<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shapeshifter</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Shapeshifter"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Shapeshifter"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T04:17:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circular_reasoning&amp;diff=767299</id>
		<title>Circular reasoning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Circular_reasoning&amp;diff=767299"/>
		<updated>2010-04-04T21:39:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shapeshifter: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Circular reasoning''' is a form of [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|proof by assertion]], often used by [[Atheist|Atheists]] in which one uses a conclusion of an argument as the [[premise]] to that same argument. This is also known as ''petitio principii'' or ''begging the question.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is considered invalid and therefore is not permitted by the rules of [[formal logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== An analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
The simplest argument is a single inference, as per the Law of Detachment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If P, then Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*P.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, Q.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law of the Syllogism uses Detachment to establish an ''intermediate'' conclusion between the original premise and the eventual conclusion. Thus:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If P, then Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*If Q, then R.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, if P, then R.&lt;br /&gt;
*P.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, Q and R.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contraposition'' uses Detachment in reverse to show that a thing is ''not'' true:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If P, then Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*Not Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, not P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All these proofs start with a proposition already verified or denied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the classic structure of circular reasoning, that is an abuse of the Law of the Syllogism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*If P, then Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*If Q, then R.&lt;br /&gt;
*If R, then P.&lt;br /&gt;
*P.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, Q.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, R.&lt;br /&gt;
*Therefore, P.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these three conditional statements would be valid by itself. Together, they create a flawed argument, because P now depends on itself to be true. The line of reasoning ends where it began, and is thus a circle. The only difference between this and ''proof by assertion'' is that the latter attempts to use a single conditional statement--&amp;quot;if P, then P&amp;quot;--while circular reasoning uses at least two, and typically three or more, syllogisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular arguments can be very difficult to detect. Circular arguments found in the professional literature, or in [[propaganda]], typically use five or six (or more) syllogisms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every logical system ''must'' begin with a set of generally accepted assumptions called ''postulates'' or ''axioms'' (from the [[Greek]] '''αξιος''' or ''axios'' worthy or deserving). Similarly, any set of definitions must start with a set of fundamental terms that need no definition. An axiom is usually a fundamental property of nature upon which all agree. Persons attempting to show that something is a fundamental property of nature when it is not, or a value of that property that is contrary to fact, typically use circular reasoning to make such an attempt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://creationwiki.org/Circular_reasoning Circular reasoning] by [[CreationWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shapeshifter</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=766494</id>
		<title>Counterexamples to Evolution</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_Evolution&amp;diff=766494"/>
		<updated>2010-03-31T13:27:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shapeshifter: Added an actual number to get a perspective. I counted 48 examples. 0.95^48 = 0,08525759&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Darwin_monkey_cartoon.jpg|thumb|180px|Caricature of [[Charles Darwin]].  To date, no fossils of ''H. darwinicus orangutanishicus'' have been found.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A scientific theory proven by the logical principal of deduction  cannot permit any counterexamples.  In order to be true, the [[theory of evolution|theory of evolution by natural selection acting upon random mutation]] must be able to explain the origins of '''''all''''' living things in terms of a purely naturalistic view. '''If any of the counterexamples listed below is correct, then the theory of evolution fails'''.  Moreover, if there is merely a 5% chance that each of these examples is correct, then the odds that these are ''all'' incorrect and that evolution is true is infinitesimally small (~8,53% with 48 examples).&lt;br /&gt;
==Counterexamples==&lt;br /&gt;
===Based on statistics===&lt;br /&gt;
* Parsimonious repetition of design elements throughout creation, e.g. the eye's appearance in remarkably different species.  For such complex structures to [[convergent evolution|arise repeatedly via evolution]] is [[statistical_impossibility | impossible]], as evolution is an inherently random and historically contingent process.&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Pleiotropy'', the fact that a change of a single gene can have several different effects, renders the &amp;quot;improvement&amp;quot; of animals by random mutation impossible, as any mutation with a potentially beneficial effect will be coupled with one or more other potentially lethal effects.&lt;br /&gt;
* The development of feathers, which could not have conceivably &amp;quot;grown&amp;quot; from the scales of dinosaurs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://icb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/40/4/687.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://palaeoblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/early-evolution-of-feathers.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* For evolution to be true, every male dog, cat, horse, elephant, giraffe, fish and bird had to have coincidentally evolved with a female alongside it (over billions of years) with fully evolved compatible reproductive parts and a desire to mate, otherwise the species couldn't keep going. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=90743&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of mechanism===&lt;br /&gt;
* Animals flee to high ground ''before'' a deadly tsunami hits their shoreline, defying any plausible [[materialistic]] explanation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deseretnews.com/article/600105348/Utah-scientific-Did-animals-sense--and-flee--the-tsunamis-in-S-Asia.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Mutations cause a loss of information, rendering it mathematically impossible for mutations to advance the complexity of life.  Similarly, entropy (disorder) increases over time, making it impossible for order to increase on its own.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Social insects&amp;quot; such as bees, ants, and termites, which have extremely ornate caste systems.  Where an insect fits is determined by its diet when young.  Evolution requires that both the genetics for the various castes, the genetics for caste determination, and the genetics for ''behavior'' allowing caste determination all appeared simultaneously.  Akin to the concept of [[irreducible complexity]], but on a higher (social) order, this is impossible given random chance.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ant]]s and other social [[insect]]s, for at least two reasons:  First, their complex social structure is evidence of [[intelligent design]]; second, since the overwhelming majority of individuals are workers and do not reproduce, they cannot perpetuate their genetic material, as evolution requires.&lt;br /&gt;
* evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as the brilliant autumn foliage and staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation&lt;br /&gt;
* the fact that [[cicada]]s appear like clockwork every 13 years for some species, and every 17 years for others&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://inside.msj.edu/academics/faculty/kritskg/cicada/faq.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* the extraordinary migration patterns of butterflies and birds, which lack any plausible materialistic explanation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[migration]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Evolution does not account for the immense amount of [[information]] in the genome, as well as the origin of the information-processing systems in the cell. Information always has a sender, who must be God in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
* the manner in which chickens return to their chicken coops at the same time, and enter the chicken coops in the same order, each day&lt;br /&gt;
