<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RachelN</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=RachelN"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/RachelN"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T00:12:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589771</id>
		<title>American History Homework Thirteen Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589771"/>
		<updated>2008-12-18T16:19:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinating. The study of this exciting culture along with the pondering of the question of what caused such a boom makes for a very interesting subject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton enjoyed the initial popularity that comes of economic good times. However, each one’s character was what caused his respective success or downfall. Ronald Reagan was not afraid to do what was right, regardless of what others told him to do. This did not always make him popular, but it made him a strong leader. Bill Clinton fell into the trap of sexual immorality, and was shamed by a scandal in the White House. This caused him to lose the respect of many of the American people, and his lies about this scandal led to his eventual impeachment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What would you say is the most important trend or trends guiding American history?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see two trends that have shaped and continue to shape America. The first relates to government and the second to cultural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the time of the Revolution until today, the government has gained more and more power (this is especially true regarding the federal government). This trend began early on with the shift from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, and continues to this day, as we see the court writing more and more of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American people as a whole have become more and more “tolerant” of those who are different from them (whether they are of different race, gender, religion, etc.). In the colonial times, there was a very intolerant sentiment, which continued, yet slowly lessened. Over time African Americans were freed from slavery, women gained the right to vote, African Americans and minorities attained more and more rights and so on. Today the trend is continuing beyond a tolerance of differences, to a denial of differences, and there is a sentiment that homosexuals deserve special rights. There also exists “reverse racism” (preference towards minority groups), which is essentially just racism. It is not surprising that this would be a trend guiding American history, as America is such a melting pot of cultures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What is the most important threat to the future of America? Cite history to support your view.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The post-modern worldview which is so prevalent in America today is a huge threat. Post-modernism is the belief that there is no such thing as truth; everything is relative. Post-modern adherents believe that we must tolerate all differences, and accept one man’s belief as “true for him”, and another man’s opposite belief as “true for him”. Yet it is fearfully ironic that post-modernists cannot tolerate any perceived “intolerance” or a belief in absolutes, and thus, they cannot tolerate Christians. We can see the effects of post-modernism everywhere we look, and the effects are sure to continue in the future. The question stands: where will this lead us? Followed through to conclusion, post-modernism actually leads to anarchy. While I do not believe anarchy to be a threat to America at this point in time, there are other immediate dangers that come of the post-modern worldview. Post-modernism is a threat to Christian’s freedom of religion. It is also the heart of the homosexual movement. Finally, it leads to the denial of a universal moral code, which is having and will continue to have a horrible effect on the laws of our nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Do you see a connection between culture and success for a nation? Give an example from history (e.g., period of time) to support your view. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a huge correlation between culture and success. This correlation runs deeper than the culture causing success; the culture in a way defines what success is for that nation. How achievable that success is and how in line with God’s principles it is, will define how successful the nation is. For instance, in World War II American culture cried out for the quickest possible end to the blood shed, while Japan’s culture required the upkeep of honor above all else. America’s definition of success was more achievable (and more in line with the Bible) than Japan’s, so thus we succeeded. Another example of this can be found in the America colonies. The colony at Plymouth was founded on Biblical principles, and it was successful from the start. Yet the colony at Jamestown was founded for monetary purposes. Success in that colony was originally defined as having a lot of money, without having to work hard. Obviously, this is not very achievable or in line with the Bible, so the colony failed (until a new leader implemented a “don’t work, don’t eat” rule, redefining “success” into something achievable). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan’s great achievements both had to do with communism: he was successful in protecting America from the threat of communist missiles, and he is accredited with ending communism in the USSR and Eastern Europe. The former was the product of his Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), which was an ingenious plan to protect America from communist missiles by preparing to shoot any missiles launched towards America down in space. The latter was the result of his willingness to do what it took to end communism no matter what others said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain during which century you think this map was drawn, and comment how America's achievements may have met or exceeded the expectations of the cartographer or other people of his time.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This map was probably drawn during the 16th Century, as the names of the lands labeled on it were all discovered and named by the Europeans during this century. The cartographer clearly underestimated the significance of North America, as is clear from its size in this map. This reflected the popular belief during the 16th Century that North America was not as important as South America, as there was little prospect seen to find gold in North America. Yet while there actually was gold in the West, that was not the main misperception that the people of the 16th Century had. The main misperception was that gold would be the greatest riches to gain from this “New World”. No one ever imagined that someday the settling of North America would lead to the forming of the future richest country in the world. At that time, few even thought of settling the New World.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589769</id>
		<title>American History Homework Thirteen Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589769"/>
		<updated>2008-12-18T16:13:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinating. The study of this exciting culture along with the pondering of the question of what caused such a boom makes for a very interesting subject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton enjoyed the initial popularity that comes of economic good times. However, each one’s character was what caused his respective success or downfall. Ronald Reagan was not afraid to do what was right, regardless of what others told him to do. This did not always make him popular, but it made him a strong leader. Bill Clinton fell into the trap of sexual immorality, and was shamed by a scandal in the White House. This caused him to lose the respect of many of the American people, and his lies about this scandal led to his eventual impeachment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What would you say is the most important trend or trends guiding American history?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see two trends that have shaped and continue to shape America. The first relates to government and the second to cultural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the time of the Revolution until today, the government has gained more and more power (this is especially true regarding the federal government). This trend began early on with the shift from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, and continues to this day, as we see the court writing more and more of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American people as a whole have become more and more “tolerant” of those who are different from them (whether they are of different race, gender, religion, etc.). In the colonial times, there was a very intolerant sentiment, which continued, yet slowly lessened. Over time African Americans were freed from slavery, women gained the right to vote, African Americans and minorities attained more and more rights and so on. Today the trend is continuing beyond a tolerance of differences, to a denial of differences, and there is a sentiment that homosexuals deserve special rights. There also exists “reverse racism” (preference towards minority groups), which is essentially just racism. It is not surprising that this would be a trend guiding American history, as America is such a melting pot of cultures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What is the most important threat to the future of America? Cite history to support your view.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The post-modern worldview which is so prevalent in America today is a huge threat. Post-modernism is the belief that there is no such thing as truth; everything is relative. Post-modern adherents believe that we must tolerate all differences, and except one man’s belief as “true for him”, and another man’s opposite belief as “true for him”. Yet it is fearfully ironic that post-modernists cannot tolerate any perceived “intolerance” or a belief in absolutes, and thus, they cannot tolerate Christians. We can see the effects of post-modernism everywhere we look, and the effects are sure to continue in the future. The question stands: where will this lead us? Followed through to conclusion, post-modernism actually leads to anarchy. While I do not believe anarchy to be a threat to America at this point in time, there are other immediate dangers that come of the post-modern worldview. Post-modernism is a threat to Christian’s freedom of religion. It is also the heart of the homosexual movement. Finally, it leads to the denial of a universal moral code, which is having and will continue to have a horrible effect on the laws of our nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Do you see a connection between culture and success for a nation? Give an example from history (e.g., period of time) to support your view. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a huge correlation between culture and success. This correlation runs deeper than the culture causing success; the culture in a way defines what success is for that nation.. How achievable that success is and how in line with God’s principles it is, will define how successful the nation is. For instance, in World War II American culture cried out for the quickest possible end to the blood shed, while Japan’s culture required the upkeep of honor above all else. America’s definition of success was more achievable (and more in line with the Bible) than Japan’s, so thus we succeeded. Another example of this can be found in the America colonies. The colony at Plymouth was founded on Biblical principles, and it was successful from the start. Yet the colony at Jamestown was founded for monetary purposes. Success in that colony was originally defined as having a lot of money, without having to work hard. Obviously, this is not very achievable or in line with the Bible, so the colony failed (until a new leader implemented a “don’t work, don’t eat” rule, redefining “success” into something achievable). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan’s great achievements both had to do with communism: he was successful in protecting America from the threat of communist missiles, and he is accredited with ending communism. The former was the product of his Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), which was an ingenious plan to protect America from communist missiles by preparing to shoot any missiles launched towards America down in space. The latter was the result of his willingness to do what it took to end communism no matter what others said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain during which century you think this map was drawn, and comment how America's achievements may have met or exceeded the expectations of the cartographer or other people of his time.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This map was probably drawn during the 16th Century, as the names of the lands labeled on it were all discovered and named by the Europeans during this century. The cartographer clearly underestimated the significance of North America. This reflected the popular belief during the 16th Century that North America was not as important as South America, as there was little prospect seen to find gold in North America. Yet while there actually was gold in the West, that was not the main misperception that the people of the 16th Century had. The main misperception was that gold would be the greatest riches to gain from this “New World”. No one ever imagined that someday the settling of North America would lead to the forming of the future richest country in the world. At that time, few even thought of settling the New World.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589767</id>
		<title>American History Homework Thirteen Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589767"/>
		<updated>2008-12-18T16:11:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinating. The study of this exciting culture along with the pondering of the question of what caused such a boom makes for a very interesting subject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton enjoyed the initial popularity that comes of economic good times. However, each one’s character was what caused his respective success or downfall. Ronald Reagan was not afraid to do what was right, regardless of what others told him to do. This did not always make him popular, but it made him a strong leader. Bill Clinton fell into the trap of sexual immorality, and was shamed by a scandal in the White House. This caused him to lose the respect of many of the American people, and his lies about this scandal led to his eventual impeachment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What would you say is the most important trend or trends guiding American history?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see two trends that have shaped and continue to shape America. The first relates to government and the second to cultural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the time of the Revolution until today, the government has gained more and more power (this is especially true regarding the federal government). This trend began early on with the shift from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, and continues to this day, as we see the court writing more and more of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American people as a whole have become more and more “tolerant” of those who are different from them (whether they are of different race, gender, religion, etc.). In the colonial times, there was a very intolerant sentiment, which continued, yet slowly lessened. Over time African Americans were freed from slavery, women gained the right to vote, African Americans and minorities attained more and more rights and so on. Today the trend is continuing beyond a tolerance of differences, to a denial of differences, and there is a sentiment that homosexuals deserve special rights. There also exists “reverse racism” (preference towards minority groups), which is essentially just racism.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What is the most important threat to the future of America? Cite history to support your view.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The post-modern worldview which is so prevalent in America today is a huge threat. Post-modernism is the belief that there is no such thing as truth; everything is relative. Post-modern adherents believe that we must tolerate all differences, and except one man’s belief as “true for him”, and another man’s opposite belief as “true for him”. Yet it is fearfully ironic that post-modernists cannot tolerate any perceived “intolerance” or a belief in absolutes, and thus, they cannot tolerate Christians. We can see the effects of post-modernism everywhere we look, and the effects are sure to continue in the future. The question stands: where will this lead us? Followed through to conclusion, post-modernism actually leads to anarchy. While I do not believe anarchy to be a threat to America at this point in time, there are other immediate dangers that come of the post-modern worldview. Post-modernism is a threat to Christian’s freedom of religion. It is also the heart of the homosexual movement. Finally, it leads to the denial of a universal moral code, which is having and will continue to have a horrible effect on the laws of our nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Do you see a connection between culture and success for a nation? Give an example from history (e.g., period of time) to support your view. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a huge correlation between culture and success. This correlation runs deeper than the culture causing success; the culture in a way defines what success is for that nation.. How achievable that success is and how in line with God’s principles it is, will define how successful the nation is. For instance, in World War II American culture cried out for the quickest possible end to the blood shed, while Japan’s culture required the upkeep of honor above all else. America’s definition of success was more achievable (and more in line with the Bible) than Japan’s, so thus we succeeded. Another example of this can be found in the America colonies. The colony at Plymouth was founded on Biblical principles, and it was successful from the start. Yet the colony at Jamestown was founded for monetary purposes. Success in that colony was originally defined as having a lot of money, without having to work hard. Obviously, this is not very achievable or in line with the Bible, so the colony failed (until a new leader implemented a “don’t work, don’t eat” rule, redefining “success” into something achievable). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan’s great achievements both had to do with communism: he was successful in protecting America from the threat of communist missiles, and he is accredited with ending communism. The former was the product of his Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), which was an ingenious plan to protect America from communist missiles by preparing to shoot any missiles launched towards America down in space. The latter was the result of his willingness to do what it took to end communism no matter what others said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain during which century you think this map was drawn, and comment how America's achievements may have met or exceeded the expectations of the cartographer or other people of his time.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This map was probably drawn during the 16th Century, as the names of the lands labeled on it were all discovered and named by the Europeans during this century. The cartographer clearly underestimated the significance of North America. This reflected the popular belief during the 16th Century that North America was not as important as South America, as there was little prospect seen to find gold in North America. Yet while there actually was gold in the West, that was not the main misperception that the people of the 16th Century had. The main misperception was that gold would be the greatest riches to gain from this “New World”. No one ever imagined that someday the settling of North America would lead to the forming of the future richest country in the world. At that time, few even thought of settling the New World.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589766</id>
		<title>American History Homework Thirteen Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589766"/>
		<updated>2008-12-18T16:11:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinating. The study of this exciting culture along with the pondering of the question of what caused such a boom makes for a very interesting subject. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton enjoyed the initial popularity that comes of economic good times. However, each one’s character was what caused his respective success or downfall. Ronald Reagan was not afraid to do what was right, regardless of what others told him to do. This did not always make him popular, but it made him a strong leader. Bill Clinton fell into the trap of sexual immorality, and was shamed by a scandal in the White House. This caused him to lose the respect of many of the American people, and his lies about this scandal led to his eventual impeachment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What would you say is the most important trend or trends guiding American history?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see two trends that have shaped and continue to shape America. The first relates to government and the second to cultural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the time of the Revolution until today, the government has gained more and more power (this is especially true regarding the federal government). This trend began early on with the shift from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, and continues to this day, as we see the court writing more and more of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American people as a whole have become more and more “tolerant” of those who are different from them (whether they are of different race, gender, religion, etc.). In the colonial times, there was a very intolerant sentiment, which continued, yet slowly lessened. Over time African Americans were freed from slavery, women gained the right to vote, African Americans and minorities attained more and more rights and so on. Today the trend is continuing beyond a tolerance of differences, to a denial of differences, and there is a sentiment that homosexuals deserve special rights. There also exists “reverse racism” (preference towards minority groups), which is essentially just racism.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What is the most important threat to the future of America? Cite history to support your view.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The post-modern worldview which is so prevalent in America today is a huge threat. Post-modernism is the belief that there is no such thing as truth; everything is relative. Post-modern adherents believe that we must tolerate all differences, and except one man’s belief as “true for him”, and another man’s opposite belief as “true for him”. Yet it is fearfully ironic that post-modernists cannot tolerate any perceived “intolerance” or a belief in absolutes, and thus, they cannot tolerate Christians. We can see the effects of post-modernism everywhere we look, and the effects are sure to continue in the future. The question stands: where will this lead us? Followed through to conclusion, post-modernism actually leads to anarchy. While I do not believe anarchy to be a threat to America at this point in time, there are other immediate dangers that come of the post-modern worldview. Post-modernism is a threat to Christian’s freedom of religion. It is also the heart of the homosexual movement. Finally, it leads to the denial of a universal moral code, which is having and will continue to have a horrible effect on the laws of our nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Do you see a connection between culture and success for a nation? Give an example from history (e.g., period of time) to support your view. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a huge correlation between culture and success. This correlation runs deeper than the culture causing success; the culture in a way defines what success is for that nation.. How achievable that success is and how in line with God’s principles it is, will define how successful the nation is. For instance, in World War II American culture cried out for the quickest possible end to the blood shed, while Japan’s culture required the upkeep of honor above all else. America’s definition of success was more achievable (and more in line with the Bible) than Japan’s, so thus we succeeded. Another example of this can be found in the America colonies. The colony at Plymouth was founded on Biblical principles, and it was successful from the start. Yet the colony at Jamestown was founded for monetary purposes. Success in that colony was originally defined as having a lot of money, without having to work hard. Obviously, this is not very achievable or in line with the Bible, so the colony failed (until a new leader implemented a “don’t work, don’t eat” rule, redefining “success” into something achievable). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan’s great achievements both had to do with communism: he was successful in protecting America from the threat of communist missiles, and he is accredited with ending communism. The former was the product of his Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), which was an ingenious plan to protect America from communist missiles by preparing to shoot any missiles launched towards America down in space. The latter was the result of his willingness to do what it took to end communism no matter what others said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain during which century you think this map was drawn, and comment how America's achievements may have met or exceeded the expectations of the cartographer or other people of his time.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This map was probably drawn during the 16th Century, as the names of the lands labeled on it were all discovered and named by the Europeans during this century. The cartographer clearly underestimated the significance of North America. This reflected the popular belief during the 16th Century that North America was not as important as South America, as there was little prospect seen to find gold in North America. Yet while there actually was gold in the West, that was not the main misperception that the people of the 16th Century had. The main misperception was that gold would be the greatest riches to gain from this “New World”. No one ever imagined that someday the settling of North America would lead to the forming of the future richest country in the world. At that time, few even thought of settling the New World.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589765</id>
