<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Scorpio</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Scorpio"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Scorpio"/>
	<updated>2026-11-10T04:17:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher&amp;diff=1609886</id>
		<title>Kosher</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher&amp;diff=1609886"/>
		<updated>2020-01-02T00:14:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Kosher must be &amp;quot;inspected&amp;quot; by a Rabbi but not &amp;quot;blessed; also the Jewish organization charges a fee for using their logo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kashrut advertizement.jpg|thumb|right|300px|As illustrated by this advertisement for a New York delicatessen, the observance of kosher transforms food into a vehicle for holiness, making the kitchen the spiritual hub of the home. Through observance, every activity associated with food becomes an opportunity for spiritual refinement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Y2K&amp;quot; (2002) [http://www.ok.org/Content.asp?ID=22 Committee For The Advancement of Torah]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kosher''' is the [[English|Anglicized]] form of the [[Hebrew]] term ''kasher'', which literally means &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;proper,&amp;quot; but came to indicate an item &amp;quot;fit for ritual use.&amp;quot; '''Kashrut''' thus means &amp;quot;fitness&amp;quot; for ritual use.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Kosher Terminology&amp;quot; [http://www.religionfacts.com/judaism/practices/kosher.htm Keeping Kosher: Jewish Dietary Laws]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Hebrew word for non-kosher is ''trayf'', derived from the word ''terayfa'', &amp;quot;torn&amp;quot;, stemming from the commandment not to eat meat that has been &amp;quot;torn&amp;quot; by other animals.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;k&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Any style of food may be kosher or non-kosher, from [[China|Chinese]] to [[Mexico|Mexican]] to [[Jewish]] food. Similarly, traditional Ashkenazic Jewish foods like knishes, bagels, blintzes, and matzah ball soup can all be non-kosher if not prepared in accordance with Jewish law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Kashrut: Jewish Dietary Laws&amp;quot; [http://kosherfood.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&amp;amp;sdn=kosherfood&amp;amp;cdn=food&amp;amp;tm=18&amp;amp;gps=180_189_1436_754&amp;amp;f=10&amp;amp;tt=14&amp;amp;bt=1&amp;amp;bts=0&amp;amp;zu=http%3A//www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm Judaism 101]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Jewish Dietary Laws originated in the [[Bible]] (Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 17), they have been codified and interpreted over the centuries by [[rabbi]]nical authorities, and the definitions of kosher have evolved in response to changes in the food industry, the Jewish people, and world culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shimoni, Giora &amp;quot;What is Kosher Food?&amp;quot; [http://kosherfood.about.com/od/whatiskosherfood/f/kosherfood.htm About.com: Kosher Food]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rules of Kashrut==&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a rough outline of the rules of kashrut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# A land animal may be eaten if it chews its cud and has split hooves.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Animals&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals which live in the water must have fins and scales.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Blood is forbidden even from kosher animals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Blood&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The sciatic nerve and its adjoining blood vessels may not be eaten.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Fats&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Insects are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.skskosher.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=22&amp;amp;Itemid=32&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Rodents, reptiles, and amphibians, are all forbidden.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Vegetables and fruits must be checked for insects.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Fruits&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Milk and meat and or poultry derived foods must not be mixed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Separation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals must be killed in a specific way by a shohet (the exception being fish).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Shechitah&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Separate silverware must be used for fleshig (meat and poultry) and milchig (milk) foods.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Utensils (pots, pans, plates, flatware, etc., etc.) must also be kosher. A utensil picks up the kosher &amp;quot;status&amp;quot; (meat, dairy, pareve, or treif) of the food that is cooked in it or eaten off of it, and transmits that status back to the next food that is cooked in it or eaten off of it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Utensils&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Most Jews who keep Kosher wait 3 to 6 hours after eating fleshig to eat milchig though the reverse is not true.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Others wait other amounts of time. &lt;br /&gt;
# Fish, eggs, fruits, vegetables and grains can be eaten with either meat/poultry or dairy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Rules&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Amongst poultry, birds of prey are considered treyf.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wine is not kosher if it has been touched by a non-Jews unless the wine has previously been boiled. This is due to the concern that the wine might be used for idolatrous purposes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.skskosher.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=64&amp;amp;Itemid=32&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.star-k.org/kashrus/kk-thirst-wine.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# When, after the ritual slaughtering, an animal, apparently sound during its life, is found to have been diseased, its milk, or cheese made of its milk, is forbidden as food.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Dietary Laws&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The ancient Israelites looked with horror upon the custom prevalent among the surrounding nations of cutting off a limb or a piece of flesh from a living animal and eating it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Such limbs had to be thrown away.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Water that was left uncovered overnight was not permitted as drink in olden times, because of the apprehension that a serpent might have left its venom in it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Where serpents are not found this prohibition does not exist.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Misconceptions about Kosher==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jewish people who do not keep kosher often complain that keeping kosher is difficult.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Difficult&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Actually, keeping kosher is not particularly difficult in and of itself; what makes it difficult to keep kosher is the fact that the rest of the world does not do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In fact, the basic underlying rules are fairly simple.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; If you buy only kosher certified products at the market, the only thing you need to think about is the separation of meat and dairy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Keeping kosher only becomes difficult when you try to eat in a non-kosher restaurant, or at the home of a person who does not keep kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In those situations, your lack of knowledge about your host's ingredients and food preparation techniques make it very difficult to keep kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some commentators have pointed out, however, that this may well have been part of what God had in mind: to make it more difficult for us to socialize with those who do not share our religion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Products that have been certified as kosher are labeled with a mark called a hekhsher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Certification&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Approximately 3/4 of all prepackaged foods have some kind of kosher certification, and most major brands have reliable Orthodox certification.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The total number of certified kosher packaged food products in the United States has reached close to 100,000.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The most controversial certification is the K, a plain letter K found on products asserted to be kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A letter of the alphabet cannot be trademarked, so any manufacturer can put a K on a product, even without any supervision at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; For example, Jell-O brand gelatin puts a K on its product, even though every reliable Orthodox authority agrees that Jell-O is not kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another misconception about Kosher is that a rabbi is required to bless food, which is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.crcweb.org/kosher/industry/whatkosher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the Jewish organizations that allow a food manufacturer to use their logos, do in fact have Rabbi's that periodically inspect the production facility. The Jewish organizations that lease their logo get paid by the food manufacturer a small fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The reason why Kosher exists==&lt;br /&gt;
According to AskMoses, a traditional Jewish website, &amp;quot;keeping kosher is the &lt;br /&gt;
means of finding God in your food.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM&amp;gt;http://www.askmoses.com/article/553,157/Why-keep-kosher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With Shabbat, we can spiritualize time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With the Shul(synagogue), we can spiritualize place.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With [[Phylactery|Tefillin]], we can spiritualize leather.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And with kosher, we can spiritualize breakfast/lunch/dinner/snacks.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his classic book Think Jewish, Rabbi Zalman Posner eloquently elaborates the above point: most secular, Westernized Jews think in secular, Westernized terms.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt; This results in the notion that spirituality is restricted to certain times, or certain places, or certain rituals, and that “real life” exists separately, outside spirituality.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But according to Judaism, spirituality is all times, and all places. Even when you eat.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Who buys Kosher certified products==&lt;br /&gt;
$50 billion per year is spent on kosher foods by various different groups.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.crcweb.org/kosher/industry/crcedge.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jews seeking to meet their religious obligations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Muslims who keep the [[Halal]] dietary laws &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Consumers insisting on a high-quality, safe and healthy product &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Lactose intolerant customers purchasing non-dairy (Pareve) Kosher products &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. [[Vegans]] and [[vegetarians]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Kashrut in the New Testament==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is sufficient Scriptual evidence that in the New Testament Kashrut is abolished, or, at least, demoted from being a Divine imperative. This is primarily founded in the saying of Christ, &amp;quot;It is not what goes into a man that defiles but what goes out of a man that defiles him, for from the heart...&amp;quot; This is followed by either the words of the Gospel of Mark or slightly later gloss but representing the original apostolic understanding, &amp;quot;thus making all foods clean.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This understanding underpinned the new reality which the Church would not lose - from now on, the gentiles were grafted into the blessings of Abraham and in the Messiah were now one with the people of God, the Jewish believers in Jesus, and eat at the same table, partaking of the same food, and one with them in the most intimate and commonplace of all their activities - sharing around the dinner table. The common Eucharist, the Holy communion for all races of believers grew out of this understanding, and remained open to all, even, subsequent to New Testament times, after the actual meal portion dropped away. In the letter to the Galatians, Peter was taken to task by Paul for having violated this truth by absenting himself from the table attended by the gentiles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acts chapter 15 shows the ability to adapt to new situations and how the spirit of Jesus was applied with kindness, firmness,  and understanding in the changing new situation of gentiles coming into the Church. The Old no longer had effect on the ingathering of the gentiles and they were free from the law of Moses. But they were not to eat meat with blood in it, a key element of Kashrut, for doing so was offensive to the Jews amongst them. &amp;quot;for Moses is read everywhere.&amp;quot;  - For the sake of peace. The unity of the Body of Christ was not to be violated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: It may be that the prohibition against eating the blood came about from an understanding that the Divine intent in the original prohibition of the Old Testament was given as a pointer to the future sacrifice of the Son of God and the shedding of His blood. But this is not explicitly brought out in Acts 15. The rational in the original prohibition in the Old Testament reads, &amp;quot;For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for the soul, for it is the blood which makes atonement for the soul.&amp;quot; Lev. 17:11&lt;br /&gt;
Yet, the symbolic import of this interpretation is not foreign to Biblical interpretation, as the basis for not eating the portion containing the sciatic nerve is found in Scripture itself in the remembrance fostered by this restraint, of Jacob's struggle with the divine being and the subsequent wounding he received on the back of his thigh. One of the symptoms of sciatica is pain in the back portion of the thigh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Use in popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''kosher'' has entered the popular culture to describe anything or anyone which is considered legitimate, honest or pleasing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Binyomen Forst, ''The Laws of Kashrus'', Mozniam, 1999&lt;br /&gt;
*Isidore Grunfeld, ''The Jewish Dietary Laws'', London: Soncino, 1972&lt;br /&gt;
*Isaac Klein, ''A Guide to Jewish Religious Practice'', JTSA, 1992&lt;br /&gt;
*James M. Lebeau, ''The Jewish Dietary Laws: [[Holy|Sanctify]] Life'',  United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, New York, 1983&lt;br /&gt;
*Yacov Lipschutz, ''Kashruth: A Comprehensive Background and Reference Guide to the Principles of Kahruth''. New York:Mesorah Publications Ltd, 1989&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dietary practices of atheists]] (Dietary habits of various irreligious regions)&lt;br /&gt;
{{RL}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
===Resources on keeping kosher===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.OUKosher.org Online resource for keeping Kosher and becoming Kosher certified - The Orthodox Union]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kashrut.org Questions and Answers about specific food products and kashrut in general]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kosherrecipe.org/keepkosher Guide to keeping kosher and Kosher Recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=113424 Guide to keeping kosher]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hanefesh.com/edu/kosher_Food_Symbols.htm International Kosher Symbols and Kosher Food Guidance]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kof-k.org/ Kosher Certification]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[http://www.star-k.com/ The Star K's website]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[http://www.ok.org/ The O-K's website]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm A useful guide to the issues of kashrus]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ritual slaughter===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=222239 About Shechita: The Method of Animal Slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/041203/peta.shtml Controversy over recent PETA complaint]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.grandin.com/ritual/kosher.slaugh.html Studies on pain during slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://learn.jtsa.edu/topics/luminaries/monograph/forum_ar.shtml Conservative Judaism viewpoints on which methods should be considered kosher] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2977086.stm Proposed British ban on kosher and halal meat]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.viva.org.uk/campaigns/ritual_slaughter/ Campaign against all ritual slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Miscellaneous===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://kosherfood.about.com About Kosher Food: Menus and Recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kosher.com/Index.cfm Kosher.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=93784 Traditional Kosher foods recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20030424111703/schwartz.enviroweb.org/view-torah.html The Torah and vegetarianism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.encyclopaediajudaica.com/AboutTheEncyclopaedia/SampleContent/DietaryLaws Second Jewish Encyclopaedia's excerpt on kashrut and Jewish dietary laws]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kashrut.com/agencies/ Kashrut certification agencies (partial list)] from around the world, and their symbols which are found on all food that has been deemed kosher.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Old Testament]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Food and Drink]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher&amp;diff=1609880</id>
		<title>Kosher</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kosher&amp;diff=1609880"/>
		<updated>2020-01-02T00:05:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Kosher must be &amp;quot;inspected&amp;quot; by a Rabbi but not &amp;quot;blessed; also the Jewish organization charges a fee for using their logo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Kashrut advertizement.jpg|thumb|right|300px|As illustrated by this advertisement for a New York delicatessen, the observance of kosher transforms food into a vehicle for holiness, making the kitchen the spiritual hub of the home. Through observance, every activity associated with food becomes an opportunity for spiritual refinement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Y2K&amp;quot; (2002) [http://www.ok.org/Content.asp?ID=22 Committee For The Advancement of Torah]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kosher''' is the [[English|Anglicized]] form of the [[Hebrew]] term ''kasher'', which literally means &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;proper,&amp;quot; but came to indicate an item &amp;quot;fit for ritual use.&amp;quot; '''Kashrut''' thus means &amp;quot;fitness&amp;quot; for ritual use.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Kosher Terminology&amp;quot; [http://www.religionfacts.com/judaism/practices/kosher.htm Keeping Kosher: Jewish Dietary Laws]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Hebrew word for non-kosher is ''trayf'', derived from the word ''terayfa'', &amp;quot;torn&amp;quot;, stemming from the commandment not to eat meat that has been &amp;quot;torn&amp;quot; by other animals.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;k&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Any style of food may be kosher or non-kosher, from [[China|Chinese]] to [[Mexico|Mexican]] to [[Jewish]] food. Similarly, traditional Ashkenazic Jewish foods like knishes, bagels, blintzes, and matzah ball soup can all be non-kosher if not prepared in accordance with Jewish law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Kashrut: Jewish Dietary Laws&amp;quot; [http://kosherfood.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&amp;amp;sdn=kosherfood&amp;amp;cdn=food&amp;amp;tm=18&amp;amp;gps=180_189_1436_754&amp;amp;f=10&amp;amp;tt=14&amp;amp;bt=1&amp;amp;bts=0&amp;amp;zu=http%3A//www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm Judaism 101]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Jewish Dietary Laws originated in the [[Bible]] (Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 17), they have been codified and interpreted over the centuries by [[rabbi]]nical authorities, and the definitions of kosher have evolved in response to changes in the food industry, the Jewish people, and world culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shimoni, Giora &amp;quot;What is Kosher Food?&amp;quot; [http://kosherfood.about.com/od/whatiskosherfood/f/kosherfood.htm About.com: Kosher Food]. Retrieved 23 July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rules of Kashrut==&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a rough outline of the rules of kashrut.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# A land animal may be eaten if it chews its cud and has split hooves.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Animals&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals which live in the water must have fins and scales.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Blood is forbidden even from kosher animals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Blood&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The sciatic nerve and its adjoining blood vessels may not be eaten.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Fats&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Insects are forbidden.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.skskosher.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=22&amp;amp;Itemid=32&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Rodents, reptiles, and amphibians, are all forbidden.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Vegetables and fruits must be checked for insects.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Fruits&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bug2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Milk and meat and or poultry derived foods must not be mixed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Separation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Animals must be killed in a specific way by a shohet (the exception being fish).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Shechitah&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Separate silverware must be used for fleshig (meat and poultry) and milchig (milk) foods.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Utensils (pots, pans, plates, flatware, etc., etc.) must also be kosher. A utensil picks up the kosher &amp;quot;status&amp;quot; (meat, dairy, pareve, or treif) of the food that is cooked in it or eaten off of it, and transmits that status back to the next food that is cooked in it or eaten off of it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Utensils&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Most Jews who keep Kosher wait 3 to 6 hours after eating fleshig to eat milchig though the reverse is not true.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;s&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Others wait other amounts of time. &lt;br /&gt;
# Fish, eggs, fruits, vegetables and grains can be eaten with either meat/poultry or dairy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Rules&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Amongst poultry, birds of prey are considered treyf.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;an&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Wine is not kosher if it has been touched by a non-Jews unless the wine has previously been boiled. This is due to the concern that the wine might be used for idolatrous purposes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.skskosher.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=64&amp;amp;Itemid=32&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.star-k.org/kashrus/kk-thirst-wine.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# When, after the ritual slaughtering, an animal, apparently sound during its life, is found to have been diseased, its milk, or cheese made of its milk, is forbidden as food.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Jewish Encyclopedia's article on Dietary Laws&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# The ancient Israelites looked with horror upon the custom prevalent among the surrounding nations of cutting off a limb or a piece of flesh from a living animal and eating it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Such limbs had to be thrown away.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Water that was left uncovered overnight was not permitted as drink in olden times, because of the apprehension that a serpent might have left its venom in it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Where serpents are not found this prohibition does not exist.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JE&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Misconceptions about Kosher==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jewish people who do not keep kosher often complain that keeping kosher is difficult.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Difficult&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Actually, keeping kosher is not particularly difficult in and of itself; what makes it difficult to keep kosher is the fact that the rest of the world does not do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In fact, the basic underlying rules are fairly simple.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; If you buy only kosher certified products at the market, the only thing you need to think about is the separation of meat and dairy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Keeping kosher only becomes difficult when you try to eat in a non-kosher restaurant, or at the home of a person who does not keep kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In those situations, your lack of knowledge about your host's ingredients and food preparation techniques make it very difficult to keep kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Some commentators have pointed out, however, that this may well have been part of what God had in mind: to make it more difficult for us to socialize with those who do not share our religion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;difficult&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Products that have been certified as kosher are labeled with a mark called a hekhsher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm#Certification&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Approximately 3/4 of all prepackaged foods have some kind of kosher certification, and most major brands have reliable Orthodox certification.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The total number of certified kosher packaged food products in the United States has reached close to 100,000.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The most controversial certification is the K, a plain letter K found on products asserted to be kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; A letter of the alphabet cannot be trademarked, so any manufacturer can put a K on a product, even without any supervision at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; For example, Jell-O brand gelatin puts a K on its product, even though every reliable Orthodox authority agrees that Jell-O is not kosher.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;certify&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another misconception about Kosher is that a rabbi is required to bless food, which is false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.crcweb.org/kosher/industry/whatkosher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the Jewish organizations that allow a food manufacturer to use their logos, do in fact have Rabbi's that periodically inspect the production facility. The Jewish organizations that that lease their logo get paid by the food manufacturer a small fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The reason why Kosher exists==&lt;br /&gt;
According to AskMoses, a traditional Jewish website, &amp;quot;keeping kosher is the &lt;br /&gt;
means of finding God in your food.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM&amp;gt;http://www.askmoses.com/article/553,157/Why-keep-kosher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With Shabbat, we can spiritualize time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With the Shul(synagogue), we can spiritualize place.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;With [[Phylactery|Tefillin]], we can spiritualize leather.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And with kosher, we can spiritualize breakfast/lunch/dinner/snacks.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his classic book Think Jewish, Rabbi Zalman Posner eloquently elaborates the above point: most secular, Westernized Jews think in secular, Westernized terms.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt; This results in the notion that spirituality is restricted to certain times, or certain places, or certain rituals, and that “real life” exists separately, outside spirituality.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But according to Judaism, spirituality is all times, and all places. Even when you eat.&amp;lt;ref name=AM/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Who buys Kosher certified products==&lt;br /&gt;
$50 billion per year is spent on kosher foods by various different groups.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.crcweb.org/kosher/industry/crcedge.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Jews seeking to meet their religious obligations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Muslims who keep the [[Halal]] dietary laws &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Consumers insisting on a high-quality, safe and healthy product &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Lactose intolerant customers purchasing non-dairy (Pareve) Kosher products &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. [[Vegans]] and [[vegetarians]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;crc&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Kashrut in the New Testament==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is sufficient Scriptual evidence that in the New Testament Kashrut is abolished, or, at least, demoted from being a Divine imperative. This is primarily founded in the saying of Christ, &amp;quot;It is not what goes into a man that defiles but what goes out of a man that defiles him, for from the heart...&amp;quot; This is followed by either the words of the Gospel of Mark or slightly later gloss but representing the original apostolic understanding, &amp;quot;thus making all foods clean.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This understanding underpinned the new reality which the Church would not lose - from now on, the gentiles were grafted into the blessings of Abraham and in the Messiah were now one with the people of God, the Jewish believers in Jesus, and eat at the same table, partaking of the same food, and one with them in the most intimate and commonplace of all their activities - sharing around the dinner table. The common Eucharist, the Holy communion for all races of believers grew out of this understanding, and remained open to all, even, subsequent to New Testament times, after the actual meal portion dropped away. In the letter to the Galatians, Peter was taken to task by Paul for having violated this truth by absenting himself from the table attended by the gentiles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acts chapter 15 shows the ability to adapt to new situations and how the spirit of Jesus was applied with kindness, firmness,  and understanding in the changing new situation of gentiles coming into the Church. The Old no longer had effect on the ingathering of the gentiles and they were free from the law of Moses. But they were not to eat meat with blood in it, a key element of Kashrut, for doing so was offensive to the Jews amongst them. &amp;quot;for Moses is read everywhere.&amp;quot;  - For the sake of peace. The unity of the Body of Christ was not to be violated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: It may be that the prohibition against eating the blood came about from an understanding that the Divine intent in the original prohibition of the Old Testament was given as a pointer to the future sacrifice of the Son of God and the shedding of His blood. But this is not explicitly brought out in Acts 15. The rational in the original prohibition in the Old Testament reads, &amp;quot;For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for the soul, for it is the blood which makes atonement for the soul.&amp;quot; Lev. 17:11&lt;br /&gt;
Yet, the symbolic import of this interpretation is not foreign to Biblical interpretation, as the basis for not eating the portion containing the sciatic nerve is found in Scripture itself in the remembrance fostered by this restraint, of Jacob's struggle with the divine being and the subsequent wounding he received on the back of his thigh. One of the symptoms of sciatica is pain in the back portion of the thigh.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Use in popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''kosher'' has entered the popular culture to describe anything or anyone which is considered legitimate, honest or pleasing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;references-small&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Binyomen Forst, ''The Laws of Kashrus'', Mozniam, 1999&lt;br /&gt;
*Isidore Grunfeld, ''The Jewish Dietary Laws'', London: Soncino, 1972&lt;br /&gt;
*Isaac Klein, ''A Guide to Jewish Religious Practice'', JTSA, 1992&lt;br /&gt;
*James M. Lebeau, ''The Jewish Dietary Laws: [[Holy|Sanctify]] Life'',  United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, New York, 1983&lt;br /&gt;
*Yacov Lipschutz, ''Kashruth: A Comprehensive Background and Reference Guide to the Principles of Kahruth''. New York:Mesorah Publications Ltd, 1989&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dietary practices of atheists]] (Dietary habits of various irreligious regions)&lt;br /&gt;
{{RL}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
===Resources on keeping kosher===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.OUKosher.org Online resource for keeping Kosher and becoming Kosher certified - The Orthodox Union]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kashrut.org Questions and Answers about specific food products and kashrut in general]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kosherrecipe.org/keepkosher Guide to keeping kosher and Kosher Recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=113424 Guide to keeping kosher]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.hanefesh.com/edu/kosher_Food_Symbols.htm International Kosher Symbols and Kosher Food Guidance]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kof-k.org/ Kosher Certification]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[http://www.star-k.com/ The Star K's website]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[http://www.ok.org/ The O-K's website]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jewfaq.org/kashrut.htm A useful guide to the issues of kashrus]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ritual slaughter===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=222239 About Shechita: The Method of Animal Slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/041203/peta.shtml Controversy over recent PETA complaint]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.grandin.com/ritual/kosher.slaugh.html Studies on pain during slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://learn.jtsa.edu/topics/luminaries/monograph/forum_ar.shtml Conservative Judaism viewpoints on which methods should be considered kosher] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2977086.stm Proposed British ban on kosher and halal meat]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.viva.org.uk/campaigns/ritual_slaughter/ Campaign against all ritual slaughter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Miscellaneous===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://kosherfood.about.com About Kosher Food: Menus and Recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kosher.com/Index.cfm Kosher.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=93784 Traditional Kosher foods recipes]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20030424111703/schwartz.enviroweb.org/view-torah.html The Torah and vegetarianism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.encyclopaediajudaica.com/AboutTheEncyclopaedia/SampleContent/DietaryLaws Second Jewish Encyclopaedia's excerpt on kashrut and Jewish dietary laws]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kashrut.com/agencies/ Kashrut certification agencies (partial list)] from around the world, and their symbols which are found on all food that has been deemed kosher.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Old Testament]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Food and Drink]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=1609156</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=1609156"/>
		<updated>2019-12-29T16:50:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Removed, &amp;quot;...occasionally without evidence; no footnote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Joseph McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Joseph McCarthy.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Jean Kerr McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Roman Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Wisconsin&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 1947 – May 2, 1957&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Robert M. La Follette, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[William Proxmire]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joe McCarthy''' (Joseph Raymond McCarthy, November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a two-term [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Wisconsin]].  He dominated the anti-[[communist]] movement in the United States, 1950–54, until his career receded after censure by the Senate.  '''&amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;''' is the aggressive exposure of Communist influences in America and the people who protect them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to object to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. A 1954 Gallup poll found that Joe McCarthy was the fourth on its list of most admired men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/mccarth5.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He is now considered an American hero by many, though liberals still seek to tarnish his name.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (May 18, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/25976-mccarthyism-a-term-that-libels-a-dead-patriot “McCarthyism” — A Term That Libels a Dead Patriot]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (March 7, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/25532-use-of-term-mccarthyism-is-unfair-to-joe-mccarthy Use of Term “McCarthyism” Is Unfair — to Joe McCarthy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the United States, inside the federal government. He was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy lost support in 1953 when he started attacking the U.S. Army and suggesting that Republican President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] was protecting subversives.  Eisenhower signaled Republicans to stop his attacks on the Army.  Although McCarthy had strong support among Catholics, such as [[Joe Kennedy]], in 1954 the Senate censured him on charges of attacking fellow Senators; this caused his influence to collapse abruptly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]]&amp;quot; was coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's aggressive attempts to ferret out suspects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
Joseph McCarthy was born to a poor Irish Catholic farm family in Appleton, Wisconsin.  A hyperactive, extroverted youth, he dropped out of school after eighth grade to start his own poultry business. After the chickens all died, he enrolled in the local public high school.  Thanks to enormous energy and a retentive mind, he finished his coursework in less than a year at age 20.  After two undergraduate years at [[Marquette University]], a leading [[Jesuit]] school in [[Milwaukee]], McCarthy entered Marquette Law School, acquiring the rudiments of the profession that he soon used to knit together a statewide network among Irish and German Catholics.   McCarthy was a practicing Catholic his entire life, but rarely referred to religion or ethnicity in his speeches.  He actively supported President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] in the Young Democrats, but did not join Irish organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although defeated in his 1936 race for district attorney, McCarthy displayed remarkable campaign abilities and an astonishing memory for faces.  He had the energy and determination to meet every voter in person, exuding charm and a concern for the voter as an individual.  The same tactics paid off in 1939, when he was successful in a nonpartisan contest for a regional judgeship.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The youngest judge in state history, he worked long hours to clear up a large backlog. He administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense. He was still a Democrat, but that party was very weak statewide at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1942 McCarthy, volunteered for the [[Marines]] (as a judge he was draft exempt), becoming an intelligence officer in an aviation unit heavily engaged in combat in the South Pacific.  Although assigned a desk job McCarthy flew numerous combat missions as a tail gunner—he exaggerated the number to qualify for a Distinguished Flying Cross.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's record was unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the [[Solomon Islands]] area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected to Senate, 1946==&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy had his name entered in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate in 1944, opposing a well-entrenched incumbent Republican, Alexander Wiley.  The absentee war hero ran a strong second, making a name for himself statewide and making himself available for the 1946 Senate contest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why McCarthy suddenly changed parties was never explained, but prospects for ambitious Wisconsin politicians were dim inside the poorly organized Democratic party, for most [[New Deal]]ers supported the state’s [[Progressive party#LaFollete creates a third party in 1924|Progressive party]].  During the war, however, that party collapsed, torn apart between its [[New Deal]] domestic liberalism, and its intensely isolationist opposition to Roosevelt’s foreign policy.   Increasingly out of touch with Wisconsin, its leader [[Robert LaFollette Jr.]] looked to his family’s past glories and made the blunder of trying for reelection to the Senate in 1946 as a Republican.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Tail Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; as his posters called him, endlessly crisscrossed Wisconsin while LaFollette remained in Washington, offered an alternative in the Republican primary to old guard Republicans who had opposed the Lafollettes for a half century.  McCarthy brilliantly captured the frustrations citizens felt about massive strikes, unstable economy, price controls, severe shortages of housing and meat, and the growing threat of from the far left in the [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]].  He nipped LaFollette in the primary. The slogan “Had Enough?—Vote Republican” gave the Republicans a landslide all across the North, electing a new junior senator from Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Communist Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
In Washington, McCarthy was a mainstream conservative in domestic policy, and, like many veterans, was an internationalist in foreign affairs, supporting the [[Marshall Plan]] and [[NATO]].  His speeches rarely mentioned domestic Communism or flaming issues like the [[Alger Hiss]] espionage case, but that suddenly changed in early 1950 when his vivid [[anti-Communist]] rhetoric drew national attention. &amp;quot;The issue between the Republicans and Democrats is clearly drawn. It has been deliberately drawn by those who have been in charge of twenty years of treason.”  Alleging there were many card-carrying Communists in U. S. President [[Harry S. Truman]]’s State Department, McCarthy forced a Senate investigation led by Millard Tydings, Democrat of [[Maryland]]. McCarthy named numerous suspect diplomats but failed to convince the three Democrats on the panel; they  concluded his allegations were “a fraud and a hoax,” while the two Republicans dissented. McCarthy retaliated by campaigning against Tydings, who was defeated for reelection in November 1950.  What the senator himself called McCarthyism was a factor in key races across the country; all his candidates won and his stock soared. A few weeks later American forces were crushed by the [[History of China#Communist Party|Chinese]] in [[Korean War|Korea]], and in spring 1951 Truman tried to shift the blame by firing General [[Douglas MacArthur]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Support from Catholics and Kennedys==&lt;br /&gt;
The great majority of Catholics were anti-Communist, but they were also loyal Democrats, so to enlarge his base McCarthy, a Republican, needed an alliance with anti-Communist Catholics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin E. Marty, ''Modern American Religion: 1941-1960'' (1996) 3:358&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Catholic bishops and the Catholic press was &amp;quot;among McCarthy's most fervid supporters.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles R. Morris, ''American Catholic'' (1997) p. 248-50, quote on p. 248; James Waldron Arnold, ''Objectivity in Selected Catholic Diocesan Newspapers'' (1954) p. 49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A major connection was with the powerful Kennedy family, which had very high visibility among all Catholics in the Northeast.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin Kenny, ''The American Irish'' (2000), 242-43.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Well before he became famous McCarthy became closely associated with [[Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr.]]. He was a frequent guest at the Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port and at one point dated Joe's daughter Patricia. After McCarthy became nationally prominent, Kennedy was a vocal supporter and helped build McCarthy's popularity among Catholics. Kennedy contributed cash and encouraged his friends to give money. Some historians have argued that in the Senate race of 1952, Joe Kennedy and McCarthy made a deal that McCarthy would not make campaign speeches for the Republican ticket in [[Massachusetts]], and in return, Congressman and future U.S. President [[John F. Kennedy]] would not give anti-McCarthy speeches. In 1953 McCarthy hired [[Robert Kennedy]] as a senior staff member. When the Senate voted to censure McCarthy in 1954, Senator Kennedy was in the hospital and never indicated then or later how he would vote; he told associates he could not vote against McCarthy because of the family ties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael O'Brien, ''John F. Kennedy: A Biography'' (2005); Crosby, ''God, Church, and Flag''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political dominance==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1950, McCarthy discussed his upcoming 1952 campaign with three fellow Catholics (Father Edmund A. Walsh and Charles H. Kraus of [[Georgetown University]] and Washington attorney Wiliam A. Roberts).   Kraus had recommended Father Walsh's recent books dealing with Communism to McCarthy, and was hoping to interest McCarthy in the problems of Communism in the world.  McCarthy's reputation among the voters was not good at that time, due to various ethical and tax violation problems, and he needed an issue that would help improve his chances of re-election.  He latched enthusiastically onto the idea of attacking Communists in the government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard H. Rovere, Senator Joe McCarthy, (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich), 1959.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Subsequently, McCarthy called Willard Edwards of the ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' asking for assistance with a speech on Communism.  Edwards sent some materials, including a copy of a letter written on July 26, 1946, by [[James F. Byrnes]], Secretary of State under Truman.  This letter was the central support for McCarthy's subsequent claims to have a list of Communists in the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Pursuant to Executive Order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred... Of those 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 284 cases by the screening committee... Of the 79 actually separated from the service, 26 were aliens and therefore under &amp;quot;political disability&amp;quot; with respect to employment in the peacetime operations of the Department.  I assume that factor alone could be considered the principal basis for their separation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document was repeatedly cited by McCarthy as the basis for his accusations; unfortunately, there was no list at that time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy now became one of the dominant leaders in American politics, with strong support among both Republicans and Catholic Democrats, as he alleged that Truman’s top people had betrayed America.  He singled out Secretary of State [[Dean Acheson]] and Secretary of Defense [[George Marshall]].  Liberals were aghast; Truman had picked General Marshall to head the State and Defense departments precisely because he thought the elderly statesman would always be above criticism, no matter that China turned from a staunch ally to a bitter enemy on his watch.  McCarthy’s blistering attacks on Marshall as “part of a conspiracy so immense, an infamy so black, as to dwarf any in the history of man” fueled the belief he was a wild-man, a pathological liar who overstepped the bounds of political discourse. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] crusading against “Korea, Communism and Corruption” in 1952, Republican victory was assured.  As a senior member of  the majority party McCarthy for the first time became a committee chairman, with control of staffing and agenda. He used his Government Operations Committee to open highly publicized hearings in 1953-54 alleging disloyalty in the State Department, the United States [[Central Intelligence Agency]] (CIA), the U.S. Information Agency, and finally the Army.  His furious attacks on the Army led to the televised “Army-McCarthy” hearings in spring 1954, which exposed his bullying tactics to a national audience.  As McCarthy’s poll rating plunged, his enemies finally pulled together to introduce a censure resolution focused on charging McCarthy with contempt for the federal government, and especially for his fellow senators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Backlash==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy’s charges that over-educated liberals tolerated Communism at home and abroad had stung the liberals.  He alleged that they had corruptly sold out the national interest to protect their upper class privileges, and were so idealistic about world affairs that they radically underestimated the threat posed by Soviet dictator [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]], his spies, and the worldwide Communist movement.  Instead of refuting the allegations, Liberals tried one of two approaches.  Some became intensely anti-Communist and claimed they were more effective than McCarthy and the Republicans in eliminating Communism in the unions and Democratic party, and in containing the Stalinist menace in Europe.  The other approach was to counterattack, to charge that “McCarthyism” never found a single spy but hurt innocent people in hunting for nonexistent witches; thus it represented an evil betrayal of American values.  In an appeal to upscale conservatives and liberal intellectuals, critics ignored the Communist infiltration of labor unions and liberal causes and focused on stereotyping anticommunists as ill-mannered ignorant troglodytes, oblivious to American traditions of free speech and free association.  McCarthy’s exaggerations and false charges encouraged opponents to stress the second approach, but it escalated the controversy to a pitch of hatreds and fears unprecedented since the days of [[Reconstruction]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Loss of influence==&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy’s superb sense of timing and his media instincts kept his partisan attacks on the front page every day; his willingness to do battle in the hustings with Democratic opponents across the country strengthened his base in the Republican party. His religion and ethnicity, refreshed with highly visible friendships with leading Irish Catholics, especially the Kennedy family, bolstered his standing among Democrats.   According to Gallup, McCarthy’s popularity crested in January 1954, when he was endorsed by all voters 50-29 (with 21 having no opinion).  His core support came from Republicans and Catholics who had not attended college. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy, however, failed to create any sort of grass roots organization.  He had no organizational skills; he did not effectively use his talented staffers (such as [[Robert Kennedy]]).  He was a loner who lurched from issue to issue, misled by the enormous media publicity into believing that a one-man crusade was possible in an increasingly well-educated complex society honeycombed with local, regional and national organizations.  By operating within the Republican party apparatus he lost the opportunity to create an independent grass roots political crusade in the style of [[Theodore Roosevelt|Teddy Roosevelt]], [[Huey Long]], or [[Ross Perot]]. He never launched his own magazine or radio show or formed alliances with publishers who agreed with him.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy’s strained relations with Senate colleagues created a trapdoor. It was sprung after many Republicans realized that he had shifted the attack away from the Democrats.  What use was his slogan “20 Years of Treason” once Eisenhower was in office? McCarthy’s answer was “21 Years of Treason!”  Eisenhower’s supporters could no longer tolerate such a loose cannon, and as McCarthy unwisely shifted his attacks to Eisenhower’s beloved Army, his cause was doomed.  While many Americans distrusted [[Ivy League]], striped pants diplomats, soldiers were held in high regard; McCarthy’s charges of subversion were flimsy (one Communist dentist had been automatically promoted); he sabotaged his own reputation by finagling favors for an aide who had been drafted.  The televised hearings proved fatal to an ill-prepared bully. After the Democrats regained control of Congress in the 1954 elections, the censure motion carried, 67-22.  McCarthy’s appeal, so widespread yet superficial, evaporated overnight and the Senator faded into the shadows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The term &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is permanently associated with the use of the word &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot; (a word which he did not coin, but of which he  did make use according to a sense more aligned with his actual philosophy) to mean an aggressive attack on Communists who had infiltrated America and on the liberals who protected them—an attack, however, without regard for due process.  Although the left was unable to make heroes of the people who supported and sometimes were controlled by Stalin, they did make heroes of opponents of McCarthy, painting him as the internal menace to American values that was far worse than Communist subversion. Schrecker (1998) sees McCarthyism as anti-Communist political repression of the early Cold War, and explores its mechanisms through, and what she considers the exaggerated public fears on which it depended. During the 1940s-1950s, McCarthyism took on a variety of forms with an array of agendas, interested parties, and modes of operating. Despite its widespread and popular character, it started with the federal government and was driven by a network of dedicated anti-Communist crusaders such as [[J. Edgar Hoover]], director of the United States [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]] (FBI).  McCarthyism's repression both responded to and helped create widespread fears of a significant threat to national security.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Margaret Chase Smith]], Republican senator from [[Maine]], gained a national reputation as one of the earliest critics McCarthyism with a Senate speech on June 1, 1950, called &amp;quot;the Declaration of Conscience.&amp;quot; It was an attempt by Smith to address the excesses of McCarthyism, and was widely hailed as a call to reason by McCarthy's opponents. Smith gave a critique of the American political process and political institutions in the responses to dissent on the left and the right. Smith, like other McCarthy critics, sought to bring a level of civility to political protest and dissent. She and many others who objected to the tactics of McCarthy actually believed in the underlying tenets of his anti-Communist crusade. Their responses to his excesses reflected a desire to narrow the scope of acceptable political dissent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gregory Peter Gallant, &amp;quot;Margaret Chase Smith, McCarthyism and the Drive for Political Purification.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation U. of Maine 1992. 302 pp.  DAI 1992 53(5): 1642-A. DA9227981&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Impact on government==&lt;br /&gt;
Rausch (2000) argues McCarthy's campaign {{cquote|had a lasting impact on the conduct of U.S. foreign relations, particularly among professional diplomatic institutions like the State Department and its [[United States Foreign Service|Foreign Service]] personnel, and McCarthyism did not disappear with the senator's censure in 1954. The 'ism' in a broad sense was a set of ideas not only about internal subversion but also about the outside world, including a simplistic, isolationist anti-communism and a deep suspicion about social reform movements abroad. It stood in open opposition to a more complex, even accommodating, view of communism.  Instead of ending the hunt for subversives begun under Truman, Eisenhower made the search systematic, universal, and more broadly defined. McCarthyist Scott McLeod took over security and personnel functions of the State Department and became one of the most famous and despised men in the executive branch. McLeod brought McCarthyist methods and assumptions to bear in ridding the department of what he defined as security risks. Oral history sources provide key evidence for the destructive atmosphere within the department in these years, and they shed valuable light on McLeod's impact on the foreign affairs bureaucracy.  In the short term, the Foreign Service declined in morale, prestige, and influence. By 1954, professionally trained diplomacy, with nuanced, internationalist views lost ground to more simplistic, strictly anticommunist views. During Eisenhower's second term, the Foreign Service and the more moderate approach experienced a resurgence but still faced opposition from hard-liners who survived the McCarthy years.   The Latin American branch of the department embodied the changes in professional diplomacy towards one region of the world. Within the division were the institutionalized tensions of the Eisenhower administration, between career diplomats and political appointees, conservative and moderate anti-communists, and trained diplomats and other specialists. The U.S. embassy in Cuba showed this internal conflict in a microcosm, as the administration's response to Latin American revolution evolved after 1954. McCarthyism accompanied Eisenhower into office, and its effects continued into his last foreign policy crisis and beyond.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rausch, Scott Alan (2000).  [http://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/10401 Abstract of ''McCarthyism and Eisenhower's State Department, 1953-1961''].  Thesis (Ph. D.)  (Seattle, WA:  University of Washington).  Abstract retrieved from University of Washington's ResearchWorks archive on April 2, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[California]] McCarthyism began before the Senator was famous. In 1946 in the [[Los Angeles]] schools two teachers from Canoga Park High School were called before the Tenney Senate Investigating Committee on charges of communistic teaching. The two teachers were exonerated of all charges, but a campaign to rid the LA district of dissident teachers was effectively launched. The target of the campaign was a group of teachers who belonged to the Los Angeles Federation of Teachers (LAFT), formerly known as Union Local 430 and chartered under the American Federation of Teachers, until 1948, when the AFT revoked the charter. By 1954, Los Angeles teachers were required to take five loyalty oaths, although not one teacher was ever charged with or convicted of subversion. In 1953, the Los Angeles City School Board announced that 304 teachers were to be investigated because of alleged Communist affiliations. The Dilworth Oath, made law in 1953, required teachers to answer questions posed to them by the Investigating Committees. Teachers who refused to answer the Committee questions by claiming their [[Fifth Amendment]] rights could then be fired by the Board for insubordination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ellen Chase Verdries, &amp;quot;Teaching with the Enemy: An Archival and Narrative Analysis of McCarthyism in the Public Schools.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation Claremont Grad. School 1996. 286 pp.  DAI 1997 57(9): 3853-A. DA9703815&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Media and popular culture==&lt;br /&gt;
