<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rj617ha</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rj617ha"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Rj617ha"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T18:36:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1033811</id>
		<title>Liberal denial</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_denial&amp;diff=1033811"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:58:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Obama messiah.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Cover of ''[[Rolling Stone]]'' Magazine, one of many published &amp;quot;halo-effect&amp;quot; photos of Barack Obama; the emphasis is on the claims that he is a &amp;quot;messiah,&amp;quot; and is an example of liberal deification of a government official in accordance with point #8.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberal denial''' is the tendency of [[liberals]] to conceal, [[denial|deny]] or [[Censorship|censor]] the truth for ideological reasons.  A list of the top ''common'' instances of [[liberal denial]] are the following:&lt;br /&gt;
'''How are you JPATT? How's the family? How're the kids doing? I'll be seeing you.....shortly'''&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that violent [[video games]] incite and train [[young mass murderers]] to go on unspeakable killing rampages.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that human intelligence inevitably and demonstrably declines from generation to generation, and that if there were another 100 generations into the future the people would not be able to understand simple concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[fetal pain]] during [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the very real existence of [[Hell]].  [[Jesus]] talked about Hell more than Heaven.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they censor the [[Bible]] from their daily activities, and encourage the censorship for others too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Fidel Castro]], who has not been seen in public since his intestinal surgery more than 6 years ago, is likely deceased.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny the [[Nobel Prize]] is an award given by liberals to other liberals, and sometimes even granted in an awkward manner designed to punish a critic of liberal falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g., the granting of the Nobel Prize to an understudy of [[Fred Hoyle]] to punish him.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how they deify government officials, similar to how communists deified Stalin and Lenin and still deify Castro.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., liberal adulation of [[Ted Kennedy]] despite his paucity of achievements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny how fellow travelers engage in [[deceit]], or at least refuse to admit it.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny they are [[liberal]], and that most of the media are [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hollywood values]], [[professor values]] and general [[liberal]] values have consequences for those who believe in them, and also for innocent victims.&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that they have censored [[prayer]] in [[public school]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A [[public school]] student who once &amp;quot;tape recorded a teacher making religious remarks to his students&amp;quot; to complain about it then later objected to a textbook explaining how prayer is censored from [[public school]] schools by court decisions. [http://abcnews.go.com/US/WireStory?id=4614012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that a woman significantly reduces her risk of [[breast cancer]] by having children rather than [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that about half of promiscuous people carry sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and those STDs cause infertility&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Among those who admitted having sex, the rate was even more disturbing -- 40 percent had an STD.&amp;quot;[http://www.tulsaworld.com/lifestyle/article.aspx?articleID=20080312_1_C12_hUShe15125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the strident promoters of [[evolution]] generally have weaker credentials than advocates of [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that College faculties at nearly every American school are completely dominated by [[liberals]], and have virtually no [[conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Homosexuality]] shortens lifespan for a wide variety of reasons&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that reducing the number of guns, which are primarily defensive weapons, results in an increase in crime&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that the war in [[Iraq]] was needed and also deny that the surge has worked&lt;br /&gt;
# Liberals deny that [[Hitler]] and the [[Nazi]] party were in fact [[Liberals]] (anti-Semitism is a well-documented characteristic of [[Liberal Christianity]] as is the [[PETA]]-like Green wing of the Third Reich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spunk.org/texts/places/germany/sp001630/peter.html Fascist Ecology: &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Green Wing&amp;quot; of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== More generally liberals deny == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That choosing [[abortion]] over childbirth increases the risk of [[breast cancer]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] support taxpayer-funded [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a child in a mother's womb has rights established by the [[Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That it is logical to disapprove of abortion and homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Atheism'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That people like [[young mass murderers]] who take [[atheistic]] beliefs to their logical conclusions are not &amp;quot;crazy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;insane&amp;quot;, but are true believers. &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[young mass murderers]] fit the profile of [[public school]]-trained [[atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That atheism is a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Crime'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[gun control]] increases [[crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That illegal immigrants contribute to crime and poverty in the towns and cities they occupy.&lt;br /&gt;
# That legalizing drugs will increase crime (many thieves and murderers are drug addicts).&lt;br /&gt;
# That a fence is the most effective and ultimately, the most peaceful way to protect our large border from illegal immigrants trying to get in&lt;br /&gt;
# That aggressive interrogation is often the only way to obtain answers from [[terrorists]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That socially dangerous people exhibit a well-documented pattern of reading habits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Economics'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That reducing [[tax rates]] stimulates the [[economy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That privately-run [[transport]] is more efficient than government-run transport&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Labor union|union]]s interfere with [[employment]] opportunities&lt;br /&gt;
# That free trade strengthens global democracies&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can drill oil our way out of high gas prices.&lt;br /&gt;
# That we can't replace our dependence on oil with green technologies, when in fact we need both oil and green technologies to solve our energy crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Education'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[homeschoolers]] often do better than those who attend [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That a school having virtually no [[conservative]] teachers and many [[atheists]] and [[liberals]] is a [[liberal]] school&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberals]] attempt to intimidate and ostracize [[conservatives]], particularly in school environments and some occupations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[liberal]] ideology is pushed on unsuspecting others, particularly youngsters&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Lawrence Summers]] was fired as President of [[Harvard]] for making a [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] suggestion about women and [[math]] aptitude&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Environment'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern technology can make [[coal]] clean&lt;br /&gt;
# That modern drilling methods result in minimal environmental impact, even if they were implemented in uninhabited lands such as the [[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That companies like [[Exxon]] should pay billions of dollars in damages to the general public, ''in addition'' to the money they spend to clean up industrial accidents and to recompense those directly affected&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[selective logging]] keeps forests healthier by reducing the risk of wildfire&lt;br /&gt;
# That high food prices are not caused by [[ethanol]] production, but rather by the million acres of crop- and pastureland that have been taken out of production in the interest of wildlife conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the life of a human is more important than the life of an animal or plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Health and medicine'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Socialized_medicine|state run health care]] has lead to Islamic terrorism in Britain, and would do so in the US. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMu6wCqdeyQ ''FOX News analyzes the new terror in state healthcare.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That obesity is a bigger problem than hunger in the Western world&lt;br /&gt;
# That eating [[meat]] and [[dairy]] is important for physical and mental health.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[marijuana]] use has lasting psychological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[universal health care]] is inferior medical care&lt;br /&gt;
# That girls and women in sports have debilitating ACL knee injuries at 3-4 times the rate of men,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Compare'' [http://www.universityhealthmatters.com/article.php?artid=50] (with an explanation of why there is a big difference) ''with'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/health/18knee.html?ex=1204088400&amp;amp;en=3a5abfaa6104ac63&amp;amp;ei=5070&amp;amp;emc=eta1 New York Times] (downplaying the difference and pretending that no one knows why).  The New York Times denies overwhelming evidence, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Female athletes, particularly basketball players, are far more likely than their male counterparts to suffer ACL [Anterior Cruciate Ligament] injuries.&amp;quot; Stephen Hargis, &amp;quot;Girls have more torn ACLs,&amp;quot; Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), D1 (Feb. 4, 2005). According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, the risk of women tearing their ACL is 1 in 100. This number drops significantly to only 1 in 500 for men. See Nikki Usher, &amp;quot;Knee injury takes toll on girls playing soccer five times more likely than males to suffer a torn ACL,&amp;quot; Philadelphia Inquirer, A01 (Nov. 29, 2004). &amp;quot;Compared with guys, female athletes run an eight-times-greater risk of tearing the ACL, a fibrous band that connects the shinbone (tibia) to the thighbone (femur). Basketball, soccer and other sports that require cutting moves or jump shots can put athletes at risk.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls face higher knee injury risk,&amp;quot; USA Today, 15B (Aug. 24, 2004). Timothy Hewett, PhD, the lead researcher on a definitive study at the Sports Medicine Biodynamics Center at the University of Cincinnati, says this is &amp;quot;close to a billion-dollar problem in girls and women in the USA. ... Even after girls have recovered from the acute injury, the changes in the joint may set the stage for osteoarthritis of the knee ....&amp;quot; ''Id.'' That obvious suspicion was quickly confirmed: a study subsequently published in Arthritis &amp;amp; Rheumatism demonstrated that &amp;quot;more than half of ... 103 soccer players, who were ages 14 to 28 at the time of the ACL injury, suffered osteoarthritis of the knee at the time of the study -- about 12 years later.&amp;quot; Kathleen Fackelmann, &amp;quot;Girls' knee injuries have later consequences,&amp;quot; USA Today, 9D (Oct. 7, 2004). &amp;quot;Many of the women, who were about 31 by that time, also said they had pain or some other disability that made it hard to conduct daily activities.&amp;quot; ''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are vulnerable to other injuries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Amber Scull ruptured her spleen after she was tackled during a practice drill at Nature Coast Tech in Brooksville 2 1/2 months ago. Had she [not] arrived at the hospital 30 minutes later, doctors told her mother, she might have died.&amp;quot; [http://www.sptimes.com/2004/01/06/news_pf/Sports/Girls_face_dangers_on.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''History'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That America's [[founding fathers]] were devout Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
# That successful [[democracy]], both historically and logically, is the result of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/cultural_apologetics/snyder-democracy1.html Calvinism and the Success of Liberal Democracy, by John Snyder]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Homosexuality'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[same sex adoption]] is harmful to children.&lt;br /&gt;
# That banning [[same-sex marriage]] is analogous to banning [[polygamy]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That opposing same-sex [[marriage]] is justified and point to decriminalized interracial marriage bans as proof.&lt;br /&gt;
# That homosexuals can be switched back into heterosexuals. (See [[ex-homosexuals]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberalism'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That they are [[intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints and then try to stifle further discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[socialism]] and liberalism have the same political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
# That liberals suppress any criticism rather acknowledge it.&lt;br /&gt;
# That they make sweeping generalizations about Conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
# That ideas do matter, and can cause great harm, including liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Media'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[mainstream media]] is [[bias]]ed&lt;br /&gt;
# That Wikipedia has a systematic bias.&lt;br /&gt;
# That liberal media tycoons such as [[Ted Turner]] support population control.&lt;br /&gt;
# That restricting free speech by the [[Fairness Doctrine]] is actually not fair nor democratic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Politics'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Obama]] ran the dirtiest campaign since [[Lyndon Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That Clinton was known for his adulterous behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That politicians that proclaim 'Change' actually do not break with policies of the past&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[God]] should have a place in government&lt;br /&gt;
# That removing [[Saddam Hussein]] from power was a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Ronald Reagan]]'s public exhortation, &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev|Mr. Gorbachev]], tear down this wall,&amp;quot; helped cause the nearly 30-year-old [[Berlin Wall]] later be torn down&lt;br /&gt;
# That Liberals support [[Totalitarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[liberal]] leaders engage in shocking wrongdoing, [[Liberal hypocrisy|hypocrisy]], and abuse of power&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., leading [[liberal]] [[Eliot Spitzer]] and how fellow [[liberals]] downplayed or were silent about his misconduct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That a [[vote]] for (yea) or a vote against (nea) is an absolute position&lt;br /&gt;
# That you can be held accountable for the statements uttered&lt;br /&gt;
#That President Bush didn't cause Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br /&gt;
#That President Clinton was responsible for Rwanda inaction.&lt;br /&gt;
#That the Democratic party discriminates against African-Americans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Religion''' &lt;br /&gt;
# That [[Islam]]ic extremism is a threat to the [[Western civilization]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leftist [[Sam Harris]] admitted and complained about this liberal denial [http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061009/REPOSITORY/610090301/1028/OPINION02 here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That faith and logic are compatible.&lt;br /&gt;
# The existence of God and Jesus, our Lord and Savior.&lt;br /&gt;
# That morality is objective.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[heavy metal]] music is generally anti-Christian and promotes themes such as drugs, sex and [[Satan]] worship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Science'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That virtually all fossil evidence for evolution has been proven wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the intellectual justification for [[Hitler]]'s attempt to build a master Aryan race was the [[theory of evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
# That evolution, global warming and [[big bang astronomy]] are refutable.&lt;br /&gt;
# The scientific accuracy contained in the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
# That climate forecasts 50 years from now are as inaccurate as 15 days from now&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Social issues'''&lt;br /&gt;
# That more than 80% of child molesters are [[pornography]] addicts&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[feminists]] censor discussion about differences between men and women, and boys and girls.&lt;br /&gt;
# That the [[nuclear family]] is beneficial to children.&lt;br /&gt;
# That [[culture]] affects [[politics]], and people's views and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
# That the numerous premature deaths of [[Hollywood]] stars are the result of [[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Liberal [[Wikipedia]] lists numerous [[actor]]s who died of drug overdoses, but will not acknowledge the role played by [[Hollywood values]], for which Wikipedia does not even have an entry. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_drug-related_deaths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
# That men and women are by nature different.&lt;br /&gt;
# That English will cease being the language of the United States in 20 years unless it is protected as the [[official language]] (and that this would be a loss if it happened).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often [[liberal]]s refuse to admit that they are [[liberal]]s, in the hope of appearing more reasonable.  [[Hillary Clinton]] refused to admit in a presidential debate in 2007 that she is a [[liberal]]. Similarly, [[Michael Dukakis]] refused for a while to admit that he was a [[liberal]] during the 1988 presidential campaign.  Only out of desperation did Dukakis admit that he was a [[liberal]], and even then he admitted only that was a liberal like President [[Harry Truman]], who served 40 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals like to bash President Bush as a war monger and cite [[President Clinton]] for his eight years of peace and prosperity. Liberals will deny record low unemployment, more people owning their homes and President Bush going after [[terrorists]] while protecting Americans from further attacks. Liberals will selectively forget that during Clinton's term: the [[Rwanda]] massacre occurred, the bombing of the USS Cole, the war in the [[Balkans]], the two US embassies bombed in [[Africa]], the Kobar tower bombing in Saudi Arabia, the [[Somalia]] conflict, the missile strike against [[Afghanistan]] and the bombing campaign against Iraq. Also, [[liberals]] will deny that Clinton's economic policy ignored a series of high profile companies that eventually collapsed due to fraud: Enron, Tyco, Worldcom and Qwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of their denial, liberals often use the word &amp;quot;denial&amp;quot; pejoratively against conservatives. Alleging that conservatives are [[racist]] and reject [[science]], they use terms like &amp;quot;[[global warming]] deniers&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[climate change]] deniers&amp;quot; in an attempt to link conservative viewpoints with [[Holocaust denial]], [[Nazism]], [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], and [[pseudoscience]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Longest liberal denials]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1033809</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1033809"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:57:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|480px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|480px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with a geometric growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]]Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have developed since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate, and with much higher quality, than [[liberal]] terms.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
'''HELLO JPATT'''&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This implies a conservative future and a correlation between conservatism and truth.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This extraordinary growth illustrates that the conservative movement itself will likewise continue to grow at a rapid rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|126&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|248&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|26 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|a.m.&lt;br /&gt;
|1762&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a.m.&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;before noon&amp;quot; in [[Latin]] (ante meridiem); it became popular much as &amp;quot;[[A.D.]]&amp;quot; did.  Also, a morning [[work ethic]] is a conservative concept.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstract nonsense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for unnecessarily abstract mathematics of doubtful rigor; [[liberal denial]] insists that this term, which describes something as &amp;quot;nonsense&amp;quot;, is somehow not negative!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, are responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|act of God&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From ''Pollard v. Shaaffer'', 1 U.S. 210, 213 (1 Dall. 210) (Pa. S.Ct. 1787): &amp;quot;In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &amp;amp;c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an extraordinary, unforeseeable event, such as a massive flood or earthquake; term was probably inspired as a reference to the [[Great Flood]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Materialists]] censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it  as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|addictive&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|the intrinsic characteristic of certain things or activities to induce repetitious involvement, usually with a harmful effect on the participant, as in [[gambling]], or [[video games]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1849&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apparatchik&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an official who blindly does what he thinks his government superiors want, as in [[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|atheistic&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/baby-boomer.html Baby boomer] phrases.org.uk, retrieved August 30, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that what is known as post-World War II baby boom actually started before the war, contrary to what textbooks teach. Perpetuating the mistake, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the generation born between 1946 and 1964 as the baby boomers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb06-ffse01-2.html Newsroom: Facts for Features - Special Edition - The Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bidenism&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|an idiotic remark that would subject the politician to enormous ridicule if he were a [[conservative]], but when spoken by [[liberal]] [[Joe Biden]] the media are just fine with it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common in the [[lamestream media]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by John Adams&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas card&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|another conservative innovation that apparently did not exist earlier, even though mail did; cards that say &amp;quot;Seasons Greetings&amp;quot; are a cheap imitation now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class act&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|this concept was initially coined by [[Karl Marx]] in ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[consumer surplus]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, ''Principles of Economics'' (1890).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the [[free market]]; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates views contrary to that of others; this type of person frustates [[liberal]] attempts to gain control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|coolant&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a fluid, typically water, that facilitates efficient energy production, especially nuclear energy to cool a reactor and slow down the fission of neutrons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cop-out&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the easy way out, usually by shirking one's responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counter-reformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|a movement in response to another movement, as in a counter-reformation to the [[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Den mother&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|leader of children's group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devil's advocate&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|earmark&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A provision in congressional legislation that allocates a specified amount of money for a specific project, program or organization.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Dictionary (2009).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurabia&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people -- such as self-centered [[atheists]] -- might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faux conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by ''The Economist'', in &amp;quot;[[New England]]'s governors; All change&amp;quot; (September 22, 1990), in reference to [[Lowell Weicker]]'s &amp;quot;loss in 1988 to a Faux-conservative Democrat, Mr [[Joseph Lieberman]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|federal government&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|used by [[Alexander Hamilton]] in the first phrase of the ''[[Federalist Papers]]'' to signify a government that is not fully sovereign, as the States are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fiscal cliff]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by Federal Reserve Chairman [[Ben Bernanke]], it refers to the effect on the economy of a sharp drop in spending and perhaps an increase in taxes scheduled to take effect at approximately the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.benjaminfedwards.com/blog/?p=197&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|good book&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gravy train&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|easy money for little or no work, in contrast with the work ethic; notice how the [[Great Depression]] hit two years later&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|happy talk&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|sensless banter among broadcasters in the [[lamestream media]], as a substitute for real news; more generally, happy talk is unjustifiably feel-good rhetoric that implicitly denies the real existence of [[Hell]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inattentive&lt;br /&gt;
|1741&lt;br /&gt;
|more than 150 years before the discovery in physics of the connection between attentiveness/observation and uncertainty/chaos, this conservative word cautioned against inattentiveness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inoculate&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|to safeguard against future harm by developing immunity against it.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;Conservapedia inoculates against [[liberal claptrap]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intelligent design&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A few isolated references to this phrase, without its full current significance, can be found dating back to the mid-1800s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined in ''Darwin on Trial'', a book by Philip Johnson, who is considered the father of the intelligent design movement and who co-founded the [[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture in 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://biologos.org/resources/johnson-phillip-e&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Hancock&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kudos&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|praise for real achievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leverage&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal creep&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|limousine liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|a clergyman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[media bullying]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;amp;oldid=430831 (Apr. 14, 2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by ''Conservapedia'', media bullying is aggressive bias by the media in the attempt to influence a politician or others, typically toward a [[liberal]] goal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1752&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry, 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obambulate&lt;br /&gt;
|1600&lt;br /&gt;
|From Latin ''obambulatus'', to walk to or before, akin to ''wander''.  Word currently claimed to have been invented by Rush Limbaugh in 2011 and used in reference to [[Barack Obama]], yet it is found in Oxford and Webster's dictionaries prior to 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ordered pair&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the [[Christian]] [[Georg Cantor]], this [[conservative]] concept was part of the [[set theory]] that he invented and revolutionized mathematics with, despite opposition by the establishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pack heat&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|carry a concealed firearm, allowed by permit in nearly every state, yet liberal bias has made dictionaries slow to recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[photo bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A letter to the editor by a reader of the [[liberal]] ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' observed, &amp;quot;This is the third time in recent weeks that a weird or disfigured picture of Mr. Quayle has appeared in your Sunday paper.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a common trick of the [[liberal media]] to push the reader to the political left on an issue, as in displaying a man without teeth as an opponent of a liberal bill or candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[RINO Backer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a more important term than &amp;quot;RINO&amp;quot;, because what matters most is whether someone will stand up for a [[conservative]] position and candidate when the [[liberal media]] demand that everyone flock to the liberal side.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|small town values&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|term was first used by [[Democrat]] [[John Glenn]] in his failed presidential run in 1984, in a futile effort to appear more conservative than [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities; this is a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soul-searching&lt;br /&gt;
|1924&lt;br /&gt;
|personal reflection about one's own values and morality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Statue of Liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a phrase used to describe it more than a decade after its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|status quo&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|a useful baseline for assessing and promoting conservative growth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stem-winder&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|first-rate of its kind, especially a political speech; term inspired by the innovation for the watch to be wound by stem rather than by a key&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|survivalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|one who is determined and prepared to stay alive, and even thrive, if liberals cause a breakdown of society&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tebowing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[QB]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|time-tested&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach that has proven to be beneficial over time, like heterosexual marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transparency&lt;br /&gt;
|1615&lt;br /&gt;
|allowing people who are affected by decisions to see how and why those decisions are really being made.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|un-American&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|contrary to American values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1887&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underwater basket weaving&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system; see [[Worst College Majors]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vacuous&lt;br /&gt;
|1850s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This word as a prior date of origin for its physical meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|lacking any insight or depth of thought - common among [[liberal claptrap]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster; on February 2, 2009 (less than two weeks after inauguration), Obama dropped use of this term. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare queen&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term for someone who collects excessive welfare payments through fraud, manipulation, or laziness. First used by [[Ronald Reagan]] during his 1976 Presidential campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's intuition&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notice how this predates the modern [[feminists]], who would tend to consider this term [[politically incorrect]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a perception more common in women that something or someone is to be avoided without yet understanding why.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Work equals force times distance.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin   Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A thousand new words are developed in English each year.  Here is a growing list of conservative concepts, each of which is not yet defined by a single word or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Not Yet Recognized Terms&lt;br /&gt;
!Suggestions&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pre-9/11 thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|9/10 mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|terror is jurisdiction of the courts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anti-family&lt;br /&gt;
|tradition opposer, familiopathic&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blame shift&lt;br /&gt;
|false accusations&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., guns blamed for an increasing murder rate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|buycott&lt;br /&gt;
|counter support&lt;br /&gt;
|An effort to cooperate and promote an organization or a process to nullify campaigns that are targeted by boycott protests.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|causing harm by spreading falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|deceit&lt;br /&gt;
|e.g., denying or concealing disease and infertility caused by promiscuity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutional values&lt;br /&gt;
|adherence to righteousness as set forth by the [[Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
|principles set in the Declaration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Counterfeit Marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|uncivil union&lt;br /&gt;