		<title>American History Homework Thirteen Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Thirteen_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=589765"/>
		<updated>2008-12-18T16:09:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why?  The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinatin...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. What is your favorite period of time in American history, and why? &lt;br /&gt;
The 1920s are a very interesting time period to study. The sudden explosion of culture during this time is fascinating. The study of this exciting culture along with the pondering of the question of what caused such a boom makes for a very interesting subject. &lt;br /&gt;
2. Contrast President Ronald Reagan with President Bill Clinton. &lt;br /&gt;
Both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton enjoyed the initial popularity that comes of economic good times. However, each one’s character was what caused his respective success or downfall. Ronald Reagan was not afraid to do what was right, regardless of what others told him to do. This did not always make him popular, but it made him a strong leader. Bill Clinton fell into the trap of sexual immorality, and was shamed by a scandal in the White House. This caused him to lose the respect of many of the American people, and his lies about this scandal led to his eventual impeachment. &lt;br /&gt;
3. What would you say is the most important trend or trends guiding American history? &lt;br /&gt;
I see two trends that have shaped and continue to shape America. The first relates to government and the second to cultural. &lt;br /&gt;
From the time of the Revolution until today, the government has gained more and more power (this is especially true regarding the federal government). This trend began early on with the shift from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, and continues to this day, as we see the court writing more and more of the law.&lt;br /&gt;
The American people as a whole have become more and more “tolerant” of those who are different from them (whether they are of different race, gender, religion, etc.). In the colonial times, there was a very intolerant sentiment, which continued, yet slowly lessened. Over time African Americans were freed from slavery, women gained the right to vote, African Americans and minorities attained more and more rights and so on. Today the trend is continuing beyond a tolerance of differences, to a denial of differences, and there is a sentiment that homosexuals deserve special rights. There also exists “reverse racism” (preference towards minority groups), which is essentially just racism.  &lt;br /&gt;
4. What is the most important threat to the future of America? Cite history to support your view. &lt;br /&gt;
The post-modern worldview which is so prevalent in America today is a huge threat. Post-modernism is the belief that there is no such thing as truth; everything is relative. Post-modern adherents believe that we must tolerate all differences, and except one man’s belief as “true for him”, and another man’s opposite belief as “true for him”. Yet it is fearfully ironic that post-modernists cannot tolerate any perceived “intolerance” or a belief in absolutes, and thus, they cannot tolerate Christians. We can see the effects of post-modernism everywhere we look, and the effects are sure to continue in the future. The question stands: where will this lead us? Followed through to conclusion, post-modernism actually leads to anarchy. While I do not believe anarchy to be a threat to America at this point in time, there are other immediate dangers that come of the post-modern worldview. Post-modernism is a threat to Christian’s freedom of religion. It is also the heart of the homosexual movement. Finally, it leads to the denial of a universal moral code, which is having and will continue to have a horrible effect on the laws of our nation. &lt;br /&gt;
5. Do you see a connection between culture and success for a nation? Give an example from history (e.g., period of time) to support your view. &lt;br /&gt;
There is a huge correlation between culture and success. This correlation runs deeper than the culture causing success; the culture in a way defines what success is for that nation.. How achievable that success is and how in line with God’s principles it is, will define how successful the nation is. For instance, in World War II American culture cried out for the quickest possible end to the blood shed, while Japan’s culture required the upkeep of honor above all else. America’s definition of success was more achievable (and more in line with the Bible) than Japan’s, so thus we succeeded. Another example of this can be found in the America colonies. The colony at Plymouth was founded on Biblical principles, and it was successful from the start. Yet the colony at Jamestown was founded for monetary purposes. Success in that colony was originally defined as having a lot of money, without having to work hard. Obviously, this is not very achievable or in line with the Bible, so the colony failed (until a new leader implemented a “don’t work, don’t eat” rule, redefining “success” into something achievable). &lt;br /&gt;
6. Describe two of the greatest achievements of Ronald Reagan. &lt;br /&gt;
Ronald Reagan’s great achievements both had to do with communism: he was successful in protecting America from the threat of communist missiles, and he is accredited with ending communism. The former was the product of his Strategic Defense Initiative (or “Star Wars”), which was an ingenious plan to protect America from communist missiles by preparing to shoot any missiles launched towards America down in space. The latter was the result of his willingness to do what it took to end communism no matter what others said. &lt;br /&gt;
7. Explain during which century you think this map was drawn, and comment how America's achievements may have met or exceeded the expectations of the cartographer or other people of his time. &lt;br /&gt;
This map was probably drawn during the 16th Century, as the names of the lands labeled on it were all discovered and named by the Europeans during this century. The cartographer clearly underestimated the significance of North America. This reflected the popular belief during the 16th Century that North America was not as important as South America, as there was little prospect seen to find gold in North America. Yet while there actually was gold in the West, that was not the main misperception that the people of the 16th Century had. The main misperception was that gold would be the greatest riches to gain from this “New World”. No one ever imagined that someday the settling of North America would lead to the forming of the future richest country in the world. At that time, few even thought of settling the New World.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584024</id>
		<title>American History Homework Twelve Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584024"/>
		<updated>2008-12-11T17:06:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Who were the main protagonists in the &amp;quot;Cold War&amp;quot;, and what was the period of this &amp;quot;war&amp;quot;?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cold War was between the Unites States and the USSR, and it lasted for most of the second half of the 20th Century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify the two wars that caused over 50,000 American deaths which occurred between 1945 and 1980, and briefly state your view of the American role in those wars. Do you agree with our acceptance of the outcomes?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Korean War and the Vietnam War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was good that we intervened in Korea. However we should have stayed in the war longer and liberated North Korea as well. Today North Korea is the single most hostile country to Christianity. Without our support, South Korea would have been under this oppression as well. With our further support, neither nation would now be under such oppression.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The Vietnam War was a war that we never should have entered as it was likely incited by President Johnson. We also went about fighting the war the wrong way, and when we finally left South Vietnam (which was the nation we were supporting) immediately fell and we had accomplished nothing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Pick an aspect of the Civil Rights Movement that impressed you most, and explain why.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I find most impressive about the Civil Rights Movement is not its leader (though some, such as Martin Luther King, Jr. were quite admirable), but the way so many common people saw the problem and decided to do something about it, despite inconveniences, ridicule and even the risk of danger. Examples of common people taking a bold stand against injustice can be found in Rosa Parks who bravely protested segregation on public buses and James Meredith who succeeded in gaining his admission into the University of Mississippi. Both of these people were just common people who saw a problem and were willing to go out of their way to solve it, even amidst the great disdain of those around them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. President Lyndon Johnson is known best for two things. Pick one and explain why, providing a specific example to support your answer. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the two things that Lyndon Johnson is most famous for is pushing through the Great Society programs. The Great Society refers to attempts made by the Democrats to eliminate poverty by expanding government power. During the Johnson Administration there was a Democrat majority in both houses of Congress. For this reason, Johnson succeeded in passing many programs that were a part of the Great Society. One of these programs was the Office of Economic Opportunity which involved President Johnson giving one billon dollars for poverty relief.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What do you like best about the 80th Congress? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate that the 80th Congress was successful in limiting the powers of the executive that had been previously abused by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I also like how efficient the 80th Congress was, since there was a Republican majority in both Houses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Who do you think was the most important person between 1945 and 1980 in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the life and the death Martin Luther King Jr. spurred on the growing Civil Rights movement, which affected many people during his time and still affects people to this day. He demonstrated the power of peaceful protest in his life, and left a legacy in his tragic assassination. What makes Martin Luther King Jr. so important is not only what he did during his lifetime, but also the influence that he continued to have after his death, thanks to his strong words and inspiring life story. His “I have a dream” speech still arouses people to this day. This lasting impact demonstrates true importance. This goes to show that in general (but note, not always) peaceful protest with strong words has more of a lasting influence than violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Throughout the 1960s, what was the name used to describe the people in charge of the building pictured here, and describe their approach or ideology, mentioning at least one issue as an example.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
This is a picture of the Supreme Court building. The Warren Court is the name that was used to refer collectively to the justices that served on the Supreme Court during the time that Earl Warren was Chief Justice. Chief Justice Warren was the most activist judge in the history of the Supreme Court. Judicial activism refers to the court inventing the law, rather than simply interpreting it and is a violation of the check and balance system in the United States. Chief Justice Warren’s activism showed through in many of the Warren Court’s decisions: the Warren Court invented new constitutional “rights”, expanded the scope of the First Amendment far beyond what the language explicitly states and ruled in favor of criminals by giving criminal suspects many unnecessary rights.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584023</id>
		<title>American History Homework Twelve Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584023"/>
		<updated>2008-12-11T17:06:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Who were the main protagonists in the &amp;quot;Cold War&amp;quot;, and what was the period of this &amp;quot;war&amp;quot;?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cold War was between the Unites States and the USSR, and it lasted for most of the second half of the 20th Century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify the two wars that caused over 50,000 American deaths which occurred between 1945 and 1980, and briefly state your view of the American role in those wars. Do you agree with our acceptance of the outcomes?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Korean War and the Vietnam War&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was good that we intervened in Korea. However we should have stayed in the war longer and liberated North Korea as well. Today North Korea is the single most hostile country to Christianity. Without our support, South Korea would have been under this oppression as well. With our further support, neither nation would now be under such oppression.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
The Vietnam War was a war that we never should have entered as it was likely incited by President Johnson. We also went about fighting the war the wrong way, and when we finally left South Vietnam (which was the nation we were supporting) immediately fell and we had accomplished nothing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Pick an aspect of the Civil Rights Movement that impressed you most, and explain why.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I find most impressive about the Civil Rights Movement is not its leader (though some, such as Martin Luther King, Jr. were quite admirable), but the way so many common people saw the problem and decided to do something about it, despite inconveniences, ridicule and even the risk of danger. Examples of common people taking a bold stand against injustice can be found in Rosa Parks who bravely protested segregation on public buses and James Meredith who succeeded in gaining his admission into the University of Mississippi. Both of these people were just common people who saw a problem and were willing to go out of their way to solve it, even amidst the great disdain of those around them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. President Lyndon Johnson is known best for two things. Pick one and explain why, providing a specific example to support your answer. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the two things that Lyndon Johnson is most famous for is pushing through the Great Society programs. The Great Society refers to attempts made by the Democrats to eliminate poverty by expanding government power. During the Johnson Administration there was a Democrat majority in both houses of Congress. For this reason, Johnson succeeded in passing many programs that were a part of the Great Society. One of these programs was the Office of Economic Opportunity which involved President Johnson giving one billon dollars for poverty relief.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What do you like best about the 80th Congress? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate that the 80th Congress was successful in limiting the powers of the executive that had been previously abused by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I also like how efficient the 80th Congress was, since there was a Republican majority in both Houses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Who do you think was the most important person between 1945 and 1980 in American history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the life and the death Martin Luther King Jr. spurred on the growing Civil Rights movement, which affected many people during his time and still affects people to this day. He demonstrated the power of peaceful protest in his life, and left a legacy in his tragic assassination. What makes Martin Luther King Jr. so important is not only what he did during his lifetime, but also the influence that he continued to have after his death, thanks to his strong words and inspiring life story. His “I have a dream” speech still arouses people to this day. This lasting impact demonstrates true importance. This goes to show that in general (but note, not always) peaceful protest with strong words has more of a lasting influence than violence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Throughout the 1960s, what was the name used to describe the people in charge of the building pictured here, and describe their approach or ideology, mentioning at least one issue as an example.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
This is a picture of the Supreme Court building. The Warren Court is the name that was used to refer collectively to the justices that served on the Supreme Court during the time that Earl Warren was Chief Justice. Chief Justice Warren was the most activist judge in the history of the Supreme Court. Judicial activism refers to the court inventing the law, rather than simply interpreting it and is a violation of the check and balance system in the United States. Chief Justice Warren’s activism showed through in many of the Warren Court’s decisions: the Warren Court invented new constitutional “rights”, expanded the scope of the First Amendment far beyond what the language explicitly states and ruled in favor of criminals by giving criminal suspects many unnecessary rights.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584022</id>
		<title>American History Homework Twelve Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Twelve_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=584022"/>
		<updated>2008-12-11T17:04:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. Who were the main protagonists in the &amp;quot;Cold War&amp;quot;, and what was the period of this &amp;quot;war&amp;quot;?  The Cold War was between the Unites States and the USSR, and it lasted for most of the second h...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. Who were the main protagonists in the &amp;quot;Cold War&amp;quot;, and what was the period of this &amp;quot;war&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
The Cold War was between the Unites States and the USSR, and it lasted for most of the second half of the 20th Century. &lt;br /&gt;
2. Identify the two wars that caused over 50,000 American deaths which occurred between 1945 and 1980, and briefly state your view of the American role in those wars. Do you agree with our acceptance of the outcomes? &lt;br /&gt;
The Korean War and the Vietnam War&lt;br /&gt;
It was good that we intervened in Korea. However we should have stayed in the war longer and liberated North Korea as well. Today North Korea is the single most hostile country to Christianity. Without our support, South Korea would have been under this oppression as well. With our further support, neither nation would now be under such oppression.  &lt;br /&gt;
The Vietnam War was a war that we never should have entered as it was likely incited by President Johnson. We also went about fighting the war the wrong way, and when we finally left South Vietnam (which was the nation we were supporting) immediately fell and we had accomplished nothing. &lt;br /&gt;
3. Pick an aspect of the Civil Rights Movement that impressed you most, and explain why. &lt;br /&gt;
What I find most impressive about the Civil Rights Movement is not its leader (though some, such as Martin Luther King, Jr. were quite admirable), but the way so many common people saw the problem and decided to do something about it, despite inconveniences, ridicule and even the risk of danger. Examples of common people taking a bold stand against injustice can be found in Rosa Parks who bravely protested segregation on public buses and James Meredith who succeeded in gaining his admission into the University of Mississippi. Both of these people were just common people who saw a problem and were willing to go out of their way to solve it, even amidst the great disdain of those around them.&lt;br /&gt;
4. President Lyndon Johnson is known best for two things. Pick one and explain why, providing a specific example to support your answer. &lt;br /&gt;
One of the two things that Lyndon Johnson is most famous for is pushing through the Great Society programs. The Great Society refers to attempts made by the Democrats to eliminate poverty by expanding government power. During the Johnson Administration there was a Democrat majority in both houses of Congress. For this reason, Johnson succeeded in passing many programs that were a part of the Great Society. One of these programs was the Office of Economic Opportunity which involved President Johnson giving one billon dollars for poverty relief.&lt;br /&gt;
5. What do you like best about the 80th Congress? Explain. &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate that the 80th Congress was successful in limiting the powers of the executive that had been previously abused by Franklin Delano Roosevelt. I also like how efficient the 80th Congress was, since there was a Republican majority in both Houses. &lt;br /&gt;
6. Who do you think was the most important person between 1945 and 1980 in American history, and why? &lt;br /&gt;