* Symbiosis - There are many examples where creatures rely on each other to survive which could not arise through evolution. Grass cannot survive without a certain fungus that helps it fix nitrogen from the atmosphere and the fungus can't survive without the grass.  They must have appeared on earth at the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070410084136.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Consciousness - No animal displays self-awareness (such as clothing), morality, tool-making, or self-sacrifice to the same extent that man does.  It is unclear how a random mutation could have arisen which accounts for humanity's significantly higher cognitive ability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Humans exhibit behaviors such as performing [[science]], creating [[art]] and [[music]], [[dance|dancing]], and a number of other intellectual and artistic behaviors which could not have been produced by random mutations. There is no known evolutionary reason why these should be favored.&lt;br /&gt;
* Trematode parasites, like many other kinds, lack a plausible evolutionary phylogeny, though they can easily be explained by a teleological design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/36/36_4/trematodes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* In addition, evolution cannot explain the many complex sex-determining systems. For example, in most mammals, females have two X chromosomes whereas males have an X and Y chromosome, but in birds, many insects, and other organisms, the situation is reversed. In flies, sex is determined the ratio of non-sex chromosomes to X chromosomes (so that males have only one X whereas females have two). It is impossible for evolution to create these new sex-determining systems ''ex nihilo''.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Several species of fish in the Arctic ocean have chemicals in their blood that essentially act as anti-freeze.  Evolution requires gradual change, leaving no plausible explanation as to how the fish survived before developing this trait.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maladaptation===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jellyfish]] in [[Hawaii]] swarm to the beaches roughly 9 to 10 days after each full [[moon]], for no apparent evolutionary reason&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aloha.com/~lifeguards/jelyfish.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Variation in chromosome count (ploidy) is impossible in evolution.  One member of a species with 2 sets of chromosomes cannot mate with a member with 4.  Thus, for the chromosome count of a species to change (and thus account for the variety of counts in nature) a vast portion of a species would have to evolve a new chromosome set simultaneously.&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[human]] [[prostate]] surrounds the [[urethra]] and in doing so provides many benefits.  Evolutionists consider the structure to be poor design, which should mean that natural selection would have eliminated that design.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sarfati, Jonathan, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5757 The Prostate Gland–is it ‘badly designed’?], 1st August 2008 (Creation Ministries International)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Inability to account for widely observed altruism among animals, as it ''reduces'' an animal's ability to survive.  “The existence of altruism between different species — which is not uncommon — remains an obstinate enigma.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood''  [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes12.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Not surprisingly, atheist evolutionists have done their utmost to ''deny'' animal altruism (See especially [[Richard Dawkins]]' ''[[The Selfish Gene]]'', which denies altruism without providing any evidence to back up his enormous claim)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lack of genetic diversity among the ''Homo sapiens'' species.  Were evolution and the old earth true, the human population would show a much larger genetic variance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Too many deleterious mutations.  Each generation of humans has far more negative mutations than the posited natural selection can remove.  Evolution is thus impossible as species would become nonviable long before they could diverge.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/descent.html#rpafAHIwKHS7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wrong prediction===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;the loss and addition of large DNA sequence blocks are present in humans and gorillas, but not in chimps&amp;quot; even though &amp;quot;the gorilla is lower on the primate tree than the chimp and supposedly more distant to humans. How could these large blocks of DNA--from an evolutionary perspective--appear first in gorillas, disappear in chimps, and then reappear in humans?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.icr.org/article/4624/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Lack of any vestigial organs in the human body.  While evolutionists used to claim dozens or even hundreds of human traits and organs were vestigial, useless items disused through evolution, we now know what functions they all have, including the appendix  (the classic example). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ken Ham and Carl Wieland, ''Your Appendix: It's There for a Reason.'' (1997)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Lack of any demonstrable vestigial parts of the human [[genome]]. While evolutionists often claim that regions of the genome are &amp;quot;junk DNA&amp;quot; and would not have been placed there by a designer, none have actually shown this to be true, and much so-called &amp;quot;junk DNA&amp;quot; has been shown to be useful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/junkdna.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* While evolutionists argue that there are examples of &amp;quot;[[argument from poor design|bad design]]&amp;quot; in the bodies of many organisms, such as &amp;quot;flaws&amp;quot; in the human spine and sinus system, evolutionists fail to realize that, by their own theory, natural selection should have removed these things! The simpler explanation, that these represent degeneration from an original, created perfect form, is the superior one.&lt;br /&gt;
* We have the perfect number of [[teeth]] to fit in our [[mouth]]s.  While creationism perfectly accounts for that result, evolutionism predicts a contrary result: As our [[face]]s evolved from chimpanzee-like faces to human faces, the shortening of the muzzle would have caused the teeth to become overcrowded in the mouth.&lt;br /&gt;
* Human fertility is rapidly declining, disproving evolutionary improvement in humans and also suggesting a brief timeline for human existence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Missing fossils===&lt;br /&gt;
* the remarkable whale, which is a mammal, has no plausible evolutionary ancestor&lt;br /&gt;
* No transitional forms appear for horses, instead different horse like animals appear in the fossil record distinct&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ray comfort, forward to the 150th anniversary edition of On the Origin of Species&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* the enormous gaps and lack of intermediate species in the [[fossils|fossil]] record.&lt;br /&gt;
* No clear transition from unicellular to multicellular organisms. &lt;br /&gt;
* Mammalian fur and body hair.  There is no known evolutionary pathway for the development of fur, and no fossil evidence of hair evolving from scales, even though it survives very well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_4/Bergman.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A lack of any evolution from prehistoric forms has been demonstrated for many species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Paradoxical fossils===&lt;br /&gt;
* The fact that new discoveries, such as ''[[Raptorex]],'' routinely call into question key dogmas of evolutionism and require the &amp;quot;immutable&amp;quot; laws of evolution to be reassessed.  By contrast, creationism has prevailed in the face of scientific discoveries for six thousand years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irreducible Complexity===&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[immune system]] is irreducibly complex, as without one which is thoroughly developed, an organism would not be able to resist any infection&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Behe, Michael J. 1996. ''Darwin's Black Box'', New York: The Free Press, pp. 117-139.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://biology.creighton.edu/courses/BIO432/Evolution%2005.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* the extraordinarily long neck of the [[giraffe]].  It serves no function (the theory that giraffes use the long neck to eat from tree trunks was never true).  The presence of valves in the neck (which are necessary because of its great length) raises a question of how one could have arisen without the other being there first (see the irreducible complexity argument).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www1.pacific.edu/~e-buhals/GIRAFFE2.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* The development of wings, as intermediary wing stubs would have no use, and be a competitive disadvantage.&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[flagellum]] a multi-part cellular motor which fails to function if a single part is removed is the classic example of [[irreducible complexity]] and cannot arise according to the theory of evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/design2/article.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Many [[bat]]s which live in caves employ a type of sonar in order to navigate and find prey. Evolutionists propose that the bat evolved from a squirrel-like animal, but a squirrel would have no use for a sonar system. The bats can't fly without sonar, and an animal that can't fly doesn't need it. Therefore, bats must have been created with fully functioning sonar and flight.&lt;br /&gt;
