Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

War

2007-04-03T02:36:30Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}

'''War''' is a conflict, almost always involving killing, between two or more groups of people with differing interests (like religion).

Book of Revelation

2007-04-03T02:35:53Z

Schnee:

The '''Book of Revelation''' (often called '''The Revelation to John''', '''The Apocalypse of John''', or simply '''Revelations''') is the final book of the [[Christian]] [[Bible]] (The [[New Testament]]). It describes the end times and the second coming of [[Jesus Christ]].

The Book of Revelation describes the final rebellion of [[Satan]] (at [[Armageddon]]), the final pwnage of Satan by [[God]], and the return of peace to the world.

===[[Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]]===
Revelation first describes the arrival of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Pestilence, War, Famine, and Death. However, the Bible itself only directly names the fourth horseman, "death".

[[Category:New Testament]]

Pope Benedict XVI

2007-04-03T02:34:24Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}

'''Pope Benedict XVI''' is the current Pope, born Josef Alois Ratzinger. Elected to position on April 19, 2005, he succeeded [[Pope John Paul II]]. He was previously Archbishop of [[Munich]].

He claims [[relativism]]'s denial of objective and [[moral truths]] to be the main problem of [[21st century]] society.

He operated AA flak cannons in WWII

[[Category:Popes|Benedict XVI, Pope]]

Russia

2007-04-03T02:33:02Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}

'''The Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), commonly referred to as "Russia", is the largest of the [[earth]]'s countries and has the sixth largest population. It is known for its cold winters, high radiation level, vodka, 007, chechnya, those badass sukhois and MIGs, chess, IL2 production team, the inability of rescuing hostages and (of course) harsh weather (except if you're a russian). Russia is a [[federal government|federation]], consisting of a number of constituent entities. Nonetheless, the centralized government is relatively strong.

Russia has only been conquered once in the winter, by the famous [[Mongol]] [[Ghengis Khan]]. [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]], [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]] and many other famous military geniuses have tried to conquer it during the winter but all failed. Germany in [[World War I]] did declare peace with Russia in a treaty favorable to the Germans (often considered to be humiliating to Russia) at the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, but did not actually conquer the country.

[[Category:European Countries]]
[[Category:Asian Countries]]
[[Category:Former Soviet Countries]]

Russia

2007-04-03T02:32:42Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}

'''The Russian Federation''' (Russian: Российская Федерация, ''Rossiyskaya Federatsiya''), commonly referred to as "Russia", is the largest of the [[earth]]'s countries and has the sixth largest population. It is known for its cold winters, high radiation level, vodka, 007, chechnya, those badass sukhois and MIGs, chess, IL2 production team, the inability of rescuing hostages and (of course) harsh weather (escept if you're a russian). Russia is a [[federal government|federation]], consisting of a number of constituent entities. Nonetheless, the centralized government is relatively strong.

Russia has only been conquered once in the winter, by the famous [[Mongol]] [[Ghengis Khan]]. [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]], [[Napoleon Bonaparte|Napoleon]] and many other famous military geniuses have tried to conquer it during the winter but all failed. Germany in [[World War I]] did declare peace with Russia in a treaty favorable to the Germans (often considered to be humiliating to Russia) at the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, but did not actually conquer the country.

[[Category:European Countries]]
[[Category:Asian Countries]]
[[Category:Former Soviet Countries]]

Royal Air Force

2007-04-03T02:28:54Z

Schnee:

[[Image:GASJV.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A restored RAF Supermarine Spitfire. This type of aircraft played a major role in World War II (photo copyright Ian Older -- Used with permission)]]
The Royal Air Force (RAF) is the flying branch of the British military. The RAF is most notably known for defending the [[British Isles]] against the German [[Luftwaffe]] during the early stages of [[World War II]]. Of their role in the [[Battle of Britain]], [[Winston Churchill|Churchill]] said:

:PWNED HITLER!

The RAF, in World War II, was also known as "the thin blue line" due to having planes and men thinly spread out all over the British coast to defend against the [[Luftwaffe]]. The RAF was founded on April 1st, 1918, and is still in existence today, with just shy of 1000 aircraft in April of 2006.

[[Category:Military]]

Royal Air Force

2007-04-03T02:27:47Z

Schnee:

[[Image:GASJV.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A restored RAF Supermarine Spitfire. This type of aircraft played a major role in World War II (photo copyright Ian Older -- Used with permission)]]
The Royal Air Force (RAF) is the flying branch of the British military. The RAF is most notably known for defending the [[British Isles]] against the German [[Luftwaffe]] during the early stages of [[World War II]]. Of their role in the [[Battle of Britain]], [[Winston Churchill|Churchill]] said:

:PWNED THEM!