Historians have debated the degree to which McCarthyism permeated the American mood and popular culture. Anti-Communist liberals at the time said it played to isolationism (especially strong in McCarthy's Wisconsin) by diverting attention away from the real threat, Stalin's Soviet Union as an external power.  The Left said that they had a First Amendment right to their beliefs and that McCarthyism had a chilling effect.  Dussere (2003) shows that comic strip artist Walt Kelly in &amp;quot;Pogo&amp;quot; parodied McCarthyism and promoted leftist politics as old-fashioned American common sense, representing a time when concerns about art and politics with respect to popular culture were in the forefront.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoover's FBI targeted retired film comedian [[Charlie Chaplin]] because of his status as a cultural icon and as part of its broader investigation of Hollywood. Some of Chaplin's films were considered &amp;quot;Communist propaganda,&amp;quot; but because Chaplin was a British citizen and was not a member of the Communist Party, he was not among those investigated by the [[House Un-American Activities Committee]] in 1947. Nevertheless, he was vulnerable to protests by the American Legion and other patriotic groups because of both his sexual and political unorthodoxy. Although countersubversives succeeded in driving Chaplin out of the U.S., they failed to build a consensus that Chaplin was a threat to the nation. Chaplin's story testifies to both the power of the countersubversive campaign at mid-century and to some of its limitations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sbardellati and Shaw (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Strout (1999) looks at [[Christian Science Monitor|''The Christian Science Monitor'']] during the McCarthy era (1950-1954); it was a highly influential newspaper at home and abroad. Strout asks: (1) Was the ''Monitor'' a consistent critic of McCarthy? (2) How did the coverage compare to other elite and popular press newspapers? (3) How did the pressures associated with McCarthyism effect individuals at the ''Monitor'' and its news product? An extensive review of editorials and news articles suggests that it was thorough and fair in reporting, yet outspoken and responsible in editorial criticism. [[Mary Baker Eddy]]'s original 1907 statement that, &amp;quot;The purpose of the ''Monitor'' is to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,&amp;quot; was referred to repeatedly in interoffice correspondence during the McCarthy era. The ''Monitor'' did not attack McCarthy personally as other papers did; rather, its criticism centered on the actions of the senator and the negative effects they were having at home and abroad. The ''Monitor'' served as a voice of moderation, yet at the same time, remained a persistent critic of McCarthy's tactics.  Individuals were affected by the pressures of McCarthyism.  For instance, veteran Washington correspondent Richard L. Strout was suspended from covering McCarthy for eight to 12 months after being mentioned in McCarthy's book, ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''I have in my hand...''==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. At a Lincoln Day speech, on February 9, 1950, before the Republican Women's Club of Wheeling, [[West Virginia]], at the Colonnade Room of Wheeling's McClure Hotel, he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card-carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Senator Joseph McCarthy, [http://faculty.tnstate.edu/tcorse/h2020/senator_joseph_mccarthy.htm Speech at Wheeling, West Virginia], 1950, Congressional Record of the Senate, 81st Congress 2nd Session, February 20, 1950 (Tennessee State University). Cf. ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951, reprinted from the Congressional Record'' (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1951); &amp;quot;Senator Joe McCarthy's Visit to Valley Area,&amp;quot; ''Wheeling Intelligencer'', February 11, 1950; &amp;quot;57 Reds Help Shaping U.S. Policy: McCarthy,&amp;quot; ''Denver Post'', February 11, 1950; ''Salt Lake Tribune'', February 11, 1950; ''Salt Lake Telegram'', February 11, 1950; [https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/mccarthy-telegram/images/telegram-page-1.gif McCarthy to President Truman] (telegram), February 11, 1950; &amp;quot;McCarthy Blasts State Department,&amp;quot; ''Nevada State Journal'', February 12, 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
*McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&lt;br /&gt;
*Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/ ''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&lt;br /&gt;
*Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/ ''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&lt;br /&gt;
*Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named [[John S. Service]], Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriation Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six-hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom — Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) — interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy sought to avoid naming names publicly when possible, using numbered cases instead of names in public session. He preferred to name his suspects only in executive session, in order to protect those who might have been erroneously identified by the FBI, State Department Security, Army counterintelligence, etc. &amp;quot;[I]t would be improper to make the names public until the appropriate Senate committee can meet in executive session and get them,&amp;quot; explained McCarthy. &amp;quot;If we should label one man a Communist when he is not a Communist I think it would be too bad.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
But when McCarthy began reading his numbered cases to the Senate, the Democrat Majority Leader, [[Illinois]] Senator Scott Lucas, interrupted, &amp;quot;I want him to name those Communists.&amp;quot; In response to McCarthy's desire not to name names publicly in order to protect the innocent, Lucas bizarrely referred to the fact that statements in Congress are privileged against defamation suits, saying, &amp;quot;if those people are not Communists the senator will be protected.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;M. Stanton Evans, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=xCaDcYsr0sgC Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies]'' (Crown Forum 2007) ISBN 1400081068, p. 202.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (This was hardly germane: McCarthy's expressed concern was not about protecting ''himself'', but protecting ''suspects who might be innocent''.) McCarthy responded:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals ... I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee — and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic Senator William Benton of [[Connecticut]] introduced a bill to eject McCarthy from the Senate. His first charge was that at Wheeling, McCarthy had said that he had a list of 205 names, rather than 57 names. The Senate (then under Democrat control) sent staff investigators to Wheeling to try to substantiate Benton's charges. The investigation found no evidence to support Benton's charge. According to one investigator:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The newly unearthed evidence demolished Senator Benton’s charges in all their material respects and thoroughly proved Senator McCarthy’s account of the facts to be truthful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statement by Daniel Buckley, December 13, 1951, McCarthy papers, cited in M. Stanton Evans, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=xCaDcYsr0sgC Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies]'' (Crown Forum 2007) ISBN 1400081068, pp. 438-439.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Democrats quietly buried the 44-page staff memo summarizing these findings, but the charge that McCarthy had said “205” was likewise dropped. Thus the ''Congressional Record'' to this day records that McCarthy said &amp;quot;57,&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;205.&amp;quot; Nevertheless, many on the left continue to promote Benton's discredited claim as gospel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post [http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Benton made this allegation only about McCarthy's speech in Wheeling, West Virginia and not in the other cities where he made the speech. The 205 number actually came in another part of his speech; on February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the ''Congressional Record'' on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President—and I think wisely so—set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the ''Congressional Record'', says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of State from various war agencies such as the [[Office of Strategic Services|OSS [Office of Strategic Services]]], [[Foreign Economic Administration|FEA [Foreign Economic Administration]]], [[Office of War Information|OWI [Office of War Information]]], OIAA [Office of Inter-American Affairs], and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic Party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Gallup, McCarthy’s popularity crested in January 1954, when he was endorsed by all voters 50-29 (with 21 having no opinion).  His core support came from Republicans and Catholics who had not attended college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, [[CBS]] broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venona files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the [[Venona files|Venona]] transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy [[disinformation]], or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
* FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break.&lt;br /&gt;
* FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling, West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary of espionage terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a [[Communist Party of the United States of America]] (CPUSA) member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons pled the Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination.  An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the Fifth Amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is — she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss — all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment — after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China — Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the [[National Labor Relations Board]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the [[National Labor Relations Board]], [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriations Committee in 1947.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts—both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett—charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot; See also FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 116, Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&lt;br /&gt;
See also &lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file, Hottel to the Director&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 12, 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster116.pdf Vol. 116, pg. 100] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government,}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of [[Communist front]] organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An FBI Surveillance report on [[Edward Fitzgerald (Soviet spy)|Edward Fitzgerald]] from September 1947 notes that on May 20, 1947 Fitzgerald's brother-in-law had lunch with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] and an appointment with [[Leslie Groves]].  Sometime later Frank Cameron, a regular contact of Fitzgerald tried to contact Gertrude Cameron in the State Department from the Fitzgerald’s home.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = September 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Volume 130, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster130.pdf pgs 17 -18] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Federal Bureau of Investigation}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms — a proposal which Dean Acheson two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Isaac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file, Tamm to the Director, &lt;br /&gt;
 | date = April 22, 1946&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster042.pdf Vol. 42, pg. 100] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = October 10, 1946&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster076.pdf [Vol. 76, pgs. 9 and 126] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government}}; (heavily redacted). Memorandum discuss inquiry from the U.S. Statement as to the participation of Alger Hiss, Gustavo Duran and others in the [[Amerasia]] case. Fitch recommends replying to the State Dept. by referring to the detailed memoranda on Hiss and Duran which was previously submitted and a summary memo transmitted to General Holmes, to Fred Lyon's attention on May 29, 1945 in connection with [[Philip Jaffe]] and the Amerasia case (pg. 9).  Statement that memos on Alger Hiss and Gustavo Duran will follow. Hiss memo is included, but that on Duran is not (pg. 126).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], John Tipton Fishburn, [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], Franz Leopold Neumann, [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, September 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* John Tipton Fishburn, U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, Stella Gordon, Myron Victor Hunt, Esther Less Kopelewich, Franz Leopold Neumann, Robert Ross, Sylvia Schimmel, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the Tydings Committee hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the Tydings Committee, [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Stella Gordon, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Myron Victor Hunt, Esther Less Kopelewich, Franz Leopold Neumann, Robert Ross, Sylvia Schimmel, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of [[Communist front]] organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Myron Victor Hunt, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Stella Gordon, Esther Less Kopelewich, Franz Leopold Neumann, Robert Ross, Sylvia Schimmel, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the Tydings Committee hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five [[Communist front]] groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = March 30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dorothy Kenyon]], New York City Municipal Court Judge, U.S. State Department appointee as American Delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dorothy Kenyon is considered one of McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot; that was presented to the Tydings Committee. Kenyon was McCarthy's first case and it took two days in order for McCarthy to present the evidence due to the constant interruptions by members of the Tyding's Committee. This prompted Senator Lodge to state that, &amp;quot;I think to interrupt the witness [McCarthy] every time and break up his continuity and destroy the flow of his argument, the way we are doing, is not the right procedure....For some reason that has not been made clear to me, whether it is to rattle or whether it is to confuse, I don't know, we have an entirely different procedure today...I am objecting to the constant interruption of the witness so that he never gets a fair shake.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the constant harassment, McCarthy's evidence included showing that Kenyon belonged to at least 24 Communist front organizations labeled as such in part by the [[United States Attorney General]], the [[House Un-American Activities Committee]], and other governmental committees. The documents presented by McCarthy included, official organization letterheads that listed Kenyon as a sponsor or as a member, official programs of organization sponsored dinners, and newspaper reports of open letters that Kenyon had signed that connected her with the organizations. Certainly, these were all documents that were easily accessible to the State Department should they have cared to look into Kenyon's political background.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When Kenyon was asked by the Tydings Committee whether she had ever been interviewed by the State Department as to her affiliation to any Communist front organizations, she responded that she had never been asked. According to the security evaluation procedure of the State Department, Kenyon should have been asked about these affiliations but failed to do so. McCarthy had easily demonstrated from this first case that the screening process of the State Department was certainly lax and quite possibly purposefully ignoring easily identifiable security risks. However, the Tydings Committee instead ignored this evidence and set the precedent for the hearings that anyone that came before the committee was going to be given a positive evaluation no matter how strongly the evidence indicated the witness was a security risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 68&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = March 30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4380-81&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the McCarran Committee indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Less Kopelewich, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Stella Gordon, Myron Victor Hunt, Franz Leopold Neumann, Robert Ross, Sylvia Schimmel, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the McCarran Committee classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm5c.pdf FBI Silvmaster file 5c pg. 11 pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' incompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Department. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing incompetent or as though they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco KGB [[Rezident]] [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshall]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector Elizabeth Bentley's deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequently were developed as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, September 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Ross, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Stella Gordon, Myron Victor Hunt, Franz Leopold Neumann, Sylvia Schimmel, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Sylvia Schimmel, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Stella Gordon, Myron Victor Hunt, Franz Leopold Neumann, Frances M. Tuchser on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdf; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between Mary Jane Keeney and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Political Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the Tydings Committee in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Amerasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the Tydings Committee, Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identified Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Frances M. Tuchser, U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like Arpad Erdos, Gertrude Cameron, Nelson Chipchin, John Tipton Fishburn, Stella Gordon, Myron Victor Hunt, and Franz Leopold Neumann, on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the Tydings Committee a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the Tydings Committee. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The McCarran Committee concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the McCarran Committee regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | isbn = 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Attacks on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;  The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | isbn = 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communists within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the FBI had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herman, pages 333-337&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herman, p. 253&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''Saturday Review'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | isbn = 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day.... The youngsters read back, and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy, and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sevareid, Eric (January 1978).  CBS.  Reprinted in Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (''Times'' columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | isbn = 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Senate opposition to McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
While over the previous few years, Senator McCarthy had withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., who sought to prevent him from damaging their causes any further; the organized and co-ordinated effort between the two groups to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in March 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
===Senate opposition===&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954 a fellow conservative and anti-communist [[Republican]] Senator, [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]], gave a speech criticizing what he felt was Senator McCarthy’s &amp;quot;misdirection of our efforts at fighting communism” and his role in “the loss of respect for us in the world at large.” Flanders felt the nation should pay more attention looking outwards at the “alarming world-wide advance of Communist power” that would leave the United States and Canada as “the last remnants of the free world.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple refereeces:&lt;br /&gt;
* Flanders, Ralph E. (March 9, 1954).  &amp;quot;Activities of Senator McCarthy&amp;amp;mdash;The world crisis&amp;quot;.  ''Proceedings and Debates of the 83rd Congress, Second Session&amp;amp;mdash;Congressional Record'' (Washington, D.C.:  Government Printing Office).&lt;br /&gt;
* Flanders, Ralph E. (1961).  ''Senator from Vermont'' (Boston: Little, Brown), pp. 255-257.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Eisenhower Administration]] cabinet officials told Flanders to “lay off,” while President Eisenhower sent Flanders a brief note of appreciation for his speech, but did not otherwise confer with him or explicitly support him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 258&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a June 1, 1954 speech, Flanders emphasized how the Soviet Union was winning military successes in Asia without risking its own resources or men, and said this nation was witnessing &amp;quot;another example of economy of effort...in the conquest of this country for communism.&amp;quot; He added, &amp;quot;One of the characteristic elements of communist and fascist tyranny is at hand as citizens are set to spy upon each other.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Crozier&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Barney &lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Vermont Senator's Speech Heralded McCarthy's End&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Times-Argus Newspaper&lt;br /&gt;
  | publication-place = Randolph, Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages =&lt;br /&gt;
  | date =September 29, 1979&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = &lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; he accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | isbn = 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 11, 1954 Flanders introduced a resolution charging McCarthy “with unbecoming conduct&amp;quot; and calling for his removal from his committee chairmanship. Upon the advice of Senators John Sherman Cooper and [[J. William Fulbright]] and legal assistance from the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]], a liberal organization, he modified his resolution to “bring it in line with previous actions of censure.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 260–261, 267&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After introducing his censure motion, Flanders had no active role in the ensuing Watkins Committee hearings. Flanders bore McCarthy no personal animosity and reported that McCarthy accepted his invitation to join him at lunch after the hearings had taken place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Flanders, pages = 267-268&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html 44 of the 46 charges were dropped]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18 was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Resolution condemns McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with [[Roy Cohn]] and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was severely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]], likely brought on by his lifelong struggle with alcoholism, in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], New Jersey.  He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterward and continuing to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [https://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940s. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930s and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950s, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be pointed out how many people followed McCarthy on his crusade, and that many pro-Americans still do.  The majority of the sources that discredited Senator McCarthy originated from a large assault by the liberal media that managed to sway the majority of Americans against him at that time. While many Americans – liberals and conservatives – use McCarthy's name in a negative connotation, such references are unfair to McCarthy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (August 20, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29818-trump-compares-mueller-probe-to-joe-mccarthy Trump Compares Mueller Probe to Joe McCarthy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*  &amp;quot;if liberals were merely stupid, the laws of probability would dictate that at least some of their decisions would serve America's interests.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=0hlSo3QC27oC&amp;amp;pg=PA72&amp;amp;dq=if+liberals+were+merely+stupid,+the+laws+of+probability+would+dictate+that+at+least+some+of+their+decisions+would+serve+America's+interests.&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=pyVjTdetBYH68AbDnbWKDA&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ved=0CCcQ6AEwAA A If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans - Page 72, Ann Coulter, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Buckley, William F. ''McCarthy and His Enemies'' (1954), a major statement by a young conservative&lt;br /&gt;
* Crosby, S.J., Donald F. ''God, Church and Flag: Senator Joseph R. McCarthy and the Catholic Church, 1950-1957'' (1978). [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104464047 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fried, Richard M. ''Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective'' 1990 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=79027083 online edition][[File:Joe-McC.jpg|thumb|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Griffith, Robert. ''The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the Senate'' 1987 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=81177256 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Herman, Arthur ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America’s Most Hated Senator'' (2000). [https://www.amazon.com/Joseph-McCarthy-Reexamining-Americas-Senator/dp/0684836254/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964395&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search], very favorable to McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
* Latham, Earl ''Communist Controversy in Washington: From the New Deal to McCarthy.'' (1969). &lt;br /&gt;
* O'Brien, Michael. ''McCarthy and McCarthyism in Wisconsin.'' (1981)&lt;br /&gt;
* Oshinsky, David M. ''A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy'' (1983), standard biography [https://www.amazon.com/Conspiracy-So-Immense-World-McCarthy/dp/019515424X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964395&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reeves, Thomas C. ''The Life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography'' (1982), standard biography by a leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
===McCarthyism===&lt;br /&gt;
* Klehr, Harvey, John Earl Hayes and Fridrikh Igorevich Firsov. ''The Secret World of American Communism'' (1995) [https://www.amazon.com/Secret-World-American-Communism-Annals/dp/0300068557/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964654&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Klehr, Harvey,  and Ronald Radosh. ''The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism'' (1996), suggests that Soviet spying in the postwar United States was extensive and that in the case of the arrest of the editors of the ''Amerasia'' magazine, and others, in 1945, naive liberals in the Justice and State departments blocked efforts to bring the spy ring to justice. [https://www.amazon.com/Amerasia-Spy-Case-Prelude-McCarthyism/dp/0807822450/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964692&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Earl Raab. ''The Politics of Unreason: Right Wing Extremism in America, 1790-1970'' (1970) (Chap. 6 &amp;quot;The 1950's: McCarthyism&amp;quot;) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=65264140&amp;amp;oplinknum=16 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Ted.  ''Reds: McCarthyism in Twentieth-Century America.'' 2003. 685 pp.  [https://www.amazon.com/Reds-McCarthyism-Twentieth-Century-Ted-Morgan/dp/B000I0RTS8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964728&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* O'Reilly, Kenneth. ''Hoover and the Un-Americans: The FBI, HUAC, and the Red Menace'' 1983&lt;br /&gt;
* Ottanelli, Fraser M. '' The Communist Party of the United States: From the Depression to World War II'' 1991 [https://www.amazon.com/Communist-Party-United-States-Depression/dp/0813516137/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964802&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rausch, Scott Alan.  &amp;quot;McCarthyism and Eisenhower's State Department, 1953-1961.&amp;quot; PhD dissertation U. of Washington 2000. 231 pp.   DAI 2000 61(6A): 2438-A. DA9976046  &lt;br /&gt;
* Schrecker, Ellen. &amp;quot;McCarthyism: Political Repression and the Fear of Communism.&amp;quot; ''Social Research'' 2004 71(4): 1041-1086. Issn: 0037-783x Fulltext: in Ebsco; summarizes her books on the subject&lt;br /&gt;
* Schrecker, Ellen. ''Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America'' (1998) [https://www.amazon.com/Many-Are-Crimes-McCarthyism-America/dp/0316774707/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964838&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schrecker, Ellen. ''The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents.'' (2d ed. 2002). 308 pp.  [https://www.amazon.com/Age-Mccarthyism-History-Documents-Bedford/dp/0312294255/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964838&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tanenhaus, Sam. ''Whittaker Chambers: A Biography'' (1998) [https://www.amazon.com/Whittaker-Chambers-Biography-Library-Paperbacks/dp/0375751459/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964901&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Theoharis, Athan.  ''Chasing Spies: How the FBI Failed in Counterintelligence but Promoted the Politics of McCarthyism in the Cold War Years.'' (2002). 307 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/Chasing-Spies-Counter-Intelligence-Promoted-McCarthyism/dp/1566634202/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964932&amp;amp;sr=1-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Weinstein, Allen, and Vassiliev, Alexander. ''The Haunted Wood: Soviet Espionage in America: The Stalin Era'' (1999) [https://www.amazon.com/Haunted-Wood-Espionage-America-Paperbacks/dp/0375755365/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205964983&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Media issues===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Doherty, Thomas. ''Cold War, Cool Media: Television, McCarthyism, and American Culture'' (2003) [https://www.amazon.com/Cold-War-Cool-Medium-McCarthyism/dp/0231129521/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205965016&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dussere, Erik. &amp;quot;Subversion in the Swamp: Pogo and the Folk in the McCarthy Era.&amp;quot; ''Journal of American Culture''2003 26(1): 134-141. Issn: 1542-7331 Fulltext: in Ebsco &lt;br /&gt;
* Murphy, Brenda.  ''Congressional Theatre: Dramatizing McCarthyism on Stage, Film, and Television.'' (1999). 310 pp. [https://www.amazon.com/Congressional-Theatre-Dramatizing-McCarthyism-Television/dp/0521891663/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205965050&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Sbardellati, John and Shaw, Tony. &amp;quot;Booting a Tramp: Charlie Chaplin, the FBI, and the Construction of the Subversive Image in Red Scare America.&amp;quot; ''Pacific Historical Review'' 2003 72(4): 495-530. Issn: 0030-8684 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-8684(200311)72%3A4%3C495%3ABATCCT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-I in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Strout, Lawrence N.  ''Covering McCarthyism: How the Christian Science Monitor Handled Joseph R. McCarthy, 1950-1954.'' 1999. 171 pp.  [http://www.questia.com/library/book/covering-mccarthyism-how-the-christian-science-monitor-handled-joseph-r-mccarthy-1950-1954-by-lawrence-n-strout.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe McCarthy. ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951'' U. S. Government Printing Office, 1953 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=9034820 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Joe McCarthy. ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America'' 1952 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=97298720 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fried, ed. Albert. ''McCarthyism: The Great American Red Scare: a Documentary History'' 1997 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=54810194 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schrecker, Ellen W. &amp;quot;Archival Sources for the Study of McCarthyism,&amp;quot; ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 75, No. 1 (Jun., 1988), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;197–208 [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-8723(198806)75%3A1%3C197%3AASFTSO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T at JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Communist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Greenglass]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anatoli Gorsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Annie Lee Moss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Morton Sobell]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Larry McDonald]] Congressional anti-communist successor&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [https://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And Its Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Espionage]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Irish-Americans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wisconsin]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1950s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Communism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357096</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357096"/>
		<updated>2007-12-23T03:59:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Flanders role in Senate censure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== National Review article plus we should mention MCCarthy's apparent drinking problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a helpful article from the conservative magazine ''National Review'': http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, I think we should acknowledge McCarthy's apparent alcohol problem and some of his possible other shortcomings which the conservative National Review article mentions.  I think it is important that Conservapedia does not fail to reveal relevant facts about a person as one of the virtues of the Bible is that is does not fail to reveal the blemishes of its heroes. I think having a article on McCarthy without mentioning his apparent excess drinking is like having an article on Churchill without mentioning his excess drinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:37, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The National Review article doesn't mention his (alleged) drinking problem. Do you have any objectives sources that he did have a problem? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:49, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oops, the NR article does say &amp;quot;Alcohol addled McCarthy's wits, which were not that sharp to begin with.&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144/pg_3] But that's all. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:07, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ruth Watt, who worked on the PSI staff [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf] is ths best unbiased source on this.  In an interview for the Senate hisotrians office she says for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Joe McCarthy was a very kind man, very thoughtful of people working with him, and I was very much taken with the way he treated people. (pg. 140)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': You once said that you had watched the program &amp;quot;Tail-Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; on television. What was your impression of that program?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I thought it was terrible. It was not factual. It was an insult to the Marine Corps, I thought, because who in the Marine Corps would allow somebody to go around shooting the way he did? It was completely untrue, I'm sure. I don't believe the girl that did the work did the research in the right places. She did the things she wanted to do, in my opinion. I thought it was very inaccurate. I was disgusted with it. I didn't think it was fair or true. There might have been some things in there that were true, but very few. But I suppose she had to make it interesting for TV, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': The portrayal of McCarthy as a senator didn't ring true to you, as a person who knew him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Not necessarily, no. They had to exaggerate. Of course, a program like that was not supposed to be a factual thing anyway, was it? If it was, it was not factual. There were just so many things that were not true. I'd have to go through it piece by piece before I could say what. (pgs 154-155)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': I've heard that after the censure Senator McCarthy began to drink pretty heavily. Was that noticeable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I don't think it was any different then it was before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': He drank heavily before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I think he drank before. I don't know that he drank that heavily, but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis. And about that time someone told me that McCarthy had told Senator McClellan he had just a year to live. He knew that he had something that was not going to get any better. The person who told me this, he never would have said it, but this person knew that he had said it to Senator McClellan. I was told about it in '56 sometime. He died the end of April in '57. (pg. 150)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That is unreliable hearsay. Watt didn't know the answers to the questions, and just recited rumors. If this is the best evidence, then it is better to say nothing. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:15, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I think he drank before''. '''I don't know that he drank that heavily''', but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That doesn't even come close to being a reliable source, factual or worthy of any mention in a scholarly article.  Period. It is worthy, however of Wikipedia or the National Inquirer. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt attended all the hearings, all of them, public and private, worked with McCarthy outside hearings in routine staff work, and she knew McCarthy as intimately as any living family member could testify, which are few in number, unavailble, or haven't left any written record.  She worked closely with him for many years (and all the Senators, Ray Cohn, and Bobby Kenedy), knew them all very personally, and tells us all straight up what has been written and publicized about McCarthy for several decades is untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt even shed some light on the close relationship between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy, and Bobby Kennedy's family (McCarthy is the Godfather of two of RFK's kids).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt talks about the spirit of bipartisanship on the Committee, defined as such, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Everybody worked together and there were no politics involved. It was just an investigating committee and you were for motherhood and against sin!! Everybody was in the same boat. But after the McCarthy problems, why then the senators said we had to have a minority counsel, that was in January 1954. ([http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_2.pdf pgs. 61-62])  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. United States Senate Historical Office -- Oral History Project in league with the WP or National Enquirer?  I'd rate it a little higher.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, I don't think either Roger or I are disagreeing that he might have been a drinker. Or doubting Ruth Watt...however, it is uncorroborated, and she herself said  &amp;quot;I don't know that he drank that heavily&amp;quot;, so we now have conflicting information, and nary a Doctor to define for us what is &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not much&amp;quot;. Personally I would be surprised if he wasn't drinking, given the number of years he was under constant attack.  Her recollections of the committee style is something she is expert on, so that isn't hearsay. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Her testmony is extremely important.  It shows (a) all the garbage from Hollywood and elsewhere is untrue, including what it says about his drinking.  Much of the stories of his drinking originate from that film, ''Tailgunner Joe''. (b) She says he was a very kind man.  She sat through the roughly 600 witnesses who were called to testify.  She doesn't say what an animal he was.  Rather, she was very taken by his kindness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Watt relates only one instance she feared things might have got out of control.  Her husband was a door guard, and a witness who was to testify had threatened McCarthy's life.  Her husband had to search the guy for weapons, and if he did sneak a weapon in the room, her husband would have to be the guy to intervene.  And he likewise was fearful of her, cause she was in the room with the crazed communist lunatic who the press reported  would kill Joe McCarthy if given the chance.  She says the hearing went without any trouble, McCarthy was cordial and polite as he always was, and the guy was just chicken, all talk &amp;amp; blather.  Given the opportunity to kill the monster, chose to give testimony instead.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:11, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the thrust of National Review article accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Review]] is a conservative magazine. Is this National Review article a generally accurate portrayal of McCarthy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arthur Herman, a program coordinator at the Smithsonian Institution and an adjunct professor at George Mason University, has filed a brief for the defense that is simultaneously audacious in its argument and painstaking in its scholarship. It is a work of vindication all the more powerful for standing so nearly alone, its only company a new novel by William F. Buckley Jr. And it challenges us to rethink our understanding not only of McCarthy's moment, but of our own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman, it should be said straight off, can do only so much with McCarthy the man. Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder. But if McCarthy never rose to the marble-statue level of statesmanship, he was, Herman contends, something more than the vicious demagogue he has been made out to be.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is held in odium for his accusations that men like George C. Marshall and Dean Acheson accepted security risks into their department because of some lack of loyalty to the United States. Herman has no more time for those accusations than the severest of McCarthy's detractors. But something hindered those two wise men from acting as vigorously as they ought to have done to protect their department and their country against those risks, and Herman's defense of McCarthy is based on exposing what that something was. He quotes Raymond Moley, one of FDR's early advisers, confessing in 1953 that McCarthy &amp;quot;was the product of the fright and anger of a 'deceived and injured public,' who had been lied to regarding the Soviet threat both at home and abroad.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman's book does a fine job of exploring individual cases and exposing the falseness of the allegation that McCarthyism led to the punishment and humiliation of innocent people. He does a fine job, too, of catching McCarthy's political opponents in behavior every bit as unscrupulous as the junior senator's....&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:38, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's right.  Herman makes largely the same point I made; the issues McCarthy took up were two decades of Soviet infiltration into the New Deal.  The US fought a war as a Soviet ally, and suddenly the US was forced into a nuclear arms race with that same ally ''because of New Dealers'', not because of any technolgical achievements the Soviet Union accomplished in its own right.  Our fellow citizens who were responsible for this insane nuclear arms race responded that they just had never stopped fighting fascism, McCarthy and anyone else who question thier motives or methods are considered by them as fascists as well.  These are the basic issues.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:53, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobS, you agree with the good things that Herman stated about MCCarthy but do you agree with this: &amp;quot;Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric.....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:59, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::McCarthy, at the time, did much damage to the cause of anti-Communism.  McCarthy it appears was using the issue for short term partisan advantage.  When Ike won, what it really looks like is Eisenhower himeself was behind McCarthy's destruction.  And if there's a villian, it's probably Hoover, who really just used McCarthy without telling him all the facts.  With the picture we have today, we can say McCarthy was right in his basic premise.  But then again, it all relates more to the Adminisration of Franklin Roosevelt, who basically it appears, allowed a foreign power to take over his Adminstration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, the Soviet Union manuovered the US into war with Japan, to get the US to destroy the lone obstacle to the Moscow directed plan to spread Communism to China &amp;amp; the Far East.  Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union is what purchased the enslavement of 100 million people for 50 years in Eastern Europe (350 million at the time of the collapse of the Soviet bloc).  The Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, none of these things had to be; it all was the result of CPUSA infiltration and subversion into the Adminstration of Franklin Roosevelt.  Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bascially to stop the exact same things the CPUSA was doing here in the United States at the exact same time.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:24, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Hitler probably came to power for different reasons as a whole, but it cannot be denied that Hitler was anti-communist.  At the same time,  I am not that familar with what the CP was doing in Germany. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the exact language used here [http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410622b.html STATEMENT BY JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER, ON THE DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION], Berlin, June 22, 1941. ''New York Times'', June 23, 1941, where the Germans explain precisely ''what'' prompted the German invasion,  and ''why'' the Hitler-Stalin pact was ended; no less than three times it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;..Comintern to seek to conduct their subversive activities...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activities were carried on in territories occupied by Germany&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activity and reconnoitering carried on by the Comintern. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA &amp;amp; the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these &amp;quot;biographies&amp;quot; have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flanders role in Senate censure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding Vermont Senator Flanders's role in speaking out against McCarthy and initiating the Senate censure hearings, I request that the italicized passages below be either properly referenced or deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by Liberals, Communists, etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials''. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of Adolf Hitler as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;[97] ''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials'',&amp;quot; the citable literature suggests that Flanders felt that McCarthy's emphasis on possible Communists within our borders distracted us from a much greater menace of Communist encroachment abroad. The literature shows Flanders to be a conservative marching to his own drummer and not supported (except for one note from Eisenhower after his March, 1954 speech) by the administration. In his autobiography, ''Senator from Vermont,'' Flanders reports a cabinet member taking him aside and suggesting that a majority of other cabinet members wanted him to lay off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress,''&amp;quot; given Flanders's confirmed enmity towards the Roosevelt administration, it would be remarkable to suggest that he would be in collaboration with the National Committee for an Effective Congress. Instead, he reports having consulted with Senators Cooper and Fulbright to develop articles of censure that were consistent with previous actions. I've seen no other literature that contradicts this report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel that even without the italicized passages, there's plenty of material to characterize Flanders's role. If there are credible citations supporting those passages, then they should stand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 13:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Norwich, your reliance on Flanders' own autobiography of the events surrounding Senator McCarthy is not set upon a sufficient factual basis. While the info you dislike is attributed to an appropriate primary source, namely the Congressional Record and the secondary sources of the Heritage Foundation [http://www.heritage.org/Research/GovernmentReform/IA5.cfm] and the recent book by Stanton Evans (pages 586-588). I disagree with your changes and challenge them with the aforementioned NPOV sources. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:59, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Book by [[M. Stanton Evans]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone read the new book, ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies''? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not yet, but User:Scorpio said he'd be back after it came out. According to the [http://www.amazon.com/Blacklisted-History-Senator-McCarthy-Americas/dp/140008105X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-0280032-8865773?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194391332&amp;amp;sr=8-1 Amazon Review], &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the FBI knew '''as early as 1942''' that [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]], the director of the atomic bomb project, had been identified by Communist leaders as a party member; that high-level U.S. officials were warned that [[Alger Hiss]] was a Soviet spy almost '''a decade before the Hiss case became a public scandal'''; that a cabal of White House, Justice Department, and State Department officials lied about and covered up the [[Amerasia]] spy case; and that the State Department had been heavily penetrated by Communists and Soviet agents before McCarthy came on the scene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We have most of this I think already, but Evans maybe able to shed more light on other cases, and he certainly will be an invaluable, and historically definitve source in the post-[[Venona]]/Soviet Archives era.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:59, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, Rob, as promised, I have stopped by after ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies'' came out and had a chance to read through half of it. I can only say that Evans did a brilliant job with the book. But honestly, he could have taken some of his work straight from our work here. Evans has done the best job of examining Senator McCarthy's work ever seen. It is a must read for anyone who wants to work on this article or simply better understand the subject. I'm coming across a great deal of substantive information. The book utterly destroys anything that the Left had with which to attack the Senator. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Unfortunately my schedule is such that I have limited time to devote to this article (or any article). (EDIT:  I just noticed that the article has been unprotected and also noticed that the &amp;quot;Wikifying&amp;quot; of the article has begun with the addition of Senator Flanders own false perception of the events in question. Sad to see.) But I urge you to read Evan's book and add whatever you feel will bolster this article. Hope all is well and a Merry Christmas to you and everyone here at Conservapedia. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:10, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Norwich&amp;diff=357094</id>
		<title>User talk:Norwich</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Norwich&amp;diff=357094"/>
		<updated>2007-12-23T03:49:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* McCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome|sig=[[User:Tash|Tash]] 12:01, 15 October 2007 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
==McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
This article was mainly worked on by a Sysop [[User:RobS]], You should contact him for any issues. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:36, 21 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No, Geo, this article was mainly worked on by me. Go back and look at the history. Rob has done a great deal of work related to Venona and McCarthy and is certainly a great contributor to the article. But as for the subject itself, Norwich would have better been directed to me to explain to him why his source is inappropriate and where he could find accurate sources, including the Congressional Record. I hope that helped. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:49, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Geo, for you guidance. I have done so. It wasn't clear where to turn to. Sincerely, [[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 14:31, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's unlocked.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:36, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flanders role in Senate censure of [[Joseph McCarthy]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I propose substituting the following text for the first two paragraphs in [[Joseph McCarthy#Condemnation and the Watkins Committee]]. The current text suggests that Flanders was acting at the bidding of “a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials.” The literature shows him to be a conservative with an approach to fighting communism that was different from that of Senator McCarthy. Please leave your comments at [[User talk:Norwich#Proposed text#Your comments below, please | &amp;quot;Your comments below, please&amp;quot;]]. [[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 16:07, 11 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proposed text==&lt;br /&gt;
While over the previous few years, Senator McCarthy had withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in March of 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
===Senate opposition===&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954 a fellow conservative and anti-communist [[Republican]] Senator, [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]], gave a speech criticizing what he felt was Senator McCarthy’s &amp;quot;misdirection of our efforts at fighting communism” and his role in “the loss of respect for us in the world at large.” Flanders felt the nation should pay more attention looking outwards at the “alarming world-wide advance of Communist power” that would leave the United States and Canada as “the last remnants of the free world.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = March 9, 1954 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Activities of Senator McCarthy&amp;amp;mdash;The World Crisis&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Proceedings and debates of the 83rd Congress, second session&amp;amp;mdash;Congressional Record&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 255-257&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Eisenhower Administration]] cabinet officials told Flanders to “lay off,” while President Eisenhower sent Flanders a brief note of appreciation for his speech, but did not otherwise confer with him or explicitly support him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 258&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a June 1, 1954 speech, Flanders emphasized how the Soviet Union was winning military successes in Asia without risking its own resources or men, and said this nation was witnessing &amp;quot;another example of economy of effort...in the conquest of this country for communism.&amp;quot; He added, &amp;quot;One of the characteristic elements of communist and fascist tyranny is at hand as citizens are set to spy upon each other.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Crozier&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Barney &lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Vermont Senator's Speech Heralded McCarthy's End&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Times-Argus Newspaper&lt;br /&gt;
  | publication-place = Randolph, Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages =&lt;br /&gt;
  | year =1979&lt;br /&gt;
  | date =September 29, 1979&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = &lt;br /&gt;
}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; he accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 11, 1954 Flanders introduced a resolution charging McCarthy “with unbecoming conduct&amp;quot; and calling for his removal from his committee chairmanship. Upon the advice of Senators John Sherman Cooper and J. William Fulbright and legal assistance from the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]], a liberal organization, he modified his resolution to “bring it in line with previous actions of censure.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 260-261, 267&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After introducing his censure motion, Flanders had no active role in the ensuing Watkins Committee hearings. Flanders bore McCarthy no personal animosity and reported that McCarthy accepted his invitation to join him at lunch after the hearings had taken place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Flanders&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Ralph E.&lt;br /&gt;
 | year =1961 &lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Senator from Vermont&lt;br /&gt;
 | publication-place = Boston&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Little, Brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages = 267-268&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
(rest of existing text would follow here)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===References for the above passage===&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Your comments below, please===&lt;br /&gt;
This certainly is interesting, well researched and balanced.  The sentence, &amp;quot;Eisenhower Administration cabinet officials told Flanders to “lay off,” while President Eisenhower sent Flanders a brief note of appreciation for his speech, but did not otherwise confer with him or explicitly support him&amp;quot; is fine.  Recently I read Eisenhower's account in his ''Memoirs'', Eisenhower moreless indirectly takes credit for bringing down McCarthy.  I have no objections to inserting this material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me add, it was peculiar circumstances with a now de-Sysoped Sysop that led to the current shape of the Joe McCarthy entry, which ''still'' emphasizes McCarthy in his own time, that is, from 1950 to 1954.  In the long run, that is to say, in the context of American history this will need to be revised, and we need to get away from McCarthy's failings, and emphasize what McCarthy investigated,  Communist Party USA activity for the two decades ''prior'' to anyone every hearing of McCarthy.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:18, 12 December 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357087</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357087"/>