* The organ and brain development required for retinal imagery require a base level of complexity, making a primitive form useless and impossible under evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/43/43_1/retinal_imagery.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncategorized===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pterosaurs]]; a scientist recently stated that they could not have flown, but why then did they evolve wings?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.physorg.com/news142086647.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* No other animal exhibits [[religion]]. A far better explanation than random mutations is that humans were given the capacity to be religious by a loving God who wants a relationship with His creations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Evolution requires that random mutations can cause one [[kind]] to change into another, but this has never been observed.&lt;br /&gt;
*The existence of two symmetrical kidneys, which are unnecessary in most people, lacks a plausible evolutionary explanation based on functionality alone.  Because evolution falsehoods mislead most people into thinking they need their second kidney, &amp;quot;the average waiting time for the organs from a deceased donor in the United States is five years&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;3,916 patients waiting for a kidney in 2006 died before one became available.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.scienceline.org/2009/03/04/levitan-health-living-kidney-donor-transplant/]  This article observes, &amp;quot;As a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found, living kidney donors live as long or longer and enjoy better quality of life than the general population.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Logical Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
As scientific theories require that their laws be immutable, the existence of merely one counterexample disproves the truth of the rule.  Thus, if evolution fails to account for any one of these items (or countless others), it must be discarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Evolution]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shapeshifter</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Germany&amp;diff=766483</id>
		<title>Germany</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Germany&amp;diff=766483"/>
		<updated>2010-03-31T13:02:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shapeshifter: /* The Left */ added information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''Bundesrepublik Deutschland''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Germany rel 94.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of Germany.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Germany.JPG&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Germany.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Berlin&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Federal Republic (Parliamentary)&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=German&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Horst Köhler&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=Angela Merkel&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =137,858 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =82,310,000 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=$3.045 trillion (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$36,975 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Euro (formerly the Deutsche Mark)&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Germ-vote-2009.jpg|200px|thumb|Exit polls from Sept. 2009 election won by the conservative coalition CDU and FDP]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Germany''' (official name: '''Federal Republic of Germany''') is a federally organized [[Democracy]] in Western [[Europe]] with a population of about 82.2 million. The capital city and seat of government is [[Berlin]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major ethnic groups are German 94%, Polish 1%, Yugoslavs 1% and others 4%. 34% of the population are Protestants, 34% are Roman Catholics and 4% are Muslim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/gm.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Europe's largest economy and the most populous nation wholly within Europe, Germany is a key member of the continent's economic, political, and defense organizations.  The central German bank, the [[Bundesbank]], has historically been the most influential force within the financial markets of the European Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The September 2009 elections were a major win for the conservative forces led by Chancellor [[Angela Merkel]], breaking a stalemate and opening the way for more conservative economic policies.  Previously since an indecisive election in 2005 the Christian Democrats (CDU) (on the center-right) formed a &amp;quot;grand coalition&amp;quot; with the Social Democrats (SPD) (on the center-left).  Now Merkel and her CDU will form a coalition with the libertarian, pro-business Free Democrats (FDP). Left in the cold will be the SPD, the Greens, and the ex-Communists who remain strong in the former East Germany under the name &amp;quot;Left party&amp;quot;. Merkel is now expected to move forward on tax cuts, reform of the tax code, reduction of bureaucracy and a possible extension of the time that nuclear power plants can continue to operate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig Whitlock, &amp;quot;Germany's Merkel Reelected Easily, Will Form New Coalition,&amp;quot; [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092700631.html?nav=emailpage ''Washington Post'' Sept. 28, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merkel's program announced as she took office Oct. 28 includes $36 billion in income tax cuts, lower business taxes, and higher family benefits. The budget will be in deficit for the next four years, as the government believes the economy is too fragile for spending cuts  and that more stimulus is needed to end the recession.  By law the budget must be balanced by the year 2016. Nuclear power plants will be given an extension, and Merkel wants to move more of the welfare costs from corporations to households.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
===Demography===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 there were 388,451 marriages and 201,693 divorces. There were 685,795 births and 830,227 deaths. The number of births has dropped from 767,000 in 2000, while the deaths have risen from 179,600. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The average age at marrying (for the first time) for men was 32 and for women 29. Abortions are officially illegal, according to a 1995 law. However, prosecutions are not brought if they are performed in the first three months of pregnancy after consultation with a doctor. The annual abortion rate, at under ten per 1,000 women aged 15–44, is among the lowest in the world &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005 10.2% of all children lived in poverty (in households with income below 50% of the national median). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germany had a Net Reproduction Rate (NRR) of 0.66 in 1999. A rate of NRR=1.0 equals a constant population. Therefore, in terms of births and deaths (and not counting immigration) the population is shrinking by 34% between generations.[3] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life expectancy of females at birth in West Germany rose from 71 years in 1954 to 80 years in 2000; the expectancy for boys rose from 66 to 75. Expectancy in the eastern zone was about three years less. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Projected population in 2050 is 76 million, down from the present 82 million. There will be more deaths than births, and that is largely offset by a net inflow of immigrants from 2000 to 2050, predicted to be about 240,000 per year.&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnicity===&lt;br /&gt;