|Manipulating Man's laws by usurping God's laws.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle to grave &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/spanish/from%20cradle%20to%20grave cradle to grave- no entry found] Merriam-Websters&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sanctity of life, conception to natural death&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-life stance, also can mean socialist entitlement programs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cut and run&lt;br /&gt;
|surrender advocates&lt;br /&gt;
|when the going gets tough, run away from the problem&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debtucation&lt;br /&gt;
|tuition noose&lt;br /&gt;
|College student debt is now larger than credit card debt in the US&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deliberate ignorance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|mind-locked, self-centered pride obscuring the truth&lt;br /&gt;
|the term exists; the dictionary does not yet include it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denial that [[Hell]] exists&lt;br /&gt;
|Hell-denier? Antinfernal? (Should be &amp;quot;antihadessic&amp;quot; so as not to mix Hellenate and Latinate roots)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstinence denial|denier of the effectiveness of abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|abstinence-denier?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drive-by media&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan slander&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal mainstream media assault on the GOP or conservative principles, deceitful attacks for opposing viewpoints&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|easily amused by [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|dolophile&lt;br /&gt;
|from Greek/Latin root ''dolo-'' meaning guile, deceit, deception [http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/664]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|enemedia&lt;br /&gt;
|pressitutes, Democrat Media Complex&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of domestic enemy and media, describing the biased media coordination between Democrats the legacy media&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Faculty lounge liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|educrat&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal professors with no real-world job experience, typically hired by Democrat administrations to implement their ideas, like [[Cass Sunstein]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|family-friendly&lt;br /&gt;
|wholesome&lt;br /&gt;
|describes TV programming, websites, social events that are not offensive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fleebagger&lt;br /&gt;
|Oath breakers&lt;br /&gt;
|Describes [[liberal]] politicians who avoid their sworn duties as a way to advance their political agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hatred of one's country, refusal to recognize the good elements of it, or unreasonably critical of it&lt;br /&gt;
|misopatria, misopatrist&lt;br /&gt;
|From Greek ''misein'', to hate, and Latin ''patria'', nation or homeland&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heavenly body&lt;br /&gt;
|celestial body&lt;br /&gt;
|natural objects visible in the sky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hellbound&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|recognized by over 1.3 million sites in a Google search and no substitute term is available, yet dictionaries refuse to recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hoax and Chains&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Keynesian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|a phonetic play on the rhetoric slogan of Hope and Change. Hope replaced by unemployment and Change represents obsessive tax burdens. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax plant&lt;br /&gt;
|fake townhall, kkk teaparty&lt;br /&gt;
|a term to describe a deceitful method of placing an operative that appears to be part of a group in order to push an agenda or to make a competing agenda look ridiculous. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hollywood values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|West Coast Hedonism &lt;br /&gt;
|Over 800,000 results on Google, not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|homo-fascist &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1318230 LaBarbera: Apple's action stems from 'homo-facism', OneNewsNow, March 25, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|LGBT Stormtrooper, Gay-vangelist&lt;br /&gt;
|Guardians of gender identity ideology&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Illegal Alien|illegal alien]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|widely used in court decisions and political discourse for years, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it is as a term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ineptocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|circle of failure&lt;br /&gt;
|a government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infotainment&lt;br /&gt;
|tabloid news, dramacast&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstream media presents drama fluff stories as news, e.g. 20/20 - Datelin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limited government]]&lt;br /&gt;
|we the people democracy&lt;br /&gt;
|first testament to this was the [[U.S. Constitution]], defining [[Reagan]]s presidency, can't be found in Merriam-Websters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/limited%20government Limited government - Not found] Merriam-Webster's&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Low-information Voter&lt;br /&gt;
|Easily manipulated electorate&lt;br /&gt;
|Citizens who base their voting decisions on small issues; contraception, skin color, govt. handouts, etc. instead of character, economic policy, foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manufactured outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|fake tears &lt;br /&gt;
|liberal politicians and the liberal media's method of stroking anger to pursue an agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media vigilantism&lt;br /&gt;
|soviet-style censorship&lt;br /&gt;
|media's public campaign to demonize dissent against people or groups, such as [[Juan Williams]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mediscare&lt;br /&gt;
|fear card&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrats opposed to entitlement reform use fear to stop changes to Medicare&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|merit pay&lt;br /&gt;
|performance bonus&lt;br /&gt;
|Doing your job better with perks as a reward. The typical liberal union teacher avoids merit pay at all costs, self before students. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[militant gays]]&lt;br /&gt;
|intimidating homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|modern idolatry&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;media idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;money idolatry&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;celebrity idolatry&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|idolatry conjures images of golden calves, and a modern version is needed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral fabric&lt;br /&gt;
|domestic tranquility&lt;br /&gt;
|ethics and virtues united for the common good of all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|morally bankrupt&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheism]], self-void  &lt;br /&gt;
|ethically and spiritually challenged souls&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|narrative hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|delusional finger-pointing&lt;br /&gt;
|a frantic attempt to capitalize on calamity by casting their opponents as somehow responsible for an act of madness and evil&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|regional warming&lt;br /&gt;
|the North pole shrinks as the South pole increases&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|opposite of [[materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritualism and idealism have been its philosophical opposites, historically&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dualism]] has been suggested, but it is not the ''opposite'' of [[materialism]]; &amp;quot;spiritualism&amp;quot; is not a common term and is the &amp;quot;opposite&amp;quot; of materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[peer pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|used in titles to professional journal articles as early as 1994&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe that isn't recognized by Merriam-Webster?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proven wrong, a refusal to admit it&lt;br /&gt;
|mulism; heel-digger?&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. mulish. This refusal is what promoted the [[Parable of the Good Samaritan]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|religious right&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
|religion in America almost exclusively a conservative institution, no religious left term in existence.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reward failure&lt;br /&gt;
|TARP &lt;br /&gt;
|too big to fail, bailout bankrupt, mismanagement subsidized &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rewrite history &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/rewrite%20history  rewrite history not found, Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deceit]], mislead &lt;br /&gt;
|Commonly used term describing liberal deceit to hide, defraud others about factual history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue states&lt;br /&gt;
|rogue nations&lt;br /&gt;
|nations defying international law, only rogue is listed in Merriman-Websters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|runaway jury&lt;br /&gt;
|The term has existed for decades, but Merriam-Webster has not recognized it yet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule of Law&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[schlockumentary]]&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|documentary films based on falsehoods and half-truths&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Second generation atheist|second-generation atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|cradle atheist&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|selective outrage&lt;br /&gt;
|partisan hypocrisy, bipolar&lt;br /&gt;
|to be against something to further a cause and reject, stay silent, ignore or discount something similar. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smear merchant&lt;br /&gt;
|serial slander&lt;br /&gt;
|to constantly hurl degrading or false accusations against others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strict constructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|an important term for over 200 years to describe adherence to the text of the Constitution, Merriam-Webster still does not recognize it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conservative| Traditional Values]]&lt;br /&gt;
| principles of Conservatism&lt;br /&gt;
|much the same as family values but incorporating all aspects society; family, religion, self-sufficiency, the truth, hard work. Only listed in Merriam-Websters to describe what Nilihism is against. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|true emergency&lt;br /&gt;
|life support&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning a high probability of serious injury or death to an individual or property. Emergency has been watered down, e.g. to be locked out of one's car.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unaffected by, or impervious to, the media&lt;br /&gt;
|mediaproof&lt;br /&gt;
|cf. bulletproof. ''Once John became aware of the extent of [[liberal deceit]], he set about mediaproofing his mind''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Wikipedia]]'s undue influence on people's thinking (eg the [[hearsay society]])&lt;br /&gt;
|wikiwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|comparable to brainwashing - Wikipedia's claims and procedures become more important than reality or [[logic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Terms Difficult to Classify ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These new terms are difficult to classify:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[affirmative action|affirmative action]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|first used in [http://www.thecre.com/fedlaw/legal6/eo10925.htm JFK's Executive Order 10925] in 1961 and subsequently promoted by [[LBJ]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Americanism&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|Originally, a phrase unique to American English, later, loyalty to America and its principles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bipartisan&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|emphasized by liberals when they are in the minority in power, but ignored by liberals when they are the majority in power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colonist&lt;br /&gt;
|1701&lt;br /&gt;
|settlers of a new country&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalize&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|compartmentalizing the Bible away from knowledge and education leads to ignorance and despair&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who delights in taking a position contrary to others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eclectic&lt;br /&gt;
|1683&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the best from among different styles or ideas; compare [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|evangelism&lt;br /&gt;
|1620-30&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;isms&amp;quot; are usually pejorative, though this acquired a positive meaning over time, and perhaps from the outset&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|genetics&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|perhaps this should be on the conservative list?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|identity politics&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|exploiting racial, ethnic, gender alliances for political gain&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inane&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to comments, often made by liberals, that are utterly devoid of substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|junk legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially by liberals to complain about the lack of meaningful legislation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1635-1645&lt;br /&gt;
|conservative?&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|multitasking&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|performing multiple tasks all at once&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|polar coordinates&lt;br /&gt;
|1694&lt;br /&gt;
|Newton may have used it earlier&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|republican&lt;br /&gt;
|1685&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse engineer&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|to deconstruct a product (or software) in order to understand how it works, often with the purpose of copying it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrooge&lt;br /&gt;
|1843&lt;br /&gt;
|the main character in Charles Dickens' ''A Christmas Carol''; the story is based on materialism and is often used as a substitute for the Biblical account, but charity is a conservative value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|describes the use of deceit, particularly in politics; probably a conservative term, but will await more etymology about it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|now used pejoratively, but probably not initially when it was a way for the public to participate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|states' rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1790&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals often invoke this too; Democrats were its biggest champions in the 1800s (in connection with slavery), and even today on issues like legalizing drugs and same-sex marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|technocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1932&lt;br /&gt;
|technical expert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|telecommute&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term was in the British magazine ''The Economist''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a combination of a Greek root (&amp;quot;tele&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;far off&amp;quot;) and a Latin root (&amp;quot;commutare&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;to exchange&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|toady&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a toady caves into peer pressure to seek acceptance by others: &amp;quot;the largest gathering of toadies is by college students herded into Obama campaign rallies&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tomfoolery&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|playful or foolish behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;beliefs of those opposed to [[modernism]], [[liberalism]], or [[radicalism]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[twilight zone]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|the realm of imagination that seems impossible but is difficult to disprove, and which challenges ordinary views of reality; also the terminator between night and day on a planetary body&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Whip&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In its political usage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|late 1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|An elected position in each political party for the legislator responsible for gathering and confirming support for the party position on particular bills.  This term is derived from &amp;quot;whipper-in,&amp;quot; which in fox-hunting refers to the man who prevents hunting dogs from straying amid a chase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/11/durbin_re-elected_number_two_s.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wiki&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a website (or website software) that facilitates contributions and corrections by the public&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|working class&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|those who work regular, 40-hour weeks in manual labor, such as factory jobs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Downgraded Conservative Terms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These conservative terms are less significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|byzantine&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The usage here -- in sense of complex governmental rules -- probably developed later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|connive&lt;br /&gt;
|1601&lt;br /&gt;
|to pretend ignorance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eleemosynary&lt;br /&gt;
|1616&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to charity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entropy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|disorder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[filibuster]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1851&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incandescent&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|bright and radiant, conquering darkness, precursor to the invention of the incandescent lamp (light bulb)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jabberwocky&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|talking nonsense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level playing field&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|A term originally used to describe fair, competitive [[free market]] conditions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/228650.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal policies such as [[affirmative action]] and [[progressive taxation]] have been enacted in the name of leveling the playing field, but by favoring certain groups of people these policies do the opposite.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|luddite&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|one who opposes and even destroys technological advances&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|media&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[milquetoast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|timid and unassertive; easily persuaded or exploited; inspired by Caspar Milquetoast, the unassertive character in &amp;quot;The Timid Soul&amp;quot; cartoon strip by Harold T. Webster, which ran in the New York Herald Tribune on Sundays beginning in 1924.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|normalcy&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|related to the election of [[Warren G. Harding]] by the largest margin yet in history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ne'er-do-well&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;an idle worthless person&amp;quot; - Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reticent&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|restrained in expression, presentation, or appearance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-indulgence&lt;br /&gt;
|1753&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smart aleck&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|an obnoxiously conceited and self-assertive person with pretensions to being superior to others. Etymology: Aleck, nickname for Alexander &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smart%20alec Smart Aleck Merriam-Websters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare to work&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mUUuAAAAIBAJ&amp;amp;sjid=MlkEAAAAIBAJ&amp;amp;pg=7129,542675&amp;amp;dq=welfare-to-work&amp;amp;hl=en]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|refers to reforms curtailing welfare abuse and providing incentives to work rather than earn a government paycheck&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best of Conservapedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Sports_Stars&amp;diff=1033808</id>
		<title>Essay:Greatest Conservative Sports Stars</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Greatest_Conservative_Sports_Stars&amp;diff=1033808"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:56:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Bold text''JUST STOPPING IN TO SAY HI LOLZ'''Most sports stars are probably [[conservative]]. Athletes at all levels of competition frequently praise [[God]] for giving them the strength to succeed at their sports.  Here are some of the greatest:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Athlete&lt;br /&gt;
!Sport&lt;br /&gt;
![[Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Chuck Norris]]&lt;br /&gt;
|karate&lt;br /&gt;
|Six-time undefeated World Professional Karate Champion, middleweight division, and the first westerner ever to achieve an eighth degree black belt in Tae Kwon Do; now a leading conservative commentator.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jim Jordan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|wrestling&lt;br /&gt;
|two-time NCAA Division I wrestling champion, which included defeating a future Olympic gold medalist, and four-time state champion; leading [[conservative]] in [[Congress]] who chaired the Republican Study Committee for the 112th Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nolan Ryan&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|went from being one of the greatest pitchers of all time (7 no-hitters) to endorsing Texan Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst as &amp;quot;a proven conservative&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jon Runyan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|A pro-bowler for being one of the best linemen in the NFL, Runyan is now a Republican Congressman (NJ) who won reelection in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Novak Djokovic&lt;br /&gt;
|tennis&lt;br /&gt;
|Current number 1 player in the world, Novak gives glory to God with the sign of the [[Crucifixion|Cross]] after big tennis victories.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tim Tebow]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first college sophomore to win the [[Heisman Trophy]], and the only quarterback to lead his team to two [[BCS]] college championships.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]], outspoken Christian; an analyst for the [[lamestream media]] said about him, &amp;quot;You need to disappear, okay, [[Tim Tebow]]?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tedy Bruschi continued to say about Tebow, &amp;quot;You're not the starting quarterback, it's Mark Sanchez's team. I want my voice to come from my head coach and my quarterback -- my starting quarterback. That message has to be consistent. I don't want all this competition brewing, and every time you speak and anytime you talk about competition or anything like that, you're twisting things,&amp;quot; he went on. &amp;quot;I want one voice. One quarterback, not two.&amp;quot; [http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d829b6a76/article/tedy-bruschi-thinks-tim-tebow-should-pipe-down Tedy Bruschi thinks Tim Tebow should pipe down] nfl.com, retrieved June 26, 2012.  (Tedi Bruschi was a former New England Patriots linebacker.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Pressed for a response, Tebow simply smiled and said, &amp;quot;I can't help him with that.  That would be pretty hard.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2012/06/jets-tim-tebow-on-tedy-bruschis-advice-i-just-do-what-im-told/1?loc=interstitialskip&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Josh Hamilton&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|Used to be a drug addict, then became a born-again Christian and plays major league baseball now. He has appeared on Glenn Beck's show to talk about his faith and addiction.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Matt Hasselbeck&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro Bowl quarterback is a Christian who lends his name to &amp;quot;Tweet for Youcef&amp;quot; campaign organized by the [[ACLJ]], in support of the Iranian Christian pastor who has been sentenced to death.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill Laimbeer&lt;br /&gt;
|basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|led the [[Detroit Pistons]] to two [[NBA]] titles by defeating [[Michael Jordan]], [[Larry Bird]] and [[Magic Johnson]]; for a center, Laimbeer had an amazing outside shot and free-throw percentage, showing the versatility of a [[conservative]]; illustrating their [[double standard]], liberals whined about Laimbeer's rough style of play, without complaining about [[Dennis Rodman]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|hockey&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[conservative]], Thomas declined to attend a ceremony staged by the [[Obama]] [[White House]] after Thomas's team won the [[Stanley Cup]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/01/boston-bruins-goalie-snubs-president-obama-111928.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Thomas is a four-time [[NHL]] All-Star as a goalie - a great conservative position to play!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=610011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Curt Schilling&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|led the hopeless [[Boston Red Sox]] to a stunning [[World Series]] championship in 2004 after defeating the [[liberal]] [[New York Yankees]] in the American League Championship Series; for an encore he helped Scott Brown win &amp;quot;[[Ted Kennedy|Kennedy]]'s seat,&amp;quot; an even greater upset. Also was co-MVP of the 2001 World Series, in which he helped the Arizona Diamondbacks defeat the Yankees in one of the biggest World Series upsets in history.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jim Bunning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|former Republican Senator (KY); he pitched a perfect game with the fewest pitches ever in the National League (only 90) -- like a true conservative!  Bunning is also one of only five players to pitch a no-hitter in both the National and American Leagues.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|George Allen&lt;br /&gt;
|football coach&lt;br /&gt;
|The father of [[conservative]] Senator George Allen, the coach ran a trick play once for President [[Richard Nixon]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/politics/GOP_drafts_NFL_talent-53346877.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mike Ditka&lt;br /&gt;
|football player and coach&lt;br /&gt;
|outspoken pro-lifer when he was considering running for public office&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philip Rivers &lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|endorsed [[Rick Santorum]] with a strong statement on religious values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Janet Lynn&lt;br /&gt;
|figure skating&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lynn&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Considered One of the Greatest Freeskaters of All Time.&amp;quot; [http://figureskating.about.com/od/famousfemaleiceskater1/p/janetlynn.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Before every performance she would close her eyes and give thanks and praise to God. She believed that God had given her the gift of skating and in each performance she worked to glorify God.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lynn&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Lynn, once the highest-paid female athlete, also has written in support of conservative values.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ted Williams]]&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball &lt;br /&gt;
|campaigned for Republicans, served as a fighter pilot, and also criticized the media, which was unfair to him, even denying him the MVP when he hit over .400 in 1941. It could be argued that [[Joe DiMaggio]]'s 56-game hit streak was more impressive that year, but the media bias was clearly a factor in the vote. One sportswriter inexplicably left Williams off his ballot entirely.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Kurt Warner]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|pro-lifer who led two ''different'' teams to the [[Super Bowl]], one of whom was the underachieving Cardinals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Zach Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
|golf&lt;br /&gt;
|won the [[Masters]] on [[Easter Sunday]] against the heavily favored Tiger Woods,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fcagolf.org/masters-peace&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Woods was at the peak of his career, and then gave credit to [[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trevor Bayne&lt;br /&gt;
|auto racing&lt;br /&gt;
|Gave credit to God for being the youngest Daytona 500 winner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pete Sampras&lt;br /&gt;
|tennis&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Winner of 14 Grand Slam singles titles.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Held the record for the longest time as #1 in the world -- more than 5 years -- until tied by Roger Federer due to his winning Wimbledon in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mary Lou Retton]]&lt;br /&gt;
|gymnastics&lt;br /&gt;
|Olympic gold medalist, delivered the Pledge of Allegiance at the 2004 Republican National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Karl Malone&lt;br /&gt;
|basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|NBA Most Valuable Player and All-Star selection. He overcame troubled youth years and became a role model. Donated to the George W. Bush campaign and visited our troops in Afghanistan. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Steve Largent&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|former Republican Congressman (OK)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jack Kemp]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|author of Kemp-Roth tax cuts as a Republican congressman from upstate [[New York]]; was also the vice presidential Republican candidate in 1996&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Drew Brees&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|Led the [[New Orleans Saints]] to victory in the 2009 [[Super Bowl]]--professed his belief in Jesus Christ. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;amp;v=t0buCfbFuHw STV Interview with Drew Brees]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chris Dudley &lt;br /&gt;
|basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|Republican nominee for Oregon governor&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jim Ryun]]&lt;br /&gt;
|track&lt;br /&gt;
|former Republican Congressman (KS)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[J.C. Watts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|former Republican Congressman (OK)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John Elway]]&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|supporter of Republican candidates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lynn Swann&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|Republican candidate for governor (PA)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeff Suppan&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|did a pro-life ad while winning the World Series in 2006&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Billy Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|Left professional baseball and became a famous evangelist&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rick Monday&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|In 1976 he saved an American Flag from burning at the hands of two protestors&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Dan Hampton&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|helped lead the Chicago Bears to their 1985 Super Bowl title, but declined an invitation to a ceremony held decades later by the [[Obama]] White House.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Paul Azinger&lt;br /&gt;
|golf&lt;br /&gt;
|PGA champion who criticized Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack Lynch&lt;br /&gt;
|hurling&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the greatest ever dual players. As Taoiseach, reduced taxes and thereby increased employment in Ireland.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lewis Hamilton&lt;br /&gt;
|auto racing&lt;br /&gt;
|outspoken Christian, describing his 2008 world championship win as &amp;quot;a blessing&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Doug Flutie&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|endorsed [[RINO]] [[Scott Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Jones&lt;br /&gt;
|rugby&lt;br /&gt;
|His Christian beliefs caused him to abstain from playing or training on Sundays.  Recently endorsed the conservative New Zealand National Party&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|David Icke&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer&lt;br /&gt;
|Currently best known for his outspoken opposition to attempts by [[liberal]]s to control government and people's lives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ewan Murray&lt;br /&gt;
|rugby&lt;br /&gt;
|Observes the Sabbath and does not play for his club (Newcastle) or country (Scotland) on Sundays.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eric Liddell&lt;br /&gt;
|track&lt;br /&gt;
|Honoured in both Scotland and China as one of their great-ever athletes, Liddell refused to run in the 1924 Olympic 100m on a Sunday. Instead, he competed in the 400m and, though it was not his best event, he won the gold medal! Returned to China as a missionary and was devoted to helping the sick and poor.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gavin Peacock&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacking midfielder for Newcastle, Chelsea and QPR then a respected footballer commentator. From 2006, combined commentating with attending a seminary. Now training full-time for the ministry.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jason Robinson&lt;br /&gt;
|rugby&lt;br /&gt;
|Becoming a born-again Christian enabled him to reform his troubled personal life&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ryan Hall&lt;br /&gt;
|Track&lt;br /&gt;
|Evangelical Christian, said God was his trainer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Annie Oakley]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Sharpshooter&lt;br /&gt;
|Came to fame in her teens as an exhibition shooter, later to international fame in Buffalo Bill's Wild West show. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gerald Ford]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Football&lt;br /&gt;
|Played center and linebacker for the [[University of Michigan]] and led them to two undefeated championship seasons. He was later offered professional contracts by two NFL franchises, but declined in order to attend law school. Later, Ford became minority leader of the [[House of Representatives]] and was appointed [[Vice President]] following the resignation of [[Spiro Agnew]] in the wake of the [[Wategrate]] scandal. When President [[Richard Nixon]] resigned shortly thereafter due to his role in the scandal, Ford became the first (and only) President of the United States never elected President or Vice President. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stars Who Have Taken a Conservative or Religious Position ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Athlete&lt;br /&gt;
!Sport&lt;br /&gt;
![[Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gabby Douglas&lt;br /&gt;
|Gymnastics&lt;br /&gt;