		<updated>2007-12-23T03:38:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Flanders role in Senate censure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== National Review article plus we should mention MCCarthy's apparent drinking problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a helpful article from the conservative magazine ''National Review'': http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, I think we should acknowledge McCarthy's apparent alcohol problem and some of his possible other shortcomings which the conservative National Review article mentions.  I think it is important that Conservapedia does not fail to reveal relevant facts about a person as one of the virtues of the Bible is that is does not fail to reveal the blemishes of its heroes. I think having a article on McCarthy without mentioning his apparent excess drinking is like having an article on Churchill without mentioning his excess drinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:37, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The National Review article doesn't mention his (alleged) drinking problem. Do you have any objectives sources that he did have a problem? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:49, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oops, the NR article does say &amp;quot;Alcohol addled McCarthy's wits, which were not that sharp to begin with.&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144/pg_3] But that's all. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:07, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ruth Watt, who worked on the PSI staff [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf] is ths best unbiased source on this.  In an interview for the Senate hisotrians office she says for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Joe McCarthy was a very kind man, very thoughtful of people working with him, and I was very much taken with the way he treated people. (pg. 140)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': You once said that you had watched the program &amp;quot;Tail-Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; on television. What was your impression of that program?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I thought it was terrible. It was not factual. It was an insult to the Marine Corps, I thought, because who in the Marine Corps would allow somebody to go around shooting the way he did? It was completely untrue, I'm sure. I don't believe the girl that did the work did the research in the right places. She did the things she wanted to do, in my opinion. I thought it was very inaccurate. I was disgusted with it. I didn't think it was fair or true. There might have been some things in there that were true, but very few. But I suppose she had to make it interesting for TV, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': The portrayal of McCarthy as a senator didn't ring true to you, as a person who knew him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Not necessarily, no. They had to exaggerate. Of course, a program like that was not supposed to be a factual thing anyway, was it? If it was, it was not factual. There were just so many things that were not true. I'd have to go through it piece by piece before I could say what. (pgs 154-155)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': I've heard that after the censure Senator McCarthy began to drink pretty heavily. Was that noticeable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I don't think it was any different then it was before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': He drank heavily before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I think he drank before. I don't know that he drank that heavily, but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis. And about that time someone told me that McCarthy had told Senator McClellan he had just a year to live. He knew that he had something that was not going to get any better. The person who told me this, he never would have said it, but this person knew that he had said it to Senator McClellan. I was told about it in '56 sometime. He died the end of April in '57. (pg. 150)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That is unreliable hearsay. Watt didn't know the answers to the questions, and just recited rumors. If this is the best evidence, then it is better to say nothing. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:15, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I think he drank before''. '''I don't know that he drank that heavily''', but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That doesn't even come close to being a reliable source, factual or worthy of any mention in a scholarly article.  Period. It is worthy, however of Wikipedia or the National Inquirer. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt attended all the hearings, all of them, public and private, worked with McCarthy outside hearings in routine staff work, and she knew McCarthy as intimately as any living family member could testify, which are few in number, unavailble, or haven't left any written record.  She worked closely with him for many years (and all the Senators, Ray Cohn, and Bobby Kenedy), knew them all very personally, and tells us all straight up what has been written and publicized about McCarthy for several decades is untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt even shed some light on the close relationship between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy, and Bobby Kennedy's family (McCarthy is the Godfather of two of RFK's kids).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt talks about the spirit of bipartisanship on the Committee, defined as such, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Everybody worked together and there were no politics involved. It was just an investigating committee and you were for motherhood and against sin!! Everybody was in the same boat. But after the McCarthy problems, why then the senators said we had to have a minority counsel, that was in January 1954. ([http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_2.pdf pgs. 61-62])  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. United States Senate Historical Office -- Oral History Project in league with the WP or National Enquirer?  I'd rate it a little higher.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, I don't think either Roger or I are disagreeing that he might have been a drinker. Or doubting Ruth Watt...however, it is uncorroborated, and she herself said  &amp;quot;I don't know that he drank that heavily&amp;quot;, so we now have conflicting information, and nary a Doctor to define for us what is &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not much&amp;quot;. Personally I would be surprised if he wasn't drinking, given the number of years he was under constant attack.  Her recollections of the committee style is something she is expert on, so that isn't hearsay. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Her testmony is extremely important.  It shows (a) all the garbage from Hollywood and elsewhere is untrue, including what it says about his drinking.  Much of the stories of his drinking originate from that film, ''Tailgunner Joe''. (b) She says he was a very kind man.  She sat through the roughly 600 witnesses who were called to testify.  She doesn't say what an animal he was.  Rather, she was very taken by his kindness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Watt relates only one instance she feared things might have got out of control.  Her husband was a door guard, and a witness who was to testify had threatened McCarthy's life.  Her husband had to search the guy for weapons, and if he did sneak a weapon in the room, her husband would have to be the guy to intervene.  And he likewise was fearful of her, cause she was in the room with the crazed communist lunatic who the press reported  would kill Joe McCarthy if given the chance.  She says the hearing went without any trouble, McCarthy was cordial and polite as he always was, and the guy was just chicken, all talk &amp;amp; blather.  Given the opportunity to kill the monster, chose to give testimony instead.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:11, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the thrust of National Review article accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Review]] is a conservative magazine. Is this National Review article a generally accurate portrayal of McCarthy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arthur Herman, a program coordinator at the Smithsonian Institution and an adjunct professor at George Mason University, has filed a brief for the defense that is simultaneously audacious in its argument and painstaking in its scholarship. It is a work of vindication all the more powerful for standing so nearly alone, its only company a new novel by William F. Buckley Jr. And it challenges us to rethink our understanding not only of McCarthy's moment, but of our own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman, it should be said straight off, can do only so much with McCarthy the man. Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder. But if McCarthy never rose to the marble-statue level of statesmanship, he was, Herman contends, something more than the vicious demagogue he has been made out to be.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is held in odium for his accusations that men like George C. Marshall and Dean Acheson accepted security risks into their department because of some lack of loyalty to the United States. Herman has no more time for those accusations than the severest of McCarthy's detractors. But something hindered those two wise men from acting as vigorously as they ought to have done to protect their department and their country against those risks, and Herman's defense of McCarthy is based on exposing what that something was. He quotes Raymond Moley, one of FDR's early advisers, confessing in 1953 that McCarthy &amp;quot;was the product of the fright and anger of a 'deceived and injured public,' who had been lied to regarding the Soviet threat both at home and abroad.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman's book does a fine job of exploring individual cases and exposing the falseness of the allegation that McCarthyism led to the punishment and humiliation of innocent people. He does a fine job, too, of catching McCarthy's political opponents in behavior every bit as unscrupulous as the junior senator's....&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:38, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's right.  Herman makes largely the same point I made; the issues McCarthy took up were two decades of Soviet infiltration into the New Deal.  The US fought a war as a Soviet ally, and suddenly the US was forced into a nuclear arms race with that same ally ''because of New Dealers'', not because of any technolgical achievements the Soviet Union accomplished in its own right.  Our fellow citizens who were responsible for this insane nuclear arms race responded that they just had never stopped fighting fascism, McCarthy and anyone else who question thier motives or methods are considered by them as fascists as well.  These are the basic issues.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:53, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobS, you agree with the good things that Herman stated about MCCarthy but do you agree with this: &amp;quot;Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric.....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:59, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::McCarthy, at the time, did much damage to the cause of anti-Communism.  McCarthy it appears was using the issue for short term partisan advantage.  When Ike won, what it really looks like is Eisenhower himeself was behind McCarthy's destruction.  And if there's a villian, it's probably Hoover, who really just used McCarthy without telling him all the facts.  With the picture we have today, we can say McCarthy was right in his basic premise.  But then again, it all relates more to the Adminisration of Franklin Roosevelt, who basically it appears, allowed a foreign power to take over his Adminstration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, the Soviet Union manuovered the US into war with Japan, to get the US to destroy the lone obstacle to the Moscow directed plan to spread Communism to China &amp;amp; the Far East.  Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union is what purchased the enslavement of 100 million people for 50 years in Eastern Europe (350 million at the time of the collapse of the Soviet bloc).  The Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, none of these things had to be; it all was the result of CPUSA infiltration and subversion into the Adminstration of Franklin Roosevelt.  Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bascially to stop the exact same things the CPUSA was doing here in the United States at the exact same time.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:24, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Hitler probably came to power for different reasons as a whole, but it cannot be denied that Hitler was anti-communist.  At the same time,  I am not that familar with what the CP was doing in Germany. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the exact language used here [http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410622b.html STATEMENT BY JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER, ON THE DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION], Berlin, June 22, 1941. ''New York Times'', June 23, 1941, where the Germans explain precisely ''what'' prompted the German invasion,  and ''why'' the Hitler-Stalin pact was ended; no less than three times it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;..Comintern to seek to conduct their subversive activities...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activities were carried on in territories occupied by Germany&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activity and reconnoitering carried on by the Comintern. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA &amp;amp; the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these &amp;quot;biographies&amp;quot; have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flanders role in Senate censure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding Vermont Senator Flanders's role in speaking out against McCarthy and initiating the Senate censure hearings, I request that the italicized passages below be either properly referenced or deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by Liberals, Communists, etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials''. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of Adolf Hitler as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;[97] ''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials'',&amp;quot; the citable literature suggests that Flanders felt that McCarthy's emphasis on possible Communists within our borders distracted us from a much greater menace of Communist encroachment abroad. The literature shows Flanders to be a conservative marching to his own drummer and not supported (except for one note from Eisenhower after his March, 1954 speech) by the administration. In his autobiography, ''Senator from Vermont,'' Flanders reports a cabinet member taking him aside and suggesting that a majority of other cabinet members wanted him to lay off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress,''&amp;quot; given Flanders's confirmed enmity towards the Roosevelt administration, it would be remarkable to suggest that he would be in collaboration with the National Committee for an Effective Congress. Instead, he reports having consulted with Senators Cooper and Fulbright to develop articles of censure that were consistent with previous actions. I've seen no other literature that contradicts this report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel that even without the italicized passages, there's plenty of material to characterize Flanders's role. If there are credible citations supporting those passages, then they should stand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 13:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Norwich, your reliance on Flanders' own ramblings of the events surrounding Senator McCarthy is not set upon a  sufficient factual basis. While the info you dislike is attributed to an appropriate secondary source, namely the Heritage Foundation. [http://www.heritage.org/Research/GovernmentReform/IA5.cfm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Book by [[M. Stanton Evans]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone read the new book, ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies''? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not yet, but User:Scorpio said he'd be back after it came out. According to the [http://www.amazon.com/Blacklisted-History-Senator-McCarthy-Americas/dp/140008105X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-0280032-8865773?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194391332&amp;amp;sr=8-1 Amazon Review], &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the FBI knew '''as early as 1942''' that [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]], the director of the atomic bomb project, had been identified by Communist leaders as a party member; that high-level U.S. officials were warned that [[Alger Hiss]] was a Soviet spy almost '''a decade before the Hiss case became a public scandal'''; that a cabal of White House, Justice Department, and State Department officials lied about and covered up the [[Amerasia]] spy case; and that the State Department had been heavily penetrated by Communists and Soviet agents before McCarthy came on the scene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We have most of this I think already, but Evans maybe able to shed more light on other cases, and he certainly will be an invaluable, and historically definitve source in the post-[[Venona]]/Soviet Archives era.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:59, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, Rob, as promised, I have stopped by after ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies'' came out and had a chance to read through half of it. I can only say that Evans did a brilliant job with the book. But honestly, he could have taken some of his work straight from our work here. Evans has done the best job of examining Senator McCarthy's work ever seen. It is a must read for anyone who wants to work on this article or simply better understand the subject. I'm coming across a great deal of substantive information. The book utterly destroys anything that the Left had with which to attack the Senator. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Unfortunately my schedule is such that I have limited time to devote to this article (or any article). (EDIT:  I just noticed that the article has been unprotected and also noticed that the &amp;quot;Wikifying&amp;quot; of the article has begun with the addition of Senator Flanders own false perception of the events in question. Sad to see.) But I urge you to read Evan's book and add whatever you feel will bolster this article. Hope all is well and a Merry Christmas to you and everyone here at Conservapedia. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:10, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357086</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357086"/>
		<updated>2007-12-23T03:36:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Book by M. Stanton Evans */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== National Review article plus we should mention MCCarthy's apparent drinking problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a helpful article from the conservative magazine ''National Review'': http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, I think we should acknowledge McCarthy's apparent alcohol problem and some of his possible other shortcomings which the conservative National Review article mentions.  I think it is important that Conservapedia does not fail to reveal relevant facts about a person as one of the virtues of the Bible is that is does not fail to reveal the blemishes of its heroes. I think having a article on McCarthy without mentioning his apparent excess drinking is like having an article on Churchill without mentioning his excess drinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:37, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The National Review article doesn't mention his (alleged) drinking problem. Do you have any objectives sources that he did have a problem? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:49, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oops, the NR article does say &amp;quot;Alcohol addled McCarthy's wits, which were not that sharp to begin with.&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144/pg_3] But that's all. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:07, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ruth Watt, who worked on the PSI staff [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf] is ths best unbiased source on this.  In an interview for the Senate hisotrians office she says for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Joe McCarthy was a very kind man, very thoughtful of people working with him, and I was very much taken with the way he treated people. (pg. 140)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': You once said that you had watched the program &amp;quot;Tail-Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; on television. What was your impression of that program?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I thought it was terrible. It was not factual. It was an insult to the Marine Corps, I thought, because who in the Marine Corps would allow somebody to go around shooting the way he did? It was completely untrue, I'm sure. I don't believe the girl that did the work did the research in the right places. She did the things she wanted to do, in my opinion. I thought it was very inaccurate. I was disgusted with it. I didn't think it was fair or true. There might have been some things in there that were true, but very few. But I suppose she had to make it interesting for TV, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': The portrayal of McCarthy as a senator didn't ring true to you, as a person who knew him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Not necessarily, no. They had to exaggerate. Of course, a program like that was not supposed to be a factual thing anyway, was it? If it was, it was not factual. There were just so many things that were not true. I'd have to go through it piece by piece before I could say what. (pgs 154-155)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': I've heard that after the censure Senator McCarthy began to drink pretty heavily. Was that noticeable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I don't think it was any different then it was before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': He drank heavily before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I think he drank before. I don't know that he drank that heavily, but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis. And about that time someone told me that McCarthy had told Senator McClellan he had just a year to live. He knew that he had something that was not going to get any better. The person who told me this, he never would have said it, but this person knew that he had said it to Senator McClellan. I was told about it in '56 sometime. He died the end of April in '57. (pg. 150)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That is unreliable hearsay. Watt didn't know the answers to the questions, and just recited rumors. If this is the best evidence, then it is better to say nothing. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:15, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I think he drank before''. '''I don't know that he drank that heavily''', but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That doesn't even come close to being a reliable source, factual or worthy of any mention in a scholarly article.  Period. It is worthy, however of Wikipedia or the National Inquirer. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt attended all the hearings, all of them, public and private, worked with McCarthy outside hearings in routine staff work, and she knew McCarthy as intimately as any living family member could testify, which are few in number, unavailble, or haven't left any written record.  She worked closely with him for many years (and all the Senators, Ray Cohn, and Bobby Kenedy), knew them all very personally, and tells us all straight up what has been written and publicized about McCarthy for several decades is untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt even shed some light on the close relationship between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy, and Bobby Kennedy's family (McCarthy is the Godfather of two of RFK's kids).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt talks about the spirit of bipartisanship on the Committee, defined as such, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Everybody worked together and there were no politics involved. It was just an investigating committee and you were for motherhood and against sin!! Everybody was in the same boat. But after the McCarthy problems, why then the senators said we had to have a minority counsel, that was in January 1954. ([http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_2.pdf pgs. 61-62])  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. United States Senate Historical Office -- Oral History Project in league with the WP or National Enquirer?  I'd rate it a little higher.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, I don't think either Roger or I are disagreeing that he might have been a drinker. Or doubting Ruth Watt...however, it is uncorroborated, and she herself said  &amp;quot;I don't know that he drank that heavily&amp;quot;, so we now have conflicting information, and nary a Doctor to define for us what is &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not much&amp;quot;. Personally I would be surprised if he wasn't drinking, given the number of years he was under constant attack.  Her recollections of the committee style is something she is expert on, so that isn't hearsay. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Her testmony is extremely important.  It shows (a) all the garbage from Hollywood and elsewhere is untrue, including what it says about his drinking.  Much of the stories of his drinking originate from that film, ''Tailgunner Joe''. (b) She says he was a very kind man.  She sat through the roughly 600 witnesses who were called to testify.  She doesn't say what an animal he was.  Rather, she was very taken by his kindness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Watt relates only one instance she feared things might have got out of control.  Her husband was a door guard, and a witness who was to testify had threatened McCarthy's life.  Her husband had to search the guy for weapons, and if he did sneak a weapon in the room, her husband would have to be the guy to intervene.  And he likewise was fearful of her, cause she was in the room with the crazed communist lunatic who the press reported  would kill Joe McCarthy if given the chance.  She says the hearing went without any trouble, McCarthy was cordial and polite as he always was, and the guy was just chicken, all talk &amp;amp; blather.  Given the opportunity to kill the monster, chose to give testimony instead.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:11, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the thrust of National Review article accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Review]] is a conservative magazine. Is this National Review article a generally accurate portrayal of McCarthy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arthur Herman, a program coordinator at the Smithsonian Institution and an adjunct professor at George Mason University, has filed a brief for the defense that is simultaneously audacious in its argument and painstaking in its scholarship. It is a work of vindication all the more powerful for standing so nearly alone, its only company a new novel by William F. Buckley Jr. And it challenges us to rethink our understanding not only of McCarthy's moment, but of our own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman, it should be said straight off, can do only so much with McCarthy the man. Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder. But if McCarthy never rose to the marble-statue level of statesmanship, he was, Herman contends, something more than the vicious demagogue he has been made out to be.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is held in odium for his accusations that men like George C. Marshall and Dean Acheson accepted security risks into their department because of some lack of loyalty to the United States. Herman has no more time for those accusations than the severest of McCarthy's detractors. But something hindered those two wise men from acting as vigorously as they ought to have done to protect their department and their country against those risks, and Herman's defense of McCarthy is based on exposing what that something was. He quotes Raymond Moley, one of FDR's early advisers, confessing in 1953 that McCarthy &amp;quot;was the product of the fright and anger of a 'deceived and injured public,' who had been lied to regarding the Soviet threat both at home and abroad.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman's book does a fine job of exploring individual cases and exposing the falseness of the allegation that McCarthyism led to the punishment and humiliation of innocent people. He does a fine job, too, of catching McCarthy's political opponents in behavior every bit as unscrupulous as the junior senator's....&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:38, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's right.  Herman makes largely the same point I made; the issues McCarthy took up were two decades of Soviet infiltration into the New Deal.  The US fought a war as a Soviet ally, and suddenly the US was forced into a nuclear arms race with that same ally ''because of New Dealers'', not because of any technolgical achievements the Soviet Union accomplished in its own right.  Our fellow citizens who were responsible for this insane nuclear arms race responded that they just had never stopped fighting fascism, McCarthy and anyone else who question thier motives or methods are considered by them as fascists as well.  These are the basic issues.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:53, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobS, you agree with the good things that Herman stated about MCCarthy but do you agree with this: &amp;quot;Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric.....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:59, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::McCarthy, at the time, did much damage to the cause of anti-Communism.  McCarthy it appears was using the issue for short term partisan advantage.  When Ike won, what it really looks like is Eisenhower himeself was behind McCarthy's destruction.  And if there's a villian, it's probably Hoover, who really just used McCarthy without telling him all the facts.  With the picture we have today, we can say McCarthy was right in his basic premise.  But then again, it all relates more to the Adminisration of Franklin Roosevelt, who basically it appears, allowed a foreign power to take over his Adminstration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, the Soviet Union manuovered the US into war with Japan, to get the US to destroy the lone obstacle to the Moscow directed plan to spread Communism to China &amp;amp; the Far East.  Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union is what purchased the enslavement of 100 million people for 50 years in Eastern Europe (350 million at the time of the collapse of the Soviet bloc).  The Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, none of these things had to be; it all was the result of CPUSA infiltration and subversion into the Adminstration of Franklin Roosevelt.  Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bascially to stop the exact same things the CPUSA was doing here in the United States at the exact same time.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:24, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Hitler probably came to power for different reasons as a whole, but it cannot be denied that Hitler was anti-communist.  At the same time,  I am not that familar with what the CP was doing in Germany. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the exact language used here [http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410622b.html STATEMENT BY JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER, ON THE DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION], Berlin, June 22, 1941. ''New York Times'', June 23, 1941, where the Germans explain precisely ''what'' prompted the German invasion,  and ''why'' the Hitler-Stalin pact was ended; no less than three times it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;..Comintern to seek to conduct their subversive activities...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activities were carried on in territories occupied by Germany&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activity and reconnoitering carried on by the Comintern. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA &amp;amp; the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these &amp;quot;biographies&amp;quot; have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flanders role in Senate censure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding Vermont Senator Flanders's role in speaking out against McCarthy and initiating the Senate censure hearings, I request that the italicized passages below be either properly referenced or deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by Liberals, Communists, etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials''. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of Adolf Hitler as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;[97] ''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials'',&amp;quot; the citable literature suggests that Flanders felt that McCarthy's emphasis on possible Communists within our borders distracted us from a much greater menace of Communist encroachment abroad. The literature shows Flanders to be a conservative marching to his own drummer and not supported (except for one note from Eisenhower after his March, 1954 speech) by the administration. In his autobiography, ''Senator from Vermont,'' Flanders reports a cabinet member taking him aside and suggesting that a majority of other cabinet members wanted him to lay off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress,''&amp;quot; given Flanders's confirmed enmity towards the Roosevelt administration, it would be remarkable to suggest that he would be in collaboration with the National Committee for an Effective Congress. Instead, he reports having consulted with Senators Cooper and Fulbright to develop articles of censure that were consistent with previous actions. I've seen no other literature that contradicts this report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel that even without the italicized passages, there's plenty of material to characterize Flanders's role. If there are credible citations supporting those passages, then they should stand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 13:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Book by [[M. Stanton Evans]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone read the new book, ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies''? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not yet, but User:Scorpio said he'd be back after it came out. According to the [http://www.amazon.com/Blacklisted-History-Senator-McCarthy-Americas/dp/140008105X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-0280032-8865773?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194391332&amp;amp;sr=8-1 Amazon Review], &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the FBI knew '''as early as 1942''' that [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]], the director of the atomic bomb project, had been identified by Communist leaders as a party member; that high-level U.S. officials were warned that [[Alger Hiss]] was a Soviet spy almost '''a decade before the Hiss case became a public scandal'''; that a cabal of White House, Justice Department, and State Department officials lied about and covered up the [[Amerasia]] spy case; and that the State Department had been heavily penetrated by Communists and Soviet agents before McCarthy came on the scene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We have most of this I think already, but Evans maybe able to shed more light on other cases, and he certainly will be an invaluable, and historically definitve source in the post-[[Venona]]/Soviet Archives era.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:59, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, Rob, as promised, I have stopped by after ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies'' came out and had a chance to read through half of it. I can only say that Evans did a brilliant job with the book. But honestly, he could have taken some of his work straight from our work here. Evans has done the best job of examining Senator McCarthy's work ever seen. It is a must read for anyone who wants to work on this article or simply better understand the subject. I'm coming across a great deal of substantive information. The book utterly destroys anything that the Left had with which to attack the Senator. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Unfortunately my schedule is such that I have limited time to devote to this article (or any article). (EDIT:  I just noticed that the article has been unprotected and also noticed that the &amp;quot;Wikifying&amp;quot; of the article has begun with the addition of Senator Flanders own false perception of the events in question. Sad to see.) But I urge you to read Evan's book and add whatever you feel will bolster this article. Hope all is well and a Merry Christmas to you and everyone here at Conservapedia. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:10, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357083</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=357083"/>
		<updated>2007-12-23T03:10:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Book by M. Stanton Evans */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== National Review article plus we should mention MCCarthy's apparent drinking problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a helpful article from the conservative magazine ''National Review'': http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, I think we should acknowledge McCarthy's apparent alcohol problem and some of his possible other shortcomings which the conservative National Review article mentions.  I think it is important that Conservapedia does not fail to reveal relevant facts about a person as one of the virtues of the Bible is that is does not fail to reveal the blemishes of its heroes. I think having a article on McCarthy without mentioning his apparent excess drinking is like having an article on Churchill without mentioning his excess drinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:37, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The National Review article doesn't mention his (alleged) drinking problem. Do you have any objectives sources that he did have a problem? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:49, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oops, the NR article does say &amp;quot;Alcohol addled McCarthy's wits, which were not that sharp to begin with.&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144/pg_3] But that's all. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:07, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ruth Watt, who worked on the PSI staff [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf] is ths best unbiased source on this.  In an interview for the Senate hisotrians office she says for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Joe McCarthy was a very kind man, very thoughtful of people working with him, and I was very much taken with the way he treated people. (pg. 140)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': You once said that you had watched the program &amp;quot;Tail-Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; on television. What was your impression of that program?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I thought it was terrible. It was not factual. It was an insult to the Marine Corps, I thought, because who in the Marine Corps would allow somebody to go around shooting the way he did? It was completely untrue, I'm sure. I don't believe the girl that did the work did the research in the right places. She did the things she wanted to do, in my opinion. I thought it was very inaccurate. I was disgusted with it. I didn't think it was fair or true. There might have been some things in there that were true, but very few. But I suppose she had to make it interesting for TV, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': The portrayal of McCarthy as a senator didn't ring true to you, as a person who knew him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Not necessarily, no. They had to exaggerate. Of course, a program like that was not supposed to be a factual thing anyway, was it? If it was, it was not factual. There were just so many things that were not true. I'd have to go through it piece by piece before I could say what. (pgs 154-155)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': I've heard that after the censure Senator McCarthy began to drink pretty heavily. Was that noticeable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I don't think it was any different then it was before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': He drank heavily before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I think he drank before. I don't know that he drank that heavily, but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis. And about that time someone told me that McCarthy had told Senator McClellan he had just a year to live. He knew that he had something that was not going to get any better. The person who told me this, he never would have said it, but this person knew that he had said it to Senator McClellan. I was told about it in '56 sometime. He died the end of April in '57. (pg. 150)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That is unreliable hearsay. Watt didn't know the answers to the questions, and just recited rumors. If this is the best evidence, then it is better to say nothing. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:15, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I think he drank before''. '''I don't know that he drank that heavily''', but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That doesn't even come close to being a reliable source, factual or worthy of any mention in a scholarly article.  Period. It is worthy, however of Wikipedia or the National Inquirer. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt attended all the hearings, all of them, public and private, worked with McCarthy outside hearings in routine staff work, and she knew McCarthy as intimately as any living family member could testify, which are few in number, unavailble, or haven't left any written record.  She worked closely with him for many years (and all the Senators, Ray Cohn, and Bobby Kenedy), knew them all very personally, and tells us all straight up what has been written and publicized about McCarthy for several decades is untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt even shed some light on the close relationship between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy, and Bobby Kennedy's family (McCarthy is the Godfather of two of RFK's kids).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt talks about the spirit of bipartisanship on the Committee, defined as such, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Everybody worked together and there were no politics involved. It was just an investigating committee and you were for motherhood and against sin!! Everybody was in the same boat. But after the McCarthy problems, why then the senators said we had to have a minority counsel, that was in January 1954. ([http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_2.pdf pgs. 61-62])  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. United States Senate Historical Office -- Oral History Project in league with the WP or National Enquirer?  I'd rate it a little higher.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, I don't think either Roger or I are disagreeing that he might have been a drinker. Or doubting Ruth Watt...however, it is uncorroborated, and she herself said  &amp;quot;I don't know that he drank that heavily&amp;quot;, so we now have conflicting information, and nary a Doctor to define for us what is &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not much&amp;quot;. Personally I would be surprised if he wasn't drinking, given the number of years he was under constant attack.  Her recollections of the committee style is something she is expert on, so that isn't hearsay. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Her testmony is extremely important.  It shows (a) all the garbage from Hollywood and elsewhere is untrue, including what it says about his drinking.  Much of the stories of his drinking originate from that film, ''Tailgunner Joe''. (b) She says he was a very kind man.  She sat through the roughly 600 witnesses who were called to testify.  She doesn't say what an animal he was.  Rather, she was very taken by his kindness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Watt relates only one instance she feared things might have got out of control.  Her husband was a door guard, and a witness who was to testify had threatened McCarthy's life.  Her husband had to search the guy for weapons, and if he did sneak a weapon in the room, her husband would have to be the guy to intervene.  And he likewise was fearful of her, cause she was in the room with the crazed communist lunatic who the press reported  would kill Joe McCarthy if given the chance.  She says the hearing went without any trouble, McCarthy was cordial and polite as he always was, and the guy was just chicken, all talk &amp;amp; blather.  Given the opportunity to kill the monster, chose to give testimony instead.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:11, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the thrust of National Review article accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Review]] is a conservative magazine. Is this National Review article a generally accurate portrayal of McCarthy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arthur Herman, a program coordinator at the Smithsonian Institution and an adjunct professor at George Mason University, has filed a brief for the defense that is simultaneously audacious in its argument and painstaking in its scholarship. It is a work of vindication all the more powerful for standing so nearly alone, its only company a new novel by William F. Buckley Jr. And it challenges us to rethink our understanding not only of McCarthy's moment, but of our own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman, it should be said straight off, can do only so much with McCarthy the man. Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder. But if McCarthy never rose to the marble-statue level of statesmanship, he was, Herman contends, something more than the vicious demagogue he has been made out to be.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is held in odium for his accusations that men like George C. Marshall and Dean Acheson accepted security risks into their department because of some lack of loyalty to the United States. Herman has no more time for those accusations than the severest of McCarthy's detractors. But something hindered those two wise men from acting as vigorously as they ought to have done to protect their department and their country against those risks, and Herman's defense of McCarthy is based on exposing what that something was. He quotes Raymond Moley, one of FDR's early advisers, confessing in 1953 that McCarthy &amp;quot;was the product of the fright and anger of a 'deceived and injured public,' who had been lied to regarding the Soviet threat both at home and abroad.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman's book does a fine job of exploring individual cases and exposing the falseness of the allegation that McCarthyism led to the punishment and humiliation of innocent people. He does a fine job, too, of catching McCarthy's political opponents in behavior every bit as unscrupulous as the junior senator's....&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:38, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's right.  Herman makes largely the same point I made; the issues McCarthy took up were two decades of Soviet infiltration into the New Deal.  The US fought a war as a Soviet ally, and suddenly the US was forced into a nuclear arms race with that same ally ''because of New Dealers'', not because of any technolgical achievements the Soviet Union accomplished in its own right.  Our fellow citizens who were responsible for this insane nuclear arms race responded that they just had never stopped fighting fascism, McCarthy and anyone else who question thier motives or methods are considered by them as fascists as well.  These are the basic issues.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:53, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobS, you agree with the good things that Herman stated about MCCarthy but do you agree with this: &amp;quot;Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric.....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:59, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::McCarthy, at the time, did much damage to the cause of anti-Communism.  McCarthy it appears was using the issue for short term partisan advantage.  When Ike won, what it really looks like is Eisenhower himeself was behind McCarthy's destruction.  And if there's a villian, it's probably Hoover, who really just used McCarthy without telling him all the facts.  With the picture we have today, we can say McCarthy was right in his basic premise.  But then again, it all relates more to the Adminisration of Franklin Roosevelt, who basically it appears, allowed a foreign power to take over his Adminstration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, the Soviet Union manuovered the US into war with Japan, to get the US to destroy the lone obstacle to the Moscow directed plan to spread Communism to China &amp;amp; the Far East.  Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union is what purchased the enslavement of 100 million people for 50 years in Eastern Europe (350 million at the time of the collapse of the Soviet bloc).  The Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, none of these things had to be; it all was the result of CPUSA infiltration and subversion into the Adminstration of Franklin Roosevelt.  Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bascially to stop the exact same things the CPUSA was doing here in the United States at the exact same time.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:24, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Hitler probably came to power for different reasons as a whole, but it cannot be denied that Hitler was anti-communist.  At the same time,  I am not that familar with what the CP was doing in Germany. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the exact language used here [http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410622b.html STATEMENT BY JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER, ON THE DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION], Berlin, June 22, 1941. ''New York Times'', June 23, 1941, where the Germans explain precisely ''what'' prompted the German invasion,  and ''why'' the Hitler-Stalin pact was ended; no less than three times it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;..Comintern to seek to conduct their subversive activities...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activities were carried on in territories occupied by Germany&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activity and reconnoitering carried on by the Comintern. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA &amp;amp; the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these &amp;quot;biographies&amp;quot; have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flanders role in Senate censure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding Vermont Senator Flanders's role in speaking out against McCarthy and initiating the Senate censure hearings, I request that the italicized passages below be either properly referenced or deleted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by Liberals, Communists, etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials''. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of Adolf Hitler as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;[97] ''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;It was started by fellow Republican Senator Ralph E. Flanders of Vermont ''at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and Eisenhower Administration officials'',&amp;quot; the citable literature suggests that Flanders felt that McCarthy's emphasis on possible Communists within our borders distracted us from a much greater menace of Communist encroachment abroad. The literature shows Flanders to be a conservative marching to his own drummer and not supported (except for one note from Eisenhower after his March, 1954 speech) by the administration. In his autobiography, ''Senator from Vermont,'' Flanders reports a cabinet member taking him aside and suggesting that a majority of other cabinet members wanted him to lay off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the statement that &amp;quot;''Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the National Committee for an Effective Congress,''&amp;quot; given Flanders's confirmed enmity towards the Roosevelt administration, it would be remarkable to suggest that he would be in collaboration with the National Committee for an Effective Congress. Instead, he reports having consulted with Senators Cooper and Fulbright to develop articles of censure that were consistent with previous actions. I've seen no other literature that contradicts this report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel that even without the italicized passages, there's plenty of material to characterize Flanders's role. If there are credible citations supporting those passages, then they should stand. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Norwich|Norwich]] 13:49, 23 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Book by [[M. Stanton Evans]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has anyone read the new book, ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies''? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:23, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Not yet, but User:Scorpio said he'd be back after it came out. According to the [http://www.amazon.com/Blacklisted-History-Senator-McCarthy-Americas/dp/140008105X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/102-0280032-8865773?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194391332&amp;amp;sr=8-1 Amazon Review], &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the FBI knew '''as early as 1942''' that [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]], the director of the atomic bomb project, had been identified by Communist leaders as a party member; that high-level U.S. officials were warned that [[Alger Hiss]] was a Soviet spy almost '''a decade before the Hiss case became a public scandal'''; that a cabal of White House, Justice Department, and State Department officials lied about and covered up the [[Amerasia]] spy case; and that the State Department had been heavily penetrated by Communists and Soviet agents before McCarthy came on the scene.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We have most of this I think already, but Evans maybe able to shed more light on other cases, and he certainly will be an invaluable, and historically definitve source in the post-[[Venona]]/Soviet Archives era.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 16:59, 7 November 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, Rob, as promised, I have stopped by after ''Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies'' came out and had a chance to read through half of it. I can only say that Evans did a brilliant job with the book. But honestly, he could have taken some of his work straight from our work here. Evans has done the best job of examining Senator McCarthy's work ever seen. It is a must read for anyone who wants to work on this article or simply better understand the subject. I'm coming across a great deal of substantive information. The book utterly destroys anything that the Left had with which to attack the Senator. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Unfortunately my schedule is such that I have limited time to devote to this article (or any article) and the hassle of getting permission for every change because I'm not a SysOp is just silly and far too time consuming. But I urge you to read the book and add whatever you feel will bolster this article. Hope all is well and a Merry Christmas to you and everyone here at Conservapedia. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:10, 22 December 2007 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=324019</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=324019"/>
		<updated>2007-10-29T02:14:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Whatever became of...... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This is gonna take some more time.  I tend to be very thorough and leave no stone unturned.  But I have a big hunch, the CP version could look quite different than the WP.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:25, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, that's fine with me. You do great research work so I'm sure you'll get it right but in the meantime, what is a summation of what this was all about? Was Butler lying, crazy, etc.? Was there really some crazy plot? What do you think? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mcCarthy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the additions or propsed substitutions on my talk page and i can merge them. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:44, 6 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, one thing that would be great is if changes and edits to the McCarthy article be limited to those done by SysOps. Which would require me to ask if someone would please elevate me to that level. Any thoughts on that? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:49, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Whatever became of...... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:58, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for asking, TK. It's good to hear from you. :) Actually the McCarthy page was locked for some reason and since I wasn't a SysOp, I would have to get approval to add any further information. Rob and I had made the McCarthy page the definitive source on the internet for accurate information regarding Senator McCarthy. Conservapedia recently honored our work by making it the article of the month. And, sadly, after all my work, I was relegated to having to get approval for any additional work. Since that seemed like just another hassle and since there was no apparent interest in making me a SysOp or giving me the ability to add info without going through such trouble, I thought it best to turn my attention to other matters.&lt;br /&gt;
:I still think there's about 100 hours work worth of additional info that needs to be added to the article and to related articles. I wished Rob continued success on his tireless work on Communist subversion in govt. and bowed out of the picture. No hard feelings toward anyone and I was glad to have the opportunity to contribute to Conservapedia. Also, thanks to you for your guidance. I greatly appreciate it. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:14, 28 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Please understand I am, unreservedly, at your disposal, whenever you would like, to help. It was a pleasant surprise to come back from a horrid tele-meeting to your posting! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:18, 28 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::TK, as usual, you have an uncanny ability to say and do the right things to make someone feel good about themselves and their efforts. That's a rare quality and distinction and it's an honor to know someone with these fine attributes. Thank you for your kind words. Should my schedule change to allow for free time once again, I will contact you for advice on how to proceed so as to be of the greatest service to this wonderful encyclopedia and assist in any project where you may decide I can assist you. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:14, 28 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=323914</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=323914"/>
		<updated>2007-10-28T23:14:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Whatever became of...... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This is gonna take some more time.  I tend to be very thorough and leave no stone unturned.  But I have a big hunch, the CP version could look quite different than the WP.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:25, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, that's fine with me. You do great research work so I'm sure you'll get it right but in the meantime, what is a summation of what this was all about? Was Butler lying, crazy, etc.? Was there really some crazy plot? What do you think? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mcCarthy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the additions or propsed substitutions on my talk page and i can merge them. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:44, 6 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, one thing that would be great is if changes and edits to the McCarthy article be limited to those done by SysOps. Which would require me to ask if someone would please elevate me to that level. Any thoughts on that? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:49, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Whatever became of...... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:58, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for asking, TK. It's good to hear from you. :) Actually the McCarthy page was locked for some reason and since I wasn't a SysOp, I would have to get approval to add any further information. Rob and I had made the McCarthy page the definitive source on the internet for accurate information regarding Senator McCarthy. Conservapedia recently honored our work by making it the article of the month. And, sadly, after all my work, I was relegated to having to get approval for any additional work. Since that seemed like just another hassle and since there was no apparent interest in making me a SysOp or giving me the ability to add info without going through such trouble, I thought it best to turn my attention to other matters.&lt;br /&gt;
:I still think there's about 100 hours work worth of additional info that needs to be added to the article and to related articles. I wished Rob continued success on his tireless work on Communist subversion in govt. and bowed out of the picture. No hard feelings toward anyone and I was glad to have the opportunity to contribute to Conservapedia. Also, thanks to you for your guidance. I greatly appreciate it. All my best. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:14, 28 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=323913</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=323913"/>
		<updated>2007-10-28T23:10:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Whatever became of...... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This is gonna take some more time.  I tend to be very thorough and leave no stone unturned.  But I have a big hunch, the CP version could look quite different than the WP.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:25, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, that's fine with me. You do great research work so I'm sure you'll get it right but in the meantime, what is a summation of what this was all about? Was Butler lying, crazy, etc.? Was there really some crazy plot? What do you think? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mcCarthy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the additions or propsed substitutions on my talk page and i can merge them. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:44, 6 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, one thing that would be great is if changes and edits to the McCarthy article be limited to those done by SysOps. Which would require me to ask if someone would please elevate me to that level. Any thoughts on that? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:49, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Whatever became of...... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio?  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:58, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for asking. :) Actually the McCarthy page was locked for some reason and since I wasn't a SysOp, I would have to get approval to add any further information. Rob and I had made the McCarthy page the definitive source on the internet for accurate information regarding Senator McCarthy. Conservapedia recently honored our work by making it the article of the month. And, sadly, after all my work, I was relegated to having to get approval for any additional work. Since that seemed like just another hassle and since there was no apparent interest in making me a SysOp or giving me the ability to add info without going through such trouble, I thought it best to turn my attention to other matters.&lt;br /&gt;
:I still think there's about 100 hours work worth of additional info that needs to be added to the article and to related articles. I wished Rob continued success on his tireless work on Communist subversion in govt. and bowed out of the picture. No hard feelings toward anyone and I was glad to have the opportunity to contribute to Conservapedia. Thanks again for asking. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:10, 28 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=288874</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=288874"/>