Most inhabitants of Germany are ethnic German. There are, however, more than 7 million foreign residents, many of whom are the families and descendants of so-called &amp;quot;guest workers&amp;quot; (foreign workers, mostly from Turkey, invited to Germany in the 1950s and 1960s to fill labor shortages) who remained in Germany. Germany has a sizable ethnic Turkish population. Germany is also a prime destination for political and economic refugees from many developing countries. An ethnic Danish minority lives in the north, and a small Slavic minority known as the Sorbs lives in eastern Germany. Due to restrictive German citizenship laws, most &amp;quot;foreigners&amp;quot; do not hold German citizenship even when born and raised in Germany. However, since the German government undertook citizenship and immigration law reforms in 2002, more foreign residents have had the ability to naturalize. &lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has one of the world's highest average levels of education, technological development, and economic productivity. Since the end of World War II, the number of youths entering universities has more than tripled, and the trade and technical schools of the Federal Republic of Germany (F.R.G.) are reasonable good.  German 15-year olds score about average in comparison with similar countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the university level, however, there has been a dramatic decline in quality from the days before Hitler, when German universities were the best in the world. Since the student revolts of 1968, conditions at the once-famous universities have deteriorated badly. A strong egalitarianism prevents the re-emergence of world class faculties and no German university ranks among the top 40 in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gebhard Schweigler, &amp;quot;Heidelberg is Not Harvard …and Germany is embarrassed.&amp;quot; [http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=83 ''The Atlantic Times'' Dec. 2004]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservative government has tried to reverse the decline by offering €1.9 billion (about $2.7 billion) in excellence grants to numerous schools spread over a period of five years--far less money than Harvard spends in one year. Little improvement has been reported from this small investment.  The leading schools are Freiburg, Heidelberg and Konstanz (all in the southern state of Baden-Württemberg), Aachen, Göttingen, the Free University of Berlin, two schools in Munich and Karlsruhe’s Technical University.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Lutz Lichtenberger, &amp;quot;Selective Upgrades The government’s 'Excellence Initiative' grants German universities small packs of ivy seeds,&amp;quot; [http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=1080 ''The Atlantic Times'' Nov. 2007]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Meanwhile top German scientists and engineers migrate to the United States, where their talents are appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Standard of Living===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rothenburg ob der Tauber.jpg|thumb|Rothenburg ob der Tauber. (Photo:Klaus Dolle.)]]&lt;br /&gt;
With a per capita income level of more than $28,700, Germany is a broadly middle class society. A generous social welfare system provides for universal medical care, unemployment compensation, and other social needs. Millions of Germans travel abroad each year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With unification on October 3, 1990, Germany began the major task of bringing the standard of living of Germans in the former German Democratic Republic (G.D.R.) up to that of western Germany. This has been a lengthy and difficult process due to the relative inefficiency of industrial enterprises in the former G.D.R., difficulties in resolving property ownership in eastern Germany, and the inadequate infrastructure and environmental damage that resulted from years of mismanagement under communist rule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Extremism===&lt;br /&gt;
Economic malaise in eastern Germany is one factor contributing to extremist violence, primarily from the political right. Confusion about the causes of the current hardships and a need to place blame has found expression in harassment and violence by some Germans directed toward foreigners, particularly non-Europeans. The vast majority of Germans condemn such violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wolfgang Schaube, the Interior minister 2005-9, was shot by a deranged man in 1990 and is confined to a wheel chair. He calls on Germans to feel more patriotic, and for immigrants to assimilate faster.  He has adopted tough policies on policing and anti-terrorism, such as giving the military authority to shoot down hijacked planes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:St Stephens Cathedral interior.jpg|thumb|left|300px|St. Stephens Cathedral (''Stephansdom'') in Passau, Bavaria. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 the Roman Catholic Church reported a membership of 25.7 million. The Evangelical Church, a confederation of the Lutheran, Uniate, and Reformed Protestant Churches, has 25.3 million members. Together, these two churches account for nearly two-thirds of the population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108448.htm U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Protestant Christian denominations include: New Apostolic Church, 371,305; Ethnic German Baptists from the former Soviet Union (FSU), 85,000; and Baptist, 75,000. Muslims number 3.5 million, including Sunnis, 2.5 million; Alevis, 410,000; and Shi'a, 225,000. Until 2004 the annual number of conversions to Islam was 300, largely Christian women native citizens marrying Muslim men; however, since 2004 the annual numbers of conversions have jumped into the thousands. There are approximately 2,600 Islamic places of worship, including an estimated 150 traditional architecture mosques, with 100 more mosques being planned. One million Muslims are citizens. Orthodox Christians number 1.4 million, including Greek Orthodox/Constantinople Patriarchate, 450,000; Serbian Orthodox, 250,000; Romanian Orthodox, 300,000; and Russian Orthodox/Moscow Patriarchate, 150,000. Buddhists number 245,000, Jehovah's Witnesses 165,000, and Hindus 97,500. The Church of Scientology operates 18 churches and missions, and according to press reports, it has 30,000 members. However, according to the Offices for the Protection of the Constitution (OPC) in Brandenburg and Hamburg, the Church of Scientology has 5,000-6,000 members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to estimates, Jews number more than 200,000, of which 107,330 are registered members of the Jewish community. Of these registered community members, 100,967 are immigrants and 6,363 are originally from the country. From 1990 to 2006, approximately 202,000 Jews and non-Jewish dependents from the countries of the FSU arrived, joining 25,000 to 30,000 Jews already in the country. As a result of a more restrictive immigration policy regarding Jews from the FSU, the number of Jewish immigrants decreased to 1,296 in 2007 from 1,971 in 2006 and 3,124 in 2005. The new policy was designed in cooperation with Jewish organizations in order to better manage the integration of individuals into the Jewish community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An estimated 21 million persons (one-quarter of the population) either have no religious affiliation or belong to unrecorded religious organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 18, 2007, the Bertelsmann Foundation published a survey on religious convictions and practice in the country, which failed to confirm the commonly held belief that the country was becoming more secular. Fully 70% of adult respondents said they were religious, and of those, 18% said they were &amp;quot;deeply religious&amp;quot; and regularly attend worship services, up from 15% in earlier studies. In the 18-29 age group, 41% expressed a belief in eternal life and a divine being, more than in any other age bracket. Roman Catholics report that 15% of nominal Catholics regularly attend Sunday Mass. Seventeen years after reunification, the country's eastern part remains far more secular than the west. The Bertelsmann Foundation found former easterners self-identified as 36% religious and 8% deeply religious, in contrast with 78% and 21%, respectively, for those from the west. Only 5 to 10% of eastern citizens belong to a religious organization, but numbers are increasing among non-Lutheran Protestants in the east. &lt;br /&gt;
====Discrimination====&lt;br /&gt;
There have been recent reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, and practice. Right-wing extremists committed politically motivated crimes against minorities including religious groups, as well as anti-Semitic and anti-Islamic acts. Cemeteries were desecrated, and Muslim communities sometimes suffered societal discrimination when building new mosques and finding allotments of land for cemeteries; however, many members of Government and civil society initiated discussions about Muslim integration and expressed their commitment to addressing the issue. The Roman Catholic and Evangelical churches continued to use &amp;quot;sect commissioners&amp;quot; to warn the public of dangers from some minority religious groups such as the Unification Church, Scientologists, Universal Life (Universelles Leben), and Transcendental Meditation practitioners. Scientologists continue to find &amp;quot;sect filters&amp;quot; used against them in employment as well as discrimination in political party membership.&lt;br /&gt;
====Religion in schools====&lt;br /&gt;