|Gave glory to God upon making the cut to represent the United States in the [[Olympics 2012|2012 Olympics]], and won the gold in the All-Around competition, as well as with the United States team event.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tara Lipinski&lt;br /&gt;
|Figure skating&lt;br /&gt;
|Youngest (15) gold medalist in figure skating history, Tara gave credit to St. Therese of Lisieux for helping her win.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thegregorian.org/blog/american-catholic-hall-of-fame-sports-figures&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Babe Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|defended [[Catholic]]ism, saying that it gave him a standard for him to strive for personally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|A.C. Green&lt;br /&gt;
|basketball&lt;br /&gt;
|record-holder for the longest number of consecutive games in the rough, injury-prone [[NBA]], Green has long been an outspoken advocate of [[abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lolo Jones&lt;br /&gt;
|Olympic hurdler&lt;br /&gt;
|outspoken supporter of [[abstinence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Al Oerter&lt;br /&gt;
|track and field&lt;br /&gt;
|a self-confessed &amp;quot;old fashioned Olympian&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sify.com/sports/olympics/Profile/Al_Oerter.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; this four-time Olympics discus champion spoke out against the use of steroids and their harmful effects during a time when other athletes were relying on them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bubba Smith&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|one of the greatest defensive lineman, Bubba Smith gave up a lucrative contract to do beer commercials because he was concerned about the effect that alcohol has on people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|David Tyree&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|hero of the upset victory by the New York Giants in the 2008 [[Super Bowl]] with a phenomenal catch, Tyree spoke out against [[same-sex marriage]], and later tweeted: &amp;quot;People of [[faith]] ... direct some prayers my way.  Got darts comin from every direction. Blessed are those persecuted for [[Jesus|His name]]'s sake.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://sports.espn.go.com/new-york/nfl/news/story?id=6667583&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Roger Staubach&lt;br /&gt;
|football&lt;br /&gt;
|an active Catholic, he told the press he said a &amp;quot;Hail Mary&amp;quot; during his last-ditch 50-yard pass toward the end zone in a 1975 playoff game, which was caught for a come-from-behind victory for his Cowboys; the name for such a football pass has stuck ever since.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thegregorian.org/blog/american-catholic-hall-of-fame-sports-figures&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Songs]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Television Shows]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Overrated Sports Stars]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sports]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_parables&amp;diff=1033807</id>
		<title>Conservative parables</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_parables&amp;diff=1033807"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:55:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Conservative parables''' are stories that illustrate a [[conservative]] insight.  The stories are typically based on real events.&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Italic text'''I'm on to you JPatt. And I've got a personal vendetta''&lt;br /&gt;
== The Broken Bicycle ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One morning in [[New York City]] a crowd of pedestrians waited for the    streetlight to change so that they could cross the intersection.  The sidewalk corner was crowded with people, as it often is, and one pedestrian stepped slightly into the street in anticipation of crossing it.  But at that moment a messenger on a bicycle was moving quickly through the intersection, and was thrown off balance by hitting the pedestrian's foot.  The bicycle crashed, destroying it beyond repair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crowd gasped in horror, but the bicyclist was unharmed.  His bicycle, however, had been ruined.  One bystander, observing that the fault was due to the pedestrian, wanted to donate so that the bicyclist could buy a replacement.  But the bystander could not afford to give him much money. So instead the bystander took out a $20 bill and handed it to the bicyclist in front of the crowd.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others then followed that example and made donations of their own to the bicyclist.  Before long he had enough to buy a replacement for his bicycle, and was back at work by the afternoon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Desperate Smoker==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ashtray.jpg|thumb|150px|Is charity really charity if it just goes up in [[cigarette|smoke]]?]]&lt;br /&gt;
A smoker was in a drug store to purchase a pack of [[cigarette]]s.  Short on cash, he emptied all his pockets in order to scrounge up with every last penny he had.  The cashier counted all the change and but found it was ten cents short of the total required for the cheapest pack of cigarettes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The smoker desperately turned to the man standing behind him and asked him for a dime.  The bystander clearly had a spare dime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should the bystander give the smoker a dime so he can purchase the pack of cigarettes?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bystander, who is generous by nature, did something more difficult for him: he denied the request and instead urged the smoker to &amp;quot;kick the habit.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The smoker then gathered all his change and left the store.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Fasting Woman ==&lt;br /&gt;
A woman had been fasting for several days and was quite weak. It was Sunday morning, and she wondered whether she had enough strength to attend church.  It would have been easy to justify not going, as she had already shown her love and devotion to God that week. But she decided to attend the services anyway. Without eating any breakfast, she prepared herself for the late morning service. She got dressed, gathered her purse and belongings, and drove off to the church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The church was filled for the late-morning service, with many hundreds of worshipers. The woman sat near the back and watched the pews fill up with members of the community, young and old. The service was about to begin. The woman then heard an unusual commotion outside, including several loud noises and shouts. She turned around several times to look at the door to the church. Her intuition told her something was wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suddenly, a large man burst through the door and began shooting at the hundreds of worshipers, children and all.  The woman mustered all her strength and pulled out her gun from her bag.  She then shot the intruder.  Stunned, and expecting to die from her shot, the intruder killed himself.  The worshipers in the church were all saved. Afterwards, the woman said that she had been &amp;quot;praying to God that he direct me&amp;quot; in what to do in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14817480/detail.html ''God Guided Me And Protected Me.''] 7 News: The Denver Channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Troubled Pregnancy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pregnant woman was doing missionary work in the Philippines.  Due to contaminated drinking water in an impoverished area, the woman contracted amoebic dysentery while pregnant.  This required that she take strong medications in order to recover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The woman's doctor told her that the medication inevitably caused irreversible damage to the developing unborn child in her womb.  The doctor advised the woman to have an [[abortion]].  The doctor told the woman that she would be burdened with a disabled child and it would be better to get rid of the unborn child now through [[abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The woman refused to have the [[abortion]] and subsequently gave birth to a baby boy, whom she named Timothy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twenty years later, [[Tim Tebow]] was recognized as the best college football player in the [[United States]] by winning the [[Heisman Trophy]], the first to win that prestigious award as only a sophomore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This parable is based on the birth and life of Tim Tebow. [http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/dec/07121108.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Lost $40 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One day a teenager received $40 from his father.  The teenager then had to drive somewhere, and he put the $40 on the seat of his car.  After going in and out of the car several times, and driving with the windows open, the $40 was gone.  He searched and searched for it, but could not find it anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He then spent dozens of hours agonizing over the lost $40, obsessed with having lost it.  It bothered him for weeks, even months.  He still remembered it years later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One day he realized that, based on the prevailing wage for teenagers of $8 per hour, that $40 was worth no more than about 6 hours of his time (after taxes).  If he had simply worked rather than worry, he would have quickly &amp;quot;found&amp;quot; the $40 and accomplished something in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Flop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A skinny young man having limited athletic ability had a determination to do his very best and win.  He picked the high jump event, but could only clear about 5' 3&amp;quot;, nowhere near what was needed to win any competitions.  But he worked tirelessly, trying all known techniques for jumping over a bar.  Still, he could not improve to the point where he could win.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet he did not give up, and harnessed his competitive spirit to invent a revolutionary style of jumping back-first over the bar.  Though lacking the athletic gifts of his competitors, the young man improved his jumping ability by a foot and more.  He began to win.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His peculiar style attracted mockery and name-calling, as people derided his technique as the &amp;quot;flop&amp;quot;.  But that did not faze him, and he continued to jump in the direction opposite to all his competitors.  Despite winning the national college high jump event, experts still considered his success to be a fluke and his approach to be a joke.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When it came time for the [[Olympics]], no one considered the young man to have a chance, and his more athletic competitors were favorites to win the high jump event.  The whole world was riveted to the television screen as the young man flawlessly cleared every height as the bar was raised again and again.  When the bar was finally raised to an Olympic record height of 7' 4 1/4&amp;quot;, only the young man and his &amp;quot;flop&amp;quot; were able to jump over it.  He had won the gold medal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virtually immediately everyone else, including those who had mercilessly mocked him, began praising and imitating his style.  To this day it is known as the &amp;quot;[[Fosbury Flop]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatf.org/halloffame/TF/showBio.asp?HOFIDs=57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Difficult Science Problem ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Physics 401 was the most difficult course in the entire college, having problem sets that would take many hours to complete each week.  The students often worked on the homework together, as allowed and even encouraged by the professor.  Students were also able to consult books and online resources in solving problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the course progressed, the problems became increasingly difficult and complex.  Some students were better than others at solving the problems.  Reputations developed about which students had answers, and which ones did not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Near the end of the course, the teacher assigned a particularly difficult problem to the class.  The night before it was due, the students gathered as they had been throughout the course, and worked as hard as they could to find the answer.  One student who had a reputation for not being as smart claimed he had the answer, and started to explain it to the others.  But the smarter students quickly rejected his approach to the problem and told him to be quiet.  Despite trying several times to describe his answer, he was ignored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The next day the students handed in their homeworks, and the following week the professor returned their graded papers.  He said that only one student had answered the difficult problem correctly.  That student was the one who had tried to explain it to the others, but they would not listen.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The one student had found the correct answer in a book not used by the other students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The [[Prodigal Son]] Has Children ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good man had two sons.  One of them was defiant and insisted on ignoring and disobeying his father, leaving him, and then squandering his money on immoral living in a distant land.  He refused to return to his father to ask forgiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually the defiant son had children of his own.  Living in squalor, his own suffering children would ask him about their grandfather.  One day his own children asked why they never visit Grandpa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first time the man looked at himself objectively, and realized how illogical and wrong it was for him to abandon his own father.  He finally returned to home to ask for forgiveness, and brought his children with him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Conservative Conference==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[conservative]] conference was scheduled for Sept. 25, 2001, expecting most attendees to travel by air.  Unfortunately, on Sept. 11, 2001 there was the [[9/11]] terrorist hijacking of airplanes and a national crisis resulting in the grounding of airplanes for a week and widespread panic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, most conferences were cancelled, and the few that were held were poorly attended.  Airplanes flew nearly empty for weeks once they were allowed to fly at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though he expected few others to attend, one [[conservative]] rejected the objections of his family and flew out to the conference.  He saw only two other passengers on his 140-seat airplane.  He checked into the hotel and felt that at least he could cheer up the conference organizers when no one else showed up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But to his great surprise, everyone else showed up.  The other attendees concluded that both [[logic]] and [[faith]] weighed in favor of traveling to the conference.  There was no logical reason for staying home, and [[faith]] eliminated any anxiety.  In fact, the [[conservatives]] did not even waste time discussing their decisions to attend, at a time when nearly all other travelers acted irrationally and avoided airplanes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Convert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Born in 1910, this child suffered from a physical handicap as a youngster and could not attend regular school. He had to wear leg braces and was eventually enrolled in a school for &amp;quot;physical defectives.&amp;quot; But that school was managed by the same organization that ran the school for &amp;quot;mental defectives&amp;quot; and, as he later explained, there was &amp;quot;some overlapping in the curriculum.&amp;quot; As a result,&lt;br /&gt;
he spent his days in basket-weaving classes, and was deprived of any formal academic instruction until age 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But he worked hard, and eventually found his way to the [[London School of Economics]], the top school of its kind in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was an avid [[socialist]], as were most of his fellow students.  But in his senior year, he happened to take an [[economics]] seminar taught by Professor [[Arnold Plant]]. That course was devoted to the &amp;quot;[[invisible hand]].&amp;quot;  It did not have any readings, and focused on stimulating discussions instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This young man's prior educational background may not have given him as much knowledge as his classmates, but it did give him an open mind.  This single course changed his life, as he embraced the logic and power of the free market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later he immigrated to the United States and became an economics professor.  But unlike most of his colleagues, he avoided mathematical equations and formulae, bucking the modern trend in his field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His extraordinary insight was that the free market always reaches the most efficient level of productive activity, in the absence of [[transaction costs]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, he was the sole recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics.  His name is [[Ronald Coase]].  To this day [[liberals]] fail to give him the recognition he earned.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jpands.org/vol12no2/schlafly.pdf The Coase Theorem: The Greatest Economic Insight of the 20th Century]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Wall ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The leader of a nation traveled to a distant land, and planned to deliver a speech there.  This leader was not known for having great intelligence, and in fact was often ridiculed within his own country.  He wondered what he should say in the foreign country while he was there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For decades, there had been a massive wall in this foreign land which denied its inhabitants the freedom to travel and visit relatives, or simply move to places having greater opportunity.  Inhabitants who tried to surmount the wall were shot and killed.  The region enclosed by the wall was subjected to communism; outside the wall capitalism and freedom existed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The leader began to focus on the wall in connection with his planned speech, and  proposed uttering the bold command, &amp;quot;tear down this wall.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But his top advisers, who were very experienced in politics and foreign policy, were adamantly against such a bold statement.  They insisted on removing it from the speech.  As each draft circulated these experts took the phrase out, but each time the leader inserted this phrase back in.  The experts felt the phrase made the leader look foolish and hopelessly naive, and could not possibly have a positive effect.  The experts were sure it would subject their leader to even more ridicule than he already endured.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the leader did not care about the potential for ridicule, and he wanted to say what he felt was best for his audience.  He ignored his experts and delivered the bold command as part of his speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The leader's advisers were horrified when they heard the words delivered in the actual speech.  They braced for a backlash and criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But two years later, to the amazement of the entire world, this wall that had stood for decades was torn down exactly as the leader courageously suggested.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070610/18speeches.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Fly Ball ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One Sunday afternoon a dozen teenagers gathered for a game of coed softball against a rival team from another [[church]].  As the first team's coach assigned his players to positions in the field, he noticed a new player on his team whom he had seen only before in church services.  She suffered from a severe case of [[cerebral palsy]], making it difficult for her to walk or use her arms.  But she always had a smile on her face, and she brought a [[softball]] glove to play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coach, against his better judgment, told her to be the right-fielder.  The coach knew that in softball the ball is hit to the right field less frequent than to other positions.  This was supposed to be a friendly game between churches, but turned out to be far more competitive than that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The game went smoothly for several innings.  But the other team was good, and it was hitting the ball hard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inevitable disaster then struck in the 6th inning, with several runners on base and two outs.  A batter for the other team hit a line drive directly at the right fielder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The coach, and indeed his entire team, turned in dreadful anticipation as they watched the ball travel at a high speed right at the player with cerebral palsy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The player held up her glove and the ball smacked directly into its pocket.  She had caught the third out.  Her team erupted in cheers and her ever-present smile glowed even wider.  Her team went on to win the game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Her teammates were inspired more by her catch than by anything else they saw the entire year'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Story of Two Psychiatrists&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; -- Or How To Deal With Liberal Critics ==&lt;br /&gt;
''Rowland Evans, the famed columnist, was having lunch with Ronald Reagan in 1987, six years into his presidency, a milestone by which the previous five presidents had been defeated, resigned in disgrace, refused to consider reelection, or assassinated. Somehow, Reagan was shining through, making it look easy, and was enormously popular. Evans, a tough old newsman, was in awe. He looked Reagan in the eye and said, “You know, Mr. President, I’ve known you for more than twenty years. I first met you in 1966, and the amazing thing is that you don’t look any older now than you did back then, and the criticism never gets you down.  How do you do it?”''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Reagan offered a parable. &amp;quot;Let me explain it this way&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me tell you the story of the two psychiatrists — the old psychiatrist and the young psychiatrist — who had a practice together. They’d come into their office every day just bubbling with enthusiasm, always happy, upbeat, smiling, and chipper. Then they’d go into their separate suites and have patients come in and lie on the couch all day and talk about the woes in their lives. At 6:00 p.m. they’d come out and the young psychiatrist would be devastated, wiped out by the day, with a stomachache, and just miserable. The old psychiatrist would be just as chipper and smiling and upbeat as he was when he went in that morning. This went on for a number of months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally one day they came out at 6:00 p.m., the young psychiatrist devastated as usual, and the old psychiatrist just as happy and smiling as he was when went in. The young psychiatrist stopped him and said, “I don’t understand it. We do the same thing every day, and I leave wiped out by hearing patients all day, and you come out after patients have been streaming in and out of your office just as upbeat as ever. How do you do it?” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The old psychiatrist paused a minute and said, “I never listen.” ''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33189 Bob Novak, a Giant of Journalism ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Welfare ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I was talking to this little girl Catherine, the daughter of some friends, and she said she wanted to be President some day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both of her parents, [[liberal]] [[Democrats]], were standing there with us - and I asked Catherine - &amp;quot;If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catherine replied - &amp;quot;I would give houses to all the homeless people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Wow - what a worthy goal you have there, Catherine.&amp;quot; I told her, &amp;quot;You don't have to wait until you're President to do that, you can come over to my house and clean up all the dog poop in my back yard and I will pay you $5. Then we can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $5 to use for a new house.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Catherine thought that over for a second, while her mom looked at me seething, and Catherine replied, &amp;quot;why doesn't the homeless guy come over and clean up the dog poop and you can just pay him the $5?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I said, &amp;quot;Welcome to the [[Republican Party]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The University Assignment==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A young student studying his first [[Politics]] assignment picked to answer the question - &amp;quot;Have we reached the end of political ideology?&amp;quot; The young student, as this was his first paper, studied hard and long to argue that there has been a rise in [[conservative]] thought in recent years as a response to growing [[globalization]] and encroaching [[liberalism]]. The lecturer gave the paper low marks despite solid referencing and an extensive bibliography. The young student felt slighted by this as he had put in many hours work. Instead of bowing down and re-writing the assignment according to [[professor values|his lecturer's standards]], the student petitioned the head of department to have his paper and final mark reviewed and also got several others to back him. In the end the student got an A grade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Little Red Hen - Ronald Reagan Version ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''''&amp;quot;About a year ago I imposed a little poetry on you. It was called &amp;quot;The Incredible Bread Machine&amp;quot; and made a lot of sense with reference to matters economic. You didn't object too much so having gotten away with it once I'm going to try again. This is a little treatise on basic economics called 'The Modern little Red Hen.'&amp;quot;''''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=wS6LcPIDRFIC&amp;amp;lpg=PA381&amp;amp;dq=%22Ronald%20Reagan%3A%20the%20power%20of%20conviction%20and%20the%20success%20of%20his%20presidency%22%20%22Little%20Red%20Hen%22&amp;amp;pg=PA380#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false ''Ronald Reagan'' By Peter J. Wallison]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once upon a time there was a little red hen who scratched about the barnyard until she uncovered some grains of wheat. She called her neighbors and said 'If we plant this wheat, we shall have bread to eat. Who will help me plant it?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not I, &amp;quot; said the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not I,&amp;quot; said the duck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not I,&amp;quot; said the pig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not I,&amp;quot; said the goose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Then I will,&amp;quot; said the little red hen. And she did. The wheat grew tall and ripened into golden grain. &amp;quot;Who will help me reap my wheat?&amp;quot; asked the little red hen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not I,&amp;quot; said the duck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Out of my classification,&amp;quot; said the pig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd lose my seniority,&amp;quot; said the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd lose my unemployment compensation,&amp;quot; said the goose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Then I will,&amp;quot; said the little red hen, and she did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At last the time came to bake the bread. &amp;quot;Who will help me bake bread?&amp;quot; asked the little red hen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;That would be overtime for me,&amp;quot; said the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd lose my welfare benefits,&amp;quot; said the duck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'm a dropout and never learned how,&amp;quot; said the pig.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If I'm to be the only helper, that's discrimination,&amp;quot; said the goose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Then I will,&amp;quot; said the little red hen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She baked five loaves and held them up for the neighbors to see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They all wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share. But the little red hen said, &amp;quot;No, I can eat the five loaves myself.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Excess profits,&amp;quot; cried the cow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Capitalist leech,&amp;quot; screamed the duck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I demand equal rights,&amp;quot; yelled the goose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the pig just grunted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And they painted &amp;quot;unfair&amp;quot; picket signs and marched round and around the little red hen shouting obscenities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the government agent came, he said to the little red hen, &amp;quot;You must not be greedy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But I earned the bread,&amp;quot; said the little red hen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Exactly,&amp;quot; said the agent. &amp;quot;That's the wonderful free enterprise system. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. &lt;br /&gt;
But under our modern government regulations productive workers must divide their products with the idle.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And they lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, &amp;quot;I am grateful, I am grateful.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But her neighbors wondered why she never again baked any more bread....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
A Parable about Socialism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and among other liberal ideals, was very much in favor of higher taxes to support more government programs, in other words, redistribution of wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Conservative, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the need for more government programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken aback, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, as she worked with other people in a group. Most of them were competent and they all worked more or less to the best of their abilities. However, due to the fact that she had formed the group, she got to distribute the grades and often saved the best for herself, based solely on the fact that she formed the group, rather than on individual performance and despite the fact that all the others worked just as hard and contributed just as much, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her father listened and then asked, 'How is your friend Audrey doing?' She replied, 'Audrey is barely getting by. She hasn't sucked up to anyone, nor has she been particularly ruthless. As a result, I've only given her a 2.0, despite her working just as hard as me. Her wise father asked his daughter, 'Why don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct 1.0 off your GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of your GPA.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired back, 'That's a crazy idea, how would that be fair! I formed the group! I had an idea that others, like Audrey, improved upon and then combined with their own ideas, then I took the credit and praise. I should be the one who gets the grades, even if the others are putting forth just as much if not more effort.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, 'Welcome to the conservative's philosophy.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Socialism In The Classroom===&lt;br /&gt;
An economics professor at Texas Tech said he had never failed a single&lt;br /&gt;
student, but had once failed an entire class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The class (students) insisted that socialism worked since no one would be poor and&lt;br /&gt;
no one would be rich, a great equalizer. The professor then said, &amp;quot;OK, we&lt;br /&gt;
will have an experiment in this class on socialism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no&lt;br /&gt;
one will fail and no one will receive an A,&amp;quot; said the professor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the first test the grades were averaged and everyone got a B. The&lt;br /&gt;
students who had studied hard were upset while the students who had studied&lt;br /&gt;
very little were happy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, as the second test rolled around, the students who had studied little&lt;br /&gt;
studied even less and the ones who had studied hard decided that since they&lt;br /&gt;
couldn't make an A, they also studied less. The second Test average was a D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one was happy. When the 3rd test rolled around the average grade was an F.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scores never increased as bickering, blame, name calling, all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for anyone else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To their great surprise they all failed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The professor told them that socialism, too, would ultimately fail because of the same basic human principles of incentive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The harder people try to succeed the greater their reward (capitalism), but when a government takes all the reward away (socialism) no one will try or succeed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= Other Parables =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Drowning Man ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A conservative and a liberal are walking along the beach when they see a man drowning a hundred feet off shore.  The conservative throws him a 50 foot rope and shouts to the victim &amp;quot;You provide the other fifty feet.&amp;quot;  The liberal throws the man a 200 foot rope...and lets go of both ends.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Missing Child ==&lt;br /&gt;
A little girl is late home from school one day. Her mother becomes increasingly worried and after 15 minutes have passed is beside herself with anxiety. Afraid to leave the house in case the child returns, and desperate to go look for her, she is on the verge of telephoning the police when the child waltzes in through the door as though nothing is amiss. Relieved and angry the mother cries: &amp;quot;Where have you been?! I've been so worried!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The child answers that she had been with the woman who lived just next door, who had very recently lost her husband. &amp;quot;What have you been doing bothering the poor lady next door?&amp;quot; the mother asks crossly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I haven't been bothering her, I've been comforting her,&amp;quot; says the little girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Comforting her? You're just a child, what could you do to comfort her?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I sat in her lap and I cried with her.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes there are ''no'' solutions, no smart come-backs, no quick fixes that can be determined through intellectual reasoning or policy making. As Dreher says: '''Politics and economics won’t save us; if our culture is to be saved at all, it will be by faithfully living by the Permanent Things, conserving these ancient moral truths in the choices we make in our everyday lives.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dreher, Rod. &amp;quot;A Crunchy Con Manifesto&amp;quot; [http://crunchycon.nationalreview.com/about/ National Review Online]. 26 December 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cottrell, Stephen. ''I Thirst.'' (Zondervan; Grand Rapids, [[Michigan]]; 2003.) ISBN 0-310-25069-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Atheist and the Believer ==&lt;br /&gt;
An atheist and a believer were having a discussion. &amp;quot;I don't believe in anything I can't understand!&amp;quot; cried the atheist. &amp;quot;Ah,&amp;quot; said the believer gently. &amp;quot;Then your beliefs must be very small.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Communism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who ''understands'' Marx and Lenin.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://listverse.com/2009/02/21/20-great-quotes-from-ronald-reagan/ Ronald Reagan; Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Umgawa ==&lt;br /&gt;