		<updated>2007-09-08T18:03:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== National Review article plus we should mention MCCarthy's apparent drinking problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a helpful article from the conservative magazine ''National Review'': http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next, I think we should acknowledge McCarthy's apparent alcohol problem and some of his possible other shortcomings which the conservative National Review article mentions.  I think it is important that Conservapedia does not fail to reveal relevant facts about a person as one of the virtues of the Bible is that is does not fail to reveal the blemishes of its heroes. I think having a article on McCarthy without mentioning his apparent excess drinking is like having an article on Churchill without mentioning his excess drinking. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:37, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The National Review article doesn't mention his (alleged) drinking problem. Do you have any objectives sources that he did have a problem? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 15:49, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Oops, the NR article does say &amp;quot;Alcohol addled McCarthy's wits, which were not that sharp to begin with.&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144/pg_3] But that's all. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:07, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ruth Watt, who worked on the PSI staff [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf] is ths best unbiased source on this.  In an interview for the Senate hisotrians office she says for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Joe McCarthy was a very kind man, very thoughtful of people working with him, and I was very much taken with the way he treated people. (pg. 140)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': You once said that you had watched the program &amp;quot;Tail-Gunner Joe,&amp;quot; on television. What was your impression of that program?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I thought it was terrible. It was not factual. It was an insult to the Marine Corps, I thought, because who in the Marine Corps would allow somebody to go around shooting the way he did? It was completely untrue, I'm sure. I don't believe the girl that did the work did the research in the right places. She did the things she wanted to do, in my opinion. I thought it was very inaccurate. I was disgusted with it. I didn't think it was fair or true. There might have been some things in there that were true, but very few. But I suppose she had to make it interesting for TV, probably.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': The portrayal of McCarthy as a senator didn't ring true to you, as a person who knew him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': Not necessarily, no. They had to exaggerate. Of course, a program like that was not supposed to be a factual thing anyway, was it? If it was, it was not factual. There were just so many things that were not true. I'd have to go through it piece by piece before I could say what. (pgs 154-155)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': I've heard that after the censure Senator McCarthy began to drink pretty heavily. Was that noticeable?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I don't think it was any different then it was before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Ritchie''': He drank heavily before?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Watt''': I think he drank before. I don't know that he drank that heavily, but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis. And about that time someone told me that McCarthy had told Senator McClellan he had just a year to live. He knew that he had something that was not going to get any better. The person who told me this, he never would have said it, but this person knew that he had said it to Senator McClellan. I was told about it in '56 sometime. He died the end of April in '57. (pg. 150)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That is unreliable hearsay. Watt didn't know the answers to the questions, and just recited rumors. If this is the best evidence, then it is better to say nothing. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:15, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I think he drank before''. '''I don't know that he drank that heavily''', but by the end of '55, about '56 he was in pretty bad shape and we knew he had cirrhosis.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; That doesn't even come close to being a reliable source, factual or worthy of any mention in a scholarly article.  Period. It is worthy, however of Wikipedia or the National Inquirer. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt attended all the hearings, all of them, public and private, worked with McCarthy outside hearings in routine staff work, and she knew McCarthy as intimately as any living family member could testify, which are few in number, unavailble, or haven't left any written record.  She worked closely with him for many years (and all the Senators, Ray Cohn, and Bobby Kenedy), knew them all very personally, and tells us all straight up what has been written and publicized about McCarthy for several decades is untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt even shed some light on the close relationship between McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy, and Bobby Kennedy's family (McCarthy is the Godfather of two of RFK's kids).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Watt talks about the spirit of bipartisanship on the Committee, defined as such, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Everybody worked together and there were no politics involved. It was just an investigating committee and you were for motherhood and against sin!! Everybody was in the same boat. But after the McCarthy problems, why then the senators said we had to have a minority counsel, that was in January 1954. ([http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_2.pdf pgs. 61-62])  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:35, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. United States Senate Historical Office -- Oral History Project in league with the WP or National Enquirer?  I'd rate it a little higher.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 17:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, I don't think either Roger or I are disagreeing that he might have been a drinker. Or doubting Ruth Watt...however, it is uncorroborated, and she herself said  &amp;quot;I don't know that he drank that heavily&amp;quot;, so we now have conflicting information, and nary a Doctor to define for us what is &amp;quot;too much&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;not much&amp;quot;. Personally I would be surprised if he wasn't drinking, given the number of years he was under constant attack.  Her recollections of the committee style is something she is expert on, so that isn't hearsay. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Her testmony is extremely important.  It shows (a) all the garbage from Hollywood and elsewhere is untrue, including what it says about his drinking.  Much of the stories of his drinking originate from that film, ''Tailgunner Joe''. (b) She says he was a very kind man.  She sat through the roughly 600 witnesses who were called to testify.  She doesn't say what an animal he was.  Rather, she was very taken by his kindness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Watt relates only one instance she feared things might have got out of control.  Her husband was a door guard, and a witness who was to testify had threatened McCarthy's life.  Her husband had to search the guy for weapons, and if he did sneak a weapon in the room, her husband would have to be the guy to intervene.  And he likewise was fearful of her, cause she was in the room with the crazed communist lunatic who the press reported  would kill Joe McCarthy if given the chance.  She says the hearing went without any trouble, McCarthy was cordial and polite as he always was, and the guy was just chicken, all talk &amp;amp; blather.  Given the opportunity to kill the monster, chose to give testimony instead.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:11, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== thrust of National Review article - Is it accurate? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the thrust of National Review article accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Review]] is a conservative magazine. Is this National Review article a generally accurate portrayal of McCarthy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Arthur Herman, a program coordinator at the Smithsonian Institution and an adjunct professor at George Mason University, has filed a brief for the defense that is simultaneously audacious in its argument and painstaking in its scholarship. It is a work of vindication all the more powerful for standing so nearly alone, its only company a new novel by William F. Buckley Jr. And it challenges us to rethink our understanding not only of McCarthy's moment, but of our own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman, it should be said straight off, can do only so much with McCarthy the man. Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder. But if McCarthy never rose to the marble-statue level of statesmanship, he was, Herman contends, something more than the vicious demagogue he has been made out to be.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is held in odium for his accusations that men like George C. Marshall and Dean Acheson accepted security risks into their department because of some lack of loyalty to the United States. Herman has no more time for those accusations than the severest of McCarthy's detractors. But something hindered those two wise men from acting as vigorously as they ought to have done to protect their department and their country against those risks, and Herman's defense of McCarthy is based on exposing what that something was. He quotes Raymond Moley, one of FDR's early advisers, confessing in 1953 that McCarthy &amp;quot;was the product of the fright and anger of a 'deceived and injured public,' who had been lied to regarding the Soviet threat both at home and abroad.....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herman's book does a fine job of exploring individual cases and exposing the falseness of the allegation that McCarthyism led to the punishment and humiliation of innocent people. He does a fine job, too, of catching McCarthy's political opponents in behavior every bit as unscrupulous as the junior senator's....&amp;quot;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_24_51/ai_59247144]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:38, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's right.  Herman makes largely the same point I made; the issues McCarthy took up were two decades of Soviet infiltration into the New Deal.  The US fought a war as a Soviet ally, and suddenly the US was forced into a nuclear arms race with that same ally ''because of New Dealers'', not because of any technolgical achievements the Soviet Union accomplished in its own right.  Our fellow citizens who were responsible for this insane nuclear arms race responded that they just had never stopped fighting fascism, McCarthy and anyone else who question thier motives or methods are considered by them as fascists as well.  These are the basic issues.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 21:53, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobS, you agree with the good things that Herman stated about MCCarthy but do you agree with this: &amp;quot;Herman freely admits that McCarthy was careless with his facts and reckless in his rhetoric.....Herman's McCarthy is crude, ignorant, bullying, and possibly even mentally ill: McCarthy's manic mood swings, his gambling, the chaos in which he worked, his ability to go for days without sleep-these all look to Herman like the symptoms of a hypomanic disorder.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:59, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::McCarthy, at the time, did much damage to the cause of anti-Communism.  McCarthy it appears was using the issue for short term partisan advantage.  When Ike won, what it really looks like is Eisenhower himeself was behind McCarthy's destruction.  And if there's a villian, it's probably Hoover, who really just used McCarthy without telling him all the facts.  With the picture we have today, we can say McCarthy was right in his basic premise.  But then again, it all relates more to the Adminisration of Franklin Roosevelt, who basically it appears, allowed a foreign power to take over his Adminstration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::For example, the Soviet Union manuovered the US into war with Japan, to get the US to destroy the lone obstacle to the Moscow directed plan to spread Communism to China &amp;amp; the Far East.  Lend-Lease aid to the Soviet Union is what purchased the enslavement of 100 million people for 50 years in Eastern Europe (350 million at the time of the collapse of the Soviet bloc).  The Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, none of these things had to be; it all was the result of CPUSA infiltration and subversion into the Adminstration of Franklin Roosevelt.  Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, bascially to stop the exact same things the CPUSA was doing here in the United States at the exact same time.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:24, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Hitler probably came to power for different reasons as a whole, but it cannot be denied that Hitler was anti-communist.  At the same time,  I am not that familar with what the CP was doing in Germany. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:40, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the exact language used here [http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/policy/1941/410622b.html STATEMENT BY JOACHIM VON RIBBENTROP, GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER, ON THE DECLARATION OF WAR ON THE SOVIET UNION], Berlin, June 22, 1941. ''New York Times'', June 23, 1941, where the Germans explain precisely ''what'' prompted the German invasion,  and ''why'' the Hitler-Stalin pact was ended; no less than three times it is stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;..Comintern to seek to conduct their subversive activities...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activities were carried on in territories occupied by Germany&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;subversive activity and reconnoitering carried on by the Comintern. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pattern develops.  So what is the official German version that motivated the German-Soviet War?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did the Soviert Union obtain atomic weapons knowhow from Los Alamos?  Comintern subversive activities.  How did  the CPUSA &amp;amp; the Soviet Union penetrate the White House, the Manhattan Project, the OSS, the State, Treasury, and War Depts?  Comintern subversive activities.  What was McCarthy investigating? Comintern subversive activities.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:54, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arthur Herman does a good job when he sticks to facts and relies on the Congressional Record and other official documents. Herman fails when he attempts to make nice with the liberals by spreading the same unsubstantianted rumors that had been making the rounds in the early 1950's. I've noticed that the anti-McCarthy info that Herman cites usually has no citation or is attributed to incredibly unreliable sources. One example is where Herman makes a reference to Oshinsky who makes reference to another source that ultimately is just a rumor. That's how a great deal of these &amp;quot;biographies&amp;quot; have been written and the article here at Conservapedia has done the best job in sticking merely to the facts and avoiding rumor. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:03, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo.plrd&amp;diff=288871</id>
		<title>User talk:Geo.plrd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo.plrd&amp;diff=288871"/>
		<updated>2007-09-08T17:50:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* New McCarthy article block */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;table&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Geo.plrd&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Archives&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive1|1]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive2|2]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive3|3]]  [[User:Geo.plrd/Archive4|4]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;('''geoplrd''' on AIM/'''geo.plrd At yahoo.com)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Current messages&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Linus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you. I had missed the page of his parole. [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 05:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. Thank you also for deleting the page I had created by mistake! [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 07:20, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please read this:  [[New Sysops Training Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:25, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==You're not conservative==&lt;br /&gt;
How come you are on here, your political compass indicates that you are center to center-left. I didn't think other moderates were allowed on here. --[[User:UncleJalapeno|UncleJalapeno]] 10:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Check out his subtle vandalism here, Geo: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Iran-Contra_affair&amp;amp;curid=6481&amp;amp;diff=166849&amp;amp;oldid=118172] Nice, sly changes, Jalapeno, and you being so &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; to CP!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:53, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pleistocene ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you gave this a definition coming from &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot;.  I would have put it down as a term from &amp;quot;geology&amp;quot;.  I don't want to edit it in case you think I pushing a POV.  I would like to know what you think. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 12:23, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sci-Tol ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not possible - the article has been put in a deleted articles category or something to prevent subsequent re-creation. Dunno why, I guess they have their reasons.[[User:Fantomas|Fantomas]] 12:52, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just adding on that I saw you're a SYSOP. With a big &amp;quot;Ooops!&amp;quot; to go with it!  :-) [[User:Fantomas|Fantomas]] 13:17, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== test ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Conservapedia:Sysop|Site Sheriff]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:08, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Site Sheriff(Sysop)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 14:10, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Felicitaciones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GRACIAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your template(s) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{TemplateDocRqd|ClayPin|sysop=true|done=yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:58, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, please ask me to delete it for you, or Philip, Geo...if your hands are broken! :p  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 06:04, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(The message previously said to ask a sysop to delete unwanted templates, but I've altered the message to no longer say that.)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:34, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, I saw the earlier ones, and got my humor in before you caught it!  ;-)  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 08:19, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, thanks for putting them on the template list, but they also need to be documented on each template's page.  I've done {{tl|ClayPin}} for you as an example, although I'm not sure of a couple of points, so please review that one as well.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:56, 4 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AIM? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aim! Please message. Read my posts there. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 13:33, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Apologies, but I am not near a IM client right now. I will hopefully be able to IM you when I get home in a few hours. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Site Sheriff(Sysop)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Paint ball?  ;-)  I will forward on to you a recent email about all this.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:55, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== blah ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 17:49, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Copyright Violations&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moon and the Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This fact is clearly stated in our entry for the paper - why shouldn't it be in the Moon entry? [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 21:02, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry - my bad. [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 21:03, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncyclopedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look, can you unlock the [[Uncyclopedia]] article? There's hardly anything on there and more is needed, but we can't edit it because you've protected it! Why did you protect it for? There's no reason to. Please unprotect '''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FFCC00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Scorp&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#773300&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ion&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When and if you make it back, Scorpion, Geo might be able to answer you, or not.  This isn't WP.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:13, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh, I don't know what &amp;quot;When or if you make it back&amp;quot; means. I'm still on here. Any Geo, here's the material I'd like you to add:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Uncyclopedia, despite being a parody of Wikipedia, supports much of the same material that Wikipedia does. They take an obviously liberal stance, and much of their humor is directed at Christian and Conservative values. In particular, their article on Conservapedia is composed mostly of hate speech, labelling Conservatives as &amp;quot;retards&amp;quot;. In addition, they attack creationism via a &amp;quot;pro-creationist&amp;quot; article, which mocks creationism by phrases like &amp;quot;evolution will get you sent straight to hell&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Darwin was a **** Satanist&amp;quot;. At any rate, it is clear that Uncyclopedia hates Christians and creationism, and aims to destroy Conservativism.'' '''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FFCC00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Scorp&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#773300&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ion&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:50, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scorpio==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User:Scorpio has been blocked for one week for twice removing discussion page comments from RSchlafly'es page.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&amp;amp;diff=217145&amp;amp;oldid=216629&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=217848&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I believe we have evidence of a meatpuppet attack on me after a &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; with TK.  The removal of comments from RSchlafly's page were critical of TK.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TK&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=211850&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geoffrey, you can begin examination of the facts right here, and determine if User:Scorpio has become a meatpuppet of TK.  TK offered to block Scorpio on the discussion list (available in the Search engine) and privately.  Since the Conley email, it appears TK contacted Scorpio, and TK has further intiated other actions that have no transparency. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In the meantime, I await you forwarding me any and all transcripts of discussions on processes. Scorpio will remain blocked for information destruction from RSchlafly's page.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:41, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, you're approved as our first judge for the contest.  There will be additional judges also.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:57, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Greetings, fellow judge! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, Geo. I have accepted the team captains' appointment as a [[Conservapedia:Team contest|judge]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus far, I've put in for the consideration of having our own namespace so that we can &amp;quot;retire to chambers&amp;quot; as we weigh the &amp;quot;evidence.&amp;quot;--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welcome, Geo, as a Judge!  I've created a new namespace that only Judges can access.  I can't even access it.  You might create a page in it like [[Judges:Contest]] (note that I cannot even create that page).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:36, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, as you can see, the [[Judges:Contest|chambers]] is now open. Thus far you and I are the only two Judges. I assume that that will soon change.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== McCarthy mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I invite you over to the McCarthy Discussion page for a mediation issue that I'm hoping you can resolve. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:56, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:22, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geoff, Rob has reverted the work I did as per your orders. I informed him that he is in contempt of your status as Mediator. I await your further instructions. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:25, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geoff, thanks for making the change but there is an extra &amp;quot;period&amp;quot; in the new sentence so I'm going have to fix that. Also, I don't think there was a need for a new section for the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info since it's essentially related to the Venona info and should be included in that parapraph. Would you mind terribly if I simply reverted back to the latest changes which you authorized me to do last night? It would make the flow of the article more concise. I would appreciate that. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The key word we need to place in the Intro is &amp;quot;conspiracy.&amp;quot;  For one half century (and still today) teachers in classrooms at all levels, junior high school through Graduate School, maintain McCarthy was a right-wing paranoid conspiracy theorist whose crusades produced nothing.  The U.S Government Secrecy Commission in its Final Report in 1995 gave McCarthy a clean bill of health with &amp;quot;The first fact is, there was a conspiracy...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So, we have two statements. Scorpio has inserted extensive quotes from what is commonly known as McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot; speech, which needs to be contrasted with the exoneration from the Secrecy Commission findings.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A big concern I have with Venona documents is, that in no way they be misrepresented to say something other than what they say.  Hence, we need to place exoneration from the Secrecy Commission in the Intro, and not represent Venona as something other than what it is.[[User:RobS|RobS]] 10:28, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, you refuse to address MOS which forbids what you propose. The new intro as placed by Geo does in fact do what you say needs to be done without going into elaborate detail. The detail is in the appropriate sub-section. The current format is more in line with MOS than what you had there before and does the job adequately. The only thing I suggest is that the new section be changed from &amp;quot;Declassified Soviet Files&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Declassified Soviet files &amp;amp; McCarthy vindication&amp;quot;. There are still many things that need to be done to this article in order to present pertinent info but as you may have noticed, I have stopped adding anything further until these ridiculously simple matters are resolved. I've got lots of great stuff to add but we are getting bogged down in procedure. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:33, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm involved with the contest right now (as Geo is too), so I haven't really been able to engage all that needs to be discussed.  As per the MOS, I need to discuss with the MOS author what historiography of dead persons vs bios living polticians should be, because that recommended format you cite is intended for living persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::As to the substance of &amp;quot;conspiracy', this is in keeping with your original idea in the opening which was edited out, &amp;quot;subsequently proving&amp;quot;; McCarthy didn't prove conspiracy, but the Secrecy Commission did.  As to the new subtitle, we should probably discuss the overall structure once I'm available after the contest is over, cause I'm a bit uneasy about putting ==Venona== under ==US Senate==.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:46, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full IP address? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am concerned about the publishing of the full IP address of users.  Does this conflict with [[Conservapedia:Privacy policy]]. Is [[Conservapedia:Shame]] in conflict with sharing private information with the world? I am not sure if that page is what is being used to report vandalism to the authorities.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:54, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no expectation of privacy on the Internet, we are constantly told.  Also, an IP address doesn't narrow down a user's location to such a point where they are easily identified anyway.  So what is this concern?  Is someone forced to come here and vandalize?  Please stop with the Red Herrings.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 18:14, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contest ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is winning at this time? Or are you not allowed to say? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 01:12, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is sad, is it not, that you don't have anything funny in your signature, no?  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:20, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:21, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*No, the other, he should have something fun in it....I am thinking. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:22, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Click here for ban!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hahaha!  But I can unblock myself!  :P  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scores==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just wondering if you know and could tell me the final scores of Team1 and Team2...Aschlafly and I are trying to figure out how close we came, and it would be a lot easier to just have the final numbers! Thanks, [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 17:42, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the response! And yes, Aschlafly definitly deserves that honor...he was on constantly contributing for his team! [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 23:27, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categorizing articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding a new article. Please, though, categorize your articles when you create them; while there are those of us who will go through and clean-up the uncategorized articles, you know your subject better than we do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a list of categories, go here: [[Special:Categories]]. To add a category to your article, type two open brackets, then &amp;quot;category:&amp;quot; followed by the category you want. Just add two closed brackets and you're done! You can add as many categories as you feel are appropriate. Thanks! [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 20:41, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Geoffrey is on vacation, so just let me know what is needed. Thanks. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I categorized the article for him; this is just a boilerplate reminder I leave people to help encourage them to categorize their own stuff. I don't necessarily mind doing it, but often times the author will have a better idea of the appropriate category than I will. Das all. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 21:29, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Actually, they usually have a worse idea of where to put it than you do, but hey, I understand your tact. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:16, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yes, exactly. ;) I could be hit by a bus or something... [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 10:44, 17 August 2007 (EDT) ''&amp;lt;-look out!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, &amp;quot;accidents&amp;quot; do happen.....[[Image:Schoolbusaccident3_011907.jpg‎ ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:19, 17 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New McCarthy article block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, is there any way that you can arrange it so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthhy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:30, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, one thing that would be great is if changes and edits to the McCarthy article be limited to those done by SysOps. Which would require me to ask if someone would please elevate me to that level. Any thoughts on that? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:50, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=288870</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=288870"/>
		<updated>2007-09-08T17:49:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* mcCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This is gonna take some more time.  I tend to be very thorough and leave no stone unturned.  But I have a big hunch, the CP version could look quite different than the WP.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:25, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, that's fine with me. You do great research work so I'm sure you'll get it right but in the meantime, what is a summation of what this was all about? Was Butler lying, crazy, etc.? Was there really some crazy plot? What do you think? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mcCarthy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leave the additions or propsed substitutions on my talk page and i can merge them. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:44, 6 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, one thing that would be great is if changes and edits to the McCarthy article be limited to those done by SysOps. Which would require me to ask if someone would please elevate me to that level. Any thoughts on that? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:49, 8 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=284837</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=284837"/>
		<updated>2007-09-02T14:36:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Block on article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not certain what this website is, but it on here [http://americandeception.com/index.php?page=usercat&amp;amp;catid=8&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498], along with Budenz, Toladano, Krivistky, and some other interesting things.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 22:01, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block on article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I've noted this in Geo's Talk page but I also thought it would be appropriate here as well. I'm wondering if there is there any way that it can be arranged so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:36, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo.plrd&amp;diff=284836</id>
		<title>User talk:Geo.plrd</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Geo.plrd&amp;diff=284836"/>
		<updated>2007-09-02T14:30:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: New McCarthy article block&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;table&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Geo.plrd&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Archives&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive1|1]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive2|2]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive3|3]]  [[User:Geo.plrd/Archive4|4]] [[User_talk:Geo.plrd/Archive5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;('''geoplrd''' on AIM/'''geo.plrd At yahoo.com)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Current messages&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Linus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you. I had missed the page of his parole. [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 05:21, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. Thank you also for deleting the page I had created by mistake! [[User:Leopeo|Leopeo]] 07:20, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please read this:  [[New Sysops Training Page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:25, 17 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==You're not conservative==&lt;br /&gt;
How come you are on here, your political compass indicates that you are center to center-left. I didn't think other moderates were allowed on here. --[[User:UncleJalapeno|UncleJalapeno]] 10:47, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Check out his subtle vandalism here, Geo: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Iran-Contra_affair&amp;amp;curid=6481&amp;amp;diff=166849&amp;amp;oldid=118172] Nice, sly changes, Jalapeno, and you being so &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; to CP!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 16:53, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Pleistocene ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see that you gave this a definition coming from &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot;.  I would have put it down as a term from &amp;quot;geology&amp;quot;.  I don't want to edit it in case you think I pushing a POV.  I would like to know what you think. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 12:23, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sci-Tol ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not possible - the article has been put in a deleted articles category or something to prevent subsequent re-creation. Dunno why, I guess they have their reasons.[[User:Fantomas|Fantomas]] 12:52, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was just adding on that I saw you're a SYSOP. With a big &amp;quot;Ooops!&amp;quot; to go with it!  :-) [[User:Fantomas|Fantomas]] 13:17, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== test ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Conservapedia:Sysop|Site Sheriff]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:08, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Site Sheriff(Sysop)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 14:10, 18 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Felicitaciones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GRACIAS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your template(s) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{TemplateDocRqd|ClayPin|sysop=true|done=yes}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:58, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, please ask me to delete it for you, or Philip, Geo...if your hands are broken! :p  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 06:04, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(The message previously said to ask a sysop to delete unwanted templates, but I've altered the message to no longer say that.)  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:34, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, I saw the earlier ones, and got my humor in before you caught it!  ;-)  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 08:19, 2 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, thanks for putting them on the template list, but they also need to be documented on each template's page.  I've done {{tl|ClayPin}} for you as an example, although I'm not sure of a couple of points, so please review that one as well.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:56, 4 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== AIM? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aim! Please message. Read my posts there. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 13:33, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Apologies, but I am not near a IM client right now. I will hopefully be able to IM you when I get home in a few hours. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Site Sheriff(Sysop)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 21:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Paint ball?  ;-)  I will forward on to you a recent email about all this.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:55, 11 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== blah ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 17:49, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Copyright Violations&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Moon and the Times ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This fact is clearly stated in our entry for the paper - why shouldn't it be in the Moon entry? [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 21:02, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry - my bad. [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 21:03, 25 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uncyclopedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look, can you unlock the [[Uncyclopedia]] article? There's hardly anything on there and more is needed, but we can't edit it because you've protected it! Why did you protect it for? There's no reason to. Please unprotect '''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FFCC00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Scorp&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#773300&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ion&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:54, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When and if you make it back, Scorpion, Geo might be able to answer you, or not.  This isn't WP.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:13, 27 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh, I don't know what &amp;quot;When or if you make it back&amp;quot; means. I'm still on here. Any Geo, here's the material I'd like you to add:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Uncyclopedia, despite being a parody of Wikipedia, supports much of the same material that Wikipedia does. They take an obviously liberal stance, and much of their humor is directed at Christian and Conservative values. In particular, their article on Conservapedia is composed mostly of hate speech, labelling Conservatives as &amp;quot;retards&amp;quot;. In addition, they attack creationism via a &amp;quot;pro-creationist&amp;quot; article, which mocks creationism by phrases like &amp;quot;evolution will get you sent straight to hell&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Darwin was a **** Satanist&amp;quot;. At any rate, it is clear that Uncyclopedia hates Christians and creationism, and aims to destroy Conservativism.'' '''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#FFCC00&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Scorp&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#773300&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ion&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:50, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scorpio==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User:Scorpio has been blocked for one week for twice removing discussion page comments from RSchlafly'es page.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&amp;amp;diff=217145&amp;amp;oldid=216629&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RSchlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=217848&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I believe we have evidence of a meatpuppet attack on me after a &amp;quot;chat&amp;quot; with TK.  The removal of comments from RSchlafly's page were critical of TK.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:TK&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=211850&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geoffrey, you can begin examination of the facts right here, and determine if User:Scorpio has become a meatpuppet of TK.  TK offered to block Scorpio on the discussion list (available in the Search engine) and privately.  Since the Conley email, it appears TK contacted Scorpio, and TK has further intiated other actions that have no transparency. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In the meantime, I await you forwarding me any and all transcripts of discussions on processes. Scorpio will remain blocked for information destruction from RSchlafly's page.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:41, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, you're approved as our first judge for the contest.  There will be additional judges also.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:57, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Greetings, fellow judge! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, Geo. I have accepted the team captains' appointment as a [[Conservapedia:Team contest|judge]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus far, I've put in for the consideration of having our own namespace so that we can &amp;quot;retire to chambers&amp;quot; as we weigh the &amp;quot;evidence.&amp;quot;--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welcome, Geo, as a Judge!  I've created a new namespace that only Judges can access.  I can't even access it.  You might create a page in it like [[Judges:Contest]] (note that I cannot even create that page).--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:36, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geo, as you can see, the [[Judges:Contest|chambers]] is now open. Thus far you and I are the only two Judges. I assume that that will soon change.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== McCarthy mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I invite you over to the McCarthy Discussion page for a mediation issue that I'm hoping you can resolve. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:56, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:22, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Geoff, Rob has reverted the work I did as per your orders. I informed him that he is in contempt of your status as Mediator. I await your further instructions. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:25, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geoff, thanks for making the change but there is an extra &amp;quot;period&amp;quot; in the new sentence so I'm going have to fix that. Also, I don't think there was a need for a new section for the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info since it's essentially related to the Venona info and should be included in that parapraph. Would you mind terribly if I simply reverted back to the latest changes which you authorized me to do last night? It would make the flow of the article more concise. I would appreciate that. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:24, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The key word we need to place in the Intro is &amp;quot;conspiracy.&amp;quot;  For one half century (and still today) teachers in classrooms at all levels, junior high school through Graduate School, maintain McCarthy was a right-wing paranoid conspiracy theorist whose crusades produced nothing.  The U.S Government Secrecy Commission in its Final Report in 1995 gave McCarthy a clean bill of health with &amp;quot;The first fact is, there was a conspiracy...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So, we have two statements. Scorpio has inserted extensive quotes from what is commonly known as McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot; speech, which needs to be contrasted with the exoneration from the Secrecy Commission findings.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A big concern I have with Venona documents is, that in no way they be misrepresented to say something other than what they say.  Hence, we need to place exoneration from the Secrecy Commission in the Intro, and not represent Venona as something other than what it is.[[User:RobS|RobS]] 10:28, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, you refuse to address MOS which forbids what you propose. The new intro as placed by Geo does in fact do what you say needs to be done without going into elaborate detail. The detail is in the appropriate sub-section. The current format is more in line with MOS than what you had there before and does the job adequately. The only thing I suggest is that the new section be changed from &amp;quot;Declassified Soviet Files&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Declassified Soviet files &amp;amp; McCarthy vindication&amp;quot;. There are still many things that need to be done to this article in order to present pertinent info but as you may have noticed, I have stopped adding anything further until these ridiculously simple matters are resolved. I've got lots of great stuff to add but we are getting bogged down in procedure. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:33, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm involved with the contest right now (as Geo is too), so I haven't really been able to engage all that needs to be discussed.  As per the MOS, I need to discuss with the MOS author what historiography of dead persons vs bios living polticians should be, because that recommended format you cite is intended for living persons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::As to the substance of &amp;quot;conspiracy', this is in keeping with your original idea in the opening which was edited out, &amp;quot;subsequently proving&amp;quot;; McCarthy didn't prove conspiracy, but the Secrecy Commission did.  As to the new subtitle, we should probably discuss the overall structure once I'm available after the contest is over, cause I'm a bit uneasy about putting ==Venona== under ==US Senate==.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:46, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Full IP address? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am concerned about the publishing of the full IP address of users.  Does this conflict with [[Conservapedia:Privacy policy]]. Is [[Conservapedia:Shame]] in conflict with sharing private information with the world? I am not sure if that page is what is being used to report vandalism to the authorities.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:54, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There is no expectation of privacy on the Internet, we are constantly told.  Also, an IP address doesn't narrow down a user's location to such a point where they are easily identified anyway.  So what is this concern?  Is someone forced to come here and vandalize?  Please stop with the Red Herrings.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 18:14, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contest ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is winning at this time? Or are you not allowed to say? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 01:12, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is sad, is it not, that you don't have anything funny in your signature, no?  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:20, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Me? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:21, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*No, the other, he should have something fun in it....I am thinking. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:22, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Click here for ban!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hahaha!  But I can unblock myself!  :P  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:35, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scores==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just wondering if you know and could tell me the final scores of Team1 and Team2...Aschlafly and I are trying to figure out how close we came, and it would be a lot easier to just have the final numbers! Thanks, [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 17:42, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the response! And yes, Aschlafly definitly deserves that honor...he was on constantly contributing for his team! [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 23:27, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== categorizing articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding a new article. Please, though, categorize your articles when you create them; while there are those of us who will go through and clean-up the uncategorized articles, you know your subject better than we do.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a list of categories, go here: [[Special:Categories]]. To add a category to your article, type two open brackets, then &amp;quot;category:&amp;quot; followed by the category you want. Just add two closed brackets and you're done! You can add as many categories as you feel are appropriate. Thanks! [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 20:41, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Geoffrey is on vacation, so just let me know what is needed. Thanks. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I categorized the article for him; this is just a boilerplate reminder I leave people to help encourage them to categorize their own stuff. I don't necessarily mind doing it, but often times the author will have a better idea of the appropriate category than I will. Das all. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 21:29, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Actually, they usually have a worse idea of where to put it than you do, but hey, I understand your tact. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:16, 16 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well yes, exactly. ;) I could be hit by a bus or something... [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 10:44, 17 August 2007 (EDT) ''&amp;lt;-look out!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, &amp;quot;accidents&amp;quot; do happen.....[[Image:Schoolbusaccident3_011907.jpg‎ ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:19, 17 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New McCarthy article block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, is there any way that you can arrange it so that these blocks do not prevent me from working on the McCarthhy article? I realize that the the newest block was put into place to protect against vandals but unfortunately this also affects my ability to add to the article and I don't think my additions are an issue. Can you please work with me to find a solution to this matter? I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:30, 2 September 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=283708</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=283708"/>
		<updated>2007-09-01T01:31:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Alphabetical listing of Venona cases */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There is a phenomenal mass of material on Mary Jane Keeney in the Silvermaster file, absolutley phenomenal.  She seems to have had a very active social life, and was ''personally'' in contact with virtually everyone involved in the CPUSA Underground Apparatus.  She singularly is probably the most surveilled and reported on individual in all 164 volumes of the Silvermaster file (I estimate it at 40,000 pages).  This is significant, because in sum, Mary Jane Keeney is the only case were McCarthy made an accusation in an open hearing of her being Communist agent, which she denied.  Let me do a little more study before alphabetizing, ok?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, as to Dan Margolies, I found a Dan Morgolis in the Silvermaster file, but am unsure if its the same.  I suspect it is, but need more information.  Also, there are several figures in the Silvermaster file which may be spouses or relatives of  names on the Lee List, buy again we need more information (there are several Stones, and couple of Hunts, for example).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Interestingly, I discovered former CIA Director [[Richard Bissell]] came under surveillance in 1946 in connection with a suspect; it appears he was inquiring about information on a veteran's relief bill or something, and propably got some information to passed to him.  Nothing subversive, just your routine everyday Washington Congressional leak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Another little quirck I may have stumbled upon is, Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr make light of the fact that [[Charles Flato]] was never named in [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition, and didn't recieve full scrutiny as the other suspects named by Bentley, so it was much of a surprise when [[Venona]] documents added him to the Silvermaster group.  A document from Soviet Archives corroborates it, misspelling his name as &amp;quot;Floto.&amp;quot;  I found summaries of FBI wiretaps (in those days wiretaps include reading telegrams), one from Mary Jane Kenney &amp;amp; Philip Kenney to a &amp;quot;Charles Slato.&amp;quot;  Who knows, a teletypist may have misspelled Flato's name, Bentley didn't ID him, Hoover kept tight lipped about Venona to most of these FBI field investigators in the Silvermaster case, and by a total fluke of history Flato was never fully developed as a suspect and escaped scrutiny and surveillance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Such is life.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. You know the 1954 version of Buckley/Bozell is online in its entirety, right?  Do we have a link to it?  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 15:27, 26 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice work, Rob. It's incredible what you've been able to find. As for the alphabeticalizing, sure, no problem, take your time with it. I only suggested it because it seemed odd in its' current format but feel free to do what you feel is best. Also, no, I didn't know that Buckley's book is online. Do you have a link? Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:31, 31 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277244</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277244"/>
		<updated>2007-08-26T00:48:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Alphabetical listing of Venona cases&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alphabetical listing of Venona cases ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you have any objection to listing the Venona cases in the Venona section in alphabetical order? They seem to be listed randomly. I thought in keeping with the MOS that they be re-listed in alphabetical order. Any thoughts? Do you want to handle it or do you want me to do it? It doesn't matter to me. Let me know. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:48, 25 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277232</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277232"/>
		<updated>2007-08-26T00:16:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Known security/loyalty risks - fixed typos in Kenyon case */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the [[National Labor Relations Board]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the [[National Labor Relations Board]], [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot; See also FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 116, Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&lt;br /&gt;
See also &lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file, Hottel to the Director&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 12, 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster116.pdf Vol. 116, pg. 100] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government,}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An FBI Surveillance report on [[Edward Fitzgerald (Soviet spy)|Edward Fitzgerald]] from September 1947 notes that on May 20 1947 Fitzgerald's brother-in-law had lunch with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] and an appointment with [[Leslie Groves]].  Sometime later Frank Cameron, a regular contact of Fitzgerald tried to contact Gertrude Cameron in the State Department from the Fitzgerald’s home.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = September 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Volume 130, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster130.pdf pgs 17 -18] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Federal Bureau of Investigation}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dorothy Kenyon]], New York City Municipal Court Judge, U.S. State Department appointee as American Delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dorothy Kenyon is considered one of McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot; that was presented to the [[Tydings Committee]]. Kenyon was McCarthy's first case and it took two days in order for McCarthy to present the evidence due to the constant interruptions by members of the Tyding's Committee. This prompted Senator Lodge to state that, &amp;quot;I think to interrupt the witness [McCarthy] every time and break up his continuity and destroy the flow of his argument, the way we are doing, is not the right procedure....For some reason that has not been made clear to me, whether it is to rattle or whether it is to confuse, I don't know, we have an entirely different procedure today...I am objecting to the constant interruption of the witness so that he never gets a fair shake.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the constant harassment, McCarthy's evidence included showing that Kenyon belonged to at least 24 Communist front organizations labeled as such in part by the [[United States Attorney General]], the [[House Un-American Activities Committee]], and other governmental committees. The documents presented by McCarthy included, official organization letterheads that listed Kenyon as a sponsor or as a member, official programs of organization sponsored dinners, and newspaper reports of open letters that Kenyon had signed that connected her with the organizations. Certainly, these were all documents that were easily accessible to the State Department should they have cared to look into Kenyon's political background.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When Kenyon was asked by the Tydings Committee whether she had ever been interviewed by the State Department as to her affiliation to any Communist front organizations, she responded that she had never been asked. According to the security evaluation procedure of the State Department, Kenyon should have been asked about these affiliations but failed to do so. McCarthy had easily demonstrated from this first case that the screening process of the State Department was certainly lax and quite possibly purposefully ignoring easily identifiable security risks. However, the Tydings Committee instead ignored this evidence and set the precident for the hearings that anyone that came before the committee was going to be given a positive evaluation no matter how strongly the evidence indicated the witness was a security risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 68&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4380-81&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshall]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277231</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=277231"/>
		<updated>2007-08-26T00:13:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Known security/loyalty risks - added Dorothy Kenyon */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the [[National Labor Relations Board]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the [[National Labor Relations Board]], [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot; See also FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 116, Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&lt;br /&gt;
