<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Seekcommon</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Seekcommon"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Seekcommon"/>
	<updated>2026-11-02T15:06:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=143939</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=143939"/>
		<updated>2007-05-05T00:39:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Sarkozy | Enamoured of Sarkozy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Holier Than Thou | Holier Than Thou]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Scientology a false religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[When Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, why did God lie about what the outcome would be (Genesis 2:17),9 while the serpent told the truth (Genesis 3:5,22)? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce? Moses allowed divorce, Jesus disallowed it and also allowed it, Paul allowed it, and Ezra actually commanded it to appease God (Ezra 10)??? im confused!! whats a christian to do??]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia : What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are there any people who visit this site and contribute to debates that aren’t Christian?? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are Souls Unlimited?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The current front page focus on homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Pastafarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who were the first Saints?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?|Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[ Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God did not mean us to develop a Theory of Evolution, why did he provide us with the capacity to do science, and leave such convincing evidence lying around ?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are God's works always questioned?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Are there any elements of choice, when it comes to carrying out homosexual acts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia representing a conservative POV or a Young Earth Creationist POV?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia anti-British?|Is Conservapedia anti-British?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are editors allowed to use personal blogs and other unsourced sites as citations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are there too many debates on Conservapedia? | Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does an encyclopedia define complex subjects, or insert more bias into them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Aschlafly deserve an article on himself?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who named our planet &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should TK and some of the other Sysops on here Lighten Up?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Rap music torture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should weed be legalized?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does your mom go to college?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=142004</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=142004"/>
		<updated>2007-05-03T18:56:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I seem to have some difficulty in providing a link to any interested reader.  The article is at online.wsj.com/article/SB117807233027389126.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose I see immoral behavior anywhere when it comes to immigrants and their current status in the US (particularly Mexican, Chinese, Korean or other non-caucasian, non-white).  Even for a litigious society like the US, this surely takes first prize - the story of a Judge that sues a dry cleaner for 65 million dollars - taking it out on immigrants who have done good I suppose.  &lt;br /&gt;
[www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502763_pf.html Here is the article by Marc Fisher] I am curious as to what the position (if any) of the conservatives on this board about whether of not the law suit has any merit.  And why there has been no significant outcry - Could it be because the affected party is not white or black?  Where is Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton when working people like the Cheungs are being victimized by the system?  Or does it have to do something about the race and color of the affected parties and the one that is doing the suing? No, I do not know if the Most Eminent Judge Pearson is black or white - BUT I can guess He is black since nary a word from Jackson or Sharpton. Replace black with &amp;quot;African American&amp;quot; if it offends and I am aware that certain words are to be used only by certain people at certain times under certain conditions after getting permission from Jackson and Sharpton. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
: The Most Honorable Judge Pearson is an African American, there was a video.  Now it makes perfect sense as to why Jackson and Sharpton are not protecting the cleaners against this blatant racist, anti-immigrant fervor of an officer of the Court in these United States of America - after all, he is one of them and so cannot be bad.  Shame on the establishment for allowing such obvious attempts at persecuting hard working immigrants.  I can only imagine the treatment meted out to the poor illegals that cross the border to find work and take jobs that others refuse to take [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=141975</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=141975"/>
		<updated>2007-05-03T18:39:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Sarkozy | Enamoured of Sarkozy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Scientology a false religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[When Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, why did God lie about what the outcome would be (Genesis 2:17),9 while the serpent told the truth (Genesis 3:5,22)? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce? Moses allowed divorce, Jesus disallowed it and also allowed it, Paul allowed it, and Ezra actually commanded it to appease God (Ezra 10)??? im confused!! whats a christian to do??]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia : What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are there any people who visit this site and contribute to debates that aren’t Christian?? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are Souls Unlimited?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The current front page focus on homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Pastafarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who were the first Saints?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?|Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[ Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God did not mean us to develop a Theory of Evolution, why did he provide us with the capacity to do science, and leave such convincing evidence lying around ?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are God's works always questioned?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Are there any elements of choice, when it comes to carrying out homosexual acts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia anti-British?|Is Conservapedia anti-British?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are editors allowed to use personal blogs and other unsourced sites as citations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are there too many debates on Conservapedia? | Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does an encyclopedia define complex subjects, or insert more bias into them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Aschlafly deserve an article on himself?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who named our planet &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should TK and some of the other Sysops on here Lighten Up?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Rap music torture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should weed be legalized?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does your mom go to college?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=141973</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=141973"/>
		<updated>2007-05-03T18:38:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Enamoured of Sarkozy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Scientology a false religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[When Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, why did God lie about what the outcome would be (Genesis 2:17),9 while the serpent told the truth (Genesis 3:5,22)? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce? Moses allowed divorce, Jesus disallowed it and also allowed it, Paul allowed it, and Ezra actually commanded it to appease God (Ezra 10)??? im confused!! whats a christian to do??]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia : What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are there any people who visit this site and contribute to debates that aren’t Christian?? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are Souls Unlimited?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The current front page focus on homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Deism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Atheism vs. Pastafarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who were the first Saints?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?|Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[ Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do we all know what Democrat Presidential candidates stand for yet?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define Civil War]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God did not mean us to develop a Theory of Evolution, why did he provide us with the capacity to do science, and leave such convincing evidence lying around ?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are God's works always questioned?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Are there any elements of choice, when it comes to carrying out homosexual acts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia anti-British?|Is Conservapedia anti-British?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are editors allowed to use personal blogs and other unsourced sites as citations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are there too many debates on Conservapedia? | Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does an encyclopedia define complex subjects, or insert more bias into them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Aschlafly deserve an article on himself?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do sysops block editing on pages when it seems their opponents are making strong points?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who named our planet &amp;quot;Earth&amp;quot;?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should TK and some of the other Sysops on here Lighten Up?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Rap music torture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should weed be legalized?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does your mom go to college?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141179</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141179"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T23:32:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I seem to have some difficulty in providing a link to any interested reader.  The article is at online.wsj.com/article/SB117807233027389126.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose I see immoral behavior anywhere when it comes to immigrants and their current status in the US (particularly Mexican, Chinese, Korean or other non-caucasian, non-white).  Even for a litigious society like the US, this surely takes first prize - the story of a Judge that sues a dry cleaner for 65 million dollars - taking it out on immigrants who have done good I suppose.  &lt;br /&gt;
[www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502763_pf.html Here is the article by Marc Fisher] I am curious as to what the position (if any) of the conservatives on this board about whether of not the law suit has any merit.  And why there has been no significant outcry - Could it be because the affected party is not white or black?  Where is Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton when working people like the Cheungs are being victimized by the system?  Or does it have to do something about the race and color of the affected parties and the one that is doing the suing? No, I do not know if the Most Eminent Judge Pearson is black or white - BUT I can guess He is black since nary a word from Jackson or Sharpton. Replace black with &amp;quot;African American&amp;quot; if it offends and I am aware that certain words are to be used only by certain people at certain times under certain conditions after getting permission from Jackson and Sharpton. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141176</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141176"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T23:31:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I seem to have some difficulty in providing a link to any interested reader.  The article is at online.wsj.com/article/SB117807233027389126.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose I see immoral behavior anywhere when it comes to immigrants and their current status in the US (particularly Mexican, Chinese, Korean or other non-caucasian, non-white).  Even for a litigious society like the US, this surely takes first prize - the story of a Judge that sues a dry cleaner for 65 million dollars - taking it out on immigrants who have done good I suppose.  &lt;br /&gt;