by R.W. Grant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While junketing in Africa&lt;br /&gt;
Our senator one day&lt;br /&gt;
A friendly tribe did gather 'round&lt;br /&gt;
To hear what he would say.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Said he, &amp;quot;I bring enlightment!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Umgawa!&amp;quot; they all cried&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you'd but follow our advice!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Umgawa!&amp;quot; they replied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'll tell you how our system works,&lt;br /&gt;
I'll tell you how it's run:&lt;br /&gt;
We serve the public good by force!&lt;br /&gt;
And this is how it's done:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If one needs what others earn&lt;br /&gt;
No longer need one steal it!&lt;br /&gt;
Our government now does the job&lt;br /&gt;
And people hardly feel it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Umgawa!&amp;quot; they cried out again -&lt;br /&gt;
The senator continued then:&lt;br /&gt;
And we will show you how it's done,&lt;br /&gt;
And we will show the way,&lt;br /&gt;
So you may have Utopia&lt;br /&gt;
As in the U.S.A.!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our senator was finished now.&lt;br /&gt;
The chief rose with a smile:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thank you for your words,&amp;quot; he said,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Now stay with us a while!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The senator was pleased as punch&lt;br /&gt;
With witnessing that day&lt;br /&gt;
The happy people at their work,&lt;br /&gt;
The children at their play,&lt;br /&gt;
As he was greeted all about:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Umgawa!&amp;quot; was the happy shout.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And now the chieftain said, &amp;quot;My friend,&lt;br /&gt;
Come see our cattle which we tend!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
So off across the pasture now&lt;br /&gt;
The senator was led -&lt;br /&gt;
But suddenly the chief said &amp;quot;Wait!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
He took his arm and said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A word of caution ere we pass -&lt;br /&gt;
Don't step before you look -&lt;br /&gt;
Lest, my friend, you tread upon&lt;br /&gt;
Umgawa underfoot!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Graduate's Gift ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An arrogant young man was getting ready to graduate from college. For many months he had admired a beautiful sports car in a dealer's showroom, and knowing his wealthy father could easily afford it, he told him that was all he wanted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Graduation Day approached, the young man awaited signs that his father had purchased the car. Finally, on the morning of his graduation, his father called him into his private study. His father told him how proud he was to have such a fine son, and told him how much he loved him. He handed his son a beautifully wrapped gift box. Curious, and somewhat disappointed, the young man opened the box and found a lovely, leather-bound Bible, with the young man's name embossed in gold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Angry, he shouted at his father and said &amp;quot;with all your money, you give me a Bible?&amp;quot; and stormed out of the house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many years passed and the young man had become very successful in business. He had a beautiful home and wonderful family, but realized his father now was getting old, and thought perhaps he should go see him. He had not seen him since that graduation day. Before he could make arrangements, he received a telegram telling him his father had passed away, and willed all of his possessions to his son. He needed to come home immediately and take care of things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When he arrived at his father's house, sudden sadness and regret filled his heart. He began to search through his father's important papers and saw the still gift-wrapped Bible, just as he had left it years ago. With tears, he opened the Bible and began to turn the pages. His father had carefully underlined a verse, Matt.7:11, &amp;quot;And if ye, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Heavenly Father which is in Heaven, give to those who ask Him?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As he read those words, a car key dropped from the back of the Bible. It had a tag with the dealer's name, the same dealer who had the sports car he had wanted. On the tag was the date of his graduation, and the words PAID IN FULL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Pitcher, the Chicken, and the Crow ==&lt;br /&gt;
A thirsty chicken and a thirsty crow were each given a pitcher of water. First they tried reaching into the pitchers with their beaks, but neither could reach the water. Then they tried pushing the pitchers over, but they were heavy and sturdily built so they would not tip.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chicken began flapping its wings and strutted up to the crow. &amp;quot;No fair!&amp;quot; squawked the chicken &amp;quot;the greedy farmer hasn't given us enough water.&amp;quot; The crow shrugged, and began hopping around the pitcher, looking at it this way and that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chicken strutted off and went to complain to the farmer. It squawked and squawked, but the farmer ignored it. It went back to the crow, who was grabbing pebbles in his beak and dropping them into its pitcher with pebbles. &amp;quot;Come with me!&amp;quot; it said, &amp;quot;Let's demand that the farmer give us our water!&amp;quot; The crow ignored it and returned to his work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chicken went again to the farmer and decided to take its protest to the next level. It scratched and pecked at the farmer's leg, cutting the skin, until the farmer angrily kicked it away. Indignant, the chicken went back to the crow, squawking more than ever. &amp;quot;That brutal farmer kicked me,&amp;quot; it complained. &amp;quot;when all I was doing was demanding my rights.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By this point the crow was standing on the top of his pitcher, happily drinking. He had dropped enough pebbles into the pitcher that the water level had risen nearly to the top. The chicken saw this and walked up to the crow to complain. &amp;quot;Unfair!&amp;quot; it cried. &amp;quot;I want water too.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crow looked over at the chicken and told him: &amp;quot;I have water because while you were complaining, I was looking for a way to get the water. The first two ways did not work, but I kept trying until I came up with something better. Then I patiently put in the hard work to put my plan into action, and now, finally, I can drink. You can do the same with your pitcher, and you will have water too. You are bigger and stronger than me, so it will be even easier for you.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chicken strutted over to his pitcher and picked up one pebble and dropped it in and sat down. &amp;quot;This is hard work!&amp;quot; it complained &amp;quot;I'm thirsty and I'm tired.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crow looked over at the chicken and said &amp;quot;just this one time I will be charitable. You can drink from my pitcher, but next time you must do the work yourself.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chicken hopped up and stuck its head down. Because its beak was shorter than the crow's, it could not quite reach the water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You cheated me!&amp;quot; it cried, &amp;quot;I cannot reach the water!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I am sorry,&amp;quot; said the crow, &amp;quot;but you are only a few pebbles short. Surely you can do the tiny bit of work yourself.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The crow flew off, its thirst satiated. The chicken scratched at the ground and squawked and squawked but nobody would listen and it stayed thirsty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Greatest Conservative Parables]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]] Example 3 [the enacted parable]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&amp;diff=1033806</id>
		<title>Conservapedia proven right</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&amp;diff=1033806"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:54:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup, even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed.  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Bold text''I've seen a lot of stupid pages, but this one is one of the stupidest. By far.'''&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Date of ''Conservapedia'' statement&lt;br /&gt;
!''Conservapedia'' statement&lt;br /&gt;
![[liberal claptrap]] in response&lt;br /&gt;
!Result&lt;br /&gt;
!Date of Result&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Dec. 26, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[Nobel Prize]] &amp;quot;selection process has become political, as it was not given to Ronald Reagan or Pope John Paul II or to anyone who criticizes the [[theory of evolution]]. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken [[liberal]]s, such as Jimmy Carter.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&amp;amp;oldid=7393&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
|Subsequently the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to [[Barack Obama]] despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with &amp;quot;shock&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|October 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mar. 24, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Pointed out how hostile the [[Fox News Channel]] is to [[pro-life]] leaders,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sean_Hannity&amp;amp;oldid=64126&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and  observed in 2012 how it had become a bunch of [[RINO Backers]].&lt;br /&gt;
|Silence by [[liberals]] who like pretending that [[Fox News Channel]] is [[conservative]], when it isn't.&lt;br /&gt;
|The ratings of Fox News drops to a 12-year low, doing particularly poorly among the 25-54 age group.&lt;br /&gt;
|January 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Aug. 18, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Because [[Jon Stewart]]'s movies &amp;quot;almost always do very badly (critically and financially) people say that there is a 'Jon Stewart Curse' that he brings to all his movies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Jon_Stewart&amp;amp;oldid=271190&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|His audience of [[public school]] kids is clueless.&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2008 Oscars, which he hosted, set the modern record for fewest viewers, and except for one very minor part as himself Stewart has not appeared in a movie since Conservapedia's observation in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 24, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|In 2007, Conservapedia creates its [[Homosexuality in animals myth]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals tout a supposed &amp;quot;gay [[penguin]]&amp;quot; in a California zoo.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://americansfortruth.com/2009/07/15/gay-penguin-flies-straight/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals rabidly deny someone can be an [[ex-homosexuals|ex-homosexual]]. Ex-homosexual is faced with a $10,000 fine, spends $7,000 in legal fees, and is forced to go to pro-homosexuality classes by a liberal judge who claimed he engaged in a aggressive behavior in a discussion with homosexual man (during his discussion the ex-homosexual man was holding a baby).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56702&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|In 2010, the alleged gay penguin in a California zoo starts a romance with lady penguin and abandons his supposed male penguin lover. The homosexual activist [[Wayne Besen]] claims the penguin is living in denial and not an [[ex-homosexuals|ex-homosexual]] male penguin. (see: [[Homosexuality in animals myth]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://americansfortruth.com/2009/07/15/gay-penguin-flies-straight/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2010    &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jan. 10, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia observes that [[Shaken Baby Syndrome]] is a doubtful theory by governmental child protective services, which has resulted in dubious convictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shaken_Baby_Syndrome&amp;amp;oldid=367617&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The governmental &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; must be right and Conservapedia must somehow be wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
|Years later, even [[National Public Radio]] admitted doubts about a conviction for Shaken Baby Syndrome, and [[Democrat]] Governor [[Jerry Brown]] commuted a high-profile sentence for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/04/shaken-baby-case-an-update/#.T4DftOjeRkI.email&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|March and April 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia warns against the [[HPV vaccine]], observing that it was not tested for possibly causing infertility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=HPV_vaccine&amp;amp;oldid=395596&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|How can government and the big pharmaceutical industry be wrong???&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''British Medical Journal'' reports on a case study of a severe condition of infertility in a 16-year-old girl subsequent to taking the HPV vaccine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://casereports.bmj.com/content/2012/bcr-2012-006879.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|October 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|summer and fall 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Observed that [[Barack Obama]] is likely Muslim and could become the first Muslim President.&lt;br /&gt;
|While liberals would denounce the religion of Obama's future rival, [[Mitt Romney]], they insist that Obama's religion cannot be questioned.&lt;br /&gt;
|Once elected, Obama stops attending church, and he eschews using a Bible for his official swearing-in procedure; [[Obama's Religion|Obama makes it clear that he is likely Muslim]] in additional ways.&lt;br /&gt;
|January 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2008-2010&lt;br /&gt;
|Beginning in March of 2008, Conservapedia begins chronicling higher education moral corruption via its [[Professor values]] article. Starting in 2010, Conservapedia repeatedly warns students about picking their college majors on its main page. See: [[Worst college majors]] Conservapedia also cites [[Gerald Celente]] about future protests in Europe/Europe and cites Celente concerning useless college majors which needlessly rack up debts in young people. Conservapedia warns about a future &amp;quot;higher educational bubble&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/archive91&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal colleges and liberal press do not give enough attention to the issue of picking a college major. Nor does the liberal press sufficiently warn about future protests. Liberal press does not give adequate coverage to the issue of higher education moral corruption. Liberal press and liberal academia do not sufficiently warn about the poor education universities and colleges are often providing. &lt;br /&gt;
|In January of 2011, it is reported that a study shows that a very large percentage of college students are not developing higher thinking skills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/01/18/106949/study-many-college-students-not.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The trend of liberal colleges closing their doors continues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/07/09/baldwin&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/5312/losing_liberal_arts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Occupy Wall Street]] and other Occupy protests happen in the United States and in Europe in 2011 and young people are very prevalent in the protests. Some protests turn violent and engage in property destruction. In November of 2011, the Daily Mail reports concerning the Occupy Wall Street movement and the trash/garbage associated with it: &amp;quot;If this is the product of our liberal arts colleges, why continue their tax exemptions and tax support? Universities are supposed to produce intelligent people who will make a positive contribution to society. Not these pigs&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/46288&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2011, it is reported that Occupy movements are littering the streets.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freestaterevolution.com/?p=1967&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young Occupy Wall Street protestors are caught on film mindlessly doing a pro-[[bestiality]] chant (see: [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]]). &lt;br /&gt;
|The Occupy movements of 2011 are still prevalent in the world and the unemployment levels of young people remain high.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Dec. 22, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
|the theory of [[man-made global warming]] is not verified science, and there is no consensus&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;amp;oldid=592227&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;The science is settled&amp;quot; that rapid [[global warming]] is somehow occurring, despite much evidence to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
|Frigid temperatures, October blizzards, and rejection of the theory by the American public; liberals try to change the terminology to &amp;quot;[[climate change]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|August 2009 to 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia indicates that [[Ben Bernanke]]'s investment portfolio dropped in value in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/August_2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Conservapedia declares, &amp;quot;Given the abysmal economic policy of Bernanke and the [[Obama administration]], Bernanke probably should invest in gold.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/August_2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During the period of 2010-2011, Conservapedia cited the investor Jim Rogers who repeatedly suggests that people invest in commodites.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&amp;amp;redirs=0&amp;amp;search=%22Jim+rogers%22&amp;amp;fulltext=Search&amp;amp;ns0=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLL9YdR2y2g Jim Rogers : Missing out on Commodities?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals call Conservapedians &amp;quot;gold bugs&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|As of November 2011, the price of gold has gone up dramatically. The price has gone from about $950 an ounce to about $1,700 an ounce.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au1825nyb.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Price of gold continues to have an overall upward trend. In August of 2011, the ''[[Financial Times]]'' has an article entitled &amp;quot;Gold remains world's most powerful trend&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://video.ft.com/v/1135911356001/Gold-remains-world-s-most-powerful-trend Gold remains world's most powerful trend]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Wall Street Journal reports in 2011 that &amp;quot;Companies Stock Up as Commodities Prices Rise&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704775604576120533736097682.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In November of 2011, Unilever warns about rising commodity prices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/unilever-warns-about-rising-commodity-prices-6256894.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|August of 2009 to 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|September 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia mentions that some Americans are turning to self-employment during the economic downturn as jobs are difficult to come by. In addition, Conservapedia mentions developing multiple streams of income in case the economy goes into a depression and many people lose their jobs. Conservapedia also gives resources and suggestions for low cost businesses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/Main_Page/Previous_Conservapedia_Breaking_News/Archives/September_2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The liberal &amp;quot;graduate student at a [[sociology]] department somewhere in the United States&amp;quot; at the Total Drek blog seems to shiver in horror at the hard work involved. In addition, he appears to want people to have a defeatist cry in their beer attitude instead of having a proactive and creative can do attitude.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://totaldrek.blogspot.com/2009/09/conservapedia-for-laughs-or-facepalms.html Conservapedia: For laughs or facepalms - Tuesday, September 08, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2011, Conservapedia indicates that a sociology major is one of the [[worst college majors]] to have.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Barack Obama]]'s [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009|&amp;quot;stimulus&amp;quot; package]] fails. Many Americans lose their jobs and have their unemployment benefits run out. In 2011, Fox News reports that most unemployed no longer receive unemployment benefits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/05/most-us-unemployed-no-longer-receive-benefits/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Homelessness increases and &amp;quot;[[Obamaville]]s&amp;quot; spring up.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebradentontimes.com/news/2011/11/09/community/national_hunger_and_homelessness_awareness_week_puts_spotlight_on_increasing_need/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Unemployment in the United States and many other countries remains high.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bls.gov/fls/intl_unemployment_rates_monthly.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2011, Cafe Press is selling unemployed sociology major bumper stickers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cafepress.com/+unemployed_sociology_major_bumper_sticker,25387924&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|World economy continues to skate on thin ice and the Eurozone is experiencing significant economic problems. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|January 14, 2010&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Robert_Menendez&amp;amp;oldid=744786&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia identifies the significance of an effort to recall Menendez from office.&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals stood by Menendez for years.&lt;br /&gt;
|Finally the ''[[New York Times]]'' said that [[Harry Reid]] should take a committee gavel away from Menendez.&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|March 14, 2010&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&amp;amp;oldid=762021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' predicted that [[Rick Santorum]] was a stalking horse for [[Mitt Romney]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Some mistakenly viewed Santorum as the only other option besides Romney, at the expense of [[Newt Gingrich]]&lt;br /&gt;
|After taking votes away from Gingrich, Santorum surprised many by dropping out of the race, practically giving the victory to Romney; Santorum then endorsed Romney-like [[Jon Bruning]] instead of the [[conservative]] [[Don Stenberg]] for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[Nebraska]], and then endorsed Romney in a late-night email.&lt;br /&gt;
|April to May 7, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|April 19, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|In [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]], ''Conservapedia'' observed that intelligence has long been declining.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;amp;oldid=770704&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Repeated attempts to remove the insight from the entry.&lt;br /&gt;
|A Stanford University geneticist confirms that intelligence has been declining for thousands of years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/nov/12/pampered-humanity-less-intelligent&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Nov. 12, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mid-June 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Atheistic]] [[Britain]] would embarrass itself in the [[World Cup]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;News archives for June 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] shouts down any observation of the correlation between atheism and underachievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;England's performance at South Africa 2010 was officially their worst at a World Cup finals, according to Fifa.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/world_cup_2010/8814195.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|July 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|June 30, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|In an [[Letter to Douglas Moo|open letter to a leader]] of a new revision to the [[NIV]] [[Bible]], ''Conservapedia'' expressed &amp;quot;concern that your Committee might produce a liberal translation that distorts and conceals references to the unborn child in appeasement of the pro-abortion position.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|No response to the letter, and a prior expression of ridicule of the [[Conservapedia Bible Project]] before that.&lt;br /&gt;
|The new version [[Feminist Bible|distorts and conceals numerous references]] to the unborn child in the Bible, apparently to appease the pro-abortion position.&lt;br /&gt;
|Nov. 1, 2010&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thechurchofjesuschrist.us/2010/10/new-niv-text-to-be-made-available-online-november-1/ (announcing availability of online version)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|August 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|In August of 2010, Conservapedia created the article [[Women's views of Richard Dawkins]] indicating that [[Richard Dawkins]] had a significant problem with the women segment of the marketplace and that he [[Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins|was abrasive]] and [[Atheism and cowardice|cowardly.]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist men scoff at the article. &lt;br /&gt;
|In July of 2011, the [[Elevatorgate]] scandal occurs. A woman in the [[Skepchick]] community says &amp;quot;I look forward to watching your legacy crash and burn&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzoCyyqmp5b5LUdobkxhblpmTDA/edit?pli=1 Skepchick woman]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|July of 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Oct. 14, 2010&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia observes and predicts increased premature graying as a [[Counterexample to an Old Earth]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;amp;oldid=822877&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] that premature graying is increasing.&lt;br /&gt;
|A top actress -- Katie Holmes, the wife of Tom Cruise -- is observed having gray hairs at only age 33.&lt;br /&gt;
|April 29, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 28, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Predicted that [[Sarah Palin]] will not be the [[Republican]] nominee for president, after observing how [[Facebook]] (which personified her political approach) lost the [[Academy Award]] to ''The King's Speech''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&amp;amp;oldid=852880&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[lamestream media]] continued to promote Palin as a leading contender for more than six months.&lt;br /&gt;
|Palin announced she will not be a candidate for the nomination and has lost political influence.&lt;br /&gt;
|October 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|August 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|In the late summer of 2011, a Conservapedian was very optimistic on [[Creation Ministries International]]'s [[Question evolution! campaign]] and continues to be very optimistic. &lt;br /&gt;
|Atheists and evolutionists whine about the campaign plus a YouTube atheist and/or evolutionist creates a fairly popular yet ultimately ineffective video which is easily refuted. See: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRz0ORtoIRg&amp;amp;feature=BFa&amp;amp;list=PL12B8A2B1F72664EC&amp;amp;lf=plpp_play_all 15 Questions Evolutionists STILL can't answer!]&lt;br /&gt;
|The website traffic of [[Creation Ministries International]] (CMI) sees significant growth post August 2011 (see: [[Essay: Grinding up American atheism into a fine pulp|CMI web traffic growth]]). Atheists and evolutionists have yet to adequately answer the [http://creation.com/15-questions 15 questions that satisfactorily evolutionists cannot answer] which is the focus of the [[Question evolution! campaign]].  Global atheism continues to fall in the number of its adherents.&lt;br /&gt;
|Fall of 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|July 2, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Chris Christie]] will endorse [[Mitt Romney]] for president&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[lamestream media]] insisted that Christie was a contender himself.&lt;br /&gt;
|Chris Christie made a special endorsement of Mitt Romney for president&lt;br /&gt;
|Oct. 11, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sept. 3, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Large earthquakes are increasing in frequency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Counterexamples_to_an_Old_Earth&amp;amp;oldid=909160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] becaues this would suggest that [[atheist]]ic claims of a stable [[Old Earth]] are untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;Sept. 3, 2011&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;quot;A remarkable increase in the rate of (magnitude 3) and greater earthquakes is currently in progress,&amp;quot; according to a presentation at the Seismological Society of America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/us-earthquakes-usa-idUSBRE83G1FL20120417&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|April 17, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nov. 2, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia claimed that [[Pacific Institute]] was not a non-partisan environmental group but deceitful liberals promoting lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretend that Peter Gleick and other environmentalists don't utilize bad science or push political agendas&lt;br /&gt;
|Pacific Institute's president Peter Gleick promoted bad science and pushed a biased liberal political agenda by admitting to fraud in 2012. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/02/21/climate-scientist-admits-stealing-docs-from-conservative-think-tank/ Climate scientist admits stealing docs from conservative think tank, Fox News, February 21, 2012]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 21, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nov. 29, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Conservapedia pointed out the connection between violent video games and [[young mass murderers]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;amp;oldid=941531&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Nonsense, liberals claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
|An unspeakable slaughter of 20 elementary school children occurred in Newtown, Connecticut by a 20-year-old player of violent video games, followed by a mass burning of violent games weeks later.&lt;br /&gt;
|Dec. 17, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jan. 3, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' declared [[Rick Santorum]] the winner of the [[Iowa Caucuses]] before all the results were in, and despite polling suggesting he would only attain third place&lt;br /&gt;
|For weeks the [[lamestream media]] insisted that [[Mitt Romney]] won.&lt;br /&gt;
|Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner&lt;br /&gt;
|late January 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 7, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' declared [[Rick Santorum]] the winner of the [[Colorado]] primary relatively early in the evening, long before all the results were in, and despite Romney later surpassing Santorum during part of the night&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals delayed for hours before admitting that Santorum would win.&lt;br /&gt;
|Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner&lt;br /&gt;
|early February 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mid-March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Disney movies, which have churned out liberal claptrap for more than a decade, strike out again on opening night for Disney's lame ''John Carter''. The last Disney movie to qualify for [[Greatest Conservative Movies]] was its brilliant Beauty and the Beast (1991).&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals don't criticize Disney as long it continues to promote [[feminism]] and other liberal drivel.&lt;br /&gt;
|The Disney film unit chairman &amp;quot;resigned following the company’s $200 million loss on the science-fiction picture 'John Carter,' possibly the biggest ever for a single movie.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|April 20, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' criticizes the Denver Broncos for replacing [[Tim Tebow]] with Peyton Manning, and adds Manning to the list of [[Overrated Sports Stars]].&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals insist that Manning will be better for Broncos, and pretend that politics had nothing to do with this surprise replacement.&lt;br /&gt;
|To the amazement of liberals, Manning throws 2 key interceptions that enable the underdog Ravens to humiliate the Broncos in Denver in their first playoff game.&lt;br /&gt;
|January 11, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|June 23, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' adds [[David Beckham]] to the list of [[Overrated Sports Stars]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals desperately tried to find a role for Beckham, eventually having him play the absurd part of conveying the torch by speedboat to the Olympic Stadium while the final part of the ceremony was in progress. &lt;br /&gt;
|To the amazement of liberals, Beckham was not even selected for the British Olympic soccer team, even though other players over the age of 23 were selected. Subsequently, the media promoted Beckham as the likely final torchbearer, which was instead given to [[the best of the public]] (five unknown but rising young athletes). &lt;br /&gt;
|June 28, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|September 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' added [[God]]-denier [[Lance Armstrong]] to our list of [[Overrated Sports Stars]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] continued about Armstrong, insisting that he be removed from this entry because Armstrong continued to deny the obvious;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1004539]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the liberal Olympic bureaucrats refused for months to strip Armstrong of his medal, until after Armstrong admitted his doping.&lt;br /&gt;
|Finally and pathetically Armstrong admitted what he had so aggressively denied about doping.&lt;br /&gt;
|January 14, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fall 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' repeatedly predicted that liberals would not allow one of the [[Greatest Conservative Sports Stars|Greatest Conservative Sports Star]]s, [[Tim Tebow]], to have any real playing time on the ''New York Jets'', and that it would pathetically fail without Tebow.&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals insisted Tebow would play if the other QB failed, or that Tebow was not good enough to play, despite how he led the underachieving Broncos to a playoff victory against the highly ranked Steelers.&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''New York Jets'' failed miserably while never giving Tebow any real playing time, and the ''Jets'' were eliminated from playoff contention even before the last week of the season.&lt;br /&gt;
|December 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nov. 18, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' observed that the ''L.A. Lakers'' had packed their starting line-up with [[Overrated Sports Stars]], and then hired their preferred coach despite how a better one was available.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Overrated_Sports_Stars&amp;amp;oldid=1019273&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals thought these players and the hiring of the new coach were good because the media told them so.&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''L.A. Lakers'' run their record to 15-20, after losing 5 in a row, and in a massive embarrassment are unlikely even to make the playoffs.&lt;br /&gt;
|January 10, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 3, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conservapedia'' observed that extended 35-minute blackout at the [[Super Bowl]] was likely caused in part by the energy rationing mindset of liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|It was a faulty relay, the [[lamestream media]] and local authorities claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