See also &lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file, Hottel to the Director&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 12, 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster116.pdf Vol. 116, pg. 100] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government,}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Barnett contacts with [[Donald Wheeler]] formerly of [[OSS]]; Robert Barnett also served in OSS).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An FBI Surveillance report on [[Edward Fitzgerald (Soviet spy)|Edward Fitzgerald]] from September 1947 notes that on May 20 1947 Fitzgerald's brother-in-law had lunch with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] and an appointment with [[Leslie Groves]].  Sometime later Frank Cameron, a regular contact of Fitzgerald tried to contact Gertrude Cameron in the State Department from the Fitzgerald’s home.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = FBI Silvermaster file,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = September 1947&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Volume 130, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster130.pdf pgs 17 -18] pdf&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Federal Bureau of Investigation}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dorothy Kenyon]], New York City Municipal Court Judge, U.S. State Department appointee as American Delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Dorothy Kenyon is considered one of McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot; that was presented to the [[Tydings Committee]]. Kenyon was McCarthy's first case and was it took two days in order to present the evidence due to the constant interruptions by members of the Tyding's Committee. This prompted Senator Lodge to state that, &amp;quot;I think to interrupt the witness [McCarthy] every time and break up his continuity and destroy the flow of his argument, the way we are doing, is not the right procedure....For some reason that has not been made clear to me, whether it is to rattle or whether it is to confuse, I don't know, we have an entirely different procedure today...I am objecting to the constant interruption of the witness so that he never gets a fair shake.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the constant harassment, McCarthy's evidence included showing that Kenyon belonged to at least 24 Communist front organizations labeled as such in part by the [[United States Attorney General]], the [[House Un-American Activities Committee]], and other governmental committees. The documents presented by McCarthy included, official organization letterheads that listed Kenyon as a sponsor or as a member, official programs of organization sponsored dinners, and newspaper reports of open letters that Kenyon had signed that connected her with the organizations. Certainly, these were all documents that were easily accessible to the State Department should they have cared to look into Kenyon's political background.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When Kenyon was asked by the Tydings Committee whether she had ever been interviewed by the State Department as to her affiliation to any Communist front organizations, she responded that she had never been asked. According to the security evaluation procedure of the State Department, Kenyon should have been asked about these affiliations but failed to do so. McCarthy had easily demonstrated from this first case that the screening process of the State Department was certainly lax and quite possibly purposefully ignoring easily identifiable security risks. However, the Tydings Committee instead ignored this evidence and set the precident for the hearings that anyone that came before the committee was going to be given a positive evaluation no matter how strongly the evidence indicated the witness was a security risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 68&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4380-81&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshall]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273992</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273992"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:45:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Moved &amp;quot;See Also&amp;quot; to meet CP:MOS */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his ''See It Now'' assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pgs. 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Murrow R., Edward}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273991</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273991"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:28:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his ''See It Now'' assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pgs. 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Murrow R., Edward}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273990</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273990"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:26:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pgs. 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Murrow R., Edward}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273989</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273989"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:25:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Moved &amp;quot;See Also&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Murrow R., Edward}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273987</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273987"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:11:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* See also - fixed format */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273986</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273986"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:09:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273984</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273984"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:06:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:journalists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273983</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273983"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T13:05:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Added link to main body &amp;amp; added external links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the Media'']. (November 15, 2005). Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:journalists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273981</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273981"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T12:57:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273980</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273980"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T12:55:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* External Links - added links; fixed Transcript format problem */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954. By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations, Transcripts]. (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540309.html ''See It Now, Edward R. Murrow report on Senator McCarthy'']. (March 9, 1954). CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.honors.umd.edu/HONR269J/archive/Murrow540406.html ''See It Now, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's Reply to Edward R. Murrow'']. (April 6, 1954}. CBS-TV. Retrieved on 8/21/07.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273974</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273974"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T11:51:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* References - added Murrow references */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954. By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273973</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273973"/>
		<updated>2007-08-22T11:48:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* United States Senate - added &amp;quot;Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy&amp;quot; */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954. By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Scorpio&amp;diff=273125</id>
		<title>User:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Scorpio&amp;diff=273125"/>
		<updated>2007-08-21T18:39:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Articles to which I contributed significantly */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;margin-left: -5px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-top: -5px; margin-right: -5px; padding: 5px; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid #39f;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;'''{{CURRENTDAYNAME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}'''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Usflag.png|420px|Old Glory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;width:395px;border:red solid 2px;text-align:left;background:#FFFFF0;padding:1em;margin-bottom:5px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[United States of America|America - The Enemy of Tyranny - The Defender of Freedom]]'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxtop|This Editor:}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User American}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User en}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Christian1}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User NoCareSH}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User tolerancecompromisetruth}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User NRA}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User patriot}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User ronny}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User CPLeader|[[user:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxbottom}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hello!!'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My user name here at [[Conservapedia]] is [http://www.conservapedia.com/User:Scorpio Scorpio].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am a [[Conservative]] and I am interested in working on various topics using the guideline of verifiable truth to establish and improve these articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope to be able to help others in improving their work and discuss with them their edits and how they can maximize their efforts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservapedia]] is a vast, mostly clean slate that is just waiting to be filled with honest, fair, verifiable topics that lack the usual left-wing bias that is replete throughtout online sources, like Wikipedia. I look forward to being an effective and informative editor here at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is a need for another Administrator, I would be happy to help in any way that I can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please do not edit this page. Feel free to post any comments on my discussion page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Articles I created==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Kosher]]/[[Kashrut]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Articles to which I contributed significantly==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward R. Murrow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Christianity}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273123</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273123"/>
		<updated>2007-08-21T18:38:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Update */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That link gives us which names from the Buckley/Bozell list to begin with, including the volume from that link as an external link.  So those entries will have two sources to begin with, Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell, and the specific volume as cataloged from that site (incidentally, Herbert Rommerstein is connected with that project).  It's still gonna be a job to dig out the infromation, cause some volumes have as many as a 165 pages, and the search feature can't be used.  But I am somewhat familiar with the Silvermaster file, and this cataloguing and summaries is a big useful step.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 19:53, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update==&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio: I've been spending a lot of time on Herbert Rommerstein's werbsite.  His organization has procured much of the Silvermaster file through FOIA.  After the Silvermaster investigation was aborted because of leaks, much of it was incorporated later into the Rosenberg file investigation.  What has been declassified of the Silvermaster file must be 40,000 pages (wheeww).  Parts are missing, for example SAC Lamphere's files.  Lamphere was FBI field &lt;br /&gt;
investigator laiason with Army Signals Intelligence Venona decyptors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a preliminary basis, here's what happened: from the point of Elizabeth Bentley's deposition in December 1945 until about December 1947 the files reflect routine surveillance reports.  All information was channelled through Hoover, rather sparingly, to Department heads and the White House. Venona was kept secret even from Silvermaster field investigators.  An internal leak occurred when a field investigator began discussing prosecution with DOJ Criminal Division.  The Criminal Division learned of Bentley, and wanted to interview her personally. It was at this point Hoover, and other field investigators, realized prosecution was unlikely if not impossible once the investigation was compromised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure enough, after the lower level DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors heard of the investigation, stories began to appear in UPI (United Press International). Congressional investigators became interested.  Bentley submitted to an interview with DOJ Criminal Division prosecutors, a full report was summarized internally by the FBI, HUAC and other Congressional Committees began subpeonaing documents and witnesses.  By August 1948, three months before the election, Bentley &amp;amp; Chambers testified publicly accusing Hiss &amp;amp; others.  Nixon built his career off of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meantime, when the FBI summarized the investigation, an Executive Conference was held between the FBI and the Criminal Division to determine how to proceed.  Notifying Department heads of security risks was recommended, but it was obvious that once some members of the underground apparatus knew they were being survielled, all knew they were suspect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then in 1949 and 1950 the situation got worse.  The Ruskie's exploded the bomb and thier [[Comintern]] ally invaded South Korea.  Also, who lost China. And the Berlin Crisis, etc.  Yet no action had been taken in the State Department and elsewhere to remove security risks. So in early February 1950, Hoover briefed McCarthy on the some of the details, vaguely, McCarthy saw the poltical potential to embarass Truman &amp;amp; the Democrats, took the ball and ran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was working only with files earlier Congressional investigations procured, and what he got from Hoover.  Hoover did not give up any valuable material with provenance, only stuff that could be used to compromise the &amp;quot;weaker sister.&amp;quot;  Given the nature of the CPUSA, and CPUSA underground apparatus, it was a family affair.  Whole families were invovled, mother and daughters, in-laws, etc.  These were the people who were targeted to get them to compromise someone they might know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, as to the Executive Session transcripts, and VOA investigation, there is really some very interesting things here that could totally destroy some of the myths about McCarthy (still propounded for example, by Wikipedia). I'll update you on that as time allows.  [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 14:50, 9 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, thanks for that update info. I haven't looked at Conservapedia since I've been on vacation. I'm still going to be away but check out the [[Edward R. Murrow]] article. I added a bunch of stuff. I would like to work some of it into this article as well. After I get back, I'll return to assist you with the work on this and the various related articles. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:38, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273121</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=273121"/>
		<updated>2007-08-21T18:33:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Known security/loyalty risks - fixed format on 1st entry */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' (November 14, 1908 – May 2, 1957) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] government. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 150, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster150.pdf pgs. 50-64] pdf. Excerpts from memorandum by FBI agent Edward Morgan asserting that there was no possible legal case against the Bentley suspects and that investigation should be discontinued, with possible exception of trying to get one of the weaker suspects to break. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Vol. 93, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf pgs. 166 - 170] pdf.  Original Edward Morgan memo 1/14/47, &amp;quot;The only reasonable hope of salvaging a successful prosecution is (a) to endeavor to make an informant of one of the subjects and/or (b) interview the subjects in the hope that at least one will break...Failing to successfully develop one of the subjects as an informant, I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation...This case will stand or fall dependent upon the extent to which the subjects may break and in breaking corroborate [Elizabeth Bentley].  I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed.  The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview....one of the subjects, probably the weakest sister, be contacted with a view to making him an informant.   This is an outside chance but offers the only reasonable prospect of making a case with respect to contemporaneous and future events.  Failing in this respect, that immediately the other subjects be exhaustively interviewed.  Since an interview with one would virtually amount to putting all of them on notice, it would seem logical to conduct such interviews as nearly simultaneously as possible....That failing to break any of the subjects, serious consideration be given to exposing this lousy outfit and at least hounding them from Federal service.  Several possibilities exist in this regard but this would seem to be a bridge to cross when we get to it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster050.pdf Vol. 50, pgs. 13-16] pdf, May 29, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to discuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster064.pdf Vol. 64, pg. 240] pdf. Brief background on Herbert Fierst.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pg. 202] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.  Nash had worked in the [[Office of War Information]] beginning in 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster058.pdf Vol. 58, pgs. 107 - 110] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pgs. 155 - 156] pdf. August 1946. Notes contact between Nash and [[Louise Bransten]] in January 1944. Bransten was the mistress of San Francisco [[KGB]] Rezident [[Grigory Kheifets]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] in the home of Bransten on December 6, 1941.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster023.pdf &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government&amp;quot;], Vol. 23, pgs. 55 - 272 pdf, February 21, 1946. Includes alphabetical index at end.  In the later part of February 1946, the [[FBI]] transmitted to Secretary of State [[George Marshal]]l a 194 page Report based upon Soviet defector [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s deposition three months earlier entitled, &amp;quot;Underground Espionage Organization (NKVD) in Agencies of the United States Government.&amp;quot;  Preliminary investigations and other information in Bureau files gave support and credence to the providential value of Bentley's serious allegations. Bentley had been assigned a covername by the FBI, &amp;quot;Gregory,&amp;quot; and the highly secret investigation was referred to by investigators as &amp;quot;the Gregory Case.&amp;quot;  State Department internal investigators provided a list of questions to the FBI for the confidtential informant to answer. The Statement requested information about Philip and Alice Raine.  Bentley, who worked out of New York, responded the names were entirely unfamiliar (pg. Vol. 96, pg. 87).  Philip and Alicia Raine subsequnetly were delevoped as leads by FBI investigators in the Washington field office while surveilling the many contacts of [[Mary Jane Keeney]]. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file, Hoover letter to Secretary of State George Marshall, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pgs. 85 -90] pdf, March 10, 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster077.pdf Vol. 77, pgs. 133, 135, 201] pdf, Septermber 1946.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster061.pdf Vol. 61, pgs. 74 -79] pdg; Hottel to the Director, &amp;quot;Just Lunning,&amp;quot; July 18, 1947.   Discussion between [[Mary Jane Keeney]] and Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, who would become Schimmel’s supervisor at the State Department. Sylvia Schimmel complained to Just Lunning she was not being given meaningful work at the State Dept. due to Schimmel's work for the Poltical Action Committee. Just Lunning had links to William T. Stone, [[V. Frank Coe]], Philip Dunaway, David Wahl, [[Donald Wheeler]], [[Allan Rosenberg]], Bowen Smith, and [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Mary Jane Keeney had innumerable contacts in the [[CPUSA]] underground espionage apparatus which included [[Greg Silvermaster]], [[Helen Silvermaster]], [[Sergey Kurnakov]], [[Joseph Bernstein]], [[Frederick Field]], [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Haakon Chevalier]], [[Richard Bransten]], [[Laurence Todd]], [[William Ullman]], and [[Robert Miller]]. Much of the Silvermaster file is devoted to surveillance reports on them.  Mary Jane Keeney had served in the occupation of Berlin while at this time her husband, [[Philip Keeney]] was serving in Japan. Mary Jane Keeney was seeking to join him there. The FBI and State Department officials were moving to prevent this, and to have Philip recalled from his position with the occupation forces.  Mary Jane Keeney had turned to Sylvia Schimmel for assistance with her passport problems.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster065.pdf Vol. 65, pg. 51] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster096.pdf Vol. 96, pg. 78] pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Hayden B. Peake]],[http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Reconstruction Finance Corporation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:McCarthy, Joseph}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273118</id>
		<title>Talk:Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273118"/>
		<updated>2007-08-21T18:29:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: Still needs...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Still needs... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just added a great deal of info on this topic. Still need to add more biographical info. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:29, 21 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273115</id>
		<title>Edward R. Murrow</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_R._Murrow&amp;diff=273115"/>
		<updated>2007-08-21T18:27:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Added info */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Edward R. &amp;quot;Ed&amp;quot; Murrow''' (April 25 1908 - April 27 1965) was a [[Left-wing]] [[United States|American]] [[journalism|journalist]] and television figure. He first came to prominence with a series of [[radio]] news broadcasts during [[World War II]], which were followed by millions of listeners in the United States and Canada. Liberal media historians consider him among journalism's greatest figures being considered one of the first journalists who would editorialize the news instead of just reporting the news. Murrow produced a series of TV news reports that lead up to the censure of Senator [[Joseph McCarthy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Murrow's ''See It Now'' attack on Senator McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most prominent attacks on Senator McCarthy was an episode of the TV documentary series ''See It Now'', hosted by [[Edward R. Murrow]], which was broadcast on March 9, 1954. By the time Murrow produced his &amp;quot;See It Now&amp;quot; assault on Senator McCarthy in 1954, the senator had been under almost constant vicious attack for four years. According to McCarthy biographer Arthur Herman, Murrow and his staff had spent two months carefully editing film clips to portray McCarthy in the worst possible light. There were no clips showing McCarthy in a professional manner. Despite Murrow's claims, this &amp;quot;was not a report at all but instead a full-scale assault, employing exactly the same techniques of 'partial truth and innuendo' that critics accused McCarthy of using.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The episode consisted largely of clips of McCarthy in the most unflattering context, including &amp;quot;belching and picking his nose&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4 }}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In these clips, McCarthy accuses the [[Democratic Party]] of &amp;quot;twenty years of treason&amp;quot; because of the Democratic Party's concessions to the [[Soviet Union]] at the [[Yalta conference]] and [[Potsdam conference]], describes the [[American Civil Liberties Union]] as &amp;quot;listed as 'a front for, and doing the work of,' the Communist Party,&amp;quot; and berates General Zwicker for Zwicker's claim that he would protect any other general who promotes Communist's within the military. Murrow also portrays a Pentagon coding room employee, [[Annie Lee Moss]] as an innocent victim of McCarthy even though it was later established that the F.B.I. had warned the Army and the Civil Service Commission about her [[Communist Party]] connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pages 333-337&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, even some McCarthy critics were outraged by this one-sided presentation. Consistent McCarthy critic, John Cogley of ''[[Commonweal]]'', &amp;quot;sharply attacked Murrow and his producers for their distorted summary and selected use of video clips.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Herman&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 253&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cogley commented that a different selection of footage could have easily portrayed McCarthy in an extremely positive light and, then further warned against the misuse of television in this fashion. He and another McCarthy critic from the ''[[Saturday Review]]'' agreed that it &amp;quot;was not a proud moment for television journalism&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Lately&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = When Even Angels Wept&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Morrow&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1973&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = page 466&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To counter the negative publicity, McCarthy appeared on ''See It Now'' on April 6, 1954, and presented his case in order to clarify the misconceptions that Murrow had televised. McCarthy countered that his committee, &amp;quot;has forced out of government, and out of important defense plants, Communists engaged in the Soviet conspiracy.&amp;quot; McCarthy went on to say, &amp;quot;For example, 238 witnesses were examined [in] public session; 367 witnesses examined [in] executive session; 84 witnesses refused to testify as to Communist activities on the ground that, if they told the truth, they might go to jail; twenty-four witnesses with Communist backgrounds have been discharged from jobs [in] which they were handling secret, top-secret, confidential material, individuals who were exposed before our committee.&amp;quot; McCarthy also exposed Murrow's left-wing background and previous associations with Communist organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Murrow report, together with the televised Army-McCarthy hearings of the same year, and four years of consistent anti-McCarthy media reporting were the major causes of a nationwide popular opinion backlash against McCarthy. However, well-known broadcaster Eric Sevareid said the Murrow assault &amp;quot;came very late in the day. The youngsters read back and they think only one person in broadcasting and the press stood up to McCarthy and this has made a lot of people feel very upset, including me, because that program came awfully late.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 ''Murrow, McCarthy, and the media'']. Renew America.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Murrow discounted his role in the decline of Senator McCarthy's popularity. Murrow stated, &amp;quot;My God, I didn't do anything. (Times columnist) Scotty Reston and lot of guys have been writing like this, saying the same things, for months, for years. We're bringing up the rear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Bayley&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Edwin R.&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Joe McCarthy and the Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = University of Wisconsin Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1981&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-688-00148-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, despite the deceptive nature of the ''See It Now'' program and the late date in which it appears,  anti-McCarthy historians have credited and celebrated Murrow as playing a major role in damaging Senator McCarthy's campaign to remove security risks from the U.S. government.&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;{{reflist|2}}&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Bayley, Edwin R. (1981). ''Joe McCarthy and the Press''. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4. &lt;br /&gt;
#Lately, Thomas (1973). ''When Even Angels Wept''. Morrow. page 466. ISBN 0-688-00148-3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
#Bates, Michael M. (November 15, 2005). [http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bates/051115 Murrow, McCarthy, and the media]. Renew America.&lt;br /&gt;
#Murrow, Edward R. (May 31, 2005). [http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/MRC/murrowmccarthy2.html ''The Edward R. Murrow: The McCarthy Years'']. New Video Group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Amy Goodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Joseph McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Keith Olbermann]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:journalists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=253779</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=253779"/>
		<updated>2007-07-28T20:06:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Venona and Soviet Files - fixed &amp;quot;Peake's&amp;quot; name */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' ([[November 14]], [[1908]] – [[May 2]], [[1957]]) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] goverment. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations.  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to dicuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peake, Hayden B., [http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=253771</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=253771"/>
		<updated>2007-07-28T19:52:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Known security/loyalty risks - Added Schumann */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' ([[November 14]], [[1908]] – [[May 2]], [[1957]]) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] goverment. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:FBI-Chart-Web.png|right|450px|thumb|FBI Master Chart of distribution in 1945-46 of investigative reports to the White House, Attorney General, and employing agencies of Communist agents in the Federal government.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations.  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to dicuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frederick Schumann]], contracted by U.S. State Department as lecturer; Professor at Williams College; not on Lee list;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schumann was a consultant for the State Department but not as an employee. His job was to lecture and train State Department employees who were subsequently to be placed in sensitive posts. In this capacity, out of 57 instructors, only three, Schumann, Edward Acheson (Dean's brother), and Communist [[Owen Lattimore]] were not government officials. According to the [[House Committee on Un-American Activities]], Schumann was a member of over 50 Communist front organizations. In 1932, Schuman supported the Communist Party ticket for President. Schumann wrote a pro-Soviet book titled, ''Soviet Politics at Home and Abroad'' that appeared just before the State Department enlisted him for his help in helping out orient the Foreign Service officers. While Schumann declined an invitation to the [[Tydings Committee]] in order to address charges against him, the Committee, as with other cases, showed no interest in determining why pro-Soviet lecturers were being utilized by the State Department and who was doing the hiring.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = December 19, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 16747&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peale, Hayden B., [http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=250190</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=250190"/>
		<updated>2007-07-25T23:46:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Silvermaster file Summaries */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Silvermaster file Summaries===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, last nite I found an excellent source that may be useful in melding some of the Buckley/Bozell material with known Venona spies.  Someone created a summary page for the massive FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm Silvermaster File Summaries].  See for example,&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 7 late November 1945&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Victor Perlo]] and '''[[Stanley Graze]]'''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 14 December 1945—January 1946 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Interactions of [[Maurice Halperin]], [[Joseph Gregg]], [[Robert Miller]], and unidentified woman employed by [[UNRRA]]. Contacts recounted among [[George Perazich]] of UNRRA staff (Yugoslavia), [[Irving Kaplan]], [[Edward Fitzgerald]]. Further details on Perazich. Contacts of [[Robert Miller]] with Herman Habicht, John Marsalka, Minter Wood, and, apparently, [[Alger Hiss]]. Further background on [[Mildred Price]] (Ed note: this is the sister of [[Mary Price]], [[Walter Lippmann]]'s secretary; I had a short bio on her but its been lost somehere in WP or among wikimirrors). Extensive biographical data on Miller, '''listing more than 70 individuals''' known as contacts of Miller and his wife, including Travis Hedrick, Duncan Aikman, Alice and '''[[Philip Raine]]''', Maurice Halperin...Haldore Hanson...Howard Fast...plus additional contacts of Russian origin or nationality. Not indexed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 15 December 1945&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...Extensive background on Grace Granich, links to [[Amerasia]] group, and report that she was to be contacted by '''[[John Stewart Service]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 16 December 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...extensive background on [[Albert Kahn]] and his reported contacts including Mrs. [[John Abt]] (Jessica Smith), Howard Fast, former White House aide [[David Niles]], CP leader Gilbert Green, union leader Harry Bridges, '''[[Philip Jaffe]]'''...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 19 Dec. 1945—January 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...contact between Victor Perlo and Stanley Graze of OSS&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 25 (Part I) March 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summary of investigative results concerning [[Willard Park]] (including connection to [[Louise Bransten]])(Ed. note: Louise Branston is the mistress of KGB Rezident [[Grigory Kheifetz]] who made initial contact with [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]), [[Bernard Redmont]], [[William Remington]], [[Peter Rhodes]], Ruth Rifkin, [[Helen Tenney]], [[Cedric Belfrage]], [[Albert Kahn]] and his contacts, including [[David Karr]], Howard Fast, [[David Niles]], Gilbert Green, Harry Bridges, and '''[[Philip Jaffe]]''' of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 42 April 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;...'''[[Gustavo Duran]]'''...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 58 July 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Extensive section also on James Newman, contacts with Helen Gahagan Douglas, '''[[Philleo Nash]]''', Alfred Friendly, Byron Miller, Thomas Emerson, Harold Stein, Myer Cohen of [[UNRRA]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Volume 64 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;... various interactions and contacts among subjects dating to December 1945. Among items noted are connections of John and Cynthia Dierkes to [[Robert Miller]]; contacts of [[Edward Fitzgerald]]s and [[George Silverman]] with Mrs. Frank Cameron; discussion of [[Alger Hiss]] State Department contacts Donald Blaisdell and Chester Williams, the latter formerly with [[UNRRA]] and [[OWI]], and brief mentions of Williams employee '''[[Esther Brunauer]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Volume 65 August 1946&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Summaries of activities, contacts and interactions of subjects during July 1946. Among items covered are ...continued interaction among [[Maurice Halperin]], Theodore Halperin, David Wahl, Philip Dunaway, Maynard Gerstler, [[Julius Joseph]]. Contact between Theodore Halperin and identified CP member in DC area; further correspondence of '''Philip''' and [[Mary Jane Keeney]], detail on Mary Jane Keeney discussion with Sylvia Schimmel about Just Lunning, notation of Mary Jane Keeney contact with Lois Carlisle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Discussions also of Mrs. Keeney’s contacts with [[Michael Greenberg]], Eric Beecroft, and Ursula Wasserman; background on Florence Levy, sister-in-law of [[Robert Miller]], including work at State Department and previous employment at Hemisphere; interactions of [[George Silverman]] and [[David Weintraub]], recently fired from [[UNRRA]]; contacts of Ursula Wasserman with David Melcher and '''[[Philleo Nash]]''' formerly of OWI;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AMYWAYS.....altogether there are 162 Volumes, and this is just glancing at it since last nite.  I have read most of the Silvermaster file, but this Summary [http://education-research.org/CSR/Holdings/Silvermaster/summaries.htm] is the first one page online summary  with links to the PDF files.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A NOTE ON WHAT YOU ARE READING: This in the ongoing FBI investigation which opened about November of 1945; the FBI was not aware of Army Signals intelligence Venona decrpyts for yet.  This is between disbandenment of the OSS, and the creation of CIA in 1947. And there is no knowledge yet by the FBI in 1945-46 of Soviet theft of nuclear secrets.  So what the aims of this investigation are is to simply drive security risks out of the State Department and elsewhere, particularly after disbandenment of the OSS, because many were seeking to be reemployed elsewhere. The object is not so much to gather prosecutable evidence, but rather to simply and quietly remove security risks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time McCarthy is introduced on the scene in 1950, most probably at the behest of Hoover, (1) FBI coordination with Venona began; (2) Hiss and others were exposed publicly; (3) the Soviets tested a nuke &amp;amp; this was public knowledge; (4) there still remained a large number of unidentified codenames and known security risks in the government.  So the Silvermaster file reveals ''why'' so many of McCarthy's cases were suspected in the first place, as you can follow detailed surveillance activity by FBI field investigators in late 1945 and 1946 with others who are now known to be KGB operatives.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:13, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that is some incredible information. Nice job finding it. The size of this data is mind-boggling. What are your thoughts as how to incorporate this info into new or existing articles? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:46, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Margaret_Sanger&amp;diff=249879</id>
		<title>Talk:Margaret Sanger</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Margaret_Sanger&amp;diff=249879"/>
		<updated>2007-07-25T19:17:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* People With Black Skin..... */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Michael Crichton, is an author of fiction and a non-practicing MD—is he really a proper source for historical quotes?  I think not.  I would, therefore, argue in favor of removing the last paragraph from this page unless better sourcing for these quotes can be found.--[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 10:17, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's the kind of censorship I came here to avoid. Wikipedians made the same argument, but I don't buy it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On what grounds do you reject the quote?&lt;br /&gt;
:#Writing fiction discredits all non-fiction written by an author.&lt;br /&gt;
:#*Bio-chemist (and science fiction author) [[Isaac Asimov]] wrote a ''History of Chemistry'' which I read as a teen. Bad source, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:#When an MD stops practicing or never even starts, he forgets everything he learned at university and his degree becomes worthless.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In your reply, please refer to the numbered list above. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:41, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::First, I am not censoring anything – Michael Crichton’s views are appropriate to place on his entry, I am simply suggesting he is not a good source for Margaret Sanger’s views, I didn’t delete the quote I simply asked that someone justify Crichton as a source or that a better source for the quote be found or that the quote be removed.  So please do not accuse me of censorship.  If I were a censor I would have simply deleted the quote and moved on.&lt;br /&gt;
::As to your points I do not reject the quote for either of the reasons you suggest that I am rejecting the quotes.  I am saying the two qualifications Chichton has are popular fiction author and non-practicing MD—this means that he would be a good source on writing, the publishing industry, how to provide publicity for a book (etc.), and he would be a good source for those things one would learn in earning an MD during the time period he was earning his MD (this rules out, for example, modern practice in dealing with premature births as that technology has greatly changed since he earned his degree—but does not rule out how to set a broken arm).  What Sanger said is not in his area of expertise, not in either of them.  &lt;br /&gt;
::So I am rejecting the quote for reason number 3 (not 1 or 2—both of which, you are quite right are bad reasons to reject a statement):&lt;br /&gt;
:::3. What Margaret Sanger said is not in Michael Chrichton’s field of expertise and he, therefore, is not a proper source for what she said.&lt;br /&gt;
::If she said what Chrichton claims she did a better source can be found, if a better source cannot be found it should be removed.  --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 10:57, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for taking the time to clarify your remarks. Returning the favor, let me point out that I do not consider you a &amp;quot;censor&amp;quot; - I was perhaps unclear about that. I meant that removing the quote 'would be' censorship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate you listing your grounds for removal of this passage:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:According to [[Michael Crichton]], Sanger was a supporter of [[eugenics]]. He quotes her as having said, &amp;quot;Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty … there is no greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.michaelcrichton.net/fear/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Crichton also writes that 'She spoke of the burden of caring for &amp;quot;this dead weight of human waste.&amp;quot;' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.michaelcrichton.net/fear/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But &amp;quot;not in Michael Chrichton’s field of expertise&amp;quot; doesn't seem like a good enough reason. Everything in the passage is easily checked. Would you like to dig into this matter, and tell us whether Crichton was right and/or whether I've cited him properly? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The points in question are:&lt;br /&gt;
#Was [[Margaret Sanger]] a supporter of [[eugenics]]?&lt;br /&gt;
#Did she say &amp;quot;Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty … there is no greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
#*And is this quote taken in context or [[out of context]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you've got time, we could sure use your help on this. It could even turn into a guideline on [[Use of quoted material]]. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:12, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#That [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for the reply and the clarification.&lt;br /&gt;
:I’ll take a stab at researching these quotes, but I want to suggest that you are misplacing the burden of proof.  If you (or anyone else) is going to say that someone said, “X”, then the burden to prove that the person did indeed say “X” should be on the person making the claim.  To meet this burden I would suggest that the person asserting the quote should have to point to an eyewitness account, a text written or signed by the person in question, a newspaper report, a history text, or some other reliable source for historical information.  I think that is the standard that should be applied to all quotations.&lt;br /&gt;
:I worry that a more relaxed standard—like the one you are proposing here (I take it that you are suggesting that so long as I can find a person (or possibly a person who has some degree of education or a person who has an easily recognized name—I’m not sure why exactly you would accept Chrichton’s authority here) who attributes the quote to the person in question, it is acceptably posted to their article) will lead to bad information being posted in articles.&lt;br /&gt;
:The standard I am proposing is that sources have to be roughly what they would have to be if a person were writing their addition to the article as part of a college (or even a high school—assuming the high school is sufficiently strict) paper—a source used as a reference has to be reliable either by virtue of expertise or by virtue of it being an eyewitness account (or in the case of some newspaper articles a second hand eyewitness account).  I’m not sure what standard you are proposing, but I would be very interested to know what exactly it is and why you think it is superior. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:01, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A quick search finds the first quote attributed to Herbert Spencer here &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/LeBon/LeBon_1899/LeBon_1899_24.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  A bit more reaserch finds it here &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/~rauch/abortion_eugenics/sanger/sanger_05.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as part of an epigram to a chapter of a book Sanger wrote.  So, I would argue that it is absolutely out of contex. --[[User:Reginod|Reginod]] 12:09, 2 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[:Category:Abortion]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not 100% sure why this article was in [[:Category:Abortion]]. She didn't campaign for abortion in her lifetime, neither of the groups she founded supported abortion until well after she left them, and the only time she felt the need to comment on abortion was in part of campaigning against suppressing birth control (with comments along the lines of &amp;quot;If birth control were available mothers wouldn't have to risk their lives getting abortions&amp;quot; and so on). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked for categories for activists, eugenicists, birth control, or feminists, and found bupkis. Those seem like the most likely candidates. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:08, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Margaret Sanger founded what became Planned Paranthood, supported murdering infants in large families, argued that the African Race should be exterminated, and much of what she wanted is being worked on via planned parenthood.  She is a very important figure in the history of abortion.  Google returns 100K+ hits for [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=%22Margaret+Sanger%22++%2Babortion +&amp;quot;Margaret Sanger&amp;quot; +abortion].  Yeah, I see the first link is wikipedia apologetics Sanger vis-a-vis abortion, but this is conservapedia.   {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 01:14, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you help me out with some references to show that she argued for the legalization or legitimization of abortion, or that she advocated for the extermination of the African race? AFAICT, she argued for the marginalization and sterilization of southern and eastern European immigrants to the US, and subscribed to the then-universal school of thought that abortion was an unqualified evil. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:20, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Wow, those links are particularly unhelpful. Wikipedia is vague and mealymouthed (par for the course), there's lots of useless partisan frothing at the mouth on both sides, and there are lots of off-hand (unsourced, argh!) references to her being galvanized by the evils of abortion (again making it hard to tell between partisan frothing at the mouth and substance). *sigh* [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:25, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/sexuality/se0057.html Angry White Female: Margaret Sanger's Race of Thoroughbreds], going to add it now.  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 01:27, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That source doesn't mention that she had any feelings on abortion, although it's helpful on her specific racial feelings. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:37, 25 July 2007 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, Sanger herself on abortion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;To force poor mothers to resort to this dangerous and healthdestroying method of curtailing their families is cruel, wicked, and heartless, and it is often the mothers who care most about the welfare of their children who are willing to undergo any pain or risk to prevent the coming of infants for whom they cannot properly care.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is something she wrote for the Woman Citizen in 1924, and is available [http://womenshistory.about.com/library/etext/bl_sanger_1924.htm here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm having trouble seeing her as an abortion advocate, here. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 01:48, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Work together well, and in harmony!''' --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 01:28, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:She was an infanticide advocate.   She founded what became planned parenthood, one of the if not the largest abortion provider in the U.S..  More than 10,000,000 African American fetuses (read: infants) have been aborted thanks to planned parenthood.  Anyway, have at the article, I'll be back tomorrow.  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 01:51, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::She founded the American Birth Control League, which was folded into the National Birth Control League (which later became Planned Parenthood). (Saying she founded Planned Parenthood is just factually wrong, in this case. She was heavily involved in its early days, but her organization was actually subsumed by PP.) Planned Parenthood didn't perform any abortions until after Sanger's death; the Supreme Court didn't even strike down laws prohibiting contraceptive use by married couples until shortly before her death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::She was a sick person, and had some extremist, repulsive views. Let's try our best to stick to attributing to her the views she actually held, instead of the views held by those she associated with, though. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 02:07, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;These unwanted pregnancies often provoke the crime of abortion, or alternatively multiply the number of child-workers and lower the standard of living.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:- Sanger in ''The Pivot of Civilization''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I assert that the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:- Sanger in ''Woman and the New Race'' (''Woman and the New Race'' has more on how to combat abortion, with an entire chapter advocating contraceptives as a means to eliminate abortion.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How are these the words of an abortion advocate? :/ [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 02:28, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sanger and Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some seem to be suggesting that the link between Sanger and abortion is tenuous.  Let's review:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Supported infanticide (read: ex post facto abortions)&lt;br /&gt;
*Founded what became Planned Parenthood (a leading abortion provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The link between Sanger and abortion is strong.  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 01:59, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*sigh*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; I was hoping that we could avoid shrillness here. She argued for infanticide, and if we were going to add a category for advocates of infanticide, I wouldn't (based on what I've read, I'm still digging) oppose it. She drew a distinction between abortion and infanticide, and opposed abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for founding Planned Parenthood (which she didn't, but that's quibbling, since she was one of its defining voices in its early years), lots of organizations become something other than what their founders want them to be. AFAICT from what sources I've read (and, please, I'd love to see some better info on her view of abortion post-1930) Planned Parenthood began dealing with abortion after her death. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 02:07, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'll do some digging, but your replies sound a lot like &amp;quot;Muhammad did not support Jihad&amp;quot; (with apologies to those of the Islam faith).  {{User:PheasantHunter/FullSig}} 02:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm merely cautioning against painting an organization's founder with the anachronistic views of the organization. Think of how silly it would be to put [[:Category:Opponents of same-sex marriage]] to [[John C. Frémont]] or [[:Category:Opponents to slavery]] to [[George W. Bush]]. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 02:19, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, you say that she's an abortion advocate because she founded Planned Parenthood. When she founded the American Birth Control League, she stated its founding principles in ''The Pivot of Civilization'', which is happily available on [http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/6/8/1689/1689.txt Project Gutenberg]. An excerpt from these principles, emphasis added:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to this grave evil we witness the appalling waste of women's health and women's lives by too frequent pregnancies. '''These unwanted pregnancies often provoke the crime of abortion''', or alternatively multiply the number of child-workers and lower the standard of living.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her own words, Sanger argued for birth control as a way to prevent both uncontrolled population growth and abortion. Her single admirable trait was arguing for birth control as a means for a couple to manage the growth of their family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was a racist and a eugenicist, not an admirable person at all. But let us be precise in describing her views and goals, instead of throwing up our hands and ascribing all vaguely-related evils to her. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 02:36, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I know both of you have worked with far more difficult people than each other (me for instance)!  I am rooting for you both! :p --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 02:27, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== People With Black Skin..... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe it almost universally acceptable to refer to them as &amp;quot;Blacks&amp;quot;, African-Americans and people of African descent. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 03:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:TK, I agree. One thing that I've wondered is why it's OK to call someone, &amp;quot;a person of color&amp;quot; but not OK to call them a &amp;quot;colored person&amp;quot;? It's the bizarre process of keeping up with labels. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=249612</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=249612"/>
		<updated>2007-07-25T14:10:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Trim */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, yes we're discussing trimming the mainspace here.  What we are likely to do is spin the text off from the footnotes into individual articles for all the red links in the Security risk subhead.  That a good place to start.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:27, 23 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know we have to come to some conclusion on this. This page is indeed 108 kilobytes long and the Wikipedia article is 99 kilobytes long. Not much difference in size yet this article is far too short in order to properly cover the topic. Rob is right that we should spin off the text from the footnotes at some point. In fact, we should probably create an article dedicated to those footnotes. We will have to eventually summarize more of the sections and spin off the larger issues into related articles. For example, there's no way we can fully address the &amp;quot;censure&amp;quot; debate in this article. It will have to have it's own article. All we can do is keep working at it until we have it right. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:10, 25 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that is Haynes site, and it's the only one I know of.  The entire list would have to be reconstructed from how Haynes displays it, but I think it's possible.  Also, Haynes gives a citation where to find it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps between Haynes &amp;amp; CP, these are the two best sites available on the internet.  Marquette University gives an inventory of the McCarthy Papers [http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-jrm-s-14.html], and it's cited as &amp;quot;Lee Report, 1948, n.d.&amp;quot;  The McCarthy Papers remain sealed until 2050, but we do have a list of other files McCarthy was using.  Some are quite interesting (like &amp;quot;State Dept. Rifling of Files&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Franz Leopold Neuman&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;Harold Glasser&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, Whitakker Chambers personal papers will be available soon, so it looks like we'll have some new information shortly.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=243311</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=243311"/>
		<updated>2007-07-20T23:10:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* External Links - Added &amp;quot;Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club&amp;quot; link */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' ([[November 14]], [[1908]] – [[May 2]], [[1957]]) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] goverment. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations.  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to dicuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peale, Hayden B., [http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://boomp3.com/m/91d184a59074 Joseph McCarthy: Address To The Chicago Irish Fellowship Club] (listen online)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Moore&amp;diff=239960</id>
		<title>Talk:Michael Moore</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Moore&amp;diff=239960"/>