Both the life and the death Martin Luther King Jr. spurred on the growing Civil Rights movement, which affected many people during his time and still affects people to this day. He demonstrated the power of peaceful protest in his life, and left a legacy in his tragic assassination. What makes Martin Luther King Jr. so important is not only what he did during his lifetime, but also the influence that he continued to have after his death, thanks to his strong words and inspiring life story. His “I have a dream” speech still arouses people to this day. This lasting impact demonstrates true importance. This goes to show that in general (but note, not always) peaceful protest with strong words has more of a lasting influence than violence.&lt;br /&gt;
7. Throughout the 1960s, what was the name used to describe the people in charge of the building pictured here, and describe their approach or ideology, mentioning at least one issue as an example. &lt;br /&gt;
This is a picture of the Supreme Court building. The Warren Court is the name that was used to refer collectively to the justices that served on the Supreme Court during the time that Earl Warren was Chief Justice. Chief Justice Warren was the most activist judge in the history of the Supreme Court. Judicial activism refers to the court inventing the law, rather than simply interpreting it and is a violation of the check and balance system in the United States. Chief Justice Warren’s activism showed through in many of the Warren Court’s decisions: the Warren Court invented new constitutional “rights”, expanded the scope of the First Amendment far beyond what the language explicitly states and ruled in favor of criminals by giving criminal suspects many unnecessary rights.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577419</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577419"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:41:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I prefer the approach used from 1905 through 1914 over the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed ''laissez-faire'' economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which certainly inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to a drastic measure (in this case, using the atomic bomb). The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an ''individual'' to place value on one life over another, it remains a ''nation’s'' duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577416</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577416"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:38:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I prefer the approach used from 1905 through 1914 over the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed ''laissez-faire'' economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which certainly inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577415</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577415"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:38:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I prefer the approach used from 1905 through 1914 over the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed ''laissez-faire'' economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which also inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577413</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577413"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:36:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I prefer the approach used from 1905 through 1914 over the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed laissez-faire economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which also inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577402</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577402"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:32:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I the approach used from 1905 through 1914 better than the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed laissez-faire economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which also inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577401</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=577401"/>
		<updated>2008-12-04T15:31:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I the approach used from 1905 through 1914 better than the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed laissez-faire economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which also inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret and explain the cartoon, including an estimate of its date. (It was published by a paper in New Jersey years ago.)''' &lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon displays the ghost of Theodore Roosevelt looking on in disgust at how his fifth cousin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt took his “big stick” policy to a much higher extreme than he had ever intended for it. In this context “big stick” refers to the federal government (and furthermore, the executive branch) having a large amount of power. When the democrat FDR was president there was a democrat majority in both the House and the Senate. For that reason, Congress went along with virtually everything that FDR introduced—and FDR introduced more than any president before him with his New Deal. This cartoon portrays this relationship between Congress and the executive by showing two men (representing the House and the Senate) carrying huge sticks to the White House as “gifts” for the president (FDR). This was probably drawn in 1933, the year that FDR took office and proceeded to make more changes to the American government than any president before or after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History lectures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=575804</id>
		<title>American History Homework Eleven Answers - Student Six</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Eleven_Answers_-_Student_Six&amp;diff=575804"/>
		<updated>2008-12-02T23:13:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: '''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''   ''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under th...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. This course is mostly over. Can you now identify a value in learning history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
''What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
History is full of nations and individuals who made the same mistakes as those who came before them. As this verse says, there is nothing new under the sun. Following this logic, we see that the study of history will reveal to us old mistakes that could be repeated. The study of history, along with a firm understanding of the root of past problems, can be helpful in avoiding future problems. For instance, the liberal political ideology of taxing the rich to give to the poor sounds good in theory. However, if one studies history carefully it will become apparent that this idea is reminiscent of communism, which was a horrible failure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Was the United States right to enter World War II, and should we have entered sooner or later?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was wrong that we did not take more effort to protect ourselves from the events that lead up to our joining World War II, yet the events that did happen were legitimate reasons for our entering the war. Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor in December of 1941. In theory, this was a legitimate reason to enter the war. However, it has been speculated that President Franklin D. Roosevelt knew that Japan had made plans to attack Pearl Harbor, yet did nothing about it. Roosevelt had also worked hard to incite support in Congress and among the American public for joining the war before this. This incitation and the failure to protect Pearl Harbor were wrong, yet the actual act of joining the war after we were attacked was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Which of the approaches in American history towards immigration do you like best, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I like the approach used from 1905 through 1914. There were no limits set regarding how many people could immigrate from a particular nation. I appreciate this because I believe that legislation that limits immigration by country of origin is often the result of prejudice and irrational fear or hate. An example of how this can hurt our nation and good, hard-working people can be found in the life of my great-grandfather. He emigrated from Italy during this time period (in 1912), and later willingly served America in its fight against the nation of his origin during World War I. In 1924, due to the American people’s mistrust of Italians, the United States implemented legislation that severely reduced immigration from Italy and thus inhibited the immigration of other potential upstanding citizens like my great-grandfather. I the approach used from 1905 through 1914 better than the one used today because it encouraged legal immigration, unlike the approach today does. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Pick out something from the &amp;quot;Roaring Twenties&amp;quot; and describe what you like about it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The sudden development of art, music, technology and culture associated with the Roaring Twenties is fascinating. The question of what caused this free expression and development is an interesting one to explore. I see many causes for it. First, the economy was under Republican control at that time and followed laissez-faire economics, which encourages initiative, entrepreneurship and free exploration of ideas. Also, racial segregation was seeing the beginning of its end, and this led to the development of a blended culture (often called a “melting pot”) entirely unique to America (for instance, the Jazz music of the 1920s combined elements from African and European music). Finally, the end of World War I, which at that time was thought to have been “the war to end all wars”, gave a certain blissfulness to the times, which also inspired people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. What is your view of the New Deal, and what might you have done differently in response to the Great Depression?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are natural swings in the economy, and government policies and programs such as the ones that FDR implemented in the New Deal can do little to change this. The previous statement can be proven by observing recent history. In the past forty years the economy had flourished twice: once under the Reagan administration and once under the Clinton administration. There could not possibly be two more opposite economic policies than the policies of these administrations. This leads to the conclusion that the government has little effect on the economy. In FDR’s position, I would have used any money set aside to boost the economy to invest in the free market by giving grants to businesses rather than by employing individuals directly by the government. This would provide long-term jobs (as opposed to the short-term ones that FDR’s plan provided), and encourage business and the free market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Do you think we should have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Explain.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Japan was a formidable and brutal enemy in World War II. Because of their culture’s call to uphold honor over all else, the Japanese would literally fight to the death before surrendering. This obviously presented a huge challenge to America. We had only two options: to participate in a long drawn-out blood bath or to resort to using the atomic bomb. The former would have resulted in a huge loss of life on both sides, while the latter only required the loss of life on the Japanese side. While I believe it is morally wrong for an individual to place value on one life over another, it remains a nation’s duty to look after its own citizens over the citizens of another nation. Thus, I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and furthermore, the best option America had at the time.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566977</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566977"/>
		<updated>2008-11-23T19:54:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar questions on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly” and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do.  However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 18th Amendment established Prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. This amendment was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia, and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566973</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566973"/>
		<updated>2008-11-23T19:50:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar questions on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly”, and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do. Like Woodrow, keeping the US out of unnecessary war should be the goal of any president. However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 18th Amendment established Prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. It was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566375</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566375"/>
		<updated>2008-11-22T21:28:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar question on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly”, and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do. Like Woodrow, keeping the US out of unnecessary war should be the goal of any president. However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 18th Amendment established Prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. It was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566372</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566372"/>
		<updated>2008-11-22T21:27:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar question on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly”, and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do. Like Woodrow, keeping the US out of unnecessary war should be the goal of any president. However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 18th Amendment established Prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. It was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566370</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566370"/>
		<updated>2008-11-22T21:27:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar question on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly”, and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do. Like Woodrow, keeping the US out of unnecessary war should be the goal of any president. However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The 18th Amendment established prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. It was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566369</id>
		<title>American History Homework Ten Answers - Student 21</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Ten_Answers_-_Student_21&amp;diff=566369"/>
		<updated>2008-11-22T21:26:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: '''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''  I feel I utilized the time I took t...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. How could you have prepared better for the midterm exam, and which part of American history do you think you could improve most for next time?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel I utilized the time I took to study well; I devoted my time to understanding concepts, trends, timeline and significant details, rather than obscure details or specific dates. However I did not set aside enough time for studying, and thus I was not fully prepared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next time I should put a greater emphasis on learning the important documents and writings of US history as three of the seven questions I got wrong were about documents.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Which is your favorite question on the midterm exam that you missed, and what do you like about the question or subject matter?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I appreciated question twenty-six. It required combining critical thinking with the facts we had learned about US history. I enjoyed this challenge, and hope to do better with any similar question on the final.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Comment on any aspect of the Scopes Trial or the issues leading up to it, and/or can you compare it to any other influential trial in American history?'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As a member of a Mock Trial team, I found it very interesting that the attorney, Bryan, allowed himself to be cross-examined as a witness by his opposing council, Darrow. I looked this cross-examination up online, and found the use of witticisms by both Bryan and Darrow to be very interesting (not to mention amusing). Humor can be a very powerful tool in conveying a point, covering up a blunder or squelching an opponent’s originally well-made point. The following excerpt is an example of both Darrow and Bryan utilizing humor to smooth over the other’s somewhat damaging remark: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: Can you answer my question?&lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: When you let me finish the statement.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: It is a simple question, but finish it. &lt;br /&gt;
BRYAN: You cannot measure the length of my answer by the length of your question.&lt;br /&gt;
DARROW: No, except that the answer will be longer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you think the United States should have entered World War I, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''“Speak softly and carry a big stick.” –Teddy Roosevelt''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This quote perfectly explains the best policy regarding war and foreign affairs. Woodrow Wilson ran for president by promising to “speak softly”, and keep America out of World War I, and this is exactly what he attempted to do. Like Woodrow, keeping the US out of unnecessary war should be the goal of any president. However, numerous violent acts towards American ships and the threat of an attack from Mexico pushed the peace-loving Woodrow to declare war. A “big stick” is not very threatening if everyone knows that the carrier is too afraid to use it. The acts of violence were certainly reason enough for us to join the war. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Your view of Teddy Roosevelt, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I admire Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to do what he believed to be right, regardless of what side his party took on an issue. This is an admirable and rare trait in a politician. I also appreciate that he saw the value in our natural resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Pick one of the Constitutional Amendments 16 through 19, and express your understanding and view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 The 18th Amendment established prohibition, which essentially banned alcohol. This was in response to a movement that had been growing for decades. The Prohibition movement was inspired by Christian women (the involvement of women was probably the main reason it took so long for women to receive the right to vote, as men did not want to lose alcohol).I believe that this amendment was unconstitutional as it inhibited the freedom of religion (many religions, such as Judaism, have religious traditions that involve alcohol). It was also impractical as it increased illegal activity tremendously. It was reversed by the 21st Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the cartoon.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man on the left represents Russia and the man on the right represents Japan. The man in the middle is Teddy Roosevelt. This cartoon portrays the Treaty of Portsmouth (1905) that ended the Russo-Japanese War. President Roosevelt was a peacemaker, and also very involved in foreign affairs. He negotiated the peace terms of this war between Japan and Russia. The angel wings on Roosevelt presumably reflect upon his “angelic” peacemaking abilities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=556151</id>
		<title>American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=556151"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T14:48:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. In your opinion, the 2008 election that concluded on Tuesday is most similar to which election in history, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 election is in many ways reminiscent of the election of 1932 which was held between the Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Republican incumbent Herbert Hoover. The year 1932 was economically disastrous and the American people naturally wanted change in the economy. Just as Americans did not think that John McCain, being from the same party as President George W. Bush, could reverse the economic turmoil, so the Americans in 1932 believed that their current president, Hoover, could not reverse the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the 1925 election in a landslide by promising to implement his elusive “New Deal” just as President Elect Barack Obama won the election of 2008 in a landslide by promising to implement his elusive plans for “change”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Imperialism: a good or bad thing?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Imperialism is essentially greed and pride played out on the grand scale. It is greed for an obvious reason: the expansion of a nation’s territories and influence often results in financial benefit for its citizens. Imperialism is prideful in that it requires the imperialistic nation to believe that it is better than the nation that it desires to take over. Obviously greed and pride are wrong, so it follows that imperialism is wrong. Beyond this, if war is required, the lives of the soldiers of the imperialistic nation are put at risk. There are certainly times and places where it would be appropriate for soldiers to give their lives for their country, but this unnecessary expansion is not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Your thoughts on the progressive movement, please.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The progressive movement did not call for more government (as liberals do) or for less government (as conservatives do); it called for “better” government. It sought to draw from both parties in a compromise that would ultimately benefit all. This is a good idea in theory, and it actually succeeded in bringing about many important changes and reforms. For what it was, the progressive movement was a huge success and is perhaps the best example in the history of American politics of successful compromise. The ironic thing about this movement (and probably the reason that it didn’t last long) is that both liberals and conservatives believe that their government ideology is “better”, so progressivism effectively leaves both sides feeling not fully satisfied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Please explain the cartoon in the Minnesota Tribune, having the caption at top, &amp;quot;WHAT WILL HE DO!&amp;quot; and the caption at the bottom, &amp;quot;The eyes of the world are upon him.&amp;quot; Include your description of the point of view of the cartoonist.'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The man in this cartoon is President McKinley, and the child is a Filipino boy, presumably representing the Filipino people as a whole. This cartoon was draw after the fighting in the Philippians between the Unites States and Spain (during the Spanish-American War of the early 20th century) had ceased and President McKinley had to decide whether to keep the Philippians as a US territory or to return them to Spain. Like most all of the media at this time, this cartoonist supported keeping the Philippians as a US territory. This is demonstrated in that Spain is portrayed as in the same “direction” as a cliff. This was meant to communicate that McKinley giving the Philippians to Spain would be like him throwing them off a cliff. This reflected the popular view that the Spanish would mistreat the Filipinos. The world was watching to see what McKinley would decide in this matter as Spain and America were both world powers, so hence the man with a globe as a head looking on in the background.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=556149</id>