[www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502763_pf.html Here is the article by Marc Fisher] I am curious as to what the position (if any) of the conservatives on this board about whether of not the law suit has any merit.  And why there has been no significant outcry - Could it be because the affected party is not white or black?  Where is Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton when working people like the Cheungs are being victimized by the system?  Or does it have to do something about the race and color of the affected parties and the one that is doing the suing? No, I do not know if the Most Eminent Judge Pearson is black or white - BUT I can guess He is black since nary a word from Jackson or Sharpton. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141175</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=141175"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T23:30:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I seem to have some difficulty in providing a link to any interested reader.  The article is at online.wsj.com/article/SB117807233027389126.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suppose I see immoral behavior anywhere when it comes to immigrants and their current status in the US (particularly Mexican, Chinese, Korean or other non-caucasian, non-white).  Even for a litigious society like the US, this surely takes first prize - the story of a Judge that sues a dry cleaner for 65 million dollars - taking it out on immigrants who have done good I suppose.  &lt;br /&gt;
[www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/25/AR2007042502763_pf.html Here is the article by Marc Fisher] I am curious as to what the position (if any) of the conservatives on this board about whether of not the law suit has any merit.  And why there has been no significant outcry - Could it be because the affected party is not white or black?  Where is Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton when working people like the Cheungs are being victimized by the system?  Or does it have to do something about the race and color of the affected parties and the one that is doing the suing?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140272</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140272"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T15:12:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I seem to have some difficulty in providing a link to any interested reader.  The article is at online.wsj.com/article/SB117807233027389126.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140260</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140260"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T15:07:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140259</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140259"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T15:07:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
But instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal  reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140255</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=140255"/>
		<updated>2007-05-02T15:06:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
Is one civilization responsible for the well being of another civilization?&lt;br /&gt;
Is an influx of uneducated people into your country beneficial to your country?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my humble opinion, in terms of whats best for the country, I would say no to both questions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Apparently illegal border crossings have slowed by more than 10% this year according to a report cited by the Wall Street Journal, today May 2, 2007.  &lt;br /&gt;
but instead of rigorous enforcement as many would have us believe, this reflects supply and demand, again according to the Wall Street Journal.  The slump in the housing market is cited as the main reason as to why fewer illegals are crossing the border and it indicates, again as the Wall Street Journal reports, that immigrants come here to work and not idle and collect welfare.  I should add they work and improve OUR standard of living while accepting jobs that go abegging.  Many on our unemployed rolls are unwilling to take these jobs or perhaps do not even have those skills necessary or simply refuse because they can and sit and complain about illegal immigration or something else.  I'd recommend that  they complain to the Wall Street Journal and tell them that the Journal is being unpatriotic and UnAmerican. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=131088</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=131088"/>
		<updated>2007-04-27T11:30:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Religious debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Is Scientology a false religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[When Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, why did God lie about what the outcome would be (Genesis 2:17),9 while the serpent told the truth (Genesis 3:5,22)? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce? Moses allowed divorce, Jesus disallowed it and also allowed it, Paul allowed it, and Ezra actually commanded it to appease God (Ezra 10)??? im confused!! whats a christian to do??]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia : What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are there any people who visit this site and contribute to debates that aren’t Christian?? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Was Christ a fundamentalist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are Souls Unlimited?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The current front page focus on homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?|Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[ Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who feels that scientific related articles should only reference published research papers instead of websites when dealing with research instead of application?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God did not mean us to develop a Theory of Evolution, why did he provide us with the capacity to do science, and leave such convincing evidence lying around ?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are editors allowed to use personal blogs and other unsourced sites as citations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are there too many debates on Conservapedia? | Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has anyone ever been been banned for pointing out that many of the other entries on this site are in need of citation and evidence to back up statements?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does an encyclopedia define complex subjects, or insert more bias into them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Rap music torture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should weed be legalized?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does your mom go to college?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:What are the lessons that we should take away from the Milgram Experiment]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=123667</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=123667"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T23:09:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, illegal immigrants aren't &amp;quot;helping&amp;quot; the economy. The exploitation of illegal immigrants is the slave mentality. Just as on the cotton plantations of the 19th century, today we have the idea of businesses exploiting illegal immigrants for their own profit. You are right about the existance of flawed policy. That we have sanctuary cities and towns that protect criminal business practices who exploit cheap labor. All about the money, right? They don't lose their business or go to jail even if their under paid workers are rounded up and deported. There are always plenty of American citizens in line to replace them. But if you were given the choice of paying someone five bucks an hour or fifteen bucks then the decision is simple. I've also noticed that only those that don't see a problem with the illegal exploitation of illegal aliens are always screaming about racism. The flawed/inhumane legal immigration policy of the United States allows the &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration of more people then any other country on the planet. Perhaps the real answer to illegal immigration would be throwing American Citizens in jail for the inhumane monetary exploitation of their fellow human beings. Until that happens, people will immigrate illegally to work as cheap labor.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 15:58, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: The fundamental reason our country, the US of A is a magnet for the rest of the world is the simple fact that each person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  By any measure, we have benefited enormously by both legal AND illegal immigration, I know you disagree.  Fine.  The workers who are &amp;quot;exploited&amp;quot; are still better off than they would have been in their own country (yes, that includes legal AND illegal immigrants).  In fact what is happening is that because the world is slowly trying to catch up to the US and as more opportunities are made available to people in those countries, there is less and less interest and pressure for many to emigrate from their native lands and immigrate to the US - these trends are evident in Higher Education, for sure.  Unlike other countries, we are dynamic - people who are laid off, do find other ways to survive/thrive.  Yes, many are hurt irreversibly and never recover.  No system is perfect, what we have in the US comes close.  Adam Smith explained it best - supply and demand.  It is OUR demand for goods/services and OUR refusal to pay any more than what we WANT to pay that results in producers trying to find ways to reduce their costs and OUR costs.  Yes, the producers DO MAKE money by using cheap labor, but millions of people do have jobs and do very well.  No matter what I say or write (or what the Wall Street Journal writes), you will hold steadfast to your view that &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration hurts us all and does not help the economy.  I disagree.  You can make a difference.  Stop shopping at Walmart, do not buy a car or a computer or a shirt or a pant that is NOT made in the US A and before you buy anything, ask if the people who made them were paid a &amp;quot;decent wage&amp;quot; and were &amp;quot;not exploited&amp;quot; or whatever.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Mary_Magdalene_-_First_Witness_to_the_Resurrection_-_Significance%3F&amp;diff=123636</id>
		<title>Debate:Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Mary_Magdalene_-_First_Witness_to_the_Resurrection_-_Significance%3F&amp;diff=123636"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T22:51:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am curious as to what the significance (if any) is to the fact that Mary Magdalene was the First to witness the resurrection of Christ.  A &amp;quot;fallen woman&amp;quot; according to some accounts.  Yet, a &amp;quot;female&amp;quot;.  Why did Jesus not choose to reveal himself to any one of the male apostles?  To me, it speaks volumes about tolerance and acceptance, no matter what impression you may have about Mary Magdalene.  Then, how does one explain so much of Paul's writings which show marked misogyny (women hating) and other biases?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually recent studies (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,472868-2,00.html) suggest Mary Magdalene may not have been a &amp;quot;fallen woman&amp;quot; at all, claiming it was a lie installed by the early church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And from what I know about him, Jesus was one of the few men in his time who saw men and women as equals, Paul on the other hand was a common 0 AD near-east man, raised according to traditional Jewish values, explaining his misogyny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes, an important message for me anyway is how Jesus looked at people versus how some conservatives (and yes liberals) view the role of women and how they are to be treated.  So much of what people believe to be based on scripture etc etc is simply not true.  Yes, even slavery was considered OK since the slaves were &amp;quot;dark skinned&amp;quot; and so on and so forth.  Another message for me is that one cannot and should not take the Bible as the infallible words of God - but words that were translated and passed on from man to man with every man adding his interpretations and prejudices and beliefs and forcing the followers to accept them.  But EVEN TODAY, there are those who cannot accept anything other than &amp;quot;Bible is the word of God in it's entirety&amp;quot; and simply refuse to examine anything that contradicts that.  Oh well ... words that help a few gain power over many [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=123299</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=123299"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T18:35:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, that is what is called racism. It has nothing to do with immigrating from one sovereign country to another in a legal means by todays standards of civilization. But let us go farther back in time when succesive waves of people &amp;quot;immigrated&amp;quot; to the Americas. Each one killing their way across the continents until they became the dominant culture. If you can go back far enough to find the first person to inhabit the Americas then it won't mean nothing since they probably no longer exist. But their ancestors weren't originally born here either if you go back far enough. So how about putting a clamp on the racism?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 09:25, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I see &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; in the current vitriol being thrown at &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, yes, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot;.  The fact is that, &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration happens because we have a flawed/inhumane &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration policy.  Today's immigrants (legal and illegal) are very different from the ones that came in the early 20th century/late 19th century.  The fact is that without the illegals, much of our economy will crawl.  Using the pretext of &amp;quot;illegal&amp;quot; immigration, demagogues like Lou Dobbs of CNN unload on &amp;quot;legal&amp;quot; immigration - issues of H-1 visas for technical people and such - claiming that &amp;quot;such immigrants&amp;quot; take jobs away from &amp;quot;natives&amp;quot;.  Rubbish, says that most radical of all newspapers, The Wall Street Journal.  [[User:Seekcommon] PS - My comments about the white man and such were, obviously meant to make a point that we are ALL immigrants and many came illegally.  Inspite of all this, I have always believed that of ALL countries in the world, the US of A remains the most humane and welcoming of ALL foreigners, immigrants - Let's keep it that way, is what I hope we do. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122955</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122955"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T13:13:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* 2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love that quote! I'm gonna put it on my page!&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus had much to teach, he was right there on the same level as Buddha, it's a shame his followers misinterpreted him so often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love it too.  In fact, the essence of what Jesus wrote/stood for is timeless and will remain uncorrupted by the vain and the power hungry who use what Jesus said/wrote for their own purposes.  The breadth of human experience seen through the people, prophets is so similar yet it is painful to watch the hijacking of particulars from one religion to persecute those who in their minds do not follow those teachings.  There is a lot more common among the fundamental human experiences and &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and more that binds than things that SEEM to separate and differentiate.  Peace ... Or, to use another language, ''Om Shanti, Shanti, Shanti'' [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Religious texts aren't propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Go to the bottom of the web page and read &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Read previous posts and see where that conflicts with &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot; statement.&lt;br /&gt;
