of &amp;quot;No religion, [[atheist]], agnostic, humanist, secular, other.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikimedians_by_religion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry on [[abortion]] reads like a brochure for the abortion industry. Wikipedia denies and omits the results of 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies showing increased risk of breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia's entry also omits the evidence of abortion causing increased premature birth of subsequent children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Instead of providing these facts, Wikipedia blames women by declaring that &amp;quot;breast cancer elicits disproportionate fear in women&amp;quot;!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion-breast_cancer_hypothesis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  The Wikipedia entry for the [[Voting Rights Act]] contained (as of March 9-10) a call to participate in a political march to establish congressional representation for D.C.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Voting_Rights_Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is a longtime [[liberal]] cause prohibited by the [[U.S. Constitution]]. A conservative entry like that would be deleted by Wikipedia editors within minutes, but that entry remained until after it was criticized here.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Initially, in December 2006, a Wikipedia administrator named &amp;quot;Nearly Headless Nick&amp;quot; (the signature nickname for Wikipedia user &amp;quot;Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_Nicholas_de_Mimsy-Porpington&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) deleted an entry about Conservapedia, following a discussion on the &amp;quot;Articles for deletion&amp;quot; section in which a horde of Wikipedia editors demanded and obtained deletion, claiming that the site failed a &amp;quot;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(web) notability guideline for websites]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, in response to publicity, Wikipedia posted a new entry about Conservapedia. Wikipedia's entry is filled with obvious bias, numerous errors, out-of-date citations, and self-serving false statements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, the Wikipedia entry made the absurd claim that Conservapedia says the &amp;quot;General Theory of Relativity&amp;quot; has &amp;quot;nothing to do with physics.&amp;quot; Wikipedia's claim was completely false and unsupported by its citations. After this example was posted here, Wikipedia removed its error but has left other false and outdated claims in its entry, reflecting Wikipedia's pervasive bias.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for conservative physicist [[Edward Teller]] promotes the [[liberal]] attempt to blame him for the government taking away the security clearance of [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]. Teller testified, &amp;quot;If it is a question of wisdom and judgment, as demonstrated by actions since 1945, then I would say one would be wiser not to grant clearance.&amp;quot; Wikipedia first called this statement &amp;quot;damning&amp;quot;, and after criticism here replaced its term with &amp;quot;problematic&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Teller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In light of how multiple spies leaked secrets under Oppenheimer's supervision in the [[Manhattan Project]] and spying even worsened afterwards, Wikipedia's spin on Teller's statement is unjustified bias.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for the [[Association of American Physicians and Surgeons]], a conservative group, features a rant against the group by a British journalist who was a former press officer for the leftist Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons&amp;amp;oldid=107830399 The version] criticized above; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons the note] left by dpbsmith on the article's discussion page; the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons current version].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The only cited credential for the journalist is that he works for a television &amp;quot;programme-production company,&amp;quot; and there is no citation for any of the factual claims in his intemperate and misleading description of the group, which were prompted by an independent criticism in England of the journalist's own work. After receiving a complaint about this, Wikipedia trimmed this rant but still kept most of it, reflecting Wikipedia's bias. Preserving this unpublished diatribe is against Wikipedia policy (e.g., NPOV), but it Wikipedia administrators insist on keeping it. Wikipedia's entry also features another [[liberal]] journalist's swipe at AAPS from ... 40 years ago!&lt;br /&gt;
#  There is a strong anti-American and anti-capitalist bias on Wikipedia. In its description of the post-war [[Bell Trade Act]] of 1946, in which the United States gave the Philippines $800 million in exchange for some free trade provisions, Wikipedia omits any mention of the $800 million dollars and instead lambasts the &amp;quot;wrath of Father Capitalism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This phrase was removed from Wikipedia only after this criticism was posted here. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Trade_Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The agreement was approved by popular vote on the Philippines, but the Wikipedia article omits that fact also.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia distorts the youthful acceptance of [[deism]] by [[Benjamin Franklin]] by never acknowledging that he later abandoned it. Wikipedia fails to admit the significance of how Franklin, near the end of his life, proposed the saying of prayers at the [[Constitutional Convention]] for divine intervention and assistance in the proceedings,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Deist_thinkers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; an act contrary to the teachings of deism. Wikipedia also omits any acknowledgment of Franklin's praise of ''[[Pilgrim's Progress]]'' in his autobiography.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry on the intelligent design court decision in ''Dover''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; distorts and omits the key facts that (i) the judge awarded over $2 million in attorneys fees to the [[ACLU]]'s side (not $1 million), (ii) the judge copied over 90% of his opinion from the [[ACLU]]'s briefs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and (iii) his opinion relied heavily on another decision that was subsequently reversed on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Gossip is pervasive on Wikipedia. Many entries read like the [[National Enquirer]]. For example, Wikipedia's entry, &amp;quot;Nina Totenberg&amp;quot;, states, &amp;quot;She remarried in 2000 to Dr. H. David Reines, a trauma surgeon and vice chairman of surgery at Inova Fairfax Hospital. On their honeymoon, he treated her for severe injuries after she was hit by a boat propeller while swimming.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nina_Totenberg&amp;amp;oldid=171577028 Nina Totenberg - Wikipedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That sounds just like the National Enquirer, and reflects a bias towards gossip. Conservapedia avoids gossip and vulgarity, just as a true encyclopedia does.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Edits to include facts against [[Evolution]] are almost immediately censored. On Conservapedia, contributions that meet simple [[The Conservapedia Commandments|rules]] are respected to the maximum extent possible.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia has as its official policy the following: &amp;quot;If we are going to characterize disputes neutrally, we should present competing views with a consistently fair and sensitive tone.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet what does Wikipedia do in relation to its article on [[Young Earth Creationism]]? It currently offers an article on the topic under the category &amp;quot;Pseudoscience&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_Earth_creationism Young Earth creationism - Wikipedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; What reputable encyclopedia uses such a non-encyclopedic tone for an article in regards to creationism? The log on the article shows that Wikipedia has a history of using the pejorative term &amp;quot;pseudoscience&amp;quot; to disparage young earth creationism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Earth_creationism&amp;amp;action=history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia removed and permanently blocked a page identifying its many biases. Wikipedia omits any meaningful reference to political bias in its 7000-word entry [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia Criticism of Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia claims about 2.9 million articles, but what it does not say is that a large number of those articles have zero educational value. For example, Wikipedia has 1075 separate articles about &amp;quot;Moby&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;song&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simply search &amp;quot;Moby&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;song&amp;quot; together on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles -- perhaps over half its website -- are about music, Hollywood, and other topics beneath a regular encyclopedia. This reflects a bias towards popular gossip rather than helpful or enlightening information.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Often key facts are missing from Wikipedia entries in favor of meaningless detail. Wikipedia's entry about [[Indentured Servitude]] is massive, but it omitted any reference to [[Bacon's Rebellion]], which was the turning point for the use of indentured servants in the New World! Finally, weeks after this glaring omission was noted here, Wikipedia added one line to its entry: &amp;quot;Indentured servants in Virginia supported Bacon's Rebellion in 1676.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indentured_servant&amp;amp;diff=115675763&amp;amp;oldid=113879992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Unlike most encyclopedias and news outlets, Wikipedia does not exert any centralized authority to take steps to reduce bias or provide balance; it has a &amp;quot;neutral point of view&amp;quot; policy but the policy is followed only to the extent that individual editors acting in social groups choose to follow it. For example, CNN would ensure that Crossfire had a representative of the political right and one from the political left. In contrast, Wikipedia policy allows bias to exist and worsen. For example, even though most Americans reject the theory of evolution,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia editors commenting on the topic are nearly 100% pro-evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Evolution Talk:Evolution - Wikipedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Self-selection has a tendency to exacerbate bias, as in mobs, where there are no restraints. [[Gresham's Law]] reflects the problem in economics of bad money driving out good in the absence of corrective action. As a result, Wikipedia is arguably more biased than CNN and other information sources.&lt;br /&gt;
#: The above paragraph was posted on the Wikipedia entry for &amp;quot;Wikipedia&amp;quot;, under bias, but its editors then illustrated their bias by replacing the above with this: &amp;quot;Ojective [sic], or neutrally biased, articles present different opinions as equally legitimate regardless of validity, while unbiased articles focus on accuracy and validity. For example, the evolution article is not objective because it does not present creationism, a counter argument to evolution, as a valid scientific theory. However, this does not make the article biased because evolution is an accepted scientific theory. CNN's Crossfire, on the other hand, was considered objective ... because it had representatives from the political right from the political left.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia has many entries on mathematical concepts, but lacked any entry on the basic concept of an [[elementary proof]] until this omission was pointed out here.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_proof&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Elementary proofs require a rigor lacking in many mathematical claims promoted on Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
#  The Wikipedia entry for the [[Piltdown Man]] omits many key facts, such as how it was taught in schools for an entire generation and how the dating methodology used by evolutionists is fraudulent.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D. The dates are based on the birth of [[Jesus]], so why pretend otherwise? Conservapedia gives the credit due to Christianity and exposes the [[CE]] deception.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's article on [[Feudalism]] is limited to feudalism in Europe and did not mention the feudal systems that developed independently in Japan and India until this defect was described here.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's article on the longest-serving and most powerful Maryland official in its history, [[William Donald Schaefer]], contains about 1900 words, but over two-thirds of those words (1400/1900) are devoted to silly gossip, outright vulgarity and National Enquirer-type material.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Donald_Schaefer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 406 words, which is over 20% of the entire entry, is devoted to a silly dispute Schaefer had one day with the local newspaper!&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's article about the late Senator John Tower includes a mean-spirited story whose only point seems to be to indicate the degree of his ex-wife's bitterness toward him. The article previously spelled his wife's name incorrectly. The article was in that state since it was first inserted in May 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Tower&amp;amp;oldid=101859325 John Tower], revision as of Jan 25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and until it was corrected on January 26, 2007 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Tower&amp;amp;offset=20070208110937&amp;amp;limit=20&amp;amp;action=history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. No real encyclopedia would print such silly gossip.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for the [[National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act]] (NCVIA) reads like an advertisement for vaccine manufacturers, including unsupported and implausible claims about vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine_Injury_Act&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Unsupported claims featured there include &amp;quot;Vaccine makers indicated they would cease production if their proposal for the NCVIA was not enacted&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;concern that the NCVIA may not provide an adequate legal shield.&amp;quot; Wikipedia's entry omits references to leading pro-parent websites concerning vaccination,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.909shot.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and instead Wikipedia's entry lists pro-government and pro-vaccine-manufacturer websites. Wikipedia's entry even includes this entire paragraph, which is unsupported and is little more than an advertisement for drug companies:&lt;br /&gt;
#: Public health safety, according to backers of the legislation, depends upon the financial viability of pharmaceutical companies, whose ability to produce sufficient supplies in a timely manner could be imperiled by civil litigation on behalf of vaccine injury victims that was mounting rapidly at the time of its passage. Vaccination against infectious illnesses provides protection against contagious diseases and afflictions which may cause permanent disability or even death. Vaccines have reduced morbidity caused by infectious disease; e.g., in the case of smallpox, mass vaccination programs have eradicated a once life-threatening illness.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia displays an obsession with English social distinctions, such as obscure royalty, and with unexplained academic distinctions earned in the English college system, such as references to &amp;quot;double first degree.&amp;quot; The entry on [[Henry Liddell]] illustrates this extreme form of Anglophilia that characterizes many entries in Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liddell&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That entry fails to tell us when Liddell was dean of Christ Church, Oxford and has a grammatical error in its first sentence, yet describes in painstaking detail four obscure royal titles for Liddell's relatives and his &amp;quot;double first degree&amp;quot; in college. The casual reader of that entry wouldn't even notice a buried reference (well after a description of all the royal lineage) to Liddell's primary claim to fame: his daughter Alice inspired [[Alice's Adventures in Wonderland]]. The arcane English descriptions in many Wikipedia entries may be due to its copying, verbatim, passages from the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. This copying was not disclosed in the debate in late 2005 about whether Wikipedia was as reliable a resource as the Encyclopedia Britannica.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.com.com/Study+Wikipedia+as+accurate+as+Britannica/2100-1038_3-5997332.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Robert McHenry, former Editor-in-Chief for the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', wrote about Wikipedia's bias and included this observation:&lt;br /&gt;
#: &amp;quot;One simple fact that must be accepted as the basis for any intellectual work is that truth – whatever definition of that word you may subscribe to – is not democratically determined.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Bob Schmidt observed on the ''Illinois Review'':&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2007/01/conservapedia_w.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#: I just spent some time in Wikipedia checking if my recollections of its bias are correct. The bias is much worse than I had remembered.&lt;br /&gt;