		<title>American History Homework Nine Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Nine_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=556149"/>
		<updated>2008-11-13T14:47:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. In your opinion, the 2008 election that concluded on Tuesday is most similar to which election in history, and why?  The 2008 election is in many ways reminiscent of the election of 193...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. In your opinion, the 2008 election that concluded on Tuesday is most similar to which election in history, and why? &lt;br /&gt;
The 2008 election is in many ways reminiscent of the election of 1932 which was held between the Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Republican incumbent Herbert Hoover. The year 1932 was economically disastrous and the American people naturally wanted change in the economy. Just as Americans did not think that John McCain, being from the same party as President George W. Bush, could reverse the economic turmoil, so the Americans in 1932 believed that their current president, Hoover, could not reverse the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt won the 1925 election in a landslide by promising to implement his elusive “New Deal” just as President Elect Barack Obama won the election of 2008 in a landslide by promising to implement his elusive plans for “change”. &lt;br /&gt;
2. Imperialism: a good or bad thing? 	&lt;br /&gt;
Imperialism is essentially greed and pride played out on the grand scale. It is greed for an obvious reason: the expansion of a nation’s territories and influence often results in financial benefit for its citizens. Imperialism is prideful in that it requires the imperialistic nation to believe that it is better than the nation that it desires to take over. Obviously greed and pride are wrong, so it follows that imperialism is wrong. Beyond this, if war is required, the lives of the soldiers of the imperialistic nation are put at risk. There are certainly times and places where it would be appropriate for soldiers to give their lives for their country, but this unnecessary expansion is not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
3. Your thoughts on the progressive movement, please. &lt;br /&gt;
The progressive movement did not call for more government (as liberals do) or for less government (as conservatives do); it called for “better” government. It sought to draw from both parties in a compromise that would ultimately benefit all. This is a good idea in theory, and it actually succeeded in bringing about many important changes and reforms. For what it was, the progressive movement was a huge success and is perhaps the best example in the history of American politics of successful compromise. The ironic thing about this movement (and probably the reason that it didn’t last long) is that both liberals and conservatives believe that their government ideology is “better”, so progressivism effectively leaves both sides feeling not fully satisfied. &lt;br /&gt;
4. Please explain the cartoon in the Minnesota Tribune, having the caption at top, &amp;quot;WHAT WILL HE DO!&amp;quot; and the caption at the bottom, &amp;quot;The eyes of the world are upon him.&amp;quot; Include your description of the point of view of the cartoonist. &lt;br /&gt;
The man in this cartoon is President McKinley, and the child is a Filipino boy, presumably representing the Filipino people as a whole. This cartoon was draw after the fighting in the Philippians between the Unites States and Spain (during the Spanish-American War of the early 20th century) had ceased and President McKinley had to decide whether to keep the Philippians as a US territory or to return them to Spain. Like most all of the media at this time, this cartoonist supported keeping the Philippians as a US territory. This is demonstrated in that Spain is portrayed as in the same “direction” as a cliff. This was meant to communicate that McKinley giving the Philippians to Spain would be like him throwing them off a cliff. This reflected the popular view that the Spanish would mistreat the Filipinos. The world was watching to see what McKinley would decide in this matter as Spain and America were both world powers, so hence the man with a globe as a head looking on in the background.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546147</id>
		<title>American History Homework Seven Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546147"/>
		<updated>2008-10-31T14:51:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What was the &amp;quot;Gilded Age&amp;quot;?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gilded Age (1865-1901) refers to the time of prosperity and wealth that America enjoyed after the Civil War. It is named the “Gilded Age” as opposed to the “Golden Age” in reference to the fact that while it was apparently “golden” (prosperous), there was much corruption and greed beneath that wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. What do you like about Thomas Edison, and do you think homeschooling him created enormous wealth?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Edison never gave up, even when there was no end in sight. I find this very inspiring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling probably gave Thomas Edison his rigorous work ethic, as the free exploration in learning that homeschooling involves teaches the student to learn and discover on his own. This in turn generally develops a hard working student. Without a strong work ethic, Edison would have never succeeded in inventing the light bulb. It took him 2,000 tries to find a filament that worked for the light bulb; he would have never gotten to his 2,000th attempt without a strong work ethic. The invention of the light bulb, like most inventions, created wealth. Thus from the reasoning above, homeschooling Edison essentially created wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. How do you think the frontier might have affected the views of Americans?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frontier gave Americans a false sense of security in their resources. Many Americans were under the impression that the supply of land, animals and resources on the frontier were endless. This sentiment often resulted in wastefulness on the part of the Americans. For instance, the bison that once covered the plains of the Midwest were almost entirely killed off. As men rode the cross country train, they would shoot at the bison for the mere sport of it. This not only nearly destroyed these animals, but worse than that it also destroyed many Indians’ sources of food and clothing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What do you think is special about the United States that has made it the world leader in inventions?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who first immigrated to America were not average. They were the ones that did not “fit in” with the old world (Europe).  They were extremely creative and thoughtful; they were idealists; they were not afraid of hard work. Children often inherit many of their parents’ character traits. This work ethic and creativity were surely passed down from generation to generation, and essentially became a part of the culture. A hardworking and creative culture is the perfect base for inventiveness. On top of this base, the American government itself has encouraged inventiveness by providing the patent system to ensure that inventors receive the money that they deserve for their efforts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. How influential do you think political cartoons really are? Give an example or two.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The influence of political cartoons can be best understood by remembering the idiom “a picture is worth a thousand words”. A cartoon portrays the same idea or position that an article would yet it can be understood after one careful glance, while an article must be read before it can have any influence. A picture is also more stimulating than an article, and thus leaves a more lasting impression. An example of the huge influence of political cartoonists is found in the story of Thomas Nash. Nash was an artist who exposed the corruption of the New York City government through a series of cartoons. His cartoons, like any good cartoons, could be quickly understood and left a strong impression. Thus they were more successful with exposing the corruption than any written articles were.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Other than Thomas Edison, who do you think was the most influential person between 1877 and 1896?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John D. Rockefeller controlled the oil industry during this time, and thus had a huge influence on the economy. As a side note, he always gave ten percent of his income to the church, but as his wealth increased, so did his giving. Rockefeller also gave massive amounts to universities, and thus had influence there too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret the above cartoon, with special emphasis on explaining the images used and including a description of the point of view of the cartoonist.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon was a result of the debate between the supporters of a money system based solely on gold and the supporters of a money system based on silver as well. Westerners supported a system that included silver because there was silver to be mined in the West so that would benefit them financially. The cartoonist was probably a Westerner since in this cartoon Uncle Sam (America) is depicted on horse back, riding towards the mountains (like a Westerner), and, moreover, because the cartoon is blatantly in favor of silver as a money source (silver is shown as being in the same direction as prosperity and gold is displayed as quick sand).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546146</id>
		<title>American History Homework Seven Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546146"/>
		<updated>2008-10-31T14:51:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What was the &amp;quot;Gilded Age&amp;quot;?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gilded Age (1865-1901) refers to the time of prosperity and wealth that America enjoyed after the Civil War. It is named the “Gilded Age” as opposed to the “Golden Age” in reference to the fact that while it was apparently “golden” (prosperous), there was much corruption and greed beneath that wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. What do you like about Thomas Edison, and do you think homeschooling him created enormous wealth?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Edison never gave up, even when there was no end in sight. I find this very inspiring.&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling probably gave Thomas Edison his rigorous work ethic, as the free exploration in learning that homeschooling involves teaches the student to learn and discover on his own. This in turn generally develops a hard working student. Without a strong work ethic, Edison would have never succeeded in inventing the light bulb. It took him 2,000 tries to find a filament that worked for the light bulb; he would have never gotten to his 2,000th attempt without a strong work ethic. The invention of the light bulb, like most inventions, created wealth. Thus from the reasoning above, homeschooling Edison essentially created wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. How do you think the frontier might have affected the views of Americans?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The frontier gave Americans a false sense of security in their resources. Many Americans were under the impression that the supply of land, animals and resources on the frontier were endless. This sentiment often resulted in wastefulness on the part of the Americans. For instance, the bison that once covered the plains of the Midwest were almost entirely killed off. As men rode the cross country train, they would shoot at the bison for the mere sport of it. This not only nearly destroyed these animals, but worse than that it also destroyed many Indians’ sources of food and clothing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. What do you think is special about the United States that has made it the world leader in inventions?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The people who first immigrated to America were not average. They were the ones that did not “fit in” with the old world (Europe).  They were extremely creative and thoughtful; they were idealists; they were not afraid of hard work. Children often inherit many of their parents’ character traits. This work ethic and creativity were surely passed down from generation to generation, and essentially became a part of the culture. A hardworking and creative culture is the perfect base for inventiveness. On top of this base, the American government itself has encouraged inventiveness by providing the patent system to ensure that inventors receive the money that they deserve for their efforts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. How influential do you think political cartoons really are? Give an example or two.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The influence of political cartoons can be best understood by remembering the idiom “a picture is worth a thousand words”. A cartoon portrays the same idea or position that an article would yet it can be understood after one careful glance, while an article must be read before it can have any influence. A picture is also more stimulating than an article, and thus leaves a more lasting impression. An example of the huge influence of political cartoonists is found in the story of Thomas Nash. Nash was an artist who exposed the corruption of the New York City government through a series of cartoons. His cartoons, like any good cartoons, could be quickly understood and left a strong impression. Thus they were more successful with exposing the corruption than any written articles were.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Other than Thomas Edison, who do you think was the most influential person between 1877 and 1896?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John D. Rockefeller controlled the oil industry during this time, and thus had a huge influence on the economy. As a side note, he always gave ten percent of his income to the church, but as his wealth increased, so did his giving. Rockefeller also gave massive amounts to universities, and thus had influence there too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret the above cartoon, with special emphasis on explaining the images used and including a description of the point of view of the cartoonist.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon was a result of the debate between the supporters of a money system based solely on gold and the supporters of a money system based on silver as well. Westerners supported a system that included silver because there was silver to be mined in the West so that would benefit them financially. The cartoonist was probably a Westerner since in this cartoon Uncle Sam (America) is depicted on horse back, riding towards the mountains (like a Westerner), and, moreover, because the cartoon is blatantly in favor of silver as a money source (silver is shown as being in the same direction as prosperity and gold is displayed as quick sand).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546145</id>
		<title>American History Homework Seven Answers - Student Thirteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Seven_Answers_-_Student_Thirteen&amp;diff=546145"/>
		<updated>2008-10-31T14:50:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. What was the &amp;quot;Gilded Age&amp;quot;?  The Gilded Age (1865-1901) refers to the time of prosperity and wealth that America enjoyed after the Civil War. It is named the “Gilded Age” as opposed ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. What was the &amp;quot;Gilded Age&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;
The Gilded Age (1865-1901) refers to the time of prosperity and wealth that America enjoyed after the Civil War. It is named the “Gilded Age” as opposed to the “Golden Age” in reference to the fact that while it was apparently “golden” (prosperous), there was much corruption and greed beneath that wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
2. What do you like about Thomas Edison, and do you think homeschooling him created enormous wealth? &lt;br /&gt;
Thomas Edison never gave up, even when there was no end in sight. I find this very inspiring.&lt;br /&gt;
Homeschooling probably gave Thomas Edison his rigorous work ethic, as the free exploration in learning that homeschooling involves teaches the student to learn and discover on his own. This in turn generally develops a hard working student. Without a strong work ethic, Edison would have never succeeded in inventing the light bulb. It took him 2,000 tries to find a filament that worked for the light bulb; he would have never gotten to his 2,000th attempt without a strong work ethic. The invention of the light bulb, like most inventions, created wealth. Thus from the reasoning above, homeschooling Edison essentially created wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
3. How do you think the frontier might have affected the views of Americans? &lt;br /&gt;
The frontier gave Americans a false sense of security in their resources. Many Americans were under the impression that the supply of land, animals and resources on the frontier were endless. This sentiment often resulted in wastefulness on the part of the Americans. For instance, the bison that once covered the plains of the Midwest were almost entirely killed off. As men rode the cross country train, they would shoot at the bison for the mere sport of it. This not only nearly destroyed these animals, but worse than that it also destroyed many Indians’ sources of food and clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
4. What do you think is special about the United States that has made it the world leader in inventions? &lt;br /&gt;
The people who first immigrated to America were not average. They were the ones that did not “fit in” with the old world (Europe).  They were extremely creative and thoughtful; they were idealists; they were not afraid of hard work. Children often inherit many of their parents’ character traits. This work ethic and creativity were surely passed down from generation to generation, and essentially became a part of the culture. A hardworking and creative culture is the perfect base for inventiveness. On top of this base, the American government itself has encouraged inventiveness by providing the patent system to ensure that inventors receive the money that they deserve for their efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
5. How influential do you think political cartoons really are? Give an example or two. &lt;br /&gt;
The influence of political cartoons can be best understood by remembering the idiom “a picture is worth a thousand words”. A cartoon portrays the same idea or position that an article would yet it can be understood after one careful glance, while an article must be read before it can have any influence. A picture is also more stimulating than an article, and thus leaves a more lasting impression. An example of the huge influence of political cartoonists is found in the story of Thomas Nash. Nash was an artist who exposed the corruption of the New York City government through a series of cartoons. His cartoons, like any good cartoons, could be quickly understood and left a strong impression. Thus they were more successful with exposing the corruption than any written articles were.&lt;br /&gt;
6. Other than Thomas Edison, who do you think was the most influential person between 1877 and 1896? &lt;br /&gt;
John D. Rockefeller controlled the oil industry during this time, and thus had a huge influence on the economy. As a side note, he always gave ten percent of his income to the church, but as his wealth increased, so did his giving. Rockefeller also gave massive amounts to universities, and thus had influence there too. &lt;br /&gt;
7. Please interpret the above cartoon, with special emphasis on explaining the images used and including a description of the point of view of the cartoonist. &lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon was a result of the debate between the supporters of a money system based solely on gold and the supporters of a money system based on silver as well. Westerners supported a system that included silver because there was silver to be mined in the West so that would benefit them financially. The cartoonist was probably a Westerner since in this cartoon Uncle Sam (America) is depicted on horse back, riding towards the mountains (like a Westerner), and, moreover, because the cartoon is blatantly in favor of silver as a money source (silver is shown as being in the same direction as prosperity and gold is displayed as quick sand).&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Six_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=541327</id>
		<title>American History Homework Six Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Six_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=541327"/>
		<updated>2008-10-23T14:45:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Was the main goal of the newly elected President Lincoln to end slavery, or save the Union?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Lincoln’s main goal was to keep the Union together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Explain the purposes of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All three of these amendments were passed to protect the rights of African Americans. More specifically, the 13th Amendment banned slavery, the 14th Amendment gave all races equal rights and the 15th Amendment gave all races the right to vote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Who was your favorite military figure from the Civil War, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I greatly admire Stonewall Jackson. Although he was a general for the Confederacy and I do not agree with what he stood for, he was an outstanding fighter, leader and general. Moreover, I respect him for his determination. He is famous for being like a “stonewall” and never backing down. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. How would you have handled Reconstruction differently?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first president elected after Lincoln was Ulysses S. Grant (note this excludes Andrew Johnson who became president upon Lincoln’s death). Grant had been the general for the Union army. A man not so heavily involved in the war would have been better fit for the job of bringing the two sides back together.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Abraham Lincoln was homeschooled. Do you see any characteristics in him that might have reflected his homeschooling, such as his independent thinking?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lincoln was not afraid to do what he believed was right even if it made him unpopular. During his presidency he was often thought of a failure; it was not until afterwards that people began to appreciate him. Yet he did not let this bother him. Homeschool students spend their early years at home learning their morals from their parents, while public school students spend their early years at school, where they are constantly exposed to peer pressure. Lincoln had clearly learned from his homeschool experience that doing what is right is more important than doing what is pleasing to others. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Please interpret the cartoon about the dream to the right. Its title is &amp;quot;Abraham's dream!--'Coming events cast their shadows before.'&amp;quot; Lincoln is fleeing to left while wearing a Scotsman's plaid cap and a cape. He declares, &amp;quot;This don't remind me of any joke!!&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon speculates on Lincoln’s fears, by portraying him as dreaming about possible future events. In the dream, Columbia (representing America) is seen holding the head of a black man, Lincoln is fleeing the White House and a man in uniform (presumably a southern general) is entering the White House. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The media often portrayed Lincoln as wearing a Scotsman’s plaid cap and cape disguise to make fun of his “timidity”. Before his first inauguration, under the threat of assassination, Lincoln rode a train in disguise. The press never let him off the hook for this, and Lincoln’s wearing the Scotsman’s cape and cap were an indirect reference to that event and the character traits that caused him to do such a thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Please interpret the cartoon with Columbia below. The caption is, &amp;quot;The Chinese Question.&amp;quot; Columbia says, &amp;quot;Hands off, gentlemen. America means fair play for all men.&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this cartoon angry American workers are shown ready to attack a Chinese immigrant. Columbia (representing America) stands over the Chinese man protecting him. This was probably drawn in response to The Burlingame Treaty in which the US granted the Chinese the right to unrestricted immigration. The workers in the cartoon are angry because the Chinese immigrants are taking their jobs. America is shown protecting the Chinese man because that is essentially what she did through the Burlingame Treaty.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Six_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=541325</id>
