Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:Howard Stern

2008-01-28T17:29:37Z

Ronpaulican:

Look, CoulterMan, maybe then you can explain to me why its relevant to Stern's politics that he had Moore on at one point? Or why in a discussion about Stern's politics its necessary to describe Stem-Cell research as basically Murder? Its editorializing where none is necessary. Thats why I keep cutting it out, can you tell us why you keep putting it in? Theres no descriptive paragraph explaining what Satellite Radio is when thats mentioned, and no paragraph describing Boston University when its mentioned, so why hold up Stern's political section with an inflammatory description of stem cells? Plus, having Moore on his show is irrelevant to Stern's political views since he has alot of people on. He's had Drew Carey on and He's a registered republican, so what the hell's the point of mentioning just one guest? And to say that he "even" had Moore on, as though that crosses some kind of line, where is the sense in this? Explain yourself.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 19:21, 2 April 2007 (EDT)

== "that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" ==

The passage "that involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" has been removed with [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&curid=7381&diff=82511&oldid=82490 this edit] (which is marked as minor - but isn't). Does anyone have anything to back this up either way? The removal of this phrase significantly changes what is said when it comes to stem cell research. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:15, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*Listen to his show! That's what he supports! -- [[User:CoulterMan|CoulterMan]] 08:43, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
:Nobody's challenging that that he supports embryonic stem cell research, but unless stern himself has said, directly, that he supports embryo-killing, then its not necessary to say it. Unless you can say "Stern has said that he supports 'the killing and cloning of human embryos'" as a direct quote from him then its completely unnecessary to describe it in imflammatory language just for your own petty need to frame the debate however you like. Grow up about this, and realize that nobody in fact wants to hear you editorialize, especially when it takes the article away from its subject matter (Stern) into where you want to go just to vent (Moore and Stem Cells, frinstance).

::This is a touchy issue for those who believes that embryos are human. Please be sensitive to your fellow contributors. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 15:48, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

::I try to be. However I dont see editorializing about Michael Moore and opinions on Stem Cells in an entry on Howard Stern actually contributes anything. To say embryonic stem cell research "involves the killing and cloning of human embryos" is as it may be and is perhaps an acceptable (if loaded) opinion in a discussion on stem cells. It is not appropriate to a discussion on Howard Stern to detail what this one person thinks about this particular field of medical research. If it is, then at what point can you stop it at all? Why not have the article on Howard Stern just outright hijacked by a debate then?
::"Stern is in favor of embryonic stem cell research which involves the killing and cloning of human embryos, but is seen by many as a necessary and vital step in medical research with the potential to save untold numbers of lives, although that salvation surely comes at a moral cost given the nature of the research, however some would argue that it is morally permissable to terminate the life of non-sentient cellular clusters to save a human, but how can you say that they're only cellular clusters when you're very clearly committing homicide on infants, but they're not really infants they havent even developed a nervous system, but they have a soul, and if they're not baptised then they'll burn in hell for the sake of your medical research, and is that what you want? Is it?!
::Stern also considers Ralph Nader to be a personal hero."
::Its unnecessary editorializing to describe, in loaded, opinionated language, what Stem Cell research is in an obvious attempt to attack the man in an already loaded article ("attempts at humor" in the opening sentence lets us know outright what the opinion being put forth is, so much for non-biased) as is saying "Stern even had Michael Moore on his show once! Can you believe that? Can you!? HUH!?!?" and saying that one particular episode with extraordinarily offensive content is "Typical." Its loaded language, its unnecessary, and it has no place whatsoever in any place that pretends to take itself seriously.
::Funny thing how I'm always having to explain myself and what I do and still watch it undone. Not surprising of course given the nature of this site, just funny. "An encyclopedia you can trust" indeed.
::--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 16:15, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

:::There is much stem cell research that is done without going to human cell lines at all. Furthermore, look at the HeLa line (not a stem cell, but an example of a cell line). One can also obtain stem cells from umbilical chords and there is work being done to isolate stem cells from adults. These are all approaches that are not in conflict with Howard Stern's stance on stem cell research. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 15:56, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

::::I probably should read this entire thread, but I stopped when I read Rex's point about article hijacking. Would you both agree to moving this discussion to [[Talk:stem cell]]s? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:41, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Better yet, [[Stem cell research]]'s talk page: [[Talk:Stem cell research]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 14:43, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