|It was not a faulty relay - relays almost never fail in such a manner, as confirmed by an expert quoted by ''National Geographic''.&lt;br /&gt;
|Feb. 9, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia proven wrong]] - A much shorter list!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=1033805</id>
		<title>Global warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=1033805"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:53:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:NASA-1024x933.jpg|thumb|right|250px|A composite map of [[Antarctica]] showing areas of greatest warming in red. The Wilkins Ice Shelf lies off the peninsula in the top left corner, and shows extensive warming. Overall, Antarctica shows little warming, and many areas to the  East (right) are cooling&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roberts, Greg. &amp;quot;Antarctic Ice is Growing, Not Melting Away.&amp;quot; April 18, 2009. http://www.news.com.au/antarctic-ice-is-growing-not-melting-away/story-0-1225700043191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Global warming''' is the [[liberal]] hoax&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cringing Over Climategate [http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/01/climategate-scandal-science-obama-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html Forbes], 12/2/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate [http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/11/23/climategate-2-0-new-e-mails-rock-the-global-warming-debate/ Forbes], 11/23/2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the world is becoming dangerously warmer due to the human pollution of greenhouse gasses, such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide. Liberals have used this theory of [[Global warming theory|man-made global warming]] to justify demands for a more powerful government and that the government needs to assert more controls over energy production and consumption in order to stop the Earth from warming. Although supposedly 2005 and 2010 are the warmest years on record based on unscientific surface thermometers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2010-warmest-year.html NASA Research Finds 2010 Tied for Warmest Year on Record, Jan. 12 2011, NASA]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; more reliable measures of temperature (such as oceanic or atmospheric temperature) do not show such an increase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/08/10/not-hot-ocean-sst-around-the-usa-not-anywhere-near-record-levels/ &amp;quot;Not so hot – ocean temperatures around the USA are not anywhere near record levels&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Moreover, natural periods of global warming and global cooling are expected to occur regardless of human activity, and not long ago liberals were demanding more government control to combat an alleged cooling in temperatures, with some scientists warning of a possible ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Science: Another Ice Age?'' Time magazine, Monday, Jun. 24, 1974&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Global cooling]], a theory that predates global warming, obviously occurs naturally many times throughout [[Earth|Earth's]] geological history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;After any given warming phase begins, thousands of years later the cyclical [[Milankovitch]] decrease in the sun's heat kicks in. The warming stops, reverses and an [[ice age]] ensues.&amp;quot; [http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn06092007.html Counterpunch], June 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ease of refutation of anthropogenic global cooling claims foretells the eventual fate of the current global warming hysteria.&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Bold text''its real people!!! why else do we have these bipolar a$$ winters?!!!! I'm over it people!!'''&lt;br /&gt;
Many political activists use the term &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; to refer to [[anthropogenic global warming theory]] (AGW), which asserts that human activity such as spewing &amp;quot;[[greenhouse gases]]&amp;quot; is causing an increase in temperature and is more significant than natural causes and cycles. The AGW theory is supported by left-leaning political parties, as well as a majority of sovereign states, national agencies, and an intergovernmental panel (see [[IPCC]]). The reality is that there is no immediate global crisis, and even dire warnings by the UN's [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC) admit that significant effects will not be manifested for at least 100 years. Predictions made by [[climate model]]s publicized by the IPCC have not come to pass in recent years. Many scientists, such as Hal Lewis, have decried global warming as a conspiracy for the purpose of securing trillions of dollars in grant money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 2009, emails were disclosed that implicated a wrongful manipulation and concealment of data by scientists who have insisted that there is dangerous man-made global warming. Prior to [[ClimateGate]], both the Republican and Democratic party Platforms in 2008 suggested that global warming is happening, that it is caused by human activity, and that it should be counteracted. For example, in 2007, the Republican presidential candidate Senator [[John McCain]] called global warming &amp;quot;an issue we can no longer afford to ignore&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/John_McCain_Environment.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2010, an independent analysis cleared the scientists involved of any wrongdoing, but the effects of the scandal still linger.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hilary Whiteman. [http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/07/07/climategate.email.review/?hpt=Sbin 'Climategate' review clears scientists of dishonesty], ''CNN World'', July 07, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unsuccessful Democratic candidate for President in 2000, [[Al Gore]], won a [[Nobel Prize]] in 2007 for claiming that there is a dangerous man-made global warming that threatens the world. However, it has since been revealed that he convinced many people through inaccurate information in his &amp;quot;documentary,&amp;quot; i.e., he only won the Nobel Prize by lying.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Citation needed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Summary of Arguments Against Anthropogenic Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
The following facts can help dissuade even the most illogical of liberals from believing in the flawed theory of anthropogenic global warming. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature Flat ===&lt;br /&gt;
The overall temperature has been flat for about 16 years. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .  &lt;br /&gt;
=== Data Manipulation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Climate data stating otherwise has been proven to be manipulated.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=30000] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
=== Alternate Causation ===&lt;br /&gt;
-Even if global warming did actually exist, the overall effect of human activities on global warming are minimal, if not nonexistent.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-08-30/news/ct-oped-0830-byrne-20110830_1_cosmic-rays-aerosols-magnetic-field] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Science of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Presence of CO2===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the primary concerns of Global Warming research is the increased presence of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Original claims stated that the increase in carbon dioxide - which is a greenhouse gas - were caused primarily through the burning of [[fossil fuels]], and that such increases were the foremost cause of global temperatures rising. Historically, Global temperature changes precede changes in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most obvious way that this would occur would be through the evaporation of ocean water. The oceans are the single largest storage unit for carbon dioxide gas on the planet, containing about 93% of the Earth's carbon dioxide. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/Bi-Ca/Carbon-Dioxide-in-the-Ocean-and-Atmosphere.html] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As temperatures rise, ocean water evaporates, causing the dissolved carbon dioxide gas to enter the atmosphere, and begin trapping radiation from the sun. Scientists now believe that this cycle causes a sort of chain effect, where increased temperature causes more carbon dioxide to enter the atmosphere, which in turn causes more temperature rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also noteworthy to point out that carbon dioxide, while not as abundant in the atmosphere, has a more significant effect on global warming than water vapor does. Carbon dioxide cannot form clouds, as water vapor does. When water vapor forms clouds, those clouds actually block some of the sun's radiation from reaching the Earth, causing water vapor to both contribute positively and negatively to global temperature rise. Carbon dioxide can only act as a greenhouse gas, causing the above mentioned cyclic effect. The current concentration of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere is about 392 ppm, which is the highest it has been in at least 800,000 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide&amp;quot; [http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/mlo.html NOAA], December 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Modern Warm Period===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Average [[Earth]] surface air temperature has risen about 1° F since 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hansen's group at the Goddard Institute wrote, &amp;quot;Global warming is now 0.6&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.0&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past three decades and 0.8&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.4&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past century.&amp;quot; http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Studies have ruled out the possibility that errors in the measurements and sampling significantly affect the temperature trends detected over the past century. This accounts for spatial errors in the sampling and thus also incorporates errors associated with the urban-heating effect. According to Karl et al. (1993) ''&amp;quot;Results imply that the errors associated with century-scale trends of temperature are probably an order of magnitude smaller than the observed global warming of nearly 0.5°C per 100 years since the late nineteenth century&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994JCli....7.1144K Karl et al. (1993) 'Global and Hemispheric Temperature Trends: Uncertainties Related to Inadequate Spatial Sampling' in Journal of Climate, 7(7); 1144 - 1168&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to temperature reconstruction made within an [[Old Earth]] paradigm, there have been many cycles of naturally-caused global warming and cooling over many millions of years (see [[climate cycles]]). Some scientists, including [[Richard Lindzen]] of [[MIT]], [[Sallie Baliunas]] of [[Harvard]] and [[Fred Singer]] (independent), say that the recent warming could be part of another natural cycle or random fluctuations in the atmosphere. However, many scientists also think that human activities were most likely the cause of the the planet's recent warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recent studies of the Milankovitch Cycles, which predict Earth's climate by studying changes in its orbit and axial tilt, suggest that we are currently 18,000 years into a 150,000 year period between ice ages. This would imply that we should expect the temperature to be rising anyway. A 2002 study by Berger and Loutre suggests 50,000 years of warmer weather before Earth begins to cool again, but that model incorroprated anthropogenic forces and concluded:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;While combinations of natural forcings produce a gradual warming up to about 1960, none of them leads to a warming over the last 30 years (this period containing three major volcanic eruptions). In contrast, simulations incorporating only anthropogenic forcings reproduce the warming over the last three decades at a rate consistent with that observed, but underestimate the early 20th century warming. As a consequence, only the use of both natural and anthropogenic forcings allows to reproduce much of the observed decadal scale variations of the annual mean hemispheric temperature over the last 150 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0870.2002.00287.x/full] Climate of the last millennium: a sensitivity study, May 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted, however, that computer simulated climate models are often tweaked so they agree with the historical temperature record. There is no way to completely simulate all of the Earth's climate with a computer program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sun Spots===&lt;br /&gt;
Sunspot activity is a factor in climate fluctuations, however, little details were known about how much of an impact these fluctuations had on the Earth's climate. During the deepest solar minimum ever recorded, from 2005 to 2010, NASA measured the Earth's energy balance, i.e. the amount of energy absorbed by the sun subtract the amount of energy lost to radiation into space. They concluded:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If the Sun were the only climate forcing or the dominant climate forcing, then the planet would gain energy during the solar maxima, but lose energy during solar minima. The fact that Earth gained energy at a rate 0.58 W/m2 during a deep prolonged solar minimum reveals that there is a strong positive forcing overwhelming the negative forcing by below-average solar irradiance. That result is not a surprise, given knowledge of other forcings, but it provides unequivocal refutation of assertions that the Sun is the dominant climate forcing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_16/ NASA: Earth's Energy Imbalance] nasa.gov, January, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However, just because the sun isn't the dominate force, doesn't mean that it doesn't nonetheless have a significant impact upon the Earth's climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Unnecessary Expansion of Government===&lt;br /&gt;
The idea of dangerous anthropogenic (man-made) global warming (AGW) is promoted by liberals and socialists seeking greater government control over the production and use of energy, which is a substantial percentage of the economy. In economic terms, they would like to 'internalize' the 'externality,' which is to say that they think that producers of emissions should be directly connected to the consequences of those emissions, leading syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer to warn of an impending ''Environmental Shakedown''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/11/copenhagen_shakedown.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Public Stances on Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Politicization of the Issue===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Environmentalists and their political allies have presented a one-sided, anti-scientific account of global warming. They have ignored natural warming cycles and suppressed evidence which contradicts their theories. They have viciously attacked the credibility of any scientist daring to contradict them, creating a climate of fear where only a tiny handful of scientists dare speak out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Gray wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
* The contrary views of the many warming skeptics have been largely ignored and their motives denigrated.&lt;br /&gt;
* The normal scientific process of objectively studying both sides of the question has not yet occurred.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf Area Experts Debate Global Warming]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalists in the West, dominated by liberal viewpoints, have painted a misleading picture of the science. They have publicized liberal slanders against scientists who dare to speak up against the fake &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even organizations that are not normally biased towards leftist ideas have publicly supported the global warming theory. The oil company Exxon/Mobil official policy is that CO2 emissions pose risks to society and ecosystems. Exxon/Mobil has also committed to reducing their own CO2 emissions, and invested $600 million in algae based fuels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/energy_climate_views.aspx]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agencies of the United States Government such as NASA, EPA &amp;amp; NOAA give selected information that strongly supports the global warming theory. At the same time, they reject freedom of information requests to see the raw data. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/58087 Vitter, Inhofe Ask NASA Inspector General to Probe Possible Obstruction of FOIA Requests Seeking Climate Change Records, CNSNews.com, December 04, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), for one example, states that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising due to human activity, and that the surface of the Earth has warmed, on average, quickly over the last 50 years, even though North America cooled slightly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html#q2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008 The Bush Administration requested $4.1 billion dollars of taxpayer money from Congress to fund NOAA, a 7.7 percent increase from 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.noaa.gov/budget/] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 Democratic National Committee Platform states;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[states;http://www.democrats.org/a/party/platform.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We must end the tyranny of oil in our time. This immediate danger is eclipsed only by the longer - term threat from climate change&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...climate change is not just an economic issue or an environmental concern - this is a national security crisis.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 Republican National Committee Platform states; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Environment.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The same human economic activity that has brought freedom and opportunity to billions has also increased the amount of carbon in the atmosphere.  While the scope and long-term consequences of this are the subject of ongoing scientific research, common sense dictates that the United States should take measured and reasonable steps today to reduce any impact on the environment.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have also been some Conservatives, such as John Bliese, Ph.D., who at one point believed that global warming is a critical problem, and that [[Conservatism]] and environmental conservation are fully compatible. Speaking to those who are skeptical of global warming, in the [[Summer]] of 2001, he wrote, &amp;quot;[T]here is nothing conservative about denying scientific evidence.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rep.org/news/GEvol5/ge5.1_globalwarming.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 10, 2009, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham coauthored (with Democrat Senator John Kerry) an op ed piece in the New York Times which stated &amp;quot;Even climate change skeptics should recognize that reducing our dependence on foreign oil and increasing our energy efficiency strengthens our national security. Both of us served in the military. We know that sending nearly $800 million a day to sometimes-hostile oil-producing countries threatens our security. In the same way, many scientists warn that failing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will lead to global instability and poverty that could put our nation at risk.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/opinion/11kerrygraham.html?pagewanted=1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in 2008 the Center for Naval Analyses empaneled eleven retired generals and admirals to prepare a paper titled &amp;quot;National Security and the Threat of Climate Change&amp;quot;. They concluded that Global climate change presents a serious national security threat which could impact Americans at home, impact United States military operations and heighten global tensions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://securityandclimate.cna.org/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Central Intelligence Agency has opened The Center on Climate Change and National Security to study the impact of climate change on US national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climate-change-and-national-security.html CIA Opens Center on Climate Change and National Security], Central Intelligence Agency, September 25, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative activist and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has called for a Conservative Environmentalism to find solutions to global warming by free market mechanisms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newt.org/EditNewt/FeaturedBloggersDB/tabid/193/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/3392/Default.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Climate Change As A Cult===&lt;br /&gt;
The zeal of climate-change advocates and lack of objectivity has led some observers to see it as a core belief in a new eco-theology, using themes of traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs. columnist Deon Feder warns, that following other  attempts  such as  Marxism, overpopulation, ''Silent Spring'', &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;now we have the Church of Global Warming, under the leadership of Pope Albert I and his college of cardinals (the [[Natural Resources Defense Council]], Sierra Club and editorial board of The New York Times).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its Office for the Propagation of the Faith works overtime, churning out books, movies (from the fictional “The Day After Tomorrow” to the fictional “An Inconvenient Truth”), textbooks, concerts, congressional hearings, media pleading and inquisitions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Feder, ''The Cult of Global Warming'', GrassTopsUSA.com  7/31/2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commenting on the tendency to hastily issue dire warnings of Climate Change, seen in the coming [[Ice Age]] scare of the 70's,  Maurizio Morabito asked, “Is the problem with the general public, who cannot talk about climate except in doom-laden terms, and for whom the sky is the last animist god?&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Maurizio Morabito, ''The CIA’s ‘global cooling’ files'', The Spectator December 5 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Steyn writes in Macleans, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Forty years ago conventional religious belief was certainly in decline in what we once knew as Christendom, but the hole was not yet ozone-layer sized. Once the sea of faith had receded far from shore, the post-Christian West looked at what remained and found “Gaia.”&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And while, &amp;quot;When man was made in the image of God, he was fallen but redeemable&amp;quot;, among these devotees of [[Gaia]],  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Anti-humanism is everywhere, not least in the barely concealed admiration for China’s (demographically disastrous) “One Child” policy advanced by everyone from the National Post’s Diane Francis to Sir David Attenborough, the world’s leading telly naturalist but also a BBC exec who once long ago commissioned the great series The Ascent of Man. If Sir David’s any guide, the great thing about man’s ascent is it gives him a higher cliff to nosedive off.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Steyn, ''Why climate change is hot hot hot'' Macleans, December 24, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Politics of Global Warming and Dissent===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Politics of global warming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christine Stewart- Canadian Environment Ministry, &amp;quot;'''No matter if the science is all phony''', there are collateral environmental benefits . . . Climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aim.org/wls/use-environmentalism-to-change-the-world/ Christine Stewart] Accuracy in Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Global Warming Now World's Most Boring Topic’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/node/14167&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The need to fight &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; has become part of the dogma of the liberal conscience. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly, &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; is a tempting issue for many very important groups to exploit. &lt;br /&gt;
... dealing with the threat of warming fits in with a great variety of preexisting agendas [like] dissatisfaction with industrial society (neopastoralism), ... governmental desires for enhanced revenues (carbon taxes), and bureaucratic desires for enhanced power. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark Steyn writes in &amp;quot;Why climate change is hot hot hot&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What’s also changed since the seventies is the nature of the UN and the transnational bureaucracies...“Aid” is a discredited word these days and comes with too many strings attached. But eco-credits sluiced through an oil-for-food program on steroids offers splendid new opportunities for bulking up an ambitious dictator’s Swiss bank accounts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/12/24/why-climate-change-is-hot-hot-hot/2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IPCC is desperate to claim the 20th century-- the warmest on record. Thus, tying the progress of modern mankind to our supposed planet imbalance problem. Unfortunately for the IPCC, that point is disputed as well. In 2008, it was discovered that tree rings in Finland were more accurate record of the warmest century. The current era was not the warmest period-- it was the period between 931 and 1180. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://tbirdnow.mee.nu/archive/2008/6?page=2 The Trees of Finland; Temperature Readings and Historical Reconstruction] Tbirdnow.mee.nu Blog (with links to actual data sources), June 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments of climate science by the [[United Nations]] (see [[IPCC]] - ''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'')&lt;br /&gt;
have claimed that scientists are 90% sure that over 50% of the observed global warming in recent decades is human-caused, and that continued global warming should be expected over at least the next century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists whose research demonstrates that climate change is taking place have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, a number of the participants have testified to the pressures placed on them to emphasize results supportive of the current scenario and to suppress other results. That pressure has frequently been effective, and a survey of participants reveals substantial disagreement with the final report. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richard Lindzen wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps more important are the pressures being brought to bear on scientists to get the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; results. Such pressures are inevitable, given how far out on a limb much of the scientific community has gone. The situation is compounded by the fact that some of the strongest proponents of &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; in Congress are also among the major supporters of science (Sen. Gore is notable among those). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Monckton wrote an article titled Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered. &lt;br /&gt;
:States that Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change studies are flawed. The present analysis suggests the models failure to predict other climatic phenomena arises from defects in its evaluation of radioactive forcing, no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter and feedback multiplier. In conclusion, that there may be no &amp;quot;Climate Crisis&amp;quot; and for governments to reduce emissions may be pointless or even harmful. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm , Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered, July 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was published on a forum of the American Physical Society with the following disclaimer &amp;quot;The article has not undergone any scientific peer review&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the APS disagrees with the articles conclusions&amp;quot; In fact, the APS disagrees with the article without ever reviewing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ryan N. Maue: &lt;br /&gt;
:A doctoral student at the Department of Meteorology at Florida State University did a study of global tropical cyclone activity. Its conclusions state that  global warming might be greatly overblown. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_617111.html# Global warming? More doubts] Pittsburgh Tribune, March 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mr. Maue found that tropical cyclone activity worldwide &amp;quot;has completely and utterly collapsed&amp;quot; during the past two to three years with energy levels sinking to those of the late 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Vincent Gray:&lt;br /&gt;
:A member of the IPCC’s expert reviewers’ panel asserts, “There is no relationship between warming and the level of gases in the atmosphere,” and &amp;quot;there is no serious threat to the climate&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americanfreedomnow.com/2009/06/04/the-panic-over-global-warming-is-totally-unjustified-says-vice-chair-ipcc/ “THE PANIC OVER GLOBAL WARMING IS TOTALLY UNJUSTIFIED” says Vice Chair, IPCC] Americanfreedomnow.com, June 4th, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe D’Aleo: Climatologist &lt;br /&gt;
:The International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project says new data &amp;quot;show that in five of the last seven decades since World War II, including this one, global temperatures have cooled while carbon dioxide has continued to rise,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;'''The data suggest cooling''', not warming, in Earth's future.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=92557 Shocker: 'Global warming' simply no longer happening] Worldnetdaily, March 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. John S. Theon:&lt;br /&gt;
:Retired senior NASA atmospheric [[scientist]], Dr. John S. Theon, the former boss of global warming alarmist James Hansen of [[NASA]], rebukes him declaring “climate models are useless.” “My own belief concerning anthropogenic climate change is that the models do not realistically simulate the climate system because there are many very important sub-grid scale processes that the models either replicate poorly or completely omit,” “Furthermore, some scientists have manipulated the observed data to justify their model results.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/01/28/former-boss-rebukes-nasa-global-warming-alarmist-hansen-agw-skeptic Former Boss Rebukes NASA Global Warming Alarmist Hansen, Is AGW Skeptic] NewsBusters.org, January 28, 2009 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sammy Wilson -Ireland's environment minister &lt;br /&gt;
:He argues that global weather patterns are naturally cooling, not warming. He calls television ads that promote global warming as &amp;quot;an insidious propaganda campaign&amp;quot; peddling &amp;quot;patent nonsense.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=43255 Belfast Environment Chief Bans Climate Change Ads] AP, February 09, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the broadcast of his movie '[[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]', filmmaker Martin Durkin's statements read &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=32796  UK Broadcaster Scolded for Film on Global Warming] CNSNEWS July 22, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“Everywhere you are told that man-made [[climate change]] is proved beyond doubt,”  “But you are being told lies.”&lt;br /&gt;
*“This is a story of how a theory about climate turned into a political [[ideology]] ... it is the story of the distortion of a whole area of [[science]].”&lt;br /&gt;
*“as the frenzy over man-made [[global warming]] grows shriller, many senior scientists say the actual scientific basis for the [[theory]] is crumbling.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2008, the [[AP]] published an article by its Science Writer Seth Borenstein, which is seen by skeptics as another example of one-sided, uncritical reporting on the issue by [[liberal media]]. The report stated that global warming was &amp;quot;a ticking time bomb that President-elect Barack Obama can't avoid&amp;quot;, and that  &amp;quot;We're out of time&amp;quot;, with Al Gore calling the situation &amp;quot;the equivalent of a five-alarm fire that has to be addressed immediately.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D952LKOO1&amp;amp;show_article=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response, Fox News (December 16, 2008) reported that scientists skeptical of anthropogenic global warming criticized the report as &amp;quot;irrational hysteria,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;horrifically bad&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;incredibly biased&amp;quot;, containing sweeping scientific errors and being a one-sided portrayal of a complicated issue. Geology professor [[David Deming]] stated, &amp;quot;If the issues weren't so serious and the ramifications so profound, I would have to laugh at it&amp;quot;, and accused Borenstein of &amp;quot;writing a polemic and reporting it as fact.&amp;quot; Deming noted that &amp;quot;the mean global temperature, at least as measured by satellite, is now the same as it was in the year 1980. In the last couple of years sea level has stopped rising. Hurricane and cyclone activity in the northern hemisphere is at a 24-year low and sea ice globally is also the same as it was in 1980.&amp;quot; The AP responded to criticism by stating that, &amp;quot;It’s a news story, based on fact and the clearly expressed views of President-elect Barack Obama and others.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,468084,00.html Scientists Call AP Report on Global Warming 'Hysteria'] Fox News, December 16, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in the discussion of the biased AP report, Michael R. Fox, a retired nuclear scientist and chemistry professor from the University of Idaho stated, &amp;quot;There is little evidence to believe that man-made carbon dioxide is causing temperature fluctuation. Other factors, including sun spots, solar winds, variations in the solar magnetic field and solar irradiation, could all be affecting temperature changes.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The year 2008 turned out to be the coolest year since 2000, yet the seventh to tenth warmest year on record, according to the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.eoportal.org/research/090127_res3.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a preliminary analysis by NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, the average June-August 2009 summer temperature for the contiguous United States was below average – the 34th coolest on record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/20090910_summerstats.html NOAA: Summer Temperature Below Average for U.S.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Richard S. Courtney, a U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) expert reviewer and a U.K.-based climate and atmospheric science consultant says  &amp;quot;Rubbish! Global warming is not 'accelerating,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;...that anybody who proclaims that 'Global warming is accelerating' is a liar, a fool, or both.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/brennan/global_warming_debunked/2008/12/16/162489.html Global Warming’s Last Gasp] NewsMax, December 17, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don J. Easterbrook, Ph.D., emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, asked, &amp;quot;What does it take to ignore 10 years of global cooling....? The answer is really quite simple — just follow the money!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008 Presidential candidates on climate Change===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bob Barr]] is the only major 2008 Presidential Candidate who has not adopted wholesale the theory of human-caused global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to his website,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/News/PressReleases/BA6709C3-B27D-4EF9-81E6-2BA9D6F8AB20.htm John McCain on Global warming.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Republican]] Presidential candidate [[John McCain]] will take a more &amp;quot;aggressive approach&amp;quot; to global warming which he has declared as &amp;quot;undeniable and urgent.&amp;quot; He was supported in this in June 2008 by Republican governor [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]] who said McCain was the &amp;quot;real deal on the environment&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/30/MNDB11H66C.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics Schwarzenegger backs McCain on climate Change]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his own words, McCain says &amp;quot;the overwhelming majority of scientific opinion in America today, and in the world, is that climate change is real. The fact is that it ''is'' real. The fact is that the solution to it is the development of technologies.... and a [[cap and trade]] proposal.... the debate is over.&amp;quot;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQMxIwpK_es] Unless McCain believes that Global Warming is entirely or largely man-made, there would be no sense in supporting a cap and trade solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama]] believes &amp;quot;that global warming is not just the greatest [[environmental]] [[challenge]] facing our planet—it is one of our greatest challenges of any kind.&amp;quot; During his first 100 days in office, he would enact a giant and far-reaching [[tax]] &amp;quot;an economy-wide cap on U.S. carbon emissions that will reduce U.S. emissions by the amount scientists agree is necessary (80% by 2050). With worldwide cuts in emissions estimated to cost '''$45 Trillion dollars''' overall. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article4079036.ece World needs $45 trillion energy revolution] Timesonline.uk, June 6, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He comments &amp;quot;Putting a price on carbon is the most important step we can to take to reduce emissions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://presidentialprofiles2008.org/Obama/tab1.html League of Conservation Voters] presidentialprofiles2008.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evangelicals===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 86 evangelical pastors, including Rev. Dr.[[Rick Warren]] signed a statement titled &amp;quot;Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action&amp;quot;, which called on Christians to acknowledge the moral importance of action to counteract man-made climate change. the statement includes specific support for market-based CO2 reductions such as a cap-and-trade program.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://christiansandclimate.org/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In contrast, a group of evangelical scholars, comprised of scientists, economists and theologians, contend that the liberal view of pending catastrophe caused by climate change is  misleading and/or exaggerated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianpost.com/article/20091204/evangelicals-push-back-against-climate-change-hoax/pageall.html ''Evangelicals Push Back Against Global Warming Doom'',  Dec. 04 2009, christianpost.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inaccuracies of Global Warming evidence==&lt;br /&gt;
