https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=RandRover1982 2026-09-30T15:58:35Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Mathematics&diff=556873 2008-11-14T03:21:07Z

<p>RandRover1982: /* Who's in charge? */</p> <hr /> <div>== Who's in charge? ==<br /> <br /> Anybody? I'm new here and would love to start systematically making the mathematics articles on Conservapedia awesome. [[User:RandRover1982|RandRover1982]] 22:11, 13 November 2008 (EST)<br /> <br /> :Well, ''I'' am a senior administrator here. Want to start editing the math pages? Let's see what you can do. You have the right to create new pages, after all. What precisely did you have in mind?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&lt;sup&gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&lt;/sup&gt; 22:13, 13 November 2008 (EST)<br /> <br /> ::Wow, that was fast. Thanks for the quick response!<br /> ::I actually have less of a grand plan in mind than my initial comment may suggest. But, in general, I think there are gaps to be filled and details to be smoothed out. I'll poke around and edit/add a few things over the next few days. [[User:RandRover1982|RandRover1982]] 22:21, 13 November 2008 (EST)</div>

RandRover1982 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mathematics&diff=556864 2008-11-14T03:13:42Z

<p>RandRover1982: </p> <hr /> <div>This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservapedia has no interest what-so-ever in mathematics, a true testament to the intelligence of this fine, fine website. {{unsigned|GroupsAndFields}}<br /> <br /> : Dude, you misspelled &quot;testament&quot;. Try improving yourself first and then you might be in a position to criticize others.<br /> <br /> : Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia does not take the childish approach of &quot;more words is better.&quot; We strive to be concise as a good encyclopedia should. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT)<br /> :: [Note: GroupsAndFields corrected his original spelling of &quot;testiment&quot; after this [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:55, 31 May 2008 (EDT)]<br /> <br /> : Also, Conservapedia has been around for only a year and a half, whereas Wikipedia has had 7 years to acquire all its articles. I'd say the amount of content, mathematical and otherwise, that CP has produced in that short time is downright astounding. While I don't think we will usurp the position of a pure mathematical reference such as [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ MathWorld], we will have a thorough sampling of all the major concepts of mathematics in an accessible form. That's the content a general knowledge encyclopedia should have. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:12, 24 May 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> <br /> == Let's do this. ==<br /> <br /> And by &quot;this&quot; I mean &quot;make major strides in the quality and quantity of mathematics articles on Conservapedia&quot;. I'm new here and don't know whether to just jump in or to cool my heels and appeal to authority. [[User:RandRover1982|RandRover1982]] 22:13, 13 November 2008 (EST)</div>

RandRover1982 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Mathematics&diff=556863 2008-11-14T03:13:29Z

<p>RandRover1982: </p> <hr /> <div>This is great, conservapedia has half a page about mathematics, whereas wikipedia has dozens upon dozens of pages devoted to various fields of mathematics. I'm glad to see that conservapedia has no interest what-so-ever in mathematics, a true testament to the intelligence of this fine, fine website. {{unsigned|GroupsAndFields}}<br /> <br /> : Dude, you misspelled &quot;testament&quot;. Try improving yourself first and then you might be in a position to criticize others.<br /> <br /> : Unlike Wikipedia, Conservapedia does not take the childish approach of &quot;more words is better.&quot; We strive to be concise as a good encyclopedia should. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:57, 24 May 2008 (EDT)<br /> :: [Note: GroupsAndFields corrected his original spelling of &quot;testiment&quot; after this [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:55, 31 May 2008 (EDT)]<br /> <br /> : Also, Conservapedia has been around for only a year and a half, whereas Wikipedia has had 7 years to acquire all its articles. I'd say the amount of content, mathematical and otherwise, that CP has produced in that short time is downright astounding. While I don't think we will usurp the position of a pure mathematical reference such as [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ MathWorld], we will have a thorough sampling of all the major concepts of mathematics in an accessible form. That's the content a general knowledge encyclopedia should have. [[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:12, 24 May 2008 (EDT)<br /> <br /> <br /> == Let's do this. ==<br /> <br /> And by &quot;this&quot; I mean &quot;make major strides in the quality and quantity of mathematics articles on Conservapedia&quot;. I'm new here and don't know whether to just jump in or to cool my heels and appeal to authority.</div>

RandRover1982 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Mathematics&diff=556860 2008-11-14T03:11:29Z

<p>RandRover1982: </p> <hr /> <div>== Who's in charge? ==<br /> <br /> Anybody? I'm new here and would love to start systematically making the mathematics articles on Conservapedia awesome. [[User:RandRover1982|RandRover1982]] 22:11, 13 November 2008 (EST)</div>

RandRover1982 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category_talk:Mathematics&diff=556858 2008-11-14T03:10:30Z

<p>RandRover1982: New page: == Who's in charge? == Anybody? I'm new here and would love to start systematically making the mathematics articles on Conservapedia awesome.</p> <hr /> <div><br /> == Who's in charge? ==<br /> <br /> Anybody? I'm new here and would love to start systematically making the mathematics articles on Conservapedia awesome.</div>

RandRover1982 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:RandRover1982&diff=556855 2008-11-14T03:06:07Z

<p>RandRover1982: New page: Roving the land for Rand.</p> <hr /> <div>Roving the land for Rand.</div>

RandRover1982