<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rdsmith</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Rdsmith"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Rdsmith"/>
	<updated>2026-10-02T13:57:11Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967368</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967368"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T16:45:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why create a new calender when the Farsi and Chinese calenders already existed? Again, please stop trying to split hairs on the subject between secular and religion. We were not founded as a theocracy and we were not founded as a Godless nation either. The overblown &amp;quot;Jefferson was not religious&amp;quot; lovefest has been debunked already. Your &amp;quot;moot&amp;quot; point that nobody talks about is that Jefferson founded the American Bible Society and paid for the importation of 20000 Bibles. Look at the opening preambles of the 50 state constitutions and their references to God. [http://www.christianindex.org/617.article]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I understand that this story has been circulating for many years in many forms but none of this is true. Jefferson did not found the American Bible Society. Neither he nor Congress paid for 20,000 Bibles to be imported. The 20,000 number comes from a proposed resolution in Congress to import Bibles because there were no printers in the US during the revolutionary war and we were obviously embargoed from importing Bibles during the war. After the war there was a real shortage. Jefferson really wasn't Christian in any sense: he may have believed in his own idea of God but he absolutely didn't accept the divinity of Jesus Christ, his resurrection, the triune person of Christ, etc. These beliefs are central to Christianity as far as I am aware. I may be wrong about whether evangelicals accept the various personages of Christ. Jefferson accepted none of them. I understand the desire of Christian men to associate important figures with their faiths but we wouldn't do this with a villain or a blasphemer and we oughtn't do it with a man who didn't adore Jesus Christ as his lord and savior but only as some random guy who lived in Palestine a long time ago. Nate  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I fixed my quote above. Jefferson did respect religion and is quoted praising the Bible. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:16, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The people living in the colonies were primarily accustomed to a European (therefore Christ-based) calender so using the Farsi or Chinese calenders would be of equal folly. I'm talking about the government of the United States and since the Articles of Confederation has been godless, as for America the nation, I'll agree it is has a strong Christian heritage (then again to question Christianity openly has been taboo until contemporary times).The &amp;quot;godliness&amp;quot; of the constitutions of the colonies range from freedom to religion to religious requirements for office (the latter being specifically opposed by the Constitution in Article VI). You can fixate on preambles all you want, all they state is ends, while I'm look at means, but I looked at the preambles of the constitutions of the states when America was founded, not very Judeo-Christian to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, for a third time, in the context of &amp;quot; the United States Constitution was written; grounded on republican political principles and Judeo-Christian values,&amp;quot; show me the specific Judeo-Christian values in the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution. If not, then I can show you the Enlightenment principles the government of this country was founded upon. The Declaration of Independence was based on Locke, but even Locke uses the term &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; as opposed to more deistic references of the Dec. -- [[Rdsmith]] 11:42 (EST) 9 March 2012&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967367</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967367"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T16:44:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why create a new calender when the Farsi and Chinese calenders already existed? Again, please stop trying to split hairs on the subject between secular and religion. We were not founded as a theocracy and we were not founded as a Godless nation either. The overblown &amp;quot;Jefferson was not religious&amp;quot; lovefest has been debunked already. Your &amp;quot;moot&amp;quot; point that nobody talks about is that Jefferson founded the American Bible Society and paid for the importation of 20000 Bibles. Look at the opening preambles of the 50 state constitutions and their references to God. [http://www.christianindex.org/617.article]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I understand that this story has been circulating for many years in many forms but none of this is true. Jefferson did not found the American Bible Society. Neither he nor Congress paid for 20,000 Bibles to be imported. The 20,000 number comes from a proposed resolution in Congress to import Bibles because there were no printers in the US during the revolutionary war and we were obviously embargoed from importing Bibles during the war. After the war there was a real shortage. Jefferson really wasn't Christian in any sense: he may have believed in his own idea of God but he absolutely didn't accept the divinity of Jesus Christ, his resurrection, the triune person of Christ, etc. These beliefs are central to Christianity as far as I am aware. I may be wrong about whether evangelicals accept the various personages of Christ. Jefferson accepted none of them. I understand the desire of Christian men to associate important figures with their faiths but we wouldn't do this with a villain or a blasphemer and we oughtn't do it with a man who didn't adore Jesus Christ as his lord and savior but only as some random guy who lived in Palestine a long time ago. Nate  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I fixed my quote above. Jefferson did respect religion and is quoted praising the Bible. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:16, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The people living in the colonies were primarily accustomed to a European (therefore Christ-based) calender so using the Farsi or Chinese calenders would be of equal folly. I'm talking about the government of the United States and since the Articles of Confederation has been godless, as for America the nation, I'll agree it is has a strong Christian heritage (then again to question Christianity openly has been taboo until contemporary times).The &amp;quot;godliness&amp;quot; of the constitutions of the colonies range from freedom to religion to religious requirements for office (the latter being specifically opposed by the Constitution in Article VI). You can fixate on preambles all you want, all they state is ends, while I'm look at means, but I looked at the preambles of the constitutions of the states when America was founded, not very Judeo-Christian to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, for a third time, in the context of &amp;quot; the United States Constitution was written; grounded on republican political principles and Judeo-Christian values,&amp;quot; show me the specific Judeo-Christian values in the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution. If not, then I can show you the Enlightenment principles the government of this country was founded upon. The Declaration of Independence was based on Locke, but even Locke uses the term &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; as opposed to more deistic references of the Dec. -- [[Rdsmith]] 11:42 (EST) 9 March 2012&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967366</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967366"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T16:43:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why create a new calender when the Farsi and Chinese calenders already existed? Again, please stop trying to split hairs on the subject between secular and religion. We were not founded as a theocracy and we were not founded as a Godless nation either. The overblown &amp;quot;Jefferson was not religious&amp;quot; lovefest has been debunked already. Your &amp;quot;moot&amp;quot; point that nobody talks about is that Jefferson founded the American Bible Society and paid for the importation of 20000 Bibles. Look at the opening preambles of the 50 state constitutions and their references to God. [http://www.christianindex.org/617.article]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I understand that this story has been circulating for many years in many forms but none of this is true. Jefferson did not found the American Bible Society. Neither he nor Congress paid for 20,000 Bibles to be imported. The 20,000 number comes from a proposed resolution in Congress to import Bibles because there were no printers in the US during the revolutionary war and we were obviously embargoed from importing Bibles during the war. After the war there was a real shortage. Jefferson really wasn't Christian in any sense: he may have believed in his own idea of God but he absolutely didn't accept the divinity of Jesus Christ, his resurrection, the triune person of Christ, etc. These beliefs are central to Christianity as far as I am aware. I may be wrong about whether evangelicals accept the various personages of Christ. Jefferson accepted none of them. I understand the desire of Christian men to associate important figures with their faiths but we wouldn't do this with a villain or a blasphemer and we oughtn't do it with a man who didn't adore Jesus Christ as his lord and savior but only as some random guy who lived in Palestine a long time ago. Nate  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The people living in the colonies were primarily accustomed to a European (therefore Christ-based) calender so using the Farsi or Chinese calenders would be of equal folly. I'm talking about the government of the United States and since the Articles of Confederation has been godless, as for America the nation, I'll agree it is has a strong Christian heritage (then again to question Christianity openly has been taboo until contemporary times).The &amp;quot;godliness&amp;quot; of the constitutions of the colonies range from freedom to religion to religious requirements for office (the latter being specifically opposed by the Constitution in Article VI). You can fixate on preambles all you want, all they state is ends, while I'm look at means, but I looked at the preambles of the constitutions of the states when America was founded, not very Judeo-Christian to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::So, for a third time, in the context of &amp;quot; the United States Constitution was written; grounded on republican political principles and Judeo-Christian values,&amp;quot; show me the specific Judeo-Christian values in the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution. If not, then I can show you the Enlightenment principles the government of this country was founded upon. The Declaration of Independence was based on Locke, but even Locke uses the term &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; as opposed to more deistic references of the Dec. -- [[Rdsmith]] 11:42 (EST) 9 March 2012 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I fixed my quote above. Jefferson did respect religion and is quoted praising the Bible. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:16, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967365</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967365"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T16:42:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why create a new calender when the Farsi and Chinese calenders already existed? Again, please stop trying to split hairs on the subject between secular and religion. We were not founded as a theocracy and we were not founded as a Godless nation either. The overblown &amp;quot;Jefferson was not religious&amp;quot; lovefest has been debunked already. Your &amp;quot;moot&amp;quot; point that nobody talks about is that Jefferson founded the American Bible Society and paid for the importation of 20000 Bibles. Look at the opening preambles of the 50 state constitutions and their references to God. [http://www.christianindex.org/617.article]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I understand that this story has been circulating for many years in many forms but none of this is true. Jefferson did not found the American Bible Society. Neither he nor Congress paid for 20,000 Bibles to be imported. The 20,000 number comes from a proposed resolution in Congress to import Bibles because there were no printers in the US during the revolutionary war and we were obviously embargoed from importing Bibles during the war. After the war there was a real shortage. Jefferson really wasn't Christian in any sense: he may have believed in his own idea of God but he absolutely didn't accept the divinity of Jesus Christ, his resurrection, the triune person of Christ, etc. These beliefs are central to Christianity as far as I am aware. I may be wrong about whether evangelicals accept the various personages of Christ. Jefferson accepted none of them. I understand the desire of Christian men to associate important figures with their faiths but we wouldn't do this with a villain or a blasphemer and we oughtn't do it with a man who didn't adore Jesus Christ as his lord and savior but only as some random guy who lived in Palestine a long time ago. Nate  [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 13:06, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The people living in the colonies were primarily accustomed to a European (therefore Christ-based) calender so using the Farsi or Chinese calenders would be of equal folly. I'm talking about the government of the United States and since the Articles of Confederation has been godless, as for America the nation, I'll agree it is has a strong Christian heritage (then again to question Christianity openly has been taboo until contemporary times).The &amp;quot;godliness&amp;quot; of the constitutions of the colonies range from freedom to religion to religious requirements for office (the latter being specifically opposed by the Constitution in Article VI). You can fixate on preambles all you want, all they state is ends, while I'm look at means, but I looked at the preambles of the constitutions of the states when America was founded, not very Judeo-Christian to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, for a third time, in the context of &amp;quot; the United States Constitution was written; grounded on republican political principles and Judeo-Christian values,&amp;quot; show me the specific Judeo-Christian values in the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution. If not, then I can show you the Enlightenment principles the government of this country was founded upon. The Declaration of Independence, based on Locke, but Locke uses the term &amp;quot;God&amp;quot; as opposed to more deistic references of the Dec. -- [[Rdsmith]] 11:42 (EST) 9 March 2012 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I fixed my quote above. Jefferson did respect religion and is quoted praising the Bible. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:16, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=967120</id>
		<title>Contraception</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=967120"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T16:37:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Contraception''' (or '''birth control''') refers to techniques, [[drug]]s, or devices that prevent [[pregnancy|conception]]. There are many different methods, each having its own level of effectiveness and safety. The only known method that is 100% effective is [[abstinence]]. [[Abstinence]] during fertile times can take the place of artificial form of birth control. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;When a couple for serious reasons abstain from intercourse at times at which they might conceive, their abstaining is itself chosen sexual behavior, and virtuous sexual behavior because it is expressive of a recognition of the demands of the pro creative good.&amp;quot; [http://www.linacre.org/contra.html Linacre.org] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Catholic teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Roman Catholic church]] prohibits the use of artificial contraceptives such as pills or barriers to Catholics, though it supports natural methods of avoiding conception based on timing. The policy on contraception is given in the [[Humanae Vitae]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Church does not teach that in engaging in intercourse has to be acting with an intention for procreation, an objective one could realistically have in mind only when one was fertile. What they teach is that sexual intercourse will not make for an authentic unity of two-in-one-flesh if those engaging in it set out to negate its built-in significance as generative/procreation behavior. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linacre.org/contra.html Linacre.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Vatican observes that the only morally sound method of birth control is avoiding sex when the woman is fertile.  In contrast, &amp;quot;'every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible' is intrinsically evil.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#III]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anglican teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Anglican Church]] regards sexual love as an essential way for a husband and wife to express and strengthen their mutual love, citing Genesis 2:18 'It is not good that the man (Adam) should be alone' in support of this. At the [[Lambeth Conference]] of 1930 a resolution was passed stating: ''Where there is a clearly felt moral obligation to limit or avoid parenthood, complete abstinence is the primary and obvious method.'' It continued by saying that if there was morally sound reasoning for avoiding abstinence, ''the Conference agrees that other methods may be used, provided that this is done in the light of Christian principles.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, by the Lambeth Conference of 1958, contraceptive use among most Anglicans was widespread and a resolution that year stated that the responsibility for deciding upon the number and frequency of children was laid by God upon the consciences of parents ''in such ways as are acceptable to husband and wife''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.cofe.anglican.org/info/socialpublic/smte.html#contraception Science, Medicine, Technology &amp;amp;amp; Environment | Church of England] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no single attitude to contraception within Islam; however eight of the nine classic schools of Islamic law permit it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But some Islamic leaders have openly campaigned against the use of condoms or other birth control methods, thus making population planning in many countries ineffective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This resistance to birth control was reflected in 2005 when a conference involving 40 Islamic scholars from 21 countries urged fresh efforts to push population planning and better reproductive health services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hindu teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hinduism encourages procreation within marriage, yet there is no opposition against contraception. Most Hindus accept that there is a duty to have a family during that stage of one’s life. So they are unlikely to use birth control to avoid having children altogether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional Hindu texts praise large families (which was normal in ancient times). Yet, Hindu scriptures that applaud small families also exist which emphasize the development of a positive social conscience. So family planning is seen as an ethical good. The Upanishads (texts delineating key Hindu concepts) describe birth control methods, and some Hindu scriptures contain advice on what a couple should do to promote conception (thus providing a type of contraceptive advice).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (US)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until a 1923 court decision, the federal [[Anthony Comstock|Comstock Act]] prohibited the use of the mail service to distribute contraceptives or information on contraception or [[abortion]]. Contraception was until this time considered [[obscenity|obscene]] for legal purposes, as it was considered to serve only in the promotion of immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until 1965, some US states criminalized the possession and/or distribution of contraceptives for reasons of public morality on the grounds that contraception would encourage premarital sex. In the 1965 [[Supreme Court]] case of [[Griswold v. Connecticut]], [[activist judge]]s invented a constitutional right to contraception. The 1972 case of Eisenstadt v. Baird later extended this invented right to include even unmarried couples, rendering any legal attempt to restrict access impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Roberts]] upheld &amp;quot;Griswold&amp;quot; at his 2005 confirmation hearings to be Chief Justice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://privacy-law.blogspot.com/2005/09/john-roberts-right-to-privacy-part-5.html quotations]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:asked, &amp;quot;Do you agree that there is a right of privacy to be found in the liberty clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?&amp;quot; Roberts responded:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I do, Senator. I think that the court's expressions, and I think if my reading of the precedent is correct, I think every justice on the court believes that, to some extent or another. Liberty is not limited to freedom from physical restraint. It does cover areas, as you said, such as privacy. And it's not protected only in procedural terms but it is protected substantively as well.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I agree with the Griswold court's conclusion that marital privacy extends to contraception and availability of that. The court, since Griswold, has grounded the privacy right discussed in that case in the liberty interest protected under the due process clause.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I feel comfortable commenting on Griswold and the result in Griswold because that does not appear to me to be an area that is going to come before the court again.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (International)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==   &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contraception]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967119</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967119"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T16:36:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967118</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967118"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T16:35:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.  [[Rdsmith]] 11:35 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967117</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967117"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T16:34:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the United States of America page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;quot;all men are endowed by their Creator,&amp;quot; In other words, the same era of people that wrote the Constitution, ratified the Declaration of Independence. I will not remove Judeo-Christian principles from the United States of America page. The Founders put us on the Gregorian calender. This means the Judeo-Christian.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 11:04, 8 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That is the Declaration of Independence, which is not law, it is a deist reference, and to cite Jefferson for Judeo-Christian values is moot (at least) as he created his own Bible where he cut the New Testament to present Jesus as good moral teacher who died. The Gregorian calender was the prevailing calender at the time, and creating a new calender would have been folly. Again, please show me exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Virginia&amp;diff=967115</id>