		<title>American History Homework Six Answers - Student Nine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Six_Answers_-_Student_Nine&amp;diff=541325"/>
		<updated>2008-10-23T14:44:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. Was the main goal of the newly elected President Lincoln to end slavery, or save the Union?  President Lincoln’s main goal was to keep the Union together.  2. Explain the purposes of ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. Was the main goal of the newly elected President Lincoln to end slavery, or save the Union? &lt;br /&gt;
President Lincoln’s main goal was to keep the Union together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Explain the purposes of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
All three of these amendments were passed to protect the rights of African Americans. More specifically, the 13th Amendment banned slavery, the 14th Amendment gave all races equal rights and the 15th Amendment gave all races the right to vote. &lt;br /&gt;
3. Who was your favorite military figure from the Civil War, and why? &lt;br /&gt;
I greatly admire Stonewall Jackson. Although he was a general for the Confederacy and I do not agree with what he stood for, he was an outstanding fighter, leader and general. Moreover, I respect him for his determination. He is famous for being like a “stonewall” and never backing down. &lt;br /&gt;
4. How would you have handled Reconstruction differently? &lt;br /&gt;
The first president elected after Lincoln was Ulysses S. Grant (note this excludes Andrew Johnson who became president upon Lincoln’s death). Grant had been the general for the Union army. A man not so heavily involved in the war would have been better fit for the job of bringing the two sides back together.    &lt;br /&gt;
5. Abraham Lincoln was homeschooled. Do you see any characteristics in him that might have reflected his homeschooling, such as his independent thinking? &lt;br /&gt;
Lincoln was not afraid to do what he believed was right even if it made him unpopular. During his presidency he was often thought of a failure; it was not until afterwards that people began to appreciate him. Yet he did not let this bother him. Homeschool students spend their early years at home learning their morals from their parents, while public school students spend their early years at school, where they are constantly exposed to peer pressure. Lincoln had clearly learned from his homeschool experience that doing what is right is more important than doing what is pleasing to others. &lt;br /&gt;
6. Please interpret the cartoon about the dream to the right. Its title is &amp;quot;Abraham's dream!--'Coming events cast their shadows before.'&amp;quot; Lincoln is fleeing to left while wearing a Scotsman's plaid cap and a cape. He declares, &amp;quot;This don't remind me of any joke!!&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon speculates on Lincoln’s fears, by portraying him as dreaming about possible future events. In the dream, Columbia (representing America) is seen holding the head of a black man, Lincoln is fleeing the White House and a man in uniform (presumably a southern general) is entering the White House. &lt;br /&gt;
The media often portrayed Lincoln as wearing a Scotsman’s plaid cap and cape disguise to make fun of his “timidity”. Before his first inauguration, under the threat of assassination, Lincoln rode a train in disguise. The press never let him off the hook for this, and Lincoln’s wearing the Scotsman’s cape and cap were an indirect reference to that event and the character traits that caused him to do such a thing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Please interpret the cartoon with Columbia below. The caption is, &amp;quot;The Chinese Question.&amp;quot; Columbia says, &amp;quot;Hands off, gentlemen. America means fair play for all men.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
In this cartoon angry American workers are shown ready to attack a Chinese immigrant. Columbia (representing America) stands over the Chinese man protecting him. This was probably drawn in response to The Burlingame Treaty in which the US granted the Chinese the right to unrestricted immigration. The workers in the cartoon are angry because the Chinese immigrants are taking their jobs. America is shown protecting the Chinese man because that is essentially what she did through the Burlingame Treaty.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537327</id>
		<title>American History Homework Five Answers - Student Sixteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537327"/>
		<updated>2008-10-16T15:58:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the &amp;quot;Know Nothing Party.&amp;quot; The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of tariffs to promote domestic manufacturing, and it was also in favor of a national bank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mexican War was a result of the Manifest Destiny sentiment in America (the belief of many Americans that it was God’s will for the nation to expand), and the sequential border dispute between the US and Mexico. It is uncertain to this day which nation actually instigated the violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The war ended when the US army took over Mexico City, and the chief clerk of the Department of State, Nicholas Trist, came to negotiate the peace terms. Trist was a true peacemaker and displeased the president with his rather generous terms. Still, he did successfully end the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852. This novel stirred up the anti-slavery sentiment and was a bestselling book in both the United States and Europe. The effect of Uncle Tom’s Cabin demonstrated the truth of the idiom “The pen is mightier than the sword”. The book was so powerful that it was banned in the Southern states. Force surely won the Civil War, but the ideals that this book inspired were what made this war a victory in the true sense of the word. Abraham Lincoln described Harriet Beecher Stowe as, “The little woman who started this great war.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain what &amp;quot;Bleeding Kansas&amp;quot; was.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bleeding Kansas refers a time of violence in Kansas right before it received its statehood. The violence was the result of the recently passed Kansas-Nebraska Act which established “popular sovereignty” (the right of a potential state to decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state). Bleeding Kansas consisted of a string of random acts of violence on the part of both sides of the issues of slavery and was essentially a preamble to the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, &amp;quot;You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ....&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The woman represents America, and the man receiving the beating represents Stephen Douglas. This cartoon was drawn in reaction to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill that Stephen Douglas pushed through the Senate. The Kansas-Nebraska Bill established that a new state entering the Union would decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Douglas hoped to ease tension in the Union with this bill, but instead heightened it. This cartoon illustrates that his plan turned backwards on him. The cartoonist was probably a Republican (note that the Republican Party was established by those in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
No. The country was divided effectively in half by the debate over slavery. It would be impossible for a country so evenly split over such an emotional issue to long exist without the outbreak of a civil war. The South’s entire economy was threatened by the possibly of the abolition of slavery and the North felt strongly that slavery was morally wrong. There was no simple political resolution. Certainly civil war could have been held off for longer if we had made some smarted political moves, but it would have been impossible to avoid in the long run. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he quoted the Bible saying, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a side note it would have been possible to avoid the Civil War if the North had allowed the South to secede peacefully. This, however, would have been extremely unlikely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537326</id>
		<title>American History Homework Five Answers - Student Sixteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537326"/>
		<updated>2008-10-16T15:58:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the &amp;quot;Know Nothing Party.&amp;quot; The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of tariffs to promote domestic manufacturing.&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of a national bank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mexican War was a result of the Manifest Destiny sentiment in America (the belief of many Americans that it was God’s will for the nation to expand), and the sequential border dispute between the US and Mexico. It is uncertain to this day which nation actually instigated the violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The war ended when the US army took over Mexico City, and the chief clerk of the Department of State, Nicholas Trist, came to negotiate the peace terms. Trist was a true peacemaker and displeased the president with his rather generous terms. Still, he did successfully end the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852. This novel stirred up the anti-slavery sentiment and was a bestselling book in both the United States and Europe. The effect of Uncle Tom’s Cabin demonstrated the truth of the idiom “The pen is mightier than the sword”. The book was so powerful that it was banned in the Southern states. Force surely won the Civil War, but the ideals that this book inspired were what made this war a victory in the true sense of the word. Abraham Lincoln described Harriet Beecher Stowe as, “The little woman who started this great war.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain what &amp;quot;Bleeding Kansas&amp;quot; was.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bleeding Kansas refers a time of violence in Kansas right before it received its statehood. The violence was the result of the recently passed Kansas-Nebraska Act which established “popular sovereignty” (the right of a potential state to decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state). Bleeding Kansas consisted of a string of random acts of violence on the part of both sides of the issues of slavery and was essentially a preamble to the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, &amp;quot;You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ....&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The woman represents America, and the man receiving the beating represents Stephen Douglas. This cartoon was drawn in reaction to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill that Stephen Douglas pushed through the Senate. The Kansas-Nebraska Bill established that a new state entering the Union would decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Douglas hoped to ease tension in the Union with this bill, but instead heightened it. This cartoon illustrates that his plan turned backwards on him. The cartoonist was probably a Republican (note that the Republican Party was established by those in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
No. The country was divided effectively in half by the debate over slavery. It would be impossible for a country so evenly split over such an emotional issue to long exist without the outbreak of a civil war. The South’s entire economy was threatened by the possibly of the abolition of slavery and the North felt strongly that slavery was morally wrong. There was no simple political resolution. Certainly civil war could have been held off for longer if we had made some smarted political moves, but it would have been impossible to avoid in the long run. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he quoted the Bible saying, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a side note it would have been possible to avoid the Civil War if the North had allowed the South to secede peacefully. This, however, would have been extremely unlikely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537325</id>
		<title>American History Homework Five Answers - Student Sixteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537325"/>
		<updated>2008-10-16T15:57:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the &amp;quot;Know Nothing Party.&amp;quot; The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of tariffs to promote domestic manufacturing.&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of a national bank.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mexican War was a result of the Manifest Destiny sentiment in America (the belief of many Americans that it was God’s will for the nation to expand), and the sequential border dispute between the US and Mexico. It is uncertain to this day which nation actually instigated the violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The war ended when the US army took over Mexico City, and the chief clerk of the Department of State, Nicholas Trist, came to negotiate the peace terms. Trist was a true peacemaker and displeased the president with his rather generous terms. Still, he did successfully end the war.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852. This novel stirred up the anti-slavery sentiment and was a bestselling book in both the United States and Europe. The effect of Uncle Tom’s Cabin demonstrated the truth of the idiom “The pen is mightier than the sword”. The book was so powerful that it was banned in the Southern states. Force surely won the Civil War, but the ideals that this book inspired were what made this war a victory in the true sense of the word. Abraham Lincoln described Harriet Beecher Stowe as, “The little woman who started this great war.” &lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
5. Explain what &amp;quot;Bleeding Kansas&amp;quot; was.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bleeding Kansas refers a time of violence in Kansas right before it received its statehood. The violence was the result of the recently passed Kansas-Nebraska Act which established “popular sovereignty” (the right of a potential state to decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state). Bleeding Kansas consisted of a string of random acts of violence on the part of both sides of the issues of slavery and was essentially a preamble to the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, &amp;quot;You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ....&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The woman represents America, and the man receiving the beating represents Stephen Douglas. This cartoon was drawn in reaction to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill that Stephen Douglas pushed through the Senate. The Kansas-Nebraska Bill established that a new state entering the Union would decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Douglas hoped to ease tension in the Union with this bill, but instead heightened it. This cartoon illustrates that his plan turned backwards on him. The cartoonist was probably a Republican (note that the Republican Party was established by those in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill). &lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. The country was divided effectively in half by the debate over slavery. It would be impossible for a country so evenly split over such an emotional issue to long exist without the outbreak of a civil war. The South’s entire economy was threatened by the possibly of the abolition of slavery and the North felt strongly that slavery was morally wrong. There was no simple political resolution. Certainly civil war could have been held off for longer if we had made some smarted political moves, but it would have been impossible to avoid in the long run. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he quoted the Bible saying, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a side note it would have been possible to avoid the Civil War if the North had allowed the South to secede peacefully. This, however, would have been extremely unlikely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537324</id>
		<title>American History Homework Five Answers - Student Sixteen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Five_Answers_-_Student_Sixteen&amp;diff=537324"/>
		<updated>2008-10-16T15:56:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the &amp;quot;Know Nothing Party.&amp;quot; The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT: (b) He welcom...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. Imagine that someone by the name of Joe Biden lived in 1858. Imagine also that he belonged to the &amp;quot;Know Nothing Party.&amp;quot; The following would be true about Mr. Biden EXCEPT:&lt;br /&gt;
(b) He welcomed immigrants into the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Identify at least two key positions of the Whig Party. &lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of tariffs to promote domestic manufacturing.&lt;br /&gt;
The Whig Party was in favor of a national bank.&lt;br /&gt;
3. What caused and what ended the Mexican War? &lt;br /&gt;
The Mexican War was a result of the Manifest Destiny sentiment in America (the belief of many Americans that it was God’s will for the nation to expand), and the sequential border dispute between the US and Mexico. It is uncertain to this day which nation actually instigated the violence. &lt;br /&gt;
The war ended when the US army took over Mexico City, and the chief clerk of the Department of State, Nicholas Trist, came to negotiate the peace terms. Trist was a true peacemaker and displeased the president with his rather generous terms. Still, he did successfully end the war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Who do you think was the most important person in the period 1840-1860, and why? &lt;br /&gt;
Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote the book Uncle Tom’s Cabin in 1852. This novel stirred up the anti-slavery sentiment and was a bestselling book in both the United States and Europe. The effect of Uncle Tom’s Cabin demonstrated the truth of the idiom “The pen is mightier than the sword”. The book was so powerful that it was banned in the Southern states. Force surely won the Civil War, but the ideals that this book inspired were what made this war a victory in the true sense of the word. Abraham Lincoln described Harriet Beecher Stowe as, “The little woman who started this great war.” &lt;br /&gt;
5. Explain what &amp;quot;Bleeding Kansas&amp;quot; was. &lt;br /&gt;
Bleeding Kansas refers a time of violence in Kansas right before it received its statehood. The violence was the result of the recently passed Kansas-Nebraska Act which established “popular sovereignty” (the right of a potential state to decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state). Bleeding Kansas consisted of a string of random acts of violence on the part of both sides of the issues of slavery and was essentially a preamble to the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Explain the cartoon, and what you think the cartoonist's view was. The woman's quote begins, &amp;quot;You have been a bad boy, Steve, ever since you had anything to do with that Nebraska Bill ....&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
The woman represents America, and the man receiving the beating represents Stephen Douglas. This cartoon was drawn in reaction to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill that Stephen Douglas pushed through the Senate. The Kansas-Nebraska Bill established that a new state entering the Union would decide by popular vote whether it would be a slave state or a free state. Stephen Douglas hoped to ease tension in the Union with this bill, but instead heightened it. This cartoon illustrates that his plan turned backwards on him. The cartoonist was probably a Republican (note that the Republican Party was established by those in opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Bill). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Do you think it was possible to avoid the Civil War? Explain. &lt;br /&gt;
No. The country was divided effectively in half by the debate over slavery. It would be impossible for a country so evenly split over such an emotional issue to long exist without the outbreak of a civil war. The South’s entire economy was threatened by the possibly of the abolition of slavery and the North felt strongly that slavery was morally wrong. There was no simple political resolution. Certainly civil war could have been held off for longer if we had made some smarted political moves, but it would have been impossible to avoid in the long run. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he quoted the Bible saying, “A house divided against itself cannot stand”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a side note it would have been possible to avoid the Civil War if the North had allowed the South to secede peacefully. This, however, would have been extremely unlikely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532896</id>
		<title>American History Homework Four Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532896"/>
		<updated>2008-10-09T15:34:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What was the &amp;quot;Revolution of 1800&amp;quot;?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Revolution of 1800 refers to the first time in modern history that power shifted peacefully as a result of an election. More specifically, this revolution was the shift of power from the Federalist Party to the Democratic-Republican Party, when Thomas Jefferson was voted into office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. If you were the president, would you have approved the Louisiana Purchase? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would have approved the Louisiana Purchase. Not only was it an incredible deal (it came out to only several cents an acre), but it also saved us the money that we would have most likely had to spend later to protect our border. The fact that it provided our growing nation with invaluable farm land is also significant.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Identify a cause of the War of 1812.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One cause of the War of 1812 was the “Chesapeake Affair” during which a British ship seized an American one in international waters. This was very humiliating to the Americans, and led to increased tensions between the new nation and her former mother country.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Describe what you like most about the Monroe Administration.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate the Monroe Administration for its conservative values the progress and peace associated with the times, but I believe that its most important accomplishment was effectively establishing the Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine essentially told Europe to leave the Americas alone. This was one of the first important foreign policy moves that our country made, and to this day it is often sited. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain what is meant by &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy.&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Jacksonian Democracy” refers to the political philosophy of Andrew Jackson. He believed in a strong federal government under a powerful executive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain what the Marshall Court is known for.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Marshall Court refers to the Supreme Court when it was under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Marshall Court is famous for expanding federal power and establishing the practice of judicial activism. Its most famous case was Marbury v. Madison, in which it asserted the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional (this is called judicial review). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Identify the figures in the cartoon, provide an approximate date, and describe the likely viewpoint of the cartoonist:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bear, “Bruin”, represents Russia, the bull, “John Bull”, represents Britain and the woman, “Columbia”, represents America. It depicts the treaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812. The cartoonist was clearly an American, as he depicts America as a beautiful woman, and Britain as a bull. The cartoonist also felt that America was victorious, because John Bull (Britain) is depicted on his knees, eagerly clutching the hand of the peacemaker, Russia, while “Columbia” (America) stands tall, and is shown graciously extending her hand towards peace. This was drawn circa 1813.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532895</id>