		<updated>2007-07-18T21:24:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* See also */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|TK}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please note edits! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When making an edit, always note what it is exactly you did.  Synopsis.  Summary. Thank you! --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:48, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be happy to do that, but the thing is, the page seams to be locked like so many other pages here. Change i would have liked to make was to remove the ideological claim that all his documentaryes where &amp;quot;pseudo-documentaryes&amp;quot;. I hope that SYSOP:s would read the articles and remove this kind of clearly opinionated sentences before locking the pages. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 18:48, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Your ideas, Timppeli, is exactly why it is locked, because they are not accurate.  Moore does not make conventional documentaries, and as such, it is a misnomer to label them that way. I was the one who locked it.  This is not Wikipedia.  We do not engage in &amp;quot;double-speak&amp;quot; or label clearly propagandist efforts as documentaries. What Moore does is mix polemics, propaganda and the documentary styles together.  While clearly he includes factual data, he also extrapolates, adds conjecture that comes from dubious sources, and mixes it with his own rather extreme leftist POV, all without any disclaimers in the credits.--~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:52, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hahaha, Moore isn't an &amp;quot;extreme leftist&amp;quot;, I am.  He's about in the center between you and I.  The middle of the road is the yellow line in the center, not the white one on the right hand side.  Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn, they're lefties.  Moore is a centrist, populist good ole boy who has a camera and a knack for making money. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:24, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has there ever been a political documentary which the other side with difrent opinnions havent claimed to be propagandist? There is allready a critisism section on the article, and thats fine, but to outright label the documents pseudo-documentaryes is not neutral in any way. What by the way are my ideas? i happen to disagree Mr Moore on several things allso. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:59, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Well, let us start with the fact he doesn't even label them &amp;quot;political documentaries&amp;quot;. And I missed the &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; that says we are neutral, would you point me to it?  What I posted above is fact.  Documentarians decry Moore, and don't respect him. But he is good at what he does, and highly successful. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 05:18, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Don't know where to start from... You seriously think that war in Irak, president Bush, gun controll and the the &amp;quot;war on terrorism&amp;quot; arent political issues? Ill just list some sites referring to Moores documentaryes as political documentaryes: [http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/multimedia/tp/aatpdocfilms.htm] [http://www.movie-vault.com/articles/DPVbuRTELEzZFOdb]  [http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/147/report_display.asp]  [http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/insideindies/infocus/truthorfaction/index.html] I really wonder how anyone could claim that his documentaryes arent political on nature, not atleast without an clear agenda to discredit him. What comes to neutrality of this site, how about some quates from the rules: &amp;quot; Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry.&amp;quot; &amp;quot; Everything you post must be true and verifiable.&amp;quot; So, i ask you, isn't labeling Michael Moores documentaryes as pseudo-documentaryes an opinnion that is mostly held by people who allso are against his political ideas? And there for against the rules. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 09:52, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 09:57, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And now i am speechles. No arguments why your answer is no? I think this is clearly against the rules and no way of making an encyclopedia. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 10:07, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*You asked, I answered.  This isn't Wikipedia, or a debating society. I don't engage editors in endless discussion, as there is no point to it.  Try to free your mind from your experience at other wiki's. :-)   --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 10:20, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm sorry, at what point exactly did you not only get to decide that Moore's films aren't documentaries but the right to be smug about it too?  I can only find one definition that suggests a documentary is obligated to be unbiased toward one viewpoint, but what all the definitions I've found agree on is that documentary films basically source all the footage contained within them as either coming from previous recordings of the news or Cspan or whatnot, or coming from the directors filming, and all footage is nonfiction.  In F911 f'rinstance, Moore shows footage of himself interviewing senators, and other footage he did not film, but all footage was, inarguable, non-fiction, since the events depicted did happen.  Moore's commentary supposes links between events that may (very very very likely) not have happened at all, but the premises of his suppositiong come from the documented non-fiction sources.  I have to imagine you'd be hard pressed to find a definition of &amp;quot;Documentary&amp;quot; that doesn't have that core of non-fiction (probably the reason why you provide none).  For you, therefore, to contradict this definition in order to use terms like pseudo-documentary (so Bush didn't say &amp;quot;Bring em on&amp;quot;?) is, in fact, your insertion of opinion, and for you to dispute the definition of &amp;quot;Documentary&amp;quot; is equally unsourced.  You are violating two of this sites &amp;quot;commandments.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As such, however, I realize that you will recieve no reprimand, no mention from a higher up, in fact you're probably already being considered for the Presidential medal of freedom.  I don't imagine that my calm and rational explanation of what rules youve broken and how youve done it will even manage to convince you that you're wrong about a blessed thing, and will only serve to get me banned again for pointing out things the site does not want pointed out.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Michael Moore is fat.  This is a central complaint lobbed against him by most of his critics.  It is unfair of the article not to acknowledge this.  Please make mention of how fat Michael Moore is.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I forgot that part.  Corrected: Moore is a centrist, populist, '''''fat''''' good ole boy who has a camera and a knack for making money. Man is he ever fat. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:24, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hmmmm, maybe your arguments are better suited here: [http://www.afi.com/] I do agree, however, that you have been fairly calm. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 10:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What do you mean by that?  The AFI considers Moore a documentatian.  Thats what his academy award was for, isnt it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Well, they also gave an award to Al Gore.  After he was post-facto made a producer of the film, or whatever it was that was going to disqualify his appearing on stage.  --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:26, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fine, whatever, but my point is that the films themselves is considered a documentary.  Inventing a term like Pseudo-documentary to describe it evokes films like Spinal Tap and Best in Show which are entirely fictive.  You can dispute his methods and his logic, and lord knows half the people here already dispute his motives, but every piece of footage in his films is non-fiction.  Disproportionally distorted nonfiction, perhaps, but nonfiction the same.  Look, come from the other side, what would have to be different about his films for you to concede that they are actually documentaries?  It cant be bias, all documentaries have a point to make, social, political or otherwise, and it cant even be distortion since any presentation of facts is going to play up some over others, so what then?--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 11:08, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*I enjoyed several of his films, FYI.  Roger and Me, I actually own.  However, legitimate footage, edited and altered to depict events that never happened as he said, when he said they happened, well that is fiction.  Your moral compass seems a bit off, and I would have it checked.  A lie, by any other name, is still a lie, no?  Gently, nicely, ''respectfully'',  I tell you that the matter is now considered closed. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 04:15, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I tell you that it is not because with your narrowing criteria you've defined away the entirety of documentary filmmaking.  You may as well say that March of the Pengiuns &amp;quot;Lies&amp;quot; by pretending that Morgan Freeman's voice is present everywhere in the antarctic.  Thats the image it projects after all, if you want to argue that the film is factual.  Isn't that a lie?  Doesn't that disqualify it as a documentary?&lt;br /&gt;
::While I concede that, as you say, Moore does have a problem with depicting events as happening differently than they may have, it is done only for the same reason any documentarian makes any film at all, which is to argue a point.  If he's incorrect, even consciously so, that's as it may be, but he is not as a result making a work of fiction, or a pseudo-documentary.  Something like &amp;quot;Death of a President&amp;quot; that uses actual footage of GWBush to pretend he was assassinated and filming people's reaction to it, that can be called a pseudo-documentary since its presenting a central point which is entirely fictive, and acknowledged so by the filmmakers.  However, though you may disagree with the central thesis of, for instance, F911, that doesnt make the film a work of fiction.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, this page is completely biased.  If you want this site to rival Wikipedia in any way, shape or form you should probably remove the quotes around &amp;quot;documentary&amp;quot; when referring to &amp;quot;Sicko&amp;quot; (which by the way has won praise from conservatives as well as liberals.  Not to mention under the picture it is captioned &amp;quot;Michael Moore, ranting&amp;quot;.  Hardly unbiased at all as you claim this site to be. Nor is it trustworth.  {{unsigned|RobWW}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Please Fix==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This &amp;quot;paragraph&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Before producing Moore&amp;quot; Also, why did the line about him being an outspoken critic of Bush get removed?  It's actually something he is famous for, even among those who do not know his work.  Or, should I say, infamous?  Hey, you can even say &amp;quot;reviled&amp;quot; if you want.  But I'd say, put it back in. [[User:Human|Human]] 14:13, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Are you kidding? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That picture is the dumbest thing I've ever seen, and to portray this as &amp;quot;just another image&amp;quot; is indulging in ridiculous, childish games.  Please, if you even have the pretense of being &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; choose an image that looks like the person and not just catching them in an off-guard moment, or speaking, or eating, or whatever you choose to make people look silly. Otherwise, all you are doing is engaging in propaganda. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, I can see your request for Sysop is right on track!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I uploaded a picture of Michael Moore that could ease the tension on this discussion page. The picture is at image:Michael-Moore.jpg --[[User:Element|Element]] 20:38, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you, Element for the kindness and reasoned response/request!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Moore High School Photo==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mmoore.png|right|thumb|Michael Moore's high school yearbook photo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He looks like a lovely young lady. Too bad about the way things worked out. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:43, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why the second photo? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article's kinda short, does it really necessitate a second photo?  Also, the caption is subjective, since Ranting is kind of a POV term, and really we don't know when or where the photo was taken either.  For all we know he's singing Carry On My Wayward Son.  If the photo's going to be kept (in a, preferably, longer article if at all) the caption should either say when/where it was taken, or just say &amp;quot;Michael Moore in an unflattering pose because his mouth is open and that is funny, him being fat and all.  Teh Lulz!!!11!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:RexMundane|Rex Mundane]] 10:53, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scare quotes and use of pseudo-documentary ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm no fan of Michael Moore's, but using the quotes around &amp;quot;documentary&amp;quot; and writing &amp;quot;pseudo-documentary&amp;quot; in the article are needlessly pejorative.  A documentary doesn't have to be purely factual, and it doesn't have to be have completely undisputed accuracy.  People kibitzed about &amp;quot;Waco: Rules of Engagement&amp;quot; and about the nature facts presented in &amp;quot;March of the Penguins,&amp;quot; but those are both obviously documentaries.  Since you've already got a section in about factual disputes in his articles, why not clear out the stuff that takes the article from impartial to snide?  [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 11:50, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Michael Moore presented his &amp;quot;information&amp;quot; as definitive fact. This places him well within the bounds of reasonable scrutiny and criticism. Even minor inconsistencies (including information later validated) that he would not have been privy to are unacceptable. Placing documentary within quotations provides all the information required to illustrate the doubt cast on his claims. Conservapedia proclaims conciseness and this is an apt and just oppurtunity to provide us with some. Having an entire section devoted to &amp;quot;liberoganda&amp;quot; backpedalling and weak attempts to legitimize his controversial films would be a clear instance of bias. It would serve no purpose other than one-sided filler material. --[[User:Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 11:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::But then you're pre-emptively judging his next film Sicko without even knowing what it claims by putting the word Documentary in &amp;quot;Sarcastic quotes&amp;quot;.  Yes, he should be, and is, scrutinized for what he says, but so then is everything.  As brainslug says, people will always claim that documentaries present inaccurate facts or interpretations, but whatever the results of such scrutinous challenges, this doesnt make them not documentaries.  Its enough to say, as the article does, that people challenge his claims without having to invent a word like &amp;quot;pseudo-documentary&amp;quot; (a term which seems to apply to ficticious movies like Spinal Tap) to describe a movie that the site finds disagreeable.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:RexMundane|Rex Mundane]] 11:48, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: In addition to what Rex said above, we already have a small paragraph in which he's accused of using deceit and so on.  We might as well expand &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;that&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;.  More facts are better than fewer facts; speaking in detail about his errors is better than insinuating without detail. [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 11:53, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default sort ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{DEFAULTSORT:Moore, Michael}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to the article before the categories.  The article is locked.  Thanks.  [[User:HeartOfGold|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;eart&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;old&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]][[User_talk:HeartOfGold|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 02:32, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I did, but wish I knew why we do this...--[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 02:52, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== POlitics requires a minimum of brains? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can conclude from this that RobS knows NOTHING about politics, and has never met an actual politician.  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 22:19, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Be careful with your accusations.  Andy once ran for office. [[User:Arjen|Arjen]] 22:35, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not an accusation, it's a simple statement. Categroizing Michael Moore as a &amp;quot;political person&amp;quot; is an insult to people who generally are informed, and are concerned about public policy, and public discourse.  I'm not sure &amp;quot;satirist&amp;quot; would apply, and if so, not a very good one.  &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; might offend real comedians, too.  Perhaps &amp;quot;film maker&amp;quot; or some such garbage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:47, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Political people can be buffoons, too.  Sometimes it seems like a job requirement.  OTOH, I guess Rush Limbaugh isn't listed as a &amp;quot;Political Person&amp;quot;, either.  But I get the impressing Moore '''is''' informed and concerned--he just happens to think Conservatives are doing a terrible job. Oh, and he's fat, so there's no point in listening to him. --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 22:55, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good point. Do we really want to ''elevate'' Limbaugh to a political person?  OTOH, Al Franken is probably running for Senate; once he's a real candidate, he should qualify for awhile, unless he wins then he can enter the Pantheon with all our other failed icons.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:00, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You guys want to see a real masterwork of deception, check out the efforts by the &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; at WP who refuse to identify Moore as &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot; for fear that it may paint him in a negative fashion. This, despite Moore's own admission to being &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot;. WP truly is a magical land where fantasy prevails over reality. A lot like Disneyland but without the fun. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
That whole section should be removed. Maybe if you have seen some of his movies you wouldn't say that it is all based on &amp;quot;junk science&amp;quot;. Also why is there a criticism section but no praise? Since his movies have gotten much more praise than criticism [[User:Ttwashere|Ttwashere]] 20:28, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First, welcome to CP!  I pasted a welcome template on your talk page (which now exists) and hope you will read the links provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Second, I don't know who is &amp;quot;you&amp;quot;, but I have indeed seen all of Moore's work.  I would commend to you the posted reviews, not by people considered by anyone to be defenders of Conservative thought, for you to contemplate.  In the real world, Moore hasn't gotten more professional praise than criticism.  Quite the opposite.  Here at CP, we do not strive for political correctness, and do not tolerate Liberal [[deceit]]. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ttwashere, I agree with TK. Liberal [[deceit]] is not tolerated and anyone here suggesting Moore is anything but a propragandist for Socialism, is deluding themselves. Moore is a liar. He uses the film medium to promote an agenda which is radical left-wing extremism. He distorts his information in his &amp;quot;documentaries&amp;quot; as well as any Nazi or Communist propagandist from the past. There are quite a few good sources for drawing this conclusion. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:28, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Moore is just a greedy capitalist pig.  Even limousine liberals need to be judged by thier works, moreso than the lies they advocate which they may or may not believe in themselves.  The big probelm with deceit is, once a person gets well practiced in it, they become thier own biggest victim.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:29, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Greed certainly does create its' own idealogy, that's for sure. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:24, 18 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob, there was a &amp;quot;report&amp;quot;, news item, last year I believe, or early in this one, where someone actually go hold of some of his (Moore's) financial information.  It showed large sums sheltered in the Cayman's, and a rather large block of Haliburton stock!  If you ever run across it, that would be a great addition to the article! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 13:34, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Excellant idea. For some reason Moore makes me think of [[Ken Ley]], there's a lot of similiarities between these two rich scam artists who prey on an unsuspecting public to line their own pockets.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:02, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes. Once at a Beverly Hills eatery, where the price of a sandwich with fries approaches what I had to spend weekly as a student for food, I was shocked to have someone point him out to me.  He was in Armani, and certainly not wearing a truckers hat, and did indeed leave in his Liberal Limousine! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 14:19, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Moore&amp;diff=237604</id>
		<title>Talk:Michael Moore</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Michael_Moore&amp;diff=237604"/>
		<updated>2007-07-17T13:28:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* See also */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|TK}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please note edits! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When making an edit, always note what it is exactly you did.  Synopsis.  Summary. Thank you! --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 17:48, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Would be happy to do that, but the thing is, the page seams to be locked like so many other pages here. Change i would have liked to make was to remove the ideological claim that all his documentaryes where &amp;quot;pseudo-documentaryes&amp;quot;. I hope that SYSOP:s would read the articles and remove this kind of clearly opinionated sentences before locking the pages. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 18:48, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Your ideas, Timppeli, is exactly why it is locked, because they are not accurate.  Moore does not make conventional documentaries, and as such, it is a misnomer to label them that way. I was the one who locked it.  This is not Wikipedia.  We do not engage in &amp;quot;double-speak&amp;quot; or label clearly propagandist efforts as documentaries. What Moore does is mix polemics, propaganda and the documentary styles together.  While clearly he includes factual data, he also extrapolates, adds conjecture that comes from dubious sources, and mixes it with his own rather extreme leftist POV, all without any disclaimers in the credits.--~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 19:52, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Hahaha, Moore isn't an &amp;quot;extreme leftist&amp;quot;, I am.  He's about in the center between you and I.  The middle of the road is the yellow line in the center, not the white one on the right hand side.  Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn, they're lefties.  Moore is a centrist, populist good ole boy who has a camera and a knack for making money. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:24, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has there ever been a political documentary which the other side with difrent opinnions havent claimed to be propagandist? There is allready a critisism section on the article, and thats fine, but to outright label the documents pseudo-documentaryes is not neutral in any way. What by the way are my ideas? i happen to disagree Mr Moore on several things allso. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 19:59, 18 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Well, let us start with the fact he doesn't even label them &amp;quot;political documentaries&amp;quot;. And I missed the &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; that says we are neutral, would you point me to it?  What I posted above is fact.  Documentarians decry Moore, and don't respect him. But he is good at what he does, and highly successful. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 05:18, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Don't know where to start from... You seriously think that war in Irak, president Bush, gun controll and the the &amp;quot;war on terrorism&amp;quot; arent political issues? Ill just list some sites referring to Moores documentaryes as political documentaryes: [http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/multimedia/tp/aatpdocfilms.htm] [http://www.movie-vault.com/articles/DPVbuRTELEzZFOdb]  [http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/147/report_display.asp]  [http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/insideindies/infocus/truthorfaction/index.html] I really wonder how anyone could claim that his documentaryes arent political on nature, not atleast without an clear agenda to discredit him. What comes to neutrality of this site, how about some quates from the rules: &amp;quot; Do not post personal opinion on an encyclopedia entry.&amp;quot; &amp;quot; Everything you post must be true and verifiable.&amp;quot; So, i ask you, isn't labeling Michael Moores documentaryes as pseudo-documentaryes an opinnion that is mostly held by people who allso are against his political ideas? And there for against the rules. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 09:52, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 09:57, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And now i am speechles. No arguments why your answer is no? I think this is clearly against the rules and no way of making an encyclopedia. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 10:07, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*You asked, I answered.  This isn't Wikipedia, or a debating society. I don't engage editors in endless discussion, as there is no point to it.  Try to free your mind from your experience at other wiki's. :-)   --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 10:20, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...I'm sorry, at what point exactly did you not only get to decide that Moore's films aren't documentaries but the right to be smug about it too?  I can only find one definition that suggests a documentary is obligated to be unbiased toward one viewpoint, but what all the definitions I've found agree on is that documentary films basically source all the footage contained within them as either coming from previous recordings of the news or Cspan or whatnot, or coming from the directors filming, and all footage is nonfiction.  In F911 f'rinstance, Moore shows footage of himself interviewing senators, and other footage he did not film, but all footage was, inarguable, non-fiction, since the events depicted did happen.  Moore's commentary supposes links between events that may (very very very likely) not have happened at all, but the premises of his suppositiong come from the documented non-fiction sources.  I have to imagine you'd be hard pressed to find a definition of &amp;quot;Documentary&amp;quot; that doesn't have that core of non-fiction (probably the reason why you provide none).  For you, therefore, to contradict this definition in order to use terms like pseudo-documentary (so Bush didn't say &amp;quot;Bring em on&amp;quot;?) is, in fact, your insertion of opinion, and for you to dispute the definition of &amp;quot;Documentary&amp;quot; is equally unsourced.  You are violating two of this sites &amp;quot;commandments.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As such, however, I realize that you will recieve no reprimand, no mention from a higher up, in fact you're probably already being considered for the Presidential medal of freedom.  I don't imagine that my calm and rational explanation of what rules youve broken and how youve done it will even manage to convince you that you're wrong about a blessed thing, and will only serve to get me banned again for pointing out things the site does not want pointed out.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, Michael Moore is fat.  This is a central complaint lobbed against him by most of his critics.  It is unfair of the article not to acknowledge this.  Please make mention of how fat Michael Moore is.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I forgot that part.  Corrected: Moore is a centrist, populist, '''''fat''''' good ole boy who has a camera and a knack for making money. Man is he ever fat. [[User:Human|Human]] 21:24, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hmmmm, maybe your arguments are better suited here: [http://www.afi.com/] I do agree, however, that you have been fairly calm. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 10:51, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What do you mean by that?  The AFI considers Moore a documentatian.  Thats what his academy award was for, isnt it?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Well, they also gave an award to Al Gore.  After he was post-facto made a producer of the film, or whatever it was that was going to disqualify his appearing on stage.  --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:26, 19 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fine, whatever, but my point is that the films themselves is considered a documentary.  Inventing a term like Pseudo-documentary to describe it evokes films like Spinal Tap and Best in Show which are entirely fictive.  You can dispute his methods and his logic, and lord knows half the people here already dispute his motives, but every piece of footage in his films is non-fiction.  Disproportionally distorted nonfiction, perhaps, but nonfiction the same.  Look, come from the other side, what would have to be different about his films for you to concede that they are actually documentaries?  It cant be bias, all documentaries have a point to make, social, political or otherwise, and it cant even be distortion since any presentation of facts is going to play up some over others, so what then?--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 11:08, 20 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*I enjoyed several of his films, FYI.  Roger and Me, I actually own.  However, legitimate footage, edited and altered to depict events that never happened as he said, when he said they happened, well that is fiction.  Your moral compass seems a bit off, and I would have it checked.  A lie, by any other name, is still a lie, no?  Gently, nicely, ''respectfully'',  I tell you that the matter is now considered closed. --~ [[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 04:15, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I tell you that it is not because with your narrowing criteria you've defined away the entirety of documentary filmmaking.  You may as well say that March of the Pengiuns &amp;quot;Lies&amp;quot; by pretending that Morgan Freeman's voice is present everywhere in the antarctic.  Thats the image it projects after all, if you want to argue that the film is factual.  Isn't that a lie?  Doesn't that disqualify it as a documentary?&lt;br /&gt;
::While I concede that, as you say, Moore does have a problem with depicting events as happening differently than they may have, it is done only for the same reason any documentarian makes any film at all, which is to argue a point.  If he's incorrect, even consciously so, that's as it may be, but he is not as a result making a work of fiction, or a pseudo-documentary.  Something like &amp;quot;Death of a President&amp;quot; that uses actual footage of GWBush to pretend he was assassinated and filming people's reaction to it, that can be called a pseudo-documentary since its presenting a central point which is entirely fictive, and acknowledged so by the filmmakers.  However, though you may disagree with the central thesis of, for instance, F911, that doesnt make the film a work of fiction.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 10:45, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, this page is completely biased.  If you want this site to rival Wikipedia in any way, shape or form you should probably remove the quotes around &amp;quot;documentary&amp;quot; when referring to &amp;quot;Sicko&amp;quot; (which by the way has won praise from conservatives as well as liberals.  Not to mention under the picture it is captioned &amp;quot;Michael Moore, ranting&amp;quot;.  Hardly unbiased at all as you claim this site to be. Nor is it trustworth.  {{unsigned|RobWW}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Please Fix==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This &amp;quot;paragraph&amp;quot;: &amp;quot;Before producing Moore&amp;quot; Also, why did the line about him being an outspoken critic of Bush get removed?  It's actually something he is famous for, even among those who do not know his work.  Or, should I say, infamous?  Hey, you can even say &amp;quot;reviled&amp;quot; if you want.  But I'd say, put it back in. [[User:Human|Human]] 14:13, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Are you kidding? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That picture is the dumbest thing I've ever seen, and to portray this as &amp;quot;just another image&amp;quot; is indulging in ridiculous, childish games.  Please, if you even have the pretense of being &amp;quot;trustworthy&amp;quot; choose an image that looks like the person and not just catching them in an off-guard moment, or speaking, or eating, or whatever you choose to make people look silly. Otherwise, all you are doing is engaging in propaganda. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 17:20, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Well, I can see your request for Sysop is right on track!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:18, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I uploaded a picture of Michael Moore that could ease the tension on this discussion page. The picture is at image:Michael-Moore.jpg --[[User:Element|Element]] 20:38, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you, Element for the kindness and reasoned response/request!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:41, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Moore High School Photo==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mmoore.png|right|thumb|Michael Moore's high school yearbook photo.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He looks like a lovely young lady. Too bad about the way things worked out. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:43, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why the second photo? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article's kinda short, does it really necessitate a second photo?  Also, the caption is subjective, since Ranting is kind of a POV term, and really we don't know when or where the photo was taken either.  For all we know he's singing Carry On My Wayward Son.  If the photo's going to be kept (in a, preferably, longer article if at all) the caption should either say when/where it was taken, or just say &amp;quot;Michael Moore in an unflattering pose because his mouth is open and that is funny, him being fat and all.  Teh Lulz!!!11!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:RexMundane|Rex Mundane]] 10:53, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scare quotes and use of pseudo-documentary ==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm no fan of Michael Moore's, but using the quotes around &amp;quot;documentary&amp;quot; and writing &amp;quot;pseudo-documentary&amp;quot; in the article are needlessly pejorative.  A documentary doesn't have to be purely factual, and it doesn't have to be have completely undisputed accuracy.  People kibitzed about &amp;quot;Waco: Rules of Engagement&amp;quot; and about the nature facts presented in &amp;quot;March of the Penguins,&amp;quot; but those are both obviously documentaries.  Since you've already got a section in about factual disputes in his articles, why not clear out the stuff that takes the article from impartial to snide?  [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 11:50, 15 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Michael Moore presented his &amp;quot;information&amp;quot; as definitive fact. This places him well within the bounds of reasonable scrutiny and criticism. Even minor inconsistencies (including information later validated) that he would not have been privy to are unacceptable. Placing documentary within quotations provides all the information required to illustrate the doubt cast on his claims. Conservapedia proclaims conciseness and this is an apt and just oppurtunity to provide us with some. Having an entire section devoted to &amp;quot;liberoganda&amp;quot; backpedalling and weak attempts to legitimize his controversial films would be a clear instance of bias. It would serve no purpose other than one-sided filler material. --[[User:Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 11:38, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::But then you're pre-emptively judging his next film Sicko without even knowing what it claims by putting the word Documentary in &amp;quot;Sarcastic quotes&amp;quot;.  Yes, he should be, and is, scrutinized for what he says, but so then is everything.  As brainslug says, people will always claim that documentaries present inaccurate facts or interpretations, but whatever the results of such scrutinous challenges, this doesnt make them not documentaries.  Its enough to say, as the article does, that people challenge his claims without having to invent a word like &amp;quot;pseudo-documentary&amp;quot; (a term which seems to apply to ficticious movies like Spinal Tap) to describe a movie that the site finds disagreeable.&lt;br /&gt;
::--[[User:RexMundane|Rex Mundane]] 11:48, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: In addition to what Rex said above, we already have a small paragraph in which he's accused of using deceit and so on.  We might as well expand &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;that&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;.  More facts are better than fewer facts; speaking in detail about his errors is better than insinuating without detail. [[User:Brainslug|Brainslug]] 11:53, 16 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Default sort ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{DEFAULTSORT:Moore, Michael}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to the article before the categories.  The article is locked.  Thanks.  [[User:HeartOfGold|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;eart&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;old&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]][[User_talk:HeartOfGold|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;talk&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 02:32, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I did, but wish I knew why we do this...--[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 02:52, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== POlitics requires a minimum of brains? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I can conclude from this that RobS knows NOTHING about politics, and has never met an actual politician.  --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 22:19, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Be careful with your accusations.  Andy once ran for office. [[User:Arjen|Arjen]] 22:35, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not an accusation, it's a simple statement. Categroizing Michael Moore as a &amp;quot;political person&amp;quot; is an insult to people who generally are informed, and are concerned about public policy, and public discourse.  I'm not sure &amp;quot;satirist&amp;quot; would apply, and if so, not a very good one.  &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; might offend real comedians, too.  Perhaps &amp;quot;film maker&amp;quot; or some such garbage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:47, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Political people can be buffoons, too.  Sometimes it seems like a job requirement.  OTOH, I guess Rush Limbaugh isn't listed as a &amp;quot;Political Person&amp;quot;, either.  But I get the impressing Moore '''is''' informed and concerned--he just happens to think Conservatives are doing a terrible job. Oh, and he's fat, so there's no point in listening to him. --[[User:Gulik3|Gulik3]] 22:55, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Good point. Do we really want to ''elevate'' Limbaugh to a political person?  OTOH, Al Franken is probably running for Senate; once he's a real candidate, he should qualify for awhile, unless he wins then he can enter the Pantheon with all our other failed icons.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:00, 21 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You guys want to see a real masterwork of deception, check out the efforts by the &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; at WP who refuse to identify Moore as &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot; for fear that it may paint him in a negative fashion. This, despite Moore's own admission to being &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot;. WP truly is a magical land where fantasy prevails over reality. A lot like Disneyland but without the fun. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:46, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
That whole section should be removed. Maybe if you have seen some of his movies you wouldn't say that it is all based on &amp;quot;junk science&amp;quot;. Also why is there a criticism section but no praise? Since his movies have gotten much more praise than criticism [[User:Ttwashere|Ttwashere]] 20:28, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First, welcome to CP!  I pasted a welcome template on your talk page (which now exists) and hope you will read the links provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Second, I don't know who is &amp;quot;you&amp;quot;, but I have indeed seen all of Moore's work.  I would commend to you the posted reviews, not by people considered by anyone to be defenders of Conservative thought, for you to contemplate.  In the real world, Moore hasn't gotten more professional praise than criticism.  Quite the opposite.  Here at CP, we do not strive for political correctness, and do not tolerate Liberal [[deceit]]. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ttwashere, I agree with TK. Liberal [[deceit]] is not tolerated and anyone here suggesting Moore is anything but a propragandist for Socialism, is deluding themselves. Moore is a liar. He uses the film medium to promote an agenda which is radical left-wing extremism. He distorts his information in his &amp;quot;documentaries&amp;quot; as well as any Nazi or Communist propagandist from the past. There are quite a few good sources for drawing this conclusion. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:28, 17 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234746</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234746"/>
		<updated>2007-07-16T01:46:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Business plot */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This is gonna take some more time.  I tend to be very thorough and leave no stone unturned.  But I have a big hunch, the CP version could look quite different than the WP.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:25, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, that's fine with me. You do great research work so I'm sure you'll get it right but in the meantime, what is a summation of what this was all about? Was Butler lying, crazy, etc.? Was there really some crazy plot? What do you think? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234669</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234669"/>
		<updated>2007-07-16T00:29:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Business plot */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Rob, so what is your conclusion about this whole &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot;? What do you think this was all about? Was Butler nuts? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 20:29, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234611</id>
		<title>User talk:Scorpio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;diff=234611"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T23:02:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Business plot */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Welcome to my Discussion Page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please feel free to leave posts regarding my work here and any other issues you think are relevant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm delighted to be able to contribute to [[Conservapedia]] and work with members to help make this an accurate and useful source for the various topics found in any hardbound encyclopedia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are modifying or adding to information I have posted, please contact me here and allow me the opportunity to share sources with you so that we can ensure that we are offering the public the most accurate and up-to-date information available on the subject at hand. Also, please only edit your own comments on this page. Thank you&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Please scroll down to append your message at the bottom or [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Scorpio&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;section=new start a new topic].'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== RobS comments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Scorpio, I have analyzed all your editing here at CP, and thus far you have convinced me of absolutely nothing.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:24, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, I'm not sure what the point of your comments were on my Discussion page. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. What exactly is your point? I'm pretty new here so there is no body of work that you can look at. Can you further elaborate on your comments? I just finished adding some new names to the section in the McCarthy article retitled, &amp;quot;VENONA files &amp;amp; Other Security/Loyalty Risks&amp;quot;. There's still lots of work to be done, including listing everything alphabetically and creating separate articles for the new entries. Let me know if you like the work. And, please, use the &amp;quot;+&amp;quot; tab to add new topics on my Discussion page next time. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:57, 7 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]==&lt;br /&gt;
You can just place them here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:10, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading privileges ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have uploading privileges now.  Thanks for your contributions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:21, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]], thank you very much. Greatly appreciated. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:27, 18 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that brief mention should go in the intro with full information in another section. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:13, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you do it, leave a message at Robs page. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll do it but please be prepared to unblock me and the McCarthy page after Rob gets upset. :p [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Andrew Roth==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, what do you kow about [[Andrew Roth]]?  This is an extremely difficult article I've been working on for years, and my original WP version was deleted (1 of only 5 or 6).  That original article, as small as it was, was still highly problematic.  Care to collaborate?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, unfortunately, I probably know less than you already know about this guy. I found this [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/08/14/nmp14.html article] that may help you in your research. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:19, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, this one in interesting for several reasons.  The Amerasia case, his career in Britain, and he worked for ONI.  Naval Intelligence is supposedly the only intelligence organization ''that was not'' penetrated, yet Nigel West &amp;amp; others cite Roth as a KGB boy.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:31, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Does the article I listed help at all? Why did your info get erased from WP? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:41, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I had to use Internet Archive on Venona Progeny, new secrecy regulations restrict access to the Naval War College Review.  That cite helps on Roth, and brings his career close to the current decade, but it's not really the Guardian, and appears somewhat biased or scandalous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Amerasia affair really is the background on what motivated McCarthy.  These guys got arrested, and the Truman Administration covered it all up.  McCarthy even cites it in his Conspiracy so black speech, how J. Edgar had all the evidence and was ready to go, but the prosecutors in the Truman Justice Dept did nothing. Then, in 1948 when a Grand Jury was empanelled after Bentley's story went public, Roth skips town to avoid indictment.  Lives happily ever after in London as a credible journalist digging up dirt on British MPs. The guy may even still be alive.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:59, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, that site is the archive of the ''Telegraph'' so it's fine. I would be happy to work with you on the Roth article. I've got to go out for a while so if you want to start, go ahead and I'll join you a little later. Why did WP wipe out all history of your Roth article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, what do you want to do about the Progeny link? Do you have a copy of what that article said? If so, we can add an inline quote of the relevant info right into the McCarthy article, assuming it's a small amount of info about McCarthy. Let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:08, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::There has been a cabal of conspirators in WP to undo my work since day one; several articles have been nominated for deletion repeatedly, but only about 6 small articles of 300 total ever got deleted, and few were even recreated afterword. This Roth artcle, though small, was one such deleted.  And it was extremely problematic back then when I wrote it, cause I think the guy's still alive. That's probably why it got deleted,and now has been recreated, making no mention of [[Amerasia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Business plot==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I'm proud to say though, several very qualified editors have greatly improved and expanded the area of early Cold War history from the sorry condition it was in when I started. Look at this one for example, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::''In the 1990s scholars discovered documents in the Moscow archives showing Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. When Dickstein left the Committee the Soviets dropped him from the payroll.[1] '''No historian has disputed the evidence'''....Dickstein '''later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court...'''  ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Dickstein_(congressman)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::This leads to another area we should discuss, the so-called &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; (we should consider a different name than WP's before starting the article).  Lookee here [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf].  The problem with this article is, ''both'' Dickestein ''and'' Spivak were commie spies!  And ''both'' were commie spies precisely at the time this article was written! And according to this article, Democrartic Presidential Nominees [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]] are fascists!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Imagine the contrast between what we could do with this historic event, WP's sad and putrid retelling of it!  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:27, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, I remember some info about the &amp;quot;Business Plot&amp;quot; from a few years ago but had forgotten all about it until you just brought it up. Yes, you're right about doing an article about that as well. As for WP, you are right about a cabal of &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; who do everything they can to stop verifiable and truthful info regarding communists in govt. from being discussed. That was one of the main reasons I came to CP. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;--&lt;br /&gt;
WP says, &lt;br /&gt;
::''The Business Plot, The Plot Against FDR, or The White House Putsch, was an uncovered conspiracy involving several wealthy businessmen to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt... Butler testified before the McCormack-Dickstein Committee in 1934 [1]. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of several men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot]... names as Al Smith... were said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]...[[Spivak]], researching Nazism and anti-Semitism for New Masses magazine, got permission from [[Dickstein]] to examine [[HUAC]]'s public documents and was (it seems unwittingly) given the unexpurgated testimony amid stacks of other papers. Spivak's ...relevant material was embellished with overblown aspersions against &amp;quot;Jewish financiers working with fascist groups&amp;quot; -- a mishmash of guilt-by-association that connected Morgan interests with Jewish financier Felix Warburg, HUAC, and certain members of the American Jewish Committee.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#John_Spivak]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, so what is really going on here?  Dickstein &amp;amp; Spivak are both commie spies.  Al Smith, former DNC Presidential Candidate from the election just before FDR got elected, and whom FDR was his VP running mate, is supposedly a fascist.  The Committee has hearings, chaired by a commie spy, impugns critics of the New Deal as fascists. Commie spies in the commie press smear loyal Democrats who are also New Deal critics as rich capitalistic bankers &amp;amp; fascists, accuse the gubmint of corruption &amp;amp; coverup (done so by thier own commie on the committee), and make an appeal to the masses why (a) the US Government doesn't work because its corrupt, (b) rich evil doers oppose [[economic planning]] and the New Deal (c) Stalin, the KGB, and underground Communist Party have effectively taken over the New Deal Democratic Coalition, and they don't have room for oldtime Democrats and non-New Dealers like [[Al Smith]] and [[John Davis]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:46, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, this would be funny if it weren't so scary and so true. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:19, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP says, ''Al Smith, Roosevelt's political foe....said to be the financial and organizational backbone of the plot'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_Plot#McCormack-Dickstein_Committee]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::WP [[American Liberty League]] says, '' a U.S. organization formed in 1934 by conservative Democrats such as Al Smith (the 1928 Democratic presidential nominee),...the League labeled Roosevelt's [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] &amp;quot;a trend toward Fascist control of agriculture.&amp;quot; ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Liberty_League]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then Spivak calls Smith a fascist [http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/spivak-NewMasses.pdf] and accuses the Government of covering up a fascist plot to overthrow the government.  And of course he specifically accuses his KGB bloodbrother, KGB agent [[Samuel Dickstein]] of covering up for the fascists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, there certainly was a conpsiracy here, a commie plot against &amp;quot;conservative Democrats,&amp;quot; and to see who would have the last word on calling who a fascist. Most importantly, the playing to the press and media about &amp;quot;rich bankers&amp;quot; and corrupt polticians, for which Stalin &amp;amp; the CPUSA had all the answers and solutions.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:37, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Incredible stuff. Are you going to get an article in place about this topic? You're one of the few people with enough info who could write this thing. Also, nice work on the &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; link. I alphabetically listed it and added it to the references for you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:02, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=234601</id>
		<title>Talk:Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=234601"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T22:52:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* Copyedit */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{protect|Geo.plrd}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive1]] (March 10 2007 - March 31 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Talk:Joseph McCarthy/Archive2]] (March 31 2007 - June 29 2007) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article is horrendously written.  Truly.  Would someone with some good sources tear it apart?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 23:03, 9 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; book ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I finished a book last night titled, &amp;quot;Who killed Joe McCarthy?&amp;quot; It was just another anti-McCarthy book among a number of such books. But the real joke about this book is that there isn't one single footnote!! No joke. This guy didn't even bother to give attribution to his comments. At the end of the book, he lists a bunch of books and sources that he used to source his book but he does not say what goes where. The gist of the book is how Eisenhower worked behind the scenes to destroy McCarthy using sleazy methods and violating the U.S. Constitution. The author was actually praising Eisenhower for these acts!! There's a reason why I was able to buy this book used at Amazon for one penny: It wasn't worth any more than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also bought Roy Cohen's book, ''McCarthy''. It's actually a great read. He addresses the subject in a very neutral fashion and doesn't try and screw with the reader. Cohen gives attribution to his sources, aside from his own observations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I've read most all of the anti-McCarthy books that have ever been written, I haven't re-read any of them for a number of years so I'm going to endeavor to buy used copies of those books over a short period of time. As I recall, there's really nothing in those books that can negate Buckley's book or certainly none of the Venona info, which they didn't know about anyway. Thought you might be interested. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:48, 29 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;Victims&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
*''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
:This is an extemely important aspect of Venona revelations in relation to McCarthy &amp;amp; McCarthyism.  [[Harry Magdoff]], for example, was a Senior Economist in the [[War Production Board]], according to Venona &amp;amp; Soviet Archives had been an active [[KGB]] agent working in the U.S. Government since 1938.  Much of the information he passed to the KGB was found in Soviet Archives.  Here, in a dispute over his biographical entry in WP  [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Venona_project&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23941675#NPOV] let me reproduce part of that exchange:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote style=&amp;quot;background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=23856282&amp;amp;oldid=23851850], reveals [Chip Berlet, former VP, [[NLG]]] is so anxious to insert &amp;quot;McCarthy hearings&amp;quot; into this text, that with a keystroke he has converted a written FBI Deposition of Elizabeth Bentley into oral testimony before a Congressional Committee.  Witness:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Original text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Chip Berlet's] doctored text: &amp;quot;...[[Elizabeth Bentley]] who provided this information to the FBI and later testified to that same effect during [[McCarthy era]] hearings [http://foia.fbi.gov/silversm/silversm2c.pdf]:&amp;quot; (followed by deposition quote).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts were established two months ago:&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff left government 30 December 1946.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy took office the first week of January 1947.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was never summoned before a Committee chaired by Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The circumstances of Magdoff leaving government employment had absolutely nothing to do with Joseph McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Harry Magdoff was not &amp;quot;hounded out&amp;quot; of government by Joseph McCarthy, and/or &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Joseph McCarthy did not begin his crusade until morethan four years after Magdoff leaving government employment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, after several months of establishing the facts, and presenting the evidence in carefully crafted language by several editors, in [Chip Berlet's] exuberance to insert references to Joseph McCarthy, and present Magdoff as a &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; of &amp;quot;McCarthyite&amp;quot; &amp;quot;persecution&amp;quot;, [Chip Berlet] with a simple phrase transforms facts into a world that never existed.  This fits the definition of [[Wikipedia:POV]].  [RobS] 20:45, 24 September 2005 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''[RobS] is correct that my original wording about the Bentley testimony was unsatisfactory''', which is why I (not [RobS]) changed it on my next edit: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&amp;amp;diff=next&amp;amp;oldid=23889258]. [ed note: This is false, Mr.Berlet did not correct it.] I have no idea why [RobS] has not noticed this, and assume his attack on me for having &amp;quot;doctored&amp;quot; the text was due to inadequate research. I will be happy to accept his apology for this error.  We all make mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:24, 30 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, I'm completely confused as to what you're trying to tell me here. I originally removed the sentence, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. There's no citation. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. Also, we're being redundant in a couple of places. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We're stating the same exact thing in two places. We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I'll add back the line I suggested above so that it reads like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think this second one sounds better so I will edit out the first one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in the section above Venona, I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You re-added into Venona, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obviously we're being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. But you reverted that back so it's now redundant. Now, I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what you are trying to say. Hopefully that covers all aspects of those sections. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 21:51, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solomon Adler ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, do you know if Adler ever testified in front of McCarthy's Committee? I can't find info on that in his article. Please let me know. Thanks. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 22:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Locking of McCarthy article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on your Talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, what are you doing on the McCarthy article? I have explained all of my work on the Discussion page and urged us to avoid redundant statements. Now you have locked the article so I can't add any further info to the article? Why? Why are you posting redundancy in the article? I have been upfront with all my changes and called your attention to all changes. It's not as if I have been making modifications without talking to you first. And my changes do not affect your work at all. So I'm totally confused about what you are doing. There is no vandalism going on so &amp;quot;protection&amp;quot; of the page is unwarranted. The page was unlocked at my request so I could add info. Can you please explain your reasoning here and unlock the McCarthy page? I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 11:31, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why do you keep removing Venona references, and why do you keep removing the summary conclusion?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 21:49, 3 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, can you be a bit more specific? To what references are you speaking? I don't recall removing any Venona references. In fact, the more Venona references, the better. And regarding the summary, to what removal are you addressing? Can you please be specific so I can see what your concern is regarding? Also, are you able to give a citation for the first paragraph under &amp;quot;Venona files&amp;quot;? It makes a serious charge but there is no citation for it. As it stands, it appears as Original Research. And, can you give a citation for this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Can you cite who the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; were that were abused? A citation here would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Been cited several times; here's one [[Talk:Joseph_McCarthy#.22Victims.22]].  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Lastly, can you cite where Solomon Adler was interviewed by McCarthy? I couldn't find anything right off the top but if you have a source for an interview or maybe something McCarthy said, it would be great as well. I am hoping we can keep working together on this article but since you've locked it, obviously all the additional info that I have to contribute to the article is on hold. Please let me know what we can do to work this out. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Adler I will review.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:06, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Speaking from memory, I do not think Adler ever testified before the [[PSI]] either publicly or in Executive Session, but I do believe I is referenced several times by several witnessess in Executive Session.  Also, Adler figures in the [[Amerasia]] scandal and the [[IPR]] controversy. ANd yes, we agree Adler is an excellant example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::If a dispute is said to exist, it simply is the prominence given to your weblink to the Univ. of Wis of a transcript cited in the 1998 book by Bedforsd that states McCarthy said 54 on the podium in Wheeling.  That book, and that citation is fine, and making mention of it is no probably.  The &amp;quot;dispute,&amp;quot; such that it exists is, you are asking Conservapedia to take a definitive stand that McCarthy did in fact state 54 on the podium in Wheeling West Virginia.  Obviously we can't do that.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:35, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, have you actually taken the time to look at the links I provided regarding this issue? Also, if you don't have a copy of the Buckley book, I highly recommend getting a copy. This book is the fairest assessment of McCarthy's cases you're ever going to read. The conclusion of that book and that of witnesses is that McCarthy stated &amp;quot;57&amp;quot; (not 54 as you state above) cases. It's a simple matter of looking at the evidence to figure out the truth. For years, the leftists have tried to confuse people regarding this matter and sadly they have been rather effective in their efforts. Nevertheless, the evidence is there for anyone to review it. I'm merely reflecting the existing evidence and refuse to succumb to the propaganda of the Left that has no basis in fact. As you know, verifiable truth is the goal of Conservapedia and in this regard, it has been achieved. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The issue of 57 vs 205 would be of interest if it were the issue; Venona has made it moot.  Only leftists &amp;amp; commies still harp on it, as if it were determintive of McCarthy's credibility. And it makes sense they would do this, since they have absolutely nothing to refute Venona with.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 17:56, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, the problem with that argument is this is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not Venona. Venona is here merely to support the McCarthy article. It is not the highlight of the article. This article does not revolve around Venona, it revolves around McCarthy and providing verifiable and truthful information. It is incumbent on anyone working on this article to address all the issues related to McCarthy, including his life before being Senator. And, again, you're trying to suggest that since I'm addressing the 57 vs. 205 numbers, that I'm right in there with the &amp;quot;leftists &amp;amp; commies&amp;quot;. Do you realize that your statement is insulting, inaccurate, and not at all helpful? You're making me spend more time in this discussion and less time improving the article. Would you do me a favor and think about that for a while before responding? Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:14, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, one thing that occurred to me last night after I shut down my computer for the night is that it seems as if you've contributed as much as you can to this article. I think that you are very well informed on Venona and Communist subversion in govt. but you only have a limited knowledge of McCarthy's life and work. On the other hand, I'm a solid McCarthy expert. In fact, I had been in discussions with William Grigg and James Drummey about writing a McCarthy book. I had actually been working on one until I got wind of the fact that Medford Evans was working on the definitive book on McCarthy. Now, if I knew that Evans was going to postpone his release date for years, I could have finished my book. So now instead of writing a book, I'm putting my knowledge to use here at Conservapedia. I probably have around 20 books dealing with McCarthy and a few on Venona but my Venona info was going to be used to back up McCarthy not as a separate subject. You on the other hand probably don't own a single McCarthy book but have some number of books regarding Venona and related issues. So the bottom line is, while I estimate that I have about 100 hours of work to do on the McCarthy article including time needed to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot;, I don't see what more you can really add. I appreciate anything extra but it seems you are spending more and more time in discussion now than actually contributing to the article itself. You may wish to consider devoting your knowledge to the various other articles regarding Venona, communist subversion, etc. where your efforts can be best allocated. Just a suggestion. (By the way, I just got my copy of &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot; by Haynes &amp;amp; Klehr. If you don't already know, it's a great book about Left-wingers still living in denial even after Venona and other former Soviet Union documents have been released. Good book. I was looking for a way to include some of the info into this article.) Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 09:16, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mediation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Per private discussion with several sysops I will be moderating negotiations to end the dispute currently existing. I would like to request that no major/controversial editing take place. As one party is a fellow Sysop, I have unlocked the article to remove a unfair advantage. &lt;br /&gt;