:Thank you, yes, that was my point from the outset, that an article on Howard Stern is not the place to exposit personal commentary on a seperate issue, and that its enough to say Stern supports the research.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 15:06, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

==Plagarism?==

This article is largely an unsourced lift from [http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Howard_Stern here]. I thought we weren't supposed to copy from other sources. [[User:Matthew1036|Matthew1036]] 20:44, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
:Blanked pending clarification. Would you mind checking exactly how much of it is a copyright violation? The old version of the page can be found in the page history. --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 20:47, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
::The entire "biography" section is a direct lift from the other page, as is the paragraph in the politics section discussing Franken's book. The Overview, the remainder of the Politics section, and the trivia section appear to be original. [[User:Matthew1036|Matthew1036]] 01:43, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
:::I'd say gut it guys except for the things that aren't directly lifted. We can add in other brief biographical information. Quite frankly Howard Stern probably doesn't warrant an extensive article anyway. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 10:48, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

==Stern and liberalism==
Ster can't really be considered either liberal or conservative, let's not throw "liberal" as a random slur. [[User:Ronpaulican|Ronpaulican]] 12:29, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Racism

2008-01-28T17:20:59Z

Ronpaulican:

'''Racism''' is [[prejudice]] and [[discrimination]] based on [[race]].
An example is a claim that of inferiority or superiority based on the color of one's skin. Another example was the [[Jim Crow]] laws. Reverse racism, discrimination against the majority, is manifested through [[affirmative action]].

Racism has come to mean the hatred of another person because of the color of his or her skin, or perceived difference in origin. The doctrine of [[substantive due process]] in United States constitutional law can be used to invalidate racist laws. Alternately, the [[Equal Protection|equal protection]] clause of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] can be used to do the same. ''See e.g.'' [[Brown v. Board of Education]], 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
[[category:psychology]]

==Opposition to racism==
[[Laird Wilcox]] wrote:
*There is a [[humanist]] anti-racism that focuses on [[reconciliation]] and [[healing]], that works to bring people together, that functions openly and honestly without the use of [[dossier]]s, [[spies]], specious [[lawsuit]]s, [[disinformation]], and that recognizes the [[right]]s of individuals whether they agree with one another or not. This is the anti-racism of good neighbors, of people helping people, of community goodwill, and of the realization that we are all [[human being]]s. ... On the other hand there is a vindictive and corrupt anti-racism that focuses on paybacks and [[punishment]], that demonizes and degrades its critics, that attempts to carve out [[special rights]] for its constituency, that opposes free and open discussion of ideas, that attempts to silence, [[censor]] and stifle its opposition through intimidation and harassment, and encourages [[law enforcement]] scrutiny of opponents because of their alleged [[values]], opinions and beliefs.<ref>''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist "Watchdog" Groups'', Laird Wilcox, Editorial Research Service, 1999, pg. 3. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.</ref>

==References==
<references/>

Talk:Holocaust denial

2008-01-28T17:11:13Z

Ronpaulican:

==Wikipedia==

While I disagree on the way Wikipedia words this, I think it's slightly misleading to call their reporting of the fact that people do, in fact, deny the Holocaust, an endorsement. A few people do not believe in the Holocaust, and this is a fact, regardless of the validity of this belief. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 16:24, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
:Well, I've raised this issue in several forums with Wikipedia; and given the way the term "Holocaust denier" is so lightly thrown around in Wikipdia (it is Chip Berlet calling Danial Brandt a Holocaust denier, and Wikipedia's refusal to take it down, that is the root cause of all the problems WP has had with Brandt), it's not surprising this pejoritive has boomeranged home once again. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:31, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

:OK, so the stuff about Wikipedia's abuse of the term gives undue weight right now; I do intend to bring it back, however, as the article expands. And there are other issues regarding Wikipedia & Holocaust denial that also need sun light. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:11, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

How is holocaust denial different from denying that slavery ever existed in the United States, because it doesn't exist now?