===Climate &amp;quot;Science&amp;quot; Fraud===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Climategate}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Climategate#Climategate_scandal|Climategate scandal]] revealed how liberal scientists appeared to be deceiving the public with the use of fraudulent data for use as climate science. The [[Liberal media|liberal media]] has attempted to bury the story and discount it as the work of computer hackers illegally stealing data, however, [[FOIA|Freedom of Information]] requests is likely what led to the data being leaked — intentionally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.junkscience.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Willie Soon, a [[Physicist|physicist]], [[Astronomer|astronomer]] and climate researcher at the solar and stellar physics division of the [[Harvard University]]-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said in an interview, &amp;quot;[The Climatic Research Unit climate scientists] are making scientific progress more difficult now. This is a shameful, dark day for science.&amp;quot; Dr. Soon also suggested that there has been systemic suppression of dissenting opinion among scientists in the climate change community, ranging from social snubs to e-mail stalking and even threats of harm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gene J. Koprowski. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,578368,00.html Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say], ''[[Fox News]]'', December 01, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:GoreFireBreathing.jpg|thumb|left|250px|Al Gore's [[Schlockumentary]] under fire; [[An Inconvenient Truth]] found to be an inconvenient [[lie]] based on [[junk science]] and digitally enhanced, totally faked scenes of polar icecaps melting.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal claims of &amp;quot;Consensus&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
Reports of a scientific &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; among scientists allege that the Earth is warming overall, and that this warming, as well as other changes in climate patterns, is largely caused by human activities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anderegg, Prall, Harold, and Schneider. &amp;quot;Expert credibility in climate change.&amp;quot; April 9, 2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From &amp;quot;IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007.&amp;quot; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/spmsspm-understanding-and.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These allegations do not necessarily make the consensus true, as discussed throughout the referenced citation. Numerous scientists, especially those outside of university faculties, have been critical of anthropogenic global warming. However, according to some researchers, scientists who do not support the anthropogenic global warming theory offer a general lack of comparative credentials; proponents of man-made global warming argue that this has led to agreement that, among authorities in scientific disciplines, there is a &amp;quot;[[scientific consensus]]&amp;quot; supporting the theory for greater government control. Scientists skeptical of the theory question whether there is a financial incentive for supporting research.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.seattlepi.com/printer2/index.asp?ploc=t&amp;amp;refer=http://www.seattlepi.com/opinion/336889_climatepolicy26.html Pual Chesser, &lt;br /&gt;
''Be wary of climate policy development'', Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Act. 25, 2007]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It has also been documented that on most college campuses criticism of the global warming theory is silenced or censored; evidence shows that scientists skeptical of AGW are being supressed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/1782/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=102031&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is well understood that most media companies do not offer balanced reporting. Many politicians have bought into the liberal claim of consensus, for example Barack Obama's views, &amp;quot;Few challenges facing America and the world are more urgent than fighting climate change. The science is beyond dispute and the facts are clear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cato.org/special/climatechange/ Climate Change Reality] Cato Institute&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, many scientists disagree with the &amp;quot;facts,&amp;quot; their certainty, and their interpretation. Over 100 of them have signed the statement that appears in the Cato Institute's newspaper ad. Liberals have failed to back up their claims with any scientific facts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ad.jpg|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Past Speculation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speculation and warnings of catastrophic climate change are not unprecedented.  In 2001 the ''Guardian'' noted that some 70s headlines shouted, &amp;quot;Brace yourself for another ice age&amp;quot;. In 1971 the journal ''Science'' reported that the subsequent cooling effect resulting from a possible eightfold increased from atmospheric aerosol concentrations, &amp;quot;if sustained over a period of several years - is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reported by Alison George in ''Breaking the ice'', The Guardian, Thursday 28 June 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Richard Lindzen]] wrote in 1992 on the doubtfulness of man-caused warming on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Indeed, a recent Gallup poll of climate scientists in the American Meteorological Society and in the American Geophysical Union shows that a vast majority doubts that there has been any identifiable man-caused warming to date (49 percent asserted no, 33 percent did not know, 18 percent thought some has occurred; however, among those actively involved in research and publishing frequently in peer-reviewed research journals, none believes that any man-caused global warming has been identified so far). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cato&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oddly enough, even though 82% of US climate scientists refused to support the global warming theory then, [[liberal]] activists were already claiming a scientific consensus for [[anthropogenic global warming]]. (It's hard to understand how 18 percent credence in ''any'' global warming translates into &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; support for ''human-caused'' global warming.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The campaign to convince the public (and their elected representatives) that the &amp;quot;science is settled&amp;quot; began in 1988 or 1989.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the 2008 elections both candidates for the Presidency of the United States were proposing plans to mitigate climate change.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over 31,000 American scientists have signed the petition rejecting global warming. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.petitionproject.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Teller_Card_100dpi.jpg|600px|center|thumb| Global Warming Petition]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June, 1974, ''[[Time]]'' magazine published its front page article, ''Science: Another Ice Age?'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Science: Another Ice Age?'' Time magazine, Monday, Jun. 24, 1974&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while a report by the [[CIA]] in the same year stated that, &amp;quot;The world's leading climatologists have confirmed recent reports of a detrimental global climatic change”, noting such things as that the &amp;quot;world's snow and ice cover had increased by at least 10 to 15 percent&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;the Canadian area of [[Arctic]] Greenland suffered below normal temperatures for 19 consecutive months&amp;quot;, which was unique during the last 100 years.  A &amp;quot;major climatic shift&amp;quot; was speculated, which would threaten the &amp;quot;the stability of most nations.” It further warned that &amp;quot;Scientists are confident that unless man is able to modify the climate, the  northern regions, such as Canada&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;major areas in northern China will again be covered with 100 to 200 feet of ice and snow&amp;quot;, within the next 2500 years - or sooner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.climatemonitor.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1974.pdf ''A study of climatological research as it pertains to intelligence problems'', August 1974]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also in 1974, Nigel Calder, former editor of ''New Scientist'' and atmospheric researcher wrote in his book ''The Weather Machine'', &amp;quot;One might argue that there is a virtual certainty of the next ice age starting some time in the next 2000 years. Then the odds are only about 20-to-1 against it beginning in the next 100 years.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1975 the liberal magazine ''[[Newsweek]]'' reported that &amp;quot;Meteorologists disagree about the cause and extent of the cooling trend,...but they are almost unanimous in the view that the trend will reduce agricultural productivity for the rest of the century.&amp;quot; These authorities were skeptical that political leaders would take any positive action to compensate for the [[climate change]], and they conceded that the more dramatic solutions, such as melting the arctic ice cap, might create worse problems than that which they were designed to solve.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Natural Variability of the Climate System===&lt;br /&gt;
It is virtually universally accepted amongst secular climatologists that the earth has experienced numerous [[Ice Age|ice age]]s over two million years, during which global temperatures fluctuated created glacial and inter-glacial periods. The frigid temperatures allowed ice sheets to expand southward, covering much of [[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[North America]]. The cooling associated with ice ages is gradual, while the terminations are relatively rapid. However, even the rapid terminations of ice ages take centuries to millennia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Natural Climate Change on Other Planets===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [[Viking spacecraft]] reached [[Mars]] in the 1970s until recent readings were taken, the average temperature on Mars has risen {{temperature|0.6|1.1}} just as the average temperature on the earth has risen.  Since human industrialization is clearly not to blame for the change on Mars, other causes are being considered.  One possibility is that dust storms are changing the albedo of the planet, allowing it to warm, while another possibility is that solar variations from the sun are causing the warming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070404_gw_mars.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, it has also been found that similar to the Earth and Mars, [[Neptune]] is also undergoing global warming.  Measurements taken at the Lowell observatory in [[Arizona]] have shown an increase in Neptune's brightness and temperature since 1980 following the same pattern seen on Earth and Mars.  The researchers who discovered this warming suggest there may be a correlation between the warming and solar variations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007.../2006GL028764.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pluto]] has also been found to be undergoing global warming.  The overall temperature increase on Pluto has been greater than that on the earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand [[Uranus]] has had no net change in temperature since 1977.  A rapid increase in temperature reversed itself.  The reasons for this are not understood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boulder.swri.edu/~layoung/eprint/ur149/Young2001Uranus.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Global temperatures change on other planets even when there is no life, something which strongly supports the idea that humans are not necessarily the cause of earth's global warming.  Moreover, the temperature on Uranus has fluctuated back and forth.  There is no reason that fluctuations cannot occur on earth, too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although measurements have been made of the temperatures of other planets these are by no means thorough or comparable with the measurements used for earth. The short space of time over which measurements have been taken and the very limited spatial coverage means that reliable average figures have not been obtained. They have certainly not been taken extensively enough to produce a five year average temperature, which is the standard when determining temperature trends on earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, if accurate measurements could be made, and their accuracy and reliability is improving over time, then they may prove useful to climate science. Their different atmospheres and distances from the sun provide natural laboratories to study climatic changes without human influences. Though of course they will not be directly comparable due to the vast differences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Al Gore's Claims===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gore GlobalWarming.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The decision by the government to distribute Al Gore's film, ''An Inconvenient Truth'', became the subject of a legal challenge by [[New Party]] member Stewart Dimmock. A school governor from Dover and father of two, Dimmock charged the Government with brainwashing children with propaganda by presenting Gore’s sci-fi film as science. In October 2007, Mr Justice Burton of London's High Court found that while the film was &amp;quot;broadly accurate&amp;quot;, it contained nine significant errors,“in which statements were made that were not supported by the current mainstream scientific consensus”, some of which had arisen in “the context of alarmism and exaggeration”. He also found the Guidance Notes drafted by the Education Secretary’s advisers only worked to exacerbate the political propaganda in the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/clearly_its_al_gore_whos_in_de.html American Thinker;  ''Clearly It's Al Gore Who's In Denial'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Times online, October 11, 2007 ''Al Gore’s inconvenient judgment''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taken from the official transcript,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://noteviljustwrong.com/images/nejw/docs/22161.pdf Stuart Dimmock and Secretary of State for Education and Skills]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the nine errors the judge found were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1. Sea  level  rise  of  up  to  20  feet  (7 metres) will  be  caused  by melting  of either West Antarctica or Greenland in the near future. This is distinctly alarmist, and part of Mr Gore's 'wake-up call'. It is common ground that if indeed Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water, but only after, and  over,  millennia,  so  that  the  Armageddon  scenario  he  predicts,  insofar  as  it suggests that sea level rises of 7 metres might occur in the immediate future, is not in line with the scientific consensus.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2. Low  lying  inhabited  Pacific  atolls  are  being  inundated  because  of anthropogenic global warming. In scene 20, Mr Gore states &amp;quot;that's why the citizens of these Pacific nations have all had to evacuate to New Zealand&amp;quot;. There is no evidence of any such evacuation having yet happened. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*3. Shutting down of the &amp;quot;Ocean Conveyor&amp;quot;. According  to  the  IPCC,  it  is  very  unlikely  that  the  Ocean  Conveyor (known  technically  as  the  Meridional  Overturning  Circulation  or  thermohaline circulation)  will  shut  down  in  the  future,  though  it  is  considered  likely  that thermohaline circulation may slow down. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*4. Direct coincidence between rise in CO2 in the atmosphere and in temperature, by reference to two graphs. In scenes 8 and 9, Mr Gore shows  two graphs relating  to a period of 650,000 years, one  showing  rise  in  CO2  and  one  showing  rise  in  temperature,  and  asserts  (by ridiculing  the  opposite  view)  that  they  show  an  exact  fit. Although  there  is  general scientific agreement  that  there  is a connection,  the  two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*5. The snows of Kilimanjaro. The film asserted that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidenced global warming. The Government's expert was had to admit that this is not correct. Mr  Gore  asserts  in  scene  7  that  the  disappearance  of  snow  on Mt  Kilimanjaro  is expressly  attributable  to  global  warming.  It  is  noteworthy  that  this  is  a  point  that specifically  impressed Mr Milliband  (see  the  press  release  quoted  at  paragraph  6 above). However, it is common ground that, the scientific consensus is that it cannot be established that the recession of snows on Mt Kilimanjaro is mainly attributable to human-induced climate change.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*6. Lake Chad etc. The drying up of Lake Chad  is used  as  a prime  example of  a  catastrophic  result of global  warming.  However,  it  is  generally  accepted  that  the  evidence  remains insufficient to establish such an attribution. It is apparently considered to be far more likely  to result from other factors, such as population  increase and over-grazing, and regional climate variability.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*7. Hurricane Katrina. In  scene  12  Hurricane  Katrina  and  the  consequent  devastation  in  New  Orleans  is ascribed to global warming. It is common ground that there is insufficient evidence to show that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*8. Death of polar bears. In scene 16, by reference to a dramatic graphic of a polar bear desperately swimming through  the water  looking  for  ice, Mr Gore says: &amp;quot;A new scientific study shows  that for  the  first  time  they are  finding polar bears  that have actually drowned swimming long distances up to 60 miles to find the ice. They did not find that before.&amp;quot; The only scientific  study  that  either  side  before me  can  find  is  one which  indicates  that  four polar bears have recently been found drowned because of a storm.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*9. Coral reefs. In scene 19, Mr Gore says: &amp;quot;Coral reefs all over the world because of global warming and  other  factors  are  bleaching  and  they  end  up  like  this. All  the  fish  species  that depend on  the coral reef are also  in  jeopardy as a result. Overall specie loss  is now occurring at a rate 1000 times greater than the natural background rate.&amp;quot; The actual scientific view, as recorded in the IPCC report, is that, if the temperature were to rise by 1-3 degrees Centigrade,  there would be  increased coral bleaching and widespread coral  mortality,  unless  corals  could  adapt or climatize, but  that  separating  the impacts  of  climate  change-related  stresses  from  other  stresses,  such  as  over-fishing and polluting, is difficult. &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Dimmock's lawyer, Mr. Downes,  argued that by schools making available such film to its teachers, and if teachers then showed such  film  to  their pupils, then  this would inevitably result &amp;quot;in  the promotion of partisan political views  in  the  teaching of any  subject  in  the  school, which  is  thus not only not being forbidden  by  the  local  education  authority  (and  the  DES), but  being  positively facilitated by them.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Justice Barton stressed that the “apocalyptic vision” presented in the film was politically partisan and not an impartial analysis of the science of climate change. “It is now common ground that it is not simply a science film – although it is clear that it is based substantially on scientific research and opinion – but that it is a political film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justice Barton also stated that, “I conclude that the claimant substantially won this case by virtue of my finding that, but for the new guidance note, the film would have been distributed in breach of sections 406 and 407 of the 1996 Education Act.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; BBC news, Thursday, 11 October 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order for the film to be shown, the Government must first amend their Guidance Notes to Teachers to make clear that &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1.  The Film is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2. If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of section 406 of the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political indoctrination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*3.  Nine inaccuracies have to be specifically drawn to the attention of school children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newparty.co.uk/articles/inaccuracies-gore.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Science and Public Policy took issue with the response to the ruling by Al Gore’s spokesman and  environment adviser, and asserted that his film contains ''35 Inconvenient Truths''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/monckton/goreerrors.html 35 Inconvenient Truths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding his claims that the snow cap atop Africa's Mt. Kilimanjaro is shrinking and that global warming is to blame, the November 23, 2003, issue of Nature magazine stated,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Although it's tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think that deforestation of the mountain's foothills is the more likely culprit. Without the forests' humidity, previously moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many conservatives see Al Gore as an example of [[liberals]] using [[deceit]]ful tactics in important debates, in order to make a position seem more solid than it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scientists===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerrevelle.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;35%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Achim Steiner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Singer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard Lindzen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sallie Baliunas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lonnie Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;33%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James E. Hansen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Keeling]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edwin A. Hernández-Delgado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Hal Lewis====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] claims of global warming led to the resignation in October 2010 by Professor Hal Lewis from The American Physical Society because of &amp;quot;the [[global warming]] scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. '''It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1670-hal-lewis-my-resignation-from-the-american-physical-society.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Critique of the Hockey Stick Reconstruction===&lt;br /&gt;
::''See also : [[Climategate#Hockey_Stick_Graph|Climategate: hockey stick graph]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf Corrections To The Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base And Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series] by Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, ''Energy &amp;amp; Enviornment'' volume 14, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html The Decay of the Hockey Stick by Von Storch] published on the journal ''Nature'''s blog, May 3, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/13830/ A Global Warming Bombshell] by Richard A. Muller, ''Technology Review'' , Oct. 2004; calls into question famous graph by Michael Mann.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/306/5696/679 Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data] by Hans von Storch, Eduardo Zorita, Julie M. Jones, Yegor Dimitriev, Fidel González-Rouco, Simon F. B. Tett, ''Science'' magazine, 22 October 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.image.ucar.edu/~boli/manuscripts/2007-LNA-TeA.pdf The ‘hockey stick’ and the 1990s: a statistical perspective on reconstructing hemispheric temperatures] by Bo Li, Douglas W. Nychka and Casper M. Ammann, ''Institute for Mathmatics Applied to Geosciences''; (Manuscript received 22 March 2007; in final form 28 June 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/IceCoreSprg97.pdf Ice Core Data Show No Carbon Dioxide Increase] by Zbigniew Jaworowski, Ph.D., Spring 1997; this article examines one of the main pillars of the global warming thesis.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.ee.2005.pdf The M&amp;amp;M Critique of the MBH98 Northern Hemisphere Climate Index: Update and Implications] (''Energy &amp;amp; Environment'', vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69-100, January 2005) - Stephen McIntyre, Ross McKitrick&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2005/09/mcintyre.grl.2005.pdf Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance] (''Geophysical Research Letters'', vol. 32, February 2005) - Stephen McIntyre, Ross McKitrick&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Effects of Global Warming==&lt;br /&gt;
===Beneficial effects of Global Warming===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Autumn foliage.jpg|thumb|Canoing on a Colorful Day, (NY).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some researchers point out that benefits of health global warming have been overlooked, or minimized. As far back as 1996, Thomas Gale Moore, Senior Fellow at Hoover Institution (Stanford University) contended that positive health and amenity effects would be a result of projected increases in temperature. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stanford.edu/~moore/health.html Health and Amenity Effects of Global Warming]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another source notes,  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In areas that see extreme cold temperatures, deaths related to colder weather would drop significantly, leading to decreased health care costs, while areas that already have hot climates will see no increase. Warmer temperatures would also mean less energy use to heat homes and buildings, helping to conserve energy as cooling is much more energy efficient. With the changes brought about by global warming more land that is not lost to desert and/or rising sea levels would become available for uses like farming and living. Forests and plants would grow stronger, healthier, and more abundant because of the warmer weather, and this would mean more oxygen being released into the atmosphere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bionomicfuel.com/what-are-the-benefits-of-global-warming/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reported effects of Climate Change===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides Global Warming, reported past or expected/possible future environmental and societal consequences of Climate Change include,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Global cooling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/global-warming-causing-global-cooling&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased food production.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Fred Pearce, ''Climate change warning over food production,'' Newscientist.com, April 26, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased food production.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-1127111.html] William Booth, ''Global Heating Could Benefit U.S. Farmers; Prices Seen Rising As Production Falls'' The Washington Post, May 17, 1990&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking forests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/11/amazon-global-warming-trees/print David Adam, ''Amazon could shrink by 85% due to climate change''] March 11, 2009, guardian.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased tree foliage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.greenfingers.com/articledisplay.asp?id=1734&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased productivity of high-elevation forests.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Global Warming May Spur Increased Growth In Pacific Northwest'' Oct. 20, 2009, Forests Science Daily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Melting glaciers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Global warming causing hundreds of Antarctic Peninsula glaciers to melt,''&lt;br /&gt;
June 6, 2007, The Hindustan Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Growing glaciers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2043047/posts?page=51&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing landmass in Antarctica.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2005/05/27/antarctic-ice-a-global-warming-snow-job/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Colder winters &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Climate change could bring colder winters,'' March 13, 2003, Canadian Broadcasting Centre&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A new ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2003/nov/13/comment.research/print Bill McGuire, The Guardian, November 13, 2003]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Prevention of an ice age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,296060,00.html Andrea Thompson, ''Global Warming May Cancel Next Ice Age''], Monday, September 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Taller mountains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ker Than, ''Taller Mountains Blamed on Global Warming, Too'', August 4, 2006, LiveScience&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A lop-sided planet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Roy Britt, June 29,2005 LiveScience.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Stronger hurricanes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Global Warming: Warmer Seas Linked To Strengthening Hurricanes,'' Sep. 4, 2008, ScienceDaily&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Weaker Hurricanes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Randolph E. Schmid, AP Science Writer, ''Global warming may diminish Atlantic hurricane activity'', 04-17-2007, USA Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shorter days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.itwire.com/content/view/11220/1066/ William Atkins, ''Researchers say global warming should cause shorter days''], ITWire, April 11, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Earthquakes and volcanoes, and other geological disasters. Attempts to prevent climate change may do the same.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Fisher, ''Climate change may trigger earthquakes and volcanoes,'' September 23 2009 Newscientist.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking brains.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gordon G. Gallup Jr., Human Nature (Vol. 18, Issue 2, 2007U)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shrinking sheep.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Steve Connor, Science Editor, ''How global warming shrank St Kilda's sheep,''&lt;br /&gt;
Independent.co.uk, 3 July 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tiger Attacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Global Warming Linked to Indian Tiger Attacks'', Reuters, Mon Oct 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Shark attacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.junkscience.com/news3/shark.htmlBruce Johnston, ''Shark attack on boat result of global warming''] Augsut 31, 1998, Electronic Telegraph (U.K.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Walrus stampede deaths.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1939754/posts ''Global warming is blamed for walrus stampede deaths'', Associated Press - December 14, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Imminent cannibalism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ted Turner, April 1, 2008, Charlie Rose PBS show&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The need for a drastic reduction of the earth’s population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thisistheendoftheworldasweknowit.com/archives/one-less-child-environmental-extremists-warn-that-overpopulation-is-causing-climate-change-and-will-ultimately-destroy-the-earth&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong increase in people dying of [[AIDS]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Tarantola, University of NSW, Australia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/?p=608&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased risk of civil war in Africa.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/november23/climate-civil-wars-112309.html?view=print ''Global warming increases risk of civil war in Africa,''] Stanford Report, November 23, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Child ''climate cops''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=70811&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Increase in depression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Emily Sohn Thurs., Discovery Channel, Dec . 10, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase in psychiatric illness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;World Health Organisation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Climate change leads to psychiatric illness'' 04-08, 2008, Sify.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increased anxiety and loss of sleep among many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Jones, The Scotsman, February 22, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Climategate scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also == &lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Massachusetts v. EPA]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal_hysteria#Global_Warming_Derangement_Syndrome|Global Warming Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Socialist Environmental Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Counterexamples to Global Warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/global-warming/ What Liberals Say - Category: Global Warming], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://global-warming.accuweather.com/2007/12/attempting_to_stop_global_warm_1.html Attempting to Stop Global Warming is Futile and a Mistake, says letter to the UN]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=164004 Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/global-temperature-not-exist.pdf Does a global temperature exist?], ''Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics'', June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html The appliance of science] by Mike Hulme.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climatecrisis.net/ ''An Inconvenient Truth''], Film by [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&amp;amp;q=great+global+warming+swindle ''The Great Global Warming Swindle'' - Documentary Film]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~motl/iris-effect.pdf Climate Sensitivity and Observed Negative Feedbacks], lecture by Richard Lindzen and Roberto Rondanelli.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/~motl/lindzen-nature-of-arguments.pdf Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], by Richard Lindzen&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/store/book_detail.asp?bookID=42 ''Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warmings's Unfinished Debate'', by S. Fred Singer]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus] - [[Richard S. Lindzen]], Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=47&amp;amp;articleID=604 &amp;quot;Should We Have Acted Thirty Years Ago to Prevent Climate Change?&amp;quot;, by Randall G. Holcombe].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=25&amp;amp;articleID=296 &amp;quot;After Kyoto: A Global Scramble for Advantage,&amp;quot; by Bruce Yandle].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=2319 The physical evidence of earth's unstoppable 1,500-year climate cycle]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1714 &amp;quot;Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm?&amp;quot;, by Richard Lindzen]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/policy_reports/detail.asp?type=full&amp;amp;id=5 &amp;quot;New Perspectives in Climate Change: What the EPA Isn’t Telling Us&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17181 Survey Shows Climatologists Are Split on Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.magma.ca/~hurleyp/FightingTheHoax.htm Fighting the Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalwarminghoax.com/news.php Refuting the Myth of Man-made Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climateaudit.org Climate Audit], Steve McIntyre's blog&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.realclimate.org Real Climate], blog by a group of climatologists including Michael Mann&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/01/co2_fairytales_in_global_warmi.html &amp;quot;CO2 Fairytales in Global Warming&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm A complete list of things caused by global warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/hackers-prove-global-warming-is-scam.html Hackers Prove Global Warming Is A Scam]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Earth Sciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=1033804</id>