Where does each side see issues that need to be discussed? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 12:53, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi, Geoff, thank you for unlocking this page and mediating any existing issues. I think Rob has done some great work with the article and we only seem to have had an issue on a few minor things that I would attribute to simple miscommunication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(1) The first issue is regarding a sentence I removed because it had been in the article for a long time yet had no citation. That sentence is, ''While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.'' Because the &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; people that &amp;quot;may have been abused&amp;quot; are not identified. I asked, &amp;quot;Who are these innocent people? I can't find anyone that was innocent and abused by McCarthy. If you have any names, please post them so that we can adhere to verifiability and truth. I just re-phrased the sentence to simply state that, &amp;quot;Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of 'McCarthyism'&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(2) The second issue was about being redundant in a couple of places basically saying the same thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are stating this in one place:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy sought to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations fell flat with Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. While innocent persons may have been abused, many of the truly guilty walked away free under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And we're stating this in another:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The second one obviously doesn't have the &amp;quot;innocent persons&amp;quot; comment, so I added back the line I suggested above so that it read like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists. Because of the Truman Administration being unaware of Venona, many of the guilty people escaped under the cloak of &amp;quot;McCarthyism&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So, I tried to keep this version as the best one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(3) The third issue was in the section above Venona, where I stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For some reason the essentially same sentence existed in the Venona section. It says, ''McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Obviously we were being redundant. That's why I changed the one in Venona to address directly the 205 figure. I changed the wording slightly so it doesn't appear so redundant but still retains the essence of what Rob was trying to say. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(4) The fourth issue was just asking for a citation regarding Solomon Adler who is listed in this article but there is nothing to indicate that he was either interviewed by McCarthy or if McCarthy ever spoke about him. A simple citation would handle this issue nicely. But even if Adler didn't have anything to do with McCarthy, that's still fine because he is an excellent example of a subverse in govt. that was later identified by Venona. I was just asking if there was some direct connection to McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob and I have been working very nicely on this article but we seem to have run into some minor issues with which we could not seem to effectively communicate. I look forward to continue working with him. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:26, 4 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::What has been taken care of? [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 15:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Geo, can you please elaborate? Are you addressing Rob or me? If me, can you please re-state the question? Thank you for your help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:19, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Geo, I would like to ask your advice on a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] issue. Rob has submitted some excellent info to the article that we've named the &amp;quot;Moynihan&amp;quot; info. It begins with the words, &amp;quot;After the collapse of the Soviet Union...&amp;quot; and ends with the words, &amp;quot;...more thoroughly penetrated.'&amp;quot; The only dispute is where to locate that info. Rob believes since it's very important info that vindicates Senator McCarthy, it should be placed in full right in the first section, which is normally identified as the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, I disagree with that placement for a number of reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I believe that the intro section or &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; should be brief and not go into detail about any particular item in the biography of the subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) This article is about Joseph McCarthy's entire life and not just his Senatorial career and that the info Rob posted is far too detailed and far too involved to act as a brief description in relation to the rest of the intro section and as compliant with the format of Manual of Style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(3) I believe that [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style] makes this very clear and affirms my perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(4) I believe the info should be placed in the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section and fits very nicely as the first paragraph of that section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is the essence of my argument. Rob may wish to add some additional perspective on his reasoning, but this is in sum my complete thoughts. Would you please mediate this matter and issue an instruction to place the information in question in the proposed section? I thank you for your time and help. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:47, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:How about a compromise, brief mention &amp;quot;was later proven correct by gov. inquiry&amp;quot; with full info in another section? [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree 100%. The disturbing thing is that Rob removed this from the intro paragraph:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::''He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It was fine the way it was but Rob changed it without discussion. I have no problem changing to what you suggested. How should we proceed? Do you want to make the change or me or Rob? Your call. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:20, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations, Rob, you are now in contempt of a Mediators orders. I'll alert Geo. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 00:23, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trim==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest we can tighten up this article by moving the Buckley/Bozell footnotes as the basis to create new pages to fill in all the red links.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:30, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I had actually considered doing that but the essence of McCarthy's career is based upon those cases and I wanted to make the reader easily able to find this incredibly important information. That's why I have added into the footnote of each case only the bare minimum information that makes the case. [[Philip Jessup]] is a perfect example. Jessup has a very extensive biography but I refrained from going into every aspect of his background so that the footnote didn't get ridiculously large. On the subject of Jessup and others who's biographies are more extensive than what I noted in their case footnotes, I did not add biographical info that extended past the McCarthy investigation period because it would seemingly suggest that the case in question was employed in that position during the time before or during McCarthy's investigation. For that reason and for brevity, I did not add the entire employment biography of those cases. But I noticed you added it to the Jessup article so that's good. So, for the sake of consistency, and without some reason to deviate from that format, I think it's best to remove that additional information from Jessup's footnote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I absolutely agree that we need to fill in the &amp;quot;red links&amp;quot; and I was planning on focusing on that after we had pretty much wrapped up what we were going to put into the article. But, I have recently started filling in the red links. I was planning to work on the Jessup article but you already added my info to it so thanks for handling that. As I mentioned there is still more biographical info for Jessup so I'll add to that article as soon as I can. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:17, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, so because McCarthy was a crank, a commie gets appointed to the [[World Court]].  You'd think this would be news.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:53, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Do you realize that does not make any sense at all? As I stated, that information is appropriate to the article on Jessup but in order to be consistent in the footnotes in this article, it would not be appropriate to list the entire biography of every case McCarthy mentioned. Is that more clear? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:50, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That was probably the discussion in the Kennedy Oval Office over Jessup; someone probably argued McCarthy was a crank, and here's mud-in-the-eye of all those right-wing commie hunters.  So they appointed Jessup to the World Court.  And President John Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would probably be of interest to Conservapedia readers, but somehow, you forgot to mention this fact.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:01, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, you're doing it again. You're not understanding what I'm writing. Like I said, that info is great for the Jessup article but it doesn't make sense to stick it in the footnote section that we are trying to keep brief and trying to keep focused on the case itself. The footnotes are not the place for a detailed biography of each person. And, yes, Kennedy appointing a communist to the World Court would be of interest to Conservapedia readers but it should be mentioned in the appropriate place. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 19:30, 7 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ok, so you wish to downplay the areas McCarthy was right on, and emphasize the areas McCarthy was wrong.  We at least got that out in the open.  The ==securirty risk== subhead is modeled on the ==Venona list== subhead; let's take the case of [[Frank Coe]] for example: the evidence placing him on the Venona list predates his appointment to the [[International Monetary Fund]], yet it is included in his credentials. There are other cases we can disucss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Keep in mind, we a writing a bio based upon historical perspective, not rehashing highly charged partisan arguments widely propagated in the media from 1954 based upon limited knoweldge.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:13, 8 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, please tell me that you're joking around. Why are you ignoring what I'm saying? I've broken it down to the extent that it's so very clear what I'm stating. Again, all I'm saying is that for the sake of brevity in the footnotes and so that we can focus on the jobs that any particular person held before and during the time the person was being charged with being a security issue, that we leave out extended biographical info. I've repeated this to you several times now so I'm just wondering if you're not understanding or you're kidding around with me. Again, the whole bio of the person is appropriately placed on the article for that person. The info we should provide in the McCarthy article should be related to McCarthy and frame the resume of the case with that in mind. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 08:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Right. Ignore the historical record that McCarthy's conspiracy so immense of infamy so black as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man which when finally exposed, its principals shall forever be deserving of the maledictions of all honest men and focus on McCarthy's errors.  I understand completely.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:12, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::OK, now I know you're just kidding with me. You had me going there for a while. :) I appreciate the chuckle. You are officially the &amp;quot;King of Communist Subversion Comedy&amp;quot;!! :) Thanks for breaking the tension between us. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 13:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copyedit==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scorpio, I proof read the entire article over the past few days, but haven't made any substantive changes (beyond an addition to the intro) til we got our bearings on the process to move forward.  Yes, there is one or two redundancies that should be consolidated, and the 205 vs 57, I suggest we momentarilly put it on hold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are only two sentences you've added I question&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*''In addition to some of the individuals identified in the Venona project listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:''&lt;br /&gt;
:*This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.&lt;br /&gt;
*'' He was noted for claiming and subsequently proving that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers inside the federal government. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:*we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As to the Executive Session transcripts, I suggest you look at the [[William Henry Taylor]] article, and read his testimony available from the footnotes. Also Alvin Hall from the Bureau of Printing and engraving, and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s testimony, all three are contiguous.  This relates to the stolen occupation currency plates.  Taylor, though not identified in Venona, was (a) a memver of the [[Silvermaster group]], and (b) did not plead the Fifth but actually testified.  The names of Harold Glasser, Lud Ulman, Silvermaster, Frank Coe, and Harry Dexter White -- all Venona spies -- are discussed in his &amp;amp; Bentley's testimony.  This is one instance where McCarthy actually was on a hot trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Taylor is not identified in Venona, I am hesitant to put him in the list subheaded Venona, yet I'd like to get him into the article.  Perhaps we should consider doing a mini-section on the currency plates, as this alos ties in the deceased Harry Dexter White.  (And the transcripts also cite that Bentley had testified one time earlier; the Ruth Watt external link on the main page has a little background material about when Bentley testified, how she liked to drink beer, etc., if it helps get some feel for the context.  Actually, in reading her testimony, she does sound either hungover or drunk in some places....).  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Rob, let me address your points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''This should be clarified, because McCarthy only accused one of being a Soviet spy, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], the rest all came up in a different context.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What I'm saying is that in addition to the Venona names you have provided, the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/Loyalty&amp;quot; section were exposed by McCarthy. I'm not saying that the names in the &amp;quot;Known Security/loyalty&amp;quot; section are all spies. If you think we can phrase that better, please post an alternative here and let's talk it through.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''we need to drop &amp;quot;subsequently proving;&amp;quot; McCarthy didn't prove diddly, as we all know, he's famous for barking up the wrong tree.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you trying to be funny again? Like I asked you before, have you read the Buckley book and read the ''Congressional Record''? There's a reason so many witnesses took the Fifth when asked if they were a member of the Communist Party. I laugh everytime I'm reading the transcripts and when Cohn or McCarthy ask that question, the person takes the Fifth!! Great stuff. It's all there for you to see. McCarthy was right and Buckley documents it all very nicely as do the transcripts. I loved Carl Bernstein's father's comments about McCarthy being right. And, Ann Coulter talks about that as well. McCarthy did his job, it was up to the appropriate U.S. dept. to deal with dismissals, which many McCarthy-named people did get dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You stated, ''There are a few typos, grammatical errors, and links I'd like to copyedit, when you are ready to let me know.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If they are simple errors, please feel free to make the changes. I only ask that you be careful and not change the meaning of a phrase unless there's some compelling reason for doing so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As for the transcript stuff, by all means, if you have names to add, please add them in the same format that is currently in place. No reason to wait on that. I'm still adding names from McCarthy's initial list but if you have names from the transcripts, go for it!! And, yes, the Ruth Watt article was excellent. She refutes a great many misconceptions and distortions about McCarthy. I loved reading that, so thanks for posting it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only thing I would caution is to remember not to get too carried away with adding Venona stuff to the article that doesn't apply. Please keep focused on the fact that we are doing an article on McCarthy here and the Venona stuff added should compliment the article. One criticism I've seen the Left-Wingers make is that much of the Venona stuff doesn't have anything to do with McCarthy. Of course, in this case, they're right. Nevertheless, they miss the point that McCarthy was right about Communists in govt. As you know, there's tons of great Venona stuff out there that has nothing to do with McCarthy. Reading the book, &amp;quot;In Denial&amp;quot;, is a perfect example of Venona stuff that is great but is not directly related to McCarthy. And it amazes me to the extent the Left-Wingers will go in order to discredit Venona and related Soviet archive material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, that new info you added regarding Moynihan is great but I don't think it should be placed at that part of the article. I think it should be in the Venona section or in a sub-section to Venona. The first part of the article is best for giving an &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; rather than getting into specifics of the article. Without any objection, I'll move that info to either Venona or create a sub-section to Venona, whatever looks best. Or, feel free to do it yourself since it was your addition. I'll wait until tomorrow or the following day to give you a chance to think about it. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:37, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Buckley &amp;amp; Bozell repeatedly say things such as &amp;quot; How [[Stanley Graze]] passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&amp;quot; IOW, unlike Venona, (a) the question is inconclusive, and (b) the question is usually on the lower level classification of security risks rather than more vital question of espionage.  And the witnesses pleading the Fifth is largley moot, because the questions usually are about CPUSA membership, not espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Moynihan Secrecy Commission cite up front gets to the heart of the matter--it confirms the conspircay of infamy so black that, when it is finally exposed, its principals shall be forever deserving of the maledictions of all honest men.  If we can leave this up front, I would not be averse to citing Rovere's phrase somewhere, (something to the effect of) &amp;quot;McCarthy was the greatest demagogue to ever walk these shores.&amp;quot;  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:22, 9 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, again, it's great to use Venona to back up McCarthy but it's also important to state upon which evidence McCarthy used to nail people like Graze. I have told you repeatedly that Venona is important here as well and should be used at every possible opportunity. And as I stated, I love the Moynihan info, but it should be moved as I think you also now recognize. As for citing Rovere's phrase, it really is funny now looking back at the evidence but sadly people still aren't well educated in this matter and tend to keep believing the real demagogues like Rovere. So as poignant as that statement would be to unmask the liberal stupidity, other than people like you and me, they just wouldn't get it. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 10:06, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline: the Moynihan Commission corroborates McCarthy's &amp;quot;conspiracy of infamy so black&amp;quot;, which actually is the common title given to McCarthy's 20 February 1950 Senate floor speech which you have quoted extensivley in the mainspace.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rob, what do I keep telling you? This is an article about '''ALL'''of McCarthy's life, not just the Senatorial aspect of his life. That paragraph would be perfect if we were doing strictly an article on his Senate career but this is not such an article. That info is '''perfect''' for the Venona section. So, unless you have a better reason for putting it in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section, let's move it to the &amp;quot;Venona&amp;quot; section, OK? [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the ==Analysis of the resolution== section, final sentence, paragraph two:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should probably remove or reword  blatant editorial speculation of this nature.  Perhaps attributing it to Drummey or Buckley, or wherever it came from.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:55, 10 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I agree. In fact, that info comes from a couple of good sources but I have a much better analysis from Cohn's book that I was planning to replace that section with so please be patient and let that sit for now and let me replace it as soon as I can. &lt;br /&gt;
:Also, please consider why when I make a change why I'm doing it. I don't make changes for the laughs, I do it for a reason. Would you please explain why in a biography of a person's whole life, that you place in the &amp;quot;Executive Summary&amp;quot; section a detailed explanation of one aspect of the person's life? It would be one thing to put a one line sentence, which is what already there but such a detailed bit of info goes against the concept of Manual of Style. I realize that the Senate part of McCarthy's life is the most significant but it's important for the article to flow correctly that we adhere to proper form so that the reader does not get confused. Please let me know your thought process on this. Other than placing verifiable truthful information into the article, I'm also concerned about proper structure within each article by not putting details of a person's biography in the wrong place. So, please, let's make sure we're conforming to the appropriate Manual of Style. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 12:42, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Simple answer: everywhere McCarthy's name is associated with alleged &amp;quot;witchhunts;&amp;quot; the Moynihan Commission finding is directly associated with McCarthy's career and life.   [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:49, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, that still doesn't address my point. This is an article about '''Joseph McCarthy''', not [[McCarthyism]]. Please see [http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style/Politicians Manual of Style]. You are failing to adhere to the basic layout of Conservapedia MOS. Do you want me ask [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] to chime in on this? I think it's fairly obvious but if you want another opinion, we could always ask him. It's up to you but I don't think we need him to tell us that we should not violate Conservapedia protocol and that with the current position of the Moynihan comments, that is exactly what is happening. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:15, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow, I thought you wanted to tell the world how misunderstood &amp;amp; slimed McCarthy's has been fro 50 years.  There's no better way to exonerate McCarthy's motives than to put the U.S. Government's admission he was correct right up front.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 15:55, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I do want to tell the world the verifiable truth about McCarthy but Conservapedia has a Manual of Style for their articles and I just want to follow protocol. Is that wrong? As a Sysop, I would think you would be a stickler for this sort of thing. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh, so a per Manual of Style, we couldn't mention [[George Washington]] is the Father of the Country in the opening section, right?&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LOL!! Yes, of course we could but do you think it would be appropriate to quote anyone or anything in great detail about it in the opening section? Do we place footnotes before a prologue? Of course not. Manual of Style. We are bound to it. You're just messing with me now, right. :) [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 17:11, 11 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Rob, it seems we've hit an impasse on this Manual of Style matter. So in all fairness, I'm going to submit this matter to Geo for mediation in the above &amp;quot;mediation&amp;quot; section. Please feel free to make your case there. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 16:27, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, doing clean-up is one thing but you're changing material information in the article. Can you please discuss any changes before you do them? I've spent a lot of time with this article and I would like to be included in any changes. I would appreciate it. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 23:25, 12 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:BTW, you seen [[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]], it's a beauty.  It combines Venona, Bentley, Guzenko, Budenz, Gorsky memo, ''et al'' into one list. It's still amazing how many names &amp;amp; bios I got that are not yet on the list.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a chronology &amp;amp; structure basically from the day Lenin declared &amp;quot;we must establish everywhere illegal apparatuses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Golos]], an [[NKVD]] officer, came over in 1921 and started operations.  I can't find anything on him in the [[Ellis Island]] database under either his birth name, or Golos, or his place of origin.  Seems they were operating illegally even before Golos got here.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:27, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, that's great stuff. Well done. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:41, 13 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Rob, thanks for adding &amp;quot;America's Retreat from Victory&amp;quot; to the external links. I listed it alphabetically and added it to the reference section as well. Great link. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 18:52, 15 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== H. Julian Wadleigh &amp;amp; &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rob, thanks for linking  H. Julian Wadleigh. I didn't know he had an article here. Well done. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please see if you can find another link for &amp;quot;The Venona Progeny&amp;quot; (footnote #79). The existing link at the Naval War College is dead. Simple typo but, the author's name is &amp;quot;Peake&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;Peale&amp;quot;. Please see what you can find. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, before I forget again, is there a good source on the internet that gives the full &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot;? I've been looking but haven't found anything other than this [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html one]. Please let me know. Thank you. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:44, 14 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=234598</id>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joseph_McCarthy&amp;diff=234598"/>
		<updated>2007-07-15T22:49:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Scorpio: /* External Links - Alphabetical listing */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:160px-Joseph_McCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Senator Joseph Raymond McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Joseph Raymond McCarthy''' ([[November 14]], [[1908]] – [[May 2]], [[1957]]) was a [[Republican]] [[United States Senate|U.S. Senator]] from the state of [[Wisconsin]] between 1947 and 1957. Beginning in 1950, McCarthy became the most visible public figure to stand up to [[Communist]] infiltration of the [[United States]] goverment. He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of [[Communist Party|Communists]] and [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the [[United States]], inside the federal government and was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted [[Venona]] files. Ultimately, his detractors, including the [[Communist Party]], were able to organize an effective effort to having him censured by the [[United States Senate]]. The term &amp;quot;[[McCarthyism]],&amp;quot; coined in 1950 in reference to McCarthy's attempts to expose Communists, was soon applied to similar dogmatic pursuits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early life==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born and raised on a Wisconsin farm, McCarthy earned a law degree at [[Marquette University]] in 1935 and was elected as a circuit judge in 1939, the youngest in state history. When McCarthy took over as circuit judge, his district had a backlog of more than 200 cases. By working long hours, including keeping the court open past midnight at least a dozen times, and eliminating a great deal of red tape, Judge McCarthy cleared up the backlog quickly. And, in the words of one local newspaper, Judge McCarthy &amp;quot;administered justice promptly and with a combination of legal knowledge and good sense.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section I. The Years Before 1950.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Military service===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:JosephMcCarthyMilitaryUniform.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Joseph McCarthy in the U.S. Marine Corps]]&lt;br /&gt;
Even though that as a judge McCarthy was exempt from military service, at age 33, McCarthy volunteered for the [[United States Marine Corps]]. He was sworn in as a first lieutenant in August 1942 and served during [[World War II]]. He served as an intelligence officer for a bomber squadron stationed in the Solomon Islands, and also risked his life by volunteering to fly in the tail-gunner's seat on many combat missions. McCarthy was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross in 1952. During his 30 months of military service, McCarthy's achievements were unanimously praised by his commanding officers and Admiral [[Chester Nimitz]], commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Nimitz issued the following citation regarding the service of Captain McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|For meritorious and efficient performance of duty as an observer and rear gunner of a dive bomber attached to a Marine scout bombing squadron operating in the Solomon Islands area from September 1 to December 31, 1943. He participated in a large number of combat missions, and in addition to his regular duties, acted as aerial photographer. He obtained excellent photographs of enemy gun positions, despite intense anti-aircraft fire, thereby gaining valuable information which contributed materially to the success of subsequent strikes in the area. Although suffering from a severe leg injury, he refused to be hospitalized and continued to carry out his duties as Intelligence Officer in a highly efficient manner. His courageous devotion to duty was in keeping with the highest traditions of the naval service.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pgs. 273-274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Major General Field Harris, Assistant Commandant (Air) of the [[United States Marine Corps]], sent a letter to McCarthy stating the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Dear Judge McCarthy: I note with gratification your unusual accomplishments during 30 months of active duty, particularly in the combat area, and that you received a citation from Admiral Nimitz for meritorious performance of duty. Without exception, the commanding officers under whom you served spoke of the performance of your duties in the highest terms.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Marine Corps will not forget the fine contribution you have made. It is largely through the devoted effort and sacrifice of patriotic Americans like yourself that the corps is able to maintain its unbroken tradition of defeating the enemy, wherever, whenever, and however encountered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You have my warm appreciation of your services, and my wishes for your continued success and good luck in the years ahead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lastly, in a recommendation for a citation, McCarthy's immediate superior, Major E.E. Munn not only praised McCarthy's record as a volunteer tail-gunner, observer, and aerial photographer on combat missions, it specifically referred to the air strikes in which he took part. This included heavily defended areas such as Kolombangara, Ballale, Bonis, Kara, Kahili, and Buka. The recommendation in part states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The cool bravery and high devotion to duty consistently displayed by Captain McCarthy are in keeping with the highest standards and traditions of the [[United States Marine Corps]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc., pg. 274. ASIN B000KIR8FC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was McCarthy's charges of Communist, security, and loyalty risk infiltration of the State Department that shot him into prominence in 1950. On February 9th speech in Wheeling, [[West Virginia]] at the Colonnade Room of the McClure Hotel he stated: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have in my hand 57 cases of individuals who would appear to be either card carrying members or certainly loyal to the Communist Party, but who nevertheless are still helping to shape our foreign policy.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy, Joseph (February 9, 1950) &amp;quot;[http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/pdocs/mccarthy_wheeling.pdf Speech at Wheeling], West Virginia, 9 February 1950,&amp;quot; in Michael P. Johnson, ed., Reading the American Past, Vol. II (Boston: Bedford Books, 1998), pgs. 191-195.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vernon, Wes (January 13, 2006). [http://www.aim.org/aim_report/A4297_0_4_0_C/|''AIM Report: Looney Clooney Smears Senator McCarthy'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Reed and Kincaid, Cliff (September 13, 2000). [http://www.aim.org/media_monitor/A2958_0_2_0_C/|''Joe McCarthy, a Victimizer or Victim'']. Accuracy In Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc., pgs. 41-61. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy compiled a list of 57 security risks and publicly named John S. Service, Gustavo Duran, [[Mary Jane Keeney]], Harlow Shapley, and [[H. Julian Wadleigh]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as being on the list. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. pgs. 222-238. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  These names came from the &amp;quot;Lee List&amp;quot; of unresolved State Department security cases compiled by the earlier investigators for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947.  Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a six hour speech on the Senate floor on February 20, 1950 in which McCarthy was constantly interrupted by hostile senators; four of whom -- Scott Lucas (61 times), Brien McMahon (27 times), Garrett Withers (22 times), and Herbert Lehman (13 times) -- interrupted him a total of 123 times, McCarthy raised the issue of some eighty individuals who had worked in the [[State Department]], or wartime agencies such as the [[Office of War Information]] (OWI) and the [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW). Democrats insisted McCarthy name names.  McCarthy responded,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The Senator from Illinois demanded, loudly, that I furnish all the names. I told him at that time that so far as I was concerned, I thought that would be improper; that I did not have all the information about these individuals. . . .I have enough to convince me that either they are members of the Communist Party or they have given great aid to the Communists: I may be wrong. That is why I said that unless the Senate demanded that I do so, I would not submit this publicly, but I would submit it to any committee - and would let the committee go over these in executive session. It is possible that some of these persons will get a clean bill of health. . . .}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said by some to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Washington Post (February 12, 1950).''Washington Post, February 12, 1950; McCarthy's speech in Wheeling &amp;amp; letter to President Truman are cited in the article titled &amp;quot;Security Risks&amp;quot; to the lower left of the photo''. Washington Post[http://www.conservapedia.com/images/thumb/4/49/Washpost1950.jpg/250px-Washpost1950.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This alleged statement was made only about his speech in Wheeling, WV and not in the other cities where he made a speech addressing the issue of subversion in government.  The 205 number came in another part of his speech. On February 20, 1950, in a speech made on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy officially clarified the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I have before me a letter which was reproduced in the Congressional Record on August 1, 1946, at page A4892. It is a letter from James F. Byrnes, former Secretary of State. It deals with the screening of the first group, of about 3,000. There were a great number of subsequent screenings. This was the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter deals with the first group of 3,000 which was screened. The President--and I think wisely so--set up a board to screen the employees who were coming to the State Department from the various war agencies of the War Department. There were thousands of unusual characters in some of those war agencies. Former Secretary Byrnes in his letter, which is reproduced in the Congressional Record, says this: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Pursuant to Executive order, approximately 4,000 employees have been transferred to the Department of state from various war agencies such as the OSS, FEA, OWI, OIAA, and so forth. Of these 4,000 employees, the case histories of approximately 3,000 have been subjected to a preliminary examination, as a result of which a recommendation against permanent employment has been made in 285 cases by the screening committee to which you refer in your letter.''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In other words, former Secretary Byrnes said that 285 of those men are unsafe risks. He goes on to say that of this number only 79 have been removed. Of the 57 I mentioned some are from this group of 205, and some are from subsequent groups which have been screened but not discharged. &lt;br /&gt;
I might say in that connection that the investigative agency of the State Department has done an excellent job. The files show that they went into great detail in labeling Communists as such. The only trouble is that after the investigative agency had properly labeled these men as Communists the State Department refused to discharge them. I shall give detailed cases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was able to characterize President Truman and the Democratic party as soft on or even in league with the Communists. McCarthy's allegations were rejected by Truman who was unaware of [[Venona project]] decrypts which corroborated [[Elizabeth Bentley]]'s debriefing after her defection from the Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's support and popularity peaked in early 1954 when a January 1954 Gallup Poll showed that 50 percent of the respondents had a generally &amp;quot;favorable opinion&amp;quot; of him. McCarthy was also fourth on the list of the &amp;quot;most admired men&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Kazin, Michael&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1998&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History'' &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Cornell University Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | page = 342&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-801-48558-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On March 9, 1954, CBS broadcasted [[Edward R. Murrow]]'s ''See It Now'' TV documentary attacking McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===VENONA files===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, when the VENONA transcripts were declassified, further detailed information was revealed about Soviet espionage in the United States.  FBI Director [[J. Edgar Hoover]] was among only a handful of people in the U.S. Government who was aware of the Venona project, and there is no indication whatsoever Hoover shared Venona information with McCarthy.  In fact, Hoover may have actually fed McCarthy disinformation, or dead end files, in an effort to put pressure on relatives, friends, or close associates of real Venona suspects by threatening to reveal embarrassing information about them in a public forum if they failed to cooperate and reveal what they might have known about someone's else’s activities and associations.  And there is no indication McCarthy might have known he was being used by Hoover in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 1950, three days before McCarthy's acclaimed Wheeling West Virginia speech, Hoover testified before House Appropriations Committee that [[Glossary_of_espionage_terms#Counterintelligence|counterespionage]] requires &amp;quot;an objective different from the handling of criminal cases. It is more important to ascertain his contacts, his objectives, his sources of information and his methods of communication&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;arrest and public disclosure are steps to be taken only as a matter of last resort.&amp;quot; He concluded that &amp;quot;we can be secure only when we have a full knowledge of the operations of an espionage network, because then we are in a position to render their efforts ineffective.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence], John F. Fox, Jr., FBI Historian, Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, 10/27/2005. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy is said to have made the claim, &amp;quot;I have here in my hand a list of 205—a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party.&amp;quot; The famous &amp;quot;List&amp;quot;, as it has come to be known, has always engendered much controversy. The figure of 205 appears to have come from an oral briefing McCarthy had with Hoover regarding espionage suspects the FBI was then investigating.  The FBI had discovered on its own five Soviet agents operating in the United States during World War II; defector Elizabeth Bentley further added another 81 known identities of espionage agents; Venona materials had provided the balance, and by the time a full accounting of true name identities was compiled in an FBI memo in 1957, one more subject had been added to the number, now totaling 206. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Synopsis_on_%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York,_1944-45%22 FBI Memo Referencing 206 Communists in Government]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much confusion has always surrounded the subject.  While the closely guarded FBI/Venona information of identified espionage agents uses the number of 206, McCarthy in his Wheeling speech only referred to Communist Party membership and other security risks, and not espionage activity.  Being a security risk as a CPUSA member does not necessarily entail or imply that a person was or is actively involved in espionage activity.  Venona materials indicated a very large number of espionage agents remained unidentified by the FBI.  When McCarthy was questioned on the number, he referred to the Lee List of security risks, by which it appears Hoover was attempting to match unidentified code names to known security risks. Hoover kept the identities of persons known to be involved in espionage activity from Venona evidence secret. Hoover in the very early days of the FBI's joint investigation with the [[Army Signals Intelligence Service]] in May of 1946 did precisely the same deception with a confidant of [[President Truman]] using Venona decryptions.  Hoover reported that a reliable source revealed “an enormous Soviet espionage ring in Washington.” Of some fourteen names, [[KGB|Soviet agents]] [[Alger Hiss]] and [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] were listed well down the list. The name at the top was “Undersecretary of State [[Dean Acheson]]” and included others beyond reproach, thus discrediting the Hiss and Silvermaster accusations, which actually were on target. Hence the Truman White House always suspected Hoover and the FBI of playing partisan political games with accusations of various administration members’ complicity in Soviet espionage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/foreword.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Chairmans Forward], 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United States&amp;amp;mdash;including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residents&amp;amp;mdash;who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified.  In public hearings before the [[Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]] (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American, Section III. Committee Chairman (1953-54).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by [[NSA]] and [[FBI]] as agents of the Soviet Union in the [[Venona project]] involved in espionage. Several prominent examples are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Jane Keeney]], a United Nations employee, and her husband [[Philip Keeney]], who worked in the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Then there was a Mrs. Mary Jane Keeney from the Board of Economic Warfare in the State Department, who was named in a F.B.I. report and a House Committee report as a courier for the Communist Party while working for the Government. And where do you think Mrs. Keeney is -- she is now an editor in the U.N. Documents Bureau.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lauchlin Currie]], a special assistant to President Roosevelt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On September 9, 1950, at the Columbia County Republican Club in Portage, Wisconsin, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Just turn back a page of history to 1945. This  Lauchlin Currie was administrative assistant to the President. This is the same Lauchlin Currie who has been named under oath by [[Elizabeth Bentley]] as the man who tipped off her Russian espionage agents that we were about to break the Japanese code...This is the same Lauchlin Currie whose picture I hold in my hand, with a picture of [[Harry Dexter White]], John Abt, and Alger Hiss -- all named under oath repeatedly as Communists...At that time Lauchlin Currie was Administrative Assistant to the President. The Joint Chiefs of Staff approved sending vast amounts of German captured arms to those fighting Communism in China. After the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Eisenhower had approved the shipment -- after vast quantities had left German ports destined for our allies in China -- Lauchlin Currie, Truman's Administrative Assistant, the man named by Bentley and Chambers, signed an order on White House stationery ordering that all this military equipment be destroyed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On June 14, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information about Currie and his connection to the other individuals involved in supporting the Chinese Communists. He stated, &amp;quot;The Stilwell-Davies group took over in China in 1942. Soon thereafter, Lauchlin, at the White House, and [[John Carter Vincent]], and subsequently [[Alger Hiss]] at the State Department were exercising their influence at the Washington end of the transmission belt conveying poisonous misinformation from ChungKing. The full outlines of Currie's betrayal have yet to be traced....In this connection it should be recalled that Currie issued an order on White House stationery depriving the Republic of China of 20,000 German rifles.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virginius Frank Coe]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of V. Frank Coe, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol1.pdf Vol. 1]: 147-50, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvo43.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3413, 3417-18, 3421, 3428-29&lt;br /&gt;
  testimony of, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349-72.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Director of Division of Monetary Research, U.S. Treasury;  Technical Secretary at the Bretton Woods Conference; International Monetary Fund;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Ludwig Ullman]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of William Ludwig Ullman, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol3.pdf Vol. 3]: 2146, 2147, 2152, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3411-14, 3418, 3421, 3426-29, testimony of, Vol. 3: 2345-49.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, delegate to the United Nations Charter Conference and Bretton Woods Conference;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McCarthy Hearings, Testimony of Nathan Gregory Silvermaster, Executive Session, [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol2.pdf Vol. 2]: 1349, 1361, 1362,  [http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mccarthy/hearingsvol4.pdf Vol. 4]: 3403, 3412-14, 3425-29.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Chief Planning Technician, Procurement Division, United States Department of the Treasury and head of the Silvermaster network of spies;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harold Glasser]], U.S. Treasury Representative to the Allied High Commission in Italy;&lt;br /&gt;
* Four staff members of the [[LaFollette Committee|LaFollette Civil Liberties Committee]], a Senate subcommittee on labor rights;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Allan Rosenberg]], Chief of the Economic Institution Staff, [[Foreign Economic Administration]]; Counsel to the National Labor Relations Board;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Solomon Adler]], U.S. Treasury Dept., went to China and joined government of [[Mao Zedong]]; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert T. Miller]], Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs; Near Eastern Division United States Department of State; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; McCarthy's Case #16 and Lee list #12;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Vassiliev, Notes on A. Gorsky’s Report to Savchenko S.R., 23 December 1949.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], consultant at Board of Economic Warfare; Deputy Chief of the Central European Section of Office of Strategic Services; First Chief of Research of the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]]; also identified in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laurence Duggan]], head of United States Department of State Division of American Republics; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leonard Mins]], &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/Volume3.pdf Army Signal Corps—Subversion and Espionage, October 22] (PDF). Executive Sessions Of The Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations Of The Committee On Government Operations; Vol. 3. pgs. 2717-2726, U.S. Government Printing Office (1953).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Russian Section of the Research and Analysis Division of the [[Office of Strategic Services]];&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cedric Belfrage]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/06amay20030700/www.gpo.gov/congress/senate/mccarthy/83870.html Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations], Vol. 2, Eighty-third Congress, 14 May 1953, pgs. 1135-1164.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, [[British Security Coordination]]; founder the ''[[National Guardian]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gerald Graze]], U.S. State Department; Lee List #29, confirmed in the ''Gorsky Memo'' from Soviet Archives, brother of Stanley Graze;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sergey Nikolaevich Kurnakov]], ''[[Daily Worker]]''; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joseph R. McCarthy Papers, Series 14, Senate Subject Files, Marquettte University Library Special Collections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Karr]], Office of War Information; chief aide to journalist Drew Pearson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Venona transcripts confirm the Senate Civil Liberties Subcommittee, chaired by former Senator Robert LaFollette, Jr., whom McCarthy defeated for election in 1946, had at least four staff members working on behalf of the [[KGB]].  Chief Counsel of the Committee [[John Abt]]; [[Charles Kramer]], who served on three other Congressional Committees; Allen Rosenberg, who also served on the National Labor Relations Board, [[Board of Economic Warfare]] (BEW), the [[Foreign Economic Administration]] (FEA) and later argued cases before the United States Supreme Court; and [[Charles Flato]], who served on the BEW and FEA, all were [[CPUSA]] members and associated with the [[Comintern]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the underlying premise of Communists in the government was true, many of McCarthy's targets were not complicit in espionage.  Recent scholarship has established of 159 persons investigated between 1950 and 1952, there is substantial evidence nine had assisted Soviet espionage using evidence from Venona or other sources.  Of the remainder, while not being directly complicit in espionage, many were considered security risks. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Known security/loyalty risks===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1947, a Senate Appropriations subcommittee addressed a secret memorandum to Secretary of State George Marshall, calling to his attention a condition that developed and was continuing in the State Department.  The memo stated that &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|it was evident there was a deliberate, calculated program being carried out not only to protect communist personnel in high places, but to reduce security and intelligence protection to a nullity. On file in the department is a copy of a preliminary report of the FBI on Soviet espionage activities in the United States which involved a large number of State Department employees, some in high official positions.}}&lt;br /&gt;