#: I looked only at topics on business and information technology. Clearly there are enthusiasts for certain vendors who are spending a large portion of their time hyping technology in a way that makes their vendor look good in comparison to other vendors.&lt;br /&gt;
#: They will set up a set of criteria for the definition of a product that their product will meet. They conveniently omit from the criteria anything that would detract from their favorite.&lt;br /&gt;
#: In short, Wikipedia is not objective. It is accurate only within its selective use of facts that are convenient to promote a predetermined outcome.&lt;br /&gt;
#: Even for just one area of knowledge, it would take a major time consuming effort for a person or group to have an impact on reducing the bias and improving the accuracy of the entries.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, admitted the following understated bias in an interview in 2006:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/email_debatewales_discusses_po.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#: &amp;quot;I would say that the Wikipedia community is slightly more [[liberal]] than the U.S. population on average, because we are global and the international community of English speakers is slightly more [[liberal]] than the U.S. population. There are no data or surveys to back that.&amp;quot; [Conservapedia editor: why not? Wales admitted that only about 615 editors are responsible for over 50% of the edits on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Why doesn't Wikipedia survey these editors? Is this deliberate indifference to bias?]&lt;br /&gt;
#  Many people know how a prominent Tennessee journalist [[John Lawrence Seigenthaler]] was defamed for four months on Wikipedia before it was corrected. He described and criticized this in ''USA Today'', concluding with the following:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
#: When I was a child, my mother lectured me on the evils of &amp;quot;gossip.&amp;quot; She held a feather pillow and said, &amp;quot;If I tear this open, the feathers will fly to the four winds, and I could never get them back in the pillow. That's how it is when you spread mean things about people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# What most people don't know is how many Wikipedia editors savaged [[Seigenthaler]] ''afterwards'' on a Wikipedia talk page for publicly criticizing the falsehoods about him:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#: &amp;quot;Mr. [[Seigenthaler]]'s attitude and actions are reprehensible and ill-formed,&amp;quot; said one typical comment. &amp;quot;[He] has the responsibility to learn about his own name and how it is being applied and used, as any celebrity does on the Internet and the world-at-large. Besides, if there is an error whether large or small, he can correct it on Wikipedia. Everyone fails to understand that logic.&amp;quot; Another wrote: &amp;quot;Rather than fixing the article himself, he made a legal threat. He's causing Wikipedia a lot of trouble, on purpose.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
#  The co-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, described &amp;quot;serious and endemic problems&amp;quot; in Wikipedia in a document entitled &amp;quot;Toward a Compendium of Knowledge&amp;quot; (Sept. 2006). Sanger observed that Wikipedia editors do not enforce their own rules consistently or effectively and that it has become an &amp;quot;arguably dysfunctional community&amp;quot; unattractive to traditional experts. Sanger declared the Wikipedia community's response to the Seigenthaler incident to be &amp;quot;completely unacceptable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/citizendium.ars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's errors spill undetected into newspapers. A Wikipedia entry falsely stated that Rutgers was once invited to join the Ivy League. Although that false statement was eventually removed from Wikipedia, it was not removed before the ''Daily News'' relied on it in this story:&lt;br /&gt;
#: &amp;quot;You don't have to define your college with your football team, but Rutgers long ago decided to give it a try. Back in 1954, when it was considered a 'public Ivy,' Rutgers might have joined the fledgling Ivy League and altered its destiny. But the school declined the offer - arguably the dumbest mistake in its history. Ever since then, Rutgers has scrambled to prove itself worthy of playing football with the big boys.&amp;quot; — Bondy, Filip. &amp;quot;They Can Finally Say They Belong Here&amp;quot;, New York Daily News, 2006-11-10, p. 92. Retrieved on 2006-12-13. &lt;br /&gt;
#  Wikipedia's entry for [[Johnny Appleseed]], a Christian folk hero, omits a discussion of his strong faith and instead features baseless speculation about his health, a year of death different from that of his obituary, and a silly story designed to make a Christian preacher look foolish.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnny_Appleseed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#  In a brief-lived example of pro-homosexuality bias, the category allowing users to self identify as Heterosexual was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/June_2007# Category:Heterosexual_Wikipedians deleted] because it served no useful purpose, yet the exact same category for Homosexuals was [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/July_2007# Category:Gay_Wikipedians kept]. The latter was deleted after a month along with all other categories focused on the sexuality of Wikipedians. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:LGBT_Wikipedians Category:LGBT_Wikipedians] has revived itself after a delete but is still fighting to not be deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia has refused to have an article on [[Sudden Jihad Syndrome]] despite a term discussed by multiple commentator including [[neoconservative]] academic [[Daniel Pipes]] and a column in the [[Washington Times]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nysun.com/article/29080&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;amp;page=Sudden+Jihad+Syndrome&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thecourier.com/opinion/editoral/ar_ED_021607.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sudden_Jihad_Syndrome&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sudden_jihad_syndrome&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080102/NATION/203823370/1001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even refused to let an editor work on a draft for a rewrite of the article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:CltFn/Sudden_Jihad_Syndrome&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's article on Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign makes no mention of her endorsement by the leadership of the terrorist group Hamas,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58699&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but lists endorsements of Republican presidential candidates by the Ku Klux Klan.&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's entry for &amp;quot;Right to bear arms&amp;quot; mentions the discrepancies many have with the interpretation of the phrase. They begin by labeling the first section &amp;quot;Military service ''definition''&amp;quot; and go on to explain how the words &amp;quot;bear arms&amp;quot; had a different meaning a couple hundred years ago in European countries. After the 7 paragraph section that has little relation with the Second Amendment of the ''United States'', Wikipedia offers 2 paragraphs that talks about the &amp;quot;Insurrectionary ''Theory''&amp;quot;. First thing, they call people that adhere to this concept &amp;quot;extremists&amp;quot; and attempt to prove why this viewpoint is false. The criticism was strangely missing from the military service section. So, in short, Wikipedia believes that the faultless, [[liberal]] &amp;quot;definition&amp;quot; is true and the sketchy, extremist, conservative &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_bear_arms#Military_service_definition&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_bear_arms#Insurrectionary_theory&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia is sexist? Definitions of antonym words don't match up:  &lt;br /&gt;
## '''Matriarchy''' is a term, which is applied to gynocentric form of society, in which the leading role is with the female and especially with the mothers of a community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matriarchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
## '''Patriarchy''' describes a social structure where the actions and ideas of men and boys are dominant over those of women and girls.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarchy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's article on [[Jeremiah Wright]] repeatedly has material referenced from the New York Post and the conservative news website, Newsmax, removed citing them as unreliable sources.&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's single article on American conservatism has only a vague definition in its one-sentence lead section.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia has two extensive articles on liberalism in the United States; they use a combined 800 words in their lead sections, which are comprised of quotes from liberal politicians and claims that the stances of today's liberals &amp;quot;may be viewed as the modern version of the classical liberalism upon which America was founded&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_liberalism_in_the_United_States&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism_in_the_United_States&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# For a period of time (January 4, 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco_and_health&amp;amp;oldid=182111544&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - April 5, 2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tobacco_and_health&amp;amp;diff=203433685&amp;amp;oldid=202851436&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), Wikipedia's page on Tobacco and health had a disclaimer in the pipe smoking section that stated three references (The American Cancer Society, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and the National Cancer Institute) might not be reliable resources and should be reviewed.&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's main article on Communism does not mention any act of genocide in Communist countries, and any attempts to edit the page to include this information are deleted. The Nazism page, however, includes multiple mentions of the Holocaust. The only mention of communist genocide is buried deep within the article structure for Communism.&lt;br /&gt;
# The Meta.Wikimedia.org site, that governs all modifications to databases maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation, recently denied an application to place Conservapedia on its Interwiki Map&amp;amp;mdash;this although Wikimedia maintains an interwiki link for [http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Main_Page EvoWiki]. In their discussions, the administration accepted some frankly puerile and self-serving contentions that Conservapedia was a POV-pushing site, and ignored the testimony of multiple witnesses that EvoWiki did the same thing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Interwiki_map&amp;amp;oldid=1032322&amp;gt; (permanent link)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's most controversial pages are guarded by liberal elite. Thereby, accuracy is replaced with ideology. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/08/opinion/main4241293.shtml Wikipropaganda On Global Warming] National Review, July 8, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The first one-hundred and sixty-eight words on Wikipedia's [[Global Warming]] page contains multiple conjectures, major errors and bias. ''&amp;quot;increase in the average measured [[temperature]] ... since the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;mid-twentieth century&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;'' that same paragraph &amp;quot;''solar variation combined with volcanoes ... and a small cooling effect from &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;1950&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; onward.&amp;quot;'' Which is it, warmer or cooler from 1950? &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;''very likely due''&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot; &amp;quot;&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;''probably had''&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;''the overwhelming majority of scientists working on climate change agree with the [[IPCC]]'s main conclusions''&amp;quot;- unsubstantiated bias.&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia trivializes the book ''Inventing the AIDS Virus'' by making it a redirect. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventing_the_AIDS_Virus&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_Theological_Seminary Westminster Theological Seminary] demonstrates its anti-Christian bias when it states &amp;quot;with the vision of continuing the theological tradition of Princeton Theological Seminary '''in a militant and explicitly polemical manner''', from which the Westminster founders felt Princeton was departing.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
# It's apparently okay to cast doubt on well-known evangelical Christian's claims of being former atheists, as was recently done repeatedly to Kirk Cameron's Wikipedia article&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirk_Cameron&amp;amp;diff=262633707&amp;amp;oldid=262591086&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirk_Cameron&amp;amp;diff=263109644&amp;amp;oldid=263063442&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kirk_Cameron&amp;amp;diff=263670595&amp;amp;oldid=263666117&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but similar edits regarding claims made by famous atheists of being former Christians would never be tolerated (e.g. PZ Myers' Wikipedia article&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pz_myers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
# The unofficial evolutionist cabal continues to control any and all pages covering or related to evolution, Intelligent Design and Creationism, and they freely engage in edit-warring without fear of being blocked due to several editors helping each other subvert the &amp;quot;3 revert rule&amp;quot; and the help of admins who are biased to their side. Non-evolutionists are described with the non-referenced, non-neutral term &amp;quot;dogmatically&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wedge_strategy&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=267885268&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wedge_strategy&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=268115244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and ID advocates are called &amp;quot;intelligent design creationists&amp;quot; despite the fact that neither they nor Creationists consider themselves alike.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strengths_and_weaknesses_of_evolution&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=267130640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strengths_and_weaknesses_of_evolution&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=267873798&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strengths_and_weaknesses_of_evolution&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=268116166&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=267130755&amp;amp;oldid=267129633&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=267875875&amp;amp;oldid=267874801&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=267881496&amp;amp;oldid=267877410&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creationism&amp;amp;diff=268117670&amp;amp;oldid=268115954&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia added a &amp;quot;Controversies&amp;quot; sections to their article for the &amp;quot;Presidency of George W. Bush&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Presidency_of_George_W._Bush&amp;amp;oldid=282227871#Controversies_and_criticism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but not to their article on the &amp;quot;Presidency of Barack Obama&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Barack_Obama&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It has since been removed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Presidency_of_George_W._Bush&amp;amp;diff=282810799&amp;amp;oldid=282227871&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# In addition to the previous example, there was a massive Wikipedia article for &amp;quot;Criticism of George W. Bush,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_George_W._Bush&amp;amp;oldid=278422248&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the article for &amp;quot;Criticism of Barack Obama&amp;quot; had been deleted at least ''FOUR TIMES'' since October 2008 with excuses like &amp;quot;Article that has no meaningful, substantive content&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Attack page or negative unsourced BLP.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Barack_Obama&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia has since redirected &amp;quot;Criticism of George W. Bush&amp;quot; and added &amp;quot;Public image of&amp;quot; articles for both presidents, however President Bush's article is heavily negative&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_George_W._Bush&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while President Obama's is filled with glowing, pandering fluff with very few meaningful criticisms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_Barack_Obama&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia has an anti-American, &amp;quot;blame Bush&amp;quot; view of the USA under his administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals want it to appear that Bush acted alone in his decisions. On the George W. Bush page under the section 'Foreign policy', ''President Bush launched the War on Terrorism&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;President Bush launched the invasion of Iraq&amp;quot;'' and ''&amp;quot;which President Bush viewed as...