4. Respond in an evil, godless, liberal manner.&lt;br /&gt;
Happy Earth day!--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 14:56, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess I am puzzled for referring to a response with quotes from Matthew as Evil and Godless.  I guess Matthew is someone else then and in his writing and in the Bible I saw, it is something very different.  I appreciate your pointing them out to me.  From now on, I will consider everything Matthew has written to be evil.  Unless, you can correct me since you know everything.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look what they came up with now: according to the front page Mr. Schlaffy can apparently predict the future: he already knows who's going to win the second round of the French Presidential elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seekcommon, I'm right there with you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Since you know everything? Last time I heard that was from a 10 year old girl; and she was right. Dude, he only won the first round, get a grip! Also, thanks for following number four. Please, carry on.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 08:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I do agree with you on the issue of age, we do lose a lot as we age, I know, I have an intelligent one myself that I learn from.  But I am curious, point 4, you talk about responding in an &amp;quot;Evil, Godless, Liberal&amp;quot; manner ... Does that also refer to my quoting Matthew?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course I know he only won the first round, but the front page says he won the elections altogether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
: Then again, a story from the Left.  When Daniel Ortega was defeated the first time in Nicaragua, Peter Jennings that this incredible look on his face and kept wondering how he lost when &amp;quot;polls&amp;quot; indicated that he should have won.  It is as if, Jennings so wanted Ortega to win that he could not accept the decision.  Mainstream media were stunned that a left winger lost an election.  So, stuff happens.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122954</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122954"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T13:11:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* 2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love that quote! I'm gonna put it on my page!&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus had much to teach, he was right there on the same level as Buddha, it's a shame his followers misinterpreted him so often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love it too.  In fact, the essence of what Jesus wrote/stood for is timeless and will remain uncorrupted by the vain and the power hungry who use what Jesus said/wrote for their own purposes.  The breadth of human experience seen through the people, prophets is so similar yet it is painful to watch the hijacking of particulars from one religion to persecute those who in their minds do not follow those teachings.  There is a lot more common among the fundamental human experiences and &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and more that binds than things that SEEM to separate and differentiate.  Peace ... Or, to use another language, ''Om Shanti, Shanti, Shanti'' [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Religious texts aren't propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Go to the bottom of the web page and read &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Read previous posts and see where that conflicts with &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot; statement.&lt;br /&gt;
4. Respond in an evil, godless, liberal manner.&lt;br /&gt;
Happy Earth day!--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 14:56, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess I am puzzled for referring to a response with quotes from Matthew as Evil and Godless.  I guess Matthew is someone else then and in his writing and in the Bible I saw, it is something very different.  I appreciate your pointing them out to me.  From now on, I will consider everything Matthew has written to be evil.  Unless, you can correct me since you know everything.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look what they came up with now: according to the front page Mr. Schlaffy can apparently predict the future: he already knows who's going to win the second round of the French Presidential elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seekcommon, I'm right there with you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Since you know everything? Last time I heard that was from a 10 year old girl; and she was right. Dude, he only won the first round, get a grip! Also, thanks for following number four. Please, carry on.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 08:51, 23 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I do agree with you on the issue of age, we do lose a lot as we age, I know, I have an intelligent one myself that I learn from.  But I am curious, point 4, you talk about responding in an &amp;quot;Evil, Godless, Liberal&amp;quot; manner ... Does that also refer to my quoting Matthew?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course I know he only won the first round, but the front page says he won the elections altogether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Mary_Magdalene_-_First_Witness_to_the_Resurrection_-_Significance%3F&amp;diff=122602</id>
		<title>Debate:Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Mary_Magdalene_-_First_Witness_to_the_Resurrection_-_Significance%3F&amp;diff=122602"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T03:50:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: New page: I am curious as to what the significance (if any) is to the fact that Mary Magdalene was the First to witness the resurrection of Christ.  A &amp;quot;fallen woman&amp;quot; according to some accounts.  Yet...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am curious as to what the significance (if any) is to the fact that Mary Magdalene was the First to witness the resurrection of Christ.  A &amp;quot;fallen woman&amp;quot; according to some accounts.  Yet, a &amp;quot;female&amp;quot;.  Why did Jesus not choose to reveal himself to any one of the male apostles?  To me, it speaks volumes about tolerance and acceptance, no matter what impression you may have about Mary Magdalene.  Then, how does one explain so much of Paul's writings which show marked misogyny (women hating) and other biases?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=122598</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=122598"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T03:46:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Religious debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[When Adam and Eve ate the forbidden fruit, why did God lie about what the outcome would be (Genesis 2:17),9 while the serpent told the truth (Genesis 3:5,22)? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do Moses, Ezra, Jesus, and Paul all disagree on divorce? Moses allowed divorce, Jesus disallowed it and also allowed it, Paul allowed it, and Ezra actually commanded it to appease God (Ezra 10)??? im confused!! whats a christian to do??]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia : What does Christianity say about homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still perform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are there any people who visit this site and contribute to debates that aren’t Christian?? ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Mary Magdalene - First Witness to the Resurrection - Significance?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?|Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Can a rogue nation be thought of as a sovereign nation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[ Has Russia reinstalled stealth communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why are editors allowed to use personal blogs and other unsourced sites as citations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are there too many debates on Conservapedia? | Are there too many debates on Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it tasteless for Conservapedia to critique the Virginia Tech poem on the Main Page?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Can_Objectivism_develop_beyond_Ayn_Rand%27s_original_formulation%3F&amp;diff=122476</id>
		<title>Debate:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Can_Objectivism_develop_beyond_Ayn_Rand%27s_original_formulation%3F&amp;diff=122476"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T01:35:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: New page: What Ayn Rand wrote in Atlas Shrugged (and ofcourse in all of her books) is remarkable as to how the concepts stand the test of time.  Liberals AND Conservatives hate her, except specific ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What Ayn Rand wrote in Atlas Shrugged (and ofcourse in all of her books) is remarkable as to how the concepts stand the test of time.  Liberals AND Conservatives hate her, except specific portions that they like to use.  She rejoiced in &amp;quot;man&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;humanity&amp;quot; and defined a code of ethics/morality as part of her philosophical novels.  Alan Greenspan used to be in her discussion group at one time.  Atlas Shrugged will remain, in my opinion, the greatest book ever written.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=122451</id>
		<title>Debate:Is illegal immigration control the answer to illegal immigration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Is_illegal_immigration_control_the_answer_to_illegal_immigration%3F&amp;diff=122451"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T01:21:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* No */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Yes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No==&lt;br /&gt;
Legal immigration control is the answer to illegal immigration. That way people will know what is legal and illegal. Legal=civility while illegal=jail time.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 12:40, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I agree.  It is time that the White man who killed the original inhabitants of the country we call the US of A should leave.  Christopher Columbus thought he had reached India when he did not and he allowed for the killings that followed.  More recently, so many Irish came to the US, many illegally, we should demand proof that they are here legally.  Every one who was not born of parents who were not here on this land originally ought to be asked to demand proof that they belong here and are not here illegally.  Great idea.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Was_the_shooting_at_Virginia_Tech_somehow_President_Bush%27s_fault%3F&amp;diff=122443</id>
		<title>Debate:Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Was_the_shooting_at_Virginia_Tech_somehow_President_Bush%27s_fault%3F&amp;diff=122443"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T01:18:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Adam ate the apple because of president Bush. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 08:10, 17 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hahahahah this is great.  Were the tainted peanutbutter illness cause be president Bush's shrinking of the FDA?[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 13:14, 17 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Snicker TeeHee.  Was the Quagmire in Iraq caused by bush ignoring and then firing the general who told him he needed half a million troops?[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 13:14, 17 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Which'' President Bush? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:09, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Har Har Har that is hilarious Dpbsmith.  I guess the answer is both yeeehaaaaw.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 12:40, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Was a strong economy and no new terror attacks President Bush's failed strategy?--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 23:07, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now that is funny Jpatt[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 11:45, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Know what else is funny, every Bush hater can't say a single good thing about GWB, not one thing.--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 20:15, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the Virginia Tech incident be considered a Terrorist attack that occured in the homeland?  Should it be considered a major terrorist attack?[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 11:49, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since in the eyes of the conservatives, there is nothing redeeming about those Liberals, I suppose in the eyes of Liberals, everything is Bush's fault.  Something just occurred to me, we are perfectly polarized and talk past one another.  Time for someone else to take over.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122436</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=122436"/>