		<title>American History Homework Four Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532895"/>
		<updated>2008-10-09T15:33:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What was the &amp;quot;Revolution of 1800&amp;quot;?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Revolution of 1800 refers to the first time in modern history that power shifted peacefully as a result of an election. More specifically, this revolution was the shift of power from the Federalist Party to the Democratic-Republican Party, when Thomas Jefferson was voted into office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. If you were the president, would you have approved the Louisiana Purchase? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would have approved the Louisiana Purchase. Not only was it an incredible deal (it came out to only several cents an acre), but it also saved us the money that we would have most likely had to spend later to protect our border. The fact that it provided our growing nation with invaluable farm land is also significant.  &lt;br /&gt;
3. Identify a cause of the War of 1812. &lt;br /&gt;
One cause of the War of 1812 was the “Chesapeake Affair” during which a British ship seized an American one in international waters. This was very humiliating to the Americans, and led to increased tensions between the new nation and her former mother country.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Describe what you like most about the Monroe Administration.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate the Monroe Administration for its conservative values the progress and peace associated with the times, but I believe that its most important accomplishment was effectively establishing the Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine essentially told Europe to leave the Americas alone. This was one of the first important foreign policy moves that our country made, and to this day it is often sited. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain what is meant by &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy.&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Jacksonian Democracy” refers to the political philosophy of Andrew Jackson. He believed in a strong federal government under a powerful executive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain what the Marshall Court is known for.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Marshall Court refers to the Supreme Court when it was under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Marshall Court is famous for expanding federal power and establishing the practice of judicial activism. Its most famous case was Marbury v. Madison, in which it asserted the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional (this is called judicial review). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Identify the figures in the cartoon, provide an approximate date, and describe the likely viewpoint of the cartoonist:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bear, “Bruin”, represents Russia, the bull, “John Bull”, represents Britain and the woman, “Columbia”, represents America. It depicts the treaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812. The cartoonist was clearly an American, as he depicts America as a beautiful woman, and Britain as a bull. The cartoonist also felt that America was victorious, because John Bull (Britain) is depicted on his knees, eagerly clutching the hand of the peacemaker, Russia, while “Columbia” (America) stands tall, and is shown graciously extending her hand towards peace. This was drawn circa 1813.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532894</id>
		<title>American History Homework Four Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Four_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=532894"/>
		<updated>2008-10-09T15:33:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: '''1. What was the &amp;quot;Revolution of 1800&amp;quot;?'''   The Revolution of 1800 refers to the first time in modern history that power shifted peacefully as a result of an election. More specifically,...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What was the &amp;quot;Revolution of 1800&amp;quot;?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Revolution of 1800 refers to the first time in modern history that power shifted peacefully as a result of an election. More specifically, this revolution was the shift of power from the Federalist Party to the Democratic-Republican Party, when Thomas Jefferson was voted into office. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. If you were the president, would you have approved the Louisiana Purchase? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would have approved the Louisiana Purchase. Not only was it an incredible deal (it came out to only several cents an acre), but it also saved us the money that we would have most likely had to spend later to protect our border. The fact that it provided our growing nation with invaluable farm land is also significant.  &lt;br /&gt;
3. Identify a cause of the War of 1812. &lt;br /&gt;
One cause of the War of 1812 was the “Chesapeake Affair” during which a British ship seized an American one in international waters. This was very humiliating to the Americans, and led to increased tensions between the new nation and her former mother country.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Describe what you like most about the Monroe Administration.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I appreciate the Monroe Administration for its conservative values the progress and peace associated with the times, but I believe that its most important accomplishment was effectively establishing the Monroe Doctrine. The Monroe Doctrine essentially told Europe to leave the Americas alone. This was one of the first important foreign policy moves that our country made, and to this day it is often sited. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain what is meant by &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy.&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Jacksonian Democracy” refers to the political philosophy of Andrew Jackson. He believed in a strong federal government under a powerful executive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Explain what the Marshall Court is known for.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Marshall Court refers to the Supreme Court when it was under Chief Justice John Marshall. The Marshall Court is famous for expanding federal power and establishing the practice of judicial activism. Its most famous case was Marbury v. Madison, in which it asserted the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional (this is called judicial review). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Identify the figures in the cartoon, provide an approximate date, and describe the likely viewpoint of the cartoonist:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bear, “Bruin”, represents Russia, the bull, “John Bull”, represents Britain and the woman, “Columbia”, represents America. It depicts the treaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812. The cartoonist was clearly an American, as he depicts America as a beautiful woman, and Britain as a bull. The cartoonist also felt that America was victorious, because John Bull (Britain) is depicted on his knees, eagerly clutching the hand of the peacemaker, Russia, while “Columbia” (America) stands tall, and is shown graciously extending her hand towards peace. This was drawn circa 1813.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Three_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=527852</id>
		<title>American History Homework Three Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Three_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=527852"/>
		<updated>2008-10-02T01:21:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Identify two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Articles of Confederation, nine out of the thirteen states’ approval was needed in order for a law to be passed. This made for a virtually powerless national government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The articles of Confederation did not give the Congress the right to impose taxes, so even the few powers that the federal government did have (the power to declare war for example) were essentially impossible for it to practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify the first three Articles of the Constitution and what each Article establishes.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first three amendments of the Constitution establish the three branches of the United States’ government and lay out their responsibilities:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article I established the legislative branch to makes the laws. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article II established the executive branch, to enforce the laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article III established the judicial branch to interpret the laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Explain what you like most about George Washington.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The appeal of power has been the downfall of mankind since the beginning of time. Eve ate the forbidden fruit upon hearing the promise that she would have the power to know good and evil. Throughout history countless potentially good rulers have fallen into the trappings of the appeal of power (for example, Saul of the Old Testament). Many kings have had masses of people put to death out of the fear of losing power (King Herod, for example, when he massacred the babies in Bethlehem). Yet George Washington conquered the evil that few have been able to resist; he turned down power for the sake of the greater good, forgoing kingship, a third term as president and the opportunity to take revenge (as in the case of “Citizen Gent”). Washington’s exceptional resistance of this common weakness played an essential part in making our nation exceptional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Describe the most important invention of the 1790s, and its political impact.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1973, revolutionizing the economy of the South. The cotton gin was a machine that could do the work of fifty men. This allowed for the cotton industry to flourish, creating a booming economy in the Southern states and thus giving them much more political power. This newfound political and economic couth for the South was bad news for slaves. It was also later an indirect cause of the Civil War, as the South’s economic stability made separation from the Union a reasonable option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain the political view expressed by this week's cartoon, and which side of what issue the cartoonist likely represents.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon depicts the federal government as the foundation for a strong building, and each state as an essential pillar in that foundation. A hand (presumably the hand of God) is shown placing Massachusetts into the foundation. The cartoonist was probably a Federalist, in favor of a unified nation under a stronger federal government, rather than estranged states joined together only loosely by a weak federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two significant achievements of The Northwest Ordinance.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Northwest Ordinance effectively established the land west of the thirteen states as part of the United States and “off limits” to Europe. It was one of the first important moves that America made in the international political scene. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Northwest Ordinance also set out guidelines for a territory to become a state, thus creating grounds for the United States to grow in the future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Describe what you think was most significant about John Adams' presidency.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Adams’ signed the Sedition Act, which made it a crime to criticize the president. This was clearly unconstitutional as it violated the First Amendment, which calls for free speech. Yet this was a very significant part of our history. In many ways, the interpretation and enforcement or lack thereof of the First Amendment has always defined American politics and history. The way that Adams’ opponents effectively reacted to and severed Adams’ move set a precedent for the future the First Amendment.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Three_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=527848</id>
		<title>American History Homework Three Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Three_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=527848"/>
		<updated>2008-10-02T01:19:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: '''1. Identify two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.'''  Under the Articles of Confederation, nine out of the thirteen states’ approval was needed in order for a law to be pas...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. Identify two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Under the Articles of Confederation, nine out of the thirteen states’ approval was needed in order for a law to be passed. This made for a virtually powerless national government. &lt;br /&gt;
The articles of Confederation did not give the Congress the right to impose taxes, so even the few powers that the federal government did have (the power to declare war for example) were essentially impossible for it to practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. Identify the first three Articles of the Constitution and what each Article establishes.''' &lt;br /&gt;
The first three amendments of the Constitution establish the three branches of the United States’ government and lay out their responsibilities:&lt;br /&gt;
Article I established the legislative branch to makes the laws. &lt;br /&gt;
Article II established the executive branch, to enforce the laws.&lt;br /&gt;
Article III established the judicial branch to interpret the laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Explain what you like most about George Washington.'''&lt;br /&gt;
The appeal of power has been the downfall of mankind since the beginning of time. Eve ate the forbidden fruit upon hearing the promise that she would have the power to know good and evil. Throughout history countless potentially good rulers have fallen into the trappings of the appeal of power (for example, Saul of the Old Testament). Many kings have had masses of people put to death out of the fear of losing power (King Herod, for example, when he massacred the babies in Bethlehem). Yet George Washington conquered the evil that few have been able to resist; he turned down power for the sake of the greater good, forgoing kingship, a third term as president and the opportunity to take revenge (as in the case of “Citizen Gent”). Washington’s exceptional resistance of this common weakness played an essential part in making our nation exceptional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Describe the most important invention of the 1790s, and its political impact.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1973, revolutionizing the economy of the South. The cotton gin was a machine that could do the work of fifty men. This allowed for the cotton industry to flourish, creating a booming economy in the Southern states and thus giving them much more political power. This newfound political and economic couth for the South was bad news for slaves. It was also later an indirect cause of the Civil War, as the South’s economic stability made separation from the Union a reasonable option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain the political view expressed by this week's cartoon, and which side of what issue the cartoonist likely represents.''' &lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon depicts the federal government as the foundation for a strong building, and each state as an essential pillar in that foundation. A hand (presumably the hand of God) is shown placing Massachusetts into the foundation. The cartoonist was probably a Federalist, in favor of a unified nation under a stronger federal government, rather than estranged states joined together only loosely by a weak federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Describe two significant achievements of The Northwest Ordinance.''' &lt;br /&gt;
The Northwest Ordinance effectively established the land west of the thirteen states as part of the United States and “off limits” to Europe. It was one of the first important moves that America made in the international political scene. &lt;br /&gt;
The Northwest Ordinance also set out guidelines for a territory to become a state, thus creating grounds for the United States to grow in the future. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Describe what you think was most significant about John Adams' presidency.''' &lt;br /&gt;
John Adams’ signed the Sedition Act, which made it a crime to criticize the president. This was clearly unconstitutional as it violated the First Amendment, which calls for free speech. Yet this was a very significant part of our history. In many ways, the interpretation and enforcement or lack thereof of the First Amendment has always defined American politics and history. The way that Adams’ opponents effectively reacted to and severed Adams’ move set a precedent for the future the First Amendment.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Two_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=519559</id>
		<title>American History Homework Two Answers - Student Twelve</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_Two_Answers_-_Student_Twelve&amp;diff=519559"/>
		<updated>2008-09-18T14:13:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: '''1. What do you think were the three most important causes of the American Revolution.'''   The three main causes were a kind of chain reaction:  The colonists had grown accustomed to fr...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. What do you think were the three most important causes of the American Revolution.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three main causes were a kind of chain reaction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The colonists had grown accustomed to freedom during the period of salutary neglect, and most people who experience freedom will not be willing to give it up without a fight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The colonists were embittered and then angered by the oppressive British taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This shared grief pulled the colonies together into one unit, making a successful revolution attainable for the first time. &lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
2. Who used the phrase &amp;quot;taxation without representation,&amp;quot; and why?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many American colonists coined this phrase during the late 18th century in protest to the heavy taxes that Britain laid on them. They argued that they should not be taxed (especially not so heavily) if they were not represented in Parliament. Hence the phrase, “No taxation without representation.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. What was the Boston Tea Party?''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Boston Tea Party was a protest to the high taxes that Britain placed on the colonists, but more than that it was a protest to British control in general. It was a key event leading up to the Revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4. Do you blame anyone for the Salem Witch Trials? Explain.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Edmund Burke once said, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” I firmly believe this, in general and as it applies to the Salem Witch Trials. Many people could have stopped this nightmare: the governor (who eventually did, but should have sooner), Tituba (who should have never allowed her own resentment to bring others harm), Chief Judge William Stoughton, any of the other defendants convicted of being witches, and even the people of the town. The blame cannot be laid on any one person, but rather it is shared by everyone who saw the evil of the situation yet refused to act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. True or false: colonies having more religious freedom had less conflict with the King. Explain your answer.&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True. The colonies with more religious freedom were run by the Quakers, who did not believe in war. Massachusetts—a Puritan colony—was a leader in the early struggle against British control, while Pennsylvania—a Quaker-led colony open to all religions—was not. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. Briefly discuss (in a few sentences) any of the debate or discussion topics from the lecture, or mysteries (see H3 below for the link).''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Washington. Was he great, and if so, why?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Washington was great, not only because of his accomplishments (for these alone, though great, do not set him apart), but also because of his selflessness. He chose the general good over himself when he decided against the kingship that he could have so easily claimed. Human nature and the culture that he lived in both told him to name himself king; yet he chose against doing so and in that decision essentially gave America her freedom, a freedom that we still experience to this day. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Explain the meaning of the political cartoon on the right. As with all cartoons, pay particular attention to all of its details. Provide a rough estimate for its date.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This cartoon called the colonists to join together against England. It pointed out that if they did not function as one unit, their cause would be lost. It is interesting that Georgia is not included in the cartoon. This is probably because Georgia was very removed from the affairs of the rest of the colonies. This cartoon was probably drawn in the late 1760s or early 1770s.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers_-_Student_36&amp;diff=515188</id>
		<title>American History Homework One Answers - Student 36</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers_-_Student_36&amp;diff=515188"/>
		<updated>2008-09-12T15:13:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''1. List the order in which the English, French and Spanish settled in the New World.''' &lt;br /&gt;
The Spanish, followed by the English and then finally the French &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2. What do you find most inspiring about Christopher Columbus?''' &lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Columbus exhibited an inspiring picture of faith and confidence in his journey across the Atlantic Ocean. He had faith in two ideas—the generally-accepted idea that the world was round and his own personal belief that Asia was close enough to reach by sailing west. Contrary to popular belief, the former was generally accepted in his time, but the latter was unproven. Despite the fact that he could not see irrefutable proof for either idea, his faith in them was so firm that he decided to gamble his career, his reputation, even his very life upon them. I find this very inspiring. In our day of “relative truth” and tolerance for all beliefs it is easy to be passive in our ideas and believe only in opinions, not in truth. Yet this is so wrong. Like Columbus, we should let our beliefs define our lives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3. Why do you think several early settlements in America failed?''' &lt;br /&gt;
Many of the early settlers came to America with the expectation of getting rich fast and experiencing exciting adventures. They failed to understand the value of hard work, initiative and teamwork. Any difficult endeavor requires all three of these. Think of a sports team, a small business or new government. All of these require those three elements for success. The settling of America was no different; where there was not hard work, initiative or teamwork, there was failure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
4. What was the motivation for the first settlements in the Massachusetts area? Include mention of how the Pilgrims differed from the mainstream Puritans.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Both the Puritans and the Separatists (the Pilgrims) came to the New World seeking the freedom to practice Christianity in their own way. Both were at odds with the Church of England, which was the government appointed church at the time. Government persecution led both congregations to move to the New World. These are very similar situations, yet they differ at one point: while both the Puritans and the Separatists saw problems in the Church of England, they each saw different solutions. As their name suggests, the Puritans desired to purify the Church of England of the problems they saw with it, rather than leave it entirely. While the Separatists saw the Church of England’s problems as incurable, and desired instead to separate from it completely.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5. Explain how William Penn was remarkable.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Many people came to America seeking religious freedom, yet of these most all ironically refused to offer the freedom that they so valued to people whose beliefs differed from their own. William Penn was different. He was a Quaker who had faced religious persecution from the King. After failing in his attempt to jail Penn, the King settled instead on getting rid of him by granting him land in America. Penn founded Pennsylvania, the only colony in the New World that allowed for the free practice of any religion. Penn demonstrated a true understanding of the Bible and its teachings on love by his astonishing decision to allow freedom for all religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6. What were the four types of colonies, and (if possible) give an example of each.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Royal colonies were under the control of a governor appointed by the King. New Jersey was a royal colony. &lt;br /&gt;
Charter colonies were established on land that the King granted to an individual or company. Rhode Island was an example of a charter colony.&lt;br /&gt;
Proprietary colonies were owned by an individual or a group of individuals. For example, William Penn owned and controlled Pennsylvania.&lt;br /&gt;
Joint-stock colonies were funded by investors through a joint-stock company. Virginia was a joint-stock colony before the King took control of it and made it a royal colony.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7. Briefly discuss (in a few sentences) any of the debate or discussion topics from the lecture.''' &lt;br /&gt;
Were the Puritans right to be strict and to expel people of other religions?&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to judge a people who lived in such a different world than we do today. It is easy now to point our fingers and call the Puritans “hypocrites” for denying others exactly what they themselves had wanted so desperately and “ignorant” for ignoring many of the teachings of their own Bible. Yet while their failure to allow religious freedom was wrong, both Biblically and ethically, they were justified. &lt;br /&gt;
Religious freedom is a very new concept. Up until the past few centuries, almost all civilizations have been built upon a common religion. The Puritans did not have any reason to believe that it was even possible for people of different religions to live in peace, side-by-side. To the best of my knowledge, it had never been done before, and if it had, it’s unlikely that the Puritans would have known of or given much thought to such a phenomenon. Considering the world they lived in, the Puritans were justified. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''H1. Explain mercantilism and add a sentence or two describing your view of it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Mercantilism is the policy of allowing fewer imports into a nation than exports, in order to increase financial gain. For example, today China is using mercantilism in an attempt to economically catch up with the Western world.  &lt;br /&gt;
Mercantilism is an extremely profitable economic policy. It ensures jobs for the citizens of the nation, who will then be able to spend money and benefit the economy even more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
H2. Did triangular trade really exist?'''&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular trade did exist. Skeptics argue that there was nothing to take from Europe to Africa, but that is exactly the point: rather than simply trading their goods in at each port, they actually gained money at the European stop because they did not need to purchase things in Europe to trade in Africa. Slaves could be taken for free (or at a minimal cost). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''H3. What problems do you think a colony based on a particular religion or religious ideal might encounter? Do you think it can survive and thrive? Give at least one example.'''&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that the religion in question is compatible with “surviving and thriving”, a colony based on that religion could do quite well as a whole. From the outside looking in, it would be a functional, orderly colony, a pleasant place to live for the people who were adherent to the religion of the colony. Yet the there would be underlying problems: unjust treatment for those who questioned the official religion, a probable suppression of the growth of knowledge and creative thinking (freedom to question and explore different ideas leads to these), the possible discontentment of citizens and often a trade of a true, heartfelt faith for a phony religion based only on tradition and rules. In conclusion, a colony based on religion would generally be workable, yet not ideal. The Puritans were an example of a functional, yet imperfect religious colony.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers_-_Student_36&amp;diff=515187</id>
		<title>American History Homework One Answers - Student 36</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers_-_Student_36&amp;diff=515187"/>
		<updated>2008-09-12T15:11:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: 1. List the order in which the English, French and Spanish settled in the New World.  The Spanish, followed by the English and then finally the French   2. What do you find most inspiring ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;1. List the order in which the English, French and Spanish settled in the New World. &lt;br /&gt;
The Spanish, followed by the English and then finally the French &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. What do you find most inspiring about Christopher Columbus? &lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Columbus exhibited an inspiring picture of faith and confidence in his journey across the Atlantic Ocean. He had faith in two ideas—the generally-accepted idea that the world was round and his own personal belief that Asia was close enough to reach by sailing west. Contrary to popular belief, the former was generally accepted in his time, but the latter was unproven. Despite the fact that he could not see irrefutable proof for either idea, his faith in them was so firm that he decided to gamble his career, his reputation, even his very life upon them. I find this very inspiring. In our day of “relative truth” and tolerance for all beliefs it is easy to be passive in our ideas and believe only in opinions, not in truth. Yet this is so wrong. Like Columbus, we should let our beliefs define our lives. &lt;br /&gt;
3. Why do you think several early settlements in America failed? &lt;br /&gt;
Many of the early settlers came to America with the expectation of getting rich fast and experiencing exciting adventures. They failed to understand the value of hard work, initiative and teamwork. Any difficult endeavor requires all three of these. Think of a sports team, a small business or new government. All of these require those three elements for success. The settling of America was no different; where there was not hard work, initiative or teamwork, there was failure.&lt;br /&gt;
4. What was the motivation for the first settlements in the Massachusetts area? Include mention of how the Pilgrims differed from the mainstream Puritans. &lt;br /&gt;
Both the Puritans and the Separatists (the Pilgrims) came to the New World seeking the freedom to practice Christianity in their own way. Both were at odds with the Church of England, which was the government appointed church at the time. Government persecution led both congregations to move to the New World. These are very similar situations, yet they differ at one point: while both the Puritans and the Separatists saw problems in the Church of England, they each saw different solutions. As their name suggests, the Puritans desired to purify the Church of England of the problems they saw with it, rather than leave it entirely. While the Separatists saw the Church of England’s problems as incurable, and desired instead to separate from it completely.&lt;br /&gt;
5. Explain how William Penn was remarkable. &lt;br /&gt;
Many people came to America seeking religious freedom, yet of these most all ironically refused to offer the freedom that they so valued to people whose beliefs differed from their own. The Puritans and the Separatists for example both refused to allow the practice of any other religion. William Penn was different. He was a Quaker who had faced religious persecution from the King. After failing in his attempt to jail Penn, the King settled instead on getting rid of him by granting him land in America. Penn founded Pennsylvania, the only colony in the New World that allowed for the free practice of any religion. Penn demonstrated a true understanding of the Bible and its teachings on love by his astonishing decision to allow freedom for all religions.&lt;br /&gt;
6. What were the four types of colonies, and (if possible) give an example of each.&lt;br /&gt;
Royal colonies were under the control of a governor appointed by the King. New Jersey was a royal colony. &lt;br /&gt;
Charter colonies were established on land that the King granted to an individual or company. Rhode Island was an example of a charter colony.&lt;br /&gt;
Proprietary colonies were owned by an individual or a group of individuals. For example, William Penn owned and controlled Pennsylvania.&lt;br /&gt;
Joint-stock colonies were funded by investors through a joint-stock company. Virginia was a joint-stock colony before the King took control of it and made it a royal colony.  &lt;br /&gt;
7. Briefly discuss (in a few sentences) any of the debate or discussion topics from the lecture. &lt;br /&gt;
Were the Puritans right to be strict and to expel people of other religions?&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to judge a people who lived in such a different world than we do today. It is easy now to point our fingers and call the Puritans “hypocrites” for denying others exactly what they themselves had wanted so desperately and “ignorant” for ignoring many of the teachings of their own Bible. Yet while their failure to allow religious freedom was wrong, both Biblically and ethically, they were justified. &lt;br /&gt;
Religious freedom is a very new concept. Up until the past few centuries, almost all civilizations have been built upon a common religion. The Puritans did not have any reason to believe that it was even possible for people of different religions to live in peace, side-by-side. To the best of my knowledge, it had never been done before, and if it had, it’s unlikely that the Puritans would have known of or given much thought to such a phenomenon. Considering the world they lived in, the Puritans were justified. &lt;br /&gt;
H1. Explain mercantilism and add a sentence or two describing your view of it.&lt;br /&gt;
Mercantilism is the policy of allowing fewer imports into a nation than exports, in order to increase financial gain. For example, today China is using mercantilism in an attempt to economically catch up with the Western world.  &lt;br /&gt;
Mercantilism is an extremely profitable economic policy. It ensures jobs for the citizens of the nation, who will then be able to spend money and benefit the economy even more. &lt;br /&gt;
H2. Did triangular trade really exist?&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular trade did exist. Skeptics argue that there was nothing to take from Europe to Africa, but that is exactly the point: rather than simply trading their goods in at each port, they actually gained money at the European stop because they did not need to purchase things in Europe to trade in Africa. Slaves could be taken for free (or at a minimal cost). &lt;br /&gt;
H3. What problems do you think a colony based on a particular religion or religious ideal might encounter? Do you think it can survive and thrive? Give at least one example.&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming that the religion in question is compatible with “surviving and thriving”, a colony based on that religion could do quite well as a whole. From the outside looking in, it would be a functional, orderly colony, a pleasant place to live for the people who were adherent to the religion of the colony. Yet the there would be underlying problems: unjust treatment for those who questioned the official religion, a probable suppression of the growth of knowledge and creative thinking (freedom to question and explore different ideas leads to these), the possible discontentment of citizens and often a trade of a true, heartfelt faith for a phony religion based only on tradition and rules. In conclusion, a colony based on religion would generally be workable, yet not ideal. The Puritans were an example of a functional, yet imperfect religious colony.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers&amp;diff=515185</id>
		<title>American History Homework One Answers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers&amp;diff=515185"/>
		<updated>2008-09-12T15:10:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Student Answers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Student Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Graded through paper 26 (except for student 2), as of 11:40pm 9/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student One]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Two]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Three]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Five]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Six]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Seven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Eight]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Nine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Ten]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Eleven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Twelve]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Thirteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Fourteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Fifteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Sixteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* gap in answers&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 26]]&lt;br /&gt;
* gap in answers&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 30]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 31]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 33]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 34]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 35]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 36]]&lt;br /&gt;
(add more)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Model Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Model]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers&amp;diff=515184</id>
		<title>American History Homework One Answers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_History_Homework_One_Answers&amp;diff=515184"/>
		<updated>2008-09-12T15:10:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Student Answers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Student Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Graded through paper 26 (except for student 2), as of 11:40pm 9/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student One]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Two]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Three]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Four]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Five]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Six]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Seven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Eight]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Nine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Ten]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Eleven]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Twelve]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Thirteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Fourteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Fifteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student Sixteen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* gap in answers&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 26]]&lt;br /&gt;
* gap in answers&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 30]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 31]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 33]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Student 34]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework ONe Answers - Student 35]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework ONe Answers - Student 36]]&lt;br /&gt;
(add more)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Model Answers ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American History Homework One Answers - Model]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=299832</id>
		<title>Contest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=299832"/>
		<updated>2007-09-25T16:45:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Contributors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the contest page for Conservapedia editors and students.  The latest period began Thursday, Sept. 13, at 6 pm. Please add tallies for yourself or others.  The point system is set forth below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is open to all, not merely students in a class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Congratulations to the winners and runners-up!!!'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contest winners and new team captains:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Runners-up:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*JessicaS&lt;br /&gt;
*DeborahB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Contest will begin this Friday, September 28th.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These totals need only be approximate:&lt;br /&gt;
*Aschlafly (as of Sept. 20, 10:31pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 44&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 48&lt;br /&gt;
**add link: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: 25&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 432&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash (as of Sept. 16, 2:46pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 8&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality edit of an existing entry:3&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 116&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 298&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Crocoite (as of Sept .23, 4:51am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:Crocoite/Contest2|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS (as of Sept. 18, 8:36am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:SharonS/Contest|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 193&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*JessicaS (as of Sept. 20, 6:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**unique links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 45 (90 points)&lt;br /&gt;
**duplicate links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 97 (97 points)&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 187&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*DeborahB.&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entry: 1 (including first two cases in [[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]:76&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 11&lt;br /&gt;
**quality edit of an existing entry:10 (including 9 new cases in [[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 154&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BethanyS (as of Sept. 16, 1:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 8&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[American Government Terms]] list: 64&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Katieb (as of Sept. 16, 10:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 72&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*RachelN (as of Sept. 20, 3:55pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 61&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ashleys (as of Sept. 20, 2:16pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;amp;Ordinary new entries:&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 58&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mer (as of 9:50pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Ordinary new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added links: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**Added category: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambers (as of Sept. 21, 11:25am)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**added links: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Additioner (as of Sept. 16, 2:42pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: &lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: &lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SPierce (as of Sept. 19 5:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality New Entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rbeach (as of Sept. 16, 11 am)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe B (as of Sept. 18, 2pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Point System ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality new entry: '''10 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality new entry&amp;quot; includes at least two full-length paragraphs, three relevant citations, several links to other entries, some in-depth content and designations of category.  Partial credit is awarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An ordinary new entry: '''6 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**An additional bonus of '''3 points''' is awarded for adding a new entry on the &amp;quot;most-wanted&amp;quot; list, [[Special:Wantedpages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality edit of an existing entry: '''4 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality edit&amp;quot; to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**Minor edit, such as a correction, of an existing entry: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding a unique working link within [[American Government Lectures]]: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Adding a additional (non-unique) working links for the same term within the same [[American Government Lectures|American Government Lecture]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding a working link within any entry in [[:Category:United States Government]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding two new terms to [[American Government Terms]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An additional bonus of 1 point is awarded for adding a link to an entry on the [[Special:Deadendpages]], and thereby removing that entry from that list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:education]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Judicial_Review&amp;diff=299827</id>
		<title>Judicial Review</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Judicial_Review&amp;diff=299827"/>