The RAF, in World War II, was also known as "the thin blue line" due to having planes and men thinly spread out all over the British coast to defend against the [[Luftwaffe]]. The RAF was founded on April 1st, 1918, and is still in existence today, with just shy of 1000 aircraft in April of 2006.

[[Category:Military]]

Royal Air Force

2007-04-03T02:27:29Z

Schnee:

[[Image:GASJV.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A restored RAF Supermarine Spitfire. This type of aircraft played a major role in World War II (photo copyright Ian Older -- Used with permission)]]
The Royal Air Force (RAF) is the flying branch of the British military. The RAF is most notably known for defending the [[British Isles]] against the German [[Luftwaffe]] during the early stages of [[World War II]]. Of their role in the [[Battle of Britain]], [[Winston Churchill|Churchill]] said:

:PWNED!

The RAF, in World War II, was also known as "the thin blue line" due to having planes and men thinly spread out all over the British coast to defend against the [[Luftwaffe]]. The RAF was founded on April 1st, 1918, and is still in existence today, with just shy of 1000 aircraft in April of 2006.

[[Category:Military]]

B-2 Spirit

2007-04-03T02:25:03Z

Schnee:

[[Image:Stealth-bomber.jpg|300px|thumb|right|B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber dropping bombs on Bagdad]]
The B-2 Spirit ("Stealth bomber") is an advanced, [[stealth]] aircraft developed by [[Lockheed Martin]].

It's radar signature is almost as small most conservapedia articles, and no, it's not on of the four horsemen.

[[Category:Airplanes]]

Bomb

2007-04-03T02:23:06Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}A '''bomb''' is an explosive weapon used primarily in [[War|warfare]].

This article is complete trash, since mines, rockets, grenades and satchel charges are also explosive weapons used primarily in war

Talk:M3A1 Grease Gun Submachine Gun

2007-04-03T02:19:31Z

Schnee: New page: Gotta love how conservapedia has articles on random WWII guns

Gotta love how conservapedia has articles on random WWII guns

Talk:Manfred von Richthofen

2007-04-03T02:18:16Z

Schnee: New page: This article is an insult to the red baron

This article is an insult to the red baron

Manfred von Richthofen

2007-04-03T02:17:14Z

Schnee:

'''Manfred von Richthofen''' (1892-1918) was a German ace fighter pilot in [[World War I]]. He was also called the "[[Red Baron]]," the "Bloody Red Baron," the "Jolly Red Baron," the "Red Falcon," the "Red Devil," and "Le Diable Rouge."<ref>http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0151771723&id=XB0HAAAAMAAJ&q=%22bloody+red+baron%22&dq=%22bloody+red+baron%22&pgis=1</ref> He flew a bright red [[Fokker]] Albatross airplane, and is credited with over 80 "kills", the number of enemy aircraft shot down, and 127 personnel killed. During the last year of his life, he was not mentaly healthy. He suffered a some brain damage from a minor crash. He was not as smart as he used to be breaking many of the rules of flying. He flew into enemy territory and was KIA in 1918 ending his famous high flying career.

[[Image:redbaron.jpg]]

==In Popular Culture==

[[James Thurber]] wrote a famous story entitled ''The Secret Life of Walter Mitty,'' in which a mild-mannered man has heroic daydreams while running shopping errands for his wife. In one of them, he imagines himself a World War I pilot in the RAF fighting Von Richthofen's Flying Circus.

In [[Charles M. Schulz]]'s Peanuts cartoons, the beagle Snoopy, in a reference to Walter Mitty, is constantly daydreaming of being a World War I flying ace and fighting the Red Baron.

Then, in 1966, The Royal Guardsmen recorded a hit song entitled "Snoopy Vs. The Red Baron" which retells Schulz's story in song lyric form:

[[Image:snoppy.jpg]]

  Now, Snoopy had sworn that he'd get that man 
  So he asked the Great Pumpkin for a new battle plan 
  He challenged the German to a real dogfight 
  While the Baron was laughing, he got him in his sight.... 