Robert E. Lee was the committee’s lead investigator and supervised preparation of the list. The Lee list, also using numbers rather than names, was published in the proceeding of the subcommittee. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigations (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1950).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memorandum listed the names of nine State Department officials and said that they were &amp;quot;only a few of the hundreds now employed in varying capacities who are protected and allowed to remain despite the fact that their presence is an obvious hazard to national security.&amp;quot;  Ten persons were removed from the list by June 24th. But from 1947 until McCarthy's Wheeling speech in February 1950, the State Department did not fire one person as a loyalty or security risk. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/jepeurifoy.htm John Emil Peurifoy, Foreign Service Office &amp;amp; United States Ambassador],  Arlington National Cemetery Website, retrieved 21 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In other branches of the government, however, more than 300 persons were discharged for loyalty reasons alone during the period from 1947 to 1951. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most but not all of Senator McCarthy’s numbered cases were drawn from the “Lee List” or “108 list” of unresolved Department of State security cases compiled by Lee for the House Appropriates Committee in 1947. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html  Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Lists and Venona], by John Earl Haynes, April 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The Tydings subcommittee also obtained this list.  In addition to some of the person involved in espionage identified in the [[Venona project]] listed above, there are other security and loyalty risks identified correctly by Senator McCarthy included in the following list:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Warren Barnett]] &amp;amp; [[Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #48 and #49 respectively and both are on Lee list as #59;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Numbers 48 and 49 respectively and both are Number 59 on the Lee list. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;The letters of charges against the Barnetts--both Robert Warren Barnett and his wife, Mrs. Robert Warren Barnett-charge them with close association and constant contact with known Soviet espionage activity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Brunauer]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #47 and Lee list #55;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 47 and Number 55 on the Lee list. She belonged to a number of Communist front organizations, including chairman of a meeting of the American Friends of the Soviet Union where the main speaker was a well known Communist and writer for the ''Daily Worker''. &amp;quot;Brunauer was a signer of a call to the annual meeting of the [[American Youth Congress]] which was publicly known to be completely dominated by the Communist Party. She admitted that her husband had Communist connections and had been a member of the [[Young Communist League]].&amp;quot; Brunauer was suspended by the State Department in 1951 pending adjudication of security proceedings against her. On June 16, 1952, she was discharged by the State Department as a security risk. See ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning'' for greater detail on this case.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen Brunauer]], U.S. Navy, chemist in the explosive research division;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;Brunauer, an admitted former member of the Young Communist League, was suspended from his job as head of the Navy's high explosives section where he was engaged in top secret work. He resigned before the Navy's Loyalty Board could complete questioning him and dispose of his case.&amp;quot; Brunauer also had a reputation for associating with know Communists. McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;For example, his very good friend, [[Noel Field]], a known Communist and espionage agent, spent night after night with Stephen Brunauer, who had access to all the top secrets in the explosive section of our Navy. Field then left the country, and has since disappeared behind the iron curtain, taking with him all the information which his friend Brunauer had given him ... What forced the Navy to take action was that it appeared during the atom-spy investigations that Stephen Brunauer was involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 8, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5058&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gertrude Cameron]], Information and Editorial Specialist in the U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #55 and Lee list #65;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 55 and Number 65 on the Lee list. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Cameron as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Cameron, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Cameron remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Cameron, like, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nelson Chipchin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's list #23;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 23. Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Chipchin as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Chipchin, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Chipchin remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Chipchin, like Cameron, Fishburn, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oliver Edmund Clubb]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy presented Clubb's name and evidence against him to the [[Tyding's Committee]]. In 1952, by unanimous vote, the U.S. State Department Loyalty and Security Board found that Clubb's employment in the State Department constituted a security risk. The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration, Carlisle Humelsine agreed with this decision. Clubb ultimately resigned. On March 5, 1952, [[Dean Acheson|Secretary Acheson]] confirmed to the Media that Senator McCarthy was correct.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Paton Davies]], U.S. State Department, Policy Planning Committee;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;Both [John Stewart] Service and Davies spent considerable time in China as State Department officials. In their recommendations to Washington both followed the Communist Party line. For example, on November 7, 1944, Davies submitted a memorandum to the State Department outing that the Communist Party in China was 'a modern dynamic popular government.' At the same time he referred to the anti-Communists as 'feudal.' 'The Communists are in China to stay. And China's destiny is not Chiang's but theirs,' said Davies. On December 12, 1944 he urged that we supply the Chinese Communists with arms -- a proposal which [[Dean Acheson]] two years later requested Congress to approve.&amp;quot; In 1944, Ambassador to China, [[Patrick J. Hurley]], accused Davies of working behind his back to support the Communists. According to Hurley, &amp;quot;Davies had one day flown off to Yenan to tell [[Mao Zedong|Mao TseTung]], the Communist leader, that Hurley, our Ambassador (an anti-Communist), did not represent the American viewpoint.&amp;quot; According to ''The China Story'' by [[Freda Utley]], Davies was a great fan of Communist operative [[Agnes Smedley]] who operated in China. Utley states, &amp;quot;Davies was also a great admirer of [[Agnes Smedley]], whom he called one of 'the pure in heart.' He used to invite us all to excellent dinners at the American consulate, at which he expressed both his admiration and affection for Agnes. Together with [[Edgar Snow]] and other journalists I knew in Hankow, he [Davies] became one of the most potent influences in the Department [of State] furthering the cause of the Chinese Communists.&amp;quot; The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] had found that Davies had &amp;quot;testified falsely before the subcommittee in denying that he recommended the Central Intelligence Agency employ, utilize and rely upon certain individuals having Communist associations and connections. This matter was...substantial in import.&amp;quot; Despite the enormous evidence of Davies' support of the Communists, the State Department cleared him of being a security/loyalty risk. Eventually, in 1954, under political pressure from McCarthy and Senator [[Patrick McCarran]], Secretary of State [[John Foster Dulles]] asked Davies to resign. When he refused, on 5 November, 1954, Dulles terminated his employment, stating that Davies had &amp;quot;demonstrated a lack of judgment, discretion and reliability.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 14, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 6574&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Utley&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Freda &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The China Story&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Chicago, H. Regnery Co.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B00005VL2B}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gustavo Duran]], U.S. State Department, assistant to the Assistant Secretary of State in charge of Latin American Affairs, and Chief of the Cultural Activities Section of the Department of Social Affairs of the United Nations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Duran Case is considered one of Senator McCarthy's &amp;quot;Nine Public Cases&amp;quot;. McCarthy attempted to present evidence of Gustavo Duran's status as a security risk during the [[Tydings Committee]]. In violation of its mandate, the Tydings Committee refused to dicuss McCarthy's evidence. Intelligence reports presented by McCarthy made the case quite clear that Duran was a bad security risk. All evidence submitted indicated that Duran was a Communist agent prior and during WWII, who took orders directly from the Soviet Union. It is unclear whether Duran was either hired with the knowledge that he had a Communist Party background or whether the State Department Loyalty Board simply failed to perform its obligation to properly screen out security risks. Either way, the State Department failed to perform its duties.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}},&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1956&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}},&lt;br /&gt;
 Issac Walton League, Fond du Lac (July 30, 1950), Wisconsin)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Arpad Erdos]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], and [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Erdos as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Erdos, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Erdos remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Erdos, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Fierst]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's case #1 and Lee list #51;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Presented by McCarthy as Case Number 1 and Number 51 on the Lee list. Fierst was employed by the State Department beginning in September, 1946. In 1951, he was placed into the loyalty-security channels of the State Department. The Civil Service Loyalty Review Board expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of his case, and sent it back to the State Department Board for readjudication. Afterwards, a judgment was issued by the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board that, &amp;quot;a State Department officer's loyalty status had not been explored with sufficient thoroughness even after seven years.&amp;quot; According to Robert L. Bannerman, Special Assistant and security officer in the State Department, in a memo issued by him on August 2, 1946, indicates that, &amp;quot;physical surveillance showed that this man Fierst was in constant contact with members of an espionage group and that he recommended Communists for State Department employment, and was engaged in a number of other Communist activities.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Tipton Fishburn]], U.S. State Department; Lee list #106;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Fishburn as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Fishburn, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Fishburn remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Fishburn, like Cameron, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Theodore Geiger]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings, Robert Morris, the Chief Counsel for the Minority, stated that Geiger was engaged in espionage activities as part of a Communist Party cell operating in the U.S. Morris offered to provide several witnesses who were also in Geiger's Communist Party cell however the Chairman of the [[Tydings Committee]], [[Millard Tydings]] declined to hear the testimony. On July 25, 1950, Senator McCarthy told the Senate about this case and that the witnesses to Geiger's Communist Party cell where willing to testify but that [[Millard Tydings]] refused the opportunity to expose a known Communist working for the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 25, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1091&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stella Gordon]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #40 and Lee list #45&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Gordon as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Gordon, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Gordon remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Gordon, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Hunt, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stanley Graze]], U.S. State Department intelligence; McCarthy's Case #8 and Lee list #8, brother of Gerald Graze, confirmed in KGB Archives;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Graze was McCarthy's Case Number 8. Graze and his brother, [[Gerald Graze|Gerald]], were both employed by the State Department during [[World War II]] and in 1944, Gerald was identified as a secret member of the [[Communist Party of the United States]]. Even so, Stanley continued to work for the State Department until 1948. Oddly enough, on April 20, 1948, the Loyalty Security Board cleared him. Ten days later he resigned and became employed with the United Nations. Both Gerald and Stanley Graze are identified in the 1948 ''Gorsky Memo'' of Compromised American sources and networks having a covert relationship with Soviet intelligence. On October 14, 1952, while testifying before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] he refused to answer questions regarding participation in the [[Communist Party of the United States]] and questions regarding espionage activity against the U.S. How Graze passed the State Department's Review Board remains unexplained.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ruth Marcia Harrison]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #7 and Lee list #4;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Harrison as being a U.S. State Department employee who was clearly a security and loyalty risk. McCarthy mentioned that Harrison belonged to a long list of Communist front organizations and the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party. Harrison was investigated by various branches of the Federal government numerous times before her termination in 1951, mainly because of her involvement in the 1930’s in organizations that had been identified as subversive. These organizations include the American Student Union, the [[Young Communist League]], and the Washington Bookshop Association. Subversive elements in the Federal government were able to clear Harrison in all prior investigations, but in 1951, her luck ran out. An informant revealed that Harrison had been active in the Library of Congress branch of the Communist Party when she was employed there as a cataloger, and this information ultimately led to the Loyalty and Security Board’s determination that Harrison posed a security risk as a Federal employee. Government documents related to her case that were declassified after amendments to the Freedom of Information Act in 1975, including investigation files from the [[FBI]], the State Department, the [[CIA]], and the Civil Service Commission indicated that the government's case against Harrison was absolutely correct and her termination justified.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Myron Victor Hunt]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #65 and Lee list #79;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Hunt as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Hunt, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Hunt remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Hunt, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Kopelewich, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Jessup]], U.S. State Department, Assistant Director for the Naval School of Military Government and Administration at Columbia University in New York, Delegate to the U.N. in a number of different capacities, Ambassador-at-large, and Chairman of the Institute of Pacific Relations Research Advisory Committee; McCarthy's Case #15;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy's first comments regarding Jessup were made during the [[Tydings Committee]] hearings where McCarthy stated that Jessup had an unusual affinity for Communist causes. McCarthy was never allowed by the Tydings Committee to outline his case regarding Jessup but the committee did allow Jessup to fly in from Pakistan and give his defense against charges that McCarthy had not yet even made. Needless to say, the Tydings Committee cleared Jessup as they did with everyone that appeared before them. However, in two speeches on the floor of the Senate, McCarthy gave his evidence regarding Jessup's &amp;quot;unusual affinity for Communist causes&amp;quot;. They are as follows:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(1) That Jessup had been affiliated with five Communist front groups;&lt;br /&gt;
(2) That Jessup had been a leading light in the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR) at a time that organization was reflecting the Communist Party line;&lt;br /&gt;
(3) And that he had &amp;quot;pioneered the smear campaign against Nationalist China and Chiang Kai-shek&amp;quot; and propagated the &amp;quot;myth of the 'democratic Chinese Communist'&amp;quot; through the IPR magazine, ''Far Eastern Survey'', over which he had &amp;quot;absolute control&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(4) That Jessup had associated with known Communists in the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(5) That the IPR's American Council under Jessup's guidance had received more than $7,000 of Communist funds from [[Frederick Vanderbilt Field]];&lt;br /&gt;
(6) That Jessup had &amp;quot;expressed vigorous opposition&amp;quot; to attempts to investigate Communist penetration of the IPR;&lt;br /&gt;
(7) That Jessup had urged that United States atom bomb production be brought to a halt in 1946, and that essential atomic ingredients be &amp;quot;dumped into the ocean&amp;quot;;&lt;br /&gt;
(8) That Jessup had appeared as a character witness for Alger Hiss, and that later, after Hiss's conviction, Jessup had found &amp;quot;no reason whatever to change his opinion about Hiss's veracity, loyalty and integrity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
While it may be questionable that Jessup pioneered the smear campaign against Chiang Kai-Shek, it's clear that he aided in it. There's no doubt that every single one of these allegations was essentially correct. Solid evidence shows that Jessup was associated with four Communist front organizations. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
the [[American Russian Institute]], the [[National Emergency Conference]] (and its successor, the [[National Emergency Conference for Democratic Rights]]), the [[American Law Students Association]], and the [[American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations]]. According to the House Committee on Un-American Activities each of these organizations was cited as Communist front groups at the time of Jessup's association with them. Although the Tydings Committee did not allow McCarthy to present his evidence against Jessup, the Tydings Committee did refer to some of McCarthy's evidence that were made on the floor of the Senate. Of course, as usual, the Tydings Committee either ignored the significance of the evidence or downplayed it. It was up to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] a year later to do the real investigating and in discussing the IPR, it stated, &amp;quot;The IPR was a vehicle used by Communists to orientate American Far Eastern policy toward Communist objectives.&amp;quot; The McCarran Committee Hearings clearly indicate that the IPR was more than just a Communist front organization in that there was an active Communist &amp;quot;cell&amp;quot; that put the services of the IPR at the disposal of &amp;quot;Communist imperialism&amp;quot;. And that this was achieved by &amp;quot;manipulating&amp;quot; the IPR's policy-making officials.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The McCarran Committee reported that ten of the thirty-three individuals whom Jessup recommended as delegates to the IPR Hot Springs Convention in January of 1945 have been named as members of the Communist Party. Jessup was well aware that Frederick Vanderbilt Field was a member of the Communist Party, and especially so when Field resigned from the IPR to devote full time to the Communist front organization, [[American Peace Mobilization]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Jessup also presided over the State Department Policy Conference of October 1949 that was not only stocked with Jessup's pro-Communist associates but also, in the words of the McCarran Committee, which stated, &amp;quot;...the prevailing [majority] view at the conference advocated (a) the recognition of Communist China; (b) normal trade relations between the United States and Communist China; (c) encouragement of trade between Japan and Communist China; (d) economic assistance to Communist China; (e) recognition that Communist conquest in Asia was a natural and inevitable consequence of revolutionary ferment in Asia with its Communist nature being incidental.&amp;quot; [[Harold Stassen]] and [[General Joseph Fortier]] have respectively testified that Jessup not only ignored advice to disregard the pro-Communist direction of the conference and that Jessup was in favor of recognizing Communist China. The above evidence clearly demonstrates that Jessup was at least a security risk and that the State Department Loyalty program failed to identify him as such. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Tydings Committee Hearings&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 28, 41, 42, 100, 229, 247, 256, 257, 273, 497-498, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = March  30, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 4402-4405&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = June 2, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 8000-8003&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarran Report,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = July 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Pages 100-103, 122-123, 147-148, 212, 225, 494-495, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]], President [[Harry Truman]]'s Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling had an extensive background of service in the U.S. government. He had helped to shift the emphasis of U.S. economic policy toward a more [[Socialist]]ic structure. Evidence in the form of sworn testimony submitted to the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] indicated that he agreed with the principles of the Communist Party except for the idea that Communization of the U.S. could only be achieved through &amp;quot;bloody revolution&amp;quot; and he was against the idea of a separate political entity for Black people in the U.S. South. Other than those two details, Keyserling, a major official in the U.S. government, agreed with the Communization of the U.S. Less than a year after Senator McCarthy made this information public, Keyserling left U.S. government work for the private sector yet continued to act as a paid consultant to the U.S. Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Dublin Keyserling]], U.S. Department of Commerce;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Keyserling is the wife of [[Leon Hirsch Keyserling]] and also had an extensive background working for the U.S. government. On April 21, 1952, McCarthy gave her specifics to the Senate. He stated that the evidence presented to the Commerce Department's Loyalty Board showed that Keyserling had been a member of the Communist Party and that she also belonged to a great many Communist front organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 21, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 4153&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther Less Kopelewich]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #24;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Robert Ross]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Kopelewich as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Kopelewich, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Kopelewich remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Kopelewich, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Ross, Schimmel, Tuchser, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Owen Lattimore]], Board member of the communist-dominated [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (I.P.R) and editor the I.P.R.’s journal ''Pacific Affairs'';&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Identified by McCarthy as a Communist and under Party discipline. Former Communist Party member and head of the Buben group of spies, [[Louis Budenz]] corroborated McCarthy's claims and detailed how Lattimore had been of service to the Communist Party in the ''Amerasia'' case. Lattimore was also identified by former Soviet Army General [[Alexander Barmine]] as a member of Russian Military Intelligence ([[GRU]]). In a unanimous report, the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] classified Lattimore as a &amp;quot;conscious articulate instrument of the Soviet conspiracy&amp;quot;. Lattimore wrote a letter of introduction for [[Haakon Chevalier]] to [[KGB]] operative, [[Lauchlin Currie]]. Chevalier was attempting to obtain a Government job during this period of time. Chevalier is a known Soviet Secret Intelligence Service ([[NKVD]]) contact and was associated with numerous members of the Communist Party on the West Coast. Currie also recommended Lattimore to President Roosevelt to serve as a special advisor to [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. Indicted for committing perjury. In December 1952, Currie gave evidence in New York to a grand jury investigating Lattimore's role in the publication by [[Amerasia]] magazine of secret State Department documents. All evidence indicates that Lattimore was a security and a loyalty risk and served to guide U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of U.S national interests.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Paul A. Lifantieff-Lee]], U.S. Naval Department; McCarthy's Case #56 and Lee list #66;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Born in the Soviet Union. On August 9, 1951, McCarthy presented to the Senate information about Lifantieff-Lee. He stated that, &amp;quot;His file in the Navy Department, which was transmitted to the State Department, shows that he took secret State Department documents, which were found in his room and picked up by naval intelligence. That is shown by the naval intelligence report.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Val R. Lorwin]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #54 and Lee list #64;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In December, 1945, Lorwin became employed with the State Department. He quickly became Chief of the State Department's  European Division of International Labor, Social, and Health Affairs. After that, he became a labor economist for the State Department. On February 5, 1952, approximately one year after the [[Tyding's Committee]] cleared Lorwin, the State Department suspended him. On March 28, 1952, he was restored to full duty, and in June 1952, was formally cleared of all charges regarding security or loyalty issues. Shortly thereafter, Lorwin resigned, and went to work for the University of Chicago as an assistant professor of social sciences and industrial relations. According to Buckley, &amp;quot;on December 4, 1953, a Federal Grand Jury handed down an indictment of Lorwin, charging that he had lied under oath in claiming (1) that he had never been a member of the Communist Party, (2) that he had never carried a Communist Party card, and (3) that he had never held a Communist Party meeting in his home.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel F. Margolies]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #41 and Lee list #46;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy gave the Senate information on an employee of the State Department named Daniel F. Margolies. McCarthy described Margolies as, &amp;quot;one of the top security men in the State Department&amp;quot; and was hired by the State Department despite the fact that he was disapproved on the grounds that he was a &amp;quot;bad loyalty and security risk.&amp;quot; The State Department never explained the rationale in hiring someone who was clearly a security and loyalty risk.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Peveril Meigs]], U.S. State Department; Department of the Army; McCarthy's Case #3 and Lee list #2;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Meigs became employed with the State Department in September, 1945, and was allowed to resign from the State department in 1948 even though there were concerns regarding his security/loyalty. McCarthy related to the Senate the fact that Meigs was under investigation by the State Department's security/loyalty board yet was allowed to resign without noting his file as having been under investigation. Subsequently, Meigs went to work for the Department of the Army and after McCarthy communicated to the Army that Meigs should be investigated, the Army then looked into Meigs' background and found him to be a clear loyalty/security risk. In January 12, 1952 and again on May 26, 1952, McCarthy stated to the Senate that, &amp;quot;On February 20, I believe, I laid before the Senate the case of Perveril Meigs. The State Department held a hearing. They knew that they could not conceivably clear Perveril Meigs, even with the type of board which they have. What did they do? They notified him that he would not be cleared, so he then resigned, went over to the Army and got a job in the Army, with no notification to the Army that this man was an extremely bad security risk because of close association with espionage agents. It was only after we called the Army's attention to the case that the Army Loyalty Board took the case up, and of course, they promptly ordered him discharged.&amp;quot; Meigs' case is a perfect example of the State Department covering up either its' imcompetence in hiring individuals that are security/loyalty risks and/or in being able to properly filter out such individuals once they are employees of the State Deparmtent. The tactic of informing a suspected security/loyalty risk and allowing him or her to resign was a strategy implemented in order for the State Department to avoid appearing imcompetent or as though they they did not make any effort to avoid hiring loyalty/security risks. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 15, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 192&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = May 26, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 5963&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The Devin-Adair Company&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B0007DRBZ2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ella M. Montague]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #34 and Lee list #32;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
She was born in the [[Soviet Union]] in 1896. On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;She [Montague] worked for the [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]]. The testimony before three different committees is that only top members of the Communist Party could work for Amtorg.&amp;quot; McCarthy also stated that, &amp;quot;...5 or 6 of the officers of Amtorg were picked up about a year ago and charged with espionage. Under pressure from the State Department they were allowed to return to Russia.&amp;quot; As usual, McCarthy was correct about both Montague being a security/loyalty risk and about Amtorg being a front organization to further the expansionistic goals of the Soviet Union. [[Amtorg Trading Corporation]] is an American company based in New York that was founded in 1924 by the Soviet Union to serve as its buying and selling organization in trade between the USSR and the USA. It handled the bulk of Soviet-American trade until 1935, and continues to exist today. Working as an Amtorg employee served as a convenient cover for Soviet spies, such the Soviet spy, [[Morris Cohen]].&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = The American Legion&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1937&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = ISMS: A Review of Alien Isms, Revolutionary Communism, and Their Active Sympathizers in the United States, Pages 85-87&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The American Legion, Indianapolis&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ASIN B000KIJS6Y}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philleo Nash]], Presidential Advisor, [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] and [[Harry S. Truman]] administrations;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 29, 1952, Senator McCarthy outlined the charges against Nash, who had been a Presidential advisor in the Franklin D. Roosevelt and Truman administrations. McCarthy stated that this matter was &amp;quot;developed by the F.B.I.&amp;quot; and that Nash &amp;quot;had been in close contact with the Communist underground in Washington D.C.&amp;quot;; that he had been a close friend and associate of a convicted Canadian Communist; that Nash had &amp;quot;contributed to the support of the Canadian ''Tribune'', the official organ of the Communist Party in Canada&amp;quot;; that during the early 1940's some of the Canadian spy ring were using his home in Toronto as a meeting point and that some of them were living there; and that in the early 1940's Nash &amp;quot;was attending Communist meetings and had officially joined the Communist Party.&amp;quot; In an interview with Jerry N. Hess on May 15, 1969, Nash essentially confirmed the essence of these charges, yet Nash was never adversely affected by these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = January 29, 1952&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 581&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Hess&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Jerry&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Oral History Interview with Philleo Nash&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Truman Presidential Museum and Library&lt;br /&gt;
 | date = May 15, 1969&lt;br /&gt;
 | url = http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/nash15.htm}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Olga V. Osnatch]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #81 and Lee list #78;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Osnatch as his Case #81. At the time of McCarthy's original investigation, Osnatch was not yet a citizen of the United States. At the time of this speech, it was not clear if she had gotten her citizenship papers or not. McCarthy stated that, &amp;quot;She worked for the Russian Embassy in Turkey for 3 years. Then with the Russian Welfare Society, and so forth. One of the significant things here, of course, is that the Russians do not hire people in their embassies unless they are Communists.&amp;quot; So, what McCarthy was making clear in this speech was that only committed Communists are employed with Soviet agencies. Why an assumed Communist was allowed to work for the U.S. government was yet another mystery that the Truman administration would not explain.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9707&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edward Posniak]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case Number 77;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Posniak was submitted to the Tyding's Committee by McCarthy as Case Number 77. An F.B.I. agent and an F.B.I. informant reported that Posniak was a member of the Communist Party. On November 15, 1950, the State Department contacted the Loyalty Review Board that Posniak &amp;quot;elected to resign rather than accept suspension pending investigation and adjudication of certain charges bearing loyalty.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Raine]], U.S. State Department, Regional Specialist; McCarthy's Case #52 and Lee list #62;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On August 9, 1951, McCarthy stated, &amp;quot;He [Raine] is tied up, in the letter of the charges, very closely with Robert T. Miller, who has been identified under oath several times as a Russian espionage agent.&amp;quot; McCarthy was making a close association to Miller who he himself had been identified by former Soviet operative, [[Elizabeth Bentley]] in her 1945 FBI statement. Again, it was incumbent upon the State Department to investigate these serious allegations yet did nothing about them.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Robert Ross]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #32 and Lee list #30;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Sylvia Schimmel]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Ross as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Ross, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Ross remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, Schimmel, and Tuchser, was able to carry on his activities despite concerns about his loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sylvia Schimmel]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #50 and Lee list #60;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], [[Frances M. Tuchser]] on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Schimmel as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Schimmel, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Schimmel remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Ross, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, Neumann, and Tuchser, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John S. Service]], U.S. State Department;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy of being a security and loyalty risk. Between the years of 1942 and 1945, Service submitted memos to the U.S. State Department supporting the Chinese Communists and Mao and advocated that the U.S. destroy [[Chiang Kai-shek]]. According to Senator McCarthy, &amp;quot;Service was named by the U.S. Ambassador to China as one of the men who was serving the cause of Communism in China. He asked the President to remove Service. He said that this man's actions are not good for the United States, they are good for Russia. While in China, Service, in secret recommendations to the State Department, urged that the Communists were the only hope for China. On June 6, 1945, Service was arrested by the F.B.I. for, &amp;quot;having transmitted, without authority, classified documents to the editors of ''Ameriasia'', a Communist magazine&amp;quot;. Service had in effect turned over to a known Communist, not only State Department documents, but also secret military information. In December of 1951, Service was fired from the U.S. State Department, &amp;quot;as a result of an adverse finding as to his security qualifications by the Loyalty Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2 }}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Klehr, Harvey and Radosh, Ronald&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1996&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism &lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = The University of North Carolina Press &lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-80782-245-0}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harlow Shapley]], U.S. State Department appointee to UNESCO, Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Shapley joined at least six Communist front groups during the period of 1939-1941. By the time McCarthy had presented Shapley's case to the [[Tydings Committee]], Shapley was a member of at least 21 Communist front organizations, eight of them listed on the Attorney General's list. McCarthy's documentation clearly showed that Shapley remained associated with at least ten of these groups even after they were exposed and officially cited as subversive by multiple legislative investigating committees. In March 1949, at the &amp;quot;Waldorf Peace Conference&amp;quot;, Shapley was Chairman of the National Council of Arts, Sciences, and Professions, of which even President Truman denounced as a &amp;quot;tool for Russia and a sounding board for Communist propaganda&amp;quot;. Even so, Secretary of State Dean Achesson appointed Shapley as a representative of the U.S. and the U.S. State Department at UNESCO.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
So, despite even Truman's concerns, the State Department appointed yet another clear security risk. As Buckley states in his book, &amp;quot;...a Rider to the Appropriations Act forbade the paying of funds to a person actively affiliated with any organization on the Attorney General's list. And Shapley, according to the evidence before the Tydings Committee, clearly was such a person.&amp;quot; As usual, the Tydings Committee ignored the facts and only made mention of Shapley's limited association with the State Department. Once again, McCarthy proved his case but was brushed aside by the Tydings Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Herman, Arthur&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-684-83625-4}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = February 20, 1950&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 1973&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William T. Stone]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #46 and Lee list #54;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Accused by McCarthy as a security/loyalty risk, Stone is McCarthy's Case Number 46. As early as 1946, the Bannerman Security Screening Board of the State Department concluded that Stone should be &amp;quot;terminated&amp;quot;, that Stone's &amp;quot;continued presence in the Department is embarrassing...that he be given an opportunity to resign&amp;quot; and failing to do so should result in his forced termination &amp;quot;under Civil Service Rule 3.&amp;quot; The State Department failed to act on this recommendation and Stone continued working in the State Department. Stone was on the Communist controlled editorial board of ''Amerasia'' magazine, recommended fellow ''Amerasia'' members to jobs with the U.S. State Department, informed Venona identifed Communist and espionage operative, [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]] of an adverse security report concerning Silvermaster, was constantly under investigation as a security/loyalty risk, and was eventually given the opportunity to resign, which he did in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Frances M. Tuchser]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #6 and Lee list #6;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just like [[Arpad Erdos]], [[Gertrude Cameron]], [[Nelson Chipchin]], [[John Tipton Fishburn]], [[Stella Gordon]], [[Myron Victor Hunt]], and [[Franz Leopold Neumann]], on August 9, 1951, Senator McCarthy listed Tuchser as being one of the individuals that he had given to the [[Tydings Committee]] a year earlier. McCarthy submitted to the Senate, Tuchser, as yet another example of a clear security risk who was currently in the loyalty-security channels in the State Department. There was no explanation from the State Department as to why Tuchser remained in loyalty-security channels for such a lengthy period of time. In the meantime, Tuchser, like Cameron, Fishburn, Chipchin, Erdos, Gordon, Hunt, and Neumann, was able to carry on her activities despite concerns about her loyalty and security clearance.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = McCarthy&lt;br /&gt;
 | first = Joseph &lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1953&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-87968-308-2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Congressional Record,&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = August 9, 1951&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = Page 9708&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = U. S. Government Printing Office}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Carter Vincent]], U.S. State Department; McCarthy's Case #2 and Lee list #52;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One of McCarthy's numbered cases given to the [[Tydings Committee]]. During his tenure as chief of the Division of Chinese Affairs, Vincent played an important role in hastening Mao's conquest of China. The [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] concluded that &amp;quot;over a period of years, John Carter Vincent was the principal fulcrum of [[Institute of Pacific Relations|IPR]] pressures and influence in the State Department.&amp;quot; [[Louis F. Budenz]] testified in the summer of 1951 that Vincent was a member of the Communist Party. In December 1952, the Civil Service Loyalty Review Board found reasonable doubt regarding Vincent's loyalty. In 1953, [[John Foster Dulles|Secretary Dulles]] requested Vincent's resignation.&lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Zablodowsky]], U.S. State Department &amp;amp; Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. McCarthy's Case #103;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Zablodowsky was McCarthy's Case Number 103. Zablodowsky worked in the State Department and later as Director of the United Nations Publishing Division. He admitted to being a member of an espionage ring in 1936 after [[Whittaker Chambers]], on October 23, 1952, gave testimony before the [[United States Senate Subcommittee on Internal Security|McCarran Committee]] regarding Zablodowsky's activities. &lt;br /&gt;
({{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
 | last = Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent&lt;br /&gt;
 | year = 1954, 1995 Printing&lt;br /&gt;
 | title = McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning&lt;br /&gt;
 | publisher = Regnery Publishing Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 | id = ISBN 0-89526-472-2}})&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Condemnation and the Watkins Committee===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While, over the past few years, Senator McCarthy withstood countless biased and unsubstantiated attacks by [[Liberals]], [[Communists]], etc., the organized effort to remove McCarthy from his Chairmanship and officially condemn him began in the Spring of 1954. It was started by fellow [[Republican]] Senator [[Ralph E. Flanders]] of [[Vermont]] at the behest of a coalition of Communists, Liberals, and [[Eisenhower Administration]] officials. Flanders told the Senate that McCarthy's &amp;quot;anti-Communism so completely parallels that of [[Adolf Hitler]] as to strike fear into the hearts of any defenseless minority&amp;quot;; accused McCarthy of spreading &amp;quot;division and confusion&amp;quot; and saying, &amp;quot;Were the Junior Senator from Wisconsin in the pay of the Communists he could not have done a better job for them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Woods&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Randall Bennett&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Fulbright: A Biography&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1995&lt;br /&gt;
  | pages = pg. 187&lt;br /&gt;
  | id = ISBN 0-521-48262-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Flanders had obtained his list of charges against McCarthy from a left-wing group named the [[National Committee for an Effective Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1954, Flanders introduced a resolution to have McCarthy removed as chair of his committees. Since there was not a majority supporting this resolution, Flanders then introduced a resolution to censure McCarthy. Initially, the resolution was not written with any particular actions or misdeeds on McCarthy's part. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ultimately, McCarthy was accused of 46 different counts of allegedly improper conduct and another special committee was set up, under the chairmanship of Senator [[Arthur Watkins]], to study and evaluate the charges. This was to be the fifth investigation of Senator McCarthy in five years. This committee opened hearings on August 31, 1954. After two months of hearings and deliberations, the Watkins Committee recommended that McCarthy be censured on only two of the original 46 counts. The committee exonerated McCarthy on all substantive charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;44 of the 46 charges were dropped.[http://www.xmission.com/~nccs/newsletter/nov05nl.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 8, 1954, a special session of the Senate convened to debate the two charges. The charges to be debated and voted on were: 1) That Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;failed to cooperate&amp;quot; in 1952 with the Senate Subcommitee on Privileges and Elections that was looking into certain aspects of his private and political life in connection with a resolution for his expulsion from the Senate; and 2) That in conducting a senatorial inquiry, Senator McCarthy had &amp;quot;intemperately abused&amp;quot; General Ralph Zwicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zwicker count was dropped by the full Senate on the grounds that McCarthy's conduct was arguably &amp;quot;induced&amp;quot; by Zwicker's own behavior. Many senators felt that the Army had shown contempt for committee chairman McCarthy by disregarding his letter of February 1, 1954 and honorably discharging Irving Peress the next day. So, for this reason, the Senate concluded that McCarthy's conduct toward Zwicker on February 18th was justified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, the Zwicker count was dropped at the last minute and was replaced with this substitute charge: 2) That Senator McCarthy, by characterizing the Watkins Committee as the &amp;quot;unwitting handmaiden&amp;quot; of the Communist Party and by describing the special Senate session as a &amp;quot;lynch party&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;lynch bee,&amp;quot; had &amp;quot;acted contrary to senatorial ethics and tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute, to obstruct the constitutional processes of the Senate, and to impair its dignity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/60.htm Censure of Senator Joseph McCarthy] (1954) The United States Department of State.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On December 2, 1954, even though more than a dozen senators told McCarthy that they did not want to vote against him but had to do so because of the enormous pressure being put on them by the [[Eisenhower Administration]] and by leaders of both political parties, the Senate voted to &amp;quot;condemn&amp;quot; Senator Joseph McCarthy on both counts by a vote of 67 to 22. The Democrats voted unanimously in favor of condemnation and the Republicans split evenly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Analysis of the resolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resolution condemning Senator McCarthy has been criticized as a ridiculous attempt to silence the strongest voice in the Senate investigating security and loyalty risks in the U.S. government. When examined closely, the two counts used in condemning McCarthy were hopelessly flawed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In analyzing the first count, &amp;quot;failure to cooperate with the Subcommittee on Privileges and Elections&amp;quot;, the fact is that the subcommittee never subpoenaed McCarthy, but only &amp;quot;invited&amp;quot; him to testify. One senator and two staff members resigned from the subcommittee because of its dishonesty towards McCarthy. In its' final report dated January 2, 1953, the subcommittee, stated that the matters under consideration &amp;quot;have become moot by reason of the 1952 election.&amp;quot; Up until this moment in U.S. history, no senator had ever been punished for something that had happened in a previous Congress or for declining an &amp;quot;invitation&amp;quot; to testify. Therefore, the first count was a complete fraud and nothing more than a trumped up charge in order to damage Senator McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second count was even more flawed than the first. McCarthy was condemned for opinions he had expressed outside the Senate when he criticized the Watkins Committee and the special Senate session. In an editorial by David Lawrence in the June 7, 1957 issue of ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report'', other senators had accused McCarthy of lying under oath, accepting influence money, engaging in election fraud, making libelous and false statements, practicing blackmail, doing the work of the communists for them, and engaging in a questionable &amp;quot;personal relationship&amp;quot; with Roy Cohn and David Schine. However, these other Senators were not censured for acting &amp;quot;contrary to senatorial ethics&amp;quot; or for impairing the &amp;quot;dignity&amp;quot; of the Senate. Only Senator McCarthy would be held responsible for his words. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632|''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final years==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:CapitolStepsSenatorMcCarthy.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The flag-draped coffin containing the body of Senator McCarthy is carried up the steps of the U.S. Capitol for funeral services in the Senate chamber after an earlier service at St. Matthew's Cathedral, May 6, 1957. Photograph courtesy of [http://www.apl.org/history/mccarthy/capitol_steps.html ''The Post-Crescent'']]]&lt;br /&gt;
Senator McCarthy's power and clout to continue the search for Communists in positions of power in America was extremely curtailed. After the Republicans lost control of the Senate in 1954, McCarthy, now a member of the minority Party, had to depend on public speeches to continue his campaign of warning the American people to the danger of Communism. He did this in a number of important addresses during those two and a half years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1957, McCarthy and his wife, Jean, adopted a baby girl and named her, Tierney. Unfortunately, several months later, McCarthy died of acute [[hepatitis]] in Bethesda Naval Hospital on May 2, 1957, at the age of 48.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McCarthy was given a state funeral attended by 70 senators. McCarthy was the first senator in 17 years to have funeral services in the Senate chamber. Thousands of people viewed the body in Washington D.C. and it is estimated more than 30,000 people from Wisconsin filed through St. Mary's Church in the senator's hometown of Appleton, Wisconsin, where the clergy performed a Solemn Pontifical Requiem before more than 100 priests and 2,000 others. Three senators, George Malone, William E. Jenner, and Herman Welker, had flown from Washington D.C. to Appleton on the plane carrying McCarthy's casket. [[Robert Kennedy]] attended the funeral in Wisconsin. McCarthy was buried in St. Mary's Parish Cemetery in Appleton and was survived by his wife, Jean, and their adopted daughter, Tierney.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Retrospective views on McCarthy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In her popular book, ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism'', [[Ann Coulter]] said of McCarthy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;A half century later, when the only people who call themselves Communists are harmless cranks, it is difficult to grasp the importance of McCarthy's crusade. But there's a reason 'Communist' now sounds about as threatening as 'monarchist' -- and it's not because of intrepid ''New York Times'' editorials denouncing McCarthy and praising Harvard educated Soviet spies. McCarthy made it a disgrace to be a Communist. Domestic Communism could never recover.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. pg. 33. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Ann Coulter asked [[Fox News]]’ [[Bill O'Reilly]] to identify a McCarthy-tormented innocent, O'Reilly responded with [[Dalton Trumbo]], one of [[House Un-American Activities Committee]]'s (HUAC) “Hollywood Ten”, not realizing [[HUAC]] investigated CPUSA infiltration in Hollywood and called “the Hollywood Ten” of writers, directors and producers to testify in 1947. McCarthy did not start his crusade against Communism until 1950.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In 1953-54, McCarthy had been investigating lax security in the top secret facility at [[Ft. Monmouth]], N.J. He was attacked by [[liberals]] and [[Communists]] on the grounds that there were no security problems at Ft. Monmouth. Years later, in addressing the reason why the U.S. Army's top-secret operations at Fort Monmouth were quietly moved to Arizona, Senator [[Barry Goldwater]], in his 1979 book ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater'', Goldwater stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Carl Hayden, who in January 1955 became chairman of the powerful Appropriations Committee of the United States Senate, told me privately Monmouth had been moved because he and other members of the majority Democratic Party were convinced security at Monmouth had been penetrated. They didn't want to admit that McCarthy was right in his accusations. Their only alternative was to move the installation from New Jersey to a new location in Arizona.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though McCarthy's investigations proved that his suspicions were right, for many years afterwards and continue to this day, liberals have spread the falsehood that McCarthy had found nothing at Fort Monmouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the 1989 release of [[Carl Bernstein]]'s book, ''Loyalties: A Son's Memoir'', Albert Bernstein, Carl's father, expressed dismay at the revelations that the book would make regarding Communist infiltration of the U.S. government and other sectors of American society. Albert Bernstein stated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;You're going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right. ... I'm worried about the kind of book you're going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you're saying he was right. ... I agree that the Party was a force in the country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com. Retrieved on 2007-06-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Albert Bernstein and Sylvia Bernstein, Carl's mother, had both been Communists since the 1940's. Albert Bernstein was a Union activist, while Sylvia Bernstein was a secretary for the War Department in the 1930's and, during the [[Clinton Administration]], volunteered in the White House, answering letters that were addressed to [[Hillary Clinton]]. During the 1950's, Sylvia Bernstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid revealing her party ties to Congress but worked openly in assisting convicted spies [[Julius Rosenberg]] and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed in 1953 for espionage.&lt;br /&gt;
==Venona and Soviet Files==&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the [[KGB]] and [[Comintern]] Archives in [[Moscow]] became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy's undelying premise. In the United States, the [[Moynihan Secrecy Commission]] was empowered by statute to investigate and secure documents from the [[National Security Agency]] and the [[FBI]] which had remained classified for more than 40 years.  The Secrecy Commission's Final Report found that,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But for every accusation there was a denial. ... For all who could agree there were Communists in government, there were as many who saw the Government as contriving fantastic accusations against innocent persons. A balanced history of this period is now beginning to appear; the [[VENONA]] messages will surely supply a great cache of facts to bring the matter to some closure....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix [http://www.gpo.gov/congress/commissions/secrecy/pdf/12hist1.pdf ''The Experience of the Bomb,''] pg. A-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hayden Peake, curator of the [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, &amp;quot;No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peale, Hayden B., [http://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War Production Board]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Board of Economic Warfare]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of War Information]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreign Economic Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advisory Committee of Postwar Foreign Policy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Strategic Services]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of Price Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Institute of Pacific Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amerasia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William Henry Taylor]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Soviet spies in America (1921-1948)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#Brennan, Phil (April 23, 2003). [http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/22/225916.shtml ''The Left’s Lies That Never Die'']. NewsMax.com.&lt;br /&gt;
#Buckley, Jr., William F. and Bozell, L. Brent (1954, 1995 Printing). ''McCarthy &amp;amp; His Enemies, The Record And It's Meaning''. Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0-89526-472-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#Cohn, Roy (1968). ''McCarthy''. The New American Library, Inc. ASIN B000KIR8FC.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1950s/Communist_54.html Communist Control Act of 1954] U.S. Statutes at Large, Public Law 637, Chp. 886, p. 775-780. &lt;br /&gt;
#Coulter, Ann (2004). ''Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism''. Three Rivers Press. ISBN 1-400-05032-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Drummey, James J. (May 11, 1987). [http://www.jbs.org/node/632 ''The Real McCarthy Record'']. The New American.&lt;br /&gt;
#Evans, Medford (1970). ''The Assassination of Joe McCarthy''. Western Islands. ISBN 0-88279-217-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations] (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office.&lt;br /&gt;
#Fox, Jr., John F., FBI Historian, (Presented at the 2005 Symposium on Cryptologic History, Washington, D.C., 10/27/2005). [http://www.fbi.gov/libref/historic/history/foxpaper.htm ''In the Enemy’s House: Venona and the Maturation of American Counterintelligence'']. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
#Goldwater, Barry M. (1979). ''With no apologies: The personal and political memoirs of United States Senator Barry M. Goldwater''. Morrow. ISBN 0-688-03547-7.&lt;br /&gt;
#Haynes, John Earl and Klehr, Harvey (2003). ''In Denial: Historians, Communism, &amp;amp; Espionage''. Encounter Books. ISBN 1-59403-088-X.&lt;br /&gt;
#Herman, Arthur (1999). ''Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator''. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-83625-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#Kazin, Michael (1998). ''The Populist Persuasion: An American History''. Cornell University Press. ISBN 0-801-48558-4.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1961). ''America's Retreat from Victory: The Story of George Catlett Marshall''. American Opinion (Reprint Series). ASIN B0007EKWVQ.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1953). ''Major Speeches and Debates of Senator Joe McCarthy Delivered in the United States Senate, 1950-1951''. U. S. Government Printing Office. ISBN 0-87968-308-2.&lt;br /&gt;
#McCarthy, Joseph (1952). ''McCarthyism: The Fight for America: Documented Answers to Questions Asked by Friend and Foe''. The Devin-Adair Company. ASIN B0007DRBZ2.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/mccarthy/telegram.htm McCarthy to Truman 11 February 1950], telegram.&lt;br /&gt;
#Morgan, T. (Nov./Dec. 2003).  ''Judge Joe:  How the youngest judge in Wisconsin's history became the country's most notorious senator''.  Legal Affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
#[http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/%22Operations_of_the_MGB_Residency_at_New_York%2C_1944-45%22 Operations of the MGB Residency at New York, 1944-45]&lt;br /&gt;
#Reeves, Thomas C. (1997). ''The life and Times of Joe McCarthy: A Biography''. Madison Books. ISBN 1-56833-101-0.&lt;br /&gt;
#Rusher, William A. (1968). ''Special Counsel''. Arlington House. ASIN B0006BUY2M.&lt;br /&gt;
#Utley, Freda (1951). ''The China Story''. Chicago, H. Regnery Co. ASIN B00005VL2B. &lt;br /&gt;
#Wicker, Tom (2006). ''Shooting Star: The Brief Arc of Joe McCarthy''. Harcourt, Inc. ISBN 0-15101-082-X&lt;br /&gt;
#Woods, Randall Bennett (1995). ''Fulbright: A Biography''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-48262-3. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/6315/victory.html America's Retreat From Victory], by Senator Joe McCarthy.&lt;br /&gt;
*{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Transcripts, Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee On Investigations. &lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = (2003). U.S. Government Printing Office&lt;br /&gt;
  | url = http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Venona file]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/mccarthy.htm Joseph McCarthy FBI FOIA File], 4,296 pages.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marquette.edu/library/collections/archives/Mss/JRM/mss-JRM.html Joseph McCarthy Papers, Marquette University Library]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&amp;amp;id=455 McCarthyism: Waging the Cold War in America], by M. Stanton Evans, ''Human Events'', 05/30/1997. Updated 05/08/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/pdf/watt_interview_3.pdf Oral Interview with Ruth Young Watt], Chief Clerk, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 1948-1979. United States Senate Historical Office.  Retrieved from www.senate.gov 24 June 2007.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Scorpio</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>