		<updated>2007-04-23T01:11:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* 2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love that quote! I'm gonna put it on my page!&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus had much to teach, he was right there on the same level as Buddha, it's a shame his followers misinterpreted him so often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love it too.  In fact, the essence of what Jesus wrote/stood for is timeless and will remain uncorrupted by the vain and the power hungry who use what Jesus said/wrote for their own purposes.  The breadth of human experience seen through the people, prophets is so similar yet it is painful to watch the hijacking of particulars from one religion to persecute those who in their minds do not follow those teachings.  There is a lot more common among the fundamental human experiences and &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and more that binds than things that SEEM to separate and differentiate.  Peace ... Or, to use another language, ''Om Shanti, Shanti, Shanti'' [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2Evil&amp;amp;GodlessLiberals==&lt;br /&gt;
1. Religious texts aren't propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
2. Go to the bottom of the web page and read &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Read previous posts and see where that conflicts with &amp;quot;About Conservapedia&amp;quot; statement.&lt;br /&gt;
4. Respond in an evil, godless, liberal manner.&lt;br /&gt;
Happy Earth day!--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 14:56, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess I am puzzled for referring to a response with quotes from Matthew as Evil and Godless.  I guess Matthew is someone else then and in his writing and in the Bible I saw, it is something very different.  I appreciate your pointing them out to me.  From now on, I will consider everything Matthew has written to be evil.  Unless, you can correct me since you know everything.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Grave_errors/inconsistencies_in_the_Bible_make_literal_translation_worthless.&amp;diff=121455</id>
		<title>Debate:Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Grave_errors/inconsistencies_in_the_Bible_make_literal_translation_worthless.&amp;diff=121455"/>
		<updated>2007-04-22T01:49:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The bible cannot truly be taken literally, because its facts contradict itself. Take the gospels of Luke and Matthew, for example. Matthew states that in the lineage between Jesus and David there are 42 entires, and Luke proclaims only 27, and only three of them overlap. Obviously, both cannot be right, and cannot be used with literal conviction. Also, if Jesus is truly of virgin birth, then he cannot be the Messiah. The Old Testament clearly proclaims that the messiah must be David's descendant. Since Joseph was supposedly a descendant of David, this would make sense, but if he didn't shoot his DNA at Mary, then how can Jesus be the messiah at all? Something is clearly amiss here, and removes credibility from a literal bible. Finally, Matthew chronicles a census ordered by Caesar Augustus happening during the time that Mary and Joseph settled in Bethlehem. However, there were no censi taken at this time by Caesar Augustus. The closest on was done by Qurinin, and that was in 6 AD, no sooner. I question whether any of these bible literalists have actually read the bibles they claim dictate their lives, as if they did, they'd realize how truly ridiculous some of the errors are. [[[[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]] 23:17, 17 April 2007 (EDT)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==No discernment==&lt;br /&gt;
If you are looking for the truth then you'd better start looking harder and longer. Understanding the Word of God is a little different then reading your school textbook. It sounds like you did a rudimentary scan of the Bible only to find everything not to be totally synchronic. The lineage answer is here: http://www.gracethrufaith.com/ask-a-bible-teacher/are-josephs-and-marys-lineage-incorrect&lt;br /&gt;
You go on from there, but it is only the same type of faulty logic used with an incomplete picture of actual history. You use selective facts in a subjective manner in order to prove your agenda that the Bible cannot be taken literally. What context are you trying to find these literal inconsistancies? The Creation, the Garden of Eden, the Flood, or the Exodus? These are the literal truths of the Bible. If you don't believe in the One that wrote the Bible then don't waste your time in finding any literal truth in it because you don't have the key.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:26, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''''Wow'''''.  So, this book which you and your sort wish to hold out to me and [[Liberal|my]] [[Atheist|sort]] as being ultimate revealed truth, cannot be understood properly unless I have already accepted your worldview?  You know, there are same Christians out there who love the bible, and Jesus, and God, and don't worry about literalism. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:49, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical response. My main argument against a literal interpretation of the Bible is that &amp;quot;the One&amp;quot; didn't write the entire bible, which includes texts that were never meant to be incorporated with others. Also, the Bible as we knew it has gone through numerous translations; it wasn't originally written in English, because it didn't exist back then. Because of the multiple translations needed to get to English, all sense of context is lost since the original Aramic or Hebrew. A crude but effective test can be done on those free translations websites. Take a slang phrase (or any other phrase) such as &amp;quot;All dressed up and nowhere to go&amp;quot;, or something like that. Translate it from English to French, then French to German, then from German to English. You'll find that the new phrase has zero relationship with the original one. Admittedly, translation would be more sophisticated via the human element, but the point is the same. Nobody can accept a literal interpretation of the bible through the English version; the ONLY way to get an accurate interpretation of the Bible is through the original root languages. Otherwise, any literal interpretation is simply a fallacy. And I SINCERELY doubt that you have read the entire collected works of the Bible in its original Hebrew and Aramic. By the way, those websites do not describe how Jesus could have been the Messiah AND of virgin birth. He cannot be both, for if he is of immaculate conception, he doesn't meet the requirements of the prophecy in the Old Testament (on a side note, isn't it funny how god is much meaner and nastier in the Old Testament than in the New?). However, if he is descended from David through Joseph, making him the messiah, that denies a main tenet of Jesus being of immaculate conception. Ergo, it is silly and plain false to take a literal interpretation of the Bible, which was purely meant to describe a template for good and compassion in a world lacking those qualities.&lt;br /&gt;
One other point: after the Flood, God used the rainbow as a symbol to people that he was so distraught by his destruction of the world that he would never do anything cataclysmic again. So how does that hold against the claims of a coming Judgement or any of that other stuff? [[[[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]] 12:19, 20 April 2007 (EDT)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the eternal worlds of Homer Simpson: 'Facts, schmacts. Facts can be used to prove anything that's even remotely true.' That's exactly what you are doing: flying in the face of the facts. [[[[User:AdamNelson|AdamNelson]] 12:25, 20 April 2007 (EDT)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Typical legalism. I've heard them a thousand times. Usually a big waste of time trying to argue a point. Fine then, for you, this point is worthless. Since you won't accept what it says is the antithesis of your religious belief. Be a nihilist. You wish to slander the wisdom of a book thousands of years older then you'll ever be. You offer nothing to fill the void. By the way the rainbow was the symbol God used to show mankind He would never again destroy the entire world by flood. The Judgement day is when all of mankind will come before their Creator and be judged worthy to live or die. Then you can argue all of your legalist points and tell Him how badly he goofed everything up. That should go good for you. The final 7 year Tribulation that culminates at a little place called Har Megiddo, a.k.a. Armegedon, doesn't result in the total destruction of mankind. Just a third or two of it. But why do I wast my time here? You have no faith in Him, so His words are meaningless to you. They are foolishness to those without faith.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 22:19, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: You are right, do not waste any time of yours.  If you are part of the establishment on this wiki, take such blasphemists off the board since they obviously do not believe in the book that holds ALL the truth and ALWAYS has.  Evolution is a theory, what the Bible says about man/life is the truth.  All the stuff about fossils and carbon dating and gene structure and function and the similarity between genes and proteins among humans, chimps, worms, mice and rats are all a scientific conspiracy designed to make believers in the literal truth of the Bible look bad.  I mean, scientists make up things and are dishonest while men of God are honorable and are always seeking the truth as stated in the Bible.  The real problem is that Gutenberg came along and made it possible not only to make copies of the Bible but blasphemies like textbooks in the sciences and humanities.  Worse, Galileo was let off the hook last century for his blasphemies, the Sun does go around the Earth and we are the center of the Universe.  The real enemies are not Muslims or Buddhists or Hindus or Bahais or the Jews - but teachers and professors who have the temerity of teaching students how to think and question everything.  And how dare does anyone question the eternal truths in the Bible?  All of it is true, and anyone who says anything else is evil.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Does_the_Bible_display_poor_ethics_and_morals%3F&amp;diff=121332</id>
		<title>Debate:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Does_the_Bible_display_poor_ethics_and_morals%3F&amp;diff=121332"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T23:57:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Yes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Yes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The bible is an interpreted work and poor interpretation lead to a poor set of ethics derived from that interpretation[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've never read the bible completly, but alot of what I have read is soo violent and alot is degrading towards women. I am not saying the WHOLE bible is that way, but it seems that way. Yes, lets kill anyone who breaks the silliest of rules. It says thou shalt not kill for one of them comendment things, but then its like PUT THEM TO DEATH YAY FER KILLING PEOPLE. Overal, it's a poor display of morals and ethics and makes it sound okay to be mean and hurt other people and destroy stuff [[User:AtheistKathryn|AtheistKathryn]] 23:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all open to interpretations. I mean, don't kill, don't steal, don't cheat on your wife, obey your parents, it's not like those are a bad set of morals. Now, when the Bible contradicts itself is when you have to apply your own judgment. At least, thats how I view it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 23:46, 12 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lot was described as a righteous man, but offered to send his young daughters out to be gang raped.  [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 09:45, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think it's only fair to point out that the ten commandments were only intended to apply to other jews (judaism being the religion of moses tribe) therefore Thou shalt not kill, means thou shalt not kill other jews (or christians) and so on. what the bible basically says is that you can do anything to someone who is not of your religion, and that there is nothing morally wrong with that. in todays multicultural society that is obviously not an accebtable source of morals. {{unsigned|Bolly Ottihw}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's really &amp;quot;yes and no&amp;quot; but I'll post here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Bible puts on display the poor ethics and morals of a number of people. The first that comes to mind is King Herod. Some of the ancient Egyptian kings were pretty bad, too. Then there was the king who wanted Abram's wife and was going to kill him to get her. I tell that one in Sunday School, whenever the kids get too rowdy to pay attention to theological stuff. The good examples of [[Ruth]] and [[Esther]] make the little girls sit up and pay attention, too. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:47, 17 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am reminded of a novel by Irving Wallace, ''Seven Minutes'' where a book publisher is being prosecuted for selling a pornographic novel.  His attorney, reads several passages from novels/books and asks a ''community person'' as to whether or not she thought the passages were ''pornographic'' - and in the novel, she concludes three of the four passages as fine, while the fourth passage, she declares as ''pornographic'' - the three passages she claimed were NOT, were from books that were BANNED, while the fourth passage was selected from the Bible.  The author goes onto say that ofcourse he was not implying anything about the Bible being pornographic - but that when passages are taken out of context, any conclusions can be drawn.  The Bible includes stories that describe good and evil - and so can be taken out of context.  Peter McWilliams had, in my opinion, the best analysis of the Bible in a book titled 'Aint Nobody's Business if you do&amp;quot; [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No ==&lt;br /&gt;