*A videogame was made based on the song

F-22 Raptor

2007-04-03T02:15:57Z

Schnee:

[[Image:F-22_raptor.jpg|right|300px|thumb|F-22 Raptor]]
The F-22 Raptor is a stealth fighter produced by Lockheed Martin. It is capable of air-to-air combat, ground attack, electronic warfare and signals detection (just like every other f***ing multirole plane). It was originally developed to counter advances in technology in aircraft developed by the [[Soviet Union]]. The Raptor has two afterburning engines with [[Thrust Vectoring|thrust vectoring]]* capabilities. The craft has an internal armament bay which holds air-to-air missiles and can carry various small bombs internally or on hard-point attachments.

*It's funny of how the guy tought there would be an article aout TVC in conservapedia!

[[Category:Airplanes]]

Vietnam

2007-04-03T02:12:38Z

Schnee:

Vietnam is a [[Communist]] nation in Southeast Asia bordering [[China]], [[Cambodia]], [[Laos]], and the [[Pacific Ocean]]. Much of Vietnam is mountaineous or covered in jungle. In the 20th century Vietnam was the site of guerilla fighting during World War Two in the 1940s, a war against the French for independance in the 1950s, and a civil war between the US backed South Vietnam and the Red China/USSR backed North Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s. After American forces withdrew in 1975 the entire country fell to communism and the '''butcherous''' [[Khmer Rouge]] in nearby Cambodia was emboldened. The wide-spread use by the US Air Force of concentrated herbicides, especially the dioxin-contaminated Agent Orange, has been criticized for its long-lasting consequences on the environment. According to the Vietnamese government, it led to an important increase in birth defects. Oh, i forgot, the use of Agent Orange was not as critiscized as '''napalm''', '''carpet bombing''', '''arch fires''' (if you know what is that), '''war crimes''', '''civillian killing''' and heavy losses from both sides

Vietnam

2007-04-03T02:10:17Z

Schnee:

Talk:Stealth technology

2007-04-03T02:08:21Z

Schnee:

RUSSIA IS DEVELOPPING A BETTER STEALTH THAN USA ON THE MIG LFI!! PLASMA STEALTH! (see article on wiki, there's nothing here)
But to put it simple: it doesn't need to be unstable as f**k, because it doesn't need all those shapes

Talk:Stealth technology

2007-04-03T02:07:27Z

Schnee: New page: RUSSIA IS DEVELOPPING A BETTER STEALTH THAN USA ON THE MIG LFI!! PLASMA STEALTH! (see article on wiki, there's nothing here)

RUSSIA IS DEVELOPPING A BETTER STEALTH THAN USA ON THE MIG LFI!! PLASMA STEALTH! (see article on wiki, there's nothing here)

Stealth technology

2007-04-03T02:04:26Z

Schnee:

Stealth technology makes an aircraft difficult or impossible to detect by radar or other electronic detection systems. American engineers developed this new technology in the 1970s and several types of aircraft have been constructed using it. This minimizes the ability of enemies to shoot down our '''(OUR? wtf? russia is also developing stealth!)''' aircraft and capture or kill our pilots.

Stealth technology makes use of the following approaches:

:reduction in radar cross-section (RCS) through clever shapes, anti-radar electronic signalling, radar-absorbing paint and non-metallic materials

:reduced visibility

:reducted acoustics

:hidden engines

:reduced radiofrequency (RF) emissions

:praying for everything to work right (has not worked on the F-22).

F-22 Raptor

2007-04-03T01:57:07Z

Schnee:

[[Image:F-22_raptor.jpg|right|300px|thumb|F-22 Raptor]]
The F-22 Raptor is a stealth fighter produced by Lockheed Martin. It is capable of air-to-air combat, ground attack, electronic warfare and signals detection. It was originally developed to counter advances in technology in aircraft developed by the [[Soviet Union]]. The Raptor has two afterburning engines with [[Thrust Vectoring|thrust vectoring]]* capabilities. The craft has an internal armament bay which holds air-to-air missiles and can carry various small bombs internally or on hard-point attachments.

*It's funny of how the guy tought there would be an article aout TVC in conservapedia!

[[Category:Airplanes]]

B-2 Spirit

2007-04-03T01:56:03Z

Schnee:

[[Image:Stealth-bomber.jpg|300px|thumb|right|B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber beating the shit out of Bagdad]]
The B-2 Spirit ("Stealth bomber") is an advanced, [[stealth]] aircraft developed by [[Lockheed Martin]].

It's radar signature is almost as small as this article, and no, it's not on of the four horsemen.