&amp;quot;''' &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;No mention of the (111) Democrats who voted with George W. Bush.&amp;lt;/U&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Wikipedia's presidential template for George W. Bush is a sterile presentation of his life and presidency&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:George_W._Bush&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but the template for Barack Obama is filled with non-notable, forgettable fluff such as links to articles about songs about him, a list of artists who support him, a Super Mario-type video game based on him and a list of places named after him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Public_image_of_Barack_Obama&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Note that there is no mention on Wikipedia of George W. Bush Elementary in Stockton, CA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.google.com/search?q=%22george+w.+bush+elementary%22+stockton&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
# The article about the legitimate questions surrounding President Obama's birth certificate is entitled &amp;quot;Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however one is hard-pressed to find such bold use of the phrase &amp;quot;conspiracy theory&amp;quot; in articles about Dominionism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominionism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the 9/11 Truth movement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and many other conspiracy theories that the left favors. The article also describes advocates of the questions as &amp;quot;fringe&amp;quot; several times despite including the likes of Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh, but the same word is only used once in the 9/11 Truth movement article (and it uses it in a quote stating that the movement isn't fringe) and not at all in the Dominionism article.&lt;br /&gt;
# In the article for flood geology&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_geology&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the section containing evidence in favor of a global flood has the header &amp;quot;Evidence cited to support a global flood&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_geology#Evidence_cited_to_support_a_global_flood&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while the section containing evidence against it has the header &amp;quot;Evidence against a global flood.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_geology#Evidence_against_a_global_flood&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Attempts to balance this disparity are met with quick reversions with excuses such as &amp;quot;I don't see this as an improvement&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flood_geology&amp;amp;diff=288093849&amp;amp;oldid=288042808&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and appeals referencing the so-called &amp;quot;scientific community&amp;quot; (i.e. the &amp;quot;scientific consensus&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flood_geology&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=288488331&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, in a recent edit, Hrafn (one of the &amp;quot;usual suspects&amp;quot; who gang up and protect their preferred version of evolution and Creation articles) revealed his unabashed bias by reverting an edit with the explanation &amp;quot;all creationists are WP:FRINGE/'cracked pot[s].'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flood_geology&amp;amp;diff=289076441&amp;amp;oldid=289074740&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The Carrie Prejean article on Wikipedia is carefully crafted however, major points tend to end with a liberals last word. 'Photograph controversy' last line quotes &amp;quot;go beyond what the Miss California pageant says are appropriate, and do not benefit Prejean's status.&amp;quot; The section 'Crown retention', last line says- &amp;quot;she no longer believes in the organization,&amp;quot; referring to a pageant official. The page is locked from mentioning other contestants who also had photos questionable under pageant rules. The last line of 'Miss USA 2009 controversy', plug the candidate for governor of Ca. and same-sex advocate SF mayor Gavin Newsom beliefs, supports Prejean. Wikipedia's non family-friendly presentation is complete with text of Hilton's foul-mouthed tirade.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carrie_Prejean&amp;amp;diff= http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carrie_Prejean&amp;amp;diff=] Wikipedia- Carrie Prejean&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Wikipedia's purity ring page is hopelessly biased against the concept. 573 characters describing the purity ring. Criticisms of purity rings- 1475 characters with three references. How does Wikipedia educate their readers when they only discredit purity rings? &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purity_ring&amp;amp;diff= http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purity_ring&amp;amp;diff=] Wikipedia- Purity ring&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#The scope and depth of racism prevalent on Wikipedia is despicable. Over a thousand pages that include the ethnic slur 'Nigger', many in the page title. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=nigger&amp;amp;limit=500&amp;amp;offset=0]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/21/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat/ SHEFFIELD: Conservatives miss Wikipedia's threat] by [[Washington Times]], August 21, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=83640 Wikipedia lies, slander continue by Joseph Farah]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Guidelines for inclusion''':&lt;br /&gt;
* Each entry must include a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;diff&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; which shows the content being posted, and the user that posted it.&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid mentioning posts that were made by new Wikipedians or anonymous Wikipedians, unless their biased edits were not reverted after a substantial amount of time.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikis]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=679449</id>
		<title>Canada</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canada&amp;diff=679449"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T04:31:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Education */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Canada''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Canada pol99.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of Canada.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Canada.svg&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Canada arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Ottawa&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Parliamentary Democracy/Federal Constitutional monarchy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English, French&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =Elizabeth II&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Stephen Harper&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|chairman       =&lt;br /&gt;
|premier        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        = &lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =32,907,500 &lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=2007&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$1.105 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=2007&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$35,133&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Canadian dollar&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Canada''' is a [[country]] in [[North America]] which extends from the [[Pacific Ocean]] in the west to the [[Atlantic Ocean]] in the east and northward to the [[Arctic Ocean]].  Canada is the largest country by total area in [[North America]] and the second largest in the world behind [[Russia]]. It also has the longest coastline of any nation, as well as the longest border with the [[United States]] to the south and northwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada's motto, ''A Mari usque ad Mare'' (From sea to sea), is based on biblical scripture: &amp;quot;He shall have dominion from sea to sea and from the river unto the ends of the earth (Psalm 72:8)&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/arm2_e.cfm The Arms of Canada- Description]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etymology==&lt;br /&gt;
The name Canada originated in 1535 by [[Jacques Cartier]] is based on the Iroquoian word &amp;quot;kanata&amp;quot;, meaning &amp;quot;village.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Canadian_Encylopedia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCE&amp;amp;ArticleId=A0001216 The Canadian Encyclopedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1545, Europeans began referring to this region as Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The name ''Dominion of Canada'' was adopted during [[British North America Act|confederation]] in 1867; the term &amp;quot;dominion&amp;quot; was new, and it seemed a better choice than &amp;quot;kingdom&amp;quot; (which might annoy the Americans). The name continued until the [[Constitution Act]] of 1982, when &amp;quot;Canada&amp;quot; became the legal name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flag and anthem==&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national flag was officially adopted February 15, 1965; prior to that time and subsequent to Confederation in 1867, Canada used a variant of the Red Ensign, a British merchant flag, as its national flag. The Liberal government refused to hold a referendum on the subject; instead the public was invited to submit designs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/df3_e.cfm Birth of the Canadian Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The introduction of the new flag was not without controversy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a memo from Diefenbaker’s personal files he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The Pearson flag is a meaningless Flag. There is no recognition of history; no indication of the existence of French and English Canada; the partnership of the races; no acknowledgement of history. It is a flag without a past, without history, without honour and without pride.” (Source – I Stand for Canada: The Story of the Maple Leaf Flag ).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mapleleafweb.com/features/cultural/flag/national-flag-canada.html The Debate Over the Maple Leaf Flag]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the debate has been largely forgotten today, the Red Ensign can still be seen flying on some private homes and the debate does reemerge into the public domain occasionally. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070321.wxflag21/BNStory/National/ PM wants Red Ensign to fly at Vimy, sources say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian national anthem, '[[O Canada]]', was written by Sir Adolphe-Basile Routhier as a poem, to which music, composed by Calixa Lavall&amp;amp;eacute;e, was later added, in 1880. The original was composed in French, and was first translated into English by Dr. Thomas Bedford Richardson of Toronto, Ontario, in 1906. However, it was not officially adopted as the national anthem until 1980.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/anthem_e.cfm National Anthem: O Canada]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to distinguish between 'O Canada', the national anthem, and 'God Save The Queen', which is the Royal anthem, played as a salute to Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]] as Queen of Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:E-canada.jpg|thumb|450px|political map of Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Confederation, Canada was comprised of four provinces: Upper Canada (now Ontario), Lower Canada (now Québec), Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Since that time, six additional provinces have joined Canada or have been created. From west to east, the provinces are [[British Columbia]], [[Alberta]], [[Saskatchewan]], [[Manitoba]], [[Ontario]], [[Québec]], [[New Brunswick]], [[Prince Edward Island]], [[Nova Scotia]], and [[Newfoundland|Newfoundland and Labrador]]. Newfoundland was the last province to join Canada, in 1949.  The provinces all elect a single (unicameral) legislature, headed by Premier, who is selected the same way as the Prime Minister.  A Lieutenant-Governor represents the Queen, similar to the Governor General.  &lt;br /&gt;
Canada has three territories: the [[Yukon Territory]], the [[Northwest Territories]], and [[Nunavut]]. Territories have only have those powers delegated to them by the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 9.9 million sq. km. (3.8 million sq. mi.); second-largest country in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Ottawa (pop. 1.1 million). Other major cities--Toronto (5.1 million), Montreal (3.6 million), Vancouver (2.1 million), Calgary  (1.1 million), Edmonton (1.0 million), Quebec City (0.7 million), Winnipeg (0.7 million), Hamilton (0.7 million). &lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Mostly plains with mountains in the west and lowlands in the southeast. &lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Temperate to arctic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2008 est.): 33.1 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: British/Irish 28%, French 23%, other European 15%, Asian/Arab/African 6%, indigenous Amerindian 2%, mixed background 26%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Roman Catholic 43.6%, Protestant 29.2%, other Christian 4.3%, Muslim 2.0%, Jewish 1.1%, Buddhist 1.0%, Hindu 1.0% other 1.3%, none 16.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Languages: English (official) 57.8%, French (official) 22.1%, other 20.1% (including Chinese and aboriginal languages). &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Literacy--99% of population aged 15 and over has at least a ninth-grade education. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate--5.4/1,000. Life expectancy--77.7 yrs. male, 82.5 yrs. female. &lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (2008, 18.2 million): Goods-producing sector--25%, of which: manufacturing 15%; construction 6%; agriculture 2%; natural resources 2%; utilities 1%. Service-producing sector--75%, of which: trade 16%; health care and social assistance 11%; educational services 7%, accommodation and food services 7%; professional, scientific, and technical services 7%; finance 6%; public administration 5%; transportation and warehousing 5%; information, culture, and recreation 5%; other services 4%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 the city of [[Vancouver]], [[British Columbia]] was voted &amp;quot;the world's best place to live&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;   [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4306936.stm Vancouver is &amp;quot;best place to live&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Canada's population is increasingly urban, with 6 cities recording a population over 1 million ([[Toronto]], [[Montreal]], [[Vancouver]], [[Ottawa]]-Gatineau, [[Calgary]], [[Edmonton]]); these 6 cities represent over 45% of Canada's population.  Canada is becoming an increasingly multicultural country, with most new immigrants settling in [[Toronto]], [[Montreal]] and [[Vancouver]].  [[Toronto]] is the world's most multicultural city, with 43% a member of a visible minority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=bb0fee45-b305-490a-b161-a21bcb1d7329&amp;amp;k=34160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-Canada-satellite.jpg|right|thumb|200px|A satellite image of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Culture====&lt;br /&gt;
Due to its colonial past, Canadian culture has historically been heavily influenced by British culture. Quebec maintains a French culture but has been largekly cut off from Parisian trends for 250 years. Sine 1800 Canadian culture has been greatly influenced by American culture, due to the proximity and the migration of people, ideas, and capital. Amidst this, Canadian culture has developed some unique characteristics, and many Canadian movies, authors, television shows, and musicians are equally popular in United States. Canadian culture has also been influenced by indigenous cultures, and by immigrant groups from around the world. It has the highest per capita immigration rate of any country in the world &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;.http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/080402/d080402a.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has two federal official languages, French and English. The province of Quebec has French as an official language, New Brunswick both French and English, and all other provinces English (although in some parts of Ontario French has special status). The territory of Nunavut has Inuktitu and Innuinaqtun as official languages in addition to French and English, the North West territories has eleven official languages, and the Yukon recognises French and English.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada tends to reflect slightly more liberal social policies than neighboring states of the United States. Two such examples are the legalizing of [[gay marriage]] in June, 2005&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/06/28/samesex050628.html CBC news article on passing of gay marriage law]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, in some regions, the decriminalization of medicinal [[marijuana]] and small amounts of other psychoactive substances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sports===&lt;br /&gt;