		<title>Public schools in the United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Public_schools_in_the_United_States&amp;diff=1033804"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:52:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:800px-Warning signs at CHS.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Because of violence, vandalism, and other undesirable elements, this public school has a glaring sign warning of the on-campus surveillance cameras at its parking lot entrance.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Public schools]] in the [[United States]]''' have become predominantly [[liberal]] and [[atheistic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.exodusmandate.org/art_exodus_from_public_schools_gets_helping_hand.htm Exodus from &amp;quot;public schools&amp;quot; gets a helping hand], Exodus Mandate, Sept 15, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, &amp;quot;in 2005, officials at East Brunswick High School adopted a policy prohibiting representatives of the school district from participating in student-initiated prayer.&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=61806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 2004 to 2006, a [[public school]] banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  Principal &amp;quot;Summa, having learned of a complaint by a teacher and of the students' Bible study, told fourth-grade teacher Virginia Larue to nix the group's recess meeting. ... Larue later told one of Luke's Bible study colleagues the group could no longer meet at recess.&amp;quot;[http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Atheists]] routinely impose their views on [[public schools]], though liberals deny it.  For example, a court prohibited a moment of silence in [[Illinois]] &amp;quot;Township High School District 214 after atheist activist Rob Sherman challenged&amp;quot; it.[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-moment_of_silence_bothmay30,0,7722271.story]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
government institutions that employ 3 million people and spend $411.5 billion annually at a cost of $10,770 per student.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=section&amp;amp;pSectionID=15&amp;amp;cSectionID=97 Statistics about education]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Liberals]] censor [[classroom prayer]], the [[Ten Commandments]], sharing of [[faith]] in classrooms during school hours, and teaching [[Bible]]-based [[morality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', ''[[Stone v. Graham]]'' (1980) (excluding Ten Commandments from public school).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A public school banned [[Bible]] study by children ... ''during recess''. A teacher complained about the use of the Bible and the principal then censored the study activity, according to a sworn statement by a teacher told to stop it.  [http://knoxnews.com/news/2008/jan/03/recess-bible-study-spurs-lawsuit/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mandatory [[Homosexual Agenda|homosexual indoctrination]] is common as early as elementary school in more [[liberal]] states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.massresistance.org/media/video/brainwashing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The failures of underperforming public schools are paradigm of [[socialism]], along with [[landfills]] and the [[Canada|Canadian]] healthcare system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are characteristics of US public schools:&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Bold text''BASICALLY WHERE POOR PEOPLE GO TO SCHOOL LOL!!! NOT AS GOOD AS PRIVATE SRRY'''&lt;br /&gt;
*30% of public school students fail to graduate from [[high school]],&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 70% of all students in public high schools graduate, and only 32% of all students leave high school qualified to attend four-year colleges.&amp;quot;[http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_03.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and more than 40% of minorities fail to graduate;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Only 71 percent of kids graduate from high school within four years, and for minorities the numbers are even worse -- 58 percent for Hispanics and 55 percent for African Americans,&amp;quot; [Bill Gates] wrote. &amp;quot;If the decline in childhood deaths [in developing countries] is one of the most positive statistics ever, these are some of the most negative.&amp;quot;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/29/AR2009032901353.html?wpisrc=newsletter]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the real drop-out rate may be 50%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/47272207.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nearly 70% of students leave high school unqualified to attend four-year college, and many are unable to hold a steady job.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;graduate&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A 2007 study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse found that 77% of students between eighth and 12th grade had used illicit drugs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to Monitoring the Future, a study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, illicit drug use is up among students between eighth and 12th grade. In 1991, 62 percent had used illicit drugs. In 2007, the number jumped to 77 percent. [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20081207/NEWS08/812070305/1002]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fatal overdoses are common but underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fatal overdoses are common, although often underreported.[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B01E5DB123EF932A25750C0A9629C8B63 Reporting of a heroin overdose by 16-year-old [[public school]] student was an exception to the underreporting].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Public schools are required to present [[Drug education|drug &amp;quot;education&amp;quot;]] to kids.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 60% of public school teenagers (in one regional study) watch more than 3 hours of television a day, compared with a national average of 35%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/ (study of Memphis students)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*About half of the viable pregnancies among girls attending public school end in [[abortion|abortions]] and about half end in birth. Public schools &amp;quot;[[Sex education|educate]]&amp;quot; kids about sex.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;There is zero shame [to [[teenage pregnancy]]],&amp;quot; the school nurse observed.[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/12/AR2008121203507.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;About 160,000 students miss school daily because they [[fear]] being [[Bully|bullied]],&amp;quot; and students viciously fight each other and post videos of it on [[YouTube|Youtube.com]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;One victim is now &amp;quot;being [[homeschooled]] at state expense.&amp;quot;[http://starbulletin.com/2008/05/18/news/story01.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*20% of students had been dangerously &amp;quot;[[binge drinking]]&amp;quot; in the previous 30 days, and 50% of seniors regularly drink illegally, according to a 2007 study of Ottawa County, Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Grand Rapids Press The Grand Rapids Press:  Ottawa County confronts teen drinking, By Greg Chandler, December 04, 2008[http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_county_confronts_teen_d.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/ottawa_co_youth_survey_surpris.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*10-20% of students become [[Addiction|addicted]] to [[cigarettes]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Oregon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/dec/01/memphis-youth-make-progress-on-risky-behavior/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*35% of students are overweight&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/nov/29/students-health-needs-attention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Health screening of public schools in Memphis, Tennessee, found that nearly 10% of students have mental health problems&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;health&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*More than 10% of public high schools have a [[Homosexual Agenda|pro-homosexual]] student club&lt;br /&gt;
*The majority of public school students are completely ignorant about the [[Bible]], even as [[Bible history|history]] and literature&lt;br /&gt;
*California public schools, largest in the nation, now rank at the bottom in academic achievement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/us/us_california_broken_schools/2009/06/21/227552.html High-Spending California School System Collapsing] AP, June 21, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''See Also: [[Public school culture]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1647, [[Massachusetts]] [[Puritans]] enacted the second law, after Scotland in 1616,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Social, Economic &amp;amp; Political Reasons for the Decline of Gaelic in Scotland [http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/highlands/gaelic/gaelic_page1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; establishing universal public [[school]]s in the English-speaking world to block the attempts by &amp;quot;ould deluder Satan to keepe men from the whole knowledge of the Scriptures&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Family Encyclopedia of American History'' (Reader's Digest 1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Each settlement larger than 50 families was required to pay a [[teacher|schoolmaster]] to teach reading, writing and religious doctrine to the [[children]] in the community. Beginning in 1670, Massachusetts provided [[taxation|tax]] funding for school maintenance. This model was then copied throughout the colonies, and even throughout the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many children did not attend public school for the first two centuries. It was not until 1852 that Massachusetts became the first state to require attendance by students aged 6 through 16, and it was not until 1918 that all states had [[compulsory attendance]] laws. High schools did not generally exist until after the [[Civil War]], and the first American [[kindergarten]] didn't exist until 1856 in Watertown, Wisconsin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views on morals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;character education&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the perception that public schools have stopped teaching morality, many state education departments have or are in the process of developing &amp;quot;morality&amp;quot; that avoid good and evil, right and wrong, and instead present under the heading of &amp;quot;character&amp;quot; education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3971/is_199910/ai_n8866284]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The lack of appreciation for right and wrong can surprise outsiders, and even school principals.  When one public school student was charged with [[felony]] [[computer crime]] for altering the grades of 20 students, the principal said, we &amp;quot;want to teach them what's right and wrong, and it's tough for some kids to catch on to the idea that changing grades is the wrong thing to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cw2.trb.com/news/kwgn-student-grade-felony,0,7871401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The impact of the removal of morality from the [[public school]] curriculum (which is also used in private schools) is that &amp;quot;more than one in three boys (35 percent) and one-fourth of the girls (26 percent) — a total of 30 percent overall — admitted stealing from a store within the past year.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal politicians are the most frequent opponents of initiatives designed to build moral fiber in the public school system, with organizations like the [[ACLU]] and teacher's unions devoting a significant amount of their resources towards this end. In 2010, a school board in [[North Dakota]] decided to change the name of their mascot from the &amp;quot;Satans.&amp;quot; Liberals unrolled a large-scale media campaign that blanketed the district with pro-Satan propaganda in an attempt to keep the name, but they were unsuccessful. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-03-11/news/ct-perspec-0311-things-20120311_1_devil-man-great-deceiver-native-americans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prayer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Classroom prayer]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The White House announced the release of Revised Religious  Guidelines for America's Public Schools on May 29, 1998.  Within this announcement, President [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] stated, &amp;quot;Nothing in the [[First Amendment]] converts our public schools into religion-free zones, or requires all religious expression to be left behind at the school house door.&amp;quot; --President Clinton, July 12, 1998&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/05-1998/wh-0530.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003, the Education Department released the following guidelines that clarified and added requirements to Public Schools to ensure the religious rights of students.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=17550&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Schools that don’t allow students to pray outside the classroom or that prohibit teachers from holding religious meetings among themselves could lose federal money, the Education Department said late last week.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The guidance reflects the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration’s push to ensure that schools give teachers and students as much freedom to pray as the courts have allowed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department makes clear that teachers cannot pray with students or attempt to shape their religious views.&lt;br /&gt;
The instructions, released by the department on Feb. 7, broadly follow the same direction given by the Clinton administration and the courts. Prayer is generally allowed provided it happens outside the class and is initiated by students, not by school officials.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The department, however, also offered some significant additions, including more details on such contentious matters as moments of silence and prayer in student assemblies. And for the first time, federal funds are tied to compliance with the guidelines. The burden is on schools to prove compliance through a yearly report.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Teaching the Bible in Public Schools ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bibleinschools.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (NCBCPS) provides a program for teaching the Bible in public schools. Currently, the NCBCPS's Bible curriculum has been voted into 462 school districts (over 1,900 high schools) in 38 states. Over 210,000 students have already taken this course nationwide, on the high school campus, during school hours, for credit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Suppression and intolerance of Christian views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Activist judges]] have proclaimed that teaching [[creationism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/578/case.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[intelligent design]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.pamd.uscourts.gov/kitzmiller/kitzmiller_342.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in public schools is unconstitutional because they claim that such teachings would amount to a government establishment of religion, which is prohibited by the First Amendment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Kitzmiller'', 400 F.Supp.2d at 765&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational outcomes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Declining literacy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Since the rapid expansion and liberalization of public schools after [[World War II]], students' [[literacy]] levels have dropped significantly.  While the average 14-year-old had a vocabulary of 25,000 words in 1945, the equivalent student in 2000 had a vocabulary of only 10,000 words, a severe disadvantage in an increasingly textual world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Utne Reader'' (July-August 2000), 28-9.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal bias in textbooks===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Textbook bias]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Textbook]]s (K-12) have been systematically analyzed in a study funded by the U.S. government.  The 1986 findings were that massive, systematic [[liberal bias]] exists, resulting in several information blackouts in four key areas of modern American life&amp;amp;mdash;[[marriage]], [[religion]], [[politics]], and [[business]].  While an actual conspiracy was then ruled out, the cause was found to be a &amp;quot;a very widespread [[secular]] and [[liberal]] mindset&amp;quot; pervading &amp;quot;the leadership in the world of education [and textbook publishing]&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; ''Censorship: Evidence of Bias in Our Children's textbooks'', [[Paul C. Vitz]], Servant Books, 1986, ISBN 0-89283-305-X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Larry Schwikart, of the [[University of Dayton]], wrote a book about biased textbooks. False claims common in those texts included that the [[Founding Fathers]] wanted a &amp;quot;wall of [[Separation of church and state|separation&amp;quot; between church and state]], that &amp;quot;[[Abraham Lincoln|Lincoln]] issued the [[Emancipation Proclamation]] only because he needed [[Black Soldiers in the Civil War|black soldiers]]&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;[[Mikhail Gorbachev]], not [[Ronald Reagan]], was responsible for ending the [[Cold War]]&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emailwire.com/release/20086-Controversial-Historian-on-the-Price-of-Business-Show.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence for bias in school textbooks includes promotion of [[Homosexual]] agenda, support of liberal viewpoint, as well as support of the unproven theory of evolution. Most Biology textbooks do not provide the [[Creationist]] viewpoint a chance, or even a second thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Non-Dismissal of Tenured Teachers===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the strength of the nation's teachers' [[Labor union|union]], it is nearly impossible to fire a bad performing teacher with [[tenure]]. The process can take years and involves countless steps to even attempt. The union claims that the protections are needed against arbitrary and malicious lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New York public schools system has approximately 700 teachers accused of  insubordination to sexual misconduct. They remain in seclusion from the classroom but are paid full salaries until their cases are heard, sometimes from months to years later. All because their union contract makes it extremely difficult to fire them. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/us_rubber_rooms/2009/06/22/227959.html 700 NYC Teachers Paid to Do Nothing] AP, June 22, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
   &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pathtodismissal.JPG|center|thumb|800px| Flow chart for firing teachers in the nations second largest [[school district]], Los Angeles Unified School district]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Graduates==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Before 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Given that public schools educate about 90% of [[Americans]], it is astounding how few prominent Americans attended public school after the banning of school-sponsored prayer in 1962.  Here is an impressive list of people who attended public schools ''before'' the banning of school-sponsored prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dixonil.com/reagan/reagan2.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Dixon High School, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dwight D. Eisenhower]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/press_releases/2007/PR07_11_August_02_2007_Eisenhower_Co_Sponsor_Little_Rock.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Abilene High School in Abilene, Kansas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard M. Nixon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/edu/836/000068632/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Fullerton and Whittier High Schools, California&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gerald Ford]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.visitgrandrapids.org/ford-facts.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Grand Rapids South High School, Michigan&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lyndon B. Johnson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/062/000023990/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Johnson City High School, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harry S Truman]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/103truman/103visual1.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended Independence High School, Missouri&lt;br /&gt;
*[[H. Ross Perot]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.famoustexans.com/rossperot.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attended public schools and Texarkana Junior College, Texas&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Cheney]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/598/000022532/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper, Wyoming.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Colin Powell]] graduated from Morris High School, NY in 1954 and received his B.A. in geology from the City College of New York in 1958 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gale.cengage.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/powell_c.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Billy Graham]] graduated from Sharon High School, NC in May 1936&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online-bibleconcordance.com/Ministers/BillyGraham.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Medved]] graduated from Palisades High School, CA &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;michaelmedved.townhall.com/About.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Wright Brothers]] attended public schools in Richmond, India and Dayton OH but did not graduate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.kyrene.org/schools/brisas/sunda/inventor/wright/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roy Jay Glauber]], Nobel laureate, graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, NY in 1941. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/738/000138324/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Reines]], Nobel laureate, attended Union Hill High School, NJ, during the late 1930's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/052/000099752/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oliver North]], US Army Officer, political commentator, graduated from Ockawamick High School in 1961. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://libraryoflibrary.com/E_n_c_p_d_Ollie_North.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== After 1962 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a mostly unimpressive list of people who attended public school ''after'' school-sponsored prayer was banned in 1962:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brad Pitt]], actor, graduated from Kickapoo High School in Springfield, Missouri, 1981; dropped out of college.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rolemodel.net/brad_pitt.cfm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Cruise]], actor, attended several public high schools including Glen Ridge High School, New Jersey during the 1970's. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/people/791/000022725/&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Sununu]], former one-term Senator from [[New Hampshire]], graduated from Salem High School in the 1970's;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sununu.senate.gov/biography.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; claiming to be [[pro-life]], Sununu arranged for the nomination of [[David Souter]] to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], where he then repeatedly voted on the side of [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Edwards]], indicted in 2011 on allegations arising from his affair with a mistress, was a former one-term Senator from [[North Carolina]] and two-time unsuccessful candidate for nomination for president, attended public school in Robbins, N.C. during the 1960's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2004/primaries/edwards_bio.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spike Lee]], producer, actor, graduated from John Dewey High School, Brooklyn, NY.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://movies.nytimes.com/person/99175/Spike-Lee/biography&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Laura Bush]] attended James Bowie Elementary School, San Jacinto Junior High School, and Midland Lee High School in Midland, Texas (Graduated 1964); came out in support of [[gay marriage]] and [[abortion]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/laura-bush-supports-gay-marriage-abortion/story?id=10629213&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[William J. Clinton]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hotsprings.org/things_to_do/historic_hotsprings/presidents_hometown.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; graduated from Hot Springs High School in Arkansas in 1964, and became the only president impeached in the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
*Anthony Weiner, a congressman who resigned in disgrace in 2011 after first denying but then confirming an indecent use of [[Twitter]], graduated from a public high school in [[Brooklyn]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Steve Jobs]], founder of [[Apple Inc.]], graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, CA in 1972; his colleague, [[Steve Wozniak]], graduated from the same high school in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eminem]], a [[liberal]] [[rapper]], repeatedly failed 9th grade in public school and ultimately dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]], a liberal news commentator, attended public school in [[New York City]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]], vice presidential candidate on the [[Republican Party]] ticket in 2008 and favorite of some [[Tea Party]] groups, went to [[Wasilla High School]] and graduated in 1982 and then attended 5 different colleges before becoming more [[conservative]] later in life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://outhouserag.typepad.com/outhouserag/2008/09/sarah-palin-198.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rick Perry]], [[Texas]] governor, infringed on [[parental rights]] by requiring young girls to receive an HPV vaccine.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kenneth D. Cockrell]], [[Texas]] Graduated from Rockdale High School, Rockdale, Texas, in 1968.  A veteran of five spaceflights, Cockrell has logged more than 1,560 hours in space.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/cockrell.htmll&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russell Alan Hulse]], [[New York]] Graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, New York, in 1966.  Winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://alumni.bxscience.edu/?page=NotableAlumni&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Axel]], [[New York]] Graduated from  Stuyvesant High School, New York, New York, in 1963.  Winner of the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Axel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugh David Politzer]], [[New York]] Graduated from Bronx High School of Science, Bronx, New York, in 1966.  Winner of the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://alumni.bxscience.edu/?page=NotableAlumni&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christine O'Donnell]] graduated from Moorestown High School in 1987.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=201010100363&amp;amp;nclick_check=1 &amp;quot;Delaware politics: From middle-class New Jersey, moral activist Christine O'Donnell knew 'God was calling'&amp;quot;, ''Delaware Online'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Walker]] graduated from Delavan-Darien High School in 1986.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://walworthcountytoday.com/news/2010/sep/07/rock-county-close-home-walker/ Ames, Ann Marie, &amp;quot;Rock County Close to Home for Walker&amp;quot;, ''Walworth County Today'', Sept. 7, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Ryan]], an establishment [[Republican]], graduated from Joseph A. Craig High School, Janesville, WI in 1988.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/06/16/politics/wis-ryan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sharron Angle]] (born 1949) graduated from Wooster High School in Reno, Nevada.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sharronangle.com/sharron-angle-biography &amp;quot;Sharron Angle, Biography&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jon Huntsman]], Republican Presidential candidate and former Governor of Utah, attended Highland High School in Salt Lake City, Utah before he dropped out in 1978 to pursue a career as a rock and roll keyboardist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jon2012.com/jon]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Bachmann]], Republican member of the House of Representatives graduated from Anoka High School, Anoka, Minnesota in 1974.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.startribune.com/local/north/129276683.html?refer=y]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mike Huckabee]], former Republican Governor of Arkansas, graduated from Hope High School, Hope Arkansas, in 1974.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=108]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Netanyahu]], Prime Minister of Israel, Graduated from Cheltenham High School,  Wyncote, Pennsylvania, in 1967. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cheltenhamalumni.org/BIOS/netanyahu-benjamin.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rand Paul]], Republican Senator, Graduated from Brazoswood High School, Clute, Texas in 1981. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politics.laws.com/rand-paul]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Public school culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teacher Pay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Parental rights]] (focusing on the rights of parents to control the education, upbringing and disclipline of their children)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Education in the United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1610/466/Dumb_As_A_Rock:_You_Will_Be_Absolutely_Amazed_At_The_Things_That_U.S._High_School_Students_Do_Not_Know.html Dumb As A Rock: You Will Be Absolutely Amazed At The Things That U.S. High School Students Do Not Know]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2012/03/28/9-notorious-teacher-sex-scandals/?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000058?test=latestnews 8 Bizarre Teacher Scandals You Won't Believe]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Causes_of_Homosexuality&amp;diff=1033803</id>
		<title>Causes of Homosexuality</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Causes_of_Homosexuality&amp;diff=1033803"/>
		<updated>2013-02-10T01:51:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rj617ha: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The causes of homosexuality originally came from the Ancient Egypt because of Moses having a secret affair with the pharaoh's son. This relationship started because Moses didn't get any women and still wanted to have sexual intercourse, so he persuaded the pharaoh's son with his silver tongue, successfully having sexual intercourse with him. After this the seven land plagues came and they got married and lived happily ever after. This can be read in the Holy Bible, by God. If you do not find it you most likely have the wrong version of the Bible, please see the publisher about this fault. God also agreed on the relationship later on as he found the truth about himself in the fountain of truth, that he was a pedophile, and from that day he made homosexuals. This is the real cause of homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
causes in three steps:  &lt;br /&gt;
you are born &lt;br /&gt;
you hit puberty &lt;br /&gt;
you realize you like boys instead of girls, or vice versa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HOW HARD IS IT PEOPLE!?? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Causes of homosexuality - Biblical explanation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bible]], being  the most comprehensive transcendent moral authority, abundantly deals with human nature and behavior and consistently manifests that the nature of man has not changed since [[the Fall]]. So the Bible is certainly the preeminent authoritative source when it comes to providing a framework when determining the causes of homosexuality. Man is shown to have been created as a perfectly made being (Gn. 1:31) - yet not as a robot - but as a being designed to be able to make choices, which thereby allowed him to distort his perfection. God from the beginning also joined male and female in life-long marriage, and placed a priority on the family, and provided laws, as needed, for its health and preservation and that of society, while aberrations result from failure to abide by them. ''For more information please see:'' [[Homosexuality and the Bible]] and [[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nature of man and causes of homosexuality === &lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning, man disobeyed his Creator, and as part of the punishment for so doing both mankind and that which he was given stewardship of was negatively affected. In addition to physical decay and the suffering and natural death of living creatures being introduced into the world, (Gn. 2:17; 3:17-19; Rm. 5:12,17; 6:23; ) the Fall resulted in the nature of man demonstrating a certain proclivity to sin. However, this does not determine that a man must practice a certain sin, nor does it justify man giving into this attraction to sin, as God also gave man ability to resist sin. (Gn. 4:7)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sbts.edu/documents/tschreiner/Homosexuality.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Certain negative physical effects of sin are also seen as being progressive, as with time more diseases and other aberrations seemed to have occurred, and laws against incest later became necessary. In addition, as men continued to act contrary to the basic moral laws which they knew innately and through creation, conscience and oral tradition, a formal body of law was given through [[Moses]], which detailed and codified the immutable morality God enjoins upon man. (Ex. 20; Dt. 4:8,9; Lv. 18; Gal. 3:19) Addition laws include ceremonial laws which the [[New Testament]] reveals were typological. ''For more information please see:'' [[Leviticus 18]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As regards homosexuality, from the beginning of the Bible and throughout, it consistently teaches that God only sexually joined opposite genders together, sanctifying them in marriage, having created  men and women uniquely compatible and complementary.(Gn. 2:18-24; Mt. 19:4; 1Cor. 11:8-12)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbmw.org/Articles/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to what God had ordained by design and decree, homosexuality is one of many sins which are a result of man yielding to his sinful nature, and is a form of fornication, although a most perverse kind. The prohibition of it is given along with sexual relations with animals, (Lv. 18:23) and is  clearly condemned wherever it is manifestly dealt with. (Lv. 18:22; 20:13; Mk. 7:21; Rm. 1:20-27; 1Cor. 6:9; 1Tim. 1:10)   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, as well as history, also evidences that while there are three areas in which man sins, those of lust for pleasure, possessions and power, (1Jn. 2:16) individuals may differ as regards which type of sins present the greatest temptation for them, with genetics playing at least a part in that. That judgment upon a people who gave into a specific sin could result in a genetic predisposition to that same sin among their offspring may be speculated, but it is not proven.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible  provides a clear link between the adherence of a family or a nation to the laws of God and the moral choices of offspring. (Prov. 22:6) The Bible also positively examples close father-son and familial relationships, and may be seen to partially implicate detachment with rebellion. (Gn. 37-50; 2 Sam. 13-18) Studies today have shown that [[Religious Upbringing and Culture Affects Rates of Homosexuality|religious upbringing and culture can strongly affect rates of homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The record of [[Sodom]], as well as accounts of nations elsewhere, testify that living within the environment of people where [[iniquity]] abounds is conducive to furthering the same iniquity among succeeding generations, resulting in the necessity of Divine judgment when nations became given over to such. (Lv. 18:24; 20:22; Dt. 18:12; 28; Jer. 14:9,10; Rm. 2:2) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Genesis 19, the city of Sodom is revealed as a place in which men sexually lusted after men, from which the term &amp;quot;sodomy&amp;quot; was derived (like as homosexuals use the term &amp;quot;gay&amp;quot;, although this is contradictory in the end), and Jude 7 refers to Sodom and its region being given to fornication, including that of unnatural relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Ezekiel 16:49 the general iniquity of Sodom and its &amp;quot;sisters&amp;quot; is given as &amp;quot;pride, fulness of bread, and abundance of idleness&amp;quot; and general indifference to the needy. The next verse proceeds to inform that &amp;quot;the Sodomites were haughty, and committed abomination before me: therefore I took them away as I saw good.&amp;quot; The word for ''abomination'' here is ''tô‛êbah'', which  is not the word often used for ritual uncleanness, but is often used for sexual sin, in particular sexual sins and including sodomy. (Lv.18:22; 26-27,29,30; 20:13; Dt. 23:18; 24:4 1Ki. 14:24; Ezek. 22:11; 33:26) Sodom is also associated more with sexual sins than with any other ''physical'' type of sin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What the Bible, as well as secular history, reveals is that prevalent homosexuality is concomitant with pride, affluence, increased free time, and selfish indulgence and carelessness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Homosex_versus_the_Bible.html Homosexual relations and the Bible: see Genesis 19 to Ezekiel 16:49]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Therefore, rebellion against God's laws and order and the resultant environmental factors are seen to be a cause in promoting sensuality and homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Idolatry and judgment===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Martin destruction sodom640x422.jpg|thumbnail|300px|right|Destruction of [[Sodom]] by [[God]] - [[Benjamin Martin]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Romans 1]], God, through the [[apostle Paul]], condemns both  male and female homoeroticism, which, as a cultural practice, is shown to be a manifestation and a result of idolatry, in which man progressively acted contrary to that which God has revealed by creation, by design and normality. This is morality which is confirmed by written decree (the Law), as the next chapter declares. As a result of this continued rebellion, which was partly manifest in God being reduced to an image like unto corruptible creatures (like as today with homosexuals construing Christ to be homosexual, or sanctioning it, as well as nature effectively being worshiped), &amp;quot;God gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves.&amp;quot; (v. 24) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also stated that a certain afflictive punishment(s) of the body were incurred by those men who engaged in relations with each other. (v. 27) Unless repentance takes place, worse consequences will follow. (Rv. 21:28) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While some seek to render this chapter as only condemning homosexual relations when done as part of idolatry, the condemnation is not due to its association with paganism, rather as it inherently contrary to that which God ordained, then it is a manifestation of false religion, regardless of its form, though in ancient times in which religion was an inseparable part of culture, then formal idolatry was what was more manifested. Romans 1 proceeds to show that homosexuality is not alone as a fruit of idolatry, but that this particular pernicious physical sin is one of many inherently evil things. (Rm. 1:28-32)  ''For more information please see:'' [[Romans 1]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary, God's eternal power is manifest in His [[creation]] (Romans 1:18-20).  Nonetheless, certain people chose to worship the creature more than the Creator (Romans 1:21-25).  Therefore, God gave them up to homosexuality and other sins and gave them over to a reprobate mind (Romans 1:26-32).  As an example of the truth of this teaching, [[feminist]]s, wishing to deny the [[Women#New_Testament_statements_on_the_role_of_women|God-given role of women]], often engage in [[goddess]] worship and other forms of [[idolatry]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/goddess.html &amp;quot;Probe Ministries: Goddess Worship,&amp;quot; by Russ Wise]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and as a consequence are often given up to lesbianism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56458 Hetero woman: Feminism turned me into a lesbian], from [[WorldNetDaily]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conclusion of Biblical explanation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is  revealed in the Bible is that homosexuality is a practice due to man yielding to his sinful nature and disobeying the good laws of God, and misusing, among other things, his sexual abilities. This disobedience itself is idolatry (whatever holds your chief allegiance is your god, at least at that time), while continued idolatry results in homosexuality as a practice, as God delivers one over to perverse desires. In addition, individual and societal disobedience to the laws of God creates an environment which is conducive to perpetuating and further intensifying iniquity, which if continued, in time requires judgment. Studies today have shown that [[Religious Upbringing and Culture Affects Rates of Homosexuality|Religious upbringing and culture can strongly affect rates of homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modern studies concerning the causes of homosexuality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some studies indicate environmental factors can be involved in persons becoming homosexuals. Stanton L. Jones, Mark A. Yarhouse state in ''Homosexuality: the use of scientific research in the church's moral debate'' (and a main source for this section), &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The origins of homosexuality are not clearly understood by scientists, and the topic is a subject of hot debate. Theories and and empirical studies, which often contrast sharply, abound. The theories about the [[etiology]]  of homosexuality fall into two very large categories: theories that point to nature (that is, biological variables) and theories that point to nurture (that is, the influence of experience, of psychological variables.&amp;quot; (p. 52).&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who emphasize nurture, sometimes known as the ''[[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytical theory]]'', see powerful psychological forces at work, shaping and molding children from their birth, while those who emphasize nature contend that early homosexual traits attest to a biological cause. (p. 53)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite many psychological studies which indicate that the parent-child relationship, early childhood development, early homosexual experiences, and childhood abuse foster homosexuality, liberals tend to reject the environmental aspect, and favor a biological influence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David G. Myers, ''A level of explanations view'', Psychology of Christianity: four views. pp. 54-83&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is then used to render homosexuals to be slaves to genes, and justified in acting it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environment and nurture==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:325979 dna150.jpg|thumbnail|150px|left|[[Columbia University]] [[psychiatry]] professors Drs. William Byrne and Bruce Parsons stated: &amp;quot;There is no evidence that at present to substantiate a [[biology|biological]] theory. [T]he appeal of current biological explanations for sexual orientation may derive more from dissatisfaction with the present status of [[psychosocial]] explanations than from a substantiating body of experimental data&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/bornorbred.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That homosexuality is affected by environment and nurture has been the historical secular position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1980 work ''Overcoming Homosexuality'', Robert Kronemeyer writes: &amp;quot;With rare exceptions, homosexuality is neither inherited nor the result of some glandular disturbance or the scrambling of genes or chromosomes. Homosexuals are made, not born 'that way.' I firmly believe that homosexuality is a learned response to early painful experiences and that it can be unlearned. For those homosexuals who are unhappy with their life and find effective therapy, it is 'curable.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Kronemeyer, ''Overcoming Homosexuality'', p. 7 (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, in a 1989 ''[[USA Today]]'' article, [[San Francisco]] State University professor of psychology John DeCecco, and the former editor of the 25-volume, ''Journal of Homosexuality'', stated, &amp;quot;The idea that people are born into one type of sexual behavior is entirely foolish&amp;quot;.  Homosexuality is &amp;quot;a behavior, not a condition,&amp;quot; and something that some people can and do change, just like they sometimes change other tastes and personality traits.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kim Painter, ''A Biological Theory for Sexual Preference'', USA Today, 1 January 1989, p. 4D&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Parental relationships with offspring===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The psychoanalytical theory is the historical position, which implicates a detached, rejecting or absent father, often along with a close bond to the mother, as working, on the conscious and unconscious level, against a secure sexual identity. Also contributing to this can be a mother who has animosity toward the father, or men in general, and who works to present him negatively, and to make the child side with her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the earliest studies supporting this position was that of Irving Bieber and associates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bieber, ''Homsexuality: A psychoanalytical study of male homosexuality'' (1962)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Comparison of 106 homosexuals with 100 male heterosexuals showed that mothers of the former had enmeshed seductive type relationships with their sons, while their fathers were detached, distant or rejecting. This study was contested by some who charged the researchers with bias, but a further study by Ray B. Evans, which also compared homosexuals with heterosexuals, reported similar results, this time among self-identified  homosexuals who had never sought treatment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ray b. Evans, &amp;quot;Childhood parental relationships of homosexual men&amp;quot;, ''Journal of Consulting and clinical psychology'', 33. (1969), pp. 129-33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based upon his work with 200 male homosexuals, Gerard van den Aardweg stated that 79 percent described their mother as &amp;quot;overanxious&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;overconcerned&amp;quot; about them; their safety, health, and being overly sentimental when they met with some hardship, as well as manifesting other aspects of over-mothering. In addition, in 71 percent of homosexual cases, &amp;quot;the most important factor was the father's detachedness or nonparticipation in the son's upbringing. The fathers of 38 percent of the men were so hypercritical that the sons were made to feel either rejected and/or inferior. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gerard van den Aardweg, ''on the origins and treatment of homosexuality'' (1985), pp.184-85.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another  study of about 1500 homosexuals showed much less influence by the mother, while far more reported an unaffectionate or detached father, and approximately half of homosexuals reported they had negative feelings toward their fathers, versus 29 percent of heterosexuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bell, Weinberg, Hammersmith, ''Sexual preference: Its development in men and women'' (1981).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While these factors are conducive to homosexuality, it should be stressed that these do not ensure that children raised this way will become homosexual, nor are these factors alone in influencing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sexual abuse===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Childhood sexual abuse is well attested to demonstrate a correlation to the incidence of homosexuality among those affected by it. A large national survey of almost 35,000 Americans showed that more than three times as many men and women who had been sexually abused as children became homosexuals, versus that of heterosexuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;7.4 percent or homosexual men and 3.1 percent of females, versus 2.0 percent  of heterosexual men and 0.8 percent women.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, and Michaels, ''The social organization of homosexuality:...'', (1994) p. 344&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Another study reported that 58 percent of male adolescents who later became homosexuals suffered sexual abuse as children, while 90 percent who did not suffer sexual abuse identified themselves as heterosexuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sheir and Johnson, ''Sexual victimization of boys:... (1988) pp. 1189-93&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, 43 percent of male homosexuals reported sexual activity with another male during the ages of 10-12,  versus 9 percent of heterosexuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Manosevitz, &amp;quot;Early sexual behavior in adult homosexual and heterosexual males&amp;quot;, ''Journal of abnormal psychology'', 76 (1970), 396-402.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Educational indoctrination===&lt;br /&gt;
As part of the liberal ideology in modern [[education]], and as a result of psychological tactics used by homosexual [[activist]]s, schools have increasingly fostered the promotion of homosexuality, whether as part of official policy through homosexual activists working with or in schools. As a form of indoctrination which begins at the kindergarten level, homosexuality is treated as healthy and normal, with students at very impressionable ages sometimes being influenced to experiment with homosexual behavior. This is often done under the rubric of [[HIV]] instruction of preventing [[suicide]] by homosexuals, and preventing ''[[homophobia]]''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cwfa.org/articles/12546/MEDIA/family/index.htm CWA: School Tells Kids to Hide Pro-‘Gay’ Propaganda From Parents], Concerned Women for America, 3/13/2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.missionamerica.com/agenda.php Fighting the Gay Agenda in Schools Articles], Mission America&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chroniclewatch.com/2009/06/17/indoctrination-of-youth/  Roberto Santiago, The Indoctrination of our Youth],The Chronicle Watch, June 17, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.missionamerica.com/oldagenda26.php GLSEN, Corruption and Crime],  Mission America&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=127050 'Hate' laws could label 5-year-olds 'offenders'] WorldNetDaily, March 05, 2010&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=126233 'Czar' sees transgender school goals in reach], WorldNetDaily, February 25, 2010&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=54683 District gags 14-year-olds after 'gay' indoctrination], WorldNetDaily,  March 13, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biological research on the causes of homosexuality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see:'' [[Genetics, Homosexuality, Evolutionary Paradigm, and Creation Science]] and [[Homosexuality and Genetics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The belief that homosexuality has a biological cause can be traced back to the preliminary findings of neuroscientist Dr. Simon LeVay. In 1991 LeVay's studied the brains of 41 cadavers which included 19 homosexual males, and claimed that &amp;quot;a tiny area believed to control sexual activity [the hypothalamus] was less than half the size in the gay men than in the heterosexuals.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charlene Crabb, ''Are Some Men Born to Be Homosexual?'', U. S. News &amp;amp; World Report, 9 September 1991, p. 58&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S. LeVay, &amp;quot;A Difference in Hypothalamic Structure Between heterosexual and Homosexual Men,&amp;quot; Science 253 (1991), pp. 1034-37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   This study was immediately seized upon by many as  proof that homosexuality was biologically determined. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, further scrutiny showed this hasty conclusion as lacking in warrant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*1.  The range of sizes of the hypothalamic region varied and was inconsistent. The region at subject was the same size in a few homosexual men as that of the heterosexuals, while in a few other heterosexuals this region was a small as that of a homosexual. &lt;br /&gt;
*2. The fact that all 19 of the homosexual men had died of [[AIDS]] could easily have accounted for or contributed to the differences.&lt;br /&gt;
*3. It has not been determined if the smaller hypothalamuses were the cause rather than the effect of homosexual activity.  &amp;quot;Researchers have found that when people who become blind begin to learn Braille, the area of the brain controlling the reading finger actual grows larger.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reported in D. Gelman &amp;quot;Born or Bred?&amp;quot; Newsweek, 24 February 1992, pp. 46-53&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/homotheo.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*4. Levay's study was based  study was based upon a supposed sexual functional correlation between the SDN-POA brain center in male rats and a brain center called INAH3 in humans, but which assumption was shown to be false.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron4.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*5. The sexual history of the &amp;quot;heterosexual&amp;quot; men was not known, and Levay's samples included 16 brains from men whose sexual orientation was unknown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.equip.org/PDF/DH055-1.pdf Joseph P. Gudel, ''HOMOSEXUALITY: Fact and Fiction'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*6. And as William Byne noted, LeVay’s work &amp;quot;has not been replicated, and human neuroanatomical studies of this kind have a very poor track record for reproducibility. Indeed, procedures similar to those LeVay used to identify nuclei have previously led researchers astray&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byne, William (1994), “The Biological Evidence Challenged,” Scientific American, May, 1994, 270: p. 53&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*7. The conclusions were that which were sought by the researcher. Dr. LeVay, a homosexual himself, confessed that his study was not entirely a dispassionate scientific endeavor,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simon LeVay on The Phil Donahue Show, ''Genetically Gay: Born Gay or Become Gay?'', January 3, 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He also later stated, &amp;quot;I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byrd, A. Dean, Shirley E. Cox, and Jeffrey W. Robinson (2001), ''Homosexuality: The Innate-Immutability Argument Finds No Basis in Science'', The Salt Lake Tribune&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sltrib.com/2001/may/05272001/commenta/100523.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two prominent geneticists, Paul Billings and Jonathan Beckwith, commenting on the quality of the LeVay research, stated that  LeVay, &amp;quot;could not really be certain about his subject's sexual preferences, since they were dead&amp;quot;, and that his &amp;quot;research design and subject sample did not allow others to determine whether it was sexual behavior, drug use, or disease history that was correlated with the observed differences among the subjects' brains.&amp;quot;  And in addition, it was very likely that LeVay's method of defining homosexuality would &amp;quot;create inaccurate or inconsistent study groups.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;P. Billings and J. Beckwith, &amp;quot;Born Gay?&amp;quot; Technology Review, July 1993, p. 60,61&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study, published in ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America'', examined the ''anterior commissure'' (a structure that divides the left and right halves of the brain) of male heterosexuals and homosexual men, most of whom died of AIDS. The study shows that the anterior commissure was larger in women and in 27 of the 30 homosexual men than in heterosexual men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L. Allen, et al., ''Sexual Orientation and the Size of the Anterior Commissure in the Human Brain,'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 89, no. 15 (1992), pp. 7199-7202&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here again, how AIDS might have factored in this difference is an issue, and the findings of this study were overall in contradiction to another study published in 1988, which  found, in part, that the anterior commissure was larger in men than in women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S. Demeter et al., &amp;quot;Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure,&amp;quot; Human Neurobiology 6 1988), pp. 219-26&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 1991 study of twins by  Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard was also promoted as establishing biological determination of homosexuality, but which conclusion was also soon found to be lacking in warrant, and contrary to other studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/homotheo.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron4.html  Dr. Paul Cameron, ''Born WHAT Way?'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That blood chemistry as well as brains can change over time in response to environment and lifestyle has been documented by studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/bioresearch.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, ''The Biology of Homosexuality: Science or Politics?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/bioresearch.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Richard Dawkins pic.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|The [[atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] speculates that a &amp;quot;gay gene&amp;quot; causes homosexuality, but science has not discovered such a gene.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://anglicansamizdat.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/richard-dawkins-explains-how-the-gay-gene-was-preserved/ Richard Dawkins speculates that gene for homosexuality exists]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Causes of homosexuality and origins paradigms ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1993, Professor [[Miron Baron]], M.D., the renowned medical researcher and Professor at [[Columbia University]], wrote in [[BMJ]] (British Medical Journal) that there is a  conflict relative to the theory of [[evolution]] and the notion of [[gene|genetic]] [[determinism]] concerning [[homosexuality]].  Dr. Baron wrote &amp;quot;...from an evolutionary perspective, [[homosexuality and genetics|genetically determined homosexuality]] would have become [[extinct]] long ago because of reduced reproduction.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1678219 BMJ. 1993 August 7; 307(6900): 337–338.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the United States, [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals are more likely to believe in the theory of evolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Also, in the United States, twice as many liberals as conservatives (46% versus 22%) believe people are born homosexual and [[Views on Homosexuality|liberals generally have more favorable opinions about homosexuality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=764&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Given Dr. [[Miron Baron]]'s commentary about homosexuality, many American liberals are inconsistent on the issues of evolution and homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sociologist Steven Goldberg, Ph.D. states, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Virtually all of the evidence argues against there being a determinative physiological causal factor and I know of no researcher who believes that such a determinative factor exists...such factors play a predisposing, not a determinative role...I know of no one in the field who argues that homosexuality can be explained without reference to environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goldberg also expressed, &amp;quot;Gay criticism has not addressed the classic family configuration&amp;quot;; it has merely &amp;quot;asserted away the considerable evidence&amp;quot; for the existence of family factors. Studies which attempt to disprove the existence of the classic family pattern in homosexuality are &amp;quot;convincing only to those with a need to believe.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S. Goldberg, ''When Wish Replaces Thought: Why So Much of What You Believe is False'' (1994), Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Psychiatrists Friedman and Downey: &amp;quot;Despite recent neurobiological findings suggesting homosexuality is genetically-biologically determined, credible evidence is lacking for a biological model of homosexuality.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R. Friedman, M.D. and J. Downey, M.D., ''Journal of Neuropsychiatry'', vol. 5, No. 2, Spring l993&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Psychiatrist and author Jeffrey Satinover, M.D. concludes, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Like all complex behavioral and mental states, homosexuality is...neither exclusively biological nor exclusively psychological, but results from an as-yet-difficult-to-quantitate mixture of genetic factors, intrauterine influences...postnatal environment (such as parent, sibling and cultural behavior), and a complex series of repeatedly reinforced choices occurring at critical phases of development.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J. Satinover, M.D., ''Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth'', (1996). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Drs. William Byne and Bruce Parsons, researchers at the New York State Psychiatric Institute,having carefully analyzed all the major biological studies of homosexuality, found none that definitively supported a biological theory of causation.  &amp;quot;Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised.&amp;quot; Archives of General Psychiatry 50, no.3. (1993)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other similarly express that nurture and choice factor as being mostly or wholly determinative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/narth/homorig.html On the Origins of Homosexuality:&lt;br /&gt;
Is a Person &amp;quot;Born that Way&amp;quot;?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Indications of onset homosexuality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Childhood manifestations of gender non-conformity such as consistent preference by a boy for the clothing, company and play things (dolls, etc.) of girls over that of boys is generally seen as predisposing such to homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanton L. Jones, Mark A. Yarhouse, ''Homosexuality: the use of scientific research in the church's moral debate'', pp. 52-92&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, this is not always the case, and many children who manifest gender non-conformity are simply trying to discover what gender is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homosexuality as a choice==&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible shows that while nurture and environment can make one more predisposed to certain types of behavior, man's sinful nature can also deceive one into believing that sinful behaviors are not sin, while yielding to sin reduces ones ability to resist it.  Secular studies also indicate that most homosexuals have been attracted to the opposite gender. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A research project (2004) of Robert Goetze identified 84 articles or books that contain some relevance to the possibility of sexual orientation change. Of the data reported, 31 of the 84 studies showed a quantitative outcome of individuals able to change sexual orientation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2553&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, the homosexuals themselves argued back in 1971 that homosexuality is &amp;quot;merely a preference, orientation, or propensity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RainbowHistory&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=The Rainbow History Project|url=http://www.rainbowhistory.org/html/apazap.htm}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. One homosexual received the question on this topic in the CBS documentary from 1967: &amp;quot;Most homosexuals if they had a chance to be a heterosexual, would they? Well, I have a friend who took a poll of 300 people on that very question, he asked them: If you were able to take a pill to change yourself from homosexual to heterosexual, would you do it? And something like 95% of men said: “No.”&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;CBS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Time Capsule: Mike Wallace tells truth about homosexuality in 1967 documentary |publisher=CBS |page=02min:58sec |url=http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/time-capsule-mike-wallace-tells-truth-about-homosexuality-in-1967-documenta}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Former homosexuals===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:St Paul Preaching.jpg|left|thumb|200px|St. [[Paul]] defends his preaching (Giovanni Ricco)]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Ex-Homosexuals]] and [[Overcoming Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the earliest historical records of the existence of [[Ex-Homosexuals|ex-homosexuals]] is found in the letter of the [[Paul|Apostle Paul]] to the [[Corinth|Corinthian]] [[Christianity|Christian]] church (approx. 59 AD).&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]]? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such '''were''' some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the [[Holy Spirit|Spirit]] of our [[God]]. - I Corinthians 6:9-11 (KJV)}} &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Today people still report leaving homosexuality and becoming heterosexual by being born again through repentance and faith in the Lord [[Jesus Christ]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56481&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=19650&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwfa.org/articles/4216/CFI/cfreport/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.aspid=25145&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.witnessfortheworld.org/blkexgbks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontlinemin.org/wasgay.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.charismamag.com/display.php?id=9019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apocalipsis.org/testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.baylor.edu/lariat/news.php?action=story&amp;amp;story=13784&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Peter LaBarbera]] is the President of [[Americans for Truth]] which is a organization which counters the [[Homosexual Agenda|homosexual agenda]]. Peter LaBarbera stated the following regarding Christian ex-homosexuals who reported being transformed by the power of God:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Another factor from my experience as a close observer of the “ex-gay” phenomenon is that many former homosexuals do not linger in “[[Reparative Therapy|reparative therapy]]” programs, or participate in them at all. They attribute their dramatic and (relatively) rapid transformation to the power of God, and likely would not show up in a study of this kind. In fact, these “unstudied” overcomers would appear to be the most successful ex-homosexuals because they’ve moved on with their lives — as “reborn” Christians can move on after overcoming any besetting sin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americansfortruth.com/news/landmark-study-change-for-homosexuals-is-possible.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Additional sources concerning the causes of homosexuality ==  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been much work done since the latter part of the 20th century. Below are some resources in regards to the various causes of homosexuality:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religious Upbringing and Culture Affects Rates of Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sexual Abuse Being a Contributing Factor for Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and Choice]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and Genetics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality in animals myth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Genetics, Homosexuality, Evolutionary Paradigm, and Creation Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mygenes.co.nz/download.htm My genes made me do it!]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Homosexuality and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ex-Homosexuals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Teenager Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality Research]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality Statistics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutworldview.org/causes-of-homosexuality-faq.htm What are some of the causes of homosexuality?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://ankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/streams-of-life/SL2W0803.pdf What Causes Homosexuality] by Dr. John F. Ankerberg&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.godandscience.org/evolution/genetics_of_homosexuality.html Rich Deem, ''Genetics and Homosexuality: Are People Born Gay? The Biological Basis for Sexual Orientation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{homosexualityb}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rj617ha</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>