The bible defines the standard of morality therefore one cannot apply a assesment of the bible ethics from a moral perspective.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:27, 8 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to definitly dissagree with the above statements. We really have no way of knowing wether the nations the isrealites were forced to destroy were ever warned of there imminent doom. But i can say with reasonable certainty that they were. I say this because Nineva was an evil nation who did things detestable to the Lord. God sent Jonah to warn them that if they didn't, then they would die. We really have no way of knowing if God gave them warning. Secondly, if you mess up, you have to pay the price. Moses was God's most reverent prophet, but he never got to see the promised land. Moses disobeyed. God doesn't believe in killing innocent civilians for the sake of them being innocent. He believes in punishment. And who knows, maybe in the afterlife, how he'll judge his people. [[User:DfairlyXED13|DfairlyXED13]] 8:40, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: There is of course a distinction here between the God of the old testament and that of the new. The God of the new testament is a forgiving God, and the God of the old testament was a vengeful God. I would argue that ethics and morals vary civisilisation to civilisation, and era to era. You can only judge the God of the time by the morals and ethics of the time. Until we hear differently, we must assume the current God is that of two millennia ago. [[User:Proberts84|Proberts84]] 10:46, 14 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Does_the_Bible_display_poor_ethics_and_morals%3F&amp;diff=121329</id>
		<title>Debate:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Does_the_Bible_display_poor_ethics_and_morals%3F&amp;diff=121329"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T23:57:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Yes */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Yes ==&lt;br /&gt;
The bible is an interpreted work and poor interpretation lead to a poor set of ethics derived from that interpretation[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:28, 8 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've never read the bible completly, but alot of what I have read is soo violent and alot is degrading towards women. I am not saying the WHOLE bible is that way, but it seems that way. Yes, lets kill anyone who breaks the silliest of rules. It says thou shalt not kill for one of them comendment things, but then its like PUT THEM TO DEATH YAY FER KILLING PEOPLE. Overal, it's a poor display of morals and ethics and makes it sound okay to be mean and hurt other people and destroy stuff [[User:AtheistKathryn|AtheistKathryn]] 23:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all open to interpretations. I mean, don't kill, don't steal, don't cheat on your wife, obey your parents, it's not like those are a bad set of morals. Now, when the Bible contradicts itself is when you have to apply your own judgment. At least, thats how I view it.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 23:46, 12 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lot was described as a righteous man, but offered to send his young daughters out to be gang raped.  [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 09:45, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i think it's only fair to point out that the ten commandments were only intended to apply to other jews (judaism being the religion of moses tribe) therefore Thou shalt not kill, means thou shalt not kill other jews (or christians) and so on. what the bible basically says is that you can do anything to someone who is not of your religion, and that there is nothing morally wrong with that. in todays multicultural society that is obviously not an accebtable source of morals. {{unsigned|Bolly Ottihw}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's really &amp;quot;yes and no&amp;quot; but I'll post here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Bible puts on display the poor ethics and morals of a number of people. The first that comes to mind is King Herod. Some of the ancient Egyptian kings were pretty bad, too. Then there was the king who wanted Abram's wife and was going to kill him to get her. I tell that one in Sunday School, whenever the kids get too rowdy to pay attention to theological stuff. The good examples of [[Ruth]] and [[Esther]] make the little girls sit up and pay attention, too. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:47, 17 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am reminded of a novel by Irving Wallace, ''Seven Minutes'' where a book publisher is being prosecuted for selling a pornographic novel.  His attorney, reads several passages from novels/books and asks a ''community person'' as to whether or not she thought the passages were ''pornographic'' - and in the novel, she concludes three of the four passages as fine, while the fourth passage, she declares as ''pornographic'' - the three passages she claimed were NOT, were from books that were BANNED, while the fourth passage was selected from the Bible.  The author goes onto say that ofcourse he was not implying anything about the Bible being pornographic - but that when passages are taken out of context, any conclusions can be drawn.  The Bible includes stories that describe good and evil - and so can be taken out of context.  Peter McWilliams had, in my opinion, the best analysis of the Bible in a book titled 'Aint Nobody's Business if you do&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== No ==&lt;br /&gt;
The bible defines the standard of morality therefore one cannot apply a assesment of the bible ethics from a moral perspective.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 15:27, 8 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to definitly dissagree with the above statements. We really have no way of knowing wether the nations the isrealites were forced to destroy were ever warned of there imminent doom. But i can say with reasonable certainty that they were. I say this because Nineva was an evil nation who did things detestable to the Lord. God sent Jonah to warn them that if they didn't, then they would die. We really have no way of knowing if God gave them warning. Secondly, if you mess up, you have to pay the price. Moses was God's most reverent prophet, but he never got to see the promised land. Moses disobeyed. God doesn't believe in killing innocent civilians for the sake of them being innocent. He believes in punishment. And who knows, maybe in the afterlife, how he'll judge his people. [[User:DfairlyXED13|DfairlyXED13]] 8:40, 13 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: There is of course a distinction here between the God of the old testament and that of the new. The God of the new testament is a forgiving God, and the God of the old testament was a vengeful God. I would argue that ethics and morals vary civisilisation to civilisation, and era to era. You can only judge the God of the time by the morals and ethics of the time. Until we hear differently, we must assume the current God is that of two millennia ago. [[User:Proberts84|Proberts84]] 10:46, 14 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120760</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120760"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T16:52:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love that quote! I'm gonna put it on my page!&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus had much to teach, he was right there on the same level as Buddha, it's a shame his followers misinterpreted him so often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love it too.  In fact, the essence of what Jesus wrote/stood for is timeless and will remain uncorrupted by the vain and the power hungry who use what Jesus said/wrote for their own purposes.  The breadth of human experience seen through the people, prophets is so similar yet it is painful to watch the hijacking of particulars from one religion to persecute those who in their minds do not follow those teachings.  There is a lot more common among the fundamental human experiences and &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and more that binds than things that SEEM to separate and differentiate.  Peace ... Or, to use another language, ''Om Shanti, Shanti, Shanti'' [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120758</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120758"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T16:52:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love that quote! I'm gonna put it on my page!&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus had much to teach, he was right there on the same level as Buddha, it's a shame his followers misinterpreted him so often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I love it too.  In fact, the essence of what Jesus wrote/stood for is timeless and will remain uncorrupted by the vain and the power hungry who use what Jesus said/wrote for their own purposes.  The breadth of human experience seen through the people, prophets is so similar yet it is painful to watch the hijacking of particulars from one religion to persecute those who in their minds do not follow those teachings.  There is a lot more common among the fundamental human experiences and &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; and more that binds that things that SEEM to separate and differentiate.  Peace ... Or, to use another language, ''Om Shanti, Shanti, Shanti'' [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120740</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120740"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T16:32:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, exactly, God has nothing to do with this (talk about unrelated subjects), the poem is fine the way it is.&lt;br /&gt;
And if questioning (social) injustice around the world is the work of evil Godless liberals, than I'm proud to be an evil Godless liberal!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And here is something from the Good Book. Matthew 6:5-8 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. And when you pray, do not keep on babbling like pagans, for they think they will be heard because of their many words. Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask him.&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120447</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120447"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T13:44:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have to say however that there is a silver lining to the diatribes and the single minded devotion to a specific cause and the lashing out at those that do not fall in line.  The more unreasonable the position is, the better most people understand how unreasonable they are and so it does become easier to deal with.  So, yea, go ahead and look in every nook and corner on how some &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; somewhere does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;refuses&amp;quot; to pray.  Keep saying it loudly and often.  There are already references to the mad man's writings/videos and such, next perhaps the effort should be on the victims - and from what I have seen, in addition to &amp;quot;Christians&amp;quot; some of the victims were Muslims and Hindus.  Did THEY deserve to be killed?  Which &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; &amp;quot;ordered&amp;quot; that??  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120366</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=120366"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T12:57:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderater on here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front page diatribe continues, today the complaint is about a poem that is said to be &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and the fact that it does not mention &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;prayer&amp;quot;.  Uh??  It is a beautiful poem that shows how sad the VT commumity is due to the tragedy ''We do not understand this tragedy We know we did nothing to deserve it'' - The words reflect the bewilderment of all humans at senseless killings.  Since the omniscient God knows everything including the past and the future, were they supposed to have said &amp;quot;Thank God&amp;quot; for &amp;quot;what Thou has brought?&amp;quot; ... Many, many students were shown praying - on TV, openly crying, grieving ... Yet, the diatribe here is about how &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; was missing in the poem.  Uh??? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119601</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119601"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T00:55:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderate here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; does not equal evangelist or christian or (fill-in-the-blanks), neither does &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; mean &amp;quot;one that wants to kill the unborn&amp;quot; or people who do not believe in God.  Milton Friedman, one of the greatest economists of the 20th Century may be called &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; by many, but I have heard him describe himself as &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; - and as he explained, &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; used to mean what many today called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot;.  But then again I have heard many of today's &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot; characterize conservatives as religious nuts which they are not. Yes, there is &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; evil (good) and &amp;quot;Conservative&amp;quot; evil (good)[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119582</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119582"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T00:48:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderate here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