see [[Canadian sports]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable sports which are enjoyed throughout Canada include [[hockey]], [[curling]], [[lacrosse]], and [[football]]. Canada collected 18 medals in the Summer Olympics, more per capita than the United States but less than Australia.  The country finished third overall in the Torino Winter Olympics, with a total of 24 medals, one less than the United States and 10 more than next-place [[Sweden]].  The next winter Olympics, to be held in 2010 will be held in Vancouver and Whistler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cultural style====&lt;br /&gt;
Canadian culture puts stress on open-mindedness and tolerance of multiple viewpoints.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/features/cucanada.xml&amp;amp;source=EMC-exp_01102008 National Cultural Profiles, a guide from the London ''Telegraph''  to the thinking patterns of all the world's major cultures]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Canadian opinion shows a strong sense of wanting to be independent of the U.S., although their economy, society, and culture closely resembles the U.S., and most Canadians live a short drive from the border. Canada is usually contrasted as a &amp;quot;cultural mosaic&amp;quot; to the United States' &amp;quot;melting pot&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freeonlineresearchpapers.com/canadian-cultural-mosaic-american-melting-pot&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Education====&lt;br /&gt;
Education in Canada is the responsibility of provincial and territorial governments; curriculum and marking schemes are completely removed from the control of the federal government. Each province uses a different method of administering education, with variation in the number of years and the curriculum. Quebec, for example has five years of secondary school finishing at the equivalent of grade 11 followed by two years of CEGEP, while Ontario has two years of kindergarten. Most provinces have kidergarten beginning at age 5 through grade 12 (age 17) as part of the public system. Some provinces have standardised provincial exams at the end of secondary school and/or at other designated grades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several provinces have two publicly funded school systems: public and separate (e.g. Catholic). The constitution also guarantees education in one's first official language and, as such, all provinces and territories have both English and French language schooling.  Additionally, private schools both religious and secular exist throughout the country. Alberta has an additional category, known as charter schools. Charter schools are schools that have been created in the community to surround a particular theme. They could be artistic, vocational, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A source of comparison is the Human Development Index, a measurement of literacy, education, life expectancy and standard of living. Using this scale, Canada scores +.967 and the U.S. +950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Religion====&lt;br /&gt;
For the total population,  in 2001, 12.9 million (44%) were Roman Catholic, with 8.7 million Protestants (29%).  4.9 million (16% )report no religious affiliation (including atheists and agnostics). Other religions of significance in Canada include 580,000 Muslims; 330,000 Jews; 300,000 Buddhists; 297,000 Hindus; and 278,000 Sikhs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/demo30a-eng.htm &amp;quot;Population by religion, by province and territory (2001 Census)&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catholicism formerly dominated Quebec until the &amp;quot;[[Quiet Revolution]]&amp;quot; of the 1960s, which has greatly reduced the power of the Catholic Church in Quebec, and its participation rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proportion attending religious services on a regular basis has declined over the past 20 years. According to the General Social Survey (GSS), 21% of Canadians aged 15 and over reported they attended a religious service at least once a week in 2005, down from 30% in 1985.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Colin Lindsay, &amp;quot;Canadians attend weekly religious services less than 20 years ago,&amp;quot; [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-630-x/2008001/article/10650-eng.htm ''Statistics Canada'' (2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Between 1985 and 2004, the share of Canadians aged 15 and older reporting no religious affiliation increased by seven percentage points from 12% to 19%.  37% of Canadians who rarely attend formal services nevertheless regularly engage in personal religious practices.  Of of those who had not attended any religious services over the previous year, 27% engaged in weekly religious practices on their own. Overall this group of adults who regularly engage in private religious practices, but infrequently or never attend religious services, represent, 21% of the adult population.  This pattern was most prevalent among older Canadians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Warren Clark and Grant Schellenberg, &amp;quot;Who's religious?&amp;quot; [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2006001/9181-eng.htm '&amp;quot;Statistics Canada'' (2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Civil liberties organizations, the media, and some members of Parliament occasionally criticized federal and provincial human rights commissions and tribunals for their application of hate speech restrictions included in federal and provincial human rights acts, claiming that the commissions and tribunals at times limited free speech and expression, and religious rights. The commissions are required by law to process all complaints they receive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A complaint against the editor of ''Catholic Insight'', alleging the magazine promoted hatred against homosexuals,remained before the Canadian Human Rights Commission at the end of 2008. The complainant alleged that he was upholding Catholic teaching on homosexuality in the magazine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2008 members of the Ontario legislature voted unanimously to maintain the tradition of reading the Lord's Prayer in the provincial legislature and to add a rotation of prayers from other major religious traditions and a moment of silent reflection for atheists. The vote was prompted by a proposal by Ontario's premier in February 2008 to discontinue the religious observance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
The government of Canada is split into two orders, federal and provincial, as outlined by the BNA Act. Each has very specific responsibilities, with some overlap. For instance, universal health care is mandated by the Federal Government, but it is administered by the Provincial Governments.  Neither level has supremacy over the other.  The Federal Government is run out of [[Ottawa]], [[Ontario]]; the provincial governments are run out the ten provincial capitals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The federal parliament is bicameral, including both a lower house - the [[Canadian House of Commons]] - and an upper house - the [[Canadian Senate]].  The parliamentary system is based on the British parliament. Members of Parliament represent specific geographical areas, generally chosen to have approximately equal population. A single member is elected from each on a [[first past the post]] system. The [[prime minister]] is usually the leader of the party with the most seats, though two or more parties may form a [[coalition]] to form a government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Senate is made up of sentors appointed for life by the prime minister (acting on behalf of the Governer General).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In almost all cases, Acts of Parliament are created in the House of Commons. After passing three readings in the House of Commons, the bill is passed to the Senate.  The job of the Senate is to further debate the proposed legislation, before passing it to the Governor General for Royal Assent. The Governor General is the official representative of Her Majesty [[Queen Elizabeth II]], Queen of Canada. The Governor General is, in the absence of the Queen, Canada's Head of State, and the Commander-in-Chief of the [[Canadian Forces]].  The Prime Minister of Canada is the head of Government of Canada, acting as the Minister of the Crown, based on the British system.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All provincial legislatures are unicameral.  The legislative process for provincial legislation is the same as for federal legislation, except that there is no Senate and the legislation is given royal assent by the provincial Lieutenants Governor, who represent the monarch at the provincial level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1841 to 1844, the capital city of what would become Canada was located in [[Kingston|Kingston, Ontario]]. Subsequently the capital alternated between [[Toronto]] and [[Montreal]] until 1857, when the capital moved to [[Ottawa|Ottawa, Ontario]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Supreme Court of Canada.jpg|right|thumb|200px|The Supreme Court of Canada.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The 40th Canadian Federal General Election occurred on October 14, 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/09/07/election-call.html &amp;quot;Vote set for Oct. 14&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Currently, the Prime Minister is The Right Honourable [[Stephen Harper]], a member of the [[Conservative Party of Canada]], while Her Excellency [[Michaëlle Jean]] is the Governor General. At present Canada is governed by a [[minority government]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials=== &lt;br /&gt;
*Head of State--Queen Elizabeth II&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor General--Michaëlle Jean&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister--Stephen Harper &lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Foreign Affairs--Lawrence Cannon&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the United Nations--John McNee &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Conditions===&lt;br /&gt;
On February 6, 2006, Stephen Harper was sworn in as Canada's twenty-second Prime Minister, succeeding Liberal Party leader Paul Martin. An admitted &amp;quot;policy specialist,&amp;quot; Harper rose from the ranks of conservative political party staffers. Prior to becoming Prime Minister, he sat as a Member of Parliament, including as Leader of the Opposition since 2002 when he became head of the western-based Canadian Alliance. He was elected the first leader of the Conservative Party of Canada when it was created in 2003 through the merger of Canadian Alliance and Peter MacKay's Progressive Conservative Party. The January 23, 2006 election victory by the Conservative Party ended 12 years of Liberal Party rule that, in the end, was tainted by corruption and ethics concerns, despite the economic progress Canada achieved while the Liberals were in power. In a subsequent federal election on October 14, 2008, the Conservatives won 38% of the vote and formed a second minority government with 143 seats in the House of Commons. The Liberals won 26% of the vote and 77 seats in the House of Commons. As the party with the second-largest number of seats, the Liberals form the &amp;quot;official opposition.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conservatives made unexpected gains in Quebec by winning ten seats in the January 2006 election, but failed to increase their number of seats in the province in the 2008 election. The separatist Bloc Quebecois (BQ) has a majority (49) of Quebec's 75 seats (the BQ offers candidates only in Quebec). The left-leaning New Democratic Party (NDP) now has 37 seats, and two independents also sit in Parliament. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Policy priorities of the Conservatives under Prime Minister Harper have remained fairly consistent since 2006: improving accountability and ethics in government; lower taxes; fighting crime and urban violence; reinvesting in defense; bolstering Canada's Arctic sovereignty; promoting national unity; and raising the profile of Canada's role abroad, through its combat mission in Afghanistan, contributions to stabilization in Haiti, and renewed partnership with the Americas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada's political system, a key challenge for any federal government is balancing the conflicting interests of Canada's 10 provinces and 3 territories. Recognizing the advantages of a coordinated approach in dealing with the federal government, the provinces and territories created a Council of the Federation in 2003, with their leaders (Canada's first ministers) meeting regularly in that forum to develop common positions. Prime Minister Harper met with the provincial premiers and territorial leaders formally on January 11, 2008 and on November 10, 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quebec, which represents 23% of the national population (and has a similar proportion of seats in the House of Commons), seeks to preserve its distinctive francophone nature, and is perceived by the less-populous western provinces as wielding undue influence on the Federal Government. At least until January 2006's election of Albertan Stephen Harper as Prime Minister, the western provinces had sometimes expressed concern that Ottawa did not fully attend to their interests. Ontario, believes that it pays out significantly more to the Federal Government than it gets back in revenues, while the Atlantic Provinces seek to assert greater control over fishing and mineral rights off their shores. The Federal Government ceded some power in a few areas of provincial jurisdiction, while seeking to strengthen the federal role in many other areas such as inter-provincial trade and the regulation of securities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====National Unity====&lt;br /&gt;
Popular support for sovereignty appears to be on the wane in Quebec, although pride in that province's unique cultural and linguistic identity remains very strong. Most Quebec voters seem to appreciate the economic benefits of remaining in the Canadian confederation and aim to advance their separate francophone identity within the confederation. In a provincial election held on December 8, 2008, provincial Liberal Leader Jean Charest won a majority government. The separatist Parti Quebecois placed second.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Quebec secession movement====&lt;br /&gt;
There are separatist movements lobbying for independence from Canada in British Columbia, Alberta, and Québec. The only movement of real significance is in Québec, where the province has twice voted on whether or not to separate from Canada, once in 1980 and again in 1995; the vote in 1995 failed by just 1 percent. On November 27, 2006, the Federal Government passed a motion declaring Québec a nation &amp;quot;within a united Canada&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=hansard&amp;amp;Language=E&amp;amp;Mode=1&amp;amp;Parl=39&amp;amp;Ses=1&amp;amp;DocId=2544166&amp;amp;File=0#OOB-1799206&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taxation===&lt;br /&gt;
The average tax rate in Canada is higher than in the United States. In 2003, Canada's tax burden equals about 33.8% of GDP placing it in the middle of the G7 countries, with Japan lowest at 25.3% and France highest at 43.4% &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/activty/faq1e.html#Taxation Department of Finance Canada: FAQs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The US rate is roughly 25.6%; this discrepancy is consistent with the differing levels of social services which the governments funds. Canada also has managed to run without a budget deficit for a number of years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equalization payments, worth 11.7 billion Canadian dollars are made by the federal government to the provinces from richer provinces (currently Alberta, Newfoundland&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2008/11/03/have-not.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,  and British Columbia) and the poorer provinces (Ontario, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/11/03/flaherty-ministers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Quebec, Manitoba and Saskatchewan) .  This is to ensure that reasonably uniform standards of services and taxation are kept between the richer and poorer provinces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Budget 2007 [http://www.budget.gc.ca/2007/bp/bpc4e.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These payments have not been without controversy as provinces begin to make more revenues from natural resources they do not want to give up the Equalization payments.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British Columbia has the lowest corporate tax rate in North America &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investbc.com/businessclimate.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada also has a national sales tax, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) of 5% on all purchases. Some provinces add an additional percentage in the form of a Provincial Sales Tax (PST), or a combined Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) combining GST and the Provincial Sales Tax. Based on actual income, and a number of other factors, the government will refund GST/HST to eligible tax payers in quarterly installments on the fifth of the month in July, October, January, and April.