		<updated>2007-09-25T16:41:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: The power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional. This power is what makes the judicial branch perhaps the most powerful branch of the American government, as i...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The power of the [[Supreme Court]] to declare a law [[unconstitutional]]. This power is what makes the [[judicial branch]] perhaps the most powerful branch of the American government, as it involves overturning a legislative decision of Congress, and there is no way to override a Supreme Court decision unless a [[Constitutional Amendment]] is made (this is a very long and difficult process).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judicial review is never specifically mentioned in the Constitution, but instead is perhaps implied in Article III:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judicial review ''is'', however, mentioned by [[Alexander Hamilton]] in ''[[The Federalist Papers]]'', and was established in the landmark case ''[[Marbury v. Madison]]'' in 1803 by the ruling of Chief Justice [[John Marshall]]. It is now a well established power of the Supreme Court, despite its how debatable its Constitutionality may be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''US Government and Politics'' by Paul Soifer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/constitution/article03/13.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/federal/fed78.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US Government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=299809</id>
		<title>Contest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=299809"/>
		<updated>2007-09-25T15:54:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Contributors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the contest page for Conservapedia editors and students.  The latest period began Thursday, Sept. 13, at 6 pm. Please add tallies for yourself or others.  The point system is set forth below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is open to all, not merely students in a class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Congratulations to the winners and runners-up!!!'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contest winners and new team captains:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Runners-up:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*JessicaS&lt;br /&gt;
*DeborahB.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Contest will begin this Friday, September 28th.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These totals need only be approximate:&lt;br /&gt;
*Aschlafly (as of Sept. 20, 10:31pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 44&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 48&lt;br /&gt;
**add link: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: 25&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 432&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash (as of Sept. 16, 2:46pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 8&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality edit of an existing entry:3&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 116&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 298&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Crocoite (as of Sept .23, 4:51am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:Crocoite/Contest2|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS (as of Sept. 18, 8:36am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:SharonS/Contest|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 193&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*JessicaS (as of Sept. 20, 6:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**unique links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 45 (90 points)&lt;br /&gt;
**duplicate links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 97 (97 points)&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 187&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*DeborahB.&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entry: 1 (including first two cases in [[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]:76&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 11&lt;br /&gt;
**quality edit of an existing entry:10 (including 9 new cases in [[U.S. Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 154&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BethanyS (as of Sept. 16, 1:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 8&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[American Government Terms]] list: 64&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Katieb (as of Sept. 16, 10:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 72&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ashleys (as of Sept. 20, 2:16pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;amp;Ordinary new entries:&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 58&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mer (as of 9:50pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Ordinary new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added links: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**Added category: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambers (as of Sept. 21, 11:25am)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**added links: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*RachelN (as of Sept. 20, 3:55pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 51&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Additioner (as of Sept. 16, 2:42pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: &lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: &lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SPierce (as of Sept. 19 5:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality New Entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rbeach (as of Sept. 16, 11 am)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe B (as of Sept. 18, 2pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Point System ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality new entry: '''10 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality new entry&amp;quot; includes at least two full-length paragraphs, three relevant citations, several links to other entries, some in-depth content and designations of category.  Partial credit is awarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An ordinary new entry: '''6 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**An additional bonus of '''3 points''' is awarded for adding a new entry on the &amp;quot;most-wanted&amp;quot; list, [[Special:Wantedpages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality edit of an existing entry: '''4 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality edit&amp;quot; to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**Minor edit, such as a correction, of an existing entry: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding a unique working link within [[American Government Lectures]]: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**Adding a additional (non-unique) working links for the same term within the same [[American Government Lectures|American Government Lecture]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding a working link within any entry in [[:Category:United States Government]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Adding two new terms to [[American Government Terms]]: '''1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An additional bonus of 1 point is awarded for adding a link to an entry on the [[Special:Deadendpages]], and thereby removing that entry from that list&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:education]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hobby&amp;diff=299808</id>
		<title>Hobby</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hobby&amp;diff=299808"/>
		<updated>2007-09-25T15:52:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: A favorite pastime or activity of of a particular person that has nothing to do with occupation or other responsibilities. A hobby is an activity that one enjoys devoting their leisure tim...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A favorite pastime or activity of of a particular person that has nothing to do with occupation or other responsibilities. A hobby is an activity that one enjoys devoting their leisure time to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=297037</id>
		<title>Contest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=297037"/>
		<updated>2007-09-21T01:42:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Contributors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the contest page for Conservapedia editors and students.  The latest period began Thursday, Sept. 13, at 6 pm. Please add tallies for yourself or others.  The point system is set forth below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is open to all, not merely students in a class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''On Friday, September 21, we will assign team captains to pick teams.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These totals need only be approximate:&lt;br /&gt;
*Aschlafly (as of Sept. 19, 11:26pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 44&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 45&lt;br /&gt;
**add link: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: 20&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 421&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash (as of Sept. 16, 2:46pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality edit of an existing entry:3&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 113&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 284&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*JessicaS (as of Sept. 20, 6:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**unique links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 45 (90 points)&lt;br /&gt;
**duplicate links to [[American Government Lecture Two]]: 97 (97 points)&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 187&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS (as of Sept. 18, 8:36am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:SharonS/Contest|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BethanyS (as of Sept. 16, 1:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 8&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[American Government Terms]] list: 64&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 90&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Crocoite (as of Sept .19, 8:01pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:Crocoite/Contest2|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 78&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Katieb (as of Sept. 16, 10:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 72&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mer (as of 9:50pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Ordinary new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added links: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**Added category: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 52&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ashleys (as of Sept. 16, 2:16pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;amp;Ordinary new entries:&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 45&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambers (as of Sept. 14, 4:40pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**added links: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 43&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*RachelN (as of Sept. 17, 3:55pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Additioner (as of Sept. 16, 2:42pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: &lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: &lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*DeborahB.&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]:76&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 38&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SPierce (as of Sept. 19 5:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**Quality New Entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 37&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rbeach (as of Sept. 16, 11 am)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe B (as of Sept. 18, 2pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Point System ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality new entry: '''10 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality new entry&amp;quot; includes at least two full-length paragraphs, three relevant citations, several links to other entries, some in-depth content and designations of category.  Partial credit is awarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An ordinary new entry: '''6 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**An additional bonus of '''3 points''' is awarded for adding a new entry on the &amp;quot;most-wanted&amp;quot; list, [[Special:Wantedpages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality edit of an existing entry: '''4 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality edit&amp;quot; to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**Minor edit, such as a correction, of an existing entry: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding a working link within [[American Government Lectures]]: 2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding a working link within any entry in [[:Category:United States Government]]: 1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding two new terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''An additional bonus of 1 point is awarded for adding a link to an entry on the [[Special:Deadendpages]], and thereby removing that entry from that list'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:education]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Composer&amp;diff=297035</id>
		<title>Composer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Composer&amp;diff=297035"/>
		<updated>2007-09-21T01:40:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A composer is defined by the Meriam-Webster online dictionary as &amp;quot;a person who writes music&amp;quot;. More specifically, a composer writes the music to be preformed by the musician.  Though a composer can refer to anyone who writes music, the term is more commonly associated with European classical music, then the pop culture music genre  of today (a person who writes music of this genre would be called a &amp;quot;songwriter&amp;quot; as opposed to a composer). A person who writes songs for movies, plays, etc. is reffered to as a composer today. Also there is an imerging genre of modern instumental music known as [[New Age]] that is written by composers.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Famous composers of old Europe include Ludwig Van [[Beethoven]], [[Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart]], George Frideric [[Handel]] and [[Frédéric Chopin]]. Two modern day composers are [[John Williams]] and New Age composer [[Yanni]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Composers are more interested in the actual music than fame or fotune, as opposed to many modern day musicians. This quote by Ludvig Van Beethoven shows the respect that composers in general have for the music they write:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Music is the one incorporeal entrance into the higher world of knowledge which comprehends mankind but which mankind cannot comprehend.&lt;br /&gt;
-- Ludwig van Beethoven, quoted by Bettina von Arnin, letter to Goethe, 1810&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.musicwithease.com/beethoven-quotes.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mn200/music/composers.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/composer&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=295945</id>
		<title>Contest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Contest&amp;diff=295945"/>
		<updated>2007-09-19T13:27:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: /* Contributors */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the contest page for Conservapedia editors and students.  The latest period began Thursday, Sept. 13, at 6 pm. Please add tallies for yourself or others.  The point system is set forth below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is open to all, not merely students in a class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''On Friday, September 21, we will assign team captains to pick teams.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These totals need only be approximate:&lt;br /&gt;
*Aschlafly (as of Sept. 19, 1:28am)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 44&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 43&lt;br /&gt;
**add link: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**add terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: 20&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 415&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SharonS (as of Sept. 18, 8:36am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:SharonS/Contest|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 103&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tash (as of Sept. 16, 2:46pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 50&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 100&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Katieb (as of Sept. 16, 10:54pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 72&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BethanyS (as of Sept. 16, 1:30pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 4&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[American Government Terms]] list: 60&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 64&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Additioner (as of Sept. 16, 2:42pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: &lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 5&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 6&lt;br /&gt;
**undeadend: &lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 42&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rbeach (as of Sept. 16, 11 am)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Crocoite (as of Sept .18, 11:50am)&lt;br /&gt;
**See complete edit summary [[User:Crocoite/Contest2|here]]&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*RachelN (as of Sept. 17, 3:55pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 2&lt;br /&gt;
**Added to [[Special:Wantedpages]]: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 29&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*SPierce (as of Sept. 16, 11:40pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**ordinary new entries: 3&lt;br /&gt;
**improved existing entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 16&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*AshleyS (as of Sept. 16, 2:16pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe B (as of Sept. 18, 2pm)&lt;br /&gt;
**quality new entries: 1&lt;br /&gt;
***Approximate point total: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Point System ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality new entry: '''10 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality new entry&amp;quot; includes at least two full-length paragraphs, three relevant citations, several links to other entries, some in-depth content and designations of category.  Partial credit is awarded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*An ordinary new entry: '''6 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**An additional bonus of '''3 points''' is awarded for adding a new entry on the &amp;quot;most-wanted&amp;quot; list, [[Special:Wantedpages]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Quality edit of an existing entry: '''4 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
**A &amp;quot;quality edit&amp;quot; to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.&lt;br /&gt;
**Minor edit, such as a correction, of an existing entry: '''2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding a working link within [[American Government Lectures]]: 2 points'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding a working link within any entry in [[:Category:United States Government]]: 1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Adding two new terms to [[American Government Terms]]: 1 point'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''An additional bonus of 1 point is awarded for adding a link to an entry on the [[Special:Deadendpages]], and thereby removing that entry from that list'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:education]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Judicial_Branch&amp;diff=295388</id>
		<title>Judicial Branch</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Judicial_Branch&amp;diff=295388"/>
		<updated>2007-09-18T16:15:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;RachelN: New page: The judicial branch, consisting of the Supreme Court and a system of lower courts, is one of three branches of the American government laid out by the Constitution to provide a system ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The judicial branch, consisting of the Supreme Court and a system of lower courts, is one of three branches of the American government laid out by the [[Constitution]] to provide a system of [[Checks and Balances]]. Its function is described Article III of the US Constitution. Its purpose is to interpret the law (the executive branch carries out the law and the legislative branch makes the laws). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Justices on the Supreme Court are appointed by the president and serve for life. There are nine justices in the Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Judicial branch was thought (wrongly) by the [[Founders]] to be the least dangerous branch of our government, because it had the power to interpret the law, not enforce or make it. For this reason, the Constitution is not very specific about the judicial branch. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
As aforesaid, the Founders were wrong on this. The Supreme Court is probably  the most powerful (and therefore, most dangerous) branch of our government. The idea of [[judicial review]] (the power of the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional), implied by the Constitution, but established by the ruling of Chief Justice [[John Marshall]] in the famous case ''[[Marbury v. Madison]]'', established the Supreme Court's power. In this case, Justice Marshall declared that the Supreme Court could overrule any law passed by Congress that wasn't Constitutional. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While this decision provided that the Supreme Court keeps the other two branches in check (and very effectively), there are next to no checks on the Supreme Court. This is why the five majority on the court of nine are said to be the five most powerful people in the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The words written on the entrance of the Supreme Court building summarize the purpose of the judicial branch: &amp;quot;Equal justice under law.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''A History of the US; Book 4; The New Nation'' by Joy Hakim&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/about/constitutional.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''U.S. Government and Politics'' by Paul Soifer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:government]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>RachelN</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>