[[Category:Airplanes]]

B-2 Spirit

2007-04-03T01:54:13Z

Schnee:

[[Image:Stealth-bomber.jpg|300px|thumb|right|B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber]]
The B-2 Spirit ("Stealth bomber") is an advanced, [[stealth]] aircraft developed by [[Lockheed Martin]]. It's radar signature is almost as small as this article, and no, it's not on of the four horsemen.

[[Category:Airplanes]]

Talk:F-22 Raptor

2007-04-03T01:53:09Z

Schnee:

THe F-22 can't have external hard points, you conservationist...

Talk:F-22 Raptor

2007-04-03T01:52:56Z

Schnee: New page: THe F-22 can't have external hard points...

THe F-22 can't have external hard points...

South Park

2007-04-03T01:51:53Z

Schnee:

'''South Park''' is an animated cartoon series that is controversial due to its use of vulgar and obscene language, biting humor, and mockery of religion and other respected institutions. Shows have mocked [[Catholic|Catholicism]], [[Islam]], [[Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints|Mormonism]], [[Judaism]], [[Scientology]], and made jokes about [[Jesus]], [[Moses]], [[Mohammed]] and other religious leaders. Its creators decribe themselves as "equal opportunity offenders" and some shows have made fun of liberal causes, particularly environmentalism. '''It also has mocked conservatonism, be neutral!'''

Of the 1999 ''South Park'' movie, movie reviewer [[Roger Ebert]] said "The film is rated R instead of NC-17 only because it's a cartoon, I suspect; even so, the MPAA has a lot of 'splaining to do," meaning presumably that Ebert believes it should have been rated NC-17. "Waves of four-letter words roll out over the audience," he says.

A frequent criticism of South Park is that it indulges in shock for shock's sake. Ebert says of the film, "All it lacks is a point to its message. What is it saying? That movies have gone too far, or that protests against movies have gone too far? It is a sign of our times that I cannot tell. Perhaps it's simply anarchistic, and feels that if it throws enough shocking material at the wall, some of it will stick. A lot of the movie offended me." However, he acknowledges, "I laughed. I did not always feel proud of myself while I was laughing, however.... No target is too low, no attitude too mean or hurtful, no image too unthinkable."<ref>[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19990630/REVIEWS/906300301/1023]</ref>

However, South Park has been praised for its often blunt viewpoints on many political, moral, and social issues of the day.

==References==

<references/>

[[Category:Broadcasting]]

Debate:Does Darwinian natural selection suggest that bigotry is a necessary self-defense mechanism?

2007-04-03T01:41:17Z

Schnee:

And how would it do this again? [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]]) 10:31, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

I was thinking the same thing. Honestly, bigotry and racism are pretty much the antithesis of Darwinian evolution, for many reasons. Requirement of genetic diversity, adaption to environments, etc. People who actually state this haven't an idea of Darwinism.
::Actully, xenophobes are much more likely to survive in nature.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 08:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

'''excuse me?''' We are sentient enough to be racist, it does'nt depend on evolution

Debate:Should the United States intervene in small countries to defeat communism there?

2007-04-03T01:38:00Z

Schnee:

{{debate}}

Definitely; we're the only world power, after all; it's our job to go in and stop communism there. If we don't, it'll only come here! [[User:CraigK|CraigK]] 22:37, 7 March 2007 (EST)

How can the US claim to be in favour of democracy if they intervene if they try to overthrow democratically elected communist governments?

Don't worry CraigK, you're lucky enough to live in a democracy - communists won't be winning any elections in the US in our lifetimes

We have a limited amount of political capital worldwide at this point in time, and right now, I think it's more prudent for us to concentrate on stopping terrorism and protecting Israel. This is unfortunate because of the trend toward liberalization of Latin America. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 01:25, 8 March 2007 (EST)

Just how many small countries are really communist anymore? Cuba and Vietnam seem the only candidates, and since the current regimes in both of those countries appear honestly popular an American intervention could become dangerous. --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 22:35, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Communism isn't some sort of virus. It will not spread to us. We (as in the US) have no reason to defeat communism. It's an ideology, and when it fails, something else will come along. If someone came into your household and murdered your family, and then tell you to believe in communism, you just won't. Leave it alone, and it'll die out on it's own. --[[User:Cpryd001|Cpryd001]] 19:21, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

This debate is highly reminiscent of 1967. Communism, obviously, is no longer expanding because it failed as a realistic ideology. That's that. US military intervention did not stop Communism; Communism was efficient enough at doing that.