: Not to many I am afraid.  Selective quotes and the spreading of paranoia is what drives many extremists and yes there is no difference between a &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; extremist and an &amp;quot;Islamic&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Hindu&amp;quot; extremist or a &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; extremist. They all think THEY know the answer and the way to the truth. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119576</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119576"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T00:45:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blasphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderate here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119575</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119575"/>
		<updated>2007-04-21T00:45:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the main page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so you're having a problem when a quotation from the Bible is posted everyday.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:06, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is this a Bible encyclopedia?  Or a Conservative Encyclopedia?  If Conservapedia, and Bible quotations are to be included, SAY SO.  Do not claim it is an &amp;quot;Encylopedia&amp;quot; and put Bible quotations on the front.  Unless, to you and a lot of others, being a Conservative means the Bible (and ofcourse the version the moderators are willing to accept and what they reject selectively or accept selectively) - Perhaps it would be a good idea to put quotes from the Bible about the blood thirsty almighty that is always seeking/asking put people to death - including for working on the sabbath and on and on.  Have I committed blashphemy and should I await thunder and lightning and all that?[[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just believe a truly reliable and unbiased encyclopedia would be more credible without this much propaganda on its main page.&lt;br /&gt;
Like Seekcommon said, if they posted quotations from the Koran or the Vedda's on the main page, every moderate here would call it propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119274</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=119274"/>
		<updated>2007-04-20T21:51:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the front page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  And why the rush to judgement about &amp;quot;anti christian&amp;quot; rant(s) or whatever that madman may have said/written?  Would Conservapedia have said anything if the rants were anti-(fill in the religion other than the christianity practiced by the moderators)?? I think not.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=118849</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=118849"/>
		<updated>2007-04-20T17:20:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the front page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did (as Middle Man has noted) and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=118846</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=118846"/>
		<updated>2007-04-20T17:20:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* What quotation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case and just maybe try to use reason and logic to analyse this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe something like this: (I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his &amp;quot;rich-kid&amp;quot; classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to &amp;quot;make the world pay&amp;quot;, like those kids from Columbine.&lt;br /&gt;
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;is&amp;quot;) a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against &amp;quot;America&amp;quot; and no evil brainwashing porn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the &amp;quot;liberals this and liberals that&amp;quot; crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==What quotation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't see any Bible quotations. What are you ranting about?--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:45, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Mr. Cho posed on the front page, they had a fresh bible quotation every day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, they did and THAT was what I was talking about, RANT if you choose to say I do.  So, is IT or is IT not propaganda for advancing the Bible?  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=115923</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Front Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Front_Page&amp;diff=115923"/>
		<updated>2007-04-19T01:47:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: New page: Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is &amp;quot;encylopedic&amp;quot;.  Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page.  Also, Bible quotations on the front page?  Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible?  Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=115918</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=115918"/>
		<updated>2007-04-19T01:45:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine gateway drugs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Front Page| Front Page - Encylopedia? Or Propaganda?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Did Jesus ever claim to be God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still preform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Porn or guns?|Does porn actually cause (not merely correlate to) violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115832</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115832"/>
		<updated>2007-04-19T00:25:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry ''&amp;quot;continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States&amp;quot;'' and it continues to say how ''&amp;quot;In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, &amp;quot;the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach.&amp;quot;'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It amazes me how much the media sings the tune for embryonic stem cells when zero has been accomplished. Probally has to do more with the Bush bashers (his veto), than any logical reason for promoting a big big maybe. John Kerry claims embryonic stem cells saved a little old mouse. Is that not the most pathetic augument ever--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 16:00, 17 April 2007 (EDT)?&lt;br /&gt;
:: Research in medicine is slow and the medications and treatments we enjoy today are the result of years of painstaking efforts by people all around the world.  When we examine history, we realize that there was horror at scientists/medical doctors interested in dissection of cadavers, experimentation on animals - certain religious groups do not believe anything other than their faith can cure all illl - and oppose all modern medical interventions.  There is slow progress being made on understanding how stem cells (adult and embryonic) can be programmed/taught to develop along particular lines for transplantation/therapy/ and yes, initial progress is usually demonstrated in small animals, particular mice.  So, NO, it is NOT a pathetic argument whatsoever, it indicates we are making progress.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::I heard ''PETA'' is one of the biggest organizations against animal testing.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 19:42, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yes, I have heard report of their atrocities also.  To many who belong to PETA/ human life is far less (or not important) than any/all animal life - they would take human life to protect animals, what I understand.  Despicable for sure. [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
Stem cell research is a vital part of a growing scientific and medic commune that hopes to eraticate such diseases as Alzheimers. The unfortunate thing is that FETAL stem cells are incapable of providing such results. However, ADULT stem cells have already cured 60 some odd diseases and cured parallysis in several test subjects. The thought of farming children like livestock is barbaric. To really just grow children for spare parts is inhumane. Besides, trials involving FETAL stem cells have had side effects similar to being jolted with lightning include spaztic convulsions that does not dissipate. Its harmful to both the humans who were involved in clinical trials and the humans they were harvested from. My responce does not come as a Republican, or a Bushie, but as a concerned citizen of Earth who feels more can be accomplished whithout sacrificing the next generation. P.S. Aztecs sacrificed children and we called them barbaric. [[User; Dfairlyxed13|Dairlyxed13]]&lt;br /&gt;
: It IS barbaric to &amp;quot;grow&amp;quot; children for spare parts, that is not the intention, as fas as I know, of the people who pursue embryonic stem cell research.  It is not true that ALL stem cells are equivalent, from what I understand.  While attempts are being made to reprogram stem cells from any source, the current state of the art/science seems to be that only embryonic stem cells seem capable of differentiating into any tissue/organs.  Again, from what I understand, the clamor is to be able to use cells which were going to be destroyed - or use cells that were discarded naturally - e.g. when there is a miscarriage ... again, my limited understanding.  Nature/God is far more &amp;quot;cruel&amp;quot; if you can say that when it comes to terminating pregnancies - it happens at far higher rates than deliberately induced abortions, again, what I gather.  Humans are always pushing the envelope - we are always seeking means to improve and yes, protect lives - starting with drugs to kill bacteria/viruses, to deliberate surgical interventions to transplantation and so on.  We should ALWAYS be careful in what we pursue, yet, where the lines we must NOT cross are not clear to all and hence the controversies.  I do not for a minute believe that the right to choose people are simply waiting to kill babies/unborns - OR that the right to life people are not sympathetic to the victim of rape or incest or unwanted pregnancies.  I just wish that each side would understand what it is that they seek and work towards the common goal of reducing living, human suffering and not add to the sufferings.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115830</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115830"/>
		<updated>2007-04-19T00:24:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry ''&amp;quot;continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States&amp;quot;'' and it continues to say how ''&amp;quot;In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, &amp;quot;the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach.&amp;quot;'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait to see how long this topic survives before I spend any time writing about this.  The clock is, again, ticking.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It amazes me how much the media sings the tune for embryonic stem cells when zero has been accomplished. Probally has to do more with the Bush bashers (his veto), than any logical reason for promoting a big big maybe. John Kerry claims embryonic stem cells saved a little old mouse. Is that not the most pathetic augument ever--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 16:00, 17 April 2007 (EDT)?&lt;br /&gt;
:: Research in medicine is slow and the medications and treatments we enjoy today are the result of years of painstaking efforts by people all around the world.  When we examine history, we realize that there was horror at scientists/medical doctors interested in dissection of cadavers, experimentation on animals - certain religious groups do not believe anything other than their faith can cure all illl - and oppose all modern medical interventions.  There is slow progress being made on understanding how stem cells (adult and embryonic) can be programmed/taught to develop along particular lines for transplantation/therapy/ and yes, initial progress is usually demonstrated in small animals, particular mice.  So, NO, it is NOT a pathetic argument whatsoever, it indicates we are making progress.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::I heard ''PETA'' is one of the biggest organizations against animal testing.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 19:42, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yes, I have heard report of their atrocities also.  To many who belong to PETA/ human life is far less (or not important) than any/all animal life - they would take human life to protect animals, what I understand.  Despicable for sure.&lt;br /&gt;
Stem cell research is a vital part of a growing scientific and medic commune that hopes to eraticate such diseases as Alzheimers. The unfortunate thing is that FETAL stem cells are incapable of providing such results. However, ADULT stem cells have already cured 60 some odd diseases and cured parallysis in several test subjects. The thought of farming children like livestock is barbaric. To really just grow children for spare parts is inhumane. Besides, trials involving FETAL stem cells have had side effects similar to being jolted with lightning include spaztic convulsions that does not dissipate. Its harmful to both the humans who were involved in clinical trials and the humans they were harvested from. My responce does not come as a Republican, or a Bushie, but as a concerned citizen of Earth who feels more can be accomplished whithout sacrificing the next generation. P.S. Aztecs sacrificed children and we called them barbaric. [[User; Dfairlyxed13|Dairlyxed13]]&lt;br /&gt;