		<title>Virginia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Virginia&amp;diff=967115"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T16:23:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Mother of Presidents */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{USState&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
|flag=11121.gif&lt;br /&gt;
|motto=&amp;quot;Sic Semper Tyrannis&amp;quot; (Thus Always to Tyrants)&lt;br /&gt;
|nick=The Old Dominion State&lt;br /&gt;
|capital=Richmond&lt;br /&gt;
|language=English&lt;br /&gt;
|governor=Bob McDonnell&lt;br /&gt;
|gparty=Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|senator2=Mark Warner&lt;br /&gt;
|s2party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s2phone=(202) 224-2023&lt;br /&gt;
|s2email=http://warner.senate.gov/contact/contact.cfm Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|senator1=Jim Webb&lt;br /&gt;
|s1party=Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|s1phone=(202) 224-4024 &lt;br /&gt;
|s1email=http://webb.senate.gov/contact/ Contact&lt;br /&gt;
|population=&lt;br /&gt;
|date=June 25, 1788 (10th)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Virginia''' (Officially '''''The Commonwealth of Virginia''''') is one of the fifty [[United States]]. Named in honor of [[Queen Elizabeth I]] of [[England]], Virginia was also nicknamed the ''Old Dominion'' by King Charles II because it remained loyal to the crown during the [[English Civil War]] and throughout [[Oliver Cromwell]]'s years. Virginia was one of the first colonies in [[Colonial America]] in the 1600s and was a leader in the [[American Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
In partisan terms, the two parties compete furiously for the legislature and the governorship. In presidential elections Virginia was reliably Republican from 1968 until 2004, but in 2008 Obama won, thanks to the growing liberal strength in the Washington suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Va-gov.jpg|thumb|330px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 election for governor was a referendum on the Obama administration. Republican [[Bob McDonnell]], Virginia's former attorney general, defeated Democrat State Senator [[Creigh Deeds]]. Since 1977, the political party that has won the presidency has, in every case, lost the Virginia governorship in the next election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McDonnell explained that, &amp;quot;The business community was the first to recoil&amp;quot; from policies such as &amp;quot;card check&amp;quot; -- legislation to allow union organization by signing cards instead of by a secret ballot -- and cap-and-trade environmental policies. &amp;quot;But health care now dwarfs previous concerns -- handing over the best medical system in the world to the federal government. It affects everyone.&amp;quot; Conservatives, he contends, are more activated than at any time since 1993. A young McDonnell campaign worker exuded confidence, boasting, &amp;quot;We have the enthusiasm Obama's people had last time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Gerson, &amp;quot;A Virginia Model For a GOP Comeback?&amp;quot; [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/27/AR2009082703256.html?hpid=opinionsbox1 '&amp;quot;Washington Post'' Aug. 28, 2009] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Virginia Senate has 22 Democrats and 18 Republicans. The House of Delegates, however, consists of 59 Republicans, 39 Democrats, and two Independents who caucus with Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Elected Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Federal===&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[James Webb]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. [[Mark Warner]] (D)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Rob Wittman]] [R, VA-01]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Scott Rigell]] [R, VA-02]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Robert Scott]] [D, VA-03]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Randy Forbes]] [R, VA-04]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Robert Hurt]] [R, VA-05]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Bob Goodlatte]] [R, VA-06]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Eric Cantor]] [R, VA-07]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Jim Moran]] [D, VA-08]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Morgan Griffith]] [R, VA-09]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Frank Wolf]] [R, VA-10]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rep. [[Gerry Connolly]] [D, VA-11]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Statewide===&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor [[Robert McDonnell]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lt. Governor [[Bill Bolling]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
*Attorney General [[Ken Cuccinelli]] (R)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geological Regions of Virginia==&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia is commonly divided into five geological regions, Tidewater, Piedmont, Blue Ridge, Valley and Ridge and the Appalachia Plateau. There are no formal lines marking these regions and any political boundaries, such as county or city boundaries are coincidental. However, these regions have identifiable geology which differentiates them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fall Line===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Fall Line'' is so named because it marks a line where many waterfalls occur in Virginia Rivers. Below the Fall Line most rivers, such as the James and Potomac and Rappahannok, are broad, deep and gentle, but above the Fall Line the rivers are rockier and swifter. Below the Fall Line rivers are navigable by ocean-going vessels. Above the Fall Line canoes and flat boats are the only means to navigate most rivers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of this the C&amp;amp;O Canal (Chesapeake and Ohio Canal) was constructed above the Fall Line. The goal was to unite the Chesapeake Bay with the Ohio River system the way the Erie Canal had opened up the Great Lakes below Niagara.  Many important Virginia cities such as Alexandria, Richmond and Petersburg are just below the Fall Line. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tidewater===&lt;br /&gt;
The Tidewater or &amp;quot;Coastal Plain&amp;quot; of Virginia is bounded on the east by the Atlantic Ocean and on the west by the ''Fall Line''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tidewater Region was the first region of Virginia to be settled by Europeans, and is home to many of the oldest English settlements in North America, such as [[Jamestown]]. The dominant geographical feature of the region is the [[Chesapeake_Bay | Chesapeake Bay]]. Rivers in the region rise and fall with the tides because they flow into the Chesapeake or other salt-water bays. Major ports such as [[Norfolk]] or Newport News are found in the region as are historical port cities such as the tobacco ports of Alexandria and Yorktown are found on the Coastal Plain. The British surrender at Yorktown was considered a tipping point in the [[Revolutionary War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Eastern Shore====&lt;br /&gt;
The Eastern Shore of Virginia is that part of Virginia situated on the Delmarva Peninsula between the [[Chesapeake Bay]] and the [[Atlantic Ocean]]. The region is fairly undeveloped due to the remoteness imposed by the bay and ocean, but many fishers, farmers and chicken farms are found here. These region is geographically part of the Tidewater region and its connected to the mainland by way of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761554210/Delmarva_Peninsula.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Piedmont===&lt;br /&gt;
Above the Fall Line are the foothills of the Appalachian and the region whose name means &amp;quot;foot mountain&amp;quot;. The Piedmont is rockier and higher than the coastal plain of the Tidewater. The Piedmont was settled by English pioneers in the earliest days of colonial America and later by African slaves who worked the plantations of the region. Tobacco and corn are still an important part of the Piedmont economy.  Scenic and historic cities such as Charlottesville and Lynchburg are two important Piedmont cities. The famed Appomattox courthouse is in the Piedmont.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Blue Ridge===&lt;br /&gt;
The Blue Ridge is a range of mountains rise up above the Piedmont and mark the point where the Appalachian Mountains rise up above the Piedmont. The [[Shenandoah National Park]] and the Skyline Drive are Blue Ridge tourist destinations. Apples orchards are common in this region, but the industry is not as vibrant as it was historically. [http://www.whitehousefoods.com/ White House Foods], a major apple juicer and product packager, draws many of its apples from this region. Cities are uncommon, perhaps unknown in this region, but &amp;quot;mountain people&amp;quot; inhabited much of the highlands before they were converted to parks.  Mountain people, sometimes called ''hillbillies, rednecks, or or other liberal slurs for reverse discrimination'', had a unique culture devoted to life in the highland. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Memories of a Lewis Mountain Man by John W. Stoneberger published by Potomac Appalachian Trail Club&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.patc.net/store/PC320.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Valley and Ridge===&lt;br /&gt;
Beyond the Blue Ridge is the ''Valley and Ridge Region''. Perhaps the most famous part of the Valley and Ridge Region west of the Blue Ridge is the Shenandoah Valley. Stonewall Jackson's Valley campaign was fought throughout this region.  Cities in this region developed in proximity to the early railroad system, and this figured into the strategy of the [[American Civil War | War Between the States]]. Manassas, Harrisonburg and Roanoke are important cities in this region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Appalachian Plateau===&lt;br /&gt;
The southwest corner of Virginia between [[West Virginia]], [[Kentucky]], and [[Tennessee]] makes up Virginia's Appalachian Plateau. The region is similar geographically to West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky with rugged terrain not well-suited to the development of large cities like the westernmost metropolitan area, Roanoke, though some parts of the region, such as the Grundy area, have major educational facilities which attracts many out of state residents (i.e., the Appalachian School of Law). The [[Coal]] industry is an important industry and way of life in this part of Virginia. Also, this region is one of the leading producers of natural gas due to large methane deposits found within deep (underground) mines. The region is also known for its national parks (i.e. the Breaks Interstate Park, which is on the VA/KY border.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Regions, Counties and Cities==&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia has evolved into several different cultural regions which have very divergent economic interests, lifestyle goals and ways of life.  Northern Virginia is one of the wealthiest, best educated and most developed parts of the United States and thus the entire world. Traffic congestion is a common problem and the [[Metrorail|Metro]] ([[subway]] system) aids commuters into and out of Washington D.C., [[Arlington, Virginia|Arlington]] and Alexandria. High technology industries and U.S. government jobs are leading employers in this region. Southwestern Virginia is mountainous with coal mining and few other industries. The Virginia Beach/Norfolk Region is home to several major military installations and [[ship]]-building foundries. Central Virginia is dominated by mid-sized cities with disproportionate political strength such as [[Richmond, Virginia|Richmond]]. The [[Chesapeake Bay]] separates the Eastern Shore of Virgina from the rest of Virgina. The Eastern Shore is the Virginia portion of the Delmarva Peninsula and is sparsely populated, flat, and sandy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia is organized into a system of [[county|counties]] and [[independent city|independent cities]]. Towns are incorporated in counties, and towns have the power to levy taxes in addition to those imposed by the county. Arlington is organized as a county, but it is completely urbanized, and there are [[unincorporated area|no towns]] in the county limits, so for all practical purposes, Arlington is a city. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cities &amp;amp; Towns===&lt;br /&gt;
* Alexandria&lt;br /&gt;
* Abingdon&lt;br /&gt;
* Bedford&lt;br /&gt;
* Bridgewater&lt;br /&gt;
* Chesapeake&lt;br /&gt;
* Danville&lt;br /&gt;
* Fairfax City&lt;br /&gt;
* Falls Church&lt;br /&gt;
* Fredericksburg&lt;br /&gt;
* Galax&lt;br /&gt;
* Grundy&lt;br /&gt;
* Hampton&lt;br /&gt;
* Hampton Roads Region&lt;br /&gt;
* Lebanon&lt;br /&gt;
* Lynchburg&lt;br /&gt;
* Manassas&lt;br /&gt;
* Norfolk&lt;br /&gt;
* Petersburg&lt;br /&gt;
* Richmond&lt;br /&gt;
* Roanoke&lt;br /&gt;
* Staunton&lt;br /&gt;
* Tangiers Island&lt;br /&gt;
* Virginia Beach&lt;br /&gt;
* Williamsburg&lt;br /&gt;
* Winchester &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Counties===&lt;br /&gt;
*Accomack&lt;br /&gt;
*Albemarle&lt;br /&gt;
*Alleghany&lt;br /&gt;
*Amelia&lt;br /&gt;
*Amherst&lt;br /&gt;
*Appomattox&lt;br /&gt;
*Arlington&lt;br /&gt;
*Augusta &lt;br /&gt;
*Bath&lt;br /&gt;
*Bedford&lt;br /&gt;
*Bland&lt;br /&gt;
*Botetourt&lt;br /&gt;
*Brunswick&lt;br /&gt;
*Buchanan&lt;br /&gt;
*Buckingham &lt;br /&gt;
*Campbell&lt;br /&gt;
*Caroline&lt;br /&gt;
*Carroll&lt;br /&gt;
*Charles City&lt;br /&gt;
*Charlotte&lt;br /&gt;
*Chesterfield&lt;br /&gt;
*Clarke&lt;br /&gt;
*Craig&lt;br /&gt;
*Culpeper&lt;br /&gt;
*Cumberland &lt;br /&gt;
*Dickenson&lt;br /&gt;
*Dinwiddie &lt;br /&gt;
*Essex &lt;br /&gt;
*Fairfax&lt;br /&gt;
*Fauquier&lt;br /&gt;
*Floyd&lt;br /&gt;
*Fluvanna&lt;br /&gt;
*Franklin&lt;br /&gt;
*Frederick &lt;br /&gt;
*Giles&lt;br /&gt;
*Gloucester &lt;br /&gt;
*Goochland&lt;br /&gt;
*Grayson&lt;br /&gt;
*Greene&lt;br /&gt;
*Greensville &lt;br /&gt;
*Halifax&lt;br /&gt;
*Hanover&lt;br /&gt;
*Henrico&lt;br /&gt;
*Henry&lt;br /&gt;
*Highland &lt;br /&gt;
*Isle of Wight &lt;br /&gt;
*James City &lt;br /&gt;
*King and Queen &lt;br /&gt;
*King George&lt;br /&gt;
*King William &lt;br /&gt;
*Lancaster&lt;br /&gt;
*Lee&lt;br /&gt;
*Loudoun&lt;br /&gt;
*Louisa&lt;br /&gt;
*Lunenburg &lt;br /&gt;
*Madison&lt;br /&gt;
*Mathews&lt;br /&gt;
*Mecklenburg&lt;br /&gt;
*Middlesex&lt;br /&gt;
*Montgomery &lt;br /&gt;
*Nelson&lt;br /&gt;
*New Kent&lt;br /&gt;
*Northampton&lt;br /&gt;
*Northumberland&lt;br /&gt;
*Nottoway &lt;br /&gt;
*Orange &lt;br /&gt;
*Page&lt;br /&gt;
*Patrick&lt;br /&gt;
*Pittsylvania&lt;br /&gt;
*Powhatan&lt;br /&gt;
*Prince Edward &lt;br /&gt;
*Prince George&lt;br /&gt;
*Prince William&lt;br /&gt;
*Pulaski &lt;br /&gt;
*Rappahannock&lt;br /&gt;
*Richmond&lt;br /&gt;
*Roanoke&lt;br /&gt;
*Rockbridge&lt;br /&gt;
*Rockingham&lt;br /&gt;
*Russell &lt;br /&gt;
*Scott&lt;br /&gt;
*Shenandoah&lt;br /&gt;
*Smyth&lt;br /&gt;
*Southampton&lt;br /&gt;
*Spotsylvania&lt;br /&gt;
*Stafford&lt;br /&gt;
*Surry&lt;br /&gt;
*Sussex&lt;br /&gt;
*Tazewell &lt;br /&gt;
*Warren&lt;br /&gt;
*Washington&lt;br /&gt;
*Westmoreland&lt;br /&gt;
*Wise&lt;br /&gt;
*Wythe &lt;br /&gt;
*York&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*Information obtained from VA state site.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flag, Seal and Official Symbols &amp;amp; Emblems==&lt;br /&gt;
The unofficial motto and tourist marketing slogan of the Commonwealth is ''Virginia is for Lovers'' but the official State Motto is ''Sic Semper Tyrannis'', a Latin phrase meaning &amp;quot;Thus Always to Tyrants&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.state.va.us/cmsportal2/facts_and_history_4096/facts_4104/trivia_facts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The front of the Great Seal of Virginia (called the obverse) features the Roman goddess Virtus standing over a defeated opponent. Virtus wears a blue tunic exposing her left breast. One arm rests on a spear, the other carries a sheathed sword. This goddess stands in a triumphant victor's with one foot on the chest of a fallen tyrant, whose crown lies at Virtus' feet. ''Sic Semper Tyrannis'' arches at the bottom the image and &amp;quot;Virginia&amp;quot; symmetrically arches above Virtus. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.netstate.com/states/symb/seals/va_seal.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The reverse (or back side) of the Seal features the Latin word ''Perseverando'' (Persevering) and a depiction of three robed Roman goddesses figures who represent Libertas, Ceres and Aeternitas.    Ceres the goddess of agriculture holds a horn of plenty with other symbols of agricultural bounty. In the center of the reverse, Libertas, the goddess of liberty, holds a wand at the top of the wand hangs a Phrygian Cap, also known as a Liberty Cap. To the right of Libertas is Aeternitas or &amp;quot;Eternity&amp;quot; holding a orb representing Virginia's authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legis.state.va.us/cap_class/4-5/4_5_emb_symb.html#Emblems&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia's flag features the Great Seal of the Commonwealth on white center over a field of royal blue. Many web images depict a light blue flag, but the actual flag is a rich purplish blue. The General Assembly adopted an official flag salute in 1954:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''I salute the flag of Virginia, with reverence and patriotic devotion to the ‘Mother of States and Statesmen,’ which it represents—the ‘Old Dominion,’ where liberty and independence were born.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legis.state.va.us/cap_class/4-5/4_5_emb_symb.html#Emblems&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cardinal and the dogwood petal are among Virginia's most well-known emblems, but Virginia's has many emblems:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* State Bat: Virginia Big Eared [[Bat]] (an endangered species)&lt;br /&gt;
* State Beverage: [[Milk]]&lt;br /&gt;
* State Bird: Northern [[cardinal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* State Boat: Chesapeake Bay Deadrise &lt;br /&gt;
* State Dog: American Foxhound &lt;br /&gt;
* State Dance: Square Dance (Virginia Reel)&lt;br /&gt;
* State Fish: Brook [[Trout]] &lt;br /&gt;
* State Flower (and tree): American Dogwood &lt;br /&gt;
* State Fossil: Chesapeten Jeffersonius	&lt;br /&gt;
* State Insect: Tiger Swallowtail [[Butterfly]]&lt;br /&gt;
* State Shell: Oyster Shell &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legis.state.va.us/cap_class/4-5/4_5_emb_symb.html#Emblems&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transportation==&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia is well served by the [[Interstate Highway System]] including at least two of the busiest highways on the Eastern Coast of the US, I-81 and I-95. Interstate 81, which moves through the city of Bristol, TN/VA is popular with tractor-trailers and some travelers, while 95 is a popular tourist highway. The famed [[Beltway]] (I-495) surrounds Washington DC by looping through Northern Virginia. Richmond is served by I-95 and a beltway looping off I-64. Rail lines are not as busy as they were historically, but important coal lines still make their way through the Valley and Ridge Region of Virginia. [[Amtrak]] lines Richmond and Alexandria to the cities in the Eastern US. Dulles International is one of the busiest airports in the US and the Northern Virginia area is also served by Ronald Reagan National Airport. Norfolk Virginia is one of the largest ports on the East Coast. The Virginia Inland Port in Front Royal Virginia is linked by rail line to Norfolk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