Most public schools offer Protestant and Catholic religious instruction in cooperation with those churches, as well as instruction in Judaism if enough students express interest. The number of Islamic religion classes in public schools continued to grow. In principle, participants of the federal government-sponsored Islam Conference agreed that Islamic education should be made widely available. Education is a state responsibility and, in part because no nationally recognized Islamic organization exists that could assist in developing a curriculum or providing services, the form and content of Islamic instruction vary from state to state. Organizations providing Islamic instruction do not have public law corporation status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the state, a nonreligious ethics course or study hall may be available for students not wishing to participate in religious instruction. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islamic classes in public schools continued to be a controversial topic but were increasingly common throughout the country, except in areas where the Muslim population was too small to support them. Although no Muslim group had &amp;quot;public law corporation&amp;quot; status that would entitle them to offer Islamic courses, state governments recognized the need and demand and worked with local Muslim organizations to establish such courses. On March 13, 2008, the Interior Minister was quoted in the press indicating that the Federal Government and Muslim community leaders had reached an agreement in principle that schools should offer classes in Islam taught in German alongside the other religions, but he noted that it would take time to implement the agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are an estimated 900,000 Muslim students in the public school system; Islamic education in schools is offered in some states. At the start of the 2006‑07 school year, authorities in Baden‑Wuerttemberg established a two‑course system: one for Sunni and Shi'a students and another for Alevis. State officials and Muslim groups in Baden‑Wuerttemberg agreed upon the system and the initial reactions were positive. Some states offered similar programs while others were working with Muslim leaders to establish a uniform curriculum. Later in the year, universities in Frankfurt, Ludwigsburg, Karlsruhe, and Weingarten began offering training courses in the teaching of Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The legal obligation that children attend school, confirmed by the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice in 2006, continued to be a problem for some home-schooling advocates, such as Baptists from the FSU in Eastern Westphalia, due to concerns about sex education and the teaching of evolution. On August 2, 2007, the Stuttgart Administrative Court dismissed the case brought by several Russian‑German immigrant families belonging to the Baptist group Gemeinde Gottes who had petitioned in 2004 to send their children to a private religious school run by members of their community. The court ruled that the teaching staff was insufficiently qualified. Other home-schooling cases remain in the court system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Data===&lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 82 million.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethnic groups: Primarily German; Danish minority in the north, Sorbian (Slavic) minority in the east; 7.3 million foreign residents.&lt;br /&gt;
*Religions: Protestants (26 million); Roman Catholics (26 million); approximately 3.2 million Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
*Language: German. &lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory--9-13 (depending on the Land); attendance--100%; literacy--99%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate (2006 est.)--4.12/1,000; life expectancy (2006 est.)--women 81.96 years, men 77.81 years.&lt;br /&gt;
*Persons employed (2006 avg.): 39.08 million; unemployed (2006 avg.): 9.8% of labor force.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
===Executive Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a President as [[Head of State]], with little power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The actual political power and head of government is the Chancellor (&amp;quot;Bundeskanzler&amp;quot;), who is elected by federal parliament (&amp;quot;Bundestag&amp;quot;). The Chancellor is typically elected in the first session of a newly elected Bundestag for the entire legislative period of four years. The parliament can only force the Chancellor to resign in a ''constructive motion of no-confidence'', if it elects at the same time a new Chancellor.  The current Chancellor is [[Angela Merkel|Dr. Angela Merkel]]. The current government is a center-right coalition between the Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU) and the Free Democrats (FDP).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569386,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a bicameral system with a federal parliament (&amp;quot;Bundestag&amp;quot;) and a representation of the states (&amp;quot;Bundesrat&amp;quot;). The members of Bundestag in elected every four years, using a personalized proportional system. The members of the Bundesrat are representatives of the state governments, and the delegations of each state are required to vote as a bloc on behalf of their governments. Each delegation has between 3 and 6 members, depending on the size of the represented state. The position of president of the Bundesrat rotates on an annual basis between the prime ministers of the states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
The German constitution provides for an independent jurisdiction. The highest appeals court in Germany is the Federal Court of Justice (&amp;quot;Bundesgerichtshof&amp;quot;), which is seated in the Southwestern city of [[Karlsruhe]]. Members of the Federal court are elected by a committee, with 16 delegates from the states, one from each state, appointed by the state governments, and 16 delegates appointed by the federal parliament. The Federal Constitutional Court (&amp;quot;Bundesverfassungsgericht&amp;quot;) is the highest court to review decisions and acts by the executive and legislative branches of government. It can be called to determine whether public acts are unconstitutional and can render them ineffective if they are not. This court is also seated in city of Karlsruhe, and it members are elected by the Bundesrat and Bundestag, and need a 2/3 majority in each.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political Parties===&lt;br /&gt;
====Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU)====&lt;br /&gt;
An important aspect of postwar German politics was the emergence of a moderate, ecumenical Christian party--the Christian Democratic Union (CDU)--operating in alliance with a related Bavarian party, the Christian Social Union (CSU). Although each party maintains its own structure, the two form a common caucus in the Bundestag and do not run opposing campaigns. The CDU/CSU has adherents among Catholics, Protestants, rural interests, and members of all economic classes. It is generally conservative on economic and social policy and more identified with the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Social Democratic Party (SPD)====&lt;br /&gt;
The SPD is one of the oldest organized political parties in the world. It originally advocated Marxist principles, but in the 1959 Godesberg Program abandoned the concept of a &amp;quot;class party&amp;quot; while continuing to stress social welfare programs. Under the leadership of Gerhard Schroeder, the SPD-Greens government implemented in 2003 the centrist Agenda 2010 reforms, designed to modernize the country's social system and labor market. The SPD has a powerful base in the bigger cities and industrialized states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Free Democratic Party (FDP)====&lt;br /&gt;
The FDP has traditionally been composed mainly of middle and upper class Protestants who consider themselves heirs to the European liberal tradition. It supports free trade and reducing the role of the state in economic policy. It is libertarian on social issues. The party has participated in all but three postwar federal governments but has not been in federal government since 1998. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Left====&lt;br /&gt;
The PDS (for 'Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus'; &amp;quot;Party of Democratic Socialism&amp;quot;, composed largely of former East German socialists and follow-up of the [[SED]]) and the WASG (for 'Wahlalternative Arbeit und Soziale Gerechtigkeit'; &amp;quot;Voting alternative work and social justice&amp;quot;) composed of west-German leftists) merged in June 2007 to form a party simply known as &amp;quot;The Left.&amp;quot; The party's foreign policy is largely shaped by its rigid opposition to foreign military deployments, for example in [[Afghanistan]], and insists on an immediate pull-out. On domestic policy, the party opposes economic and social reforms, such as Hartz IV, which aim to increase free markets and reduce unemployment benefits. The Left proposes to weaken the free market system with a new orientation to democratic socialist principles. The Left also experienced a lot of criticism due to its communist wing, the 'communist platform' which actually makes up less than 1% of the party's members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Alliance 90/Greens====&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1970s, environmentalists organized politically as the Greens. Opposition to nuclear power, military power, and certain aspects of highly industrialized society were principal campaign issues. In the December 1990 all-German elections, the Greens merged with the Eastern German Alliance 90, a loose grouping of civil rights activists with diverse political views. The Greens joined a federal government for the first time in 1998, forming a coalition with the SPD. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Other parties====&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the instability caused by the need for multi-party coalitions in the Weimar Republic, Germany's Basic Law today requires parties reach 5% of the vote to win seats in the Bundestag. In addition to those parties that won representation in the Bundestag in 2005, a variety of minor parties won a cumulative 2.7% of the vote, down from 3.0% in 2002. Several other parties were on the ballot in one or more states but did not qualify for representation in the federal Bundestag. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*President--Horst Köhler (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*President of the Bundestag--Norbert Lammert (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Chancellor--Angela Merkel (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice Chancellor and Minister of Foreign Affairs--Guido Westerwelle (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Defense--Karl-Theodor Freiherr zu Guttenberg (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Finance--Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Interior--Thomas de Maizière (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Labor and Social Affairs--Franz Josef Jung (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Justice--Sabine Leutheuser-Schnarrenberger (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Economics and Technology--Rainer Brüderle (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection--Ilse Aigner (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth--Ursula von der Leyen (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Health--Philipp Rösler (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs--Peter Ramsauer (CSU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety--Norbert Röttgen (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Education and Research--Annette Schavan (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development--Dirk Niebel (FDP)&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of the Federal Chancellery and Minister for Special Tasks--Ronald Pofalla (CDU)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany continues to emphasize close ties with the United States, membership in NATO, and the &amp;quot;deepening&amp;quot; of integration among current members of the EU. The Federal Republic of Germany took part in all of the joint postwar efforts aimed at closer political, economic, and defense cooperation among the countries of western Europe. Germany has been a large net contributor to the EU budget. Germany also is a strong supporter of the United Nations and of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the postwar era, the Federal Republic of Germany also sought to improve its relationship with the countries of eastern Europe, first establishing trade agreements and, subsequently, diplomatic relations. With unification, German relations with the new democracies in central and eastern Europe intensified. On November 14, 1990, Germany and Poland signed a treaty confirming the Oder-Neisse border. They also concluded a cooperation treaty on June 17, 1991. Germany concluded four treaties with the Soviet Union covering the overall bilateral relationship, economic relations, the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the territory of the former G.D.R., and German support for those troops. Russia accepted obligations under these treaties as successor to the Soviet Union. Germany continues to be active economically in the states of central and eastern Europe and to actively support the development of democratic institutions, bilaterally and through the EU. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Relations with the United States==== &lt;br /&gt;
U.S.-German relations have been a focal point of American involvement in Europe since the end of World War II. Germany stands at the center of European affairs and is a key partner in U.S. relations with Europeans in NATO and the European Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German-American ties extend back to the colonial era. More than 7 million Germans have immigrated over the last three centuries, and today nearly a quarter of U.S. citizens claim German ancestry. In recognition of this heritage and the importance of modern-day U.S.-German ties, the U.S. President annually has proclaimed October 6, the date the first German immigrants arrived in 1623, to be &amp;quot;German-American Day.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. policy toward Germany remains the preservation and consolidation of a close and vital relationship with Germany, not only as friends and trading partners, but also as allies sharing common institutions. During the 45 years in which Germany was divided, the U.S. role in Berlin and the large American military presence in West Germany served as symbols of the U.S. commitment to preserving peace and security in Europe. Since German unification, the U.S. commitment to these goals has not changed. The U.S. made significant reductions in its troop levels in Germany after the Cold War ended, and, on July 12, 1994, President Clinton &amp;quot;cased the colors&amp;quot; at the Berlin Brigade's deactivation ceremony. The U.S., however, continues to recognize that the security and prosperity of the United States and Germany significantly depend on each other. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As allies in NATO, the United States and Germany work side by side to maintain peace and freedom. This unity and resolve made possible the successful conclusion of the 1987 U.S.-U.S.S.R. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), the Two-plus-Four process--which led to the Final Settlement Treaty--and the November 1990 Conventional Armed Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More recently, the two allies have cooperated closely in peacekeeping efforts in the Balkans and have worked together to encourage the evolution of open and democratic states throughout central and eastern Europe. Germany is also a strong contributor to our common effort to secure peace and stability in Afghanistan, contributing almost 3,000 troops to the NATO ISAF mission. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, DC, Germany has been a reliable U.S. ally in the campaign against terrorism. As two of the world's leading trading nations, the United States and Germany share a common, deep-seated commitment to an open and expanding world economy. Personal ties between the United States and Germany extend beyond immigration to include intensive foreign exchange programs, booming tourism in both directions, and the presence in Germany of large numbers of American military personnel and their dependents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and Germany have built a solid foundation of bilateral cooperation in a relationship that has changed significantly over nearly six decades. The historic unification of Germany and the role the United States played in that process have served to strengthen ties between the two countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German-American political, economic, and security relationships continue to be based on close consultation and coordination at the most senior levels. High-level visits take place frequently, and the United States and Germany cooperate actively in international forums. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===War on Terror===&lt;br /&gt;
Germany currently contributes troops to the NATO-led ISAF operation in [[Afghanistan]], but did not support the invasion of [[Iraq]]. German military participates in NATO Force Protection Program, protecting US military bases located in Germany.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:The_castle3.jpg|right|thumb|Neuschwanstein Castle, a popular tourist destination.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Germany is the world's third-largest economy and the largest in Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
From the 1948 currency reform until the early 1970s, West Germany experienced almost continuous economic expansion. Real gross domestic product (GDP) growth slowed down, and even declined, from the mid-1970s through the recession of the early 1980s. The economy then experienced 8 consecutive years of growth that ended with a downturn beginning in late 1992. Since unification, Germany has seen annual average real growth of only about 1.5% and stubbornly high unemployment. In 2006, Germany had its best year since 2000 with 2.7% growth; for 2007, growth was at 2.5% despite a 3 percentage point VAT hike at the beginning of the year. The government forecasts 1.7% growth in GDP for 2008. Unemployment in 2007 dropped to an annualized average of 9.0% nationwide, but it is still significantly higher--15.1%--in the German states that make up the former East Germany. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germans often describe their economic system as a &amp;quot;social market economy.&amp;quot; The German Government provides an extensive array of social services. The state intervenes in the economy by providing subsidies to selected sectors and by owning some segments of the economy, while promoting competition and free enterprise. The government has restructured the railroad system on a corporate basis, privatized the national airline, and is privatizing telecommunications and postal services. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The German economy is heavily export-oriented, with exports accounting for more than one-third of national output. As a result, exports traditionally have been a key element in German macroeconomic expansion, accounting for over half of the economic growth in recent years. Germany is a strong advocate of closer European economic integration, and its economic and commercial policies are increasingly determined within the European Union (EU). Germany uses the common European currency, the euro, and the European Central Bank sets monetary policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early-mid 2000s, Germany adopted a complex set of labor/social welfare reforms to overcome structural weaknesses of the German welfare state and to create policies more conductive to employment. Defying a skeptical German public, the coalition government of Chancellor Angela Merkel initiated additional reform measures, such as the gradual increase in the mandatory retirement age from 65 to 67--a move that would add 2.5 million to the workforce by 2030. Subsequently, however, there has been active political debate and some rollback of these labor reforms; most notably the government decided to extend the payment period of unemployment benefits to older workers in early 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fifteen years after reunification (October 3, 1990), Germany had made great progress in raising the standard of living in eastern Germany, introducing a market economy and improving its infrastructure. At the same time, the process of convergence between east and west is taking longer than originally expected and, on some measures, has stagnated since the mid-1990s. Eastern economic growth rates have been lower than in the west in recent years, unemployment is twice as high, prompting many skilled easterners to seek work in the west, and productivity continues to lag. Eastern consumption levels are dependent on public net financial transfers from west to east totaling about $13 billion per year. In addition to social assistance payments, the government will extend funds to promote eastern economic development through 2019. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States is Germany's second-largest trading partner, and U.S.-German trade has continued to grow strongly. Two-way trade in goods totaled $184 billion in 2007. U.S. exports to Germany were $ 71 billion while U.S. imports from Germany were more than $113 billion. At nearly $45 billion, the U.S.'s fifth-largest trade deficit is with Germany. Major U.S. export categories include aircraft, electrical equipment, telecommunications equipment, data processing equipment, and motor vehicles and parts. German export sales are concentrated in metalworks, motor vehicles, machinery, chemicals and heavy electrical equipment. Much bilateral trade is intra-industry or intra-firm. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germany has a liberal foreign investment policy. For 2005, the most recent year for which statistics are available, German investment in the U.S. amounted to 233 billion euros (29 % of all German foreign direct investment, or FDI; the U.S. is the number-one destination for German FDI), while U.S. investment in Germany was 45 billion euros (11.5 % of all FDI invested in Germany; U.S. is third-largest source of FDI in Germany). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. firms employ about 510,000 people in Germany; German firms likewise employ about 746,000 people in the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite persistence of some structural rigidities in the labor market and extensive government regulation, the economy remains strong and internationally competitive. Although production costs are very high, Germany is still an export powerhouse, and unit labor costs have decreased in the last 10 years. Additionally, Germany is strategically placed to take advantage of the rapidly growing central European countries. The current government has addressed some of the country's structural problems, with important tax, social security, and financial sector reforms. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (2007 est.): $3.1 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate: (2006) 2.7%; (2007) 2.5%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita income (PPP, 2006): $31,900.&lt;br /&gt;
*Inflation rate (consumer prices, 2007): 2.2%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Iron, hard coal, lignite, potash, natural gas.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture (0.9% of GDP): Products--corn, wheat, potatoes, sugar, beets, barley, hops, viticulture, forestry, fisheries.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry (29.1% of GDP): Types--car-making; mechanical, electrical, and precision engineering; chemicals; environmental technology; optics; medical technology; biotech and genetic engineering; nanotechnology; aerospace; logistics.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006): Exports--$1.03 trillion: chemicals, motor vehicles, iron and steel products, manufactured goods, electrical products. Major markets--France, U.S., and U.K. Imports--$844 billion: food, petroleum products, manufactured goods, electrical products, motor vehicles, apparel. Major suppliers--France, Netherlands, U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The German economy showed substantial improvement in 2007 at 2.5% growth due to the effect of recent economic reforms and strong global economic growth. The export-led recovery is now filtering through to the domestic economy where private consumption has long been at a low level. &lt;br /&gt;
===Crisis of 2008===&lt;br /&gt;
The worldwide [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] hit Germany in the summer, revealing high risk policies pursued by numerous large banks looking for high rates of return outside Germany. In September the government unveiled a $635-billion bailout package for its floundering banks. Economic growth for 2009 is forecast to be an anemic 0.2%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Automobile manufacturing is a major sector, but the financial crisis caused credit to be harder to obtain; many families postponed purchases. Auto exports fell 10% in October 2008 from October 2007; domestic sales dropped 8%.  In contrast 2007 was a record year with production of 12.1 million vehicles and employment of  756,000 workers; an eighth of those jobs were created in the last five years alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
see [[German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The states (Bundesländer) and their capitals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(In alphabetical order)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Baden-Wuerttemberg]]:  [[Stuttgart]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bavaria]] (''Bayern''):  [[München]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Berlin]]:  [[Berlin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Brandenburg]]:  [[Potsdam]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bremen]]:  [[Bremen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hamburg]]:  [[Hamburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hesse]] (''Hessen''):  [[Wiesbaden]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mecklenburg-Vorpommern]]:  [[Schwerin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lower Saxony]] (''Niedersachsen''):  [[Hannover]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[North Rhine-Westphalia]] (''Nordrhein-Westfalen''):  [[Düsseldorf]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Rhineland-Palatinate]] (''Rheinland-Pfalz''):  [[Mainz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saarland]]:  [[Saarbrücken]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saxony]] (''Sachsen''):  [[Dresden]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saxony-Anhalt]] (''Sachsen-Anhalt''):  [[Magdeburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sleswick-Holsatia]] (''Schleswig-Holstein''):  [[Kiel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Thuringia]] (''Thüringen''):  [[Erfurt]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Famous Germans==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Konrad Adenauer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hannah Arendt]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johann Sebastian Bach]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Franz Beckenbauer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Boris Becker]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pope Benedict XVI]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ludwig van Beethoven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto von Bismarck]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Böll]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Willy Brandt]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wernher von Braun]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bertolt Brecht]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dietrich Buxtehude]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marlene Dietrich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albrecht Dürer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Albert Einstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roland Emmerich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Daniel Fahrenheit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainer Werner Fassbinder]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Goebbels]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hermann Göring]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Günter Grass]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hans Jakob Christoffel von Grimmelshausen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Johannes Gutenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Georg Friedrich Händel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Hahn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Händel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ernst August von Hannover]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl August von Hardenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Hegel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Werner Heisenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Hesse]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Himmler]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver Kahn]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Kissinger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Helmut Kohl]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Käthe Kollwitz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Kretschmer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Loriot]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Luther]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rosa Luxemburg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thomas Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Angela Merkel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lise Meitner]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anne-Sophie Mutter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dirk Nowitzki]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Nietzsche]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erwin Rommel]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Friedrich Schiller]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerhard Schröder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heinrich Schliemann]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Schumacher]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karlheinz Stockhausen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Wagner]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wim Wenders]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Schafers, Bernha, ''The State of Germany Atlas'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/State-Germany-Atlas-Bernha-Schafers/dp/0415188261/ref=sr_1_27?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-27 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Schulte-Peevers, Andrea, et al. ''Lonely Planet Germany'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Lonely-Planet-Germany-Andrea-Schulte-Peevers/dp/1740599888/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324694&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Since 1990===&lt;br /&gt;
* Alba, Richard. Peter Schmidt, and Martina Wasmer. ''Germans or Foreigners?: Attitudes Toward Ethnic Minorities in Post-Reunification Germany'' (2004)  [http://www.amazon.com/Germans-Foreigners-Minorities-Post-Reunification-Transition/dp/1403963789/ref=sr_1_22?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324886&amp;amp;sr=1-22 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Berghahn, Volker Rolf. ''Modern Germany: society, economy, and politics in the twentieth century'' (1987) [http://hdl.handle.net.proxy.cc.uic.edu/2027/heb.01673 ACLS E-book] &lt;br /&gt;
* Buse, Dieter K. ed. ''Modern Germany: An Encyclopedia of History, People, and Culture 1871-1990'' (2 vol 1998) &lt;br /&gt;
* Kahn, Charlotte. ''Ten Years of German Unification: One State, Two Peoples'' (2000) [http://www.questia.com/read/23486249 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Larres, Klaus. ''Germany Since Unification: The Development of the Berlin Republic'' (2nd ed. 2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Germany-Since-Unification-Second-Development/dp/0333919998/ref=sr_1_28?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-28 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economics and society===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Siebert, Horst. ''The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/German-Economy-Beyond-Social-Market/dp/0691096643/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201328508&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Zimmermann, Klaus F. et al. ''Immigration Policy and the Labor Market: The German Experience and Lessons for Europe'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Immigration-Policy-Labor-Market-Experience/dp/354068381X/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201328716&amp;amp;sr=8-9 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
====Politics====&lt;br /&gt;
* Green, Simon, and William E. Paterson. ''Governance in Contemporary Germany: The Semisovereign State Revisited'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Governance-Contemporary-Germany-Semisovereign-Revisited/dp/0521848814/ref=sr_1_25?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324991&amp;amp;sr=1-25 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Hancock, M. Donald, ''Politics in Europe: An Introduction to the Politics of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden'' (2006) [http://www.amazon.com/Politics-Europe-Introduction-Kingdom-Germany/dp/1933116455/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201324694&amp;amp;sr=1-11 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schmidt, Manfred G. ''Political Institutions in the Federal Republic of Germany''  (2003)  ISBN 0198782594&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centroeu.com/uboote/fotos.html U-Boote Photos] S. Mata (In Spanish)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prussia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bavaria]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[German Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of German Masterpieces]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* source: [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3997.htm US State Department Country Study] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:EU Members]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shapeshifter</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=SPD&amp;diff=766482</id>
		<title>SPD</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=SPD&amp;diff=766482"/>
		<updated>2010-03-31T12:53:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shapeshifter: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Social Democratic Party''' or '''SPD''' is a left-center party in Germany. From 2005 to 2009 it formed a &amp;quot;grand coalition government&amp;quot; (a coalition between the two largest parties) with the rival [[CDU]]. In the German elections in 2009, the SPD suffered a historical loss of 9,2 % of the vote, reaching only 23 % in total. This gave the CDU (which reached 33,8% combined with its sister-party CSU) the possibility to form a conservative coalition with the 'Liberal Democratic Party of Germany', the [[FDP]]. This was considered a 'dream marriage', as opposed to the 'shotgun marriage'-coalition with the SPD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current leader of the SPD is Sigmar Gabriel, succeeding Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who had been vice chancellor and minister of foreign affairs during the grand coalition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Cold War===&lt;br /&gt;
The SPD approached the problems of German reunification and the establishment of a European Defense Community (EDC) on the assumption of the possibility of peaceful coexistence between the USSR and the Western powers. The SPD objected to the EDC, preferring to find an answer to the problem of security through the UN. According to the SPD, the EDC would give the Soviet Union an excuse for blocking German reunification. The SPD feared that the policies of [[Robert Schuman]] in France and of Germany's [[Konrad Adenauer]] would result in the domination of Europe by Catholics and conservatives, and therefore the SPD sided with Pierre Mendès-France, the French premier, on the question of Western military integration, while continuing to give priority to German reunification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Germany]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shapeshifter</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=SPD&amp;diff=766481</id>
		<title>SPD</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=SPD&amp;diff=766481"/>
		<updated>2010-03-31T12:52:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shapeshifter: Added new information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Social Democratic Party''' or '''SPD''' is a left-center party in Germany. From 2005 to 2009 it formed a &amp;quot;grand coalition government&amp;quot; (a coalition between the two largest parties) with the rival [[CDU]]. In the German elections in 2009, the SPD suffered a historical loss of 9,2 % of the vote, reaching only 23 % in total. This gave the CDU (which reached 33,8% combined with its sister-party CSU) the possibility to form a conservative coalition with the 'Liberal Democratic Party of Germany', the [[FDP]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current leader of the SPD is Sigmar Gabriel, succeeding Frank-Walter Steinmeier, who had been vice chancellor and minister of foreign affairs during the grand coalition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
===Cold War===&lt;br /&gt;
The SPD approached the problems of German reunification and the establishment of a European Defense Community (EDC) on the assumption of the possibility of peaceful coexistence between the USSR and the Western powers. The SPD objected to the EDC, preferring to find an answer to the problem of security through the UN. According to the SPD, the EDC would give the Soviet Union an excuse for blocking German reunification. The SPD feared that the policies of [[Robert Schuman]] in France and of Germany's [[Konrad Adenauer]] would result in the domination of Europe by Catholics and conservatives, and therefore the SPD sided with Pierre Mendès-France, the French premier, on the question of Western military integration, while continuing to give priority to German reunification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Germany]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Shapeshifter</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>