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Public Health Care====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, the Federal Government, under the leadership of the Liberals and The Right Honourable [[Pierre Trudeau|Pierre Elliot Trudeau]], enacted the Canada Health Act. This act was based on the five principles of &amp;quot;universality, accessibility, portability, comprehensiveness, and public administration&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fin.gc.ca/FEDPROV/hise.html History of Canada Health and Social Transfer]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This public health care system is run in partnership by Health Canada and provincial Ministries of Health, who both contribute tax revenues. The federal government sets policy, while the provinces are responsible for actual administration. In 1995, the Canada Health and Social Transfer was created to replace existing systems for the transferal of tax funding to the provinces to administer social programs. The rationale behind the system is to allow all Canadians equal access to equal treatment, regardless of socio-economic status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Canada health care is frequently listed as top issue in election campaigns and is both a topic of frequent debate and a point of pride for many Canadians, Tommy Douglas the founder of medicare was, for example, voted the &amp;quot;Greatest Canadian&amp;quot; on a CBC television programme in 2004 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current state of Canada's public health care system is gathering increasing media attention due to rising wait times. [[David Gratzer]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;... government researchers have provided the best data on the doctor shortage, noting, for example, that more than 1.5 million Ontarians (or 12 percent of that province’s population) can’t find family physicians. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html The Ugly Truth about Canadian Healthcare] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the blame for the current state of affairs has been placed on successive government mismanagement. This represents a failure of the federal government to properly regulate the level of service being offered in the provinces. People regularly have to wait between four and eight months for surgeries. The median wait time for an MRI across Canada is 10.3 weeks in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&amp;amp;id=753&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, former Prime Minister [[Jean Chretien|Jean Chrétien]] campaigned on a promise to shut down private MRI clinics because it creates a two tier system, regardless of the demand for more facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, there has been suggestion from some lobby groups that Canada should adopt a two-tier health care system, while others have expressed strong opposition to this idea, including the federal government under the Liberal Party. Some argue that Canada already does have a two-tier health care system as the very wealthy can go to the United States for treatment. The argument for allowing private health care is twofold. The first reason is that competition may improve the quality of products and services, while the increase in options will allow those with the means to access private health care and may relieve some of the burden off the public system. Critics argue that health is a right, and that everyone should have access to the same standard of care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, in [[Québec]], a provincial judge has ruled that private health care providers must be allowed to compete with the government-run health care system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense==&lt;br /&gt;
As of the most recent cabinet shuffle, Conservative MP Peter MacKay has assumed the role of Minister of National Defence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Canadian Forces]] is comprised of the Regular Force, the Reserve Force, and the Special Force (when so in service). The Regular and Reserve Forces employ over 62,000 and 25,000 members respectively. While the various branches wear distinctive elemental uniforms (DEU), the Royal Canadian Navy, Canadian Army and the Royal Canadian Air Force were amalgamated in 1968 into one common command structure &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/about/index_e.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian Forces are &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.canadianally.com/ca/forces-cf-en.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;equipped with modern vehicles such as the Canadian-built LAV III, the German-built Leopard CII tanks and both the American-built CF-18 Hornet and CC-177 Globemaster III. The Canadian government spends about 17 billion Canadian dollars annually on defence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20072008/me-bd/part1/ME-030_e.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Conservative government has continued the trend of increased defence spending initiated by the Liberals, and have also taken steps to decrease red-tape preventing the troops from having the necessary equipment to keep them safe and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 3000 Canadian troops are currently deployed around the world, with over 2500 in [[Afghanistan]] where they are assisting in anti-terrorism &amp;amp; reconstruction operations, and another 500 are deployed to the Middle East where they are attached to a US-led coalition fleet and the Standing NATO Maritime Group 1 (SNMG1). These are prime examples of Canada's capability for interoperability with foreign military forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2007): $1.266 trillion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Real GDP growth rate (2007): 2.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GDP (2007): $38,435. &lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum and natural gas, hydroelectric power, metals and minerals, fish, forests, wildlife, abundant fresh water. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--wheat, livestock and meat, feed grains, oil seeds, dairy products, tobacco, fruits, vegetables. &lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--motor vehicles and parts, machinery and equipment, aircraft and components, other diversified manufacturing, fish and forest products, processed and unprocessed minerals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade: U.S. merchandise exports to Canada (2007)--$248.9 billion: motor vehicles and spare parts, industrial and electrical machinery, plastics, computers, chemicals, petroleum products and natural gas, and agricultural products. In 2007, 65% of Canada's imports came from the United States. U.S. merchandise imports from Canada (2007)--$313.1 billion: motor vehicles and spare parts, crude petroleum and natural gas, forest products, agricultural products, metals, industrial machinery, and aircraft. In 2007, 76% of Canada's exports went to the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
===Business===&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has invested heavily in high-tech, export-oriented businesses, achieving major success in:&lt;br /&gt;
* Aerospace: Canada’s global share of aerospace activity has tripled in the last 20 years, making Canada the world’s 5th largest aerospace producer. &lt;br /&gt;
* Ag-biotech: Canadian firms’ revenues exceed those of US agro-based companies and are more than double those of Japan and the UK. &lt;br /&gt;
* Agri-food: Canada is the world’s fourth-largest exporter of agricultural products. &lt;br /&gt;
* Automotive: Canada is among the Top 10 automotive countries and the 3rd largest exporter of automotive products after Japan and the U.S. Most of the output goes to the U.S. market.&lt;br /&gt;
* Biotechnology: Canada is a leader in biotechnology—one of the top five countries in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
* Plastics: Canada is the world’s fourth largest exporter of moulds and eighth largest exporter of plastics processing machinery.&lt;br /&gt;
* see also [[Canadian railways]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
Canada has vast natural resources and is one of the world’s largest producers and exporters of energy. In 2005, Canada produced 19.1 quadrillion British Thermal Units (Btu) of total energy, the fifth-largest amount in the world. Since 1980, Canada’s total energy production has increased by 86%, while its total energy consumption has increased by only 48% during that period. Almost all of Canada’s energy exports go to the United States, making it the largest foreign source of U.S. energy imports: Canada is consistently among the top sources for U.S. oil imports, and it is the largest source of U.S. natural gas and electricity imports.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Energy Information Administration, [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Canada/Background.html &amp;quot;Canada&amp;quot; (2009 report)] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, the largest source of energy consumption in Canada was oil (31%), followed by hydroelectricity (25%) and natural gas (24%). Both coal (12%) and nuclear (7%) constitute a smaller share of the country’s overall energy mix. From 1985-2005, Canada’s overall energy mix has remained relatively stable, though hydroelectricity has decreased from 31%to 25%, as oil drilling is more popular than dam building.&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
* see [[History of Canada]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* '''see [[History of Canada]] for a more detailed bibliography.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=TCESubjects&amp;amp;Params=A1 ''Canadian Encyclopedia'' (2008)] reliable detailed encyclopedia, on-line free&lt;br /&gt;
* Artibise, Alan F. J., ed.  ''Interdisciplinary Approaches to Canadian Society: A Guide to the Literature.'' McGill-Queen's U. Press, 1990. 156 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bickerton, James, and Alain Gagnon. ''Canadian Politics'' (2004) 584 pages, textbook&lt;br /&gt;
* Blore, Shawn. ''Frommer's Canada'' (2004) 828 pages travel guide&lt;br /&gt;
* Campbell, Robert Malcolm et al. ''The Real Worlds of Canadian Politics: Cases in Process and Policy,'' (2004) 342 pages&lt;br /&gt;
* Conrad, Margaret, and Alvin Finkel. ''Canada: A National History.'' (2003), college textbook. &lt;br /&gt;
* Hallowell, Gerald, ed. ''The Oxford Companion to Canadian History'' (2004) 1650 short entries&lt;br /&gt;
* Johnson, William. ''Stephen Harper and the Future of Canada'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Stephen-Harper-Future-William-Johnson/dp/0771095546/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239348955&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morton, Desmond. ''A Short History of Canada'' 5th ed (2001) &lt;br /&gt;
* ''National Atlas of Canada'' (1st ed. 1906; 2nd ed. 1915; 3rd ed. 1957; 4th ed. 1974; 6th ed. 1999 is electronic)&lt;br /&gt;
* Pammett, Jon H., and Christopher Dornan. ''The Canadian Federal Election of 2006'' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pryke, Kenneth G. and Walter C. Soderlund, eds. ''Profiles of Canada.'' Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press, 2003. 3rd edition. &lt;br /&gt;
* Toye, William, ed.  ''The Oxford Companion to Canadian Literature.'' Oxford U. Press, 1983. 843 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Wells, Paul. ''Right Side Up: the Fall of Paul Martin and the Rise of Stephen Harper's New Conservatism'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
* Westhues, Anne. '' Canadian Social Policy: Issues and Perspectives,'' 2003&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gc.ca/ Government of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.parl.gc.ca/ Parliament of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.pch.gc.ca/ Department of Canadian Heritage]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cansim2.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-win/cnsmcgi.pgm?Lang=Eng&amp;amp;SP_Action=Main-Principal&amp;amp;SP_Mode=2 Statistics Canada current data]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ca.html CIA World Factbook:Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.forces.ca The Canadian Forces], military&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-516-x/3000140-eng.htm ''Historical Statistics of Canada'' (1983)] the major historical data source&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZtfphBDp-w&amp;amp;feature=related Canadian National Anthem with Lyrics]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Party Websites (Major) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.conservative.ca Conservative Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.liberal.ca Liberal Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ndp.ca New Democratic Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blocquebecois.org Bloc Québécois]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.greenparty.ca Green Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Party Websites (Minor) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://http://www.fpnpoc.ca/ First Peoples National Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.partyofalberta.org/ Party of Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.progressivecanadian.org/ Progressive Canadian Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mlpc.ca/ Marxist-Leninist Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/ Canadian Action Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.peoplespoliticalpower.ca/ People's Political Power Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.animalalliance.ca/ Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.westernblockparty.com/ Western Bloc Party]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chp.ca/en/index.html Christian Heritage Party of Canada]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Advocacy Websites===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.canadadivided.com/ Canada Divided]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.projectalberta.com/ Project Alberta]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://onthefencefilms.com/video/twowomen.html Two Women]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.westcan.org/ Western Canada Concept]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canada| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Canadian History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pedophilia&amp;diff=679445</id>
		<title>Pedophilia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pedophilia&amp;diff=679445"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T04:19:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''pedophile''' or '''paedophile''' (non-US spelling) is a person who is sexually attracted to [[children]] in prepubescence, but not infants. A pedophile who acts out his or her wishes in the form of molesting youngsters is committing a [[crime]] and breaking virtually all moral codes. Many acts of pedophilia are illegal in most countries throughout the world, such as viewing child [[pornography]] or engaging in sexual activities with minors (soliciting of minors.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pedophilia has been considered a [[mental illness]] by the APA since 1994.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://home.messiah.edu/~chase/h/articles/regenera/apa.htm Pedophilia No Longer a Disorder, Psychiatric Association Decides]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the American Psychiatric Association has stated is that an adult may engage in sex with a nine-year-old child, and if the adult is not bothered by what he is doing, then he has no reason to seek professional help. [http://home.messiah.edu/~chase/h/articles/regenera/dsm.htm] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sin]][[Category:Crime]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679442</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679442"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:59:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Industry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|thumb|right|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679441</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679441"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:59:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Industry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|thumb|right|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679440</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679440"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:58:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Industry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|thumb|right|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679439</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679439"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:58:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Industry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|thumb|right|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679438</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679438"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:57:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Industry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|thumb|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679437</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679437"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:56:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Defense */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|thumb|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|right|220px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679436</id>
		<title>Russia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russia&amp;diff=679436"/>
		<updated>2009-06-29T03:54:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shigruu: /* Labor force */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Российская Федерация&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Russia rel94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Russia.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of the Russian Federation.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Moscow&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Semi-Presidential Federal republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Russian&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Dmitry Medvedev&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Vladimir Putin&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =6,592,800 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =141,400,000 (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$979 billion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$6,856 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=ruble&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Russia''' (formally the '''Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), is the largest country by area (17,075,200 square kilometers) and has the sixth largest population. Its history stretches back over a thousand years, with rule by the Czars until 1917, and by the Communists, 1918-1991 under the name of the [[Soviet Union]]. Russia had an extensive empire built up over hundreds of years, all of which fell away in 1991. The capital is [[Moscow]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is theoretically a federation of constituent governments. In reality it has a highly the centralized, thanks to former President (now Prime Minister) [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin has nationalized the nation's oil and gas companies, seized foreign investments, imprisoned top businessmen, and brought an autocratic, anti-democratic style that resembles--in milder form--the czars and Soviets. Thanks to oil revenue, it has the money to pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which is mildly hostile to the United States and to [[NATO]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