I find this article offensive. I am a holocaust denier myself. [[User:Hamtandrus|Hamtandrus]] 18:11, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Then please crawl back under your rock.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 00:34, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

*People deny Jesus Christ as the true son of God. That does not alter the fact he is. Denial of the Holocaust is another bit of selective fiction a small number of people seem to embrace. They are prayed for. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] [[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]] 21:22, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

==revisionists.com==
* http://www.revisionists.com/ lists at least three historians, AJP Taylor, John Toland, and Anthony Kubek to Holocaust denial. This is a highly questionable defamatory smear. This link has been removed. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:55, 19 April 2007 (EDT)

== David Irving ==
The British right-wing historian David Irving was gaoled for three years in Austria in 2006 for holocaust denial. Link:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4733820.stm

A good heneral link on denial:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/denial.html

== Holocaust Denial in Japan ==

Unfortunately, Holocaust denial in Japan is tied to the Conservatives of that country. The Shukanshi and in particular the Shukan Bunshun is regarded as conservative, not liberal. It is in keeping with the overall Japanese conservative basic denial of responsibility and revisionist attitude towards Japanese actions during WWII. I suppose it is hard to fully accept that they were such close allies of the Nazis and participated,however indirectly,in one of the greatest tragedies in modern history. [[User:Tordenvaer:Tordenvaer|Tordenvaer:Tordenvaer]] 14:27, 16 January 2008 (EDT)

==Anti-HD bias==
Unfortunately for all of us conservatives, we have to face the facts and relaize that Holocaust deniers are almost all conservative. We need to appeal to all conservatives here, even crazy ones. [[User:Ohwhatarelief|Ohwhatarelief]] 17:23, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:HDers play loose and fast with the truth, which is a liberal trait, not a conservative one.[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:24, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::I think we should end this fight between cons in which soem conservatives call others "liberals". I've been on racist sites that claim Mike Huckabee is not a conservative but simply a "nutcase religious zealot". You people are as bad as they are. [[User:Ohwhatarelief|Ohwhatarelief]] 17:26, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::"you people"?[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:27, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::::WTF? "You people"=Conservapedians. If someone is pro-life, anti-gay, anti-gun control, anti-drugs, etc., but also deny the Holocaust, are they liberal or conservative? [[User:Ohwhatarelief|Ohwhatarelief]] 17:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::If someone denies the holocaust, they're not liberal or conservative. They're just wrong. Flat-out. Please do not use phrases like "WTF" here.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 17:30, 27 January 2008 (EST)

::::::So denying the Holocaust means you lose any political affiliation? Well, you aren't consevrative or liberal either, you're just retarded. [[User:Ohwhatarelief|Ohwhatarelief]] 17:32, 27 January 2008 (EST)

:::::I'm not sure what your point is. Holocaust denial is evil, and not conservative. It's its own thing. Fascism is not conservatism, it's atheism run amok. [[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:32, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::He's gone anyways; at least for a month...-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 17:34, 27 January 2008 (EST)

==Which do you prefer?==
Liberals or Holocaust deniers? Take your pick. [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:36, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:False dichotomy[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:37, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::This is '''''really''''' reminding me of the old Fred Phelps thing. [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:38, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::Fred Phelps does not behave like a true Christian. He acts out of hate instead of love. We are supposed to hate the sin, not the sinner...he hates both.[[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:40, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::::I don't like Fred Phelps, but he is anything but a liberal. I don't want to argue that though. Holocaust denial doesn't make one liberal-misguided, but not liberal, and jailing people for it is just wrong. [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:41, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::I have to be honest, this whole talking about holocaust denial makes me uncomfortable. I don't think we need to say which ideology HD is typical of; we can just say that, regardless, it's evil. Same with Phelps. Period.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 17:42, 27 January 2008 (EST)

::::::Fine, as long as you admit putting people in prison for it si evil too. [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:43, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::The United States rarely jails people for speech acts. Read up on the [[First Amendment]].-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 17:45, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::I agree that free speech allows these evil people...but that doesn't free them from Ultimate Judgment. [[User:RobertK|RobertK]] 17:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::::Germany jails people like Ernst Zundel for Holocaust denial. Now enough witht he edit coflicts! [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:47, 27 January 2008 (EST)