See [[History of Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''History of Virginia''' began with the settlement of the geographic region now known as the Commonwealth of Virginia in the U.S. thousands of years ago by Native Americans. Permanent European settlement began with English settlers at Jamestown in 1607.  Tobacco emerged as a profitable export crop, and the Virginia Colony became the richest and largest British colonies in North America.  The year 2007 marked the 400th anniversary of the first permanent English settlement at Jamestown. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one of the original 13 United States which won their independence from Great Britain during the [[American Revolution]], Virginia produced more national leaders than any state, including four of the first five presidents (Washington, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe). The new state gave up its western lands to form Kentucky and Ohio. During the first half of the 19th century, Virginia grew less rapidly than industrial states to the north, or cotton states to the south. The state exported young people and slaves to form plantations and farms to the west and south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia was a slave state but refused to join the cotton states in the new Confederacy until Lincoln called for troops to invade the Confederacy. Then it seceded and Richmond became the new Confederate capital.  After many decades of sectional hostility in 1861 West Virginia broke away as a separate state and joined the Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the Yankees intent on capturing Richmond, Virginia became the main battlefield of the war, which it lost in 1865 as its greatest general, Robert E. Lee, surrendered. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconstruction brought the liberation of the state's slaves, and proved less contentious than elsewhere in the South. Virginia was poor after 1865, though the new popularity of cigarettes boosted its tobacco industry. After 1940, prosperity returned. [[World War II]] gave the state a major naval and industrial economic base. Desegregation of schools and the integration of African Americans in many other aspects of the society were major issues from the 1950s to the 1970s and the changes did not come without considerable efforts. However, in 1989 [[Douglas Wilder]] became the first elected black governor anywhere in the country. By the 1980s the suburban fringes of Washington D.C. known as Northern Virginia saw the greatest growth and prosperity, a trend which was also seen in the [[Hampton Roads]] region. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Politically, the state was a stronghold of conservative Democrats for most of the 20th century, with a new strength shown by conservative Republicans in the final decade. In the early 21st century, funding for transportation needs  emerged as the most controversial single issue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In partisan terms, the two parties compete furiously for the legislature and the governorship.  In presidential elections Virginia was reliably Republican from 1968 until 2004, but in 2008 Obama won, thanks to the growing liberal strength in the Washington suburbs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mother of Presidents===&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia is often called the ''Mother of Presidents'' or ''Birthplace of Presidents'' because eight U.S. Presidents have been born in there. Four of the first five presidents, [[George Washington]], [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[James Madison]], and [[James Monroe]], were Virginians. The remaining Presidents from Virginia are [[William Henry Harrison]], [[John Tyler]], [[Zachary Taylor]], and [[Woodrow Wilson]]. Many of their Virginia homes such as Jefferson's [[Monticello]] and Washington's Mount Vernon are popular tourist destinations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.virginia.org/site/features.asp?featureID=94&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Virginia is perhaps the only state in the US to have been the birthplace of a president of a foreign nation, Sam Huston, first president of the Republic of Texas. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/sam-houston-born &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[State Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:States of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virginia| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:The South]]&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.virginia.gov/cmsportal3/&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=967110</id>
		<title>Contraception</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contraception&amp;diff=967110"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T15:58:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Contraception''' (or '''birth control''') refers to techniques, [[drug]]s, or devices that prevent [[pregnancy|conception]]. There are many different methods, each having its own level of effectiveness and safety. The only known method that is 100% effective is [[abstinence]]. [[Abstinence]] during fertile times can take the place of artificial form of birth control. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;When a couple for serious reasons abstain from intercourse at times at which they might conceive, their abstaining is itself chosen sexual behavior, and virtuous sexual behavior because it is expressive of a recognition of the demands of the pro creative good.&amp;quot; [http://www.linacre.org/contra.html Linacre.org] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A major benefit of contraception is being an alternative to abortion, however, a person should consult with their religious adviser before using contraception and/or having premarital sex. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Catholic teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Roman Catholic church]] prohibits the use of artificial contraceptives such as pills or barriers to Catholics, though it supports natural methods of avoiding conception based on timing. The policy on contraception is given in the [[Humanae Vitae]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Church does not teach that in engaging in intercourse has to be acting with an intention for procreation, an objective one could realistically have in mind only when one was fertile. What they teach is that sexual intercourse will not make for an authentic unity of two-in-one-flesh if those engaging in it set out to negate its built-in significance as generative/procreation behavior. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.linacre.org/contra.html Linacre.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The Vatican observes that the only morally sound method of birth control is avoiding sex when the woman is fertile.  In contrast, &amp;quot;'every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible' is intrinsically evil.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#III]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anglican teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Anglican Church]] regards sexual love as an essential way for a husband and wife to express and strengthen their mutual love, citing Genesis 2:18 'It is not good that the man (Adam) should be alone' in support of this. At the [[Lambeth Conference]] of 1930 a resolution was passed stating: ''Where there is a clearly felt moral obligation to limit or avoid parenthood, complete abstinence is the primary and obvious method.'' It continued by saying that if there was morally sound reasoning for avoiding abstinence, ''the Conference agrees that other methods may be used, provided that this is done in the light of Christian principles.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, by the Lambeth Conference of 1958, contraceptive use among most Anglicans was widespread and a resolution that year stated that the responsibility for deciding upon the number and frequency of children was laid by God upon the consciences of parents ''in such ways as are acceptable to husband and wife''. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.cofe.anglican.org/info/socialpublic/smte.html#contraception Science, Medicine, Technology &amp;amp;amp; Environment | Church of England] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Muslim teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no single attitude to contraception within Islam; however eight of the nine classic schools of Islamic law permit it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But some Islamic leaders have openly campaigned against the use of condoms or other birth control methods, thus making population planning in many countries ineffective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This resistance to birth control was reflected in 2005 when a conference involving 40 Islamic scholars from 21 countries urged fresh efforts to push population planning and better reproductive health services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hindu teachings on contraception==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hinduism encourages procreation within marriage, yet there is no opposition against contraception. Most Hindus accept that there is a duty to have a family during that stage of one’s life. So they are unlikely to use birth control to avoid having children altogether.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditional Hindu texts praise large families (which was normal in ancient times). Yet, Hindu scriptures that applaud small families also exist which emphasize the development of a positive social conscience. So family planning is seen as an ethical good. The Upanishads (texts delineating key Hindu concepts) describe birth control methods, and some Hindu scriptures contain advice on what a couple should do to promote conception (thus providing a type of contraceptive advice).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (US)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until a 1923 court decision, the federal [[Anthony Comstock|Comstock Act]] prohibited the use of the mail service to distribute contraceptives or information on contraception or [[abortion]]. Contraception was until this time considered [[obscenity|obscene]] for legal purposes, as it was considered to serve only in the promotion of immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until 1965, some US states criminalized the possession and/or distribution of contraceptives for reasons of public morality on the grounds that contraception would encourage premarital sex. In the 1965 [[Supreme Court]] case of [[Griswold v. Connecticut]], [[activist judge]]s invented a constitutional right to contraception. The 1972 case of Eisenstadt v. Baird later extended this invented right to include even unmarried couples, rendering any legal attempt to restrict access impossible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[John Roberts]] upheld &amp;quot;Griswold&amp;quot; at his 2005 confirmation hearings to be Chief Justice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://privacy-law.blogspot.com/2005/09/john-roberts-right-to-privacy-part-5.html quotations]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:asked, &amp;quot;Do you agree that there is a right of privacy to be found in the liberty clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?&amp;quot; Roberts responded:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I do, Senator. I think that the court's expressions, and I think if my reading of the precedent is correct, I think every justice on the court believes that, to some extent or another. Liberty is not limited to freedom from physical restraint. It does cover areas, as you said, such as privacy. And it's not protected only in procedural terms but it is protected substantively as well.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I agree with the Griswold court's conclusion that marital privacy extends to contraception and availability of that. The court, since Griswold, has grounded the privacy right discussed in that case in the liberty interest protected under the due process clause.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I feel comfortable commenting on Griswold and the result in Griswold because that does not appear to me to be an area that is going to come before the court again.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legality (International)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==   &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contraception]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/when-does-life-begin Opposing Views: When Does Life Begin?]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_States_of_America/Archive_1&amp;diff=967107</id>
		<title>Talk:United States of America/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_States_of_America/Archive_1&amp;diff=967107"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T15:43:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Is America really a Christian nation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Freedom of religion==&lt;br /&gt;
The thing on freedom of religion should be improved, as most people interpret it primarily as freedom of belief first, government noninterference second. I'm thinking an article on freedom of religion would probably be warranted, as that's a major issue in the world today. --[[User:John|John]] 14:13, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Shouldn't that go under Bill of Rights or US Constitution?--[[User:Sub Zenyth|Sub Zenyth]] 23:28, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is America really a Christian nation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that our country is a &amp;quot;Christian Nation&amp;quot; is pretty easy to disprove. A common argument involves mention of the &amp;quot;In God We Trust&amp;quot; phrase which appears on both our paper and coin currencies. Of course, this phrase didn't appear on the coins until the late 1800s, and not on the the bills until the 1950s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What our founding fathers had to say about religion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, many of our founding fathers were not Christians. Some quotes from those clever folks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Adams:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;God is an essence that we know nothing of. Until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there will never be any liberal science in the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Washington:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Religious controversies are always productive of more acrimony and irreconcilable hatreds than those which spring from any other cause. Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by the difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought most to be depreciated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society.&amp;quot; -- letter to Edward Newenham, 1792&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Benjamin Franklin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the affairs of the world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the lack of it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Jefferson:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.&amp;quot; - letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition (Christianity) one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Christianity is the most perverted system ever shone to man.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man &amp;amp; his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Treaty of Tripoli:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,--as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,--and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mohammedan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever interrupt the harmony existing between the two countries.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The biblical verse Genesis 1:16 reads: “God made two great light, the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. The sun, the 'greater light,' is but one of countless stars and that the 'lesser light' is the moon, which really is not a light at all, rather a reflector of light.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Christians claim that because the majority of people in America are Christian, America is a Christian Nation. However this argument has many holes in it. For example, does that mean that because there are a majority of women in America, America is a female Nation? &lt;br /&gt;
[[--Moderatedemocrat]] 10:01, 17 March 2007 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States may have a Judeo-Christian cultural heritage, but there are no Judeo-Christian principles (unless you choose to count slavery) in the Constitution. The government of the United States of America is distinctly secular in origin. The Mayflower Compact, while for religious ends, used what would become the Enlightenment principle of the Social Contract as a basis of government. [[Rdsmith]] 10:31 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spreading democracy==&lt;br /&gt;
The part about spreading democracy is empirically not true.  There were much more significant increases, especially throughout the 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union.  The spreading of democracy has been a stated goal of the United States throughout its entire history.  So I have deleted the last line because it just sounds like speechwriter hyperbole. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 17:20, 17 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article needs to be cleaned up&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;greatest&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The part of the introduction &amp;quot;is widely considered one of the greatest and most powerful nations on Earth&amp;quot; is a personal perspective, and should be changed to &amp;quot;is widely considered one of the most INFLUENTIAL and powerful nations on Earth&amp;quot;. The word greatest symbolises arrogance, as most people would deem there own country the 'greatest'. --[[User:Joobs|Joobs]] 16:35, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Changed. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PGA==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is a pretty good article (are there noms for pretty good articles here on CP?).  I just added a quick blurb about Lewis and Clark to the LA territory paragraph, can someone add years and the President who commissioned them to do the job? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:35, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Jefferson, 1804-1806. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:35, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, I, the lazy person, added that. [[User:Human|Human]] 20:01, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Parties ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article says the US has been governed by one of two parties since JQA. Then it goes on to say that one of the two was founded in 1854. If the 'two parties' isn't referring to any two particular parties, wouldn't it be from the first Adams? Even during the Era of Good Feelings, the Federalists had a big chunk of Congress from New England. I think. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 19:48, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't make real sense anyway - the US has often been &amp;quot;governed&amp;quot; (if we take the exec and leg branches to be the governing bodies) by the two parties together - ie, a president from one party and congress run half or all by the other party (&amp;quot;[[divided government]]&amp;quot;).  Now it is true that the two houses and the presidency have been controlled by one of the two major parties, I guess.  Since when, I don't know.  Maybe an article on [[Political Parties in the U.S.]] would be a good thing? [[User:Human|Human]] 20:05, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After reading the main page,  and your above comments on GOD, Political parties, Constitutional documents and such,  I have made an attempt to consolidate all that you have said into a revised section that I have named:  &amp;quot;Background, GOD, The Constitution, and Political Parties&amp;quot;.    I tried to essentially rewrite what was already there,  but re-arranged in a more &amp;quot;logical flow&amp;quot; ,  and to make it easier to read.   I did my did my best.  Hope you like it.  [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 16:45, May 5, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm glad someone already fixed the &amp;quot;allcaps&amp;quot; words.  I split the section in two, since the first half was about one thing, and then in the middle the religion issue is introduced and discussed.  I hope I have not offended anyone with my decision to do this. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:52, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The section needed a rewrite.  I tried to make the section a bit more balanced, while still staying on the conservative side of balance.  [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 23:12, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::By the way, &amp;quot;In America today, an individual's party affiliation is often determined by their personal view of the relationship between religion and government.&amp;quot; is insane and completely ignores why many people choose how to vote.  It is a completely strange POV.  Of course, ''some'' people decide how to vote based on that criterion - but not many.  Often?  That's pushing it.  Can this we reworded to perhaps show how the energization of the Christian right wing is related to it (this site, for example)? [[User:Human|Human]] 00:08, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I completely agree with you, but I was afraid I might face a ban for suggesting this isn't a Christian nation being overrun by the pagan hordes.[[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 07:04, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Reversion of this section by RobS?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why, but the cleaning up we just did was reverted back to Starfleet's version by RobS.  1. It clearly is two sections, the first part has nothing to do with the religion in government. 2. The use of allcaps is very distracting, I do believe it is &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;GOD&amp;quot;.  There's no need to shout, right?  3.  The section(s) were beginning to get very clear and wll written, after Starfleets bringing them together logically. Would someone with either the nerve or the rank please undo this reversion?  I'm not going to war with a sysop, even if I think I'm generally correct here.  I like not being blocked. [[User:Human|Human]] 13:11, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sysop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Stile4aly was infintely blocked for trolling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gender&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=144719]  All his edits are suspect.  The removal of this information,  [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;amp;diff=145528&amp;amp;oldid=144493] had not been properly vetted yet, and Stile4aly replacement of it with this,&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;A contentious issue in modern politics is the role of religion in public life and particularly government entanglement in religious affairs. Some groups that self identify as Republican, or in some cases '''Dominionist''', argue that the US was founded on Christian principles and that the modern US Government should be more lenient with regards to entanglement of Christianity with politics. &lt;br /&gt;