*Area: 17 million sq. km. (6.5 million sq. mi.); about 1.8 times the size of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cities: Capital--Moscow (pop. 8.3 million). Other cities--St. Petersburg (4.6 million), Novosibirsk (1.4 million), Nizhniy Novgorod (1.3 million).&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain: Broad plain with low hills west of Urals; vast coniferous forest and tundra in Siberia; uplands and mountains (Caucasus range) along southern borders.&lt;br /&gt;
*Climate: Northern continental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, only a minority of citizens actively participated in any religion. Many who identified themselves as members of a religious group participated in religious life rarely or not at all. There is no one set of reliable statistics that breaks down the population by denomination, and the statistics below are compiled from government, polling, and religious group sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108468.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 100 million citizens are Russian Orthodox. Muslims, with a population estimated between 14 million and 23 million, form the largest religious minority. The majority of Muslims live in the Volga-Ural region and the North Caucasus, although Moscow, St. Petersburg, and parts of Siberia also have sizable Muslim populations. There are an estimated one million Buddhists, the majority of whom live in the traditionally Buddhist regions of Buryatiya, Tuva, and Kalmykiya. According to the NGO Slavic Center for Law and Justice, Protestants make up the second largest group of Christian believers, with 3,500 registered organizations and more than 2 million followers. The Roman Catholic Church estimated that there are 600,000 Catholics, most of whom are not ethnic Russians. There are an estimated 250,000 Jews, the majority of whom live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. In some areas, such as Yakutiya and Chukotka, pantheistic and nature-based religions are practiced independently or alongside other religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the annual report from the Human Rights Ombudsman, the Ministry of Justice had registered 21,963 religious organizations as of January 1, 2008, 993 fewer than January 2006. The registered religious groups (with the number of registered organizations) include Russian Orthodox (12,586), Muslim (3,815), Protestant (several denominations totaling 3,410), Jehovah's Witnesses (402), Jewish (286), Orthodox Old Believers (283), Roman Catholic (240), Buddhist (200), and other denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion in schools===&lt;br /&gt;
The federal Government does not require religious instruction in schools, but it continues to allow public use of school buildings after hours for the ROC to provide religious instruction on a voluntary basis. Several regions offer a course on Orthodox Christianity in public schools, and five oblasts or regions (Kaluga, Tver, Bryansk, Smolensk, and Voronezh) have a mandatory class on the &amp;quot;Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture.&amp;quot; Students may avoid the Belgorod Oblast voluntary course only if their parents provide and pay for an alternative course. The course is offered as an elective in several other regions. In regions where the class is not mandatory, in practice students may be compelled to take it where schools do not provide alternatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some regions offer a class on &amp;quot;History of Religion,&amp;quot; a proposal that the Minister of Education had suggested but did not introduce nationally. Although the Ministry of Education rejected continued publication and dissemination of a controversial textbook that detailed Orthodox Christianity's contribution to the country's culture, some schools continued to use the text. The textbook contained descriptions of some religious groups that members of those groups found objectionable. The Congress of Religious Associations in the Tyumen region appealed to the Governor and regional department of education to allow input from other religious groups into the religious culture curriculum, claiming that the course currently contains only the viewpoint of the ROC.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
The regions of Kabardino-Balkariya and Dagestan have laws banning extremist Islamic &amp;quot;Wahhabism,&amp;quot; but there were no reports that authorities invoked these laws to deny registration to Muslim groups. The former president of the Kabardino-Balkaria republic ordered the closure of six of seven mosques in Nalchik, the region's capital, in 2004. One was reopened in 2007, while the others remained closed and were suffering from disrepair and vandalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2002 Law on Extremism, amended in July 2006, can affect religious groups, particularly Muslim groups, by criminalizing a broad spectrum of speech and activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many nontraditional denominations frequently complained that they were unable to obtain venues for worship. Because they were small and often newly established, they typically lacked the necessary resources to buy or rent facilities on the open market and must rely on government assistance. Because they are nontraditional, they frequently met opposition from the traditional communities and often were unable to find government officials who were willing to assist them in renting state-owned property. There were multiple reports of religious organizations who were not allowed to renew leases on public or private buildings. Increased competition for space in a growing economy and increasing real estate prices led many owners (public and private) to lease property to higher paying tenants, and in some cases, religious groups were refused outright at any price. Representatives of numerous Protestant groups spoke about increasing difficulty in extending existing leases or signing new leases for worship premises, the majority of which are still state-controlled. Some religious groups, particularly Jehovah's Witnesses, but also the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal congregations, and the Evangelical Christian Missionary Union, reported that local authorities in recent years denied them permission to acquire land on which to construct places of worship. Authorities continued to deny construction permits to several groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Word of Life Christian Church in Kaluga region continued to face great difficulties trying to build its church. In June 2007 a court ruled in favor of the church and invalidated the Kaluga's mayoral decree to confiscate the church's property. In October 2007 the court denied the city's appeal. Local authorities, however, continued to harass the church. On July 4, 2007, the police seized a computer and documents, reportedly to find information on the church's secondary school. After seizing a list of the church's members, the police called the members and summoned them to the prosecutor's office for questioning about the school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sochi mayor's office continued to deny the Muslim community authorization to build a new mosque; the current premises are inadequate to accommodate the membership. Officials allotted land several times but never transferred it to the Muslim community. According to the regional government, authorities can allocate land for a mosque only after a public opinion survey indicates that the proposed location would not cause conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious news sources claimed that authorities acting under the influence of the ROC sometimes prevented Orthodox churches not belonging to the ROC, including the True Orthodox, from obtaining or maintaining buildings for worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1997 Law changed the visa regime for religious and other foreign workers, nontraditional religious groups reported problems receiving long-term visas. In October 2007 the Government introduced new visa rules that allow foreigners (including religious workers) with business or humanitarian visas to spend only 90 of every 180 days in the country. According to religious experts, these rules were not aimed at religious workers, but the effect has been to severely restrict religious groups that rely upon foreign religious workers. The Roman Catholic Church, which relies almost exclusively on priests from outside the country, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with more than four hundred foreign missionaries, have been particularly hard hit by this provision. While foreign religious workers seem able to acquire visas with few problems, the 90-day limit on their stay in the country limits their ability to work and significantly increases their expenses. Although registered religious organizations have the option to sponsor foreign workers and missionaries on work visas (which do not have 90-day or 180-day limits), this is a complicated process that places significant financial and administrative burdens on the organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many religious groups were unable to regain property confiscated in the Soviet era and acquire new property. The Moscow-based SOVA Center said the property restitution problem was most prevalent among Muslim and Protestant groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Demography==&lt;br /&gt;
In a major [[demography|demographic]] catastrophe, population indicators in Russia dramatically worsened after 1990: the number of [[death]]s exceeds the number of [[birth]]s, [[life expectancy]] is drastically decreasing, the number of [[suicide]]s has increased, and there are 240 abortions per 100 live births.  Every year since 1992 the country has lost 400,000 to 650,000 population and the current total of 142 million is [[projection|projected]] to fall to 100 million by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s, life expectancy in Russia fell an astonishing six years. [[Statistical analysis]] indicates that one-quarter of the increase in [[mortality]] was due to an increase in [[alcohol consumption]] and one-quarter was a consequence of [[stress]] due to economic uncertainty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elizabeth Brainerd, and David M. Cutler, &amp;quot;Autopsy On An Empire: Understanding Mortality in Russia and the Former Soviet Union.&amp;quot; ''Journal Of Economic Perspectives'' 2005 19(1): 107-130. Issn: 0895-3309 Fulltext: in Ebsco  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's population of 141.4 million (2007) is falling. Lower birth rates and higher death rates have reduced Russia's population at a nearly 0.5% annual rate since the early 1990s. Russia is one of few countries with a declining population (although birth rates in many developed countries have dropped below the long-term population replacement). Population decline is particularly drastic in Russia due to higher death rates, especially among working-age males. Cardiovascular disease, cancer, traffic injuries, suicide, alcohol poisoning, and violence are major causes of death. In a June 2006 speech to the Russian National Security Council, President Putin declared that Russia is facing a demographic crisis and called for measures to improve birth and mortality rates and increase population through immigration, primarily the return of Russian-speaking foreigners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====HIV/AIDS====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia and Ukraine are said to have the highest growth rates of HIV infection in the world. In Russia HIV seems to be transmitted mostly by intravenous drug users sharing needles, although data is very uncertain. Data from the Federal AIDS Center shows that the number of registered cases is doubling every 12 months and is currently at 300,000 persons. When projections are made which allow for people in high-risk groups who have not been tested for the disease, estimates of the actual number of HIV-infected persons are approximately 3 million. The high growth rate of AIDS cases, if unchecked, will have negative economic consequences. Investment will suffer from the diversion of private and government funds to AIDS treatment. The effect on the labor force may be acute since about 80% of infected individuals in Russia are under 30 years of age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the roughly 141 million Russians derive from the Eastern Slavic family of peoples, whose original homeland was probably present-day Poland. Russian is the official language of Russia and is one of the six official languages of the United Nations. Russian is also the language of such giants of world literature as [[Pushkin]], [[Tolstoy]], [[Dostoevsky]], [[Chekhov]], [[Pasternak]], and [[Solzhenitsyn]]. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's educational system has produced nearly 100% literacy. About 3 million students attend Russia's 519 institutions of higher education and 48 universities, but continued reform is critical to producing students with skills to adapt to a market economy. Because great emphasis is placed on science and technology in education, Russian medical, mathematical, scientific, and space and aviation research is still generally of a high order. The number of doctors in relation to the population is high by American standards, although medical care in Russia, even in major cities, is generally far below Western standards. The unraveling of the Soviet state in its last decades and the physical and psychological traumas of transition during the 1990s resulted in a steady decline in the health of the Russian people. Currently Russia faces a demographic crisis as births lag far behind deaths. While its population is aging, skyrocketing deaths of working-age males due to cardiovascular disease is a major cause of Russia's demographic woes. A rapid increase in HIV/AIDS infections and tuberculosis compounds the problem. In 2007, life expectancy at birth was 59 for men and 73 for women. The large annual excess of deaths over births is expected to cut Russia's population by 30% over the next 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Russian band in Pushkin.jpg|thumb|240px|Russian band in Pushkin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Labor force===&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian labor force is undergoing tremendous changes. Although well educated and skilled, it is largely mismatched to the rapidly changing needs of the Russian economy. Official unemployment has shrunken in recent years to 6.9%, and labor shortages have started to appear in some high-skilled job markets. Nonetheless, pockets of high unemployment remain and many Russian workers are underemployed. Unemployment is highest among women and young people. Following the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union and the economic dislocation it engendered, the standard of living fell dramatically. However, real disposable incomes have doubled since 1999, and experts estimate that the middle class ranges from one-fifth to one-third of the population.  In 2006, 15.8% of the population lived below the subsistence level, in contrast to 38.1% in 1998.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 141.4 million. &lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2007 est.): -0.484% (population declining). &lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Russian 79.8%, Tatar 3.8%, Ukrainian 2%, other 14.4%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Religion: Russian Orthodox, Islam, Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestant, Buddhist, other. &lt;br /&gt;
*Language: Russian (official); more than 140 other languages and dialects. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education (total pop.): Literacy--99.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Life expectancy (2007 est.)--59.12 yrs. men, 73.03 yrs. women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (73.88 million) (2006 est.): Production and economic services--84%; government--16%. &lt;br /&gt;
==Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Moscow is Russia's capital and largest city (population 8.3 million). Moscow is also increasingly important as an economic and business center; it has become Russia's principal magnet for foreign investment and business presence. Its cultural tradition is rich, and there are many museums devoted to art, literature, music, dance, history, and science, as well as hundreds of churches and dozens of notable cathedrals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second-largest city in Russia is [[St. Petersburg]] (formerly '''leningrad'''), which was established by Tsar [[Peter the Great]] in 1703 to be the capital of the Russian Empire as part of his Western-looking reforms. The city was called Petrograd during World War I and Leningrad after 1924. In 1991, as the result of a city referendum, it was renamed St. Petersburg. Under the tsars, the city was Russia's cultural, intellectual, commercial, financial, and industrial center. After Lenin moved the capital back to Moscow in 1918, the city's political significance declined, but it remained a cultural, scientific, and military-industrial center. The Hermitage, formerly the Winter Palace of the tsars, is one of the world's great fine arts museums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has an area of about 17 million square kilometers (6.5 million sq. mi.); in geographic terms, this makes Russia the largest country in the world by more than 2.5 million square miles. But with a population density of about 22 persons per square mile (9 per sq. km.), it is sparsely populated, and most of its residents live in urban areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Traffic in Moscow.jpg|thumb|Traffic in Moscow.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