: It IS barbaric to &amp;quot;grow&amp;quot; children for spare parts, that is not the intention, as fas as I know, of the people who pursue embryonic stem cell research.  It is not true that ALL stem cells are equivalent, from what I understand.  While attempts are being made to reprogram stem cells from any source, the current state of the art/science seems to be that only embryonic stem cells seem capable of differentiating into any tissue/organs.  Again, from what I understand, the clamor is to be able to use cells which were going to be destroyed - or use cells that were discarded naturally - e.g. when there is a miscarriage ... again, my limited understanding.  Nature/God is far more &amp;quot;cruel&amp;quot; if you can say that when it comes to terminating pregnancies - it happens at far higher rates than deliberately induced abortions, again, what I gather.  Humans are always pushing the envelope - we are always seeking means to improve and yes, protect lives - starting with drugs to kill bacteria/viruses, to deliberate surgical interventions to transplantation and so on.  We should ALWAYS be careful in what we pursue, yet, where the lines we must NOT cross are not clear to all and hence the controversies.  I do not for a minute believe that the right to choose people are simply waiting to kill babies/unborns - OR that the right to life people are not sympathetic to the victim of rape or incest or unwanted pregnancies.  I just wish that each side would understand what it is that they seek and work towards the common goal of reducing living, human suffering and not add to the sufferings.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115009</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=115009"/>
		<updated>2007-04-18T16:55:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry ''&amp;quot;continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States&amp;quot;'' and it continues to say how ''&amp;quot;In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, &amp;quot;the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach.&amp;quot;'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait to see how long this topic survives before I spend any time writing about this.  The clock is, again, ticking.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It amazes me how much the media sings the tune for embryonic stem cells when zero has been accomplished. Probally has to do more with the Bush bashers (his veto), than any logical reason for promoting a big big maybe. John Kerry claims embryonic stem cells saved a little old mouse. Is that not the most pathetic augument ever--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 16:00, 17 April 2007 (EDT)?&lt;br /&gt;
:: Research in medicine is slow and the medications and treatments we enjoy today are the result of years of painstaking efforts by people all around the world.  When we examine history, we realize that there was horror at scientists/medical doctors interested in dissection of cadavers, experimentation on animals - certain religious groups do not believe anything other than their faith can cure all illl - and oppose all modern medical interventions.  There is slow progress being made on understanding how stem cells (adult and embryonic) can be programmed/taught to develop along particular lines for transplantation/therapy/ and yes, initial progress is usually demonstrated in small animals, particular mice.  So, NO, it is NOT a pathetic argument whatsoever, it indicates we are making progress.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stem cell research is a vital part of a growing scientific and medic commune that hopes to eraticate such diseases as Alzheimers. The unfortunate thing is that FETAL stem cells are incapable of providing such results. However, ADULT stem cells have already cured 60 some odd diseases and cured parallysis in several test subjects. The thought of farming children like livestock is barbaric. To really just grow children for spare parts is inhumane. Besides, trials involving FETAL stem cells have had side effects similar to being jolted with lightning include spaztic convulsions that does not dissipate. Its harmful to both the humans who were involved in clinical trials and the humans they were harvested from. My responce does not come as a Republican, or a Bushie, but as a concerned citizen of Earth who feels more can be accomplished whithout sacrificing the next generation. P.S. Aztecs sacrificed children and we called them barbaric. [[User; Dfairlyxed13|Dairlyxed13]]&lt;br /&gt;
: It IS barbaric to &amp;quot;grow&amp;quot; children for spare parts, that is not the intention, as fas as I know, of the people who pursue embryonic stem cell research.  It is not true that ALL stem cells are equivalent, from what I understand.  While attempts are being made to reprogram stem cells from any source, the current state of the art/science seems to be that only embryonic stem cells seem capable of differentiating into any tissue/organs.  Again, from what I understand, the clamor is to be able to use cells which were going to be destroyed - or use cells that were discarded naturally - e.g. when there is a miscarriage ... again, my limited understanding.  Nature/God is far more &amp;quot;cruel&amp;quot; if you can say that when it comes to terminating pregnancies - it happens at far higher rates than deliberately induced abortions, again, what I gather.  Humans are always pushing the envelope - we are always seeking means to improve and yes, protect lives - starting with drugs to kill bacteria/viruses, to deliberate surgical interventions to transplantation and so on.  We should ALWAYS be careful in what we pursue, yet, where the lines we must NOT cross are not clear to all and hence the controversies.  I do not for a minute believe that the right to choose people are simply waiting to kill babies/unborns - OR that the right to life people are not sympathetic to the victim of rape or incest or unwanted pregnancies.  I just wish that each side would understand what it is that they seek and work towards the common goal of reducing living, human suffering and not add to the sufferings.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=114992</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=114992"/>
		<updated>2007-04-18T16:45:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Grave errors/inconsistencies in the Bible make literal translation worthless.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still preform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is religion morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Either God is indecisive or the world's major religions have ALL got it wrong]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Has Britain become the 51st State of the US?|Has Britian become the 51st State of the US?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:You think these Phd's are nuts?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Do violent video games play a role in people on the edge of sanity?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?|Is Relativity in direct conflict with the Genesis account?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do so many topical debates descend into embarassing personal attacks?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Are we living in a computer simulation?| Are we living in a computer simulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault?|Was the shooting at Virginia Tech somehow President Bush's fault? (kind of like he caused hurricane Katrina)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Are video games getting better or worse as graphics, sound, and gameplay complexity improve?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=114672</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=114672"/>
		<updated>2007-04-18T12:54:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry ''&amp;quot;continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States&amp;quot;'' and it continues to say how ''&amp;quot;In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, &amp;quot;the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach.&amp;quot;'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait to see how long this topic survives before I spend any time writing about this.  The clock is, again, ticking.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It amazes me how much the media sings the tune for embryonic stem cells when zero has been accomplished. Probally has to do more with the Bush bashers (his veto), than any logical reason for promoting a big big maybe. John Kerry claims embryonic stem cells saved a little old mouse. Is that not the most pathetic augument ever--[[User:Jpatt|jp]] 16:00, 17 April 2007 (EDT)?&lt;br /&gt;
:: Research in medicine is slow and the medications and treatments we enjoy today are the result of years of painstaking efforts by people all around the world.  When we examine history, we realize that there was horror at scientists/medical doctors interested in dissection of cadavers, experimentation on animals - certain religious groups do not believe anything other than their faith can cure all illl - and oppose all modern medical interventions.  There is slow progress being made on understanding how stem cells (adult and embryonic) can be programmed/taught to develop along particular lines for transplantation/therapy/ and yes, initial progress is usually demonstrated in small animals, particular mice.  So, NO, it is NOT a pathetic argument whatsoever, it indicates we are making progress.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110273</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110273"/>
		<updated>2007-04-16T04:31:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not '''''(how long will this topic last??)''''']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still preform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is atheism morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110271</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110271"/>
		<updated>2007-04-16T04:30:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not ''(how long will this topic last??)'''''Bold text''']]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still preform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is atheism morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110269</id>
		<title>Conservapedia:Debate Topics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Debate_Topics&amp;diff=110269"/>
		<updated>2007-04-16T04:30:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: /* Philosophical debates */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Debate topic suggestions, organized so that it's not necessary to delete them.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note: If some topic is miscategorized, it can be cut and pasted without affecting the relevant links.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philosophical debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?|If there is no objective truth, then is the claim &amp;quot;there is no objective truth&amp;quot; also not an objective truth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does History Matter?|Does History Matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?|Is a first cause of a process necessary, always possible, or sometimes impossible?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?|Can Objectivism develop beyond Ayn Rand's original formulation?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can any man live without some code of morality?|Can any man live without some code of morality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?|Does the universe include everything, or does something outside the universe exist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?|Is it easier to ask for permission, or for forgiveness?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is there something rather than nothing?|Why is there something rather than nothing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Stem Cells| Stem Cells: Why or why not (how long will this topic last??]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious debates==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: 'το πνευμα ἁγιον'; how would you translate it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was Jesus born in the right time and place?| Was Jesus born in the right time and place?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?|If God does not exist, can anything be morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?|Were the Puritans right to banish (expel) people for religious reasons?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?|Is the Bible a reliable source of history against which one may check all other sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?|Is it wrong to have a Christmas tree?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Did God create evil?|Did God create evil?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?|Is it possible to be both Jewish and Christian at the same time?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Pope the Antichrist?|Is the Pope the Antichrist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?|Which Christian denomination is the most true to the central teachings of Christianity?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?|If Jesus were alive to day, where on the political spectrum would he fall?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?|Is religion relevant in todays society? / Should Religion Play a Large Role in Modern Societies?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus|Corinthians 11:14 and the traditional image of Jesus]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible (Old and the New Testament) have the infallible words of God?|Bible (New and Old Testament) Words of God]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: AntiSemitism|AntiSemitism]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Does Intelligent Design deny the Existence of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?|Could God create a rock so heavy that he himself could not lift it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?|If there were no religion, would we find another reason to kill each other?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Natural Disaster versus Act of God|Natural Disaster versus Act of God]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What is the Sabbath day?|What is the Sabbath day?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?|Is it possible to be a conservative and not a religious person or even an atheist?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Debate:Why do we still preform Baptisms?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_the_Resurrection_negate_Gods_Sacrifice_of_his_only_son%3F|Does the Resurrection negate Gods Sacrifice of his only son?|Does the Resurrection negate God's Sacrifice of his only son?