:confirms those suspicions.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:40, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, thank you for the clarification.  Do you mind if I do that reformatting again, then?  All I am going to do is split that section in two, as I did before, and get rid of the allcaps stuff.  I doubt I'll touch any text, except maybe to make bigger paragraphs. I knew there had to a be a reason... [[User:Human|Human]] 13:51, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sysop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This paragraph,&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;quot;The Declaration of Independence acknowledges the existence of a [[God]] when it refers to &amp;quot;the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God&amp;quot; and says all men &amp;quot;are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,&amp;quot; though the latter statement was made by [[Thomas Jefferson]], whose religious beliefs had far more in common with Unitarianism then traditional Christianity. Some Christians argued that since many of the Founding Fathers were Christians (although the majority of them could actually be qualified as Deists) and that, explicitly or not, the United States was founded upon the principles and ideals of Christianity. However, the freedom of (and from) religion (stating that the government cannot interfere in the conduct of religious groups, or vice versa) is a fundamental aspect of the [[First Amendment]] to the Constitution. This separation is a continuing source of conflict in American society, generally between those attempting to exert their own religious or anti-religious views over others. This [[Free Exercise Clause]] of the Amendment began increasingly to be tested and interpreted by the [[judiciary]] in the late 19th century as a result of the increasing population of religious [[minorities]] in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
:::appears to be entirely removed or rewritten by Starfleet and Stile4aly, and I haven't had the time to review both their contributions yet.Feel free to work on it, but i still have to go over whats been preserved and what's been lost.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Good Evenning RobS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for taking the time to review this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you can see in the above notes,  yesterday,  I rewrote / re-arranged the BACKGROUND paragraph that you have listed above.   I did not change very much,  but simply rewrote what was already there,  and made it easier to read,  and a bit more logically arranged.   I tried to make it read more smoothly.   I did that based on the previous comments of the other readers who complained that it was confusing, and rambled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However,  Stile4aly is wrong to state that the paragraph should be split in two.   It is quite obvious from reading the orginal paragraph,  that the INTENT of the original writer was to show the &amp;quot;cause and effect&amp;quot; relationship between the first issue ( the transition in governing documents to an &amp;quot;all powerful&amp;quot; US Constitution ) and how the interference / re-interpretation of that ( all powerful document ) US Constitution in recent decades by the current US Supreme Court has caused the second issue  ( Church and State ) to become such a prominent and divisive issue in US political life today.    Time is important.   This country is 231 years old,  and for the first 190 years of this country,  the US Supreme Court held the exact opposite view on the &amp;quot;Church / State&amp;quot; issue than that which the current Court has held for only the last 45 years or so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to help the original writer make his case, by re-arranging what he wrote in a more &amp;quot;logical&amp;quot; form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next,  in regards to capital letters.  ?  I capitalized only one word.   GOD.   Please do not be confused by the current internet / chatroom opinion that &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot; is yelling.    This is an Encyclopedia.   It is not a chat room,  or a forum !!!   The use of &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot;  in an encyclopedia is quite appropriate for the word GOD.   The word GOD is printed in &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot; by most religions,  and periodicals to differentiate between the one, all powerful GOD,   and the other lesser Gods of Greek mythology, etc.   In addition,  the word GOD is in all caps in the Declaration of Independence if I recall.  Perhaps Mr. Stile4aly would like to re-write it too ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally,  there was one sentence that I did remove from the paragraph,  you included it above:   &amp;quot;generally between those attempting to exert their own religious or anti-religious views over others.&amp;quot;     That sentence appears to be a slap,  and un-necessary one at that.   This is an Encyclopedia!!  we shouldn't go around insulting each other's motives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this explanation helps you make your decision as to what you keep.  Have a nice day.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 21:08, May 6, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Earlier history ==&lt;br /&gt;
History before 1600 totally missing. --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 17:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I assume it is missing because events prior to 1783 predate the United States. Perhaps it should be a new article on colonial North America?--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 18:00, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:History of land still totally missing. Or is this a land without any history?! Write someting about it or open this article for others to write... --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 18:47, 15 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello RobS &amp;amp; CPAdmin==&lt;br /&gt;
Corrected some minor typo's, and placed the term &amp;quot;American&amp;quot; in the place of &amp;quot;United Statesians&amp;quot; that someone had inserted.  Corrected two run-on sentences.  Hope this helps.  [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 10:45, May 9, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Map? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to be rather missing? [[User:Human|subHuman]] 18:20, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Map?  I don't even see it in the page history.  Explain.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:08, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::A map , you know, a diagram showing where the United States is.  The 48 + 2, + territories, perhaps?  If I had a good one in my files I would have uploaded it... This comment needed ''explaining''?[[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, because your post infered, to me, that there was one at some point, and was now &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot;.  You were not clear, and I was asking what you meant.  Then you respond with your usual nastiness.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:52, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sorry if my original style was opaque.  Let me rephrase:  &amp;quot;Where is a map of the country?&amp;quot;!!! I think you infer nastiness where constructivism is intended.  After all, ''wouldn't this article be better'' with a map? And as I said, I would have added it, if I had a decent PD one on hand. [[User:Human|Human]] 22:30, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, suggest a place to squeeze the map into! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 22:57, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifics about each state&lt;br /&gt;
I think we need to have specifics info about each of the 50 states or at least links to them.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*See below about a list of States.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:54, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree,  perhaps I am confused,  but shouldn't,  in the first paragraph, where it says &amp;quot;50 states&amp;quot; that phrase actually link to an actual list of the states? [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 12:26, May 28, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It might become confusing having an article on the fifty United States and the the United States of America...but I would love to see someone create a side-box or some kind of one, listing the States!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:52, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Greatest economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy of US is acutally behind that of the EU, so this point in the article is false.&lt;br /&gt;
::The EU is not a country. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:23, 17 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The is a list of [[per capita income]], which provides the information that the USA comes in forth, just behind Denmark and Qater and just ahead of Sweden. However, the US is larger than any of the richest states and has the larger economy when population is not taken in account - perhaps this could be specified?[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another odd, skewed factoid.  Consider this, a real measure of the economy; 2nd Quarter, 2007, the real dollar &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;growth&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of the U.S. GNP, about 3%, was greater than the total economy of China.  I wonder where that leaves Qater and Denmark?  Muahahaha!  Per capita figures are bogus for many reasons, not the least of which is the infrastructure that people in the United States enjoy, and take for granted, that just isn't in place in those other countries.  One also has to consider tax rates, etc.  Where are not equal.  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:56, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are correct in China, the economy is seen as important as it is emerging, but considering the number of people, it is still very small. That is why China is not on teh Per Capita list. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Denmark has a very high quality of life, I am not sure what you mean by infastructure, but it would certainly be as high as the US, if not higher. After all, free higher educaiton, free healthcare, slight higher life expectancy (though both do poorly there, obesity being the problem in the USA I assume and there is too much smoking in Denmark).[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 08:14, 26 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the country is much smaller so the total size of the economy is smaller.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Republic vs. Democracy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The info box lists the U.S. government as a &amp;quot;Federal Constitutional Republic/Representative Democracy&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. is a Republic. It is not a Democracy. These are two very different forms of government and our Founding Fathers specifically stated their distate of a Democracy. Saying &amp;quot;Representative Democracy&amp;quot; is actually a contrast in terms. In effect, it really is an odd way of saying &amp;quot;Republic&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that this be changed merely to &amp;quot;Constitutional Republic&amp;quot; or just leave it as &amp;quot;Federal Constitutional Republic&amp;quot; and leave off the &amp;quot;Representative Democracy&amp;quot; since the latter is convoluted and inaccurate. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:30, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Perhaps a too picky a point, Scorpio, as common useage says Representative Democracy quite often, but your logic is sound, and I have removed that bit as you suggested. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 14:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:TK, this is why I have become one of your biggest fans. :) Clarity of mind is such a rarity that when I spot it, I can't help but be thankful I have encountered it. Thanks for taking care of this issue. Also, please let me know if I can work with you on any articles where you would like my input. Always anxious to help out a friend. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:23, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spelling/Grammatical Mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Alaska in located in northwest North America and the Hawaiian Islands in the Pacific Ocean.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should be &amp;quot;is located&amp;quot;, but since the article is locked...&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ATang|ATang]] 11:19, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for pointing out the mistake! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:27, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary Table ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures in the summary table is uncited - where did they come from? Is it possible to change them to cited facts? (e.g. GDP per capita being $44,000 (2006 estimate), from CIA World Factbook.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The numbers from the World Factbook is not that different from ones given in the table, but at least it's a citation (and I think it's reliable... or is it considered &amp;quot;liberal deceit&amp;quot; in CP?) [[User:ATang|ATang]] 11:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wilst humor is often appreciated, continual, never-ending snipes are not, ATang.  Rest your neck. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:30, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's not intended as humour - I don't know what the &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; stance on CIA World Factbook is. I know people who trust it, and others who don't. Many instances I look at something as fact and it's considered liberal bias here. I'm just trying to improve an article. There's no need to get aggressive. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 13:36, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*That wasn't agressive, lol.  You must be very sheltered!  I think any government source in the U.S. is okay, but I don't take most any source, on its own, to be the end all and be all.  I have found entries in the Fact Book that are severely dated. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:22, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I was just wondering where the 2007 estimates came from. The Factbook has 2006 estimates, so it's not too dated. Whatever. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 10:10, 8 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== English as official language? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
English has never been codified as an official language of the United States.  Many individual states have taken this action, some with the addition of additional minority languages.  The page should be changed to reflect this. [[User:Prosody|Prosody]] 18:36, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You are correct. its not an official language yet. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 18:38, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;He is not correct. The article doesn't call English the ''[[official language]]''. There is a taxobox entry tagged ''language''. This is merely informative, in case someone didn't know what language most Americans speak.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We need an article on the &amp;quot;English as an official language&amp;quot; controversy. It relates to immigration and to the [[pluralism]] vs. [[particularism]] conflict. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:59, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Good catch, Prosody! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile the Wiki link is not valid - It should be English language not English (unofficial language. [[User:ViyotrNielson|ViyotrNielson]] 18:26, 15 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Category==&lt;br /&gt;
Can this be put in [[:Category:Christian-Majority Countries]] --[[User:PabloG|PabloG]] 11:23, 16 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;The United States invented popular parties in the 1790s&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phrase definitely needs clarifying. It's clearly not true that political parties were an American invention - the Whig and Tory parties came into being in Britain in 1678, over 100 years before the emergence of American parties. Perhaps it should be rephrased somewhere along the lines of &amp;quot;Popular political parties emerged in the United States in the 1790s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a suggestion. [[User:Blake|Blake]] 09:13, 10 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article not completed? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am surprised that the article seems to not be completed yet, considering this is an American website. It kind of throws in a bunch of the 1800s into the expansion section, and doesn't go into the Civil War, imperialism, World War I, so on and so forth. Obviously articles for all those aforementioned sections exist here, some being quite lengthy, so I will gladly start to add more to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My concern though is simply that the page is not completed, am I missing something? I won't edit it if the page is supposed to be this way. [[User:Sol1221|Sol1221]] 18:26, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you here to contribute or to nitpick? [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:28, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I am here to contribute and of course I am willing to. I wouldn't call what I wrote &amp;quot;nitpicking&amp;quot; simply pointing out that the page was lacking and incomplete. My concern was that there might be a reason it was incomplete; at the top of this talk page there is a banner saying &amp;quot;Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism,&amp;quot; so I wasn't really sure if the article was being rewritten by someone after some vandalism, or whatever. [[User:Sol1221|Sol1221]] 18:32, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I can see from your edit history, you're much interested in defending liberals and arguing than actually contributing to the encyclopedia.  If you're not willing to do so, I suggest you go to wikipedia. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:34, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Please, just address my concern. I am not here to argue or nitpick and that argument where I &amp;quot;defended liberals&amp;quot; was simply a mistake on my part where I WAS nitpicking. I don't consider myself a liberal, and I really just want to see if I have Conservapedia's blessing in filling out this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical mistakes fixed: Terran Empire facts mentioned==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article is all good now. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Thenewconservative|Thenewconservative]] 18:59, 15 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967106</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967106"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T15:42:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the [[United States of America]] page. - [[Rdsmith]] 10:42 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967105</id>
		<title>User talk:Jpatt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Jpatt&amp;diff=967105"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T15:40:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Archive 2008 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/Subway_Troll Here]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2009 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2009]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2010 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2010]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archive 2011 ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Jpatt/2011‎]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blank3r ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good job stopping him.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adambro==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by &amp;quot;AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X&amp;quot;. Is he a sockpuppet ? --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I will, thanks for the info. --[[User:PhilipN|PhilipN]] 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What a shame, indeed. [[User:Lansing|Lansing]] 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. [[User:DynaboyJ|DynaboyJ]] 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Also, Thanks! --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 20:03, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rubio ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.[[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, I will. I don't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn't done in namecalling. It has been stated by several members, including Andy, that any Republican supporting SOPA/PIPA is a liberal/rino no matter their record and stances. I questioned it but it was insisted. So I added what I did to Rubio since he was a sponsor. I don't consider Rubio liberal but I don't consider Lamar Smith liberal either. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 15:58, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes it is name calling. It was name calling when they did it to Lamar Smith and it was name calling when you did it right back to Rubio. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the proper response to an inappropriate edit is not another inappropriate edit. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 16:01, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's too early to label Rubio based on his supporting legislation. The Tea Party backs conservatives and Rubio. Also, I thought it was to early to label Scott Brown. I was wrong once. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:37, 20 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You do realise that you just reverted all my edits to the ones done by RickPeterson, who got blocked for inserting nonsense? Just saying... --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:24, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yea, Oops--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 16:26, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, never mind. You fixed it now. I guess it gets confusing dealing with all those idiots. --[[User:GeorgeLi|GeorgeLi]] 16:27, 24 January 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MPR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just letting you know that it was federal court that overturned Prop 8, not, as implied by your latest entry, a Californian court.  Cheers.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 17:23, 7 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Two issues==&lt;br /&gt;
*(a) Archive 107 from [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index here] mistakenly brings up Archive 106; &lt;br /&gt;