In the political system established by the 1993 [[constitution]], the [[president]] wields considerable executive power. There is no vice president, and the legislative branch is far weaker than the executive. The bicameral legislature consists of the lower house (State Duma) and the upper house (the Federation Council). The president nominates the highest state officials, including the [[prime minister]], who must be approved by the Duma. The [[president]] can pass decrees without consent from the [[Duma]]. He also is head of the armed forces and of the Security Council. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Duma elections were held most recently on December 7, 2003, and presidential elections on March 14, 2004. The pro-government party, United Russia, won close to half of the seats in the Duma. Combined with its allies, United Russia commands a two-thirds majority. The OSCE judged the Duma elections as failing to meet international standards for fairness, due largely to extensive slanted media bias in the campaign. [[Vladimir Putin]] was re-elected to a second four-year term with 71% of the vote in March 2004. The Russian constitution does not allow presidents to serve more than two consecutive terms. Next elections for the Duma occur in December 2007, and for President in March 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is a federation, but the precise distribution of powers between the central government and the regional and local authorities is still evolving. The Russian Federation consists of 89 regional administrative units, including two federal cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg. The constitution explicitly defines the federal government's exclusive powers, but it also describes most key regional issues as the joint responsibility of the federal government and the regional administrative units. In 2000, President Putin grouped the regions into seven federal districts, with presidential appointees established in Moscow and six provincial capitals. In March 2004, the Constitution was amended to permit the merger of some regional administrative units. A law enacted in December 2004 eliminated the direct election of the country's regional leaders. Governors are now nominated by the president and subject to confirmation by regional legislatures. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial System=== &lt;br /&gt;
The Russian [[judicial system]] consists of the Constitutional Court, courts of [[general jurisdiction]], military courts, and arbitrage courts (which hear commercial disputes). The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is a court of limited subject matter jurisdiction. The 1993 constitution empowers the Constitutional Court to arbitrate disputes between the executive and legislative branches and between Moscow and the regional and local governments. The court also is authorized to rule on violations of constitutional rights, to examine appeals from various bodies, and to participate in impeachment proceedings against the president. The July 1994 Law on the Constitutional Court prohibits the court from examining cases on its own initiative and limits the scope of issues the court can hear. The system of general jurisdiction courts includes the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, regional level courts, district level courts and justices of the peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Duma passed a Criminal Procedure Code and other judicial reforms during its 2001 session. These reforms help make the Russian judicial system more compatible with its Western counterparts and are seen by most as an accomplishment in human rights. The reforms have reintroduced jury [[trials]] in certain [[criminal]] cases and created a more adversarial system of criminal trials that protect the rights of defendants more adequately. In 2002, the introduction of the new code led to significant reductions in time spent in detention for new detainees, and the number of suspects placed in pretrial detention declined by 30%. Another significant advance in the new Code is the transfer from the Procuracy to the courts of the authority to issue search and arrest warrants. There are rising concerns, however, that prosecutors have selectively targeted individuals for political reasons, as in the prosecution of Yukos Oil CEO Mikhail Khodorkovskiy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of the general tendency to increase judicial [[independence]] (for example, by recent considerable salary raise to judges), many judges still see their role not as of impartial and independent arbiters, but as of government officials protecting state interests. See below for more information on the commercial court/business law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Human Rights===&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's [[human]] rights record remains uneven and has worsened in some areas in recent years. Despite significant improvements in conditions following the end of the Soviet Union, problem areas remain. In particular, the Russian Government's policy in Chechnya has been a cause for international concern. Although the government has made progress in recognizing the legitimacy of international human rights standards, the institutionalization of procedures to safeguard these rights has lagged. There are, however, some indications that the law is becoming an increasingly important tool for those seeking to protect [[human]] rights. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Human Rights.JPG|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The judiciary is often subject to manipulation by political authorities and is plagued by large case backlogs and trial delays. Lengthy pretrial detention remains a serious problem. Russia has one of the highest [[prison]] population rates in the world, at 685 per 100,000. There are credible reports of beating and torture of inmates and detainees by law enforcement and correctional officials. Prison conditions fall well below international standards. In 2001, President Putin pronounced a moratorium on the death penalty. There are reports that the Russian Government might still be violating promises they made upon entering the European Council, especially in terms of prison control and conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Chechnya, there have been credible allegations of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed by Russian and pro-Moscow Chechen forces. Chechen rebels also have committed abuses as well as acts of terrorism. Human rights groups have criticized Russian officials concerning cases of Chechens disappearing while in custody. Chechen rebels have similarly been responsible for politically motivated disappearances. Russian authorities have introduced some improvements, including better access to complaint mechanisms, the formal opening of investigations in most cases, and the introduction of two decrees requiring the presence of civilian investigators and other nonmilitary personnel during all large-scale military operations and targeted search and seizure operations. Human rights groups welcome these changes but claim that most abuses remain uninvestigated and unpunished and may be spreading more broadly in the North Caucasus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of religion and the equality of all religions before the law, as well as the separation of church and state. Although Jews and Muslims continue to encounter prejudice and societal discrimination, they have not been inhibited by the government in the free practice of their religion. High-ranking federal officials have condemned anti-Semitic hate crimes, but law enforcement bodies have not always effectively prosecuted those responsible. The influx of foreign missionaries has led to pressure by groups in Russia, specifically nationalists and the Russian Orthodox Church, to limit the activities of these &amp;quot;nontraditional&amp;quot; religious groups. In response, the Duma passed a restrictive and potentially discriminatory law on religion in October 1997. The law is complex, with many ambiguous and contradictory provisions. The law's most controversial provisions distinguish between religious &amp;quot;groups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;organizations&amp;quot; and introduce a 15-year rule, which allows groups that have been in existence for 15 years or longer to obtain accredited status. Senior Russian officials have pledged to implement the 1997 law on religion in a manner that is not in conflict with Russia's international human rights obligations. Some local officials, however, have used the law as a pretext to restrict religious liberty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government pressure continued to weaken freedom of expression and the independence and freedom of some media, particularly major national television networks and regional electronic media outlets. A government decision resulted in the elimination of the last major non-state television network in 2003. National press is also increasingly in government hands or owned by government officials, narrowing the scope of opinion available. Self-censorship is a growing press problem. Unsolved murders of journalists, including the killing of respected investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya in October 2006, have caused significant international concern and increased pressure on journalists to avoid subjects considered sensitive. In August 2007, authorities arrested several suspects in connection with the Politkovksaya case. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enactment of a new law on foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 2006 was criticized in many quarters as a device to control civil society. Implementing regulations appear to impose onerous paperwork reporting burdens on NGOs that could be used to limit or even suppress some of them. This law was used to shut down an NGO for the first time in January 2007 on the basis of extremism charges; however, most foreign NGOs have successfully re-registered. Domestic NGOs were not required to re-register, but are required to meeting new reporting requirements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constitution guarantees citizens the right to choose their place of residence and to travel abroad. Some big-city governments, however, have restricted this right through residential registration rules that closely resemble the Soviet-era &amp;quot;propiska&amp;quot; regulations. Although the rules were touted as a notification device rather than a control system, their implementation has produced many of the same results as the propiska system. The freedom to travel abroad and emigrate is respected although restrictions may apply to those who have had access to state secrets. Recognizing this progress, since 1994, the U.S. President has found Russia to be in full compliance with the provisions of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Government Spending/Taxation=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Putin..jpg|left|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian federal budget has run growing surpluses since 2001, as the government has taxed and saved much of the rapidly increasing oil revenues. According to preliminary figures, the 2006 budget surplus was 7.4% of GDP on a cash basis. Although there are strong pressures to relax spending ahead of elections, the government has loosened its spending gradually, as the economy is running at near capacity and there are dangers of increasing inflation and rapid exchange rate appreciation. Spending increases to date have mostly been for increased salaries of government employees and pensions, but some money is also being dedicated to special investment funds and tax breaks to develop new industries in special economic zones. The government overhauled its tax system for both corporations and individuals in 2000-01, introducing a 13% flat tax for individuals and a unified tax for corporations, which improved overall collection. Business has put pressure on the government to reduce value added taxes (VAT) on oil and gas, but the government has postponed this discussion. Tax enforcement of disputes, particularly following the Yukos case, continues to be uneven and unpredictable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
In the years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia took important steps to become a full partner in the world's principal political groupings. On December 27, 1991, Russia assumed the permanent UN Security Council seat formerly held by the Soviet Union. Russia also is a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC). Russia and the European Union (EU) signed a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement. It signed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Partnership for Peace initiative in 1994. The NATO-Russia Founding Act in 1997 and the NATO-Russia Council superseded that in 2002. Russia acquiesced (despite misgivings) in enlargement of NATO by members first of the former Warsaw Pact and most recently by the Baltic states that had been forcibly integrated into the Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past several years Russia has increased its international profile, played an increasing role in regional issues, and been more assertive in dealing with its neighbors. The rise in energy prices has given it leverage over countries which are dependent on Russian sources. Russia continues to support separatist regimes in Georgia and Moldova.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Russia share common interests on a broad range of issues, including counterterrorism and the drastic reduction of our strategic arsenals. Russia shares our basic goal of stemming the [[proliferation]] of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver them. We are working with Russia to compel Iran to bring its nuclear programs into compliance with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) rules and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737. On North Korea, Russia is a participant in the Six-Party Talks aimed at the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program. Russia also takes part in the Middle East Peace Process &amp;quot;Quartet&amp;quot; (along with the UN and the EU). Russia now interacts with NATO members as an equal through the NATO-Russia Council but without veto power over NATO decisions. During the past several years, Russia has intensified its efforts to combat trafficking in persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense== &lt;br /&gt;
Russia's efforts to transform its Soviet-legacy military into a smaller, lighter and more mobile force continue to be hampered by an ossified military leadership, discipline problems and human rights violations, limited funding and demographics. Recent steps by the Government of Russia suggest a desire to reform. There has been an increased emphasis on practical training, and the government is introducing bills to improve the organization of the military. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cannon Russia.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite recent increases in the budget, however, defense spending is still unable to sustain Russia's over-sized military. Current troop strength, estimated at 1.1 million, is large in comparison to Russia's GDP and military budget, which continues to make the process of transformation to a professional army difficult. This is the result of the Soviet legacy and military thinking that has changed little since the Cold War. Senior Russian leaders continue to emphasize a reliance on a large strategic nuclear force capable of deterring a massive nuclear attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russian military salaries are low. Theoretically, the army provides all necessities, but housing and food shortages continue to plague the armed forces. Problems with both discipline and brutal hazing are common as well. HIV infection rates in the Russian army are estimated to be between two to five times higher than in the general population, and tuberculosis is a persistent problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such conditions continue to encourage draft evasion and efforts to delay military service. Although the available manpower (males 15-49) for the Russian Armed Forces was projected at 35.2 million in 2005, only approximately 11% of eligible males do military service. Moreover, military officials complain that new recruit cohorts are plagued by increasing incidences of poor education, communicable diseases and criminality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Government has stated a desire to convert to a professional army, but implementation has been delayed repeatedly. Current plans envision a transition to a mixed force, in which professional soldiers fill the ranks of select units and conscription is gradually phased out. Some officials have talked of developing a non-commissioned officer corps to lead the professional army, but the military has yet to make any concrete investments in training or facilities that would begin this process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Historic Centre of St. Petersburg.jpg|thumb|260px|Historic Center of St. Petersburg.]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of March, 2009, the World Bank issued a grim forecast of the Russian Economy, projecting a 4.5% decline in the economy in 2009 and warning that 5.8 million Russians would fall into poverty unless the government shifts spending to poor families.  It praised the government’s $85 billion anticrisis program, which stabilized Russia’s banks and prevented financial panic. But it said too little had gone to households — a hazard in a society where 37 million people, a quarter of the population, lives near the poverty line.