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Muslims_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Christians%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Muslims learned their religion from their parents, just like us Christians, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If_most_Christians_learned_their_religion_from_their_parents%2C_just_like_us_Muslims%2C_they_will_probably_be_hard_to_convert._So_what_can_we_do_to_save_their_souls%3F|If most Christians learned their religion from their parents, just like us Muslims, they will probably be hard to convert. So what can we do to save their souls?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_mainstream_Islam_endorse_violence%3F|Does mainstream Islam endorse violence?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?|Does the Conservapedia entry for &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; need revision to clarify that The Jews reject Jesus as the Messiah of God and His Gospel and Church?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible|On the issue of Jews/Jesus/Bible...]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is religion morally wrong?|Is atheism morally wrong?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?|Does the Bible display poor ethics and morals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#[[Conservapedia:Why the Bible|What makes the Bible a reliable source of knowledge besides tradition?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why should we be afraid of God?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do conservative Christians have an unquestioning faith which is comparable to that of the Party in the book 1984?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Antisemitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are Christianity and the Bible superior to other religions and scriptures?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is &amp;quot;Coercive Interrogation&amp;quot; consistent with Christian Values?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the European Union pose a threat to the United States?| Does the European Union pose a threat to United States Security?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Define torture]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War I?|Should the United States have entered World War I?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have entered World War II?|Should the United States have entered World War II?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea|Should the United States have eliminated communism in North Korea as General Douglas MacArthur wanted?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Did racism play a role in the decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?|Was the United States right to drop atomic bombs so quickly on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?|If President Roosevelt had known about the Pearl Harbor attack in advance, would it have been wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?|Is gun-control the answer to crimes involving guns?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was world war inevitable?|Was world war inevitable?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth rather than simply redistribute it?|Does &amp;quot;free trade&amp;quot; increase wealth or simply redistribute it?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?|Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?]] &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is democracy even possible in Iraq?|Is democracy even possible in Iraq?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?|Should President Jimmy Carter (at the urging of Henry Kissinger) have allowed the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States in 1979 to receive medical treatment, over the objections of the Iranian people?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?|Should we have given the Panama Canal back to Panama?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are regulations by the government to keep private businesses in check necessary?|Should government allow an unchecked economy, or are regulations necessary in private business?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States leave the United Nations?|Should the United States leave the United Nations?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Crusades... Good or Bad?|Crusades... Good or Bad?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?|Was American soldier Michael New right to refuse to fight wearing part of a United Nations uniform?]]  See [[Michael New]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or communism?|Which is a more powerful ideology, Islam or Communism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?|Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?|Should public displays of the 10 Commandments be allowed under the constitution?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?|Does the high abortion rate among African Americans explain the quadruple extreme premature birth risk among the same population?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the third crusade successful?|Was the third crusade successful?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?|Which has the best philosophy of education: the public school system, private schools, or the home school movement?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?|Should people genetically engineer a cure for homosexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?|Should Bush pardon Scooter Libby?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?|Should the USA and other industrialized nations resume the building of nuclear power plants, an activity that is now effectively suspended?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?|Should We Support Democrats For Life.org?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[conservapedia:Women in the Military?|Women in the Military?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Should students learn a foreign language?|Should students learn a foreign language?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?|Why does the right side of the political spectrum tend to be more religous?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?|Is Rush Limbaugh in touch with reality, or just an uneducated opinionated conservative mouthpiece ?]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should there be a consistent standard on human rights applied to left and right?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?|Should American companies be allowed to send their own troops into a war which America is participating in?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.|Giuliani's lack of social conservative viewpoints should not stop you from voting for him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Keep Richard Around?|Should Richard Stay?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_President_Bush_good_for_America?|Is President Bush good for America?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_Iraq_War_a_success%3F|Is the Iraq War a success?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does_single_sex_schooling_promotes_homesexuality%3F|Does Single sex schooling promotes homesexuality?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is_the_murder_of_3%2C000_people_just_a_few_or_is_it_a_lot%3F_Does_it_make_a_difference_if_the_murdered_people_are_Americans%3F|Is the murder of 3,000 people just a few or is it a lot? Does it make a difference if the murdered people are Americans?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does the media really have a liberal bias?|Does the media really have a liberal bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Two sides to a coin. The liberals use of Swift Boat]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Who was the last Democrat to quit due to ethics and what year was it? Is it fair for Republicans to due the same?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[What kind of leader will Democrats make if they run from debates on Fox?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scientific debates==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?|Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that homosexuality is bad for the survival of a species?]]  &lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?|Is Darwinian natural selection compatible with Marxism?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is the theory of macroevolution true?|Is the theory of macroevolution true?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia: Is Giving Birth the Bible Way Better?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?|Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?|Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?|If the universe is young and it takes light millions of years to reach us from far off stars, how can we see them?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:God, Earth and Global Warming|God, Earth and Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Why is the evidence in favor of evolution so darn convincing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?|If the Bible didn't contain a creation story, would anyone even consider the idea of a young earth?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debates about Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?|Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?|Should the term list entries be included in Conservapedia's entry count?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?|How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Can Conservapedia Succeed?|Can Conservapedia Succeed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?|Is Conservapedia fair and balanced?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?|How can we protect Conservapedia by distinguishing real conservative encyclopedia articles from satires written by liberals?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?|Do hardly any entries on conservapedia cite sources?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format|A poll requested by Aschlafly regarding the new color format]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:What exactly is Conservapedia?|What exactly is Conservapedia?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia_Discussions#Quality_of_References|Quality of References]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Was the media attention needed?|Was the media attention needed?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?|Is NPOV and wiki culture an example of a postmodern culture?]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Conservapedia:Major bias in conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia Debate Topics full of far left liberal netroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Which is true; progressive Liberal or regressive liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Communists at Conservapedia|Should known communists be banned from editing at Conservapedia??]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Where do you personally look for facts and information on topics &amp;quot;When did Brahms live&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Why did Monet paint grainstacks?&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:On whether certain articles on human anatomy should be pre-emptively blanked and protected]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Who deletes entire discussion items from here?  And why?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do users, who contribute substantially, choose to leave this community?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Why do the creators of conservapeida see wikipedia as un-American?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Should I remove the gross Spanish profanity passing itself off as translations in several articles?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Is the use of copyrighted photographs without permission stealing?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Funny, maybe?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Are cats just useless Dogs|Are cats just useless dogs?]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?|Is the Platypus evidence that God has a sense of humour?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feel free to add additional debate topics.==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To add a topic, edit this page, and enter a '#' followed by the topic title in double square brackets. Use a '|' to separate the link from the title.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;For example:&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
which will look like this:&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Conservapedia:Fork or Spoon|Should chunky stew be eaten with a fork or a spoon?]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then you can click the link, and create the page when it isn't found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia Debates| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=110268</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=110268"/>
		<updated>2007-04-16T04:30:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry ''&amp;quot;continues to insist on unsuccessful embryonic stem cell research in the United States&amp;quot;'' and it continues to say how ''&amp;quot;In the case of a recently successful adult stem cell project for diabetics, &amp;quot;the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach.&amp;quot;'' Nonsense.  I am not a researcher in that area, but know enough to understand that scientists go where the data leads them.  If adult stem cells will work like other stem cells, people will try them and such efforts continue.  It is utter nonsense to say that doctors in the US are not interested in that approach - perhaps they know a few things the author(s) do not know.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll wait to see how long this topic survives before I spend any time writing about this.  The clock is, again, ticking.  [[User:Seekcommon]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=110264</id>
		<title>Essay:Stem Cells</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Stem_Cells&amp;diff=110264"/>
		<updated>2007-04-16T04:25:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seekcommon: New page: I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry is determined to see that such news ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I noticed on the main page the news item about adult stem cells and the byline indicating how (in the opinion of the author(s)) the &amp;quot;abortion&amp;quot; industry is determined to see that such news is not prominently spread.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Seekcommon</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>