==Holocaust deneirs as "evil people"==
You claim that you consider liberals to be "misguided" while liberals consider conservatives "evil". You must hate Holcoaust dneiers most of all since you callo them "evil". [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:50, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:Judgment is reserved for God, but those who would deny and mock the deaths of six million humans do not support the [[culture of life]] upon which [[Christianity]] is based; I do think they are some of the worst transgressors. Yes.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 17:56, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::They aren't laughing at the deaths of six million people, they are denying they ever happened. So no, you're wrong. Besides, it was eleven million people. [[User:Paleocon4freedom|Paleocon4freedom]] 17:57, 27 January 2008 (EST)

==Discussion==
I tried to remove the above discussion because of its disgusting reference to Holocaust Deniers as evil people. What is your basis for this-dare I say it-EVIL claim? [[User:Ronpaulican|Ronpaulican]] 12:11, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Talk:Holocaust denial

2008-01-28T17:03:49Z

Ronpaulican: remove awful discussion, full of slurs like "evil people" which are untrue

Negro

2008-01-28T17:01:56Z

Ronpaulican:

'''Negro''' (pronounced '''ne-gro''') is the [[Spanish]] word for [[black]]. Also a [[politically incorrect]] term for black people.

[[Category: Spanish-English Translations]]

User talk:DanH

2008-01-28T16:59:29Z

Ronpaulican:

[[Image:Banhammer2.jpg|thumb|600px|left|'''DanH''' is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted '''Banhammer''' barnstar for tireless vigilance against fascists, liberals, vandals & trolls.]]

'''Archives:'''

[[User talk:MountainDew]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive2]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive3]]

==Blocked User NW==

Sorry about that, I didn't know he was blocked yet. [[User:Lukecorlando|Lukecorlando]] 23:21, 21 October 2007 (EDT)

==Evidence of evolution==
What's with the moving my friend? It's intended to be an encyclopedic article about the subject, not an personal essay of some sort. [[User:Honestyandtruth|Honestyandtruth]] 00:00, 27 October 2007 (EDT)

== I have sent you an important email about communists and the gay conspiracy! ==

I sent one also to Rob. --[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]] 01:11, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

== Funny ==

I enjoyed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:ChavezFan&diff=324719&oldid=324649 this], and thought I'd let you know. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 16:09, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

==Endorse block==
I endorse to block on [[User:Maestro]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Maestro contribs]; we may have to review all these edits and consider other actions. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:32, 4 November 2007 (EST)

Hey, thanks for unblocking me. Never thought I'd say this to a Jayhawker, but you're okay. After that whupping your football team dished out last week, you might even get this Mizzou grad to cheer for KU. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 23:50, 6 November 2007 (EST)

Anything to keep my mind of the Rams. Jeez...BTW, any chance on getting my user page unblocked when my probation expires? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 08:55, 8 November 2007 (EST)

:If he is on probation he should have the opportunity to prove his quality having his talk page open to work. Is it truth? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 15:37, 8 November 2007 (EST)

*Joaquin, whenever any editor is restored, their pages should be unlocked and/or re-created. If that does not happen, it is usually just a mistake. --[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]] 10:08, 9 November 2007 (EST)

== Wes Clarke. ==

My bad on the spelling. Sorry. [[User:Dewey|Dewey]] 21:50, 4 November 2007 (EST)

==[[User:Oi]]==

What, no warning? I thought you took the pledge. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 17:46, 7 November 2007 (EST)

:All the pledge says is I won't block for no reason. :) Also, I think "Oi" is a term associated with skinhead culture. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:47, 7 November 2007 (EST)

::Jolly good. And here's an early Christmas present for you: [[Image:Dewtree.jpg|right|thumb|For Christmas time]] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 18:00, 7 November 2007 (EST)

Thank you! That should last me through the season. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:06, 7 November 2007 (EST)

*Ed is like Father Christmas! How magical...a tree made from Mountain Dew cans! :P --[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]] 18:18, 7 November 2007 (EST)
==Contest==
Hey Dan! So one of the first questions for our team is what our team name should be. If you have any ideas just get word out to TK, thanks! (Oh, and remember: we're using a Machiavellian policy towards this contest, we must win - no matter what. lol, good luck!)--[[User:Iduan|I]][[User_talk:Iduan|Duan]]23:59, 9 November 2007 (EST)

==Vandal==

Block this vandal please, thanks. [[User:Lukecorlando|Luke]]