*(b) [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/108 Talk:Main Page/Archive index/108] need to be added.  Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:51, 12 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Noted--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 22:02, 13 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn't aware I warranted vandalism :P Thanks for the reverts. [[User:Ayzmo|Ayzmo :)]] 19:37, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You know what they say? Without evil we would never recognize good. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 20:44, 25 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi redneck ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You don't have the skills to edit an encyclopedia. Please go, you monumental idiot. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:47, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Really, your brain is way too small. You can't write properly. Really. --[[User:Sextertainer|Sextertainer]] 13:48, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your mom called, she said you are late for your LGBT counseling. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 15:23, 28 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Mr./Mrs. Jpatt, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Please accept my apologies on the ambiguous greeting. Gender is difficult on the web without further research) Could you please give me a description of this web site? I'm writing about online media interfaces for a course at my university and would love to learn more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, &lt;br /&gt;
Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hi Sarah, try this [[Conservapedia:About]] and read about the wiki founder Andy Schlafly [[Andy_Schlafly]]. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 09:05, 2 March 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you for the information. I will be in touch with Mr. Schlafly shortly. Sarah&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exclusively Judeo-Christian principles in the US Constitution==&lt;br /&gt;
Please show them to me. If there are none, please revert my editing of the [[United States of America]] page.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_States_of_America/Archive_1&amp;diff=967104</id>
		<title>Talk:United States of America/Archive 1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_States_of_America/Archive_1&amp;diff=967104"/>
		<updated>2012-03-08T15:40:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: /* Is America really a Christian nation? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Freedom of religion==&lt;br /&gt;
The thing on freedom of religion should be improved, as most people interpret it primarily as freedom of belief first, government noninterference second. I'm thinking an article on freedom of religion would probably be warranted, as that's a major issue in the world today. --[[User:John|John]] 14:13, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Shouldn't that go under Bill of Rights or US Constitution?--[[User:Sub Zenyth|Sub Zenyth]] 23:28, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Is America really a Christian nation?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that our country is a &amp;quot;Christian Nation&amp;quot; is pretty easy to disprove. A common argument involves mention of the &amp;quot;In God We Trust&amp;quot; phrase which appears on both our paper and coin currencies. Of course, this phrase didn't appear on the coins until the late 1800s, and not on the the bills until the 1950s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What our founding fathers had to say about religion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, many of our founding fathers were not Christians. Some quotes from those clever folks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Adams:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;God is an essence that we know nothing of. Until this awful blasphemy is got rid of, there will never be any liberal science in the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Washington:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Religious controversies are always productive of more acrimony and irreconcilable hatreds than those which spring from any other cause. Of all the animosities which have existed among mankind, those which are caused by the difference of sentiments in religion appear to be the most inveterate and distressing, and ought most to be depreciated. I was in hopes that the enlightened and liberal policy, which has marked the present age, would at least have reconciled Christians of every denomination so far that we should never again see the religious disputes carried to such a pitch as to endanger the peace of society.&amp;quot; -- letter to Edward Newenham, 1792&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Benjamin Franklin:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In the affairs of the world, men are saved, not by faith, but by the lack of it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Jefferson:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise.&amp;quot; - letter to Wm. Bradford, April 1, 1774&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition (Christianity) one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Christianity is the most perverted system ever shone to man.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man &amp;amp; his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Treaty of Tripoli:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,--as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,--and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mohammedan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever interrupt the harmony existing between the two countries.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The biblical verse Genesis 1:16 reads: “God made two great light, the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. The sun, the 'greater light,' is but one of countless stars and that the 'lesser light' is the moon, which really is not a light at all, rather a reflector of light.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Christians claim that because the majority of people in America are Christian, America is a Christian Nation. However this argument has many holes in it. For example, does that mean that because there are a majority of women in America, America is a female Nation? &lt;br /&gt;
[[--Moderatedemocrat]] 10:01, 17 March 2007 (PST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States may have a Judeo-Christian heritage, but there are no Judeo-Christian principles (unless you choose to count slavery) in the Constitution. The government of the United States of America is distinctly secular in origin. The Mayflower Compact, while for religious ends, used what would become the Enlightenment principle of the Social Contract as a basis of government. [[Rdsmith]] 10:31 (EST), 8 March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Spreading democracy==&lt;br /&gt;
The part about spreading democracy is empirically not true.  There were much more significant increases, especially throughout the 1990s after the fall of the Soviet Union.  The spreading of democracy has been a stated goal of the United States throughout its entire history.  So I have deleted the last line because it just sounds like speechwriter hyperbole. --[[User:Jack|Jack]] 17:20, 17 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This article needs to be cleaned up&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;greatest&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
The part of the introduction &amp;quot;is widely considered one of the greatest and most powerful nations on Earth&amp;quot; is a personal perspective, and should be changed to &amp;quot;is widely considered one of the most INFLUENTIAL and powerful nations on Earth&amp;quot;. The word greatest symbolises arrogance, as most people would deem there own country the 'greatest'. --[[User:Joobs|Joobs]] 16:35, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Changed. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:55, 21 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==PGA==&lt;br /&gt;
I think this is a pretty good article (are there noms for pretty good articles here on CP?).  I just added a quick blurb about Lewis and Clark to the LA territory paragraph, can someone add years and the President who commissioned them to do the job? [[User:Human|Human]] 18:35, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Jefferson, 1804-1806. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:35, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, I, the lazy person, added that. [[User:Human|Human]] 20:01, 21 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Parties ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article says the US has been governed by one of two parties since JQA. Then it goes on to say that one of the two was founded in 1854. If the 'two parties' isn't referring to any two particular parties, wouldn't it be from the first Adams? Even during the Era of Good Feelings, the Federalists had a big chunk of Congress from New England. I think. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 19:48, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It doesn't make real sense anyway - the US has often been &amp;quot;governed&amp;quot; (if we take the exec and leg branches to be the governing bodies) by the two parties together - ie, a president from one party and congress run half or all by the other party (&amp;quot;[[divided government]]&amp;quot;).  Now it is true that the two houses and the presidency have been controlled by one of the two major parties, I guess.  Since when, I don't know.  Maybe an article on [[Political Parties in the U.S.]] would be a good thing? [[User:Human|Human]] 20:05, 29 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After reading the main page,  and your above comments on GOD, Political parties, Constitutional documents and such,  I have made an attempt to consolidate all that you have said into a revised section that I have named:  &amp;quot;Background, GOD, The Constitution, and Political Parties&amp;quot;.    I tried to essentially rewrite what was already there,  but re-arranged in a more &amp;quot;logical flow&amp;quot; ,  and to make it easier to read.   I did my did my best.  Hope you like it.  [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 16:45, May 5, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm glad someone already fixed the &amp;quot;allcaps&amp;quot; words.  I split the section in two, since the first half was about one thing, and then in the middle the religion issue is introduced and discussed.  I hope I have not offended anyone with my decision to do this. [[User:Human|Human]] 19:52, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The section needed a rewrite.  I tried to make the section a bit more balanced, while still staying on the conservative side of balance.  [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 23:12, 5 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::By the way, &amp;quot;In America today, an individual's party affiliation is often determined by their personal view of the relationship between religion and government.&amp;quot; is insane and completely ignores why many people choose how to vote.  It is a completely strange POV.  Of course, ''some'' people decide how to vote based on that criterion - but not many.  Often?  That's pushing it.  Can this we reworded to perhaps show how the energization of the Christian right wing is related to it (this site, for example)? [[User:Human|Human]] 00:08, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I completely agree with you, but I was afraid I might face a ban for suggesting this isn't a Christian nation being overrun by the pagan hordes.[[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 07:04, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Reversion of this section by RobS?===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know why, but the cleaning up we just did was reverted back to Starfleet's version by RobS.  1. It clearly is two sections, the first part has nothing to do with the religion in government. 2. The use of allcaps is very distracting, I do believe it is &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;GOD&amp;quot;.  There's no need to shout, right?  3.  The section(s) were beginning to get very clear and wll written, after Starfleets bringing them together logically. Would someone with either the nerve or the rank please undo this reversion?  I'm not going to war with a sysop, even if I think I'm generally correct here.  I like not being blocked. [[User:Human|Human]] 13:11, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sysop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Stile4aly was infintely blocked for trolling. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gender&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=144719]  All his edits are suspect.  The removal of this information,  [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;amp;diff=145528&amp;amp;oldid=144493] had not been properly vetted yet, and Stile4aly replacement of it with this,&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;A contentious issue in modern politics is the role of religion in public life and particularly government entanglement in religious affairs. Some groups that self identify as Republican, or in some cases '''Dominionist''', argue that the US was founded on Christian principles and that the modern US Government should be more lenient with regards to entanglement of Christianity with politics. &lt;br /&gt;
:confirms those suspicions.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:40, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ah, thank you for the clarification.  Do you mind if I do that reformatting again, then?  All I am going to do is split that section in two, as I did before, and get rid of the allcaps stuff.  I doubt I'll touch any text, except maybe to make bigger paragraphs. I knew there had to a be a reason... [[User:Human|Human]] 13:51, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== sysop ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This paragraph,&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;quot;The Declaration of Independence acknowledges the existence of a [[God]] when it refers to &amp;quot;the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God&amp;quot; and says all men &amp;quot;are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,&amp;quot; though the latter statement was made by [[Thomas Jefferson]], whose religious beliefs had far more in common with Unitarianism then traditional Christianity. Some Christians argued that since many of the Founding Fathers were Christians (although the majority of them could actually be qualified as Deists) and that, explicitly or not, the United States was founded upon the principles and ideals of Christianity. However, the freedom of (and from) religion (stating that the government cannot interfere in the conduct of religious groups, or vice versa) is a fundamental aspect of the [[First Amendment]] to the Constitution. This separation is a continuing source of conflict in American society, generally between those attempting to exert their own religious or anti-religious views over others. This [[Free Exercise Clause]] of the Amendment began increasingly to be tested and interpreted by the [[judiciary]] in the late 19th century as a result of the increasing population of religious [[minorities]] in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
:::appears to be entirely removed or rewritten by Starfleet and Stile4aly, and I haven't had the time to review both their contributions yet.Feel free to work on it, but i still have to go over whats been preserved and what's been lost.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:03, 6 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Good Evenning RobS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for taking the time to review this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you can see in the above notes,  yesterday,  I rewrote / re-arranged the BACKGROUND paragraph that you have listed above.   I did not change very much,  but simply rewrote what was already there,  and made it easier to read,  and a bit more logically arranged.   I tried to make it read more smoothly.   I did that based on the previous comments of the other readers who complained that it was confusing, and rambled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However,  Stile4aly is wrong to state that the paragraph should be split in two.   It is quite obvious from reading the orginal paragraph,  that the INTENT of the original writer was to show the &amp;quot;cause and effect&amp;quot; relationship between the first issue ( the transition in governing documents to an &amp;quot;all powerful&amp;quot; US Constitution ) and how the interference / re-interpretation of that ( all powerful document ) US Constitution in recent decades by the current US Supreme Court has caused the second issue  ( Church and State ) to become such a prominent and divisive issue in US political life today.    Time is important.   This country is 231 years old,  and for the first 190 years of this country,  the US Supreme Court held the exact opposite view on the &amp;quot;Church / State&amp;quot; issue than that which the current Court has held for only the last 45 years or so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to help the original writer make his case, by re-arranging what he wrote in a more &amp;quot;logical&amp;quot; form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next,  in regards to capital letters.  ?  I capitalized only one word.   GOD.   Please do not be confused by the current internet / chatroom opinion that &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot; is yelling.    This is an Encyclopedia.   It is not a chat room,  or a forum !!!   The use of &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot;  in an encyclopedia is quite appropriate for the word GOD.   The word GOD is printed in &amp;quot;all caps&amp;quot; by most religions,  and periodicals to differentiate between the one, all powerful GOD,   and the other lesser Gods of Greek mythology, etc.   In addition,  the word GOD is in all caps in the Declaration of Independence if I recall.  Perhaps Mr. Stile4aly would like to re-write it too ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally,  there was one sentence that I did remove from the paragraph,  you included it above:   &amp;quot;generally between those attempting to exert their own religious or anti-religious views over others.&amp;quot;     That sentence appears to be a slap,  and un-necessary one at that.   This is an Encyclopedia!!  we shouldn't go around insulting each other's motives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this explanation helps you make your decision as to what you keep.  Have a nice day.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 21:08, May 6, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Earlier history ==&lt;br /&gt;
History before 1600 totally missing. --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 17:57, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I assume it is missing because events prior to 1783 predate the United States. Perhaps it should be a new article on colonial North America?--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 18:00, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:History of land still totally missing. Or is this a land without any history?! Write someting about it or open this article for others to write... --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 18:47, 15 January 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello RobS &amp;amp; CPAdmin==&lt;br /&gt;
Corrected some minor typo's, and placed the term &amp;quot;American&amp;quot; in the place of &amp;quot;United Statesians&amp;quot; that someone had inserted.  Corrected two run-on sentences.  Hope this helps.  [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 10:45, May 9, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Map? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to be rather missing? [[User:Human|subHuman]] 18:20, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Map?  I don't even see it in the page history.  Explain.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 20:08, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::A map , you know, a diagram showing where the United States is.  The 48 + 2, + territories, perhaps?  If I had a good one in my files I would have uploaded it... This comment needed ''explaining''?[[User:Human|Human]] 21:21, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, because your post infered, to me, that there was one at some point, and was now &amp;quot;missing&amp;quot;.  You were not clear, and I was asking what you meant.  Then you respond with your usual nastiness.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:52, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Sorry if my original style was opaque.  Let me rephrase:  &amp;quot;Where is a map of the country?&amp;quot;!!! I think you infer nastiness where constructivism is intended.  After all, ''wouldn't this article be better'' with a map? And as I said, I would have added it, if I had a decent PD one on hand. [[User:Human|Human]] 22:30, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Now, suggest a place to squeeze the map into! --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 22:57, 12 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifics about each state&lt;br /&gt;
I think we need to have specifics info about each of the 50 states or at least links to them.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*See below about a list of States.  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:54, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree,  perhaps I am confused,  but shouldn't,  in the first paragraph, where it says &amp;quot;50 states&amp;quot; that phrase actually link to an actual list of the states? [[User:Starfleet7|Starfleet7]] 12:26, May 28, 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It might become confusing having an article on the fifty United States and the the United States of America...but I would love to see someone create a side-box or some kind of one, listing the States!  --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 21:52, 28 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Greatest economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy of US is acutally behind that of the EU, so this point in the article is false.&lt;br /&gt;
::The EU is not a country. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:23, 17 June 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The is a list of [[per capita income]], which provides the information that the USA comes in forth, just behind Denmark and Qater and just ahead of Sweden. However, the US is larger than any of the richest states and has the larger economy when population is not taken in account - perhaps this could be specified?[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another odd, skewed factoid.  Consider this, a real measure of the economy; 2nd Quarter, 2007, the real dollar &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;growth&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; of the U.S. GNP, about 3%, was greater than the total economy of China.  I wonder where that leaves Qater and Denmark?  Muahahaha!  Per capita figures are bogus for many reasons, not the least of which is the infrastructure that people in the United States enjoy, and take for granted, that just isn't in place in those other countries.  One also has to consider tax rates, etc.  Where are not equal.  --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#1E90FF&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DC143C&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:56, 22 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are correct in China, the economy is seen as important as it is emerging, but considering the number of people, it is still very small. That is why China is not on teh Per Capita list. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Denmark has a very high quality of life, I am not sure what you mean by infastructure, but it would certainly be as high as the US, if not higher. After all, free higher educaiton, free healthcare, slight higher life expectancy (though both do poorly there, obesity being the problem in the USA I assume and there is too much smoking in Denmark).[[User:stevendavy|stevendavy]] 08:14, 26 October 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the country is much smaller so the total size of the economy is smaller.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Republic vs. Democracy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The info box lists the U.S. government as a &amp;quot;Federal Constitutional Republic/Representative Democracy&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. is a Republic. It is not a Democracy. These are two very different forms of government and our Founding Fathers specifically stated their distate of a Democracy. Saying &amp;quot;Representative Democracy&amp;quot; is actually a contrast in terms. In effect, it really is an odd way of saying &amp;quot;Republic&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would suggest that this be changed merely to &amp;quot;Constitutional Republic&amp;quot; or just leave it as &amp;quot;Federal Constitutional Republic&amp;quot; and leave off the &amp;quot;Representative Democracy&amp;quot; since the latter is convoluted and inaccurate. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 14:30, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Perhaps a too picky a point, Scorpio, as common useage says Representative Democracy quite often, but your logic is sound, and I have removed that bit as you suggested. --[[User:TK|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Sysop-&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;TK]] &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; 14:34, 1 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:TK, this is why I have become one of your biggest fans. :) Clarity of mind is such a rarity that when I spot it, I can't help but be thankful I have encountered it. Thanks for taking care of this issue. Also, please let me know if I can work with you on any articles where you would like my input. Always anxious to help out a friend. Best Regards. [[User:Scorpio|Scorpio]] 15:23, 2 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Spelling/Grammatical Mistakes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Alaska in located in northwest North America and the Hawaiian Islands in the Pacific Ocean.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should be &amp;quot;is located&amp;quot;, but since the article is locked...&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ATang|ATang]] 11:19, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for pointing out the mistake! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:27, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary Table ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The figures in the summary table is uncited - where did they come from? Is it possible to change them to cited facts? (e.g. GDP per capita being $44,000 (2006 estimate), from CIA World Factbook.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The numbers from the World Factbook is not that different from ones given in the table, but at least it's a citation (and I think it's reliable... or is it considered &amp;quot;liberal deceit&amp;quot; in CP?) [[User:ATang|ATang]] 11:26, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Wilst humor is often appreciated, continual, never-ending snipes are not, ATang.  Rest your neck. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:30, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: It's not intended as humour - I don't know what the &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; stance on CIA World Factbook is. I know people who trust it, and others who don't. Many instances I look at something as fact and it's considered liberal bias here. I'm just trying to improve an article. There's no need to get aggressive. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 13:36, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*That wasn't agressive, lol.  You must be very sheltered!  I think any government source in the U.S. is okay, but I don't take most any source, on its own, to be the end all and be all.  I have found entries in the Fact Book that are severely dated. --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:22, 7 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I was just wondering where the 2007 estimates came from. The Factbook has 2006 estimates, so it's not too dated. Whatever. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 10:10, 8 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== English as official language? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
English has never been codified as an official language of the United States.  Many individual states have taken this action, some with the addition of additional minority languages.  The page should be changed to reflect this. [[User:Prosody|Prosody]] 18:36, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You are correct. its not an official language yet. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 18:38, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;s&amp;gt;He is not correct. The article doesn't call English the ''[[official language]]''. There is a taxobox entry tagged ''language''. This is merely informative, in case someone didn't know what language most Americans speak.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We need an article on the &amp;quot;English as an official language&amp;quot; controversy. It relates to immigration and to the [[pluralism]] vs. [[particularism]] conflict. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:59, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Good catch, Prosody! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0002AC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;OOFFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:42, 22 August 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile the Wiki link is not valid - It should be English language not English (unofficial language. [[User:ViyotrNielson|ViyotrNielson]] 18:26, 15 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Category==&lt;br /&gt;
Can this be put in [[:Category:Christian-Majority Countries]] --[[User:PabloG|PabloG]] 11:23, 16 April 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;The United States invented popular parties in the 1790s&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phrase definitely needs clarifying. It's clearly not true that political parties were an American invention - the Whig and Tory parties came into being in Britain in 1678, over 100 years before the emergence of American parties. Perhaps it should be rephrased somewhere along the lines of &amp;quot;Popular political parties emerged in the United States in the 1790s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a suggestion. [[User:Blake|Blake]] 09:13, 10 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article not completed? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am surprised that the article seems to not be completed yet, considering this is an American website. It kind of throws in a bunch of the 1800s into the expansion section, and doesn't go into the Civil War, imperialism, World War I, so on and so forth. Obviously articles for all those aforementioned sections exist here, some being quite lengthy, so I will gladly start to add more to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My concern though is simply that the page is not completed, am I missing something? I won't edit it if the page is supposed to be this way. [[User:Sol1221|Sol1221]] 18:26, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Are you here to contribute or to nitpick? [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:28, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: I am here to contribute and of course I am willing to. I wouldn't call what I wrote &amp;quot;nitpicking&amp;quot; simply pointing out that the page was lacking and incomplete. My concern was that there might be a reason it was incomplete; at the top of this talk page there is a banner saying &amp;quot;Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism,&amp;quot; so I wasn't really sure if the article was being rewritten by someone after some vandalism, or whatever. [[User:Sol1221|Sol1221]] 18:32, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::As I can see from your edit history, you're much interested in defending liberals and arguing than actually contributing to the encyclopedia.  If you're not willing to do so, I suggest you go to wikipedia. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 18:34, 22 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Please, just address my concern. I am not here to argue or nitpick and that argument where I &amp;quot;defended liberals&amp;quot; was simply a mistake on my part where I WAS nitpicking. I don't consider myself a liberal, and I really just want to see if I have Conservapedia's blessing in filling out this page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical mistakes fixed: Terran Empire facts mentioned==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article is all good now. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Thenewconservative|Thenewconservative]] 18:59, 15 January 2011 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=966671</id>
		<title>United States of America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=966671"/>
		<updated>2012-03-07T01:19:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''United States of America''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =US map.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of United States.png&lt;br /&gt;
|established=1776&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =50 star flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =United States arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|official =n&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,718,695 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =313,232,000 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=         $15 trillion (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$48,029 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=United States Dollar (USD)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''United States of America'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(''conventional short form'': '''United States'''; ''abbreviation'': '''US''' or '''USA'''; sometimes also referred to as '''the States''' or simply as '''America''')&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the most [[conservative]], prosperous and free nation in the world, based on the longest-running [[Constitution]] in history.  Located in [[North America]], this nation consists of a federal union of fifty individual states, along with territories and a capital district. Founded originally as 13 colonies in the [[British Empire]], Britain's American colonies broke with the mother country on July 4, 1776 with the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776. [http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/index.htm The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America], ushistory.org, (Accessed August 2010).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The new nation became recognized as the United States of America following the [[American Revolutionary War|War of Independence]] in 1783. Shortly thereafter, in 1787, the [[United States Constitution]] was written; grounded on [[Republican form of government|republican]] political principles and the work of [[Montesquieu]], the Constitution remains in effect today, albeit with several amendments since then. The Americans created political parties and, since abolishing [[slavery]] in a bloody [[American Civil War|civil war]] (1861-65), instituted a form of government guided by the rule of law rather than the desires of a majority of voters. According to the U.S. Constitution written by America's [[Founding Fathers]], the United States is a [[Constitutional Republic]]. It is not a true [[Democracy|democracy]], but is a form of one. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
America's capitalist economy grew rapidly, becoming the largest in the world by the 1870s. During the 19th and 20th centuries, 37 new states were added to the original 13 as the nation expanded across the North American continent and acquired a number of overseas possessions. After defeating Communism in the [[Cold War]], the U.S. emerged as the world's only [[superpower]], boasting the largest economy and most powerful military. It exerts enormous cultural and intellectual influence worldwide, and in return is the target of the enemies of democracy and [[capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capital of the United States of America is [[Washington, DC]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== People ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Php3sfokfPM.jpg|220px|left|At Washington, DC.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Population: 310,232,863 (July 2010 est.) Population growth rate: 0.97% (2010 est.) Labor force:	153.9 million (2010 est.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ethnic groups: white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate) note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean persons of Spanish/Hispanic/Latino origin including those of Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican, Dominican Republic, Spanish, and Central or South American origin living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA - The World Factbook.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, around 400,000 [[illegal immigrants]] were deported. The Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington, estimates 11.5 million to 12 million &amp;quot;unauthorized migrants&amp;quot; live in the US today. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0516/p01s02-ussc.html Illegal immigrants in the US: How many are there?] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colorado.jpg|thumb|[[Colorado]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
North America, bordering both the North [[Atlantic Ocean]] and the North [[Pacific Ocean]], is between [[Canada]] and [[Mexico]]. In addition to the boundaries of the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, the United States is otherwise bounded by the [[Bering Sea]], the Arctic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Two of the fifty states, Alaska and Hawaii (an archipelago), are not contiguous with any of the other states. Puerto Rico, which is largely self governing, is part of the U.S., as are several smaller territories in the Pacific Ocean, such as Guam. Each of the 50 states has a large degree of sovereignty, but the boundaries are debated and shift slightly every year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At over 3.7 million square miles (over 9.6 million km²), the U.S. (including its non-contiguous and overseas states and territories) is the third largest country by total area (after Russia and Canada). It is the world's third most populous nation, with over 350 million people (after China and India). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mt. McKinley is highest point in North America and Death Valley the lowest point on the continent. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA World Factbook], ''North America :: United States'', Updated on February 23, 2011, (Accessed on February 23, 2011).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===American Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|American Revolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Washington-deleware.jpg|thumb|left|Washington, Chief of the Continental Army, is shown crossing the Delaware River.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The American Revolution exploded from fears the British Empire was trying to restrict the historic rights and liberties of Americans.  The British victory in the French and Indian War ended the threat that foreign powers might attack the colonies; Britain's protection was no longer needed. At the same time Britain decided to assert its powers by imposing [[taxes]].  The taxes (as on stamps, sugar, and tea) were not large but the principle was simple: Americans insisted their own [[Legislature|legislatures]] could impose taxes but not [[Parliament]], because Americans were not represented there. &amp;quot;No taxation without representation!&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[Don't tread on me]]&amp;quot; became common phrases in America by the American people, but the British refused over and over again to accept it.  London sent in troops when Boston protested vehemently, and Americans organized shadow governments in every colony. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Americans were adopting a new political philosophy, called [[republicanism]], which stressed civic virtue, fear of corruption, and disdain for [[aristocracy]] (there were no aristocrats in America apart from occasional British visitors). Republicanism alerted Americans to their constitutional rights as Englishmen – one right was that the people, through their elected officials, set the taxes and upheld law. Constitutionally, to Americans their &amp;quot;elected officials&amp;quot; were not represented in the British Parliament, it meant having their own colonial legislatures. The British replied haughtily toward this desire from the Americans, going so far as to suggest America was &amp;quot;virtually represented&amp;quot; by the British Parliament in some way or form. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Boston Tea Party====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Boston Tea Party}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Parliaments idea of representation in America fueled their desire to increase taxes on the Americans. The tax on stamps in 1765 incited near rebellion, as the 13 separate colonies began meeting together and sharing their grievances. The stamp tax was repealed but others followed, especially the tax on tea. In response, Americans boycotted tea and merchants refused to order it, except in Boston. There, a well-organized group of patriots dumped the tea in the harbor, historically known as the [[Boston Tea Party]]. These events infuriated London, so they sent troops to North America and stripped [[Massachusetts]] of its self government and suspended the historic rights the colonists were so proud of. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Thirteen Colonies====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Thirteen Colonies}}  [[Image:Pop1750.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thirteen original colonies began organizing shadow governments, called &amp;quot;Committees of Correspondence,&amp;quot; which prepared the Americans for the day &amp;quot;patriots&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Whigs,&amp;quot; as they called themselves) could assume all functions of local government. That day came when the British sent troops from Boston to seize gunpowder in attempt to dismantle a potential revolt, and the American patriots gathered there to defend their liberty. These patriots were known as the American &amp;quot;Minute men,&amp;quot; a well trained militia, and had planned for this day at Lexington and Concord. When the militia clashed with the elite British troops they soundly defeated them, prompting an historic backlash from Britain. The American Revolution had begun. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thirteen colonies, organized as the &amp;quot;[[First Continental Congress]],&amp;quot; became a national government as the shadow governments in each colony took control and ousted all royal officials. Congress set up a [[Continental Army]] and gave command to an American hero and Virginia's leader, [[George Washington]]. George Washington took charge in Boston, and he forced the British to leave in the spring of 1776. All 13 colonies were at this point in control of the American Patriots, and they listened as [[Tom Paine]] explained ''Common Sense'' principles, proudly boasting of America's strength and its power as a new nation. America, in its own right as an individual nation no longer needed nor wanted a foreign [[King]]. Congress called on the colonies to become States and to write new State constitutions. On July 4, 1776, Congress unanimously declared the independence of a new nation, the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====France in the American Revolutionary War====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Marquis de Lafayette.jpg|thumb|[[Marquis de Lafayette]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
King [[George III]] could not abide the insolent Americans and he sent his small army and large navy to America in attempt to reconquer his lost colonies. They were able to recapture [[New York City]], but the King's failure to spread elsewhere greatly outweighed this small victory. The powerful Royal navy gave the British command of the seas and the ability to land troops anywhere and capture any specific place, but the shortage of British soldiers, and the very long 3000 mile supply line, meant that the British could only hold a few points at any one time. Hiring German soldiers (Hessians) was necessary, but they were not enough, for the Patriots always had more available soldiers. The British expectations that Loyalist would rise up and overthrow the Patriots was a [[chimera]]; the Loyalists did provide some help to British invasion forces, but were never strong enough to operate on their own or control any territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[France]], humiliated by Britain in the 1760s, was stronger in the late 1770's than it was a decade earlier and wanted revenge against the British for their past woes. Thus, the French secretly armed and financed the Americans. Lafayette, a French general in the American Revolutionary War, served in the Continental Army under George Washington. He convinced France to send their first naval and land forces to the Americas and participated in defending Richmond, Virginia from Benedict Arnold and in the battle of Yorktown, Virginia; Lafayette contributed in no slight degree toward the grand result.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1777, the British sent a large army to invade [[New York]] and cut off the revolutionary states of [[New England]]. The plan was a disaster as the American militia captured the entire British invasion force at Saratoga. Encouraged by diplomat [[Benjamin Franklin]], the French recognized the United States as an independent nation, signed a treaty of alliance, and entered the war against Britain. Later, the treaty extended to [[Spain]] and the [[Netherlands]] as allies to America; Britain's diplomacy was disjointed that it had no allies at all, and was militarily matched or surpassed by America and its new allies. The British invasion of the South in 1780-81 was designed to bring out Loyalist support, but it failed and the second major British army was captured at the [[Battle of Yorktown]]. The British Parliament revolted at their reckless king and his incompetent government and sued for peace, which was achieved on terms favorable to the U.S. in 1783. About 20% of the Loyalists moved to [[Canada]], but many stayed in America, and the new peaceful nation resumed its rapid growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Nation===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bierstadt Looking Down Yosemite-Valley 1865.jpg|thumb|[[Albert Bierstadt]], ''Looking Down Yosemite-Valley'', 1865.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1783, when the Treaty of Paris concluded the war of independence, the American population totalled some three million citizens and slaves living on about one million square miles of land.  Tens of thousands of [[Native Americans]] also lived in the [[Northwest Territory]] and the Southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Thirteen original states are [[Connecticut]], [[Delaware]], [[Georgia]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]] (including [[maine]]), [[New Hampshire]], [[New Jersey]], [[New York]], [[North Carolina]], [[Pennsylvania]], [[Rhode Island]], [[South Carolina]] and [[Virginia]].  In 1790, an agreement between supporters of Jefferson and those of [[Alexander Hamilton]] resulted in the creation of the [[District of Columbia]] from part of [[Maryland]]; it has served as the national capital since 1800.  The remainder of the 1783 territory was eventually organized as the states of [[Ohio]], [[Indiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Illinois]], [[Wisconsin]], [[Kentucky]], [[Tennessee]], [[Mississippi]] and [[Alabama]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:U.S. Territorial Acquisitions PD WC.jpg|thumb|left|Territorial acquisitions such as the Thirteen Colonies, the Louisiana Purchase, and British and Spanish Cession.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1803, [[French]] emperor [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] took advantage of a lull in his war with Great Britain to sell the [[Louisiana Territory]] to the United States, more than doubling the nation's land area.  This territory would later be organized as the states of [[Minnesota]], [[North Dakota]], [[South Dakota]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Nebraska]], [[Iowa]], [[Missouri]], [[Arkansas]], [[Kansas]], [[Oklahoma]], and [[Louisiana]] proper.  President Jefferson commissioned [[Lewis and Clark]] to explore the new territory from 1802 to 1804.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. seized, then purchased [[Florida]] from Spain in 1819. [[Texas]] joined the United States in 1845 after winning its revolution against Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map Leading Group by County US.jpg|thumb|Map Leading Group by County, 2000.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After victory the [[Mexican American War]] of 1846-48, the U.S. purchased via the [[Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo]] territory that became the states of [[California]], [[Nevada]], [[Utah]], [[Colorado]], [[New Mexico]] and [[Arizona]].  In 1846 the U.S. and Britain agreed that the 49th Parallel (degree of latitude) would serve as the boundary between the U. S. and [[British Columbia]] (now part of Canada). The American portion became the states of [[Washington]], [[Oregon]] and [[Idaho]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1867, the U.S. purchased [[Alaska]] from [[Russia]]. It became a state in 1959.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hawaii became an independent republic in 1894 and voluntarily joined the U.S. in 1898, becoming a state in 1960. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the [[Spanish-American War]], the United States took control of the [[Philippines]] and annexed [[Puerto Rico]] and [[Guam]].  The Philippines became independent in 1946, after the U.S. reconquered the islands from Japan in World War II. [[Puerto Rico]] has occasionally held referendum that ratified its continuing unique &amp;quot;Commonwealth&amp;quot; status as part of the United States.  The residents of Puerto Rico are U.S. citizens.  Guam continues as a U.S. owned territory with full citizenship for its inhabitants. The people of Puerto Rico and Guam have a vote in presidential primaries and a voice, but not a vote, in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Constitution and Politics in the United States==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:76485685i79.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The drafting committee presenting the [[Declaration of Independence]] to the [[Continental Congress]], painted by John Trumbull 1817–1819.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1776 and 1788, the United States was governed according to the [[Articles of Confederation]].  The Founding Fathers formally established the current structure of the United States by ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1788. Since 1789, that constitution has been the basic governing document. America's Founding Fathers understood that a democracy is always in flux and given to “mob rule,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Michelle Malkin]]. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/27/the-coming-g20-riots-the-spread-of-mob-rule/comment-page-1/ The coming G20 riots &amp;amp; the spread of mob rule], ''Michelle Malkin'', March 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while a republic is fixed and stable, resting on “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” Because of the uncertainty of democracy, [[Benjamin Rush]] — a signer of the Declaration of Independence — wrote: “A simple democracy is one of the greatest of evils.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;AWR Hawkins. [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/america-a-republic-not-a-democracy/ America: A Republic, Not a Democracy], ''Pajamas Media'', September 03, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sovereignty in America comes from the citizenry, and the basic political values are called &amp;quot;[[republicanism]],&amp;quot; (not to be confused with the [[Republican Party]],)  especially the commitment to civic virtue and civic duty, and opposition to corruption and aristocracy.  Popular political parties emerged in the United States in the 1790s; currently the two major political parties are the [[Democratic Party]], and the [[Republican Party]]. Minor parties are of little importance overall but can be useful in pushing certain topics to the public eye. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Role of Religion in Government ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Religion and U.S. Government}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|United States Federal Government}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:56eugyjnm.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The [[White House]], the official home and workplace of the [[President of the United States]] of America.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Executive Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Chief of state: The [[President of the United States]] is both the chief of state and head of government&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of government: President of the United States; [[Vice President of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Cabinet: Cabinet appointed by the president with Senate approval&lt;br /&gt;
*Elections: The president and vice president serve four-year terms (eligible for a second term)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States legislative branch of government is a [[bicameral]] Congress, which consists of the [[United States Senate|Senate]] (100 seats, 2 members are elected from each state by popular vote to serve six-year terms; one-third are elected every two years) and the [[House of Representatives]] (435 seats; members are directly elected by popular vote to serve two-year terms).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Supreme Court of the United States}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States [[Supreme Court]] consists of nine justices, nominated by the president and confirmed with the advice and consent of the Senate. Members of the Supreme Court are appointed to serve for life; the judicial branch extends to the United States Courts of Appeal, the United States District Courts, and State and County Courts. The primary role of the nine justices of the Supreme Court is to assure the United States government does not attempt to surrender, sell or transfer the people's unalienable rights given by [[God]]. The Supreme Court has the power to consider the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $47,400. In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than foreign firms face entering US markets. US firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace, and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War II. The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a &amp;quot;two-tier labor market&amp;quot; in which those at the bottom lack the education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and other benefits. Unfortunately, china remains both the banker and salesman to the united state's role as buyer, and debtor. This will not end well for the United States, republican president or not. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households. The war in March-April 2003 between a US-led coalition and Iraq, and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, required major shifts in national resources to the military. Soaring oil prices between 2005 and the first half of 2008 threatened inflation and unemployment, as higher gasoline prices ate into consumers' budgets. Imported oil accounts for about 60% of US consumption. Long-term problems include inadequate investment in economic infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable trade and budget deficits, and stagnation of family income in the lower economic groups. The merchandise trade deficit reached a record $840 billion in 2008 before shrinking to $506 billion in 2009, and ramping back up to $630 billion in 2010. The global economic downturn, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, investment bank failures, falling home prices, and tight credit pushed the United States into a recession by mid-2008. GDP contracted until the third quarter of 2009, making this the deepest and longest downturn since the Great Depression. To help stabilize financial markets, the US Congress established a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in October 2008. The government used some of these funds to purchase equity in US banks and other industrial corporations, much of which had been returned to the government by early 2011. In January 2009 the US Congress passed and President Barack Obama signed a bill providing an additional $787 billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds on additional spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help the economy recover. Approximately two-thirds of these funds were injected into the economy by the end of 2010. In March 2010, President Obama signed a health insurance reform bill into law that will extend coverage to an additional 32 million American citizens by 2016, through private health insurance for the general population and Medicaid for the impoverished. In July 2010, the president signed the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a bill designed to promote financial stability by protecting consumers from financial abuses, ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms, dealing with troubled banks that are &amp;quot;too big to fail,&amp;quot; and improving accountability and transparency in the financial system - in particular, by requiring certain financial derivatives to be traded in markets that are subject to government regulation and oversight. In November 2010, in an attempt to keep interest rates from rising and snuffing out the nascent recovery, the US Federal Reserve Bank (The Fed) announced that it would purchase $600 billion worth of US Government bonds by June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leading industrial power in the world, highly diversified and technologically advanced; [[petroleum]], [[steel]], motor vehicles, aerospace, telecommunications, chemicals, [[electronics]], food processing, consumer goods, lumber, mining.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA - The world Factbook]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flag Description==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:50 star flag.png|left|thumb|150px|The [[Flag of the United States of America]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Flag of the United States of America}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirteen equal horizontal stripes of red (top and bottom) alternating with white; there is a blue rectangle in the upper hoist-side corner bearing 50 small, white, five-pointed stars arranged in nine offset horizontal rows of six stars (top and bottom) alternating with rows of five stars; the 50 stars represent the 50 states, the 13 stripes represent the 13 original colonies; known as Old Glory; the design and colors have been the basis for a number of other flags, including [[Chile]], [[Liberia]], [[Malaysia]], and [[Puerto Rico]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lawrence The Migration of the Negro.jpg|thumb|The Migration of the Negro by [[Jacob Lawrence]], 1940-1941.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pledge of Allegiance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous American artists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of 50 states]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Americas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[America (continent)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of American Masterpieces]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CIA]] - [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html The World FactBook]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/616563/United-States United States.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/america.htm America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/flags_of_us_states.htm Flags of the U.S. States]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pibmug.com/files/map_test.swf Interactive map test of the 50 U.S. states]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h445.html U.S. History]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theroot.com/buzz/who-owns-united-states Who Owns the United States?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html Wealth, Income, and Power.] by G. William Domhoff, University of California Santa Cruz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=966670</id>
		<title>United States of America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_of_America&amp;diff=966670"/>
		<updated>2012-03-07T01:19:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Rdsmith: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''United States of America''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =US map.PNG&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =Loc of United States.png&lt;br /&gt;
|established=1776&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =50 star flag.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =United States arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional Republic&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|official =n&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Barack Hussein Obama&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,718,695 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =313,232,000 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=         $15 trillion (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$48,029 (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=United States Dollar (USD)&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''United States of America'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(''conventional short form'': '''United States'''; ''abbreviation'': '''US''' or '''USA'''; sometimes also referred to as '''the States''' or simply as '''America''')&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is the most [[conservative]], prosperous and free nation in the world, based on the longest-running [[Constitution]] in history.  Located in [[North America]], this nation consists of a federal union of fifty individual states, along with territories and a capital district. Founded originally as 13 colonies in the [[British Empire]], Britain's American colonies broke with the mother country on July 4, 1776 with the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776. [http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/document/index.htm The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America], ushistory.org, (Accessed August 2010).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The new nation became recognized as the United States of America following the [[American Revolutionary War|War of Independence]] in 1783. Shortly thereafter, in 1787, the [[United States Constitution]] was written; grounded on [[Republican form of government|republican]] political principles and the work of [[Montesquieu]]), the Constitution remains in effect today, albeit with several amendments since then. The Americans created political parties and, since abolishing [[slavery]] in a bloody [[American Civil War|civil war]] (1861-65), instituted a form of government guided by the rule of law rather than the desires of a majority of voters. According to the U.S. Constitution written by America's [[Founding Fathers]], the United States is a [[Constitutional Republic]]. It is not a true [[Democracy|democracy]], but is a form of one. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
America's capitalist economy grew rapidly, becoming the largest in the world by the 1870s. During the 19th and 20th centuries, 37 new states were added to the original 13 as the nation expanded across the North American continent and acquired a number of overseas possessions. After defeating Communism in the [[Cold War]], the U.S. emerged as the world's only [[superpower]], boasting the largest economy and most powerful military. It exerts enormous cultural and intellectual influence worldwide, and in return is the target of the enemies of democracy and [[capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capital of the United States of America is [[Washington, DC]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== People ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Php3sfokfPM.jpg|220px|left|At Washington, DC.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Population: 310,232,863 (July 2010 est.) Population growth rate: 0.97% (2010 est.) Labor force:	153.9 million (2010 est.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ethnic groups: white 79.96%, black 12.85%, Asian 4.43%, Amerindian and Alaska native 0.97%, native Hawaiian and other Pacific islander 0.18%, two or more races 1.61% (July 2007 estimate) note: a separate listing for Hispanic is not included because the US Census Bureau considers Hispanic to mean persons of Spanish/Hispanic/Latino origin including those of Mexican, Cuban, Puerto Rican, Dominican Republic, Spanish, and Central or South American origin living in the US who may be of any race or ethnic group (white, black, Asian, etc.); about 15.1% of the total US population is Hispanic &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA - The World Factbook.] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, around 400,000 [[illegal immigrants]] were deported. The Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington, estimates 11.5 million to 12 million &amp;quot;unauthorized migrants&amp;quot; live in the US today. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0516/p01s02-ussc.html Illegal immigrants in the US: How many are there?] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colorado.jpg|thumb|[[Colorado]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