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ellen Berry, &amp;quot;World Bank Grim on Russian Economy,&amp;quot; [http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/31/world/europe/31russia.html?ref=world ''New York Times'' Mar. 30, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian economy underwent tremendous stress in the 1990s as it moved from a centrally planned economy to a free market system. Difficulties in implementing fiscal reforms aimed at raising government revenues and a dependence on short-term borrowing to finance budget deficits led to a serious financial crisis in 1998. Lower prices for Russia's major export earners (oil and minerals) and a loss of investor confidence due to the Asian financial crisis exacerbated financial problems. The result was a rapid and steep decline (60%) in the value of the ruble, flight of foreign investment, delayed payments on sovereign and private debts, a breakdown of commercial transactions through the banking system, and the threat of runaway inflation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, Russia weathered the crisis well. In the 8 years following the financial crisis, GDP growth averaged just under 7% due to a devalued ruble, implementation of key economic reforms (tax, banking, labor and land codes), tight fiscal policy, and favorable commodities prices. Household consumption and fixed capital investments have both grown by about 10 percent per year since 1999 and have replaced net exports as the main drivers of demand growth. Inflation and exchange rates have stabilized due to a prudent fiscal policy (Russia has run a budget surplus since 2003). The government created a stabilization/rainy day fund ($127 billion in mid-2007), and has the third-largest foreign exchange reserves in the world (close to $420 billion in mid-2007) which should shelter it from commodity price shocks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's balance of payments moves from strength to strength. The current account balance grew from $58.6 billion in 2004 to $95.3 billion in 2006, almost entirely due to oil price increases. The capital account turned positive in 2006, with net inflow of $6.1 billion. In addition, net private capital flows in 2006 increased significantly to $40.9 billion, compared to an inflow of $0.1 billion in 2005 due to liberalization of the capital account in mid-2006. Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows dramatically improved in 2006 to an estimated $31 billion (inflows totaled $15.4 billion and $14.6 billion in 2004 and 2005, respectively). As of July 1, 2006, the ruble is convertible for both current and capital transactions. Russia prepaid its entire Soviet-era Paris Club debt of $22 billion in late 2006, pushing Russia's sovereign foreign debt down to $45 billion at the end of 2006, or about 5 percent of GDP. Russia's total public and private foreign debt at the end of 2006 was $310 billion, or 31 percent of GDP. Such a dramatic reversal to the macroeconomic situation is truly remarkable. Russia currently has a sovereign investment-grade rating from Standard and Poor's of BBB+. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the economy has begun to diversify, the government budget remains dependent on oil and gas revenues; consumption and investment are, however, contributing to an increasing share to GDP growth. While currently sheltered from external price shocks, the government realizes the need to intensify reforms that will promote new investment in aging infrastructure and continued productivity gains. The government believes it can do this by creating state-sponsored investment funds, special economic zones, and by exercising control of strategic enterprises (a draft law defining strategic sectors was submitted to the Duma in August 2007). Although investors are returning to Russia, excessive bureaucracy, corruption, insufficient and insufficiently enforced legislation, selective interpretation of laws (particularly tax laws), unclear limits and conditions on foreign investment, obsolete infrastructure, and stalled economic reforms still remain a problem. In 2005, the government announced reform programs in four priority areas (health, education, housing, and agriculture), but further work is needed on them as well as in financial regulation, civil service reform, and reform of government monopolies, such as railroads, gas, and electricity.&lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2006): $989 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
*Growth rate (2006): 6.7%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Petroleum, natural gas, timber, furs, precious and nonferrous metals. &lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture: Products--Grain, sugar beets, sunflower seeds, meat, dairy products.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types--Complete range of manufactures: automobiles, trucks, trains, agricultural equipment, advanced aircraft, aerospace, machine and equipment products; mining and extractive industry; medical and scientific instruments; construction equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$304 billion: petroleum and petroleum products, natural gas, woods and wood products, metals, chemicals. Major markets--EU, CIS, China, Japan. Imports--$165 billion: machinery and equipment, chemicals, consumer goods, medicines, meat, sugar, semi-finished metal products. Major partners--EU, U.S., NIS, Japan, China. U.S. exports--$4.7 billion. Principal U.S. exports (2006)--oil/gas equipment, meat, inorganic chemicals, tobacco, aircraft, medical equipment, autos/parts. U.S. imports--$19.8 billion. Principal U.S. imports (2006)--oil, aluminum, chemicals, platinum, iron/steel, fish and crustaceans, nickel, wood, and copper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gross Domestic Product==== &lt;br /&gt;
A strong expansion in domestic demand continues to drive GDP growth, despite a slowdown in manufacturing. GDP growth and industrial production for 2006 were 6.7% and 4.8%, respectively, relative to 6.4% and 5.7% in 2005. GDP growth is currently derived from non-tradable sectors, but investment remains concentrated in tradables (oil and gas). Construction was the fastest growing sector of the economy, expanding by 14% in 2006. The main private sector services--wholesale &amp;amp; retail trade, banking &amp;amp; insurance, and transportation &amp;amp; communications--showed strong growth of about 10%. In contrast, public sector services--education, health care, and public administration--lagged behind with only 2-4% growth in 2006. Recent productivity growth has still been strong in some parts of domestic manufacturing. Real disposable incomes grew by 10.2% in 2006, spurring considerable growth in private consumption. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Monetary Policy==== &lt;br /&gt;
Large balance of payments surpluses have complicated monetary policy for Russia. The Central Bank has followed a policy of managed appreciation to ease the impact on domestic producers and has sterilized capital inflows with its large budget surpluses. However, the Central Bank also has been buying back dollars, pumping additional ruble liquidity into the system. Given the rising demand for money, this has softened the inflationary impact, but these policy choices have complicated the government's efforts to lower inflation to the single digits. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation was 9% in 2006 and 10.9% in 2005, having steadily decreased from 20.2% in 2000, due primarily to prudent fiscal policy and in 2006 lower world oil prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Commercial Law====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia has a body of conflicting, overlapping and rapidly changing laws, decrees and regulations, which has resulted in an ad hoc and unpredictable approach to doing business. In this environment, negotiations and contracts from commercial transactions are complex and protracted. Uneven implementation of laws creates further complications. Regional and local courts are often subject to political pressure, and corruption is widespread. However, more and more small and medium businesses in recent years have reported fewer difficulties in this regard, especially in the Moscow region. In addition, Russian businesses are increasingly turning to the courts to resolve disputes. Russia's WTO accession process is also helping to bring the country's legal and regulatory regime in line with internationally accepted practices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Natural Resources====&lt;br /&gt;
The mineral-packed Ural Mountains and the vast oil, gas, coal, and timber reserves of Siberia and the Russian Far East make Russia rich in natural resources. However, most such resources are located in remote and climatically unfavorable areas that are difficult to develop and far from Russian ports. Nevertheless, Russia is a leading producer and exporter of minerals, gold, and all major fuels. Natural resources, especially energy, dominate Russian exports. Ninety percent of Russian exports to the United States are minerals or other raw materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industry====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Russia.JPG|right|220px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is one of the most industrialized of the former Soviet republics. However, years of very low investment have left much of Russian industry antiquated and highly inefficient. Besides its resource-based industries, it has developed large manufacturing capacities, notably in metals, food products, and transport equipment. Russia is now the world's third-largest exporter of steel and primary aluminum. Russia inherited most of the defense industrial base of the Soviet Union, so armaments remain an important export category for Russia. Efforts have been made with varying success over the past few years to convert defense industries to civilian use, and the Russian Government is engaged in an ongoing process to privatize the remaining 9,222 state-owned enterprises, 33% of which are in the industrial manufacturing sector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Agriculture====&lt;br /&gt;
For its great size, Russia has relatively little area suited for agriculture because of its arid climate and inconsistent rainfall. Northern areas concentrate mainly on livestock, and the southern parts and western Siberia produce grain. Restructuring of former state farms has been an extremely slow process. Foreigners are not allowed to own farmland in Russia although long-term leases are permitted. Private farms and garden plots of individuals account for over one-half of all agricultural production. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Investment/Banking====&lt;br /&gt;
Russia attracted an estimated $31 billion in FDI in 2006 (3.2% of GDP), up from $13 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.Russia's annual FDI figures are now in line with those of China, India, and Brazil. However, Russia's per capita cumulative FDI still lags far behind such countries as Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic. The paradox is that Russia's challenging business climate, lack of transparency, and weak rule of law/corruption has taken a back seat to Russia's extraordinary macroeconomic fundamentals and the consumer and retail boom, which is providing double digit returns to investors and attracting new flows. Russian domestic investment is also returning home, as the foreign investment coming into Russia from havens like Cyprus and Gibraltar, is actually returning Russian capital . As of the end of 2006, loans to the financial sector were 57.2% of total banking sector assets. Retail loans amounted to $78.4 billion at the end of 2006, up from $41 billion at the end of 2005. Retail deposits increased to $144.1 billion from $95.7 billion over the same period. Also, currently deposits are fully insured up to $4,000 and an additional $12,000 is insured at 90%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still small by international standards, the Russian banking sector is growing fast and is becoming a larger source of investment funds. To meet a growing demand for loans, which they were unable to cover with domestic deposits, Russian banks borrowed heavily abroad in 2006, accounting for two-thirds of the private-sector capital inflows in that year. Ruble lending has increased since the October 1998 financial crisis, and in 2006 loans were 63% of total bank assets, with consumer loans posting the fastest growth at 74% that same year. Fewer Russians prefer to keep their money outside the banking sector, the recent appreciation of the ruble against the dollar has persuaded many Russians to keep their money in rubles or other currencies such as the euro, and retail deposits grew by 65% in 2006. Despite recent growth, the poorly developed banking system, along with contradictory regulations across banking, bond, and equity markets, still makes it difficult for entrepreneurs to raise capital as well as to permit capital transfer from a capital-rich sector such as energy to capital-poor sectors such as agriculture and manufacturing and to diversify risk. Banks still perceive small and medium commercial lending as risky, and some banks are inexperienced with assessing credit risk, though the situation is improving. In 2003, Russia enacted a deposit insurance law to protect deposits up to 100,000 rubles (about $3,700) per depositor, and a bill is currently in the Duma, which if passed will increase this coverage to 190,000 rubles (about $7,000) per depositor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trade====&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. exported $4.7 billion in goods to Russia in 2006, a 21% increase from the previous year. Corresponding U.S. imports from Russia were $19.8 billion, up 29%. Russia is currently the 33rd-largest export market for U.S. goods. Russian exports to the U.S. were fuel oil, inorganic chemicals, aluminum, and precious stones. U.S. exports to Russia were machinery, meat (mostly poultry), electrical equipment, and high-tech products. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia's overall trade surplus in 2006 was $139 billion, up from $118 billion in 2005. World prices continue to have a major effect on export performance, since commodities--particularly oil, natural gas, metals, and timber--comprise 80% of Russian exports. Russian GDP growth and the surplus/deficit in the Russian Federation state budget are closely linked to world oil prices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is in the process of negotiating terms of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). The U.S. and Russia concluded a bilateral WTO accession agreement in late 2006, and negotiations continue in 2007 on meeting WTO requirements for accession. Russia reports that it has yet to conclude bilateral agreements with Saudi Arabia and Georgia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2005 U.S. Trade Representative's National Trade Estimate, Russia continues to maintain a number of barriers with respect to imports, including tariffs and tariff-rate quotas; discriminatory and prohibitive charges and fees; and discriminatory licensing, registration, and certification regimes. Discussions continue within the context of Russia's WTO accession to eliminate these measures or modify them to be consistent with internationally accepted trade policy practices. Non-tariff barriers are frequently used to restrict foreign access to the market and are also a significant topic in Russia's WTO negotiations. In addition, large losses to U.S. audiovisual and other companies in Russia owing to poor enforcement of intellectual property rights in Russia is an ongoing irritant in U.S.-Russia trade relations. Russia continues to work to bring its technical regulations, including those related to product and food safety, into conformity with international standards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[History of Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of Russian painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Guidebooks===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Frommer's Moscow &amp;amp; St. Petersburg'' by Angela Charlton (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Frommers-Moscow-St-Petersburg-Complete/dp/0470194030/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-7 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Eyewitness: Russia'' by Kathleen Berton Murrell, (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Eyewitness-Russia-Kathleen-Berton-Murrell/dp/0789458802/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Russia &amp;amp; Belarus'' (Lonely Planet Travel Guides) by Mark Elliott (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Russia-Belarus-Lonely-Planet-Travel/dp/1741042917/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239324359&amp;amp;sr=1-15 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
===Surveys===&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldman, Marshall I. ''Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia'' (2008), by a leading scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Petrostate-Putin-Power-New-Russia/dp/0195340736/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-5 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Politkovskaya, Anna. ''Putin's Russia: Life in a Failing Democracy'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Putins-Russia-Life-Failing-Democracy/dp/0805082506/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-9 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Service, Robert. ''A History of Modern Russia: From Nicholas II to Vladimir Putin'' (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucas, Edward. ''The New Cold War: Putin's Russia and the Threat to the West'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/New-Cold-War-Putins-Russia/dp/0230606121/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1239323968&amp;amp;sr=1-12 extract and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====references====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/rs.html The World Fact Book]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Asian Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Russian History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soviet Union]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shigruu</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>