If there's a movement or rebellion in a Communist country, ''if they ask us to help'' and if they haven't employed detestable practices like, say, suicide bombings, then, by all means, we should help. Not many groups meet those criteria, however... [[User:Navy Nuke|Navy Nuke]] 15:52, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

What makes the U.S. so special that provides it the justification to impose its preferences on others? --[[User:Huey gunna getcha|Huey gunna getcha]] 15:56, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

Why do you want to defeat communism? Communism defeats itself. --[[User:Order|Order]]

Cough* VIETNAM Cough*

You guys... What is this all about? Perhaps we should have a debate about whether American citizens should be allowed outside of their own borders to impose their will upon others. I am not a communist, far from it, but I also don't feel the need to impose my idea of 'the truth' on anyone else. There are many peoples in the world that fear that America and its aggressive policies - are the American people proud of that? Well yes, many of them are. --[[User:Greenman|Greenman]]

Ah these are all ridiculous comments firstly none of you have any understanding of the structural theory behind communism, secondly you are all mini hitlers (except Greenman). Maybe you should just understand that many of the worlds nations are becoming more socialist than you realsie- many in South Ameica, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba, Angola, France, Scandenavia, a portion of Africa the list goes on. Perhaps, The USA should keep to itself since and not inflict its own idealogy on others- I always thought that you fought a war with Britain for doing it to you, but hey if you wanna be hippocrits then go ahead, by the way the bible, Koran and Torah all say hippocrisy is a sin. ----[[User:Karl Marx|Karl Marx]] 04:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT) Karl Marx

My answer to the question: no. Why? Communism is an ideology and ideas do nothing to others without action. If said ideology was to inspire wars and such, then intervention could be condoned. --[[User:Kirby|Kirby]] 23:35, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

No. It caused slaughter in El Salvador, Nicaruagua, Chile, Guatemala, etc. We forced the Russians out of Afghanistan and let the Taliban in. We could easily knock out Castro, but would it be worth it? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 18:53, 27 March 2007 (EDT)

TO HAVE ANOTHER VIETNAM? NOW '''THAT'S''' CHRISTIAN!

Big Bang theory

2007-04-03T01:36:37Z

Schnee:

{{stub}}
The '''Big Bang Theory''' models the Universe as expanding outwards from a very hot, dense state approximately 14 billion years ago. It was first proposed by [[Georges-Henri Lemaitre]] and evidence for the expansion was observed by [[Edwin Hubble]]<ref>Hubble, E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 168-173.</ref>. Later [[George Gamow]] predicted that the Big Bang would leave an observable microwave background radiation. This radiation was subsequently discovered by [[Bell Labs]] and found to be close to that predicted by Gamow (Gamow predicted a background radiation level equivalent to a roughly 3 K black body object, and the observed level is that of a 2.725 K body).

Observations of distant supernovae indicate that the Universe is actually undergoing accelerated expansion<ref>Riess, A. G., et al. The Astronomical Journal, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp. 1009-1038.</ref><ref>Perlmutter, S., et al. The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 517, Issue 2, pp. 565-586.</ref>. Modern galaxy surveys[https://www.sdss.org/dr5]<ref>Tegmark, M., et al. Physical Review D, vol. 74, Issue 12.</ref> and recent observations of the microwave background[http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/]<ref>See, for example, http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603449</ref> have corroborated these claims.

==Creationist and Theistic Evolutionary Views==
[[Young Earth Creationism|Young earth creationist]] scientists hotly contest the Big Bang Theory. They trace lineages in the Bible to estimate the age of the Earth to be around 6,000 years. (but there are objects that are older than 6000 years, proved because of carbon 14 tests)

In contrast to young earth creationists, [[Old Earth Creationists|Old Earth Creationists]] and [[Theistic Evolution|Theistic evolutionists]] agree that the Big Bang occured.[http://www.reasons.org/resources/fff/2000issue03/]. Some Old Earth Creationists and Theistic Evolutionist argue that the Big Bang is in fact mentioned in the Bible. [http://www.reasons.org/resources/fff/2000issue03/index.shtml#big_bang_the_bible_taught_it_first] However, the Bible makes no mention of the "Big Bang". While the universe has been observed to be expanding, this need not be used as evidence of a Big Bang, because the Bible states in Jeremiah that God "stretched out the heavens".

==References==
<references/>

[[Category:Astronomy]]
[[Category:Naturalism]]