North America, bordering both the North [[Atlantic Ocean]] and the North [[Pacific Ocean]], is between [[Canada]] and [[Mexico]]. In addition to the boundaries of the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, the United States is otherwise bounded by the [[Bering Sea]], the Arctic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Two of the fifty states, Alaska and Hawaii (an archipelago), are not contiguous with any of the other states. Puerto Rico, which is largely self governing, is part of the U.S., as are several smaller territories in the Pacific Ocean, such as Guam. Each of the 50 states has a large degree of sovereignty, but the boundaries are debated and shift slightly every year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At over 3.7 million square miles (over 9.6 million km²), the U.S. (including its non-contiguous and overseas states and territories) is the third largest country by total area (after Russia and Canada). It is the world's third most populous nation, with over 350 million people (after China and India). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mt. McKinley is highest point in North America and Death Valley the lowest point on the continent. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA World Factbook], ''North America :: United States'', Updated on February 23, 2011, (Accessed on February 23, 2011).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===American Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|American Revolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Washington-deleware.jpg|thumb|left|Washington, Chief of the Continental Army, is shown crossing the Delaware River.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The American Revolution exploded from fears the British Empire was trying to restrict the historic rights and liberties of Americans.  The British victory in the French and Indian War ended the threat that foreign powers might attack the colonies; Britain's protection was no longer needed. At the same time Britain decided to assert its powers by imposing [[taxes]].  The taxes (as on stamps, sugar, and tea) were not large but the principle was simple: Americans insisted their own [[Legislature|legislatures]] could impose taxes but not [[Parliament]], because Americans were not represented there. &amp;quot;No taxation without representation!&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;[[Don't tread on me]]&amp;quot; became common phrases in America by the American people, but the British refused over and over again to accept it.  London sent in troops when Boston protested vehemently, and Americans organized shadow governments in every colony. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Americans were adopting a new political philosophy, called [[republicanism]], which stressed civic virtue, fear of corruption, and disdain for [[aristocracy]] (there were no aristocrats in America apart from occasional British visitors). Republicanism alerted Americans to their constitutional rights as Englishmen – one right was that the people, through their elected officials, set the taxes and upheld law. Constitutionally, to Americans their &amp;quot;elected officials&amp;quot; were not represented in the British Parliament, it meant having their own colonial legislatures. The British replied haughtily toward this desire from the Americans, going so far as to suggest America was &amp;quot;virtually represented&amp;quot; by the British Parliament in some way or form. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Boston Tea Party====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Boston Tea Party}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Parliaments idea of representation in America fueled their desire to increase taxes on the Americans. The tax on stamps in 1765 incited near rebellion, as the 13 separate colonies began meeting together and sharing their grievances. The stamp tax was repealed but others followed, especially the tax on tea. In response, Americans boycotted tea and merchants refused to order it, except in Boston. There, a well-organized group of patriots dumped the tea in the harbor, historically known as the [[Boston Tea Party]]. These events infuriated London, so they sent troops to North America and stripped [[Massachusetts]] of its self government and suspended the historic rights the colonists were so proud of. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Thirteen Colonies====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Thirteen Colonies}}  [[Image:Pop1750.jpg|right|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thirteen original colonies began organizing shadow governments, called &amp;quot;Committees of Correspondence,&amp;quot; which prepared the Americans for the day &amp;quot;patriots&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Whigs,&amp;quot; as they called themselves) could assume all functions of local government. That day came when the British sent troops from Boston to seize gunpowder in attempt to dismantle a potential revolt, and the American patriots gathered there to defend their liberty. These patriots were known as the American &amp;quot;Minute men,&amp;quot; a well trained militia, and had planned for this day at Lexington and Concord. When the militia clashed with the elite British troops they soundly defeated them, prompting an historic backlash from Britain. The American Revolution had begun. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thirteen colonies, organized as the &amp;quot;[[First Continental Congress]],&amp;quot; became a national government as the shadow governments in each colony took control and ousted all royal officials. Congress set up a [[Continental Army]] and gave command to an American hero and Virginia's leader, [[George Washington]]. George Washington took charge in Boston, and he forced the British to leave in the spring of 1776. All 13 colonies were at this point in control of the American Patriots, and they listened as [[Tom Paine]] explained ''Common Sense'' principles, proudly boasting of America's strength and its power as a new nation. America, in its own right as an individual nation no longer needed nor wanted a foreign [[King]]. Congress called on the colonies to become States and to write new State constitutions. On July 4, 1776, Congress unanimously declared the independence of a new nation, the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====France in the American Revolutionary War====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Marquis de Lafayette.jpg|thumb|[[Marquis de Lafayette]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
King [[George III]] could not abide the insolent Americans and he sent his small army and large navy to America in attempt to reconquer his lost colonies. They were able to recapture [[New York City]], but the King's failure to spread elsewhere greatly outweighed this small victory. The powerful Royal navy gave the British command of the seas and the ability to land troops anywhere and capture any specific place, but the shortage of British soldiers, and the very long 3000 mile supply line, meant that the British could only hold a few points at any one time. Hiring German soldiers (Hessians) was necessary, but they were not enough, for the Patriots always had more available soldiers. The British expectations that Loyalist would rise up and overthrow the Patriots was a [[chimera]]; the Loyalists did provide some help to British invasion forces, but were never strong enough to operate on their own or control any territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[France]], humiliated by Britain in the 1760s, was stronger in the late 1770's than it was a decade earlier and wanted revenge against the British for their past woes. Thus, the French secretly armed and financed the Americans. Lafayette, a French general in the American Revolutionary War, served in the Continental Army under George Washington. He convinced France to send their first naval and land forces to the Americas and participated in defending Richmond, Virginia from Benedict Arnold and in the battle of Yorktown, Virginia; Lafayette contributed in no slight degree toward the grand result.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1777, the British sent a large army to invade [[New York]] and cut off the revolutionary states of [[New England]]. The plan was a disaster as the American militia captured the entire British invasion force at Saratoga. Encouraged by diplomat [[Benjamin Franklin]], the French recognized the United States as an independent nation, signed a treaty of alliance, and entered the war against Britain. Later, the treaty extended to [[Spain]] and the [[Netherlands]] as allies to America; Britain's diplomacy was disjointed that it had no allies at all, and was militarily matched or surpassed by America and its new allies. The British invasion of the South in 1780-81 was designed to bring out Loyalist support, but it failed and the second major British army was captured at the [[Battle of Yorktown]]. The British Parliament revolted at their reckless king and his incompetent government and sued for peace, which was achieved on terms favorable to the U.S. in 1783. About 20% of the Loyalists moved to [[Canada]], but many stayed in America, and the new peaceful nation resumed its rapid growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Nation===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bierstadt Looking Down Yosemite-Valley 1865.jpg|thumb|[[Albert Bierstadt]], ''Looking Down Yosemite-Valley'', 1865.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1783, when the Treaty of Paris concluded the war of independence, the American population totalled some three million citizens and slaves living on about one million square miles of land.  Tens of thousands of [[Native Americans]] also lived in the [[Northwest Territory]] and the Southwest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Thirteen original states are [[Connecticut]], [[Delaware]], [[Georgia]], [[Maryland]], [[Massachusetts]] (including [[maine]]), [[New Hampshire]], [[New Jersey]], [[New York]], [[North Carolina]], [[Pennsylvania]], [[Rhode Island]], [[South Carolina]] and [[Virginia]].  In 1790, an agreement between supporters of Jefferson and those of [[Alexander Hamilton]] resulted in the creation of the [[District of Columbia]] from part of [[Maryland]]; it has served as the national capital since 1800.  The remainder of the 1783 territory was eventually organized as the states of [[Ohio]], [[Indiana]], [[Michigan]], [[Illinois]], [[Wisconsin]], [[Kentucky]], [[Tennessee]], [[Mississippi]] and [[Alabama]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expansion===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:U.S. Territorial Acquisitions PD WC.jpg|thumb|left|Territorial acquisitions such as the Thirteen Colonies, the Louisiana Purchase, and British and Spanish Cession.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1803, [[French]] emperor [[Napoleon Bonaparte]] took advantage of a lull in his war with Great Britain to sell the [[Louisiana Territory]] to the United States, more than doubling the nation's land area.  This territory would later be organized as the states of [[Minnesota]], [[North Dakota]], [[South Dakota]], [[Montana]], [[Wyoming]], [[Nebraska]], [[Iowa]], [[Missouri]], [[Arkansas]], [[Kansas]], [[Oklahoma]], and [[Louisiana]] proper.  President Jefferson commissioned [[Lewis and Clark]] to explore the new territory from 1802 to 1804.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. seized, then purchased [[Florida]] from Spain in 1819. [[Texas]] joined the United States in 1845 after winning its revolution against Mexico. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map Leading Group by County US.jpg|thumb|Map Leading Group by County, 2000.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After victory the [[Mexican American War]] of 1846-48, the U.S. purchased via the [[Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo]] territory that became the states of [[California]], [[Nevada]], [[Utah]], [[Colorado]], [[New Mexico]] and [[Arizona]].  In 1846 the U.S. and Britain agreed that the 49th Parallel (degree of latitude) would serve as the boundary between the U. S. and [[British Columbia]] (now part of Canada). The American portion became the states of [[Washington]], [[Oregon]] and [[Idaho]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1867, the U.S. purchased [[Alaska]] from [[Russia]]. It became a state in 1959.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hawaii became an independent republic in 1894 and voluntarily joined the U.S. in 1898, becoming a state in 1960. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of the [[Spanish-American War]], the United States took control of the [[Philippines]] and annexed [[Puerto Rico]] and [[Guam]].  The Philippines became independent in 1946, after the U.S. reconquered the islands from Japan in World War II. [[Puerto Rico]] has occasionally held referendum that ratified its continuing unique &amp;quot;Commonwealth&amp;quot; status as part of the United States.  The residents of Puerto Rico are U.S. citizens.  Guam continues as a U.S. owned territory with full citizenship for its inhabitants. The people of Puerto Rico and Guam have a vote in presidential primaries and a voice, but not a vote, in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Constitution and Politics in the United States==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:76485685i79.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The drafting committee presenting the [[Declaration of Independence]] to the [[Continental Congress]], painted by John Trumbull 1817–1819.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 1776 and 1788, the United States was governed according to the [[Articles of Confederation]].  The Founding Fathers formally established the current structure of the United States by ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1788. Since 1789, that constitution has been the basic governing document. America's Founding Fathers understood that a democracy is always in flux and given to “mob rule,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Michelle Malkin]]. [http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/27/the-coming-g20-riots-the-spread-of-mob-rule/comment-page-1/ The coming G20 riots &amp;amp; the spread of mob rule], ''Michelle Malkin'', March 27, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while a republic is fixed and stable, resting on “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” Because of the uncertainty of democracy, [[Benjamin Rush]] — a signer of the Declaration of Independence — wrote: “A simple democracy is one of the greatest of evils.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;AWR Hawkins. [http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/america-a-republic-not-a-democracy/ America: A Republic, Not a Democracy], ''Pajamas Media'', September 03, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sovereignty in America comes from the citizenry, and the basic political values are called &amp;quot;[[republicanism]],&amp;quot; (not to be confused with the [[Republican Party]],)  especially the commitment to civic virtue and civic duty, and opposition to corruption and aristocracy.  Popular political parties emerged in the United States in the 1790s; currently the two major political parties are the [[Democratic Party]], and the [[Republican Party]]. Minor parties are of little importance overall but can be useful in pushing certain topics to the public eye. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Role of Religion in Government ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Religion and U.S. Government}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|United States Federal Government}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:56eugyjnm.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The [[White House]], the official home and workplace of the [[President of the United States]] of America.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Executive Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Chief of state: The [[President of the United States]] is both the chief of state and head of government&lt;br /&gt;
*Head of government: President of the United States; [[Vice President of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Cabinet: Cabinet appointed by the president with Senate approval&lt;br /&gt;
*Elections: The president and vice president serve four-year terms (eligible for a second term)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legislative Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States legislative branch of government is a [[bicameral]] Congress, which consists of the [[United States Senate|Senate]] (100 seats, 2 members are elected from each state by popular vote to serve six-year terms; one-third are elected every two years) and the [[House of Representatives]] (435 seats; members are directly elected by popular vote to serve two-year terms).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judicial Branch===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Supreme Court of the United States}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States [[Supreme Court]] consists of nine justices, nominated by the president and confirmed with the advice and consent of the Senate. Members of the Supreme Court are appointed to serve for life; the judicial branch extends to the United States Courts of Appeal, the United States District Courts, and State and County Courts. The primary role of the nine justices of the Supreme Court is to assure the United States government does not attempt to surrender, sell or transfer the people's unalienable rights given by [[God]]. The Supreme Court has the power to consider the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US has the largest and most technologically powerful economy in the world, with a per capita GDP of $47,400. In this market-oriented economy, private individuals and business firms make most of the decisions, and the federal and state governments buy needed goods and services predominantly in the private marketplace. US business firms enjoy greater flexibility than their counterparts in Western Europe and Japan in decisions to expand capital plant, to lay off surplus workers, and to develop new products. At the same time, they face higher barriers to enter their rivals' home markets than foreign firms face entering US markets. US firms are at or near the forefront in technological advances, especially in computers and in medical, aerospace, and military equipment; their advantage has narrowed since the end of World War II. The onrush of technology largely explains the gradual development of a &amp;quot;two-tier labor market&amp;quot; in which those at the bottom lack the education and the professional/technical skills of those at the top and, more and more, fail to get comparable pay raises, health insurance coverage, and other benefits. Unfortunately, china remains both the banker and salesman to the united state's role as buyer, and debtor. This will not end well for the United States, republican president or not. Since 1975, practically all the gains in household income have gone to the top 20% of households. The war in March-April 2003 between a US-led coalition and Iraq, and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, required major shifts in national resources to the military. Soaring oil prices between 2005 and the first half of 2008 threatened inflation and unemployment, as higher gasoline prices ate into consumers' budgets. Imported oil accounts for about 60% of US consumption. Long-term problems include inadequate investment in economic infrastructure, rapidly rising medical and pension costs of an aging population, sizable trade and budget deficits, and stagnation of family income in the lower economic groups. The merchandise trade deficit reached a record $840 billion in 2008 before shrinking to $506 billion in 2009, and ramping back up to $630 billion in 2010. The global economic downturn, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, investment bank failures, falling home prices, and tight credit pushed the United States into a recession by mid-2008. GDP contracted until the third quarter of 2009, making this the deepest and longest downturn since the Great Depression. To help stabilize financial markets, the US Congress established a $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in October 2008. The government used some of these funds to purchase equity in US banks and other industrial corporations, much of which had been returned to the government by early 2011. In January 2009 the US Congress passed and President Barack Obama signed a bill providing an additional $787 billion fiscal stimulus to be used over 10 years - two-thirds on additional spending and one-third on tax cuts - to create jobs and to help the economy recover. Approximately two-thirds of these funds were injected into the economy by the end of 2010. In March 2010, President Obama signed a health insurance reform bill into law that will extend coverage to an additional 32 million American citizens by 2016, through private health insurance for the general population and Medicaid for the impoverished. In July 2010, the president signed the DODD-FRANK Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, a bill designed to promote financial stability by protecting consumers from financial abuses, ending taxpayer bailouts of financial firms, dealing with troubled banks that are &amp;quot;too big to fail,&amp;quot; and improving accountability and transparency in the financial system - in particular, by requiring certain financial derivatives to be traded in markets that are subject to government regulation and oversight. In November 2010, in an attempt to keep interest rates from rising and snuffing out the nascent recovery, the US Federal Reserve Bank (The Fed) announced that it would purchase $600 billion worth of US Government bonds by June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leading industrial power in the world, highly diversified and technologically advanced; [[petroleum]], [[steel]], motor vehicles, aerospace, telecommunications, chemicals, [[electronics]], food processing, consumer goods, lumber, mining.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html CIA - The world Factbook]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flag Description==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:50 star flag.png|left|thumb|150px|The [[Flag of the United States of America]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Flag of the United States of America}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thirteen equal horizontal stripes of red (top and bottom) alternating with white; there is a blue rectangle in the upper hoist-side corner bearing 50 small, white, five-pointed stars arranged in nine offset horizontal rows of six stars (top and bottom) alternating with rows of five stars; the 50 stars represent the 50 states, the 13 stripes represent the 13 original colonies; known as Old Glory; the design and colors have been the basis for a number of other flags, including [[Chile]], [[Liberia]], [[Malaysia]], and [[Puerto Rico]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lawrence The Migration of the Negro.jpg|thumb|The Migration of the Negro by [[Jacob Lawrence]], 1940-1941.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pledge of Allegiance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous American artists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of 50 states]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Americas]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[America (continent)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gallery of American Masterpieces]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CIA]] - [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html The World FactBook]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/616563/United-States United States.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/america.htm America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/flags_of_us_states.htm Flags of the U.S. States]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.pibmug.com/files/map_test.swf Interactive map test of the 50 U.S. states]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h445.html U.S. History]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theroot.com/buzz/who-owns-united-states Who Owns the United States?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html Wealth, Income, and Power.] by G. William Domhoff, University of California Santa Cruz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USstates}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:North American Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Rdsmith</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>