https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Shane1010100 2026-11-12T06:29:58Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Top_Conservative_news_websites&diff=803339 2010-08-10T13:01:43Z

<p>Shane1010100: Need links to get to the sites listed here.</p> <hr /> <div>''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like.<br /> <br /> {| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;<br /> |-<br /> !Rank<br /> !Information Source<br /> !Comments<br /> |-<br /> |1 NEED LINKS<br /> |<br /> |<br /> |-<br /> |2<br /> |WorldNet Daily<br /> |has reporters at conservative events; not afraid to criticize or take on tough issues; gives writers good leeway<br /> |-<br /> |3<br /> |cnsnews<br /> |uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones<br /> |-<br /> |4<br /> |lifenews<br /> |superb in reporting news affecting [[pro-life]] issues, which are many; this site is very high quality and could move higher in rankings<br /> |-<br /> |5<br /> |Breitbart<br /> |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well<br /> |-<br /> |6<br /> |<br /> |<br /> |-<br /> |7<br /> |Hotair<br /> |witty, insightful and timely; could move higher in ranking<br /> |-<br /> |8<br /> |RedState<br /> |timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues<br /> |-<br /> |9<br /> |Newsbusters<br /> |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well<br /> |-<br /> |10<br /> |[[Fox News]]<br /> |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s&lt;ref&gt;Conservatives censored (or disparaged) by Fox News include [[Ron Paul]], [[Rand Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]] and [[Steve Lonegan]].&lt;/ref&gt; and downplays the social issues<br /> |-<br /> |}<br /> <br /> == Nominations ==<br /> <br /> Tentative placement (high ranking, medium ranking, low ranking) in parentheses, suggestions welcome:<br /> <br /> *americanthinker.com (medium-to-low, not much on social issues)<br /> *breitbart.com (low, much of it repeating liberal news sources; political coverage dominated by foreign policy issues)<br /> *canadafreepress.com<br /> *catholicedition.com (has lots of quantity not allowed by [[lamestream media]])<br /> *climateaudit.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)<br /> *cnsnews.com (high, especially for news censored by [[lamestream media]], but it does not update news as frequently as other top sites)<br /> *examiner.com (high)<br /> *[[Fox News]] (low, but high volume)<br /> *[http://www.youtube.com/user/GeraldCelenteChannel Gerald Celente YouTube channel] (respects US Constitution, anti-[[Federal Reserve]], limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, predicted [[Tea Party Movement]] and the Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)<br /> *hotair.com (medium)<br /> *humanevents.com<br /> *lifenews.com (high quality, high volume; reports on social issues better than anyone)<br /> *michellemalkin.com (high or medium)<br /> *[[NewsBusters]] (medium)<br /> *newsmax.com (medium)<br /> *pajamasmedia.com<br /> *politico.com (medium)<br /> *rasmussenreports.com (high or medium, but high quality poll statistics)<br /> *redstate.com (medium)<br /> *rightwingnews.com (low due to crass and vulgar style)<br /> *rushlimbaugh.com (medium or low, but high volume/quality conservative radio transcripts)<br /> *sepp.org (medium, but high quality on global warming issues)<br /> *spectator.com<br /> *[[thehill.com]]<br /> *[http://www.youtube.com/user/visionvictory VisionVictory YouTube channel] (Christian, respects US Constitution, anti-Federal Reserve, limited government, against bailouts and stimulus, pro-capitalism, pro-[[Tea Party Movement]], predicted Great Recession, against USA being entangled in wars capriciously)<br /> *Wall Street Journal<br /> *Weekly Standard<br /> *wnd.com (Worldnet Daily) (medium. good op-ed writers, but suffers from sales gimmicks interspersed in headlines)<br /> <br /> Other sources:<br /> <br /> *Realclearpolitics (detailed polling about upcoming congressional elections)<br /> <br /> == Criteria ==<br /> <br /> *substantive<br /> *educational<br /> *includes social issues<br /> *does not play favorites among individuals<br /> *does not waste time and energy on [[gossip]]<br /> *factual accuracy&lt;ref&gt;&quot;Factual accuracy,&quot; per [[Conservapedia|Conservapedia's]] [[Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style#Citing_Sources_and_Using_Footnotes|Manual of Style]]: ''&quot;The party affiliation of a news source should be irrelevant. All that matters is whether the source has a record of telling the truth.&quot;''&lt;/ref&gt;<br /> *does not rely on offensive, non-family-friendly material to boost traffic<br /> *informs as well as attracting interest<br /> *original content<br /> <br /> (add more)<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> &lt;references/&gt;</div>

Shane1010100