== Go, go, go ==

42 +++++++++++++++++ a lot more... gooooooooo --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 01:29, 13 November 2007 (EST)

== Unblock Article ==

Hi Dan, could you please unblock [[Fascism]]? Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:53, 13 November 2007 (EST)

== Kentucky ==

Hi, Dan, I just wanted to leave you a note about your edit to [[Kentucky]]. While Governor Fletcher lost the recent election, he still is governor. I have re-listed him as such, as his term does not end until next month. Thanks, [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

:That sounds accurate. We just have to remember to change it on December 11! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

::Will do! [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 21:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

:::Just thought I'd remind you of the Governor's expiration of term tomorrow, as I do not expect to be on Conservapedia much in the coming weeks. [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 20:25, 10 December 2007 (EST)

== See also ==

I am sorry, but I '''do not''' agree in what you are doing in Salma and Elvis. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 16:24, 19 November 2007 (EST)

:Thank you for your reply. Salmas' links were discussed with TK at it's time. Elvis' are quite related as they send you to rock music. But, if you think it is better to change them let me know and I will find some ones more appropriated. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:59, 20 November 2007 (EST)

:*Joaquín, the issue was discussed with Mr.Schlafly, and the "See Also" should be as specific as possible. I think you would agree that "Rock Music" is breathtakingly broad, eh? Perhaps you could make sure they are more specific? Thank you for your patience, my friend! --[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]][[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]] 11:22, 20 November 2007 (EST)

::OK. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 18:33, 20 November 2007 (EST)

==Westboro Baptist Church==
Dan, Do you mind if we unlock [[Westboro Baptist Church]] to allow for adding some content? Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 12:46, 24 November 2007 (EST)

:Fine with me! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 12:48, 24 November 2007 (EST)

==MU vs. KU==

That's gotta hurt. Were you there? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 02:01, 25 November 2007 (EST)

:Yep. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:14, 25 November 2007 (EST)

== MASS REMOVAL??? ==

Where exactly did I "mass remove" information as you allege on my page? All I have done has been to copyedit and work on clarity and presentation. [[User:PaulH|PaulH]] 00:27, 28 November 2007 (EST)

Check the edit history - that was someone else - the paragraph in question was not there when I edited. [[User:PaulH|PaulH]] 00:29, 28 November 2007 (EST)

== Page Move ==

Dan, could you please move [[Meningoenephalitis]] to [[Meningoencephalitis]]? The reference used to find the definition has a mispelling (it's missing a "c"). Thanks [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:41, 9 December 2007 (EST)
:Thanks. BTW your recent block comment was hilarious. Chuck Norris can slam a revolving door, you know. And divide by 0. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:51, 9 December 2007 (EST)

==Vandal Pages==
Howdy--You might want to boot these: http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Hamidp--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 21:12, 12 December 2007 (EST)
:Done. Thanks. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 21:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)

== Superb blocks ==

Superb blocks, Dan! The break will arrive soon. :-) --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:03, 13 December 2007 (EST)

== Protect ==

Hi Dan, can you protect [[genocide]] until a concensus can be reached? Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:05, 13 December 2007 (EST)

==Genocide==

This seems a fairly straightforward issue to me. I have seen no definition of genocide outside of this site's article that requires that genocide be carried out by a government. The UN has not defined genocide this way, and the State Department states explicitly that genocide occurred in Bosnia. [http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2868.htm] Based on these facts, I think the definition in the article should be corrected, and the Srebrenica massacre should be reinserted as an example of genocide. What are your thoughts? [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 21:42, 13 December 2007 (EST)

== Thank you ==

Thank you for protecting the image of Frida Kahlo :) I appreciate your assistance -- [[User:Taj|Taj]] 01:33, 18 December 2007 (EST)

:Thanks for all your hard work! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:35, 18 December 2007 (EST)

== User "Awesome" ==

DOH! You beat me to it... well, I don't have admin access either, so the best I could do was send a threating letter to him. :( I'm glad to see that someone is watching out though. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 22:01, 18 December 2007 (EST)

:Is there a way that I could raise these people to your attention faster? Like a template or something? It would likely save admins/sysops some time. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 00:38, 19 December 2007 (EST)

I think what you did is sufficient enough :) Thanks for your help. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)

== Delete Article ==

Hi Dan,

Can you please delete [[hososcope]]. Someone made a spelling error in its creation. (I already created the appropriate article.)

Thanks,

[[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:48, 19 December 2007 (EST)

:Let's add [[December 2]] in there as well. Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:04, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks for all your hard work! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)

:Thanks Dan. I've noticed you are still quite the workhorse yourself. ;-) How about if we add one more for deletion and prevent recreation [[Lulz]]. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:07, 27 December 2007 (EST)

::Could you also please delete article [[Transvestitism]]. I'm not sure if we want to prevent recreation or not. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:11, 27 December 2007 (EST)

== Thanks ==

Thank you Dan. I am checking at this moment all his contribuitions. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 18:52, 20 December 2007 (EST)

: THANK YOU AGAIN. I did a little mistake, now [[Barney]] is ok.

::: Hi, I have 3 questions if you please: Could a deleted article be recovered?, could an "Image" be used to link to a CP article? and, at the tall page, what means the red color and the green bars? Thank you for your time. Have a HAPPY NEW YEAR! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:10, 28 December 2007 (EST)

== Dude, why did you block me? ==

Please unblock [[user:FightPerniciousSwarm]]. You took a pledge, and then you blocked me for not using my "real" name. Dude, do you want help here or not? [[User:MichaelHunt|MichaelHunt]] 18:39, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:I kind of agree, I mean, [[User:Karajou]], [[User:CollegeRepublican]], and heaps more. --[[user:mssb57|m s s b 5 7]] // [[user talk:mssb57|blah !]] // [[special:contributions/mssb57|this was my fault]] 18:55, 27 December 2007 (EST)
::When you sign up, it clearly says '''frivolous''' user names will be blocked. "FightPerniciousSwarm" is frivolous. So is Michael Hunt, probably. I'm not stupid... I know what happens when you abbreviate it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:57, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:::I'd rather get the "FightPerniciousSwarm" account back. It is far from frivolous. Fighting the pernicious liberal swarm is what I do. [[User:MichaelHunt|MichaelHunt]] 19:06, 27 December 2007 (EST)

== Please delete all of my contributions to the template space. They did not work out. ==

Please delete all of my contributions to the template space. They did not work out. I think you might need to update the wiki software for the templates to work. [[User:MichaelHunt|MichaelHunt]] 19:05, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:Thanks, I see you're deleting them. I'd like to come back as my first user name if possible. [[User:MichaelHunt|MichaelHunt]] 19:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I don't know, after all... if you ever visit a University campus, you have probably noticed that freshmen guppy up during the first weeks on campus. Okay. I'll unblock it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:09, 27 December 2007 (EST)
::Yes, they do. Thank you sir. [[User:FightPerniciousSwarm|FightPerniciousSwarm]] 19:12, 27 December 2007 (EST)

== Category ==

Hi Dan,

I'm trying to move the entries from Basketball players to Basketball Players (in line with the manual of style). I usually create the category at the end when I've done them all. Please don't fix them. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:15, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Okay, thanks! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 03:19, 28 December 2007 (EST)

==[[Liberal]]==

Okay to unprotect for PhineasBogg? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 19:03, 29 December 2007 (EST)

==Big vocabulary==

Inauspicious? Eschew obfuscation! ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 14:37, 30 December 2007 (EST)

== Great block ==

Great block this afternoon, Dan!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:14, 6 January 2008 (EST)

== Thanks!!! ==

Thanks so much for the second chance: I have already started trying to make valuable contribution to your web site.

Thanks again very much so!

== curses! ==

But that was only a test run. Maybe, say, 100 might be in order. From each of us at Ebaumsworld. --[[User:HPearce|HPearce]] 15:24, 8 January 2008 (EST)

== Thank you! ==

For catching the vandal! The username was a dead giveaway. I wish I could banhammer him... he even got my page...-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 18:04, 16 January 2008 (EST)

== Question ==

Dan, if you get a chance would you mind shooting me an IM? Thanks. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:33, 17 January 2008 (EST)
==Just FYI==
Hey Dan, I thought I'd figured out what happened to the Harry Truman page, and just to let you know: the problem was the user inserted <nowiki>{{user:Iekl}}</nowiki> in a ref tag (if your interested - see the section "Selection for Vice Presedency" http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Harry_Truman&oldid=356407&action=edit ). Nice job fixing it so quickly!--[[User:Iduan|I]][[User_talk:Iduan|Duan]] 22:00, 17 January 2008 (EST)
:Thanks! This will be helpful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:12, 17 January 2008 (EST)

== Christianity ==

You locked [[Christianity]] back in May. There's been a bit of activity there lately, with sysops having to add suggestions made by others. Do you think it's worth unlocking the article and seeing how it would go? It could always be locked again if necessary, of course. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:58, 18 January 2008 (EST)
:Let's give it a shot. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 08:09, 18 January 2008 (EST)
==I feel bad==
Dan, the warning you just gave to Luther Bifteck is my fault - not his. He removed information correctly, and I wasn't thinking, so I re-added it, but then reverted myself - he removed (again, correctly) the statement that "in God we trust" is in the pledge - I (and probably you too) was thinking "under God" - so yeah, that's my bad.--[[User:Iduan|I]][[User_talk:Iduan|Duan]] 19:29, 20 January 2008 (EST)

:Thanks. I caught that soon after I did it, and was kind of embarrassed. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:30, 20 January 2008 (EST)

:: Don't be too hard on yourself, who among us does not make a mistake every now and then? To your credit you quickly noticed and remedied. :) [[User:Taj|Taj]] 19:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)

== Vote ==

Click on the link to vote in my poll. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim (CPAdmin1)]][[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]] [[User:CPAdmin1/Election08|Vote for President]] 23:05, 23 January 2008 (EST)
==For Deletion==
Thanks for deleting all those articles!--[[User:Iduan|I]][[User_talk:Iduan|Duan]] 16:56, 26 January 2008 (EST)

Wow... they were all from a vandal? --[[User:Liam Spencer|''' L.S. ''']] 17:04, 26 January 2008 (EST)

== Blocking Barikada ==

I am not sure why you have blocked one of this sites most prolific editors. I have been unable to find the "crude sexual reference" in question. --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 16:25, 27 January 2008 (EST)
:Was due to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Video_game_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=381634 this] talk page edit - and the use of the word "t*t"? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 16:28, 27 January 2008 (EST)
::Yes. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:31, 27 January 2008 (EST)

:::Interesting. He appears to be making a legitimate point however, so the usage was not just gratuitous. Perhaps he should have used the word "breast". I assume that there is an acceptable word that wouldn't get an editor banned.

:::I find the offence taken at the use of some words and the various ways that people use to avoid it a bit curious. I note, for example, that Feebas has used "t*t". We all know what the "*" in "t*t" stands for. Why is that in any way better than using the whole word? Surely it is the use of the word we are worried about, not just the actual appearance of the letters together. --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 16:37, 27 January 2008 (EST)

::::Then again why is "br**st" any better than "t*t"? Or "h**ter" perhaps? A word represents a thing. Are we offended by the thing or the word? Curiouser and curiouser. --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 16:44, 27 January 2008 (EST)

:Anybody who gets a one hour block on Conservapedia is usually rather lucky. I would agree that meaning is generally important, but the use of coarse language generally expedites the course of desensitization. Plus, let's be honest, this is a family website. There's no reason to use that word here. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:46, 27 January 2008 (EST)

::I understand the conventions. I guess I am just interested in the psychology behind them, although I suppose that this is probably not the appropriate page to air all of that. Perhaps it might be worth an essay page some time. --[[User:GDewey|GDewey]] 16:50, 27 January 2008 (EST)

==[[Prussian Blue]]==
Calling them "white supremacist" instead of what theya re which is white nationalist is the workings of the liberal media. I demand you take that back. [[User:Ronpaulican|Ronpaulican]] 11:59, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Conservapedia:Deletedpage

2008-01-28T16:54:46Z

Ronpaulican:

<div style="background-color: #eee; border: 1px solid #aa8; margin: 0.5em; padding: 0.5em;" class="plainlinks">'''This page has been ''deleted'' and ''protected'' to prevent re-creation'''

'''Click here to return to the [[Main Page]]'''</div>

Conservapedia:Deletedpage

2008-01-28T16:54:31Z

Ronpaulican: